Alberta-Thy Euclidean and Canonical Formulations of Statistical Mechanics in the Presence of Killing Horizons Dmitri V. Fursaev Theoretical Phys
|
|
- Maryann Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Alberta-Thy 0-97 Euclidean and Canonical Formulations of Statistical Mechanics in the Presence of Killing Horizons Dmitri V. Fursaev Theoretical Physics Institute, Department of Physics, University of Alberta Edmonton, Canada T6G J and Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Dubna, Russia dfursaev@phys.ualberta.ca Abstract The relation between the covariant Euclidean free-energy F E and the canonical statistical-mechanical free energy F C in the presence of the Killing horizons is studied. F E is determined by the covariant Euclidean eective action. The denition of F C is related to the Hamiltonian which isthegenerator of the evolution along the Killing time. At arbitrary temperatures F E acquires additional ultraviolet divergences because of conical singularities. The divergences of F C are dierent and occur since the density dn of the energy levels of the system blows up near the horizon in an infrared way. We show that there are regularizations that make it possible to remove the infrared cuto in dn C. After that the divergences of F become identical to the divergences of F E. The latter property turns out to be crucial to reconcile the covariant Euclidean and the canonical formulations of the theory. The method we use is new and is based on a relation between dn and heat kernels on hyperbolic-like spaces. Our analysis includes spin 0 and spin / elds on arbitrary backgrounds. For these elds the divergences of dn, F C and F E are presented in the most complete form.
2 Introduction There are two approaches how to describe quantum thermal eects in the gravitational eld. The approach by Gibbons and Hawking [],[] denes the partition function of the system as an Euclidean path integral. It enables one to express the free energy F E [g; ]in terms of the eective action W [g; ], as F E [g; ] = W[g; ]. Functionals W [g; ] are given on Euclidean manifolds M with the period in the Euclidean time. is considered as the inverse temperature. The elds are assumed to be periodic or antiperiodic in, depending on their statistics. The Gibbons-Hawking approach is a straightforward generalization of the nite-temperature theory in the Minkowsky space-time. Its advantage is that it is manifestly covariant in the Euclidean sector and enables one to consider the gravitational eld on the equal footing with matter elds. This approach is especially convenient for the thermodynamics of black holes []-[5], it reproduces the entropy, temperature and other characteristics of a black hole in the semiclassical approximation. When the space-time is static statistical-mechanical quantities can be also described in a canonical way. The canonical partition function has the form C =Tre ^H ; (.) where the Hamiltonian ^H is the generator of the time evolution of the system. C is well dened when ^H is a normally ordered operator [6]. In this case the free-energy takes the form F C [g; ] = ln = 0 dn(!) ln ( e! ) ; (.) dn(!) where = + for Bose elds and = for Fermi elds. is the density of eigenvalues! of quantum-mechanical Hamiltonians of the elds [6]-[4]. The advantage of denition (.) is that it is given in accordance with the unitarity evolution of the system. However, as distinct from the Gibbons-Hawking approach, it is not manifestly covariant. There is no special terminology to distinguish F E and F C. In this paper we call F E and F C the covariant Euclidean and the canonical free energies, respectively. The corresponding formulations of the nite-temperature theory will be called the covariant Euclidean and the canonical formulations. Sometime we will also say "Euclidean" instead of "covariant Euclidean", for simplicity. For static space-times without horizons comparing F E and F C shows [6] that these functionals dier only by the vacuum energy which is not included in F C. Thus, in this case the Euclidean and canonical formulations are, in fact, equivalent. In space-times with Killing horizons the quantum theory has a number of specic properties. On one hand, in the Euclidean formulation there is a distinguished value of the period, corresponding to the Hawking temperature, for which M is a regular Allen [6] called exp( F E ) and exp( F C ) the "quantum" and "thermodynamic" partition functions. These names are not very suitable at least because the both partition functions are essentially quantum.
3 space. At other values of the space M has conical singularities which result in additional ultraviolet divergences [5]-[8]. On another hand, the canonical formulation runs into diculties because the time evolution is not dened at the bifurcation surface of the Killing horizons. The density dn of the energy levels in Eq. (.) blows up near the horizon [9]-[] atany temperature in an infrared way. As a result, in the presence of horizons the Euclidean and the canonical free energies look dierent and nding the relation between them becomes a problem. This problem has not been analysed before and our aim is to investigate it for the case of scalar and spinor elds in some details. Comparison of the covariant Euclidean and the canonical formulations is important for dierent reasons. The main of them is statistical-mechanical interpretation of black hole thermodynamics which can be naturally dened in the framework of the Gibbons-Hawking approach []-[5]. The paper is organized as follows. In Section we describe the Euclidean and the canonical formulations of statistical mechanics of scalar and Dirac elds on static backgrounds. The ultraviolet divergences appearing in F E because of conical singularities are given in Section 3 in the most complete form. We use the dimensional and Pauli-Villars regularization procedures. In Section 4 we develop a method how to nd the divergences of the density of levels dn dn. We rst apply this method to study in the presence of the spatial cuto near the horizon. Then we show, in Section 5, that in dimensional and Pauli-Villars regularizations the spatial cuto can be removed and one can dene dn on the complete space. In these regularizations the divergences of dn have the ultraviolet character. It means that the corresponding divergences of the covariant free energy F C coincide exactly with the divergences of the Euclidean free energy F E. In Section 6 we discuss a hypothesis that (for spinors and scalars) the entire bare functionals F C and F E must coincide. We illustrate it with some examples. Technical details are given in Appendixes. In Appendix A we remind the reader how to relate the canonical free energy on ultrastatic spaces to the eective action. Appendix B is devoted to the calculation of the spinor heat coecients on conical singularities, some of the coecients represent the new result. Denitions and basic relations Let us consider scalar elds described by the Klein-Gordon equation and spinor elds described by the Dirac equation, ( r r + R + m ) =0 ; ( r +m) =0 ; (.) This is the property of nonextremal black hole backgrounds. The extremal black holes will not be considered here. 3
4 where R is the scalar curvature and r are the covariant derivatives, dened according with the spin of the elds 3. The Dirac -matrices = ( 0 ; a ) obey the standard commutation relations f ; g = g, 0 is the anti-hermitean matrix. It is supposed that the space-time is static ds = g 00 dt + g ab dx a dx b ; a; b =;;3 : (.) The component g 00 is a nonpositive function and g 00 = at spatial innity. The temperature measured at innity is.on space (.) equations (.) can be rewritten in the form g 00 (@ t + H s ) =0 ; i 0 (i@ t + H d ) =0 ; (.3) H s = jg 00 j( r a r a w a r a + m + R) ; (.4) H d = i 0 a (r a + w a)+m : (.5) Here r a is the covariant derivative computed with the help of the metric g ab of the three-dimensional surface of constant time t = const. We denote this surface B. Index a is up and down with the help of g ab. The vector w a = r a ln jg 00 j is the vector of acceleration. The operators H s and H d are called the one-particle Hamiltonians because their eigen-values coincide with the frequencies of one-particle excitations 4. To calculate the canonical free energies Fi C (i = s; d) with the help of Eq. (.) one has to know the densities dn i of the energy levels of H s and H d. Let us dene now the Euclidean free energies for the elds described by Eq. (.). To this aim we consider the Euclidean manifold M which is the Euclidean section of the Lorentzian geometry (.) ds = g d + g ab dx a dx b ; 0 ; (.6) where g = jg 00 j. The Euclidean eective actions for the elds and are W s [g; ] = log det L s ; W d [g; ] = log det L d ; (.7) L s = r r + R + m ; L d = 5 ( r + m) : (.8) It is assumed that W i are regularized functionals. The operators L s act on scalar elds on M which are periodic in, L d act on spinors which change the sign when is increased by. The Euclidean matrix is i 0, the matrix 5 anticommutes with the other 's and it is "normalized" as 5 =. Both operators (.8) are Hermitean with respect to the standard inner product ('; ' 0 ) = R ' + ' 0 p gd4 x. According to Eq. (.), the canonical 3 We dene the spinor derivative asr =@ +, where = 8 [ ; ] V i r V i is the connection and V i are the tetrades. 4 It is easy to check R that H s and H d are Hermitean operators with respect to the following inner products ( 0 ;)= Bp R (3) p gjg 00 j d 3 x ( 0 ),( 0 ; )= (3) g d 3 x ( 0 ) + where (3) g = det g B ab and ( 0 ) + denotes Hermitean conjugation. 4
