Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
|
|
- Cleopatra Patterson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom Abstract An adaptive control algorithm is proposed for output regulation of uncertain nonlinear systems in output feedback form under disturbances generated from nonlinear exosystems A new nonlinear internal model is proposed to generate the desired input term for suppression of the disturbances The proposed internal model design is based on boundedness of the disturbance, high gain design and saturation and the designed internal model is capable to tackle disturbances in any specified initial conditions The uncertainty in the system allows the all the parameters to be unknown, except the high frequency gain, and it is specified in a vector of constant unknown parameters, which is tackled using nonlinear dominant functions and an adaptive control coefficient The proposed control algorithm ensures the global convergence of the state variables to the invariant manifold, which implies that the measurement or the tracking error approaches to zero asymptotically Index Terms Output regulation, Internal model principle, Uncertainty, Nonlinear systems, Adaptive control, Backstepping I INTRODUCTION Output regulation concerns with stabilization of dynamic systems as well rejecting the disturbances or tracking the desired trajectories The output regulation problem is well posed and solved for linear systems in [], [2] For nonlinear systems, an important contribution to output regulation is reported in [3], [4] that the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a local full information solution are specified as that the linearized system is stabilizable and there exists a certain invariant manifold A semiglobal extension to these results for a class of feedback linearizable systems is reported in [5] using a saturated high-gain observer [6] Output regulation of error feedback is solved [7], [8] with the application of system immersion technique The uncertainty parameterized by unknown constant parameters are treated as special cases of exogenous signals and the solution, extended from the error feedback regulation, is referred to as structurally stable regulation A semiglobal adaptive output feedback control is presented in [9] for nonlinear systems represented by inputoutput models, using a high-gain observer Global solutions for output regulation using state or partial state feedback are shown for strict feedback systems in [] and for extended strict feedback systems in [] Global output regulation for output feedback system is reported in [2] Global adaptive output regulation for the output feedback systems is shown in [3] A common assumption in the global output regulation results via measurement feedback [2], [3] is that the exosystem is linear The linear dynamics of the exosystem are convenient for the transformation and reformulation of the exosystem model so that a suitable internal model can then be designed for output regulation [4], [5], [6] In this paper, we consider global output regulation of uncertain nonlinear systems with a class of nonlinear exosystems The difficulty encountered in designing internal models for output regulation is that the disturbances are not measured directly, and they are always mixed with the state variables of the system The nonlinear dynamics in the exosystem make the design of the internal model more difficult We propose a novel design of a high-gain internal model which exploits the boundedness of the disturbances and the high gain dominance with delicately defined saturation levels The proposed internal model design is then used together with nonlinear adaptive control techniques to provide a solution to the output regulation with nonlinear exosystems The proposed control algorithm guarantees the convergence of the state variable to the invariant manifold, which also implies that the tacking error converges to zero II PROBLEM FORMULATION We consider a single-input-single-output nonlinear system which can be transformed into the output feedback form with ẋ = A c x + φ(y, w, a) + bu y = Cx e = y q(w) () A c =, b = C = [ ], b ρ where x R n is the state vector, u R is the control, y R is the output, e is the measurement output, a R q and b R n are vectors of unknown parameters, φ(y, w, a) is a smooth vector field with each element being polynomials of b n
