JT-60SA (super advanced) project
|
|
- Joshua Briggs
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 H27 (25min.) 3JUL215 JT-6SA T. Nakano (Japan Atomic Energy Agency) M. Sakamoto (University of Tsukuba) M. Wischmeier (IPP, Germany) Acknowledgements: N. Asakura, C. Gleason-González, K. Hoshino, H. Kawashima, Y. Miyo, S. Sakurai, K. Shimizu, H. Utoh, S. Varoutis C. Day, P. Lang, R. Neu ant JA TROs JT-6SA (super advanced) project The mission of the JT-6SA project is to contribute to the early realization of fusion energy by addressing key physics and engineering issues for ITER and DEMO.! Supportive Researches for ITER ITER operation scenarios is optimized by using break-even-equivalent class hightemperature deuterium plasmas lasting for a duration (~1 s).! Complementary Researches to ITER DEMO operation scenarios is established by long sustainment (~1 s) of high pressure plasmas necessary in DEMO. ITER (France)! Training of Domestic Scientists and Technicians especially those in younger generation who will play leading roles in R&D of ITER and DEMO DT burning JT-6SA HP: JT-6SA Research Plan: References: S. Ishida, P. Barabaschi, Y. Kamada, et al., Nucl. Fusion 51 (211) 9418 Y. Kamada, P. Barabaschi, S. Ishida, et al., Nucl. Fusion 53 (213) 141 P. Barabaschi and the JT-6SA Team, OV/3-2 in Proc. 25th IAEA-FEC (214) Support ITER Foster next generation demonstration of power generation DEMO JT-6SA (superconducting tokamak)
2 Highly Shaped Large Superconducting Tokamak 3 JT-6SA: " Large superconducting tokamak " High plasma current (max. I P =5.5 MA) " Long pulse (typically 1 s) " High heating power (41 MW 1 s) " Highly shaped (S=q 95 I p /(ab T ) ~7, A~2.5) " Full-monoblock carbon DIV, first wall (Option: Metallic wall in later phase) Full I P, 41 MW operation Plasma current, I P (MA) Toroidal magnetic field, B T (T) Major radius, R p (m) Aspect ratio, A Elongation, κ x Triangularity, δ x Safety factor, q 95 Injection power, P in (MW) Normalized beta, β N Bootstrap current ftacution, f BS Non-circular superconducting tokamaks We are here Year Construction Operation Preparation Disassembly Assembly Commissioning Experiment Integrated Commissioning Manufacture of the main components has been going well on schedule in both EU and JA towards the first plasma in 219.
3 Manufacture of the main components going well on schedule in both EU and JA 5 By Oct. 214, 25 Procurement Arrangements (PAs) have been concluded: (JA: 14PAs, EU: 11PAs) = 88% of the total cost of BA Satellite Tokamak Program. JT-6U Disassembly Completed in Oct. 212 Toroidal Field Coils Winding started. Lower 3 EF Coils were placed on the cryostat base. Mar., 213 From Dec, 215 TF coil test facility has been almost completed. First Plasma 219 March Jan. 214 Cryostat Base (26 tons) Tokamak Assembly started in Jan. 213 by installing the cryostat base. Vacuum Vessel Sectors were completed, and VV assembly started in May 214. Upper 3 EF Coils & CS: Manufacture on going. Cryostat: Manufacture started. HTS Current Lead: mass production started. 6 # (14 ) 5 F4E JAEA SOL MHD JT6SA JT-6SA JT-6SA ITER # 182 (1 /, 23 EuroFusion )
4 JT-6SA Research Plan 7 # JT-6SA Research Plan (SARP) summarizes Research items and Strategy for JT-6SA to solve critical issues in ITER and DEMO. # Points of the JT-6SARP " Make a plan " Encourage collaborative studies on JT-6SA " Optimize hard wares: heatings, fueling, pumping, diagnostics, etc. " Growing year by year toward fruitful experiments. v.3.1 (Dec. 213) Chapter 2: Research Strategy Chapter 3: Operation Regime Development Chapter 4: MHD Stability and Control Chapter 5: Transport and Confinement Chapter 6: High Energy Particle Behavior Chapter 7: Pedestal and Edge Physics Chapter 8: Divertor, SOL and PWI Chapter 9: Fusion Engineering Chapter 1: Theoretical models and simulation codes Over 33 colleagues (11 countries, 38 inst.) join activities led by Technical Responsible Officers (TROs) in the research fields. Structure of Research Plan (DSOL/PWI) Peak Heat flux / PCF Mission: Elements: 8-1.Long-pulse high-β, high-density and high-radiative plasma High β Integrate 15 MW/m 2 / C x1s 5 MW/m 2 / W x 1yr 1 MW/m 2 / W x 4s JT-6SA DEMO ITER 8-2 Divertor detachment V-shaped corner High density 8-3 Radiative divertor Ar/Ne seed 8-4.Fueling / exhaust Pellet Gas Pumping 8-5. Impurity C/W transport Wall conditioning Inter-shot cleaning 8-7~9. PWI Retention Erosion W scenario...
