Analysis of Bilateral Teleoperation Systems under Communication Time-Delay
|
|
- Cameron Waters
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Analysis of Bilateral Teleoperation Systems under Communication Time-Delay Anas FATTOUH and Olivier SENAME 1 Abstract In this article, bilateral teleoperation systems under communication time-delay are analyzed. Necessary and sufficient conditions guarantee the stability of the global system for any communication time-delay are firstly derived. Then, based on these conditions, weighting function on the slave system is obtained. Therefore, the problem of finding a position controller for the slave system which also guarantees the stability of the global system is reduced to a standard robust control problem: finding a controller which internally stabilizes a system and guarantees the H -norm of some transfer function less than one. Keywords: Bilateral teleoperation systems, Time delay systems, Robust stability. I. INTRODUCTION Force feedback can provide useful information to the operator of a teleoperation system. Assembly tasks can usually be completed much faster when the operator has a feel for the forces and torques caused by contact [1]. Other benefits include improved safety and less damage from overstressing the manipulator or material being handled [2]. However, when teleoperation is performed over a great distance, a time delay is incurred in the transmission of information from one site to another. This time delay can destabilize a bilaterally controlled teleoperator [3]. Many control schemes have been proposed in the literature to overcome the instability due to communication time delay in bilateral teleoperation systems. However, much of these works have been in the area of human performance and a few papers have dealt with control issues pertaining to this problem [4]. The main idea behind many studies in this area lies on the use of different methods to achieve desired master and slave compliance, then scaling factors on transmitted information are added to ensure the stability of the global system (see for example [5]). However, this approach reduces the bandwidth of the system which must lie in some interval for normal operation [6]. Passivity and scattering theory have also been largely used to ensure the stability of time-delay teleoperation systems (see for example [3], [7]). In this approach, all components of teleoperation system are assumed to be passive, otherwise some transformations have to be done in order to 1 Corresponding author. A. Fattouh is with Laboratoire d Automatique des Systèmes Coopératifs, Université de Metz, BP 8794, 5712 METZ Cedex 1, France Anas.Fattouh@lasc.univ-metz.fr O. Sename is with Laboratoire d Automatique de Grenoble, ENSIEG, BP 46, 3842 Saint Martin d Hères Cedex, France Olivier.Sename@inpg.fr make them passive. However, these transformations degrade the performance of the global system [8], [9]. In addition obtained control laws will not be directly applicable using digital controllers or digital communication channel as the discretization of a passive system is in generally not passive [1]. Leung et al. [4] have used H optimal control and µ-analysis and synthesis techniques to design robust controllers for bilateral teleoperation systems. However, communication time delay is treated as a disturbance on the system and not as a parameter of the system. In [15], the authors have proposed an H approach for impedance control of teleoperation systems. As in [4], where the control objectives are tracking and transparency, the delay is considered as an uncertainty, which leads to a conservative result. However, in this work a stability analysis with respect to time-delay is provided. Despite many recent studies on time-delay systems (see for instant [11]), a few results on these systems have been applied on bilateral teleoperation systems. In [12], [13], frequency sweeping test is used to derive conditions on PItype controller such that the global system is asymptotically stable. However, the study cannot be directly generalized for other types of controller. Authors have also proposed in [14] finite spectrum controller for bilateral teleoperation systems. However, the communication time-delay must be known and robustness is difficult to be analyzed. In this article, necessary and sufficient conditions ensuring the stability of a bilateral teleoperation system are derived in term of H -norm of some transfer function which must be less than one. In this case the stability of global system can be guaranteed for any communication time-delay by including this constraint (. < 1) in the design of the salve controller. This can be achieved using standard techniques in robust control (see for example [16], [17]). In addition, robustness on stability of the global system with respect to environment s variations can be also guaranteed if the H -norm of some transfer functions is less than one. Without loss of generality, the article considers only the one-dimensional case. In addition, all the transfer functions are assumed to be linear and time-invariant. A general representation of teleoperation systems is given in Section 2 followed by an analysis of this representation in Section 3. The robustness of bilateral teleoperation system is studied in Section 4. Section 5 presents simulation results that support the theoretical work and conclusion is drawn in Section 6.