2 its variables and satisfying φ(, w, a) =, q is an unknown polynomial of w, w R m are disturbances, and they are generated from an exosystem ẇ = s(w) (2) Assumption : The system is minimum phase, ie, the polynomial B(s) = n i=ρ b is n i is Hurwitz, and the high frequency gain b ρ is known Remark : We assume that b ρ is known to simplify the presentation In the case of unknown b ρ, a Nussbaum gain may be designed in a similar way as in [7] Assumption 2: The flows of vector field s(w) are bounded and converge to periodic solutions The adaptive output regulation problem that we are going to solve is to find a finite dimensional system = ν(, e(t)), R s, u = u(, e(t)) (3) such that for every x() R n, w() Ω R m, () R s, x(t), (t) and u(t) are bounded t, and lim t e(t) = III STATE TRANSFORMATION For the system () with relative degree ρ >, the following filter is introduced [8] ξ = λ ξ + ξ 2 ξ ρ = λ ρ ξ ρ + u (4) where λ i > for i =,, ρ are the design parameters Define the filtered transform z = x [ d d ρ ]ξ (5) where ξ = [ξ ξ ρ ] T, di R n for i =,, ρ and they are recursively generated by d ρ = b and d i = [A c + λ i+ I] d i+ for i = ρ 2,, The system () is then transformed to z = A c z + φ(y, w, a) + dξ y = C z (6) where d = [A c + λ I] d It can be shown that d = b ρ and D(s) := n i= ρ d i s n i = B(s) (s + λ i ) (7) i= With ξ as the input, the system (6) is with relative degree one and minimum phase We introduce another state transform to extract the internal dynamics of (6) with z R n given by z = z 2:n d 2:n d y (8) where ( ) 2:n refers to the vector or matrix formed by the 2nd row to the nth row With the coordinates {z, y}, (6) is rewritten as ż = Dz + ψ(y, w, θ) ẏ = z + ψ y (y, w, θ) + b ρ ξ (9) where the unknown parameter vector θ = [a T, b T ] T, and D is the companion matrix of d given by d 2 /d D =, d n /d and ψ(y, w, θ) = D d 2:n d y + φ 2:n (y, w, a) d 2:n d φ (y, w, a) ψ y (y, w, θ) = d 2 d y + d 2:n d φ (y, w, a) Notice that D is Hurwitz, from Assumption and (7), and that the dependence of d on b is reflected in the parameter θ in ψ(y, w, θ) and ψ y (y, w, θ) and it is easy to check that ψ(, w, θ) = and ψ y (, w, θ) = IV INTERNAL MODEL The output regulation problem considered in this paper is well posed if the following assumption is satisfied Assumption 3: There exists an invariant manifold π(w) R n satisfying π(w) s(w) = Dπ(w) + ψ(q(w), w, θ) () w Based on Assumption 3, we have q(w) w s(w) = π (w) + ψ y (q(w), w, θ) + b ρ α () With ξ bing viewed as the input, α is the feedforward term used for output regulation to tackle the disturbances, and it given by α(w, θ) = b ρ [ q(w) w s(w) π (w) ψ y (q(w), w, θ)] (2) We now introduce the last transform based on the invariant manifold with z = z π (3) Finally we have the model for the control design z = D z + ψ ė = z + ψ y + b ρ (ξ α(w)) ξ = λ ξ + ξ 2 ξ ρ = λ ρ ξ ρ + u (4)
3 where ψ = ψ(y, w, θ) ψ(q(w), w, θ) ψ y = ψ y (y, w, θ) ψ y (q(w), w, θ) To solve the problem, we need an assumption on the structure of the exosystem Assumption 4: There exists an immersion of the exosystem η = F η + ϕ(α) α = Hη (5) where η R r and F =, H = Remark 2: An example of exosystem in (5) is a Van de Pol equation η = η 2 η 3 + η η 2 = η Since the state in the internal model η is unknown, we design the internal model ˆη = (F ggkh)(ˆη b ρ ggke) + ϕ(ˆη b ρ ghgke) + ggkξ (6) where g is a design parameter, G = diag{, g,, g r }, k R r is chosen such that F o = F kh is Hurwitz, ϕ( ) : R r R r is a decentralized C ρ soft saturation function with l u,i () if ϕ i () M l,i ϕ i () = ϕ i () if ϕ i () < M l,i (7) l l,i () if ϕ i () M l,i The saturation levels are chosen such that max w Ω ϕ i(α(w)) < M l,i < M u,i < max w Ω, R ϕ i(α(w) ) (8) with M u,i denoting another positive real design parameter The functions l u,i and l l,i, for i =,, r, are (ρ ) order Hermite-Birkoff interpolation functions [9] between the points of ( p,i, M l,i ) and ( p,i + i, M u,i ), and between ( n,i, M l,i ) and ( n,i i, M u,i ) respectively with i being a positive real design parameter, and p,i and n,i being the values such that ϕ i ( p,i ) = M l,i and ϕ i ( n,i ) = M l,i The Hermite-Birkoff interpolation functions ensure that the derivatives match up to the specified order The boundary conditions for ( p,i, M l,i ) are the derivatives of ϕ i at p,i, and at the upper point ( p,i + i, M u,i ), the derivatives are set to zero Similar settings apply to the points ( n,i, M l,i ) and ( n,i i, M u,i ) Therefore the soft saturation function ϕ i has its values bounded in T, [ M u,i, M u,i ] and it has continuous derivatives up to order ρ Remark 3: If ϕ i is upper bounded or lower bounded, then the respective soft saturation function is not needed Note that the right hand side of (8) can be infinity In such a case, we only need to ensure max w Ω ϕ i (α(w)) < M l,i < M u,i If we define the auxiliary error it can be shown that η = η ˆη + b ρ ggke (9) η = (F ggkh) η + ϕ(η ) ϕ(η η ) +b ρ ggk( z + ψ y ) (2) To analyze the property of the internal model, we define a scaled auxiliary error It can be shown that ζ = G η (2) ζ = g(f kc)ζ + G [ϕ(η ) ϕ( η η )] +b ρ gk( z + ψ y ) (22) To complete the internal model design, we need a result given in the following lemma Lemma : For a smooth ϕ i and the saturation function defined in (8), there exists an upper bound of the expression ϕi(η) ϕi(η ), for all w Ω, R, and η = α(w) being a smooth function of w Proof: Let us consider in two cases Case, ϕ i (α(w) ) M l,i From the definition of M l,i we have max w Ω ϕ i (α(w)) < M l,i Since ϕ i is continuous, which is implied by the smoothness, there exists a positive real value ɛ, such that > ɛ In this case we have ϕ i (η ) ϕ i (η ) < 2M u,i ɛ (23) Case 2, the saturation function is not activated, ie, ϕ i (α(w) ) < M l,i In this case, we have Hence, we have ϕ i (η ) ϕ i (η ) = ϕ i (η ) ϕ i (η )) ϕ i (η v) = dv v [ ] ϕi (η + s) = dv (24) s s= v = ϕ i (η ) σ(ϕ i (η )) [ ] ϕi (η + s) dv (25) s s= v