5 Scenarios in JT-6SA #1 #2 #3 #4-1 #4-2 #5-1 #5-2 #6 (1) Full Full Full Current Current Current Inductive ITER- Advanced High β High β N Inductive Inductive SN, like Inductive N High β High f N Full-CD GW 3s DN, SN, 3MW Inductive (hybrid) Full-CD 41MW 41MW High density Plasma Current (MA) Toroidal field BT (T) q 95 ~3 ~3 ~3 ~3 ~4.4 ~ ~4 R/a (m/m) 2.96/ / / / / / / /1.11 Aspect ratio A Elongation κ x Triangularity δ x Shape factor S Volume (m 3 ) Cross-section (m 2 ) Normalised beta β N Electron density (1 19 m -3 ) Line-average/volume 6.3/ /5.6 1./9 9.1/ /6.2 / /4.3 / -average Greenwald density, n GW (1 19 m -3 ) / f GW 13/.5 13/.5 13/.8 11/.8 8.6/.8 5.9/ / 5.2/.39 Plasma thermal energy, W TH (MJ) P add (MW) P NNB /P PNB /P EC (MW) 41 1/24/7 41 1/24/7 3 1/2/- 34 1/24/- 37 1/2/7 37 1/2/7 3 6/17/ /6/4 Thermal confinement time, τ Eth (s) H 98(y,2) JT-6SA Research Plan v3.2 Table 3-1, Scenario I p (MA) Scenario 5-1 SONIC simulation for Full-CD, High β plasma B T (T) R p m a p (m) A κ x δ x.5.47 S q V p (m 3 ) P in (MW) H H β N τ E (s) T i () (kev) T e () (kev) n e () (1 19 /m 3 ) n bar e (1 19 / m 3 ) 6.3 n e / n Greenwald.5.85 f BS τ plasma (s) Z (m) χ e = m 2 /s χ i = m 2 /s D =.3 m 2 /s inner targets S pump : 5 m 3 /s P SOL = 37 MW Γ ion SOL = 2.8 x1 21 s -1 Coronal C + MC Ar (n e τ = 1x1 16 s/m 3 ) R (m) outer targets PFC: C Γ D2 Puff = - x1 22 s MW/m 2 x1 s for 3 cycles 1 MW/m 2 x1 s for 1 cycles
6 Only C (Monte-Carlo, Phys+Chem sputtering) Radiative divertor compatible with core plasma for Scenario 5 $Heat load: OK %n e sep (3.4 x1 19 m -3 ): Incompatible with core n e profile (~1.7 x1 19 m -3 ) C (coronal model, nc/ni=5% (div), 1%(others))+ Ar (Monte-Carlo,.86 Pam 3 /s) $Heat load: good $n e sep (1.5 x1 19 m -3 ): Compatible with core n e profile (~1.7 x1 19 m -3 ) %Z eff =2.1-> 2.4, P rad =2.8-> 4.3 MW (N. Hayashi APS214) K. Hoshino, etal, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54 (214) 44. For further radiation increase, mixture of seeding impurities play roles Ar(main) Ne(div) JT-6U For ITER and DEMO ( 1 and 5 MW/m2 ), systematic studies on the effects of mixed impurities are needed. Ne(div) Ar(main) N. Asakura, T. Nakano, etal, Nucl. Fusion 49 (29) 1151.
7 Scenarios in JT-6SA #1 #2 #3 #4-1 #4-2 #5-1 #5-2 #6 (1) Full Full Full Current Current Current Inductive ITER- Advanced High β High β N Inductive Inductive SN, like Inductive N High β High f N Full-CD GW 3s DN, SN, 3MW Inductive (hybrid) Full-CD 41MW 41MW High density Plasma Current (MA) Toroidal field BT (T) q 95 ~3 ~3 ~3 ~3 ~4.4 ~ ~4 R/a (m/m) 2.96/ / / / / / / /1.11 Aspect ratio A Elongation κ x Triangularity δ x Shape factor S Volume (m 3 ) Cross-section (m 2 ) Normalised beta β N Electron density (1 19 m -3 ) Line-average/volume 6.3/ /5.6 1./9 9.1/ /6.2 / /4.3 / -average Greenwald density, n GW (1 19 m -3 ) / f GW 13/.5 13/.5 13/.8 11/.8 8.6/.8 5.9/ / 5.2/.39 Plasma thermal energy, W TH (MJ) P add (MW) P NNB /P PNB /P EC (MW) 41 1/24/7 41 1/24/7 3 1/2/- 34 1/24/- 37 1/2/7 37 1/2/7 3 6/17/ /6/4 Thermal confinement time, τ Eth (s) H 98(y,2) JT-6SA Research Plan v3.2 Table 3-1, Scenario I p (MA) Scenario 2 SONIC simulation for Full-Ip & heating plasma B T (T) R p m a p (m) A κ x δ x.5.47 S q V p (m 3 ) P in (MW) H H β N τ E (s) T i () (kev) T e () (kev) n e () (1 19 /m 3 ) n bar e (1 19 / m 3 ) 6.3 n e / n Greenwald.5.85 f BS τ plasma (s) Z (m) χ e = m 2 /s χ i = m 2 /s D =.3 m 2 /s inner targets S pump : 5 m 3 /s P SOL = 37 MW Γ ion SOL = 2.8 x1 21 s -1 Coronal C (n e τ = 1x1 16 s/m 3 ) R (m) outer targets PFC: C Γ D2 Puff = - x1 22 s MW/m 2 x1 s for 3 cycles 1 MW/m 2 x1 s for 1 cycles
8 High neutral compression predicted in the V-shaped corners 3x1 2 m -3 3x1 2 m -3 High neutral density in the V-shaped corner is predicted by SOLDOR simulation for the case with I p of 5.5 MA, P heat of 41 MW, Γ gas of 1.5x1 22 /s and S pump of 5 m 3 /s. H. Kawashima, et al, J Nuc Mater 415 (211) S948. 6% radiation in the divertor predicted P rad In =6.2 MW 7 MWm -3 P rad out =5.5 MW P rad total =23 MW P rad total / P heat SOL =.62 7 MWm -3 High radiation in both inner and outer divertors is predicted H. Kawashima, et al, J Nuc Mater 415 (211) S948.
