arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 22 May 2017

Transcription

1 arxiv: v [ath.fa] 22 May 207 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS Abstract. We investigate pointwise convergence of entangled ergodic averages of Dunford-Schwartz operators T 0,T,...,T on a Borel probability space. These averages take the for n,...,n k N A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f, where f L p (X,µ) for soe p <, and α : {,...,} {,...,k} encodes the entangleent. We prove that under soe joint boundedness and twisted copactness conditions on the pairs (A i,t i ), alost everywhere convergence holds for all f L p. We also present an extension to polynoial powers in the case p = 2, in addition to a continuous version concerning Dunford-Schwartz C 0 -seigroups.. Introduction Entangled ergodic averages were first introduced in a paper by Accardi, Hashioto and Obata [], where these were a key ingredient in providing an analogue of the Central Liit Theore for the odels in quantu probability they studied. Entangled ergodic averages take the general for A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α(), where A i ( i ) and T i ( i ) are operators on a Banach space E, and α : {,...,} {,...,k} is a surjective ap. The operators A i are acting as transitions between the actions of the operators T i, that iteratively govern the dynaics, whereas the entangleent ap α provides a coupling between the stages. Further papers on the subject initially focused on strong convergence of these Cesàro averages, see Liebscher [20], Fidaleo [0,, 2] and Eisner, K.-K. [8]. In Eisner, K.-K. [9] and K.-K. [9], attention was turned to pointwise alost everywhere convergence in the context of the T i s being operators on function spaces E = L p (X,µ) ( p < ), where (X,µ) is a standard probability space (i.e. a 200 Matheatics Subject Classification. Priary: 47A35; Secondary: 37A30. Key words and phrases. Entangled ergodic averages, pointwise convergence, uniodular eigenvalues, polynoial ergodic averages. The author has received funding fro the European Research Council under the European Union s Seventh Fraework Prograe (FP7/ ) / ERC grant agreeent n 67747, and fro the MTA Rényi Institute Lendület Liits of Structures Research Group.

2 2 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS copact etrizable space with a Borel probability easure). The forer paper concerns itself with the case k = with the T i being Dunford-Schwartz operators, whereas the latter allows for ulti-paraeter entangleent, but at the price of only dealing with Koopan operators. In this paper we deal with the full case of general entangleent aps α and Dunford-Schwartz operators T i, and show a.e. convergence on the whole L p space for all p <, significantly iproving on previous results. We introduce a foralis for the iterated function splittings used in the proofs in order to ake the ore concise, better highlighting what the ain steps are, and where the different assuptions of the stateents coe into play. We also provide results concerning polynoial and tie-continuous versions of the ergodic theores considered. Note that in what follows, N will be used to denote the set of positive integers. Our ain result is as follows. Theore.. Let > and k be positive integers, α : {,...,} {,...,k} a not necessarily surjective ap, and let T,T 2,...T be Dunford-Schwartz operators on a Borel probability space (X,µ). Let p [, ), E := L p (X,µ) and let E = E j;r E j;s be the Jacobs-Glicksberg-deLeeuw decoposition corresponding to T j ( j ). Let further A j L(E) ( j < ) be bounded operators. For a function f E and an index j, write A j,f := { A j T n j f n N}. Suppose that the following conditions hold: (A) (Twisted copactness) For any function f E, index j and ε > 0, there exists a decoposition E = U R with 0 < diu < such that P R A j,f B ε (0,L (X,µ)), with P R denoting the projection along U onto R. (A2) (Joint L -boundedness) There exists a constant C > 0 such that we have Then we have the following: {A j T n j n N, j } B C(0,L(L (X,µ)). () for each f E ;s, n T α() A T n α( ) pointwise a.e.; (2) for each f E ;r, converges pointwise a.e.....a 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f 0 A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f Reark. Note that it was proven in [9] that the Volterra operator V on L 2 ([0,]) defined through (Vf)(x) := x 0 f(z)dz

