# Geometric Multigrid Methods

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 Geometric Multigrid Methods Susanne C. Brenner Department of Mathematics and Center for Computation & Technology Louisiana State University IMA Tutorial: Fast Solution Techniques November 28, 2010

2 Ideas Outline Set-Up Multigrid Algorithms Smoothing and Approximation Convergence of W-Cycle Convergence of V-Cycle Multiplicative Theory Additive Theory Other Algorithms

3 General References 1 W. Hacbusch Multi-grid Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, J.H. Bramble Multigrid Methods, Longman Scientific & Technical, J.H. Bramble and X. Zhang The Analysis of Multigrid Methods, in Handboo of Numerical Analysis VII, North-Holland, U. Trottenberg, C. Oosterlee and A. Schüller Multigrid, Academic Press, 2001.

4 Let A be a SPD matrix. Suppose we solve Ideas (L) Ax = b by an iterative method (Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, etc.).

5 Let A be a SPD matrix. Suppose we solve Ideas (L) Ax = b by an iterative method (Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, etc.). After m iterations (starting with some initial guess), we obtain an approximate solution x m. Then the error e m = x x m satisfies the residual equation (RE) Ae m = r m where r m = b Ax m is the (computable) residual.

6 Let A be a SPD matrix. Suppose we solve Ideas (L) Ax = b by an iterative method (Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, etc.). After m iterations (starting with some initial guess), we obtain an approximate solution x m. Then the error e m = x x m satisfies the residual equation (RE) Ae m = r m where r m = b Ax m is the (computable) residual. If we can solve (RE) exactly, then we can recover the exact solution of (L) by the relation (C) x = x m + (x x m ) = x m + e m

7 Ideas In reality, we will only solve (RE) approximately to obtain an approximation e m of e m. Then, hopefully, the correction (C ) x = x m + e m will give a better approximation of x.

8 Ideas In reality, we will only solve (RE) approximately to obtain an approximation e m of e m. Then, hopefully, the correction (C ) x = x m + e m will give a better approximation of x. In the context of finite element equations (FE h ) A h x h = f h there is a natural way to carry out this idea.

9 Ideas In reality, we will only solve (RE) approximately to obtain an approximation e m of e m. Then, hopefully, the correction (C ) x = x m + e m will give a better approximation of x. In the context of finite element equations (FE h ) A h x h = f h there is a natural way to carry out this idea. Smoothing Step Apply m iterations of a classical iterative method to obtain an approximation x m,h of x h and the corresponding residual equation e m,h = x h x m,h, (RE h ) r m,h = f h A hx m,h A h e m,h = r m,h

10 Ideas Correction Step Instead of solving (RE h ), we solve a related equation on a coarser grid T 2h (assuming that T h is obtained from T 2h by uniform refinement). (RE 2h ) A 2h e 2h = r 2h r 2h = projection of r h,m onto the coarse grid space A 2h = stiffness matrix for the coarse grid

11 Ideas Correction Step Instead of solving (RE h ), we solve a related equation on a coarser grid T 2h (assuming that T h is obtained from T 2h by uniform refinement). (RE 2h ) A 2h e 2h = r 2h r 2h = projection of r h,m onto the coarse grid space A 2h = stiffness matrix for the coarse grid We then use a transfer operator I h 2h to move e 2h to the fine grid T h and obtain the final output x m+1,h = x m,h + I h 2h e 2h This is nown as the two-grid algorithm.

12 Ideas Smoothing steps will damp out the highly oscillatory part of the error so that we can capture e h accurately on the coarser grid by the correction step. Together they produce a good approximate solution of (FE h ).

13 Ideas Smoothing steps will damp out the highly oscillatory part of the error so that we can capture e h accurately on the coarser grid by the correction step. Together they produce a good approximate solution of (FE h ). Moreover, it is cheaper to solve the coarse grid residual equation (RE 2h ).

14 Ideas Smoothing steps will damp out the highly oscillatory part of the error so that we can capture e h accurately on the coarser grid by the correction step. Together they produce a good approximate solution of (FE h ). Moreover, it is cheaper to solve the coarse grid residual equation (RE 2h ). Of course we do not have to solve (RE 2h ) exactly. Instead we can apply the same idea recursively to (RE 2h ). The resulting algorithm is a multigrid algorithm.

15 Set-Up Model Problem Find u H0 1 (Ω) such that a(u, v) = fv dx v H0(Ω) 1 Ω a(w, v) = w v dx Ω

16 Set-Up Model Problem Find u H0 1 (Ω) such that a(u, v) = fv dx v H0(Ω) 1 Ω a(w, v) = Ω w v dx Let T 0 be an initial triangulation of Ω and T ( 1) be obtained from T 1 by a refinement process. V ( 0) is the corresponding finite element space.

17 th Level Finite Element Problem a (u, v) = fv dx Ω Set-Up Find u V such that v V The bilinear form a (, ) is an approximation of the bilinear form a(, ) for the continuous problem. We can tae a (, ) to be a(, ) for conforming finite element methods. But in general a (, ) is a modification of a(, ) according to the choice of the finite element method.

18 th Level Finite Element Problem a (u, v) = fv dx Ω Set-Up Find u V such that v V It can be written as A u = φ where A : V V and φ V are defined by A w, v = a (w, v) v, w V φ, v = fv dx v V Ω

19 th Level Finite Element Problem a (u, v) = fv dx Ω Set-Up Find u V such that v V It can be written as A u = φ Two ey ingredients in defining multigrid algorithms. a good smoother for the equation A z = γ intergrid transfer operators to move functions between consecutive levels

20 Smoothing step for A z = γ (z V, γ V ) Set-Up (S) z new = z old + B 1 (γ A z old ) where B : V V is SPD, ρ(b 1 A ) 1 and B v, v h 2 v 2 L 2 (Ω) v V

21 Smoothing step for A z = γ (z V, γ V ) Set-Up (S) z new = z old + B 1 (γ A z old ) where B : V V is SPD, Example ρ(b 1 A ) 1 and B v, v h 2 v 2 L 2 (Ω) v V (Richardson relaxation scheme) V ( H 1 0 (Ω)) = P 1 Lagrange finite element space B w, v = λ p V w(p)v(p) V = the set of interior vertices of T λ = a (constant) damping factor

22 Intergrid Transfer Operators Set-Up The coarse-to-fine operator I 1 is a linear operator from V 1 to V. The fine-to-coarse operator I 1 : V V 1 is the transpose of I 1, i.e., I 1 α, v = α, I 1 v α V, v V 1

23 Intergrid Transfer Operators Set-Up The coarse-to-fine operator I 1 is a linear operator from V 1 to V. The fine-to-coarse operator I 1 : V V 1 is the transpose of I 1, i.e., Example I 1 α, v = α, I 1 v α V, v V 1 V ( H 1 0 (Ω)) = P 1 Lagrange finite element space V 0 V 1 I 1 = natural injection

24 Multigrid Algorithms V-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG V (, γ, z 0, m)

25 Multigrid Algorithms V-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG V (, γ, z 0, m) For = 0, we solve A 0 z = γ exactly to obtain MG V (0, γ, z 0, m) = A 1 0 γ

26 Multigrid Algorithms V-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG V (, γ, z 0, m) For = 0, we solve A 0 z = γ exactly to obtain MG V (0, γ, z 0, m) = A 1 0 γ For 1, we compute the multigrid output recursively in 3 steps.

27 Multigrid Algorithms V-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG V (, γ, z 0, m) For = 0, we solve A 0 z = γ exactly to obtain MG V (0, γ, z 0, m) = A 1 0 γ For 1, we compute the multigrid output recursively in 3 steps. Pre-smoothing Step For 1 m, compute z = z 1 + B 1 (γ A z 1 )

28 Multigrid Algorithms Correction Step Transfer the residual γ A z m V to the coarse grid using I 1 and solve the coarse-grid residual equation A 1 e 1 = I 1 (γ A z m ) by applying the ( 1) st level algorithm using 0 as the initial guess, i.e., we compute q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) as an approximation to e 1. Then we mae the correction z m+1 = z m + I 1 q

29 Multigrid Algorithms Correction Step Transfer the residual γ A z m V to the coarse grid using I 1 and solve the coarse-grid residual equation A 1 e 1 = I 1 (γ A z m ) by applying the ( 1) st level algorithm using 0 as the initial guess, i.e., we compute q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) as an approximation to e 1. Then we mae the correction z m+1 = z m + I 1 q Post-smoothing Step For m + 2 2m + 1, compute z = z 1 + B 1 (γ A z 1 )

30 Final Output Multigrid Algorithms MG V (, γ, z 0, m) = z 2m+1

31 Multigrid Algorithms Multigrid Algorithms for A z = ψ (z V, ψ V ) C 0 Interior Penalty Methods for Fourth Order Problems Final Output MG V (, γ, z 0, m) = z V-cycle Algorithm p = 1 2m+1 = 3 replacements = 2 = 1 = 0 scheduling Scheduling diagram Diagram for the of the V-cycle V-Cycle algorithm Algorithm Susanne C. Brenner AMIC 2010/6th EASIAM Conference