9 Detachment even w/o Ar seeding for #2 ( cf. Ar seeding mandatory for #5-1 ) Transients: Keep detachment during ELMs Slow transients: Lowering fusion output, lower β, OSP toward outer, pumping changes, plasma changes H. Kawashima, et al, J Nuc Mater 415 (211) S948. Scenario I p (MA) B T (T) R p m a p (m) A κ x δ x.5.47 S q V p (m 3 ) P in (MW) H H β N τ E (s) T i () (kev) T e () (kev) n e () (1 19 /m 3 ) n bar e (1 19 / m 3 ) 6.3 n e / n Greenwald.5.85 f BS τ plasma (s) Z (m) -2.2 Scenario 2 SONIC simulation for Full-Ip & heating plasm With W divertor *preliminary χ e = m 2 /s χ i = m 2 /s D =.3 m 2 /s inner targets S pump : 5 m 3 /s P SOL = 37 MW Γ ion SOL = 2.8 x1 21 s -1 Coronal W + MC Ar (n e τ = 1x1 16 s/m 3 ) R (m) outer targets PFC: W Γ D2 Puff = - x1 22 s MW/m 2 x1 s for 3 cycles 1 MW/m 2 x1 s for 1 cycles
10 4. Analysis of Ar transport by IMPMC code on W-wall Ar transport on W-wall (nw/ni=1e-5 (uniform)) was analyzed by the IMPMC code combined with SONIC. Conditions : Ar puff =.2 Pam3/s, Γp=e22 /s. - Results : qt=9.3 MW/m2, ne-mid=5.7e19 m-3, Prad=2 MW. (run_ _wx38) It closes to the results at case B (n /n =1e-5 (uniform)) of Ar Non-coronal simulation as shown in w i - Conditons : nar/ni =1e-3, Γp = e22 /s Results : qt=1 MW/m2, ne-mid=5.6e19 m-3, Prad=18.6 MW Mar/11/15 - Nz msec 2D profile of ni and Te at IMPMC simulation ni - Nz Nz - 3 Log NAr (x119 m-3) rt Mar/11/ Nz :53: Lower ionized Ar (+1~+7) is distributed SOL/Div. regions. Middle Ar (+8~+15) moves side. ionized to inner Higher ionized Ar (+16~+18) concentrates typically on the bottom of core edge regions. - 2 ZAr(+16~+18) n=1 shell 16:53:52 Nz msec - 1 M w ZAr(+8~+15) n=2 shell D profile of Ar density each ionized charge - Nz Mar/11/ msec Nz ZAr(+1~+7) n=3 shell Nz msec msec 4 - Te (ev) Nz Te 16:53: 2 1 Mar/11/15 16:53: H.#Kawashima,#RCM/4#215/5/19,#to#be#presented#in#PET15.5 m-3) 4 2 Nz Te (119 - Nz z rt1 1.1 E-2 E-2 E-3 E-3 E-4 2 M
11 rt1 - E-2 E-2 E-3 E-3 E-4 E-4 Mar/4/15 - Ni E-2 E-2 Mar/4/15 wxdr_6 17:14:18 Mar/4/15 17:16:48.1 E-2 E-2 E-3 E-3 which is closed E-4 E-4-4~1-3 in the divertor regions, Ar ratio (nar/ni) becomes 1 that for Noncoronal calculation at case B. the leg on high Radiation loss power (Wrad) is enhanced ne and low T along divertor e. Both nar/ni and r Wrad are also enlarged on the bottom of core edge regions. r (m) (m) Ni Profiles on the divertor target heat load qt qt_mc_run_214118_wx34 Qdpl_o._&6_cor qt_nc_run_21529_wx t q (W) separatrix hit point 1 1 IMPMC calc. 3 (Ar_puff=.2 Pam /s) distance from the hit-point Δ (m) # They almost agree with IMPMC and non-coronal evaluations E-2 E-2 Ni msec 17:16:48 Wrad (MW/m3) Wrd 4.1 E-2 E-2 E-3 E-3 E-4 E-4.1-2D profile of nar/ni and Wrad nar/ni
12 Profiles on the density n ed and temperature T ed ned_mc_run_214118_wx34 ned_nc_run_21529_wx6 Nd_Qdpl_o._&6_cor 15 Ted_MC_run_214118_wx34 Ted_nc_run_21529_wx6 Td_Qdpl_o._&6_cor n ed (1 19 m -3 ) separatrix hit point T ed (ev) IMPMC calc. (A r_puff =.2 Pam 3 /s) 1 5 separatrix hit point distance from the hit-point Δ (m) distance from the hit-point Δ (m) # n ed almost agree on the divertor target. # Differences by the calculation method appear on T ed at the outer regions. Long term plan in EUROfusion 24 In EUROfusion, work package "Preparation of JT-6SA exploitation" was started with a comprehensive long-term plan of the three sub-groups Resources (ppy) Modelling Sub-systems Operation (in cooperation with F4E) Training integrated modelling of flat-top integrated modelling of ramp-up/down, transients systematic MHD analysis of scenarios (ideal, resistive, core/pedestal) physics studies: gyrofluid & gyrokinetic simulations, Alfvén instabilities, etc. simulation of control tools ECRH antenna optical tests ECRH antenna control software development divertor pumping computations conceptual design of diagnostics tests conceptual design of matter injection systems tests feasibility study of a W divertor conceptual design of a W divertor development of new data system tests and implementation development and test of analysis tool set development and test of remote participation tools. preliminary tests of remote access Towards a EU remote control room working group on operation write Operation Handbook select and train Session Leaders working group on select Topical campaign management Group Leaders Training JT-6SA generation in view of ITER Overall strategy and main milestones in were agreed in RCM-3 (May 214).
13 Feasibility study of transition to a W divertor in JT-6SA R. Neu 1, G.Ciraolo 2, M. Missirlian 2, R. Stankiewicz 3, W. Stępniewski 3, M. Wischmeier 1, R. Zagórski 3 T. Nakano (JT-6SA R.O.) 1MPI für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany 2 CEA, IRFM, Saint-Paul-Lez-Durance, France 3 IPPLM, Warsaw, Poland All Metal PFCs in European Roadmap Options for test of all metal / all W PFCs in preparation of DEMO JET: serious option, but currently not discussed (DT compatible?) JT6-SA: potentially all necessary ingredients available! DTT: net yet decided, potentially too small to achieve relevant scaling with AUG ITER: potentially most relevant experiment, but unclear whether technical feasible, late! JET JT-6 SA DTT Result of ITER main chamber W assessment 4th JT-6SA Research Coordination Meeting W-divertor R. Neu PAGE 26
Advanced Tokamak Research in JT-60U and JT-60SA
I-07 Advanced Tokamak Research in and JT-60SA A. Isayama for the JT-60 team 18th International Toki Conference (ITC18) December 9-12, 2008 Ceratopia Toki, Toki Gifu JAPAN Contents Advanced tokamak development
More informationDEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies. Physics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor
FIP/3-4Rb FIP/3-4Ra DEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies Y. Sakamoto, K. Tobita, Y. Someya, H. Utoh, N. Asakura, K. Hoshino, M. Nakamura, S. Tokunaga and the DEMO Design Team
More information1. Motivation power exhaust in JT-60SA tokamak. 2. Tool COREDIV code. 3. Operational scenarios of JT-60SA. 4. Results. 5.
