(Motivation) Reactor tokamaks have to run without disruptions


 Derick Newman
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Abstract A database has been developed to study the evolution, the nonlinear effects on equilibria, and the disruptivity of locked and quasistationary modes with poloidal and toroidal mode numbers m=2 and n=1 at DIIID. The analysis of 22,5 discharges shows that more than 18% of disruptions are due to locked or quasi stationary modes with rotating precursors (not including born locked modes). A locked mode stability parameter, formulated by the plasma internal inductance l i divided by the safety factor at 95% of the toroidal flux q 95, is found to exhibit significant predictive capability over whether a locked mode will disrupt or not, and does so up to hundreds of milliseconds before the disruption. Within 2 ms of the disruption, a parameter that measures the shortest distance between the island separatrix and the unperturbed last closed flux surface, referred to as d edge, might surpass l i /q 95 in its ability to discriminate disruptive and non disruptive locked modes. d edge is also seen to correlate with the duration of the locked mode better than any other parameter that was considered. Within 5 ms of a locked mode disruption, average behavior shows exponential growth of the n=1 perturbed field, which might indicate exponential growth of the m/n=2/1 locked mode. Surprisingly, even assuming the aforementioned growth, disruptivity shows little dependence on island width up to 2 ms before the disruption. Timescales associated with the mode evolution are also studied and inform necessary response times for disruption avoidance and mitigation techniques. Observations of the evolution of β N during a locked mode, the effects of poloidal beta on the saturated width, and the reduction in Shafranov shift during locking are also presented. 1
2 (Motivation) Reactor tokamaks have to run without disruptions 1. Locked modes are a significant cause of disruptions in many tokamaks [DIIID, JET, ITER?] 2. Confidence in locked mode disruption avoidance relies on understanding the physics of locked mode disruptions 3. To prevent locked mode disruptions, we can: 1. Avoid locked modes (reduce field errors, eliminate seeds) 2. Operate where locked modes are unlikely to disrupt 3. Understand disruption physics well enough to drive plasma out of disruptive state (e.g. ECCD in island Opoint, I p rampdowns, others?) *Subbullets 3.2 and 3.3 are the focus of this work 2
3 Definitions IRLM = Initially Rotating Locked Mode (or locked mode with rotating precursor) Disruptive IRLM = IRLM that immediately precedes a disruption Nondisruptive IRLM = IRLM that decays or spins up prior to the I p rampdown 3
4 Example of an initially rotating locked mode (IRLM) 1. m/n = 2/1 rotating mode Source of rotating mode not studied 2. Mode locks 1. Time between f = 2 khz and locked referred to as slowdown time (a) B p (G) of 2/1 rotating NTM Disruption Survival Time B r (G) of 2/1 LM 3. Exists as locked mode 1. Few to thousands of milliseconds 2. Referred to as survival time for disruptive IRLMs 4. Disrupts or ceases to be a locked mode (decays or spins up) (b) Frequency (khz) Locking Slow Down Time Time (ms) Frequency (Hz) 4
5 Disruptions and IRLM global statistics 5
6 (a) 5993 More than a quarter of high β N disruptions are due to IRLMs 1555 Survey of plasma discharges Shots with IRLMs nondisruptive IRLMs disruptive IRLMs shot disrupted not due to IRLMs Shots without IRLMs disruptions without IRLMs normal discharge (b) Survey of discharges of N > Shots with IRLMs nondisruptive IRLMs disruptive IRLMs shot disrupted not due to IRLMs Shots without IRLMs disruptions without IRLMs normal discharges 2/1 rotating NTMs 2/1 rotating NTMs Study performed on shots 122 to (25 to 214) 28% of all disruptions in shots with peak β N >1.5 are due to IRLMs, compared with 18% for all peak β N Born locked modes not considered in this work 6
7 In a 1D study, IRLMs appear most often in intermediateβ N plasmas Fraction of shots w. IRLM No. shots w. IRLM No. shots Peak N Low occurrence at β N > 4.5 might be explained by observed conditions of q 95 > 7 and T NBI > 6 NM in most of these shots 3D study of IRLM rate of occurrence vs. β N, T NBI, and ρ q2 might be more informative 7
8 8 IRLM Timescales
9 66% of 2/1 NTMs rotating at 2 khz will lock in 45 ± 1 ms Indication of time available to prevent locking (a) No. Occurrences (b) Slow Down Time (ms) 3 Larger T wall results in shorter slowdown time Slow Down Time (ms) Torque at f = 2 khz (a.u.) 9
10 Disruptive IRLMs most frequently survive 27 ± 6ms 66% of disruptive modes terminate between 15 to 11 ms Time available to avoid disruption after locking No. Occurrences Distribution of 111 LM/QSM Events Survival Time (ms) 1
11 Degradation of β N throughout IRLM evolution 11
12 On average, β N continually decreases throughout IRLM lifetime (a) N at locking (b) Percent change in N (disruptive) (c) Percent change in N (non dis.) 4 Disruptive Dis. (final) modes Dis. avg. 5 Locking 5 Locking Saturation Saturation 3 Non dis. avg. End End N at rotating onset N at rotating onset (Left) β N tends to decrease between rotating onset and locking Purple preceded by former locked mode 1 (Middle) Disruptive IRLMs decrease β N by up to 8% N at rotating onset (Right) β N decreases by a smaller amount during lifetime of nondisruptive IRLMs 12
