(U 338-E) 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding A Workpapers

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "(U 338-E) 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding A Workpapers"

Transcription

1 (U 338-E) 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding A Workpapers 2018 SCE Trust Fund Contributions and Financial Assumptions SCE-06 Chapter II: Burial Escalation Rate Calculation ( ) and Contribution Workpapers - March 2018

2 2018 NDCTP WPSCE SCE Trust Fund Contributions and Final Assumptions DOCUMENT WPCE-06 INDEX Chapter II PAGE(S) Workpapers for Burial Escalation Rate Calculation NDCTP SCE 06 Contribution Workpapers 14-33

3 1 Methodology

4 2 SCE estimates its LLRW disposal escalation rate using an econometric model of the form: ln( C ) a gt (1) t t where ln is the natural logarithm function (base e), Ct is the LLRW disposal cost index in year t, and t is a random error term (assumed to be zero for forecasting purposes). The source data are the LLRW disposal cost indexes found in various revisions of the NUREG-1307 publication. Over the years, this publication has provided LLRW disposal cost indexes for sites in the states of Nevada, South Carolina, and Washington. For the South Carolina and Washington sites, there are separate indexes for direct LLRW disposal and for dispostion of waste by vendors. For the South Carolina site, there are different indexes for Atlantic Compact and non-atlantic Compact members. The NUREG publication now uses the Atlantic Compact index as a proxy for disposal costs at a generic site. Since 2009, SCE has computed LLRW disposal escalation growth rates for five different indexes: Nevada, South Carolina non-atlantic Compact direct, South Carolina non-atlantic Compact vendor, Washington direct, and Washington vendor. The use of the South Carolina Atlantic Compact indexes as a proxy for a generic site suggests the inclusion of two additional indexes: South Carolina Atlantic Compact direct and South Carolina Atlantic Compact vendor, making seven potential indexes in all. However, for this NDCTP application, SCE has based its LLRW disposal escalation index on the same five indexes utilized previously. Estimation of equation (1) provides an exponential growth rate, as equation (1) can be rewritten (after taking the anti-logarithm of both sides) as C gt t C 0 e (2)

5 3 However, what we need for modeling purposes is an annual escalation factor, not an instantaneous growth rate. Based on equation (2), we can calculate an annual escalation factor as follows: annual growth rate C C C e C e g( t 1) gt t 1 t 0 0 g e gt Ct C0 e 1 (3) Growth Rate Estimates Five Growth Rates Averaged Seven Growth Rates Averaged g g (Exponential Growth Rate) Annual Growth Rate (Exponential Growth Rate) Annual Growth Rate Including Revision % 7.47% 7.33% 7.61%

6 4 R Input File

7 Southern California Edison Company start time time <- Sys.time() time Load RODBC package (to read Excel spreadsheet using ODBC drivers) library(rodbc) get NUREG data from.csv file nureg_data <- read.csv("nureg_data_15f.csv", header = TRUE, na.strings = c("na","n/a","n/a N/A","REF!")) str(nureg_data) nureg_data remove R15 data not final (for 2012) [code commented out here so that R15 data is included] nureg_data <- subset(nureg_data, nureg_data[,1] < 2012) nureg_data time variable time_ <- nureg_data$year log regression function logreg <- function(cost_vector,time_vector) {logvar <- log(cost_vector) reg.lm <- lm(logvar ~ time_vector) regression_output <- summary(reg.lm) print(regression_output) growth_rate <- coefficients(regression_output)[2,1] } Nevada PWR grnevpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$nevpwr, time_) grnevpwr South Carolina Non-Atlantic Compact PWR grscnacpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$scnacpwr, time_) grscnacpwr South Carolina Non-Atlantic Compact PWR Vendor grscnacpwrv <- logreg(nureg_data$scnacpwrv, time_) grscnacpwrv Washington PWR grwashpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$washpwr, time_) grwashpwr Washington PWR Vendor grwashpwrv <- logreg(nureg_data$washpwrv, time_) grwashpwrv South Carolina Atlantic Compact PWR grscacpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$scacpwr, time_) grscacpwr South Carolina Atlantic Compact PWR Vendor grscacpwrv <- logreg(nureg_data$scacpwrv, time_) grscacpwrv Seven growth rates growth7 <- c(grnevpwr, grscnacpwr, grscnacpwrv, grwashpwr, grwashpwrv, grscacpwr, grscacpwrv) growth7 summary(growth7) growth7_mean <- mean(growth7) growth7_mean growth7_annual = exp(growth7_mean) - 1 growth7_annual Five growth rates

8 6 growth5 <- c(grnevpwr, grscnacpwr, grscnacpwrv, grwashpwr, grwashpwrv) growth5 summary(growth5) growth5_mean <- mean(growth5) growth5_mean growth5_mean_annual = exp(growth5_mean) - 1 growth5_mean_annual growth5_median <- median(growth5) growth5_median growth5_median_annual = exp(growth5_median) - 1 growth5_median_annual quit q()

9 7 R Output

10 8 R version ( ) -- "Kite-Eating Tree" Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. Natural language support but running in an English locale R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for an HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. > > Southern California Edison Company > start time > time <- Sys.time() > time [1] " :53:31 PDT" > > > Load RODBC package (to read Excel spreadsheet using ODBC drivers) > library(rodbc) > > > get NUREG data from.csv file > nureg_data <- read.csv("nureg_data_15f.csv", header = TRUE, + na.strings = c("na","n/a","n/a N/A","REF!")) > str(nureg_data) 'data.frame': 16 obs. of 10 variables: $ year : int $ washpwr : num $ washpwrv : num NA NA NA NA NA... $ nevpwr : num NA NA... $ scnacpwr : num $ scnacpwrv : num NA NA NA NA NA... $ scacpwr : num $ scacpwrv : num NA NA NA NA NA... $ genericpwr : num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA... $ genericpwrv: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA... > nureg_data year washpwr washpwrv nevpwr scnacpwr scnacpwrv scacpwr scacpwrv genericpwr NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA genericpwrv 1 NA 2 NA 3 NA 4 NA 5 NA 6 NA

11 9 7 NA 8 NA 9 NA 10 NA 11 NA 12 NA 13 NA > remove R15 data not final (for 2012) [code commented out here so that R15 data is included] > nureg_data <- subset(nureg_data, nureg_data[,1] < 2012) > nureg_data > time variable > time_ <- nureg_data$year > > log regression function > logreg <- function(cost_vector,time_vector) + {logvar <- log(cost_vector) + reg.lm <- lm(logvar ~ time_vector) + regression_output <- summary(reg.lm) + print(regression_output) + growth_rate <- coefficients(regression_output)[2,1] + } > > Nevada PWR > grnevpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$nevpwr, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) time_vector Residual standard error: on 1 degrees of freedom (13 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: on 1 and 1 DF, p-value: > grnevpwr [1] > > South Carolina Non-Atlantic Compact PWR > grscnacpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$scnacpwr, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) * time_vector e-05 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: on 11 degrees of freedom (3 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared: 0.79, Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: on 1 and 11 DF, p-value: 4.861e-05 > grscnacpwr

12 10 [1] > > South Carolina Non-Atlantic Compact PWR Vendor > grscnacpwrv <- logreg(nureg_data$scnacpwrv, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) ** time_vector Signif. codes: 0 '***' '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: on 3 degrees of freedom (11 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: on 1 and 3 DF, p-value: > grscnacpwrv [1] > > Washington PWR > grwashpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$washpwr, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) time_vector e-09 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: on 14 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: on 1 and 14 DF, p-value: 2.138e-09 > grwashpwr [1] > > Washington PWR Vendor > grwashpwrv <- logreg(nureg_data$washpwrv, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) * time_vector Signif. codes: 0 '***' '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: on 6 degrees of freedom (8 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared:

13 11 F-statistic: on 1 and 6 DF, p-value: > grwashpwrv [1] > > South Carolina Atlantic Compact PWR > grscacpwr <- logreg(nureg_data$scacpwr, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) ** time_vector e-06 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: on 14 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: on 1 and 14 DF, p-value: 1.367e-06 > grscacpwr [1] > > South Carolina Atlantic Compact PWR Vendor > grscacpwrv <- logreg(nureg_data$scacpwrv, time_) Call: lm(formula = logvar ~ time_vector) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(> t ) (Intercept) *** time_vector ** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: on 6 degrees of freedom (8 observations deleted due to missingness) Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: on 1 and 6 DF, p-value: > grscacpwrv [1] > > > Seven growth rates > growth7 <- c(grnevpwr, grscnacpwr, grscnacpwrv, grwashpwr, grwashpwrv, grscacpwr, grscacpwrv) > growth7 [1] > summary(growth7) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max > growth7_mean <- mean(growth7) > growth7_mean [1] > growth7_annual = exp(growth7_mean) - 1 > growth7_annual [1] > > > Five growth rates