1. Motivation power exhaust in JT-60SA tokamak 2. Tool COREDIV code 3. Operational scenarios of JT-60SA 4. Results 5. Conclusions K. Gałązka Efficient power exhaust in JT-60SA by COREDIV Page 2 The Institute
More informationPhysics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor
1 FIP/3-4Ra Physics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor N. Asakura 1, K. Hoshino 1, H. Utoh 1, K. Shinya 2, K. Shimizu 3, S. Tokunaga 1, Y.Someya 1, K. Tobita 1, N. Ohno
More informationModelling of JT-60U Detached Divertor Plasma using SONIC code
J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES, Vol. 9 (2010) Modelling of JT-60U Detached Divertor Plasma using SONIC code Kazuo HOSHINO, Katsuhiro SHIMIZU, Tomonori TAKIZUKA, Nobuyuki ASAKURA and Tomohide NAKANO Japan
More informationToward the Realization of Fusion Energy
Toward the Realization of Fusion Energy Nuclear fusion is the energy source of the sun and stars, in which light atomic nuclei fuse together, releasing a large amount of energy. Fusion power can be generated
More informationfor the French fusion programme
The ITER era : the 10 year roadmap for the French fusion programme E. Tsitrone 1 on behalf of IRFM and Tore Supra team 1 : CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France Association EURATOM-CEA TORE
More informationDivertor Requirements and Performance in ITER
Divertor Requirements and Performance in ITER M. Sugihara ITER International Team 1 th International Toki Conference Dec. 11-14, 001 Contents Overview of requirement and prediction for divertor performance
More informationPhysics of fusion power. Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER Thursday.. Guest lecturer and international celebrity Dr. D. Gericke will give an overview of inertial confinement fusion.. Instabilities
More informationExhaust scenarios. Alberto Loarte. Plasma Operation Directorate ITER Organization. Route de Vinon sur Verdon, St Paul lez Durance, France
Exhaust scenarios Alberto Loarte Plasma Operation Directorate ITER Organization Route de Vinon sur Verdon, 13067 St Paul lez Durance, France Acknowledgements: Members of ITER Organization (especially R.
More informationRadiative type-iii ELMy H-mode in all-tungsten ASDEX Upgrade
Radiative type-iii ELMy H-mode in all-tungsten ASDEX Upgrade J. Rapp 1, A. Kallenbach 2, R. Neu 2, T. Eich 2, R. Fischer 2, A. Herrmann 2, S. Potzel 2, G.J. van Rooij 3, J.J. Zielinski 3 and ASDEX Upgrade
More informationand expectations for the future
39 th Annual Meeting of the FPA 2018 First operation of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator and expectations for the future Hans-Stephan Bosch Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Greifswald, Germany on behalf
More informationImpurity Seeding in ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak Modeled by COREDIV Code
Contrib. Plasma Phys. 56, No. 6-8, 772 777 (2016) / DOI 10.1002/ctpp.201610008 Impurity Seeding in ASDEX Upgrade Tokamak Modeled by COREDIV Code K. Gała zka 1, I. Ivanova-Stanik 1, M. Bernert 2, A. Czarnecka
More informationDriving Mechanism of SOL Plasma Flow and Effects on the Divertor Performance in JT-60U
EX/D-3 Driving Mechanism of SOL Plasma Flow and Effects on the Divertor Performance in JT-6U N. Asakura ), H. Takenaga ), S. Sakurai ), G.D. Porter ), T.D. Rognlien ), M.E. Rensink ), O. Naito ), K. Shimizu
More informationCurrent density modelling in JET and JT-60U identity plasma experiments. Paula Sirén
Current density modelling in JET and JT-60U identity plasma experiments Paula Sirén 1/12 1/16 Euratom-TEKES Euratom-Tekes Annual Seminar 2013 28 24 May 2013 Paula Sirén Current density modelling in JET
More informationImpurity accumulation in the main plasma and radiation processes in the divetor plasma of JT-60U
1 EX/P4-25 Impurity accumulation in the main plasma and radiation processes in the divetor plasma of JT-6U T. Nakano, H. Kubo, N. Asakura, K. Shimizu and S. Higashijima Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka,
More informationIntegrated Core-SOL-Divertor Modelling for ITER Including Impurity: Effect of Tungsten on Fusion Performance in H-mode and Hybrid Scenario
1 TH/P3-45 Integrated Core-SOL-Divertor Modelling for ITER Including Impurity: Effect of Tungsten on Fusion Performance in H-mode and Hybrid Scenario R. Zagórski 1, I.Voitsekhovitch 2, I. Ivanova-Stanik
More informationSTEADY-STATE EXHAUST OF HELIUM ASH IN THE W-SHAPED DIVERTOR OF JT-60U
Abstract STEADY-STATE EXHAUST OF HELIUM ASH IN THE W-SHAPED DIVERTOR OF JT-6U A. SAKASAI, H. TAKENAGA, N. HOSOGANE, H. KUBO, S. SAKURAI, N. AKINO, T. FUJITA, S. HIGASHIJIMA, H. TAMAI, N. ASAKURA, K. ITAMI,
More informationITER operation. Ben Dudson. 14 th March Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
ITER operation Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 14 th March 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 18) ITER Some key statistics for ITER are:
More informationHIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JT-60U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES
HIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JT-U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES IAEA-CN-9/EX/ T. FUJITA, Y. KAMADA, S. ISHIDA, Y. NEYATANI, T. OIKAWA, S. IDE, S. TAKEJI, Y. KOIDE, A. ISAYAMA, T. FUKUDA, T. HATAE, Y. ISHII,
More informationFusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) Divertor Plans and Research Options
Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) Divertor Plans and Research Options A.M. Garofalo, T. Petrie, J. Smith, V. Chan, R. Stambaugh (General Atomics) J. Canik, A. Sontag, M. Cole (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)
More informationJoint ITER-IAEA-ICTP Advanced Workshop on Fusion and Plasma Physics October Introduction to Fusion Leading to ITER
2267-1 Joint ITER-IAEA-ICTP Advanced Workshop on Fusion and Plasma Physics 3-14 October 2011 Introduction to Fusion Leading to ITER SNIPES Joseph Allan Directorate for Plasma Operation Plasma Operations
More informationErosion and Confinement of Tungsten in ASDEX Upgrade
ASDEX Upgrade Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Erosion and Confinement of Tungsten in ASDEX Upgrade R. Dux, T.Pütterich, A. Janzer, and ASDEX Upgrade Team 3rd IAEA-FEC-Conference, 4.., Daejeon, Rep.
