A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
|
|
- Caroline Gregory
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1, Mohsen Ghodrat 2 and Horacio J. Marquez 3, IEEE Senior Member Abstract In this paper, a new integral-based triggering scheme is introduced for LTI systems. The main feature of the novel triggering condition is that does not require the derivative of Lyapunov function to be negative at the all time instants and so, is less conservative than the corresponding available conditions in the literature. Morever, a well-proved comparison with traditional triggering condition and simulation results for a satellite system are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed system. I. INTRODUCTION In this paper we study stability and design of eventtriggered control systems. Event-triggered systems have been growing in popularity over the last two decades, owing to their ability to deliver performance comparable to the classical periodic sampled-data systems (see for example, [1]) but with reduced transmission of information between plant and controller. In an event-triggered system information is exchanged between the different subsystems in a feedback loop only when a pre-established triggering condition is violated. Early work on the event-triggered control systems began in late 1990 s [2, 3]. In [2], Arzen defined a simple triggering condition (TC) based on the tracking error and converted the standard PID control algorithm to an event based form. Comparison with the corresponding time-triggered scheme confirmed that using an event based mechanism, is possible to obtain large reductions in the control execution with only minor control performance degradation. Event-triggered systems have received much attention in the recent years. One of the most significant and central ideas in eventtriggered control systems design was presented in [4]. In this paper, Tabuada proposed an input-to-state (ISS) Lyapunov function framework for TC design for a general class of nonlinear systems. Assuming that a continuous-time feedback control has been already designed, he introduced a TC to maintain the Lyapunov function decreasing along the system trajectories. Using a similar idea and following Tabuada s work, various event based schemes have been designed for various systems. In [5], Mazo and Tabuada investigated the event-based control problem over wireless sensor/actuator networks and presented a decentralized event-triggered implementation over a network of nonlinear systems. In [6], 1 S. H. Mousavi is with the Dept. of Electrical and Computer mousavi3@ualberta.ca 2 M. Ghodras with the Dept. of Electrical and Computer ghodrat@ualberta.ca 3 H. J. Marquez is with the Dept. of Electrical and Computer hmarquez@ualberta.ca Wang and Lemmon, examined event-triggered data transmission in NCS in the presence of packet loss and transmission delay. In [7], Donkers and Heemels developed the event-driven control scheme for output feedback based LTI systems and used several approaches to analyse stability and performance of the system. In [8], the authors considered a class of affine nonlinear systems and using a similar idea to [4] proposed an event based control algorithm to make the system states track a reference dynamical system. As mentioned earlier, most references in the literature (including those above listed) follow the same idea in [4] to design the TC, which as we will discuss, is somewhat conservative. In this paper, we propose a novel integralbased triggering condition (IBTC) for LTI systems that guarantees asymptotic stability of the event-based system while lessening the conservatism of [4]. This concept was recently explored by the authors in reference [9], in the more general case of nonlinear plants. In section II, a quick review on the traditional TC and the motivation for the IBTC are given. section III contains the main results. In this section the structure of the novel triggering condition is presented and a theoretical comparison with the traditional TC is provided. Simulation results for a satellite system are represented in Section IV to validate the privilege of our proposed scheme. Finally, concluding remarks are summarized in section V. A. Notation and Definitions Throughout the paper, R, R + and N denote the set of real numbers, set of positive real numbers and the set of natural numbers, respectively. Moreover, R n represents n dimensional Euclidean space and for x R n the Euclidean norm is defined as x = x x2 n. For mtarix A = [a ij ] m n the induced norm A is defined as: A = sup{ Ax x : x R n with x 0} Beside the above notation, the following definition is also needed: Definition 1: A continuous function α : [0, a) [0, ) is said to belong to class K if is strictly increasing and α(0) = 0. Is said to be of class K if a = and α(r) as r. II. PROBLEM STATEMENT Consider the following LTI system ẋ = Ax + Bu (1) /14/$ IEEE 1239