4 From the smoothness of ϕ i, the integration in (25) exists for any finite value of, and therefore the integral exists for ɛ For > ɛ, we still have ϕ i (η ) ϕ i (η ) < 2M u,i ɛ (26) Combining both the cases, we conclude the proof of the lemma With the result shown in Lemma, we complete the design of the internal model by setting the gain g as where ḡ = max i g > 2λ max (P F )rḡ + 2 (27) max w Ω, R ϕ i (η ) ϕ i (η )) (28) and P F is a positive definite matrix, satisfying P F (F kh) + (F kh) T P F = I V CONTROL DESIGN If the system () is of relative degree one, then ξ in (4) is the control input For the systems with higher relative degrees, adaptive backstepping will be used to find the final control output u from the desirable value of ξ Supposing that ˆξ is desirable value for ξ, we define From (4) we have ˆξ = b ρ ξ (29) ė = z + ξ + b ρ ξ b ρ η + ψ y (3) where ξ = ξ ˆξ Sine the nonlinear functions involved in ψ and ψ y are polynomials with ψ(, w, θ) = and ψ y (, w, θ) =, w is bounded, and the unknown parameters are constants, it can be shown that ψ < r z ( e + e p ) (3) ψ y < r y ( e + e p ) (32) where p is a known positive integer, depending on the polynomials in ψ and ψ y, and r z and r y are unknown positive real constants We now design the virtual control ˆξ as, with c >, ξ = c e ˆl (e + e 2p ) + b ρˆη gk e (33) where ˆl is an adaptive coefficient with ˆl () = Using (9), we have the resultant error dynamics ė = c e ˆl (e + e 2p ) + z +b ρ ξ b ρ η + ψ y (34) The adaptive law is given by ˆl = γ l (e 2 + e 2p ) (35) where γ l is a positive real design parameter If the relative degree ρ =, we set u = ˆξ For ρ >, adaptive backstepping can be used to obtain the following results: ( ˆξ 2 = b ρ e c ξ l ˆξ ) 2 ξ e + ˆξ e [b ρ(ξ ˆη ) + gk e] + ˆξ ˆη ˆη + ˆξ ˆl (36) ˆl ˆξ i = ξ i 2 c i ξi l i ( ˆξ i e + ˆξ i e [b ρ(ξ ˆη ) + gk e] + ˆξ i ˆη ) 2 ξi ˆη + ˆξ i ˆl ˆl for i = 3,, ρ where ξ i = ξ i ˆξ i for i =,, ρ 2, c i and l i, i = 2,, ρ, are positive real design parameters, and τ i, for i =,, ρ 2, are tuning functions Finally we design the control input as u = ˆξ ρ (37) VI STABILITY ANALYSIS In this section, we shall establish the boundedness of all the variables and the convergence to zero of the measurement output We start with the analysis of the internal model by defining V = ζ T P F ζ (38) Using (22), we have V = gζ T ζ + 2ζ T P f {G [ϕ(η ) ϕ(η η )] +b ρ gk( z + ψ y )} gζ T ζ + 2λ max (P F )rḡζ T ζ +2 b ρ g P F k ζ ( z + ψ y ) ζ T ζ + (b ρ g P F k ) 2 ( z + ψ y ) 2 ζ T ζ + 2(b ρ g P F k ) 2 z 2 +2(b ρ g P F k γ y ) 2 ( e + e p ) 2 ζ T ζ + 2(b ρ g P F k ) 2 z 2 +4(b ρ g P F k γ y ) 2 (e 2 + e 2p ) (39) Define a Lyapunov function candidate V = β V + β 2 z T P z z + ρ 2 [e2 + ξ i 2 + γ l (l ˆl ) 2 ] (4) i= where β and β 2 are two positive reals, P z is a positive definite matrix satisfying P z D + D T P z = I With the design of ˆξ i, for i =,, ρ, the dynamics of ξ i can be easily evaluated From the dynamics of z in (4) and
5 the dynamics of η in (2), virtual controls and adaptive laws designed in the previous section, we have the derivative of V as V = β [ ζ T ζ + 2(b ρ g P F k ) 2 z 2 +4(b ρ g P F k γ y ) 2 (e 2 + e 2p )] +β 2 [ z T z + 2 z T P z ψ] +(ˆl l )(e 2 + e 2p ) c e 2 ˆl (e 2 + e 2p ) +e z + e ψ y eb ρ ζ ρ + i= [ c i ξ2 i k i ( ˆξ i e )2 ξ2 i ξ i ˆξ i e z ξ i ˆξ i e ψ y + ξ i ˆξ i e b ρζ ] (4) The stability analysis can be proceeded by using the inequalities 2xy < rx 2 + y 2 /r or xy < rx 2 + y 2 /(4r) for x >, y > and r being any positive real, to tackle the cross terms between the variables z, ζ, e, ξi, for i =,, ρ It can be shown that there exists a sufficiently big positive real β and then a sufficiently big positive real β 2 finally the sufficient big l such that the following result holds V 2 β ζ T ζ 4 β ρ 2 z T z c e 2 c i ξ2 i (42) i= The boundedness of V further implies ζ, z, e, ξi L 2 L for i =,, ρ, and the boundedness of ˆl Since the disturbance w is bounded, e, z, ζ L implies the boundedness of y, z and ˆη, which further implies the boundedness of ˆξ and then the boundedness of ξ The boundedness of ˆξ and ξ, together with the boundedness of e, ˆη, ˆl and ˆb ρ implies the boundedness of ˆξ2 and then the boundedness of ξ 2 follows the boundedness of ξ 2 Applying the above reasoning recursively, we can establish the boundedness of ˆξ i for i > 2 to i = ρ We then conclude that all the variables are bounded The boundedness of all the variables implies the boundedness of ζ, z, ė, and ξi, which further implies, together with ζ, z, e, ξi L 2 L and Barbalat s lemma, lim t ζ =, lim t z =, lim t e(t) = and lim t ξi = for i =,, ρ The above analysis proves the following result Theorem : For a system () satisfying the Assumptions to 4, the output regulation problem is globally solvable In particular, the feedback control system consists of the ξ-filters (4), the adaptive internal model (6), the parameter adaptive law (35) and the feedback control (37) VII AN EXAMPLE We use a simple example to illustrate the proposed control