Persistence of invariant tori on sub-manifolds in Hamiltonian systems
|
|
- Marylou Lindsey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Persistence of invariant tori on sub-manifolds in Hamiltonian systems Shui-Nee Chow School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 3033, USA Yong Li Department of Mathematics, Jilin University, Changchun 3003, PRC Yingfei Yi School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 3033, USA Abstract Generalizing the degenerate KAM theorem under the Rüssmann non-degeneracy and the isoenergetic KAM theorem, we employ a quasi-linear iterative scheme to study the persistence and frequency preservation of invariant tori on a smooth sub-manifold for a real analytic, nearly integrable Hamiltonian system. Under a nondegenerate condition of Rüssmann type on the sub-manifold, we shall show the following: a) the majority of the unperturbed tori on the sub-manifold will persist; b) the perturbed toral frequencies can be partially preserved according to the maximal degeneracy of the Hessian of the unperturbed system and be fully preserved if the Hessian is nondegenerate; c) the Hamiltonian admits normal forms near the perturbed tori of arbitrarily prescribed high order. Under a sub-isoenergetic nondegenerate condition on an energy surface, we shall show that the majority of unperturbed tori give rise to invariant tori of the perturbed system of the same energy which preserve the ratio of certain components of the respective frequencies. Keywords. Hamiltonian system, KAM theory, persistence on sub-manifolds. AMS(MOS). Mathematics Subject Classification. 58F05, 58F7, 58F30. Introduction We consider an analytic family of real analytic Hamiltonian systems of the following actionangle form H = N(y) + εp (x, y, ε), (.) where (x, y) lies in a complex neighborhood {(x, y) : Imx < r, dist(y, G) < β} of T d G, G R d (d > ) is a bounded closed region, and ε is a small parameter. Partially supported by NSFC grant 99704, National 973 key Project: Nonlinearity in China and the outstanding youth project of Ministry of Education of China. Partially supported by NSF grant DMS This work is partially done when the second and third authors were visiting the National University of Singapore.
2 With the symplectic form n dx i dy i, i= the associated unperturbed motion of (.) is simply described by the equation { ẋ = ω(y), ẏ = 0, where ω(y) = N y (y). Thus, for ε = 0, the phase space G T d is foliated into invariant tori T y = {y} T d with the frequency vectors ω(y), y G. Under the Kolmogorov nondegenerate condition, i.e., K) the Hessian A(y) N (y) is nonsingular for all y G, y the classical KAM theorem (see Kolmogorov [7], Arnold [], Moser [0]) says that the majority of the invariant d-tori will persist as ε sufficiently small. More precisely, there is a family of Cantor sets G ε G, with G\G ε 0, as ε 0, such that for each y G ε, the torus T y persists and gives rise to a slightly deformed, analytic, quasi-periodic, invariant torus T ε y of the perturbed system. Moreover, for each y G ε the perturbed torus T ε y preserves the frequency ω(y) of the corresponding unperturbed torus T y. Recently, a fair amount of attention was given to the persistence of a fixed Diophantine torus with the preservation of the toral frequency, see Benettin et. al. [4] for a KAM approach, Eliasson [], Gallavotti [3], Chierchia and Falcolini [0] for a direct method using Lindstedt series, and Gallavotti, Gentile and Mastropietro [4] and Bricmont, Gawedzki, and Kupiainen [5] for using renormalization groups techniques. Important generalizations to the classical KAM theorem were also made for various degenerate cases (i.e., when the Hessian A(y) becomes singular), see Bruno ([8]), Cheng and Sun ([9]), Rüssmann ([4]), Xu, You and Qiu ([7]), Sevryuk ([5]) and references therein. The persistence of KAM tori has been shown under various partially nondegenerate conditions. The weakest such condition was given by Rüssmann in [4] which says that the frequencies {ω(y) : y G} should not lie in any hyperplane of R d. In the real analytic case, it is shown in [7] that the Rüssmann condition is equivalent to that ω R) max y G rank{ α : α d } = d. yα The matrix in the above is formed by d dimensional column vectors of all the partial derivatives of ω(y) of orders up to d. In this paper, instead of the persistence of invariant tori in the whole domain of the action variable, we shall study the persistence problem on a given smooth sub-manifold M in the action space G, e.g., a curve or a surface, which is either closed or with boundary. Clearly, such persistence will depend on both the non-degeneracy of the unperturbed system and the differential structure of the sub-manifold. By using a quasi-linear iterative scheme introduced in [8], we shall show the following results for (.) as ε sufficiently small:
3 ) The majority of the unperturbed tori {T y : y M} will persist under a nondegenerate condition of Rüssmann type on M. ) The maximal number of the preserved frequency components of a perturbed torus is characterized by the maximal rank of the Hessian matrices {A(y) : y M}. 3) If A(y) is nonsingular on M, i.e., if the Kolmogorov nondegenerate condition is satisfied on M, then all Diophantine tori of the unperturbed system on M persist with unchanged toral frequencies. 4) If the unperturbed system admits a sub-isoenergetic non-degeneracy on an energy surface, then the majority of the unperturbed tori on the energy surface will persist and give rise to perturbed tori of the same energy, whose frequency ratios of the respective nondegenerate components are preserved. These results generalize both the KAM theorem under the Rüssmann non-degeneracy and the isoenergetic KAM theorem ([],[3],[6]). Similar to the isoenergetic case, one interesting phenomenon is that the Kolmogorov and the Rüssmann non-degeneracy can be independent conditions on a sub-manifold of G, i.e., one can have the Kolmogorov but not the Rüssmann non-degeneracy on a sub-manifold and vice versa. In contrast to the KAM theory on the entire region G, the validity of the Kolmogorov nondegenerate condition on a sub-manifold does not automatically guarantee the existence of a Diophantine torus on the manifold (hence the persistence of any torus), unless the Rüssmann nondegenerate condition is also satisfied on the manifold. It should be noted the Rüssmann nondegenerate conditions on the whole domain and on a sub-manifold are also independent conditions. Hence the persistence on a particular sub-manifold does not follow from the Rüssmann non-degeneracy on the entire domain (see the examples in Section for detail). The quasi-linear scheme we employed follows the standard KAM iterative procedure but involves solving a system of quasi-linear equations at each KAM step instead of linear ones. This has the advantage of eliminating any prescribed number of high order angulardependent terms in just one iteration, resulting in a normal form in the vicinity of a perturbed torus of arbitrarily high order. The paper is organized as follows. In Section, we state our results with respect to both (.) and a parameterized Hamiltonian system, along with some discussion and examples. The quasi-linear iterative scheme will be described in Section 3 for one KAM cycle. We complete the proof of our results in Section 4 by deriving an iteration lemma and giving measure estimates. Acknowledgment. The authors would like to thank the referees and editors for their valuable suggestions and comments which leads to a significant improvement of the paper. Main results Below, unless specified otherwise, we shall use the same symbol to denote an equivalent (finite dimensional) vector norm and its induced matrix norm, absolute value of functions, and measure of sets etc., and use D to denote the supremum norm of functions on a domain D. Also, for any two complex column vectors ξ, ζ of the same dimension, ξ, ζ 3
4 always stands for ξ ζ, i.e., the transpose of ξ times ζ. For the sake of briefness, we shall not specify smoothness orders for functions having obvious orders of smoothness indicated by their derivatives taken. Moreover, all Hamiltonians in the sequel are associated to the standard symplectic structure. We first consider the following parameter-dependent, real analytic Hamiltonian system H = e(λ) + ω(λ), y + h(y, λ) + P (x, y, λ), (.) where (x, y) lies in a complex neighborhood D(r, s) = {(x, y) : Imx < r, y < s} of T d {0} T d R d, λ is a parameter lying in a bounded closed region Λ R d 0, h(y, λ) = O( y ). In the above, all λ dependence are of class C l 0 for some l 0 d. Write h = y, A(λ)y + ĥ(y, λ), where A(λ) is real symmetric for each λ Λ and ĥ(y, λ) = O( y 3 ). following conditions: We assume the A) rank{ α ω : α d } = d for all λ Λ. λα A) ranka(λ) n on Λ, and, there is a smoothly varying, nonsingular, n n principal minor A(λ) of A(λ). Remark. ) In the case that ω is real analytic and Λ is connected, the condition A) can be replaced by max λ Λ rank{ α ω λ α : α d } = d, which becomes the Rüssmann condition R) when d 0 = d. Indeed, as pointed out in [7] for the case d 0 = d, the Rüssmann condition implies that A) holds on an open subset Λ 0 Λ with Λ \ Λ 0 = 0. ) The condition A) is more or less automatic in the sense that if n = max ranka(λ) = λ Λ A(λ 0 ), then due to the symmetry of A(λ) there is an n n principal minor of A(λ) which is smoothly varying and nonsingular in a neighborhood of λ 0. Denote i, i,, i n as the row indices (in the natural order) of A(λ) in A(λ), and set d = max{d 0, d}. Our main result is as follows. Theorem A. Consider (.) and let m be a given integer. ) Assume A),A) and let τ > d(d ) be fixed. Then there exists a µ = µ(r, s, m, l 0, τ) > 0 sufficiently small such that if l λp D(r,s) Λ γ m+l 0+5 s m µ, l l 0, (.) then there exist Cantor sets Λ γ Λ with Λ \ Λ γ = O(γ d ) and a C l 0 Whitney smooth family of C m symplectic transformations Ψ λ : D( r, s ) D(r, s), λ Λ γ, 4