2 II. SYSTEM REPRESENTATION A bilateral teleoperation system can be represented by the block diagram of Fig. 1 and consists of five subsystems: the human operator, the master manipulator, the communication channel, the slave manipulator and the environment. The variables of the system are: F h is the force applied by human operator, F e is the contact force with the environment and, are the position of master and slave manipulators respectively. Fig. 2. Considered structure of bilateral teleoperation system. Fig. 1. Block diagram of bilateral teleoperation system. The operator commands a position forward to the environment through the master, the communication channel and the slave. Likewise, the force sensed at the environment is transmitted back to the human operator through these blocks. Since the teleoperator is controlled bilaterally, the arrows in Fig. 1 can be reversed. In this case the operator commands force forward to the environment and environment s position is sent back to the master. With this understanding, the teleoperation system is acting as a hybrid system, where the human operator determines the switching between the position and force control modes [18]. Generally, three controllers are designed for this system: two local controllers for master and slave manipulators in order to achieve desired master and slave compliances and second slave controller such that, in steady state, the slave position is equal to the master position and the global system is asymptotically stable. In the next section, block diagram of Fig. 1 will be studied in detailed. The communication channel will be considered as a pure time-delay. The local controllers are assumed to be already designed and integrated in the master and slave transfer functions. Then, the stability of the global system will be analyzed and constraint on the design of second salve controller will be obtained such that the global system is asymptotically stable for any communication time-delay. III. STABILITY ANALYSIS In view of previous section, let P m and P s be the transfer functions of master and slave manipulators with local controllers, Z e be the environment s impedance, h 1 and h 2 be time delays of communication forward and backward channels respectively and C be the second slave controller. With these notations, bock diagram of Fig. 1 can be redrawn as shown in Fig. 2. Definition 1: Consider the bilateral teleoperation system of Fig. 2. This system is said to be asymptotically stable if: 1) The transfer function from to is asymptotically stable with unitary gain. 2) The transfer function from F h to is asymptotically stable for any communication time-delay. A. Analysis of Condition 1 in Definition 1 The block diagram of the system from to is shown in Fig. 3 where W 1 (s) is a weighting function reflecting the desired performance. Fig. 3. Master Slave positions system. Based on Fig. 3, the transfer function from to is given by where T s := = C P s 1 + C P (1) s P s = P s 1 + P s Z e (2) From robust control theory, condition 1 in Definition 1 can be rewritten as: find C such that T s is internally stable and W 1 T s < 1 (3) where the constraint of unitary gain for T s is included in the weighting function W 1 (s). B. Analysis of Condition 2 in Definition 1 From block diagrams 2 and 3, the transfer function from F h to can be described in the block diagram of Fig. 4 where h = h 1 + h 2. Based on Fig. 4, the transfer function from F h to is given by T m := P m = F h 1 + P m T s Z e e sh (4)
3 Fig. 4. Operator force Master position system. Our objective now is to find a constraint on the transfer function T s such that T m given in (4) is asymptotically stable for any time delay h. To this end, let s recall the following result [19]. Lemma 1: Let P(s) and Q(s) be two polynomials in complex variable s satisfying: 1) deg s [P (s)] < deg s [Q(s)], 2) Q(s) is stable, then, the polynomial Q(s) + P (s) e sτ is stable for all τ if and only if Q(jω) > P (jω), ω R (5) In view of above lemma, we have the following proposition. Proposition 1: Consider the system of Fig. 4. Assume that P m and T s are strictly proper and stable, then the transfer function T m given in (4) is asymptotically stable for any time delay h if and only if W 2 T s < 1, where W 2 = P m Z e (6) Proof: Let P m (s) = Nm(s) D m(s) T s (s) = Ns(s) D s(s) Then transfer function T m given in (4) can be rewritten as follows N m D s T m = D m D s + N m N s Z e e sh (8) As P m and T s are assumed to be strictly proper and stable then the two conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied. Therefore, using Lemma 1, system (4) is asymptotically stable for all time delay h if and only if (7) D m D s (jω) > N m N s Z e (jω), ω R (9) which is equivalent to condition (6). Remark 1: It should be noted that assumptions on P m and T s in Proposition 1 are always satisfied as we initially assumed that P m is the transfer function of the master with a local controller, and T s represents the transfer function from to which has already been stabilized by C. In view of (3), (6) and Remark 1, the following proposition can be easy obtained. Proposition 2: Consider the bilateral teleoperation system in Fig. 2 and transfer functions (1) and (6). This system is asymptotically stable according to Definition 1 if and only if C such that T s is internally stable and WT s < 1 (1) where W is a weighting transfer function satisfying W(jω) = max W 1 (jω), W 2 (jω) }, ω R (11) In the next section, the robustness of the proposed control scheme will be analyzed. IV. ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS In this section, the following problem is considered: given a bilateral teleoperation system as in Fig. 2 and assuming that the environment impedance Z e belongs to some admissible set Ξ, find conditions on T s such that the system is asymptotically stable according to Definition 1 for all Z e Ξ, where the term admissible will be defined later. Notice that communication time-delay is not included in this problem as our stability criterion (5) is delay independent. According to Definition 1, robustness in stability of system in Fig. 2 is equivalent to the robustness in stability of T s : Xm and T m : F h. Consider the system of Fig. 3, define the following family of transfer functions P s = Ps : Z e Ξ } (12) The set Ξ is said to be admissible, if Ps for nominal impedance Z e and P s have the same unstable poles [2]. Proposition 3: Consider the system of Fig. 3 with the family of transfer functions (12) and Ξ is admissible. Assume that the system is internally stable for nominal impedance Z e, then the system is internally stable for all Z e Ξ if W 3 T s < 1 (13) where W 3 is a weighting transfer function satisfying P s (jω) W 3 (jω) max Z e Ξ P s n (jω) 1, ω R (14) and P n s = P s for nominal impedance Z e. proof: Using (14), the family of transfer functions (12) can be written as follows: P s = (1 + W 3 ) P n s (15) where P s n = P s for nominal impedance Z e and is a variable stable transfer function satisfying < 1. From (15) and robust control theory [2], the robust stability condition for T s : Xm is given by (13). In the next proposition, the robustness in stability of T m : F h is considered.