design, concentrating on the design of nonlinear internal model Consider a first order system ẏ = θy 2 w + u e = y (43) where θ is an unknown parameter, the disturbance w is generated by ẇ = w 2 + w w 3 ẇ 2 = w (44) with w η, a known constant It is easy to see that q(w) =, π(w) = and α(w) = w (45) From the exosystem and the desired feedforward input α, it can be seen that Assumption 4 is satisfied with w = η, and that the exosystem (44) is in the format of (5), with φ (η ) = η η 3 φ 2 (η ) = η (46) Following (6), we design the internal model [ ] [ ] [ ˆη k ˆη = ] y ˆη 2 k 2 ˆη 2 k 2 y [ φ (ˆη + k ] [ ] y) k φ 2 (ˆη k + u (47) y) k 2 where k = gk, k 2 = g 2 k 2 Since the system is of relative degree one, we design the functions φ i () as σ i (φ i ()) for i =, 2 with σ i being the saturation functions with saturation levels at η 3 η and η respectively The control input is given by where u = cy ˆl (y + y 3 ) + ˆη gk y (48) ˆl = y 2 + y 4, with ˆl () = (49) Finally we decide the value of g From the functions φ i, i =, 2, we have ḡ = η The matrix P F can be decided once the gain k is decided For this simple example, we have [ ] P F = + k2 k k 2 k + k k 2 + (5) k k 2 It is then straightforward to calculate g using (27) with r = 2 For simulation study, we set c =, k = 3, k 2 = 2, and we take η = 2 based on the characteristics of the exosystem With the chosen k and η, we obtain g = 23 In the simulation study, we found that this g value is very conservative, and the results shown in this paper were obtained with g = 2 The system output and input are shown in Figure, while the disturbance generated from the exosystem and its estimate generated from the internal model are shown in Figure 2 As shown in the figures, the internal model successfully reproduces the feedforward control needed after a transient period, and the system output is regulated to zero, as required
6 y η & estimate time(s) u time(s) Original Fig System output y and input u Estimate time(s) Fig 2 Disturbance η and its estimate ηˆ VIII CONCLUSIONS We have proposed a control design for output regulation of uncertain systems with nonlinear exosystems The success of the proposed design relies on the design of a new nonlinear internal model, which incorporates in the high gain design with saturation The proposed control design only uses the structural information of the system, and the high frequency gain, and no knowledge is needed of any other system parameters Even though the adaptive control techniques are used for the control design, the unknown system parameters are not estimated, unlike a completely adaptive treatment in [7] The system uncertainties are tackled by using high order polynomials which dominate the uncertainties This robust way of tackling uncertainties makes it possible to deal with the unknown disturbances in the measurement, which is not considered in [7] With one coefficient being made adaptive, other control design coefficients involved in the proposed algorithm can be any positive reals The proposed control algorithm ensures the convergence of state variables to the invariant manifold globally, and the measurement output approaches zero asymptotically REFERENCES [] E J Davison, The robust control of a servomechanism problem for linear time-invariant multivariable systems, IEEE Trans Automa Contr, vol 2, no, pp 25 34, 976 [2] B A Francis, The linear multivariable regulator problem, SIAM J Contr Optimiz, vol 5, pp , 977 [3] A Isidori and C I Byrnes, Output regulation of nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans Automa Contr, vol 35, no 2, pp 3 4, 99 [4] J Huang and W J Rugh, On a nonlinear multivariable servomechanism problem, Automatica, vol 26, no 6, pp , 99 [5] H K Khalil, Robust servomechanism output feedback controllers for a class of feedback linearizable systems, Automatica, vol 3, no, pp , 994 [6] F Esfandiari and H K Khalil, Output feedback stabilisation of fully linearizable systems, International Journal of Control, vol 56, pp 7 37, 992 [7] A Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 3 edition, 995 [8] C I Byrnes, F D Priscoli, and A Isidori, Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems, Birhäuser, Boston, 997 [9] H K Khalil, Adaptive output feedback control of nonlinear systems represented by input-output models, IEEE Trans Automa Contr, vol 4, no 2, pp 77 88, 996 [] R Marino, P Tomei, I Kanellakopoulos, and P V Kokotovic, Adaptive tracking for a class of feedback linearizable systems, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, vol 39, pp 34 39, 994 [] R A Freeman and P V Kokotovic, Tracking controllers for systems linear in unmeasured states, Automatica, vol 32, no 5, pp , 996 [2] A Serrani and A Isidori, Global robust output regulation for a class of nonlinear systems, Systems & Control Letters, vol 39, pp 33 39, 2 [3] Z Ding, Global output regulation of uncertain nonlinear systems with exogenous signals, Automatica, vol 37, pp 3 9, 2 [4] V O Nikiforov, Adaptive non-linear tracking with complete compensation of unknown disturbances, European Journal of Control, vol 4, pp 32 39, 998 [5] Z Ding, Global output