Mass Estimating Relationships MARYLAND. Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis
|
|
|
- Aileen Jones
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Mass Estimating Relationships Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis 2006 David L. Akin - All rights reserved
2 Akin s Laws of Spacecraft Design - #3 Design is an iterative process. The necessary number of iterations is one more than the number you have currently done. This is true at any point in time.
3 Vehicle-Level Preliminary Design - 1st Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) vehicle 5000 kg payload LOX/LH2 propellants Isp=430 sec δ=0.08 ΔV gi r = e sp = λ = r δ = M 0 = M L = 153,000 kg λ M i = δm 0 = 12, 240 kg M p = M ( 0 1 r) =135,800 kg
4 System-Level Estimation Start with propellant tanks (biggest part) LOX/LH2 engines generally run at mixture ratio of 6:1 (by weight) LH2: 19,390 kg LOX: 116,400 kg Propellant densities ρ LOX = 1140 kg m 3 ρ LH2 =112 kg m 3
5 LOX Tank MERs Mass of Tank M LOX Tank Mass of Insulation ( kg) = M ( LOX kg) M LOX Insulation kg ( ) =1.123 kg m 2
6 LOX Tank Design Mass of LOX=116,400 kg M LOX Tank ( kg) = ( 116,400) = 2087 kg Need area to find LOX tank insulation mass - assume a sphere V LOX Tank = M LOX / ρ LOX =102.1 m 3 r LOX Tank = V 1 LOX 3 = 2.90 m 4π / 3 M LOX Insulation ( kg) =1.123 kg 2 A LOX Tank = 4πr LOX m 2 =105.6 m 2 ( ) m2 = 119 kg
7 LOX Tank Mass Estimating Relation from C. R. Glatts, WAATS: A Computer Program for Weights Analysis of Advanced Transportation Systems NASA CR-2420, 1974.
8 LH2 Tank MERs Mass of Tank M LH2 Tank Mass of Insulation M LH2 Insulation kg ( kg) = M ( LH 2 kg) ( ) = 2.88 kg m 2
9 LH2 Tank Design Mass of LH2=19,390 kg M LH2 Tank ( kg ) = ( 19,390) = 1709kg Again, assume LH2 tank is spherical V LH2 Tank = M LH2 / ρ LH2 = m 3 r LH2 Tank = V LH 2 4π / 3 M LH2 Insulation kg 1 3 = 3.46 m ( ) = 2.88 kg A = 4πr 2 LH2 Tank LH 2 m 2 = m 2 ( ) m2 = 433 kg
10 Current Design Sketch Masses LOX Tank 2089 kg LOX Tank Insulation 1709 kg LH2 Tank 119 kg LH2 Tank Insulation 433 kg
11 Other Tankage MERs Storable Propellants (RP-1, N 2 O 4, N 2 H 4 ) M Storables Tank Small tank (liquids) M Small Liquid Tank ( kg) = M Storables kg Small tank (pressurized gases) M Small Gas Tank [ ( )].6 ( kg) = 0.1M ( contents kg) ( kg) = 2M ( contents kg)
12 Boost Module Propellant Tanks Low-Cost Return to the Moon Gross mass 23,000 kg Inert mass 2300 kg Propellant mass 20,700 kg Mixture ratio N 2 O 4 /A50 = 1.8 (by mass) N 2 O 4 tank Mass = 13,310 kg Density = 1450 kg/m 3 Volume = m 3 --> r sphere =1.299 m Aerozine 50 tank Mass = 7390 kg Density = 900 kg/m 3 Volume = m 3 --> r sphere =1.252 m Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland
13 N 2 O 4 Tank Sizing Low-Cost Return to the Moon Need total N 2 O 4 volume = m 3 Single tank Radius = m Mass = 94.2 kg Dual tanks Radius = m Mass = 62.2 kg (x2 = kg) Triple tanks Radius = m Mass = 48.7 kg (x3 = kg) Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland
14 Other Structural MERs Fairings and shrouds Avionics M ( Fairing kg) = 13.3 kg m 2 Wiring M Avionics M Wiring ( kg) = 10 M 0 kg [ ( )] ( kg) =1.058 M ( 0 kg) l 0.25
15 Fairing Analysis Payload Shroud Area m 2 Mass 688 kg Intertank Fairing Area m 2 Mass 1677 kg Aft Fairing Area m 2 Mass 1433 kg
16 Avionics and Wiring Masses Avionics M Avionics Wiring ( kg) = 10[ 153, 000 kg] = 744 kg M Wiring ( kg) = , 000 ( m) 0.25 = 840 kg
17 Propulsion MERs Liquid Pump-Fed Rocket Engine Mass M Rocket Engine ( kg) = T( N) + Solid Rocket Motor T( N) A e A t + 59 M Motor Casing = 0.135M propellants Thrust Structure Mass M Thrust Structure ( kg) = T( N)
18 Propulsion MERs (continued) Gimbal Mass M Gimbals Gimbal Torque τ Gimbals kg P 0 (Pa) ( ) = T(N).9375 ( N m) = 990,000 T(N) P 0 (Pa) 1.25
