Analysis and modelling of MHD instabilities in DIIID plasmas for the ITER mission


 Ella Holmes
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Analysis and modelling of MHD instabilities in DIIID plasmas for the ITER mission by F. Turco 1 with J.M. Hanson 1, A.D. Turnbull 2, G.A. Navratil 1, C. PazSoldan 2, F. Carpanese 3, C.C. Petty 2, T.C. Luce 2 1 Columbia U. 2 General Atomics 3 Dipartimento di Energetica, Politecnico di Milano IAEATM, Roma, March 6 th 2015
2 Contents  Making progress by integrating modelling and experiment à MHD spectroscopy to measure the approach to a limit à The MARSK model for plasma response calculations à The PEST3 model to evaluate Δ trends  The ITER Baseline Scenario: moderate β N, zero torque  The path to high β N and steadystate conditions à Modeling the nowall limit crossing with nonideal effects  The steadystate scenarios: high β N, high torque  Low torque at high β N  Discussion and conclusions
3 DIIID studies demonstration plasmas relevant to these scenarios: ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm)
4 DIIID studies demonstration plasmas relevant to these scenarios: ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm)
5 DIIID studies demonstration plasmas relevant to these scenarios: ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm)
6 DIIID studies demonstration plasmas relevant to these scenarios: ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm)
7 DIIID studies demonstration plasmas relevant to these scenarios: ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm) à Experiment à Modelling
8 Measure the approach to instability: MHD spectroscopy EXP MHD spectroscopy*: A rotating kinkresonant n=1 field is applied with a set of internal coils (Icoils), at f=10 Hz or f=20 Hz ß rotation frequency of the RWM à The plasma response amplitude increases close to a stability boundary à The phase shows a jump Used to probe the proximity to a stability limit Expand the analysis and modeling space to the stable side of the modes * Fasoli PRL1995 * Reimerdes PRL 2004
9 RWMs: slowly growing, slowly rotating kinks MOD The ideal kink instability, with a realistic (nonideal) wall model, is described by the RWM branch of the dispersion relation à slow growth rate of the order of τ wall (~2.5 ms in DIIID) The RWM is influenced by à pressure and current profile gradients (ideal MHD) à resonances between the plasma rotation and the thermal particles drift frequencies à nonresonant contributions from fastparticles (NBI ions in DIIID) In DIIID, RWMs Cause rotation and β N collapses in the highq min, highβ N SS plasmas
10 Drift kinetic effects are needed to describe the experimental observations MOD RWMs do not usually appear in fastrotating, low q min plasmas à kinetic damping of the RWM [Hu et al, PRL2004] γτ W = δw NW δw WW Ideal MHD RWM dispersion relation γτ W = δw NW +δw K δw WW +δw K Kinetic damping physics δw k ~ l ( ω ω E ) f ε n f ψ ez ω ω p ω b + iν eff ω E Precession frequency Bounce frequency Collision frequency Kinetic dependences may extrapolate unfavourably for low external torque and lower fraction of fast beamgenerated ions (ITER) à need to validate models for rotation and thermal/fast particles
11 MARSK model is being validated to predict the stability in unexplored regimes MOD Eigenvalue code, modified to solve for the response to an inhomogeneous forcing function ß External field from the Icoils The model includes  resistive DIIID wall geometry  rotation, T e, T i, n e from experiment  fastnbi ions with a Maxwellian slowing down distribution function  radially constant collisionality (for ions and electrons) *Y. Liu et al, Phys. Plasmas 15, (2008)
12 [IBS] MHD stability below the nowall limit, at zero torque ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm)
13 [IBS] Stable solution found at moderate to high torque EXP DIIID IBS demonstration discharges match  plasma shape (LSN)  q 95 = Q = 10 ß β N =1.8, H 98 =1 at q 95 =3 DIIID can match the predicted torque à Nm Solution non reproducible (50% of cases are unstable)
14 [IBS] At zero torque life is hard... EXP  Narrow operating point found at 1 Nm  Operation at 0 Nm remains elusive Operating on a marginal point à sensitive to small perturbations Ideal nowall limit β NW ~ Ideal withwall limit β WW ~ IBS constant β N ~ Nonideal effects à current profile, rotation, collisionality, resistivity?
15 [IBS] MHD spectroscopy shows that the plasmas are approaching a stability limit EXP Response amplitude increase Nonideal effects ß à Lower limits Phase jump at ~1215 krad/s à Typical of nowall limit crossing Response AMP (G/kA) Response PHI ( ) β N ~ β N ~ Phase jump NBI torque (Nm) NBI torque (Nm) Rotation at ρ~0.7 (krad/s)
16 [IBS] The plasma response trends indicate that nonideal effects are present EXP  At moderate rotation, the trends are consistent with the ideal model Plasma response amplitude (G/kA) β N /β lim Rotation at ρ=0.7 (krad/s)
17 [IBS] The plasma response trends indicate that nonideal effects are present EXP  At moderate rotation, the trends are consistent with the ideal model  At higher rotation the response is off trend à kinetic damping? Plasma response amplitude (G/kA) β N /β lim Rotation at ρ=0.7 (krad/s)
18 [IBS] The plasma response trends indicate that nonideal effects are present EXP  At moderate rotation, the trends are consistent with the ideal model  At higher rotation the response is off trend à kinetic damping?  At very low rotation, with ECH, higher response à collisionality? resistivity? Ideal MHD likely not sufficient to explain the trends Plasma response amplitude (G/kA) β N /β lim Rotation at ρ=0.7 (krad/s)
19 [IBS] MARSK reproduces only the higher rotation cases EXP  Collisionality is important to reproduce the higher rotation range correctly  MARS does not capture the large increase at very low rotation  The phase is overestimated by ~1520 Response amplitude(g/ka) MARSK w/o coll. MARSK w/ coll. NBI torque (Nm) Response phase ( ) NBI torque (Nm) (B r ) Rotation at ρ~0.7 (krad/s)