32 Multigrid Algorithms W-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG W (, γ, z 0, m)

33 Multigrid Algorithms W-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG W (, γ, z 0, m) Correction Step (apply the coarse grid algorithm twice) q = MG W ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) q = MG W ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), q, m)

34 Multigrid Algorithms W-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG W (, γ, z 0, m) C 0 Interior Penalty Methods for Fourth Order Problems Correction Step Multigrid Algorithms (apply the coarse grid algorithm twice) Multigrid Algorithms for A z = ψ (z V, ψ V ) q = MG W ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) W-cycle Algorithm p = 2 q = MG W ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), q, m) = 3 ents = 2 = 1 = 0 scheduling diagram for the W-cycle algorithm Scheduling Diagram of the W-Cycle Algorithm

35 Multigrid Algorithms Operation Count n = dimv (n 4 ) W = number of flops for the th level multigrid algorithm m = number of smoothing steps p = 1 or 2

36 Operation Count n = dimv (n 4 ) Multigrid Algorithms W = number of flops for the th level multigrid algorithm m = number of smoothing steps p = 1 or 2 W C mn + pw 1 C mn + p(c mn 1 ) + p 2 (C mn 2 ) + p 1 (C mn 1 ) + p W 0 C m4 + pc m4 1 + p 2 C m4 2 + p 1 (C m4) + p W 0 = C m4 ( 1 + p 4 + p p 1 ) p W 0 C m4 1 p/4 + p W 0 C 4 + p W 0 C n

37 Error Propagation Operators Multigrid Algorithms Let E : V V be the error propagation operator that maps the initial error z z 0 to the final error z MG V (, γ, z 0, m). We want to develop a recursive relation between E and E 1.

38 Error Propagation Operators Multigrid Algorithms Let E : V V be the error propagation operator that maps the initial error z z 0 to the final error z MG V (, γ, z 0, m). We want to develop a recursive relation between E and E 1. It follows from (S) and A z = γ that z z new = z z old B 1 (γ A z old ) = (Id B 1 A )(z z old ) where Id is the identity operator on V.

39 Error Propagation Operators Multigrid Algorithms Let E : V V be the error propagation operator that maps the initial error z z 0 to the final error z MG V (, γ, z 0, m). We want to develop a recursive relation between E and E 1. It follows from (S) and A z = γ that z z new = z z old B 1 (γ A z old ) = (Id B 1 A )(z z old ) where Id is the identity operator on V. Therefore the effect of one smoothing step is measured by the operator R = Id B 1 A

40 Multigrid Algorithms Let P 1 : V V 1 be the transpose of the coarse-to-fine operator I 1 with respect to the variational forms, i.e. a 1 (P 1 v, w) = a (v, I 1 w) v V, w V 1

41 Multigrid Algorithms Let P 1 : V V 1 be the transpose of the coarse-to-fine operator I 1 with respect to the variational forms, i.e. a 1 (P 1 v, w) = a (v, I 1 w) v V, w V 1 Recall the coarse grid residual equation A 1 e 1 = I 1 (γ A z m )

42 Multigrid Algorithms Let P 1 : V V 1 be the transpose of the coarse-to-fine operator I 1 with respect to the variational forms, i.e. a 1 (P 1 v, w) = a (v, I 1 w) v V, w V 1 Recall the coarse grid residual equation A 1 e 1 = I 1 (γ A z m ) a 1 (e 1, v) = A 1 e 1, v (for any v V ) = I 1 (γ A z m ), v = (γ A z m ), I 1 v = A (z z m ), I 1 v = a (z z m, I 1 v) = a 1(P 1 (z z m ), v)

43 Multigrid Algorithms Let P 1 : V V 1 be the transpose of the coarse-to-fine operator I 1 with respect to the variational forms, i.e. a 1 (P 1 v, w) = a (v, I 1 w) v V, w V 1 Recall the coarse grid residual equation A 1 e 1 = I 1 (γ A z m ) a 1 (e 1, v) = A 1 e 1, v (for any v V ) = I 1 (γ A z m ), v = (γ A z m ), I 1 v = A (z z m ), I 1 v = a (z z m, I 1 v) = a 1(P 1 (z z m ), v)

44 Multigrid Algorithms e 1 = P 1 (z z m )

45 Multigrid Algorithms e 1 = P 1 (z z m ) Recall q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) is the approximate solution of the coarse grid residual equation obtained by using the ( 1) st level V-cycle algorithm with initial guess 0.

46 Multigrid Algorithms e 1 = P 1 (z z m ) Recall q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) is the approximate solution of the coarse grid residual equation obtained by using the ( 1) st level V-cycle algorithm with initial guess 0. e 1 q = E 1 (e 1 0) = q = (Id 1 E 1 )e 1

47 Multigrid Algorithms e 1 = P 1 (z z m ) Recall q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) is the approximate solution of the coarse grid residual equation obtained by using the ( 1) st level V-cycle algorithm with initial guess 0. e 1 q = E 1 (e 1 0) = q = (Id 1 E 1 )e 1 z z m+1 = z (z m + I 1 q) = z z m I 1 (Id 1 E 1 )e 1 = z z m I 1 (Id 1 E 1 )P 1 (z z m ) = (Id I 1 P 1 + I 1 E 1P 1 )(z z m ) = (Id I 1 P 1 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m (z z 0)

48 Multigrid Algorithms z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) = z z 2m+1 = R m (z z m+1) = R m (Id I 1 P 1 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m (z z 0)

49 Multigrid Algorithms z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) = z z 2m+1 = R m (z z m+1) = R m (Id I 1 P 1 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m (z z 0)

50 Multigrid Algorithms z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) = z z 2m+1 = R m (z z m+1) = R m (Id I 1 P 1 Recursive Relation for V-Cycle E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m (z z 0) + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m

51 Multigrid Algorithms z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) = z z 2m+1 = R m (z z m+1) = R m (Id I 1 P 1 Recursive Relation for V-Cycle E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 Recursive Relation for W-Cycle E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m (z z 0) + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m + I 1 E2 1P 1 )R m

52 Smoothing and Approximation It is clear from the recursive relation E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 that we need to understand the operators + I 1 Ep 1 P 1 )R m R m and Id I 1 P 1

53 Smoothing and Approximation It is clear from the recursive relation E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 that we need to understand the operators + I 1 Ep 1 P 1 )R m R m and Id I 1 P 1 The effect of R m is measured by the smoothing property while the effect of Id I 1 P 1 is measured by the approximation property. These properties involve certain mesh dependent norms.

54 Smoothing and Approximation It is clear from the recursive relation E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 that we need to understand the operators + I 1 Ep 1 P 1 )R m R m and Id I 1 P 1 The effect of R m is measured by the smoothing property while the effect of Id I 1 P 1 is measured by the approximation property. These properties involve certain mesh dependent norms. Let the inner product (, ) on V be defined by (v, w) = h 2 B v, w Then the operator B 1 A : V V is SPD with respect to (, ).

55 Mesh-Dependent Norms v t, = h t Smoothing and Approximation ((B 1 A ) t v, v) v V, t R

56 Mesh-Dependent Norms In particular v t, = h t v 0, = (v, v) = v 1, = h 1 = Smoothing and Approximation ((B 1 B (B 1 ((B 1 A ) t v, v) v V, t R h 2 B v, v v L2 (Ω) A )v, v) A )v, v = A v, v = a (v, v) = v a

57 Mesh-Dependent Norms In particular v t, = h t v 0, = (v, v) = v 1, = h 1 = Smoothing and Approximation ((B 1 B (B 1 ((B 1 A ) t v, v) v V, t R h 2 B v, v v L2 (Ω) A )v, v) A )v, v = A v, v = a (v, v) = v a ρ(b 1 A ) 1 = R v t, v t,

58 Mesh-Dependent Norms In particular v t, = h t v 0, = (v, v) = v 1, = h 1 = Smoothing and Approximation ((B 1 B (B 1 ((B 1 A ) t v, v) v V, t R h 2 B v, v v L2 (Ω) A )v, v) Generalized Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality A )v, v = A v, v = a (v, v) = v a a (v, w) v 1+t, v 1 t, t R

59 Duality Smoothing and Approximation v 1+t, = a (v, w) max w V \{0} w 1 t, v V, t R

60 Duality Smoothing and Approximation v 1+t, = a (v, w) max w V \{0} w 1 t, v V, t R Smoothing Property For 0 s t 2 and, m = 1, 2,..., R m v s, Cm (t s) 2 h s t v t, v V

61 Duality Smoothing and Approximation v 1+t, = a (v, w) max w V \{0} w 1 t, v V, t R Smoothing Property For 0 s t 2 and, m = 1, 2,..., The proof is based on R m v s, Cm (t s) 2 h s t v t, v V Spectral Theorem ρ(b 1 A ) 1 calculus

62 Approximation Property Smoothing and Approximation There exists α ( 1 2, 1] such that (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1 α, Ch 2α v 1+α, v V, = 1, 2,... (The index α is related to elliptic regularity.)

