arxiv:physics/ Feb 2001
|
|
- Cori Jacobs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FlawsInTheBigBangPointToGENESIS, A New Millennium Model Of The Cosmos: Part 4 How Will The Scientific Community React To Big Bang s Vast Nonconservation-of-Energy Losses? arxiv:physics/ Feb 2001 Robert V. Gentry The Orion Foundation P. O. Box Knoxville, TN gentryrv@orionfdn.org 28 February 2001 Abstract In 1936 Hubble expressed his concern about astronomical redshifts and energy conservation: Obviously since the product [energy wavelength] remains constant, redshifts, by increasing wavelengths, must reduce the energy in the quanta. Any plausible interpretation of redshifts must account for the loss of energy. The scientific community rightly expects that big-bang cosmology resolved this concern consistent with energy conservation. Surprisingly, this did not happen. Instead, cosmologists exempted the big bang from energy conservation, but without saying how much was lost. This paper shows that, since t = 1 second after the big bang, expansion redshifting of CBR photons would have resulted in nonconservation-of-energy losses amounting to at least thirty million times the mass of the visible universe; moreover, losses continue at the rate of about a galactic mass every millennium. These results prove the big bang fails to match the physics of the real universe, that its expansion redshift hypothesis is fatally flawed, and hence that the big bang never possessed the qualifications necessary for being classified as a modern scientific theory. Disney has noted many uncertainties in big-bang cosmology [1], but he did not question whether its basic postulates agree with known conservation laws. This fourth paper does this, specifically focusing on whether spacetime 1
2 expansion is consistent with conservation of energy. Concerning the relation between redshifts and photon energy, in 1936 Hubble wrote [2]: Obviously since the product [energy wavelength (= Planck s constant c)]remains constant, redshifts, by increasing wavelengths, must reduce the energy in the quanta. Any plausible interpretation of redshifts must account for the loss of energy. Just how this loss could be reconciled with energy conservation did not become a major topic in physics in Hubble s time. Nor has it since. Instead big bang s expansion factor a(t) has been ex cathedra granted the extraordinary ability to cause energy to disappear from the universe without providing an explanation as to how this happens. According to Peebles [3]: The second confusing point is the nature of the energy balance in the CBR. However, since the volume of the universe varies as a(t) 3, the net radiation energy in a closed universe decreases as 1/a(t) as the universe expands. Where does the lost energy go?... The resolution of this apparent paradox is that while energy conservation is a good local concept,...there is not a general global energy conservation law in general relativity theory. Harrison has likewise granted the same exemption. In his book, in a section titled, Where has the energy gone?, he states [4]: Radiation, freely moving particles, and gases lose energy in an expanding universe. Where does the energy go? We take it for granted that light is redshifted and usually do not concern ourselves about where its energy has gone... Science clings tenaciously to concepts of conservation, the most fundamental of which is the conservation-of-energy principle... The conservation-of-energy principle serves us well in all sciences except cosmology.... To the questions where the energy goes in an expanding universe and where it comes from in a collapsing universe the answer is nowhere, because in this one case energy is not conserved. Other cosmologists [5] affirm similar views. The scientific community believes all modern physical theories pass the test of energy conservation. 2
3 Yet here is proof that the big bang has been granted an exemption. Almost certainly the scientific community would long ago have expressed concern about this if cosmologists had publicized the magnitude of the expansioninduced energy loss. Their failure to do so is why this topic has remained in obscurity for so long. It appears my relatively recent reports were the first to give that calculation [6,7], which is repeated here. Consider in particular the nonconservation-of-energy loss of CBR photons as in theory they were expansion-redshifted from 3000K at decoupling to the present 2.7K. In theory, if a photon was emitted at a wavelength λ e at the time when the expansion factor was presumed to be some unknown value R e remember that the existence of this factor has never been verified