3 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS3 as well as all of its powers can be decoposed into a finite su of operators, each of which satisfy conditions (A) and (A2) when paired with any Dunford-Schwartz operator. Hence the conclusions of Theore. apply whenever the operators A i are chosen to be powers of V. 2. Notations and tools Before proceeding to the proof of our ain result, we need to clarify soe of the notions used, and introduce notations that will siplify our arguents. In what follows, N will denote the set of positive integers, and T the unit circle in C. The proof works by iteratively splitting the functions into finitely any parts, and so introducing vector indices will be very helpful. Given a vector v N c (c ), let v N c be the vector obtained by deleting its last coordinate, and let v denote its last coordinate. Also, we shall write l(v) := c to denote the nuber of coordinates of the vector, x v if there exist vectors w 0,w,...,w b (b ) such that w 0 = x, w b = v and for each i b we have w i = w i, and finally x v if x = v or x v. Let N denote the set of all bounded sequences {a n } l (C) satisfying li N N a n = 0. n= By the Koopan-von Neuann lea, see e.g. Petersen [23, p. 65], (a n ) N if and only if it lies in l and converges to 0 along a sequence of density. Definition 2.. Given a Banach space E and an operatort L(E), the operator T is said to have relatively weakly copact orbits if for each f E the orbit set {T n f n N + } is relatively weakly closed in E. For any such operator, there exists a corresponding Jacobs-Glicksberg-deLeeuw decoposition of the for (cf. [5, Theore II.4.8]) where E r E = E r E s, := lin{f E : Tf = λf for soe λ T}, E s := {f E : (ϕ(t n f)) N for every ϕ E }. Note that every power bounded operator on a reflexive Banach space has relatively weakly copact orbits. Thus the above decoposition is valid for, e.g., every contraction on L p (X,µ) for p (, ). In addition, if T is a Dunford-Schwartz operator on L (X,µ), i.e., T and T is also a contraction on L (X,µ), then T has relatively weakly copact orbits as well, see Lin, Olsen, Tepelan [22, Prop. 2.6] and Kornfeld, Lin [5, pp ]. Note that every Dunford-Schwartz operator is also a contraction on L p (X,µ) for every p (, ), see, e.g., [7, Theore 8.23]. The Jacobs-deLeeuw-Glicksberg decoposition is therefore valid for Dunford-Schwartz operators on L p (X,µ) for every p [, ).

4 4 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS Let T be a Dunford-Schwartz operator on (X,µ). The (linear) odulus T of T is defined as the unique positive operator onl (X,µ) having the sael - andl - nor as T such that T n f T n f holds a.e. for every f L (X,µ) and every n N. The odulus of a Dunford-Schwartz operator is again a Dunford-Schwartz operator. For details, we refer to Dunford, Schwartz [4, p. 672] and Krengel [6, pp ]. Also, it is easily seen that for T Dunford-Schwartz, the operators λt (λ T) are theselves Dunford-Schwartz and have the sae odulus. For exaple, every Koopan operator (i.e., an operator induced by a µ-preserving transforation on X) is a positive Dunford-Schwartz operator, hence coincides with its odulus. A key property of Dunford-Schwartz operators needed for the present paper is that the validity of pointwise ergodic theores typically extends fro Koopan operators to Dunford-Schwartz operators. For instance, for every f L (X,µ) the ergodic averages () N N T n f n= converge a.e. as N, see Dunford, Schwartz [4, p. 675]. We shall also need to define soe classes of sequences that act as good weights for pointwise ergodic theores. A sequence (a n ) n N C is called a trigonoetric polynoial (cf. [3]) if it is of the for a n = t j= b jρ n j where the b j are coplex nubers, and ρ j T for all j t. Let P l denote the set of Bohr alost periodic sequences, i.e., the set of unifor liits of trigonoetric polynoials. The following properties of the set P will be used: It is closed inl, closed under ultiplication, and is a subclass of (Weyl) alost periodic sequences AP(N), i.e., sequences whose orbit under the left shift is relatively copact in l. Actually, AP(N) = P c 0, see Bellow, Losert [2, p. 36], corresponding to the JacobsdeLeeuw-Glicksberg decoposition of AP(N) induced by the left shift, see, e.g., [5, Theore I..20]. By Çöez, Lin, Olsen [3, Theore 2.5], every eleent (a n ) n= of AP(N), and hence of P, is a good weight for the pointwise ergodic theore for Dunford- Schwartz operators. That is, for every Dunford-Schwartz operator T on a probability space (X,µ) and every f L (X,µ), the weighted ergodic averages N N a n T n f n= converge alost everywhere as N. A sequence (a n ) n N C is called linear (cf. [6]), if there exist a Banach space E, an operatort L(E) with relatively weakly copact orbits and y E, y E such that a n = y (T n y) for all n N. Let us call a linear sequence stable if we can choose y E s, and reversible if we can chose y E r. It is easy to see that stable linear sequences all lie in N, whereas reversible linear sequences all lie in P.

