arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 31 May 2010

Transcription

1 EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN PH EP/ May, 00 Measurement of the Collins and Sivers asymmetries on transversely olarised rotons arxiv: v [he-ex] 3 May 00 The COMPASS Collaboration Abstract The Collins and Sivers asymmetries for charged hadrons roduced in deely inelastic scattering on transversely olarised rotons have been extracted from the data collected in 007 with the CERN SPS muon beam tuned at 60 GeV/c. At large values of the Bjorken x variable non-zero Collins asymmetries are observed both for ositive and negative hadrons while the Sivers asymmetry for ositive hadrons is slightly ositive over almost all the measured x range. These results nicely suort the resent theoretical interretation of these asymmetries, in terms of leading-twist quark distribution and fragmentation functions. submitted to Physics Letters B

2 The COMPASS Collaboration M.G. Alekseev 8), V.Yu. Alexakhin 7), Yu. Alexandrov 5), G.D. Alexeev 7), A. Amoroso 7), A. Austregesilo 0,7), B. Bade lek 30), F. Balestra 7), J. Ball ), J. Barth 4), G. Baum ), Y. Bedfer ), J. Bernhard 3), R. Bertini 7), M. Bettinelli 6), R. Birsa 4), J. Bislinghoff 3), P. Bordalo,a), F. Bradamante 5), A. Bravar 4), A. Bressan 5), G. Brona 0,30), E. Burtin ), M.P. Bussa 7), D. Chaberny 3), M. Chiosso 7), S.U. Chung 7), A. Cicuttin 6), M. Colantoni 8), M.L. Creso 6), S. Dalla Torre 4), S. Das 6), S.S. Dasguta 6), O.Yu. Denisov 0,8), L. Dhara 6), V. Diaz 6), S.V. Donskov ), N. Doshita,3), V. Duic 5), W. Dünnweber 6), A. Efremov 7), A. El Alaoui ), C. Elia 5), P.D. Eversheim 3), W. Eyrich 8), M. Faessler 6), A. Ferrero ), A. Filin ), M. Finger 9), M. Finger jr. 7), H. Fischer 9), C. Franco ), J.M. Friedrich 7), R. Garfagnini 7), F. Gautheron ), O.P. Gavrichtchouk 7), R. Gazda 30), S. Gerassimov 5,7), R. Geyer 6), M. Giorgi 5), I. Gnesi 7), B. Gobbo 4), S. Goertz,4), S. Grabmüller 7), A. Grasso 7), B. Grube 7), R. Gushterski 7), A. Guskov 7), F. Haas 7), D. von Harrach 3), T. Hasegawa 4), F.H. Heinsius 9), R. Hermann 3), F. Herrmann 9), C. Heß ), F. Hinterberger 3), N. Horikawa 8,b), Ch. Höner 7), N. d Hose ), C. Ilgner 0,6), S. Ishimoto 8,c), O. Ivanov 7), Yu. Ivanshin 7), T. Iwata 3), R. Jahn 3), P. Jasinski 3), G. Jegou ), R. Joosten 3), E. Kabuß 3), W. Käfer 9), D. Kang 9), B. Ketzer 7), G.V. Khaustov ), Yu.A. Khokhlov ), Yu. Kisselev ), F. Klein 4), K. Klimaszewski 30), S. Koblitz 3), J.H. Koivuniemi ), V.N. Kolosov ), K. Kondo,3), K. Königsmann 9), R. Konoka 7), I. Konorov 5,7), V.F. Konstantinov ), A. Korzenev 3,d), A.M. Kotzinian 7), O. Kouznetsov 7,), K. Kowalik 30,), M. Krämer 7), A. Kral 0), Z.V. Kroumchtein 7), R. Kuhn 7), F. Kunne ), K. Kurek 30), L. Lauser 9), J.M. Le Goff ), A.A. Lednev ), A. Lehmann 8), S. Levorato 5), J. Lichtenstadt 3), T. Liska 0), A. Maggiora 8), M. Maggiora 7), A. Magnon ), G.K. Mallot 0), A. Mann 7), C. Marchand ), A. Martin 5), J. Marzec 3), F. Massmann 3), T. Matsuda 4), W. Meyer ), T. Michigami 3), Yu.V. Mikhailov ), M.A. Moinester 3), A. Mutter 9,3), A. Nagaytsev 7), T. Nagel 7), J. Nassalski 30,+), T. Negrini 3), F. Nerling 9), S. Neubert 7), D. Neyret ), V.I. Nikolaenko ), A.S. Nunes ), A.G. Olshevsky 7), M. Ostrick 3), A. Padee 3), R. Panknin 4), D. Panzieri 9), B. Parsamyan 7), S. Paul 7), B. Pawlukiewicz-Kaminska 30), E. Perevalova 7), G. Pesaro 5), D.V. Peshekhonov 7), G. Piragino 7), S. Platchkov ), J. Pochodzalla 3), J. Polak,5), V.A. Polyakov ), G. Pontecorvo 7), J. Pretz 4), C. Quintans ), J.-F. Rajotte 6), S. Ramos,a), V. Raatsky 7), G. Reicherz ), A. Richter 8), F. Robinet ), E. Rocco 7), E. Rondio 30), D.I. Ryabchikov ), V.D. Samoylenko ), A. Sandacz 30), H. Santos ), M.G. Saozhnikov 7), S. Sarkar 6), I.A. Savin 7), G. Sbrizzai 5), P. Schiavon 5), C. Schill 9), T. Schlüter 6), L. Schmitt 7,e), S. Schoferer 9), W. Schröder 8), O.Yu. Shevchenko 7), H.-W. Siebert 3), L. Silva ), L. Sinha 6), A.N. Sissakian 7), M. Slunecka 7), G.I. Smirnov 7), S. Sosio 7), F. Sozzi 5), A. Srnka 5), M. Stolarski 0), M. Sulc ), R. Sulej 3), S. Takekawa 5), S. Tessaro 4), F. Tessarotto 4), A. Teufel 8), L.G. Tkatchev 7), S. Uhl 7), I. Uman 6), M. Virius 0), N.V. Vlassov 7), A. Vossen 9), Q. Weitzel 7), R. Windmolders 4), W. Wiślicki 30), H. Wollny 9), K. Zaremba 3), M. Zavertyaev 5), E. Zemlyanichkina 7), M. Ziembicki 3), J. Zhao 3,4), N. Zhuravlev 7) and A. Zvyagin 6)