then its wavelength λ now at another unknown value, R, ispresumedto be given by the expression λ = λ e (R/R e ). According to big bang theory the expansion ratio between the time of decoupling and the present is about In effect every photon is presumed to have had its wavelength expanded by afactorof10 3 between that time and the present. On this basis it is possible to compute the energy lost in expansion from the expression relating a photon s wavelength with its energy, ε = hc/λ, whereh and c are Planck s constant and the velocity of light, respectively. These expressions allow the computation of the expansion-induced radiation energy loss for the universe. Assuming a universal volume, V univ, of 15 billion ly radius, the 2.7K CBR having about n 410 photons-cm 3 with average photon energy of about ε 2.7 =10 15 erg [8,9], and the 3000K radiation with ε 3000 = erg, and conservation of photon number, we compute the total CBR expansioninduced, nonconservation-of-energy loss as E exp = n (ε 3000 ε 2.7 ) V univ = erg. This is about three times the mass of the present universe, estimated to be about solar masses. For an initial fireball temperature of 3 million K instead of 3000K, the total radiation energy loss would be three thousand times the mass of the universe. Further, since in theory photon number conservation extends back to at least a fireball temperature of 30 billion K [8,9], in this case the theorized nonconservation-of-energy loss projects to be a gargantuan thirty million times the mass of the visible universe. This same result also follows from Silk s discussion [8], where he notes that the average energy of a single blackbody photon at t = 1 second after the initial instant of the big bang is presumed to have been ev, whereas it is now only about ev. Moreover, since expansion is theorized to be continuing, then the predicted energy loss must also be continuing. In theory a single photon s rate of energy loss is presumed to be ε = hc λ/λ, from which it follows that the fractional rate of energy loss for a single photon is ε/ε = ( R/R) = 3
4 H, where H is Hubble s constant. Thus the expected present rate of nonconservation-of-energy loss for the entire universe would be n V univ ε 2.7 H o erg s 1 for H o =68kms 1 Mpc 1 = s. Thus, if spacetime expansion of CBR photons were a physical reality, then it would presently be causing an amount of energy equal to 1/10 the mass of our Galaxy to somehow disappear from the universe about every hundred years. The above discussion dealt with radiation losses. In theory expansion also causes free particle energy losses [10]. Each particle s de Broglie wavelength, λ = h/p, whereh is Planck s constant and p is the particle s momentum, is also hypothesized to increase due to expansion. In theory [10] free particles moving at nonrelativistic velocities will lose energy in proportion to R 2, while relativistic particles will lose energy in proportion to R 1. Robertson and Noonan acknowledge these losses to be such that [11]: We are forced to conclude that two contradictory principles hold: first, there is conservation of energy; and second, the energy in the universe is not constant...this non-constancy of energy should come as no shock. [Earlier] it was found that a free particle which experiences no forces loses momentum in an expanding universe. Free particle energy loss with no applied forces is a huge contradiction of basic physics, and simultaneous acceptance of energy conservation and energy nonconservation is an unambiguous denial of the fundamental axiom of logic excluding the simultaneous acceptance of a proposition and its opposite. In their criticisms of the NRI [12], Carlip and Scranton (C&S) offered plausibility arguments in their attempts to defend these contradictions [13]: Gentry notes, correctly, that the electromagnetic energy of the cosmic microwave background is not conserved during expansion: in a volume expanding along with the universe, the radiation goes as (1 + z) 1,andthe redshift represents a genuine loss of photon energy. But there is nothing particularly cosmological about this loss a photon rising in a static gravitational potential experiences a similar loss. In the laboratory, there is nothing mysterious about this phenomenon, which simply reflects the need to include gravitational potential energy in one s accounting. Indeed, energy conservation can be used to derive the red shift. (At this point in their report C&S cite Sect. 7.2 of ref. [10].) There appears to be an inconsistency here. On one hand C&S say expansion s (1 + z) 1 energy reduction factor proves that CBR microwave energy 4
