A Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
|
|
- Lambert Holmes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 A Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems Hao Lei and Wei Lin Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 446 ob46 Abstract We study the problem of global adaptive stabilization by output feedback for nonlinear systems with unknown parameters The class of uncertain systems under consideration is assumed to be dominated by a bounding system which is linear growth in the unmeasurable states but can be a polynomial function of the system output, with unknown growth rate To achieve global stabilization in the presence of parametric uncertainty, we propose a nonidentifier based output feedback control law using the idea of universal control integrated with the linear-like output feedback control scheme proposed recently In particular, we eplicitly design a universal output feedback controller which globally regulates all the states of the uncertain system while maintaining global boundedness of the closed-loop system I INTRODUCTION In this paper we consider the problem of global adaptive stabilization by output feedback, for a family of single-input single-output uncertain nonlinear systems in the following triangular form ẋ = + φ (,θ ẋ = 3 + φ (,,θ ẋ n = u + φ n (,, n,θ y = ( where =(,, n T IR n, u IR and y IR are the system state, input and output, respectively, θ R s is an unknown constant vector, φ i : R i R s R, i =,,n, are C functions with φ i (,,,θ= They represent the system uncertainty and need not to be precisely known Under the assumption that φ i is a C function with φ i (,θ=, it is straightforward to deduce the eistence of smooth functions b i (,, i and γ i (θ, such that (see Lemma 5 in [] φ i ( ( + + i b i (,, i γ i (θ Denote Θ= n i= γ i(θ Then, φ i ( ( + + i b i (,, i Θ ( for i =,,n In other words, the uncertain system ( always satisfies the constraint ( This work was supported in part by the NSF under grants DS-3387 and ECS-443, and in part by the Air Force Research Laboratory under Grant FA865-5-C- In the paper [], counter-eamples were given indicating that if the system nonlinearity φ i ( or, equivalently, the bounding function b i (,, n in ( grows faster than a quadratic function with respect to the unmeasurable states (,, n, system ( (even in the absence of the unknown parameters may not be globally stabilized by smooth output feedback With this in mind and in view of (, it is natural to assume that the bounding function b i (,, i =b i (, ie, depends only on the system output This hypothesis, together with inequality (, yields the eistence of a smooth function c(y satisfying φ i (,, i,θ ( + + i c(yθ (3 In the case when Θ is a known constant, global output feedback stabilization of the uncertain nonlinear system ( was shown to be possible [8], [8], as long as the growth condition (3 is fulfilled In [5], it has been further shown that global stabilization of the uncertain system ( can even be achieved by a linear-like output feedback controller with dynamic gain, under the etra requirement that c(y in (3 is a polynomial function of the system output, or, equivalently, the following condition: Assumption : The bounding function b i ( in ( is dominated by a polynomial function of the output, ie b i (,, n c(y =+ y ν, i =,,n, where ν is a known integer When Θ in (3 represents an unknown constant, global output feedback control of the uncertain system ( becomes much more involved and difficult, due to the lack of effective adaptive observer design techniques [4] In the eisting literature, most of the global adaptive stabilization results via output feedback are only applicable to a class of uncertain nonlinear systems in the parametric output feedback form [5], [3], [4], [7], ie, the system uncertainty φ i (t,, u in ( depends only on the output y multiplied by the unknown parameter θ They cannot, however, be used to deal with nonlinear systems with unknown parameters beyond the parametric output feedback form, such as the uncertain system ( satisfying Assumption, in which the unknown parameters appear not only in the front of the system output y but also in the front of the unmeasurable states (,, n The latter makes the application of the conventional observer design method [9] or the high-gain /5/$ 5 IEEE 8
2 observer [], [6] difficult, because the constructed observer contains a copy of the original system with unknown parameters and hence is not implementable For this reason, global adaptive stabilization of the uncertain system ( by output feedback is a nontrivial problem, even under a linear growth condition, ie, c(y =in the growth condition (3 When c(y =in (3, the problem of global adaptive stabilization by output feedback has been addressed recently in [], where the idea of the non-identifier based adaptive control [], [3], [7], also referred as universal control, was eploited and coupled with the non-separation principle based output feedback design method [6], resulting in a solution to the output feedback control problem in the presence of unknown parameter θ The novelty of the work [] was the introduction of an observer gain