19 Propulsion System Assumptions Initial T/mg ratio = 1.3 Keeps final acceleration low with reasonable throttling Number of engines = 6 Positive acceleration worst-case after engine out Chamber pressure = 1000 psi = 6897 kn Typical for high-performance LOX/LH2 engines Expansion ratio A e /A t =30 Compromise ratio with good vacuum performance
20 Propulsion Mass Estimates Rocket Engine Thrust (each) Rocket Engine Mass (each) M Rocket Engine ( kg) = ,900 Thrust Structure Mass M Thrust Structure T( N) = m 0g( T / W) 0 n engines = 324,900 N ( ) , 900 ( ) = 373 kg ( kg) = ( 324,900) = 497 kg
21 First Pass Vehicle Configuration
22 Mass Summary - First Pass Initial Inert Mass Estimate 12,240 kg LOX Tank 2087 kg LH2 Tank 1709 kg LOX Insulation 119 kg LH2 Insulation 433 kg Payload Fairing 688 kg Intertank Fairing 1677 kg Aft Fairing 1433 kg Engines 2236 kg Thrust Structure 497 kg Gimbals 81 kg Avionics 744 kg Wiring 840 kg Reserve - Total Inert Mass 12,543 kg Design Margin -2.4 %
23 Modifications for Second Pass Keep all initial vehicle sizing parameters constant Pick vehicle diameter and make tanks cylindrical to fit Redo MER analysis
24 Effect of Vehicle Diameter on Mass Margin Vehicle Diameter (m)
25 Effect of Mass-Optimal Diameter Vehicle has L/D of severe complications from structural dynamics Mass margin goes from -2.4% to +18.3% Decreased volume for rocket engines in aft fairing Infeasible configuration
26 Effect of Diameter on Vehicle L/D Vehicle Diameter (m)
27 Second Pass Vehicle Configuration
28 Mass Summary - Second Pass Initial Inert Mass Estimate 12,240 kg 12,240 kg LOX Tank 2087 kg 2087 kg LH2 Tank 1709 kg 1709 kg LOX Insulation 119 kg 133 kg LH2 Insulation 433 kg 547 kg Payload Fairing 688 kg 689 kg Intertank Fairing 1677 kg 669 kg Aft Fairing 1433 kg 585 kg Engines 2236 kg 2236 kg Thrust Structure 497 kg 497 kg Gimbals 81 kg 81 kg Avionics 744 kg 744 kg Wiring 840 kg 985 kg Reserve - - Total Inert Mass 12,543 kg 10,960 kg Design Margin -2.4 % %
29 Modifications for Iteration 3 Keep 4 m tank diameter Change initial assumption of δ iteratively, with resulting changes in m 0 and m i, to reach 30% mass margin
30 Vehicle-Level Preliminary Design - 3rd Pass Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) vehicle 5000 kg payload LOX/LH2 propellants Isp=430 sec δ= ΔV gi r = e sp = λ = r δ = M 0 = M L = 191,300 kg λ M i = δm 0 = 16,560 kg M p = M ( 0 1 r) =169,800 kg
31 Third Pass Vehicle Configuration
32 Mass Summary - Third Pass Initial Inert Mass Estimate 12,240 kg 12,240 kg 16,560 kg LOX Tank 2087 kg 2087 kg 2530 kg LH2 Tank 1709 kg 1709 kg 2046 kg LOX Insulation 119 kg 133 kg 162 kg LH2 Insulation 433 kg 547 kg 672 kg Payload Fairing 688 kg 689 kg 689 kg Intertank Fairing 1677 kg 669 kg 669 kg Aft Fairing 1433 kg 585 kg 585 kg Engines 2236 kg 2236 kg 2708 kg Thrust Structure 497 kg 497 kg 622 kg Gimbals 81 kg 81 kg 100 kg Avionics 744 kg 744 kg 807 kg Wiring 840 kg 985 kg 1146 kg Reserve! -! -! Total Inert Mass 12,543 kg 10,960 kg 12,740 kg Design Margin -2.4 % % +30 %
33 Mass Budgeting Estimates Budgeted Margins Initial Inert Mass Estimate 16,560 kg 16,560 kg 3826 kg LOX Tank 2530 kg 2910 kg 380 kg LH2 Tank 2046 kg 2354 kg 307 kg LOX Insulation 162 kg 187 kg 24 kg LH2 Insulation 672 kg 773 kg 101 kg Payload Fairing 689 kg 793 kg 104 kg Intertank Fairing 669 kg 769 kg 100 kg Aft Fairing 585 kg 673 kg 88 kg Engines 2708 kg 3115 kg 407 kg Thrust Structure 622 kg 715 kg 93 kg Gimbals 100 kg 115 kg 15 kg!! Avionics 807 kg 928 kg 121 kg Wiring 1146 kg 1318 kg 172 kg Reserve 1913 kg! 1913 kg Total Inert Mass 12,740 kg 16,560 kg
A little more about costing Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis
A little more about costing Review of iterative design approach (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis 2004 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl. umd.edu Internal Rate of Return Discount
Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Solid rocket motors Liquid rocket engines. Hybrid rocket engines Auxiliary propulsion systems
