L = 1 2 µφ µ φ m2 2 φ2 λ 0
|
|
- Jennifer Webb
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Physics 6 Homework solutions Renormalization Consider scalar φ 4 theory, with one real scalar field and Lagrangian L = µφ µ φ m φ λ 4 φ4. () We have seen many times that the lowest-order matrix element for the scattering process φφ φφ is M = λ. Here we consider the next order. Label the two incoming momenta p,k and the outgoing momenta p,k. Consider the diagram where p enters and p exits the upper vertex and k enters and k exits the lower vertex. (There are two similar diagrams with different external momentum labels, we will figure them out based on what happens with this diagram.). The evaluation Show that the contribution to the matrix element from this diagram is i ( iλ ) d D l ( i) (π) D (l +m iǫ)((l+p p ) +m iǫ) and label l and l+p p on a picture of the diagram. Combine the denominators using the Feynman parameter trick. Then Wick rotate the l variable. Writeanexpression forthediagraminterms ofyour Feynman integral, d D l E, m, and Mandelstamm t. Now set m = from now through the rest of the calculation, to make the problem a little simpler. Perform the l-integration in dimensional regularization. Then perform the x integration by using ln[x( x)] =. You should find (using D = 4 ǫ, your /ǫ will differ if you use the convention of the book) ( ) λ µ +ln 3π ǫ t +. (3) ()
2 Add the other two contributions to find M = λ λ 3π ( ) 3 µ6 +6+ln ǫ stu iπ (4) (Don t worry about showing that the imaginary part is correct, just assume that it arises from the difference between ln( s) and ln(s).).. Solution Actually this was already done in assignment 5. In coordinate space the diagram is ( iλ) d 4 vd 4 u ( i) 6 (x v) (y v) (v u) (u z) (u w). (5) The matrix element is i times this, with the external propagators removed and Fourier transformed into momentum space: refer to the solution key for that problem to see how to reach Eq. (). The Feynman parameter trick is (writing q = p p ) (l +m )((l+q) +m ) = = = = [( x)(l +m )+x((l +q) +m )] [( x)l +( x)m +xl +xl q +xq +xm ] [l +xl q +xq +m ] [(l +xq) +(x x )q +m ]. (6) Switch the order of the x,l integrations and shift the l integration to l + xq. Also, write q = t which is positive: M = iλ Wick rotate by replacing l il E ; M = i λ From now on I will write l E = l for simplicity of notation. In general dimension D = 4 ǫ, the integral is λ = λ d D l (π) D (l +m x( x)t iǫ). (7) d D l E (π) D (l E +m x( x)t iǫ). (8) µ ǫ (4π) D Γ(D/) µ ǫ (l ) (D )/ d(l ) (l x( x)t) (4π) D Γ(D/) ( x( x)t) ǫγ(d/)γ(ǫ). (9) Γ()
3 Now we expand in ǫ. Γ(ǫ) = ǫ γ E, which means other terms must be kept to order ǫ. We do this by using that which must be applied to (4πµ /x( x)( t)) ǫ ; M = λ = λ 3π X ǫ = e ǫlnx = +ǫln(x)+o(ǫ ) () ( (4π) 4πµ ) ǫ( ) x( x)t ǫ γ E +O(ǫ) ( ǫ +ln(4π) γ E +ln µ t ln(x( x))+o(ǫ) ). () The only x dependence is the log so we can do the x integral immediately; we also identify /ǫ+ln(4π) γ E = / ǫ. The result of the x integral is M = λ 3π ( ) µ +ln ǫ t +. () The two similar diagramsdiffer inthe replacement of p p with p k andp+k, replacing t with u and s respectively. Summing, M = λ 3π ( ) 3 µ6 +ln ǫ stu +6. (3) The argument of the log is negative, since stu > ; the iπ arises when we figure out the right branch for the log function.. The cross-section Compute the total scattering cross-section which you obtain using the lowest order result M = λ. Make the strict m = approximation to simplify the calculation. Your answer should be a function of λ and s only. [Hint: The whole phase space integral reduces to the somewhat simpler expression σ = dt (4) 6πs s see, eg, Burgess and Moore, page 96, Eq. (6.) and (6.5). Remember that the identical final states mean that you should integrate over half the t-range, or include an extra factor of to avoid double counting the available final states.] Now re-compute the scattering cross-section to order λ 3 by including the corrections you found to M. Now your result should be a function of s, µ /s, and /ǫ as well. 3