13 IRLMs change the 2D equilibrium shape by reducing the Shafranov shift Disruptive Nondisruptive Disruptive avg. Δ R (cm) over first 2 ms of mode Δ β p over first 2 ms of mode ΔR /Δβ p 4 cm Decrease of m/n=1/ shaping might affect toroidal coupling of m/n=2/1 with other n=1 perturbations 13
14 Decreasing IRLM disruptivity at high β N observed in 1D, partially attributed to coincident high q 95 Peak β N Dis. modes Nondis. modes β4.8 β3 β2.6 β1.4 β.2. IRLM disruptivity β β1 β2 β3 β Distribution (%) β β1 β2 β3 β q IRLM dis q q 95 (Left) 1D projection of IRLM disruptivity vs. β N shows decreasing disruptivity with increasing β N (Middle) IRLM disruptivity decreases with increasing q 95 (Right) Percent distributions in q 95 show high betan bins (purple and green) have less low q 95 discharges 14
15 IRLM amplitude and angular position behavior 15
16 From rotation at 2 khz to 5 ms post locking, the island width usually does not change within error Island widths not validated to better than ± 2 cm (conservative error bar) ~3 small rotating islands grow significantly 16
17 Angular distribution shows preferred angle of locking Cumulative distribution of angular positions during locked, and quasistationary phase Shots Related to residual EF or viscous drag? Disruptive NonDisruptive Intrinsic EF 1 Peaks offset from intrinsic EF by 35, which is in the normal plasma rotation direction 1 1 Angle (deg) I p, ω 17
18 Saturated width scales with β p /(dq/dr), indicating at least partial drive from bootstrap deficit w/r at saturation w/r at saturation Disruptive Nondisruptive q 95 < 4 q 95 > β p / (dq/dr) at saturation (m) Expected from steadystate Modified Rutherford Equation IRLMs occurring at low q 95 (top) correlate better than those at high q 95 (bottom) 18
19 Prior to disruption, IRLM might grow exponentially (n=1 field does) B R (G) No. of Disruptive IRLMs 18 ms 1 ms 4 ms 12 ms 8 ms 15 1 B R (G) of median Exponential I p (MA) Time before disruption (ms) B R (G) at t before disruption Time before disruption (ms) (Left) Five shots with IRLMs show a general trend of increasing n=1 field within 1 ms of disruption (Middle) Distributions of n=1 field shift toward higher field as disruption is approached (Right) Median of distributions grows exponentially in last 5 ms Poloidal analysis necessary to conclude growth of m/n=2/1 19
20 IRLM disruptivity 2
21 IRLM disruptivity scales strongly with ρ q2 (at fixed q 95 ), and weakly with q 95 (at fixed ρ q2 ) ρ q2 at mode end IRLM dis ρ1 ρ2 ρ3 ρ4 SF1 SF2 SF3 Disruptive Nondisruptive q 95 at mode end IRLM dis ρ4 IRLM disruptivity Flat ρ1 ρ2 ρ q 95 SF2 IRLM disruptivity Gradient SF1 SF ρ q2 A 1D study (blue histograms) suggests both ρ q2 and q 95 are important Fixing ρ q2 shows that q 95 alone has a weak effect on IRLM disruptivity Fixing q 95 shows that ρ q2 has a strong effect on IRLM disruptivity Are there any hidden variables here? 21
22 In DIIID operational space, ρ q2 is related to l i and q 95 where α =.67 ±.1 and c = .23 ±.1 Empirically, find extra high correlation of r c =.87 What is the effect of l i in the previous study? Does l i, q 95, or ρ q2 (l i /q 95 ) determine IRLM disruptivity? We will study how well a single parameter separates disruptive from nondisruptive IRLMs 22
23 Panels (24) and (25) inform investigation of l i /q 95, and we find it performs better than ρ q2 l i /q 95 at mode end Disruptive Nondisruptive Separation between disruptive and nondisruptive IRLMs is predominantly vertical Also, high correlation observed between l i /q 95 and ρ q ρ q2 at mode end DIIID ITER baseline 23
24 Bhattacharyya Coefficient 1 (BC) used to measure separation between two probability distributions For two discrete probability distributions p and q parameterized by x, over the parameter space X, the BC value is given by, BC= means p and q are completely separate BC=1 means p and q are identical (completely overlapping) 1 D. Comaniciu et al 2 Comput. Vision Graph. 2 24
25 Of the parameters considered, d edge and l i /q 95 separate disruptive from nondisruptive IRLMs best 4 3 Distribution (%) BC =.71 BC ** = Dis. modes Separation BC =.64 Nondis. modes 4 BC = d edge (cm) l i /q ρ q BC =.85 3 BC = BC =.95 BC ** = q l i w (cm) Nearly indistinguishable 25
26 Assuming exponential growth of 2/1 mode, d edge becomes predictive within 2 ms of disruption Separation 4 w/2 at mode end (cm) LCFS d edge =9 cm Undetectable a plasma minor radius r q2 minor radius of the q=2 surface w island width a r q2 (cm) at mode end IRLM dis. Late predictive capability might suggest d edge is relevant to thermal quench physics Even assuming exponential island growth, island width still hardly affects IRLM disruptivity (blue histogram) 26
27 Parameters predictive of IRLM disruptions 27
28 Performance of l i /q 95 and d edge can alternatively be quantified by percent missed disruptions and false alarms Parameter threshold % missed disruptions % false alarms l i /q 95 < l i /q 95 < d edge > 9 cm 2 12 d edge > 11 cm 12 2 l i /q 95 also provides at least 1 ms of disruption warning, whereas d edge only provides 2 ms Although d edge is less favorable for disruption prediction, it might still be relevant to the physics of the disruption 28