5 free energy vanishes at zero temperature. It is convenient to dene the Euclidean free energy so that it have the same property, i.e., as F E i [g; ] = W i [g; ] E 0 i [g] ; (.9) E 0 i [g] = lim W i [g; ] : (.0)! The quantities Ei 0 [g] have the meaning of the vacuum energy. Note that Fi E [g; ] and Ei 0 [g; ] are covariant functionals of the metric, because the Euclidean actions W i [g; ] are covariant atanyvalues of. Our aim is to nd the relation between F E and F C. The important property off C is that it can be represented in the form similar to Eq. (.9) F C i [g; ] = Wi [g; ] E 0 i [g] ; (.) The functionals W i [g; ] are the following eective actions E 0 i [g] = lim Wi [g; ] : (.)! W s [g; ] = log det Ls ; Wd [g; ] = log det Ld : (.3) The operators Li are related to L i, Eq. (.8), by the conformal transformations L s = e 3 L s e ; Ld = e 5 L d e 3 ; (.4) where e = g. Representation (.) is well known [6]-[] but for the sake of completeness we give its derivation in Appendix A. The key point is that Li are expressed in terms of the one-particle Hamiltonians L s = H ; (.5) L d = 5 ( Hd ) ; L d = H ; (.6) H s = e H s e ; Hd = e 3 H d e 3 ; (.7) where = e. Note that according to Eqs. (.7) the spectra of the operators Hi and H i, Eqs. (.4), (.5), coincide, which means that Hi are simply an another representation of H i. The operators Li act on the elds on the ultrastatic space M with the metric ds = d +g ab dx a dx b ; 0 (.8) which is conformally related to metric (.6), g = g =jg 00 j. One can show that where f ; g =g, and H d = i 0 ( a r a + e m) ; (.9) H i = r a r a + e m + V i : (.0) 5
6 The derivatives r are dened with the help of the metric g ab of the surface = const in ultrastatic space (.8). This surface is conformally related to B and we denote it B. The "potential terms" V i are V s = R + e ( 6)(r w w w ) ; (.) V d = 4 R + e m w : (.) Here w =(0;w a ) is the four vector of acceleration and R is the curvature of the ultrastatic background R = e (R +6(r w w w )) : (.3) The formulation of statistical mechanics in terms of the theory on ultrastatic spaces was developed by Dowker and Kennedy [9] and by Dowker and Schoeld [3],[4]. Relations (.9)-(.3) coincide with those used in Refs.[3],[4]. The actions W i and Wi are determined by the conformally related wave operators, see Eqs. (.4). In static space-times without horizons the renormalized functionals W i and Wi dier by the anomalous terms computed in [3],[4]. These terms, however, are proportional to, so they result in the dierence between vacuum energies (.0) and (.). The Euclidean and the canonical free energies in this case coincide. When there is a horizon the conformal transformation to the ultrastatic metric becomes singular and this case requires a special analysis. 3 Covariant Euclidean formulation: conical singularities and divergences To begin with we describe the class of space-times with Killing horizons which will be discussed here. We assume that the metric (.) near the bifurcation surface has the following form ds = g 00 (; )dt + d + pq (; )d p d q ; p; q =; : (3.) In this representation the location of is determined by the equation = 0, p are the coordinates on this surface. We also assume that near = 0 the components of the metric are decomposed as g 00 (; ) = 6 R ijij ()+O( 4 ) ; (3.) pq (; ) =~ pq ()+ h pq ()+O( 4 ) ; (3.3) where ~ pq is the metric tensor on. The constant is called the surface gravity. Metrics which obey the properties (3.)-(3.3) correspond to static nonextremal black holes. It 6
7 can be shown that the quantities R ijij, R ii are the projections of the Riemann and Ricci tensors calculated on on the directions normal to this surface. Namely, R ii = R n i n i ; R ijij = R n i n j n i n j : (3.4) Here n i are two unit orthonormal vectors orthogonal to and the summation over the indexes i; j =; is assumed. It can be also shown that h pq ~ pq = (R ijij R ii ) : (3.5) Near the Euclidean section M of space-time (3.) looks as This space is regular when = H ds ' dt + d +~ pq d p d q ; 0 : (3.6) =, where the constant H is called the Hawking temperature. For arbitrary there are conical singularities and M looks as C, where C is a cone. As a result of conical singularities, the Euclidean free energy F E is divergent even after subtracting from it the vacuum energy. The divergent part F div E of F E can be calculated with the help of dierent regularizations. We begin with the dimensional regularization and consider D-dimensional space-time. It is assumed that when going to arbitrary dimensions the background space holds its Killing structure and equations (3.)- (3.3) do not change. The dierence now is that the tensors R, R are calculated in D dimensions and is a (D ) dimensional surface. The divergent part of the Euclidean free energy is D F div E [g; ; D] = m D 4 (4) D= 3 "f m p 4 P + p R + p 3 R ii! ; (3.7) where D is considered as a complex parameter and the integral is taken over the bifurcation surface, R R p ~d D. We put P =R ijij R ii and introduce the constants f and p k which are listed in Table : spin f p p p r d r d 4 r d 6 r d Table. Here r d is the dimensionality of the spinor representation, r d = 4 for Dirac spinors and r d = for massless Weyl spinors. As follows from Eq. (3.7), in the dimensional regularization F E has a simple pole at D =4.The dimensional regularization reproduces the divergences 7
8 of the logarithmical type only. For this reason it is also worth studying F div E in Pauli- Villars regularization which usually gives all divergent terms. The Pauli-Villars method is based on introduction of several, say, 5 additional elds. elds with masses M k have the same statistics as the original eld, while other 3 ones with masses M 0 r have the wrong statistics, i.e., they are fermions for scalars and bosons for spinors. The latter elds give contribution to F E with the sign opposite to that of physical elds. To eliminate the divergences two restrictions are imposed m p + X k M p k X r (M 0 r) p =0 ; p=;4 : (3.8) These equations can be resolved by choosing [] M ; = p 3 + m, M 0 ; = p + m, M 0 3 = p 4 + m. The divergences in Pauli-Villars regularization can be obtained from Eq. (3.7). By adding contributions of the regulator elds with the sign corresponding to their statistics and taking the limit D! 4, which is nite due to restriction (3.8) with p =,one nds F div E [g; ; ] = 48 "bf + a p 4 X X a = a(m; ) = ln m ln M k + r b = b(m; ) =m ln m + X k k M k ln M k P + p R + p 3 R ii! X r ; (3.9) ln(m 0 r) ; (3.0) (M 0 r) ln(m 0 r) : (3.) The parameter plays the role of the ultraviolet cuto. The regularization is removed when!. In this limit a ln( =m ) and b (a; b > 0). Thus, in general, F E div includes both logarithmic and quadratic divergences. The derivation of Eq. (3.7) is standard. In the dimensional regularization the Schwinger- DeWitt proper-time representation [3] gives the divergent part of the eective action in the form W E div [g; ] = 0 ds s e m s (4s) D= B 0 + sb + s B : (3.) Here B k are the Hadamard-Minackshisundaram-DeWitt-Seeley (or heat) coecients of the heat kernel asymptotic expansion 5 Tr e s4 The Laplacians 4 look as 4 = B (4s) D= 0 + sb + s B + ::: : (3.3) r r + X, where r is the covariant derivative dened according with the spin; X =(=6 )Rfor scalars, and X = R for spinors. The relation 4 between 4's and the operators L s and L d, Eqs. (.8), is L s = 4 s + m ; L d = 4 d + m : (3.4) 5 We do not take into account the boundaries of space-time. 8
9 On singular spaces M the coecients B k can be represented as the sum of two terms B k = A k + A ;k : (3.5) A k have the form of the standard coecients dened on the regular domain of M, A ;k, k, are functionals on which appear because of conical singularities. For scalars and spinors the rst two coecients have the form A ; = 3 A ; = f 3 ( )A ; (3.6) h ( 4 )p P +( )(p R + p 3 R ii ) i ; (3.7) where = H and the numbers f and p k are given in Table. Expression (3.9) for F div E [g; ] follows from Eqs. (.9), (.0) and (3.),(3.5)-(3.7). For scalars the coecient A ; was found by Cheeger [4], see also Refs. [7],[5]. The spinor coecient A ; follows from the results of Refs. [5],[6]. The scalar coecient A ; and the general structure of the higher coecients A ;k were analysed in Refs. [6],[7],[8]. The calculation of the spinor coecient A ; is our new result. Its derivation is similar to that of Ref. [6] but has new features related to the spin. The reader can nd the details in Appendix B. 4 Canonical formulation: infrared divergences Our aim now is to investigate the divergences of the canonical free energy and compare them with the results (3.7),(3.9) found in the Euclidean formulation. We begin with remarks concerning specic features of quantum systems in the presence of horizons. In this case the one-particle oscillators of elds have a continuous spectrum of frequencies 0! <. The eigenvalues of the operators Hi, Eqs. (.9),(.0), run down to! = 0 even for massive elds, i.e., the usual mass gap is absent. This property has the simple explanation. Hi are given on the space B, which is the spatial part of ultrastatic space (.8) related to the original space (.6) by the conformal transformation. On the ultrastatic space the location of the horizon is mapped at innity and B turns out to be non-compact. At the same time, the masses m i of the elds can be neglected near the horizon because they are multiplied by the vanishing factor e = jg 00 j. Regarding the "potential" terms in Hi, see Eqs. (.),(.), they are constant and negative on the horizon, V s =, V d = 3, and look as tachionic masses [0],[]. As a result, the densities dn i of the eigen-values of Hi blow up near the horizon in an infrared way. To investigate this divergence the following method can be used. By the denition, the trace of the heat kernel of the operator H i is H Tr e i t = 0 dn i(!) e! t : (4.) 9