update law which is motivated by the design of universal controllers [7], [3] In this paper, we show that by taking advantage of the linear structure of the output feedback controller in [5], integrated with the universal output feedback design method developed in [], it is possible to etend the adaptive output feedback control result of [] to a larger class of nonlinear systems characterized by Assumption To be precise, we shall prove that under Assumption, there is a smooth dynamic output compensator of the form ż = F (z,l,,y, z IR n L = H (z,l,,y and Ṁ = H (,y u = g(z,l,,y (4 such that all the solutions of the closed-loop system (- (4 are well-defined and globally bounded on [, + oreover, lim ((t,z(t = (, t + The underlying philosophy here is, on one hand, to use the linear output feedback controller from [5] to deal with the uncertain nonlinear system ( satisfying Assumption, and on the other hand, to employ the idea of universal control as done in [] to handle the unknown parameter θ in ( or Θ in ( To achieve these two objectives simultaneously, the observer gain must be designed and tuned in a delicate manner Compared with the work [5], [], the observer gain in this paper is composed of two components and L, both of them are not constant and need to be dynamically updated The gain L istunedina universal manner, similar to the one suggested in [] The gain, which plays a similar role as the one in [5], is updated on-line via a linear, rather than Riccati, differential equation driven by a nonlinear function of the output y This is different from the gain update law introduced in [5] where the observer gain is tuned by a suitable Riccati differential equation As we shall see in the net section, the introduction of the new dynamic gain update laws will be the key for the success of the proposed universal output feedback control scheme II UNIVERSAL OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN In this section we prove that under Assumption, it is possible to eplicitly construct a universal output feedback controller of the form (4, achieving global boundedness and state regulation for the nonlinear system ( with unknown parameters Theorem : Under Assumption, there is a (n +- dimensional output feedback compensator of the from (4 such that from any initial condition (,z IR n IR n and ( = L( =, the closed-loop system (-(4 has the following properties: (i all the states of the closed-loop system (-(4 are well-defined and globally bounded on [, + ; (ii lim t + ((t,z(t = (, Proof The proof is constructive and carried out by eplicitly designing a universal output feedback control law While the construction of a high-gain observer is routine as done in [6], [], the design of the observer gain update law is new The gain update law for bears a resemblance to the papers [5], [8], [8] but is distinct from them in the sense that is tuned on-line through a linear ODE rather than a Riccati equation, enabling one to take full advantage of the linear structure of the output feedback control law On the other hand, the gain update law for L is reminiscent of the work [], where an adapted high gain observer was designed and the observer gain is tuned in a universal fashion As done in the paper [6], by discarding the uncertain terms φ i (,, i,θ, i n, we design a high-gain observer for the uncertain nonlinear system ( ˆ = ˆ +(La ( ˆ ˆ = ˆ 3 +(L a ( ˆ ˆ n = u +(L n a n ( ˆ ( where L and are two dynamic gains to be determined later on, and a i >, i =,,n are the coefficients of the Hurwitz polynomial s n + a s n + + a n s + a n Let e i = i ˆ i, i =,,n be the estimate errors Then, the error dynamics can be epressed as ė = e (La e + φ (,θ ė = e 3 (L a e + φ (,,θ ė n = (L n a n e + φ n (, θ ( Similar to the work [5], we consider the following change of coordinates (i =,,n ε i = v = e i ˆ i (L i +σ and z i = (L i +σ, u (L n+σ (3 83
3 where σ is a constant satisfying <σ</(ν (4 In the new coordinates, the closed-loop system (-( can be rewritten as ε = LAε +Φ( ( L L + Ṁ (D + σiε (5 Ṁ ż = L(A z + b v+laε ( L L + (D + σiz where D = diag{,,,n }, ε =(ε,,ε n T, z = (z,,z n T, a =(a,,a n T, b =(,,, T and [ φ (,θ Φ( = (L σ, φ (,,θ (L +σ,, φ n (, θ ] T (L n +σ a A =, A = a n a n Clearly, (A,b is controllable As a consequence, there is a real constant matri K = [k k k n ] which assigns all the eigenvalues of the matri B := A + b K on the open left-half plane With this in mind, it is clear that the linear feedback controller v = Kz = [k z + k z + + k n z n ],or, equivalently, the controller u = (L n+σ [k z + k z + + k n z n ] (6 yields ε = LAε +Φ(, θ, L, ( L L + Ṁ D σε ż = L(Bz + aε ( L L + D σz (7 where D σ = D + σi Observer that A and B are Hurwitz matrices Therefore, there eist P = P T > and Q = Q T >, such that A T P + PA I, c I D σ P + PD σ c I B T Q + QB I, c 3 I D σ Q + QD σ c 4 I (8 where c i >, i=,, 4 are real constants The proof of inequality (8 can be found in [7], [5] Using the matrices P and Q thus obtained, one can construct the Lyapunov function V (ε, z =(m +ε T Pε+ z T Qz (9 where m = Q a The time derivative of V (ε, z along the trajectories of the closed-loop system is V L(m + ε L z ( L L + Ṁ [ z T (D σ Q + QD