arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.acc-ph] 27 Jan 2000

Transcription

1 Beam Coupling Impedance of Small Dicontinuitie arxiv:phyic/000065v [phyic.acc-ph] 7 Jan 000 Sergey S. Kurennoy SNS Diviion, Lo Alamo National Laboratory, Lo Alamo, NM 87545, USA Abtract A general derivation of the beam coupling impedance produced by mall dicontinuitie on the wall of the vacuum chamber of an accelerator i reviewed. A collection of analytical formula for the impedance of mall obtacle i preented. Introduction A common tendency in deign of modern accelerator i to minimize beam-chamber coupling impedance to avoid beam intabilitie and reduce heating. Even contribution from tiny dicontinuitie like pumping hole have to be accounted for becaue of their large number. Numerical time-domain method are rather involved and time-conuming for mall obtacle, epecially for thoe protruding inide the beam pipe. Thi make analytical method for calculating the impedance of mall dicontinuitie very important. A dicontinuity on the wall of a beam pipe a hole, cavity, pot, mak, etc. i conidered to be mall when it typical ize i mall compared to the ize of the chamber cro ection and the wavelength. Analytical calculation of the coupling impedance of mall obtacle are baed on the Bethe theory of diffraction of electromagnetic wave by a mall hole in a metal plane []. The method baic idea i that the hole in the frequency range where the wavelength i large compared to the typical hole ize, can be replaced by two induced dipole, an electric and a magnetic one. The dipole magnitude are proportional to the beam field at the hole location, with the coefficient called polarizabilitie []. The field diffracted by a hole into the vacuum chamber can be found a thoe radiated by thee effective electric and magnetic dipole, and integrating the field give u the coupling impedance. Following thi path, the impedance produced by a mall hole on the round pipe were calculated firt in [3]. Since eentially the ame idea work for any mall obtacle, the method can be extended for arbitrary mall dicontinuitie on the pipe with an arbitrary-haped cro ection. Analytical expreion for the coupling impedance of variou mall dicontinuitie on the wall of a cylindrical beam pipe with an arbitrary ingle-connected cro ection have been obtained in Ref. [3]-[9]. All the dependence on the dicontinuity hape enter only through it polarizabilitie. Therefore, the problem of calculating the impedance contribution from a given mall dicontinuity wa reduced to finding it electric and magnetic polarizabilitie, which can be done by olving proper electro- or magnetotatic problem. Ueful analytical reult have been obtained for variou axiymmetric obtacle (cavitie and irie) [0], a well a for hole and lot: circular [] and elliptic [] hole in a zero-thickne wall, circular [] and elliptic [] hole in a thick wall, variou lot (ome reult are compiled in [3]), and for a ring-haped cut [4]. The impedance of variou protruion (pot, mak, etc) have been calculated in [5]. Thi text i organized a follow. In Section and 3 a general derivation of the coupling impedance for a mall dicontinuity i given, and then in Sect. 4 the trapped mode are dicued. Thi part motly follow Ref. [9]. In Sect. 5 we collected for the reader convenience ome practical formula for the coupling Lecture preented at the US Particle Accelerator School in Tucon, AZ on January 7-, 000, a a part of R.L. Glucktern coure Analytic Method for Calculating Coupling Impedance

2 impedance of variou mall dicontinuitie. In a compact form, many of thee formula are included in the handbook [6]. Field. Beam Field Let u conider an infinite cylindrical pipe with an arbitrary cro ection S and perfectly conducting wall. The z axi i directed along the pipe axi, a hole (or another mall dicontinuity like a pot, cavity or mak) i located at the point ( b,z = 0), and it typical ize h atifie h b. To evaluate the coupling impedance one ha to calculate the field induced in the chamber by a given current. If an ultrarelativitic point charge q move parallel to the chamber axi with the tranvere offet from the axi, the field harmonic E b, H b produced by thi charge on the chamber wall without dicontinuity would be Eν b (,z;ω) = Z 0Hτ b (,z;ω) () = Z 0 qe ikz n,m k nm e nm( ) ν e nm ( b), where Z 0 = 0π Ohm i the impedance of free pace, and knm, e nm( r) are eigenvalue and orthonormalized eigenfunction (EF) of the D boundary problem in S: ( +knm ) enm = 0 ; e S nm = 0. () Here i the D gradient in plane S; k = ω/c; ˆν mean an outward normal unit vector, ˆτ i a unit vector tangent to the boundary S of the chamber cro ection S, and {ˆν,ˆτ,ẑ} form a right-handed bai. The differential operator ν i the calar product ν = ˆν. The eigenvalue and EF for circular and rectangular cro ection are given in the Appendix. Let u introduce the following notation for the um in Eq. () e ν ( ) = g k g e g( ) ν e g ( b) (3) where g = {n,m} i a generalized index. From a phyical viewpoint, thi i jut a normalized electrotatic field produced at the hole location by a filament charge diplaced from the chamber axi by ditance. It atifie the normalization condition dl e ν ( ) =, (4) S where integration goe along the boundary S, which i a conequence of the Gau law. It follow from the fact that Eq. (3) give the boundary value of e ν ( ) Φ( r ), where Φ( r ) i the Green function of boundary problem (): Φ( r ) = δ( r ). For the ymmetric cae of an on-axi beam in a circular pipe of radiu b from Eq. (4) immediately follow e ν (0) = /(πb). It can alo be derived by directly umming up the erie in Eq. (3) for thi particular cae.. Effective Dipole and Polarizabilitie At ditance l uch that h l b, the field radiated by the hole into the pipe are equal to thoe produced by effective dipole [, ] P ν = χε 0 E h ν /; M τ = (ψ ττ H h τ +ψ τzh h z )/; M z = (ψ zτ H h τ +ψ zz H h z)/, (5)