5 which is real analytic in x and C m uniformly close to the identity such that H Ψ λ (x, y) = e (λ) + ω (λ), y + h (y, λ) + P (x, y, λ), (.3) where, for all λ Λ γ and (x, y) D( r, s ), h (y, λ) = O( y ), P (x, y, λ) = O( y m+ ), l λ (e e) = O(γ m+l 0+4 µ), l l 0, l λ(ω ω) = O(γ m+l 0+4 µ), l l 0, l λ j y(h h) = O(γ m+l 0+4 µ ), l l0, j m, and moreover, k, ω (λ) > γ k τ, for all k Zd \ {0}, (ω (λ)) iq (ω(λ)) iq, for all q n. Thus, for each λ Λ γ, the unperturbed torus T λ = T d {0} associated to the toral frequency ω(λ) persists and gives rise to an analytic, Diophantine, invariant torus of the perturbed system with the toral frequency ω (λ) which preserves the frequency components ω i (λ),, ω in (λ) of the unperturbed toral frequency ω(λ). Moreover, these perturbed tori form a C l 0 Whitney smooth family. ) Assume that A(λ) is nonsingular on Λ and let τ > d be fixed. Then there exists a µ = µ(r, s, m, l 0, τ) > 0 sufficiently small such that if (.) holds, then each Diophantine torus T λ = T d {0}, λ Λ, whose toral frequency ω(λ) having the Diophantine type (γ, τ), will persist, with the normal form (.3), and gives rise to an analytic, Diophantine, invariant perturbed torus with the same toral frequency. In the above theorem, d 0 can be any positive integer. The case d 0 > d will typically occur when the nondegenerate condition A) fails with respect to the original parameters of a Hamiltonian system and extra deformation parameters need to be added so that a joint nondegenerate condition of type A) can hold with respect to the extended parameters. When d 0 d, the theorem has a direct application to nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems of form (.) with respect to the persistence of invariant tori on a sub-manifold of G. Consider (.) and let M be a d 0 ( d) dimensional, C l 0 (l 0 d) sub-manifold of G which is either closed or with boundary. Denote ω(y) = N y (y), A(y) = N (y), y G. y We assume the following conditions: A) For any coordinate chart (φ, U) of M, rank{ α (ω φ ) λ α λ φ(u) R d 0. : α d } = d for all 5
6 A) ranka(y) n on M, and, there is a smoothly varying, nonsingular, n n principal minor A(y) of A(y) on M. Corollary. Consider (.). Let m be given and r, β be as in (.). ) Assume A),A) and let τ > d(d ) be fixed. Then there is an ε 0 = ε 0 (r, β, l 0, m, M, τ) > 0 and a family of Cantor sets M ε M, 0 < ε ε 0, with (d )(m+l M \ M ε = O(ε 0 +5) ), where d = max{d 0, d}, such that for each y M ε, the unperturbed torus T y persists and gives rise to an analytic, Diophantine, invariant torus of the perturbed system whose toral frequency ω ε (y) satisfies k, ω ε (y) > γ k τ, for all k Zd \ {0}, (ω ε (y)) iq = (ω(y)) iq, for all q n, (m+l where 0 < γ ε 0 +5), i,, i n are the row indices (in the natural order) of A(y) located in A(y). Moreover, these perturbed tori form a Whitney smooth family. ) Assume that A(y) is non-singular on M and let τ > d be fixed. Then each Diophantine torus T y, y M, whose toral frequency ω(y) having the Diophantine type (γ, τ) for some 0 < γ ε (m+l 0 +5), will persist and gives rise to an analytic, Diophantine, invariant perturbed torus with the same toral frequency. 3) Let y 0 M ε in ) or ω(y 0 ) be Diophantine in ). Then (.) admits the following normal form on D y0 ( r, β ) = {(x, y) : Imx < r, y y 0 < β}: H y0 (x, y) = e (y 0 ) + ω (y 0 ), y y 0 + h (y, y 0 ) + P (x, y, y 0 ), (.4) where ω (y 0 ) is the toral frequency of the perturbed torus associated to y 0 (hence equals ω(y 0 ) in the case )), h (y, y 0 ) = O( y y 0 ), P (x, y, y 0 ) = O( y y 0 m+ ), which satisfy similar properties as described in part ) of Theorem A with µ = ε m+l 0 +5, γ = ε (m+l 0 +5). Remark. ) Under the Kolmogorov or isoenergetic non-degeneracy, the arbitrarily high order normal forms of type (.4) around a perturbed Diophantine torus plays the role of the classical Birkhoff normal forms and the existence of such has implications on the measure of the set of invariant tori around the torus (see [],[],[] and references therein). In particular, a more or less straightforward application of Theorem 4 and its proof in [] to the normal form (.4) gives rise to an exponential measure estimate of the set of invariant tori around a perturbed Diophantine torus of (.). More precisely, if y 0 is as in part 3) of the Corollary, B ρ is a ball in R d centered at y 0 with sufficiently small radius ρ, and T ρ T d B ρ is the set of points lying in invariant d-tori of (.4), then (T d B ρ ) \ T ρ = O(e m 8 ). Furthermore, corresponding to the original Hamiltonian (.), one can choose m = [(cγ/ρ) τ+ ] for some constant c to conclude that the Lebesgue 6
7 measure of the set of points in T d B ρ which do not lie in any invariant d-torus of (.) is of the order of O(exp{ (cγ/6ρ) τ+ }) (see [], page 93). Given the above, it would be interesting to know whether the normal form (.4) can also lead to a similar measure estimate under the Rüssmann non-degeneracy, or more generally the condition A). In the later, relative measure estimates of a similar nature on a sub-manifold should be considered. ) Both Theorem A and the Corollary trivially hold when d =. In this case, one can simply take τ > 0, d = (see [9] for more discussions). To illustrate the significance and application of the Corollary, we now consider (.) with d = and assume that N(y) has the form N(y) = h (y ) + h (y ). Particular examples of N(y) to be considered are N (y) = y + y, N (y) = y + 3 y3, N 3 (y) = y + y. It is clear that the Hessian matrices associated to N, N, N 3 read ( ) ( ) A (y) =, A 0 (y) =, A 0 y 3 (y) = ( 0 0 respectively. Below, we discuss the application of the Corollary to the Hamiltonians above on three type of analytic plan curves: line segment, parabola, and circle. Since d 0 = in these cases, the non-degenerate condition A) will give rise to certain twist conditions on these curves. Example (Line segment). Consider the line segment: M : y (λ) = a λ, y (λ) = a λ, λ [, ], where (a, a ) is a non-zero vector. Then it is easy to see that A) is equivalent to the twist condition h h h h a y y a y y 0 (.5) on M. For N, (.5) becomes a 0. Thus, if a is non-zero and a is arbitrarily given, then it follows from part ) of the Corollary and the expression of A that the majority of -tori on M will persist with unchanged second components of toral frequencies. Since A is singular, part ) of the Corollary is not applicable. For N, (.5) becomes a a 0. Thus, if both a and a are non-zero, then part ) of the Corollary and the fact that ranka imply that all Diophantine -tori on M will 7 )
8 persist with unchanged toral frequencies. In fact, since A is non-singular on M if a 0, the same conclusion also follows from part ) of the Corollary (a 0 is still required since Diophantine tori are considered). We note that only due to the application of part ) of the Corollary one knows that the set of Diophantine -tori on M is a nearly full measure set (hence non-empty). For N 3, (.5) will never be satisfied with any choice of a, a. Hence part ) of the Corollary is not applicable. But since A 3 is always non-singular on M, one can apply part ) of the Corollary to conclude that all Diophantine -tori on M will persist with unchanged toral frequencies. However, we note in this special situation that a toral frequency of N 3 on M is Diophantine if only if (a, a ) is. Hence the above conclusion holds only if (a, a ) is Diophantine, in which case the persistence of all -tori on M follows. Example (Parabola). Consider the following parabola: M : y (λ) = a λ, y (λ) = a λ, λ [, ], where (a, a ) is a nonzero vector. Then it is easy to see that A) is equivalent to the twist condition a λ h h h h y y a y y 0 (.6) on M. For N, (.6) becomes a 0. Hence the same conclusion for N in Example is valid. For N, (.6) becomes a a 0. Thus, the same conclusion for N in Example is valid. For N 3, (.6) also becomes a a 0. Still, A 3 is always non-singular on M. Hence, if both a and a are non-zero, then one can apply either parts ) ) of the Corollary to conclude the persistence and the preservation of toral frequencies of all Diophantine -tori on M. But, again, it is because of the application of part ) of the Corollary that one can actually conclude the existence of Diophantine -tori on M in the case a a 0. Example 3 (Circle). Consider the unit circle: M 3 : y (λ) = cos πλ, y (λ) = sin πλ, λ [0, ]. Then it is easy to see that A) is equivalent to the twist condition h h h h y y y + y y y 0 (.7) on M 3. For N, (.7) becomes cos πλ 0, i.e., A) is satisfied on M 3 except two points (0, ), (0, ). In view of Remark. ), one can still apply part ) of the Corollary to conclude the persistence of the majority of invariant -tori on M 3 and the preservation of their second frequency components. For N, (.7) becomes sin πλ 0, i.e., A) is satisfied on M 3 except two points (, 0), (, 0). Since the lower right minor of A also vanishes at these points, the 8