14 12 > growth5 <- c(grnevpwr, grscnacpwr, grscnacpwrv, grwashpwr, grwashpwrv) > growth5 [1] > summary(growth5) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max > growth5_mean <- mean(growth5) > growth5_mean [1] > growth5_mean_annual = exp(growth5_mean) - 1 > growth5_mean_annual [1] > growth5_median <- median(growth5) > growth5_median [1] > growth5_median_annual = exp(growth5_median) - 1 > growth5_median_annual [1] > > > quit > q() > proc.time() user system elapsed

15 13

16 14 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 5-6 SCE Nuclear Decommissioning Trust December 31, Estimated Liquidation Value Calculation % of % of Liquidation Qualified Trust Cost Fund Market Value Fund Value* Fixed Income $2,617,966, % $2,781,282, % $ 2,737,069, BlackRock $310,720, $319,874, ,395, BlackRock - Enhanced Cash $166,457, $166,035, ,149, Alliance Bernstein Fixed $772,198, $ 801,052, ,241, PIMCO $604,485, $605,966, ,565, Schroders (STW) $712,056, $836,305, ,668, Cash $52,048, $52,048, ,048, U. S. Equity $ 105,027, % $ 1,121,664, % $ 846,440, Rhumbline $15,187, $89,440, ,338, Alliance Bernstein Equity $0.00 $ RCM $0.00 $ - - State Street (SSgA) $89,840, $1,032,224, ,101, Cash $0.00 $ International $ 169,206, % $ 483,459, % $ 398,384, PanAgora $169,206, $483,459, ,384, Cash $0.00 $ Qualified Trust Total $ 2,892,201, % $ 4,386,406, % $ 3,981,895, Non-Qualified Trust U.S. Equity $ 27, % $ 27, % $ 27, RCM $2, $2, , State Street (SSgA) $24, $24, , Cash $0.00 $ Fixed Income $53,965, % $ 53,873, % $ 53,910, PIMCO $53,965, $ 53,873, ,910, Cash $0.00 $ International $ % $ % $ - Self Directed ( ) $0.00 $ Cash $0.00 $ Total Non-Qualified Trust $ 53,993, % $ 53,900, % $ 53,938, Total Trust $ 2,946,194, $ 4,440,307, $ 4,035,833, Source: Trustee statements. *Market value adjusted for estimated deferred taxes on unrealized gains. Capital Gains Tax Rates Qualified Federal 20.00% State 8.84% Combined % Non-Qualified Federal 35.00% State 8.84% Combined %

17 15 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 5-6 SCE Nuclear Decommissioning Trust December 31, Estimated Liquidation Value Calculation Liquidation Qualified Trust Cost Market Value Value* San Onofre 1 $153,087, $304,679, ,640, San Onofre 2 $834,697, $1,290,429, ,167,054, San Onofre 3 $959,359, $1,522,942, ,370,369, Total San Onofre 1,947,145, ,118,051, ,801,063, Palo Verde 1 $306,834, $411,751, ,348, Palo Verde 2 $315,257, $421,298, ,591, Palo Verde 3 $322,963, $435,305, ,891, Total Palo Verde 945,055, ,268,354, ,180,831, Qualified Trust Total 2,892,201, ,386,405, ,981,894, Non-Qualified Trust San Onofre 1 39,935, ,859, ,890, San Onofre 2 13,365, ,342, ,352, San Onofre 3 570, , , Total San Onofre 53,871, ,777, ,815, Palo Verde 1 59, , , Palo Verde 2 62, , , Palo Verde 3 - Total Palo Verde 121, , , Nonqualified Trust Total 53,993, ,900, ,938, Total Trust (Qualified & Non-Qualified) San Onofre 1 193,023, ,538, ,531, San Onofre 2 848,063, ,303,772, ,180,406, San Onofre 3 959,929, ,523,517, ,370,942, Total San Onofre 2,001,016, ,171,828, ,854,879, Palo Verde 1 306,893, ,811, ,408, Palo Verde 2 315,320, ,361, ,653, Palo Verde 3 322,963, ,305, ,891, Total Palo Verde 945,177, ,268,478, ,180,953, Total Trust $ 2,946,194, $ 4,440,306, $ 4,035,833,177.86

18 16 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 and page 18 lines 1-2 and page 19 Table IV-7 SONGS 1 Qualified Trust Annual Ratepayer Contribution Beginning Of End Of Beginning Of Tax Benefit, Prior SONGS 1 Non Qualified Trust After Tax ROR After Tax Return End Of Required, Qualified Trust , , , ,712 3, ,002 39, % 1,030 3,510 37, , ,002 3, ,311 37, % 966 3,868 35, , ,311 3, ,508 35,491 1, % 917 3,637 33, , ,508 51, ,060 33,853 1, % , , , ,060 2, , , % 23 2,632 8, ,994 2, ,264 8, % 207 2,058 6, ,264 1, ,046 6, % 178 1,871 5, ,046 1, ,265 5, % 150 1,983 4, ,265 1, ,850 4, % 116 1,922 3, ,850 1, ,775 3, % 83 1,924 1, ,775 3, ,970 1, % 50 2, , ,970 3, , % , ,925 4, , % , ,365 3, , % , ,637 3, , % , ,774 2, , % , ,667 3, , % , ,780 4, , % , , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % , , % ,964 4, , % , ,494 3, , % , ,558 98,295 96, % , ,987 98, % ,243

19 17 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 and page 18 lines 1-2 SONGS 1 Qualified Trust Equity, Cost Basis Beginning Of Contribution Pay Cost Dividends Earned (After Tax) Realized Gain (After Tax) End Of 14,516 14,516 1,011 12, ,397 16,907 19,203 19,203 2,364 12, ,235 13,333 23,604 23,604 1,135 12, ,067 10,559 24,052 24, ,242 2, ,502 17,559 17,559 1,260 13, ,954 12,250 12,250 4, ,774 22,099 22,099 4, ,920 31,373 31,373 4, ,314 39,617 39,617 3, ,888 46,399 46,399 3, ,605 53,278 53,278 4, ,419 60,629 60,629 3, ,206 1,061 2,299 66,721 66, ,128 1,080 2,198 68,058 68,058 1, ,689 1,071 2,097 68,085 68,085 1, ,760 1,063 2,016 67,833 67,833 1, ,390 1,057 1,964 67,906 67,906 1, ,777 1,052 1,915 67,544 67,544 1, ,007 1,044 1,873 66,991 66,991 1, ,045 1,877 68,050 68,050 1, ,060 1,887 69,102 69,102 2, ,060 1,873 69,097 69,097 4, ,027 1,807 67,013 67,013 6, ,692 62,997 62,997 7, ,532 57,196 57,196 10, ,309 48,981 48,981 12, ,017 38,127 38,127 11, ,787 27,787 10, ,266 18,266 8, ,619 10,619 5, ,018 5,018 3, ,859 1,859 1,

20 18 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 and page 18 lines 1-2 Rebalancing Calculation Maximum Equity Percentage Actual Equity Percentage Actual Bond Percentage Market Cost Capital Gain Tax Contribution Bonds % 38.09% 61.91% 7,766 1,011 1,829 5, % 34.75% 65.25% 2,364 2, , % 34.94% 65.06% 1,135 1, , % 34.92% 65.08% % 33.76% 66.24% 1,260 1, , % 33.20% 66.80% 4,478 4, , % 36.83% 63.17% 4,683 4, , % 40.83% 59.17% 4,185 4, , % 44.48% 55.52% 3,082 3, , % 47.23% 52.77% 3,387 3, , % 50.23% 49.77% 4,405 4, , % 54.03% 45.97% 3,939 3, , % 57.44% 42.56% % 57.93% 42.07% 1,648 1, , % 57.09% 42.91% 1,773 1, , % 56.18% 43.82% 1,753 1, , % 55.30% 44.70% 1,740 1, , % 54.45% 45.55% 1,637 1, , % 53.68% 46.32% 1,787 1, , % 52.83% 47.17% 1,817 1, , % 52.00% 48.00% 2,942 2, , % 50.46% 49.54% 5,191 4, , % 47.51% 52.49% 7,161 6, , % 43.41% 56.59% 8,861 7, , % 38.38% 61.62% 11,220 10, , % 32.03% 67.97% 13,689 12, , % 24.34% 75.66% 12,660 11, , % 17.34% 82.66% 11,359 10, , % 11.15% 88.85% 8,950 8, , % 6.34% 93.66% 6,432 5, , % 2.94% 97.06% 3,551 3, , % 1.08% 98.92% 2,066 1, , % 0.00% % % 0.00% % % 0.00% %