4 Proposition 4: Consider the system of Fig. 2 with the family of transfer functions (12) and Ξ is admissible. Assume that the system is internally stable for nominal impedance Z e, then the system is internally stable for all Z e Ξ if W 4 T s < 1 (16) where W 4 is a weighting transfer function satisfying } W 4 (jω) = max W 3 (jω), max W (jω), Z e Ξ ω R (17) and W and W 3 are given by (11) and (14) respectively. proof: If (16)-(17) are satisfied, then we have W 3 T s < 1 (18) WT s < 1, Z e Ξ (19) As (18) is satisfied, then T s is asymptotically stable for all Z e Ξ (Proposition 3). In addition, as (19) is satisfied, then (1) is satisfied for all Z e Ξ, therefore, T m is asymptotically stable for all Z e Ξ. Remark 2: The design of C such that (1) is satisfied for nominal stability and (16) is satisfied for robust stability can be carried out using µ-analysis and synthesis toolbox of MATLAB [21]. V. SIMULATION RESULTS Consider the following dynamics of the master and the slave manipulators Mm v m = F h + τ m M s v s = F e + τ s (2) where v m and v s are the velocities for the master and the slave respectively, τ m and τ s are the respective motor torques, M m and M s are the respective inertias, F h is the operator torque and F e is the environment torque. In order to stabilize the above system, Anderson and Spong [3] have proposed the following PI control law τ m = B m v m B s1 (v m v s ) K s (vm v s )dt τ s = B s2 v s α f F e + B s1 (v m v s ) +K s (vm v s )dt where M m = kg, M s = 1kg B m = 3N/m, B s2 = N/m, Z e = 1, α = and K s and B s1 are the parameter of the PI controller which must be chosen such that the closed-loop system is stable. In the presence of communication time delay h, Niculescu et al. [12] have shown that for K s = 5 and B s1 = 2.8, the closed-loop system is stable for all h >. However, when the admittance of the environment changes to Z e = 2, the system becomes unstable. In this case, choosing K s = 12 and B s1 = 2.8, the closed-loop system is stable for all h < 27 sec. Authors in [14] have used finite spectrum techniques to design a controller for system (2). The following control law has been found which stabilize the system for any known time delay h. τ m = 7v m + u(t) τ s = ( v m v s ) + 5 ( v m v s )dt ( u(t) =.292δ+116 δ(δ+1) Fh (t) F e (t) ).46 δ+1 u(t h) + h ( 14.3e 17.5θ e θ) u(t + θ)dθ where v m (t) = v m (t h 1 ), Fe (t) = F e (t h 2 ) and δ is the differential operator. The same example is considered here. The proposed method will be used to find a controller C for nominal stability then for robust stability. Based on the above discussion, the master and slave transfer functions with local controllers are given by 1 Pm =.4s 2 +3s+5 (21) 1 P s = s 2 +s+2.8 The impedance of the environment is modelled as follows A. Design for Nominal Stability Z e = 2s + 3 (22) In this subsection, a solution to (1) is calculated. From (2), (6), (11), (21) and (22), we have s P s = 2 +s+2.8 s s s s W = W 2 = 2s+3 s 2 +3s+5 (23) Now we are looking for a controller C which internally stabilize P s and such that WC P s < 1. Using MAT- LAB, the following controller has been found C = s s s s s s s s The bode diagram of WC P s is shown in Fig. 5. It is clear from this figure that WC P s < 1. Fig. 6 and 7 show master and slave positions for variable communication time delay and nominal environment (Z e = 2s + 3) and non-nominal environment (Z e = 5s + 2) respectively. Note that in the two cases the slave position pursuits the master position. It should be noted that when slave is not in contact with the environment, the system becomes unstable (see Fig. 8). In the following subsection, a robust controller is designed to overcome this problem. B. Design for Robust Stability In this subsection, a solution to (16)-(17) is calculated. Firstly, assume that Z e = as + b (24)
5 Magnitude (db) 1 ( ) and 1 ( ) and Fig. 5. Frequency (rad/sec) Bode diagram of WC P s Fig. 8. Master - Slave positions: without contact. with a [,4] and b [,6]. By evaluating (17), we have found W 4 = 1s + 1 s (25) Now we are looking for a controller C which internally stabilize P s and such that W4C P s < 1. Using MAT- LAB, the following controller has been found C =.4s4 +.96s s s s 4 + 6s s s Fig. 9 and 1 show master and slave positions for variable communication time delay and nominal environment (Z e = 2s + 3) and for Z e = respectively. Note that in the two cases the slave position pursuits the master position. Fig. 6. Master - Slave positions: nominal environment impedance ( ) and Fig. 7. Master - Slave positions: non-nominal environment impedance. ( ) and Fig. 9. Master - Slave positions: nominal environment impedance.