9 application of part ) of the Corollary (based on Remark. )) will only guarantee the persistence of the majority of invariant -tori on M 3 and the preservation of their first frequency components. In order to apply part ) of the Corollary to obtain the persistence of all Diophantine -tori with unchanged toral frequencies, one needs to restrict to a closed portion of M 3 which does not contain these two points. For N 3, (.7) always holds and A 3 is always non-singular on M 3. One can use both parts of the Corollary to conclude the persistence and the frequency preservation of all Diophantine -tori on M 3. We now consider the case that M is a fixed energy surface {N(y) = E} in G. Then the usual isoenergetic non-degeneracy on M implies the Rüssmann non-degeneracy A) on M. Indeed, if (φ, U) is any coordinate chart on M, then one clearly has ( N φ ) y λ 0 on φ(u). It follows from the isoenergetic non-degeneracy that ) ( N φ d = rank y λ 0 0 on φ(u), hence rank = rank = rank ( N y ( N y ) 0 N y ( N y ( N y φ λ φ ) φ λ N y λ 0 ) N y 0 0 ( N φ y λ, N ) ( ) N = rank y y, N φ y = d λ on φ(u). Thus, our Corollary asserts that the perturbed system admits invariant tori conjugating to certain unperturbed ones on the energy surface M, and moreover, the perturbed toral frequencies are preserved if the Kolmogorov non-degeneracy also holds on M. However, it should be noted that such perturbed tori do not lie on the same energy level E in general, simply because the perturbed tori on the same energy level are generally equivalent (not necessary conjugated) to the unperturbed ones and only the preservation of frequency ratios can be expected (see [6]). To generalize the standard isoenergetic KAM theorem, it turns out that an additional sub-isoenergetic nondegenerate condition is needed besides the Rüssmann non-degeneracy on an energy surface. More precisely, let M be a sufficiently smooth, relatively open, bounded subset of {N(y) = E}. We assume A) on M and also the following subisoenergetic non-degeneracy: A) There is a smoothly varying n n principal minor A(y) of A(y) on M such that ( ) A(y) ω det (y) ω (y) 0 0 on M, where ω (y) = N y (y), y = (y i,, y in ), and i,, i n denote the row indices of A(y) in A(y). 9 )
10 Theorem B. Consider (.). Let m be given, r, β be as in (.), and M be a sufficiently smooth, relatively open, bounded subset of {N(y) = E}. ) Assume A) on M and let τ > d(d ) be fixed. Then there is an ε 0 = ε 0 (r, β, l 0, m, M, τ) > 0 and a family of Cantor sets M ε M, 0 < ε ε 0, with M \ M ε = O(ε (d )(m+l 0 +5) ), where d = max{d 0, d}, such that for each y M ε, the unperturbed torus T y persists and gives rise to an analytic, Diophantine, invariant torus T ε,y of the perturbed system on the energy surface {H(x, y) = E}, whose toral frequency ω ε (y) satisfies k, ω ε (y) > γ k τ for all k Z d \ {0}. Moreover, these perturbed tori form a local Whitney smooth family. ) If A) also holds on M, then each perturbed torus T ε,y preserves the ratio of the i, i,, i n components of its toral frequency ω ε (y), i.e., [ω ε,i (y) : : ω ε,in (y)] = [ω i (y) : : ω in (y)], where ω ε,ij (y) and ω ij (y) are the i j -th components of ω ε (y) and ω(y) = N y (y) respectively, for j =,,, n. 3) For y 0 M ε, (.) admits the same normal form as in part 3) of the Corollary. In the case that A(y) N(y) y (y), the condition A) coincides with the isoenergetic non-degeneracy which also implies the Rüssmann condition A) on the energy surface. Hence, part ) of the Theorem B generalizes the standard isoenergetic KAM theorem. 3 KAM step In this section, we describe the quasi-linear iterative scheme for the Hamiltonian (.) in one KAM cycle, say, from a νth KAM step to the (ν + )th-step. For simplicity, we set l 0 = d. Consider (.) and define r 0 = r, γ 0 = 4γ, β 0 = s, Λ 0 = Λ, H 0 = H, e 0 = e, A 0 = A, A 0 = A, h 0 = h, ĥ0 = ĥ, P 0 = P, N 0 = e 0 (λ) + ω 0 (λ), y + h 0. Without loss of generality, we assume that 0 < r 0, β 0, γ 0 and A 0 is the ordered n n principal minor of A 0. By monotonicity, we define µ 0, s 0 implicitly through the following equations µ = s 0 = 4 d+5 µ 0 (M + ) m K mτ, β 0 γ 0 6(M + )K τ, (3.) 0
11 where M = max l d, j m+5, y β 0,λ Λ 0 l λ j yh 0 (y, λ), K = ([log µ 0 ] + ) 3η, η is a fixed positive integer such that ( + σ) η > for σ = (m+). It is clear that µ 0 is small if and only if µ is, and, µ 0 = o(µ ɛ ) (3.) for any 0 < ɛ <. By making µ small, we assume without loss of generality that Hence s 0 < min{β 0, γ 0 }. Since (.) becomes 6(M + )K τ >. ( ) µ m = 4 d+m+5 s0, (3.3) µ 0 β 0 γ l λp 0 D(r0,s 0 ) γ d+m+5 0 s m 0 µ 0, l d. (3.4) Now, suppose that after a νth-step, we have arrived at the following real analytic Hamiltonian: H = N + P, (3.5) N = e(λ) + ω(λ), y + h(y, λ) which is defined on a phase domain D(r, s) and depends smoothly on λ Λ, where Λ Λ 0, h = y, A(λ)y + ĥ, ĥ = ĥ(y, λ) = O( y 3 ). In addition, suppose that the n n ordered principal minor A of A is non-singular on Λ, and, P = P (x, y, λ) satisfies l λ P D(r,s) γ d+m+5 s m µ, l d (3.6) for some 0 < µ µ 0, 0 < γ γ 0. By considering both averaging and translation, we shall find a symplectic transformation Φ +, which, on a small phase domain D(r +, s + ) and a smaller parameter domain Λ +, transforms the Hamiltonian (3.5) into the Hamiltonian of the next KAM cycle (the (ν + )th-step), i.e., H + = H Φ + = N + + P +, where N +, P + enjoy similar properties as N, P respectively on D(r +, s + ) Λ +. For simplicity, we shall omit index for all quantities of the present KAM step (the νthstep) and index all quantities (Hamiltonian, normal form, perturbation, transformation, and domains, etc) in the next KAM step (the (ν + )-th step) by +. All constants c c 7 below are positive and independent of the iteration process, and, we shall also use c to denote any intermediate positive constant which is independent of the iteration process. To simplify the notations, we shall suspend the λ dependence in most terms of this section.
12 Define 3. Truncation r + = r + r 0 4, s + = 8 αs, α = µσ = µ m+, β + = β + β 0 4, γ + = γ + γ 0 4, K + = ([log µ ] + )3η, D i 8 α = D(r + + i 8 (r r +), i αs), i =,,, 8, 8 D(ξ) = {y C d : y < ξ}, ξ > 0, ˆD(ξ) = D(r (r r +), ξ), ξ > 0, D + = D 8 α = D(r +, s + ), D + = D(r (r r +), β + ), Λ + = {λ Λ : k, ω(λ) > γ k τ, for all 0 < k K +}, r r + Γ(r r + ) = 8. 0< k K + k (d+m+6)τ+d+m+6 e k Consider the Taylor-Fourier series of P : P = p kj y j e k,x k Z d,j Z d + and let R be the truncation of P of the form Lemma 3. Assume that H) K + t d+m e t r r + 6 dt µ. R = k K +, j m p kj y j e k,x. (3.7) Then there is a constant c such that for all j Z+ d, l d, λ Λ, l λ(p R) D 78 α l λ R D 78 α c γ d+m+5 s m µ, c γ d+m+5 s m µ.
13 Proof: Without loss of generality, we let µ 0 8. Hence α. Let I = p kj y j e k,x, II = k >K +,j Z+ d k K +, j m+ p kj y j e k,x. Then P R = I + II. By using the standard Cauchy estimate, we have l λi ˆD(s) It follows that For q = m+, let k >K + l λp D(r,s) e k γ d+m+5 s m µ of l λ (P I) on ˆD(s) yields K + t d+m e t r r + 8 γ d+m+5 s m µ r r + 6 dt γ d+m+5 s m µ. κ=k + κ d+m e κ l λ(p I) ˆD(s) l λp D(r,s) + l λi ˆD(s) γ d+m+5 s m µ. l λii D 78 α be the obvious anti-derivative of = l λ c s m+ r r + 8 q. Then the Cauchy estimate yq q y q p kj e k,x y j dy D 78 α k K +, j m+ λ l (P I R) ˆD(s) dy D 78 α cγ d+m+5 s m µ s m+ dy D 78 α c(αs) m+ γ d+m+5 µ s = cγd+m+5 s m µ. Thus, and therefore, l λ(p R) D 78 α cγd+m+5 s m µ, (3.8) l λ R D 78 α P R D 78 α + P D(r,s) cγ d+m+5 s m µ. 3. Averaging and quasi-linear equations As usual, we shall construct the averaging transformation as the time -map φ F of the flow generated by a Hamiltonian F. Let F have the following form: F = f kj y j e k,x, (3.9) 0< k K +, j m 3