regulation of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown exosystems, in Proceedings of 4th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, USA, 2, pp 65 7 [6] X Ye and J Huang, Decentralized adaptive output regulation for large-scale nonlinear systems, in Proceedings of IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Design, St Peterburg, Russian, 2, pp [7] Z Ding, Universal disturbance rejection for nonlinear systems in output feedback form, IEEE Trans Automatic Control, vol 48, no 7, pp , 23 [8] R Marino and P Tomei, Global adaptive output feedback control of nonlinear systems, part i: Linear parameterization, IEEE Trans Automat Contr, vol 38, pp 7 32, 993 [9] A Quarteroni, R Sacco, and A Saleri, Numerical Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2
A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationFurther Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation
Proceedings of the 7 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City USA July -3 7 ThA5 Further Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation Zhen Zhang Andrea Serrani
More informationGeneralized Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems via the Robust Control Approach
Generalized Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems via the Robust Control Approach L. E. RAMOS-VELASCO, S. CELIKOVSKÝ, V. LÓPEZ-MORALES AND V. KU CERA Centro de Investigación en Tecnologías
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationA Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 A Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS, AND AUTOMATION - Vol. XIII - Nonlinear Output Regulation - Alberto Isidoro and Claudio De Persis
NONLINEAR OUTPUT REGULATION Alberto Isidori Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma La Sapienza" and Department of Systems Science and Mathematics, Washington University in St. Louis,
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationOutput feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control
Output feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control Georgia Kaliora, Zhong-Ping Jiang and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract In this note we discuss the problems of
More informationACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationOutput-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems
96 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 Output-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems Shanwei Su Abstract In this paper, an output-feedback
More informationHao Lei Wei Lin,1. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
UNIVERSA OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTRO OF NONINEAR SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN GROWTH RATE Hao ei Wei in, Dept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 446, USA
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationOutput Regulation of the Tigan System
Output Regulation of the Tigan System Dr. V. Sundarapandian Professor (Systems & Control Eng.), Research and Development Centre Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-6 6, Tamil Nadu,
More informationAdaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 0, OCTOBER 003 87 Adaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization Zhihua Qu Abstract Two classes of partially known
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.oc] 14 Dec 2015
Cooperative Output Regulation of Discrete-Time Linear Time-Delay Multi-agent Systems Yamin Yan and Jie Huang arxiv:1510.05380v2 math.oc 14 Dec 2015 Abstract In this paper, we study the cooperative output
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationRobust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 14-16, 26 FrB3.2 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Bo Xie and Bin
More informationAdaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems
Adaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio Mora-Camino To cite this version: Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationFEMLAB-BASED OUTPUT REGULATION OF NONHYPERBOLICALLY NONMINIMUM PHASE SYSTEM AND ITS REAL-TIME IMPLEMENTATION
FEMLAB-BASED OUTPUT REGULATION OF NONHYPERBOLICALLY NONMINIMUM PHASE SYSTEM AND ITS REAL-TIME IMPLEMENTATION Branislav Rehák,1 Jorge Orozco-Mora Sergej Čelikovský,2 Javier Ruiz-León Czech Technical University,
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationModel Predictive Regulation
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Model Predictive Regulation Cesar O. Aguilar Arthur J. Krener California State University, Bakersfield, CA, 93311,
More informationTrajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems
25 American Control Conference June 8-1, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThB17.4 Trajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems Kazunori Sakurama, Toshiharu Sugie and Kazushi Nakano Abstract This
More informationOutput Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System