3 ) Universität Bielefeld, Fakultät für Physik, 3350 Bielefeld, Germany f) ) Universität Bochum, Institut für Exerimentalhysik, Bochum, Germany f) 3) Universität Bonn, Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernhysik, 535 Bonn, Germany f) 4) Universität Bonn, Physikalisches Institut, 535 Bonn, Germany f) 5) Institute of Scientific Instruments, AS CR, 664 Brno, Czech Reublic g) 6) Matrivani Institute of Exerimental Research & Education, Calcutta , India h) 7) Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 4980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia i) 8) Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Physikalisches Institut, 9054 Erlangen, Germany f) 9) Universität Freiburg, Physikalisches Institut, 7904 Freiburg, Germany f) 0) CERN, Geneva 3, Switzerland ) Technical University in Liberec, 467 Liberec, Czech Reublic g) ) LIP, Lisbon, Portugal j) 3) Universität Mainz, Institut für Kernhysik, Mainz, Germany f) 4) University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-9, Jaan k) 5) Lebedev Physical Institute, 999 Moscow, Russia 6) Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deartment für Physik, Munich, Germany f,l) 7) Technische Universität München, Physik Deartment, Garching, Germany f,l) 8) Nagoya University, 464 Nagoya, Jaan k) 9) Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, 8000 Prague, Czech Reublic g) 0) Czech Technical University in Prague, 6636 Prague, Czech Reublic g) ) State Research Center of the Russian Federation, Institute for High Energy Physics, 48 Protvino, Russia ) CEA IRFU/SPhN Saclay, 99 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 3) Tel Aviv University, School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv, Israel m) 4) Trieste Section of INFN, 347 Trieste, Italy 5) University of Trieste, Deartment of Physics and Trieste Section of INFN, 347 Trieste, Italy 6) Abdus Salam ICTP and Trieste Section of INFN, 347 Trieste, Italy 7) University of Turin, Deartment of Physics and Torino Section of INFN, 05 Turin, Italy 8) Torino Section of INFN, 05 Turin, Italy 9) University of Eastern Piedmont, 500 Alessandria, and Torino Section of INFN, 05 Turin, Italy 30) So ltan Institute for Nuclear Studies and University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland n) 3) Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Radioelectronics, Warsaw, Poland o) 3) Yamagata University, Yamagata, Jaan k) +) Deceased a) Also at IST, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal b) Also at Chubu University, Kasugai, Aichi, Jaan j) c) Also at KEK, - Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Jaan d) On leave of absence from JINR Dubna e) Also at GSI mbh, Planckstr., D-649 Darmstadt, Germany f) Suorted by the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung g) Suorted by Czech Reublic MEYS grants ME49 and LA4 h) Suorted by SAIL (CSR), Govt. of India i) Suorted by Suorted by CERN-RFBR grant j) Suorted by the Portuguese FCT - Fundação ara a Ciência e Tecnologia grants POCTI/FNU/4950/00 and POCTI/FNU/509/003 k) SuortedbytheMEXTandtheJSPSundertheGrantsNo ,No andNo.85408; Daiko Foundation and Yamada Foundation l) Suorted by the DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe ( m) Suorted by the Israel Science Foundation, founded by the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities n) Suorted by Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant 4/N-CERN/007/0 o) Suorted by KBN grant nr 34/E-365/SPUB-M/CERN/P-03/DZ99/000