63 Approximation Property Smoothing and Approximation There exists α ( 1 2, 1] such that (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1 α, Ch 2α v 1+α, v V, = 1, 2,... (The index α is related to elliptic regularity.) The proof is based on elliptic regularity duality arguments relations between the mesh dependent norms s, and the Sobolev norms H s (Ω)

64 Smoothing and Approximation Example (convex Ω) V ( H0 1(Ω)) = Lagrange P 1 finite element space a (w, v) = w v dx = a(w, v) Ω V 0 V 1, I 1 : V 1 V is the natural injection B w, v = λ p V w(p)v(p) v V

65 Smoothing and Approximation Example (convex Ω) V ( H0 1(Ω)) = Lagrange P 1 finite element space a (w, v) = w v dx = a(w, v) Ω V 0 V 1, I 1 : V 1 V is the natural injection B w, v = λ p V w(p)v(p) v V v 0, = ( h 2 B ) 1/2 v, v = λh 2 v 2 (p) v L2 (Ω) v V p V v 1, = v a = v H 1 (Ω) v V

66 The operator P 1 Smoothing and Approximation : V V 1 satisfies a(p 1 v, w) = a(v, I 1 w) = a(v, w) v V, w V 1 a((id I 1 P 1 )v, w) = a(v P 1 v, w) = 0 v V, w V 1

67 The operator P 1 Smoothing and Approximation : V V 1 satisfies a(p 1 v, w) = a(v, I 1 w) = a(v, w) v V, w V 1 a((id I 1 P 1 )v, w) = a(v P 1 v, w) = 0 v V, w V 1 Duality Argument Let v V be arbitrary and ζ H0 1 (Ω) satisfy a(w, ζ) = w(id I 1 P 1 )v dx w H0(Ω) 1 Ω i.e., ζ is the solution of the boundary value problem ζ = (Id I 1 P 1 )v in Ω and ζ = 0 on Ω

68 Since Ω is convex, ζ H 2 (Ω) and Smoothing and Approximation ζ H 2 (Ω) C Ω (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω)

69 Since Ω is convex, ζ H 2 (Ω) and Smoothing and Approximation ζ H 2 (Ω) C Ω (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v 2 L 2 (Ω) = a((id I 1 P 1 )v, ζ) = a((id I 1 P 1 )v, ζ Π 1 ζ) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω) ζ Π 1 ζ H 1 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)(Ch ζ H 2 (Ω)) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)(Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω))

70 Since Ω is convex, ζ H 2 (Ω) and Smoothing and Approximation ζ H 2 (Ω) C Ω (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v 2 L 2 (Ω) = a((id I 1 P 1 )v, ζ) = a((id I 1 P 1 )v, ζ Π 1 ζ) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω) ζ Π 1 ζ H 1 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)(Ch ζ H 2 (Ω)) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)(Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω)) (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω) Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)

71 Since Ω is convex, ζ H 2 (Ω) and Smoothing and Approximation ζ H 2 (Ω) C Ω (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v 2 L 2 (Ω) = a((id I 1 P 1 )v, ζ) = a((id I 1 P 1 )v, ζ Π 1 ζ) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω) ζ Π 1 ζ H 1 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)(Ch ζ H 2 (Ω)) (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω)(Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω)) (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω) Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω) (Id I 1 P 1 )v 0, (Id I 1 P 1 )v L2 (Ω) Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v H 1 (Ω) = Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1,

72 In particular Smoothing and Approximation (Id I 1 P 1 )v 0, Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, Ch v 1,

73 Smoothing and Approximation In particular (Id I 1 P 1 )v 0, Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, Ch v 1, Duality (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, = max w V \{0} = max w V \{0} a(v, (Id I 1 P 1 )w) w 1, a(id I 1 P 1 )v, w) w 1, v 2, (Id I 1 max P 1 )w 0, Ch v 2, w V \{0} w 1,

74 Smoothing and Approximation In particular (Id I 1 P 1 )v 0, Ch (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, Ch v 1, Duality (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, = max w V \{0} = max w V \{0} a(v, (Id I 1 P 1 )w) w 1, a(id I 1 P 1 )v, w) w 1, v 2, (Id I 1 max P 1 )w 0, Ch v 2, w V \{0} w 1, Approximation Property with α = 1 (Id I 1 P 1 )v 0, Ch 2 v 2, v V

75 Two-Grid Analysis E TG W-Cycle Convergence = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m

76 Two-Grid Analysis E TG W-Cycle Convergence = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m E TG v 1, = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m v 1, Cm α 2 h α Cm α 2 h α Cm α 2 h α (Id I 1 P 1 )R m v 1 α, h 2α R m v 1+α, h 2α m α 2 h α v 1, = C m α v 1,

77 Two-Grid Analysis E TG W-Cycle Convergence = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m E TG v 1, = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m v 1, Cm α 2 h α Cm α 2 h α Cm α 2 h α (Id I 1 P 1 )R m v 1 α, h 2α R m v 1+α, h 2α m α 2 h α v 1, = C m α v 1, The convergence of the W-cycle algorithm can then be established by a perturbation argument under the condition I 1 v 1, C v 1, 1 v V 1, = 1, 2,... which implies by duality P 1 v 1, 1 C v 1, v V, = 1, 2,...

78 Suppose for some δ > 0 we have W-Cycle Convergence E 1 v 1, 1 δ v 1, 1 v V 1

79 Suppose for some δ > 0 we have W-Cycle Convergence E 1 v 1, 1 δ v 1, 1 v V 1 E v 1, = R m (Id I 1 P 1 + I 1 E2 1P 1 )R m v 1, R m (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, + R m I 1 E2 1P 1 R m v 1, C m α v 1, + C E 1P 2 1 R m v 1, C m α v 1, + C δ 2 P 1 R m v 1, C m α v 1, + C 2 δ2 v 1, = (C m α + C 2 δ2 ) v 1,

80 Suppose for some δ > 0 we have W-Cycle Convergence E 1 v 1, 1 δ v 1, 1 v V 1 E v 1, = R m (Id I 1 P 1 + I 1 E2 1P 1 )R m v 1, R m (Id I 1 P 1 )v 1, + R m I 1 E2 1P 1 R m v 1, C m α v 1, + C E 1P 2 1 R m v 1, C m α v 1, + C δ 2 P 1 R m v 1, C m α v 1, + C 2 δ2 v 1, = (C m α + C 2 δ2 ) v 1, E v 1, δ v 1, v V provided ( ) (C m α + C 2 δ2 ) = δ

81 W-Cycle Convergence Solving ( ) we find ( ) δ = 1 1 4C 2 C m α /(2C 2 ) < 1 provided ( ) 4C 2 C m α < 1

82 W-Cycle Convergence Solving ( ) we find ( ) δ = 1 1 4C 2 C m α /(2C 2 ) < 1 provided ( ) 4C 2 C m α < 1 Therefore, by mathematical induction E v 1, δ v 1, for 1 and the W-cycle algorithm is a contraction under the condition ( ). Moreover δ C m α as m

83 W-Cycle Convergence Theorem The W-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number independent of the grid levels, provided the number m of smoothing steps is greater than a number m that is also independent of the grid levels.

84 W-Cycle Convergence Theorem The W-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number independent of the grid levels, provided the number m of smoothing steps is greater than a number m that is also independent of the grid levels. The convergence analysis of W-cycle is based on the wor of Ban and Dupont (originally for conforming methods). It is a robust approach that wors for problems without full elliptic regularity (α < 1) and also for nonconforming methods.

85 W-Cycle Convergence Theorem The W-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number independent of the grid levels, provided the number m of smoothing steps is greater than a number m that is also independent of the grid levels. The convergence analysis of W-cycle is based on the wor of Ban and Dupont (originally for conforming methods). It is a robust approach that wors for problems without full elliptic regularity (α < 1) and also for nonconforming methods. References 1 R.E. Ban and T.F. Dupont An optimal order process for solving finite element equations, Math. Comp., B., Convergence of nonconforming multigrid methods without full elliptic regularity, Math. Comp., 1999.

86 W-Cycle Convergence Theorem The W-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number independent of the grid levels, provided the number m of smoothing steps is greater than a number m that is also independent of the grid levels. The convergence analysis of W-cycle is based on the wor of Ban and Dupont (originally for conforming methods). It is a robust approach that wors for problems without full elliptic regularity (α < 1) and also for nonconforming methods. Remar For conforming finite element methods with nested finite element spaces, the W-cycle algorithm is a contraction for m = 1. This result can be deduced from the corresponding result for the V-cycle algorithm.

87 Model Problem V-Cycle Convergence Poisson problem on a polygonal domain discretized by a conforming Lagrange finite element method.

88 Model Problem V-Cycle Convergence Poisson problem on a polygonal domain discretized by a conforming Lagrange finite element method. With Full Elliptic Regularity (Ω convex) u H 2 (Ω) C Ω f L2 (Ω) 1983 Braess-Hacbusch z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a C C + m z z 0 a for m, 1, where C is independent of m and. In particular, the V-cycle is a contraction with only one smoothing step.