3 where upercript h mean that the field are taken at the hole. Polarizabilitie ψ,χ are related to the effective one α e,α m ued in [, 3] a α e = χ/ and α m = ψ/, o that for a circular hole of radiu a in a thin wall ψ = 8a 3 /3 and χ = 4a 3 /3 []. In general, ψ i a ymmetric D-tenor, which can be diagonalized. If the hole i ymmetric, and it ymmetry axi i parallel to ẑ, the kew term vanih, i.e. ψ τz = ψ zτ = 0. In a more general cae of a non-zero tilt angle α between the major ymmetry axi and ẑ, ψ ττ = ψ co α+ψ in α, ψ τz = ψ zτ = (ψ ψ )inαcoα, (6) ψ zz = ψ in α+ψ co α, where ψ i the longitudinal magnetic uceptibility (for the external magnetic field along the major axi), and ψ i the tranvere one (the field i tranvere to the major axi of the hole). When the effective dipole are obtained, e.g., by ubtituting beam field () into Eq. (5), one can calculate the field in the chamber a a um of waveguide eigenmode excited in the chamber by the dipole, and find the impedance. Thi approach ha been carried out for a circular pipe in [3], and for an arbitrary chamber in [5]. The polarizabilitie for variou type of mall dicontinuitie are dicued in detail in Section 5..3 Radiated Field The radiated field in the chamber can be expanded in a erie in TM- and TE-eigenmode [] a F = [ A + nmf nm (E)+ θ(z)+a nmf nm ]+ (E) θ( z) (7) nm [ B nm + F nm (H)+ θ(z)+bnm F ] nm (H) θ( z), nm where F mean either E or H, upercript ± denote wave radiated repectively in the poitive (+, z > 0) or negative (, z < 0) direction, and θ(z) i the Heaviide tep function. The field F nm (E) of {n, m}th TM-eigenmode in Eq. (7) are expreed [] in term of EF () E z = k nm e nmexp(±γ nm z) ; H z = 0 ; E t = ±Γ nm enm exp(±γ nm z) ; (8) H t = ik Z 0 ẑ e nm exp(±γ nm z), where propagation factor Γ nm = (knm k ) / hould be replaced by iβ nm with β nm = (k knm )/ for k > k nm. For given value of dipole (5) the unknown coefficient A ± nm can be found [3, 5] uing the Lorentz reciprocity theorem A ± nm = a nmm τ ±b nm P ν, (9) with a nm = ikz 0 Γ nm knm ν e h nm ; b nm = The field F (H) nm of the TE nm -eigenmode in Eq. (7) are ε 0 knm ν e h nm. (0) H z = k nm h nmexp(±γ nm z) ; E z = 0 ; H t = ±Γ nm h nm exp(±γ nmz) ; () E t = ikz 0 ẑ h nm exp(±γ nmz), with propagation factor Γ nm = (k nm k ) / replaced by iβ nm = i(k k nm )/ when k > k nm. Here EF h nm atify the boundary problem () with the Neumann boundary condition ν h nm S = 0, and k nm 3

4 are correponding eigenvalue, ee in Appendix. The TE-mode excitation coefficient in the expanion (7) for the radiated field are B ± nm = ±c nmm τ +d nm P ν +q nm M z, () where c nm = k nm τ h h nm ; q nm = Γ h h nm ; nm ik d nm = Z 0 ε 0 Γ τ h h nm k nm. (3) nm.4 Field near Hole with Radiation Correction A more refined theory hould take into account the reaction of radiated wave back on the hole. Adding correction to the beam field () due to the radiated wave in the vicinity of the hole give E ν H τ H z = Eb ν +ψ zτ Σ xz 0 H τ +ψ zz Σ xz 0 H z χ(σ Σ ), (4) = Hb τ +ψ τz (Σ Σ )H z ψ ττ (Σ Σ ), (5) = χσ xe ν /Z 0 +ψ zτ Σ 3H τ ψ zz Σ, (6) 3 where ( = {n,m} i a generalized index) Σ = ( ) Γ ν e h ( 4 k ; Σ = k ν e h ) 4 Γ k ; ( Σ = k τ h h ) 4 Γ ; Σ k = ) Γ ( τ h h 4 k ; Σ x = i k h h τh h 4 Γ ; Σ 3 = ( ) k h h 4 Γ. (7) Since thi conideration work at ditance larger than h, one hould retrict the ummation in Eq. (7) to the value of = {n,m} uch that k h and k h. 3 Impedance 3. Longitudinal Impedance The generalized longitudinal impedance of the hole depend on the tranvere offet from the chamber axi of the leading particle and t of the tet particle, and i defined [6] a Z(k;, t) = q dze ikz E z ( t,z;ω), (8) where the longitudinal field E z ( t,z;ω) i taken along the tet particle path. The diplacement from the axi are aumed to be mall, b and t b. The impedance Z(k;, t) include higher multipole longitudinal impedance, andin the limit,t 0givethe uualmonopoleonez(k) = Z(k;0,0). TocalculateE z ( t,z;ω), 4