Propulsion Systems Design Rocket engine basics Solid rocket motors Liquid rocket engines Monopropellants Bipropellants Propellant feed systems Hybrid rocket engines Auxiliary propulsion systems 2004 David
Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design
Propulsion Systems Design Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design 2008 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu 1 Propulsion
Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design
Design Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design 2005 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Overview of the Design Process
MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design U N I V E R S I T Y O F
Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design 2004 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl. umd.edu Overview of the Design Process
Propulsion Systems Design
Propulsion Systems Design Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design 1 2016 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Liquid
Propulsion Systems Design
Propulsion Systems Design Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design 1 2011 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Propulsion
Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #03 September 5, 2017 The rocket equation Mass ratio and performance Structural and payload mass fractions Regression analysis Multistaging Optimal ΔV distribution between stages Trade-off ratios
Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #06 September 17, 2015 The rocket equation Mass ratio and performance Structural and payload mass fractions Regression analysis Multistaging Optimal ΔV distribution between stages Trade-off ratios
Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: Project Diana U N I V E R S I T Y O F.
Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 2003 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Parametric Design
Design And Analysis Of Thrust Chamber Of A Cryogenic Rocket Engine S. Senthilkumar 1, Dr. P. Maniiarasan 2,Christy Oomman Jacob 2, T.
Design And Analysis Of Thrust Chamber Of A Cryogenic Rocket Engine S. Senthilkumar 1, Dr. P. Maniiarasan 2,Christy Oomman Jacob 2, T. Vinitha 2 1 Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #06 September 18, 2014 The rocket equation Mass ratio and performance Structural and payload mass fractions Regression analysis Multistaging Optimal ΔV distribution between stages Trade-off ratios
Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design
The rocket equation Mass ratio and performance Structural and payload mass fractions Regression analysis Multistaging Optimal ΔV distribution between stages Trade-off ratios Parallel staging Modular staging
Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design
The rest of orbital mechanics The rocket equation Mass ratio and performance Structural and payload mass fractions Regression analysis Multistaging Optimal ΔV distribution between stages Trade-off ratios
Basic Ascent Performance Analyses
Basic Ascent Performance Analyses Ascent Mission Requirements Ideal Burnout Solution Constant & Average Gravity Models Gravity Loss Concept Effect of Drag on Ascent Performance Drag Profile Approximation
Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F
Parametric Design The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 2005 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Parametric
Rocket Propulsion Basics Thrust
Rockets 101: A Quick Primer on Propulsion & Launch Vehicle Technologies Steve Heister, Professor School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Purdue University Presentation to AFSAB, 13 January, 2010 Rocket
Applied Thermodynamics - II
Gas Turbines Sudheer Siddapureddy sudheer@iitp.ac.in Department of Mechanical Engineering Jet Propulsion - Classification 1. A heated and compressed atmospheric air, mixed with products of combustion,
MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.