4 .. Solution The leading-order matrix element is λ and the leading-order cross section is σ = dtλ 6πs = λ s 3πs. (5) Write t = ys so the integral is (/3πs) dy. Since s + t + u = in the massless limit, u = ( y)s. At the next order M λ ( λ 6π ( )) 3 µ6 +6+ln ǫ s ln[y( y)]. (6) 3 Note that the imaginary part cancels between M and M unless we work to order λ 4. It is not justified to work to this order since at that point two-loop contributions will also arise. The integral over t becomes so the total cross-section is.3 Renormalization dy(a Bln[y( y)]) = (A+B) (7) σ = 3πs ( λ λ3 6π [ ]) 3 µ6 +8+ln. (8) ǫ s 3 Supposing we define λ r (µ ) so that the cross-section for s = µ equals the lowest-order crosssection evaluated using λ r ; that is, equate the order-λ 3 cross-section you found in the last subsection with the leading-order expression but using λ r. Write this relation, which expresses λ r (µ ) in terms of λ. Now, invert this relation to find an expression for λ in terms of λ r, accurate to second order. (Hint: if x = y +y and both x and y are small, then the y can be approximated as x, so y = x x to the desired order of accuracy.) Substitute this relationship into your previous result for M (at general s, t, u), working to second order in λ r (µ ). You should find that all reference to /ǫ disappears. However your answer should depend on µ 6 /stu. You have now successfully renormalized a theory to one loop order..3. Solution So we have λ r(µ ) = λ λ3 6π [ ] 3 µ6 +8+ln. (9) ǫ µ 6 4
5 Therefore at leading order Inverting the relation, λ r (µ ) = λ λ 3π λ = λ r + λ r 3π ( ) 3 µ +8+3ln. () ǫ µ ( ) 3 µ +8+3ln. () ǫ µ Substituting in our expression for the scattering matrix element, we find to second order that M = λ r λ r 3π.4 Scale dependence of the coupling [ ln µ6 stu iπ ]. () As a final exercise, suppose that you use λ r (µ ) but your friend chooses a different value and uses λ r (µ ). Use the expressions from the last section to relate each coupling to λ, and then use the two relations to eliminate λ and directly relate λ r (µ ) to λ r (µ ). You should find an expression of form If µ > µ, which coupling is larger? λ r (µ ) = λ r (µ )+λ (µ r ) (something) ln µ. (3) µ.4. Solution We have and Equating, λ r (µ ) = λ λ 3π λ r (µ ) = λ λ 3π ( ) 3 µ +8+3ln. (4) ǫ µ ( ) 3 µ +8+3ln. (5) ǫ µ λ r (µ ) = λ r (µ ) 3λ(µ r ) ln µ. (6) 3π µ The differential form of this expression is the renormalization group equation to one-loop order. We easily see that if µ > µ then λ r (µ ) > λ r (µ ). 5
6 an elementary QED calculation Consider the theory QED of electrons and muons. There is a gauge field A µ representing electromagnetism, as well as two Dirac fermion fields ψ and ψ, with masses m and m. The Lagrangian is L = 4 F µνf µν + ψ (i/d m )ψ + ψ (i/d m )ψ. (7) Here /D = γ µ ( µ iea µ ).. Scattering Using the book to find the Feynman rules if you prefer, draw the single diagram responsible for the scattering process ψ ψ ψ ψ. Label the ψ and ψ incoming momenta p,k and the ψ and ψ outgoing momenta p and k respectively. Write down the associated scattering matrix element. Find its Hermitian conjugate. Write the product of the two, summed over final and averaged over initial spins. Now take the limit m,m. Then carry out the traces and find an expression for the squared matrix element. You should find M = e 4s +u. (8) t.. Solution The diagram is The matrix element is ψ,k ψ,p ψ,k ψ,p M = i(ie) ū p γ µ u p ( i)g µν q ū k γ ν u k (9) where I suppressed indicating the polarization state dependences of the u and ū s, and I defined q = p p = k k. I also chose Feynman gauge. Using (ū p γ µ u p ) = ( u p γµ βu p ) = (ūp γ µ u p ) (3) we easily find M = e ū p γ α g αβ u p q ūkγ β u k. (3) 6