2 where x(t) R n is the state vector, u(t) R m is the control input, and A and B are system matrices of appropriate dimensions. Consider the event based control law where: u = kˆx(t) (2) ˆx(t) = x( ) t [, +1 ) (3) and T = {t 1, t 2,... } are the triggering instants generated by a TC, to be designed. The closed-loop event based system can be written in the following form: ẋ = Ax + Bk(x + e) (4) where, the measurement error is defined as the last state information sent to the controller and the current state value: e = x( ) x(t) t +1 (5) Now suppose that the state feedback gain k has been already designed such that the closed-loop system (4) is asymptotically stable and so ISS with respect to measurement error e. Therefore, there exists a Lyapunov function V = x T P x, satisfying the following properties [4]: c s x V (x) c s x (6) V x (Ax + Bk(x + e)) c s x 2 + e x. (7) where c s, c s, c s and are some positive constants. The key method for TC design, introduced in [4], is to maintain the Lyapunov function V decreasing along the system trajectories. To this aim, the following TC was proposed: e σc s x 0 < σ < 1 (8) Substituting (8) in (7), is readily obtained: V x ((A + Bk)x + ke) c s(σ 1) x 2 (9) since σ < 1, the time derivative of V is negative and so the system is stable. In this work, we propose a novel TC, improving the existing TC in the sense that demands less data communication between the plant and controller to guarantee the asymptotic stability of the system. The main idea to this goal lies in the result of the following lemma. Lemma 1: Consider the linear system (4) and let T = {t 1, t 2,..., } be an infinite sequence of triggering instants. If there is a Lyapunov function satisfying (6) and the following conditions: V (+1 ) V ( ) = i+1 V (τ)dτ < 0, (10) V ( ) > V (t) t (, +1 ] (11) then the origin is the asymptotic stable equilibrium point of the system. Proof: See Appendix A. Remark 1: The foregoing Lemma is based on the assumption that the number of triggering instants tends to infinity. To guarantee this, the following algorithm is applied along with the designed triggering mechanism. Define T s as an arbitrary time index and suppose that t j is the latest triggering instant generated by an existing triggering mechanism. A fresh data is automatically transmitted from plant to the controller at the instant t j +T s if no trigger happens in the interval [t j, t j +T s ]. See [9] for further details. Based on the lemma 1, to guarantee closed-loop stability, it is sufficient to design a TC which satisfies the conditions (10) and (11). These conditions ensure that the Lyapunov function decreases from one triggering instant to the next, regardless of the sign of V in between. Therefore, the proposed IBTC is less conservative than the existing TCs in the sense that it lets the derivative of Lyapunov function become positive in some time intervals and consequently, the time interval between consecutive event times increases in this scheme. III. INTEGRAL-BASED TRIGGERING CONDITION Consider the following proposed IBTC: e(t) x(t) dt σc s x(t) 2 dt for t (12) in which, 0 < σ < 1 is some arbitrary adjustable parameter. The next update for the control law is generated at +1, the time when the above condition is violated. i.e.: i+1 e(t) x(t) dt = σc s i+1 x(t) 2 dt (13) Note that to initiate the event based mechanism, t 1 is set to 0 and then, the next execution times are generated based on the above triggering condition. In the next theorem is shown that how the proposed IBTC ensures the asymptotic stability and existence of a minimum inter-event time for the closed-loop system. Theorem 1: Consider the linear system (1), where the state feedback gain k has been already designed such that the system is ISS with respect to e and there exists a Lyapunov function V = x T P x, satisfying equations (6) and (7). Now, suppose that the system is controlled by the event based control law (2) and the IBTC (12). Then, the following properties are guaranteed for the closed-loop event based system: (I) The origin is the asymptotic stable equilibrium point of the system. (II) The length of time intervals between consecutive triggering instants are bounded below by a positive value. Proof. (I) Integrating the inequality (7) from to t and using (12), we obtain: V (t) V ( ) (1 σ)c s x(t) 2 dt (14) Then, for 0 < σ < 1 asymptotic stability is guaranteed using Lemma