Vol. 0, No. 05, 00, 60-608 Output Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan R & D Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi-Alamathi Road, Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationUDE-based Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation
UDEbased Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation DAI Jiguo, REN Beibei, ZHONG QingChang. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,
More informationAutomatica. Tracking and disturbance rejection for fully actuated mechanical systems
Automatica 44 (8) 863 868 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Automatica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Brief paper Tracking and disturbance rejection for fully actuated mechanical
More informationRobust Nonlinear Regulation: Continuous-time Internal Models and Hybrid Identifiers
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA Robust Nonlinear Regulation: Continuous-time Internal Models and Hybrid Identifiers Francesco Forte, Lorenzo
More informationApproximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control
Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis Department of Electrical
More informationOutput Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Output Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers Shahid Nazrulla Hassan K Khalil Electrical & Computer Engineering,
More informationRobust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States
obust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States John A Akpobi, Member, IAENG and Aloagbaye I Momodu Abstract Compressors for jet engines in operation experience
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD Ponesit Santhanapipatkul Watcharapong Khovidhungij Abstract: We present a controller design based on
More informationOUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION FOR COMPLETELY UNIFORMLY OBSERVABLE NONLINEAR SYSTEMS. H. Shim, J. Jin, J. S. Lee and Jin H. Seo
OUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION FOR COMPLETELY UNIFORMLY OBSERVABLE NONLINEAR SYSTEMS H. Shim, J. Jin, J. S. Lee and Jin H. Seo School of Electrical Engineering, Seoul National University San 56-, Shilim-Dong,
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationState estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs
State estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs Abdelkader Akhenak, Mohammed Chadli, Didier Maquin and José Ragot Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, CNRS UMR 79 Institut National
More informationRegulation of Linear Systems with Unknown Additive Sinusoidal Sensor Disturbances
Proceedings of the 7th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-, 8 Regulation of Linear Systems with Unknown Additive Sinusoidal Sensor Disturbances Riccardo
More informationWE propose the tracking trajectory control of a tricycle
Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 7 Vol I, IMECS 7, March - 7, 7, Hong Kong Trajectory Tracking Controller Design for A Tricycle Robot Using Piecewise
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 5, MAY Bo Yang, Student Member, IEEE, and Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE (1.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 5, MAY 2005 619 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems With Uncontrollable and Unobservable Linearization Bo Yang, Student
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationUDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationOn Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems
On Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems Bao-Zhu Guo 1, Zhi-Liang Zhao 2, 1 Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Academia Sinica, Beijing, 100190, China E-mail:
More informationQuasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 2009 FrA11.5 Quasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
More informationOn integral-input-to-state stabilization
On integral-input-to-state stabilization Daniel Liberzon Dept. of Electrical Eng. Yale University New Haven, CT 652 liberzon@@sysc.eng.yale.edu Yuan Wang Dept. of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationAdaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 47, NO 8, AUGUST 2002 1249 Adaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE, and Chunjiang Qian,
More informationMultivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking
29 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 1-12, 29 WeA18.5 Multivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking Jiaxing Guo, Yu Liu and Gang Tao Department
More informationSINCE THE formulation and solution of the problem of
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 49, NO 11, NOVEMBER 2004 1941 Output Regulation of Linear Systems With Bounded Continuous Feedback Tingshu Hu, Senior Member, IEEE, Zongli Lin, Senior Member,
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More informationFinite difference solution of discrete-time regulator equation and its application to digital output regulation problem
2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12, 2009 FrC03.4 Finite difference solution of discrete-time regulator equation and its application to digital output