5 ... is not conserved during expansion..., and hence that the expansion... redshift represents a genuine loss of energy. This agrees with Peebles [3], Harrison [4], and Alpher and Herman [5]. On the other hand, C&S then seem to reverse themselves and attempt to realign expansion redshifts with energy conservation by associating them with gravitational redshifts, which do conserve energy. This contradiction invalidates any conclusions C&S may wish to draw from this attempted realignment. Nevertheless they have raised an issue of even greater relevance to the question of the existence of spacetime expansion by claiming that the gravitational redshift is characterized by... a photon rising in a static gravitational potential experiences a similar energy loss. As noted above, C&S cite MTW s section 7.2, The energy of the photon must decease just as that of a particle does as it climbs out of a gravitational field... to support their claim of photon energy loss due to gravity. Here we come to the crux of the issue regarding the reality of the spacetime expansion hypothesis. The central issue is whether the Friedmann-Lemaitre solution of the field equations actually matches the relativistic characteristics of the universe we inhabit. If, as C&S [13] claim, photon energies do change as a photon traverses a gravitational potential gradient, this would agree with MTW s description of the relativistic effects of the expansion hypothesis namely, that expansion operates to cause wavelengths to increase while photons are in-flight but ceases to operate during emission and absorption [10]. If confirmed, this would prove the universe is relativistically governed in accord with the Friedmann-Lemaitre expanding spacetime solution of the field equations, which is big bang s cornerstone postulate. So it has always been of critical importance for cosmologists to ascertain whether general relativistic effects cause photon wavelengths to change in-flight as the expansion hypothesis predicts. It has likewise always been of extreme importance for physics in general to determine if this is true because what is at stake is conservation of energy. If expansion is correct, then we live in a universe characterized by inconceivably large nonconservation-of-energy losses. Nevertheless, in what may be one of the more significant oversights in modern science, there appears to be no record where C&S or any other cosmologists, for that matter ever sought to determine whether photons actually do experience an in-flight change in wavelength, or energy, in passing through a gravitational potential gradient. In other words, when C&S attempted to justify the existence of expansion redshifts by associating them with the gravitational redshift, they were unable to offer any firm evidence supporting this association. Instead, they appealed to the authority of MTW 5
6 [10] as substantiating the idea that the gravitational redshift is characterized as... a photon rising in a static gravitational potential experiences a similar energy loss [13]. Part 5 of this series reveals this is likewise the position of many other highly respected authorities in cosmology and general relativity. Despite this virtual unanimity, however, there is a great fallacy in the long held views about how photons interact with gravity. As will be seen in Part 5, the operation of the GPS proves that photons moving through a gravitational potential gradient do not change energy. This disproves any possibility of aligning expansion redshifts with energy conservation. The failure of cosmologists and general relativity theorists to recognize the cosmological implications of this experimental fact may now attract attention because there is no middle ground; expansion and energy conservation are mutually exclusive. In the final analysis, the fatal defect in the expansion hypothesis cannot be hidden. Expansion redshifts must be fictitious because they violate conservation of energy. And fictitious expansion redshifts can only mean that the big bang itself is a fictitious theory. Summary Spacetime expansion not only violates conservation of energy, it does so in a way that the radiation energy losses are so large as to be incomprehensible. Part 5 in this series shows there is no way out of this contradiction. There we discuss the experimental data which prove that photons do not exchange energy with the field when passing through a gravitational potential gradient. This fact excludes all possibility of attributing expansion s energy loss to an energy exchange with the gravitational field in an expanding cosmos. By using the accepted standard by which all modern theories must be tested, big bang cosmology fails when tested against consistency with conservation of energy. By every principle of modern physics it is a falsified theory. Thus, despite its wide acclaim, in reality it never possessed the qualifications needed to be classified as a physical theory. Its nonconservation-of-energy losses are so vast and its logical contradictions so great that they surely indicate there must be a fatal flaw in the expansion hypothesis [14]. And if we look carefully, we expect that it should be found. The next paper in this series examines this topic in detail. 6