3 (II) To prove the existence of minimum inter-event time, we introduce the following auxiliary system: ż = Az + Bk(z + e ) (15) implemented by the traditional TC (8): e σc s z (16) Suppose that both systems (4) and (15) trigger at and also have the same triggering state values: z( ) = x( ) (17) Denote the next triggering time of the system (15) by t i+1. Then, from the TC (16), we have: e (t) z(t) < σc s z(t) 2 t [, t i+1) (18) e (t i+1) z(t i+1) = σc s z(t i+1) 2 (19) On the other hand, based on the IBTC (12) is clear that: i+1 e(t) x(t) dt = σc s i+1 Using equation (17) is easily found that; e (t) = e(t) z(t) = x(t) x(t) 2 dt (20) t [, t i+1) t [, t i+1) Now, substituting above equations in (18) and integrating from to t i+1 we obtain: i+1 e(t) x(t) dt < σc s i+1 x(t) 2 dt (21) Comparing the lasnequality with (20), we conclude that +1 > t i+1. Since the auxliary system has a minimum enter-event time [4], so does our proposed system with the IBTC (12). Contrary to the traditional TC, the proposed IBTC stabilizes the closed-loops system without restricting the derivative of Lyapunov function to be negative at all time instants. In the next subsection is proved that how IBTC preforms better from data transmition reduction view point, rather than the corresponding TC, proposed by [4]. A. Comparison With Traditional TC To have a fair comparison between the performance of our proposed scheme and the traditional one, we consider two distinct systems with the same dynamics, one of which is implemented by the IBTC and the other one uses the traditional TC. In this regard, consider the dynamic (15) driven by the TC (16) with the triggering instants T = {t 1, t 2,... }. On the other hand, the dynamic (4) is driven by the IBTC (12) with the triggering instants T = {t 1, t 2,... }. Here, suppose that at some triggering instants t p and t q (for some p, q N) the two systems have the same state values; i.e. z(t p) = x(t q ) (22) Since the dynamic (15) is time-invariant over the interval [t p, t p+1) in the sense that e only depends on z(t p) and z(t), without loss of generality assume t p = t q and so z(t q ) = x(t q ). Because the systems have the same dynamics and same initial conditions at t = t q, one can easily say that : e (t) = e(t) t [t q, t p+1) z(t) = x(t) t [t q, t p+1) Next, taking the same approach given in proof of Theorem 1 (II), is easily porved that t q+1 > t p+1 and so our proposed IBTC takes more time to reach its next execution time. Remark 2: In the comparison given above, is assumed that the initial values of the both systems at a triggering instant are equal. The privilege of our proposed event-based scheme over the traditional version can also be proved even in the case: z(t p) x(t q ) ( i.e. there is some difference between initial triggering instant values) For detailed proof of this, one can refer to [9]. IV. SIMULATION RESULTS In this section the efficiency of the proposed mechanism is shown through numerical simulation. Consider a satellite stabilizing problem, discussed in [11]. The satellite system is comprised of two rigid bodies, connected through a flexible link. Modelling the link as a spring with torque constant k s and viscous damping f, the motion equations are given as follows: J 1 θ1 + f( θ 1 θ 2 ) + k s (θ 1 θ 2 ) = u(t) J 2 θ2 + f( θ 2 θ 1 ) + k s (θ 2 θ 1 ) = 0 (23) where, J 1 and J 2 represent the moment of inertia of two bodies, θ 1 and θ 2 denote the yaw angle of two bodies and u(t) is the control torque. Now, define the state variables as x = [ ] θ 1 θ 2 θ1 θ2 and select J1 = J 2 = 1, f = 0.09 and k s = Then, the state space equation is expressed in the following form: ẋ = x u (24) 0 Suppose that this system has been stabilized by the following control law: u = [ ] x (25) Using the Lyapunov function V = x T P x with P =
4 Fig. 1: x 1 and x 2 trajectories of the plant, controlled by the classic state feedback controller (dashed), traditional event based controller (dotted) and the proposed event based controller (solid). Fig. 2: x 3 and x 4 trajectories of the plant, controlled by the classic state feedback controller (dashed), traditional event based controller (dotted) and the proposed event based controller (solid). the inequalities (6) and (7) are satisfied with the following parameters: c s = λ min (P ) = , c s = λ max (P ) = , c s = λ min (Q) = 1, = P Bk + k T B T P = (26) where Q = (A + Bk) T P + P (A + Bk). Now, the initial condition is chosen as x 0 = [ ] and the simulations are implemented for three different controllers: Classic continuous time state-feedback controller with the feedback law u = kx. Our proposed event based scheme with the following IBTC: e(τ) x(τ) dτ σc s x(τ) 2 dτ (27) Traditional event triggering mechanism proposed in [4] with the following TC: e(t) σc s x(t) (28) Note that σ is selected as 0.75 for both triggering conditions (27) and (28). Simulation results are shown in Figs As seen in Figs. 1 and 2, all four states for the three systems asymptotically approach to the origin with similar performances. In addition, the control signals are depicted in Figs 3 and 4, where all three signals have similar trends. However, the traditional and our proposed mechanism have transmitted 100 and 50 data samples over 15 seconds respectively. It means that the IBTC triggers 50% less than the traditional TC to