arxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Mar 1996

Transcription

1 RUSSIAN GRAVITATIONAL SOCIETY INSTITUTE OF METROLOGICAL SERVICE CENTER OF GRAVITATION AND FUNDAMENTAL METROLOGY RGS-CSVR-002/96 hep-th/9603xxx arxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Mar 1996 Multidimensional Extremal Dilatonic Black Holes in String-like Model with Cosmological Term V. D. Ivashchuk and V. N. Melnikov Center for Gravitation and Fundamental Metrology, VNIIMS, 3-1 M. Ulyanovoy St., Moscow, , Russia ABSTRACT A string-like model with the cosmological constant Λ is considered. The Maki-Shiraishi multi-black-hole solution[2] is generalized to space-times with a Ricci-flat internal space. For Λ = 0 the obtained solution in the one-black-hole case is shown to coincide with the extreme limit of the charged dilatonic black hole solution [11, 12]. The Hawking temperature T H for the solution [11, 12] is presented and its extreme limit is considered. For the string value of dilatonic coupling the temperature T H does not depend upon the internal space dimension. PACS numbers: 04.20, Key words: Dilatonic Black Holes, Strings, Hawking Temperature Moscow 1996

2 1 Introduction In this paper we consider the model described by the action S = d D x g { 1 [ R[g] 2Λexp( 2λϕ) M ϕ 2κ 2 N ϕg MN] 1 4 exp(2λϕ)f MNF MN }, (1.1) where g = g MN dx M dx N is the metric, F = 1F 2 MNdx M dx N = da is the strength of the electromagnetic field and ϕ is the scalar field (dilatonic field). Here λ is the dilatonic coupling constant and D is space-time dimension (in notations of [2] a = λ D 2). For λ 2 = 1, D = 10, Λ = 0 (1.2) 8 theaction(1.1)describes apartofthebosonicsectorforthen = 1ten-dimensional Einstein- Yang-Mills supergravity that occurs in the low energy limit of superstring theory [1]. Moreover, λ 2 = λ 2 s 1 (1.3) D 2 corresponds to the tree-level string effective action in D dimensions. The non-zero cosmological term Λ occurs for non-critical string theories (in this case Λ is proportional to the central charge deficit). Another case of interest is λ 2 = λ 2 0 D 1 D 2, (1.4) which corresponds to the D-dimensional theory obtained by dimensionally reducing the (D + 1)-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory. In that case the scalar field ϕ is associated with the size of (D+1)-th dimension. 2 Exact solutions The field equations corresponding to the action (1.1) have the following form and where R MN 1 2 g MNR = κ 2 T MN Λexp( 2λϕ)g MN, (2.1) M ( M ϕ) 1 2 λκ2 exp(2λϕ)f MN F MN +2λΛexp( 2λϕ) = 0, (2.2) M (exp(2λϕ)f MN ) = 0, (2.3) Let us consider the manifold T MN = κ 2 ( M ϕ N ϕ 1 2 g MN P ϕ P ϕ) +exp(2λϕ)(f MP F N P 1 4 g MNF PQ F PQ ). (2.4) M = M (2+d) M int, (2.5) 1

3 where M (2+d) isthe (2+d)-dimensional (space-time) manifoldandm int isan internal space equipped by the Ricci-flat metric g int. Our solution to the field equations is defined on the manifold (2.5) and has the following form where C 0 is constant, and g = U (3 D)2/A dt dt+u 2/A[ 1+d ] dx a dx a +g int, (2.6) a=1 exp(2λϕ) = C 2 U 2αt, (2.7) A = A M dx M = νdt κcu, (2.8) A = A(λ,D) = D 3+λ 2 (D 2), (2.9) α t = λ 2 (D 2)/A(λ,D), (2.10) ν 2 = (D 2)/A(λ,D), (2.11) U = U(t, x) = ht+φ( x), (2.12) Φ = δ ab a b Φ = 0, (2.13) h 2(D 2) [ 2(D 2) A(λ, D) A(λ,D) 1] = 2Λ. (2.14) Here x = (x a ), a,b = 1,...,1+d. It may be verified by a straightforward calculation that the equations of motions (2.1)-(2.3) for the considered solution are satisfied identically [16]. The solution (2.6)-(2.14) generalizes the Maki-Shiraishi solution [2] (see also [7] for λ 2 = 1/2 and [8] for Λ = 0) to the case of a Ricci-flat internal space. Here we use the parametrization similar to that of [6] (D = 4). For D = d+2 our notations are related with those from [2] by the following manner: A/h = a 2 t 0, (ht) a2 /A = t MS /t 0. From (2.14) we get λ 2 < λ 2 0 D 1 D 2, h 0 (2.15) for Λ > 0, λ 2 > λ 2 0, h 0 (2.16) for Λ < 0, and λ 2 = λ 2 0, h is arbitrary, (2.17) or λ is arbitrary, h = 0 (2.18) for Λ = 0. Special cases of the above solutions with Λ > 0 were also considered by Kastor and Traschen [5] (D = 4, d = 2, λ = 0) and Horne and Horowitz [6] (D = 4, λ 2 = 1/2). The solution [5] generalizes the well-known Majumdar-Papapetrou solution [9]. For Λ 0 and Φ = 1+ m i=1 2 B i x x i d 1 (2.19)