σ z +(m +ε T (D σ P +PD σ ε ] +Lε z T Qa +(m +ε T P Φ( otivated by the papers [] and [5], we design the following gain updated laws: Ṁ = α + (y, ( = ( L = ε = σ( ˆ, L( = ( L σ where α is a positive constant and (y is a positive continuous function with (y α, both of them will be determined later By construction, it is easy to see that for all t [, +, L(t and (t Using inequality (8 and the fact that Ṁ + L L Ṁ,wehave V (m +L ε Ṁ zt (D σ Q + QD σ z L z (m +Ṁ εt (D σ P + PD σ ε +Lε z T Qa +(m +ε T P Φ( ( Now, let us estimate the last two terms on the right-hand side of ( First of all, by the completion of squares, it is clear that Lε z T Qa L( z + Q a ε (3 In addition, observe that φ i ( (L i +σ Θc(y n( z + ε Hence, (m +ε T P Φ (m +Θc(yn ε P ( z + ε c (y ( z + ε +m ε (4 where m = ( Θn(m + P Substituting (3 and (4 into ( results in V L ε (m +Ṁ εt (D σ P + PD σ ε L z Ṁ zt (D σ Q + QD σ z +m ε + c (y ( z + ε From (8 and (, it follows that V L ε + m ε + c (m +α ε ( c (m + (y c (y ε L z + c 4 α z ( c 3 (y c (y z (5 Now, choose <α<min{ c (m +, } (6 c 4 (y =βc (y+α, β ( c m + ++ c 3 Then, V L ε + m ε L z (L m ε z (7 Based on inequality (7, we can use a contradiction argument to prove Theorem In particular, it can be shown that starting from any initial condition (ε(,z( IR n IR n, L( = and ( =, the closed-loop system (7-(-( has the following properties: 84
4 (i All the states of (7-(-( are well defined and globally bounded on [, + ; (ii oreover, lim t + (z(t,ε(t = (, Assume that the property (i does not hold Then, the closed-loop system (7-(-( has a solution (L(t,(t,ε(t,z(t that is not well defined nor bounded on [, + In other words, there eists a finite escape time T>such that (L(t,(t,ε(t,z(t are only defined on the time interval [,T but lim t T (L(t,(t,ε(t,z(tT =+ First of all, we prove that L(t must be bounded on [,T] and would not escape at t = T If not, lim t T L(t =+ By construction, L = ε Thus, L(t is a monotone nondecreasing function As a result, there eists a time t >, such that L(t m +, t [t,t This, in view of (7, yields T V ε, T t [t,t Hence, ε dt ε dt V (ε(t,z(t, t t which leads to T T + = L(T L(t = L(tdt = ε (tdt t t V (ε(t,z(t = constant This is of course not possible Thus, the dynamic gain L(t is well defined and bounded on [,T] Since L = ε, T ε dt is bounded as well Net, we show that z(t is well defined and bounded on the interval [,T] To this end, consider the Lyapunov function V (z =z T Qz for the z-dynamic system of (7 A simple calculation shows that V (z L Consequently, z + m Lε z + m L L λ min (Q z(t z( T Qz( from which it follows that z(t λ min (Q z(t dt + m [L (t ], ( z( T Qz( + m [L (t ] (8 Since L(t is bounded on [,T], boundedness of z(t over [,T] follows from the last inequality oreover, t z(t dt is also bounded t [,T] Finally, we claim that ε(t is bounded on [,T] To prove this claim, we introduce the change of coordinates e i ξ i = (L, i =,,,n (9 i +σ where L is a constant satisfying L ma {L(T, 8m +}, m =Θ n P In the new coordinates, the error dynamics ( is represented as ξ = L (Aξ + aξ LΓaξ +Φ ( D σ ξ Ṁ ( where Γ=diag{, L L,,( L L n } and [ ] T Φ φ (,θ ( = (L σ, φ (,,θ (L +σ,, φ n (, θ (L n +σ Now, choose the Lyapunov function V 3 (ξ = ξ T Pξ for system ( The time derivative of V 3 along the trajectories of ( satisfies V 3 L ξ +ξ L a T Pξ ξ La T ΓPξ +Φ T ( Pξ Ṁ ξt (D σ P + PD σ ξ Observe that ξ L a T Pξ 8L a T P ξ + L 8 ξ ξ La T ΓPξ 8L a T ΓP ξ + L 8 ξ oreover, by (3, (9 and Assumption, one has φ i ( (L i +σ Θc(y n( z + ξ Φ T ( Pξ c (y ξ +m ( z + ξ Putting the estimations above together, we have (note that ξ = ε ( Lσ (L c σ ε V 3 3L ξ ( c (y c (y ξ 4 +m ( z + ξ +c α ξ +8(L a T P + L a T ΓP ξ 4 (L 8m ξ + µ z + µε 4 ξ + µ z + µε ( where µ > is a suitable constant depending on the unknown parameter Θ From ( it follows that λ min (P ξ(t ξ( T Pξ( V 3 (ξ(t V 3 (ξ( ( ξ(t dt + µ z dt + µ ε 4 dt By the boundedness of T z dt and T ε dt, we concludes from ( that ξ dt and ξ(t are bounded on [,T] Consequently, boundedness of ε dt and ε(t t [,T] follows from (9 and (3, To complete the proof, we show now that (t is bounded on [,T] First, it is easy to see that is bounded σ on [,T] As a matter of fact, σ Lσ ( z + ε C t [,T] 85
5 because L(t,z (t and ε (t are bounded on [,T], where C is a real constant As a consequence, C σ t [,T] (3 With this in mind, together with the choice of (y given in (6, we have Ṁ = α + (y α + β( y ν + + α α +βc ν σν +β + α where α and β are positive constants defined in (6 Using (4 and Young s inequality, it is not difficult to deduce from the last inequality that Ṁ α + b (4 where b>isasuitable constant Obviously, (4 implies the boundedness of (t on [,T] In summary, we have shown that L(t, (t, ε(t and z(t are well-defined and all bounded on [,T] This conclusion contradicts to the hypothesis that lim t T (L(t,(t,ε(t,z(t T =+ Therefore, the property (i must be true That is, all the states of the closed-loop system (7-(-( are well defined and bounded on [, + Using the boundedness of z dt, ε dt and (L(t,(t,ε(t,z(t on [, +, it is straightforward to deduce that ε L, ε L and z L, ż L Bythe well-known Barbalat s Lemma, lim z(t = and lim ε(t = t + t + Remark : From the proof of