Parametric Design The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 2004 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.
Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman
Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman Outline 1. Crew Systems Design Selection 2. Thermal Requirements and Design 3. Power
Comparison of Return to Launch Site Options for a Reusable Booster Stage
Comparison of Return to Launch Site Options for a Reusable Booster Stage Barry Mark Hellman Space System Design Lab (SSDL) School of Aerospace Engineering USAF ASC/XRE barry.hellman@wpafb.af.mil Advisor
ENAE483: Principles of Space System Design Power Propulsion Thermal System
Power Propulsion Thermal System Team B4: Ben Abresch Jason Burr Kevin Lee Scott Wingate November 8th, 2012 Presentation Overview Mission Guidelines Project Specifications Initial Design Power Thermal Insulation
ENAE 483: Principles of Space System Design Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms
ENAE 483: Principles of Space System Design Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Team: Vera Klimchenko Kevin Lee Kenneth Murphy Brendan Smyth October 29 th, 2012 Presentation Overview Project Overview Mission
The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration Amplification on Initial Concept Review
Parametric Design The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration Amplification on Initial Concept Review U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 2008 David L. Akin - All rights reserved
PROPULSIONE SPAZIALE. Chemical Rocket Propellant Performance Analysis
Chemical Rocket Propellant Performance Analysis Sapienza Activity in ISP-1 Program 15/01/10 Pagina 1 REAL NOZZLES Compared to an ideal nozzle, the real nozzle has energy losses and energy that is unavailable
Robotic Mobility Above the Surface
Free Space Relative Orbital Motion Airless Major Bodies (moons) 1 2016 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Propulsive Motion in Free Space Basic motion governed by Newton
11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems
11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems 11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems In the progressing Space Age, spacecrafts such as satellites and space probes are the key to space exploration,
Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Ballistic Entry ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design
Rocket Performance Parallel staging Modular staging Standard atmospheres Orbital decay due to drag Straight-line (no gravity) entry based on atmospheric density 1 2014 David L. Akin - All rights reserved
3. Write a detailed note on the following thrust vector control methods:
Code No: R05322103 Set No. 1 1. Starting from the first principles and with the help of neatly drawn velocity triangles obtain the following relationship: Ψ = 2 Φ (tan β 2 + tan β 3 ) where Ψ is the blade
IV. Rocket Propulsion Systems. A. Overview
IV. Rocket Propulsion Systems A. Overview by J. M. Seitzman for AE 4451 Jet and Rocket Propulsion Seitzman Rocket Overview-1 Rocket Definition Rocket Device that provides thrust to a vehicle by accelerating
Rocket Propulsion Overview
Rocket Propulsion Overview Seitzman Rocket Overview-1 Rocket Definition Rocket Device that provides thrust to a vehicle by accelerating some matter (the propellant) and exhausting it from the rocket Most
SOLAR ROCKET PROPULSION Ground and Space Technology Demonstration. Dr. Michael Holmes, AFRL/PRSS
SOLAR ROCKET PROPULSION Ground and Space Technology Demonstration Dr. Michael Holmes, AFRL/PRSS Solar Thermal Propulsion Concept Parabolic Mirror Sun Create thrust by collecting and focusing sunlight to
MagBeam: R. Winglee, T. Ziemba, J. Prager, B. Roberson, J Carscadden Coherent Beaming of Plasma. Separation of Power/Fuel from Payload
MagBeam: R. Winglee, T. Ziemba, J. Prager, B. Roberson, J Carscadden Coherent Beaming of Plasma Separation of Power/Fuel from Payload Fast, cost-efficient propulsion for multiple missions Plasma Propulsion
Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design Project ENAE483 Fall 2012
Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design Project ENAE483 Fall 2012 Team B8: Josh Sloane Matt Rich Rajesh Yalamanchili Kiran Patel Introduction This project is an extension of Team A2's Crew Systems Project
ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2018 NAME: a 3 = a = 42970] 1. So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773
![ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2018 NAME: a 3 = a = 42970] 1. So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773](/thumbs/91/107713935.jpg "ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 2018 NAME: a 3 = a = 42970] 1. So after one sol, the subspacecraft point would have gone 88773")
ENAE 483/788D MIDTERM FALL, 208 NAME: One 8.5 x piece of paper allowed for notes (both sides). No Internet-enabled devices allowed. Put your name on the cover page, and on each page if you disassemble
Technology of Rocket
Technology of Rocket Parts of Rocket There are four major parts of rocket Structural system Propulsion system Guidance system Payload system Structural system The structural system of a rocket includes
Performance Characterization of Supersonic Retropropulsion for Application to High-Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing
Performance Characterization of Supersonic Retropropulsion for Application to High-Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Ashley M. Korzun 1 and Robert D. Braun 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
Rockets, Missiles, and Spacecrafts
36 1 Rockets, Missiles, and Spacecrafts 2 Chinese used rockets in the 12 th century AD against the Mongol attacks. In India Tipu Sultan used rockets against the British army in the 18 th century. The modern
Propulsion and Energy Systems. Kimiya KOMURASAKI, Professor, Dept. Aeronautics & Astronautics, The University of Tokyo
Propulsion and Energy Systems Kimiya KOMURASAKI, Professor, Dept. Aeronautics & Astronautics, The University of Tokyo Schedule Space propulsion with non-chemical technologies 10/5 1) Space Propulsion Fundamentals
Homework 2, part 2! ii) Calculate and plot design spike contour,
Homework 2, part 2! 1) For Aerospike Nozzle use Sonic Throat section, assume axi-symmetric design, full spike length.. For Aerospike Nozzle use Sonic Throat section, assume axisymmetric. design, full spike
Departures from Ideal Performance for Conical Nozzles and Bell Nozzles, Straight-Cut Throats and Rounded Throats Charles E. Rogers
Departures from Ideal Performance for Conical Nozzles and Bell Nozzles, Straight-Cut Throats and Rounded Throats Charles E. Rogers This article covers departures from ideal performance for conical nozzles
ENAE 483/788D FINAL EXAMINATION FALL, 2015
ENAE 48/788D FINAL EXAMINATION FALL, 2015 No phones, computers, or internet-enabled devices. Use the spaces following the questions to write your answers; you can also use the backs of the pages as necessary,
Solar Thermal Propulsion
AM A A A01-414 AIAA 2001-77 Solar Thermal Propulsion SOLAR THERMAL PROPULSION FOR AN INTERSTELLAR PROBE Ronald W. Lyman, Mark E. Ewing, Ramesh S. Krishnan, Dean M. Lester, Thiokol Propulsion Brigham City,
Rocket Performance MARYLAND
Rocket Perforance The rocket equation Mass ratio and perforance Structural and payload ass fractions Multistaging Optial V distribution between stages Trade-off ratios Parallel staging Modular staging
Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight
Gaseous planetary environments (Mars, Venus, Titan) Lighter-than- air (balloons, dirigibles) Heavier-than- air (aircraft, rotorcraft) 1 2018 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu
JPL ISM STP Study Summary
JPL ISM STP Study Summary Nitin Arora, Jonathan Murphy, Leon Alkalai, Jonathan Sauder and JPL Team-X Study Team Detailed Team-X report can also be provided if needed High-level Team-X Mission Requirements
Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight
Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight Gaseous planetary environments (Mars, Venus, Titan) Lighter-than- air (balloons, dirigibles) Heavier-than- air (aircraft, rotorcraft) 1 2014 David L. Akin - All rights
Electric Sail Propulsion Modeling and Mission Analysis
Electric Sail Propulsion Modeling and Mission Analysis IEPC-007-35 Presented at the 30 th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Florence, Italy Pekka Janhunen Finnish Meteorological Institute,
Rocket Dynamics. Forces on the Rocket
Rocket Dynamics Forces on the Rockets - Drag Rocket Stability Rocket Equation Specific Impulse Rocket otors F Thrust Forces on the Rocket Equation of otion: Need to minimize total mass to maximize acceleration
How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?