29 Conclusions 1. In DIIID, 18% of disruptions are due to IRLMs, and this percentage rises to 28% for β N > The survival time is most often 27 ms, and exhibits moderate correlation with d edge 3. Disruptive IRLMs degrade β N by 58%, while nondisruptive IRLMs degrade β N less 4. Scaling of w/r with β p /(dq/dr) suggests that IRLMs in DIIID are driven at least in part by bootstrap deficit 5. The n=1 radial field grows exponentially within 5 ms of the disruption, and might imply exponential growth of m/n=2/1 6. l i /q 95 is found to be predictive of IRLM disruptions 1 ms prior l i /q 95 <.25 yields 11% missed disruptions and 15% false alarms 7. Assuming exponential growth of m/n=2/1, d edge becomes predictive within 2 ms of the disruption 29
30 3 APPENDIX
31 31 Disruption Identification
32 Plasma current decay time used to identify disruptions Current quench Decay time is the duration of the current quench 1 Figure: D. Shiraki et al. 215 NF 1 T.C. Hender 21 IAEA Proceedings 32
33 Decaytime used to differentiate disruptive from nondisruptive discharges Three groupings i. t d < 4 ms Disruptive ii. 4 ms < t d < 2 ms Intermediate iii. t d > 2 ms Nondisruptive 5 shots manually analyzed in populations i and iii, confirmed that: No false positives in major disruptions (i.e. calling nondisruptive shot disruptive) No false negatives in nondisruptions (i.e. calling disruptive shot nondisruptive) (a) 1 Number of I p Decay Events (b) Number of I p Decay Events i ii Events iii. non disruptive discharge completion Decay Time (ms) i. major disruptions ii. disruption occuring during rampdown Decay Time (ms) 33
34 l i /q 95 might be related to the potential energy to drive nonlinear tearing growth Assuming dj/dr monotonically decreasing, and q monotonically increasing, potential energy can be expressed as follows [Sykes PRL 8],!" =!!!!!/!!!"!" 2!!!!!!!!" +!!!!!!/!!"!"!! 2!!!!!"!! Recall l i /q 95 αρ q2 + c, and therefore l i /q 95 determine limits of integration As l i determines profile peaking, and q 95 ~1/I p, dj/dr is expected to depend on l i /q 95 34
35 d edge might be related to the physics of the thermal quench; other works that have also observed this Experimental results from CompassC find locked mode disruptions occur when inequality that is similar to d edge is satisfied [Hender NF 92] Massive gas injection simulations using NIMROD find the thermal quench is triggered when m/n=2/1 island intersects the radiating edge [Izzo NF 6] Stochastic layer exists inside the unperturbed LCFS [Evans PoP 2, Izzo NF 8], which could stochastize the m/n=2/1 island when d edge sufficiently small 35
36 Analytic current filament model used to map from BR at the external saddle loops (ESLDs) to perturbed current δi Informed by n=1 signal from ESLDs and rq2 and R from EFIT constrained by motional stark effect Find the following equation for δi, where α(r) is a quadratic function of R 36
37 Definition of δi, and mapping to island width w δσ (ka/rad) δσ (ka/rad) Opoint Opoint δi h δi Xpoint Xpoint (a) (b) Poloidal angle (rad) δi h assumes that a deficit of current exists in Opoint, and excess in Xpoint δi assumes that there is only current deficit, which is greatest at the Opoint Note that both δi and δi h produce the same nonaxisymmetric field Where δi h is in Amps, r q2, R, and dq/dr are in meters, B T is in Tesla, and c=8/15 37
38 View of q=2 surface during a disruption T e (kev) Time (ms) Estimated position and width of islands appear reasonable.2 LM R (cm) ECE location Time (ms) 38
39 ρ q2 increases through lifetime of IRLM ρ q2 at mode end Disruptive Nondisruptive evolution of ρ q2 from locking to 1 ms before mode end majority of disruptive IRLM move outwards.5 ρ q2 at mode end Nondis. ramp Dis. ramp ρ q2 at Locking 39
40 4 Modified Rutherford Equation (MRE)
41 LM disruptivity increases above density limit 2. Disruptive Nondisruptive JET density limit l i at mode end q 95 at mode end Disruptivity strongly increases past JET density limit 41
STABILIZATION OF m=2/n=1 TEARING MODES BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE IN THE DIII D TOKAMAK
GA A24738 STABILIZATION OF m=2/n=1 TEARING MODES BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE IN THE DIII D TOKAMAK by T.C. LUCE, C.C. PETTY, D.A. HUMPHREYS, R.J. LA HAYE, and R. PRATER JULY 24 DISCLAIMER This
More informationAdvanced Tokamak Research in JT60U and JT60SA
I07 Advanced Tokamak Research in and JT60SA A. Isayama for the JT60 team 18th International Toki Conference (ITC18) December 912, 2008 Ceratopia Toki, Toki Gifu JAPAN Contents Advanced tokamak development
More informationControl of Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios
FIRST CHENGDU THEORY FESTIVAL Control of Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios ZhengXiong Wang Dalian University of Technology (DLUT) Dalian, China Chengdu, China, 28 Aug, 2018 Outline
More informationCharacterization of neoclassical tearing modes in highperformance I mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator CMod
1 EX/P422 Characterization of neoclassical tearing modes in highperformance I mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator CMod Y. Lin, R.S. Granetz, A.E. Hubbard, M.L. Reinke, J.E.