Theorem, it is clear that a universal output feedback controller can be eplicitly constructed It is composed of the high-gain observer (, the controller (6 and the dynamic gain update laws (-( The parameters of the gain update laws, ie α and (y, are given by (6 Due to the nature of the feedback domination design, it is easy to see that Theorem also holds for the uncertain system ẋ i = i+ + φ i (t,, θ, i =,,n y =, n+ := u, (5 as long as φ i (t,, θ ( + + i c(yθ (6 Indeed, using the eactly same argument one can prove the following result that is an etension of Theorem Theorem 3: For the uncertain nonlinear system (5 satisfying the growth condition (6, there is a dynamic output feedback compensator consisting of the high-gain observer (, the controller (6, and the dynamic gain update laws (-(-(6, such that from any initial condition all the states of the closed-loop system are welldefined and globally bounded oreover, lim ((t, ˆ(t = (, t + III TWO ILLUSTRATIVE EXAPLES We now give two eamples to illustrate the applications of Theorem The eamples also demonstrate how the control scheme proposed in the previous section can lead to a design of universal output feedback controllers Eample 3: Consider the SISO uncertain nonlinear system [8] ẋ = ẋ = 3 ẋ 3 = u + θ 3 y = (3 where θ is an unknown constant When the bound of the unknown parameter θ is known, global stabilization of the nonlinear system (3 is solvable by the work [5], [8], [8] However, in the case of when θ is completely unknown, how to globally regulate all the states of system (3 by output feedback is an unsolved problem, as pointed out in [8] On the other hand, systems (3 satisfies Assumption with ν = By Theorem, one can construct a universal-like output feedback controller solving the global regulation problem of system (3 In fact, it is not difficult to show that the output feedback controller (-(6- (-( does the job, with the choice of the parameters (a,a,a 3 =(3, 3,, (k,k,k 3 =(, 3, 3, σ = 8 and (y =(+y + The simulation shown in Fig confirms the conclusion The simulation was conducted with the initial conditions ( (, (, 3 ( = (,,, (ˆ (, ˆ (, ˆ 3 ( = (,, and L( = ( = Fig L Eample 3: system The transient response of the closed-loop system (3 and (-(6-(-( when θ = Consider the nonlinearly parameterized 86
6 ẋ = + ( + θ ẋ = 3 + sin ln( + θ ẋ 3 = u y = (3 where θ and θ are unknown constants It should be noticed that (3 is not in a triangular form ( nor in the parametric output feedback form For this reason, global adaptive stabilization by output feedback is an open problem However, it is easy to show that the uncertain system (3 satisfies (6 Indeed, ( + θ 3 + Θ( + 3 sin ln( + θ Θ( + Θ=ma{(+θ, θ } Thus, according to Theorem 3, one can construct the output feedback controller (-(6- (-(, with the observer parameters a =[33] T, controller parameters k =[33] T, σ = 8 and (y =(+y + A numerical simulation is given in Fig, illustrating that all the states of system (3 are globally regulated The simulation was conducted with the system parameters θ = and θ = The initial conditions are ( (, (, 3 ( = (,,, (ˆ (, ˆ (, ˆ 3 ( = (,, and L( = ( = Fig Transient response of the closed-loop system (3-(-(6-(-( IV CONCLUSION By integrating the universal output feedback control scheme [] and the linear output feedback stabilization method with dynamic gain [5], we have shown that the problem of global adaptive regulation by output feedback can be solved under Assumption, for a class of nonlinear systems with unknown parameters beyond the parametric output feedback form L The solution presented in this paper relies crucially on the linear structure of the dynamic output compensator (-(6-(-(, and hence does not seem to be etendable to the non-polynomial c(y case considered in [8], [8], where a nonlinear dynamic output compensator, instead of a linear one with dynamic gain, must be designed Keeping this in mind, it appears that a new non-identifier based, adaptive output feedback control scheme is needed in order to deal with a larger family uncertain nonlinear systems ( or (5 characterized by Assumption, in which c(y is only a continuous function of y, rather than a polynomial function of y with a known order This is certainly an interesting subject for future research REFERENCES [] C I Byrnes and J C Willems, Adaptive stabilization of multivariable linear systems, Proc of the 3rd IEEE CDC, Las Vegas, pp (984 [] J P Gauthier, H Hammouri and S Othman, A simple observer for nonlinear systems, applications to bioreactocrs, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 37, pp (99 [3] A Ilchmann, Non-identifier-based high-gain adaptive control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 89, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, (993 [4] A Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, Vol II, Springer-Verlag, New York, 999 [5] Krstić, I Kanellakopoulos, and P V Kokotović, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, John Wiley, 995 [6] H K Khalil and A Saberi, Adaptive stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems using high-gain feedback, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 3, 3-35 (987 [7] P