14 where f kj are (matrix valued) functions of y. Let [R] = R(x, )dx be the average of the truncation R defined in (3.7). Substituting F into the equation T n {N, F } + R [R] = 0 (3.0) yields k, ω(λ) + y h f kj y j e k,x = 0< k K +, j m 0< k K +, j m p kj y j e k,x. By equating the coefficients above, we then obtain the following quasi-linear equations: k, ω(λ) + y h f kj = p kj, j m, 0 < k K +. (3.) Lemma 3. Assume that H) max l d, j m+5 l λ j y h l λ j y h 0 D(s) Λ+ µ 0, H3) s < γ γ + (M +)K τ+ +. Then the quasi-linear equations (3.) can be uniquely solved on D(s) Λ + to obtain a family of functions f kj which are analytic in y, smooth in λ, and satisfy the following properties: f kj (ȳ, λ) = f kj (y, λ), (3.) l λ j yf kj D(s) Λ+ c k ( l + j +)τ+ l + j + γ d+m+4 l j s m j e k r (3.3) for all j m, 0 < k K +, l d, j m + 4, where c is a constant. Proof: It follows that Hence Let (y, λ) D(s) Λ +. By H), H3), is non-vanishing on Λ +, and, y h(y) (M + ) y < (M + )s < k, ω(λ) + y h(y) > γ k τ γ k τ = L k = k, ω(λ) + y h(y) f kj = f kj (y, λ) = L k p kj γ k τ+. γ k τ. for all (y, λ) D(s) Λ +, 0 < k K +, j m, from which (3.) clearly follows. Let 0 < k K +. We note by the Cauchy estimate that l λp kj Λ+ l λ j yp D(r,s) Λ+ e k r γ d+m+5 s m j µe k r, l d, j m, (3.4) 4
15 and by H) that l λ j y L k Therefore, D(s) Λ + c k j + L k j + c k ( l + j +)τ+ l + j + γ l + j +, l d, j m + 4. λ l j y f kj D(s) Λ+ c k ( l + j +)τ+ l + j + γ l + j + γ d+m+5 s m j e k r = c k ( l + j +)τ+ l + j + γ d+m+4 l j s m j e k r, l d, j m + 4. Let F be the Hamiltonian (3.9) with coefficients given by Lemma 3.. If φ t F denotes the flow generalized by F, then where with N + = N + [R], P + = This completes the averaging process. 0 H φ F = N + + P +, {R t, F } φ t F dt + (P R) φ F, (3.5) R t = ( t)[r] + tr. 3.3 Translation and partial non-degeneracy Let Y, P 0 be the vectors formed by the first n components of y, p 0 respectively and denote Ĥ(Y ) = ĥ(( Y 0 ) ). Then by the implicit function theorem, the equation AY + Y Ĥ(Y ) = P 0 (3.6) admits a unique solution Y on D(s) which also smoothly depends on λ. Define ( ) Y y =. 0 By (3.6), we clearly have and let Consider the translation Ay + y ĥ(y ) = ( ) P0 φ : x x, y y + y Φ + = φ F φ. 0. (3.7) 5
16 Then where H Φ + = N + + P +, N + = N + φ ψ = e + + ω +, y + h + (y), P + = P + φ + ψ, (3.8) e + = e + ω, y + y, Ay + ĥ(y ) + [R](y ), (3.9) ) ω + = ω + p 0 ( P0 0, (3.0) h + (y) = y, A +y + ĥ+(y), (3.) A + = A + yĥ(y ) + y[r](y ), (3.) ĥ + (y) = ĥ(y + y ) ĥ(y ) y ĥ(y ), y y, yĥ(y )y (3.3) + [R](y + y ) [R](y ) y [R](y ), y y, y[r](y )y, ( ) ψ = y [R](y j ), y p 0, y = p 0j y j j y. (3.4) j m, j j m, j = 3.4 Estimate on N + Lemma 3.3 Assume H), H3). Then there is a constant c 3 such that the following holds for all l d: l λ y Λ+ c 3 γ d+m+5 s m µ; (3.5) l λe + l λe Λ+ c 3 γ d+m+5 s m µ; (3.6) λω l + λω l Λ+ c 3 γ d+m+5 s m µ; (3.7) { λ l j y h + λ l j y h c3 γ D(s + ) Λ + d+m+5 s m j µ, j m; c 3 γ d+m+5 (3.8) µ, j > m. Proof: Denote M = max λ Λ0 A 0 (λ) +. By (3.), we can make µ 0 small, say µ 0 < 8M (M +), such that M (M + )s 0 < 4. Let λ Λ +. To prove (3.5), we denote Then by (3.6), B(y) = A + ( 0 yĥ(θy)dθ)y. B(Y )Y = P 0. (3.9) Since, by H), A A 0 Λ µ 0 and yĥ D(s) (M + )s, we have that A 0 B(Y ) A A 0 + B(Y ) A 0 µ 0 + (M + )s µ 0 + (M + )s 0 M. 6
17 It follows that B(Y ) is non-singular and Hence B (Y ) A 0 A 0 B(Y ) A 0 M. y = Y M P 0 = M p 0 M y P D(s) M γ d+m+5 s m µ. (3.30) Differentiating (3.9) with respect to λ yields Therefore, B(Y ) λ Y + y B(Y )( λ Y )Y + λ B(Y )Y = λ P 0. λ Y 4M (M + )γ d+m+5 s m µ λ Y + M c Y + M c λ y P D(s). The estimate (3.5) now follows from (3.6), (3.30) and induction. Using (3.9) ((3.0) respectively), (3.6) ((3.7) respectively) easily follows from H), (3.5) and (3.4). Also, it follows from (3.) that Note by (3.5) that We have that Therefore, ĥ + = l λ A + l λ A Λ + c 3 γ d+m+5 s m µ. (3.3) j 3 = ĥ + ĥ = j 3 j 3 j! j yĥ(y )y j + j! j yĥ(y )y j + 3 j m 3 j ı m j! ( j yĥ(y ) j yĥ(0))yj + l λ j yĥ+ l λ j yĥ D(s) Λ + Combining the above with (3.3), we obtain (3.8). j! j y[r](y )y j ( ) ı p 0ı (y ) ı j y j. j 3 j ı m ( ) ı p 0ı (y ) ı j y j. j { c3 γ d+m+5 s m j µ, j m; c 3 γ d+m+5 µ, j > m. 3.5 Estimate on Φ + Let F be as in (3.9) with coefficients given by Lemma 3.. By (3.), F is real analytic in (x, y) D(r, s). Lemma 3.4 Assume H), H3). Then the following holds. 7
18 ) There is a constant c 4 such that for all l d, i m + 4, { λ l x i yf j c4 γ ˆD(s) Λ + d+m+4 l j s m j µγ(r r + ), j m; c 4 γ d+m+4 l j µγ(r r + ), m < j m + 4. ) F, y can be extended to functions of Hölder class C m+3,d +σ 0 ( ˆD(β 0 ) Λ 0 ), C d +σ 0 (Λ 0 ), respectively, where 0 < σ 0 < is fixed. Moreover, there is a constant c 5 such that where Proof: F C m+3,d +σ 0 ( ˆD(β0 ) Λ 0 ) c 5 µγ(r r + ), y C d +σ 0 (Λ0 ) c 5 µγ(r r + ). By (3.9), (3.3), we have λ l x i yf j c k i y( j λf l kj y j ) e k (r (r r +)) j m,0< k K + c k ( l + j +)τ+ l + i + j + γ d+m+4 l j s a( j ) µe k 0< k K + cγ d+m+4 l j s a( j ) µγ(r r + ), a( j ) = { m j, if j m, 0, if m < j m + 4. This proves ). ) follows from the standard Whitney extension theorem (see [], [6]). Lemma 3.5 In addition to H), H3), assume that H4) c 4 s m µγ(r r + ) < 8 (r r +); H5) c 4 s m µγ(r r + ) < 8 αs; H6) c 3 s m µ < 8 αs. Then for all 0 t, φ t F : D 4 α D α, (3.3) φ : D 8 α D 4 α (3.33) are well defined, real analytic and depend smoothly on λ Λ +. Proof: (3.33) follows immediately from Lemma 3.3 and H6). To show (3.3), we write φ t F = (φt, φt ), where φ t, φt are components of φt F in the directions x, y respectively. Let (x, y) D 4 α and let t = Sup{t [0, ] : φ t F (x, y) D α}. Then for any 0 t t, φ t F (x, y) x t φ t F (x, y) y 0 t 0 r r + 8 F y φ u F D α du F y ˆD(s) c 4 s m µγ(r r + ) < 6 (r r +), F x φ u F Dα du F x ˆD(s) c 4 s m µγ(r r + ) < 6 αs. It follows that φ t F (x, y) < r (r r +), φ t F (x, y) < 3 8 αs, i.e., φt F (x, y) D α D α. Thus, t = and (3.3) holds. 8
19 The above lemma implies that Φ + : D + D α is well defined, symplectic and real analytic for all λ Λ +. We now consider Φ + on the domain D +. Lemma 3.6 Assume H), H3) and also the following: H7) c 5 µγ(r r + ) < 8 (r r +); H8) c 5 µγ(r r + ) + c 3 δµ < β β +. Let F, y be the extended functions defined in Lemma 3.4 ). Then Φ + = φ F φ : ˆD + D(r, β) (3.34) is of class C m+ and also depends C d +σ 0 smoothly on λ Λ 0, where σ 0 is as in Lemma 3.4 ). Moreover, there is a constant c 6 such that Φ + id C m+,d +σ 0 ( D+ Λ 0 ) c 6µΓ(r r + ). (3.35) Proof: By a similar argument as in Lemma 3.5, it is easy to see that Φ + maps ˆD + into D(r, β) for all λ Λ 0. Let X F = (F y, F x ) be the vector field generated by F. We note that φ t F = id + t 0 X F φ u F du, 0 t, X F C m+,d +σ 0 ( ˆD(β0 ) Λ 0 ) c F C m+3,d +σ 0 ( ˆD(β 0 ) Λ 0 ). By applying Lemma 3.4 ) and the Gronwall inequality inductively, we have that, on D + Λ 0, φ t id, y φ t F I n, j yφ t F cµγ(r r + ), j m +, 0 t. (3.36) The lemma now follows from Lemma 3.4 ) and the identity ( ) Φ + id = (φ 0 F id) φ + y. (3.37) 3.6 Frequency property Lemma 3.7 Assume H),H3),H6). Then for all λ Λ + and 0 < k K +. Proof: By H3), H6), we have It follows from Lemma 3.3 that k, ω + (λ) > γ + k τ, c 3 s m+ µk τ+ + < γ γ +. as desired. k, ω + (λ) k, ω(λ) c 3 γ 0 s m µk + γ k τ c 3γ 0 s m µk + > γ + k τ, 9
20 3.7 Estimate on P + Lemma 3.8 Assume H)-H6). Then, there is a constant c 7 such that, on D + Λ +, λ l P + c 7 γ d+m+5 s m µ (Γ (r r + ) + ), l d. (3.38) Proof: By Lemmas 3., 3.4 ) and (3.36), we see that, for all l d, 0 t, λ l {R t, F } φ t F D 4 α Λ + cγd+m+5 s m µ Γ (r r + ), λ l (P R) φ F D 4 α Λ + cγd+m+5 s m µ Γ(r r + ). Hence, by (3.5), λ l P + D 4 α Λ + cγd+m+5 s m µ (Γ (r r + ) + ), l d. Since, by (3.4), l λ p 0j Λ+ cγ d+m+5 s m µ, l d, it follows from (3.4), (3.5) that By (3.5), we also have l λ ψ D + Λ + γ d+m+5 s m j µ, l d. l λφ D+ Λ + cγ d+m+5 s m µ, l d. The lemma now follows from (3.8) and the above estimates. Let c 0 = max{, c,, c 7 } and define If we assume that H9) µ σ (Γ (r r + ) + ) γd+m+5 +, γ d+m+5 then, on D + Λ +, µ + = 8 m c 0 µ +σ. l λ P + 8 m c 0 s m + µ+σ µ σ m m+ (µ σ γ d+m+5 (Γ (r r + ) + )) γ d+m+5 + s m + µ +, l d. This completes one cycle of KAM steps. 4 Proof of Main Results 4. Iteration Lemma Consider (.) and let r 0, s 0, γ 0, β 0, µ 0, Λ 0, H 0, N 0, e 0, ω 0, h 0, A 0, ĥ0, P 0 be given at the beginning of Section 3 and let ˆD 0 = D(r 0, β 0 ), K 0 = 0. We define the following sequences 0
21 inductively for all ν =,, : r ν = r 0 ( ν i= s ν = 8 α ν s ν, α ν = µ σ ν = µ µ ν = 8 m c 0 µ +σ β ν = β 0 ( γ ν = γ 0 ( ), i+ m+ ν, ν, ν i= ν i= ), i+ ), i+ K ν = ([log( )] + ) 3η, µ ν Λ ν = {λ Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ for all 0 < k K ν }, D ν = D(r ν, s ν ), D ν = D(r ν (r ν r ν ), β ν ). Lemma 4. If (3.4) holds for a sufficiently small µ 0 = µ 0 (r 0, β 0, m, d, τ), or equivalently, µ = µ(r, s, m, d, τ), then the KAM step described in Section 3 is valid for all ν = 0,,, resulting in sequences: ν =,,, with the following properties. Λ ν, H ν, N ν, e ν, ω ν, h ν, A ν, ĥν, P ν, Φ ν, ) Φ ν : ˆD ν Λ 0 ˆD ν, D ν Λ ν D ν is symplectic for each λ Λ 0 or Λ ν, and is of class C m+,d +σ 0, C α,d, respectively, where α stands for real analyticity and 0 < σ 0 < is fixed, and, Moreover, on ˆD ν Λ ν, Φ ν id C m+,d +σ 0 ( ˆDν Λ 0 ) µ ν. (4.) H ν = H ν Φ ν = N ν + P ν, where H ν = N ν + P ν, N ν = e ν + ω ν, y + h ν, h ν = y, A νy + ĥν, A ν is real symmetric with its n n ordered principal minor A ν being non-singular on Λ ν, ĥν = O( y 3 ).