7 The squared matrix element is then M = e4 t Trγµ u p ū p γ α u p ū p Trγ µ u k ū k γ α u k ū k. (3) Averaging over initial and summing final spin states, M = e4 4t Trγµ ( /p+m )γ α ( /p +m )Trγ µ ( /k +m )γ α ( /k +m ). (33) Dropping the masses and using we find Trγ µ /pγ α /p = 4(p µ p ν +p ν p µ p p g µν ) (34) M = 4e4 t (pµ p ν +p ν p µ p p g µν )(k µ k ν +k ν k µ k k g µν ) = 4e4 t (p k p k +p k p k 4p p k k +4p p k k ) = e 4s +u t. (35) In the last step we used s p k = p k and u +p k = +p k.. Annihilation and crossing Now consider the process in which ψ and its antiparticle ψ annihilate to give ψ and its antiparticle ψ. Call the ψ incoming momentum p and the ψ momentum k, while the outgoing ψ and ψ momenta are p and k. Draw the single diagram contributing to this process. Write out the matrix element and the spin summed-and-averaged squared matrix element but do not evaluate the traces and contract. Look at your two expressions for spin averaged squared matrix elements for the ψ ψ ψ ψ process and the ψ ψ ψ ψ process. Argue that they are identical, except that the four momenta (p,k, p, k ) in the first expression have been switched to p, k,k, p in the second expression. Now write the expressions for s,t,u (setting all masses to zero). Apply the same permutation what does each Mandelstamm variable turn into? Use this information to show, without performing any Dirac traces or computing any farther, that the spin summed-averaged matrix element squared for the annihilation process is M = e 4t +u. (36) s The property you have just used (that changing particles between the initial and final states corresponds to changing the choice and sign of their momenta and leads to a re-assignment of Mandelstamm variables) is called crossing symmetry. 7
8 .. Solution The diagram is ψ,k ψ,p ψ,k ψ,p is Following the same procedure, the spin averaged and summed, squared matrix element M = e4 4 Trγµ ( /p+m )γ α (+/k +m )Trγ µ (+/k +m )γ α ( /p +m ). (37) NowlookatEq. (33). If youtakethatequationandmakethesubstitutions (p,k, p, k ) (p, k,k, p ) then we get this expression including the correct handling of the particle masses. This exchange modifies the Mandelstamm variables as follows: s = (p+k) = (p k ) = u, (38) t = (p p ) = (p+k) = s, (39) u = (p k ) = (p p ) = t. (4) These substitutions change the previous result for the spin summed-averaged matrix element to M = e 4u +t s. (4) 8
LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles
LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles based on S-41 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free
More informationREVIEW REVIEW. A guess for a suitable initial state: Similarly, let s consider a final state: Summary of free theory:
LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles based on S-41 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free
More informationMaxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More informationPhysics 217 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall u(p,λ) by any method of your choosing.
Physics 27 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall 206. The helicity spinor u(p, λ satisfies u(p,λu(p,λ = 2m. ( In parts (a and (b, you may assume that m 0. (a Evaluate u(p,λ by any method of your choosing. Using the
More informationThe path integral for photons
The path integral for photons based on S-57 We will discuss the path integral for photons and the photon propagator more carefully using the Lorentz gauge: as in the case of scalar field we Fourier-transform
More informationA short Introduction to Feynman Diagrams
A short Introduction to Feynman Diagrams J. Bijnens, November 2008 This assumes knowledge at the level of Chapter two in G. Kane, Modern Elementary Particle Physics. This note is more advanced than needed
More information6.1 Quadratic Casimir Invariants
7 Version of May 6, 5 CHAPTER 6. QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS Mesons, then are described by a wavefunction and baryons by Φ = q a q a, (6.3) Ψ = ǫ abc q a q b q c. (6.4) This resolves the old paradox that ground
More informationReview of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10
Review of scalar field theory Srednicki 5, 9, 10 2 The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate
More informationPhysics 444: Quantum Field Theory 2. Homework 2.