More informationA New Resistive Response to 3D Fields in Low Rotation Hmodes
in Low Rotation Hmodes by Richard Buttery 1 with Rob La Haye 1, Yueqiang Liu 2, Bob Pinsker 1, Jongkyu Park 3, Holger Reimerdes 4, Ted Strait 1, and the DIIID research team. 1 General Atomics, USA 2
More informationPerformance limits. Ben Dudson. 24 th February Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Performance limits Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 24 th February 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 24) Previously... In the last few
More informationMacroscopic Stability
Macroscopic Stability FESAC Facilities Panel Meeting June 13, 2005 E. S. Marmar for the Alcator Group Unique CMod Properties Guide MHD Research Program High field, high current density, compact size,
More informationDependence of Achievable β N on Discharge Shape and Edge Safety Factor in DIII D SteadyState Scenario Discharges
Dependence of Achievable β N on Discharge Shape and Edge Safety Factor in DIII D SteadyState Scenario Discharges by J.R. Ferron with T.C. Luce, P.A. Politzer, R. Jayakumar, * and M.R. Wade *Lawrence Livermore
More informationResistive Wall Mode Control in DIIID
Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIIID by Andrea M. Garofalo 1 for G.L. Jackson 2, R.J. La Haye 2, M. Okabayashi 3, H. Reimerdes 1, E.J. Strait 2, R.J. Groebner 2, Y. In 4, M.J. Lanctot 1, G.A. Navratil
More informationOn tokamak plasma rotation without the neutral beam torque
On tokamak plasma rotation without the neutral beam torque Antti Salmi (VTT) With contributions from T. Tala (VTT), C. Fenzi (CEA) and O. Asunta (Aalto) 2 Motivation: Toroidal rotation Plasma rotation
More informationFormation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )
Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas ) Yasutomo ISHII and Andrei SMOLYAKOV 1) Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 3110102, Japan 1) University
More informationELM Suppression in DIIID Hybrid Plasmas Using n=3 Resonant Magnetic Perturbations
1 EXC/P502 ELM Suppression in DIIID Hybrid Plasmas Using n=3 Resonant Magnetic Perturbations B. Hudson 1, T.E. Evans 2, T.H. Osborne 2, C.C. Petty 2, and P.B. Snyder 2 1 Oak Ridge Institute for Science
More informationEdge Rotational Shear Requirements for the Edge Harmonic Oscillation in DIII D Quiescent H mode Plasmas
Edge Rotational Shear Requirements for the Edge Harmonic Oscillation in DIII D Quiescent H mode Plasmas by T.M. Wilks 1 with A. Garofalo 2, K.H. Burrell 2, Xi. Chen 2, P.H. Diamond 3, Z.B. Guo 3, X. Xu
More informationNIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU. General Atomics. Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997
NIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU General Atomics Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997 Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant DEFG0395ER54309 and Contract
More informationHighlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions
Highlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions Presented by V.A. Izzo With major contributions from S.E. Kruger, H.R. Strauss, R. Paccagnella, MHD Control Workshop 2010 Madison, WI ..onset of rapidly
More informationUnderstanding Edge Harmonic Oscillation Physics Using NIMROD
Understanding Edge Harmonic Oscillation Physics Using NIMROD J. King With contributions from S. Kruger & A. Pankin (TechX); K. Burrell, A. Garofalo, R. Groebner & P. Snyder (General Atomics) Work supported
More informationActive MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations
Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2, A. Reiman 1, and the W7AS Team and NBIGroup. 1 Princeton Plasma
More information(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) r (minor radius) time. time. Soft Xray. T_e contours (ECE) r (minor radius) time time
Studies of Spherical Tori, Stellarators and Anisotropic Pressure with M3D 1 L.E. Sugiyama 1), W. Park 2), H.R. Strauss 3), S.R. Hudson 2), D. Stutman 4), XZ. Tang 2) 1) Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
More informationEffect of Resonant and Nonresonant Magnetic Braking on Error Field Tolerance in High Beta Plasmas
1 EX/53Ra Effect of Resonant and Nonresonant Magnetic Braking on Error Field Tolerance in High Beta Plasmas H. Reimerdes 1), A.M. Garofalo 2), E.J. Strait 2), R.J. Buttery 3), M.S. Chu 2), Y. In 4),
More informationTransport Improvement Near Low Order Rational q Surfaces in DIII D
Transport Improvement Near Low Order Rational q Surfaces in DIII D M.E. Austin 1 With K.H. Burrell 2, R.E. Waltz 2, K.W. Gentle 1, E.J. Doyle 8, P. Gohil 2, C.M. Greenfield 2, R.J. Groebner 2, W.W. Heidbrink
More informationRWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENTTHEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER
GA A24759 RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENTTHEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER by A.M. GAROFALO, J. BIALEK, M.S. CHANCE, M.S. CHU, D.H. EDGELL, G.L. JACKSON, T.H. JENSEN, R.J.
More informationW.M. Solomon 1. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics Providence, RI October 29November 2, 2012
Impact of Torque and Rotation in High Fusion Performance Plasmas by W.M. Solomon 1 K.H. Burrell 2, R.J. Buttery 2, J.S.deGrassie 2, E.J. Doyle 3, A.M. Garofalo 2, G.L. Jackson 2, T.C. Luce 2, C.C. Petty
More informationDIII D Research in Support of ITER
Research in Support of ITER by E.J. Strait and the Team Presented at 22nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Geneva, Switzerland October 1318, 28 DIIID Research Has Made Significant Contributions in the Design
More informationLocalized Electron Cyclotron Current Drive in DIII D: Experiment and Theory
Localized Electron Cyclotron Current Drive in : Experiment and Theory by Y.R. LinLiu for C.C. Petty, T.C. Luce, R.W. Harvey,* L.L. Lao, P.A. Politzer, J. Lohr, M.A. Makowski, H.E. St John, A.D. Turnbull,
More informationStationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIIID Without Inductive Current Control
Stationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIIID Without Inductive Current Control P. A. Politzer, 1 A. W. Hyatt, 1 T. C. Luce, 1 F. W. Perkins, 4 R. Prater, 1 A. D. Turnbull, 1 D. P. Brennan, 5 J.
More informationAnalysis and modelling of MHD instabilities in DIIID plasmas for the ITER mission
Analysis and modelling of MHD instabilities in DIIID plasmas for the ITER mission by F. Turco 1 with J.M. Hanson 1, A.D. Turnbull 2, G.A. Navratil 1, C. PazSoldan 2, F. Carpanese 3, C.C. Petty 2, T.C.