21 19 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 and page 18 lines 1-2 SONGS 1 Qualified Trust Equity, Market Value Beginning Of Capital Gain Tax, Contribution Pay Cost Including Tax Pay Cost Capital Gains Tax, Pay Cost Equity Rate of Return Dividend Rate of Return Dividends Earned (After Tax) Price Appreciation Rate of Return Price Appreciation Unrealized Gain Realized Gain (Turnover) Capital Gains Tax on Realized Gain , ,492 5,937 1,829 12, % 1.97% 1, % 3,753 93,975 23,184 6,276 16,907 89, ,994 2, , % 1.97% 1, % 3,317 74,108 18,282 4,949 13,333 79, ,430 1, , % 1.97% 1, % 2,867 58,692 14,479 3,920 10,559 68, , ,242 7,178 5,919 1, % 1.97% % 2,249 41,700 10,288 2,785 7,502 48, ,972 1, , % 1.97% % 1,682 33,095 8,165 2,210 5,954 37, ,181 4, % 1.97% % 1,605 26,535 6,546 1,772 4,774 42, ,089 4, % 1.97% % 1,802 21,791 5,376 1,455 3,920 47, ,789 4, % 1.97% % 2,002 18,417 4,544 1,230 3,314 53, ,492 3, % 1.97% % 2,179 16,053 3,960 1,072 2,888 58, ,493 3, % 1.97% % 2,384 14,477 3, ,605 64, ,184 4, % 1.97% % 2,632 13,445 3, ,419 70, ,758 3, ,408 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,851 12,777 3, ,299 76, , ,435 2, % 1.97% 1, % 2,902 12,219 3, ,198 77, ,265 1, ,917 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,876 11,656 2, ,097 76, ,867 1, ,987 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,855 11,206 2, ,016 76, ,276 1, ,563 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,841 10,915 2, ,964 76, ,130 1, ,993 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,827 10,647 2, ,915 75, ,566 1, ,246 2, % 1.97% 1, % 2,805 10,413 2, ,873 74, ,837 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,808 10,434 2, ,877 75, ,911 1, % 1.97% 1, % 2,849 10,490 2, ,887 77, ,006 2, % 1.97% 1, % 2,847 10,413 2, ,873 76, ,942 5, % 1.97% 1, % 2,759 10,045 2, ,807 74, ,581 6, % 1.97% % 2,592 9,405 2, ,692 70, ,083 8, % 1.97% % 2,353 8,515 2, ,532 63, ,611 10, % 1.97% % 2,014 7,277 1, ,309 54, ,463 13, % 1.97% % 1,568 5,655 1, ,017 42, ,388 12, % 1.97% % 1,143 4,117 1, , ,889 11, % 1.97% % 751 2, , ,303 8, % 1.97% % 437 1, , ,802 6, % 1.97% % , ,578 3, % 1.97% % , ,066 2, % 1.97% % % 1.97% % % 1.97% % Realized Gain (After Tax) End Of

22 20 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 and page 18 lines 1-2 SONGS 1 Qualified Trust Bonds (LV Starting ) Beginning Of Contribution Contribution Pay Cost Bond Rate of Return Interest Earned (After Tax) End Of 181, ,221 5,937 22, % 4, , ,008 2,364 22, % 4, , ,882 1,135 23, % 3, , , ,111 11, % 2,884 96,088 96,088 1,260 22, % 2,190 74,814 74,814 4, % 1,839 72,176 72,176 4, % 1,765 69,258 69,258 4, % 1,702 66,775 66,775 3, % 1,666 65,358 65,358 3, % 1,621 63,592 63,592 4, % 1,541 60,213 60,213 3, , % 1,457 56,579 56, , % 1,452 56,102 56,102 1, , % 1,490 57,771 57,771 1, , % 1,536 59,499 59,499 1, , % 1,584 61,539 61,539 1, , % 1,632 63,216 63,216 1, , % 1,670 64,564 64,564 1, % 1,730 67,771 67,771 1, % 1,815 71,080 71,080 2, % 1,929 75,547 75,547 5, % 2,104 82,388 82,388 6, % 2,332 91,341 91,341 8, % 2, , ,136 10, % 2, , ,569 13, % 3, , ,757 12, % 3, , ,212 11, % 4, , ,788 8, % 4, , ,292 6, % 4, , ,386 3, , % 4, , ,428 2, , % 4, , , , % 3,724 96,987 96, , % 1,252 5

23 21 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 and page 18 lines 1-2 SONGS 1 Decommissioning Costs SONGS 1 Liquidation Value Total Cost Equity Liquidation Value Bond Liquidation Value Total Liquidation Value ,510 70, , , ,868 64, , , ,637 56, , , ,864 40, , , ,632 30,431 96, , ,058 36,677 74, , ,871 43,344 72, , ,983 49,735 69, , ,922 55,218 66, , ,924 61,231 65, , ,502 68,015 63, , ,245 73,740 60, , ,303 74,771 56, , ,330 74,489 56, , ,468 73,989 57, , ,765 73,903 59, , ,580 73,393 61, , ,094 72,712 63, , ,782 64, , ,865 67, , ,817 71, , ,531 75, , ,163 82, , ,873 91, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,316 2, , , , , , , , , , ,987 96,987

24 22 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 Required SONGS 2 Qualified Trust SONGS 2 Non-Qualified Trust Annual Ratepayer Contribution Beginning Of End Of Beginning Of Tax Benefit, Prior- After Tax ROR After Tax Return End Of Required, Qualified Trust ,274, ,813 1,274, ,751 1,169, % , ,813 1,169,474 69,306 1,108, % , ,813 1,108,638 62,799 1,058, % , ,813 1,058, , , % , , , , , % , , , , % , ,038 73, , % , ,809 59, , % , ,858 82, , % , ,722 65, , % , ,454 28, , % , ,659 11, , % , ,057 10, , % , ,856 11, , % , ,877 12, , % , ,343 14, , % , ,527 14, , % , ,387 16, , % , ,231 16, , % , ,667 14, , % , ,748 14, , % , ,540 15, , % , ,964 16, , % , ,516 16, , % , ,896 17, , % , ,081 18, , % , ,970 24, , % , ,570 24, , % , ,011 63, , % , , , , % , , , , % , ,510 93, , % , ,776 48,335 55, % , ,668 56, % ,455

25 23 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 2 Qualified Trust Equity, Cost Basis Beginning Of Contribution Pay Cost Dividends Earned (After-Tax) Realized Gain (After- Tax) End Of 79, , ,500-8,398 6,387 66, , , ,478-10,101 5,739 49, , ,970 6,596-3,418-11,974 5,427 37, , , ,398-29,582 4,896 26, , ,110 2,879-3,650-40,269 4,201 18, , ,392 23, ,886 3,900 13, , ,337 23, ,084 3,863 10, , ,523 19, ,360 3,890 9, , ,557 12, ,840 3,772 7, , ,245 12, ,980 3,609 6, , ,587 15, ,172 3,646 6, , ,039 13, ,911 3,844 6, , , ,705 3,927 6, , ,966-5, ,044 3,920 6, , ,321-5, ,297 3,901 6, , ,989-5, ,389 3,872 6, , ,557-5, ,461 3,835 6, , ,088-5, ,346 3,794 6, , ,970-5, ,910 3,741 6, , ,687-5, ,023 3,698 6, , ,333-8, ,896 3,608 6, , ,508-15, ,934 3,409 5, , ,513-20, ,510 3,119 5, , ,759-25, ,646 2,758 4, , ,560-31, ,155 2,297 3, , ,627-36, ,024 1,735 3, , ,468-33, ,921 1,219 2,101 77, ,754-28, , ,324 48, ,910-21, , , ,867-13, , , ,045-5, , , ,813-1,