generate a similar performance. This shows that the integral-based event triggering mechanism acts much more effective than the traditional scheme in data transmission reduction between the plant and controller. V. CONCLUSION A new integral-based triggering scheme was proposed for linear systems. The proposed IBTC is less conservative than Fig. 3: Control signal generated by the classic state feedback controller (dashed trajectory), traditional event based controller (dotted spikes) and the proposed event based controller (solid spikes). Fig. 4: Control signals generated by the three controllers over the time interval [2, 9]. As seen, for each two samples update, made by the traditional event based controller, averagely just one sample update is made by our proposed controller. 1242
5 the existing triggering conditions in the literature and so more effective from data transmission viewpoint. Moreover, both theoretical and numerical comparison with traditional TC were provided to show the efficiency of the proposed scheme. APPENDIX Proof of Lemma 1. Suppose that the system initial condition is x(t 1 ) at the initial time t 1. To prove the stability of the system, assume that ε V is given. Based on the equations (10) and (11), and using (6) one can easily obtain: c s x(t) c s x(t 1 ) t > t 1. (A-1) Hence, for any initial condition, satisfying x(t 1 ) δ V = c s ε V / c s, we would have: x(t) ε V t > t 1 (A-2) and so, the system is stable. In the next step the convergence of the state trajectories to the origin is proved: Condition (11) implies that for any T, there exists ξ i > 0 such that I i = {x V (x(t)) + ξ i V (x( ))} (A-3) is an invariant set containing the origin. Moreover, (10) implies that I i+1 I i i N. It follows that the intervals I i s, so defined, constitute a shrinking sequence of invariant sets, denoted by I = {I i : i N}. To prove asymptotic convergence of state trajectories, it suffices to show I i C as i (A-4) where C = {0} is the singleton containing the origin. We prove it by contradiction. Let us assume that C contains at least a point υ 0 and that V (x( )) V (υ) > 0 as i. Consider now the compact set Ω 0 = {x V (x(t)) V (x(t 1 ))} and define r > 0 large enough such that On the other hand, consider and define d > 0 such that Ω 0 B r = {x x r}. Ω f = {x V (x(t)) V (υ)} B d = {x x d} Ω f (A-5) (A-6) (A-7) (A-8) (A-9) From (A-5), we have that x( ) remains inside B r and outside the ball B d as i N. i.e. d x( ) r for i = 1, 2,... (A-10) Now define κ = max {V (x(+1)) V (x( ))}. Based d x() r on (10), we have: V (x(+1 )) V (x(t 1 )) + iκ (A-11) and since κ < 0, there is some î such that for i î the left-hand side of the above inequality is negative, which contradicts the positive definiteness of the Lyapunov function V. Hence, V (x( )) 0 as i and so, x converges asymptotically to the origin. REFERENCES [1] T. Chen and B. A. Francis, Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems. London: Springer, [2] K. E. Arzen, A simple event-based pid controller, in Proc. of 14th IFAC World Congr., Beijing, China, Jan [3] K. J. Astrom and B.. Bernhardsson, Comparison of periodic and event based sampling for first-order stochastic systems, in Proc. IFAC World Congr, 1999, pp [4] P. Tabuada, Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control task, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp , [5] M. Mazo and P. Tabuada, Decentralized eventtriggered control over wireless sensor/actuator nrtworks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 56, no. 10, pp , [6] X. Wang and M. D. Lemmon, Event-triggering in distributed networked control systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 56, no. 3, pp , [7] W. Heemels, M. C. F. Donkers, and A. R. Teel, Periodic event-triggered control for linear systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 58, no. 4, pp , [8] P. Tallapragada and N. Chopra, On event triggered trajectory tracking for control affine nonlinear systems, in CDC/ECC (Conf. Dec. Control and Eur. Control Conf), December 2011, pp [9] S. H. Mousavi, M. Ghodrat, and H. J. Marquez, A novel integral based event triggered control scheme for a general class of nonlinear systems, Submitted for Publication as Journal Paper, [10] H. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, 3rd Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, [11] R. M. Biernacki, H. Hwang, and S. P. Battacharyya, Robust stability with structured real parameter perturbations, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. AC-32, no. 6, pp ,
Event-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems
Event-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems Pavankumar Tallapragada Nikhil Chopra Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 2742 MD,