20 The path to high β N is a good platform to validate models ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm) Higher β N Higher q 95
21 Pressure (β N ) scan to cross the nowall β N limit EXP Increase the pressure with coip NBI power à fixed q95, li à Measure the plasma response
22 β N scan: It s crucial to assess the validity of the modeling results MOD Rotation has an impact on the response amplitude The rotation is not constant across the β N values à Sensitivity study: assess impact of rotation on the results
23 β N scan: MHDonly model does not reproduce approach to the nowall β N limit MOD Previous modelling* showed the MHD model without rotation has a pole at the nowall limit *Lanctot, PoP2010 Plasma Response Amplitude (GkA) Plasma Response Phase ( ) Experiment MHD only Kinetic Ideal model Model Nowall limit (without rotation) Nowall limit (without rotation) β N
24 β N scan: Drift kinetic model reproduces approach to the nowall β N limit correctly MOD Previous modelling* showed the MHD model without rotation has a pole at the nowall limit The pole is eliminated with the full kinetic model (thermal + fast ions) *Lanctot, PoP2010 Plasma Response Amplitude (GkA) Plasma Response Phase ( ) Experiment MHD only Full kinetic Kinetic Model Nowall limit (without rotation) Nowall limit (without rotation) β N
25 β N scan: Drift kinetic model reproduces approach to the nowall β N limit correctly MOD Previous modelling* showed the MHD model without rotation has a pole at the nowall limit The pole is eliminated with the full kinetic model (thermal + fast ions) Without fastion damping the pole reappears à 45% higher than expt The phase shift is still overestimated above the nowall limit ITER: very small fastion β from NBI à will the plasmas be (45%) more unstable? à Will the fast αparticles be enough to stabilize them? *Lanctot, PoP2010 Plasma Response Amplitude (GkA) Plasma Response Phase ( ) Kinetic Model Experiment MHD only Thermal+fast +45% Thermal Nowall limit (without rotation) ?? Nowall limit (without rotation) β N
26 β N scan: Precession and bounce drift frequencies are the main factors MOD The full model is necessary to reproduce the experiment
27 ITER Baseline Scenario (IBS) (RWM studies) ITER Steady State ITER I p (MA) 15 / 9 q Q 10 / 5 DIIID β N DIIID Torque (Nm) Higher β N Higher Torque
28 [SS] MHD stability is the main challenge for highβ N scenarios EXP  High rotation, β N <=3.6 à can be made passively stable  2/1 tearing modes arise on β N >3.6 flattop  They degrade the confinement significantly à loss of 2050% β N β N I p n=1 amplitude (G) , , Time (ms)
29 [SS] Tearing limits are strongly correlated with the ideal withwall limit MOD The tearing index Δ increases sharply at the ideal wall limit Modelling of the approach to the ideal limit:
30 [SS] Tearing limits are strongly correlated with the ideal withwall limit MOD The tearing index Δ increases sharply at the ideal wall limit High β N operation Operate with very large, very sensitive Δ? Modelling of the approach to the ideal limit: One solution is to increase the ideal limit:  broaden J and p  change the plasma shape Turnbull, PRL 1995 Turnbull, NF 1998
31 [SS] OFFaxis NBI used to broaden the pressure and current profiles The withwall β N limits of the OFFaxis cases are ~10% higher
32 [SS] Shape modifications can yield β limit ~6 MOD The withwall β N limits of the OFFaxis cases are ~10% higher Combined changes of outer gap and squareness: β lim 4.5 à 6 Withwall β N limit Upper squareness
33 [SS] The PEST3 model captures the approach to tearing instability PEST3 Δ Time series of Δ calculated* for experimental equilibria β N ~4 Higher β N >4 cases à Δ shows increasing trend towards the 2/1 mode β N ~ Time (s)
34 [SS] For stable plasmas, Δ decreases The stable cases can have high Δ values But show a stable or decreasing trend on the flattop β N ~
35 [Rotation scan] All the highβ N plasmas have high NBI torque MOD What happens at low rotation, high β N?  Experiment à decrease the rotation at fixed β N, q 95  Model à capture the rotation effects? fixed equilibrium and n e, T e, n i, P NBI, etc, from a DIIID plasma a selfsimilar rotation profile series Plasma rotation and drift frequencies Plasma rotation (krad/s)
36 Rotation effects above the nowall β N limit EXP Broad peak in the response at krad/s (~1% of the Alfvén velocity) Below the nowall limit (IBS) the trend is increasing Response AMP (G/kA) MHD spectroscopy Response PHI ( ) Rotation at ρ~0.6 (krad/s)
37 [Rotation scan] MARSK reproduces the response amplitude with fastions MOD MHD spectroscopy With thermal and fast ions, trend and amplitude are well matched...but the phase is underestimated by ~25% If the fastions damping is neglected, the results diverge (more) from the measurements Fastions destabilizing at highβ N? consistent with β N scan results... Response AMP (G/kA) Response PHI ( ) MARSK w/ fast ions MARSK w/o fast ions Rotation at ρ~0.6 (krad/s)
38 Summary and conclusions Modelling the approach to instability: how are we doing?  ITER Baseline Scenario:  Good match at moderate rotation  MARSK does not reproduce the high response at zero torque  Nowall limit crossing:  MARSK reproduces very well the response amplitude  The phase is overestimated at high β N  Steadystate scenarios:  PEST3 captures the approach to instability  No rotation dependence! Needed to extrapolate  The rotation dependence at high β N :  MARSK captures the amplitude trends  The phase trends are not reproduced as well
39 What physics can be added and may be relevant? Collisionality à New MARSQ: energy dependent collisionality operator Finite ion orbits? The present version of MARSK assumes a Maxwellian fastion distribution (experimental profile in ρ, but no v //, v perp dependence) à Neutral beam ions in DIIID are strongly anisotropic Large response at zero torque remains a puzzle... Experimental beamion distribution (NUBEAM)