5 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS5 We shall later also need properties of polynoial subsequences of linear sequences, and thus a corresponding class of good weights for the pointwise polynoial ergodic theore. Definition 2.2. Given p < and a subsequence (n s ) s N of N, the class B p,(ns) s N of p,(n s ) s N -Besicovitch sequences is the closure of the trigonoetric polynoials in the p,(n s ) s N sei-nor defined by (a n ) n N p p,(n s) s N = lisup N N a ns p. By [2, Th. 2.], the set of bounded sequences in these classes is independent of the choice of p, i.e., B,(ns) s N l = B p,(ns) s N l for all p (, ). Note that the seinor defined above is trivially doinated by the l nor, and hence P B,(ns) s N l for any subsequence (n s ) s N of N. The closedness of P under ultiplication thus yields the following lea. Lea 2.. Let (a n;j ) n N be a reversible linear sequence for each j t. Then (b n ) n N defined by b n := t j= a n;j lies in B,(ns) s N l for any subsequence (n s ) s N of N. The essential property of eleents of B,(ns) s N l is given by the following theore. Theore 2.2. (cf. [3, Theore 2.]) Let T be a Dunford-Schwartz operator on a standard probability space (X,µ), p <, and q(x) a polynoial with integer coefficients taking positive values on N. Then for any f L p (X,µ) and (b n ) n N B,(q(n))n N l the liit exists alost surely. li N N b q(n) T q(n) f n= Finally, we need inforation about the sequences (λ ;n ) along polynoial indices. Recall that an operator is alost weakly stable if the stable part of the Jacobs-Glicksberg-deLeeuw decoposition is the whole space. Proposition 2.3 (cf. [8] Th..). Let T be an alost weakly stable contraction on a Hilbert space H. Then T is alost weakly polynoial stable, i.e., for any h H and non-constant polynoial q with integer coefficients taking positive values on N, the sequence {T q(j) h} j= is alost weakly stable. As a consequence we obtain the following result. Corollary 2.4. Let T be a Dunford-Schwartz operator on the standard probability space (X,µ), q a non-constant polynoial with integer coefficients taking positive values on N and A an arbitrary operator on L 2 (X,µ). Then for any g,ϕ L 2 (X,µ) with g in the stable part of L 2 (X,µ) with respect to T, we have that the sequence AT q(n) g,ϕ is bounded and lies in N. n=

6 6 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS 3. Proof of Theore. We shall proceed by successive splitting and reduction. For each operator T i, starting fro T 2, we split the functions it is applied to into several ters using condition (A). Most of the obtained ters can be easily dealt with, but for the reaining difficult ters, we ove on to T i+, up to and including T. We first prove part (), and then use this result to coplete the proof for part (2). In what follows, we shall assue without loss of generality that for the constant in Theore., we have C. Given a function f E ;s, and an ε (0,), do the following. (I) First, set d = 0, c := εc and let I 0 consist of the epty index. (II) By assuption (A), for each f v (v I d ) we ay find a decoposition E = U v R v with l v := diu v < and P Rv A d+,fv B cv (0,L (X,µ)). For each v I d, choose a axial linearly independent set f v;,...,f v;lv in U v. We can then for each n N write the unique decoposition A d+ T n d+f v = λ v,;n f v, +...+λ v,lv;nf v,lv +r v;n, for appropriate coefficients λ v,j;n C and soe reainder ter r v,n R v with r v;n < c v. Choose further eleents ϕ v;,...,ϕ v;lv E with the property ϕ v;i (f v,j ) = δ i,j and ϕ v;i Rv = 0 for every i,j {,...,l v }. Set (III) Let u v := f v A d+ ax j l v ϕ v;j. I d+ := { w N d+ w I d, w l w }. Also, for each w I d+, let c w := c w /u w l w. (IV) Increase d by, and unless d =, start anew fro step (II). (V) For each w I, choose the function f w L such that f w f w f w f w p < c w ε/ I. Proof of (). Applying the above splitting procedure to f E ;s, we ay bound our original