22 ) (ω ν (λ)) q = (ω ν (λ)) q for all q =,,, n and λ Λ ν. 3) For all l d, λe l ν λe l ν Λν γ0 d+m+4 µ ν, (4.) λe l ν λe l 0 Λν γ0 d+m+4 µ, (4.3) λ l ω ν λ l ω ν Λν γ0 d+m+4 µ ν, (4.4) λ l ω ν λ l ω 0 Λν γ0 d+m+4 µ, (4.5) l λ j yh ν l λ j yh ν D(sν) Λ ν γ d+m+4 0 µ, j m +, (4.6) ν l λ j y h ν l D(s ν) λ j y h 0 Λν γ d+m+4 0 µ, j m +, (4.7) l λ P ν Dν Λ ν γ d+m+5 ν s m ν µ ν. (4.8) 4) Λ ν = {λ Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ for all K ν < k K ν }. Proof: The proof amounts to the verification of H)-H9) for all ν. For simplicity, we let r 0 = β 0 =. First, it is obvious from (3.) that H3) holds for ν = 0. By choosing µ 0 small, we also see that H), H4)-H9) hold for ν = 0 and H6) holds for all ν. By the definition of µ ν, we have that Then µ ν = (8 m c 0 ) (+σ)ν µ (+σ)ν 0. (4.9) Let ζ be fixed and µ 0 be sufficiently small such that ( ) σ µ 0 < 8 m <. (4.0) c 0 ζ Denote We note that Since Γ ν µ = 8 m c 0 µ +σ 0 < ζ µ 0 <, µ = 8 m c 0 µ +σ < ζ µ < ζ µ 0, µ ν = 8 m c 0 µ +σ ν < < ζ ν µ 0. (4.) Γ ν = Γ(r ν r ν+ ). r ν r ν+ = ν+ = β ν β ν+ β 0. (4.) λ (d+m+6)τ+d+m+6 e λ ν+6 dλ ([(d + m + 6)τ] + d + m + 7)! (ν+6)((d+m+6)τ+d+m+6),
23 it is clear that if ζ is sufficiently large, then µ σ ν Γ i ν < µ σ ν(γ i ν + ) < γd+m+5 ν+ In particular, H9) holds for all ν, and, µ ν Γ ν µ σ γν d+m+5 ν µ σ 0, i =,. (4.3). (4.4) ζ ( σ)ν By (4.) and (4.4), it is easy to see that if ζ is sufficiently large and µ 0 is sufficiently small, then H4), H5), H7), H8) hold for all ν. Since t ν+3 dt (d + m + )! (ν+6)(d+m) Kν+e n K ν+ K ν+ t d+m e ν+, it follows from (4.9) and the inequality ( + σ) η > that H) holds for all ν 0 as µ 0 small. For the verification of H3), we observe by (4.) that as µ 0 small. Then 4 (M + )µ σ ν Kτ+ ν+ < ν+, (M + )s ν K τ+ ν+ s ν 4 (M + )µ σ ν K τ+ ν+ s 0 ν+ < γ 0 ν+ < γ ν γ ν+, which verifies H3) for all ν. Let ζ σ in (4.0), (4.). We have by (3.)-(3.3) that if µ 0 is sufficiently small, then the following holds for all ν : c 0 µ ν µ 0 ν µ ν, (4.5) c 0 µ ν Γ ν µ σ 0 c 0 s m ν ν µ ν, (4.6) µ ν µ+σ(m ) 0 s0 m ν+3 (µ 0s m 0 ) µ σ(m ) 0 ν µ 8s 0 ν. (4.7) The verification of H) follows from (4.5) and an inductive application of (3.8) for all ν = 0,,. Above all, the KAM steps described in Section 3 are valid for all ν, which gives the desired sequences stated in the lemma. Now, ) follows from Lemma 3.7, ) follows from (3.0) and induction, (4.), (4.4), (4.6) follow from (4.5), (4.7) and Lemma 3.3, and (4.8) follows from Lemma 3.8 and H9). By adding up (4.), (4.4), (4.6) for all ν =,,, we also obtain (4.3), (4.5), (4.7) respectively. 4) clearly holds for ν = 0. We now assume that ν > 0. Then by Lemma 3.6, Λ ν = {λ λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ, 0 < k K ν}. 3
24 Hence Λ ν+ = {λ Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ, 0 < k K ν+} The lemma is now complete. = {λ Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ, 0 < k K ν} {y 0 Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ, K ν < k K ν+ } = Λ ν {y 0 Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ, K ν < k K ν+ } = {y 0 Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) > γ ν k τ, K ν < k K ν+ }. 4. Convergence Let Then Ψ ν : D ν Λ 0 D 0, and, Ψ ν = Φ Φ Φ ν, ν =,,. H 0 Ψ ν = H ν = N ν + P ν, N ν = e ν + ω ν (λ), y + h ν (y, λ), ν = 0,,, where Ψ 0 = id. Using (4.) and the identity ν Ψ ν = id + (Ψ i Ψ i ), i= it is easy to see that Ψ ν converges in C m+,d +σ 0 (D( r 0, β 0 ) Λ 0 ) norm to a function Ψ C m,d (D( r 0, β 0 ) Λ 0 ) such that Ψ λ = Ψ (, λ), λ Λ 0, are symplectic and C m uniformly close to the identity. Let Λ = Λ ν. ν 0 Then {Ψ λ : λ Λ } is a C d Whitney smooth family of analytic symplectic transformations on D( r 0, s 0 ). By Lemma 4., it is also clear that e ν, ω ν converge uniformly on Λ and h ν converge uniformly on D( s 0 ) Λ. Denote e, ω, h as the limit of e ν, ω ν, h ν respectively. Then, on D( s 0 ) Λ, N ν converge uniformly to N = e + ω (λ), y + h (y, λ). Hence, on D( r 0, s 0 ) Λ, converge uniformly to P ν = H 0 Ψ ν N ν, P = H 0 Ψ N. 4
25 Since P ν is real analytic on D ν and the Cauchy estimate yields that P ν Dν γ d+m+5 ν s m ν µ ν, j yp ν D(rν+m, sν) ( m r 0 ) m mν+ m + γ d+m+5 ν µ ν, j m. By (4.9), the right hand side of the above converges to 0 as ν, provided that µ (hence µ 0 ) is sufficiently small. Thus, on D( r 0, 0) Λ, j yp = 0, j m. Hence for each λ Λ, T d {0} is an analytic invariant torus of H with the toral frequency ω (λ), which, by definition of Λ ν and Lemma 4. ), satisfies γ k, ω (λ) > k τ, for all k Zd \ {0}, (ω (λ)) q (ω 0 (λ)) q, for all q n. Following the Whitney extension of Ψ ν s, all e ν, ω ν, h ν, P ν, ν = 0,,, admit uniform C d +σ 0 extensions in λ Λ 0 with derivatives in λ up to order d satisfying the same estimates (4.)-(4.8). Thus, e, ω, h, P are C d Whitney smooth in λ Λ, and, the derivatives of (e e 0 ), (ω ω 0 ), (h h 0 ) satisfy similar estimates as in (4.3),(4.5),(4.7). Consequently, the perturbed tori form a C d Whitney smooth family on Λ. 4.3 Measure estimate Lemma 4. Let Λ R d, d >, be a bounded closed region and let g : Λ R d be such that rank{ α g : α d } = d. λα Then for a fixed τ > d(d ) {λ Λ : g(λ), k γ ( ) k τ } γ c(λ, d, τ) d, k Z d k τ+ \ {0}, γ > 0. Proof: See Theorem B in [7]. We note that the constant c above does not depend on g but rather on a lower bound of the derivatives of g up to order d. The following measure estimate is adopted from [9]. We consider the following three cases. Case : d 0 = d. Let R ν+ k ˆR ν+ k = {λ Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) γ ν k τ }, k Rd \ {0}, = {λ Λ 0 : k, ω ν (λ) γ ν k τ }, k Rd \ {0}, 5
26 for all ν = 0,,. Then by Lemma 4. 4), and, Λ ν+ = Λ ν \ Λ 0 \ Λ = Rk ν+, K ν< k K ν+ Rk ν+. ν=0 K ν< k K ν+ Since (4.5) is also satisfied by the extended toral frequencies ω ν on Λ 0, A) implies that if µ is sufficiently small, then rank{ α ω ν λ α : α d } = d for all λ Λ 0, ν = 0,,. It follows from Lemma 4. that R ν+ k ( ) ν+ γ d ˆR k c, k τ+ for all k Z d \ {0} and ν = 0,,, where c is a constant independent of ν. Hence Λ 0 \ Λ Rk ν+ cγ d ν=0 K ν< k K ν+ ν=0 = O(γ d ) = O(γ d ), as desired. Case : d 0 < d. Let Λ = [, ] d d 0 Then it is clear that and define Λ = Λ 0 Λ, Λ = Λ Λ, λ = (λ, λ), λ Λ, ω ν ( λ) = ω ν (λ), rank{ α ω ν λ α ν = 0,,, λ Λ. : α d } = d K ν< k K ν+ k τ+ d on Λ for all ν = 0,,, as µ sufficiently small. Similar to Case, we have that By Fubini s theorem, Λ \ Λ = O(γ d ). Λ 0 \ Λ = O(γ d ) = O(γ d ), as desired. Case 3: d 0 > d. For any λ Λ 0, A) implies that there exist indexes α i {α Z d 0 + : α d }, i = 0,,, d, 6
27 such that rank{ αi ω λ αi (λ) : i = 0,,, d } = d. Since rank{ ω λ (λ)} d, there are λ i, λ i,, λ id0 d Then Define such that ω (λ) / { αi ω (λ) : i = 0,,, d }, j =,,, d 0 d. λ ij λ αi Ω(λ) = (λ i, λ i,, λ id0 d ), λ Λ 0, ω ν (λ) = (ω ν (λ), Ω(λ)), ν = 0,,, λ Λ 0, R ν+ k = {λ Λ ν : k, ω ν (λ) γ ν k τ }, k Zd 0 \ {0}, ν = 0,,, Λ ν+ = Λ ν \ k, ν = 0,,, Λ = ν 0 Λ ν. K ν< k K ν+ Rν+ rank{ αi ω ν (λ) : i = 0,,, d ; ω ν (λ) : j =,, d 0 d} = d 0 λ αi λ ij on Λ 0 for all ν = 0,,. It follows that rank{ α ω ν λ α : α d 0 } = d 0 on Λ 0 for all ν = 0,,. Similar to Case ), we have that Since Λ Λ, Λ \ Λ = O(γ d 0 ) = O(γ d ). Λ 0 \ Λ Λ 0 \ Λ = O(γ d ), as desired. This proves part ) of Theorem A. Given the convergence in Section 4., part ) of Theorem A clearly follows from Lemma 4. ). 4.4 Proof of Corollary Without loss of generality, we assume that M admits a global coordinate, i.e., there is a bounded closed region Λ R d 0 and a C l 0 diffeomorphism y : Λ M such that M = y(λ). Let λ Λ and consider the transformation Then (.) gives rise to y y + y(λ). H(x, y, λ, ε) = e(λ) + ω(λ), y + h(y, λ) + P (x, y, λ, ε), 7
28 where e(λ) = N(y(λ)), ω(λ) = N y (y(λ)), h(y, λ) = y, A(λ)y + ĥ(y, λ), A(λ) = N y (y(λ)), ĥ(y, λ) = O( y 3 ), P (x, y, λ, ε) = εp (x, y + y(λ), ε). Let r be fixed and take s = ε m+l 0 +5, γ = ε (m+l 0 +5), µ = ε m+l Then (.) holds and the Corollary follows immediately from the theorem as ε sufficiently small. 4.5 Proof of Theorem B By choosing λ, Λ as in the Section 4.4 above with the present M, the proof of Theorem B essentially follows from that of Theorem A, except that the translation φ : x x, y y + y in Section 3.3 should be defined for the purpose of eliminating the energy drift at each KAM step. In the case of part ) of Theorem B, y is defined so that e + = e = E. Hence, instead of (3.7), we consider the equation ω, y + y, Ay + ĥ(y ) + [R](y ) = 0, which, by the implicit function theorem, clearly admits a local smooth solution y on M. In the case of part ) of Theorem B, y is defined so that e + = e = E, and, [ω +,i : : ω +,in ] = [ω i : : ω in ]. Hence, instead of (3.7), we consider the equations ( ) ĥ A + (y i,, y in ) (y ) (yi,, yi n ) t (ω i : : ω in ) = (p 0,i,, p 0,in ), (ω i,, ω in ), (y i,, y i n ) + y, Ay + ĥ(y ) + [R](y ) = 0, which, by the sub-isoenergetic nondegenerate condition A) and the implicit function theorem, admits a local smooth solution (y, t ), y M, t R, such that yj = 0 if j / {i,, i n }. 8