5 we ue Eq. (7) with coefficient (9) and () in which the corrected near-hole field (4)-(6) are ubtituted [a dependence on enter via beam field ()]. It yield Z(k;, t) = ikz 0e ν ( )e ν ( t) (9) [ ] ψ ττ ψ ττ (Σ Σ ) + ψ τzσ χ 3 χ(σ Σ ), where e ν ( r) i defined above by Eq. (3). In practice, we are uually intereted only in the monopole term Z(k) = Z(k;0,0), and will motly ue Eq. (9) with replacement e ν ( )e ν ( t ) ẽ ν, where ẽ ν e ν (0). In deriving Eq. (9) we have neglected the coupling term between E ν, H τ and H z, cf. Eq. (4)-(6), which contribute to the third order of an expanion dicued below, and alo have taken into account that ψ τz = ψ zτ. For a mall dicontinuity, polarizabilitie ψ,χ = O(h 3 ), and they are mall compared to b 3. If we expand the impedance (9) in a perturbation erie in polarizabilitie, the firt order give Z (k) = ikz 0ẽ ν (ψ ττ χ), (0) that i exactly the inductive impedance obtained in [5] for an arbitrary cro ection of the chamber. For a particular cae of a circular pipe, from either direct ummation in () or applying the Gau law, one get ẽ ν = /(πb). Subtituting that into Eq. (0) lead to a well-known reult [3, 4]: Z(k) = ikz 0 ψ ττ χ 8π b = ikz 0 α e +α m 4π b, () where we recall that two definition of the polarizabilitie are related a α e = χ/ and α m = ψ ττ /. From a phyical point of view, keeping only the firt order term (0) correpond to dropping out all radiation correction in Eq. (4)-(6). Thee correction firt reveal themelve in the econd order term Z (k) = ikz 0ẽ ν [ ψ ττ (Σ Σ )+ψ τz Σ 3 () + χ (Σ Σ ) ], which at frequencie above the chamber cutoff ha both a real and imaginary part. The real part of the impedance i { ( ) ReZ (k) = k3 Z 0 ẽ < ν ψτz k h h 8 k β (3) [ < ( + ψττ ν e h ) ) < β β k + ( τ h h ] k k [ < ( ) + χ β ν e h ( < τ h h ]} k k + ) β k, where the um include only a finite number of the eigenmode propagating in the chamber at a given frequency, i.e. thoe with k < k or k < k. The dependence of ReZ on frequency i rather complicated; it ha harp peak near the cutoff of all propagating eigenmode of the chamber, and increae in average with the frequency increae. Well above the chamber cutoff, i.e. when kb (but till kh to jutify the Bethe approach), thi dependence can be derived a follow. If the waveguide cro ection S i a imply connected region, the average number n(k) of the eigenvalue k (or k ) which are le than k, for kb, i proportional to k [7]: n(k) S 4π k +O(k), 5

6 where S i the area of the cro ection. Uing thi property, and taking into account that ν e h k e h, and τ h h k h h, we replace um in the RHS of Eq. (3) by integral a < k dk d dkn(k). It turn out that all um in Eq. (3) have the ame aymptotic behavior, being linear in k, and a a reult, ReZ k 4. Obtaining the exact coefficient in thi dependence eem rather involved for a general S, but it can be eaily done for a rectangular chamber, ee in Appendix B. The reult i ReZ = Z 0k 4 ẽ ν π (ψ ττ +ψ τz +χ ). (4) Remarkably, the ame anwer (for ψ τz = 0) ha been obtained in Ref. [3] imply by calculating the energy radiated by the dipole into a half-pace. The phyical reaon for thi coincidence i clear: at frequencie well above the cutoff the effective dipole radiate into the waveguide the ame energy a into an open half-pace. Strictly peaking, the real part of impedance i non-zero even below the chamber cutoff, due to radiation outide. In the cae of a thin wall, ReZ below the cutoff can be etimated by Eq. (4), and twice that for high frequencie, kb. For a thick wall, the contribution of the radiation outide to ReZ i till given by Eq. (4), but with the outide polarizabilitie ubtituted, and it decreae exponentially with the thickne increae [4]. The real part of the impedance i related to the power P cattered by the hole into the beam pipe a ReZ = P/q. Thee energy conideration can be ued a an alternative way for the impedance calculation. The radiated power i P = [ ] A P (E) +BP (H), where we um overall propagatingmode in both direction, and P mean the time-averagedpower radiated in th eigenmode: P (E) = kβ k /(Z 0 ) and P (H) = Z 0 kβ k /. Subtituting beam field () into Eq. (9)-(3) for the coefficient A and B and performing calculation give u exactly the reult (3). Such an alternative derivation of the real part ha been carried out in Ref. [8] for a circular pipe with a ymmetric untilted hole (ψ τz = 0). Our reult (3) coincide, in thi particular cae, with that of Reference [8]. It i appropriate to mention alo that in thi cae at high frequencie the erie ha been ummed approximately [8] uing aymptotic expreion for root of the Beel function, and the reult, of coure, agree with Eq. (4). One hould note that the additional ψτz -term in Eq. (3) i important in ome particular cae. For example, thi kew term give a leading contribution to ReZ for a long and lightly tilted lot, becaue ψ τz can be much larger than ψ ττ in thi cae, ince ψ ψ, cf. Eq. (6). 3. Tranvere Impedance We will make ue of the expreion for the generalized longitudinal impedance Z(k;, t), Eq. (9). According to the Panofky-Wenzel theorem, the tranvere impedance can be derived a Z (k;, t) = Z(k;, t)/(k), ee, e.g., [6] for detail. Thi way lead to the expreion Z (k;, t) = iz 0e dip ν ( ) e ν ( t) [ ψ ττ ψ ττ (Σ Σ ) +ψ τz Σ 3 where e dip ν ( ) = e ν ( ). Going to the limit t 0, we get the uual dipole tranvere impedance (5) ] χ χ(σ Σ ), Z (k) = iz 0 (d x +d y) a d co(ϕ b ϕ d ) (6) [ ] ψ ττ ψ ττ (Σ Σ ) +ψ τz Σ 3 χ χ(σ Σ ). 6