40 EXTRAS
41 Currentdriven mode: The mode structure is similar to that of the pressuredriven mode The mode eigenfunction is a combination of the main harmonics m=2,3,4,5 The structure of the mode extends radially inward à not only at the edge Comparable to the pressuredriven mode Previously developed RWM feedback techniques and the low q optimizations can be applied to both currentdriven and pressuredriven, high β N modes F. Turco/IAEA 2014/St. Petersburg
42 MISK results for rotation scan
43 [IBS] MARSK reproduces only the higher rotation cases EXP  Collisionality is important to reproduce the higher rotation range correctly  MARS does not capture the large increase at very low rotation  The phase is overestimated by ~1520 Response amplitude(g/ka) MARSK w/o coll. MARSK w/ coll. NBI torque (Nm) Response phase ( ) (B p ) Rotation at ρ~0.7 (krad/s) NBI torque (Nm)
44 [IBS] MARSK reproduces only the higher rotation cases EXP
45 The Hybrid Regime Addresses the SteadyState Challenges With An Alternative Approach What is a hybrid? à Long duration, high confinement Hmode à More stable to 2/1 tearing modes Final J independent from sources Current density All external current driven in the plasma centre SS Highq min SS Hybrid No alignment issues Most efficient CD q relaxes to hybrid state q min 1 q 3/2 TM q=1 q= , Ideal MHD withwall limits are β limit 4.5 High q min present limits β lim ~ à predicted β lim ~5
46 The Highest β N Cases Are Limited By MHD At β N 3.6 à 2/1 tearing modes are avoidable At β N 4 à fishbonelike bursts, then 2/1 tearing modes à nonrecoverable isolated bursts: β N , τ 1 ms, f khz n=1 Amp (G) τ 50 ms, f~1015 khz The activity does not decrease with density à not fishbones? May be due to the large fraction of fast particles B dot B dot bursts Time (ms)
47 Hybrid plasmas reach fully NI conditions and β N =3.6 for ~2 τ R EXP Double null plasma shape β N τ R H98y , , P NBI (MW) P ECH (MW) Density (10 19 m 3 ) Stable to the 2/1 TM at β N ~3.6 Loop voltage ~ 0 for ~2 τ R Limited by NBI pulse duration V surf (mv) Time (ms)
48 The Scenario Is Sustained At High Injected Torque Lower Torque Degrades Confinement  1 neutral beam line added in counteri p direction (~4 MW)  Same β N, stored energy obtained Confinement decreases by ~20% for 35% lower T P NBI = 11 à 15 MW (35% increase) β N , P NBI (MW) 2/1 TM P ECH (MW) T NBI = 8.8 à 5.6 Nm (35% decrease) NBI torque (Nm) H 98y2 H 98y2 = 1.72 à 1.4 (20% decrease) Time (ms) 2/1 TM
49 With Present Confinement And n e, The DN Hybrid Is Consistent With an FNSF 6.7 MA Scenario INPUTS: R=2.49 m, B t = 6 T q 95 =6.2, ε=3.5 β N =3.66, n lin.av =4 DN 6.7 MA FNSF hybrid Plasma current (MA) scaled Impose I p = 6.7 MA Fix ν* H 98y2 =1.42 SCALED SCENARIO: With n/n G = 0.42 Drive 3.35 MA with ECH+NBI Need P CD = 75 MW P to sustain β N = 172 MW Central Temperature (kev) P INPUT (MW) Density (10 19 m 3 ) (f G = 0.42) Time (s) P CD (MW)
50 With Present Confinement And n e, The SN Hybrid Is Consistent With an ITER 9 MA Scenario INPUTS: R=6.2 m, B t = 5.3 T q 95 =6.2, ε=3.1 β N =3, n lin.av =3.2 SN 9 MA ITER hybrid Plasma current (MA) scaled Impose I p = 9 MA Fix ν* H 98y2 =1.49 Density (10 19 m 3 ) n G (f G = 1.17) SCALED SCENARIO: With n/n G = 1.17 Drive 4.5 MA with ECH+NBI Need P CD = 191 MW P to sustain β N à 175 MW Q = 7.1 Central Temperature (kev) P INPUT (MW) P CD (MW) Time (s)
51 With Present Confinement And lower n e, The SN Hybrid Is Consistent With an ITER 9 MA, Q=4.4 Scenario INPUTS: R=6.2 m, B t = 5.3 T q 95 =6.2, ε=3.1 β N =3, n lin.av =3.2 SN 9 MA ITER hybrid Plasma current (MA) scaled Impose I p = 9 MA Scale f GW H 98y2 =1.49 Density (10 19 m 3 ) n G (f G = 0.9) SCALED SCENARIO: With n/n G = 0.9 Drive 4.5 MA with ECH+NBI Need P CD = 112 MW P to sustain β N à 233 MW Q = 4.4 Central Temperature (kev) P INPUT (MW) P CD (MW) Time (s)
DIII D. by F. Turco 1. New York, January 23 rd, 2015
Modelling and Experimenting with ITER: the MHD Challenge by F. Turco 1 with J.M. Hanson 1, A.D. Turnbull 2, G.A. Navratil 1, F. Carpanese 3, C. PazSoldan 2, C.C. Petty 2, T.C. Luce 2, W.M. Solomon 4,
More informationGlobal Mode Control and Stabilization for Disruption Avoidance in Highβ NSTX Plasmas *
1 EX/P807 Global Mode Control and Stabilization for Disruption Avoidance in Highβ NSTX Plasmas * J.W. Berkery 1, S.A. Sabbagh 1, A. Balbaky 1, R.E. Bell 2, R. Betti 3, J.M. Bialek 1, A. Diallo 2, D.A.
More informationResistive Wall Mode Control in DIIID
Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIIID by Andrea M. Garofalo 1 for G.L. Jackson 2, R.J. La Haye 2, M. Okabayashi 3, H. Reimerdes 1, E.J. Strait 2, R.J. Groebner 2, Y. In 4, M.J. Lanctot 1, G.A. Navratil
More informationAdvanced Tokamak Research in JT60U and JT60SA
I07 Advanced Tokamak Research in and JT60SA A. Isayama for the JT60 team 18th International Toki Conference (ITC18) December 912, 2008 Ceratopia Toki, Toki Gifu JAPAN Contents Advanced tokamak development
More informationGA A27444 PROBING RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILITY USING OFFAXIS NBI
GA A27444 PROBING RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILITY USING OFFAXIS NBI by J.M. HANSON, F. TURCO M.J. LANCTOT, J. BERKERY, I.T. CHAPMAN, R.J. LA HAYE, G.A. NAVRATIL, M. OKABAYASHI, H. REIMERDES, S.A. SABBAGH,
More informationRWM Control Code Maturity
RWM Control Code Maturity Yueqiang Liu EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association Culham Science Centre Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB, UK Work partly funded by UK EPSRC and EURATOM. The views and opinions expressed do
More informationDIII D. by M. Okabayashi. Presented at 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Vilamoura, Portugal November 1st  6th, 2004.