Physics 444: Quantum Field Theory Homework. 1. Compute the differential cross section, dσ/d cos θ, for unpolarized Bhabha scattering e + e e + e. Express your results in s, t and u variables. Compute the
More informationTheory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)
Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII June 4) At the head of your report, please write your name, student ID number and a list of problems that you worked on in a report like II-1, II-3, IV- ).
More informationbe stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)
Chapter 7 A Synopsis of QED We will here sketch the outlines of quantum electrodynamics, the theory of electrons and photons, and indicate how a calculation of an important physical quantity can be carried
More informationREVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More information2P + E = 3V 3 + 4V 4 (S.2) D = 4 E
PHY 396 L. Solutions for homework set #19. Problem 1a): Let us start with the superficial degree of divergence. Scalar QED is a purely bosonic theory where all propagators behave as 1/q at large momenta.
More informationQuantum ElectroDynamics III
Quantum ElectroDynamics III Feynman diagram Dr.Farida Tahir Physics department CIIT, Islamabad Human Instinct What? Why? Feynman diagrams Feynman diagrams Feynman diagrams How? What? Graphic way to represent
More informationUnitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules
Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules 04.06.0 For more information about unitarity, dispersion relations, and Cutkosky s cutting rules, consult Peskin& Schröder, or rather Le Bellac.
More informationLoop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51
Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51 Similarly, the exact Dirac propagator can be written as: Let s consider the theory of a pseudoscalar field and a Dirac field: the only couplings allowed
More informationParticle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet
Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet Five out of these 16 questions will be given to you at the beginning of the exam. (1) (a) Which are the different fundamental interactions that exist in Nature?
More informationRenormalization of the Yukawa Theory Physics 230A (Spring 2007), Hitoshi Murayama
Renormalization of the Yukawa Theory Physics 23A (Spring 27), Hitoshi Murayama We solve Problem.2 in Peskin Schroeder. The Lagrangian density is L 2 ( µφ) 2 2 m2 φ 2 + ψ(i M)ψ ig ψγ 5 ψφ. () The action
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationQuantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I)
Quantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I) Part I is based on material that has come up in class, you can do it at home. Go straight to Part II. 1. This question will be part of a take-home
More informationQFT Perturbation Theory
QFT Perturbation Theory Ling-Fong Li (Institute) Slide_04 1 / 43 Interaction Theory As an illustration, take electromagnetic interaction. Lagrangian density is The combination L = ψ (x ) γ µ ( i µ ea µ
More information1 Spinor-Scalar Scattering in Yukawa Theory
Physics 610 Homework 9 Solutions 1 Spinor-Scalar Scattering in Yukawa Theory Consider Yukawa theory, with one Dirac fermion ψ and one real scalar field φ, with Lagrangian L = ψ(i/ m)ψ 1 ( µφ)( µ φ) M φ
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 998971 Allowed tools: mathematical tables 1. Spin zero. Consider a real, scalar field
More informationSrednicki Chapter 62
Srednicki Chapter 62 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George September 28, 213 Srednicki 62.1. Show that adding a gauge fixing term 1 2 ξ 1 ( µ A µ ) 2 to L results in equation 62.9 as the photon propagator.