4 the relations (2.6)-(2.8) describe a collection of m multidimensional extremal (charged) dilatonic black holes (with masses proportional to B i ) living in asymptotically de Sitter or anti-desitter spaces. Indeed, as will be shown below, for Λ = 0 and m = 1 in (2.19) we get an 0(d + 1)-symmetric extremal black hole solution with a Ricci-flat internal space [11, 12]. It should be also noted that the global properties of static spherically symmetric solutions to the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton system in the presence of an arbitrary exponential dilaton potential were derived in [10]. 3 Extremal and non-extremal charged dilatonic black holes for Λ = 0. Let us consider the case Λ = h = 0. Here we show that the solution (2.6)-(2.14) with Φ from (2.19) and m = 1 is an extremal limit for the multidimensional charged dilatonic black hole solution [11, 12] (see also [15]). 3.1 Non-extremal multidimensional charged dilatonic black hole The solution [11] with one internal Ricci-flat space reads Here g = f + f 1+2αt dt dt+f [ dr dr ] 2αr +r 2 dω 2 2/A d +f g int, (3.1) f + f A = ( Q C(d 1) r1 d +c ) dt, (3.2) exp(2λϕ) = C 2 f 2αt. (3.3) f ± = f ± (r) = 1 B ± rd 1, (3.4) α r = 1 d 1 1 A(λ,D), (3.5) g int is Ricci-flat internal space metric, dω 2 d is canonical metric on Sd ( spherical angle ), parameters A = A(λ,D) and α t are defined in (2.9) and (2.10) respectively, c and C 0 are constants and the parameters satisfy the relation B + > B > 0, Q 0 (3.6) B + B = κ2 Q 2 A(λ,D) (d 1) 2 (D 2). (3.7) (Here we have slightly generalized [11] by introducing the constant C 0.) The (2 + d)-dimensional section of the metric (3.1) has a horizon at r d 1 = B +. For r d 1 = B < B + a horizon is absent since α t α r < 0. (3.8) 3

5 We note that α t 0, α r 0 and α r = 0 (λ = 0, D = d + 2). The horizon at r d 1 = B < B + takes place only for λ = 0 and D = d+2. In this case the internal space is absent and we are led to the Myers-Perry O(d+1)-symmetric charged black hole solution [13]. The considered solution generalizes the solutions from [3, 4] with D = 2+d. The mass of the black hole is defined by the relation [11] where 2GM = B + +B β, (3.9) β = 1+2α t = D 3 λ2 (D 2) D 3+λ 2 (D 2) (3.10) and G = S D κ 2 is the effective gravitational constant (S D is defined in [13]). Hawking temperature. A standard calculation based on the absence of conic singularity as r d 1 B + in the Euclidean- rotated metric (3.1) (t = iτ, 0 τ TH 1 ) gives us the following relation for the Hawking temperature where r + = (B + ) 1/(d 1) and T H = (d 1) 4πr + ( 1 B B + ) α, (3.11) α = 1+α t α r < 1. (3.12) For the string case (1.3) α = α s = (d 2)/(d 1) 0. From (3.12) we get the inequality T H > T MP = (d 1) 4πr + ( 1 B B + ) (3.13) where T MP is the Hawking temperature for the Myers-Perry charged black hole [13] (λ = 0, D = d+2). For D = 4 (d = 2) relation (3.11) agrees with the corresponding relation from [14]. 3.2 Extremal charged black hole Now we consider the solution (3.1)-(3.5), (3.6) for B + = B = κ Q A(λ, D) (d 1) (D 2) = B. (3.14) In this case the mass (3.9) is minimal [11] M c = κ Q (D 3) G(d 1) A(λ,D)(D 2) (3.15) and the relations (3.1)-(3.5) describe an extremal charged dilatonic black hole. Introducing a new radial variable R by the relation r d 1 B = R d 1 (3.16) 4