26 24 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 2 Qualified Trust Equity, Market Value Beginning Of Capital Gain Tax, Contribution Pay Cost - Including Tax Pay Cost Capital Gains Tax, Pay Cost Equity Rate of Return Dividend Rate of Return Dividends Earned (After-Tax) Price Appreciation Rate of Return Price Appreciation Unrealized Gain Realized Gain (Turnover) Capital Gains Tax on Realized Gain Realized Gain (After Tax) End Of 472, , ,500-50,104-38,813-11, % 1.97% 6, % 17, ,517 90,913-24,612 66, , , ,478-30,140-24,715-5, % 1.97% 5, % 15, ,634 67,259-18,208 49, , ,345 6, ,418-25,563-21,885-3, % 1.97% 5, % 14, ,365 50,910-13,782 37, , ,184-1, ,398-50,999-45,201-5, % 1.97% 4, % 13, ,541 36,152-9,787 26, , ,500 2, ,650-61,226-55,552-5, % 1.97% 4, % 11, ,718 24,847-6,727 18, , ,262 23, ,610-38,436-3, % 1.97% 3, % 10,477 74,623 18,410-4,984 13, , ,550 23, ,434-27,715-1, % 1.97% 3, % 10,379 60,242 14,862-4,023 10, , ,903 19, ,775-24,580-1, % 1.97% 3, % 10,450 51,415 12,684-3,434 9, , ,288 12, ,357-36,864-1, % 1.97% 3, % 10,134 43,349 10,694-2,895 7, , ,899 12, ,091-30,978-1, % 1.97% 3, % 9,696 38,240 9,434-2,554 6, , ,392 15, ,916-14, % 1.97% 3, % 9,796 36,858 9,093-2,462 6, , ,804 13, ,624-6, % 1.97% 3, % 10,327 37,378 9,221-2,496 6, , , ,352-6, % 1.97% 3, % 10,551 38,061 9,390-2,542 6, , ,638-5, ,726-6, % 1.97% 3, % 10,530 37,916 9,354-2,532 6, , ,883-6, ,007-6, % 1.97% 3, % 10,479 37,687 9,297-2,517 6, , ,378-6, ,222-7, % 1.97% 3, % 10,402 37,324 9,208-2,493 6, , ,673-5, ,302-8, % 1.97% 3, % 10,302 36,959 9,118-2,468 6, , ,929-5, ,286-9, % 1.97% 3, % 10,192 36,515 9,008-2,439 6, , ,476-6, ,802-8, % 1.97% 3, % 10,049 36,033 8,889-2,407 6, , ,830-5, ,815-7, % 1.97% 3, % 9,934 35,671 8,800-2,382 6, , ,204-9, ,673-7, % 1.97% 3, % 9,692 34,794 8,584-2,324 6, , ,718-16, ,716-7, % 1.97% 3, % 9,159 32,854 8,105-2,194 5, , ,262-22, ,244-7, % 1.97% 3, % 8,380 30,053 7,414-2,007 5, , ,398-27, ,282-6, % 1.97% 2, % 7,410 26,582 6,558-1,775 4, , ,585-33, ,737-5, % 1.97% 2, % 6,170 22,111 5,455-1,477 3, , ,283-39,910-1, ,478-4, % 1.97% 1, % 4,662 16,703 4,121-1,116 3, , ,051-35,839-1, ,363-4, % 1.97% 1, % 3,275 11,678 2, ,101 86, ,551-30, ,755-2, % 1.97% % 2,061 7,358 1, ,324 54, ,453-23, ,071-3, % 1.97% % 1,098 3, , ,724-14, ,135-4, % 1.97% % 409 1, , ,016-5, ,383-1, % 1.97% % , ,046-1, % 1.97% % % 1.97% % % 1.97% %

27 25 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 2 Qualified Trust Bonds (LV Starting ) Beginning Of Contribution Contribution Pay Cost Bond Rate of Return Interest Earned (After Tax) End Of 802, , ,314-65, % 21, , , ,335-44, % 20, , ,293-6,596-6,395-40, % 19, , ,241 1,374-6,415-84, % 18, , ,121-2,879-6, , % 16, , ,784-23, , % 13, , ,487-23, , % 11, , ,906-19, , % 9, , ,569-12, , % 8, , ,823-12, , % 7, , ,061-15, , % 6, , ,855-13, , % 5, , , , % 5, , ,218 5, , % 5, , ,994 6, , % 6, , ,965 6, , % 6, , ,854 5, , % 6, , ,458 5, , % 6, , ,755 6, , % 6, , ,837 5, , % 6, , ,544 9, , % 7, , ,822 16, , % 7, , ,702 22, , % 8, , ,118 27, , % 9, , ,311 33, , % 9, , ,798 39, , % 10, , ,920 35, , % 11, , ,019 30, , % 12, , ,558 23, , % 12, , ,643 14, , % 10, , ,398 5, , % 7, , ,465 1, , % 4, , , , % 2,226 55, , , % 787 0

28 26 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 Rebalancing Calculation Maximum Equity Percentage Actual Equity Percentage Actual Bond Percentage Market Cost Capital Gain Tax Contribution Bonds 37.05% 37.05% 62.95% % 35.70% 64.30% % 34.85% 65.15% -6,596-6, , % 34.97% 65.03% 1, , % 34.32% 65.68% -2,879-2, , % 34.21% 65.79% -23,505-23, , % 37.54% 62.46% -23,568-23, , % 41.40% 58.60% -19,254-19, , % 44.89% 55.11% -12,956-12, , % 47.58% 52.42% -12,832-12, , % 50.55% 49.45% -15,347-15, , % 54.20% 45.80% -13,565-13, , % 57.46% 42.54% % 57.93% 42.07% 5,946 5, , % 57.08% 42.92% 6,360 5, , % 56.15% 43.85% 6,264 5, , % 55.26% 44.74% 6,111 5, , % 54.40% 45.60% 5,714 5, , % 53.63% 46.37% 6,228 5, , % 52.76% 47.24% 6,061 5, , % 51.92% 48.08% 9,788 8, , % 50.38% 49.62% 17,114 15, , % 47.43% 52.57% 23,113 20, , % 43.33% 56.67% 27,923 25, , % 38.30% 61.70% 34,555 31, , % 31.96% 68.04% 41,036 36,875 1,126 39, % 24.28% 75.72% 36,851 33,113 1,012 35, % 17.29% 82.71% 31,679 28, , % 11.11% 88.89% 23,911 21, , % 6.31% 93.69% 15,049 13, , % 2.90% 97.10% 5,705 5, , % 1.07% 98.93% 2,045 1, , % 0.00% % % 0.00% % % 0.00% %

29 27 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 2 Decommissioning Costs SONGS 2 Liquidation Value Total Cost Equity Liquidation Value Bond Liquidation Value Total Liquidation Value , , ,208 1,144, , , ,935 1,082, , , ,293 1,050, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,816 84, , , ,398 52, , , ,436 26, , , ,184 8, , , ,834 1, , , , , , , , , , ,668 55,668

30 28 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 Required SONGS 3 Qualified Trust SONGS 3 Non-Qualified Trust Annual Ratepayer Contribution Beginning Of End Of Beginning Of Tax Benefit, Prior- After Tax ROR After Tax Return End Of Required, Qualified Trust ,499, ,814 1,499, ,344 1,377, % , ,814 1,377,656 78,189 1,298, % , ,814 1,298,663 83,033 1,218, % , ,814 1,218, ,656 1,101, % , ,814 1,101, , , % , , , , % , ,931 87, , % , ,315 95, , % , ,586 81, , % , ,529 71, , % , ,450 29, , % , ,799 12, , % , ,533 11, , % , ,894 13, , % , ,584 14, , % , ,482 16, , % , ,505 16, , % , ,275 19, , % , ,780 17, , % , ,192 16, , % , ,382 16, , % , ,277 17, , % , ,882 21, , % , ,280 20, , % , ,584 21, , % , ,660 21, , % , ,202 35, , % , ,054 34, , % , ,071 65, , % , , , , % , , , , % , , , , % , , , , % , , , % ,787

31 29 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 3 Qualified Trust Equity, Cost Basis Beginning Of Contribution Pay Cost Dividends Earned (After-Tax) Realized Gain (After- Tax) End Of 90, , ,779-8,768 7,551 79, , , ,732-11,115 6,743 58, , ,959 7,861-7,599-15,501 6,303 43, , , ,554-27,041 5,693 32, , ,375 2,863-8,114-33,853 5,035 23, , ,526 28, ,702 4,839 17, , ,632 30, ,984 4,875 14, , ,996 24, ,145 4,863 11, , ,019 15, ,619 4,709 10, , ,708 16, ,715 4,617 8, , ,321 20, ,585 4,736 8, , ,235 17, ,418 5,035 8, , , ,228 5,166 9, , ,563-7, ,067 5,172 9, , ,657-7, ,481 5,161 8, , ,775-7, ,407 5,140 8, , ,981-7, ,489 5,113 8, , ,172-6, ,541 5,082 8, , ,654-7, ,518 5,040 8, , ,396-7, ,634 5,013 8, , ,103-11, ,540 4,919 8, , ,048-21, ,518 4,678 8, , ,271-28, ,719 4,296 7, , ,665-34, ,173 3,805 6, , ,308-42, ,385 3,178 5, , ,699-51, ,743 2,412 4, , ,411-46, ,567 1,699 2, , ,288-39, ,475 1,068 1,841 68, ,087-29, , , ,981-19, , , ,266-8, , , ,787-3,