89 V-Cycle Convergence Without Full Elliptic Regularity (Ω nonconvex) u H 1+α (Ω) C Ω f L2 (Ω) for 1 2 < α < 1

90 Without Full Elliptic Regularity for 1 2 < α < Bramble-Pascia V-Cycle Convergence (Ω nonconvex) u H 1+α (Ω) C Ω f L2 (Ω) 1988 Decer-Mandel-Parter ( 1 ) z MG V (, γ, z 0, 1) a 1 C (1 α)/α z z 0 a for 1

91 Without Full Elliptic Regularity for 1 2 < α < Bramble-Pascia V-Cycle Convergence (Ω nonconvex) u H 1+α (Ω) C Ω f L2 (Ω) 1988 Decer-Mandel-Parter ( 1 ) z MG V (, γ, z 0, 1) a 1 C (1 α)/α z z 0 a for Bramble-Pascia-Wang-Xu (no regularity assumption) z MG V (, γ, z 0, 1) a ( 1 1 ) z z 0 a for 1 C

92 1992 Zhang, Xu 1993 Bramble-Pascia There exists δ (0, 1) such that V-Cycle Convergence z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a δ z z 0 a for m, 1. In particular, the V-cycle is a contraction with one smoothing step.

93 1992 Zhang, Xu 1993 Bramble-Pascia There exists δ (0, 1) such that V-Cycle Convergence z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a δ z z 0 a for m, 1. In particular, the V-cycle is a contraction with one smoothing step. Braess-Hacbusch z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a C C + m z z 0 a for m, 1, where C is independent of m and. In particular, the V-cycle is a contraction with only one smoothing step.

94 2002 B. z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a V-Cycle Convergence C C + m α z z 0 a for m, 1, where C is independent of m and.

95 2002 B. z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a V-Cycle Convergence C C + m α z z 0 a for m, 1, where C is independent of m and. This is a complete generalization of the Braess-Hacbusch result: z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a C C + m z z 0 a for m, 1, where C is independent of m and. In particular, the V-cycle is a contraction with only one smoothing step.

96 Model Problem Multiplicative Theory P 1 Lagrange finite element method for the Poisson problem. T is generated from T 0 by uniform refinement. V ( H 1 0 (Ω)) is the P 1 Lagrange finite element space associated with T. V 0 V 1 I 1 : V 1 V is the natural injection. a (w, v) = w v dx = a(w, v) Ω

97 Recursive Relation Multiplicative Theory E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m

98 Recursive Relation Multiplicative Theory E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m Notation (j l) I l j : V j V l is the natural injection P j l : V l V j is the transpose of I l j with respect to the variational form, i.e., a(p j l v, w) = a(v, Il j w) v V l, w V j I j j = Id j = P j j

99 Multiplicative Theory Properties of I l j and P j l For j i l I l j = I l i I i j P j l = P j i P i l I i j = P i l Il j (in particular Id j = I j j = Pj l Il j ) P j i = P j l Il i (I l j Pj l )2 = I l j Pj l (Id l I l j P j l )2 = (Id l I l j P j l )

100 Multiplicative Theory Key Observation [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] = (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 [ R m 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P I 1 2 E 2P 2 ] 1 )Rm 1 P 1

101 Key Observation [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] = (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 [ R m 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P 2 = [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 2 P 2 [(Id I 1 P 1 Multiplicative Theory 1 + I 1 2 E 2P 2 1 )Rm 1 + I 2 E 2P 2 ) ] ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] ] P 1

102 Key Observation [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] = (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 [ R m 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P 2 = [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 2 P 2 Multiplicative Theory 1 + I 1 2 E 2P 2 1 )Rm 1 + I 2 E 2P 2 ) ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 = [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 2 P 2 ) + I 2 Rm 2 P 2 ] [(Id I 3 P 3 ) + I 3 E 3P 3 ] [(Id I 2 P 2 ) + I 2 Rm 2 P 2 ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] ] ] P 1

103 Multiplicative Theory E = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] R m = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 ] Rm 1 P1 (Id I0 P 0 ) [ (Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 ] Rm 1 P 1 R m

104 Multiplicative Theory E = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] R m = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 ] Rm 1 P1 (Id I0 P 0 ) [ (Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 ] Rm 1 P 1 R m Notation For 1 j T j = def I j (Id j R m j )P j

105 Multiplicative Theory E = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] R m = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 ] Rm 1 P1 (Id I0 P 0 ) [ (Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 ] Rm 1 P 1 R m Notation For 1 j In particular T j = def I j (Id j R m j )P j T = I (Id R m )P = Id R m = Rm = Id T

106 Multiplicative Theory E = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] R m = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 ] Rm 1 P1 (Id I0 P 0 ) [ (Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 ] Rm 1 P 1 R m Notation For 1 j In particular T j = def I j (Id j R m j )P j T = I (Id R m )P = Id R m = Rm = Id T (Id I j P j ) + I j R m j P j = Id I j (Id j R m j )P j = Id T j

107 Multiplicative Theory E = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 E 1P 1 ] R m = R m [ (Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 ] Rm 1 P1 (Id I0 P 0 ) [ (Id I1 P 1 ) + I1 Rm 1 P 1 ] [(Id I 1 P 1 ) + I 1 ] Rm 1 P 1 R m Notation For 1 j In particular T j = def I j (Id j R m j )P j T = I (Id R m )P = Id R m = Rm = Id T (Id I j P j ) + I j R m j P j = Id I j (Id j R m j )P j = Id T j T 0 = def I 0 P 0 = Id I 0 P 0 = Id T 0

108 Multiplicative Theory Multiplicative Expression for E E = (Id T )(Id T 1 )... (Id T 1 ) (Id T 0 )(Id T 1 )... (Id T 1 )(Id T )

109 Multiplicative Expression for E Multiplicative Theory E = (Id T )(Id T 1 )... (Id T 1 ) (Id T 0 )(Id T 1 )... (Id T 1 )(Id T ) Strengthened Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality For 0 j a(v j, v ) C2 ( j)/2 v j H 1 (Ω)h 1 v L2 (Ω) v j V j, v V

110 Multiplicative Expression for E Multiplicative Theory E = (Id T )(Id T 1 )... (Id T 1 ) (Id T 0 )(Id T 1 )... (Id T 1 )(Id T ) Strengthened Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality For 0 j a(v j, v ) C2 ( j)/2 v j H 1 (Ω)h 1 v L2 (Ω) v j V j, v V Standard Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality a(v j, v ) v j a v a = v H 1 (Ω) v H 1 (Ω) v j V j, v V which implies a(v j, v ) C v j H 1 (Ω)h 1 v L2 (Ω)

111 Theorem There exists δ (0, 1) such that Multiplicative Theory for m, 1. z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a δ z z 0 a

112 Theorem There exists δ (0, 1) such that Multiplicative Theory for m, 1. z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a δ z z 0 a Details can be found in the boo by Bramble and the survey article by Bramble and Zhang. Refinement of the multiplicative theory can be found in the paper by Xu and Ziatanov. Reference J. Xu and L. Ziatanov, The method of alternating projections and the method of subspace corrections in Hilbert space, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 2002.

113 Theorem There exists δ (0, 1) such that Multiplicative Theory for m, 1. z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a δ z z 0 a Details can be found in the boo by Bramble and the survey article by Bramble and Zhang. Refinement of the multiplicative theory can be found in the paper by Xu and Ziatanov. Reference J. Xu and L. Ziatanov, The method of alternating projections and the method of subspace corrections in Hilbert space, J. Amer. Math. Soc., The multiplicative theory cannot be applied to nonconforming finite element methods in general since many of the algebraic relations are no longer valid. For example, (Id I l P l ) 2 (Id I l P l )

114 Recursive Relation E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 Additive Theory + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m

115 Recursive Relation E E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 Additive Theory + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m + R m I 1 Rm 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P I 1 2 E 2P 2 1 )Rm 1 P 1 = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m + R m I 1 Rm 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P 2 1 )Rm 1 P 1 R m + R m I 1 Rm 1 I 1 2 Rm 2 (Id 2 I 2 3 P 3 2 )Rm 2 P 2 + R m 1 Rm 1 P 1 R m

116 Recursive Relation E E = R m (Id I 1 P 1 E 0 = 0 Additive Theory + I 1 E 1P 1 )R m = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m + R m I 1 Rm 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P I 1 2 E 2P 2 1 )Rm 1 P 1 = R m (Id I 1 P 1 )R m + R m I 1 Rm 1 (Id 1 I 1 2 P 2 1 )Rm 1 P 1 R m + R m I 1 Rm 1 I 1 2 Rm 2 (Id 2 I 2 3 P 3 2 )Rm 2 P 2 + [ R m j (Id j I j 1 P j 1 ] P j = j=1 R m I 1 Rm j+1 Ij+1 j j )R m j R m 1 Rm 1 P 1 R m j+1 Rm j P 1 R m

117 Ideas Additive Theory The operator R m j (Id j I j 1 P j 1 j )R m j has already been analyzed in the two-grid analysis.