7 References [1] M. J. Disney, arxiv:astro-ph/ [2] Edwin Hubble, TheRealmoftheNebulae(Yale University Press, 1936) p [3] P.J.E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993), p [4] E. R. Harrison, Cosmology, The Science of the Universe (Cambridge University Press, 1981) pp [5] Robert A. Alpher and Robert Herman, Early work on big bang cosmology and the cosmic blackbody radiation, in Modern Cosmology In Retrospect (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990), p [6] Robert V. Gentry and David W. Gentry, arxiv:gr-qc/ [7] Robert V. Gentry, arxiv:physics/ [8] Malcolm S. Longair, The Physics of Background Radiation, in The Deep Universe, eds. B. Binggeli and R. Buser (Springer, Berlin, 1995), pp [9] Joseph Silk, The Big Bang (W. H. Freeman & Co., Revised ed. 1989) pp [10] C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, (W. H. Freeman & Company, 1973) pp [11] H. P. Robertson and Thomas Noonan, Relativity and Cosmology (W. B. Sanders Company, 1968) pp [12] Robert V. Gentry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12 (1997) 2919; arxiv:astroph/ [13] Steven Carlip and Ryan Scranton, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 71; arxiv:astro-ph/ [14] Many thanks to Dave Gentry for useful discussions. 7
Discovery Of A Major Contradiction In Big Bang Cosmology Points To The New Cosmic Center Universe Model. Abstract
CERN Preprint Discovery Of A Major Contradiction In Big Bang Cosmology Points To The New Cosmic Center Universe Model Robert V Gentry Orion Institute for Astrophysics, P O Box 12067, Knoxville, TN 37912
More informationThe Genuine Cosmic Rosetta
The Genuine Cosmic Rosetta gr-qc/9806061 14 Jun 1998 Robert V. Gentry and David W. Gentry The Orion Foundation P.O. Box 12067 Knoxville, TN 37912 gr-qc/9806061 Abstract Reexamination of general relativistic
More informationarxiv:physics/ Feb 2001
FlawsInTheBigBangPointToGENESIS, A New Millennium Model Of The Cosmos: Part 1 Is The Scientific Community In For A Big Surprise About The Big Bang? arxiv:physics/0102092 28 Feb 2001 Robert V. Gentry The
More informationCollapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic. Center Model of the Universe
Collapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic Collapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic Robert V. Gentry Robert V. Gentry God does not intend that his record
More informationCOSMOLOGY The Universe what is its age and origin?
COSMOLOGY The Universe what is its age and origin? REVIEW (SUMMARY) Oppenheimer Volkhoff limit: upper limit to mass of neutron star remnant more than 1.4 M à neutron degeneracy Supernova à extremely dense
More informationImplications of the Hubble Law: - it is not static, unchanging - Universe had a beginning!! - could not have been expanding forever HUBBLE LAW:
Cosmology and the Evolution of the Universe Edwin Hubble, 1929: -almost all galaxies have a redshift -moving away from us -greater distance greater redshift Implications of the Hubble Law: - Universe is
More informationThe Pound-Rebka Experiment as Disproof of Einstein s General Relativity Gravity Theory.
The Pound-Rebka Experiment as Disproof of Einstein s General Relativity Gravity Theory. By James Carter When Einstein first used his equations to predict the transverse gravitational red shift of photons
More informationCosmology and the Evolution of the Universe. Implications of the Hubble Law: - Universe is changing (getting bigger!) - it is not static, unchanging
Cosmology and the Evolution of the Edwin Hubble, 1929: -almost all galaxies have a redshift -moving away from us -exceptions in Local Group -with distance measurements - found a relationship greater distance
More informationFXA ρ 0 = 3(H 0 ) 2. UNIT G485 Module Universe Evolution. Candidates should be able to : age of the universe 1/H 0
1 Candidates should be able to : Explain that the standard (hot big bang) model of the universe implies a finite age for the universe. Select and use the expression : age of the universe 1/H 0 Describe
More informationIsland Universes. Up to 1920 s, many thought that Milky Way encompassed entire universe.