More informationControl of Sawtooth Oscillation Dynamics using Externally Applied Stellarator Transform. Jeffrey Herfindal
Control of Sawtooth Oscillation Dynamics using Externally Applied Stellarator Transform Jeffrey Herfindal D.A. Ennis, J.D. Hanson, G.J. Hartwell, S.F. Knowlton, X. Ma, D.A. Maurer, M.D. Pandya, N.A. Roberds,
More informationRESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILIZATION RESEARCH ON DIII D STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS
RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILIZATION RESEARCH ON STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS by A.M. Garofalo1 in collaboration with J. Bialek,1 M.S. Chance,2 M.S. Chu,3 T.H. Jensen,3 L.C. Johnson,2 R.J. La Haye,3 G.A. Navratil,1
More informationAC loop voltages and MHD stability in RFP plasmas
AC loop voltages and MHD stability in RFP plasmas K. J. McCollam, D. J. Holly, V. V. Mirnov, J. S. Sar, D. R. Stone UWMadison 54rd Annual Meeting of the APSDPP October 29th  November 2nd, 2012 Providence,
More informationNeoclassical Tearing Modes
Neoclassical Tearing Modes O. Sauter 1, H. Zohm 2 1 CRPPEPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 2 MaxPlanckInstitut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany Physics of ITER DPG Advanced Physics School 2226 Sept, 2014,
More informationEffects of stellarator transform on sawtooth oscillations in CTH. Jeffrey Herfindal
Effects of stellarator transform on sawtooth oscillations in CTH Jeffrey Herfindal D.A. Ennis, J.D. Hanson, G.J. Hartwell, E.C. Howell, C.A. Johnson, S.F. Knowlton, X. Ma, D.A. Maurer, M.D. Pandya, N.A.
More informationA Hybrid Inductive Scenario for a Pulsed Burn RFP Reactor with QuasiSteady Current. John Sarff
A Hybrid Inductive Scenario for a Pulsed Burn RFP Reactor with QuasiSteady Current John Sarff 12th IEA RFP Workshop Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Japan Mar 2628, 2007 The RFP fusion development
More informationPredicting the Rotation Profile in ITER
Predicting the Rotation Profile in ITER by C. Chrystal1 in collaboration with B. A. Grierson2, S. R. Haskey2, A. C. Sontag3, M. W. Shafer3, F. M. Poli2, and J. S. degrassie1 1General Atomics 2Princeton
More informationGA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIIID ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS
GA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIIID ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS by M. OKABAYASHI, I.N. BOGATU, T. BOLZONELLA, M.S. CHANCE, M.S. CHU, A.M. GAROFALO, R. HATCHER, Y. IN, G.L. JACKSON,
More informationGA A26247 EFFECT OF RESONANT AND NONRESONANT MAGNETIC BRAKING ON ERROR FIELD TOLERANCE IN HIGH BETA PLASMAS
GA A26247 EFFECT OF RESONANT AND NONRESONANT MAGNETIC BRAKING ON ERROR FIELD TOLERANCE IN HIGH BETA PLASMAS by H. REIMERDES, A.M. GAROFALO, E.J. STRAIT, R.J. BUTTERY, M.S. CHU, Y. In, G.L. JACKSON, R.J.
More informationCharacterization and Forecasting of Unstable Resistive Wall Modes in NSTX and NSTXU *
1 EX/P434 Characterization and Forecasting of Unstable Resistive Wall Modes in NSTX and NSTXU * J.W. Berkery 1, S.A. Sabbagh 1, Y.S. Park 1, R.E. Bell 2, S.P. Gerhardt 2, C.E. Myers 2 1 Department of
More informationCurrentdriven instabilities
Currentdriven instabilities Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 21 st February 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 23) Previously In the last
More informationStudies of H Mode Plasmas Produced Directly by Pellet Injection in DIII D
Studies of H Mode Plasmas Produced Directly by Pellet Injection in by P. Gohil in collaboration with L.R. Baylor,* K.H. Burrell, T.C. Jernigan,* G.R. McKee, *Oak Ridge National Laboratory University of
More informationCurrent Drive Experiments in the HITII Spherical Tokamak
Current Drive Experiments in the HITII Spherical Tokamak T. R. Jarboe, P. Gu, V. A. Izzo, P. E. Jewell, K. J. McCollam, B. A. Nelson, R. Raman, A. J. Redd, P. E. Sieck, and R. J. Smith, Aerospace & Energetics
More informationRecent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science
Recent Development of LHD Experiment O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science 4521 1 Primary goal of LHD project 1. Transport studies in sufficiently high n E T regime relevant
More informationIssues in Neoclassical Tearing Mode Theory
Issues in Neoclassical Tearing Mode Theory Richard Fitzpatrick Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX Tearing Mode Stability in Tokamaks According to standard (singlefluid)
More informationMHDInduced Alpha Particle Loss in TFTR. S.J. Zweben, D.S. Darrow, E.D. Fredrickson, G. Taylor, S. von Goeler, R.B. White
MHDInduced Alpha Particle Loss in TFTR S.J. Zweben, D.S. Darrow, E.D. Fredrickson, G. Taylor, S. von Goeler, R.B. White Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, NJ 8543 Abstract MHDinduced
More informationEffect of ideal kink instabilities on particle redistribution