10 By making use of the inverse Laplace transform one obtains dn i (!) =! + d ei!tr e i H i : (4.) The diagonal matrix elements hxj exp( H i t)jxi h exp( H i t) i diag are well dened but the traces involve the integration over the non-compact space B and diverge. The key observation is that the divergent parts of dn i(!) can be found by making use of the asymptotic properties of the traces at small t, which are very well known. Let us begin with massless elds in the Rindler space ds = dt + d + dx + dy ; <x;y< ; >0 : (4.3) The Rindler horizon is the plane IR, is the proper distance to the horizon. The Rindler space can be considered as an approximation to the black hole geometry near the horizon. The metric on the corresponding space B is dl = (d + dx + dy ) : (4.4) As can be shown, B coincides with the hyperbolic manifold IH 3 having the constant curvature R = 6 [9]. A review of the heat kernels of Laplace operators on such spaces can be found in Refs. [9],[30]. It is remarkable that for the massless elds the heat kernels are known explicitly and their diagonal elements read 6 h e t H s idiag = ; (4t) 3= h e t H d idiag = r d + (4t) 3= t : (4.5) The number r d appears in the spinor case after tracing over the spinor indexes. Obviously, the traces of these operators diverge at =0. Let us restrict the integration in the traces by values where is a proper distance to the horizon. Such a method is called the volume cuto. With the help of Laplace transform (4.) (see Ref. [3]) one easily obtains from (4.5) the divergences of the densities of levels at! 0 " dns (!; ) = A "! dnd (!; ) ; 4 3 div div " A! = r d (4.6) where A formally stands for the area of the horizon 7. For scalar elds our result agrees with previous computations by the WKB method, see, for instance Ref. [9]. A generalization of (4.6) to massive scalars was explicitly found in Refs. [0],[]. Let us consider how do Eqs. (4.6) modify when the geometry deviates from the Rindler form. The spaces B can be approximated by IH 3 only in the limit! 0. For this reason, the diagonal elements of the heat kernels of H i on B are represented by the Taylor series 6 The expression for the scalar kernel is given in Ref. [9], the spinor kernel follows from the function which is also given there. 7 Since the Rindler horizon is a plane, only the densities of levels per unit area have a strict meaning. 0
11 in converging at! 0 to expressions (4.5). Presumably, the coecients in these series should be the local functions of the curvature and so to nd them it is sucient to use the asymptotic form of the traces. One has H he i ti diag ' r i +a (4t) 3= i; t +a i; t + ::: ; (4.7) where r s = and a i;n are the diagonal elements of the corresponding heat coecients. As before the summation over the spinor indexes in (4.7) is assumed. With the help of Eqs. (.)-(.3) one nds a s; = e R m 6 a d; = e r d R + (r w w w )+m ; (4.8) : (4.9) These expressions can be decomposed in powers of by making use of Eqs. (3.)-(3.5) r w = R t t = R ii + O( ) ; (4.0) w w = 3 R ijij + O( 4 ) R m ; (4.) a s; = + O( 4 ) ; (4.) 6 a d; = r d + R ii R ijij 6 R m + O( 4 ) ; (4.3) where R is evaluated at =0. For the massless elds in the Rindler space a s; = 0, while a d; = r d, in agreement with Eqs. (4.5). Decompositions (4.), (4.3) are written explicitly up to the terms of the order, other terms do not contribute to the divergence of the traces. Analogous decompositions can be found for the heat coecients a i;n with n, however, a i;n vanish at small faster than. To see this let us consider the operators L s, L d which are given on the ultrastatic space M, Eq. (.8). Ls, L d are related to the three dimensional Hamiltonians H i by Eqs. (.5),(.6). Because M = S B the diagonal parts of the heat coecients of Ls, L d coincide with a i;n. On the other hand, Ls, L d are related by conformal transformation (.4) to the covariant Euclidean operators L s, L d. In this case, according to Dowker and Schoeld [3],[4], a i; = e 4 (a i; + r J i ) ; (4.4) where a i; are the heat coecients corresponding to L s, L d. The currents J i have the form 8 J s = 5 45 r (w )+w (w ) w 3 rw r rw R w 8 Note that our signature of the metric is dierent from that in Refs. [3],[4].
12 J d = r d w R +5 R+m w 6 4 r (w )+w (w ) w rw ; (4.5) +8r rw+r w (5R +30m )w o ; (4.6) where w = w w and rw = r w. The coecients a i; are regular at! 0. With the help of Eqs. (4.0),(4.) one can check that r J i are regular as well. Therefore, as follows from (4.4), a i; e 4 4. The other coecients a i;n with n>are determined from a i; by recursion relations [3] and so a i;n vanish near at least as fast as a i;. Our conclusion is that only a i; contribute to the divergences of the traces. From Eqs. (4.),(4.7),(4.),(4.3) we obtain the divergent part of the densities of levels " dns (!; ) = (!! div 4 P ln ln 3 4 l l 6 " (! dnd (!; ) = r d! div 4 P ln l 4 ln l 8 R ii ) R m R m ) ; (4.7) : (4.8) Here P is the quantity dened after Eq. (3.7) and l is an additional infrared cuto parameter imposed at a large distance from the horizon. For massive elds l ' m. The following remarks concerning expressions (4.7) and (4.8) are in order. As compared to the computations on the Rindler space, Eqs. (4.6), there are logarithmic corrections from the mass of the elds and non-zero curvature near the horizon. Because of the logarithmic terms the densities dn i have a dierent behavior at small frequencies for scalar and spinor elds. Spinor density (4.8) is positive at small in the whole range of frequencies. Contrary to this, scalar density (4.7) at!! 0 is proportional to m ln =l and is negative (note that curvature corrections are negligible with respect to the mass of the eld). Such a feature indicates that for scalars the description of the modes with low frequencies, the so called soft modes, may need a modication Ref. [3]. From Eqs. (.),(4.7),(4.8) we get the divergent parts of the canonical free energies F s;div C [g; ; ] = ( ; " 70 4 P + d F d;div C [g; ; ] = r " P R ii ( ! ) R m ln l R m ln l ) (4.9) : (4.0) These equations enable one to calculate the divergences of the other characteristics of canonical ensembles. In particular, one can see that the statistical-mechanical entropy
13 diverges near the Killing horizon and in the leading asymptotic it is proportional to the area A of the horizon. For scalar elds this leading asymptotic coincides with the WKB results by t'hooft [9] and many other authors. Equations (4.9) and (4.0) also follow from the high-temperature expansions obtained by Dowker and Schoeld [3],[4]. Application of these results to our case is justied because when approaching the horizon the local temperature unlimitedly grows. 5 Canonical formulation: ultraviolet divergences Comparison of Eq. (3.9) with Eqs. (4.9),(4.0) shows that the divergences of the Euclidean and canonical free energies are expressed in terms of the similar geometrical quantities but have dierent dependence on the temperature. Also the nature of the divergences is dierent: F E diverges in an ultraviolet way while the -divergence in F C has an infrared origin. Finally, there is one more important dierence between the regularizations of F E and F C. The ultraviolet regularizations are usually applied to operators and functionals but not to the background eld itself. Contrary to this, the volume cuto regularization makes the space incomplete and modies the background eld essentially. In the presence of the horizon the densities of levels have a remarkable property. Namely, there are regularizations of dn which make it possible to remove the infrared cuto near the horizon and to dene the densities on the complete background. As a result, dn acquire new divergences which correspond exactly to the ultraviolet divergences of the covariant Euclidean theory. As the rst example, let us consider the dimensional regularization. The power of the leading divergency in Eqs. (4.7),(4.8) is determined by the dimensionality of the space B. In D-dimensional space-time the leading divergence is D, if D 6=,and at D > one can take the limit! 0. After the analytical continuation to the complex values of D the quantities dn dn, have a pole at D =4. The method how to investigate near the pole is the following. As before we use relation (4.). By taking into account the form of the operators H i, see Eq. (.0), we can write H he i ti diag ' (4t) e m t r (D i + b )= i; t + b i; t + ::: bd; = r d bs; = 6 + R ii ; (5.) R + O( 4 )+O(D 4) ; (5.) R ijij 6 R + O( 4 )+O(D 4) ; (5.3) bs; = O( 4 )+O(D 4; ) ; bd; = r d 4 m + O( 4 )+O(D 4; ) : (5.4) The coecients b i;n are found with the help of Eqs. (4.7),(4.)-(4.4) The terms O(D 4), O(D 4; ) denote additions which appear in formulas (4.)-(4.4) when D 6= 4. Wedo 3