More informationComparative Transport Analysis of JET and JT-60U Discharges
EFDA JET CP(1)/13 J. Garcia, N. Hayashi, G. Giruzzi, M. Schneider, E. Joffrin, S. Ide, Y. Sakamoto, T. Suzuki, H. Urano, the JT-U Team and JET EFDA contributors Comparative Transport Analysis of JET and
More informationFirst Experiments in SST-1
First Experiments in SST-1 Subrata Pradhan & SST-1 Team Institute for Plasma Research India OV 5-5 Steady State Superconducting Tokamak (SST-1) at IPR Outline SST-1 Parameters Results in SST-1 from Engineering
More informationPHYSICS OF CFETR. Baonian Wan for CFETR physics group Institute of Plasma Physcis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.
PHYSICS OF CFETR Baonian Wan for CFETR physics group Institute of Plasma Physcis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China Dec 4, 2013 Mission of CFETR Complementary with ITER Demonstration of fusion
More informationImpact of High Field & High Confinement on L-mode-Edge Negative Triangularity Tokamak (NTT) Reactor
Impact of High Field & High Confinement on L-mode-Edge Negative Triangularity Tokamak (NTT) Reactor M. Kikuchi, T. Takizuka, S. Medvedev, T. Ando, D. Chen, J.X. Li, M. Austin, O. Sauter, L. Villard, A.
More informationDivertor Heat Flux Reduction and Detachment in NSTX
1 EX/P4-28 Divertor Heat Flux Reduction and Detachment in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii 1), R. Maingi 2), R. Raman 3), R. E. Bell 4), C. Bush 2), R. Kaita 4), H. W. Kugel 4), C. J. Lasnier 1), B. P. LeBlanc
More informationThe Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth. S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
The Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory The need for fusion energy is strong and enduring Carbon production (Gton) And the need is time urgent Goal
More informationRecent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science
Recent Development of LHD Experiment O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science 4521 1 Primary goal of LHD project 1. Transport studies in sufficiently high n E T regime relevant
More informationTHE ADVANCED TOKAMAK DIVERTOR
I Department of Engineering Physics THE ADVANCED TOKAMAK DIVERTOR S.L. Allen and the team 14th PSI QTYUIOP MA D S O N UCLAUCLA UCLA UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN THE ADVANCED TOKAMAK DIVERTOR S.L. Allen and
More informationSummary of CDBM Joint Experiments
11th Meeting of the ITPA CDBM TG, Chengdu, 23-24 Oct. 2006 Summary of CDBM Joint Experiments Mon. 23 Oct, morning T. Takizuka (JAEA) CDB-2: Confinement scaling in ELMy H-modes; β degradation C.C. Petty
More informationDivertor Heat Load in ITER-Like Advanced Tokamak Scenarios on JET
EFDA JET CP(8)2/3 G. Arnoux, P. Andrew, M. Beurskens, S. Brezinsek, C.D. Challis, P. De Vries, W. Fundamenski, E. Gauthier, C. Giroud, A. Huber, S. Jachmich, X. Litaudon, R.A. Pitts, F. Rimini and JET
More informationDesign concept of near term DEMO reactor with high temperature blanket
Design concept of near term DEMO reactor with high temperature blanket Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies March 16-18, 2009 Tokyo Univ. Mai Ichinose, Yasushi Yamamoto
More informationFAST 1 : a Physics and Technology Experiment on the Fusion Road Map
Fusion Advanced Studies Torus FAST 1 : a Physics and Technology Experiment on the Fusion Road Map Presented by A. A. Tuccillo on behalf of ENEA-Euratom Association Univ. of Rome Tor Vergata Univ. of Catania
More informationITER. Power and Particle Exhaust in ITER ITER
Power and Particle Exhaust in ITER ITER G. Janeschitz, C. Ibbott, Y. Igitkhanov, A. Kukushkin, H. Pacher, G. Pacher, R. Tivey, M. Sugihara, JCT and HTs San Diego.5.2 Power and Particle Exhaust in ITER
More informationASSESSMENT AND MODELING OF INDUCTIVE AND NON-INDUCTIVE SCENARIOS FOR ITER
ASSESSMENT AND MODELING OF INDUCTIVE AND NON-INDUCTIVE SCENARIOS FOR ITER D. BOUCHER 1, D. MOREAU 2, G. VAYAKIS 1, I. VOITSEKHOVITCH 3, J.M. ANÉ 2, X. GARBET 2, V. GRANDGIRARD 2, X. LITAUDON 2, B. LLOYD
More informationFusion Development Facility (FDF) Divertor Plans and Research Options
Fusion Development Facility (FDF) Divertor Plans and Research Options A.M. Garofalo, T. Petrie, J. Smith, M. Wade, V. Chan, R. Stambaugh (General Atomics) J. Canik (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) P. Stangeby
More informationOptimization of Plasma Initiation Scenarios in JT-60SA
J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES, Vol. 9 (2010) Optimization of Plasma Initiation Scenarios in JT-60SA Makoto MATSUKAWA 1, Tsunehisa TERAKADO 1, Kunihito YAMAUCHI 1, Katsuhiro SHIMADA 1, Philippe CARA 2, Elena
More informationStudies of Next-Step Spherical Tokamaks Using High-Temperature Superconductors Jonathan Menard (PPPL)
Studies of Next-Step Spherical Tokamaks Using High-Temperature Superconductors Jonathan Menard (PPPL) 22 nd Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (TOFE) Philadelphia, PA August 22-25, 2016
More information1999 RESEARCH SUMMARY
1999 RESEARCH SUMMARY by S.L. Allen Presented to DIII D Program Advisory Committee Meeting January 2 21, 2 DIII D NATIONAL FUSION FACILITY SAN DIEGO 3 /SLA/wj Overview of Physics Results from the 1999
More informationHT-7U* Superconducting Tokamak: Physics design, engineering progress and. schedule
1 FT/P2-03 HT-7U* Superconducting Tokamak: Physics design, engineering progress and schedule Y.X. Wan 1), P.D. Weng 1), J.G. Li 1), Q.Q. Yu 1), D.M. Gao 1), HT-7U Team 1) Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese
More informationCritical Physics Issues for DEMO
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Critical Physics Issues for DEMO L.D. Horton with thanks to the contributors to the EFDA DEMO physics tasks in 2006 and to D.J. Campbell, who organized this effort
More informationNuclear Fusion and ITER
Nuclear Fusion and ITER C. Alejaldre ITER Deputy Director-General Cursos de Verano UPM Julio 2, 2007 1 ITER the way to fusion power ITER ( the way in Latin) is the essential next step in the development
