Physics 125 Course Notes Scattering Solutions to Problems F. Porter

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Physics 125 Course Notes Scattering Solutions to Problems F. Porter"

Transcription

1 Physics 15 Course Notes Scattering Solutions to Problems F. Porter 1 Exercises 1. Show that the total cross section we computed in the partial wave expansion, σ T (p) = 4π (j + 1) sin δ p j (p), (1) j=0 is in agreement with the optical theorem. Solution: Starting with the optical theorem, σ T (p) = 4π p If(p; 1) () = 4π p I 1 (j +1) [ e iδj(p) 1 ] P j (1) (3) ip j=0 = 4π ( (j +1) 1 ) R [ e iδj(p) 1 ] (4) p j=0 = 4π (j + 1) [cos δ p j (p) 1] (5) = 4π p j=0 j=0 (j + 1) sin δ j (p). (6). We have discussed the central force problem. Consider a particle of mass m under the influence of the following potential: { V0, 0 r a V (r) = (7) 0, a<r, where V 0 is a constant. (a) Write down the Schrödinger equation for the wave function ψ(x). Consider solutions which are simultaneous eigenvectors of H, L, and L z. Solve the angular dependence, and reduce the remaining 1

2 problem to a problem in one variable. [You ve done this already first quarter, so you may simply retrieve that result here.] Solution: The Schrödinger equation is [ 1 ] m + V (r) ψ(x) =Eψ(x). (8) The wave function for a state of definite L = l(l+1), and L z = M is R εl (r)y lm (θ, φ. The radial wave equation is: [ ] χ l + k l(l +1) k r 0 χ l = 0, r < a, (9) [ ] χ l + k l(l +1) r χ l = 0, r > a, (10) where χ l = rr l (suppressing the radial index ε), k =me, and k0 =mv 0. (b) Let E be the eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian, H. Consider the case where E > V 0. Solve the Schrödinger equation for eigenstates ψ(x). It will probably be convenient to use the quantity κ = m(e V 0 ). Consider the limit as r for your solutions, and give an interpretation in terms of spherical waves. Solution: Let s use K = m(v 0 E), and do parts (b) and (c) together (hence K = iκ in part (b)). For r<awe need a solution for the wave function which is finite at r = 0, and for r>awe need something finite at r = : ψ(x) = i l (l+1)p l (cos θ) l=0 { Al j l (ikr), r < a, j l (kr)+ α h(1) (kr), r > a. (11) The constants A l and α l may be determined by satisfying the continuity conditions at r = a: The result is: lim ψ(x) = lim ψ(x), (1) r a r a + ψ(x) ψ(x) lim = lim. (13) r a r r a + r A l = j l(ka)+ α h(1) l (ka), (14) j l (ika)

3 and where Asymptotically, α l = L lj l (ka) kaj l(ka) L l h (1) l (ka) kah (1) l (ka), (15) L l = ika j l (ika) j l (ika). (16) sin(x lπ/) j l (x) x, (17) x h (1) 1 e ix l (x) x i l+1 x. (18) See the discussion in section 9 for further interpretation. (c) Repeat the solution for the case where E<V 0. It will probably be convenient to use the quantity K = m(v 0 E). Again, consider the limit as r and give an interpretation, contrasting with the previous case. Solution: See part (b). Hint: You will probably benefit by thinking about solutions in the form of spherical Bessel/Neumann functions, and/or spherical Hankel functions. 3. When we calculated the density of states for a free particle, we used a box of length L (in one dimension), and imposed periodic boundary conditions to ensure no net flux of particles into or out of the box. We have in mind, of course, that we can eventually let L, and are really interested in quantities per unit length (or volume). Let us justify more carefully the use of periodic boundary conditions, i.e., we wish to convince ourselves that the intuitive rationale given above is correct. To do this, consider a free particle in a one-dimensional box from L/ to L/. Remembering that the Hilbert space of allowed states is a linear space, show that the periodic boundary condition: ψ( L/) = ψ(l/), (19) ψ ( L/) = ψ (L/) (0) 3

4 is required for acceptable wave functions. Acceptable here means that the probability to find a particle in the box must be constant. Solution: The Schrödinger equation for a free particle is i t ψ(x, t) = 1 m xψ(x, t). (1) We suppose that an acceptable wave function is one which has a constant probability to be in the box ( L/,L/): d L/ ψ(x, t) dx =0. () dt L/ It is readily verified that the function φ(x, t) =e i π ml t sin π L x (3) has the desired property. If we admit φ(x, t) as an acceptable solution, and if ψ(x, t) is any other acceptable solution, then φ + ψ must be acceptable, since any linear combination of acceptable solutions must be acceptable. Hence, we must have: d L/ ψ(x, t) dx = 0; (4) dt L/ d L/ φ(x, t) dx = 0; (5) dt L/ d L/ ψ(x, t)+φ(x, t) dx = 0. (6) dt L/ Then we may write (assuming Eqns 4 and 5): 0 = d dt = L/ L/ L/ = i m = L/ L/ L/ L/ L/ [ψ(x, t)φ (x, t)+ψ (x, t)φ(x, t)] dx (7) t [ψ(x, t)φ (x, t)+ψ (x, t)φ(x, t)] dx (8) [( x ψ ) φ ψ ( xφ ) + ψ ( xφ ) ( xψ ) φ ] dx(9) x [( x ψ) φ ψ ( x φ)+ψ ( x φ) ( x ψ ) φ] dx (30) = [( x ψ) φ ψ ( x φ)+ψ ( x φ) ( x ψ ) φ] L/ L/. (31) 4

5 But φ(±l/,t)= 0,so Further, since we obtain 0=[ ψ( x φ )+ψ ( x φ)] L/ L/. (3) x φ(±l/,t)= π L ei π ml t, (33) π i 0=ψ(L/,t)e ml t π i ψ( L/,t)e ml t +ψ (L/,t)e i π ml t ψ ( L/,t)e i π ml t. (34) This must be true for all times; also if ψ is acceptable, then e iθ ψ must be acceptable, for real θ. Hence, ψ is acceptable if and only if Eqn. 4 holds, and: ψ(l/,t)=ψ( L/,t). (35) We note that the function e i π ml t cos π x satisfies these criteria. Thus, L we could also have picked φ(x, t) =e i π ml t cos π L x (36) as an acceptable solution. Then the same argument reveals that any other acceptable solution ψ must satisfy the boundary condition: x ψ(l/,t)= x ψ( L/,t). (37) } We finally remark that the set of functions {e i n π ml t sin πn n π x, ei ml L t cos πnx; n =0, 1,... L is a complete set of functions with the required boundary conditions. 4. In our discussion of scattering theory, we supposed we had a beam of particles from some ensemble of wave packets, and obtained an effective (observed) differential cross-section: σ eff (u) = f(α)dα d (x)p (µ; ; x) {α} x R This formula assumed that the beam particles were distributed uniformly in a disk of radius R centered at the origin in the ê 1 ê plane, and that the distribution of the shape parameter was uncorrelated with position in this disk. 5