118 Ideas Additive Theory The operator R m j (Id j I j 1 P j 1 j )R m j has already been analyzed in the two-grid analysis. The ey is to analyze (for 0 j ) the multi-level operator T def,j = R m I 1 Rm j+1 Ij+1 j : V j V and its transpose with respect to the variational forms T def j, = P j j+1 Rm j P 1 R m : V V j

119 Ideas Additive Theory The operator R m j (Id j I j 1 P j 1 j )R m j has already been analyzed in the two-grid analysis. The ey is to analyze (for 0 j ) the multi-level operator T def,j = R m I 1 Rm j+1 Ij+1 j : V j V and its transpose with respect to the variational forms T def j, = P j j+1 Rm j P 1 R m : V V j We will need a strengthened Cauchy-Schwarz inequality with smoothing and estimates that compare the meshdependent norms on consecutive levels.

120 Ideas Additive Theory The operator R m j (Id j I j 1 P j 1 j )R m j has already been analyzed in the two-grid analysis. The ey is to analyze (for 0 j ) the multi-level operator T def,j = R m I 1 Rm j+1 Ij+1 j : V j V and its transpose with respect to the variational forms T def j, = P j j+1 Rm j P 1 R m : V V j We will need a strengthened Cauchy-Schwarz inequality with smoothing and estimates that compare the meshdependent norms on consecutive levels. We need to circumvent the fact that for nonconforming methods in general (Id I l P l )2 (Id I l Pl )

121 Additive Theory Strengthened Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality with Smoothing Let 0 j, l, v j V j and v l V l. a (T,j R m j v j, T,l R m l v l) C m α δ l j v j 1 α,j v l 1 α,l where C is a positive constant, 0 < δ < 1 and α ( 1 2, 1] is the index of elliptic regularity, provided the number of smoothing steps m is sufficiently large.

122 Additive Theory Strengthened Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality with Smoothing Let 0 j, l, v j V j and v l V l. a (T,j R m j v j, T,l R m l v l) C m α δ l j v j 1 α,j v l 1 α,l where C is a positive constant, 0 < δ < 1 and α ( 1 2, 1] is the index of elliptic regularity, provided the number of smoothing steps m is sufficiently large. A Nonconforming Estimate ( Id 1 P 1 I 1) v 1 α, 1 Ch α v 1, 1 v V 1 (This will allow us to handle (Id I l Pl )2 (Id I l P l ).)

123 Two-Level Estimates (0 < θ < 1) Additive Theory I 1 v 2 1, (1 + θ 2 ) v 2 1, 1 + Cθ 2 h 2α v 2 1+α, 1 v V 1 I 1 v 2 1 α, (1 + θ 2 ) v 2 1 α, 1 + Cθ 2 h 2α v 2 1, 1 v V 1 P 1 v 2 1 α, 1 (1 + θ 2 ) v 2 1 α, + Cθ 2 h 2α v 2 1, v V Important aspect: the constant C is independent of and θ.

124 Two-Level Estimates (0 < θ < 1) Additive Theory I 1 v 2 1, (1 + θ 2 ) v 2 1, 1 + Cθ 2 h 2α v 2 1+α, 1 v V 1 I 1 v 2 1 α, (1 + θ 2 ) v 2 1 α, 1 + Cθ 2 h 2α v 2 1, 1 v V 1 P 1 v 2 1 α, 1 (1 + θ 2 ) v 2 1 α, + Cθ 2 h 2α v 2 1, v V Important aspect: the constant C is independent of and θ. θ is a parameter that calibrates the meaning of high/low frequency. The freedom to choose different θ on different levels allows us to build multi-level estimates from these two-level estimates.

125 Additive Theory Theorem There exists a positive constant C independent of and m, such that z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) ah C m α z z a h provided that the number of smoothing steps m is larger than a number m which is independent of. In particular the V-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number uniformly bounded away from 1 if m is sufficiently large.

126 Additive Theory Theorem There exists a positive constant C independent of and m, such that z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) ah C m α z z a h provided that the number of smoothing steps m is larger than a number m which is independent of. In particular the V-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number uniformly bounded away from 1 if m is sufficiently large. This result holds for both conforming and nonconforming finite element methods.

127 Additive Theory Theorem There exists a positive constant C independent of and m, such that z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) ah C m α z z a h provided that the number of smoothing steps m is larger than a number m which is independent of. In particular the V-cycle algorithm is a contraction with contraction number uniformly bounded away from 1 if m is sufficiently large. This result holds for both conforming and nonconforming finite element methods. In the conforming case we can combine this with the result from the multiplicative theory to show that C z MG V (, γ, z 0, m) a C + m α z z a

128 References Additive Theory 1 B., Convergence of the multigrid V-cycle algorithm for second order boundary value problems without full elliptic regularity, Math. Comp., B., Convergence of nonconforming V-cycle and F-cycle multigrid algorithms for second order elliptic boundary value problems, Math. Comp., B., Smoothers, mesh dependent norms, interpolation and multigrid, Appl. Numer. Math., B. and L.-Y. Sung Multigrid algorithms for C 0 interior penalty methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2006.

129 Other Algorithms F-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG F (, γ, z 0, m)

130 Other Algorithms F-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG F (, γ, z 0, m) Correction Step (coarse grid algorithm followed by V-cycle) q = MG F ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), q, m)

131 Other Algorithms F-Cycle Algorithm for A z = γ with initial guess z 0 Output = MG F (, γ, z 0, m) Correction Step (coarse grid algorithm followed by V-cycle) q = MG F ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), 0, m) q = MG V ( 1, I 1 (γ A z m ), q, m) = 3 acements = 2 = 1 = 0 scheduling diagram for the F-cycle algorithm

132 Other Algorithms Convergence of the F-cycle algorithm follows from the convergence of the V-cycle algorithm by a perturbation argument. The computational cost of the F-cycle algorithm is more than the cost of the V-cycle algorithm but less than that of the W-cycle algorithm. For nonconforming methods the F-cycle is more robust than the V-cycle (i.e., it requires a smaller number of smoothing steps) and its performance is almost identical with the performance of the W-cycle. Nonconforming F-cycle algorithms have been used extensively in CFD computations by Rannacher and Ture.

133 Variable V-Cycle Other Algorithms This is the V-cycle algorithm where the number of smoothing steps can vary from level to level.

134 Variable V-Cycle Other Algorithms This is the V-cycle algorithm where the number of smoothing steps can vary from level to level. Suppose we want to solve the finite element equation on level. Then m j, the number of smoothing steps for level j, is chosen according to the rule β 1 m j m j 1 β 2 m j for 0 j, where 1 < β 1 β 2.

135 Variable V-Cycle Other Algorithms This is the V-cycle algorithm where the number of smoothing steps can vary from level to level. Suppose we want to solve the finite element equation on level. Then m j, the number of smoothing steps for level j, is chosen according to the rule β 1 m j m j 1 β 2 m j for 0 j, where 1 < β 1 β 2. The variable V-cycle algorithm is mostly used as an optimal preconditioner.

136 Full Multigrid Other Algorithms The th level multigrid algorithm solves the equation A z = γ with an (arbitrary) initial guess z 0.

137 Full Multigrid Other Algorithms The th level multigrid algorithm solves the equation A z = γ with an (arbitrary) initial guess z 0. When we are solving the finite element equation u v dx = fv dx v V Ω the finite element solution u on different levels are related, because they are approximations of the same u. Ω

138 Full Multigrid Other Algorithms The th level multigrid algorithm solves the equation A z = γ with an (arbitrary) initial guess z 0. When we are solving the finite element equation u v dx = fv dx v V Ω the finite element solution u on different levels are related, because they are approximations of the same u. Therefore the initial guess for the th level multigrid algorithm should come from the solution on the ( 1) st level. Ω

139 Finite Element Equation Full Multigrid Algorithm For = 0, û 0 = A 1 0 φ 0 For 1, A u = φ φ, v = fv dx Ω Other Algorithms v V u 0 = I 1û 1 u l = MG(, φ, u l 1, m) for 1 l r û = u r

140 Other Algorithms Suppose the multigrid algorithm is uniformly convergent. For a sufficiently large r, the full multigrid algorithm, which is a nested iteration of the th level multigrid algorithms, will produce an approximate solution of the continuous problem that is accurate to the same order as the exact solution of the finite element equation. Moreover the computational cost of the full multigrid algorithm remains proportional to the number of unnowns.