14 not write these terms explicitly because they do not result in singularities when D! 4. The integration measure in the traces is obtained from Eqs. (3.)-(3.5) B p gd D x ' D 0 D d + 4 P +O(D 4; ) : (5.5) After substitution of Eqs. (5.)-(5.4) in Eq. (5.) and making use of (5.5) we can derive the singular part of the traces h Tre H s ti div = D h Tre H d ti div = r d m D 4 (4) (D )= D m D 4 (4) (D )= t 3= t 3= m 6 m + R R t R ii t 8 P 4 P 4 ; (5.6) : (5.7) The -functions appear as a result of the integration over. It should be noted that for the spinors the contribution of the coecient b d; cancels the pole caused by the term r d = in b d;. The divergent part of density of energy levels is obtained from (5.6),(5.7) with the help of Eq. (4.) " dns (!; D) D m D 4 "! = m R (4) D= 6 P ; (5.8) " dnd (!; D) div D m D 4 = r d (4) D= " m + R R ii 8! P : (5.9) div The divergence represents a simple pole at D = 4. Finally, from Eqs. (.),(5.8),(5.9) one can nd the divergent part of the canonical free energy. We do not write this divergence explicitly because it is exactly the same as that of the Euclidean free energy, Eq. (3.7), computed in the dimensional regularization F div C [g; ; D] =FE div [g; ; D] : (5.0) This key equality can be also established in the Pauli-Villars regularization. The regularized density of states in this method is the following quantity dn i (!; ) dn i(!) + X k dn i (!; M k ) X r dn i (!; M 0 r) : (5.) Denition (5.) takes into account that in the Pauli-Villars method each eld is replaced by the "multiplet" of elds. The quantities dn i(!;m k ), dn i(!;mr 0 ) are the densities of levels of the Pauli-Villars partners and the elds with the wrong statistics give negative contributions. The number of such elds equals the number of the elds with the correct statistics and the leading -divergences in Eqs. (4.7),(4.8) are cancelled. Regarding logarithmical divergences ln, they disappear because of constraint (3.8) with p =. As a result, regularized densities (5.) are left nite when! 0 and can be dened on the 4
15 complete space. When the Pauli-Villars cuto is removed (! ), dn i(!;) diverge in an ultraviolet way. The divergences can be inferred from Eqs. (5.8),(5.9) by taking into account constraints (3.8) " dns (!; ) " dnd (!; ) div = "b + a! (4) P + 6 = r d "b + a! (4) P! R R 6 + R ii 4! ; (5.) : (5.3) div Constants a and b are dened by Eqs. (3.0),(3.) and diverge in the limit of innite. With the help of Eqs. (5.),(5.3) one can show that F div C [g; ; ] =FE div [g; ; ] ; (5.4) where F div E [g; ; ] is given by Eq. (3.9). It should be noted in conclusion that Pauli- Villars regularization of the canonical free energy was rst suggested by Demers, Lafrance and Myers [] who considered a scalar eld on the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole background. The authors used the WKB method. Although our method is dierent the results for F div C [g; ; ] in this particular case coincide. 6 Discussion We are interested in nding the relation between the covariant Euclidean and the canonical formulations of statistical mechanics on curved backgrounds with horizons. Let us discuss rst why these formulations are equivalent for spaces without horizons. As we showed in Section, the canonical formulation is equivalent to the Euclidean theory on ultrastatic background, M, Eq. (.8), conformally related to the original space-time M, Eq. (.6). The Euclidean actions W i are determined by the operators L i on M, see Eq. (.8). Analogously, in canonical theory the functionals Wi are determined by operators L i on M. The classical actions corresponding to these two types of operators are I i [g; ' i ]= M ' + i L i' i p gd 4 x ; Ii [g; ' i ]= M ' + i L i ' i p gd 4 x ; (6.) where the notation ' i is used for scalars or spinors. As a result of Eq. (.4), I i [g; ' i ]= I i [g; ' i ] (6.) for = e and = e 3. The transformation from one action to another is not singular and the classical theories on M and M are equivalent. In case of massless spinors and massless scalars with = the operators L 6 i and Li have the same form, which means that the classical theories are conformally invariant. In general case this invariance does not exist. However, it is still possible to introduce an auxiliary conformal charge in the classical actions and interpret Eq. (6.) in terms of a pseudo conformal 5
16 invariance [3],[4]. According to a common point of view [34],[35] the bare quantum actions respect the classical symmetries. Thus, for the bare regularized functionals there is the same equality asfor the classical actions 9, W i [g; ] bare = Wi [g; ] bare : (6.3) This relation is not valid for the renormalized quantities because the conformal symmetry is broken by the quantum anomalies [34],[35]. The dierence between the renormalized actions W i and Wi for scalar and spinor elds was found explicitly bydowker and Schoeld [3],[4]. The anomaly, which is an integral over the Euclidean space, is proportional to and so it contributes to the vacuum energy only. As a result, the free energies Fi E Fi C, Eqs. (.9),(.), coincide before and after renormalization. In case of the horizons M and M have the dierent topologies, IR and S B, respectively. The transformation which relates M and M is singular on the bifurcation surface. So the classical theories are not quite equivalent. On the quantum level the horizons result in the divergences of Fi E and Fi C which cannot be eliminated by subtracting the vacuum energy. Moreover, the divergences of Fi E and Fi C have the dierent origins. Our results suggest a way how can the covariant Euclidean and the canonical formulations be reconciled. We showed that there are regularizations which are applicable to both Fi E and Fi C. In such regularizations the canonical free energy Fi C can be dened on the complete background M and its divergences are identical to the divergences of Fi E, see Eqs. (5.0),(5.4). When the functionals Fi E and Fi C are well dened, it becomes possible to carry out the transformation from M to M and to interpret it as a conformal symmetry. In analogy with the case without horizons, we can make ahypothesis that (at least for scalars and spinors) the regularized bare free energies are identical and F E i [g; ] bare = F C i [g; ] bare : (6.4) It is assumed that the both functionals in (6.4) are considered in the same regularization. To give a strict proof of this equality may be a rather dicult problem. There are examples which enable one its direct check. In Ref. [0] Cognola, Vanzo and erbini obtained the free energy of massive scalar elds in the Rindler space in an explicit form, see also Ref. []. It can be shown that these results, rewritten in the Pauli-Villars regularization, conrm relation (6.4). Another direct conrmation is possible in two dimensions. Two dimensional massless scalar elds were analysed in Ref. [33] and these results support our hypothesis as well. Equality (6.4) enables one to apply the methods of quantum eld theory to statistical mechanics with the horizons. As a consequence, it justies the ultraviolet renormalization of statistical-mechanical quantities [36]. Our results are also important for studying the statistical-mechanical foundation of the thermodynamics of black holes. It was realized 9 It is true if the regularization itself does not break classical symmetries 6
17 in the last years that statistical-mechanical computations in this case require an oshell procedure [37], i.e., considering a black hole at temperatures dierent from the Hawking value. From this point of view, Eq. (6.4) demonstrates the equivalence of two o-shell methods, the canonical and the conical singularity methods. However, the comparison of the o-shell and on-shell results goes beyond the subject of this paper. As non-minimally coupled scalars show [3], the o-shell and on-shell computations are not always equivalent. Finally, several remarks about the range of validity of our results are in order. We dealt with static nonextremal black hole backgrounds. The method described in Sections 4, 5 is applicable to the extremal black holes as well, but rotating black holes require an additional analysis. For the extremal black holes the density of levels dn has the same property as in nonextremal case. Namely, the Pauli-Villars and dimensional regularizations eliminate the -divergences. For the scalar elds the corresponding calculations were done in Ref. []. Our consideration was also restricted to the scalar and spinor elds. The method to calculate the quantity dn can be generalized to the elds of other spins. Finding the correspondence between the canonical and the Euclidean formulations for these elds would be an interesting extension of this work. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to V. Frolov, Yu. Gusev, and A. elnikov for helpful discussions. This work was partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. 7