Control of the Resistive Wall Mode with Internal Coils in the Tokamak (EX/31Ra) Active Measurement of Resistive Wall Mode Stability in Rotating High Beta Plasmas (EX/31Rb) by M. Okabayashi Presented
More informationA New Resistive Response to 3D Fields in Low Rotation Hmodes
in Low Rotation Hmodes by Richard Buttery 1 with Rob La Haye 1, Yueqiang Liu 2, Bob Pinsker 1, Jongkyu Park 3, Holger Reimerdes 4, Ted Strait 1, and the DIIID research team. 1 General Atomics, USA 2
More informationGA A27805 EXPANDING THE PHYSICS BASIS OF THE BASELINE Q=10 SCENRAIO TOWARD ITER CONDITIONS
GA A27805 EXPANDING THE PHYSICS BASIS OF THE BASELINE Q=10 SCENRAIO TOWARD ITER CONDITIONS by T.C. LUCE, G.L. JACKSON, T.W. PETRIE, R.I. PINSKER, W.M. SOLOMON, F. TURCO, N. COMMAUX, J.R. FERRON, A.M. GAROFALO,
More informationRequirements for Active Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Feedback Control
Requirements for Active Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Feedback Control Yongkyoon In 1 In collaboration with M.S. Chu 2, G.L. Jackson 2, J.S. Kim 1, R.J. La Haye 2, Y.Q. Liu 3, L. Marrelli 4, M. Okabayashi
More informationResistive Wall Mode Stabilization and Plasma Rotation Damping Considerations for Maintaining High Beta Plasma Discharges in NSTX
1 EXS/55 Resistive Wall Mode Stabilization and Plasma Rotation Damping Considerations for Maintaining High Beta Plasma Discharges in NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), J.M. Bialek 1), R.E. Bell ),
More informationEffect of Resonant and Nonresonant Magnetic Braking on Error Field Tolerance in High Beta Plasmas
1 EX/53Ra Effect of Resonant and Nonresonant Magnetic Braking on Error Field Tolerance in High Beta Plasmas H. Reimerdes 1), A.M. Garofalo 2), E.J. Strait 2), R.J. Buttery 3), M.S. Chu 2), Y. In 4),
More informationAdvances in Global MHD Mode Stabilization Research on NSTX
1 EX/51 Advances in Global MHD Mode Stabilization Research on NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), R.E. Bell 2), J.M. Bialek 1), S.P. Gerhardt 2), J.E. Menard 2), R. Betti 3), D.A. Gates 2), B. Hu 3),
More informationRWM Control in FIRE and ITER
RWM Control in FIRE and ITER Gerald A. Navratil with Jim Bialek, Allen Boozer & Oksana KatsuroHopkins MHD Mode Control Workshop University of TexasAustin 35 November, 2003 OUTLINE REVIEW OF VALEN MODEL
More informationRESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILIZATION RESEARCH ON DIII D STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS
RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILIZATION RESEARCH ON STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS by A.M. Garofalo1 in collaboration with J. Bialek,1 M.S. Chance,2 M.S. Chu,3 T.H. Jensen,3 L.C. Johnson,2 R.J. La Haye,3 G.A. Navratil,1
More informationOverview of Tokamak Rotation and Momentum Transport Phenomenology and Motivations
Overview of Tokamak Rotation and Momentum Transport Phenomenology and Motivations Lecture by: P.H. Diamond Notes by: C.J. Lee March 19, 2014 Abstract Toroidal rotation is a key part of the design of ITER
More informationPlasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques
Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques by M. Clement 1 with J. M. Hanson 1, J. Bialek 1 and G. A. Navratil 1 1 Columbia University Presented at 59 th Annual APS Meeting Division of
More informationENERGETIC PARTICLES AND BURNING PLASMA PHYSICS
ENERGETIC PARTICLES AND BURNING PLASMA PHYSICS Reported by J. Van Dam Institute for Fusion Studies The University of Texas at Austin USJapan JIFT Workshop on TheoryBased Modeling and Integrated Simulation
More informationThe Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance
The Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance O. KatsuroHopkins, J. Bialek, G. Navratil (Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York,
More informationSupported by. The drift kinetic and rotational effects on determining and predicting the macroscopic MHD instability
NSTXU Supported by The drift kinetic and rotational effects on determining and predicting the macroscopic MHD instability Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL
More informationGA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIIID ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS
GA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIIID ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS by M. OKABAYASHI, I.N. BOGATU, T. BOLZONELLA, M.S. CHANCE, M.S. CHU, A.M. GAROFALO, R. HATCHER, Y. IN, G.L. JACKSON,
More informationGA A26247 EFFECT OF RESONANT AND NONRESONANT MAGNETIC BRAKING ON ERROR FIELD TOLERANCE IN HIGH BETA PLASMAS
GA A26247 EFFECT OF RESONANT AND NONRESONANT MAGNETIC BRAKING ON ERROR FIELD TOLERANCE IN HIGH BETA PLASMAS by H. REIMERDES, A.M. GAROFALO, E.J. STRAIT, R.J. BUTTERY, M.S. CHU, Y. In, G.L. JACKSON, R.J.