32 30 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 3 Qualified Trust Equity, Market Value Beginning Of Capital Gain Tax, Contribution Pay Cost - Including Tax Pay Cost Capital Gains Tax, Pay Cost Equity Rate of Return Dividend Rate of Return Dividends Earned (After- Tax) Price Appreciation Rate of Return Price Appreciation Unrealized Gain Realized Gain (Turnover) Capital Gains Tax on Realized Gain Realized Gain (After Tax) End Of 557, , ,779-53,714-41,546-12, % 1.97% 7, % 20, , ,959-29,497 79, , ,137-2, ,732-34,022-27,820-6, % 1.97% 6, % 18, ,863 80,390-21,763 58, , ,432 7, ,599-33,887-28,910-4, % 1.97% 6, % 16, ,020 60,200-16,297 43, , ,746-1, ,554-47,587-42,025-5, % 1.97% 5, % 15, ,049 43,925-11,891 32, , ,499 2, ,114-52,433-47,403-5, % 1.97% 5, % 13, ,070 31,841-8,620 23, , ,754 28, ,485-40,025-3, % 1.97% 4, % 13,000 97,445 24,040-6,508 17, , ,037 30, ,793-32,679-2, % 1.97% 4, % 13,097 78,693 19,413-5,256 14, , ,276 24, ,479-39,493-1, % 1.97% 4, % 13,065 65,011 16,038-4,342 11, , ,992 15, ,263-36,735-1, % 1.97% 4, % 12,651 55,979 13,810-3,739 10, , ,878 16, ,329-34,080-1, % 1.97% 4, % 12,402 49,957 12,325-3,336 8, , ,954 20, ,409-14, % 1.97% 4, % 12,724 48,533 11,973-3,241 8, , ,794 17, ,199-6, % 1.97% 5, % 13,528 49,306 12,164-3,293 8, , , ,938-6, % 1.97% 5, % 13,878 50,310 12,412-3,360 9, , ,462-7, ,868-7, % 1.97% 5, % 13,895 50,196 12,383-3,352 9, , ,470-8, ,326-8, % 1.97% 5, % 13,865 49,979 12,330-3,338 8, , ,424-8, ,356-9, % 1.97% 5, % 13,809 49,668 12,253-3,317 8, , ,396-7, ,446-9, % 1.97% 5, % 13,735 49,369 12,179-3,297 8, , ,361-7, ,615-10, % 1.97% 5, % 13,653 48,994 12,087-3,272 8, , ,561-8, ,477-9, % 1.97% 5, % 13,539 48,638 11,999-3,248 8, , ,036-7, ,494-8, % 1.97% 5, % 13,467 48,416 11,944-3,234 8, , ,575-12, ,388-8, % 1.97% 4, % 13,216 47,491 11,716-3,172 8, , ,823-22, ,364-8, % 1.97% 4, % 12,567 45,128 11,133-3,014 8, , ,266-30, ,699-9, % 1.97% 4, % 11,541 41,337 10,198-2,761 7, , ,804-37,424-1, ,981-7, % 1.97% 3, % 10,222 36,661 9,044-2,448 6, , ,924-46,431-1, ,104-6, % 1.97% 3, % 8,538 30,606 7,550-2,044 5, , ,754-55,339-1, ,277-5, % 1.97% 2, % 6,480 23,242 5,734-1,552 4, , ,919-49,970-1, ,194-6, % 1.97% 1, % 4,563 16,242 4,007-1,085 2, , ,523-42,901-1, ,867-3, % 1.97% 1, % 2,869 10,233 2, ,841 75, ,796-32, ,196-4, % 1.97% % 1,557 5,454 1, , ,089-21, ,209-4, % 1.97% % 625 2, , ,826-9, ,393-1, % 1.97% % , ,245-4, % 1.97% % % 1.97% % % 1.97% %

33 31 SCE 06 Section IV page 17 lines 1-12 and page 18 lines 3-13 and page 19 Tables IV-6 and IV-7 SONGS 3 Qualified Trust Bonds (LV Starting ) Beginning Of Contribution Contribution Pay Cost Bond Rate of Return Interest Earned (After Tax) End Of 941, , ,035-70, % 25, , ,519 2,491-14,082-50, % 24, , ,231-7,861-14,215-54, % 23, , ,153 1,060-14,260-78, % 21, , ,787-2,863-13,700-90, % 19, , ,861-28, , % 16, , ,894-30, , % 14, , ,040-24, , % 12, , ,595-15, , % 10, , ,651-16, , % 9, , ,496-20, , % 8, , ,004-17, , % 7, , , , % 7, , ,432 7, , % 7, , ,114 8, , % 8, , ,058 8, , % 8, , ,109 7, , % 8, , ,914 7, , % 8, , ,219 8, , % 9, , ,157 7, , % 9, , ,808 12, , % 9, , ,454 22, , % 10, , ,616 30, , % 11, , ,475 37, , % 12, , ,659 46, , % 13, , ,906 55, , % 15, , ,283 49, , % 16, , ,531 42, , % 17, , ,275 32, , % 17, , ,789 21, , % 15, , ,046 9, , % 12, , ,346 4, , % 9, , , , % 5, , , , % 1,977 0

Natural language support but running in an English locale

Natural language support but running in an English locale R version 3.2.1 (2015-06-18) -- "World-Famous Astronaut" Copyright (C) 2015 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0 (64-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY

More information

Pumpkin Example: Flaws in Diagnostics: Correcting Models

Pumpkin Example: Flaws in Diagnostics: Correcting Models Math 3080. Treibergs Pumpkin Example: Flaws in Diagnostics: Correcting Models Name: Example March, 204 From Levine Ramsey & Smidt, Applied Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, Prentice Hall, Upper

More information

Beam Example: Identifying Influential Observations using the Hat Matrix

Beam Example: Identifying Influential Observations using the Hat Matrix Math 3080. Treibergs Beam Example: Identifying Influential Observations using the Hat Matrix Name: Example March 22, 204 This R c program explores influential observations and their detection using the

More information

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN Math 3080 1. Treibergs Bread Wrapper Data: 2 4 Incomplete Block Design. Name: Example April 26, 2010 Data File Used in this Analysis: # Math 3080-1 Bread Wrapper Data April 23, 2010 # Treibergs # # From

More information

Basic Data Analysis. Stephen Turnbull Business Administration and Public Policy Lecture 9: June 6, Abstract. Regression and R.

Basic Data Analysis. Stephen Turnbull Business Administration and Public Policy Lecture 9: June 6, Abstract. Regression and R. July 22, 2013 1 ohp9 Basic Data Analysis Stephen Turnbull Business Administration and Public Policy Lecture 9: June 6, 2013 Regression and R. Abstract Regression Correlation shows the statistical strength

More information

Spectrophotometer Example: One-Factor Random Effects ANOVA

Spectrophotometer Example: One-Factor Random Effects ANOVA Math 3080 1. Treibergs Spectrophotometer Example: One-Factor Random Effects ANOVA Name: Example Jan. 22, 2014 Today s example was motivated from problem.14.9 of Walpole, Myers, Myers and Ye, Probability

More information

Straw Example: Randomized Block ANOVA

Straw Example: Randomized Block ANOVA Math 3080 1. Treibergs Straw Example: Randomized Block ANOVA Name: Example Jan. 23, 2014 Today s example was motivated from problem 13.11.9 of Walpole, Myers, Myers and Ye, Probability and Statistics for

More information

(U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case A Workpapers. RO- Property Taxes SCE-09 Volume 02, Chapter III, Book B

(U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case A Workpapers. RO- Property Taxes SCE-09 Volume 02, Chapter III, Book B (U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case A.16-09- Workpapers RO- Property Taxes SCE-09 Volume 02, Chapter III, Book B September 2016 2018 General Rate Case Application INDEX OF WORKPAPERS SCE-09, Vol. 02, Chapter

More information

Sample Financial Analysis - Strategy 1: Bad Logic

Sample Financial Analysis - Strategy 1: Bad Logic Sample Financial Analysis - Strategy 1: Bad Logic Presented By: [Licensed user's name appears here] , 55/50 Client Information Summary Current Liquid : Liquid (Taxable Interest) $ 1,000,000 Liquid (Tax

More information

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN Math 3080 1. Treibergs Spray Data: 2 3 Factorial with Multiple Replicates Per ell ANOVA Name: Example April 7, 2010 Data File Used in this Analysis: # Math 3081-1 Spray Data April 17,2010 # Treibergs #

More information

Wage and Income Transcript. Form 1099-B Proceeds From Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions

Wage and Income Transcript. Form 1099-B Proceeds From Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data Wage and Income Transcript Request Date: 06-08-2013 Response Date: 06-08-2013 Tracking Number: 100163598522 SSN Provided: 297-44-3727 Tax Period Requested:

More information

Math Treibergs. Turbine Blade Example: 2 6 Factorial Name: Example Experiment with 1 4 Replication February 22, 2016

Math Treibergs. Turbine Blade Example: 2 6 Factorial Name: Example Experiment with 1 4 Replication February 22, 2016 Math 3080 1. Treibergs Turbine Blade Example: 2 6 actorial Name: Example Experiment with 1 4 Replication ebruary 22, 2016 An experiment was run in the VPI Mechanical Engineering epartment to assess various

More information

STAT 572 Assignment 5 - Answers Due: March 2, 2007

STAT 572 Assignment 5 - Answers Due: March 2, 2007 1. The file glue.txt contains a data set with the results of an experiment on the dry sheer strength (in pounds per square inch) of birch plywood, bonded with 5 different resin glues A, B, C, D, and E.