6 (a) Try to obtain an expression for σ eff (u) without making these assumptions. Solution: We start with Eqn. 33 from the note: P (u; α; x) = d 3 (q) d 3 (q )q δ(q q ) (38) ( ) ( ) T (qu, q)t (q u, q )φ 0 (q; α)φ 0 (q ; α)e ix (q q ) (39), In general, if f(α, x) describes the beam position and shape distribution (possibly correlated), with f(α, x)dαd (x) =1, (40) {α} ( )) then the effective differential cross section is: dσ eff (u) dω = A eff {α} ( )) f(α, x)p (u; α; x)dαd (x), (41) where A eff is an effective area of the beam. The effective area of the beam may be computed by requiring that we get a consistent answer for a small hard target, of area a. In this case, P = 1 for x < a/π. Thus, a = A eff f(α, x)dαd (x). (4) {α} x < a/π We want this equality to hold in the limit as a 0: A eff = lim a 0 a {α} dα a/π 0 rdr π 0 f(α, x). (43) (b) Using part (a), write down an expression for σ eff (u) appropriate to the case where the beam particles are distributed according to a Gaussian of standard deviation ρ in radial distance from the origin (in the ê ê 3 plane), and where the wave packets are also drawn from a Gaussian distribution in the expectation value of the magnitude of the momentum. Let the standard deviation of this momentum distribution be α = α(x), for beam position x. 6

7 Solution: We have a beam distribution: f(p, x) = 1 πρ e r /ρ 1 πα(x) e (p p 0) /α (x). (44) The effective area is: A eff = lim a 0 = lim a 0 = lim a 0 = lim a 0 a a/π 0 rdr π 0 dφ dp 1 e πρ r /ρ 1 πα(x) e (p p 0) /α (x) a a/π 0 rdrπ 1 e πρ r /ρ a a/π 0 dr 1 e ρ r /ρ a a/π 0 dr 1 ρ e r /ρ = a lim a 0 1 e a /πρ = πρ. (45) Thus, dσ eff (u) dω =πρ ( )) d (x) dpf(p, x)p (u; p; x)d (x). (46) (c) For your generalized result of part (a), try to repeat our limiting case argument to obtain the fundamental cross section. Discuss. Solution: The limiting case corresponds to the beam being spread out over a size large compared with the target, and with a sharply defined momentum. The same arguments as in the note will hence apply. 5. Let us briefly consider the consequences of reflection invariance (parity conservation) for the scattering of a particle with spin s on a spinless target. [We consider elastic scattering only here]. Thus, assume the interaction is reflection invariant: (a) How does the S matrix transform under parity, i.e., what is P 1 SP, where P is the parity operator? 7

8 Solution: If the interaction is invariant under reflection, then P 1 SP = S. (47) (b) What is the condition on the helicity amplitudes A j λµ (p i) (corresponding to scattering with total angular momentum j) imposed by parity conservation? Solution: Under parity, the helicity λ reverses sign to λ. Hence, The helicity amplitude is: P p; jλ =( ) η intrinsic p; jλ. (48) A j λµ (p i)= p i ; jm,λ S p i ; jm,µ (49) Under parity, A j λµ (p i) A j λ µ (p i) (50) Thus, parity conservation requires A j λµ (p i)=a j λ µ (p i) (51) (c) What condition is imposed on the orbital angular momentum amplitudes B j ll (p i)? You may use physical intuition if you like, but it should be convincing. In any event, be sure your answer makes intuitive sense. Solution: Under a parity transformation, a wave function corresponding to definite orbital angular momentum l transforms as Pψ l (x) =( ) l ψ l (x). (5) The orbital angular momentum amplitude is: B j ll (p i) = p i ; jm,l S p i ; jm,l (53) = p i ; jm,l P PSP P p i ; jm,l (54) = ( ) l l p i ; jm,l S p i ; jm,l. (55) If parity is conserved, then B j ll (p i)=0ifl l is odd. 8

9 6. We consider the resonant scattering of light by an atom. In particular, let us consider sodium, with P 1/ S 1/ resonance at λ = λ 0 = 5986Å. Let σ 0T be the total cross section at resonance, for a monochromatic light source (i.e., σ 0T is the fundamental cross section). (a) Ignoring spin, estimate σ 0T, first in terms of λ 0 /π, and then numerically in cm. Compare your answer with a typical atomic size. Solution: The wavelength and photon momentum are related by λ = π/p, or λ = λ/π = 1/p. The total cross section on a resonance in partial wave l is: σ lt (E) = 4π p (l +1) Γ /4 (E E 0 ) +Γ /4. (56) The wavelength here is much larger than the atom, so we presume this to be an S-wave resonance (as suggested by the 0 in the problem statement). Hence, the cross section at the resonance peak is: σ 0T (E 0 ) = 4π p = λ /π =4π λ (57) = cm. (58) A typical atomic size is of order Å,or cm, which is much smaller than this resonant cross section. (b) Suppose that we have a sodium lamp source with a line width governed by the mean life of the excited P 1/ state (maybe not easy to get this piece of equipment!). The mean life of this state is about 10 8 second. Suppose that this light is incident on an absorption cell, containing sodium vapor and an inert (non-resonant) buffer gas. Let the temperature of the gas in the absorption cell be 00 C. Obtain an expression for the effective total cross section, σ efft which an atom in the cell presents to the incident light. Again, make a numerical calculation in cm. Solution: The line width of our light source is Γ 1/10 8 =10 8 Hz. (59) 9

10 The sodium atoms will move thermally according to a Maxwell- Boltzmann distribution: p(e) =Ae E/k BT (60) The Doppler broadening of the absorption line in the sodium vapor cell, due to thermal motion, is ν = ν 0 (k B T ln /m) 1/ (61) = Hz. (6) The atoms thus see a gaussianly distributed line-width: f(ν) = (ln )1/ π ν0 e 4 ln (ν ν 0) / ν 0. (63) In principle, we take a convolution of this with the resonant line shape. However, the gaussian is relatively wide, so we may approximate it with its value at ν 0 : σ efft 4π k f(ν 0)Γ cm. (64) (c) Using your result above, find the number density of Na atoms (# of atoms/cm 3 ) which is required in the cell in order that intensity of the incident light is reduced by a factor of two in a distance of 1 cm. It should be noted (and your answer should be plausible here) that such a gas will be essentially completely transparent to light of other (non-resonant) wavelengths. Solution: The attenuation of the light is exponential: I(L) =I(0)e Nσ eff L, (65) where N is the number density. We want the density such that I(1 cm)/i(0) = 1/: N = ln σ eff L. (66) 7. Consider scattering from the simple potential: { V (x) = V0 r = x <R 0 r>r. 10