UCRL-CONF-213232 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be? John C. Whitehead July 10, 2005 41 st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit Tucson, AZ Paper
Engineering Sciences and Technology. Trip to Mars
PART 2: Launch vehicle 1) Introduction : A) Open this file and save it in your directory, follow the instructions below. B) Watch this video (0 to 1min03s) and answer to questions. Give the words for each
A COMPARISON OF NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKETS WITH TRADITIONAL CHEMICAL ROCKETS FOR SPACE TRANSPORT. Joshua T. Hanes
A COMPARISON OF NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKETS WITH TRADITIONAL CHEMICAL ROCKETS FOR SPACE TRANSPORT by Joshua T. Hanes A Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The University of Utah In Partial Fulfillment
Concurrent Trajectory and Vehicle Optimization for an Orbit Transfer. Christine Taylor May 5, 2004
Concurrent Trajectory and Vehicle Optimization for an Orbit Transfer Christine Taylor May 5, 2004 Presentation Overview Motivation Single Objective Optimization Problem Description Mathematical Formulation
Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight
Robotic Mobility Atmospheric Flight Gaseous planetary environments (Mars, Venus, Titan)! Lighter-than- air (balloons, dirigibles)! Heavier-than- air (aircraft, rotorcraft) 1 2014 David L. Akin - All rights
CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction The LM-3A performance figures given in this chapter are based on the following assumptions: Launching from XSLC (Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Sichuan Province, China),
Shen Ge ECAPS LLC. Yvonne Vigue-Rodi Adelante Sciences Corporation May 6, 2016 AIAA Houston Annual Technical Symposium
Feasibility of Transferring On-Orbit Components of the International Space Station for Solar System Exploration Shen Ge ECAPS LLC Yvonne Vigue-Rodi Adelante Sciences Corporation May 6, 2016 AIAA Houston
At time t 0, the velocity of a body moving along the horizontal s-axis is v = t 2 4t + 3.
Section 3.4 The Derivative as a Rate of Change: Derivative measures the rate of change of a dependent variable to independent variable. If s=f(t) is the function of an object showing the position of the
California State Science Fair
California State Science Fair Working Model for Model Rocket Altitude Prediction Edward Ruth drruth@ix.netcom.com This is a complete model of all the forces acting on a model rocket in flight. It calculates
Low Thrust Trajectory Analysis (A Survey of Missions using VASIMR for Flexible Space Exploration - Part 2)
(A Survey of Missions using VASIMR for Flexible Space Exploration - Part 2) Prepared by: Andrew V. Ilin Ad Astra Rocket Company 141 W. Bay Area Blvd Webster, TX 77598 In fulfillment of Task Number 5 of
Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Advanced Rocket Nozzle
Research Article International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology E-ISSN 2277 4106, P-ISSN 2347-5161 2014 INPRESSCO, All Rights Reserved Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijcet Computational
Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques for Branching Trajectories
Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques for Branching Trajectories J. R. Olds L. A. Ledsinger Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA A Companion Paper to an AIAA Young Members Off-the-Drawing-Board
IAC 17 D2.8 A5.4 FLY ME TO THE MOON ON AN SLS BLOCK II
FLY ME TO THE MOON ON AN SLS BLOCK II Steven S. Pietrobon, Ph.D. Small World Communications, 6 First Avenue, Payneham South SA 5070, Australia, steven@sworld.com.au We examine how a 140 t to low Earth
A Study of CPS Stages for Missions beyond LEO Final Distribution
A Study of CPS Stages for Missions beyond LEO Final Distribution 31 May 2012 Atlanta, GA Mark Schaffer Senior Aerospace Engineer, Advanced Concepts Group mark.schaffer@sei.aero 1+770.379.8013 1 Introduction
Lecture 9 Hybrid Rocket Propulsion Liquefying Fuels
Lecture 9 Hybrid Rocket Propulsion Liquefying Fuels Prepared by Arif Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 09, 2012 Entrainment Mass Transfer Mechanism ρ e u e Liquid Layer Fuel Grain Reacting
CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction The LM-3B performance figures given in this chapter are based on the following assumptions: Launching from XSLC (Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Sichuan Province, China),
Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN
Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers Dr Ugur GUVEN Orbit Maneuvers At some point during the lifetime of most space vehicles or satellites, we must change one or more of the orbital elements. For example,
Gravitation_AHL_P1. 1. [1 mark]
![Gravitation_AHL_P1. 1. [1 mark]](/thumbs/95/125107798.jpg "Gravitation_AHL_P1. 1. [1 mark]")
Gravitation_AHL_P1 1. [1 mark] The diagram shows 5 gravitational equipotential lines. The gravitational potential on each line is indicated. A point mass m is placed on the middle line and is then released.
Positron Propelled and Powered Space Transport Vehicle for Planetary Missions
Positron Propelled and Powered Space Transport Vehicle for Planetary Missions Positronics Research, LLC, Santa Fe, NM Work performed under Universities Space Research Association Research Subaward No.