More informationEvent-Triggered Control Systems. Seyed Hossein Mousavi. Doctor of Philosophy. Control Systems. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Event-Triggered Control Systems by Seyed Hossein Mousavi A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Control Systems Department of Electrical
More informationEvent-Triggered Output Feedback Control for Networked Control Systems using Passivity: Time-varying Network Induced Delays
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, Event-Triggered Output Feedback Control for Networked Control Systems using Passivity:
More informationNetworked Control Systems, Event-Triggering, Small-Gain Theorem, Nonlinear
EVENT-TRIGGERING OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS WITHOUT ZENO BEHAVIOR C. DE PERSIS, R. SAILER, AND F. WIRTH Abstract. We present a Lyapunov based approach to event-triggering for large-scale systems using a small
More informationAn Event-Triggered Consensus Control with Sampled-Data Mechanism for Multi-agent Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control An Event-Triggered Consensus Control with Sampled-Data Mechanism for Multi-agent Systems Feng Zhou, Zhiwu Huang, Weirong
More informationAverage-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control
Outline Background Preliminaries Consensus Numerical simulations Conclusions Average-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control Email: lzhx@nankai.edu.cn, chenzq@nankai.edu.cn
More informationZeno-free, distributed event-triggered communication and control for multi-agent average consensus
Zeno-free, distributed event-triggered communication and control for multi-agent average consensus Cameron Nowzari Jorge Cortés Abstract This paper studies a distributed event-triggered communication and
More informationEvent-Based Control of Nonlinear Systems with Partial State and Output Feedback
Event-Based Control of Nonlinear Systems with Partial State and Output Feedback Tengfei Liu a, Zhong-Ping Jiang b a State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University,
More informationDiscrete Event-Triggered Sliding Mode Control With Fast Output Sampling Feedback
Discrete Event-Triggered Sliding Mode Control With Fast Output Sampling Feedback Abhisek K Behera and Bijnan Bandyopadhyay Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai 4
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.oc] 3 Feb 2011
DECENTRALIZED EVENT-TRIGGERED CONTROL OVER WIRELESS SENSOR/ACTUATOR NETWORKS MANUEL MAZO JR AND PAULO TABUADA arxiv:14.477v2 [math.oc] 3 Feb 211 Abstract. In recent years we have witnessed a move of the
More informationAN EVENT-TRIGGERED TRANSMISSION POLICY FOR NETWORKED L 2 -GAIN CONTROL
4 Journal of Marine Science and echnology, Vol. 3, No., pp. 4-9 () DOI:.69/JMS-3-3-3 AN EVEN-RIGGERED RANSMISSION POLICY FOR NEWORKED L -GAIN CONROL Jenq-Lang Wu, Yuan-Chang Chang, Xin-Hong Chen, and su-ian
More informationA Simple Self-triggered Sampler for Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 4th IFAC Conference on Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems ADHS 12 June 6-8, 212. A Simple Self-triggered Sampler for Nonlinear Systems U. Tiberi, K.H. Johansson, ACCESS Linnaeus Center,
More informationDistributed Event-Based Control for Interconnected Linear Systems
211 5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC Orlando, FL, USA, December 12-15, 211 Distributed Event-Based Control for Interconnected Linear Systems M Guinaldo,
More informationDecentralized Event-Triggering for Control of Nonlinear Systems
Decentralized Event-Triggering for Control of Nonlinear Systems Pavankumar Tallapragada and Nikhil Chopra arxiv:32.49v3 [cs.sy] 3 Jun 24 Abstract This paper considers nonlinear systems with full state
More informationDecentralized Event-triggered Broadcasts over Networked Control Systems
Decentralized Event-triggered Broadcasts over Networked Control Systems Xiaofeng Wang and Michael D. Lemmon University of Notre Dame, Department of Electrical Engineering, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA, xwang13,lemmon@nd.edu
More informationInput-to-state stability of self-triggered control systems
Input-to-state stability of self-triggered control systems Manuel Mazo Jr. and Paulo Tabuada Abstract Event-triggered and self-triggered control have recently been proposed as an alternative to periodic
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationEvent-Triggered Broadcasting across Distributed Networked Control Systems
Event-Triggered Broadcasting across Distributed Networked Control Systems Xiaofeng Wang and Michael D. Lemmon Abstract This paper examines event-triggered broadcasting of state information in distributed
More informationEvent-based control of input-output linearizable systems
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Event-based control of input-output linearizable systems Christian Stöcker Jan Lunze Institute of Automation and Computer Control, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr.