11 In the low energy limit, we might only look at S-wave l = 0 scattering. However, in the high energy limit, we expect scattering in other partial waves to become significant. For simplicity, let us here consider scattering on a hard sphere, V 0. (a) For a hard sphere potential, calculate the total cross section in partial wave l. Give the exact result, i.e., don t take the high energy limit yet. You may quote your answer in terms of the spherical Bessel functions. Solution: The total cross section is σ T = σ l, (67) l=0 where σ l is the total cross section in partial wave l. The problem has azimuthal symmetry, taking the incident wave to be along the z axis, so the angular solutions may be expressed in terms of the Legendre polynomials. The radial wave equation, for r>r, may be expressed as [ ] χ + k l(l +1) χ r l =0. (68) The solution to the Schrödinger equation for r>ris: [ ψ(x) = i l (l +1) j l (kr)+ 1 ] α lh (1) l (kr) P l (cos θ). (69) l=0 If we have a hard sphere potential, then the boundary condition is that ψ(r = R, Ω) = 0. Hence, j l (kr)+ 1 α lh (1) l (kr) =0, l =0, 1,... (70) Therefore, for the hard sphere potential, α l (k) =e iδ l 1= j l(kr) h (1) l (kr). (71) For l = 0, this reduces to α 0 = e ikr 1, or δ 0 = kr. This is also the result for l =1. 11

12 The total cross section in partial wave l is σ l = 4π k (l + 1) sin δ l (7) = 4π e iδ l 1 (l +1) (73) k i = 4π k (l +1) α l/ (74) = 4π j l (kr) (l +1) (75) k (kr) h (1) l = 4π k (l +1) [j l (kr)] [j l (kr)] +[n l (kr)], (76) where, in the final step we have used h (1) l (x) =j l (x)+in l (x). (b) Find a simple expression for the phase shift δ l in the high energy limit (kr l). Keep terms up to O(1) in your result. Solution: At high energies, letting x = kr: Thus, for kr l, α l (k) = e iδ l 1= j l(kr) (77) h (1) l (kr) ( cos x l π π ) e i(x l π π ) (78) = e i(x l π π ) 1. (79) δ l = kr + l π + π. (80) (c) Determine the total cross section (including all partial waves) in the high energy limit, kr. [This is the only somewhat tricky part of this problem to calculate. One approach is as follows: Write down the total cross section in terms of your results for part (a). Then, for fixed k, consider which values of l may be important in the sum. Neglect the other values of l, and make the high energy approximation to your part (a) result. Finally, evaluate the sum, either directly, or by turning it into an appropriate integral.] 1

13 Solution: We must evaluate: σ T =4πR 1 [j l (x)] lim (l +1) x=kr x l=0 [j l (x)] +[n l (x)]. (81) We make use of the following facts: π j l (x) = x J l+ 1 (x) (8) π n l (x) = x Y l+ 1 (x) (83) π h (1) l (x) = x H(1) (x) (84) l+ 1 J ν (x) πx cos(x ν π π 4 ) (85) H ν (1) π (x) πx ei(x ν π 4 ). (86) Thus, with ν = l +1/, j l (x) cos(x l π π) h (1) l (x) e i(x l π π ) (87) cos (x l π π ) (88) sin (x l π ), for x l. (89) We further note that, for fixed x, j l (x) approaches zero for large l, and h l (x) approaches infinity for large l. Let us argue that we may cut off the sum at l = kr on physical grounds: At high energy, 1/k R. Nowl kr, since l is the orbital angular momentum quantum number. If l>kr, then r>r, and the short wavelength beam misses the target, hence there is no contribution to the scattering cross section. Thus, in the high energy limit, for scattering on a hard sphere: Now σ T =4πR lim x=kr 1 x sin (x l π { sin )= x, cos x, 13 x (l + 1)sin (x l π ). (90) l=0 l even, l odd. (91)

14 We evaluate the sum in this limit: 1 x (l + 1)sin (x l π x l=0 ) = sin x + cos x + sin x + cos x +3 sin x + 3 cos x +... (9) = x l = 1 x(x +1). (93) Hence, σ T 4π k 8. Consider the graph in Fig. 1. δ Phase Shift (degrees) kr l=0 l = 4π k l=0 ( k R ) =πr. (94) δ 1 40 δ T π (MeV) Figure 1: Made-up graph of phase shifts δ 0 and δ 1 for elastic π + p scattering (neglecting spin). Assume that the other phase shifts are negligible (e.g., low energy is reasonably accurate). The pion mass and energy here are sufficiently small that we can at least entertain the approximation of an 14

15 infinitely heavy proton at rest we ll assume this to be the case, in any event. Note that T π is the relativistic kinetic energy of the π + : T π = P π + m π m π. (a) Is the π + p force principally attractive or repulsive (as shown in this figure)? Solution: The phase shifts are positive, indicating a dominantly attractive potential. (b) Plot the total cross section in mb (millibarns) as a function of energy, from T π =40 to 00 MeV. Solution: The total cross section in terms of the partial wave phase shifts is: σ T = 4π (l + 1) sin δ k l (95) l=0 = 4π k (sin δ sin δ 1 ). (96) The kinetic energy T π is related to k by T π = m π + k m π,or k = T (T +m π ). (97) To convert to millibarns, we multiply by: 1 = (197 MeV-fm) 10 mb/fm = MeV mb. (98) Figure shows the result. (c) Plot the angular distribution of the scattered π + at energies of 10, 140 and 160 MeV. Solution: dσ dω = 1 (j +1) [ e iδ j (k) 1 ] P j (cos θ) (99) ik j=0 = 1 4k eiδ 0(k) 1+3(e iδj(k) 1) cos θ (100) = 1 { [cos δ (cos δ 4k 1 1) cos θ] + [sin δ sin δ 1 cos θ] }. The result is shown in Fig

16 (mb) σ T Tπ (MeV) Figure : Total (made-up) cross section for elastic π + p scattering (neglecting spin). (d) What is the mean free path of 140 MeV pions in a liquid hydrogen target, with these protons? Solution: The cross section for 140 MeV pions is 60 mb. The density of liquid hydrogen is g/cm 3. The number density is ρ == m 3. The mean free path is thus λ = 1 =0.9m. (101) σ T ρ 9. We now start to consider the possibility of inelastic scatting. For example, let us suppose there is a multiplet of N non-identical particles, all of mass m. We consider scattering on a spherically symmetric center-of-force, with the properly that the interaction can change a particle from one number of the multiplet to another member. We may in this case express the scattering amplitude by f αβ (k; cos θ), with α, β = 1,...,N, corresponding to a unitary S-matrix on Hilbert space L (R 3 ) V N : S αβ (k f ; k i )=δ αβ δ (3) (k f k i )+ 16 i πk i δ(k f k i )f αβ (k f ; k i )