4 After first indications of transverse sin effects in hadron hysics in the 970s [, ] their imortance was unambiguously established by the remarkably large single sin asymmetries (SSAs) found in collisions at Fermilab both for neutral and charged ions [3]. Following the discovery by the EMC at CERN in 988 that the quark sins contribute only little to the roton sin [4], the interest in the nucleon sin structure was revived and a more comlete descrition including quark transverse sin and transverse momentum has been worked out. The quark structure of the nucleon in the collinear aroximation or after integration over the intrinsic quark transverse momentum k T is fully secified at the twist-two level by three arton distribution functions (PDFs) for each quark flavour [5]: the momentum distributions q(x), the helicity distributions q(x) and the transverse sin distributions T q(x), where x is the Bjorken variable. The latter distribution often referred to as transversity is chiral-odd and thus not directly observable in dee inelastic scattering (DIS). In 993 it was suggested [6] that transversity could be measured in semi-inclusive leton nucleon scattering (SIDIS) due to a mechanism involving another chiral-odd function in the hadronisation, known today as the Collins fragmentation function (FF). The mechanism leads to a left-right asymmetry in the distribution of the hadrons roduced in the fragmentation of transversely olarised quarks. Thus a transverse sin deendence in the azimuthal distributions of the final state hadrons can be generated both in transversely olarised scattering and in SIDIS off transversely olarised nucleons. In the latter case the measurable Collins asymmetry, A Coll, is roortional to the convolution of the transversity PDF and the Collins FF. Admitting a finite k T, intotaleight PDFsareneeded for afull descrition at leading twist and leading order in α S [7, 8, 9]. All these functions lead to azimuthal asymmetries in the distribution of hadrons roduced in SIDIS rocesses and can be disentangled measuring the different angular modulations. Amongst the transverse momentum deendent PDFs, the T-odd Sivers function [0] is of articular interest. This function arises from a correlation between the transverse momentum of an unolarised quark in a transversely olarised nucleon and the nucleon sin. It can be different from zero because of final state interactions mediated by soft gluon exchange between the interacting quark and the target remnants []. It is resonsible for the Sivers asymmetry, A Siv, which is roortional to the convolution of the Sivers function and the unolarised FF. The Sivers mechanism might also be the reason for the large asymmetries observed in collisions. Transverse sin effects in SIDIS are investigated, at different beam energies, by the HERMES exeriment at DESY and the COMPASS exeriment at CERN. An exeriment to measure transversity using a transversely olarised 3 He target has recently been erformed at JLab []. Transverse sin effects are also an imortant art of the scientific rogramme of the RHIC sin exeriments at BNL. U to now, sizable Collins asymmetries for the roton were observed recently by HERMES using a roton target [3]. This imlies non-vanishing Collins fragmentation and transversity functions. Direct measurements at the KEK e + e collider by the BELLE exeriment established that this Collins FF is sizable [4, 5]. COMPASS measured vanishing asymmetries by scattering high energy muons off a deuteron target [6, 7, 8]. All these data were well described by a global fit [9, 0] which allowed for a first extraction of the u and d-quark transversity PDFs. The Sivers asymmetry for the roton was measured by HERMES [3, ] to be different from zero for ositive hadrons, while it was found to be comatible with zero for deuteron by COMPASS [6, 7, 8]. These HERMES and COMPASS data could also