Krishnamurthy and E Khorrami, Generalized adaptive output feedback form with unknown parameters multiplying high output relative-degree states, Proc of the 4st IEEE CDC, Las Vages, NV, ( [8] P Krishnamurthy and E Khorrami, Krishnamurthy, Dynamic high gain scaling: state and output feedback with application to systems with ISS appended dynamices driven by all states, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 49, 9-39 (4 [9] A J Krener and A Isidori, Linearization by output injection and nonlinear observer, Systems & Control Letters, 3, pp 47-5, 983 [] F azenc, L Praly, W P Dayawansa, Global stabilization by output feedback: eamples and countereamples, System & Control Letters, Vol 3, pp 9-5 (994 [] H Lei and W Lin, Universal output feedback control of nonlinear systems with unknown growth rate, Proc of the 6th IFAC World Congress, Prague, July 4-8 (5 Also, to appear in Automatica [] W Lin and R Pongvuthithum, Global stabilization of cascade systems by C partial state feedback, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 47, No 8, pp ( [3] R arino and P Tomei, Nonlinear control design, Prentice Hall International, UK, 995 [4] R arino and P Tomei, Global adaptive observer for nonlinear systems via filtered transformations, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 37, pp (99 [5] L Praly and Z Jiang, Linear output feedback with dynamic high gain for nonlinear systems, System & Control Letters, Vol 53, pp 7-6, (4 [6] C Qian and W Lin, Output feedback control of a class of nonlinear systems: a nonseparation principle paradigm, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 47, pp 7-75 ( [7] J C Willems and C I Byrnes, Global adaptive stabilization in the absence of information on the sign of the high frequency gain, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 6, Springer- Verlag, Berlin (984 [8] Yang, B and W Lin, Further results on global stabilization of uncertain nonlinear systems by output feedback, Proc of the 6th IFAC Symp on Nonlinear Contr Systems, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 95- (4 A full version of the paper can be found in Int J Robust & Nonlinear Contr, 5, pp (5 87
Hao Lei Wei Lin,1. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
UNIVERSA OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTRO OF NONINEAR SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN GROWTH RATE Hao ei Wei in, Dept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 446, USA
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 5, MAY Bo Yang, Student Member, IEEE, and Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE (1.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 5, MAY 2005 619 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems With Uncontrollable and Unobservable Linearization Bo Yang, Student
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationAdaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 47, NO 8, AUGUST 2002 1249 Adaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE, and Chunjiang Qian,
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationOutput Feedback Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems: A Nonseparation Principle Paradigm
70 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 47, NO 0, OCTOBER 00 [7] F Martinelli, C Shu, and J R Perins, On the optimality of myopic production controls for single-server, continuous-flow manufacturing
More informationQuasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 2009 FrA11.5 Quasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationRobust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States
obust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States John A Akpobi, Member, IAENG and Aloagbaye I Momodu Abstract Compressors for jet engines in operation experience
More informationGlobal practical tracking via adaptive outputfeedback for uncertain nonlinear systems with generalized control coefficients
. RESEARCH PAPER. SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences January 6 Vol. 59 3: 3:3 doi:.7/s43-5-59-z Global practical tracking via adaptive outputfeedback for uncertain nonlinear systems with generalized control
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationControl design using Jordan controllable canonical form
Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form Krishna K Busawon School of Engineering, Ellison Building, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK email: krishnabusawon@unnacuk
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Piecewise Linear Systems
Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July -3, 2007 WeB20.3 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Piecewise Linear Systems A. Lj.
More informationIN THIS PAPER, we investigate the output feedback stabilization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 51, NO 9, SEPTEMBER 2006 1457 Recursive Observer Design, Homogeneous Approximation, and Nonsmooth Output Feedback Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems Chunjiang
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationStability Criteria for Interconnected iiss Systems and ISS Systems Using Scaling of Supply Rates