17 θ d σ dcos cos θ Figure 3: Differential (made-up) cross section for elastic π + p scattering (neglecting spin), at three values of T π. β is here to be interpreted as identifying the initial particle, and α the final particle. The generalization of our partial wave expansion to this situation is clearly: f αβ (k; cos θ) = 1 ik Where A (l) is an N N unitary matrix: (l + 1)(A (l) αβ δ αβ)p l (cos θ) l=0 A (l) = exp[i l (k)] with l an N N Hermitian phase shift matrix note that f αα is the elastic scattering amplitude for particle α. (a) Find expressions, in terms of A (l) (k), for the following total cross sections, for an incident particle α: (integrated over angles) 17

18 i. σαtot, el the total elastic cross section Solution: We ll use 1 dxp l (x)p l (x) = 1 l +1 δ ll. (10) 1 σαtot el = π d cos θ f αα (k; cos θ) (103) 1 = π 1 (l +1) dx P k l (x) A (l) αα 1 (104) l 1 = π (l +1) A (l) k αα 1. (105) l ii. σαtot, inel the total inelastic cross section (sometimes called the reaction cross section). Solution: σαtot inel = π β α = π k β α 1 1 iii. σ αtot, the total cross section. Solution: σ αtot = σ el l αtot + σinel = π k β l d cos θ f βα (k; cos θ) (106) (l +1) A (l) βα. (107) αtot (108) (l +1) A (l) βα δ αβ. (109) (b) Try to give the generalization of the optical theorem for this scattering of particles in a multiplet. Solution: Start with the unitarity os the S matrix: d 3 (q)s αβ (p, q)s γβ (q, p )=δ αγ δ (3) (p p ). (110) β ( ) Substitute in our form for S in terms of the scattering amplitude f, and arrive at: If αγ (p;1)= p 4π σ αtot. (111) γ 18

19 10. In the previous problem you considered the scattering of particles in a multiplet. You determined the total elastic (sometimes called scattering ) cross section and the total inelastic ( reaction ) cross sections in terms of the A (l) αβ matrix in the partial wave expansion. Consider now the graph in Fig. 4. k el(l) σ αtot π (l+1) 4 Not Allowed Allowed k π σ inel(l) αtot (l+1) Figure 4: The allowed and forbidden regions for possible elastic and inelastic cross sections for the scattering of particles in a multiplet. This graph purports to show the allowed and forbidden regions for the total elastic and inelastic cross sections in a given partial wave l. Derive the formula for the allowed region of this graph. Make sure to check the extreme points. 19

20 Solution: For simplicity, let the vertical axis be v, and the horizontal axis u: u = k σ αtot inel(l) π(l +1) ; v = k el(l) σ αtot π(l +1). (11) From the solution to the previous problem, and unitarity of the A (l) matrix, we thus have u = A (l) βα =1 A (l) αα, β α (113) v = A (l) αα 1 =1+ A (l) αα RA (l) αα. (114) The constraint imposed by unitarity is that A (l) αα 1. Let A (l) αα = re iθ. Then r 1and0 θ<π gives the allowed region. In terms of the plotted quantities, u =1 r and v =1+r r cos θ. Thus and for given u, v must be in the range 0 u 1, (115) (1 r) y (1 + r), (116) where r = 1 x. If r = 0 then (u, v) =(1, 1). If r = 1 then u =0 and 0 v In the angular distribution section, we discussed the transformation between two different types of helicity bases. In particular, we considered a system of two particles, with spins j 1 and j, in their CM frame. One basis is the spherical helicity basis, with vectors of the form: j, m, λ 1,λ, (117) where j is the total angular momentum, m is the total angular momentum projection along the 3-axis, and λ 1,λ are the helicities of the two particles. We assumed a normalization of these basis vectors such that: j,m,λ 1,λ j, m, λ 1,λ = δ jj δ mm δ λ1 λ 1 δ λ λ. (118) The other basis is the plane-wave helicity basis, with vectors of the form: θ, φ, λ 1,λ, (119) 0

21 where θ and φ are the spherical polar angles of the direction of particle one. We did not specify a normalization for these basis vectors, but an obvious (and conventional) choice is: θ,φ,λ 1,λ θ, φ, λ 1,λ = δ () (Ω Ω)δ λ1 λ 1 δ λ λ, (10) where d () Ω refers to the element of solid angle for particle one. In the section on angular distributions, we obtained the result for the transformation between these bases in the form: θ, φ, λ 1,λ = c j j, m, λ 1,λ Dmα j (φ, θ, φ), (11) j,m where α λ 1 λ. Determine the numbers c j. Solution: To select a particular c j, i.e., a particular j, let us invert the basis transformation: dωd j mδ (φ, θ, φ) θ, φ, λ 1,λ = (1) 4π c j j,m,λ 1,λ dωdmα j (φ, θ, φ)dj m j,m 4π α (φ, θ, φ) = c j j,m,λ 1,λ dωd j mδ (θ)dj m j,m 4π α (θ) exp [ i(m φ αφ)+i(mφ αφ)] = 1 π c j j,m,λ 1,λ d cos θd j mα(θ)d j m j,m 1 δ (θ) dφe i(m m )φ (13) 0 =π j c j j,m,λ 1,λ 1 1 =π j c j j,m,λ 1,λ α jj j +1 d cos θd j mα(θ)d j mα(θ) (14) (15) = 4π j +1 c j j, m, λ 1,λ. (16) Note that we should perhaps justify the interchange of the order of summation and integration in the very first step above. Thus, j, m, λ 1,λ = j +1 4πb j 4π dωd j mα(φ, θ, φ) θ, φ, λ 1,λ. (17) 1

22 Now, 1 = j, m, λ 1,λ j, m, λ 1,λ (18) [ ] j +1 = dωd j 4π c j mα(φ, θ, φ) dω D j mδ (φ,θ, φ ) θ,φ,λ 1,λ θ, φ, λ 1,λ 4π 4π [ ] j +1 = dωdmα j 4π c j (φ, θ, φ) dω Dmα j (φ,θ, φ )δ(cos θ cos θ)δ(φ φ) 4π 4π [ ] j +1 = dωdmα j 4π c j (φ, θ, φ)dj mα (φ, θ, φ) (19) 4π [ ] j +1 1 = π d cos θ [ d j mα 4π c j (θ)] (130) 1 [ ] 4π j +1 =. (131) j +1 4π b j Therefore, c j =(j +1)/4π, or picking a phase convention, 4π c j = j +1. (13) where we assume that it is all right to interchange the summation and integration. Since each term is non-negative (and each finite), there is no potential for cancellations. Hence, if we find convergence for one ordering of the operations, we will for the other as well. Note that we have used the result of Eqn. 348 of my angular momentum notes to obtain: 1 d cos θ [ d j mα (θ)] = 1 j +1. (133) 1. In the notes we derived the optical theorem assuming that we had a symmetric central force. Show that this assumption is unnecessary. Hint: This is trivial, except for one piece of the assumption which you will have to retain. Solution: Start with the step prior to making the assumption in the notes: i π δ(p p ) [f(p, p ) f (p, p )] = δ(p p ) p 4π (4π) dω u f(p, q)f (p, q). (134)