Effect of ideal kink instabilities on particle redistribution H. E. Ferrari1,2,R. Farengo1, P. L. GarciaMartinez2, M.C. Firpo3, A. F. Lifschitz4 1 Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Centro Atomico
More informationGA A26887 ADVANCES TOWARD QHMODE VIABILITY FOR ELMFREE OPERATION IN ITER
GA A26887 ADVANCES TOWARD QHMODE VIABILITY FOR ELMFREE OPERATION IN ITER by A.M. GAROFALO, K.H. BURRELL, M.J. LANCTOT, H. REIMERDES, W.M. SOLOMON and L. SCHMITZ OCTOBER 2010 DISCLAIMER This report was
More informationNonlinear MHD Simulations of Edge Localized Modes in ASDEX Upgrade. Matthias Hölzl, Isabel Krebs, Karl Lackner, Sibylle Günter
Nonlinear MHD Simulations of Edge Localized Modes in ASDEX Upgrade Matthias Hölzl, Isabel Krebs, Karl Lackner, Sibylle Günter Matthias Hölzl Nonlinear ELM Simulations DPG Spring Meeting, Jena, 02/2013
More informationElectron temperature barriers in the RFXmod experiment
Electron temperature barriers in the RFXmod experiment A. Scaggion Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy Tuesday 5 th October 2010 ADVANCED PHYSICS LESSONS 27/09/2010 07/10/2010 IPP GARCHING JOINT EUROPEAN RESEARCH
More informationInfluence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the Hmode Pedestal Height
Influence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the Hmode Pedestal Height by A.W. Leonard with R.J. Groebner, T.H. Osborne, and P.B. Snyder Presented at FortyNinth APS Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics
More informationObservation of NeoClassical Ion Pinch in the Electric Tokamak*
1 EX/P629 Observation of NeoClassical Ion Pinch in the Electric Tokamak* R. J. Taylor, T. A. Carter, J.L. Gauvreau, P.A. Gourdain, A. Grossman, D. J. LaFonteese, D. C. Pace, L. W. Schmitz, A. E. White,
More informationDIAGNOSTICS FOR ADVANCED TOKAMAK RESEARCH
DIAGNOSTICS FOR ADVANCED TOKAMAK RESEARCH by K.H. Burrell Presented at High Temperature Plasma Diagnostics 2 Conference Tucson, Arizona June 19 22, 2 134 /KHB/wj ROLE OF DIAGNOSTICS IN ADVANCED TOKAMAK
More informationRole of the Electron Temperature in the Current Decay during Disruption in JT60U )
Role of the Electron Temperature in the Current Decay during Disruption in JT60U ) Yoshihide SHIBATA, Akihiko ISAYAMA, Go MATSUNAGA, Yasunori KAWANO, Seiji MIYAMOTO 1), Victor LUKASH 2), Rustam KHAYRUTDINOV
More informationTHE DIII D PROGRAM THREEYEAR PLAN
THE PROGRAM THREEYEAR PLAN by T.S. Taylor Presented to Program Advisory Committee Meeting January 2 21, 2 3 /TST/wj PURPOSE OF TALK Show that the program plan is appropriate to meet the goals and is wellaligned
More informationGA A25853 FAST ION REDISTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HYBRID REGIME
GA A25853 FAST ION REDISTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HYBRID REGIME by R. NAZIKIAN, M.E. AUSTIN, R.V. BUDNY, M.S. CHU, W.W. HEIDBRINK, M.A. MAKOWSKI, C.C. PETTY, P.A. POLITZER, W.M. SOLOMON, M.A.
More informationHeat Flux Management via Advanced Magnetic Divertor Configurations and Divertor Detachment.
Heat Flux Management via Advanced Magnetic Divertor Configurations and Divertor Detachment E. Kolemen a, S.L. Allen b, B.D. Bray c, M.E. Fenstermacher b, D.A. Humphreys c, A.W. Hyatt c, C.J. Lasnier b,
More informationDirect drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks
Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks J. W. Van Dam and L.J. Zheng Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin 12th USEU Transport Task Force Annual
More informationSpatiotemporal investigations on the triggering of pellet induced ELMs
Spatiotemporal investigations on the triggering of pellet induced ELMs G. Kocsis, S. Kálvin, P.T. Lang*, M. Maraschek*, J. Neuhauser* W. Schneider*, T. Szepesi and ASDEX Upgrade Team KFKIRMKI, EURATOM
More informationFast Ion Confinement in the MST Reversed Field Pinch
Fast Ion Connement in the MST Reversed Field Pinch Gennady Fiksel B. Hudson, D.J. Den Hartog, R.M. Magee, R. O'Connell, S.C. Prager MST Team  University of Wisconsin  Madison Center for Magnetic SelfOrganization
More informationThe role of stochastization in fast MHD phenomena on ASDEX Upgrade
1 EX/P910 The role of stochastization in fast MHD phenomena on ASDEX Upgrade V. Igochine 1), O.Dumbrajs 2,3), H. Zohm 1), G. Papp 4), G. Por 4), G. Pokol 4), ASDEX Upgrade team 1) 1) MPI für Plasmaphysik,
More informationOn active mitigation of runaway electrons during tokamak disruptions
Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences 597 th Wilhelm and Else Heraeus Seminar Stochasticity in Fusion Plasmas 1 th Sept. 12 nd Sept. 215, Physikzentrum Bad Honnef, Germany On active mitigation
More informationDevelopment and Validation of a Predictive Model for the Pedestal Height (EPED1)
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for the Pedestal Height (EPED1) P.B. Snyder 1 with R.J. Groebner 1, A.W. Leonard 1, T.H. Osborne 1, M. Beurskens 3, L.D. Horton 4, A.E. Hubbard 5, J.W.