29 Let φ F be as in Section 3 and φ be as in the above. Then under the symplectic transformation Φ + = φ F φ, the new Hamiltonian reads H Φ + = N + + P +, N + = N + φ ψ = E + ω +, y + h + (y), P + = P + φ + ψ, where, with respect to y defined above, ω + = ω + p 0 + Ay + y ĥ(y ), and, h + (y), A +, ĥ+(y), ψ have the same forms as in (3.)-(3.4). Thus, with estimates on the present y similar to those in Sections 3.4, 3.5, the remaining proof of Theorem A is valid. Part 3) of Theorem B is a special case of part 3) of the Corollary. References [] V.I. Arnold, Proof of A. N. Kolmogorov s theorem on the preservation of quasi periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian, Usp. Math. USSR 8 (963), 3-40 [] V.I. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 980 [3] V.I. Arnold and A. Avez, Probl `mes ergodiques de la mécanique classique, Gauthier- Villars, Paris, 967 [4] G. Benettin, L. Galgani, A Giorgilli and J. Strelcyn, A proof of Kolmogorov s theorem on invariant tori using canonical transformations defined by the Lie method, Nuovo. Cimento B. 79 (984), 0-3 [5] J. Bricmont, K. Gawedzki and A. Kupiainen, KAM theorem and quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 0 (999), [6] H. Broer and G. Huitema, A proof of the isoenergetic KAM-theorem from the ordinary one, J. Diff. Eqs. 90 (99), 5-60 [7] H. Broer, G. Huitema and M. Sevryuk, Quasi-periodic motions in families of dynamical systems, Lecture Notes in Math., 645, Springer-Verlag, 996 [8] A. D. Bruno, Analytic form of differential equations, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 5 (97), 3-88 [9] C-Q. Cheng and Y-S. Sun, Existence of KAM tori in degenerate Hamiltonian systems, J. Diff. Eqs. 4 (994),
30 [0] L. Chierchia and C. Falcolini, A direct proof of a theorem by Kolmogorov in Hamiltonian systems, Ann. Sc. Super. Pisa. CI Sci. Serie 4 (994) [] A. Delshams and P. Gutierrez, Estimates on invariant tori near an elliptic equilibrium point of a Hamiltonian systems, J. Diff. Eqs. 3 (996), [] L. H. Eliasson, Absolutely convergent series expansions for quasi-periodic motions, Math. Phy. Elect. J. (996), -33 [3] G. Gallavotti, Twistless KAM tori, Comm. Math Phy. 64 (994), [4] G. Gallavotti, G. Gentile, and V. Mastropietro, Field theory and KAM tori, Math. Phy. Elect. J. (995), -3 [5] A. Giorgilli and L. Galgani, Formal integrals for an autonomous Hamiltonian system near an equilibrium point, Celest. Mech. 7 (978), [6] A. Giorgilli and L. Galgani, Rigorous estimates for the series expansions of Hamiltonian perturbation theory, Celest. Mech. 37 (985), 95- [7] A. N. Kolmogorov, On quasi-periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian, Doklady Akad. Nauk. USSR 98 (954), [8] Y. Li and Y. Yi, A quasi-periodic Poincaré s theorem, to appear in Math. Ann. [9] Y. Li and Y. Yi, Persistence of invariant tori in generalized Hamiltonian systems, to appear in Erg. Th. Dyn. Sys. [0] J. Moser, On invariant curves of area preserving mappings of an annulus, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Gött. Math. Phys. K (96), -0 [] A. I. Neishtadt, Estimates in the Kolmogorov theorem on conservation of conditionally periodic motions, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 45 (98), [] J. Pöschel, Integrability of Hamiltonian systems on Cantor sets, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (98), [3] J. Pöschel, On the elliptic lower dimensional tori in Hamiltonian systems, Math. Z. 0 (989), [4] H. Rüssmann, On twist Hamiltonians, Talk on the Colloque International: Mécanique céleste et syst. hamiltoniens (990) [5] M. B. Sevryuk, KAM-stable Hamiltonians, J. Dyn. Control Syst. (995), [6] E. M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 970 [7] J. X. Xu, J. G. You and Q. J. Qiu, Invariant tori for nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems with degeneracy, Math. Z. 6 (997),
PERSISTENCE OF LOWER DIMENSIONAL TORI OF GENERAL TYPES IN HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS
PERSISTENCE OF LOWER DIMENSIONAL TORI OF GENERAL TYPES IN HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS YONG LI AND YINGFEI YI Abstract. The work is a generalization to [4] in which we study the persistence of lower dimensional
More informationPersistence of invariant tori in generalized Hamiltonian systems
Persistence of invariant tori in generalized Hamiltonian systems Yong Li and Yingfei Yi Abstract We present some results of KAM type, comparable to the KAM theory for volume-preserving maps and flows,
More informationPERSISTENCE OF HYPERBOLIC TORI IN HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS. Dedicated to Professor George R. Sell on the occasion of his 65th birthday
PERSISTENCE OF HYPERBOLIC TORI IN HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS YONG LI AND YINGFEI YI Abstract. We generalize the well-known result of Graff and Zehnder on the persistence of hyperbolic invariant tori in Hamiltonian
More informationInvariant Tori in Hamiltonian Systems with High Order Proper Degeneracy
Ann. Henri Poincaré 99 (9999), 1 18 1424-0637/99000-0, DOI 10.1007/s00023-003-0000 c 2010 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland Annales Henri Poincaré Invariant Tori in Hamiltonian Systems with High Order
More informationNEKHOROSHEV AND KAM STABILITIES IN GENERALIZED HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS
NEKHOROSHEV AND KAM STABILITIES IN GENERALIZED HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS YONG LI AND YINGFEI YI Abstract. We present some Nekhoroshev stability results for nearly integrable, generalized Hamiltonian systems
More informationSome Collision solutions of the rectilinear periodically forced Kepler problem
Advanced Nonlinear Studies 1 (2001), xxx xxx Some Collision solutions of the rectilinear periodically forced Kepler problem Lei Zhao Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science University
More informationGevrey-smoothness of invariant tori for analytic nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems under Rüssmann s non-degeneracy condition
J Differential Equations 235 (27) 69 622 wwwelseviercom/locate/de Gevrey-smoothness of invariant tori for analytic nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems under Rüssmann s non-degeneracy condition Junxiang
More informationAn introduction to Birkhoff normal form
An introduction to Birkhoff normal form Dario Bambusi Dipartimento di Matematica, Universitá di Milano via Saldini 50, 0133 Milano (Italy) 19.11.14 1 Introduction The aim of this note is to present an
More informationPERIODIC SOLUTIONS OF THE PLANETARY N BODY PROBLEM
1 PERIODIC SOLUTIONS OF THE PLANETARY N BODY PROBLEM L. CHIERCHIA Department of Mathematics, Roma Tre University, Rome, I-146, Italy E-mail: luigi@mat.uniroma3.it The closure of periodic orbits in the
More informationResummations of self-energy graphs and KAM theory G. Gentile (Roma3), G.G. (The.H.E.S.) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227, , 2002.
Resummations of self-energy graphs and KAM theory G. Gentile (Roma3), G.G. (The.H.E.S.) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227, 421 460, 2002. 1 Hamiltonian for a rotators system H = 1 2 (A2 + B 2
More informationPerturbation theory, KAM theory and Celestial Mechanics 7. KAM theory
Perturbation theory, KAM theory and Celestial Mechanics 7. KAM theory Alessandra Celletti Department of Mathematics University of Roma Tor Vergata Sevilla, 25-27 January 2016 Outline 1. Introduction 2.
More informationA Cantor set of tori with monodromy near a focus focus singularity
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING Nonlinearity 17 (2004) 1 10 NONLINEARITY PII: S0951-7715(04)65776-8 A Cantor set of tori with monodromy near a focus focus singularity Bob Rink Mathematics Institute, Utrecht
More informationUnicity of KAM tori Henk Broer 1 and Floris Takens 1
Unicity of KAM tori Henk Broer 1 and Floris Takens 1 Abstract The classical KAM theorem establishes persistence of invariant Lagrangean tori in nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems. These tori are quasi-periodic
More informationResummations of self energy graphs and KAM theory G. Gentile (Roma3), G.G. (I.H.E.S.) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227, , 2002.