7 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS7 Cesàro averages by a finite su of averages. For a.e. z X we have A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f (z) v I + w I l(w),0 l(w)< v I + v I + T n α() f v (z) C 2 w I l(w),0 l(w)< C fv (z) λx;nα(l(x)) rw;nα(l(w)+) (z) λx;nα(l(x)) (f v f v ) (z) c w λx;nα(l(x)) λx;nα(l(x)). λx;nα(l(x)) We shall bound each of these three sus separately. Note that by the definition of the linear fors, we have for each v I l(v) ( l(v) ) λ v;n = ϕ v;v (A l(v) T n l(v) f v) = (A l(v) ϕ v;v )(T n l(v) f v), and hence λ v;n f v A l(v) ax ϕ v;j = u v, j l v but also, since f E ;s, we have (λ j;n ) n N N for each j l. Using that N is closed under ultiplication by bounded sequences, on the one hand we obtain that C li λx;nα(l(x)) = c w w I l(w),0 l(w)< w I l(w),0 l(w)< C c w =C w I 0 c w = C c = ε. li λx;nα(l(x)) On the other hand, also using that f v is essentially bounded for each v I and that T as a Dunford-Schwartz operator is a contraction on L, we obtain that li v I fv (z) λx;nα(l(x)) = 0 for alost every z X. Thus only the iddle su reains to be bounded. To treat that ter, we shall ake use of the Pointwise Ergodic Theore for Dunford-Schwartz operators. Since the odulus of a DS operator is itself DS, we ay apply the PET to T and

8 8 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS the functions f v f v to obtain that for each v I, there exists a function 0 f v L with f v f v f v and a set S v with µ(s v ) = such that N li T n (f v N f v ) (z) = f v (z) n= for all z S v. Note that by the nor bound in step (V), there then exists a set S v S v with µ(s v ) > ε/ I such that N li T n (f v N f v ) (z) c w n= for all z S v. We obtain that for every z v I S v we have li sup (f v f ) (z) v v I li v I v I c v ( T n α() u x = εc ε. f v f v )(z) λx;nα(l(x)) In total, we obtain that for every ε > 0, we have li sup n T α() A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f (z) < ε for all z v I S v. Since µ( v I S v ) > I ε/ I = ε, letting ε 0 concludes our proof of Part (). We now turn our attention to Part (2), and show a.e. convergence of the averages also on the reversible part E ;r with respect to the operator T. Again we shall proceed by iterated splitting of the function, but part () will also be ade use of. Given a function f E ;r, and an ε > 0, do the following. (i) First, set d = 0, c := εc and let I 0 consist of the epty index. (ii) By assuption (A), for each f v (v I d ) we ay find a decoposition E = U v R v with l v := diu v < and P Rv A d+,fv B cv (0,L (X,µ)). For each v I d, choose a axial linearly independent set g v,,...,g v,lv in U v. We can then for each n N write the unique decoposition A d+ T n d+f v = λ v,;n g v, +...+λ v,lv;ng v,lv +r v;n, for appropriate coefficients λ v,j;n C and soe reainder ter r v,n R v with r v;n < c v. Choose further eleents ϕ v;,...,ϕ v;lv E with the property ϕ v;i (g v,j ) = δ i,j and ϕ v;i Rv = 0 for every i,j {,...,l v }. Set u v := f v A d+ ax j l v ϕ v;j. u x

9 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS9 (iii) For each v I d and j l v, let f v,j := P Ed+2;r g v,j be the reversible part of g v,j with respect to T d+2, and let q v,j := g v,j f v,j be its stable part. (iv) Let I d+ := { w N d+ w I d, w l w }. Also, for each w I d+, let c w := c w /u w l w. (v) Increase d by, and unless d =, start anew fro step (II). Proof of (2) Let us apply the iterated decoposition (i) (vi) detailed above to the function f E ;r. We obtain that = v I + A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f w I l(w),0<l(w)< g v A T n α( )...A l(w)+ T n α(l(w)+) l(w)+ q w + w I l(w),0 l(w)< A T n α( )...A l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+). First, let us look at the ters involving the q w -s. For each w I l(w) with 0 < l(w) <, we note that the products l(x)>0,x w λ x;n α(l(x)) are bounded in absolute value by the constant l(x)>0,x w u x, and using part () with the new value := l(w) >, we obtain for each w that li sup u x li A T n α( )...A l(w)+ T n α(l(w)+) l(w)+ q w A T n α( ) (z)...a l(w)+ T n α(l(w)+) l(w)+ q w (z) = 0 for alost every z X. Since there are finitely any different q w ters, they contribute a total of 0 to the Cesàro eans on a set of full easure. Second, let us look at the ters involving the r w; -s. Note that since we work on the reversible part and lack a coefficient sequence λ in N, we cannot conclude the sae way as in part (). Let us therefore fix w I l(w) with 0 l(w) <.