### Multigrid Method ZHONG-CI SHI. Institute of Computational Mathematics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Joint work: Xuejun Xu

Multigrid Method ZHONG-CI SHI Institute of Computational Mathematics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Joint work: Xuejun Xu Outline Introduction Standard Cascadic Multigrid method(cmg) Economical

### Multigrid Methods for Maxwell s Equations

Multigrid Methods for Maxwell s Equations Jintao Cui Institute for Mathematics and Its Applications University of Minnesota Outline Nonconforming Finite Element Methods for a Two Dimensional Curl-Curl

### MULTIGRID PRECONDITIONING FOR THE BIHARMONIC DIRICHLET PROBLEM M. R. HANISCH

MULTIGRID PRECONDITIONING FOR THE BIHARMONIC DIRICHLET PROBLEM M. R. HANISCH Abstract. A multigrid preconditioning scheme for solving the Ciarlet-Raviart mixed method equations for the biharmonic Dirichlet

### On an Approximation Result for Piecewise Polynomial Functions. O. Karakashian

BULLETIN OF THE GREE MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 57, 010 (1 7) On an Approximation Result for Piecewise Polynomial Functions O. arakashian Abstract We provide a new approach for proving approximation results

### ITERATIVE METHODS FOR NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS

ITERATIVE METHODS FOR NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS LONG CHEN In this chapter we discuss iterative methods for solving the finite element discretization of semi-linear elliptic equations of the form: find

### Lecture Note III: Least-Squares Method

Lecture Note III: Least-Squares Method Zhiqiang Cai October 4, 004 In this chapter, we shall present least-squares methods for second-order scalar partial differential equations, elastic equations of solids,

### ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF GEOMETRIC AND ALGEBRAIC MULTIGRID FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION EQUATIONS

ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF GEOMETRIC AND ALGEBRAIC MULTIGRID FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION EQUATIONS CHIN-TIEN WU AND HOWARD C. ELMAN Abstract. The discrete convection-diffusion equations obtained from streamline

### PARTITION OF UNITY FOR THE STOKES PROBLEM ON NONMATCHING GRIDS

PARTITION OF UNITY FOR THE STOES PROBLEM ON NONMATCHING GRIDS CONSTANTIN BACUTA AND JINCHAO XU Abstract. We consider the Stokes Problem on a plane polygonal domain Ω R 2. We propose a finite element method

### A Mixed Nonconforming Finite Element for Linear Elasticity

A Mixed Nonconforming Finite Element for Linear Elasticity Zhiqiang Cai, 1 Xiu Ye 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1395 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics,

### Constrained Minimization and Multigrid

Constrained Minimization and Multigrid C. Gräser (FU Berlin), R. Kornhuber (FU Berlin), and O. Sander (FU Berlin) Workshop on PDE Constrained Optimization Hamburg, March 27-29, 2008 Matheon Outline Successive

### Algebraic Multigrid as Solvers and as Preconditioner

Ò Algebraic Multigrid as Solvers and as Preconditioner Domenico Lahaye domenico.lahaye@cs.kuleuven.ac.be http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/ domenico/ Department of Computer Science Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

### AMG for a Peta-scale Navier Stokes Code

AMG for a Peta-scale Navier Stokes Code James Lottes Argonne National Laboratory October 18, 2007 The Challenge Develop an AMG iterative method to solve Poisson 2 u = f discretized on highly irregular

### Chapter 7 Iterative Techniques in Matrix Algebra

Chapter 7 Iterative Techniques in Matrix Algebra Per-Olof Persson persson@berkeley.edu Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Math 128B Numerical Analysis Vector Norms Definition

### An Algebraic Multigrid Method Based on Matching 2 in Graphs 3 UNCORRECTED PROOF

1 An Algebraic Multigrid Method Based on Matching 2 in Graphs 3 James Brannic 1, Yao Chen 1, Johannes Kraus 2, and Ludmil Ziatanov 1 4 1 Department of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, PA

### Bootstrap AMG. Kailai Xu. July 12, Stanford University

Bootstrap AMG Kailai Xu Stanford University July 12, 2017 AMG Components A general AMG algorithm consists of the following components. A hierarchy of levels. A smoother. A prolongation. A restriction.

### Chapter 6 A posteriori error estimates for finite element approximations 6.1 Introduction

Chapter 6 A posteriori error estimates for finite element approximations 6.1 Introduction The a posteriori error estimation of finite element approximations of elliptic boundary value problems has reached

### Robust solution of Poisson-like problems with aggregation-based AMG

Robust solution of Poisson-like problems with aggregation-based AMG Yvan Notay Université Libre de Bruxelles Service de Métrologie Nucléaire Paris, January 26, 215 Supported by the Belgian FNRS http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/

### Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik

Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik Numerical analysis of a control and state constrained elliptic control problem with piecewise constant control approximations Klaus Deckelnick and Michael

### It is known that Morley element is not C 0 element and it is divergent for Poisson equation (see [6]). When Morley element is applied to solve problem

Modied Morley Element Method for a ourth Order Elliptic Singular Perturbation Problem Λ Wang Ming LMAM, School of Mathematical Science, Peking University Jinchao u School of Mathematical Science, Peking

### A Balancing Algorithm for Mortar Methods

A Balancing Algorithm for Mortar Methods Dan Stefanica Baruch College, City University of New York, NY 11, USA Dan Stefanica@baruch.cuny.edu Summary. The balancing methods are hybrid nonoverlapping Schwarz

### Numerische Mathematik

Numer. Math. (1999) 82: 179 191 Numerische Mathematik c Springer-Verlag 1999 Electronic Edition A cascadic multigrid algorithm for the Stokes equations Dietrich Braess 1, Wolfgang Dahmen 2 1 Fakultät für

### Introduction to Scientific Computing II Multigrid

Introduction to Scientific Computing II Multigrid Miriam Mehl Slide 5: Relaxation Methods Properties convergence depends on method clear, see exercises and 3), frequency of the error remember eigenvectors

### Numerische Mathematik

Numer. Math. (997) 76: 479 488 Numerische Mathematik c Springer-Verlag 997 Electronic Edition Exponential decay of C cubic splines vanishing at two symmetric points in each knot interval Sang Dong Kim,,

### A STOKES INTERFACE PROBLEM: STABILITY, FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND A ROBUST SOLVER

European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering ECCOMAS 2004 P. Neittaanmäki, T. Rossi, K. Majava, and O. Pironneau (eds.) O. Nevanlinna and R. Rannacher (assoc. eds.) Jyväskylä,

### Simple Examples on Rectangular Domains

84 Chapter 5 Simple Examples on Rectangular Domains In this chapter we consider simple elliptic boundary value problems in rectangular domains in R 2 or R 3 ; our prototype example is the Poisson equation

### SOLVING MESH EIGENPROBLEMS WITH MULTIGRID EFFICIENCY

SOLVING MESH EIGENPROBLEMS WITH MULTIGRID EFFICIENCY KLAUS NEYMEYR ABSTRACT. Multigrid techniques can successfully be applied to mesh eigenvalue problems for elliptic differential operators. They allow

### Poisson Equation in 2D

A Parallel Strategy Department of Mathematics and Statistics McMaster University March 31, 2010 Outline Introduction 1 Introduction Motivation Discretization Iterative Methods 2 Additive Schwarz Method

### THE BEST L 2 NORM ERROR ESTIMATE OF LOWER ORDER FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR THE FOURTH ORDER PROBLEM *

Journal of Computational Mathematics Vol.30, No.5, 2012, 449 460. http://www.global-sci.org/jcm doi:10.4208/jcm.1203-m3855 THE BEST L 2 NORM ERROR ESTIMATE OF LOWER ORDER FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR THE

### Scientific Computing WS 2017/2018. Lecture 18. Jürgen Fuhrmann Lecture 18 Slide 1

Scientific Computing WS 2017/2018 Lecture 18 Jürgen Fuhrmann juergen.fuhrmann@wias-berlin.de Lecture 18 Slide 1 Lecture 18 Slide 2 Weak formulation of homogeneous Dirichlet problem Search u H0 1 (Ω) (here,

### XIAO-CHUAN CAI AND MAKSYMILIAN DRYJA. strongly elliptic equations discretized by the nite element methods.

Contemporary Mathematics Volume 00, 0000 Domain Decomposition Methods for Monotone Nonlinear Elliptic Problems XIAO-CHUAN CAI AND MAKSYMILIAN DRYJA Abstract. In this paper, we study several overlapping

### Convergence of The Multigrid Method With A Wavelet. Abstract. This new coarse grid operator is constructed using the wavelet

Convergence of The Multigrid Method With A Wavelet Coarse Grid Operator Bjorn Engquist Erding Luo y Abstract The convergence of the two-level multigrid method with a new coarse grid operator is studied.