6 ( ) and Fig. 1. Master - Slave positions: without contact. VI. CONCLUSIONS In this article, the nominal and robust stability of bilateral teleoperation system with communication time delay has been characterized by a weighting transfer function on the complementary sensitivity transfer function of slave system. Thus, standard techniques in robust control have been used to design the position controller for slave system. In future works, deep study on the weighting transfer function will be done. [12] S.-I. Niculescu, D. Taoutaou, and R. Lozano, On the closed-loop stability of a teleoperation control scheme subject to communication time-delays, in Proc. 41st IEEE Confer. on Decision & Control, (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA), pp , 22. [13] D. Taoutaou, S.-I. Niculescu, and K. Gu, Robust stability of teleoperation schemes subject to constant and time-varying communication delays, in Proc. 42nd IEEE Confer. on Decision & Control, (Hyatt Regency Maui, Hawaii, USA), pp , 23. [14] A. Fattouh and O. Sename, Finite spectrum assignment controller for teleoperation systems with time delay, in Proc. 42nd IEEE Confer. on Decision & Control, (Hyatt Regency Maui, Hawaii, USA), 23. [15] A. Fattouh and O. Sename, H -based impedance control of teleoperation systems with time delay, in 5th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, (INRIA, Rocquencourt, France), 23. [16] B. A.Francis, A course in H control theory. Springer-Verlag, [17] K. Zhou, J. C. Doyle, and K. Glover, Robust and optimal control. Prentice-Hall Inc., [18] O. Khatib, A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators, IEEE Journal Robotics Automations, no. 1, pp , [19] L. E. El sgol ts and S. B. Norkin, Introduction to the theory and applications of differential equations with deviating arguments, vol. 15 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Academic Press, New York, [2] J. C. Doyle, B. A. Francis, and A. R. Tannenbaum, Feedback control theory. Macmillan Publishing Company, 199. [21] G. J. Balas, J. C. Doyle, K. Glover, A. Packard, and R. Smith, µ-analysis and synthesis toolbox for use with MATLAB. The MathWorks, Inc., 21. REFERENCES [1] D. Stokic, M. Vukobratovic, and D. Hristic, Implementation of force feedback in manipulation robots, Int. Journal of Robotic Research, vol. 5, pp , [2] N. R. Parker, S. E. Salcudean, and P. D. Lawrence, Application of force feedback to heavy duty hydraulic machines, in IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, (Atlanta, Georgia), [3] R. J. Anderson and M. W. Spong, Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 34, no. 5, pp , [4] G. M. H. Leung, B. A. Francis, and J. Apkarian, Bilateral controller for teleoperators with time delay via µ-synthesis, IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, vol. 11, pp , [5] J. H. Park and H. C. Cho, Sliding-mode controller for bilateral teleoperation with varying time delay, in Proc. of the 1999 IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, (Atlanta, USA), pp , [6] M. Uebel, M. Ali, and I. Minis, The effect of bandwidth on telerobot system performance, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 24, no. 2, p , [7] G. Niemeyer and J.-J. E. Slotine, Towrds force-reflecting teleoperation over the internet, in IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pp , [8] S. Munir, Internet based teleoperation, tech. rep., The George W.Woodruff School of Mechnanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2. [9] N. A. Tanner and G. Niemeyer, Pratical limitations of wave variable controllers in teleoperation. To be published, 24. [1] G. M. H. Leung and B. A. Francis, Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay through a digital communication channel, in Proc. 31st Confer. on Decision and Control, (Tucson, Arizona, USA), pp , [11] S.-I. Niculescu, Delay effects on stability. A robust control approach, vol Springer-Verlag: Heidelbeg, 21.