6 and denoting U = 1+ B R d 1 = f ± (3.17) we get a special case of the solution from Sec. 2 with Λ = h = 0 and m = 1 in (2.19) (R = x x 1, B = B 1 ). Here we put c = Q/(B(d 1)) in (3.2). In the extremal case a horizon for r d 1 = B takes place if (and only if) α = α(λ,d,d) 0 (3.18) (see (3.12)). This is equivalent to the following restriction on the dilatonic coupling parameter λ 2 1 d 2+ (D 2) λ2 c. (3.19) The relation (3.19) is satisfied for the string case (1.3). For d = 2 we have λ 2 c = λ2 s. For λ 2 = λ 2 c we get α = 0 and T H = T c d 1 4πr +. (3.20) Due to relation (3.11) the Hawking temperature has the following limit as B B +, i.e. in the extreme black hole limit T H 0, for λ 2 < λ 2 c, (3.21) T c, for λ 2 = λ 2 c. (3.22) For λ 2 > λ 2 c we get T H + as B B +. In this case the horizon at r d 1 = B = B + is absent. Remark. It may be shown that the metric (3.1) is singular as r r = B 1/(d 1) for all B + B > 0, λ and D > d+2 [16]. For λ = 0 and D = d+2 (i.e. in the Myers-Perry case [13]) the singularity is absent. 4 Special cases 4.1 Infinite-dimensional case Here we consider the interesting special case, when N int = dimm int + (or D + and d is fixed). In this limit the metric (2.6) reads g = U 2/(1+λ2) dt dt+ 1+d and the relations (2.10), (2.11) and (2.14) take the following form a=1 dx a dx a +g int, (4.1) α t = λ 2 /(1+λ 2 ), ν 2 = 1/(1+λ 2 ), (4.2) h 2 1 λ 2 = 2Λ. (1+λ 2 ) 2 (4.3) 5

7 Thus, the spatial section of the metric (4.1) is flat. For string (1.3), Kaluza-Klein (1.4) and critical (3.19) values of the coupling constants we have respectively λ 2 s = 0, λ2 0 = 1, λ2 c = d 2. (4.4) For the parameter α in (3.12) we have 4.2 Stringy case α = 1 1+λ 2 1 d 1. (4.5) For λ 2 = λ 2 s = (D 2) 1 we obtain instead of (4.1)-(4.3) the following relations g = U (3 D)2/(D 2) dt dt+u 2/(D 2)[ 1+d ] dx a dx a +g int, (4.6) a=1 α t = (D 2) 1, ν 2 = 1, (4.7) h 2 = 2Λ. (4.8) For the Hawking temperature (3.11) we get in the considered case T H = T H,s = (d 1) 4πr + ( 1 B B + )d 2 d 1. (4.9) Thus, in the string case (1.3) the Hawking temperature (4.9) does not depend upon the total dimension D (or equivalently upon the internal space dimension N int ). Moreover, it does not depend upon the Ricci-flat internal space (M int,g int ). For example, one may consider for D = 10 different internal Calabi-Yau spaces [1] with the same result for T H. For d = 2 (4.9) coincides with the corresponding formula for the Schwarzschild black hole. Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to K.A. Bronnikov and M.L. Fil chenkov, for useful discussions. This work was supported in part by the Russian Ministry of Science and Russian Fund of Basic Sciences. 6

8 References [1] M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986, p [2] T. Maki and K. Shiraishi, Class. Quantum Grav. 10 (1993) [3] G.W. Gibbons and K. Maeda, Nucl. Phys., B298 (1988) 741. [4] D. Garfinkle, G. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev., D43(1991) 3140; D45(1992) 3888(E). [5] D. Kastor and J. Traschen, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) [6] J.H. Horne and G.T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) R5457. [7] T. Maki and K. Shiraishi, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 90 (1993) [8] K. Shiraishi, J. Math. Phys. 34 (1993) 1480; Nucl. Phys. B 402 (1993) 399. [9] S.D. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 930; A. Papapetrou, Proc. R. Irish Acad. A51 (1947) 191; J. Hartle and S. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 26 (1972) 87. [10] S.J. Poletti and D.L. Wiltshire, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) [11] U. Bleyer and V.D. Ivashchuk, Phys. Lett. B 332 (1994) 292. [12] U. Bleyer, K.A. Bronnikov, S.B. Fadeev and V.N. Melnikov, Aston. Nachr. 315 (1994), 393. K.A. Bronnikov and V.N. Melnikov, Annals of Physics (N.Y.) 239 (1995), 40. K.A. Bronnikov, Gravitation and Cosmology 1 (1995) 67. [13] R.C. Myers and M.J. Perry, Ann. of Phys., 172 (1986) 304. [14] K. Shiraishi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7 (1992) [15] V.D. Ivashchuk and V.N. Melnikov, Class. Quantum Grav. 11 (1994) [16] V.D. Ivashchuk and V.N. Melnikov, in preparation. 7