Island Universes Up to 1920 s, many thought that Milky Way encompassed entire universe. Observed three types of nebulas (clouds): - diffuse, spiral, elliptical - many were faint, indistinct - originally
More informationPhysical Conclusions of Experimental Physics Versus Metaphysical Assumptions of Theoretical Physics Theoretical physicists create assumptions for
Physical Conclusions of Experimental Physics Versus Metaphysical Assumptions of Theoretical Physics Theoretical physicists create assumptions for their theories to explain the results of measurements made
More informationChapter 26: Cosmology
Chapter 26: Cosmology Cosmology means the study of the structure and evolution of the entire universe as a whole. First of all, we need to know whether the universe has changed with time, or if it has
More informationA New Redshift Interpretation
A New Redshift Interpretation arxiv:astro-ph/9806280 20 Jun 1998 Robert V. Gentry The Orion Foundation P.O. Box 12067 Knoxville, TN 37912 astro-ph/9806280 Abstract A nonhomogeneous universe with vacuum
More informationGravitational Effects on Light Propagation. Copyright 2009 Joseph A. Rybczyk
Gravitational Effects on Light Propagation Copyright 2009 Joseph A. Rybczyk Abstract An examination of the theoretical relationship between gravity and light propagation is presented that focuses on the
More informationOckham, Olbers and dark matter
Ockham, Olbers and dark matter John Billingsley University of Southern Queensland Abstract. It is the task of the theoretician to explain observations with a theory that has no unnecessary complexity.
More informationAbstracts of Powerpoint Talks - newmanlib.ibri.org - The Cosmos. Robert C. Newman
The Cosmos Robert C. Newman The Cosmos Carl Sagan said: "The cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be." If Christianity is true, Sagan is mistaken. But we can perhaps define the cosmos as "All
More informationRevision Guide for Chapter 12
Revision Guide for Chapter 12 Contents Student s Checklist Revision Notes The speed of light... 4 Doppler effect... 4 Expansion of the Universe... 5 Microwave background radiation... 5 Galaxy... 6 Summary
More informationBig Bang Theory How the Universe was Formed
Big Bang Theory How the Universe was Formed Objectives Explain the Big Bang Theory. Give evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. Dispel misconceptions about the Big Bang Theory. Explain problems with
More informationThe Contents of the Universe (or/ what do we mean by dark matter and dark energy?)
The Contents of the Universe (or/ what do we mean by dark matter and dark energy?) Unseen Influences Dark Matter: An undetected form of mass that emits little or no light but whose existence we infer from
More informationModelling the Big Bang with True Relativity
Modelling the Big Bang with True Relativity copyright 2007 Tony Stanton Abstract This paper is based on the theory of True Relativity to view spacetime using simple geometry and represents a paradigm shift
More informationAstronomy 1 Winter Lecture 24; March
Astronomy 1 Winter 2011 Lecture 24; March 7 2011 Previously on Astro-1 Introduction to special relativity Introduction to general relativity Introduction to black holes, stellar and supermassive Today..
More information6.2 Quantum Gravity and the Quantization of Time 193
6.2 Quantum Gravity and the Quantization of Time 193 (points), assumed to possess statistical weights according to Ψ 2. In contrast to Bohm s time-dependent theory, this is no longer an initial condition
More informationAstro-2: History of the Universe
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 8; May 7 2013 Previously on astro-2 Wherever we look in the sky there is a background of microwaves, the CMB. The CMB is very close to isotropic better than 0.001%
More informationExpanding Universe. 1) Hubble s Law 2) Expanding Universe 3) Fate of the Universe. Final Exam will be held in Ruby Diamond Auditorium
Expanding Universe November 20, 2002 1) Hubble s Law 2) Expanding Universe 3) Fate of the Universe Final Exam will be held in Ruby Diamond Auditorium NOTE THIS!!! not UPL Dec. 11, 2002 10am-noon Review
More informationMathematical Analysis of Dark Energy Data
Mathematical Analysis of Dark Energy Data Pavel Krejčíř (pavel@pamsoft.cz) April 22, 2009 Abstract Data collected by A. Riess et al. has been analyzed in this paper. The data provide red shift and estimated
More informationTHE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE AND BLACK HOLES
THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE AND BLACK HOLES WHAT IS COSMOGONY? Cosmogony (or cosmogeny) is any model explaining the origin of the universe. Cosmogony = Coming into existence WHAT IS COSMOLOGY Cosmology
More informationThe Expanding Universe
Cosmology Expanding Universe History of the Universe Cosmic Background Radiation The Cosmological Principle Cosmology and General Relativity Dark Matter and Dark Energy Primitive Cosmology If the universe
More informationCosmology. What is Cosmology?