Resummations of self energy graphs and KAM theory G. Gentile (Roma3), G.G. (I.H.E.S.) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227, 421 460, 2002. 1 Hamiltonian for a rotator system H = 1 2 (A2 + B 2 )+εf(α,
More informationON JUSTIFICATION OF GIBBS DISTRIBUTION
Department of Mechanics and Mathematics Moscow State University, Vorob ievy Gory 119899, Moscow, Russia ON JUSTIFICATION OF GIBBS DISTRIBUTION Received January 10, 2001 DOI: 10.1070/RD2002v007n01ABEH000190
More informationOn the smoothness of the conjugacy between circle maps with a break
On the smoothness of the conjugacy between circle maps with a break Konstantin Khanin and Saša Kocić 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 2E4 2 Department of Mathematics,
More informationDivergent series resummations: examples in ODE s & PDE s
Divergent series resummations: examples in ODE s & PDE s Survey of works by G. Gentile (Roma3), V. Matropietro (Roma2), G.G. (Roma1) http://ipparco.roma1.infn.it 1 Hamiltonian rotators system α = ε α f(α,
More informationGEVREY-SMOOTHNESS OF INVARIANT TORI FOR NEARLY INTEGRABLE SIMPLECTIC MAPPINGS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 017 (017), No. 159, pp. 1 17. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ede.math.txstate.edu or http://ede.math.unt.edu GEVREY-SMOOTHNESS OF INVARIANT TORI FOR NEARLY
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationNormal form for the non linear Schrödinger equation
Normal form for the non linear Schrödinger equation joint work with Claudio Procesi and Nguyen Bich Van Universita di Roma La Sapienza S. Etienne de Tinee 4-9 Feb. 2013 Nonlinear Schrödinger equation Consider
More informationINVARIANT TORI IN THE LUNAR PROBLEM. Kenneth R. Meyer, Jesús F. Palacián, and Patricia Yanguas. Dedicated to Jaume Llibre on his 60th birthday
Publ. Mat. (2014), 353 394 Proceedings of New Trends in Dynamical Systems. Salou, 2012. DOI: 10.5565/PUBLMAT Extra14 19 INVARIANT TORI IN THE LUNAR PROBLEM Kenneth R. Meyer, Jesús F. Palacián, and Patricia
More informationABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF FOLIATIONS
ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF FOLIATIONS C. PUGH, M. VIANA, A. WILKINSON 1. Introduction In what follows, U is an open neighborhood in a compact Riemannian manifold M, and F is a local foliation of U. By this
More informationGeometric Aspects of Sturm-Liouville Problems I. Structures on Spaces of Boundary Conditions
Geometric Aspects of Sturm-Liouville Problems I. Structures on Spaces of Boundary Conditions QINGKAI KONG HONGYOU WU and ANTON ZETTL Abstract. We consider some geometric aspects of regular Sturm-Liouville
More informationA New Approach to the Parameterization Method for Lagrangian Tori of Hamiltonian Systems
J Nonlinear Sci (017) 7:495 530 DOI 10.1007/s0033-016-934-5 A New Approach to the Parameterization Method for Lagrangian Tori of Hamiltonian Systems Jordi Villanueva 1 Received: 16 March 016 / Accepted:
More informationMagnetic wells in dimension three
Magnetic wells in dimension three Yuri A. Kordyukov joint with Bernard Helffer & Nicolas Raymond & San Vũ Ngọc Magnetic Fields and Semiclassical Analysis Rennes, May 21, 2015 Yuri A. Kordyukov (Ufa) Magnetic
More informationHIGHER ORDER CRITERION FOR THE NONEXISTENCE OF FORMAL FIRST INTEGRAL FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS. 1. Introduction
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 217 (217), No. 274, pp. 1 11. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu HIGHER ORDER CRITERION FOR THE NONEXISTENCE
More informationON THE REDUCIBILITY OF LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH QUASIPERIODIC COEFFICIENTS WHICH ARE DEGENERATE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 126, Number 5, May 1998, Pages 1445 1451 S 0002-9939(98)04523-7 ON THE REDUCIBILITY OF LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH QUASIPERIODIC COEFFICIENTS
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ds] 19 Dec 2012
arxiv:1212.4559v1 [math.ds] 19 Dec 2012 KAM theorems and open problems for infinite dimensional Hamiltonian with short range Xiaoping YUAN December 20, 2012 Abstract. Introduce several KAM theorems for
More informationThe steep Nekhoroshev s Theorem and optimal stability exponents (an announcement)
The steep Nekhoroshev s Theorem and optimal stability exponents (an announcement) Nota di Massimiliano Guzzo, Luigi Chierchia e Giancarlo Benettin Scientific chapter: Mathematical analysis. M. Guzzo Dipartimento
More informationREVERSALS ON SFT S. 1. Introduction and preliminaries
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 7, Number 2, December, 2004, Pages 119 125 REVERSALS ON SFT S JUNGSEOB LEE Abstract. Reversals of topological dynamical systems
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ds] 15 Jul 2010
July 21, Version 2.1 arxiv:99.115v2 [math.ds] 15 Jul 21 Kam à la R Jürgen Pöschel In [4] Rüssmann proposed quoting from his abstract a new variant of the Kam-theory, containing an artificial parameter
More informationCHARACTERIZATIONS OF PSEUDODIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON THE CIRCLE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 125, Number 5, May 1997, Pages 1407 1412 S 0002-9939(97)04016-1 CHARACTERIZATIONS OF PSEUDODIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON THE CIRCLE SEVERINO T. MELO
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationOn Parametrized KAM Theory
On Parametrized KAM Theory Henk Broer, University of Groningen Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science University of Groningen PO Box 407 NL-9700 AK GRONINGEN email: h.w.broer@rug.nl
More informationOn Periodic points of area preserving torus homeomorphisms
On Periodic points of area preserving torus homeomorphisms Fábio Armando Tal and Salvador Addas-Zanata Instituto de Matemática e Estatística Universidade de São Paulo Rua do Matão 11, Cidade Universitária,
More informationElliptic resonances and summation of divergent series
Elliptic resonances and summation of divergent series Guido Gentile, G. Gallavotti Universitá di Roma 3 and Roma 7/giugno/200; 9:42 Hamiltonian : H = 2 I2 +εf(ϕ) with (I,ϕ) R l T l...... Representation
More informationDaniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University. January 2005
PACKING SPHERES AND FRACTAL STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES IN R d FOR d 3 Daniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University January 005 Fix a dimension d and for x R d and r > 0, let Sx, r) stand
More informationLectures on Dynamical Systems. Anatoly Neishtadt
Lectures on Dynamical Systems Anatoly Neishtadt Lectures for Mathematics Access Grid Instruction and Collaboration (MAGIC) consortium, Loughborough University, 2007 Part 3 LECTURE 14 NORMAL FORMS Resonances
More informationA parameterization method for Lagrangian tori of exact symplectic maps of R 2r
A parameterization method for Lagrangian tori of exact symplectic maps of R 2r Jordi Villanueva Departament de Matemàtiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Diagonal 647, 08028 Barcelona (Spain.
More informationEva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath. XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid
b-symplectic manifolds: going to infinity and coming back Eva Miranda UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid Eva Miranda (UPC) b-symplectic manifolds Semptember,
More informationAMADEU DELSHAMS AND RAFAEL RAMíREZ-ROS
POINCARÉ-MELNIKOV-ARNOLD METHOD FOR TWIST MAPS AMADEU DELSHAMS AND RAFAEL RAMíREZ-ROS 1. Introduction A general theory for perturbations of an integrable planar map with a separatrix to a hyperbolic fixed
More informationDIFFERENTIATING THE ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS INVARIANT MEASURE OF AN INTERVAL MAP f WITH RESPECT TO f. by David Ruelle*.
DIFFERENTIATING THE ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS INVARIANT MEASURE OF AN INTERVAL MAP f WITH RESPECT TO f. by David Ruelle*. Abstract. Let the map f : [, 1] [, 1] have a.c.i.m. ρ (absolutely continuous f-invariant
More informationRecent progress on nonlinear wave equations via KAM theory
Recent progress on nonlinear wave equations via KAM theory Xiaoping Yuan Abstract. In this note, the present author s recent works on nonlinear wave equations via KAM theory are introduced and reviewed.
More informationMATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA
MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)
More information2 A. Morbidelli and A. Giorgilli relevant consequence is that the speed of the Arnold diusion (if any) turns out to be of superexponentially small siz
SUPEREXPONENTIAL STABILITY OF KAM TORI ALESSANDRO MORBIDELLI CNRS, Observatoire de la C^ote d'azur BP 229, 06304 { NICE Cedex 4, France. ANTONIO GIORGILLI Dipartimento di Matematica dell' Universita di
More informationSYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5
SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 LIAT KESSLER Let (M, ω) be a connected compact symplectic manifold, T a torus, T M M a Hamiltonian action of T on M, and Φ: M t the assoaciated moment map. Theorem 0.1 (The
More informationKAM for NLS with harmonic potential
Université de Nantes 3rd Meeting of the GDR Quantum Dynamics MAPMO, Orléans, 2-4 February 2011. (Joint work with Benoît Grébert) Introduction The equation : We consider the nonlinear Schrödinger equation
More informationTowards stability results for planetary problems with more than three bodies
Towards stability results for planetary problems with more than three bodies Ugo Locatelli [a] and Marco Sansottera [b] [a] Math. Dep. of Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata [b] Math. Dep. of Università
More informationA PROOF OF THE INVARIANT TORUS THEOREM OF KOLMOGOROV
A PROOF OF THE INVARIANT TORUS THEOREM OF KOLMOGOROV JACQUES FÉJOZ Abstract. A variant of Kolmogorov s initial proof is given, in terms of a group of symplectic transformations and of an elementary fixed
More informationHamiltonian Dynamics
Hamiltonian Dynamics CDS 140b Joris Vankerschaver jv@caltech.edu CDS Feb. 10, 2009 Joris Vankerschaver (CDS) Hamiltonian Dynamics Feb. 10, 2009 1 / 31 Outline 1. Introductory concepts; 2. Poisson brackets;
More informationLECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY
LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem Recall that a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called geodesically complete if the maximal defining interval of any geodesic is R. On the other
More informationKAM theory: a journey from conservative to dissipative systems
KAM theory: a journey from conservative to dissipative systems Alessandra Celletti Department of Mathematics University of Roma Tor Vergata 4 July 2012 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Qualitative description
More informationStability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games
Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games Alberto Bressan ) and Khai T. Nguyen ) *) Department of Mathematics, Penn State University **) Department of Mathematics,
More informationScalar curvature and the Thurston norm
Scalar curvature and the Thurston norm P. B. Kronheimer 1 andt.s.mrowka 2 Harvard University, CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CAMBRIDGE MA 02139 1. Introduction Let Y be a closed,
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationObstacle problems and isotonicity
Obstacle problems and isotonicity Thomas I. Seidman Revised version for NA-TMA: NA-D-06-00007R1+ [June 6, 2006] Abstract For variational inequalities of an abstract obstacle type, a comparison principle
More informationAVERAGING AND RECONSTRUCTION IN HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS
AVERAGING AND RECONSTRUCTION IN HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS Kenneth R. Meyer 1 Jesús F. Palacián 2 Patricia Yanguas 2 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (USA) 2 Departamento
More information2 A. Jorba and J. Villanueva coordinates the Hamiltonian can be written as H( ; x; I; y) =h! ;Ii hz; B( )zi + H 1( ; x; I; y); (1) where z =(x;