7 Herex,y arethehorizontalandverticalcoordinateinthechambercroection; d x x e ν (0), d y y e ν (0); ϕ b = ϕ = ϕ t i the azimuthal angle of the beam poition in the cro-ectionplane; a d = a x coϕ d + a y inϕ d i a unit vector in thi plane in direction ϕ d, which i defined by condition coϕ d = d x / d x +d y, inϕ d = d y / d x +d y. It i een from Eq. (6) that the angle ϕ d how the direction of the tranvere-impedance vector Z and, therefore, of the beam-deflecting force. Moreover, the value of Z i maximal when the beam i deflected along thi direction and vanihe when the beam offet i perpendicular to it. The equation (6) include the correction due to wave radiated by the hole into the chamber in exactly the ame way a Eq. (9) for the longitudinal impedance. If we expand it in a erie in the polarizabilitie, the firt order of the quare bracket in (6) give (ψ ττ χ), and the reulting inductive impedance i [5]: Z (k) = iz 0 (d x +d y ) a dco(ϕ b ϕ d )(ψ ττ χ). (7) For a circular pipe, d x = coϕ h /(πb ) and d y = inϕ h /(πb ), where ϕ h i the azimuthal poition of the dicontinuity (hole). A a reult, ϕ d = ϕ h, and the deflecting force i directed toward (or oppoite to) the hole. Note that in axiymmetric tructure the beam-deflecting force i directed along the beam offet; the preence of an obtacle obviouly break thi ymmetry. For a general cro ection, the direction of the deflecting force depend on the hole poition in a complicated way, ee [5] for rectangular and elliptic chamber. The tranvere impedance of a dicontinuity on the wall of a circular pipe ha a imple form [3]: Z circ (k) = iz 0 ψ ττ χ π b 4 a h co(ϕ b ϕ d ) = iz 0 α m +α e π b 4 a h co(ϕ b ϕ d ), (8) where a h i a unit vector in the direction from the chamber axi to the dicontinuity, orthogonal to ẑ. For M (M 3) hole uniformly paced in one cro ection of a circular beam pipe, a vector um of M expreion (8) give the tranvere impedance a Z circ M (k) = iz 0 α m +α e π b 4 M a b, (9) where a b = / i aunit vectorin the direction ofthe beam tranvereoffet. One can eethat the deflecting force i now directed along the beam offet, i.e. ome kind of the axial ymmetry retoration occur. The maximal value of Z for M hole which are uniformly paced in one cro-ection i only M/ time larger than that for M =. Moreover, the well-known empirical relation Z = (/b k)z, which i jutified only for axiymmetric tructure, hold in thi cae alo. The econd order term in Eq. (6) include ReZ, cf. Sect. 3. for the longitudinal impedance. 4 Trapped Mode So far we conidered the perturbation expanion of Eq. (9) implicitly auming that correction term O(ψ) and O(χ) in the denominator of it right-hand ide(rhs) are mall compared to. Under certain condition thi aumption i incorrect, and it lead to ome non-perturbative reult. Indeed, at frequencie lightly below the chamber cut-off, 0 < k k k (or the ame with replacement k k ), a ingle term in um Σ, Σ, or Σ 3 become very large, due to very mall Γ = (k k ) / (or Γ ) in it denominator, and then the correction ψσ or χσ can be of the order of. A a reult, one of the denominator of the RHS of Eq. (9) can vanih, which correpond to a reonance of the coupling impedance. On the other hand, vanihing denominator in Eq. (4)-(6) mean the exitence of non-perturbative eigenmode of the chamber with a hole, ince non-trivial olution E,H 0 exit even for vanihing external (beam) field E b,h b = 0. Thee eigenmode are nothing but the trapped mode tudied in [8] for a circular waveguide with a mall dicontinuity. In our approach, one can eaily derive parameter of trapped mode for waveguide with an arbitrary cro ection. 7

8 4. Frequency Shift Let u for brevity retrict ourelve to the cae ψ τz = 0 and conider Eq. (5) in more detail. For H b = 0 we have [ k ( ) ν e h ] H τ ψ ττ 4Γ k +... = 0, (30) where {nm} i the generalized index, and... mean all other term of the erie Σ,Σ. At frequency Ω lightly below the cutoff frequency ω = k c of the TM -mode, the fraction in Eq. (30) i large due to mall Γ in it denominator, and one can neglect the other term. Then the condition for a non-trivial olution H τ 0 to exit i Γ 4 ψ ( ττ ν e h ). (3) In other word, there i a olution of the homogeneou, i.e., without external current, Maxwell equation for the chamber with the hole, having the frequency Ω < ω the th trapped TM-mode. When Eq. (3) i atified, the erie (7) i obviouly dominated by the ingle term A F E ; hence, the field of the trapped mode have the form [cf. Eq. (8)] E z = k e exp( Γ z ) ; H z = 0 ; E t = gn(z)γ e exp( Γ z ) ; (3) Z 0 Ht = ikẑ e exp( Γ z ), up to ome arbitrary amplitude. Strictly peaking, thee expreion are valid at ditance z > b from the dicontinuity. Typically, ψ ττ = O(h 3 ) and ν e h = O(/b), and, a a reult, Γ b. It follow that the field of the trapped mode extend along the vacuum chamber over the ditance /Γ, large compared to the chamber tranvere dimenion b. The exitence of the trapped mode in a circular waveguide with a mall hole wa firt proved in [8], and condition imilar to Eq. (3) for thi particular cae were obtained in [8, 9], uing the Lorentz reciprocity theorem. From the general approach preented here for the waveguide with an arbitrary cro ection, their exitence follow in a natural way. Moreover, in uch a derivation, the phyical mechanim of thi phenomenon become quite clear: a tangential magnetic field induce a magnetic moment on the hole, and the induced magnetic moment upport thi field if the reonance condition (3) i atified, o that the mode can exit even without an external ource. One hould alo note that the induced electric moment P ν i negligible for the trapped TM-mode, ince P ν = O(Γ b)m τ, a follow from Eq. (3). The equation (3) give the frequency hift ω ω Ω of the trapped th TM-mode down from the cutoff ω ω ω 3k ψττ ( ν e h ) 4. (33) In the cae of a mall hole thi frequency hift i very mall, and for the trapped mode (3) to exit, the width of the reonance hould be maller than ω. Contribution to the reonance width come from energy diipation in the waveguide wall due to it finite conductivity, and from energy radiation inide the waveguide and outide, through the hole. Radiation ecaping through the hole i eay to etimate [8], and for a thick wall it i exponentially mall, e.g., [4]. The damping rate due to a finite conductivity i γ = P/(W), where P i the time-averaged power diipation and W i the total field energy in the trapped mode, which yield γ = δ ω 4k dl( ν e ), (34) where δ i the kin-depth at frequency Ω, and the integration i along the boundary S. The evaluation of the radiation into the lower waveguide mode propagating in the chamber at given frequency Ω i alo traightforward [8], if one make ue of the coefficient of mode excitation by effective dipole on the hole, Eq. (9)-(3). The correponding damping rate γ R = O(ψ 3 ) i mall compared to ω. For intance, if there 8