More informationResistive Wall Mode Observation and Control in ITERRelevant Plasmas
Resistive Wall Mode Observation and Control in ITERRelevant Plasmas J. P. Levesque April 12, 2011 1 Outline Basic Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) model RWM stability, neglecting kinetic effects Sufficient for
More informationLocalized Electron Cyclotron Current Drive in DIII D: Experiment and Theory
Localized Electron Cyclotron Current Drive in : Experiment and Theory by Y.R. LinLiu for C.C. Petty, T.C. Luce, R.W. Harvey,* L.L. Lao, P.A. Politzer, J. Lohr, M.A. Makowski, H.E. St John, A.D. Turnbull,
More informationEnergeticIonDriven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions
EnergeticIonDriven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions 7th APTWG Intl. Conference 58 June 2017 Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, Japan Andreas Bierwage, Yasushi Todo 14.1MeV 10 kev
More informationPlasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators
Plasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators Gerald A. Navratil GCEP Fusion Energy Workshop Princeton, NJ 1 May 006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Borrowed VGs from many colleagues: J. Bialek, A. Garofalo,R. Goldston,
More informationDIII D Research in Support of ITER
Research in Support of ITER by E.J. Strait and the Team Presented at 22nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Geneva, Switzerland October 1318, 28 DIIID Research Has Made Significant Contributions in the Design
More informationEffects of Noise in Time Dependent RWM Feedback Simulations
Effects of Noise in Time Dependent RWM Feedback Simulations O. KatsuroHopkins, J. Bialek, G. Navratil (Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY USA) Building
More information1999 RESEARCH SUMMARY
1999 RESEARCH SUMMARY by S.L. Allen Presented to DIII D Program Advisory Committee Meeting January 2 21, 2 DIII D NATIONAL FUSION FACILITY SAN DIEGO 3 /SLA/wj Overview of Physics Results from the 1999
More informationStationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIIID Without Inductive Current Control
Stationary, High Bootstrap Fraction Plasmas in DIIID Without Inductive Current Control P. A. Politzer, 1 A. W. Hyatt, 1 T. C. Luce, 1 F. W. Perkins, 4 R. Prater, 1 A. D. Turnbull, 1 D. P. Brennan, 5 J.
More informationValidation of Theoretical Models of Intrinsic Torque in DIIID and Projection to ITER by Dimensionless Scaling
Validation of Theoretical Models of Intrinsic Torque in DIIID and Projection to ITER by Dimensionless Scaling by B.A. Grierson1, C. Chrystal2, W.X. Wang1, J.A. Boedo3, J.S. degrassie2, W.M. Solomon2,
More informationKSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta
1 THS/P205 KSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta Y.S. Park 1), S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), J.M. Bialek 1), Y.M. Jeon 2), S.H. Hahn 2), N. Eidietis
More informationW.M. Solomon 1. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics Providence, RI October 29November 2, 2012
Impact of Torque and Rotation in High Fusion Performance Plasmas by W.M. Solomon 1 K.H. Burrell 2, R.J. Buttery 2, J.S.deGrassie 2, E.J. Doyle 3, A.M. Garofalo 2, G.L. Jackson 2, T.C. Luce 2, C.C. Petty
More informationRWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENTTHEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER
GA A24759 RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENTTHEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER by A.M. GAROFALO, J. BIALEK, M.S. CHANCE, M.S. CHU, D.H. EDGELL, G.L. JACKSON, T.H. JENSEN, R.J.
More informationTHE DIII D PROGRAM THREEYEAR PLAN
THE PROGRAM THREEYEAR PLAN by T.S. Taylor Presented to Program Advisory Committee Meeting January 2 21, 2 3 /TST/wj PURPOSE OF TALK Show that the program plan is appropriate to meet the goals and is wellaligned
More informationExtension of HighBeta Plasma Operation to Low Collisional Regime
EX/44 Extension of HighBeta Plasma Operation to Low Collisional Regime Satoru Sakakibara On behalf of LHD Experiment Group National Institute for Fusion Science SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for
More informationProgress Toward High Performance SteadyState Operation in DIII D
Progress Toward High Performance SteadyState Operation in DIII D by C.M. Greenfield 1 for M. Murakami, 2 A.M. Garofalo, 3 J.R. Ferron, 1 T.C. Luce, 1 M.R. Wade, 1 E.J. Doyle, 4 T.A. Casper, 5 R.J. Jayakumar,
More informationSTATIONARY, HIGH BOOTSTRAP FRACTION PLASMAS IN DIIID WITHOUT INDUCTIVE CURRENT CONTROL
th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Vilamoura, Portugal, to 6 November IAEACN6/EX/P7 STATIONARY, HIGH BOOTSTRAP FRACTION PLASMAS IN DIIID WITHOUT INDUCTIVE CURRENT CONTROL P.A. POLITZER, A.W. HYATT, T.C.