More informationRobust Event-Triggered Control Subject to External Disturbance
Robust Event-Triggered Control Subject to External Disturbance Pengpeng Zhang Tengfei Liu Zhong-Ping Jiang State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University,
More informationOn finite gain L p stability of nonlinear sampled-data systems
Submitted for publication in Systems and Control Letters, November 6, 21 On finite gain L p stability of nonlinear sampled-data systems Luca Zaccarian Dipartimento di Informatica, Sistemi e Produzione
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationEvent-triggered PI control: Saturating actuators and anti-windup compensation
Event-triggered PI control: Saturating actuators and anti-windup compensation Daniel Lehmann, Georg Aleander Kiener and Karl Henrik Johansson Abstract Event-triggered control aims at reducing the communication
More informationOUTPUT CONSENSUS OF HETEROGENEOUS LINEAR MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS BY EVENT-TRIGGERED CONTROL
OUTPUT CONSENSUS OF HETEROGENEOUS LINEAR MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS BY EVENT-TRIGGERED CONTROL Gang FENG Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering City University of Hong Kong July 25, 2014 Department
More informationA LaSalle version of Matrosov theorem
5th IEEE Conference on Decision Control European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlo, FL, USA, December -5, A LaSalle version of Matrosov theorem Alessro Astolfi Laurent Praly Abstract A weak version of
More informationEvent-triggered Control for Discrete-Time Systems
Event-triggered Control for Discrete-Time Systems Alina Eqtami, Dimos V. Dimarogonas and Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos Abstract In this paper, event-triggered strategies for control of discrete-time systems
More informationStability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms
Stability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms Yoshikatsu HOSHI, Mitsuji SAMPEI, Shigeki NAKAURA Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology 2
More informationOn a small-gain approach to distributed event-triggered control
On a small-gain approach to distributed event-triggered control Claudio De Persis, Rudolf Sailer Fabian Wirth Fac Mathematics & Natural Sciences, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
More informationAn asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability
1 An asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability Daniel Liberzon and Hyungbo Shim Abstract For continuous-time nonlinear systems with inputs, we introduce the notion of an asymptotic
More informationEvent-triggered control of nonlinear singularly perturbed systems based only on the slow dynamics
9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 4-6, 23 ThA.6 Event-triggered control of nonlinear singularly perturbed systems based only on the slow dynamics Mahmoud Abdelrahim,
More informationEvent-triggered control subject to actuator saturation
Event-triggered control subject to actuator saturation GEORG A. KIENER Degree project in Automatic Control Master's thesis Stockholm, Sweden 212 XR-EE-RT 212:9 Diploma Thesis Event-triggered control subject
More informationAN EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION FOR DIGITAL REDESIGN. Received October 2010; revised March 2011
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2012 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 8, Number 6, June 2012 pp. 4071 4081 AN EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION
More informationEnergy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion
Energy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion Ravi N. Banavar Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai-476, India Email: banavar@ee.iitb.ac.in Telephone:(91)-(22)
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationSelf-Triggering in Nonlinear Systems: A Small-Gain Theorem Approach
Self-Triggering in Nonlinear Systems: A Small-Gain Theorem Approach Domagoj Tolić, Ricardo G. Sanfelice and Rafael Fierro Abstract This paper investigates stability of nonlinear control systems under intermittent
More informationEvent-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Event-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems Sylvain Durand Nicolas Marchand J. Fermi Guerrero-Castellanos
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More information3 Stability and Lyapunov Functions
CDS140a Nonlinear Systems: Local Theory 02/01/2011 3 Stability and Lyapunov Functions 3.1 Lyapunov Stability Denition: An equilibrium point x 0 of (1) is stable if for all ɛ > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such
More informationObserver-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Observer-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory,
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationLMI-Based Synthesis for Distributed Event-Based State Estimation
LMI-Based Synthesis for Distributed Event-Based State Estimation Michael Muehlebach 1 and Sebastian Trimpe Abstract This paper presents an LMI-based synthesis procedure for distributed event-based state
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationPeriodic event-triggered control for nonlinear systems
Periodic event-triggered control for nonlinear systems Romain Postoyan, Adolfo Anta, W.P.M.H. Heemels, Paulo Tabuada, Dragan Nesic To cite this version: Romain Postoyan, Adolfo Anta, W.P.M.H. Heemels,
More informationStabilization of Large-scale Distributed Control Systems using I/O Event-driven Control and Passivity
11 5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December 1-15, 11 Stabilization of Large-scale Distributed Control Systems using I/O Event-driven
More informationABSTRACT. Pavankumar Tallapragada, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013
ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: UTILITY DRIVEN SAMPLED DATA CONTROL UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION Pavankumar Tallapragada, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Dr. Nikhil Chopra Department
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationDistributed Receding Horizon Control of Cost Coupled Systems
Distributed Receding Horizon Control of Cost Coupled Systems William B. Dunbar Abstract This paper considers the problem of distributed control of dynamically decoupled systems that are subject to decoupled
More informationStability of Parameter Adaptation Algorithms. Big picture
ME5895, UConn, Fall 215 Prof. Xu Chen Big picture For ˆθ (k + 1) = ˆθ (k) + [correction term] we haven t talked about whether ˆθ(k) will converge to the true value θ if k. We haven t even talked about
More informationStabilization and Passivity-Based Control
DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive
More informationGlobal Stability and Asymptotic Gain Imply Input-to-State Stability for State-Dependent Switched Systems
2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) Miami Beach, FL, USA, Dec. 17-19, 2018 Global Stability and Asymptotic Gain Imply Input-to-State Stability for State-Dependent Switched Systems Shenyu
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationResearch Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
Applied Mathematics Volume 202, Article ID 689820, 3 pages doi:0.55/202/689820 Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
More informationSelf-triggered MPC for constrained linear systems and quadratic costs
4th IFAC Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Conference International Federation of Automatic Control Self-triggered MPC for constrained linear systems and quadratic costs J.D.J. Barradas Berglind T.M.P.