10 0 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS We then have using (A2) that A T n α( )...A l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+) Tnα() C l(w) 2 rw;nα(l(w)+) This in turn iplies that for every N < w I l(w),0 l(w)< u x < C c w x = ε l(x)>0,x wu x w A T n α( )...A l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+) w I l(w),0 l(w)< Tnα() A T n α( ) w I l(w),0 l(w)< ε x w...a l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+) 2 = ε l x d= w I d x w 2 = ε l x d= l x. = ε( 2). It only reains to estiate the ters involving the functions g v (v I ). We have g v = n j N ( j k,j α()) N N n= l(x)>0, α(l(x))=α(), x v l(x)>0, α(l(x)) α(), x v λ x;n Tg n v. We shall show that as N tends to infinity, the first, coplex valued factor is convergent, whereas the second, function valued factor converges alost everywhere. This will then iply that the product also converges alost everywhere. Let us fix v I. We obtain for each x v with l(x) > 0 that ( ) λ x;n = ϕ x;x A l(x) Tl(x) n f x = A l(x) ϕ x;x,t n l(x) f x

11 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS and since f x is in the reversible part of E with respect to T l(x), the sequence (λ x;n ) n N is a reversible linear sequence. Using that P is closed under ultiplication, we have that for each j λ x;n l(x)>0, α(l(x))=j, x v n N P. In particular, for each v I, the Cesàro eans n j N ( j k,j α()) l(x)>0, α(l(x)) α(), x v converge. Finally, let us turn our attention to the factor N N n= l(x)>0, α(l(x))=α(), x v λ x;n T n g v. Since eleents of P are good weights for the PET for Dunford-Schwartz operators, this converges poinwise alost everywhere.

12 2 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS In conclusion, for alost every z X we have (li sup liinf ) ( n T α() A T n α( )...A 2 T n α(2) 2 A T n α() f ) (z) + + (lisup v I w I l(w),0<l(w)< ( liinf ) A T n α( ) w I l(w),0 l(w)< ( =0+0+ ( 2 sup N N A T n α( ) (li sup (li sup liinf )...A l(w)+ T n α(l(w)+) l(w)+ q w )(z) w I l(w),0 l(w)< A T n α( ) w I l(w),0 l(w)< liinf ) ( T n ) α() g v (z)...a l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+) )(z) (li sup liinf )...A l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+) )(z) A T n α( )...A l(w)+2 T n α(l(w)+2) l(w)+2 r w;nα(l(w)+) 2ε( 2). Since this holds for every ε > 0, this concludes the proof of part (2). Reark. The pointwise liit is if it exists clearly the sae as the stong liit, and takes the for given in [8, Th. 3]. 4. Pointwise polynoial ergodic version In this section our goal is to prove a polynoial version of Theore.. With these tools in hand, we can now state and prove alost everywhere pointwise convergence of entangled eans on Hilbert spaces. Theore 4.. Let > and k be positive integers, α : {,...,} {,...,k} a not necessarily surjective ap, and T,T 2,...,T Dunford-Schwartz operators on a standard probability space (X,µ). Let E := L 2 (X,µ) and let E = E j,r E j,s be the Jacobs-Glicksberg-deLeeuw decoposition corresponding to T j ( j ). Let further A j L(E) ( j < ) be bounded operators. Suppose that the conditions (A) and (A2) of Theore. hold.