9 i only one TE p -mode with the frequency below that for the lowet TM -mode, like in a circular waveguide (H ha a lower cutoff than E 0 ), γ R = ψ ττβ p ( ν ω k p h h ), (35) where β p (k k p ) / becaue k k. One can eailyee that denominator [ χ(σ Σ )] in Eq. (4) doe not vanih becaue ingularterm in Σ have a wrong ign. However, due to the coupling between E ν and H z, a non-trivial olution E ν,h z 0 of imultaneou equation (4) and (6) can exit, even when E b = 0. The correponding condition ha the form Γ nm [ ψ zz k ) 4 nm( h h ( nm χ τ h h ) ] nm, (36) which give the frequency of the trapped TE nm -mode, provided the RHS of Eq. (36) i poitive. 4. Impedance The trapped mode (3) give a reonance contribution to the longitudinal coupling impedance at ω Ω Z (ω) = iω γ R ω (Ω iγ ), (37) where the hunt impedance R can be calculated a that for a cavity with given eigenmode, e.g. [6], R = σδ dzexp( iω z/c)e z (z) S w d H τ. (38) The integral in the denominator i taken over the inner wall urface, and we aume here that the power loe due to it finite conductivity dominate. Integrating in the numerator one hould include all TM-mode generated by the effective magnetic moment on the hole uing Eq. (9)-(3), in pite of a large amplitude of onlythetrappedtm mode. WhileallotheramplitudeareuppreedbyfactorΓ b, theircontribution are comparable to that from TM, becaue thi integration produce the factor Γ q b for any TM q mode. The integral in the denominator i obviouly dominated by TM. Performing calculation yield R = Z 0ẽ ν ψ3 ττ k ( ν e) h 4 8δ dl( ν e ), (39) where ẽ ν = e ν (0) i defined by Eq. (3). Reult for a particular hape of the chamber cro ection can be obtained from the equation above by ubtituting the correponding eigenfunction (ee Appendix). One hould note that typically the peak value R of the impedance reonance due to one mall hole i rather mall except for the limit of a perfectly conducting wall, δ 0 indeed, R (h/b) 9 b/δ, and h b. However, for many not-o-far eparated hole, the reulting impedance can be much larger. The trapped mode for many dicontinuitie on a circular waveguide ha been tudied in Ref. [9], and the reult can be readily tranferred to the conidered cae of an arbitrary hape of the chamber cro ection. In particular, it wa demontrated that the reonance impedance in the extreme cae can be a large a N 3 time that for a ingle dicontinuity, where N i the number of dicontinuitie. It trongly depend on the ditribution of dicontinuitie, or on the ditance between them if a regular array i conidered. After the trapped mode in beam pipe with mall hole were predicted theoretically [8, 9], their exitence wa proved by experiment with perforated waveguide at CERN [0]. 9

10 5 Analytical Formulae for Some Small Dicontinuitie For reader convenience, in thi ection we collected analytical expreion for the coupling impedance of variou mall dicontinuitie. The expreion give the inductive part of the impedance and work well at frequencie below the chamber cutoff, and, in many cae, even at much higher frequencie. However, there can alo exit reonance of the real part at frequencie near the cutoff for hole and cavitie due to the trapped mode, a wa hown in [8, 9], and the real part of the impedance due to the energy radiated into the beam pipe hould be taken into account at frequencie above the cutoff, ee [7, 9, ]. It i worth noting that both the longitudinal and tranvere impedance are proportional to the ame combination of polarizabilitie, α e +α m, for any cro ection of the beam pipe. Here we ue the effective polarizabilitie α e,α m a defined in []; they are related to the magnetic uceptibility ψ and the electric polarizability χ of an obtacle a α e = χ/ and α m = ψ/. The real part of the impedance i proportional to α e +α m, and i uually mall compared to the reactance at frequencie below the chamber cutoff. While the impedance below are written for a round pipe, more reult for the other chamber cro ection, the impedance dependence on the obtacle poition on the wall and on the beam poition can be found in [5, 7, 9,, ]. The longitudinal impedance of a mall obtacle on the wall of a cylindrical beam pipe with a circular tranvere cro ection of radiu R i imply [3] (up to notation, it i the ame Eq. () above) Z(k) = ikz 0 α e +α m 4π R, (40) where Z 0 = 0π Ohm i the impedance of free pace, k = ω/c i the wave number, and α e,α m are the electric and magnetic polarizabilitie of the dicontinuity. The polarizabilitie depend on the obtacle hape and ize. The tranvere dipole impedance of the dicontinuity for thi cae i Z (ω) = iz 0 α m +α e π R 4 a h co(ϕ h ϕ b ), (4) where a h i the unit vector directed to the obtacle in the chamber tranvere cro ection containing it, ϕ h and ϕ b are azimuthal angle of the obtacle and beam in thi cro ection. 5. Hole and Slot For a circular hole with radiu a in a thin wall, when thickne t a, the polarizabilitie are α m = 4a 3 /3, α e = a 3 /3, o that the impedance Eq. (40) take a imple form Z(k) = ikz 0 a 3 6π R, (4) and imilarly for Eq. (4). For the hole in a thick wall, t a, the um (α m + α e ) = a 3 /3 hould be multiplied by a factor 0.56, ee [4, ]. There are alo analytical expreion for polarizabilitie of elliptic hole in a thin wall [], and paper [] give thickne correction for thi cae. Surpriingly, the thickne factor for (α m + α e ) exhibit only a weak dependence on ellipe eccentricity ε, changing it limiting value for the thick wall from 0.56 for ε = 0 to 0.59 for ε = For a longitudinal lot of length l and width w, w/l, in a thin wall, ueful approximation have been obtained [3]: for a rectangular lot and for a rounded end lot α m +α e = w 3 ( w/l) ; α m +α e = w 3 ( w/l) ; ubtituting of which into Eq. (40)-(4) give the impedance of lot. Figure compare impedance for different hape of pumping hole. 0