Delay-Independent Stabilization for Teleoperation with Time Varying Delay
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrC9.3 Delay-Independent Stabilization for Teleoperation with Time Varying Delay Hiroyuki Fujita and Toru Namerikawa
More informationDELAYED GENERALIZED PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF BILATERAL TELEOPERATION SYSTEMS. T. Slama, D. Aubry, P. Vieyres and F. Kratz
DELAYED GENERALIZED PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF BILATERAL TELEOPERATION SYSTEMS T. Slama, D. Aubry, P. Vieyres and F. Kratz Laboratoire de Vision et Robotique (UPRES EA 78) 63, Av. De Lattre de Tassigny, 18
More informationBilateral Teleoperation over the Internet: the Time Varying Delay Problem 1
Bilateral Teleoperation over the Internet: the Time Varying Delay Problem 1 Nikhil Chopra and Mark W. Spong Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 14 S. Mathews Avenue
More informationRobust Controller Design for Cancelling Biodynamic Feedthrough
Robust Controller Design for Cancelling Biodynamic Feedthrough M. R. Sirouspour and S. E. Salcudean University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada shahins@ece.ubc.ca, tims@ece.ubc.ca Abstract: There
More informationRobust Stability Analysis of Teleoperation by Delay-Dependent Neutral LMI Techniques
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 54, 2687-2700 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.42139 Robust Stability Analysis of Teleoperation by Delay-Dependent Neutral
More informationAn Adaptive Full-State Feedback Controller for Bilateral Telerobotic Systems
21 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront Baltimore MD USA June 3-July 2 21 FrB16.3 An Adaptive Full-State Feedback Controller for Bilateral Telerobotic Systems Ufuk Ozbay Erkan Zergeroglu and
More informationTWO- PHASE APPROACH TO DESIGN ROBUST CONTROLLER FOR UNCERTAIN INTERVAL SYSTEM USING GENETIC ALGORITHM
International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Research (IJEEER) ISSN:2250-155X Vol.2, Issue 2 June 2012 27-38 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd., TWO- PHASE APPROACH TO DESIGN ROBUST CONTROLLER FOR UNCERTAIN
More informationH-INFINITY CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR A DC MOTOR MODEL WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS
Engineering MECHANICS, Vol. 18, 211, No. 5/6, p. 271 279 271 H-INFINITY CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR A DC MOTOR MODEL WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS Lukáš Březina*, Tomáš Březina** The proposed article deals with
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationRobust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization
Robust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixed-order H controller design by
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationObserver Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems
2014 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014) Oct. 22 25, 2014 in KINTEX, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Observer Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems Caner Odabaş
More informationH-infinity Model Reference Controller Design for Magnetic Levitation System
H.I. Ali Control and Systems Engineering Department, University of Technology Baghdad, Iraq 6043@uotechnology.edu.iq H-infinity Model Reference Controller Design for Magnetic Levitation System Abstract-
More informationA new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of uncertain systems with delay
A new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of uncertain systems with delay Fei Hao Long Wang and Tianguang Chu Abstract A new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationH observer design for uncertain time-delay systems
H observer design for uncertain time-delay systems O. Sename, C.Briat Abstract This paper is concerned with robust observer design for linear time-delay systems in the presence of unstructured uncertainties
More informationH State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 11, NO 2, APRIL 2003 271 H State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions Doo Jin Choi and PooGyeon
More informationStability Analysis and H Synthesis for Linear Systems With Time-Varying Delays
Stability Analysis and H Synthesis for Linear Systems With Time-Varying Delays Anke Xue Yong-Yan Cao and Daoying Pi Abstract This paper is devoted to stability analysis and synthesis of the linear systems
More informationMAE 143B - Homework 9
MAE 43B - Homework 9 7.2 2 2 3.8.6.4.2.2 9 8 2 2 3 a) G(s) = (s+)(s+).4.6.8.2.2.4.6.8. Polar plot; red for negative ; no encirclements of, a.s. under unit feedback... 2 2 3. 4 9 2 2 3 h) G(s) = s+ s(s+)..2.4.6.8.2.4
More informationDesign and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes
Design and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes Emmanuel Edet Technology and Innovation Centre University of Strathclyde 99 George Street Glasgow, United Kingdom emmanuel.edet@strath.ac.uk
More informationFriction Compensation for a Force-Feedback Teleoperator with Compliant Transmission
Friction Compensation for a Force-Feedback Teleoperator with Compliant Transmission Mohsen Mahvash and Allison M. Okamura Department of Mechanical Engineering Engineering Research Center for Computer-Integrated
More informationControl of Robotic Manipulators with Input/Output Delays
2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12, 2009 WeC20.5 Control of Robotic Manipulators with Input/Output Delays Nikhil Chopra Abstract Input/output delays
More informationA novel control scheme for teleoperation with guaranteed performance under time-varying delays
A novel control scheme for teleoperation with guaranteed performance under time-varying delays Bo Zhang, Alexandre Kruszewski, Jean-Pierre Richard To cite this version: Bo Zhang, Alexandre Kruszewski,