18 A Canonical free-energy and eective action Here we give the details how to obtain relation (.). We suppose that the system has a discrete spectrum of frequencies. Then the canonical free energy is F C i [g; ] = i X! d i (!)ln i e! ; (A.) where s =, d = and d i (!) is the degeneracy of the level!. Equation (.) for Fi C [g; ] is obtained in the limit when intervals between the frequencies! go to zero. The basic identities we use are [38] ln e!! =! X +ln! + ln +! ; (A.) 4k Note that ln +e! = d X = lim 4 z!0 dz k= q! +ln+ X X k= q k=0 k= ln +! (k + q)! (k + q)! z +! X ln +! (k +)! k= q (k + q) : (A.3)! z3 5 (A.4) where q = 0 or. By using the properties of the Riemann function [38] we nd lim z!0 d dz X k= (k)! z d = ln ; lim z!0 dz X k=0 Thus, Eqs. (A.) and (A.3) are represented in the form ln i e! =! i (z j!; ) = X k= (k +)! z = ln : (A.5) lim d z!0 dz i(z j!; ) ; (A.6) 4 (k + l i)! 3 +! 5 z ; (A.7) where l s = 0 and l d =. The series (A.7) converge at Rez >, so the functions i(z j!; ) can be dened at z! 0 with the help of the analytic continuation. By taking into account Eqs. (A.) and (A.6) we get the canonical free energy in form (.) W i [g; ] = i X! F C i [g; ] = Wi [g; ] E 0 i [g] ; (A.8) d X d i (!) lim z!0 dz i(z j!; ) ; E 0 i [g] = i d i (!)!! ; (A.9) where E 0 i [g] is the vacuum energy. The quantities W i [g; ] and E 0 i [g] diverge at large! although the free energy itself is nite. To see that Wi [g; ] is eective action (.3) one 8
19 can regularize this functional with the help of the function method. It is enough to make the replacement X! d d i (!) lim z!0 dz d i(zj!; )! lim z!0 dz i(zj) (A.0) where, according to Eq. (A.7), i (zj) = X! X k= d i (!) 4 (k + l i)! 3 +! 5 z : (A.) i (zj) are the generalized functions of the operators Li, see Eqs. (.5),(.6). For operators on manifolds without boundaries i (z j) can be dened as a meromorphic function with simple poles at z =; [30]. B Spinor heat coecients on conical singularities Let us consider the heat kernel of the spinor Laplace operator 4 d = r r + R on 4 spaces M with conical singularities. For simplicity we put =, so M are regular when =. The heat kernel obeys the equation (4 d ) x K (x; x 0 ;s)+@ s K (x; x 0 ;s)=0 ; K (x; x 0 ; 0) = (x; x 0 ) ; (B.) where (x; x 0 ) is the delta function on M. We rst describe the heat kernel on a simple cone C, which will be required for us later. It is known since Sommerfeld that heat kernels on C can be expressed in terms of the corresponding heat kernels on the plane IR. A suitable generalization of the Sommerfeld representation for integer and half-odd-integer spins was given by Dowker [39],[40]. By making use of the results of Ref. [40] we can represent the spinor heat kernel on C in the following form K (x();x 0 (0);s)= i A sin (z + )U(z)K (x(z);x0 (0);s) : (B.) Here is the polar-angle coordinate on C. A is the contour in the complex plane which has two parts. In the upper half-plane it runs from ( )+i to ( + )+i and in the lower half-plane from ( + ) i to ( ) i. K (x; x 0 ;s) is the spinor heat kernel which obeys the problem (B.) on IR. The operators K (x; x 0 ;s) and K (x; x 0 ;s) correspond to the dierent spin structures and have the dierent periodicity. The kernel on IR is unchanged when going around the origin of the polar coordinate system. (There is no dierence between the origin of the polar coordinates and other points on the plane). Contrary to this, the kernel on C changes the sign when is increased by. The covariant derivatives on IR are trivial, r but the the covariant derivatives on C are dened by the polar tetrades and nontrivial, r +. In the basis = ( ; ), where k are the Pauli matrices, the spinor connection -form is = i 3d. The role of the 9
20 matrix U in relation (B.) is to make a gauge-like transformation from the derivative on IR to that on C, i U()@ U () =r ; U() = exp 3 : (B.3) In fact, when is real U() is the unitary matrix which is the spinor representation of the rotation on the angle. To nd corrections to the heat coecients from the conical singularities we follow the method suggested in Ref. [6]. According to this method, it is sucient to work in a narrow domain ~ of the singular surface. The rest region of M does not have conical singularities and the heat kernel expansion on it has a standard form. ~ can be approximated as C. So here one can relate K (x; x 0 ;s) with the kernel K(x; x 0 ;s) on the regular space M = by the formula analogous to Eq. (B.). The contribution Tr ~ K (s) from ~ to the trace can be written as Tr ~ K (s) =Tr ~ K(s)+ i A 0 sin z ~ p gd D xtr i [U(z)K (x(z);x(0);s)] ; (B.4) where Tr i stands for the trace over the spinor indexes. The points x(z) and x(0) are connected by the integral line of the Killing The two terms in r.h.s. of (B.4) appear when contour A is deformed to a small loop around the origin and contour A 0 which consists of two vertical curves. The eect of conical singularities is related to the second term in (B.4). The asymptotic form of K(x; x 0 ;s)is K(x; x 0 ;s)' e (x;x 0 )=4s (4s) D= 4= (x; x 0 X ) n a n (x; x 0 )s n ; (B.5) where (x; x 0 ) is the geodesic distance between points x; x 0 and 4(x; x 0 ) is the Van Vleck determinant. The coecients a n are determined in terms of the Riemann tensor and its derivatives. Let be the proper distance from the points x(z) and x(0) to. One can nd the following relations [6] (x(z);x(0)) ' 4 sin z 6 4 R ijij sin z ; (B.6) 4 = (x(z);x(0)) ' + 6 R ii sin z ; (B.7) where R ii and R ijij are dened in (3.4). The integration measure on ~ can be derived from Eqs. (3.)-(3.3) ~ p gd D x ' p d D dd For the rst coecients in Eq. (B.5) one nds + 6 R ijij 4 R ii : (B.8) a 0 (x 0 ;x)'i + 8 R (x 0 ) x ; a (x 0 ;x)' RI ; (B.9) 0
21 where I is the unit matrix in the spinor representation and = 4 [ ; ]. The matrix U(z) corresponds to the rotation of a vector normal to the surface on the angle z. So from Eq. (B.9) we get Tr i [U(z)a 0 (x(z);x(0))] ' r d cos z + 4 sin z R ijij : (B.0) Here r d is the dimensionality of the spinor representation. Now, it follows from Eqs. (B.5)-(B.7),(B.9) that Tr i [U(z)K (x(z);x(0))] " exp s ' r sin z d cos z + (4s) D= 4 R ijij + 6 R ii sin z + 4 4s R ijij sin z Rs : (B.) It can be shown that approximation (B.) is sucient to nd all corrections for the rst three heat coecients due to conical singularities. By integrating (B.) with measure (B.8) we obtain an integral over the surface. Its integrand is an expression linear in the quantities R, R ii and R ijij with coecients proportional to cos z sin q z, q = ;. Finally, we have to integrate this expression in the complex plane, see. Eq. (B.4). This can be done with the help of formulas [8] where = (B.4) we nd i A 0 i A 0 dz sin z cos z sin z dz sin z cos z sin 4 z = = 3 ( ) ; (B.) 80 ( )(7 + 7) ; (B.3) (or, in general case, = H ). By making use of these relations and Eq. Tr ~ K (s) Tr ~ K(s) ' (4s) D= A ; + sa ; + O(s ) ; (B.4) where A ;k are given by Eqs. (3.6),(3.7) and Table for spinors. Formula (B.4) determines the dierence between asymptotic expansions on regular and singular spaces. It is easy to see that A ;k are the corrections to the spinor heat coecients from conical singularities. References [] G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D5 (976) 75. [] S.W. Hawking, In: General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. (eds. S.W. Hawking and W. Israel), Cambridge Univ.Press, Cambridge, 979. [3] J.W. York, Phys. Rev. D33 (986) 09.
22 [4] J.D. Brown, G.L. Comer, E.A. Martinetz, J. Malmed, B.F. Whiting and J.W. York, Class. Quantum Grav. 7 (990) 433. [5] H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting, and J. W. Jork, Phys. Rev. D4 (990) [6] B. Allen, Phys. Rev. D33 (986) [7] G.W. Gibbons, Phys. Lett. 60A (977) 385. [8] G.W. Gibbons, in Dierential Geometrical Methods in Mathematical Physics II edited by K. Bleuler, H.R. Petry, and A. Reetz (Springer, New York, 978), p. 58. [9] J.S. Dowker and G. Kennedy, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. (978) 895. [0] G.W. Gibbons and M.J. Perry, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A358 (978) 467. [] J.S. Dowker, Class. Quantum. Grav. (984) 369. [] J.S. Dowker, Phys. Rev. D39 (989) 35. [3] J.S. Dowker and J.P. Schoeld, Phys. Rev. D38 (988) 337. [4] J.S. Dowker and J.P. Schoeld, Nucl. Phys. 37 (989) 67. [5] D.V. Fursaev, Class. Quantum Grav. (994) 43. [6] D.V. Fursaev, Phys. Lett. B334 (994) 53. [7] G. Cognola, K. Kirsten and L. Vanzo, Phys. Rev. D49 (994) 09. [8] D.V. Fursaev, Mod. Phys. Lett. A0 (995) 649. [9] G.'t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B56 (985) 77. [0] G. Cognola, L. Vanzo and S. erbini, Class. Quantum Grav. (995) 97. [] A.A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, and S. erbini, Nucl. Phys. B458 (996) 67. [] J.-G. Demers, R. Lafrance, and R.C. Myers, Phys. Rev. D5 (995) 45. [3] B.S. DeWitt, Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields, Gordon and Breach, New York 965. [4] J. Cheeger, J. Dierential Geometry, 8 (983) 575. [5] D. Kabat, Nucl. Phys. B453 (995) 8.