11 .5.5 Z Rectangular Rounded end 0.5 Elliptic l/w Figure : Slot impedance veru lot length l for fixed width w in unit of the impedance of the circular hole with diameter w. 5. Annular Cut The polarizabilitie of a ring-haped cut in the wall of an arbitrary thickne have been calculated in [4]. Such an aperture can erve a an approximation for a electrode of a button-type beam poition monitor, for a thin wall, or a model of a coax attached to the vacuum chamber, when the wall thickne i large. If a and b denote the inner and outer radii of the annular cut, a b R, the magnetic uceptibility of a narrow (w = b a b) annular lot in a thin plate i ψ π b a ln(3b/w). (43) For a narrow annular gap in the thick wall the aymptotic behavior i ψ πb w. The approximation (43) work well for narrow gap, w/b 0.5, while the thick wall reult i good only for w/b Analytical reult for the electric polarizability of a narrow annular cut are: for a thin wall and for a thick wall χ π w (b+a)/8, (44) χ w (b+a). (45) Thee etimate work amazingly well even for very wide gap, up to w/b The electric polarizability depend on the wall thickne rather weakly. The difference (ψ χ)/b 3 = (α m +α e )/b 3 for an annular cut, calculated by variational method in [4], i plotted in Fig. for a few value of the wall thickne. 5.3 Protruion For a protruion inide the beam pipe having the hape of a half ellipoid with emiaxi a in the longitudinal direction (along the chamber axi), b in the radial direction, and c in the azimuthal one, with a,b,c R,

12 .5 ψ χ w/b Figure : Difference of the polarizabilitie (in unit of b 3 ) of an annular cut veru it relative width w/b for different thicknee of the wall t = 0; w/; w; w, and t w (from top to bottom). The dotted line correpond to the circular hole in a thin wall, (ψ χ)/b 3 = 4/3. the polarizabilitie are [5] and where I b = abc 0 α e = πabc 3I b, (46) α m = πabc 3(I c ), (47) d, (48) (+b ) 3/ (+a ) / (+c ) / and I c i given by Eq. (48) with b and c interchanged. In the particularcaea = c, b = h we havean ellipoid ofrevolution, and the polarizabilitieareexpreed in term of the hypergeometric function F : α e = πa h F (,;5/; h /a ), (49) and α m = πa h F (,;5/; a /h ) 3. (50) 5.3. Pot In the limit a = c h, correponding to a pinlike obtacle, we get a imple expreion for the inductive impedance of a narrow pin (pot) of height h and radiu a, protruding radially into the beam pipe: Z(k) ikz 0 h 3 6πR (ln(h/a) ). (5) One could ue the known reult for the induced electric dipole of a narrow cylinder parallel to the electric field [3]. It will only change ln(h/a) in Eq. (5) to ln(4h/a) 7/3.

13 40 F h/a Figure 3: Function F (α e +α m )/V veru apect ratio h/a for a pinlike obtacle (olid line). The electric contribution i hort dahed, the magnetic one i long dahed, and the dotted line how the aymptotic form ued in Eq. (5). The factor F (α e + α m )/V, where V = πa h/3 i the volume occupied by the obtacle, i plotted in Fig. 3 veru the ratio h/a. The figure alo how comparion with the aymptotic approximation given by Eq. (5) Mak One more particular cae of interet i h = a, i.e. a emipherical obtacle of radiu a. From Eq. (49)-(50) the impedance of uch a dicontinuity i Z(k) = ikz 0 a 3 4πR, (5) which i 3π/ time that for a circular hole of the ame radiu in a thin wall, cf. Eq. (4). Another ueful reult that can be derived from the general olution, Eq. (46)-(48), i the impedance of a mak intended to intercept ynchrotron radiation. We put b = c = h, o that our model mak ha the emicircular hape with radiu h in it larget tranvere cro ection. Then the integral in Eq. (48) i reduced to I b = I c = ( 3 F, ; 5 ) h ; a, and we can further implify the reult for two particular cae. The firt one i the thin mak, a h, in which cae α e 8h 3 /3, and again it dominate the magnetic term, α m V = πah /3. The coupling impedance for uch an obtacle a half dik of radiu h and thickne a, a h, tranvere to the chamber axi i therefore Z(k) = ikz 0 h 3 3π R where the next-to-leading term i hown explicitly. [ + ( 4 π π 4 ) a h +... ], (53) 3