More information1 The muon decay in the Fermi theory
Quantum Field Theory-I Problem Set n. 9 UZH and ETH, HS-015 Prof. G. Isidori Assistants: K. Ferreira, A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, A. Pattori, M. Soni Due: 03-1-015 http://www.physik.uzh.ch/lectures/qft/index1.html
More informationSummary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:
The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free theory:
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More informationQuantum Field Theory Example Sheet 4 Michelmas Term 2011
Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 4 Michelmas Term 0 Solutions by: Johannes Hofmann Laurence Perreault Levasseur Dave M. Morris Marcel Schmittfull jbh38@cam.ac.uk L.Perreault-Levasseur@damtp.cam.ac.uk
More informationIntercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics. Paper 1: The Standard Model
Brunel University Queen Mary, University of London Royal Holloway, University of London University College London Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics Paper 1: The Standard Model
More informationFeynCalc Tutorial 2. (Dated: November 7, 2016)
FeynCalc Tutorial 2 (Dated: Novemer 7, 206) Last time we learned how to do Lorentz contractions with FeynCalc. We also did a simple calculation in scalar QED: two scalars annihilating into two photons
More informationQuantum Electrodynamics Test
MSc in Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Quantum Electrodynamics Test Monday, 11th January 2010 Please answer all three questions. All questions are worth 20 marks. Use a separate booklet for each
More information3 Quantization of the Dirac equation
3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary
More informationBeta functions in quantum electrodynamics
Beta functions in quantum electrodynamics based on S-66 Let s calculate the beta function in QED: the dictionary: Note! following the usual procedure: we find: or equivalently: For a theory with N Dirac
More informationIntroduction to Elementary Particle Physics I
Physics 56400 Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I Lecture 16 Fall 018 Semester Prof. Matthew Jones Review of Lecture 15 When we introduced a (classical) electromagnetic field, the Dirac equation
More information3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016
3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 016 Corrections and suggestions should be emailed to B.C.Allanach@damtp.cam.ac.uk. Starred questions may be handed in to your supervisor for feedback
More informationQFT Perturbation Theory
QFT Perturbation Theory Ling-Fong Li Institute) Slide_04 1 / 44 Interaction Theory As an illustration, take electromagnetic interaction. Lagrangian density is The combination is the covariant derivative.
More informationVacuum Energy and Effective Potentials
Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials Quantum field theories have badly divergent vacuum energies. In perturbation theory, the leading term is the net zero-point energy E zeropoint = particle species
More informationPhysics 161 Homework 2 - Solutions Wednesday August 31, 2011
Physics 161 Homework 2 - s Wednesday August 31, 2011 Make sure your name is on every page, and please box your final answer. Because we will be giving partial credit, be sure to attempt all the problems,
More informationLecture 10. September 28, 2017
Lecture 10 September 28, 2017 The Standard Model s QCD theory Comments on QED calculations Ø The general approach using Feynman diagrams Ø Example of a LO calculation Ø Higher order calculations and running
More informationiδ jk q 2 m 2 +i0. φ j φ j) 2 φ φ = j
PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #8. Problem : The Feynman propagators of a theory follow from the free part of its Lagrangian. For the problem at hand, we have N scalar fields φ i (x of similar mass
More information2.4 Parity transformation
2.4 Parity transformation An extremely simple group is one that has only two elements: {e, P }. Obviously, P 1 = P, so P 2 = e, with e represented by the unit n n matrix in an n- dimensional representation.
More informationTheory of Elementary Particles homework XI (July??)
Theory of Elementary Particles homework XI (July??) At the head of your report, please write your name, student ID number and a list of problems that you worked on in a report (like II-1, II-3, IV- ).
More informationLecture 6:Feynman diagrams and QED
Lecture 6:Feynman diagrams and QED 0 Introduction to current particle physics 1 The Yukawa potential and transition amplitudes 2 Scattering processes and phase space 3 Feynman diagrams and QED 4 The weak
More information5 Infrared Divergences
5 Infrared Divergences We have already seen that some QED graphs have a divergence associated with the masslessness of the photon. The divergence occurs at small values of the photon momentum k. In a general
More informationMoller Scattering. I would like to thank Paul Leonard Große-Bley for pointing out errors in the original version of this document.
: Moller Scattering Particle Physics Elementary Particle Physics in a Nutshell - M. Tully February 16, 017 I would like to thank Paul Leonard Große-Bley for pointing out errors in the original version
More informationCornell University, Department of Physics
Cornell University, Department of Physics May 18th, 2017 PHYS 4444, Particle physics, Final exam You have two and a half hours for the exam. The questions are short and do not require long calculations.