23 Note that we must have p = p = q p. Thus, write: i p [f(pu,pu ) f (pu,pu )] = 1 dω u f(pu,pu)f (pu,pu). π (4π) (135) Now consider foward scattering: u = u : i p [f(pu,pu ) f (pu,pu )] = 1 dω u f(pu,pu)f (pu,pu). π (4π) (136) With the assumption that f(pu,pu) =f(pu,pu ), we immediately see that we have once again the optical theorem: σ T (p) = 4π p If(p;1). (137) Note that the assumption we retained was that the scattering amplitude is invariant (up to a phase) under interchange of incoming and outgoing directions. References [1] Eyvind H. Wichmann, Scattering of Wave Packets, American Journal of Physics, 33 (1965) [] M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals of Physics, 7 (1959)

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2 Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2 1 The Born approximation for the differential cross section is valid if the interaction

More information

Physics 125 Course Notes Scattering F. Porter. 3 The Differential Cross Section 5

Physics 125 Course Notes Scattering F. Porter. 3 The Differential Cross Section 5 Physics 125 Course Notes Scattering 040407 F. Porter Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The S Matrix 2 3 The Differential Cross Section 5 4 Partial Wave Expansion 11 5 Optical Theorem 13 6 Interim Remarks 15

More information

Quantum Mechanics II

Quantum Mechanics II Quantum Mechanics II Prof. Boris Altshuler April, 20 Lecture 2. Scattering Theory Reviewed Remember what we have covered so far for scattering theory. We separated the Hamiltonian similar to the way in

More information

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and 9 Scattering Theory II 9.1 Partial wave analysis Expand ψ in spherical harmonics Y lm (θ, φ), derive 1D differential equations for expansion coefficients. Spherical coordinates: x = r sin θ cos φ (1) y

More information

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6 1 Problem 1 Elastic scattering Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6 A heavy scatterer interacts with a fast electron with a potential V (r) = V e r/r. (a) Find the differential cross section dσ dω = f(θ) 2 in the

More information

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one. Scattering Classical model As a model for the classical approach to collision, consider the case of a billiard ball colliding with a stationary one. The scattering direction quite clearly depends rather

More information

Non-stationary States and Electric Dipole Transitions

Non-stationary States and Electric Dipole Transitions Pre-Lab Lecture II Non-stationary States and Electric Dipole Transitions You will recall that the wavefunction for any system is calculated in general from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation ĤΨ(x,t)=i

More information

Quantum Physics 130A. April 1, 2006

Quantum Physics 130A. April 1, 2006 Quantum Physics 130A April 1, 2006 2 1 HOMEWORK 1: Due Friday, Apr. 14 1. A polished silver plate is hit by beams of photons of known energy. It is measured that the maximum electron energy is 3.1 ± 0.11

More information

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 11

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 11 Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 00 Assignment 11 Readings Most of the reading needed for this problem set was already given on Problem Set 9. The new readings are: Phase shifts are discussed in Cohen-Tannoudji

More information

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation Chapter 6 The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation 6.1 Angular Momentum To study how angular momentum is represented in quantum mechanics we start by reviewing the classical vector of orbital angular momentum

More information

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours. Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours. There are 10 problems, totalling 180 points. Do all problems. Answer all problems in the white books provided.

More information

Scattering Theory. In quantum mechanics the basic observable is the probability

Scattering Theory. In quantum mechanics the basic observable is the probability Scattering Theory In quantum mechanics the basic observable is the probability P = ψ + t ψ t 2, for a transition from and initial state, ψ t, to a final state, ψ + t. Since time evolution is unitary this

More information

Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential

Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential Introduction to Nuclear Science Simon Fraser University Spring 2011 NUCS 342 January 24, 2011 NUCS 342 (Lecture 4) January 24, 2011 1 / 32 Outline 1 One-dimensional

More information

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1 Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp Problem (4 p): (a) Define the concept of unitary operator and show that the operator e ipa/ is unitary (p is the momentum operator in one dimension) (b)

More information

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz February 2013 We seek a more systematic treatment of the multipole expansion

More information

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Advanced Quantum Mechanics Advanced Quantum Mechanics Rajdeep Sensarma sensarma@theory.tifr.res.in Scattering Theory Ref : Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics Taylor, Quantum Theory of Non-Relativistic Collisions Landau and Lifshitz,

More information

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture # 22

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture # 22 PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture # 22 Dr. Barry Spurlock Simple Harmonic Oscillator Barriers and Tunneling Alpha Particle Decay Schrodinger Equation on Hydrogen Atom Solutions for Schrodinger Equation for

More information

r 2 dr h2 α = 8m2 q 4 Substituting we find that variational estimate for the energy is m e q 4 E G = 4

r 2 dr h2 α = 8m2 q 4 Substituting we find that variational estimate for the energy is m e q 4 E G = 4 Variational calculations for Hydrogen and Helium Recall the variational principle See Chapter 16 of the textbook The variational theorem states that for a Hermitian operator H with the smallest eigenvalue

More information

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Final Examination December 17, 2004

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Final Examination December 17, 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics Course: 8.09 Classical Mechanics Term: Fall 004 Final Examination December 17, 004 Instructions Do not start until you are told to do so. Solve

More information

Spring /2/ pts 1 point per minute

Spring /2/ pts 1 point per minute Physics 519 MIDTERM Name: Spring 014 6//14 80 pts 1 point per minute Exam procedures. Please write your name above. Please sit away from other students. If you have a question about the exam, please ask.

More information

Non-relativistic scattering

Non-relativistic scattering Non-relativistic scattering Contents Scattering theory 2. Scattering amplitudes......................... 3.2 The Born approximation........................ 5 2 Virtual Particles 5 3 The Yukawa Potential

More information

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I Physics 56400 Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I Lecture 2 Fall 2018 Semester Prof. Matthew Jones Cross Sections Reaction rate: R = L σ The cross section is proportional to the probability of

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II August 23, 208 9:00 a.m. :00 p.m. Do any four problems. Each problem is worth 25 points.

More information

Brief Review of the R-Matrix Theory

Brief Review of the R-Matrix Theory Brief Review of the R-Matrix Theory L. C. Leal Introduction Resonance theory deals with the description of the nucleon-nucleus interaction and aims at the prediction of the experimental structure of cross

More information

Physics 505 Homework No. 12 Solutions S12-1

Physics 505 Homework No. 12 Solutions S12-1 Physics 55 Homework No. 1 s S1-1 1. 1D ionization. This problem is from the January, 7, prelims. Consider a nonrelativistic mass m particle with coordinate x in one dimension that is subject to an attractive

More information

Intrinsic Parity of Neutral Pion. Taushif Ahmed 13th September, 2012

Intrinsic Parity of Neutral Pion. Taushif Ahmed 13th September, 2012 Intrinsic Parity of Neutral Pion Taushif Ahmed 13th September, 01 1 Contents 1 Symmetry 4 Parity Transformation 5.1 Parity in CM............................. 5. Parity in QM.............................