More informationEvolution of BootstrapSustained Discharge in JT60U
1 Evolution of BootstrapSustained Discharge in JT60U Y. Takase 1), S. Ide 2), Y. Kamada 2), H. Kubo 2), O. Mitarai 3), H. Nuga 1), Y. Sakamoto 2), T. Suzuki 2), H. Takenaga 2), and the JT60 Team 1)
More informationA multivariate analysis of disruption precursors on JET and AUG
A multivariate analysis of disruption precursors on JET and AUG G.Sias 1, R. Aledda 1, B. Cannas 1, R. S. Delogu 2, A. Fanni 1, A. Murari 2, A. Pau 1, the ASDEX Upgrade Team 3 and JET Contributors 4 1
More information Effect of Stochastic Field and Resonant Magnetic Perturbation on Global MHD Fluctuation 
15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL: "USJapan Workshop on 3D Magnetic Field Effects in MHD Control" U. Wisconsin, Madison, Nov 1517, 17, 2010 LHD experiments relevant to Tokamak MHD control  Effect
More informationDependences of Critical Rotational Shear in DIIID QHmode Discharges
Dependences of Critical Rotational Shear in DIIID QHmode Discharges by T.M. Wilks 1 with K.H. Burrell 2, Xi. Chen 2, A. Garofalo 2, R.J. Groebner 2, P. Diamond 3, Z. Guo 3, and J.W. Hughes 1 1 MIT 2
More informationPlasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators
Plasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators Gerald A. Navratil GCEP Fusion Energy Workshop Princeton, NJ 1 May 006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Borrowed VGs from many colleagues: J. Bialek, A. Garofalo,R. Goldston,
More informationIntegrated Transport Modeling of HighField Tokamak Burning Plasma Devices
Integrated Transport Modeling of HighField Tokamak Burning Plasma Devices Arnold H. Kritz, T.Onjun,C.Nguyen,P.Zhu,G.Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 1815
More informationGA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIIID
GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIIID by A. WINGEN, N.M. FERRARO, M.W. SHAFER, E.A. UNTERBERG, T.E. EVANS, D.L. HILLIS, and P.B. SNYDER JULY 2014 DISCLAIMER This report was
More informationThe Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance
The Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance O. KatsuroHopkins, J. Bialek, G. Navratil (Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York,
More informationMHD Analysis of the Tokamak Edge Pedestal in the Low Collisionality Regime Thoughts on the Physics of ELMfree QH and RMP Discharges
MHD Analysis of the Tokamak Edge Pedestal in the Low Collisionality Regime Thoughts on the Physics of ELMfree QH and RMP Discharges P.B. Snyder 1 Contributions from: H.R. Wilson 2, D.P. Brennan 1, K.H.
More informationIntroduction to Fusion Physics
Introduction to Fusion Physics Hartmut Zohm MaxPlanckInstitut für Plasmaphysik 85748 Garching DPG Advanced Physics School The Physics of ITER Bad Honnef, 22.09.2014 Energy from nuclear fusion Reduction
More informationEnergeticIonDriven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions
EnergeticIonDriven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions 7th APTWG Intl. Conference 58 June 2017 Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, Japan Andreas Bierwage, Yasushi Todo 14.1MeV 10 kev
More informationOverview of Recent Results from Alcator CMod including Applications to ITER Scenarios
Overview of Recent Results from Alcator CMod including Applications to ITER Scenarios E. S. Marmar and the Alcator CMod Team MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Cambridge MA 02139 USA Email contact
More informationSUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T10 TOKAMAK PLASMAS
SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T1 TOKAMAK PLASMAS V. Vershkov, L.G. Eliseev, S.A. Grashin. A.V. Melnikov, D.A. Shelukhin, S.V. Soldatov, A.O. Urazbaev and T1 team
More informationDisruption dynamics in NSTX. longpulse discharges. Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL. for the NSTX Research Team
Disruption dynamics in NSTX longpulse discharges Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL for the NSTX Research Team Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability: Extension of Performance Monday, November 18, 2002
More informationRole of Magnetic Configuration and Heating Power in ITB Formation in JET.
Role of Magnetic Configuration and Heating Power in ITB Formation in JET. The JET Team (presented by V. Parail 1 ) JET Joint Undertaking, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom 1 present address: EURATOM/UKAEA
More informationPossible Pedestal Transport Theory Models And Modeling Tests
Possible Pedestal Transport Theory Models And Modeling Tests J.D. Callen, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 537061609 DIIID Pedestal Transport Workshop, General Atomics, San Diego, CA, February 17,
More informationProduction and Damping of Runaway Electrons in a Tokamak
International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Madison, WI, April 46, 2016 Production and Damping of Runaway Electrons in a Tokamak Boris Breizman 1) and Pavel Aleynikov 2) 1) Institute for Fusion Studies,
More informationGA A22443 STUDY OF H MODE THRESHOLD CONDITIONS IN DIII D
GA A443 STUDY OF H MODE THRESHOLD CONDITIONS IN DIII D by R.J. GROEBNER, T.N. CARLSTROM, K.H. BURRELL, S. CODA, E.J. DOYLE, P. GOHIL, K.W. KIM, Q. PENG, R. MAINGI, R.A. MOYER, C.L. RETTIG, T.L. RHODES,
More informationSnakes and similar coherent structures in tokamaks
Snakes and similar coherent structures in tokamaks A. Y. Aydemir 1, K. C. Shaing 2, and F. W. Waelbroeck 1 1 Institute for Fusion Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 2 Plasma and
More informationELMs and Constraints on the HMode Pedestal:
ELMs and Constraints on the HMode Pedestal: A Model Based on PeelingBallooning Modes P.B. Snyder, 1 H.R. Wilson, 2 J.R. Ferron, 1 L.L. Lao, 1 A.W. Leonard, 1 D. Mossessian, 3 M. Murakami, 4 T.H. Osborne,
More informationDIII D. by F. Turco 1. New York, January 23 rd, 2015
Modelling and Experimenting with ITER: the MHD Challenge by F. Turco 1 with J.M. Hanson 1, A.D. Turnbull 2, G.A. Navratil 1, F. Carpanese 3, C. PazSoldan 2, C.C. Petty 2, T.C. Luce 2, W.M. Solomon 4,
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.plasmph] 24 Nov 2017
arxiv:1711.09043v1 [physics.plasmph] 24 Nov 2017 Evaluation of ideal MHD mode stability of CFETR baseline scenario Debabrata Banerjee CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Department of Modern
More informationParticle transport results from collisionality scans and perturbative experiments on DIIID
1 EX/P326 Particle transport results from collisionality scans and perturbative experiments on DIIID E.J. Doyle 1), L. Zeng 1), G.M. Staebler 2), T.E. Evans 2), T.C. Luce 2), G.R. McKee 3), S. Mordijck
More informationAn ITPA joint experiment to study threshold conditions for runaway electron generation and suppression
An ITPA joint experiment to study threshold conditions for runaway electron generation and suppression R. Granetz, A. DuBois, B. Esposito, J. Kim, R. Koslowski, M. Lehnen, J. MartinSolis,C. PazSoldan,
More informationSimulation Research on disruptions and runaway electrons
第 20 回 NEXT 研究会 Simulation Research on disruptions and runaway electrons A. Matsuyama, M. Yagi, H. Nuga, N. Aiba, and Y. Ishii JAEA, Rokkasho, Japan Acknowledgement: Y. Shibata, A. Ito, M. Furukawa, S.