More informationTHE DIII D PROGRAM THREE-YEAR PLAN
THE PROGRAM THREE-YEAR PLAN by T.S. Taylor Presented to Program Advisory Committee Meeting January 2 21, 2 3 /TST/wj PURPOSE OF TALK Show that the program plan is appropriate to meet the goals and is well-aligned
More informationFirst plasma operation of Wendelstein 7-X
First plasma operation of Wendelstein 7-X R. C. Wolf on behalf of the W7-X Team *) robert.wolf@ipp.mpg.de *) see author list Bosch et al. Nucl. Fusion 53 (2013) 126001 The optimized stellarator Wendelstein
More informationInfluence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the H-mode Pedestal Height
Influence of Beta, Shape and Rotation on the H-mode Pedestal Height by A.W. Leonard with R.J. Groebner, T.H. Osborne, and P.B. Snyder Presented at Forty-Ninth APS Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics
More informationHistory of PARASOL! T. Takizuka! Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University!! PARASOL was developed at Japan Atomic Energy Agency!
History of PARASOL! T. Takizuka!!! Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University!! PARASOL was developed at Japan Atomic Energy Agency! OSAKA UNIVERSITY! 20th NEXT Meeting, Kyoto Terrsa, Kyoto, 13-14
More informationAssessment of the operational window for JT-60SA divertor pumping under consideration of the effects from neutral-neutral collisions
1 Assessment of the operational window for JT-60SA divertor pumping under consideration of the effects from neutral-neutral collisions Chr. Day 1, C. Gleason-González 1, K. Shimizu 2, S. Varoutis 1, T.
More information3D analysis of impurity transport and radiation for ITER limiter start-up configurations
3D analysis of impurity transport and radiation for ITER limiter start-up configurations P2-74 X. Zha a*, F. Sardei a, Y. Feng a, M. Kobayashi b, A. Loarte c, G. Federici c a Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik,
More informationComparing Different Scalings of Parallel Heat Flux with Toroidal Magnetic Field [q with BT] M.L. Reinke. February, 2018
PSFC/RR-18-4 Comparing Different Scalings of Parallel Heat Flux with Toroidal Magnetic Field [q with BT] M.L. Reinke February, 2018 Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology
More informationOverview of Pilot Plant Studies
Overview of Pilot Plant Studies and contributions to FNST Jon Menard, Rich Hawryluk, Hutch Neilson, Stewart Prager, Mike Zarnstorff Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology
More informationEffect of Variation in Equilibrium Shape on ELMing H Mode Performance in DIII D Diverted Plasmas
Effect of Variation in Equilibrium Shape on ELMing H Mode Performance in DIII D Diverted Plasmas M.E. Fenstermacher, T.H. Osborne, T.W. Petrie, C.J. Lasnier, A.W. Leonard, J.G. Watkins, 3 T.N. Carlstrom,
More informationExperimental studies of ITER demonstration discharges
IT/2-2 Experimental studies of ITER demonstration discharges George Sips MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Association, Garching, Germany T.A. Casper 2, E.J. Doyle 3, G. Giruzzi 4, Y. Gribov 5, J. Hobirk 1,
More informationITER Divertor Plasma Modelling with Consistent Core-Edge Parameters
CT/P-7 ITER Divertor Plasma Modelling with Consistent Core-Edge Parameters A. S. Kukushkin ), H. D. Pacher ), G. W. Pacher 3), G. Janeschitz ), D. Coster 5), A. Loarte 6), D. Reiter 7) ) ITER IT, Boltzmannstr.,
More informationEdge Plasma Energy and Particle Fluxes in Divertor Tokamaks
Edge Plasma Energy and Particle Fluxes in Divertor Tokamaks Alberto Loarte European Fusion Development Agreement Close Support Unit - Garching Alberto Loarte New Trends in Plasma Physics II Max-Planck-Institut
More informationMission Elements of the FNSP and FNSF
Mission Elements of the FNSP and FNSF by R.D. Stambaugh PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Presented at FNST Workshop August 3, 2010 In Addition to What Will Be Learned
More informationMulti-machine comparisons of divertor heat flux mitigation by radiative cooling with nitrogen
1 ITR/P1-28 Multi-machine comparisons of divertor heat flux mitigation by radiative cooling with nitrogen A. Kallenbach 1, M. Bernert 1, R. Dux 1, T. Eich 1, C. Giroud 2, A. Herrmann 1, J.W. Hughes 3,
More informationThe performance of improved H-modes at ASDEX Upgrade and projection to ITER
EX/1-1 The performance of improved H-modes at ASDEX Upgrade and projection to George Sips MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Association, D-85748, Germany G. Tardini 1, C. Forest 2, O. Gruber 1, P. Mc Carthy
More informationFast ion generation with novel three-ion radiofrequency heating scenarios:
1 Fast ion generation with novel three-ion radiofrequency heating scenarios: from JET, W7-X and ITER applications to aneutronic fusion studies Yevgen Kazakov 1, D. Van Eester 1, J. Ongena 1, R. Bilato
More informationCapability requirements for a PMI research thrust fusion facility
Capability requirements for a PMI research thrust fusion facility J.E. Menard, R.J. Goldston, J.M. Canik J.P. Allain, J.N. Brooks, R. Doerner, G.-Y. Fu, D.A. Gates, C.A. Gentile, J.H. Harris, A. Hassanein,
More informationITER A/M/PMI Data Requirements and Management Strategy
ITER A/M/PMI Data Requirements and Management Strategy Steven Lisgo, R. Barnsley, D. Campbell, A. Kukushkin, M. Hosokawa, R. A. Pitts, M. Shimada, J. Snipes, A. Winter ITER Organisation with contributions
More informationFirst Observation of ELM Suppression by Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade and Comparison to DIII-D Matched-Shape Plasmas
1 PD/1-1 First Observation of ELM Suppression by Magnetic Perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade and Comparison to DIII-D Matched-Shape Plasmas R. Nazikian 1, W. Suttrop 2, A. Kirk 3, M. Cavedon 2, T.E. Evans
More informationProvisional scenario of radioactive waste management for DEMO