More information

Chapter 8 Conclusion

Chapter 8 Conclusion 1 Chapter 8 Conclusion Three questions about test scores (score) and student-teacher ratio (str): a) After controlling for differences in economic characteristics of different districts, does the effect

More information

Exercise 2 SISG Association Mapping

Exercise 2 SISG Association Mapping Exercise 2 SISG Association Mapping Load the bpdata.csv data file into your R session. LHON.txt data file into your R session. Can read the data directly from the website if your computer is connected

More information

Variance Decomposition in Regression James M. Murray, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin - La Crosse Updated: October 04, 2017

Variance Decomposition in Regression James M. Murray, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin - La Crosse Updated: October 04, 2017 Variance Decomposition in Regression James M. Murray, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin - La Crosse Updated: October 04, 2017 PDF file location: http://www.murraylax.org/rtutorials/regression_anovatable.pdf

More information

Carapace Example: Confidence Intervals in the Wilcoxon Sign-rank Test

Carapace Example: Confidence Intervals in the Wilcoxon Sign-rank Test Math 3080 1. Treibergs Carapace Example: Confidence Intervals in the Wilcoxon Sign-rank Test Name: Example April 19, 2014 In this discussion, we look at confidence intervals in the Wilcoxon Sign-Rank Test

More information

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN Math 3070 1. Treibergs Extraterrestial Life Example: One-Sample CI and Test of Proportion Name: Example May 31, 2011 The existence of intelligent life on other planets has fascinated writers, such as H.

More information

Horse Kick Example: Chi-Squared Test for Goodness of Fit with Unknown Parameters

Horse Kick Example: Chi-Squared Test for Goodness of Fit with Unknown Parameters Math 3080 1. Treibergs Horse Kick Example: Chi-Squared Test for Goodness of Fit with Unknown Parameters Name: Example April 4, 014 This R c program explores a goodness of fit test where the parameter is

More information

(1) (AE) (BE) + (AB) + (CE) (AC) (BE) + (ABCE) +(DE) (AD) (BD) + (ABDE) + (CD) (ACDE) (BCDE) + (ABCD)

(1) (AE) (BE) + (AB) + (CE) (AC) (BE) + (ABCE) +(DE) (AD) (BD) + (ABDE) + (CD) (ACDE) (BCDE) + (ABCD) Math 3080 1. Treibergs Peanut xample: 2 5 alf Replication Factorial xperiment Name: xample Feb. 8, 2014 We describe a 2 5 experimental design with one half replicate per cell. It comes from a paper by

More information

Class: Dean Foster. September 30, Read sections: Examples chapter (chapter 3) Question today: Do prices go up faster than they go down?

Class: Dean Foster. September 30, Read sections: Examples chapter (chapter 3) Question today: Do prices go up faster than they go down? Class: Dean Foster September 30, 2013 Administrivia Read sections: Examples chapter (chapter 3) Gas prices Question today: Do prices go up faster than they go down? Idea is that sellers watch spot price

More information

Gas Transport Example: Confidence Intervals in the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

Gas Transport Example: Confidence Intervals in the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test Math 3080 1. Treibergs Gas Transport Example: Confidence Intervals in the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test Name: Example April 19, 014 In this discussion, we look at confidence intervals in the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum

More information

How to Calculate Form Line 15

How to Calculate Form Line 15 How to Calculate Form 8621 - Line 15 2013-2015 Comprehensive Example Mary Beth Lougen EA USTCP Chief Operating Officer Expat Tax Tools B.Lougen@f8621.com 1 (844) 312-8670 ext. 402 www.f8621.com www.expattaxtools.com

More information

Variance Decomposition and Goodness of Fit

Variance Decomposition and Goodness of Fit Variance Decomposition and Goodness of Fit 1. Example: Monthly Earnings and Years of Education In this tutorial, we will focus on an example that explores the relationship between total monthly earnings

More information

f Simulation Example: Simulating p-values of Two Sample Variance Test. Name: Example June 26, 2011 Math Treibergs

f Simulation Example: Simulating p-values of Two Sample Variance Test. Name: Example June 26, 2011 Math Treibergs Math 3070 1. Treibergs f Simulation Example: Simulating p-values of Two Sample Variance Test. Name: Example June 26, 2011 The t-test is fairly robust with regard to actual distribution of data. But the

More information

Math Treibergs. Peanut Oil Data: 2 5 Factorial design with 1/2 Replication. Name: Example April 22, Data File Used in this Analysis:

Math Treibergs. Peanut Oil Data: 2 5 Factorial design with 1/2 Replication. Name: Example April 22, Data File Used in this Analysis: Math 3080 1. Treibergs Peanut Oil Data: 2 5 Factorial design with 1/2 Replication. Name: Example April 22, 2010 Data File Used in this Analysis: # Math 3080-1 Peanut Oil Data April 22, 2010 # Treibergs

More information

Homework 2. For the homework, be sure to give full explanations where required and to turn in any relevant plots.

Homework 2. For the homework, be sure to give full explanations where required and to turn in any relevant plots. Homework 2 1 Data analysis problems For the homework, be sure to give full explanations where required and to turn in any relevant plots. 1. The file berkeley.dat contains average yearly temperatures for

More information

Munitions Example: Negative Binomial to Predict Number of Accidents

Munitions Example: Negative Binomial to Predict Number of Accidents Math 37 1. Treibergs Munitions Eample: Negative Binomial to Predict Number of Accidents Name: Eample July 17, 211 This problem comes from Bulmer, Principles of Statistics, Dover, 1979, which is a republication

More information

2006 Supplemental Tax Information for JennisonDryden and Strategic Partners Funds

2006 Supplemental Tax Information for JennisonDryden and Strategic Partners Funds 2006 Supplemental Information for JennisonDryden and Strategic Partners s We have compiled the following information to help you prepare your 2006 federal and state tax returns: Percentage of income from

More information

Econometrics Homework 1

Econometrics Homework 1 Econometrics Homework Due Date: March, 24. by This problem set includes questions for Lecture -4 covered before midterm exam. Question Let z be a random column vector of size 3 : z = @ (a) Write out z

More information

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN

R version ( ) Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN Math 3070 1. Tibergs Simulating the Sampling Distribution of the t-statistic Name: Eample May 20, 2011 How well does a statistic behave when the assumptions about the underlying population fail to hold?

More information

STAT 3022 Spring 2007

STAT 3022 Spring 2007 Simple Linear Regression Example These commands reproduce what we did in class. You should enter these in R and see what they do. Start by typing > set.seed(42) to reset the random number generator so

More information

lm statistics Chris Parrish

lm statistics Chris Parrish lm statistics Chris Parrish 2017-04-01 Contents s e and R 2 1 experiment1................................................. 2 experiment2................................................. 3 experiment3.................................................

More information

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A ) (DATA REQUEST DRA-MPS-2)

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A ) (DATA REQUEST DRA-MPS-2) QUESTION 1: Please provide the following in excel format for SCG and SDG&E: a) Provide historical quarterly data for all variables for the customer/meter forecast model (1988Ql to 2011Q4) workpapers page

More information

Math 2311 Written Homework 6 (Sections )

Math 2311 Written Homework 6 (Sections ) Math 2311 Written Homework 6 (Sections 5.4 5.6) Name: PeopleSoft ID: Instructions: Homework will NOT be accepted through email or in person. Homework must be submitted through CourseWare BEFORE the deadline.

More information

Chapter 12: Linear regression II

Chapter 12: Linear regression II Chapter 12: Linear regression II Timothy Hanson Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina Stat 205: Elementary Statistics for the Biological and Life Sciences 1 / 14 12.4 The regression model

More information

ST430 Exam 1 with Answers

ST430 Exam 1 with Answers ST430 Exam 1 with Answers Date: October 5, 2015 Name: Guideline: You may use one-page (front and back of a standard A4 paper) of notes. No laptop or textook are permitted but you may use a calculator.

More information

Tests of Linear Restrictions

Tests of Linear Restrictions Tests of Linear Restrictions 1. Linear Restricted in Regression Models In this tutorial, we consider tests on general linear restrictions on regression coefficients. In other tutorials, we examine some

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU F CLASS FILING INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN MODEL

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU F CLASS FILING INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN MODEL F Class Exhibit 4 Proposed 10/1/16 PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU F CLASS FILING INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN MODEL The attached pages present exhibits and a description of the internal rate of return

More information

CLEAR EVIDENCE OF VOTING ANOMALIES IN BLADEN AND ROBESON COUNTIES RICHARD L. SMITH FEBRUARY 11, 2019

CLEAR EVIDENCE OF VOTING ANOMALIES IN BLADEN AND ROBESON COUNTIES RICHARD L. SMITH FEBRUARY 11, 2019 CLEAR EVIDENCE OF VOTING ANOMALIES IN BLADEN AND ROBESON COUNTIES RICHARD L. SMITH FEBRUARY 11, 2019 This is a revision of an earlier commentary submitted on January 18. I am a professor of statistics

More information

Workshop 7.4a: Single factor ANOVA

Workshop 7.4a: Single factor ANOVA -1- Workshop 7.4a: Single factor ANOVA Murray Logan November 23, 2016 Table of contents 1 Revision 1 2 Anova Parameterization 2 3 Partitioning of variance (ANOVA) 10 4 Worked Examples 13 1. Revision 1.1.