13 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS 3 Further, let q,q 2,...,q k be non-constant polynoials with integer coefficients taking positive values on N. Then we have the following: () for each f E,s, T q α()(n α() )...A 2 T q α(2)(n α(2) ) 2 A T q α()(n α() ) pointwise a.e.; (2) for each f E,r, the averages f T q α()(n α() )...A 2 T q α(2)(n α(2) ) 2 A T q α()(n α() ) f converge pointwise alost everywhere. 0 Proof. We shall follow the proof of Theore., using the sae recursive splitting. The question is then why the convergences still hold when averaging along polynoial subsequences. For part (), we have three ters to bound: those involving the reainder functions r ;n, the ones involving the essentially bounded functions f, and finally the ones with the sall approxiation errors f f. Using Corollary 2.4, we obtain that the subsequences λ j;q(n) involved ( j l) also lie in N, leading to the sae bounds as in the linear case for the first two types of ters. For the ters involving the functions f f, we use the polynoial version of PET for Dunford- Schwartz operators, Theore 2.2, to obtain that for each v I, there exists a function 0 f v L and a set S v with µ(s v ) = such that li N N T q(n) (f v f v ) (z) = f v (z). n= for all z S v. Since the polynoial Cesàro eans are also contractive in L for Dunford-Schwartz operators, the rest of the arguents reain unchanged, and this concludes the proof of part (). For part (2), we again have three types of ters. The ters involving the functions q can again be treated using part () and shown to have a zero contribution alost everywhere, and the ters with the r ;n -s also do not require any change in the arguents used. Only the ters involving the functions g v (v I ) reain. For these, we use Lea 2. cobined with Theore 2.2 to obtain the alost everywhere convergence needed. 5. The continuous case In this section, we finally turn our attention to a variant of the above results, where we replace the discrete action of the Dunford-Schwartz operators with the continuous action C 0 -seigroups. In other words, the seigroups {Ti n n N+ } are replaced by strongly continuous seigroups {T i (t) t [0, )}.

14 4 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS Let T( ) := (T(t)) t [0, ) be a C 0 -seigroup of Dunford-Schwartz operators on L (X,µ). Then, by the standard approxiation arguent, using that the unit ball in L (X,µ) is invariant under the seigroup, T( ) is autoatically a C 0 - seigroup (of contractions) on L p (X,µ) for every > p. In addition, by Fubini s theore, see, e.g., Sato [24, p. 3], for every f L (X,µ) the function (T( )f)(x) is Lebesgue integrable over finite intervals in [0, ) for alost every x X. Siilarly, for C 0 -seigroups T 0 ( ),...,T a ( ) on E := L p (X,µ), operators A 0,...,A a L(E) and f E, the product (T a ( )A a T a ( )...A T ( )A 0 T 0 ( )f)(x) is Lebesgue integrable over finite intervals in [0, ) for alost every x X. By Dunford, Schwartz [4, pp. 694, 708], the pointwise ergodic theore extends to every strongly easurable seigroup T( ) of Dunford-Schwartz operators. In addition, it can be shown through a siple adaptation of the arguents in Lin, Olsen, Tepelan [22, Proof of Prop. 2.6] that every C 0 -seigroup of Dunford- Schwartz operators has relatively weakly copact orbits in L (X,µ). Thus, the continuous version of the Jacobs-deLeeuw-Glicksberg decoposition (see e.g. [5, Theore III.5.7]) is valid for such seigroups. In the discrete case, the odulus T of the operator T was used to obtain a discrete seigroup of positive operators that doinates (T n ) n N whilst keeping the Dunford-Schwartz property. The tie-continuous case turns out to be ore involved, as there is no first operator whose odulus can be used to generate the doinating seigroup. Just as in the discrete case, we usually have T 2 = T 2, in thec 0 setting( T(t) ) t 0 will generally not be a strongly continuous seigroup. By e.g. Kipnis [4] or Kubokawa [7], for a C 0 -seigroup T( ) of contractions there exists a inial C 0 -seigroup of positive operators doinating T( ), which we shall denote by T ( ). Of course, T ( ) = T( ) for positive seigroups. Moreover, the construction in [4, pp ] iplies that if T( ) consists of Dunford-Schwartz operators then so does T ( ). With the above, the proof of Theore. can be extended to the tie-continuous setting to obtain the following C 0 version of our ain theore. Theore 5.. Let > and k be positive integers, α : {,...,} {,...,k} a not necessarily surjective ap and let (T (t)) t 0,...,(T (t)) t 0 be C 0 -seigroups of Dunford-Schwartz operators on a standard probability space (X, µ). Let p [, ), E := L p (X,µ) and let E = E j,r E j,s be the Jacobs-Glicksberg-deLeeuw decoposition corresponding to T j ( ) ( j ). Let further A j L(E) ( j < ) be bounded operators. For a function f E and an index j, write A j,f := {A j T j (t)f t [0, )}. Suppose that the following conditions hold: (Ac) (Twisted copactness) For any function f E, index j and ε > 0, there exists a decoposition E = U R with diu < such that P R A j,f B ε (0,L (X,µ)), with P R denoting the projection onto R along U. (A2c) (Joint L -boundedness) There exists a constant C > 0 such that we have {A j T j (t) t [0, ), j } B C (0,L(L (X,µ)).