Electrically Propelled Cargo Spacecraft for Sustained Lunar Supply Operations
42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 9-12 July 2006, Sacramento, California AIAA 2006-4435 Electrically Propelled Cargo Spacecraft for Sustained Lunar Supply Operations Christian
Investigation of Combined Airbreathing/Rocket. Air Launch of Micro-Satellites from a Combat Aircraft
6th Responsive Space Conference AIAA-RS6-008-5003 Investigation of Combined Airbreathing/Rocket Propulsion for Air Launch of Micro-Satellites from a Combat Aircraft Avichai Socher and Alon Gany Faculty
Exercise 7: Thrust and the Rocket Equation
Astronomy 102 Name: Exercise 7: Thrust and the Rocket Equation Parts of this exercise were taken from NASA s Beginner s Guide to Rockets: Rocket Propulsion Activity, edited by Tom Benson. Objective: To
Fly Me to the Moon on an SLS Block II
Fly Me to the Moon on an SLS Block II Steven S. Pietrobon, Ph.D. 20 July 2015 The first Lunar mission will be the beginning. Later missions will stay for longer periods on the Moon and continue its exploration.
A STUDY OF CRYOGENIC PROPULSIVE STAGES FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT
A STUDY OF CRYOGENIC PROPULSIVE STAGES FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT Mark Schaffer SpaceWorks Enterprises, Inc., United States, mark.schaffer@sei.aero Chauncey Wenner United Launch Alliance,
Propulsion Technology Assessment: Science and Enabling Technologies to Explore the Interstellar Medium
Propulsion Technology Assessment: Science and Enabling Technologies to Explore the Interstellar Medium January 2015 Les Johnson / NASA MSFC / ED04 www.nasa.gov Mission Statement Interstellar Probe Mission:
Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required
Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required ΔV Not in Taylor 1 Available Ignoring Aerodynamic Drag. The available Delta V for a Given rocket burn/propellant load is ( ) V = g I ln 1+ P
A trendsetting Micro-Launcher for Europe
A trendsetting Micro-Launcher for Europe Farid Gamgami German Aerospace Center (DLR), Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART) Bremen, Germany Farid.Gamgami@dlr.de ABSTRACT In this paper we analyse a potential,
Thermal Radiation Studies for an Electron-Positron Annihilation Propulsion System
Thermal Radiation Studies for an Electron-Positron Annihilation Propulsion System Jonathan A. Webb Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott, AZ 8631 Recent studies have shown the potential of antimatter
Conceptual Design of Manned Space Transportation Vehicle (MSTV) Using Laser Thruster in Combination with H-II Rocket
Conceptual Design of Manned Space Transportation Vehicle (MSTV) Using Laser Thruster in Combination with H-II Rocket Laser Thruster Yoshinari Minami Advanced Sci.-Tech. Rsch. Orgn. (Formerly NEC Space
1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded
Code No: R05322106 Set No. 1 1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded rocket nozzles. (b) While on its way into orbit a space shuttle with an initial mass
Thermal Systems Design
Thermal Systems Design Fundamentals of heat transfer Radiative equilibrium Surface properties Non-ideal effects Internal power generation Environmental temperatures Conduction Thermal system components
IAC-17- D Suitability of reusability and in-situ propellant production for a Lunar transportation system
IAC-17- D2.3.1 Suitability of reusability and in-situ propellant production for a Lunar transportation system Etienne Dumont a *, Weixiong Goh a, Matthieu Delbourg a, Stéphanie Lizy-Destrez b, Bastien
AAE SOLID ROCKET PROPULSION (SRP) SYSTEMS
7. SOLID ROCKET PROPULSION (SRP) SYSTEMS Ch7 1 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.1 INTRODUCTION Ch7 2 APPLICATIONS FOR SRM APPLICATIONS FOR SRM Strap-On Boosters for Space Launch Vehicles, Upper Stage Propulsion System
HM7B Simulation with ESPSS Tool on Ariane 5 ESC-A Upper Stage
46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 25-28 July 21, Nashville, TN AIAA 21-747 HM7B Simulation with ESPSS Tool on Ariane 5 ESC-A Upper Stage Armin Isselhorst, Propulsion Systems,
Multistage Rockets. Chapter Notation
Chapter 8 Multistage Rockets 8.1 Notation With current technology and fuels, and without greatly increasing the e ective I sp by air-breathing, a single stage rocket to Earth orbit is still not possible.