More information

Chapter 10: QUANTUM SCATTERING

Chapter 10: QUANTUM SCATTERING Chapter : QUANTUM SCATTERING Scattering is an extremely important tool to investigate particle structures and the interaction between the target particle and the scattering particle. For example, Rutherford

More information

P3317 HW from Lecture 15 and Recitation 8

P3317 HW from Lecture 15 and Recitation 8 P3317 HW from Lecture 15 and Recitation 8 Due Oct 23, 218 Problem 1. Variational Energy of Helium Here we will estimate the ground state energy of Helium. Helium has two electrons circling around a nucleus

More information

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points) Problem 1: Spin 1 particles 1 points 1 Consider a system made up of spin 1/ particles. If one measures the spin of the particles, one can only measure spin up or spin down. The general spin state of a

More information

Comparative study of scattering by hard core and absorptive potential

Comparative study of scattering by hard core and absorptive potential 6 Comparative study of scattering by hard core and absorptive potential Quantum scattering in three dimension by a hard sphere and complex potential are important in collision theory to study the nuclear

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i. Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =

More information

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles Decays and Scattering Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles 1 Decay Rates There are THREE experimental probes of Elementary Particle Interactions - bound states

More information

= ( Prove the nonexistence of electron in the nucleus on the basis of uncertainty principle.

= ( Prove the nonexistence of electron in the nucleus on the basis of uncertainty principle. Worked out examples (Quantum mechanics). A microscope, using photons, is employed to locate an electron in an atom within a distance of. Å. What is the uncertainty in the momentum of the electron located

More information

Outline Spherical symmetry Free particle Coulomb problem Keywords and References. Central potentials. Sourendu Gupta. TIFR, Mumbai, India

Outline Spherical symmetry Free particle Coulomb problem Keywords and References. Central potentials. Sourendu Gupta. TIFR, Mumbai, India Central potentials Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Quantum Mechanics 1 2013 3 October, 2013 Outline 1 Outline 2 Rotationally invariant potentials 3 The free particle 4 The Coulomb problem 5 Keywords

More information

The Hydrogen Atom. Dr. Sabry El-Taher 1. e 4. U U r

The Hydrogen Atom. Dr. Sabry El-Taher 1. e 4. U U r The Hydrogen Atom Atom is a 3D object, and the electron motion is three-dimensional. We ll start with the simplest case - The hydrogen atom. An electron and a proton (nucleus) are bound by the central-symmetric

More information

Physics 216 Problem Set 4 Spring 2010 DUE: MAY 25, 2010

Physics 216 Problem Set 4 Spring 2010 DUE: MAY 25, 2010 Physics 216 Problem Set 4 Spring 2010 DUE: MAY 25, 2010 1. (a) Consider the Born approximation as the first term of the Born series. Show that: (i) the Born approximation for the forward scattering amplitude

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Quantum Mechanics Solutions Quantum Mechanics Solutions (a (i f A and B are Hermitian, since (AB = B A = BA, operator AB is Hermitian if and only if A and B commute So, we know that [A,B] = 0, which means that the Hilbert space H

More information

Physics 115C Homework 2

Physics 115C Homework 2 Physics 5C Homework Problem Our full Hamiltonian is H = p m + mω x +βx 4 = H +H where the unperturbed Hamiltonian is our usual and the perturbation is H = p m + mω x H = βx 4 Assuming β is small, the perturbation

More information

Physics 580: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 2017 Professor Eduardo Fradkin

Physics 580: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 2017 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Physics 58: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 7 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. 5 Bound States and Scattering Theory Due Date: November 7, 7 Square Well in Three Dimensions

More information

Physics 342 Lecture 23. Radial Separation. Lecture 23. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Physics 342 Lecture 23. Radial Separation. Lecture 23. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Physics 342 Lecture 23 Radial Separation Lecture 23 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, March 26th, 2010 We begin our spherical solutions with the simplest possible case zero potential. Aside from

More information

Elastic Scattering. R = m 1r 1 + m 2 r 2 m 1 + m 2. is the center of mass which is known to move with a constant velocity (see previous lectures):

Elastic Scattering. R = m 1r 1 + m 2 r 2 m 1 + m 2. is the center of mass which is known to move with a constant velocity (see previous lectures): Elastic Scattering In this section we will consider a problem of scattering of two particles obeying Newtonian mechanics. The problem of scattering can be viewed as a truncated version of dynamic problem

More information

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination. January 7, 2013 (Tuesday) 9:00 am - 12:00 noon

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination. January 7, 2013 (Tuesday) 9:00 am - 12:00 noon University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination January 7, 13 Tuesday 9: am - 1: noon Full credit can be achieved from completely correct answers to 4 questions

More information

Mathematical Tripos Part IB Michaelmas Term Example Sheet 1. Values of some physical constants are given on the supplementary sheet

Mathematical Tripos Part IB Michaelmas Term Example Sheet 1. Values of some physical constants are given on the supplementary sheet Mathematical Tripos Part IB Michaelmas Term 2015 Quantum Mechanics Dr. J.M. Evans Example Sheet 1 Values of some physical constants are given on the supplementary sheet 1. Whenasampleofpotassiumisilluminatedwithlightofwavelength3

More information

CHAPTER 8 The Quantum Theory of Motion

CHAPTER 8 The Quantum Theory of Motion I. Translational motion. CHAPTER 8 The Quantum Theory of Motion A. Single particle in free space, 1-D. 1. Schrodinger eqn H ψ = Eψ! 2 2m d 2 dx 2 ψ = Eψ ; no boundary conditions 2. General solution: ψ

More information

Physics 228 Today: Ch 41: 1-3: 3D quantum mechanics, hydrogen atom

Physics 228 Today: Ch 41: 1-3: 3D quantum mechanics, hydrogen atom Physics 228 Today: Ch 41: 1-3: 3D quantum mechanics, hydrogen atom Website: Sakai 01:750:228 or www.physics.rutgers.edu/ugrad/228 Happy April Fools Day Example / Worked Problems What is the ratio of the

More information

Physics 217 Problem Set 1 Due: Friday, Aug 29th, 2008

Physics 217 Problem Set 1 Due: Friday, Aug 29th, 2008 Problem Set 1 Due: Friday, Aug 29th, 2008 Course page: http://www.physics.wustl.edu/~alford/p217/ Review of complex numbers. See appendix K of the textbook. 1. Consider complex numbers z = 1.5 + 0.5i and

More information

Lecture: Scattering theory

Lecture: Scattering theory Lecture: Scattering theory 30.05.2012 SS2012: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2 1 Part I: Scattering theory: Classical trajectoriest and cross-sections Quantum Scattering 2 I. Scattering

More information

16. Elastic Scattering Michael Fowler

16. Elastic Scattering Michael Fowler 6 Elastic Scattering Michael Fowler Billiard Balls Elastic means no internal energy modes of the scatterer or of the scatteree are excited so total kinetic energy is conserved As a simple first exercise,

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics We now consider the spatial degrees of freedom of a particle moving in 3-dimensional space, which of course is an important

More information

Scattering amplitude and partial waves. f(θ) = (2l + 1)f l P l (cos(θ)) (3)

Scattering amplitude and partial waves. f(θ) = (2l + 1)f l P l (cos(θ)) (3) Scattering amplitude and partial waves In assignment 4 you are asked to simulate a scattering experiment. Your simulation will need to have some random error in the data. Before we discuss how to produce

More information

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours.