### EXACT DE RHAM SEQUENCES OF SPACES DEFINED ON MACRO-ELEMENTS IN TWO AND THREE SPATIAL DIMENSIONS

EXACT DE RHAM SEQUENCES OF SPACES DEFINED ON MACRO-ELEMENTS IN TWO AND THREE SPATIAL DIMENSIONS JOSEPH E. PASCIAK AND PANAYOT S. VASSILEVSKI Abstract. This paper proposes new finite element spaces that

### Institut für Mathematik

U n i v e r s i t ä t A u g s b u r g Institut für Mathematik Xuejun Xu, Huangxin Chen, Ronald H.W. Hoppe Optimality of Local Multilevel Methods on Adaptively Refined Meshes for Elliptic Boundary Value

The Conjugate Gradient Method Classical Iterations We have a problem, We assume that the matrix comes from a discretization of a PDE. The best and most popular model problem is, The matrix will be as large

### Math 5520 Homework 2 Solutions

Math 552 Homework 2 Solutions March, 26. Consider the function fx) = 2x ) 3 if x, 3x ) 2 if < x 2. Determine for which k there holds f H k, 2). Find D α f for α k. Solution. We show that k = 2. The formulas

### Chapter 5 A priori error estimates for nonconforming finite element approximations 5.1 Strang s first lemma

Chapter 5 A priori error estimates for nonconforming finite element approximations 51 Strang s first lemma We consider the variational equation (51 a(u, v = l(v, v V H 1 (Ω, and assume that the conditions

### Numerische Mathematik

umer. Math. 73: 149 167 (1996) umerische Mathematik c Springer-Verlag 1996 Overlapping Schwarz methods on unstructured meshes using non-matching coarse grids Tony F. Chan 1, Barry F. Smith 2, Jun Zou 3

### Introduction to Multigrid Method

Introduction to Multigrid Metod Presented by: Bogojeska Jasmina /08/005 JASS, 005, St. Petersburg 1 Te ultimate upsot of MLAT Te amount of computational work sould be proportional to te amount of real

### A Balancing Algorithm for Mortar Methods

A Balancing Algorithm for Mortar Methods Dan Stefanica Baruch College, City University of New York, NY, USA. Dan_Stefanica@baruch.cuny.edu Summary. The balancing methods are hybrid nonoverlapping Schwarz

### A Robust Approach to Minimizing H(div)-Dominated Functionals in an H 1 -Conforming Finite Element Space

NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 2000; 00:1 23 [Version: 2002/09/18 v1.02] A Robust Approach to Minimizing H(div)-Dominated Functionals in an H 1 -Conforming Finite

### THE EFFECT OF MULTIGRID PARAMETERS IN A 3D HEAT DIFFUSION EQUATION

Int. J. of Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, vol.23, No.1, pp.213-221 DOI: 10.1515/ijame-2018-0012 Brief note THE EFFECT OF MULTIGRID PARAMETERS IN A 3D HEAT DIFFUSION EQUATION F. DE OLIVEIRA *

### Goal-oriented error control of the iterative solution of finite element equations

J. Numer. Math., Vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1 31 (2009) DOI 10.1515/ JNUM.2009.000 c de Gruyter 2009 Prepared using jnm.sty [Version: 20.02.2007 v1.3] Goal-oriented error control of the iterative solution of finite

### Multigrid Solution of the Debye-Hückel Equation

Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections 5-17-2013 Multigrid Solution of the Debye-Hückel Equation Benjamin Quanah Parker Follow this and additional works

### STEEPEST DESCENT AND CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS WITH VARIABLE PRECONDITIONING

SIAM J. MATRIX ANAL. APPL. Vol.?, No.?, pp.?? c 2007 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics STEEPEST DESCENT AND CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS WITH VARIABLE PRECONDITIONING ANDREW V. KNYAZEV AND ILYA

### WEAK GALERKIN FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR SECOND ORDER PARABOLIC EQUATIONS

INERNAIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELING Volume 13, Number 4, Pages 525 544 c 216 Institute for Scientific Computing and Information WEAK GALERKIN FINIE ELEMEN MEHOD FOR SECOND ORDER PARABOLIC

### Basic Concepts of Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Elliptic Boundary Value Problems

Basic Concepts of Adaptive Finite lement Methods for lliptic Boundary Value Problems Ronald H.W. Hoppe 1,2 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Houston 2 Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg

### A LEAST-SQUARES APPROACH BASED ON A DISCRETE MINUS ONE INNER PRODUCT FOR FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS

MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION Volume 66, Number 219, July 1997, Pages 935 955 S 0025-5718(97)00848-X A LEAST-SQUARES APPROACH BASED ON A DISCRETE MINUS ONE INNER PRODUCT FOR FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS JAMES H BRAMBLE,

### Iterative Methods for Linear Systems

Iterative Methods for Linear Systems 1. Introduction: Direct solvers versus iterative solvers In many applications we have to solve a linear system Ax = b with A R n n and b R n given. If n is large the

### PREPRINT 2010:25. Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: II. A stabilized Nitsche method ERIK BURMAN PETER HANSBO

PREPRINT 2010:25 Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: II. A stabilized Nitsche method ERIK BURMAN PETER HANSBO Department of Mathematical Sciences Division of Mathematics CHALMERS

### Numerical Solution of the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation: Developing More Robust and Efficient Methods

Numerical Solution of the Nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation: Developing More Robust and Efficient Methods Michael J. Holst Department of Applied Mathematics and CRPC California Institute of Technology

### Recovery-Based A Posteriori Error Estimation

Recovery-Based A Posteriori Error Estimation Zhiqiang Cai Purdue University Department of Mathematics, Purdue University Slide 1, March 2, 2011 Outline Introduction Diffusion Problems Higher Order Elements

### Computational Linear Algebra

Computational Linear Algebra PD Dr. rer. nat. habil. Ralf Peter Mundani Computation in Engineering / BGU Scientific Computing in Computer Science / INF Winter Term 2017/18 Part 3: Iterative Methods PD

### Chapter Two: Numerical Methods for Elliptic PDEs. 1 Finite Difference Methods for Elliptic PDEs

Chapter Two: Numerical Methods for Elliptic PDEs Finite Difference Methods for Elliptic PDEs.. Finite difference scheme. We consider a simple example u := subject to Dirichlet boundary conditions ( ) u

### arxiv: v2 [math.na] 16 Nov 2016

BOOTSTRAP MULTIGRID FOR THE SHIFTED LAPLACE-BELTRAMI EIGENVALUE PROBLEM JAMES BRANNICK AND SHUHAO CAO arxiv:1511.07042v2 [math.na] 16 Nov 2016 Abstract. This paper introduces bootstrap two-grid and multigrid

### A DECOMPOSITION RESULT FOR BIHARMONIC PROBLEMS AND THE HELLAN-HERRMANN-JOHNSON METHOD

Electronic ransactions on Numerical Analysis. Volume 45, pp. 257 282, 2016. Copyright c 2016,. ISSN 1068 9613. ENA A DECOMPOSIION RESUL FOR BIHARMONIC PROBLEMS AND HE HELLAN-HERRMANN-JOHNSON MEHOD WOLFGANG

### On Nonlinear Dirichlet Neumann Algorithms for Jumping Nonlinearities

On Nonlinear Dirichlet Neumann Algorithms for Jumping Nonlinearities Heiko Berninger, Ralf Kornhuber, and Oliver Sander FU Berlin, FB Mathematik und Informatik (http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/rd/we-02/numerik/)

### Newton-Multigrid Least-Squares FEM for S-V-P Formulation of the Navier-Stokes Equations

Newton-Multigrid Least-Squares FEM for S-V-P Formulation of the Navier-Stokes Equations A. Ouazzi, M. Nickaeen, S. Turek, and M. Waseem Institut für Angewandte Mathematik, LSIII, TU Dortmund, Vogelpothsweg

### Parallel Discontinuous Galerkin Method

Parallel Discontinuous Galerkin Method Yin Ki, NG The Chinese University of Hong Kong Aug 5, 2015 Mentors: Dr. Ohannes Karakashian, Dr. Kwai Wong Overview Project Goal Implement parallelization on Discontinuous

### Regular article Nonlinear multigrid methods for total variation image denoising

Comput Visual Sci 7: 199 06 (004) Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s00791-004-0150-3 Computing and Visualization in Science Regular article Nonlinear multigrid methods for total variation image

### Basic Principles of Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for PDEs

Basic Principles of Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for PDEs Junping Wang Computational Mathematics Division of Mathematical Sciences National Science Foundation Arlington, VA 22230 Polytopal Element

### Optimal preconditioners for Nitsche-XFEM discretizations of interface problems

Optimal preconditioners for Nitsche-XFEM discretizations of interface problems Christoph Lehrenfeld Arnold Reusken August 13, 2014 In the past decade, a combination of unfitted finite elements (or XFEM)

### On Pressure Stabilization Method and Projection Method for Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations 1

On Pressure Stabilization Method and Projection Method for Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations 1 Jie Shen Department of Mathematics, Penn State University University Park, PA 1682 Abstract. We present some

### A DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHOD FOR ELLIPTIC INTERFACE PROBLEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ELECTROPORATION

A DISCONTINUOUS GALERIN METHOD FOR ELLIPTIC INTERFACE PROBLEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ELECTROPORATION GRÉGORY GUYOMARC H AND CHANG-OC LEE Abstract. We present a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method to solve

### On domain decomposition preconditioners for finite element approximations of the Helmholtz equation using absorption

On domain decomposition preconditioners for finite element approximations of the Helmholtz equation using absorption Ivan Graham and Euan Spence (Bath, UK) Collaborations with: Paul Childs (Emerson Roxar,

### ELLIPTIC RECONSTRUCTION AND A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS

ELLIPTIC RECONSTRUCTION AND A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS CHARALAMBOS MAKRIDAKIS AND RICARDO H. NOCHETTO Abstract. It is known that the energy technique for a posteriori error analysis

### Final Ph.D. Progress Report. Integration of hp-adaptivity with a Two Grid Solver: Applications to Electromagnetics. David Pardo

Final Ph.D. Progress Report Integration of hp-adaptivity with a Two Grid Solver: Applications to Electromagnetics. David Pardo Dissertation Committee: I. Babuska, L. Demkowicz, C. Torres-Verdin, R. Van

### The Effect of the Schedule on the CPU Time for 2D Poisson Equation

Trabalho apresentado no XXXV CNMAC, Natal-RN, 2014. The Effect of the Schedule on the CPU Time for 2D Poisson Equation Fabiane de Oliveira, State University of Ponta Grossa, Department of Mathematics and

### Boundary Value Problems and Iterative Methods for Linear Systems

Boundary Value Problems and Iterative Methods for Linear Systems 1. Equilibrium Problems 1.1. Abstract setting We want to find a displacement u V. Here V is a complete vector space with a norm v V. In

### Reduction of Finite Element Models of Complex Mechanical Components

Reduction of Finite Element Models of Complex Mechanical Components Håkan Jakobsson Research Assistant hakan.jakobsson@math.umu.se Mats G. Larson Professor Applied Mathematics mats.larson@math.umu.se Department

### Domain Decomposition Methods for Mortar Finite Elements

Domain Decomposition Methods for Mortar Finite Elements Dan Stefanica Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University September 1999 A dissertation in the Department of Mathematics Submitted

### FEM Convergence for PDEs with Point Sources in 2-D and 3-D

FEM Convergence for PDEs with Point Sources in -D and 3-D Kourosh M. Kalayeh 1, Jonathan S. Graf, and Matthias K. Gobbert 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

### SUPERCONVERGENCE PROPERTIES FOR OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS DISCRETIZED BY PIECEWISE LINEAR AND DISCONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

SUPERCONVERGENCE PROPERTIES FOR OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS DISCRETIZED BY PIECEWISE LINEAR AND DISCONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS A. RÖSCH AND R. SIMON Abstract. An optimal control problem for an elliptic equation

### A Space-Time Multigrid Solver Methodology for the Optimal Control of Time-Dependent Fluid Flow

A Space-Time Multigrid Solver Methodology for the Optimal Control of Time-Dependent Fluid Flow Michael Köster, Michael Hinze, Stefan Turek Michael Köster Institute for Applied Mathematics TU Dortmund Trier,

### Ultraconvergence of ZZ Patch Recovery at Mesh Symmetry Points

Ultraconvergence of ZZ Patch Recovery at Mesh Symmetry Points Zhimin Zhang and Runchang Lin Department of Mathematics, Wayne State University Abstract. The ultraconvergence property of the Zienkiewicz-Zhu

### A Line search Multigrid Method for Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization

A Line search Multigrid Method for Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization Zaiwen Wen Donald Goldfarb Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University 2008 Siam Conference on

### AN HELMHOLTZ ITERATIVE SOLVER FOR THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEISMIC IMAGING PROBLEMS?

European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ECCOMAS CFD 2006 P. Wesseling, E. Oñate, J. Périaux (Eds) c TU Delft, Delft The Netherlands, 2006 AN HELMHOLTZ ITERATIVE SOLVER FOR THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL

### Chapter 3 Conforming Finite Element Methods 3.1 Foundations Ritz-Galerkin Method

Chapter 3 Conforming Finite Element Methods 3.1 Foundations 3.1.1 Ritz-Galerkin Method Let V be a Hilbert space, a(, ) : V V lr a bounded, V-elliptic bilinear form and l : V lr a bounded linear functional.

### Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations Zhiping Li LMAM and School of Mathematical Sciences Peking University Sobolev Embedding Theorems Embedding Operators and the Sobolev Embedding Theorem

### Conjugate gradient method. Descent method. Conjugate search direction. Conjugate Gradient Algorithm (294)

Conjugate gradient method Descent method Hestenes, Stiefel 1952 For A N N SPD In exact arithmetic, solves in N steps In real arithmetic No guaranteed stopping Often converges in many fewer than N steps

### A Finite Element Method for an Ill-Posed Problem. Martin-Luther-Universitat, Fachbereich Mathematik/Informatik,Postfach 8, D Halle, Abstract

A Finite Element Method for an Ill-Posed Problem W. Lucht Martin-Luther-Universitat, Fachbereich Mathematik/Informatik,Postfach 8, D-699 Halle, Germany Abstract For an ill-posed problem which has its origin

### MIXED FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION OF THE VECTOR LAPLACIAN WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

MIXED FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION OF THE VECTOR LAPLACIAN WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS DOUGLAS N. ARNOLD, RICHARD S. FALK, AND JAY GOPALAKRISHNAN Abstract. We consider the finite element solution

### On intermediate value theorem in ordered Banach spaces for noncompact and discontinuous mappings

Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 7 (2016) No. 1, 295-300 ISSN: 2008-6822 (electronic) http://dx.doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2015.341 On intermediate value theorem in ordered Banach spaces for noncompact and discontinuous

### POLYNOMIAL PRESERVING GRADIENT RECOVERY AND A POSTERIORI ESTIMATE FOR BILINEAR ELEMENT ON IRREGULAR QUADRILATERALS

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELING Volume, Number, Pages 24 c 2004 Institute for Scientific Computing and Information POLYNOMIAL PRESERVING GRADIENT RECOVERY AND A POSTERIORI ESTIMATE

### Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations Zhiping Li LMAM and School of Mathematical Sciences Peking University Variational Problems of the Dirichlet BVP of the Poisson Equation 1 For the homogeneous

### 7.3 The Jacobi and Gauss-Siedel Iterative Techniques. Problem: To solve Ax = b for A R n n. Methodology: Iteratively approximate solution x. No GEPP.

7.3 The Jacobi and Gauss-Siedel Iterative Techniques Problem: To solve Ax = b for A R n n. Methodology: Iteratively approximate solution x. No GEPP. 7.3 The Jacobi and Gauss-Siedel Iterative Techniques

### High-order ADI schemes for convection-diffusion equations with mixed derivative terms

High-order ADI schemes for convection-diffusion equations with mixed derivative terms B. Düring, M. Fournié and A. Rigal Abstract We consider new high-order Alternating Direction Implicit ADI) schemes

### Multispace and Multilevel BDDC

Multispace and Multilevel BDDC Jan Mandel Bedřich Sousedík Clark R. Dohrmann February 11, 2018 arxiv:0712.3977v2 [math.na] 21 Jan 2008 Abstract BDDC method is the most advanced method from the Balancing

### On Surface Meshes Induced by Level Set Functions

On Surface Meshes Induced by Level Set Functions Maxim A. Olshanskii, Arnold Reusken, and Xianmin Xu Bericht Nr. 347 Oktober 01 Key words: surface finite elements, level set function, surface triangulation,

### Contents. Computational Fluid Dynamics. Fundamentals. Deformation of Materials

Contents R. Verfürth www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/num1 Lecture Series / Bochum / Summer Term 2018 Variational Formulation of the Stokes Equations of the Stokes Equations Stationary Incompressible Navier-Stokes

### A WEAK GALERKIN MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR BIHARMONIC EQUATIONS

A WEAK GALERKIN MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR BIHARMONIC EQUATIONS LIN MU, JUNPING WANG, YANQIU WANG, AND XIU YE Abstract. This article introduces and analyzes a weak Galerkin mixed finite element method

### Scientific Computing II

Technische Universität München ST 008 Institut für Informatik Dr. Miriam Mehl Scientific Computing II Final Exam, July, 008 Iterative Solvers (3 pts + 4 extra pts, 60 min) a) Steepest Descent and Conjugate

### Optimal Left and Right Additive Schwarz Preconditioning for Minimal Residual Methods with Euclidean and Energy Norms

Optimal Left and Right Additive Schwarz Preconditioning for Minimal Residual Methods with Euclidean and Energy Norms Marcus Sarkis Worcester Polytechnic Inst., Mass. and IMPA, Rio de Janeiro and Daniel

### A multilevel, level-set method for optimizing eigenvalues in shape design problems

A multilevel, level-set method for optimizing eigenvalues in shape design problems E. Haber July 22, 2003 Abstract In this paper we consider optimal design problems that involve shape optimization. The

### Optimal Newton-type methods for nonconvex smooth optimization problems

Optimal Newton-type methods for nonconvex smooth optimization problems Coralia Cartis, Nicholas I. M. Gould and Philippe L. Toint June 9, 20 Abstract We consider a general class of second-order iterations

### Solutions of Selected Problems

1 Solutions of Selected Problems October 16, 2015 Chapter I 1.9 Consider the potential equation in the disk := {(x, y) R 2 ; x 2 +y 2 < 1}, with the boundary condition u(x) = g(x) r for x on the derivative

### Technische Universität Graz

Technische Universität Graz Stability of the Laplace single layer boundary integral operator in Sobolev spaces O. Steinbach Berichte aus dem Institut für Numerische Mathematik Bericht 2016/2 Technische

### NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF INTERACTION BETWEEN INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW AND AN ELASTIC WALL

Proceedings of ALGORITMY 212 pp. 29 218 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF INTERACTION BETWEEN INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW AND AN ELASTIC WALL MARTIN HADRAVA, MILOSLAV FEISTAUER, AND PETR SVÁČEK Abstract. The present paper

### A FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS ON SURFACES

A FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS ON SURFACES MAXIM A. OLSHANSKII, ARNOLD REUSKEN, AND JÖRG GRANDE Abstract. In this paper a new finite element approach for the discretization of elliptic