More information

Coefficient of Determination

Coefficient of Determination Coefficient of Determination ST 430/514 The coefficient of determination, R 2, is defined as before: R 2 = 1 SS E (yi ŷ i ) = 1 2 SS yy (yi ȳ) 2 The interpretation of R 2 is still the fraction of variance

More information

Regression Methods for Survey Data

Regression Methods for Survey Data Regression Methods for Survey Data Professor Ron Fricker! Naval Postgraduate School! Monterey, California! 3/26/13 Reading:! Lohr chapter 11! 1 Goals for this Lecture! Linear regression! Review of linear

More information

INCOME BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS 32,373 Net Operating Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 70, ,619 32,373 Net Total Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 71, ,306

INCOME BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS 32,373 Net Operating Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 70, ,619 32,373 Net Total Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 71, ,306 Goodwill Industries, Inc. Comparative Income Statement Feb16 Year to Date Variance/ Variance Variance Variance/ Last Year from Budget Actual INCOME Actual from Budget Last Year (5,847) (6,678) 1,471,935

More information

Inferences on Linear Combinations of Coefficients

Inferences on Linear Combinations of Coefficients Inferences on Linear Combinations of Coefficients Note on required packages: The following code required the package multcomp to test hypotheses on linear combinations of regression coefficients. If you

More information

Distributed-lag linear structural equation models in R: the dlsem package

Distributed-lag linear structural equation models in R: the dlsem package Distributed-lag linear structural equation models in R: the dlsem package Alessandro Magrini Dep. Statistics, Computer Science, Applications University of Florence, Italy dlsem

More information

Comparing Nested Models

Comparing Nested Models Comparing Nested Models ST 370 Two regression models are called nested if one contains all the predictors of the other, and some additional predictors. For example, the first-order model in two independent

More information

Summary of Main Checking Account

Summary of Main Checking Account December 31, 2014 Summary of Main Checking Account Cash In Cash Out Net Change Prior Month Current Pre-Paid Sub Total Current Pre-Paid Sub Total Current Pre-Paid Total Year October 34,667.52 20,265.00

More information

The linear model. Our models so far are linear. Change in Y due to change in X? See plots for: o age vs. ahe o carats vs.

The linear model. Our models so far are linear. Change in Y due to change in X? See plots for: o age vs. ahe o carats vs. 8 Nonlinear effects Lots of effects in economics are nonlinear Examples Deal with these in two (sort of three) ways: o Polynomials o Logarithms o Interaction terms (sort of) 1 The linear model Our models

More information

Regression on Faithful with Section 9.3 content

Regression on Faithful with Section 9.3 content Regression on Faithful with Section 9.3 content The faithful data frame contains 272 obervational units with variables waiting and eruptions measuring, in minutes, the amount of wait time between eruptions,

More information

As included in Load Forecast Review Report (Page 1):

As included in Load Forecast Review Report (Page 1): As included in Load Forecast Review Report (Page 1): A key shortcoming of the approach taken by MH is the reliance on a forecast that has a probability of being accurate 50% of the time for a business

More information

Term Insurance vs. Indexed Universal Life

Term Insurance vs. Indexed Universal Life Insurance vs. Indexed Universal Life For: Tom Robinson Presented By: [Licensed user's name appears here] Preface A decision to acquire additional life insurance can represent one of several significant

More information

Sunshine City 47-Sp MHP

Sunshine City 47-Sp MHP Sunshine City 47-Sp MHP 47-sp MHP w/36 POM's Recreation Building used for StorageLaundry Room (Currently not in use) 70% Occupancy - 9-spaces left & 5 MH's left to lease 10 Mobile Homes Newly Rehabbed

More information

Booklet of Code and Output for STAC32 Final Exam

Booklet of Code and Output for STAC32 Final Exam Booklet of Code and Output for STAC32 Final Exam December 7, 2017 Figure captions are below the Figures they refer to. LowCalorie LowFat LowCarbo Control 8 2 3 2 9 4 5 2 6 3 4-1 7 5 2 0 3 1 3 3 Figure

More information

Example: Data from the Child Health and Development Study

Example: Data from the Child Health and Development Study Example: Data from the Child Health and Development Study Can we use linear regression to examine how well length of gesta:onal period predicts birth weight? First look at the sca@erplot: Does a linear

More information

Cash Flow Illustration

Cash Flow Illustration Cash Flow Illustration An Integrated Analysis of LIFETIME CASH FLOWS & NET WORTH AN ANALYSIS PREPARED EXCLUSIVELY FOR Jack Retires at Age 62 & Jill Retires at Age 60 1 Disclaimer This financial plan is

More information

Circling the Square: Experiments in Regression

Circling the Square: Experiments in Regression Circling the Square: Experiments in Regression R. D. Coleman [unaffiliated] This document is excerpted from the research paper entitled Critique of Asset Pricing Circularity by Robert D. Coleman dated

More information

Problem 4.4 and 6.16 of Devore discuss the Rayleigh Distribution, whose pdf is x, x > 0; x x 0. x 2 f(x; θ) dx x=0. pe p dp.

Problem 4.4 and 6.16 of Devore discuss the Rayleigh Distribution, whose pdf is x, x > 0; x x 0. x 2 f(x; θ) dx x=0. pe p dp. Math 3070 1. Treibergs Blade Stress Example: Estimate Parameter of Rayleigh Distribution. Name: Example June 15, 2011 Problem 4.4 and 6.16 of Devore discuss the Rayleigh Distribution, whose pdf is ) x

More information

Simple Linear Regression

Simple Linear Regression Simple Linear Regression MATH 282A Introduction to Computational Statistics University of California, San Diego Instructor: Ery Arias-Castro http://math.ucsd.edu/ eariasca/math282a.html MATH 282A University

More information

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Internal Rate Of Return Model

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Internal Rate Of Return Model Exhibit 9 As Filed DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Internal Rate Of Return Model The attached pages present exhibits and a description of the internal rate of return model used in deriving the

More information

MODELS WITHOUT AN INTERCEPT

MODELS WITHOUT AN INTERCEPT Consider the balanced two factor design MODELS WITHOUT AN INTERCEPT Factor A 3 levels, indexed j 0, 1, 2; Factor B 5 levels, indexed l 0, 1, 2, 3, 4; n jl 4 replicate observations for each factor level

More information

Multiple Linear Regression

Multiple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression ST 430/514 Recall: a regression model describes how a dependent variable (or response) Y is affected, on average, by one or more independent variables (or factors, or covariates).

More information

Study Sheet. December 10, The course PDF has been updated (6/11). Read the new one.

Study Sheet. December 10, The course PDF has been updated (6/11). Read the new one. Study Sheet December 10, 2017 The course PDF has been updated (6/11). Read the new one. 1 Definitions to know The mode:= the class or center of the class with the highest frequency. The median : Q 2 is

More information

Jan-16 Balance February Net Feb-16 Balance Market Avg Rate DEBT SERVICE FUND

Jan-16 Balance February Net Feb-16 Balance Market Avg Rate DEBT SERVICE FUND SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INVESTMENT REPORT February 29, 2016 Jan-16 Balance February Net Feb-16 Balance Market Avg Rate Description Int Earned 1/31/2016 % Transactions Int Earned 2/29/2016

More information

Introduction and Background to Multilevel Analysis

Introduction and Background to Multilevel Analysis Introduction and Background to Multilevel Analysis Dr. J. Kyle Roberts Southern Methodist University Simmons School of Education and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning Background and

More information

Introduction to Mixed Models in R

Introduction to Mixed Models in R Introduction to Mixed Models in R Galin Jones School of Statistics University of Minnesota http://www.stat.umn.edu/ galin March 2011 Second in a Series Sponsored by Quantitative Methods Collaborative.

More information

Continuous soil attribute modeling and mapping: Multiple linear regression

Continuous soil attribute modeling and mapping: Multiple linear regression Continuous soil attribute modeling and mapping: Multiple linear regression Soil Security Laboratory 2017 1 Multiple linear regression Multiple linear regression (MLR) is where we regress a target variable

More information

Factor Mimicking Portfolios

Factor Mimicking Portfolios Factor Mimicking Portfolios Bernt Arne Ødegaard 25 October 2018 Contents 1 Factor Mimicking Portfolios 1 1.1 Economic Tracking Portfolios.................................................. 1 1.2 Example.............................................................

More information

STAT Lecture 11: Bayesian Regression

STAT Lecture 11: Bayesian Regression STAT 491 - Lecture 11: Bayesian Regression Generalized Linear Models Generalized linear models (GLMs) are a class of techniques that include linear regression, logistic regression, and Poisson regression.