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours. 8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 0 FINAL EXAM Thursday December, 9:00 am -:00 You have 3 hours. Answer all problems in the white books provided. Write YOUR NAME and YOUR SECTION on your white books. There

More information

ψ( ) k (r) which take the asymtotic form far away from the scattering center: k (r) = E kψ (±) φ k (r) = e ikr

ψ( ) k (r) which take the asymtotic form far away from the scattering center: k (r) = E kψ (±) φ k (r) = e ikr Scattering Theory Consider scattering of two particles in the center of mass frame, or equivalently scattering of a single particle from a potential V (r), which becomes zero suciently fast as r. The initial

More information

Elastic Collisions. Chapter Center of Mass Frame

Elastic Collisions. Chapter Center of Mass Frame Chapter 11 Elastic Collisions 11.1 Center of Mass Frame A collision or scattering event is said to be elastic if it results in no change in the internal state of any of the particles involved. Thus, no

More information

1 r 2 sin 2 θ. This must be the case as we can see by the following argument + L2

1 r 2 sin 2 θ. This must be the case as we can see by the following argument + L2 PHYS 4 3. The momentum operator in three dimensions is p = i Therefore the momentum-squared operator is [ p 2 = 2 2 = 2 r 2 ) + r 2 r r r 2 sin θ We notice that this can be written as sin θ ) + θ θ r 2

More information

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 5 : Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering. Electron-Proton Scattering

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 5 : Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering. Electron-Proton Scattering Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson Handout 5 : Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 149 i.e. the QED part of ( q q) Electron-Proton Scattering In this

More information

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization: The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free theory:

More information

1 Measurement and expectation values

1 Measurement and expectation values C/CS/Phys 191 Measurement and expectation values, Intro to Spin 2/15/05 Spring 2005 Lecture 9 1 Measurement and expectation values Last time we discussed how useful it is to work in the basis of energy

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms Hyperfine effects in atomic physics are due to the interaction of the atomic electrons with the electric and magnetic multipole

More information

-state problems and an application to the free particle

-state problems and an application to the free particle -state problems and an application to the free particle Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Quantum Mechanics 1 2013 3 September, 2013 Outline 1 Outline 2 The Hilbert space 3 A free particle 4 Keywords

More information

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Physics 4 Lecture 7 Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Lecture 7 Physics 4 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April th, 008 We have the Hydrogen Hamiltonian for central potential φ(r), we can write: H r = p

More information

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension Background Previously, we have addressed quantum mechanics of 1d systems and explored bound and unbound (scattering) states. Although general concepts

More information

Lecture 10. Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections

Lecture 10. Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections Lecture 10 Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections TRANSITION PROBABILITIES AND PHOTOELECTRIC CROSS SECTIONS Cross section = σ = Transition probability per unit time of exciting a single

More information

11 Quantum theory: introduction and principles

11 Quantum theory: introduction and principles Part 2: Structure Quantum theory: introduction and principles Solutions to exercises E.b E.2b E.3b E.4b E.5b E.6b Discussion questions A successful theory of black-body radiation must be able to explain

More information

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2) Part I - Mechanics J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2) J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2) s α l θ g z x A uniform rod of length l and mass m moves in the x-z plane. One end of the rod is suspended from a straight

More information

does not change the dynamics of the system, i.e. that it leaves the Schrödinger equation invariant,

does not change the dynamics of the system, i.e. that it leaves the Schrödinger equation invariant, FYST5 Quantum Mechanics II 9..212 1. intermediate eam (1. välikoe): 4 problems, 4 hours 1. As you remember, the Hamilton operator for a charged particle interacting with an electromagentic field can be

More information

Indiana University PHYSICS P301 Final Exam 15 December 2004

Indiana University PHYSICS P301 Final Exam 15 December 2004 Indiana University PHYSICS P30 Final Exam 5 December 004 This is a closed-book examination. You may not refer to lecture notes, textbooks, or any other course materials. You may use a calculator, but solely

More information

22.02 Intro to Applied Nuclear Physics

22.02 Intro to Applied Nuclear Physics 22.02 Intro to Applied Nuclear Physics Mid-Term Exam Solution Problem 1: Short Questions 24 points These short questions require only short answers (but even for yes/no questions give a brief explanation)

More information

QMI PRELIM Problem 1. All problems have the same point value. If a problem is divided in parts, each part has equal value. Show all your work.

QMI PRELIM Problem 1. All problems have the same point value. If a problem is divided in parts, each part has equal value. Show all your work. QMI PRELIM 013 All problems have the same point value. If a problem is divided in parts, each part has equal value. Show all your work. Problem 1 L = r p, p = i h ( ) (a) Show that L z = i h y x ; (cyclic

More information

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS A047W SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS TRINITY TERM 05 Thursday, 8 June,.30 pm 5.45 pm 5 minutes

More information

Numerical simulations of neutron scattering cross sections for heavy nuclei

Numerical simulations of neutron scattering cross sections for heavy nuclei Bachelor thesis Numerical simulations of neutron scattering cross sections for heavy nuclei Kevin-Alexander Blasl Supervisor: Assoc.-Prof. Dr. Peter Puschnig University of Graz Institute of Physics June

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II January 22, 2016 9:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Do any four problems. Each problem is worth 25 points.

More information

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 4 Fall 2009

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 4 Fall 2009 Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 4 Fall 9 1. Liboff, problem 1.16 on page 594 595. Consider an atom whose electrons are L S coupled so that the good quantum numbers are j l s m j and eigenstates

More information

Solution Set of Homework # 2. Friday, September 09, 2017

Solution Set of Homework # 2. Friday, September 09, 2017 Temple University Department of Physics Quantum Mechanics II Physics 57 Fall Semester 17 Z. Meziani Quantum Mechanics Textboo Volume II Solution Set of Homewor # Friday, September 9, 17 Problem # 1 In

More information

Final Exam - Solutions PHYS/ECE Fall 2011

Final Exam - Solutions PHYS/ECE Fall 2011 Final Exam - Solutions PHYS/ECE 34 - Fall 211 Problem 1 Cosmic Rays The telescope array project in Millard County, UT can detect cosmic rays with energies up to E 1 2 ev. The cosmic rays are of unknown

More information

Lorentz invariant scattering cross section and phase space

Lorentz invariant scattering cross section and phase space Chapter 3 Lorentz invariant scattering cross section and phase space In particle physics, there are basically two observable quantities : Decay rates, Scattering cross-sections. Decay: p p 2 i a f p n

More information

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd. Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd. A summary of the machinery for the Perturbation theory: H = H o + H p ; H 0 n >= E n n >; H Ψ n >= E n Ψ n > E n = E n + E n ; E n = < n H p n > + < m H p n

More information

The Hydrogen atom. Chapter The Schrödinger Equation. 2.2 Angular momentum

The Hydrogen atom. Chapter The Schrödinger Equation. 2.2 Angular momentum Chapter 2 The Hydrogen atom In the previous chapter we gave a quick overview of the Bohr model, which is only really valid in the semiclassical limit. cf. section 1.7.) We now begin our task in earnest

More information

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions Physics 342 Lecture 21 Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions Lecture 21 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, March 22nd, 21 We are used to the temporal separation that gives, for example, the timeindependent

More information

(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions.