More informationActive Control of Alfvén Eigenmodes in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak
Active Control of Alfvén Eigenmodes in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak M. GarciaMunoz, S. E. Sharapov, J. Ayllon, B. Bobkov, L. Chen, R. Coelho, M. Dunne, J. Ferreira, A. Figueiredo, M. Fitzgerald, J. GaldonQuiroga,
More informationDirect drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks
Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks J. W. Van Dam and L.J. Zheng Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin 12th USEU Transport Task Force Annual
More informationInfluence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the Hmode Pedestal Height
Influence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the Hmode Pedestal Height by A.W. Leonard with R.J. Groebner, T.H. Osborne, and P.B. Snyder Presented at FortyNinth APS Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics
More informationOVERVIEW OF THE ALCATOR CMOD PROGRAM. IAEAFEC November, 2004 Alcator Team Presented by Martin Greenwald MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center
OVERVIEW OF THE ALCATOR CMOD PROGRAM IAEAFEC November, 2004 Alcator Team Presented by Martin Greenwald MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center OUTLINE CMod is compact, high field, high density, high power
More informationHIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JT60U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES
HIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JTU REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES IAEACN9/EX/ T. FUJITA, Y. KAMADA, S. ISHIDA, Y. NEYATANI, T. OIKAWA, S. IDE, S. TAKEJI, Y. KOIDE, A. ISAYAMA, T. FUKUDA, T. HATAE, Y. ISHII,
More informationCharacterization and Forecasting of Unstable Resistive Wall Modes in NSTX and NSTXU *
1 EX/P434 Characterization and Forecasting of Unstable Resistive Wall Modes in NSTX and NSTXU * J.W. Berkery 1, S.A. Sabbagh 1, Y.S. Park 1, R.E. Bell 2, S.P. Gerhardt 2, C.E. Myers 2 1 Department of
More informationDependence of Achievable β N on Discharge Shape and Edge Safety Factor in DIII D SteadyState Scenario Discharges
Dependence of Achievable β N on Discharge Shape and Edge Safety Factor in DIII D SteadyState Scenario Discharges by J.R. Ferron with T.C. Luce, P.A. Politzer, R. Jayakumar, * and M.R. Wade *Lawrence Livermore
More informationThree Dimensional Effects in Tokamaks How Tokamaks Can Benefit From Stellarator Research
1 TH/P910 Three Dimensional Effects in Tokamaks How Tokamaks Can Benefit From Stellarator Research S. Günter, M. GarciaMunoz, K. Lackner, Ph. Lauber, P. Merkel, M. Sempf, E. Strumberger, D. Tekle and
More informationFormation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )
Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas ) Yasutomo ISHII and Andrei SMOLYAKOV 1) Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 3110102, Japan 1) University
More informationActive and Fast Particle Driven Alfvén Eigenmodes in Alcator CMod
Active and Fast Particle Driven Alfvén Eigenmodes in Alcator CMod JUST DID IT. J A Snipes, N Basse, C Boswell, E Edlund, A Fasoli #, N N Gorelenkov, R S Granetz, L Lin, Y Lin, R Parker, M Porkolab, J
More informationActive and Passive MHD Spectroscopy on Alcator CMod
Active and Passive MHD Spectroscopy on Alcator CMod J A Snipes, D A Schmittdiel, C Boswell, A Fasoli *, W Burke, R S Granetz, R R Parker, S Sharapov #, R Vieira MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Cambridge,
More informationSupported by. Role of plasma edge in global stability and control*
NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U Purdue U
More informationELMs and Constraints on the HMode Pedestal:
ELMs and Constraints on the HMode Pedestal: A Model Based on PeelingBallooning Modes P.B. Snyder, 1 H.R. Wilson, 2 J.R. Ferron, 1 L.L. Lao, 1 A.W. Leonard, 1 D. Mossessian, 3 M. Murakami, 4 T.H. Osborne,
More informationParticle transport results from collisionality scans and perturbative experiments on DIIID
1 EX/P326 Particle transport results from collisionality scans and perturbative experiments on DIIID E.J. Doyle 1), L. Zeng 1), G.M. Staebler 2), T.E. Evans 2), T.C. Luce 2), G.R. McKee 3), S. Mordijck
More informationCharacteristics of the Hmode H and Extrapolation to ITER
Characteristics of the Hmode H Pedestal and Extrapolation to ITER The Hmode Pedestal Study Group of the International Tokamak Physics Activity presented by T.Osborne 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
More informationPHYSICS OF CFETR. Baonian Wan for CFETR physics group Institute of Plasma Physcis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.
PHYSICS OF CFETR Baonian Wan for CFETR physics group Institute of Plasma Physcis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China Dec 4, 2013 Mission of CFETR Complementary with ITER Demonstration of fusion
More informationTimedependent Modeling of Sustained Advanced Tokamak Scenarios
Timedependent Modeling of Sustained Advanced Tokamak Scenarios T. A. Casper, L. L. LoDestro and L. D. Pearlstein LLNL M. Murakami ORNL L.L. Lao and H.E. StJohn GA We are modeling timedependent behavior
More informationDIAGNOSTICS FOR ADVANCED TOKAMAK RESEARCH
DIAGNOSTICS FOR ADVANCED TOKAMAK RESEARCH by K.H. Burrell Presented at High Temperature Plasma Diagnostics 2 Conference Tucson, Arizona June 19 22, 2 134 /KHB/wj ROLE OF DIAGNOSTICS IN ADVANCED TOKAMAK
More informationGA A23713 RECENT ECCD EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON DIII D
GA A271 RECENT ECCD EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON DIII D by C.C. PETTY, J.S. degrassie, R.W. HARVEY, Y.R. LINLIU, J.M. LOHR, T.C. LUCE, M.A. MAKOWSKI, Y.A. OMELCHENKO, and R. PRATER AUGUST 2001 DISCLAIMER This
More informationSTABILIZATION OF m=2/n=1 TEARING MODES BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE IN THE DIII D TOKAMAK
GA A24738 STABILIZATION OF m=2/n=1 TEARING MODES BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE IN THE DIII D TOKAMAK by T.C. LUCE, C.C. PETTY, D.A. HUMPHREYS, R.J. LA HAYE, and R. PRATER JULY 24 DISCLAIMER This
More informationCritical Physics Issues for DEMO
MaxPlanckInstitut für Plasmaphysik Critical Physics Issues for DEMO L.D. Horton with thanks to the contributors to the EFDA DEMO physics tasks in 2006 and to D.J. Campbell, who organized this effort
More informationEdge Rotational Shear Requirements for the Edge Harmonic Oscillation in DIII D Quiescent H mode Plasmas
Edge Rotational Shear Requirements for the Edge Harmonic Oscillation in DIII D Quiescent H mode Plasmas by T.M. Wilks 1 with A. Garofalo 2, K.H. Burrell 2, Xi. Chen 2, P.H. Diamond 3, Z.B. Guo 3, X. Xu
More informationPredicting the Rotation Profile in ITER
Predicting the Rotation Profile in ITER by C. Chrystal1 in collaboration with B. A. Grierson2, S. R. Haskey2, A. C. Sontag3, M. W. Shafer3, F. M. Poli2, and J. S. degrassie1 1General Atomics 2Princeton
More informationMHDparticle simulations and collective alphaparticle transport: analysis of ITER scenarios and perspectives for integrated modelling
MHDparticle simulations and collective alphaparticle transport: analysis of ITER scenarios and perspectives for integrated modelling G. Vlad, S. Briguglio, G. Fogaccia, F. Zonca Associazione EuratomENEA
More informationControl of Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios
FIRST CHENGDU THEORY FESTIVAL Control of Neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) in advanced scenarios ZhengXiong Wang Dalian University of Technology (DLUT) Dalian, China Chengdu, China, 28 Aug, 2018 Outline
More informationDependences of Critical Rotational Shear in DIIID QHmode Discharges
Dependences of Critical Rotational Shear in DIIID QHmode Discharges by T.M. Wilks 1 with K.H. Burrell 2, Xi. Chen 2, A. Garofalo 2, R.J. Groebner 2, P. Diamond 3, Z. Guo 3, and J.W. Hughes 1 1 MIT 2
More informationInfluence of ECR Heating on NBIdriven Alfvén Eigenmodes in the TJII Stellarator
EX/P Influence of ECR Heating on NBIdriven Alfvén Eigenmodes in the TJII Stellarator Á. Cappa, F. Castejón, T. Estrada, J.M. Fontdecaba, M. Liniers and E. Ascasíbar Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión CIEMAT,
More informationMHD. Jeff Freidberg MIT
MHD Jeff Freidberg MIT 1 What is MHD MHD stands for magnetohydrodynamics MHD is a simple, selfconsistent fluid description of a fusion plasma Its main application involves the macroscopic equilibrium
More informationEffects of Alpha Particle Transport Driven by Alfvénic Instabilities on Proposed Burning Plasma Scenarios on ITER
Effects of Alpha Particle Transport Driven by Alfvénic Instabilities on Proposed Burning Plasma Scenarios on ITER G. Vlad, S. Briguglio, G. Fogaccia, F. Zonca Associazione EuratomENEA sulla Fusione, C.R.