More informationUltraviolet Divergences
Ultraviolet Divergences In higher-order perturbation theory we encounter Feynman graphs with closed loops, associated with unconstrained momenta. For every such momentum k µ, we have to integrate over
More informationQED Vertex Correction
QED Vertex Correction In these notes I shall calculate the one-loop correction to the PI electron-electron-photon vertex in QED, ieγ µ p,p) = ) We are interested in this vertex in the context of elastic
More informationPHYS 611, SPR 12: HOMEWORK NO. 4 Solution Guide
PHYS 611 SPR 12: HOMEWORK NO. 4 Solution Guide 1. In φ 3 4 theory compute the renormalized mass m R as a function of the physical mass m P to order g 2 in MS scheme and for an off-shell momentum subtraction
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14 Majorana spinors March 15, 2012 So far, we have only considered massless, two-component
More informationQED Vertex Correction: Working through the Algebra
QED Vertex Correction: Working through the Algebra At the one-loop level of QED, the PI vertex correction comes from a single Feynman diagram thus ieγ µ loop p,p = where reg = e 3 d 4 k π 4 reg ig νλ k
More informationIntroduction to the physics of highly charged ions. Lecture 12: Self-energy and vertex correction
Introduction to the physics of highly charged ions Lecture 12: Self-energy and vertex correction Zoltán Harman harman@mpi-hd.mpg.de Universität Heidelberg, 03.02.2014 Recapitulation from the previous lecture
More informationQuantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition
Quantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition FRANZ MANDL and GRAHAM SHAW School of Physics & Astromony, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK WILEY A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Preface
More informationQuantum Electrodynamics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 666, Quantum Field Theory April 2001
Quantum Electrodynamics D. E. Soper University of Oregon Physics 666, Quantum Field Theory April The action We begin with an argument that quantum electrodynamics is a natural extension of the theory of
More informationOn-shell Recursion Relations of Scattering Amplitudes at Tree-level
On-shell Recursion Relations of Scattering Amplitudes at Tree-level Notes for Journal Club by Yikun Wang June 9, 206 We will introduce the on-shell recursion relations of scattering amplitudes at tree-level
More information1 Running and matching of the QED coupling constant
Quantum Field Theory-II UZH and ETH, FS-6 Assistants: A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, J. Shapiro http://www.physik.uzh.ch/lectures/qft/ Problem Set n. 8 Prof. G. Isidori Due: -5-6 Running and matching of the QED
More information. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ
. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω Friday April 1 ± ǁ 1 Chapter 5. Photons: Covariant Theory 5.1. The classical fields 5.2. Covariant
More informationFundamental Interactions (Forces) of Nature
Chapter 14 Fundamental Interactions (Forces) of Nature Interaction Gauge Boson Gauge Boson Mass Interaction Range (Force carrier) Strong Gluon 0 short-range (a few fm) Weak W ±, Z M W = 80.4 GeV/c 2 short-range
More informationPhysics 215C QFT Spring 2017 Assignment 7
University of California at San Diego Department of Physics Prof. John McGreevy Physics 215C QFT Spring 2017 Assignment 7 Due 12:30pm Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1. More about 0+0d field theory. Here we will
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In the h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass
More informationPHY 396 L. Solutions for homework set #20.
PHY 396 L. Solutions for homework set #. Problem 1 problem 1d) from the previous set): At the end of solution for part b) we saw that un-renormalized gauge invariance of the bare Lagrangian requires Z
More informationPAPER 45 THE STANDARD MODEL
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III Friday, 6 June, 014 1:0 pm to 4:0 pm PAPER 45 THE STANDARD MODEL Attempt no more than THREE questions. There are FOUR questions in total. The questions carry equal weight.