5 be well described by theoretical calculations and fits, and allowed for extractions of the Sivers function [], which turned out to be different from zero and oosite in sign for u and d-quarks. In this Letter, we resent the COMPASS results on the Collins and Sivers asymmetries for charged hadrons roduced in SIDIS of high energy muons on transversely olarised rotons. The data were collected in 007 using NH 3 as target material and a 60 GeV/c beam with a momentum sread / = ±5%. The beam was naturally olarised by the π decay mechanism, with a longitudinal olarisation of about -80%. This measurement followed the measurements erformed in 00, 003 and 004 at the same energy with the transversely olarised 6 LiD target. TheCOMPASSsectrometer[3]isinoerationontheMbeamlineofCERNsince 00. Two magnetic stages are used to ensure large angular and momentum accetance. A variety of tracking detectors is used to coe with the different requirements of osition accuracy and rate caability at different angles. Particle identification is rovided by a large accetance RICH detector, calorimeters, and muon filters. Major ugrades in 005 mainly concerned the olarised target, the tracking system, the RICH detector, and the electromagnetic calorimeters. The new target solenoid magnet rovides a field of.5 T and has a olar angle accetance of 80 mrad as seen from the ustream end of the target. In the earlier measurements with the 6 LiD target the olar angle accetance was 70 mrad. The target material is cooled in a 3 He 4 He dilution refrigerator, and the rotons in the H atoms are olarised to by dynamical nuclear olarisation. About 48 hours are necessary to reach 95% of the maximal olarisation. A air of saddle-shaed coils can rovide a 0.6 T vertical field which is used to rotate the target nucleon sin and to hold the olarisation vertical for the transversity measurements. In the frozen sin mode, and with the holding field at its oerational value, the relaxation time of the olarisation exceeds 3000 hours. The target consisted of three cylindrical cells with 4 cm diameter, one central cell of 60 cm length and two outer ones of 30 cm length, all searated by 5 cm. Neighbouring cells were olarised in oosite directions, so that data with both sin directions were recorded at the same time. In order to minimise the effects due to different sectrometer accetance for different target cells, in each eriod of data taking a olarisation reversal was erformed after 4 5 days by changing the microwave frequencies in the three cells. The geometry of the olarised target and the data taking rocedure were chosen such as to otimise the extraction of sin asymmetries. The rincile of the measurement can be understood by considering the ratio roduct [7] R = N inner N N outer inner N, () outer where N inner and N outer are the number of hadrons roduced in the first sub-eriod on oositely olarised cells, and N inner and N outer are the corresonding numbers in the second sub-eriod, i.e. after olarisation reversal. The ratio roduct is constructed such that beam flux, sin-averaged cross-section, and the number of scattering centres cancel. As long as the ratios between the sectrometer accetances of each cell are the same in the two sub-eriods and the number of roduced hadrons follows the generic azimuthal modulation N ±ǫsinφ, one simly gets R = +4ǫsinΦ, and the extraction of the amlitude ǫ of the azimuthal modulation is straightforward. In 007 data were taken at a mean beam intensity of about µ + /s (tyically

6 µ + /sill, for a sill length of 4.8 s every 6.8 s). Using u muons, about 0 9 events were collected in six searate eriods, corresonding to 440 TB of data. In the data analysis, events were selected if they had at least one rimary vertex, defined as the intersection oint of a beam track, the scattered muon track, and other ossible outgoing tracks. The momenta of both incoming and outgoing charged articles were measured. The rimary vertex was required to be inside a target cell. In order to guarantee the same muon flux along the target material, the extraolated beam track had to traverse all the three target cells. For incoming and scattered muon tracks, as well as for the other reconstructed tracks, χ cuts were alied to assure the quality of track reconstruction. Tracks from the rimary vertex which traversed more than 30 radiation lengths were identified as scattered muons. The event was rejected if more than one of such tracks were found. In order to be in the DIS regime, only events with a hoton virtuality Q > (GeV/c), a fractional energy of the virtual hoton 0. < y < 0.9, and a mass of the hadronic final state W > 5 GeV/c were considered. The variable x covers the range from to 0.7. All articles emerging from the rimary vertex were assumed to be hadrons if they traversed less than 0 radiation lengths of material. For tracks with an associated cluster in one of the hadronic calorimeters, a minimal amount of deosited energy was required to further reduce the electron and muon contamination. Finally, tracks reconstructed only in the fringe field of the first analysing magnet of the sectrometer were rejected. This roughly corresonds to a cut at.5 GeV/c in the hadron momenta. In order to reconstruct the hadron azimuthal angle with good recision, the hadron transverse momentum with resect to the virtual hoton direction, h T, was required to be above 0. GeV/c. A minimum value of 0. for z, the relative energy of the hadron with resect to the virtual hoton energy, was chosen to avoid hadrons from the target fragmentation region. As exlained in detail in Ref. [7], the Collins effect shows u as a modulation [ + ǫ C sin(φ h + φ S π)] in the number of events, where φ h and φ S are the azimuthal angles of the hadron and of the target nucleon sin vector in a reference system in which the z-axis is the virtual hoton direction and the x z lane is the leton lane according to Ref. [4].. The amlitude of the modulation is ǫ C = D NN fp T A Coll, where D NN = ( y)/( y + y /) is the transverse sin transfer coefficient from target quark to struck quark, f the dilution factor of the NH 3 material, and P T is the roton olarisation. Similarly,theSiverseffectresultsinamodulation[+ǫ S sin(φ h φ S )],whereǫ S = fp T A Siv. The transverse sin asymmetries were obtained by comaring the azimuthal distributions of the detected hadrons as measured in the first sub-eriod of data taking with the corresonding distributions of the second half measured with oosite target olarisation. Since the two sets of data were taken tyically one week aart, the stability of the aaratus is a central oint in the measurement. As a first ste in the data selection, the hit distributions of all trackers were scrutinised, as well as the number of reconstructed events, the number of vertices er events, and the number of tracks er event. In a second ste, the stability of the average π + π invariant mass in the K 0 region as well as the distribution of twelve kinematic quantities (x, y, W, z,...) were investigated dividing the data in small time-ordered sub-samles. Each distribution of each sub-samle was comared with the corresonding ones of each other sub-samle within the same data taking eriod, and sub-samles were rejected when deviating more than 3.5 σ stat from the mean values. As a final selection criterion, the data were tested for a ossible deendence on 3

7 either sin(φ h +φ S ) or sin(φ h φ S ) of the accetance ratio between two consecutive suberiods with oosite target olarisation. Combining the number of events reconstructed in the different target cells in two consecutive data taking sub-eriods, one can construct two different estimators on the stability of the accetance. The first estimator measures the mean modulation in the relevant azimuthal angle of the accetance ratio between two sub-eriods. The second one robes ossible large differences in the accetance ratios for the different target cells which could affect the hysics asymmetry. These two ieces of information have been used to construct a χ and the final selection of the data taking eriods was done on the basis of its value. As a result of the quality control, all data collected in the six eriods were used for the extraction of the Collins asymmetry, while only four eriods were used for the Sivers asymmetry. This can be understood because the Sivers asymmetry is very sensitive to instabilities of the sectrometer since it is the amlitude of a modulation of the azimuthal angle of the hadron transverse momentum with resect to the target sin vector. On the contrary, the Collins asymmetry is an asymmetry in the azimuthal angle between the hadron transverse momentum and a direction which deends on the target sin direction and the leton scattering lane, which is different for each event. The final samle contains SIDISevents forthecollins asymmetry and forthe Sivers asymmetry. The asymmetries were evaluated for ositive and negative hadrons in bins of the three kinematic variables x, z and h T. The binning is the same as used for the revious analyses of deuteron data and consists of 9 bins in x, 8 bins in z and 9 bins in h T, integrating over the other two variables. For each eriod, the hysics asymmetries were obtained by dividing the raw asymmetries by the target olarisation, the dilution factor, and, in the case of Collins analysis, by the D NN factor. The target olarisation was measured individually for each cell and each eriod. The dilution factor of the ammonia target was evaluated for each bin. It is 0.5 in average, and increases with x from 0.4 to 0.7. The estimator used for the evaluation of the raw asymmetries is based on an extended unbinned maximum likelihood method [5]. The likelihood function is built as the roduct of the robability densities corresonding to each hadron i from each target cell. The likelihood for hadrons from a given target cell in one eriod is written as L = e N+ I+ i=0 + (φ h,i,φ S,i ) N + e N I i=0 N (φ h,i,φ S,i ). () The + and signs refer to the orientation of the target olarisation in the two suberiods and N ± is the corresonding total number of hadrons. The quantities I ± are the integrals of the robability densities over φ S and φ h. The robability densities ± are the roduct of two arts, one corresonding to the accetance descrition and the other to the SIDIS cross section of longitudinally olarised letons on transversely olarised nucleons. Various arametrisations of the accetance art were tested, resulting in a negligible deendence of the extracted asymmetries on the accetance descrition. The cross section was arametrised taking into account both the unolarised and olarised arts. The olarised art consists of all the exected eight modulations, namely sin(φ h + φ S π), sin(φ h φ S ), cos(φ h φ S ), sin(φ h φ S ), cos(φ h φ S ), sin(φ S ), cos(φ S ), and sin(3φ h φ S ), and all their amlitudes were extracted at the same time. The Collins and Sivers asymmetries are roortional to the amlitudes of the first two terms. Systematic studies for the other six amlitudes are still ongoing, and those results will be the subject 4

8 A Coll 0. ositive hadrons negative hadrons x 0.5 z (GeV/c) h T Figure : Collins asymmetry as a function of x, z, and h T, for ositive (closed oints) and negative (oen oints) hadrons. The bars show the statistical errors. The oint to oint systematic uncertainties have been estimated to be 0.5 σ stat for ositive and 0.6 σ stat for negative hadrons and are given by the bands. of a future ublication. The final Collins and Sivers asymmetries extracted with the likelihood method were comared with the asymmetries extracted using four other estimators, including those used in the revious ublications which were based on the ratio roduct R of Eq., finding an excellent agreement between all results. The correlation coefficient between the Collins and the Sivers asymmetries turned out to be small, less than 0. in absolute value over the whole x range. Extensive studies were erformed in order to assess the systematic uncertainty of the measured asymmetries. All the studies were done searately for ositive and negative hadrons and for the Collins and the Sivers asymmetries. The largest systematic error is due to residual accetance variations within airs of data taking sub-eriods. To quantify these effects, two different tyes of false asymmetries were calculated, using the external cells and the internal cell divided in two arts, and assuming wrong sign olarisation for one of the two. Moreover, the hysical asymmetries were also extracted using only the first and only the second half of the target. The difference between these two hysical asymmetries, the false asymmetries, and the degree of comatibility of the results from different eriods were all used to quantify the systematic uncertainty. In the case of the Collins asymmetry, the systematic uncertainty is estimated to be 0.5σ stat forositiveand0.6σ stat fornegativehadrons. InthecaseoftheSivers asymmetry, the systematic error is 0.8 σ stat for ositive and 0.4 σ stat for negative hadrons. A further systematic uncertainty of ±0.0 is resent in the absolute scale of the Sivers asymmetry for ositive hadrons. It reflects a 0.0 difference in the mean value of the asymmetries extracted in the first two and in the second two eriods of data taking used for this analysis. In site of throughout studies, the origin of this difference, which affects only the Sivers asymmetry for ositive hadrons, could not be identified and had therefore to be included in the systematic uncertainty. The results of this measurement of the Collins and Sivers asymmetries are shown in Fig. and as a function of x, z, and h T, for ositive and negative hadrons. Figure 3 dislays the mean values of kinematic variables for ositive hadrons in the x, z, and h T bins. The corresonding quantities for negative 5

9 A Siv 0. ositive hadrons negative hadrons x 0.5 z (GeV/c) h T Figure : Sivers asymmetry as a function of x, z, and h T, for ositive (closed oints) and negative (oen oints) hadrons. The bars show the statistical errors. The oint to oint systematic uncertainties have been estimated to be 0.8 σ stat for ositive and 0.4 σ stat for negative hadrons and are given by the bands. For ositive hadrons only, an absolute scale uncertainty of ±0.0 has also to be taken into account. (GeV/c) Q 5 (GeV/c) T z Q (GeV/c) h h (GeV/c) T x 0 Q (GeV/c) x 0 z Q (GeV/c) (GeV/c) h T z, x 0.5 z h (GeV/c) T, x Figure 3: Mean values of some kinematic variables in the final data samle. From left to right: mean values of h T, z and Q as functions of x; mean values of h T, x and Q as functions of z; mean values of x, z and Q as functions of h T. hadrons are very similar ). As it is clear from Fig., the Collins asymmetry has a strong x deendence. It is comatible with zero at small x within the small statistical errors and increases in absolute value u to about 0. for x > 0.. There, the values agree both in magnitude and in sign with the revious measurements of HERMES [3], which were erformed at the considerably lower electron beam energy of 7.5 GeV. Also, the resent results agree with the redictions of the global analysis of ref. [9, 0] and thus strongly suort the underlying interretation of the Collins asymmetry in terms of a convolution of the twisttwo transversity PDF and the FF of a transversely olarised quark. An imortant issue is the Q deendence of these functions. Our results at large x are comatible with the HERMES data in site of the higher Q values which exceed those of HERMES by a factor to 3 with increasing x. This indicates that the ossible Q deendence should not ) All numerical values have been ut to HEPDATA. 6

10 A Coll 0. ositive hadrons x >0.03 x <0.03 negative hadrons 0 0. A Siv 0. ositive hadrons negative hadrons W (GeV/c ) 5 0 W (GeV/c ) Figure 4: Collins (uer row) and Sivers (lower row) asymmetry as a function of W, for ositive (left) and negative (right) hadrons. The closed and oen oints give the values for the large x and the small x samles resectively. The errors are statistical only. be dramatic in the resent energy ranges. (GeV/c) Q 5 x >0.03 x < x W (GeV/c ) W (GeV/c ) Figure 5: Mean values of Q (left) and x (right) as functions of W. The closed and oen oints give the values for the large x and the small x samles resectively. The results for the Sivers asymmetry for negative hadrons exhibit values comatible with zero within the statistical accuracy of the measurement. For ositive hadrons, the data indicate small ositive values, u to about 3% in the valence region. These values are somewhat smaller than but still comatible with the ones measured by HERMES at smaller Q. Given the imortance of the Sivers function in the resent descrition of the transverse momentum structure of the nucleon, we looked at a ossible kinematic deendence of our measurements. In articular, we evaluated the asymmetries as a function of 7

11 W, searately for the large-x (x > 0.03) and small-x (x < 0.03) samles. The results areshown infig. 4. The mean values of Q and xin all W bins aregiven in Fig.5. As it is aarent from Fig. 4, no conclusion can be drawn about a ossible W deendence of the Collins asymmetry. On the other hand, the signal of the Sivers asymmetry for ositive hadrons seems to be concentrated at small W, in the region where HERMES measures, and goes to zero at large W, which for large x means large Q. Thus our data give an indication for a ossible W deendence of the Sivers asymmetry for ositive hadrons. Definite conclusions will be ossible only when new more recise data at high energy will become available. In summary, for the first time the Collins and Sivers asymmetries for ositive and negative hadron roduction in DIS off the roton have been measured at high energy. Our data extend the kinematic range to large Q and large W values. The x range has been extended to considerably smaller values which are needed to evaluate the PDF first moments. For the Sivers asymmetry, a signal is seen for ositive hadrons, which ersists to rather small x values. The data give an indication for a ossible W deendence of this asymmetry, but the resent statistical and systematic uncertainties do not allow definite conclusions. The measured Collins asymmetry is sizable for both ositive and negative hadrons also at high energies and Q. Thus Collins asymmetries measured in SIDIS are an aroriate tool to investigate the transversity PDF. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the suort of the CERN management and staff and the skill and effort of the technicians of our collaborating institutes. Secial thanks go to V. Anosov and V. Pesaro for their technical suort during the installation and running of this exeriment. References [] G. Bunce et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (976) 3. [] J. Antille et al., Phys. Lett. B 94 (980) 53. [3] A. Bravar et al. [Fermilab E704 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (996) 66. [4] J. Ashman et al. [Euroean Muon Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 06 (988) 364; Nucl. Phys. B 38 (989). [5] R. L. Jaffe and X. D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 55 (99). [6] J. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B 396 (993) 6. [7] A. Kotzinian, Nucl. Phys. B 44, 34 (995). [8] P. J. Mulders and R. D. Tangerman, Nucl. Phys. B 46 (996) 97 [Erratum-ibid. B 484 (997) 538]. [9] A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P. J. Mulders and M. Schlegel, JHEP 070 (007) 093. [0] D. W. Sivers, Phys. Rev. D 4 (990) 83. [] S. J. Brodsky and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 74 (006) [] Exeriment E-06-0 / E-06- in HALL A. [3] A. Airaetian et al. [HERMES Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (005) 000. [4] K. Abe et al. [Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (006) 300. [5] R. Seidl et al. [Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 78, 030 (008). [6] V. Y. Alexakhin et al. [COMPASS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (005) 000. [7] E. S. Ageev et al. [COMPASS Collaboration], Nucl. Phys. B 765 (007) 3. 8

12 [8] M. Alekseev et al. [COMPASS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 673 (009) 7. [9] M. Anselmino et al., Phys. Rev. D 75 (007) [0] M. Anselmino et al., Nucl. Phys. Proc. Sul. 9 (009) 98. [] A. Airaetian et al. [HERMES Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 03 (009) 500. [] M. Anselmino et al., roceedings of Transversity 005, World Scientific, 006, age 36 [arxiv:he-h/0507]. [3] P. Abbon et al. [COMPASS Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 577 (007) 455. [4] A. Bacchetta, U. D Alesio, M. Diehl and C. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 70 (004) [5] R. J. Barlow, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 97 (990)