More informationMHD Analysis of the Tokamak Edge Pedestal in the Low Collisionality Regime Thoughts on the Physics of ELMfree QH and RMP Discharges
MHD Analysis of the Tokamak Edge Pedestal in the Low Collisionality Regime Thoughts on the Physics of ELMfree QH and RMP Discharges P.B. Snyder 1 Contributions from: H.R. Wilson 2, D.P. Brennan 1, K.H.
More informationCMod Transport Program
CMod Transport Program PAC 2006 Presented by Martin Greenwald MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center 1/26/2006 Introduction Programmatic Focus Transport is a broad topic so where do we focus? Where CMod
More informationNonlinear Consequences of Weakly Driven Energetic Particle Instabilities
2008 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference March 30  April 2, 2008, Boulder, Colorado Nonlinear Consequences of Weakly Driven Energetic Particle Instabilities Boris Breizman Institute for Fusion
More informationNonlinear MHD effects on TAE evolution and TAE bursts
Nonlinear MHD effects on TAE evolution and TAE bursts Y. Todo (NIFS) collaborating with H. L. Berk and B. N. Breizman (IFS, Univ. Texas) GSEP 3rd Annual Meeting (remote participation / Aug. 910, 2010)
More informationHybrid KineticMHD simulations with NIMROD
simulations with NIMROD 1 Yasushi Todo 2, Dylan P. Brennan 3, KwangIl You 4, JaeChun Seol 4 and the NIMROD Team 1 University of Washington, Seattle 2 NIFS, TokiJapan 3 University of Tulsa 4 NFRI, DaejeonKorea
More informationAC loop voltages and MHD stability in RFP plasmas
AC loop voltages and MHD stability in RFP plasmas K. J. McCollam, D. J. Holly, V. V. Mirnov, J. S. Sar, D. R. Stone UWMadison 54rd Annual Meeting of the APSDPP October 29th  November 2nd, 2012 Providence,
More informationGA A27806 TURBULENCE BEHAVIOR AND TRANSPORT RESPONSE APPROACHING BURNING PLASMA RELEVANT PARAMETERS
GA A27806 TURBULENCE BEHAVIOR AND TRANSPORT RESPONSE APPROACHING by G.R. McKEE, C. HOLLAND, Z. YAN, E.J. DOYLE, T.C. LUCE, A. MARINONI, C.C. PETTY, T.L. RHODES, L. SCHMITZ, W.M. SOLOMON, B.J. TOBIAS, G.
More informationMHD limits and plasma response in high beta hybrid operations in ASDEX Upgrade
EUROFUSION WPMST1CP(16) 15178 V Igochine et al. MHD limits and plasma response in high beta hybrid operations in ASDEX Upgrade Preprint of Paper to be submitted for publication in Proceedings of 26th
More informationImpact of Localized ECRH on NBI and ICRH Driven Alfven Eigenmodes in the ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak
Impact of Localized ECRH on NBI and ICRH Driven Alfven Eigenmodes in the ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak M. GarciaMunoz M. A. Van Zeeland, S. Sharapov, Ph. Lauber, J. Ayllon, I. Classen, G. Conway, J. Ferreira,
More information(Motivation) Reactor tokamaks have to run without disruptions
Abstract A database has been developed to study the evolution, the nonlinear effects on equilibria, and the disruptivity of locked and quasistationary modes with poloidal and toroidal mode numbers m=2
More informationHigh fusion performance at high T i /T e in JETILW baseline plasmas with high NBI heating power and low gas puffing
High fusion performance at high T i /T e in JETILW baseline plasmas with high NBI heating power and low gas puffing HyunTae Kim, A.C.C. Sips, C. D. Challis, F. Rimini, L. Garzotti, E. Lerche, L. Frassinetti,
More informationResistive wall mode stabilization by slow plasma rotation in DIIID tokamak discharges with balanced neutral beam injection a
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 14, 056101 2007 Resistive wall mode stabilization by slow plasma rotation in DIIID tokamak discharges with balanced neutral beam injection a E. J. Strait, b A. M. Garofalo, c G. L.
More informationEffects of fast ion phase space modifications by instabilities on fast ion modeling
Effects of fast ion phase space modifications by instabilities on fast ion modeling M. Podestà, M. Gorelenkova, E. Fredrickson, N. Gorelenkov, R. White PPPL, Princeton USA Acknowledgements: NSTXU and
More informationExtended Lumped Parameter Model of Resistive Wall Mode and The Effective SelfInductance
Extended Lumped Parameter Model of Resistive Wall Mode and The Effective SelfInductance M.Okabayashi, M. Chance, M. Chu* and R. Hatcher A. Garofalo**, R. La Haye*, H. Remeirdes**, T. Scoville*, and T.