14 0.8 Z a/h Figure 4: Impedance Z of a mak (in unit of that for a emiphere with the ame depth, Eq. (5) with a = h) veru it length. The narrow-mak approximation, Eq. (53), i hort dahed, and the long-mak one, Eq. (54), i long dahed. In the oppoite limit, h a, which correpond to a long (along the beam) mak, the leading term α e α m 4πah /3 cancel each other. A a reult, the impedance of a long mak with length l = a and height h, h l, i 4h 4 Z(k) ikz 0 (ln lh ) 3πR l, (54) which i relatively mall due to the aerodynamic hape of thi obtacle, in complete analogy with reult for long elliptic lot [3, 4, 3]. Figure 4 how the impedance of a mak with a given emicircular tranvere cro ection of radiu h veru it normalized half length, a/h. The comparion with the aymptotic approximation Eq. (53) and (54) i alo hown. One can ee, that the aymptotic behavior (54) tart to work well only for very long mak, namely, when l = a 0h. Figure 4 demontrate that the mak impedance depend rather weakly on the length. Even a very thin mak (a h) contribute a much a 8/(3π) 0.85 time the emiphere (a = h) impedance, Eq. (5), while for long mak the impedance decreae lowly: at l/h = 0, it i till 0.54 of that for the emiphere. In practice, however, the mak ha uually an abrupt cut toward the incident ynchrotron radiation, o that it i rather one-half of a long mak. From conideration above one can ugget a a reaonable impedance etimate for uch a dicontinuity the half um of the impedance given by Eq. (53) and (54). Thi etimate i corroborated by 3D numerical imulation uing the MAFIA code, at leat, for the mak which are not too long. In fact, the low-frequency impedance of a emiphere and a half emiphere of the ame depth which can be conidered a a relatively hort realitic mak were found numerically to be almot equal (within the error), and cloe to that for a longer half mak. From thee reult one can conclude that a good etimate for the mak impedance i given imply by Eq. (5). 4

15 5.4 Axiymmetric Dicontinuitie Following a imilar procedure one can alo eaily obtain the reult for axiymmetric irie having a emielliptic profile in the longitudinal chamber cro ection, with depth b = h and length a along the beam. For that purpoe, one hould conider limit c in Eq. (48) to calculate the effective polarizabilitie α e and α m per unit length ofthe circumferenceof the chamber tranverecroection. The broad-bandimpedance of axiymmetric dicontinuitie have been tudied in [0], and the longitudinal coupling impedance i given by Z(k) = ikz 0 α e + α m πr, (55) quite imilar to Eq. (40). A c, the integral I c 0, and I b i expreed in elementary function a I b = ( F, ) h ;; a = a a+h. It give u immediately α e = π h(h+a); α m = π ah, (56) and the reulting impedance of the iri of depth h with the emielliptic profile i imply Z(k) = ikz 0 h 4R, (57) which prove to be independent of the iri thickne a. The ame reult ha been obtained uing another method [4], and alo directly by conformal mapping in [5], following the general method of [0]. Uing a conformal mapping, one can readily obtain an anwer alo for irie having the profile haped a a circle egment with the chord of length along the chamber wall in the longitudinal direction, and opening angle ϕ, where 0 ϕ π. The impedance of uch an exotic iri, expreed in term of it height h = ( coϕ)/(inϕ): h Z(k) = ikz 0 R( coϕ) (58) [ ϕ(π ϕ) 3(π ϕ) in ϕ ϕ inϕ ]. π Again, the impedance i proportional to h, but the coefficient now depend (in fact, rather weakly) on ϕ. A few ueful reult for low-frequency impedance of axiymmetric cavitie and irie with a rectangular, trapezoidal and triangular tranvere profile have been obtained in [0] uing conformal mapping to calculate the electric polarizability. The low-frequency impedance of the mall hort pill-box whoe length g i not large than depth h i Z(ω) = ikz 0 πr (gh g π The low-frequency impedance of the hallow enlargement take the form ), (59) h Z(ω) = ikz 0 π (ln(πg/h)+), (60) R where g h, but till le than R. The low-frequency impedance of a mall tep of depth h R i h Z(ω) = ikz 0 4π (ln(πr/h)+). (6) R 5

16 Z Figure 5: Impedance Z of a tranition veru it lop, in unit of that for the abrupt tep (ν = /, Eq. (6)) with the ame height. ν The inductance produced by the tranition with the lope angle θ = πν ha the form: Z(ω) = i Z 0kh { [ ( )] b π ln πν R h cotπν + 3 γ ψ(ν) π cotπν }, (6) ν where γ = i Euler contant, ψ(ν) i the pi-function and the tranition i aumed to be hort compared to the chamber radiu, i.e. tranition length l = hcotπν R. The ratio of thi inductance to that of the abrupt tep (ν = /, Eq. (6)) with the ame height i plotted in Fig. 5 a a function of the lope angle. The impedance of a thin (or deep) iri, g h, ha the form Z(ω) = ikz 0 4R [h + ghπ (ln(8πg/h) 3) ]. (63) Thi formula work well even for rather large h, when h i cloe to R. More generally, the low-frequency impedance of the iri having a rectangular profile with an arbitrary apect ratio i Z(ω) = ikz 0 gh πr F ( ) h g, (64) where function F(x) i plotted in Fig. 6. The impedance of dicontinuitie having a triangle-haped cro ection with height (depth) h and bae g along the beam are given below. When g h, the low-frequency impedance of a triangular enlargement i and that of a triangular iri i Z(ω) = ikz 0 4πR (gh g π [ Z(ω) = ikz 0 h + gh ] 4R π ( ln) 6 ), (65). (66)

17 0 F(h/g) g = mm g = 4 mm g = 8 mm h/g Figure 6: The inductance dependence on the apect ratio of a rectangular iri, cf. Eq. (64). The mark how numerical reult for a beam pipe with radiu R = cm, for comparion. For the cae of hallow triangular perturbation, h g < R, both the enlargement and contraction of the chamber have the ame inductance, Z(ω) = ikz 0 h ln π R, (67) which i independent of g. Appendix Circular Chamber For a circular cro ection of radiu b the eigenvalue k nm = µ nm /b, where µ nm i mth zero of the Beel function J n (x), and the normalized EF are e nm (r,ϕ) = J { } n(k nm r) conϕ, (68) N E nm innϕ with Nnm E = πb ǫ n Jn+(µ nm )/, where ǫ 0 = and ǫ n = for n 0. For TE-mode, k nm = µ nm/b with J n(µ nm) = 0, and h nm (r,ϕ) = J n(k nmr) { } conϕ, (69) N H nm innϕ where N H nm = πb ǫ n ( n /µ nm)j n(µ nm)/. In thi cae ẽ ν = /(πb), which alo follow from the Gau law, and the formula for the inductive impedance take an epecially imple form, cf. [3, 4]. 7