More informationWeitian Chen and Brian D. O. Anderson. FrA04.5
2010 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 30-July 02, 2010 FrA04.5 Adaptive Output Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Parameterization: A Dwell-time-switching
More informationObserver Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators
1 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of 1 IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control Yokohama, Japan, September 8-1, 1 Observer Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationLyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched Perturbations
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, Lyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched
More informationNavigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Mathias Bürger, Frank Allgöwer Abstract We study backstepping controllers
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Tracking & Regulation. Nonlinear Control
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Tracking & Regulation Normal form: η = f 0 (η,ξ) ξ i = ξ i+1, for 1 i ρ 1 ξ ρ = a(η,ξ)+b(η,ξ)u y = ξ 1 η D η R n ρ, ξ = col(ξ 1,...,ξ ρ ) D ξ R ρ Tracking Problem: Design
More informationA LaSalle version of Matrosov theorem
5th IEEE Conference on Decision Control European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlo, FL, USA, December -5, A LaSalle version of Matrosov theorem Alessro Astolfi Laurent Praly Abstract A weak version of
More informationDISCRETE-TIME TIME-VARYING ROBUST STABILIZATION FOR SYSTEMS IN POWER FORM. Dina Shona Laila and Alessandro Astolfi
DISCRETE-TIME TIME-VARYING ROBUST STABILIZATION FOR SYSTEMS IN POWER FORM Dina Shona Laila and Alessandro Astolfi Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London
More informationDecentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections
Decentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections Yi Guo Abstract The problem of decentralized disturbance attenuation is considered for a new
More informationOutput-based disturbance rejection control for nonlinear uncertain systems with unknown frequency disturbances using an observer backstepping approach
Output-based disturbance rejection control for nonlinear uncertain systems with unknown frequency disturbances using an observer backstepping approach Jun Yang a,, Zhengtao Ding b, Wen-Hua Chen c, Shihua
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture # 36 Tracking & Regulation. Nonlinear Control
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 36 Tracking & Regulation Normal form: η = f 0 (η,ξ) ξ i = ξ i+1, for 1 i ρ 1 ξ ρ = a(η,ξ)+b(η,ξ)u y = ξ 1 η D η R n ρ, ξ = col(ξ 1,...,ξ ρ ) D ξ R ρ Tracking Problem: Design
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationNonlinear Formation Control of Marine Craft
Nonlinear Formation Control of Marine Craft Roger Skjetne, Sonja Moi, and Thor I. Fossen Abstract This paper investigates formation control of a fleet of ships. The control objective for each ship is to
More informationRobust control of a submarine snorkel system
Robust control of a submarine snorkel system Alessandro Macchelli Lorenzo Marconi Marco Lucci Daniele Bertin University of Bologna, Dept. of Electronics, Computer Science and Systems (DEIS), viale del
More informationA Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control
A Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control Fernando A. C. C. Fontes 1 and Lalo Magni 2 1 Officina Mathematica, Departamento de Matemática para a Ciência e
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationInternal model based fault tolerant control of a robot manipulator
Internal model based fault tolerant control of a robot manipulator Claudio Bonivento, Luca Gentili and Andrea Paoli Abstract In this paper an implicit fault tolerant control scheme is specialized for an
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationGramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems
Gramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems Y. Chahlaoui Younes.Chahlaoui@manchester.ac.uk Centre for Interdisciplinary Computational and Dynamical Analysis (CICADA) School of Mathematics
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationFUZZY CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT SATURATION USING MULTIPLE MODEL STRUCTURE. Min Zhang and Shousong Hu
ICIC Express Letters ICIC International c 2008 ISSN 1881-803X Volume 2, Number 2, June 2008 pp. 131 136 FUZZY CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT SATURATION USING MULTIPLE MODEL STRUCTURE Min Zhang
More informationASTATISM IN NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ROBOTICS
dx dt DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND CONTROL PROCESSES N 1, 1997 Electronic Journal, reg. N P23275 at 07.03.97 http://www.neva.ru/journal e-mail: diff@osipenko.stu.neva.ru Control problems in nonlinear systems
More informationAutomatica. A unifying point of view on output feedback designs for global asymptotic stabilization. V. Andrieu a,b,, L. Praly c.