15 POINTWISE ENTANGLED ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ OPERATORS 5 Then we have the following: () for each f E,s, li T T T k (t α() )...A 2 T 2 (t α(2) )A T (t α() )f 0 {t,...,t k } [0,T ] k pointwise a.e.; (2) for each f E,r, T k T (t α() )A T (t α( ) )...A 2 T 2 (t α(2) )A T (t α() )f {t,...,t k } [0,T] k converges pointwise a.e.. References [] L. Accardi, Yu. Hashioto, N. Obata, Notions of independence related to the free group, Infin. Diens. Anal. Quantu Probab. Relat. Top. (998), [2] A. Bellow, V. Losert, The weighted pointwise ergodic theore and the individual ergodic theore along subsequences, Trans. Aer. Math. Soc. 288 (985), [3] D. Çöez, M. Lin, J. Olsen, Weighted ergodic theores for ean ergodic L -contractions, Trans. Aer. Math. Soc. 350 (998), 0 7. [4] N. Dunford, J. T. Schwartz, Linear Operators. Part I. General theory. With the assistance of Willia G. Bade and Robert G. Bartle. Reprint of the 958 original. Wiley Classics Library. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 988. [5] T. Eisner, Stability of Operators and Operator Seigroups, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 209, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 200. [6] T. Eisner, Linear sequences and weighted ergodic theores Abstr. Appl. Anal., (203), Art. ID [7] T. Eisner, B. Farkas, M. Haase, R. Nagel, Operator Theoretic Aspects of Ergodic Theory, Graduate Texts in Matheatics 272, Springer, Cha, 205. [8] T. Eisner, D. Kunszenti-Kovács, On the entangled ergodic theore, Ann. Scuola Nor. Sup. di Pisa Cl. Sci. XII (203), [9] T. Eisner, D. Kunszenti-Kovács, On the pointwise entangled ergodic theore, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 449 (207), [0] F. Fidaleo, On the entangled ergodic theore, Infin. Diens. Anal. Quantu Probab. Relat. Top. 0 (2007), [] F. Fidaleo, The entangled ergodic theore in the alost periodic case, Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (200), [2] F. Fidaleo, Nonconventional ergodic theores for quantu dynaical systes, Infin. Diens. Anal. Quantu Probab. Relat. Top. 7 (204), DOI:0.42/S X [3] R. L. Jones, M. Lin and J. Olsen, Weighted Ergodic Theores Along Subsequences of Density Zero, New York J. Math. 3A (998), [4] C. Kipnis, Majoration des sei-groupes de contractions de L et applications. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 0 (974), [5] I. Kornfeld, M. Lin, Weak alost periodicity of L contractions and coboundaries of nonsingular transforations, Studia Math. 38 (2000), [6] U. Krengel, Ergodic Theores. De Gruyter Studies in Matheatics, de Gruyter, Berlin, 985. [7] Y. Kubokawa, Ergodic theores for contraction sei-groups, J. Math. Soc. Japan 77 (975), [8] D. Kunszenti-Kovács, Alost weak polynoial stability of operators, Houston J. Math. 4 (205), [9] D. Kunszenti-Kovács, Alost Everywhere Convergence of Entangled Ergodic Averages, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 86:(2) (206), DOI 0.007/s

16 6 DÁVID KUNSZENTI-KOVÁCS [20] V. Liebscher, Note on entangled ergodic theores, Infin. Diens. Anal. Quantu Probab. Relat. Top. 2 (999), [2] M. Lin and J. Olsen, Besicovitch functions and weigthted ergodic theores for LCA group actions, Convergence in Ergodic Theory and Probability (Bergelson, March and Rosenblatt, eds.), de Gruyter, Berlin, 996, [22] M. Lin, J. Olsen, A. Tepelan, On odulated ergodic theores for Dunford-Schwartz operators, Proceedings of the Conference on Probability, Ergodic Theory, and Analysis (Evanston, IL, 997), Illinois J. Math. 43 (999), [23] K. Petersen, Ergodic Theory, Cabridge Studies in Advanced Matheatics, Cabridge University Press, 983. [24] R. Sato, Ergodic Theores for d-paraeter seigroups of Dunford-Schwartz operators, Math. J. Okayaa Univ. 23 (98), MTA Alfréd Rényi Institute of Matheatics, P.O. Box 27, H-364 Budapest, Hungary E-ail address: daku@renyi.hu