18 Rectangular Chamber For a rectangular chamber of width a and height b the eigenvalue are k nm = π n /a +m /b with n,m =,,..., and the normalized EF are e nm (x,y) = in πnx πmy in ab a b, (70) with 0 x a and 0 y b. Let a hole be located in the ide wall at x = a, y = y h. From Eq. (3) after ome algebra follow ẽ ν = ( a b Σ b, y ) h, b (7) where ( ) l in[π(l+)v] Σ(u,v) = coh[π(l + )u/] (7) l=0 i a fat converging erie; the behavior of Σ(u,v) veru v for different value of the apect ratio u i plotted in Ref. [5]. 6 Summary A review of calculating the beam coupling impedance of mall dicontinuitie wa preented. We alo collected ome analytical formula for the inductive contribution due to variou mall obtacle to the beam coupling impedance of the vacuum chamber. An importance of undertanding thee effect can be illutrated by the following example. An original deign of the beam liner for the LHC vacuum chamber anticipated a circular liner with many circular hole of -mm radiu, providing the pumping area about 5% of the liner urface. Their total contribution to the low-frequency coupling impedance wa calculated [3] to be Z/n = 0.53 Ω, Z = 0 MΩ/m, which wa cloe or above (for Z ) the etimated intability threhold. A modified liner deign had about the ame pumping area provided by rounded-end lot.5 6 mm, which were placed near the corner of the rounded-quare cro ection of the liner [7]. A a reult of thee change, the coupling impedance were reduced by more than an order of magnitude, time: Z/n = 0.07 Ω, Z = 0.4 MΩ/m. Now the pumping lot are not among the major contributor to the impedance budget of the machine. One hould mention that thee note do not include more recent development, in particular, reult for coaxial tructure, frequency correction for polarizabilitie, etc. Some of thee new reult and proper reference can be found in [6]. Reference [] H.A. Bethe, Theory of diffraction by mall hole, Phy. Rev. 66, 63 (944). [] R.E. Collin, Field Theory of Guided Wave (IEEE Pre, NY, 99). [3] S.S. Kurennoy, Coupling impedance of pumping hole, Part. Acc. 39, (99); alo CERN Report SL/9-9(AP)rev, Geneva (99) [4] R.L. Glucktern, Coupling impedance of a ingle hole in a thick-wall beam pipe, Phy. Rev. A 46, 06 and 0 (99). 8

19 [5] S.S. Kurennoy, Beam interaction with pumping hole in vacuum-chamber wall, in Proceed. of EPAC (Berlin, 99), p.87; Report IHEP 9-84, Protvino, 99. [6] S.S. Kurennoy, Beam-chamber coupling impedance. Calculation method, CERN Report SL/9-3(AP), Geneva (99); alo Phy. Part. Nucl. 4, 380 (993). [7] S.S. Kurennoy, Impedance iue for LHC beam creen, Part. Acc. 50, 67 (995). [8] G.V. Stupakov, Coupling impedance of a long lot and an array of lot in a circular vacuum chamber, Phy. Rev. E 5, 355 (995). [9] S.S. Kurennoy, R.L. Glucktern, and G.V. Stupakov, Coupling impedance of mall dicontinuitie: A general approach, Phy. Rev. E 5, 4354 (995). [0] S.S. Kurennoy and G.V. Stupakov, A new method for calculation of low frequency coupling impedance, Part. Acc. 45, 95 (994). [] R.L. Glucktern and J.A. Diamond, Penetration of field through a circular hole in a wall of finite thickne, IEEE Tran. MTT 39, 74 (99). [] B. Radak and R.L. Glucktern, Penetration of field through an elliptical hole in a wall of finite thickne, IEEE Tran. MTT 43, 94 (995). [3] S.S. Kurennoy, Pumping lot: coupling impedance calculation and etimate, Report SSCL-636, Dalla (993) (unpublihed). [4] S.S. Kurennoy, Polarizabilitie of an annular cut in the wall of an arbitrary thickne, IEEE Tran. MTT 44, 09 (996). [5] S.S. Kurennoy, Beam coupling impedance of obtacle protruding into a beam pipe, Phy. Rev. E 55, 359 (997). [6] Handbook of Accelerator Phyic and Engineering, A.W. Chao and M. Tigner, Ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 999), Sect. 3.. [7] P.M. More and H. Fehbach, Method of Theoretical Phyic (McGraw-Hill, NY, 953), 6.3. [8] G.V. Stupakov and S.S. Kurennoy, Trapped electromagnetic mode in a waveguide with a mall dicontinuity, Phy. Rev. E 49, 794 (994). [9] S.S. Kurennoy, Trapped mode in waveguide with many mall dicontinuitie, Phy. Rev. E 5, 498 (995). [0] F. Caper and T. Scholz, Meaurement of trapped mode in perforated waveguide, Part. Acc. 5, 5 (995). [] S.S. Kurennoy and Y.H. Chin, Impedance and power loe due to pumping lot in B-factorie, Part. Acc. 5, 0 (996). [] S.S. Kurennoy, Impedance and Power Loe for an Off-Axi Beam, in Proceed. of EPAC (Barcelona, 996), p.449. [3] L.D. Landau and I.M. Lifhitz, Electrodynamic of Continuou Media (Pergamon Pre, Oxford, 960), 3. [4] R.L. Glucktern and S.S. Kurennoy, Coupling impedance of axiymmetric irie and cavitie with emi-elliptical profile in a beam pipe, Phy. Rev. E 55, 3533 (997). 9