More informationA New Approach to Control of Robot
A New Approach to Control of Robot Ali Akbarzadeh Tootoonchi, Mohammad Reza Gharib, Yadollah Farzaneh Department of Mechanical Engineering Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Mashhad, IRAN ali_akbarzadeh_t@yahoo.com,
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationLMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System
LMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System Gholamreza Khademi, Haniyeh Mohammadi, and Maryam Dehghani School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Shiraz
More informationCOMPLIANT CONTROL FOR PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION
COMPLIANT CONTROL FOR PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION Andrea Calanca Paolo Fiorini Invited Speakers Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte Fabrizio Sergi 18/07/2014 Andrea Calanca - Altair Lab 2 In this tutorial Review
More informationOutput Feedback Bilateral Teleoperation with Force Estimation in the Presence of Time Delays
Output Feedback Bilateral Teleoperation with Force Estimation in the Presence of Time Delays by John M. Daly A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for
More informationRobust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators
Robust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators Marcel Bergerman * Yangsheng Xu +,** Yun-Hui Liu ** * Automation Institute Informatics Technology Center Campinas SP Brazil + The Robotics Institute
More informationOptimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems
1 Optimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems Prof Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning this paper should
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationStabilisation of network controlled systems with a predictive approach
Stabilisation of network controlled systems with a predictive approach Emmanuel Witrant with D. Georges, C. Canudas de Wit and O. Sename Laboratoire d Automatique de Grenoble, UMR CNRS 5528 ENSIEG-INPG,
More informationStable Limit Cycle Generation for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Application: Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum
Stable Limit Cycle Generation for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Application: Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum Sébastien Andary Ahmed Chemori Sébastien Krut LIRMM, Univ. Montpellier - CNRS, 6, rue Ada
More informationRevisiting Llewellyn s Absolute Stability Criterion for Bilateral Teleoperation Systems under Non-passive Operator or Environment
2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems October 712, 2012. Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal visiting Llewellyn s Absolute Stability Criterion for Bilateral Teleoperation Systems
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationA DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS WITH SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 202 ISSN 349-498 Volume 8, Number 7(A), July 202 pp. 4883 4899 A DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS
More informationRobust Controller Design for Speed Control of an Indirect Field Oriented Induction Machine Drive
Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies ISSN 1583-1078 Issue 6, January-June 2005 p. 1-16 Robust Controller Design for Speed Control of an Indirect Field Oriented Induction Machine Drive
More informationPosition with Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Arm
Position with Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Arm 1 B. K. Chitra, 2 J. Nandha Gopal, 3 Dr. K. Rajeswari PG Student, Department of EIE Assistant Professor, Professor, Department of EEE Abstract This
More informationQFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
45-E-PSS-75 QFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi, Roozbeh Izadi-Zamanabadi Department of Control Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark Correspondence
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): -7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationLecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control. Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification
Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification What is Mathematical Model? A set of mathematical equations (e.g., differential
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationFixed-Order Robust H Controller Design with Regional Pole Assignment
SUBMITTED 1 Fixed-Order Robust H Controller Design with Regional Pole Assignment Fuwen Yang, Mahbub Gani, and Didier Henrion Abstract In this paper, the problem of designing fixed-order robust H controllers
More informationObserver-based sampled-data controller of linear system for the wave energy converter
International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, December 211, pp. 275-279 http://dx.doi.org/1.5391/ijfis.211.11.4.275 Observer-based sampled-data controller of linear system
More informationAn Exact Stability Analysis Test for Single-Parameter. Polynomially-Dependent Linear Systems
An Exact Stability Analysis Test for Single-Parameter Polynomially-Dependent Linear Systems P. Tsiotras and P.-A. Bliman Abstract We provide a new condition for testing the stability of a single-parameter,
More informationControl of Electromechanical Systems
Control of Electromechanical Systems November 3, 27 Exercise Consider the feedback control scheme of the motor speed ω in Fig., where the torque actuation includes a time constant τ A =. s and a disturbance
More information[Type the document title]
[Type the company name] [Type the document title] [Type the document subtitle] Camila [Pick the date] Abstract Impedance and admittance control are complementary in terms of stability and performance properties.