23 [6] D.V. Fursaev and G. Miele, Nucl. Phys. B484 (997) 697. [7] J.S. Dowker, Class. Quantum Grav. (994) L37. [8] J.S. Dowker, Phys. Rev. D50 (994) [9] A.A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, and S. erbini, Phys. Rep. 66 (996). [30] R. Camporesi, Phys. Rep. 96 (990). [3] H. Bateman and A. Erdelyi, Tables of Integral Transformations, v.., New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 954. [3] V.P. Frolov and D.V. Fursaev, Phys. Rev. D56 (997). [33] S.N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D54 (996) [34] M.J. Du, Nucl. Phys. 5 (977) 334. [35] N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 98. [36] D.V. Fursaev and S.N. Solodukhin, Phys. Lett. B365 (996) 5. [37] V.P. Frolov, D.V. Fursaev and A.I. elnikov, Phys. Rev. D54 (996) 7. [38] I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, New York 994. [39] J.S. Dowker, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 0 (977) 5. [40] J.S. Dowker, Phys. Rev. D5 (987)
Yadernaya Fizika, 56 (1993) Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 56, No 1, (1993)
Start of body part published in Russian in: Yadernaya Fizika, 56 (1993) 45-5 translated in English in: Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 56, No 1, (1993) A METHOD FOR CALCULATING THE HEAT KERNEL
More informationThermal Fields, Entropy, and Black Holes
Alberta-Thy 03-98 Thermal Fields, Entropy, and Black Holes arxiv:hep-th/9802010v1 3 Feb 1998 V.P. Frolov 1,2,3 and D.V. Fursaev 1,4 1 Theoretical Physics Institute, Department of Physics, University of
More informationPlenty of Nothing: Black Hole Entropy in Induced Gravity
J. Astrophys. Astr. (1999) 20, 121 129 Plenty of Nothing: Black Hole Entropy in Induced Gravity V. P. Frolov, Theoretical Physics Institute, Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
More information/95 $ $.25 per page
Fields Institute Communications Volume 00, 0000 McGill/95-40 gr-qc/950063 Two-Dimensional Dilaton Black Holes Guy Michaud and Robert C. Myers Department of Physics, McGill University Montreal, Quebec,
More informationEntropy, Area, and Black Hole Pairs. University of Cambridge, 20 Clarkson Rd., Cambridge CB3 0EH
NI-9-0 DAMTP/R 9-6 UCSBTH-9-5 gr-qc/90903 Entropy, Area, and Black Hole Pairs S. W. Hawking, Gary T. Horowitz, y and Simon F. Ross Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences University of Cambridge,
More information1. Introduction As is well known, the bosonic string can be described by the two-dimensional quantum gravity coupled with D scalar elds, where D denot
RIMS-1161 Proof of the Gauge Independence of the Conformal Anomaly of Bosonic String in the Sense of Kraemmer and Rebhan Mitsuo Abe a; 1 and Noboru Nakanishi b; 2 a Research Institute for Mathematical
More informationNear horizon geometry, Brick wall model and the Entropy of a scalar field in the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole backgrounds
Near horizon geometry, Brick wall model and the Entropy of a scalar field in the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole backgrounds Kaushik Ghosh 1 Department of Physics, St. Xavier s College, 30, Mother Teresa
More informationRegularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Regularization Physics 3A, Spring 7, Hitoshi Murayama Introduction In quantum field theories, we encounter many apparent divergences. Of course all physical quantities are finite, and therefore divergences
More informationOne Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT
One Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT Simone Giombi UNC-Chapel Hill, Jan. 30 2014 Based on 1308.2337 with I. Klebanov and 1401.0825 with I. Klebanov and B. Safdi Massless higher spins Consistent interactions
More informationBlack hole entropy of gauge fields
Black hole entropy of gauge fields William Donnelly (University of Waterloo) with Aron Wall (UC Santa Barbara) September 29 th, 2012 William Donnelly (UW) Black hole entropy of gauge fields September 29
More informationEntanglement in Topological Phases
Entanglement in Topological Phases Dylan Liu August 31, 2012 Abstract In this report, the research conducted on entanglement in topological phases is detailed and summarized. This includes background developed
More informationhep-ph/ Sep 1998
Some Aspects of Trace Anomaly Martin Schnabl Nuclear Centre, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holesovickach 2, C-8000 Praha 8, Czech Republic July 998 hep-ph/9809534 25 Sep 998
More informationPRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in
LONDON BEIJING HONG TSINGHUA Report and Review in Physics Vol2 PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS From Quantum Field Theory to Classical Mechanics Ni Jun Tsinghua University, China NEW JERSEY \Hp SINGAPORE World Scientific
More informationConformal factor dynamics in the 1=N. expansion. E. Elizalde. Department ofphysics, Faculty of Science, Hiroshima University. and. S.D.
Conformal factor dynamics in the =N expansion E. Elizalde Department ofphysics, Faculty of Science, Hiroshima University Higashi-Hiroshima 74, Japan and S.D. Odintsov Department ECM, Faculty ofphysics,
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationThree-dimensional gravity. Max Bañados Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Max Bañados Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile The geometry of spacetime is determined by Einstein equations, R µ 1 2 Rg µ =8 G T µ Well, not quite. The geometry is known once the full curvature
More informationIntroduction Finding the explicit form of Killing spinors on curved spaces can be an involved task. Often, one merely uses integrability conditions to
CTP TAMU-22/98 LPTENS-98/22 SU-ITP-98/3 hep-th/98055 May 998 A Construction of Killing Spinors on S n H. Lu y, C.N. Pope z and J. Rahmfeld 2 y Laboratoire de Physique Theorique de l' Ecole Normale Superieure
More informationDo semiclassical zero temperature black holes exist?
Do semiclassical zero temperature black holes exist? Paul R. Anderson Department of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 7109 William A. Hiscock, Brett E. Taylor Department of
More informationAngular momentum and Killing potentials
Angular momentum and Killing potentials E. N. Glass a) Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 4809 Received 6 April 995; accepted for publication September 995 When the Penrose
More informationview that the mathematics of quantum mechanics (in particular a positive denite scalar product) emerges only at an approximate level in a semiclassica
Mode decomposition and unitarity in quantum cosmology Franz Embacher Institut fur Theoretische Physik, Universitat Wien, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-090 Wien E-mail: fe@pap.univie.ac.at UWThPh-996-67 gr-qc/96055
More informationManifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group
Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for Asymptotic Safety seminar,
More informationWilliam P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds
William P. Thurston The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds Electronic version 1.1 - March 00 http://www.msri.org/publications/books/gt3m/ This is an electronic edition of the 1980 notes distributed
More informationIntroduction to string theory 2 - Quantization
Remigiusz Durka Institute of Theoretical Physics Wroclaw / 34 Table of content Introduction to Quantization Classical String Quantum String 2 / 34 Classical Theory In the classical mechanics one has dynamical
More informationThe Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9. Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria
ESI The Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Asymptotic Structure of Symmetry Reduced General Relativity Abhay Ashtekar Jir Bicak Bernd
More informationOne can specify a model of 2d gravity by requiring that the eld q(x) satises some dynamical equation. The Liouville eld equation [3] ) q(
Liouville Field Theory and 2d Gravity George Jorjadze Dept. of Theoretical Physics, Razmadze Mathematical Institute Tbilisi, Georgia Abstract We investigate character of physical degrees of freedom for
More information31st Jerusalem Winter School in Theoretical Physics: Problem Set 2
31st Jerusalem Winter School in Theoretical Physics: Problem Set Contents Frank Verstraete: Quantum Information and Quantum Matter : 3 : Solution to Problem 9 7 Daniel Harlow: Black Holes and Quantum Information
More informationLecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist
More informationBeta functions in quantum electrodynamics
Beta functions in quantum electrodynamics based on S-66 Let s calculate the beta function in QED: the dictionary: Note! following the usual procedure: we find: or equivalently: For a theory with N Dirac
More informationThe Finiteness Requirement for Six-Dimensional Euclidean Einstein Gravity
The Finiteness Requirement for Six-Dimensional Euclidean Einstein Gravity G.W. Gibbons and S. Ichinose Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de l Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 Rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex
More informationGravity - Balls. Daksh Lohiya. Inter University Centre for Astromony and Astrophysics. Poona, INDIA. Abstract
Gravity - Balls Daksh Lohiya Inter University Centre for Astromony and Astrophysics [IUCAA], Postbag 4, Ganeshkhind Poona, INDIA Abstract The existence of non trivial, non topological solutions in a class
More informationOn the Geometry of Planar Domain Walls. F. M. Paiva and Anzhong Wang y. Abstract. The Geometry of planar domain walls is studied.