More informationMeasuring from electron temperature fluctuations in the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS VOLUME 5, NUMBER FEBRUARY 1998 Measuring from electron temperature fluctuations in the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor C. Ren, a) J. D. Callen, T. A. Gianakon, and C. C. Hegna University
More informationUnderstanding and Predicting Profile Structure and Parametric Scaling of Intrinsic Rotation. Abstract
Understanding and Predicting Profile Structure and Parametric Scaling of Intrinsic Rotation W. X. Wang, B. A. Grierson, S. Ethier, J. Chen, and E. Startsev Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University,
More informationMacroscopic Stability Research on Alcator CMod: 5year plan
Macroscopic Stability Research on Alcator CMod: 5year plan Presented by R. Granetz Alcator CMod PAC 0608 Feb 2008 Principal MHD Research Topics in the Next 5year Plan Effects of nonaxisymmetric fields
More informationEdge Momentum Transport by Neutrals
1 TH/P318 Edge Momentum Transport by Neutrals J.T. Omotani 1, S.L. Newton 1,2, I. Pusztai 1 and T. Fülöp 1 1 Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden 2 CCFE,
More informationHeating and Current Drive by Electron Cyclotron Waves in JT60U
EX/W Heating and Current Drive by Electron Cyclotron Waves in JT6U T. Suzuki ), S. Ide ), C. C. Petty ), Y. Ikeda ), K. Kajiwara ), A. Isayama ), K. Hamamatsu ), O. Naito ), M. Seki ), S. Moriyama )
More informationDerivation of dynamo current drive in a closed current volume and stable current sustainment in the HIT SI experiment
Derivation of dynamo current drive and stable current sustainment in the HIT SI experiment 1 Derivation of dynamo current drive in a closed current volume and stable current sustainment in the HIT SI experiment
More informationTOKAMAK EXPERIMENTS  Summary 
17 th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, October, 1998 TOKAMAK EXPERIMENTS  Summary  H. KISHIMOTO Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute 22 UchisaiwaiCho, ChiyodaKu, Tokyo, Japan 1. Introduction
More informationMHD Stabilization Analysis in Tokamak with Helical Field
USJapan Workshop on MHD Control, Magnetic Islands and Rotation the University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA AT&T Executive Education & Conference Center NOVEMBER 35, 8 MHD Stabilization Analysis in Tokamak
More informationPROGRESS TOWARDS SUSTAINMENT OF ADVANCED TOKAMAK MODES IN DIIIÐD *
PROGRESS TOWARDS SUSTAINMENT OF ADVANCED TOKAMAK MODES IN DIIIÐD * B.W. RICE, K.H. BURRELL, J.R. FERRON, C.M. GREENFIELD, G.L. JACKSON, L.L. LAO, R.J. LA HAYE, T.C. LUCE, B.W. STALLARD, E.J. STRAIT, E.J.
More informationKSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta
1 THS/P205 KSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta Y.S. Park 1), S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), J.M. Bialek 1), Y.M. Jeon 2), S.H. Hahn 2), N. Eidietis
More informationMHD. Jeff Freidberg MIT
MHD Jeff Freidberg MIT 1 What is MHD MHD stands for magnetohydrodynamics MHD is a simple, selfconsistent fluid description of a fusion plasma Its main application involves the macroscopic equilibrium
More informationDIII D UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROL OF TRANSPORT IN ADVANCED TOKAMAK REGIMES IN DIII D QTYUIOP C.M. GREENFIELD. Presented by
UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROL OF TRANSPORT IN ADVANCED TOKAMAK REGIMES IN Presented by C.M. GREENFIELD for J.C. DeBOO, T.C. LUCE, B.W. STALLARD, E.J. SYNAKOWSKI, L.R. BAYLOR,3 K.H. BURRELL, T.A. CASPER, E.J.
More informationGA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIIID
GA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIIID by J.G. WATKINS, T.E. EVANS, I. JOSEPH, C.J. LASNIER, R.A. MOYER, D.L. RUDAKOV, O. SCHMITZ,
More informationIssues of Perpendicular Conductivity and Electric Fields in Fusion Devices
Issues of Perpendicular Conductivity and Electric Fields in Fusion Devices Michael Tendler, Alfven Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Plasma Turbulence Turbulence can be regarded
More informationEnergetic Particle Physics in Tokamak Burning Plasmas
Energetic Particle Physics in Tokamak Burning Plasmas presented by C. Z. (Frank) Cheng in collaboration with N. N. Gorelenkov, G. J. Kramer, R. Nazikian, E. Fredrickson, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
More informationCharacteristics of the Hmode H and Extrapolation to ITER
Characteristics of the Hmode H Pedestal and Extrapolation to ITER The Hmode Pedestal Study Group of the International Tokamak Physics Activity presented by T.Osborne 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
More information