Danish Parvez, Samadarshi Adhikari. Amity University Gurugram,
COMPARITIVE STUDY OF SPECIES ANALYSIS OF SEMI- CRYOGENIC PROPELLANTS Danish Parvez, Samadarshi Adhikari Amity University Gurugram, Danishparvez003@gmail.com Abstract Different computational software s
All questions are of equal value. No marks are subtracted for wrong answers.
(1:30 PM 4:30 PM) Page 1 of 6 All questions are of equal value. No marks are subtracted for wrong answers. Record all answers on the computer score sheet provided. USE PENCIL ONLY! Black pen will look
Optimal Control based Time Optimal Low Thrust Orbit Raising
Optimal Control based Time Optimal Low Thrust Orbit Raising Deepak Gaur 1, M. S. Prasad 2 1 M. Tech. (Avionics), Amity Institute of Space Science and Technology, Amity University, Noida, U.P., India 2
Learn From The Proven Best!
Applied Technology Institute (ATIcourses.com) Stay Current In Your Field Broaden Your Knowledge Increase Productivity 349 Berkshire Drive Riva, Maryland 21140 888-501-2100 410-956-8805 Website: www.aticourses.com
Final Examination 2015
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering AERO 2705: Space Engineering 1 Final Examination 2015 READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY! Answer at least 4 (four of
Lunar Orbit Propellant Transfer
Lunar Orbit Propellant Transfer Steven S. Pietrobon An investigation of various crewed Lunar transportation schemes using liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen is made. These include the traditional direct
but is fed to the rotor motor. (The reverse process will be employed when the tether is reeled back in.) The counter balance tether length is servodri
ABSTRACT A tether launch system (TLS) on the lunar surface can launch 10 tonne payloads of lunar produced oxygen (LLOX) into low lunar orbit or lunar escape using existing materials and technologies. The
Chapter 7 Rocket Propulsion Physics
Chapter 7 Rocket Propulsion Physics To move any spacecraft off the Earth, or indeed forward at all, there must be a system of propulsion. All rocket propulsion relies on Newton s Third Law of Motion: in
Variations of Solid Rocket Motor Preliminary Design for Small TSTO launcher
Variations of Solid Rocket Motor Preliminary Design for Small TSTO launcher Etienne Dumont Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART), DLR, Bremen, Germany Etienne.Dumont@dlr.de Abstract Several combinations
Bifrost: A 4 th Generation Launch Architecture Concept
Bifrost: A 4 th Generation Launch Architecture Concept Rohrschneider, R.R., Young, D., St.Germain, B., Brown, N., Crowley, J., Maatsch, J., Olds, J.R. (Advisor) Abstract Space Systems Design Lab School
The development of a family of Resistojet Thruster Propulsion Systems for Small Spacecraft
The development of a family of Resistojet Thruster Propulsion Systems for Small Spacecraft D.Gibbon, I.Coxhill, A.Baker, M.Sweeting Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd, University of Surrey, Guildford, England
Low Thrust Mission Trajectories to Near Earth Asteroids
Low Thrust Mission Trajectories to Near Earth Asteroids Pratik Saripalli Graduate Research Assistant, College Park, Maryland, 20740, USA Eric Cardiff NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland,
Robotic Mobility Above the Surface
Free Space Relative Orbital Motion Airless Major Bodies (moons) Gaseous Environments (Mars, Venus, Titan) Lighter-than- air (balloons, dirigibles) Heavier-than- air (aircraft, helicopters) 1 2012 David
Rocket Propulsion. Combustion chamber Throat Nozzle
Rocket Propulsion In the section about the rocket equation we explored some of the issues surrounding the performance of a whole rocket. What we didn t explore was the heart of the rocket, the motor. In
Study of Required Thrust Profile Determination of a Three Stages Small Launch Vehicle
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Study of Required Thrust Profile Determination of a Three Stages Small Launch Vehicle To cite this article: A Fariz et al 218 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
Supplementary Problems
A Supplementary Problems These are practice questions: you do not need to hand in solutions. You can also study past exam papers. PH211 (now PHYS2006) was a new course in 1993, so you ll find some relevant