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7-(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More informationForce Tracking Impedance Control with Variable Target Stiffness
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Force Tracking Impedance Control with Variable Target Stiffness K. Lee and M. Buss Institute of Automatic Control
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More informationMobile Manipulation: Force Control
8803 - Mobile Manipulation: Force Control Mike Stilman Robotics & Intelligent Machines @ GT Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0760 February 19, 2008 1 Force Control Strategies Logic Branching
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationTHE DIFFICULTY in implementing a teleoperation system
776 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, VOL. 23, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007 Quantitative Comparison of Bilateral Teleoperation Systems Using µ-synthesis Keehoon Kim, Member, IEEE, M.CenkÇavuşoğlu, Senior Member, IEEE,
More informationPositioning Servo Design Example
Positioning Servo Design Example 1 Goal. The goal in this design example is to design a control system that will be used in a pick-and-place robot to move the link of a robot between two positions. Usually
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationStability Overlay for Adaptive Control Laws Applied to Linear Time-Invariant Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 1-1, 9 WeC18. Stability Overlay for Adaptive Control Laws Applied to Linear Time-Invariant Systems Paulo Rosa, Jeff S. Shamma,
More informationand Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs
and Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs Nasser Mohamad Zadeh Electrical Engineering Department Tarbiat Modares University Tehran, Iran mohamadzadeh@ieee.org Ramin Amirifar Electrical
More informationRobust Observer for Uncertain T S model of a Synchronous Machine
Recent Advances in Circuits Communications Signal Processing Robust Observer for Uncertain T S model of a Synchronous Machine OUAALINE Najat ELALAMI Noureddine Laboratory of Automation Computer Engineering
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationThe parameterization of all. of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers
The parameterization stabilizing controllers 89 The parameterization of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada 2, Yuko Tatsumi 3, Non-members ABSTRACT
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationTHE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS FOR MIMO TD PLANTS WITH THE SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 218 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 14, Number 2, April 218 pp. 387 43 THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD
More informationOptimal Control of Switching Surfaces
Optimal Control of Switching Surfaces Y. Wardi, M. Egerstedt, M. Boccadoro, and E. Verriest {ywardi,magnus,verriest}@ece.gatech.edu School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
More informationUNCERTAINTY MODELING VIA FREQUENCY DOMAIN MODEL VALIDATION
AIAA 99-3959 UNCERTAINTY MODELING VIA FREQUENCY DOMAIN MODEL VALIDATION Martin R. Waszak, * NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia Dominick Andrisani II, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
More informationRobust Control of Robot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 511-513, Nov./Dec. 2003 obust Control of obot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation Keywords : obot manipulators, MBDA, position control,
More informationHuman Friendly Control : an application to Drive by Wire
Human Friendly Control : an application to Drive by Wire By Emmanuel Witrant Master Thesis, 2001-2002 Laboratoire d Automatique de Grenoble with Carlos Canudas-de-Wit 2 Juillet 2002 Typeset by FoilTEX
More informationAn Adaptive LQG Combined With the MRAS Based LFFC for Motion Control Systems
Journal of Automation Control Engineering Vol 3 No 2 April 2015 An Adaptive LQG Combined With the MRAS Based LFFC for Motion Control Systems Nguyen Duy Cuong Nguyen Van Lanh Gia Thi Dinh Electronics Faculty
More informationLecture 7 : Generalized Plant and LFT form Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto Assistant Professor
Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto Assistant Professor Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkuts Unniversity of Technology Thonburi Thailand Linear Quadratic Gaussian The state space
More informationPassivity control of bilateral and multilateral teleoperation systems
University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2015 Passivity control of bilateral and multilateral teleoperation
More informationDesign Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain
World Applied Sciences Journal 14 (9): 1306-1312, 2011 ISSN 1818-4952 IDOSI Publications, 2011 Design Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain Samira Soltani
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using the
More informationANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF DISTURBANCE OBSERVER AS AN ADD-ON ROBUST CONTROLLER
ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF DISTURBANCE OBSERVER AS AN ADD-ON ROBUST CONTROLLER Hyungbo Shim (School of Electrical Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea) in collaboration with Juhoon Back, Nam Hoon