More information1 Introduction. 1.1 The Standard Model of particle physics The fundamental particles
1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief introduction to the Standard Model of particle physics. In particular, it gives an overview of the fundamental particles and the relationship
More informationQuantum Field Theory I
Quantum Field Theory I Problem Sets ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert c 2014 ETH Zurich This document as well as its parts is protected by copyright. Reproduction of any part in any form without prior
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass rather
More informationClassical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator
Classical field theory 212 (NS-364B Feynman propagator 1. Introduction States in quantum mechanics in Schrödinger picture evolve as ( Ψt = Û(t,t Ψt, Û(t,t = T exp ı t dt Ĥ(t, (1 t where Û(t,t denotes the
More informationPhysics 218. Quantum Field Theory. Professor Dine. Green s Functions and S Matrices from the Operator (Hamiltonian) Viewpoint
Physics 28. Quantum Field Theory. Professor Dine Green s Functions and S Matrices from the Operator (Hamiltonian) Viewpoint Field Theory in a Box Consider a real scalar field, with lagrangian L = 2 ( µφ)
More informationPart I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory
Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory 1. Classical and Quantum Mechanics of Particle Systems 3 1.1 Introduction. 3 1.2 Classical Mechanics of Mass Points 4 1.3 Quantum Mechanics: The Harmonic
More informationSISSA entrance examination (2007)
SISSA Entrance Examination Theory of Elementary Particles Trieste, 18 July 2007 Four problems are given. You are expected to solve completely two of them. Please, do not try to solve more than two problems;
More informationPHY 396 K. Problem set #11, the last set this semester! Due December 1, 2016.
PHY 396 K. Problem set #11, the last set this semester! Due December 1, 2016. In my notations, the A µ and their components A a µ are the canonically normalized vector fields, while the A µ = ga µ and
More information0 Ψ d γ α. Ψ u π + 0 Ψ d γ 5 γ α. Ψ u π + ). 2
PHY 396 K/L. Solutions for homework set #25. Problem 1a: For the sake of definiteness, let s focus on the decay of the positive pion, π + µ + ν µ. In the Fermi s current-current theory 1 of this weak decay,
More information2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections
2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections 2.1 Feynman rules Normalization In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, wave functions of free particles are normalized so that there is one particle in
More informationPion Lifetime. A. George January 18, 2012
Pion Lifetime A. George January 18, 01 Abstract We derive the expected lifetime of the pion, assuming only the Feynman Rules, Fermi s Golden Rule, the Dirac Equation and its corollary, the completeness
More informationParticle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )
Particle Physics WS 2012/13 (6.11.2012) Stephanie Hansmann-Menzemer Physikalisches Institut, INF 226, 3.101 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 Where are we? W fi = 2π 4 LI matrix element M i (2Ei) fi 2 ρ f (E i ) LI phase
More informationScattering amplitudes and the Feynman rules
Scattering amplitudes and the Feynman rules based on S-10 We have found Z( J ) for the phi-cubed theory and now we can calculate vacuum expectation values of the time ordered products of any number of
More information. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ
. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ 1 Chapter 5. Photons: Covariant Theory 5.1. The classical fields 5.2. Covariant
More informationA General Expression for Symmetry Factors of Feynman Diagrams. Abstract
A General Expression for Symmetry Factors of Feynman Diagrams C.D. Palmer a and M.E. Carrington b,c a Department of Mathematics, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, R7A 6A9 Canada b Department of Physics,
More informationMandl and Shaw reading assignments
Mandl and Shaw reading assignments Chapter 2 Lagrangian Field Theory 2.1 Relativistic notation 2.2 Classical Lagrangian field theory 2.3 Quantized Lagrangian field theory 2.4 Symmetries and conservation
More informationProblem set 6 for Quantum Field Theory course
Problem set 6 or Quantum Field Theory course 2018.03.13. Toics covered Scattering cross-section and decay rate Yukawa theory and Yukawa otential Scattering in external electromagnetic ield, Rutherord ormula
More informationCALCULATING TRANSITION AMPLITUDES FROM FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS
CALCULATING TRANSITION AMPLITUDES FROM FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS LOGAN T. MEREDITH 1. Introduction When one thinks of quantum field theory, one s mind is undoubtedly drawn to Feynman diagrams. The naïve view these
More informationPhysics 217 Solution Set #5 Fall 2016
Physics 217 Solution Set #5 Fall 2016 1. Repeat the computation of problem 3 of Problem Set 4, but this time use the full relativistic expression for the matrix element. Show that the resulting spin-averaged
More informationIntroduction to Elementary Particles
David Criffiths Introduction to Elementary Particles Second, Revised Edition WILEY- VCH WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Preface to the First Edition IX Preface to the Second Edition XI Formulas and Constants
More informationSolution set #7 Physics 571 Tuesday 3/17/2014. p 1. p 2. Figure 1: Muon production (e + e µ + µ ) γ ν /p 2
Solution set #7 Physics 571 Tuesday 3/17/2014 μ 1. The amplitude is Figure 1: Muon production ( e µ + µ ) it = ie2 s (v 2γ µ u 1 )(u 1 γ µ v 2 ), (1) so the spin averaged squared amplitude is T 2 = e4
More informationRenormalization of the fermion self energy
Part I Renormalization of the fermion self energy Electron self energy in general gauge The self energy in n = 4 Z i 0 = ( ie 0 ) d n k () n (! dimensions is i k )[g ( a 0 ) k k k ] i /p + /k m 0 use Z
More informationOn particle production by classical backgrounds
On particle production by classical backgrounds arxiv:hep-th/0103251v2 30 Mar 2001 Hrvoje Nikolić Theoretical Physics Division, Rudjer Bošković Institute, P.O.B. 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia hrvoje@faust.irb.hr
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables 1. Procca equation. 5 points A massive spin-1
More informationFeynCalc Tutorial 1 (Dated: September 8, 2015)
FeynCalc Tutorial 1 (Dated: Septemer 8, 2015) In this tutorial, we will learn to use Mathematica and FeynCalc to contract Lorentz indices. After some practice to get familiar with FeynCalc, we will do
More informationQuantization of the Dirac Field
Quantization of the Dirac Field Asaf Pe er 1 March 5, 2014 This part of the course is based on Refs. [1] and [2]. After deriving the Dirac Lagrangian: it is now time to quantize it. 1. Introduction L =
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationWeek 11 Reading material from the books
Week 11 Reading material from the books Polchinski, Chapter 6, chapter 10 Becker, Becker, Schwartz, Chapter 3, 4 Green, Schwartz, Witten, chapter 7 Normalization conventions. In general, the most convenient
More informationWhat are the Low-Q and Large-x Boundaries of Collinear QCD Factorization Theorems?
What are the Low-Q and Large-x Boundaries of Collinear QCD Factorization Theorems? Presented by Eric Moffat Paper written in collaboration with Wally Melnitchouk, Ted Rogers, and Nobuo Sato arxiv:1702.03955
More informationEvaluation of Triangle Diagrams
Evaluation of Triangle Diagrams R. Abe, T. Fujita, N. Kanda, H. Kato, and H. Tsuda Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan E-mail: csru11002@g.nihon-u.ac.jp
More informationQuantum Field Theory 2011 Solutions
Quantum Field Theory 011 Solution Yichen Shi Eater 014 Note that we ue the metric convention + ++). 1. State and prove Noether theorem in the context of a claical Lagrangian field theory defined in Minkowki
More informationLIMIT ON MASS DIFFERENCES IN THE WEINBERG MODEL. M. VELTMAN Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Utrecht, Netherlands
Nuclear Physics B123 (1977) 89-99 North-Holland Publishing Company LIMIT ON MASS DIFFERENCES IN THE WEINBERG MODEL M. VELTMAN Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Utrecht, Netherlands Received
More informationDR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )
11 Perturbation Theory and Feynman Diagrams We now turn our attention to interacting quantum field theories. All of the results that we will derive in this section apply equally to both relativistic and
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More informationLecture 3 (Part 1) Physics 4213/5213
September 8, 2000 1 FUNDAMENTAL QED FEYNMAN DIAGRAM Lecture 3 (Part 1) Physics 4213/5213 1 Fundamental QED Feynman Diagram The most fundamental process in QED, is give by the definition of how the field
More informationPhys624 Formalism for interactions Homework 6. Homework 6 Solutions Restriction on interaction Lagrangian. 6.1.
Homework 6 Solutions 6. - Restriction on interaction Lagrangian 6.. - Hermiticity 6.. - Lorentz invariance We borrow the following results from homework 4. Under a Lorentz transformation, the bilinears
More informationThe Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Lorentz Transformation Properties of the Dirac Field First, rotations. In ordinary quantum mechanics, ψ σ i ψ (1) is
More information