US-Japan Workshop on Fusion power plants and Related advanced technologies 13-14 March 2014 UCSD, USA Provisional scenario of radioactive waste management for DEMO Youji Someya Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
More informationSecuring High β N JT-60SA Operational Space by MHD Stability and Active Control Modelling
1 TH/P1-18 Securing High β N JT-60SA Operational Space by MHD Stability and Active Control Modelling T. Bolzonella 1, P. Bettini 1, L. Figini 2, S.C. Guo 1, Y.Q. Liu 3, G. Marchiori 1, G. Matsunaga 4,
More informationNon-Solenoidal Plasma Startup in
Non-Solenoidal Plasma Startup in the A.C. Sontag for the Pegasus Research Team A.C. Sontag, 5th APS-DPP, Nov. 2, 28 1 Point-Source DC Helicity Injection Provides Viable Non-Solenoidal Startup Technique
More informationPower Deposition Measurements in Deuterium and Helium Discharges in JET MKIIGB Divertor by IR-Thermography
EFDA JET CP(02)01/03 T Eich, A Herrmann, P Andrew and A Loarte Power Deposition Measurements in Deuterium and Helium Discharges in JET MKIIGB Divertor by IR-Thermography . Power Deposition Measurements
More informationReview of experimental observations of plasma detachment and of the effects of divertor geometry on divertor performance
Review of experimental observations of plasma detachment and of the effects of divertor geometry on divertor performance Alberto Loarte European Fusion Development Agreement Close Support Unit - Garching
More informationPhysics Basis of ITER-FEAT
IAEA-CN-77/ITERP/05 Physics Basis of ITER-FEAT M. Shimada 1), D. J. Campbell 2), M. Wakatani 3), H. Ninomiya 4), N. Ivanov 5), V. Mukhovatov 1) and the ITER Joint Central Team and Home Teams 1) ITER Joint
More informationDIVIMP simulation of W transport in the SOL of JET H-mode plasmas
DIVIMP simulation of W transport in the SOL of JET H-mode plasmas A. Järvinen a, C. Giroud b, M. Groth a, K. Krieger c, D. Moulton d, S. Wiesen e, S. Brezinsek e and JET- EFDA contributors¹ JET-EFDA, Culham
More informationEX/C3-5Rb Relationship between particle and heat transport in JT-60U plasmas with internal transport barrier
EX/C-Rb Relationship between particle and heat transport in JT-U plasmas with internal transport barrier H. Takenaga ), S. Higashijima ), N. Oyama ), L. G. Bruskin ), Y. Koide ), S. Ide ), H. Shirai ),
More informationD- 3 He HA tokamak device for experiments and power generations
D- He HA tokamak device for experiments and power generations US-Japan Fusion Power Plant Studies Contents University of Tokyo, Japan January -, 5 O.Mitarai (Kyushu Tokai University).Motivation.Formalism,
More informationTokamak Divertor System Concept and the Design for ITER. Chris Stoafer April 14, 2011
Tokamak Divertor System Concept and the Design for ITER Chris Stoafer April 14, 2011 Presentation Overview Divertor concept and purpose Divertor physics General design considerations Overview of ITER divertor
More informationDT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift )
DT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift ) Tsuguhiro WATANABE National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan (Received
More informationThe Li-wall Stellarator Experiment in TJ-II
The Li-wall Stellarator Experiment in TJ-II Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión. CIEMAT. Madrid. Spain Outlook Introduction Why Lithium? Li coating technique in TJ-II 2008 Results Particle recycling and confinement
More informationSpherical Torus Fusion Contributions and Game-Changing Issues
Spherical Torus Fusion Contributions and Game-Changing Issues Spherical Torus (ST) research contributes to advancing fusion, and leverages on several game-changing issues 1) What is ST? 2) How does research
More informationA Faster Way to Fusion
A Faster Way to Fusion 2017 Tokamak Energy Tokamak Energy Ltd Company Overview April 2018 Our Mission To deliver to mankind a cheap, safe, secure and practically limitless source of clean energy fusion
More informationOptimization of Stationary High-Performance Scenarios
Optimization of Stationary High-Performance Scenarios Presented by T.C. Luce National Fusion Program Midterm Review Office of Fusion Energy Science Washington, DC September, 6 QTYUIOP 8-6/TCL/rs Strategy
More informationSpatio-temporal investigations on the triggering of pellet induced ELMs
Spatio-temporal investigations on the triggering of pellet induced ELMs G. Kocsis, S. Kálvin, P.T. Lang*, M. Maraschek*, J. Neuhauser* W. Schneider*, T. Szepesi and ASDEX Upgrade Team KFKI-RMKI, EURATOM
More informationDeveloping Steady State ELM-absent H-Mode scenarios with Advanced Divertor Configuration in EAST tokamak
Developing Steady State ELM-absent H-Mode scenarios with Advanced Divertor Configuration in EAST tokamak G. Calabrò, B.J. Xiao, J.G. Li, Z.P. Luo, Q.P. Yuan, L. Wang, K. Wu, R. Albanese, R. Ambrosino,
More informationTurbulent Transport Analysis of JET H-mode and Hybrid Plasmas using QuaLiKiz, TGLF and GLF23
EFDA JET CP(1)/ B. Baiocchi, J. Garcia, M. Beurkens, C. Bourdelle, F. Crisanti, C. Giroud, J. Hobirk, F. Imbeaux, I. Nunes, EU-ITM ITER Scenario Modelling group and JET EFDA contributors Turbulent Transport
More information1 EX/P6-5 Analysis of Pedestal Characteristics in JT-60U H-mode Plasmas Based on Monte-Carlo Neutral Transport Simulation
1 Analysis of Pedestal Characteristics in JT-60U H-mode Plasmas Based on Monte-Carlo Neutral Transport Simulation Y. Nakashima1), Y. Higashizono1), H. Kawano1), H. Takenaga2), N. Asakura2), N. Oyama2),
More informationIMPURITY ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF DIII-D RADIATIVE MANTLE DISCHARGES
IMPURITY ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF DIII-D RADIATIVE MANTLE DISCHARGES J. Mandrekas, W.M. Stacey Georgia Institute of Technology M. Murakami, M.R. Wade ORNL G. L. Jackson General Atomics Presented at the
More informationUS-Japan workshop on Fusion Power Reactor Design and Related Advanced Technologies, March at UCSD.