Stability Criteria for Interconnected iiss Systems and ISS Systems Using Scaling of Supply Rates Hiroshi Ito Abstract This paper deals with problems of stability analysis of feedback and cascade interconnection
More informationGlobal Output-Feedback Tracking for Nonlinear Cascade Systems with Unknown Growth Rate and Control Coefficients
J Syst Sci Complex 05 8: 30 46 Global Output-Feedback Tracking for Nonlinear Cascade Systems with Unknown Growth Rate and Control Coefficients YAN Xuehua IU Yungang WANG Qingguo DOI: 0.007/s44-04-00-3
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationMANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation
610 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 52, NO 4, APRIL 2007 Direct Adaptive Dynamic Compensation for Minimum Phase Systems With Unknown Relative Degree Jesse B Hoagg and Dennis S Bernstein Abstract
More informationBo Yang Wei Lin,1. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
FINITE-TIME STABILIZATION OF NONSMOOTHLY STABILIZABLE SYSTEMS Bo Yang Wei Lin,1 Dept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA Abstract:
More informationObserver design for a general class of triangular systems
1st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems July 7-11, 014. Observer design for a general class of triangular systems Dimitris Boskos 1 John Tsinias Abstract The paper deals
More informationRobust Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Input Unmodeled Dynamics
International Journal of Automation Computing 5(3), July 28, 37-312 DOI: 117/s11633-8-37-5 Robust Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Input Unmodeled Dynamics Ming-Zhe Hou 1,
More informationAdaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 0, OCTOBER 003 87 Adaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization Zhihua Qu Abstract Two classes of partially known
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationHIGHER ORDER SLIDING MODES AND ARBITRARY-ORDER EXACT ROBUST DIFFERENTIATION
HIGHER ORDER SLIDING MODES AND ARBITRARY-ORDER EXACT ROBUST DIFFERENTIATION A. Levant Institute for Industrial Mathematics, 4/24 Yehuda Ha-Nachtom St., Beer-Sheva 843, Israel Fax: +972-7-232 and E-mail:
More informationObserver-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Observer-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory,
More informationStability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms
Stability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms Yoshikatsu HOSHI, Mitsuji SAMPEI, Shigeki NAKAURA Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology 2
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationMultivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking
29 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 1-12, 29 WeA18.5 Multivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking Jiaxing Guo, Yu Liu and Gang Tao Department
More informationDecentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections
Decentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections Yi Guo Abstract The problem of decentralized disturbance attenuation is considered for a new
More informationFinite-Time Convergent Observer for A Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Homogeneous Method
2 American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 29 - July, 2 Finite-Time Convergent Observer for A Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Homogeneous Method Weisong Tian, Chunjiang
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationCramér-Rao Bounds for Estimation of Linear System Noise Covariances
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation (): 6- DOI: 593/jjmea Cramér-Rao Bounds for Estimation of Linear System oise Covariances Peter Matiso * Vladimír Havlena Czech echnical University in Prague
More informationA Systematic Approach to Extremum Seeking Based on Parameter Estimation
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 21 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA A Systematic Approach to Extremum Seeking Based on Parameter Estimation Dragan Nešić, Alireza Mohammadi
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationA conjecture on sustained oscillations for a closed-loop heat equation
A conjecture on sustained oscillations for a closed-loop heat equation C.I. Byrnes, D.S. Gilliam Abstract The conjecture in this paper represents an initial step aimed toward understanding and shaping
More informationState estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs
State estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs Abdelkader Akhenak, Mohammed Chadli, Didier Maquin and José Ragot Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, CNRS UMR 79 Institut National
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationAdaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems
Adaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio Mora-Camino To cite this version: Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio
More informationOutput Input Stability and Minimum-Phase Nonlinear Systems