(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions. 1. Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2007) Consider a hydrogen atom in a weak uniform magnetic field B = Bê z. (a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron,

More information

Lecture 10. Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections

Lecture 10. Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections Lecture 10 Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections TRANSITION PROBABILITIES AND PHOTOELECTRIC CROSS SECTIONS Cross section = = Transition probability per unit time of exciting a single

More information

which implies that we can take solutions which are simultaneous eigen functions of

which implies that we can take solutions which are simultaneous eigen functions of Module 1 : Quantum Mechanics Chapter 6 : Quantum mechanics in 3-D Quantum mechanics in 3-D For most physical systems, the dynamics is in 3-D. The solutions to the general 3-d problem are quite complicated,

More information

Physics Dec The Maxwell Velocity Distribution

Physics Dec The Maxwell Velocity Distribution Physics 301 7-Dec-2005 29-1 The Maxwell Velocity Distribution The beginning of chapter 14 covers some things we ve already discussed. Way back in lecture 6, we calculated the pressure for an ideal gas

More information

Computation of the scattering amplitude in the spheroidal coordinates

Computation of the scattering amplitude in the spheroidal coordinates Computation of the scattering amplitude in the spheroidal coordinates Takuya MINE Kyoto Institute of Technology 12 October 2015 Lab Seminar at Kochi University of Technology Takuya MINE (KIT) Spheroidal

More information

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension Background Previously, we have addressed quantum mechanics of 1d systems and explored bound and unbound (scattering) states. Although general concepts

More information

C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11

C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11 C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/0/08 Fall 008 Lecture 11 Last time we saw that the time dependent Schr. eqn. can be decomposed into two equations, one in time (t) and one in space (x): space

More information

PHYS 771, Quantum Mechanics, Final Exam, Fall 2011 Instructor: Dr. A. G. Petukhov. Solutions

PHYS 771, Quantum Mechanics, Final Exam, Fall 2011 Instructor: Dr. A. G. Petukhov. Solutions PHYS 771, Quantum Mechanics, Final Exam, Fall 11 Instructor: Dr. A. G. Petukhov Solutions 1. Apply WKB approximation to a particle moving in a potential 1 V x) = mω x x > otherwise Find eigenfunctions,

More information

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009 Physics 39B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 9 Liboff, problem 35 on pages 749 75 A one-dimensional harmonic oscillator of charge-to-mass ratio e/m, and spring constant K oscillates parallel to the x-axis

More information

Srednicki Chapter 9. QFT Problems & Solutions. A. George. August 21, Srednicki 9.1. State and justify the symmetry factors in figure 9.

Srednicki Chapter 9. QFT Problems & Solutions. A. George. August 21, Srednicki 9.1. State and justify the symmetry factors in figure 9. Srednicki Chapter 9 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 2, 22 Srednicki 9.. State and justify the symmetry factors in figure 9.3 Swapping the sources is the same thing as swapping the ends of the

More information

2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections

2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections 2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections 2.1 Feynman rules Normalization In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, wave functions of free particles are normalized so that there is one particle in

More information

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case Time Total energy = Hamiltonian To find out about the

More information

Quantum Mechanics FKA081/FIM400 Final Exam 28 October 2015

Quantum Mechanics FKA081/FIM400 Final Exam 28 October 2015 Quantum Mechanics FKA081/FIM400 Final Exam 28 October 2015 Next review time for the exam: December 2nd between 14:00-16:00 in my room. (This info is also available on the course homepage.) Examinator:

More information

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5) LECTURE 12 Maxwell Velocity Distribution Suppose we have a dilute gas of molecules, each with mass m. If the gas is dilute enough, we can ignore the interactions between the molecules and the energy will

More information

Electron Atom Scattering

Electron Atom Scattering SOCRATES Intensive Programme Calculating Atomic Data for Astrophysics using New Technologies Electron Atom Scattering Kevin Dunseath Mariko Dunseath-Terao Laboratoire de Physique des Atomes, Lasers, Molécules

More information

Physics 221B Spring 2019 Notes 37 The Lippmann-Schwinger Equation and Formal Scattering Theory

Physics 221B Spring 2019 Notes 37 The Lippmann-Schwinger Equation and Formal Scattering Theory Copyright c 208 by Robert G. Littlejohn Physics 22B Spring 209 Notes 37 The Lippmann-Schwinger Equation and Formal Scattering Theory. Introduction In earlier lectures we studied the scattering of spinless

More information

Physics 220. Exam #2. May 23 May 30, 2014

Physics 220. Exam #2. May 23 May 30, 2014 Physics 0 Exam # May 3 May 30, 014 Name Please read and follow these instructions carefully: Read all problems carefully before attempting to solve them. Your work must be legible, with clear organization,

More information

8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current

8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current Prolem Set 5 Solutions 8.04 Spring 03 March, 03 Prolem. (0 points) The Proaility Current We wish to prove that dp a = J(a, t) J(, t). () dt Since P a (t) is the proaility of finding the particle in the

More information

1 Planck-Einstein Relation E = hν

1 Planck-Einstein Relation E = hν C/CS/Phys C191 Representations and Wavefunctions 09/30/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 8 1 Planck-Einstein Relation E = hν This is the equation relating energy to frequency. It was the earliest equation of quantum

More information

(relativistic effects kinetic energy & spin-orbit coupling) 3. Hyperfine structure: ) (spin-spin coupling of e & p + magnetic moments) 4.

(relativistic effects kinetic energy & spin-orbit coupling) 3. Hyperfine structure: ) (spin-spin coupling of e & p + magnetic moments) 4. 4 Time-ind. Perturbation Theory II We said we solved the Hydrogen atom exactly, but we lied. There are a number of physical effects our solution of the Hamiltonian H = p /m e /r left out. We already said

More information

Oh, the humanity! David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Oh, the humanity! David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214 Oh, the humanity! -Herbert Morrison, radio reporter of the Hindenburg disaster David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 24 The hydrogen atom is composed of a proton and an electron with potential energy:

More information

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10 May 5, 2008 Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10 You do not need to hand this pset in. The solutions will be provided after Friday May 9th. Your FINAL EXAM is MONDAY MAY 19, 1:30PM-4:30PM,

More information