Automatica 45 (2009 1789 1798 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Automatica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Survey paper A unifying point of view on output feedback designs
More informationSpectral factorization and H 2 -model following
Spectral factorization and H 2 -model following Fabio Morbidi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA MTNS - July 5-9, 2010 F. Morbidi (Northwestern Univ.) MTNS
More informationOBSERVER DESIGN WITH GUARANTEED BOUND FOR LPV SYSTEMS. Jamal Daafouz Gilles Millerioux Lionel Rosier
OBSERVER DESIGN WITH GUARANTEED BOUND FOR LPV SYSTEMS Jamal Daafouz Gilles Millerioux Lionel Rosier CRAN UMR 739 ENSEM 2, Avenue de la Forêt de Haye 54516 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex France, Email: Jamal.Daafouz@ensem.inpl-nancy.fr
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED DATA CONTROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS 1
NONLINEAR SAMPLED DAA CONROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCIONS 1 Lars Grüne Dragan Nešić Mathematical Institute, University of Bayreuth, 9544 Bayreuth, Germany, lars.gruene@uni-bayreuth.de Department of
More informationMANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation
610 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 52, NO 4, APRIL 2007 Direct Adaptive Dynamic Compensation for Minimum Phase Systems With Unknown Relative Degree Jesse B Hoagg and Dennis S Bernstein Abstract
More informationOutput Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x)
Output Feedback and State Feedback EL2620 Nonlinear Control Lecture 10 Exact feedback linearization Input-output linearization Lyapunov-based control design methods ẋ = f(x,u) y = h(x) Output feedback:
More informationRobust Adaptive MPC for Systems with Exogeneous Disturbances
Robust Adaptive MPC for Systems with Exogeneous Disturbances V. Adetola M. Guay Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (e-mail: martin.guay@chee.queensu.ca) Abstract:
More informationNeural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot
Vol.3 No., 27 مجلد 3 العدد 27 Neural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot Abdul-Basset A. AL-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah
More informationStability Criteria for Interconnected iiss Systems and ISS Systems Using Scaling of Supply Rates
Stability Criteria for Interconnected iiss Systems and ISS Systems Using Scaling of Supply Rates Hiroshi Ito Abstract This paper deals with problems of stability analysis of feedback and cascade interconnection
More informationLocally optimal controllers and application to orbital transfer (long version)
9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 4-6, 13 FrA1.4 Locally optimal controllers and application to orbital transfer (long version) S. Benachour V. Andrieu Université
More informationRobust Control of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems via Sliding Mode with Backstepping Design
1 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, 1 ThC.5 Robust Control of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems via Sliding Mode with Backstepping Design R. Benayache 1, L. Chrifi-Alaoui
More informationOUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROL FOR NONHOLONOMIC SYSTEMS WITH LINEAR GROWTH CONDITION
J Syst Sci Complex 4: 86 874 OUTPUT-FEEDBACK CONTROL FOR NONHOLONOMIC SYSTEMS WITH LINEAR GROWTH CONDITION Guiling JU Yuiang WU Weihai SUN DOI:.7/s44--8447-z Received: 8 December 8 / Revised: 5 June 9
More information