On the Geometry of Planar Domain Walls F. M. Paiva and Anzhong Wang y Departmento de Astrofsica, Observatorio Nacional { CNPq, Rua General Jose Cristino 77, 091-400 Rio de Janeiro { RJ, Brazil Abstract
More informationMaxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More informationPhysics 772 Peskin and Schroeder Problem 3.4.! R R (!,! ) = 1 ı!!
Physics 77 Peskin and Schroeder Problem 3.4 Problem 3.4 a) We start with the equation ı @ ım = 0. Define R L (!,! ) = ı!!!! R R (!,! ) = ı!! +!! Remember we showed in class (and it is shown in the text)
More informationNon-Abelian Berry phase and topological spin-currents
Non-Abelian Berry phase and topological spin-currents Clara Mühlherr University of Constance January 0, 017 Reminder Non-degenerate levels Schrödinger equation Berry connection: ^H() j n ()i = E n j n
More informationone tries, the metric must always contain singularities. The point of this note is to give a simple proof of this fact in the case that n is even. Thi
Kinks and Time Machines Andrew Chamblin, G.W. Gibbons, Alan R. Steif Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, England. We show that it is not possible
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 17 Oct 2001
SNUTP01-036 hep-th/0110154 arxiv:hep-th/0110154v1 17 Oct 2001 One-loop Effective Actions in Shape-invariant Scalar Backgrounds Chanju Kim, 1 O-Kab Kwon, 2 and Choonkyu Lee 3 Department of Physics and Center
More informationAXIOMATIC APPROACH TO PERTURBATIVE QUANTUM FIELD THEORY O. Steinmann Universitat Bielefeld Fakultat fur Physik D Bielefeld Germany April 26, 199
AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO PERTURBATIVE QUANTUM FIELD THEORY O. Steinmann Universitat Bielefeld Fakultat fur Physik D-33501 Bielefeld Germany April 26, 1997 Abstract A derivation with axiomatic methods of a
More informationmaximally charged black holes and Hideki Ishihara Department ofphysics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Oh-okayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152, Japan
Quasinormal modes of maximally charged black holes Hisashi Onozawa y,takashi Mishima z,takashi Okamura, and Hideki Ishihara Department ofphysics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Oh-okayama, Meguro, Tokyo
More informationSupersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Geometry by Nicholas Mee of Trinity College, Cambridge. October 1989
Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Geometry by Nicholas Mee of Trinity College Cambridge October 1989 Preface This dissertation is the result of my own individual effort except where reference is explicitly
More informationCollapse of Kaluza-Klein Bubbles. Abstract. Kaluza-Klein theory admits \bubble" congurations, in which the
UMDGR{94{089 gr{qc/940307 Collapse of Kaluza-Klein Bubbles Steven Corley and Ted Jacobson 2 Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742{4 Abstract Kaluza-Klein theory admits \bubble"
More informationQuantized 2d Dilaton Gravity and. abstract. We have examined a modied dilaton gravity whose action is separable into the
FIT-HE-95-3 March 995 hep-th/xxxxxx Quantized d Dilaton Gravity and Black Holes PostScript processed by the SLAC/DESY Libraries on 9 Mar 995. Kazuo Ghoroku Department of Physics, Fukuoka Institute of Technology,Wajiro,
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationExistence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature. Felix M. Lev
Existence of Antiparticles as an Indication of Finiteness of Nature Felix M. Lev Artwork Conversion Software Inc., 1201 Morningside Drive, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266, USA (Email: felixlev314@gmail.com)
More informationVacuum Polarization in the Presence of Magnetic Flux at Finite Temperature in the Cosmic String Background
Vacuum Polarization in the Presence of Magnetic Flux at Finite Temperature in the Cosmic String Background Univ. Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Brazil E-mail: jeanspinelly@ig.com.br E. R. Bezerra de Mello
More informationThe Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9. Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria
ESI The Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Comparison of the Bondi{Sachs and Penrose Approaches to Asymptotic Flatness J. Tafel S.
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationQuantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime Lecture 3 Finn Larsen Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics Yerevan, August 22, 2016. Recap AdS 3 is an instructive application of quantum fields in curved space. The
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 4 Dec 2008
Multi-fermion interaction models in curved spacetime arxiv:0812.0900v1 [hep-ph] 4 Dec 2008 Masako Hayashi Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan E-mail: hayashi@theo.phys.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v1 11 Oct 1999
NIKHEF/99-026 Killing-Yano tensors, non-standard supersymmetries and an index theorem J.W. van Holten arxiv:gr-qc/9910035 v1 11 Oct 1999 Theoretical Physics Group, NIKHEF P.O. Box 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam
More informationQuantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University
Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model MATTHEW D. Harvard University SCHWARTZ!H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS t Contents v Preface page xv Part I Field theory 1 1 Microscopic theory of radiation 3 1.1
More informationLight-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics
Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics David G. Robertson Department of Physics, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract Light-cone quantization of (3+1)-dimensional electrodynamics is
More informationExact Solutions of the Einstein Equations
Notes from phz 6607, Special and General Relativity University of Florida, Fall 2004, Detweiler Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations These notes are not a substitute in any manner for class lectures.
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 16 Sep 2008
Quasi-classical Hawking Temperatures and Black Hole Thermodynamics Terry Pilling Department of Physics, North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota, USA, 58105 arxiv:0809.2701v1 [hep-th] 16 Sep 2008
More informationPhysics Department. Northeastern University ABSTRACT. An electric monopole solution to the equations of Maxwell and Einstein's
NUB 302 October 994 Another Look at the Einstein-Maxwell Equations M. H. Friedman Physics Department Northeastern University Boston, MA 025, USA ABSTRACT HEP-PH-95030 An electric monopole solution to the
More informationGeometric Entropy: Black Hole Background
Geometric Entropy: Black Hole Background Frank Wilczek Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139 USA March 13, 2014 Abstract I review the derivation of Hawking temperature and entropy through
More informationBlack Hole Evaporation and Complementarity. summary of lectures presented by Erik Verlinde y
Black Hole Evaporation and Complementarity summary of lectures presented by Erik Verlinde y PostScript processed by the SLAC/DESY Libraries on 2 Mar 1995. About twenty years ago Hawking made the remarkable
More informationBRST and Dirac Cohomology
BRST and Dirac Cohomology Peter Woit Columbia University Dartmouth Math Dept., October 23, 2008 Peter Woit (Columbia University) BRST and Dirac Cohomology October 2008 1 / 23 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Representation
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Mar 1996
RUSSIAN GRAVITATIONAL SOCIETY INSTITUTE OF METROLOGICAL SERVICE CENTER OF GRAVITATION AND FUNDAMENTAL METROLOGY RGS-CSVR-002/96 hep-th/9603xxx arxiv:hep-th/9603107v1 15 Mar 1996 Multidimensional Extremal
More informationStress-energy tensor is the most important object in a field theory and have been studied
Chapter 1 Introduction Stress-energy tensor is the most important object in a field theory and have been studied extensively [1-6]. In particular, the finiteness of stress-energy tensor has received great
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 14 Oct 1997
T-duality and HKT manifolds arxiv:hep-th/9709048v2 14 Oct 1997 A. Opfermann Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK February
More informationNewman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions
Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions V. Pravda various parts in collaboration with: A. Coley, R. Milson, M. Ortaggio and A. Pravdová Introduction - algebraic classification in four dimensions
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v3 25 Sep 2006
OCU-PHYS 46 AP-GR 33 Kaluza-Klein Multi-Black Holes in Five-Dimensional arxiv:hep-th/0605030v3 5 Sep 006 Einstein-Maxwell Theory Hideki Ishihara, Masashi Kimura, Ken Matsuno, and Shinya Tomizawa Department
More informationBMS current algebra and central extension
Recent Developments in General Relativity The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, -3 May 07 BMS current algebra and central extension Glenn Barnich Physique théorique et mathématique Université libre de Bruxelles
More informationGeneralized Penner models to all genera. The Niels Bohr Institute. Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. C. F. Kristjansen NORDITA
NBI-HE-94-14 NORDITA - 94/8 P January 1994 Generalized Penner models to all genera J. Ambjrn The Niels Bohr Institute Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark C. F. Kristjansen NORDITA Blegdamsvej 17,
More informationKeith R. Dienes y. School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study. Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ USA. Abstract
IASSNS-HEP-94/71 hep-th/9409114 September 1994 How Strings Make Do Without Supersymmetry: An Introduction to Misaligned Supersymmetry Keith R. Dienes y School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced
More informationAbstract. Jacobi curves are far going generalizations of the spaces of \Jacobi
Principal Invariants of Jacobi Curves Andrei Agrachev 1 and Igor Zelenko 2 1 S.I.S.S.A., Via Beirut 2-4, 34013 Trieste, Italy and Steklov Mathematical Institute, ul. Gubkina 8, 117966 Moscow, Russia; email:
More informationFirst Year Seminar. Dario Rosa Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012
dario.rosa@mib.infn.it Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli studi di Milano Bicocca Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012 1 Holomorphic Chern-Simons theory (HCS) Strategy of solution and results 2
More informationOne-loop renormalization in a toy model of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity
1/0 Università di Roma TRE, Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik One-loop renormalization in a toy model of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity Based on (hep-th:1311.653) with Dario Benedetti Filippo Guarnieri
More informationTowards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group
Towards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for UK QFT-V, University of Nottingham,
More informationLinear Algebra (part 1) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v. 1.07) 1.1 The Formal Denition of a Vector Space
Linear Algebra (part 1) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v. 1.07) Contents 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.1 The Formal Denition of a Vector Space.................................. 1 1.2 Subspaces...................................................
More informationIntroduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics. Satoshi Iso (KEK)
Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics Satoshi Iso (KEK) Plan of the talk [1] Overview of BH thermodynamics causal structure of horizon Hawking radiation stringy picture of BH entropy [2] Hawking radiation
More informationMassive Spinors and ds/cft Correspondence
Massive Spinors and ds/cft Correspondence Farhang Loran arxiv:hep-th/00135v3 16 Jun 00 Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology IUT) Isfahan, Iran, Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics
More informationChern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee
Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee Maxwell Theory Maxwell Theory: Gauge Transformation and Invariance Gauss Law Charge Degrees of
More informationThree Point Functions at Finite. T.S. Evans. Theoretical Physics Institute. Department of Physics. University of Alberta.
Three Point Functions at Finite Temperature T.S. Evans Theoretical Physics Institute Department of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2J1, Canada Bitnet: usero12n@ualtamts February 1990
More informationDoes the third law of black hole thermodynamics really have a serious failure?
Does the third law of black hole thermodynamics really have a serious failure? István Rácz KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114 P.O.B. 49, Hungary September 16,
More informationLattice Quantum Chromo Dynamics and the Art of Smearing
Lattice Quantum Chromo Dynamics and the Art of Georg Engel March 25, 2009 KarlFranzensUniversität Graz Advisor: Christian B. Lang Co-workers: M. Limmer and D. Mohler 1 / 29 2 / 29 Continuum Theory Regularization:
More informationModern Geometric Structures and Fields
Modern Geometric Structures and Fields S. P. Novikov I.A.TaJmanov Translated by Dmitry Chibisov Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 71 American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island Preface
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
FY3464 Quantum Field Theory II Final exam 0..0 NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory II Contact: Kåre Olaussen, tel. 735 9365/4543770 Allowed tools: mathematical
More informationFinite entropy of Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black hole in different coordinates
Vol 16 No 12, December 2007 c 2007 Chin. Phys. Soc. 1009-196/2007/16(12/610-06 Chinese Physics and IOP Publishing Ltd Finite entropy of Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black hole in different coordinates
More informationhep-lat/ Dec 94
IASSNS-HEP-xx/xx RU-94-99 Two dimensional twisted chiral fermions on the lattice. Rajamani Narayanan and Herbert Neuberger * School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Olden Lane, Princeton,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF PHYSICS DAN CORNEA. Summary of Ph.D. THESIS
UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF PHYSICS DAN CORNEA Summary of Ph.D. THESIS COHOMOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO EINSTEIN-HILBERT GRAVITY Ph.D. supervisor Prof. dr. CONSTANTIN BIZDADEA CRAIOVA 2008 Contents 1 Introduction
More informationIMSc/98/10/51 hep-th/ The Hagedorn Transition, Deconnement and the AdS/CFT Correspondence S. Kalyana Rama and B. Sathiapalan Institute of Mathe
Email: krama, bala@imsc.ernet.in 1 IMSc/98/10/51 hep-th/9810069 The Hagedorn Transition, Deconnement and the AdS/CFT Correspondence S. Kalyana Rama and B. Sathiapalan Institute of Mathematical Sciences
More informationMass dependence of instanton determinant in QCD: part I
Mass dependence of instanton determinant in QCD: part I Gerald Dunne (UConn) Hyunsoo Min (Univ. Seoul and UConn) determinants in quantum field theory semiclassical instanton background 1 dimensional (ODE)
More informationNew Geometric Formalism for Gravity Equation in Empty Space
New Geometric Formalism for Gravity Equation in Empty Space Xin-Bing Huang Department of Physics, Peking University, arxiv:hep-th/0402139v3 10 Mar 2004 100871 Beijing, China Abstract In this paper, complex
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationBrane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field
Brane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field Merab Gogberashvili Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, 6 Tamarashvili Str., Tbilisi 380077, Georgia E-mail: gogber@hotmail.com September 7, 00 Abstract It is shown
More informationhep-ph/ Jul 94
Thermal versus Vacuum Magnetization in QED Goteborg ITP 94-3 June 994 Per Elmfors,,a Per Liljenberg, 2,b David Persson 3,b and Bo-Sture Skagerstam 4,b,c a NORDITA, Blegdamsvej 7, DK-200 Copenhagen, Denmark
More informationK. Melnikov 1. Institut fur Physik, THEP, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat, Abstract
MZ-TH-95-0 November 995 Two loopo(n f s )corrections to the decay width of the Higgs boson to two massive fermions. K. Melnikov Institut fur Physik, THEP, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat, Staudinger Weg
More informationEntanglement and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
Entanglement and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy Eugenio Bianchi relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar Black hole entropy Bekenstein-Hawking 1974 Process: matter falling
More informationEric Perlmutter, DAMTP, Cambridge
Eric Perlmutter, DAMTP, Cambridge Based on work with: P. Kraus; T. Prochazka, J. Raeymaekers ; E. Hijano, P. Kraus; M. Gaberdiel, K. Jin TAMU Workshop, Holography and its applications, April 10, 2013 1.
More informationREPORTRAPPORT. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica. Asymptotics of zeros of incomplete gamma functions. N.M. Temme
Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica REPORTRAPPORT Asymptotics of zeros of incomplete gamma functions N.M. Temme Department of Analysis, Algebra and Geometry AM-R9402 994 Asymptotics of Zeros of Incomplete
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v2 1 Oct 1998
Action and entropy of black holes in spacetimes with cosmological constant Rong-Gen Cai Center for Theoretical Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea Jeong-Young Ji and Kwang-Sup Soh
More informationFT/UCM{7{96 On the \gauge" dependence of the toplogical sigma model beta functions Luis Alvarez-Consuly Departamento de Fsica Teorica, Universidad Aut
FT/UCM{7{96 On the \gauge" dependence of the toplogical sigma model beta functions Luis Alvarez-Consuly Departamento de Fsica Teorica, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco,28049 Madrid, Spain C.
More informationExercise 1 Classical Bosonic String
Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String 1. The Relativistic Particle The action describing a free relativistic point particle of mass m moving in a D- dimensional Minkowski spacetime is described by ) 1 S
More informationE.T. Akhmedov, T. Pilling, D. Singleton, JMPD 17. (2008)
L. Parker, S. A. Fulling, PD 9, (1974) L.H. Ford, PD 11, (1975) J. S. Dowker,. Critchley, PD 13, (1976) D. Hochberg,T. W.Kephart, PD 49, (1994) J. G. Demers,.Lafrance,.C.Myers, CM PD 5, (1995) E.T. Akhmedov,
More informationQuantum Field Theory. Kerson Huang. Second, Revised, and Enlarged Edition WILEY- VCH. From Operators to Path Integrals
Kerson Huang Quantum Field Theory From Operators to Path Integrals Second, Revised, and Enlarged Edition WILEY- VCH WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA I vh Contents Preface XIII 1 Introducing Quantum Fields
More informationSEARCH FOR THE QCD GROUND STATE. M. Reuter. DESY, Notkestrae 85, D Hamburg. C. Wetterich. Institut fur Theoretische Physik
DESY 94-081 HD{THEP{94{6 hep-ph/9405300 SEARCH FOR THE QCD GROUND STATE M. Reuter DESY, Notkestrae 85, D-22603 Hamburg C. Wetterich Institut fur Theoretische Physik Universitat Heidelberg Philosophenweg
More information= a. a = Let us now study what is a? c ( a A a )
7636S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solutions 1 Spring 010 1 Warm up a Show that the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator A are real and that the eigenkets of A corresponding to dierent eigenvalues are orthogonal
More informationSeparability of Dirac equation in higher dimensional Kerr NUT de Sitter spacetime
Physics Letters B 659 2008 688 693 wwwelseviercom/locate/physletb Separability of Dirac equation in higher dimensional Kerr NUT de Sitter spacetime Takeshi Oota a Yukinori Yasui b a Osaka City University
More information