More informationEvent-triggered control of nonlinear singularly perturbed systems based only on the slow dynamics
Event-triggered control of nonlinear singularly perturbed systems based only on the slow dynamics Mahmoud Abdelrahim, Romain Postoyan, Jamal Daafouz To cite this version: Mahmoud Abdelrahim, Romain Postoyan,
More informationTriggering mechanism using freely selected sensors for linear time-invariant systems
Triggering mechanism using freely selected sensors for linear time-invariant systems Romain Postoyan and Antoine Girard Abstract Eisting event-triggering sampling techniques for state feedback controllers
More informationLyapunov Stability Theory
Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous
More informationOn the Stabilization of Neutrally Stable Linear Discrete Time Systems
TWCCC Texas Wisconsin California Control Consortium Technical report number 2017 01 On the Stabilization of Neutrally Stable Linear Discrete Time Systems Travis J. Arnold and James B. Rawlings Department
More informationIntroduction. Introduction. Introduction. Standard digital control loop. Resource-aware control
Introduction 2/52 Standard digital control loop Resource-aware control Maurice Heemels All control tasks executed periodically and triggered by time Zandvoort, June 25 Where innovation starts Introduction
More informationPostface to Model Predictive Control: Theory and Design
Postface to Model Predictive Control: Theory and Design J. B. Rawlings and D. Q. Mayne August 19, 2012 The goal of this postface is to point out and comment upon recent MPC papers and issues pertaining
More informationA Hybrid Systems Approach to Trajectory Tracking Control for Juggling Systems
A Hybrid Systems Approach to Trajectory Tracking Control for Juggling Systems Ricardo G Sanfelice, Andrew R Teel, and Rodolphe Sepulchre Abstract From a hybrid systems point of view, we provide a modeling
More informationMOST control systems are designed under the assumption
2076 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 53, NO. 9, OCTOBER 2008 Lyapunov-Based Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Systems Subject to Data Losses David Muñoz de la Peña and Panagiotis D. Christofides
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.oc] 10 Sep 2011
On the Minimum Attention and the Anytime Attention Control Problems for Linear Systems: A Linear Programming Approach M.C.F. Donkers P. Tabuada W.P.M.H. Heemels arxiv:8.2783v3 [math.oc] Sep 2 May 24, 28
More informationEvent-triggered and self-triggered stabilization of distributed networked control systems
Event-triggered self-triggered stabilization of distributed networked control systems Romain Postoyan, Paulo Tabuada, Dragan Nešić, Adolfo Anta Abstract Event-triggered self-triggered control have recently
More informationA conjecture on sustained oscillations for a closed-loop heat equation
A conjecture on sustained oscillations for a closed-loop heat equation C.I. Byrnes, D.S. Gilliam Abstract The conjecture in this paper represents an initial step aimed toward understanding and shaping
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationDelay-independent stability via a reset loop
Delay-independent stability via a reset loop S. Tarbouriech & L. Zaccarian (LAAS-CNRS) Joint work with F. Perez Rubio & A. Banos (Universidad de Murcia) L2S Paris, 20-22 November 2012 L2S Paris, 20-22
More informationDissipativity. Outline. Motivation. Dissipative Systems. M. Sami Fadali EBME Dept., UNR
Dissipativity M. Sami Fadali EBME Dept., UNR 1 Outline Differential storage functions. QSR Dissipativity. Algebraic conditions for dissipativity. Stability of dissipative systems. Feedback Interconnections
More informationLyapunov-based control of quantum systems
Lyapunov-based control of quantum systems Symeon Grivopoulos Bassam Bamieh Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 936-57 symeon,bamieh@engineering.ucsb.edu
More informationResearch Article An Equivalent LMI Representation of Bounded Real Lemma for Continuous-Time Systems
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 28, Article ID 67295, 8 pages doi:1.1155/28/67295 Research Article An Equivalent LMI Representation of Bounded Real Lemma
More informationDistributed Event-Based Control Strategies for Interconnected Linear Systems
Distributed Event-Based Control Strategies for Interconnected Linear Systems M. Guinaldo, D. V. Dimarogonas, K. H. Johansson, J. Sánchez, S. Dormido January 9, 213 Abstract This paper presents a distributed
More informationOn Lyapunov Sampling for Event-driven Controllers
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, PR China, December 6-8, 29 ThCIn64 On Lyapunov Sampling for Event-driven Controllers Manel Velasco, Pau
More informationChap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability
Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :
More informationOptimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems
1 Optimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems Prof Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning this paper should
More informationA Robust Event-Triggered Consensus Strategy for Linear Multi-Agent Systems with Uncertain Network Topology
A Robust Event-Triggered Consensus Strategy for Linear Multi-Agent Systems with Uncertain Network Topology Amir Amini, Amir Asif, Arash Mohammadi Electrical and Computer Engineering,, Montreal, Canada.
