Recent hydrodynamic investigations Floating solar islands and Ringing of offshore wind turbines

Transcription

1 Recent hydrodynamic investigations Floating solar islands and Ringing of offshore wind turbines AMOS days 2017 Trondheim, Norway, Trygve Kristiansen 1 1 Dept. of Marine Technology and NTNU AMOS, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU

2

3 Offshore wind

4 Floating solar islands and liquid carbon-based fuel production

5 Global perspectives in energy * TW TW * Population growth : 2.3 billion (mean ~ 0.8 %/yr) Lewis & Nocera, PNAS (2006) Economic growth per capita: GDP/N ~ %/yr Energy intensity decrease: E/GDP ~ %/yr Energy consumption rate: E ~ %/yr + 10 TW power by 2050

6 Options: Lewis & Nocera, PNAS (2006) Nuclear fission Need to build 1 GW plant per 1.25 days, 235 U exhausted in 10 yrs IPCC: We need additional 10 TW C-free energy by 2050 Fossil fuels + CO 2 capture / storage store 1.4 x Lake Superior/yr (at NTP) or 10% of LS/yr (at P ~ 14.5 atm); leakage < 1%/century Offshore Wind Significant global potential (need 20 million 10MW turbines) Wave power No global potential Solar Average daily insolation 200 W/m (Southern Spain) 10 20% PV panel efficiency need km PV = Photo Voltaic Energy storage: Batteries: too expensive, insufficient capacity Bio fuel: efficiency < 0.5% Solar thermal: maybe Hydrogen: new infrastructure needed, dangerous Chemical bonds: liquid C-based solar fuel Ocean and atmosphere in CO2 equilibrum

7 Floating C-based fuel factories at sea Powered by floating solar islands Multi-disciplinary Idea: Frode Mo and Bruce Patterson Marine structures Fuel factories Solar islands (Cost-efficient!) New technology Chemical processing Operations Robust Efficiency rate Liquid fuel transport Installation Maintenance Robots Autonomy Physics (PV-panels) Robust Sea spray, heat Electrical engineering Political and social aspects Safety New materials km 0.07% of World oceans

8 Solar island Solar island park producing power Inspired by fish farms Carbon-based fuel factory and storage

9 Example: Air-supported solar island Petter Borvik, master thesis (2017)

10

11

12 Example: Air-supported solar island Failure modes: Operation: Limitations on angles and accelerations Slamming on PV panels Air escape Out of water Wear and tear Flooding - Wave over-topping = 5m, = 12s

13

14 Example: Air-supported solar island Modal theory

15 Example: Air-supported solar island 2 Vertical motion Modal theory:, = cos : heave : pitch : first flexible mode : higher flexible modes Euler beam equation for floater: + + = (, ) Peng Li and Odd Faltinsen 2017 Simplified heave equation, including air cushion: h = h + 2 Mass of membrane and skirt Air cushion restoring force Froude-Kriloff wave excitation force

16 Heave RAO (regular waves) 2 Floater only Exp Theory Peng Li and Odd Faltinsen s 4.2s

17 Heave RAO (regular waves) 2 Solar island Exp Theory Floater only Exp Theory Peng Li and Odd Faltinsen 2017 Repeatability

18 Pitch RAO 2 Repeatability? Air custion makes the island statically unstable

19 First flexible mode RAO 2 Repeatability? Air custion makes the island statically unstable (On-going investigation)

20 Ringing of Offshore Wind turbines

21 Steep, non-breaking, irregular wave event

22 Steep, non-breaking, irregular wave event

23 Ringing Maximum response Wave Ringing response (flexible model) Wave load (rigid model) Erin Bachynski, Trygve Kristiansen and Maxime Thys Appl. Ocean Res. 68 (2017)

24 Non-breaking event Breaking wave event Erin Bachynski, Trygve Kristiansen and Maxime Thys Appl. Ocean Res. 68 (2017)

25 The monopile might break due to ringing Design problem Large irregular wave events

26 Load harmonics in regular waves

27 Automated testing

28 Automated testing Duration of test Pause between tests «Quality by quantity» Repetition tests Parameter studies Trends Flaw detection Save time! Extensions? Machine learning Auto-morphing of models?

29 Load harmonics in regular waves Focus: discrepancies in the 3 loads Regular wave experiments FNV theory Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

30 Load harmonics = 1 40 ( ) ( ) ( ) Second order freesurface diffraction Good agreement in main trends Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

31 Load harmonics = 1 40 ( ) ( ) ( ) = 1 25 Discrepancies in 3 loads Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

32 FNV theory (Faltinsen, Newman and Vinje, JFM 1995) Froude-Kriloff Based on potential flow assumption Diffraction Sectional force:, = (Similar to inertia term in Morison s equation) Incident free surface Total force: =, d + Point force at = 0: = Extension to finite water depth: use finite water depth wave kinematics Half the 3 load in deep water Loses importance in finite waterdepth

33 Adding a Morison drag term and KC-dependent is not able to predict the discrepancies What is the cause? Movie

34 Rear run-up due to viscous flow separation

35 Rear run-up Measure of flow excursions KC = = 1/50 KC = 2.3

36 Rear run-up 1/40 KC = 2.7

37 Rear run-up 1/30 KC =4.2

38 Rear run-up 1/25 KC = 5.3

39 Rear run-up 1/20 KC = 7.3 «Mound»

40 LES-simulations Flow field examples High-pressure zone (different from steady flow) Clear vortical structures Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

41 Pressure from 2D CFD Associated free surface Simplified model: (linearized z-component of Navier Stokes equations, integrated vertically) + Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

42 (pot. theory + CFD) Rear Still water line Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

43 Conclusion: Clear evidence of flow separation This is believed be the cause of the discrepancies in the 3 loads Additional complexity: In-and-out of water «start-up flow» Trygve Kristiansen and Odd M. Faltinsen, JFM (2017)

44 Open question: Challenge: Is the effect equally important in irregular waves? Develop a rational load model accounting for the flow separation effects (On-going investigations)

45 Brief summary Towards a rational ringing load model Floating C-based fuel factories at sea Powered by floating solar islands The solution for a carbon-neutral future?

46 Thank you! AMOS days 2017 Trondheim, Norway, Trygve Kristiansen 1 1 Dept. of Marine Technology and NTNU AMOS, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU