Based on arxiv with Shohei Okawa (Nagoya Univ.)

Transcription

1 Based on arxv wth Shohe Okawa (Nagoya Unv.)

2

3

4 Actually, so many canddates for new physcs have been proposed.

5

6 pushes up exstence regon

7 pushes up exstence regon There may be a few hnts for new physcs (DM, a few lght partcles, flavor observables, etc.)

8 pushes up exstence regon There may be a few hnts for new physcs (DM, a few lght partcles, flavor observables, etc.) We have to fnd out what new physcs really exsts from a few hnts.

9 Many setups and parameter choces would be possble. Whch drecton s correct? DM

10 Many setups and parameter choces would be possble. Whch drecton s correct? My dea s 1. Classfy BSMs and focus on on each class of BSMs. DM

11 Many setups and parameter choces would be possble. Whch drecton s correct? My dea s 1. Classfy BSMs and focus on on each class of BSMs. DM 2. Fnd some predctons of ths class. Look for connecton between DM and other observables. flavor observables, etc.

12 1. Focus on one class of BSMs

13 1. Focus on one class of BSMs CKM matrx s orgnated from the dfference between the mass bases of up-type and down-type quarks. V j W µ u L µ ˆd j L V j close to unt, but not V j = j Why?

14 1. Focus on one class of BSMs CKM matrx s orgnated from the dfference between the mass bases of up-type and down-type quarks. V j W µ u L µ ˆd j L V j close to unt, but not V j = j Why? The mass bases are gven by M u j u L uj R + M d j d L dj R M u j = j y u 2 v M d j = j y d 2 v + M d j (n the nteracton base)

15 1. Focus on one class of BSMs CKM matrx s orgnated from the dfference between the mass bases of up-type and down-type quarks. V j W µ u L µ ˆd j L V j close to unt, but not V j = j Why? The mass bases are gven by M u j u L uj R + M d j d L dj R M u j = j y u 2 v M d j = j y d 2 v + M d j New physcs may exst behnd (n the nteracton base)

16 Many possbltes d R ( M 2 ) j m F F L F R H j d j L The sum gves the mass matrx: M d j = j y d 2 v +( M d j) (1) +( M d j) (2) +( M d j) (3) +...

17 ( M 2 ) j H j m F d R F L F R d j L The sum gves the mass matrx and may be complcated M d j = j y d 2 v +( M d j) (1) +( M d j) (2) +( M d j) (3) +... Ths knd of models have been proposed n the GUT and flavor symmetrc models. ( Barber, Nanopoulos, PLB91 (1980);PLB95 (1980); Kramer,Montvay, Z.PC11 (1981); Balakrshna, PRL60(1988); Lahanas, Wyler, PLB122(1983);Barr, PRD31 (1985); Kagan, PRD40(1989);Baumgart, Stolarsk,Zorawsk,PRD90(2014);He, Volkas, Wu, PRD41 (1990);Kownack, Ma, PLB760 (2016);et.al..)

18 Let me focus on one contrbuton nvolvng the lghtest modes of scalars (DM) ( MA 2 ) j X H j HD m F d R λ F L F R κj d j L

19 Let me focus on one contrbuton nvolvng the lghtest modes of scalars (DM) ( MA 2 ) j X H j HD m F d R λ F L F R κj d j L Smply assume ths contrbuton s domnant (because X and HD are lght) Then Mass Matrx approxmately gven by (M d ) j y d 2 v j + v 2 j

20 2. Fnd some predctons of ths class (M d ) j y d 2 v j + v 2 j not many parameters and the structure s unque relate to the ΔF=2 processes There are predctons of the CP phases. Assumng ether X or HD s DM, there are correlatons between DM and flavor physcs.

21

22 (M u ) j = yu 2 v (M d) j = yd 2 v j + v 2 j The one-loop correcton

23 (M u ) j = yu 2 v (M d) j = yd 2 v j + v 2 j dagonalzng The one-loop correcton (m d ) j = v 2 Vy d V R j + (V ) V R j If we see the off-dagonal elements of, VR should satsfy Y 31 Y 13 = Y 21 Y 12 Y 32 Y 23 where Y j = Vy d V R j

24 (M u ) j = yu 2 v (M d) j = yd 2 v j + v 2 j The one-loop correcton Estmaton of the sze of the couplngs for the realstc mass matrx New CP-phases. Phase of CKM The structure lmts the CP phases! ( V j j and = j V Rj )

25 The couplngs are also constraned by flavor physcs. ( MA2 )j X H HDj For the CKM mf dr λ FL FR j dl κj These combnatons appear n ΔF=2 d F j HD X X X dj ( j )( ( dj j F The mass scale s constraned. d Vj j j ) and = j VR j )

26 ( MA 2 ) j X H j HD For the CKM m F d R λ F L F R κj d j L also appear n EDM X,HD Note CP phases of EDM and εk are related. dl 1 F mf 1 dr

27

28 A ( M 2 ) j X H j HD d R λ F L m F F R κj d j L Yukawa couplngs: λ κj A fxed by the realstc Yukawa Masses: mf mx mh We can also expect X X 2 H H D 2 H 2

29 Relaton wth ΔF=2 processes ( MA2 )j X H HDj For the CKM mf dr λ FL FR j dl κj These combnatons appear n ΔF=2 d F j HD X X X dj ( j )( ( dj j F The mass scale s constraned. d Vj j j ) and = j VR j )

30 predcton of εk allowed regons for 1.0»e K» mf=30tev Hd R L 12 =0.1 Aêm F = m F =10TeV m H êm F m F =25TeV m X êm F ( R ) 12 =0 m HD /m F =2 ( R ) 12 =0.1 m HD /m F =0.9 m HD /m F = mf=20tev Exclude by vacuum stablty m X êm F By tunng the CP-phase( (δr)12), mf (NW scale) could be less than 10 TeV.

31 ( MA 2 ) j X H j HD For the CKM m F d R λ F L F R κj d j L also appear n EDM X,HD Note CP phases of EDM and εk are related. dl 1 F mf 1 dr

32 Current upper bound Δ(εK) almost mnmzed. cmd ( R ) 12 =0 m HD /m F =2 ( R ) 12 =0.1 m HD /m F =0.9 m HD /m F = m F = 10 TeV m X êm F excluson lne from vacuum stablty@mhd/mf=0.1 mf=10 TeV s almost lower bound!

33 ( MA 2 ) j X H j HD For the CKM m F d R λ F L F R κj d j L Assume that lghtest one among the scalars (X or HD) s a DM. and κ are too small to acheve the relc densty. Hggs portal model -lke relc densty domnantly gven by X X 2 H H D 2 H 2

34 O(1) TeV m X 10 TeV vacuum stablty and flavor physcs DM relc densty Note: relc densty domnantly gven by X X 2 H H D 2 H 2 SI [pb] F-exchangng contrbuton s about 10 %.

35 DM mass: O(1) TeV m X 10 TeV drect detecton: SI [pb] neutron EDM: d n = O(10 26 )[ecm] extra quark: m F O(10) TeV