Cosmology What is Cosmology? The study of the structure and evolution of the entire universe The idea is to form picture of the entire Universe: origin, size, and future We will make assumptions that what
More informationHomework 6 Name: Due Date: June 9, 2008
Homework 6 Name: Due Date: June 9, 2008 1. Where in the universe does the general expansion occur? A) everywhere in the universe, including our local space upon Earth, the solar system, our galaxy and
More informationAstronomy 102: Stars and Galaxies Review Exam 3
October 31, 2004 Name: Astronomy 102: Stars and Galaxies Review Exam 3 Instructions: Write your answers in the space provided; indicate clearly if you continue on the back of a page. No books, notes, or
More informationTheoretical Astrophysics and Cosmology
Theoretical Astrophysics and Cosmology What is COSMOLOGY? -The study of the Universe as a whole, namely as the collection of its matter/energy components and its constituent phenomena, and of its evolution.
More informationIntroduction and Fundamental Observations
Notes for Cosmology course, fall 2005 Introduction and Fundamental Observations Prelude Cosmology is the study of the universe taken as a whole ruthless simplification necessary (e.g. homogeneity)! Cosmology
More information26. Cosmology. Significance of a dark night sky. The Universe Is Expanding
26. Cosmology Significance of a dark night sky The Universe is expanding The Big Bang initiated the expanding Universe Microwave radiation evidence of the Big Bang The Universe was initially hot & opaque
More informationAstro-2: History of the Universe
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 6; April 30 2013 Lecture 5 - Summary 1 Mass concentrations between us and a given object in the sky distort the image of that object on the sky, acting like magnifying
More informationCosmology Dark Energy Models ASTR 2120 Sarazin
Cosmology Dark Energy Models ASTR 2120 Sarazin Late Homeworks Last day Wednesday, May 1 My mail box in ASTR 204 Maximum credit 50% unless excused (but, better than nothing) Final Exam Thursday, May 2,
More informationThe Big Bang Theory was first proposed in the late 1920 s. This singularity was incredibly dense and hot.
The Big Bang Theory was first proposed in the late 1920 s. It states that there was an infinitely small, infinitely dense point that contained everything that is the universe. This singularity was incredibly
More informationThe Cosmological Principle
Cosmological Models John O Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney Using diagrams and pp slides from Seeds Foundations of Astronomy and the Supernova Cosmology Project http://www-supernova.lbl.gov
More informationModern Physics notes Spring 2005 Paul Fendley Lecture 37
Modern Physics notes Spring 2005 Paul Fendley fendley@virginia.edu Lecture 37 The red shift The Hubble constant Critical density Weinberg, chapters I and II cosmological parameters: Tegmark et al, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310723
More informationPhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1 1. State the Cosmological Principle. [Total 2 marks] 2. Describe the important properties of the cosmic microwave background radiation and how the standard model of the Universe
More informationCosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.
Cosmology Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick http://astro.uni-tuebingen.de/~wilms/teach/cosmo Contents 2 Old Cosmology Space and Time Friedmann Equations World Models Modern Cosmology
More informationCosmic Landscape Introduction Study Notes
Cosmic Landscape Introduction Study Notes About how much bigger in radius is the Sun than the Earth? The ratio of the Sun's radius to the Earth's radius is 1,392,000/12756 = 109.1 How big is an astronomical
More informationIntroduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?
Cosmology 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Cosmology: science of the universe as a whole How did the universe evolve to what it is today? Based on four basic facts: The universe expands, is isotropic, and is homogeneous.
More informationChapter 22 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective. Seventh Edition. The Birth of the Universe Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 22 Lecture The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition The Birth of the Universe The Birth of the Universe 22.1 The Big Bang Theory Our goals for learning: What were conditions like in the early universe?
More informationClass 5 Cosmology Large-Scale Structure of the Universe What do we see? Big Bang Cosmology What model explains what we see?