More informationElectron temperature barriers in the RFXmod experiment
Electron temperature barriers in the RFXmod experiment A. Scaggion Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy Tuesday 5 th October 2010 ADVANCED PHYSICS LESSONS 27/09/2010 07/10/2010 IPP GARCHING JOINT EUROPEAN RESEARCH
More informationProgress in Modeling of ARIES ACT Plasma
Progress in Modeling of ARIES ACT Plasma And the ARIES Team A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, General Atomics H. St John, G. Staebler C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
More informationPresentation by Herb Berk University of Texas at Austin Institute for Fusion Studies in Vienna, Austria Sept. 14, 2015
Review of Theory Papers at 14 th IAEA technical meeting on Engertic Particles in Magnetic Confinement systems Presentation by Herb Berk University of Texas at Austin Institute for Fusion Studies in Vienna,
More informationEnergetic particle modes: from bump on tail to tokamak plasmas
Energetic particle modes: from bump on tail to tokamak plasmas M. K. Lilley 1 B. N. Breizman 2, S. E. Sharapov 3, S. D. Pinches 3 1 Physics Department, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK 2 IFS,
More informationControl of linear modes in cylindrical resistive MHD with a resistive wall, plasma rotation, and complex gain
Control of linear modes in cylindrical resistive MHD with a resistive wall, plasma rotation, and complex gain Dylan Brennan 1 and John Finn 2 contributions from Andrew Cole 3 1 Princeton University / PPPL
More informationEnergetic Particle Physics in Tokamak Burning Plasmas
Energetic Particle Physics in Tokamak Burning Plasmas presented by C. Z. (Frank) Cheng in collaboration with N. N. Gorelenkov, G. J. Kramer, R. Nazikian, E. Fredrickson, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
More informationDynamics of Zonal Shear Collapse in Hydrodynamic Electron Limit. Transport Physics of the Density Limit
Dynamics of Zonal Shear Collapse in Hydrodynamic Electron Limit Transport Physics of the Density Limit R. Hajjar, P. H. Diamond, M. Malkov This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy,
More informationGyrokinetic Transport Driven by Energetic Particle Modes
Gyrokinetic Transport Driven by Energetic Particle Modes by Eric Bass (General Atomics) Collaborators: Ron Waltz, Ming Chu GSEP Workshop General Atomics August 10, 2009 Outline I. Background Alfvén (TAE/EPM)
More informationThe Effect of Energetic Particles on Resistive Wall Mode Stability in MAST
The Effect of Energetic Particles on Resistive Wall Mode Stability in MAST IT Chapman 1, MP Gryaznevich 1, DF Howell 1, YQ Liu 1 and the MAST Team 1 EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre,
More informationPlan of Offaxis Neutral Beam Injector in KSTAR
KSTAR conference, Feb 2527, 2015, Daejeon (DCC), Korea Plan of Offaxis Neutral Beam Injector in KSTAR Feb. 26, 2015 DCC, Daejeon, Korea Youngsoon Bae a L. Terzolo a, K.S. Lee a, H.K. Kim a, H.L. Yang
More informationSTABILIZATION OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE IN DIII D BY PLASMA ROTATION AND MAGNETIC FEEDBACK
GA A24014 STABILIZATION OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE IN DIII D BY PLASMA ROTATION AND MAGNETIC FEEDBACK by M. Okabayashi, J. Bialek, M.S. Chance, M.S. Chu, E.D. Fredrickson, A.M. Garofalo, R. Hatcher, T.H.
More information27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Ahmedabad, India. October 22 27, 2018
Advances in Runaway Electron Control and Model Validation for ITER by C. PazSoldan1 with contributions from: N. Eidietis,1 E. Hollmann,2 A. Lvovskiy,3 C. Cooper,3 J. Herfindal,4 R. Moyer,2 D. Shiraki,4
More informationSimulation Study of Interaction between Energetic Ions and Alfvén Eigenmodes in LHD
1 Simulation Study of Interaction between Energetic Ions and Alfvén Eigenmodes in LHD Y. Todo 1), N. Nakajima 1), M. Osakabe 1), S. Yamamoto 2), D. A. Spong 3) 1) National Institute for Fusion Science,
More informationEdge Momentum Transport by Neutrals
1 TH/P318 Edge Momentum Transport by Neutrals J.T. Omotani 1, S.L. Newton 1,2, I. Pusztai 1 and T. Fülöp 1 1 Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden 2 CCFE,
More informationSummary of CDBM Joint Experiments
11th Meeting of the ITPA CDBM TG, Chengdu, 2324 Oct. 2006 Summary of CDBM Joint Experiments Mon. 23 Oct, morning T. Takizuka (JAEA) CDB2: Confinement scaling in ELMy Hmodes; β degradation C.C. Petty
More informationCharacterization of neoclassical tearing modes in highperformance I mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator CMod
1 EX/P422 Characterization of neoclassical tearing modes in highperformance I mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator CMod Y. Lin, R.S. Granetz, A.E. Hubbard, M.L. Reinke, J.E.
More informationExcitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with subalfvénic neutral beam ions in JET and DIIID plasmas
Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with subalfvénic neutral beam ions in JET and DIIID plasmas D. Borba 1,9, R. Nazikian 2, B. Alper 3, H.L. Berk 4, A. Boboc 3, R.V. Budny 2, K.H. Burrell 5, M. De Baar
More informationNeutral BeamIon Prompt Loss Induced by Alfvén Eigenmodes in DIIID
Neutral BeamIon Prompt Loss Induced by Alfvén Eigenmodes in DIIID by X. Chen,1 M.E. Austin,2 R.K. Fisher,3 W.W. Heidbrink,1 G.J. Kramer,4 R. Nazikian,4 D.C. Pace,3 C.C. Petty,3 M.A. Van Zeeland3 1University
More informationDisruption dynamics in NSTX. longpulse discharges. Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL. for the NSTX Research Team
Disruption dynamics in NSTX longpulse discharges Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL for the NSTX Research Team Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability: Extension of Performance Monday, November 18, 2002
More information