US-Japan workshop on Fusion Power Reactor Design and Related Advanced Technologies, March 5-7 28 at UCSD. Overview Overview of of Design Design Integration Integration toward toward Optimization -type
More informationMagnetic Confinement Fusion and Tokamaks Chijin Xiao Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan
The Sun Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Tokamaks Chijin Xiao Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan 2017 CNS Conference Niagara Falls, June 4-7, 2017 Tokamak Outline Fusion
More informationDesign of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system
Design of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system J.M. Ané 1, V. Grandgirard, F. Albajar 1, J.Johner 1 1Euratom-CEA Association, Cadarache, France Euratom-EPFL
More informationIntegrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport
1 Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Ibaraki-ken, 311-0193 Japan
More informationThermographic measurements of power loads to plasma facing components at Wendelstein 7-X
Thermographic measurements of power loads to plasma facing components at Wendelstein 7-X M.W. Jakubowski 1, A. Ali 1, P. Drewelow 1, H. Niemann 1, F. Pisano 4, A. Puig Sitjes 1, G. Wurden 3, C. Biedermann
More informationMitigation of ELMs and Disruptions by Pellet Injection
TH/P4-5 Mitigation of ELMs and Disruptions by Pellet Injection K. Gál ), T. Fehér ), T. Fülöp ), P. T. Lang 3), H. M. Smith 4), ASDEX Upgrade Team 5) and JET-EFDA contributors 3) ) KFKI-RMKI, Association
More informationHigh fusion performance at high T i /T e in JET-ILW baseline plasmas with high NBI heating power and low gas puffing
High fusion performance at high T i /T e in JET-ILW baseline plasmas with high NBI heating power and low gas puffing Hyun-Tae Kim, A.C.C. Sips, C. D. Challis, F. Rimini, L. Garzotti, E. Lerche, L. Frassinetti,
More informationA SUPERCONDUCTING TOKAMAK FUSION TRANSMUTATION OF WASTE REACTOR
A SUPERCONDUCTING TOKAMAK FUSION TRANSMUTATION OF WASTE REACTOR A.N. Mauer, W.M. Stacey, J. Mandrekas and E.A. Hoffman Fusion Research Center Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationIntegrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss and Cycle in Improved H-mode Plasmas
1 Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss and Cycle in Improved H-mode Plasmas N. Hayashi 1), T. Takizuka 1), N. Aiba 1), N. Oyama 1), T. Ozeki 1), S. Wiesen 2), V. Parail 3) 1) Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
More informationDevelopment of a Systematic, Self-consistent Algorithm for the K-DEMO Steady-state Operation Scenario
Development of a Systematic, Self-consistent Algorithm for the K-DEMO Steady-state Operation Scenario J.S. Kang 1, J.M. Park 2, L. Jung 3, S.K. Kim 1, J. Wang 1, D. H. Na 1, C.-S. Byun 1, Y. S. Na 1, and
More informationTechnological and Engineering Challenges of Fusion
Technological and Engineering Challenges of Fusion David Maisonnier and Jim Hayward EFDA CSU Garching (david.maisonnier@tech.efda.org) 2nd IAEA TM on First Generation of FPP PPCS-KN1 1 Outline The European
More informationImplementation of a long leg X-point target divertor in the ARC fusion pilot plant
Implementation of a long leg X-point target divertor in the ARC fusion pilot plant A.Q. Kuang, N.M. Cao, A.J. Creely, C.A. Dennett, J. Hecla, H. Hoffman, M. Major, J. Ruiz Ruiz, R.A. Tinguely, E.A. Tolman
More informationDEMO diagnostics and impact on controllability
Member of the Helmholtz Association DEMO diagnostics and impact on controllability IAEA DEMO workshop, 17 th -20 th Dec 2013, Vienna (Austria) W. Biel 1, A. Dinklage 2, F. Felici 3, R. König 2, H. Meister
More informationMission and Design of the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment (FIRE)
Mission and Design of the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment (FIRE) D. M. Meade 1), S. C. Jardin 1), J. A. Schmidt 1), R. J. Thome 2), N. R. Sauthoff 1), P. Heitzenroeder 1), B. E. Nelson 3), M. A. Ulrickson
More informationTOKAMAK EXPERIMENTS - Summary -
17 th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, October, 1998 TOKAMAK EXPERIMENTS - Summary - H. KISHIMOTO Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute 2-2 Uchisaiwai-Cho, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, Japan 1. Introduction
More informationLocal organizer. National Centralized Tokamak
US/Japan Workshop on MHD Stability Control and Related Confinement of Toroidal Plasmas, 6-8 February 2006, JAEA-Naka, Japan with ITPA meeting of MHD Topical Group, 6-9 February Venue and Dates The workshop
More informationCritical Gaps between Tokamak Physics and Nuclear Science. Clement P.C. Wong General Atomics
Critical Gaps between Tokamak Physics and Nuclear Science (Step 1: Identifying critical gaps) (Step 2: Options to fill the critical gaps initiated) (Step 3: Success not yet) Clement P.C. Wong General Atomics
More information