The fine geometry of the Cantor families of invariant tori in Hamiltonian systems y Angel Jorba and Jordi Villanueva Abstract. This work focuses on the dynamics around a partially elliptic, lower dimensional
More informationPeriodic solutions of weakly coupled superlinear systems
Periodic solutions of weakly coupled superlinear systems Alessandro Fonda and Andrea Sfecci Abstract By the use of a higher dimensional version of the Poincaré Birkhoff theorem, we are able to generalize
More informationNumerical Algorithm for Optimal Control of Continuity Equations
Numerical Algorithm for Optimal Control of Continuity Equations Nikolay Pogodaev Matrosov Institute for System Dynamics and Control Theory Lermontov str., 134 664033 Irkutsk, Russia Krasovskii Institute
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF MORSE THEORY
DEVELOPMENT OF MORSE THEORY MATTHEW STEED Abstract. In this paper, we develop Morse theory, which allows us to determine topological information about manifolds using certain real-valued functions defined
More informationIn Arnold s Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (1), it
Near strongly resonant periodic orbits in a Hamiltonian system Vassili Gelfreich* Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom Communicated by John N. Mather, Princeton
More informationi=1 α i. Given an m-times continuously
1 Fundamentals 1.1 Classification and characteristics Let Ω R d, d N, d 2, be an open set and α = (α 1,, α d ) T N d 0, N 0 := N {0}, a multiindex with α := d i=1 α i. Given an m-times continuously differentiable
More informationRemarks on Quadratic Hamiltonians in Spaceflight Mechanics
Remarks on Quadratic Hamiltonians in Spaceflight Mechanics Bernard Bonnard 1, Jean-Baptiste Caillau 2, and Romain Dujol 2 1 Institut de mathématiques de Bourgogne, CNRS, Dijon, France, bernard.bonnard@u-bourgogne.fr
More informationKAM tori for higher dimensional beam equations with constant potentials
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING Nonlinearity 9 (2006) 2405 2423 NONLINEARITY doi:0.088/095-775/9/0/007 KAM tori for higher dimensional beam equations with constant potentials Jiansheng Geng and Jiangong
More informationUNIFORM SUBHARMONIC ORBITS FOR SITNIKOV PROBLEM
Manuscript submitted to Website: http://aimsciences.org AIMS Journals Volume 00, Number 0, Xxxx XXXX pp. 000 000 UNIFORM SUBHARMONIC ORBITS FOR SITNIKOV PROBLEM CLARK ROBINSON Abstract. We highlight the
More informationMAPPING CLASS ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math 9 (2003),
MAPPING CLASS ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES RICHARD J. BROWN Abstract. It is known that the mapping class group of a compact surface S, MCG(S), acts ergodically with respect to symplectic measure on each symplectic
More informationDiagrammatic Methods in Classical Perturbation Theory
Diagrammatic Methods in Classical Perturbation Theory Guido Gentile Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Roma Tre, Roma, I-0046, Italy. E-mail: gentile@mat.uniroma3.it Article outline Glossary. Definition
More informationSHADOWING ORBITS FOR TRANSITION CHAINS OF INVARIANT TORI ALTERNATING WITH BIRKHOFF ZONES OF INSTABILITY
SHADOWING ORBITS FOR TRANSITION CHAINS OF INVARIANT TORI ALTERNATING WITH BIRKHOFF ZONES OF INSTABILITY MARIAN GIDEA AND CLARK ROBINSON Abstract. We consider a dynamical system that exhibits transition
More information16. Local theory of regular singular points and applications
16. Local theory of regular singular points and applications 265 16. Local theory of regular singular points and applications In this section we consider linear systems defined by the germs of meromorphic
More informationAubry Mather Theory from a Topological Viewpoint
Aubry Mather Theory from a Topological Viewpoint III. Applications to Hamiltonian instability Marian Gidea,2 Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago 2 Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton WORKSHOP
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationGEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION
GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION 1. The basic idea The setting of the Hamiltonian version of classical (Newtonian) mechanics is the phase space (position and momentum), which is a symplectic manifold. The typical
More informationINVARIANT TORI IN NON-DEGENERATE NEARLY INTEGRABLE HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS
H. Rüssmann Fachbereich Mathemati Universität Mainz 55099 Mainz, Germany E-mail: ruessmann@mathemati.uni -mainz.de INVARIANT TORI IN NON-DEGENERATE NEARLY INTEGRABLE HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS Received May 00
More informationNON-EXTINCTION OF SOLUTIONS TO A FAST DIFFUSION SYSTEM WITH NONLOCAL SOURCES
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2016 (2016, No. 45, pp. 1 5. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NON-EXTINCTION OF
More informationA strongly polynomial algorithm for linear systems having a binary solution
A strongly polynomial algorithm for linear systems having a binary solution Sergei Chubanov Institute of Information Systems at the University of Siegen, Germany e-mail: sergei.chubanov@uni-siegen.de 7th
More informationHamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic
Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic A. A. Agrachev N. N. Chtcherbakova Abstract The curvature and the reduced curvature are basic differential invariants of the pair: Hamiltonian system,
More informationNewtonian Mechanics. Chapter Classical space-time
Chapter 1 Newtonian Mechanics In these notes classical mechanics will be viewed as a mathematical model for the description of physical systems consisting of a certain (generally finite) number of particles
More informationConvergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems
Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems Philippe JOUAN and Saïd NACIRI arxiv:1511.01737v1 [math.oc] 5 Nov 2015 January 23, 2018 Abstract This paper is concerned with the convergence rate of the
More informationON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS
ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS DUSA MCDUFF AND SUSAN TOLMAN Abstract. Recall that an effective circle action is semifree if the stabilizer subgroup of each point is connected. We show that if (M, ω)
More informationUniqueness of ground states for quasilinear elliptic equations in the exponential case
Uniqueness of ground states for quasilinear elliptic equations in the exponential case Patrizia Pucci & James Serrin We consider ground states of the quasilinear equation (.) div(a( Du )Du) + f(u) = 0
More informationTHE MULTIPLICATIVE ERGODIC THEOREM OF OSELEDETS
THE MULTIPLICATIVE ERGODIC THEOREM OF OSELEDETS. STATEMENT Let (X, µ, A) be a probability space, and let T : X X be an ergodic measure-preserving transformation. Given a measurable map A : X GL(d, R),
More informationMultiperiodic dynamics overview and some recent results
Multiperiodic dynamics overview and some recent results Henk Broer Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Instituut voor Wiskunde en Informatica POBox 800 9700 AV Groningen email: broer@math.rug.nl URL: http://www.math.rug.nl/~broer
More informationIm + α α. β + I 1 I 1< 0 I 1= 0 I 1 > 0
ON THE HAMILTONIAN ANDRONOV-HOPF BIFURCATION M. Olle, J. Villanueva 2 and J. R. Pacha 3 2 3 Departament de Matematica Aplicada I (UPC), Barcelona, Spain In this contribution, we consider an specic type
More informationKAM for quasi-linear KdV. Pietro Baldi, Massimiliano Berti, Riccardo Montalto
KAM for quasi-linear KdV Pietro Baldi, Massimiliano Berti, Riccardo Montalto Abstract. We prove the existence and stability of Cantor families of quasi-periodic, small amplitude solutions of quasi-linear
More information9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 93 9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning 9a Borel-Kolmogorov paradox............. 93 9b Radon-Nikodym theorem.............. 94 9c Conditioning.....................
More informationIn particular, if A is a square matrix and λ is one of its eigenvalues, then we can find a non-zero column vector X with
Appendix: Matrix Estimates and the Perron-Frobenius Theorem. This Appendix will first present some well known estimates. For any m n matrix A = [a ij ] over the real or complex numbers, it will be convenient
More informationA Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections
A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections Manabu AKAHO Department of Mathematics Tokyo Metropolitan University akaho@math.metro-u.ac.jp 1 Introduction There are several kinds of Floer
More informationYURI LEVIN, MIKHAIL NEDIAK, AND ADI BEN-ISRAEL
Journal of Comput. & Applied Mathematics 139(2001), 197 213 DIRECT APPROACH TO CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS VIA NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD YURI LEVIN, MIKHAIL NEDIAK, AND ADI BEN-ISRAEL Abstract. Consider m functions
More informationNONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Fixed Point Theory, Volume 9, No. 1, 28, 3-16 http://www.math.ubbcluj.ro/ nodeacj/sfptcj.html NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS GIOVANNI ANELLO Department of Mathematics University
More informationOn groups of Hölder diffeomorphisms and their regularity
On groups of Hölder diffeomorphisms and their regularity Joint work with Armin Rainer David Nenning University of Vienna Valencia, October 17, 217 Diffeomorphism groups generated by time-dependent vector
More informationImplications of the Constant Rank Constraint Qualification
Mathematical Programming manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Implications of the Constant Rank Constraint Qualification Shu Lu Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract This paper investigates
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001
arxiv:math/0112260v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001 VOLUME PRESERVING EMBEDDINGS OF OPEN SUBSETS OF Ê n INTO MANIFOLDS FELIX SCHLENK Abstract. We consider a connected smooth n-dimensional manifold M endowed with
More informationKAM Tori for 1D Nonlinear Wave Equations with Periodic Boundary Conditions
KAM Tori for 1D Nonlinear Wave Equations with Periodic Boundary Conditions Luigi Chierchia Dipartimento di Matematica Università Roma Tre E-mail: luigi@matrm3.mat.uniroma3.it Jiangong You Department of
More informationINTEGRABILITY OF SUPERHARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN A JOHN DOMAIN. Hiroaki Aikawa
INTEGRABILITY OF SUPERHARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN A OHN OMAIN Hiroaki Aikawa Abstract. The integrability of positive erharmonic functions on a bounded fat ohn domain is established. No exterior conditions are
More informationProperties for systems with weak invariant manifolds
Statistical properties for systems with weak invariant manifolds Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto Joint work with José F. Alves Workshop rare & extreme Gibbs-Markov-Young structure Let M
More informationTHE POINCARÉ RECURRENCE PROBLEM OF INVISCID INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS
ASIAN J. MATH. c 2009 International Press Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 007 014, March 2009 002 THE POINCARÉ RECURRENCE PROBLEM OF INVISCID INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS Y. CHARLES LI Abstract. Nadirashvili presented a
More information= 0. = q i., q i = E
Summary of the Above Newton s second law: d 2 r dt 2 = Φ( r) Complicated vector arithmetic & coordinate system dependence Lagrangian Formalism: L q i d dt ( L q i ) = 0 n second-order differential equations
More informationfor all subintervals I J. If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D J only, we will write ϕ BMO d (J). In fact, the following is true
3 ohn Nirenberg inequality, Part I A function ϕ L () belongs to the space BMO() if sup ϕ(s) ϕ I I I < for all subintervals I If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D only, we will write ϕ BMO
More information