422 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 47, NO. 3, MARCH 2002 Output Input Stability and Minimum-Phase Nonlinear Systems Daniel Liberzon, Member, IEEE, A. Stephen Morse, Fellow, IEEE, and Eduardo
More informationCOMBINED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR UAV GUIDANCE
COMBINED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR UAV GUIDANCE B.R. Andrievsky, A.L. Fradkov Institute for Problems of Mechanical Engineering of Russian Academy of Sciences 61, Bolshoy av., V.O., 199178 Saint Petersburg,
More informationOutput Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System
Vol. 0, No. 05, 00, 60-608 Output Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan R & D Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi-Alamathi Road, Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED DATA CONTROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS 1
NONLINEAR SAMPLED DAA CONROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCIONS 1 Lars Grüne Dragan Nešić Mathematical Institute, University of Bayreuth, 9544 Bayreuth, Germany, lars.gruene@uni-bayreuth.de Department of
More informationLyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched Perturbations
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, Lyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationA small-gain type stability criterion for large scale networks of ISS systems
A small-gain type stability criterion for large scale networks of ISS systems Sergey Dashkovskiy Björn Sebastian Rüffer Fabian R. Wirth Abstract We provide a generalized version of the nonlinear small-gain
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationRotational Motion Control Design for Cart-Pendulum System with Lebesgue Sampling
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, (: 5 DOI:.59/j.jmea.. Rotational Motion Control Design for Cart-Pendulum System with Lebesgue Sampling Hiroshi Ohsaki,*, Masami Iwase, Shoshiro Hatakeyama
More informationSimultaneous State and Fault Estimation for Descriptor Systems using an Augmented PD Observer
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Simultaneous State and Fault Estimation for Descriptor Systems using an Augmented PD Observer Fengming Shi*, Ron J.
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED-DATA OBSERVER DESIGN VIA APPROXIMATE DISCRETE-TIME MODELS AND EMULATION
NONLINEAR SAMPLED-DAA OBSERVER DESIGN VIA APPROXIMAE DISCREE-IME MODELS AND EMULAION Murat Arcak Dragan Nešić Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
More informationAn asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability
1 An asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability Daniel Liberzon and Hyungbo Shim Abstract For continuous-time nonlinear systems with inputs, we introduce the notion of an asymptotic
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More information1 Introduction Almost every physical system is subject to certain degrees of model uncertainties, which makes the design of high performance control a
Observer Based Adaptive Robust Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Dynamic Uncertainties Λ Bin Yao + Li Xu School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA + Tel:
More informationAnalytic Nonlinear Inverse-Optimal Control for Euler Lagrange System
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL. 16, NO. 6, DECEMBER 847 Analytic Nonlinear Inverse-Optimal Control for Euler Lagrange System Jonghoon Park and Wan Kyun Chung, Member, IEEE Abstract Recent
More informationA Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control
A Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control Fernando A. C. C. Fontes 1 and Lalo Magni 2 1 Officina Mathematica, Departamento de Matemática para a Ciência e
More informationIndirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme
Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme Itamiya, K. *1, Sawada, M. 2 1 Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
More informationNEW SUPERVISORY CONTROL USING CONTROL-RELEVANT SWITCHING
NEW SUPERVISORY CONTROL USING CONTROL-RELEVANT SWITCHING Tae-Woong Yoon, Jung-Su Kim Dept. of Electrical Engineering. Korea University, Anam-dong 5-ga Seongbuk-gu 36-73, Seoul, Korea, twy@korea.ac.kr,
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationNoncausal Optimal Tracking of Linear Switched Systems
Noncausal Optimal Tracking of Linear Switched Systems Gou Nakura Osaka University, Department of Engineering 2-1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan nakura@watt.mech.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp Abstract. In
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationBackstepping Design for Time-Delay Nonlinear Systems
Backstepping Design for Time-Delay Nonlinear Systems Frédéric Mazenc, Projet MERE INRIA-INRA, UMR Analyse des Systèmes et Biométrie, INRA, pl. Viala, 346 Montpellier, France, e-mail: mazenc@helios.ensam.inra.fr
More informationNonlinear Observers: A Circle Criterion Design and Robustness Analysis
Nonlinear Observers: A Circle Criterion Design and Robustness Analysis Murat Arcak 1 arcak@ecse.rpi.edu Petar Kokotović 2 petar@ece.ucsb.edu 1 Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering
More informationReduced order observer design for nonlinear systems
Applied Mathematics Letters 19 (2006) 936 941 www.elsevier.com/locate/aml Reduced order observer design for nonlinear systems V. Sundarapandian Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, SRM
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II Reading: SHV Ch.8 Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE647 p.1/14 Robust vs. Adaptive
More informationFeedback Linearization
Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationHW #1 SOLUTIONS. g(x) sin 1 x
HW #1 SOLUTIONS 1. Let f : [a, b] R and let v : I R, where I is an interval containing f([a, b]). Suppose that f is continuous at [a, b]. Suppose that lim s f() v(s) = v(f()). Using the ɛ δ definition
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationObserver Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators
1 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of 1 IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control Yokohama, Japan, September 8-1, 1 Observer Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot
More informationDynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems
Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems ZHANG Sheng *, QIAN Wei-qi (7.6) Computational Aerodynamics Institution, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang, 6,
More informationModel Predictive Regulation
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Model Predictive Regulation Cesar O. Aguilar Arthur J. Krener California State University, Bakersfield, CA, 93311,
More informationFurther Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation
Proceedings of the 7 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City USA July -3 7 ThA5 Further Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation Zhen Zhang Andrea Serrani
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION - Vol. XIII - Nonlinear Observers - A. J. Krener
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS A. J. Krener University of California, Davis, CA, USA Keywords: nonlinear observer, state estimation, nonlinear filtering, observability, high gain observers, minimum energy estimation,
More informationMulti-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Multi-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures Eric Peterson Harry G.
More informationH 2 Adaptive Control. Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan. WeA03.4
1 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, 1 WeA3. H Adaptive Control Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan Abstract Model reference adaptive
More informationOUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROL FOR NONHOLONOMIC SYSTEMS WITH LINEAR GROWTH CONDITION
J Syst Sci Complex 4: 86 874 OUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROL FOR NONHOLONOMIC SYSTEMS WITH LINEAR GROWTH CONDITION Guiling JU Yuiang WU Weihai SUN DOI:.7/s44--8447-z Received: 8 December 8 / Revised: 5 June 9
More informationExpressions for the covariance matrix of covariance data
Expressions for the covariance matrix of covariance data Torsten Söderström Division of Systems and Control, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, P O Box 337, SE-7505 Uppsala, Sweden
More informationFINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS 1. Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ
Copyright IFAC 5th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain FINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ Λ Institute of Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
More informationc 2002 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
SIAM J. CONTROL OPTIM. Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 888 94 c 22 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics A UNIFYING INTEGRAL ISS FRAMEWORK FOR STABILITY OF NONLINEAR CASCADES MURAT ARCAK, DAVID ANGELI, AND
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD Ponesit Santhanapipatkul Watcharapong Khovidhungij Abstract: We present a controller design based on
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationResearch Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
Applied Mathematics Volume 202, Article ID 689820, 3 pages doi:0.55/202/689820 Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
More informationRobust-to-Dynamics Linear Programming
Robust-to-Dynamics Linear Programg Amir Ali Ahmad and Oktay Günlük Abstract We consider a class of robust optimization problems that we call robust-to-dynamics optimization (RDO) The input to an RDO problem
More informationDiscretization of a non-linear, exponentially stabilizing control law using an L p -gain approach
Discretization of a non-linear, eponentially stabilizing control law using an L p -gain approach Guido Herrmann, Sarah K. Spurgeon and Christopher Edwards Control Systems Research Group, University of
More informationRobust Nonlinear Regulation: Continuous-time Internal Models and Hybrid Identifiers
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA Robust Nonlinear Regulation: Continuous-time Internal Models and Hybrid Identifiers Francesco Forte, Lorenzo
More information