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 2002-2003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationAverage-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control
Outline Background Preliminaries Consensus Numerical simulations Conclusions Average-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control Email: lzhx@nankai.edu.cn, chenzq@nankai.edu.cn
More informationWE PROPOSE a new approach to robust control of robot
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL. 14, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1998 69 An Optimal Control Approach to Robust Control of Robot Manipulators Feng Lin and Robert D. Brandt Abstract We present a new
More informationInternal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems
Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems Asma Mezzi Tunis El Manar University, Automatic Control Research Laboratory, LA.R.A, National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT),
More informationAN EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION FOR DIGITAL REDESIGN. Received October 2010; revised March 2011
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2012 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 8, Number 6, June 2012 pp. 4071 4081 AN EXTENSION OF GENERALIZED BILINEAR TRANSFORMATION
More informationControl Systems II. ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017. G. Ducard
Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control
More informationQuantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System
Quantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System Chandrima Roy Department of E.C.E, Assistant Professor Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, WB Kalyankumar Datta Department
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steady-state Steady-state errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationComputer Aided Control Design
Computer Aided Control Design Project-Lab 3 Automatic Control Basic Course, EL1000/EL1100/EL1120 Revised August 18, 2008 Modified version of laboration developed by Håkan Fortell and Svante Gunnarsson
More informationA Comparative Study on Automatic Flight Control for small UAV
Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'18) Niagara Falls, Canada June 7 9, 18 Paper No. 13 DOI: 1.11159/cdsr18.13 A Comparative Study on Automatic
More informationROBUST DIGITAL CONTROL USING POLE PLACEMENT WITH SENSITIVITY FUNCTION SHAPING METHOD
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR CONTROL, VOL. 8, 191 210 (1998) ROBUST DIGITAL CONTROL USING POLE PLACEMENT WITH SENSITIVITY FUNCTION SHAPING METHOD I.D. LANDAU* AND A. KARIMI Laboratoire
More informationChapter 7 - Solved Problems
Chapter 7 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 7.1. A continuous time system has transfer function G o (s) given by G o (s) = B o(s) A o (s) = 2 (s 1)(s + 2) = 2 s 2 + s 2 (1) Find a controller of minimal
More informationOptimization based robust control
Optimization based robust control Didier Henrion 1,2 Draft of March 27, 2014 Prepared for possible inclusion into The Encyclopedia of Systems and Control edited by John Baillieul and Tariq Samad and published
More informationChapter 15 - Solved Problems
Chapter 5 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 5.. Contributed by - Alvaro Liendo, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Consider a plant having a nominal model given by G o (s) = s + 2 The aim of the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationImplementation Issues for the Virtual Spring
Implementation Issues for the Virtual Spring J. S. Freudenberg EECS 461 Embedded Control Systems 1 Introduction One of the tasks in Lab 4 is to attach the haptic wheel to a virtual reference position with
More informationGAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL
GAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL 1 KHALED M. HELAL, 2 MOSTAFA R.A. ATIA, 3 MOHAMED I. ABU EL-SEBAH 1, 2 Mechanical Engineering Department ARAB ACADEMY
More informationA Model-Free Control System Based on the Sliding Mode Control Method with Applications to Multi-Input-Multi-Output Systems
Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'17) Toronto, Canada August 21 23, 2017 Paper No. 119 DOI: 10.11159/cdsr17.119 A Model-Free Control System
More informationApplicatin of the α-approximation for Discretization of Analogue Systems
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS (NIŠ) SER.: ELEC. ENERG. vol. 8, no. 3, December 5, 57-586 Applicatin of the α-approximation for Discretization of Analogue Systems Tomislav B. Šekara and Milić R. Stojić Abstract:
More informationA Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants
00 ECTI TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VOL., NO.2 NOVEMBER 2005 A Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants Kou Yamada Nobuaki Matsushima, Non-members
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationObserver Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators
1 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of 1 IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control Yokohama, Japan, September 8-1, 1 Observer Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot
More information