More information

Vector Autoregression

Vector Autoregression Vector Autoregression Prabakar Rajasekaran December 13, 212 1 Introduction Vector autoregression (VAR) is an econometric model used to capture the evolution and the interdependencies between multiple time

More information

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Midterm Test, October 2013

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Midterm Test, October 2013 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences Midterm Test, October 2013 STAC67H3 Regression Analysis Duration: One hour and fifty minutes Last Name: First Name: Student

More information

R in Linguistic Analysis. Wassink 2012 University of Washington Week 6

R in Linguistic Analysis. Wassink 2012 University of Washington Week 6 R in Linguistic Analysis Wassink 2012 University of Washington Week 6 Overview R for phoneticians and lab phonologists Johnson 3 Reading Qs Equivalence of means (t-tests) Multiple Regression Principal

More information

Allianz Thailand Equity

Allianz Thailand Equity Allianz Thailand Equity In the six month period ending 31 March 2016 ( the period ), market conditions were highly volatile. The SET index declined sharply from mid-october 2015 to early January 2016,

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Department of Mathematics and Statistics Basic Exam - Applied Statistics January, 2018

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Department of Mathematics and Statistics Basic Exam - Applied Statistics January, 2018 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Department of Mathematics and Statistics Basic Exam - Applied Statistics January, 2018 Work all problems. 60 points needed to pass at the Masters level, 75 to pass at the PhD

More information

GMM - Generalized method of moments

GMM - Generalized method of moments GMM - Generalized method of moments GMM Intuition: Matching moments You want to estimate properties of a data set {x t } T t=1. You assume that x t has a constant mean and variance. x t (µ 0, σ 2 ) Consider

More information

Beers Law Instructor s Guide David T. Harvey

Beers Law Instructor s Guide David T. Harvey Beers Law Instructor s Guide David T. Harvey Introduction This learning module provides an introduction to Beer s law that is designed for an introductory course in analytical chemistry. The module consists

More information

Information Content Change under SFAS No. 131 s Interim Segment Reporting Requirements

Information Content Change under SFAS No. 131 s Interim Segment Reporting Requirements Vol 2, No. 3, Fall 2010 Page 61~75 Information Content Change under SFAS No. 131 s Interim Segment Reporting Requirements Cho, Joong-Seok a a. School of Business Administration, Hanyang University, Seoul,

More information

Final Exam. Name: Solution:

Final Exam. Name: Solution: Final Exam. Name: Instructions. Answer all questions on the exam. Open books, open notes, but no electronic devices. The first 13 problems are worth 5 points each. The rest are worth 1 point each. HW1.

More information

Introductory Mathematics and Statistics Summer Practice Questions

Introductory Mathematics and Statistics Summer Practice Questions University of Warwick Introductory Mathematics and Statistics Summer Practice Questions Jeremy Smith Piotr Z. Jelonek Nicholas Jackson This version: 22nd August 2017 Please find below a list of warm-up

More information

Stat 411/511 ESTIMATING THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT. Charlotte Wickham. stat511.cwick.co.nz. Nov

Stat 411/511 ESTIMATING THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT. Charlotte Wickham. stat511.cwick.co.nz. Nov Stat 411/511 ESTIMATING THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT Nov 20 2015 Charlotte Wickham stat511.cwick.co.nz Quiz #4 This weekend, don t forget. Usual format Assumptions Display 7.5 p. 180 The ideal normal, simple

More information

Practice 2 due today. Assignment from Berndt due Monday. If you double the number of programmers the amount of time it takes doubles. Huh?

Practice 2 due today. Assignment from Berndt due Monday. If you double the number of programmers the amount of time it takes doubles. Huh? Admistrivia Practice 2 due today. Assignment from Berndt due Monday. 1 Story: Pair programming Mythical man month If you double the number of programmers the amount of time it takes doubles. Huh? Invention

More information

Lakeland Court MHP Norton Rd Lakeland, FL 33809

Lakeland Court MHP Norton Rd Lakeland, FL 33809 23-space/units - 2 Block Homes - 2 Duplexes 75% Occupied - Annual Leases - Long Term Tenants City Water - Septic Possible 3 additional spaces can be added Seller may consider offering Seller Financing

More information

Product Overview EXPLORE. Scholars Choice 529 plan INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE

Product Overview EXPLORE. Scholars Choice 529 plan INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE Product Overview EXPLORE Scholars Choice 529 plan INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE College is within reach. You just need the right partner. With the Scholars Choice

More information

22s:152 Applied Linear Regression

22s:152 Applied Linear Regression 22s:152 Applied Linear Regression Chapter 7: Dummy Variable Regression So far, we ve only considered quantitative variables in our models. We can integrate categorical predictors by constructing artificial

More information

Multivariate Regression Model Results

Multivariate Regression Model Results Updated: August, 0 Page of Multivariate Regression Model Results 4 5 6 7 8 This exhibit provides the results of the load model forecast discussed in Schedule. Included is the forecast of short term system

More information

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam List of Figures in this document by page: List of Figures 1 NBA attendance data........................ 2 2 Regression model for NBA attendances...............

More information

Using regression to study economic relationships is called econometrics. econo = of or pertaining to the economy. metrics = measurement

Using regression to study economic relationships is called econometrics. econo = of or pertaining to the economy. metrics = measurement EconS 450 Forecasting part 3 Forecasting with Regression Using regression to study economic relationships is called econometrics econo = of or pertaining to the economy metrics = measurement Econometrics

More information

Report Kristján Ágústsson Bergþóra Þorbjarnardóttir Kristín Vogfjörð. Seismic wave attenuation for earthquakes in SW Iceland.

Report Kristján Ágústsson Bergþóra Þorbjarnardóttir Kristín Vogfjörð. Seismic wave attenuation for earthquakes in SW Iceland. Report 08005 Kristján Ágústsson Bergþóra Þorbjarnardóttir Kristín Vogfjörð Seismic wave attenuation for earthquakes in SW Iceland First results VÍ-ES-02 Reykjavík April 2008 Contents ABSTRACT... 5 INTRODUCTION...

More information

Estimating the return to education for married women mroz.csv: 753 observations and 22 variables

Estimating the return to education for married women mroz.csv: 753 observations and 22 variables Return to education Estimating the return to education for married women mroz.csv: 753 observations and 22 variables 1. inlf =1 if in labor force, 1975 2. hours hours worked, 1975 3. kidslt6 # kids < 6

More information

Homework1 Yang Sun 2017/9/11

Homework1 Yang Sun 2017/9/11 Homework1 Yang Sun 2017/9/11 1. Describe data According to the data description, the response variable is AmountSpent; the predictors are, Age, Gender, OwnHome, Married, Location, Salary, Children, History,

More information

L21: Chapter 12: Linear regression

L21: Chapter 12: Linear regression L21: Chapter 12: Linear regression Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina Stat 205: Elementary Statistics for the Biological and Life Sciences 1 / 37 So far... 12.1 Introduction One sample

More information

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Application No: A.1-0- Exhibit No.: Witness: Gregory Teplow Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 G) for Authority to Revise their Natural Gas

More information

X = S 2 = 1 n. X i. i=1

X = S 2 = 1 n. X i. i=1 Math 3070 1. Treibergs Horse Kick Example: Confidence Interval for Poisson Parameter Name: Example July 3, 2011 The Poisson Random Variable describes the number of occurences of rare events in a period

More information

The Big Picture. Model Modifications. Example (cont.) Bacteria Count Example

The Big Picture. Model Modifications. Example (cont.) Bacteria Count Example The Big Picture Remedies after Model Diagnostics The Big Picture Model Modifications Bret Larget Departments of Botany and of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison February 6, 2007 Residual plots

More information

Introductory Mathematics and Statistics Summer Practice Questions

Introductory Mathematics and Statistics Summer Practice Questions University of Warwick Introductory Mathematics and Statistics Summer Practice Questions Jeremy Smith Piotr Z. Jelonek Nicholas Jackson This version: 15th August 2018 Please find below a list of warm-up

More information

Treatment Effects with Normal Disturbances in sampleselection Package

Treatment Effects with Normal Disturbances in sampleselection Package Treatment Effects with Normal Disturbances in sampleselection Package Ott Toomet University of Washington December 7, 017 1 The Problem Recent decades have seen a surge in interest for evidence-based policy-making.

More information

Solution to Series 3

Solution to Series 3 Prof. Nicolai Meinshausen Regression FS 2016 Solution to Series 3 1. a) The general least-squares regression estimator is given as Using the model equation, we get in this case ( ) X T x X (1)T x (1) x

More information

Solution: anti-fungal treatment exercise

Solution: anti-fungal treatment exercise Solution: anti-fungal treatment exercise Course repeated measurements - R exercise class 5 December 5, 2017 Contents 1 Question 1: Import data 2 1.1 Data management.....................................

More information

Interactions. Interactions. Lectures 1 & 2. Linear Relationships. y = a + bx. Slope. Intercept

Interactions. Interactions. Lectures 1 & 2. Linear Relationships. y = a + bx. Slope. Intercept Interactions Lectures 1 & Regression Sometimes two variables appear related: > smoking and lung cancers > height and weight > years of education and income > engine size and gas mileage > GMAT scores and

More information

ANZ Smart Choice Super for employers and their employees

ANZ Smart Choice Super for employers and their employees ANZ Smart Choice Super for employers and their employees Investment Returns and Asset Allocation - As at 31 March 2018 Contents Returns... 2 Asset Allocations........... 4 To access the fund profile for

More information