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems
p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t
More informationOn robustness of suboptimal min-max model predictive control *
Manuscript received June 5, 007; revised Sep., 007 On robustness of suboptimal min-max model predictive control * DE-FENG HE, HAI-BO JI, TAO ZHENG Department of Automation University of Science and Technology
More informationA study on event triggering criteria for estimation
A study on event triggering criteria for estimation Joris Sijs TNO Technical Sciences Den Haag, The Netherlands Email: joris.sijs@tno.nl Leon Kester TNO Technical Sciences Den Haag, The Netherlands Email:
More informationChapter 2 Optimal Control Problem
Chapter 2 Optimal Control Problem Optimal control of any process can be achieved either in open or closed loop. In the following two chapters we concentrate mainly on the first class. The first chapter
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationPartial-State-Feedback Controller Design for Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems Using Homotopy Method
Partial-State-Feedback Controller Design for Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems Using Homotopy Method Huaping Liu, Fuchun Sun, Zengqi Sun and Chunwen Li Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua
More informationSingular perturbation analysis of an additive increase multiplicative decrease control algorithm under time-varying buffering delays.
Singular perturbation analysis of an additive increase multiplicative decrease control algorithm under time-varying buffering delays. V. Guffens 1 and G. Bastin 2 Intelligent Systems and Networks Research
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 5. Input-Output Stability DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs2012/ 2012 1 Input-Output Stability y = Hu H denotes
More informationRobust Observer for Uncertain T S model of a Synchronous Machine
Recent Advances in Circuits Communications Signal Processing Robust Observer for Uncertain T S model of a Synchronous Machine OUAALINE Najat ELALAMI Noureddine Laboratory of Automation Computer Engineering
More informationA unifying Lyapunov-based framework for the event-triggered control of nonlinear systems
A unifying Lyapunov-based framework for the event-triggered control of nonlinear systems Romain Postoyan, Adolfo Anta, Dragan Nešić, Paulo Tabuada Abstract We present a prescriptive framework for the event-triggered
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013 Abstract As in optimal control theory, linear quadratic (LQ) differential games (DG) can be solved, even in high dimension,
More informationDiscretization of MIMO Systems with Nonuniform Input and Output Fractional Time Delays
Discretization of MIMO Systems with Nonuniform Input and Output Fractional Time Delays Zaher M Kassas and Ricardo Dunia Abstract Input and output time delays in continuous-time state-space systems are
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationPacket-loss Dependent Controller Design for Networked Control Systems via Switched System Approach
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec. 9-11, 8 WeC6.3 Packet-loss Dependent Controller Design for Networked Control Systems via Switched System Approach Junyan
More informationQuasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 2009 FrA11.5 Quasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
More informationOn Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems
On Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems arxiv:1206.4240v1 [math.oc] 19 Jun 2012 P. Pepe Abstract In this paper input-to-state practically stabilizing
More informationThe ϵ-capacity of a gain matrix and tolerable disturbances: Discrete-time perturbed linear systems
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 3 Ver. IV (May - Jun. 2015), PP 52-62 www.iosrjournals.org The ϵ-capacity of a gain matrix and tolerable disturbances:
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationEvent-Triggered Control for Linear Systems Subject to Actuator Saturation
Preprints of the 9th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 24-29, 24 Event-Triggered Control for Linear Systems Subject to Actuator Saturation
More information1 Lyapunov theory of stability
M.Kawski, APM 581 Diff Equns Intro to Lyapunov theory. November 15, 29 1 1 Lyapunov theory of stability Introduction. Lyapunov s second (or direct) method provides tools for studying (asymptotic) stability
More informationIMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS. Shumei Mu, Tianguang Chu, and Long Wang
IMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS Shumei Mu Tianguang Chu and Long Wang Intelligent Control Laboratory Center for Systems and Control Department of Mechanics
More information