Class 1 Introduction, Background History of Modern Astronomy The Night Sky, Eclipses and the Seasons Kepler's Laws Newtonian Gravity General Relativity Matter and Light Telescopes Class 2 Solar System
More informationSmooth Bang Theory: The Universe Steadily Gains Mass With Rate c 3 /G
Smooth Bang Theory: The Universe Steadily Gains Mass With Rate c 3 /G Abstract Mikhail Vlasov Email: vlasovm@hotmail.com October 31, 2015 According to spectroscopic data of light coming from distant galaxies
More information(Part 1) Recycling Universe
(Part 1) Recycling Universe Nuri Saryal Abstract Existence of galaxies starts with star formation from the great amount of hydrogen, available in outer space. Stars spiral around the galaxy and end up
More informationλ λ CHAPTER 7 RED-SHIFTS AND ENERGY BALANCE Red-shifts Energy density of radiation Energy density of matter Continuous creation 7.
CHAPTER 7 RED-SHIFTS AND ENERGY BALANCE Red-shifts Energy density of radiation Energy density of matter Continuous creation Religion teaches us that matter in all its forms, including ourselves, is created
More informationModule 3: Astronomy The Universe Topic 1 Content: Cosmology Presentation Notes
Pretend that you have been given the opportunity to travel through time to explore cosmology. Cosmology is the study of how the universe formed and what will happen to it. Watch through your viewport as
More informationComplete Cosmos Chapter 24: Big Bang, Big Crunch Outline Sub-chapters
Complete Cosmos Chapter 24: Big Bang, Big Crunch Theory of the Big Bang. From that cataclysmic explosion, the Universe continues to expand. But will it stop and reverse? Outline How did the Universe begin?
More informationi>clicker Quiz #14 Which of the following statements is TRUE?
i>clicker Quiz #14 Which of the following statements is TRUE? A. Hubble s discovery that most distant galaxies are receding from us tells us that we are at the center of the Universe B. The Universe started
More informationPossible Solutions to Olbers Paradox
Possible Solutions to Olbers Paradox Olbers Paradox summarises the universe s contradiction of physics and investigates why the sky does not remain light throughout night. Despite the Earth s 24- hour
More informationCosmology. Thornton and Rex, Ch. 16
Cosmology Thornton and Rex, Ch. 16 Expansion of the Universe 1923 - Edwin Hubble resolved Andromeda Nebula into separate stars. 1929 - Hubble compared radial velocity versus distance for 18 nearest galaxies.
More informationIn the case of a nonrotating, uncharged black hole, the event horizon is a sphere; its radius R is related to its mass M according to
Black hole General relativity predicts that when a massive body is compressed to sufficiently high density, it becomes a black hole, an object whose gravitational pull is so powerful that nothing can escape
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.286: The Early Universe February 29, 2000 Prof.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.286: The Early Universe February 29, 2000 Prof. Alan Guth QUIZ 1 USEFUL INFORMATION: DOPPLER SHIFT: z = v/u (nonrelativistic, source moving)
More informationThe Universe and Galaxies. Adapted from:
The Universe and Galaxies Adapted from: http://www.west-jefferson.k12.oh.us/earthandspacescience.aspx Astronomy The study of objects and matter outside the Earth s atmosphere and of their physical and
More informationMIT Exploring Black Holes
THE UNIVERSE and Three Examples Alan Guth, MIT MIT 8.224 Exploring Black Holes EINSTEIN'S CONTRIBUTIONS March, 1916: The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity Feb, 1917: Cosmological Considerations
More informationModern Physics notes Spring 2005 Paul Fendley Lecture 38
Modern Physics notes Spring 2005 Paul Fendley fendley@virginia.edu Lecture 38 Dark matter and energy Cosmic Microwave Background Weinberg, chapters II and III cosmological parameters: Tegmark et al, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310723
More informationLecture Outlines. Chapter 26. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.
Lecture Outlines Chapter 26 Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Chapter 26 Cosmology Units of Chapter 26 26.1 The Universe on the Largest Scales 26.2 The Expanding Universe 26.3 The Fate of the
More informationRedshift-Distance Relationships
Redshift-Distance Relationships George Jones April 4, 0. Distances in Cosmology This note considers two conceptually important definitions of cosmological distances, look-back distance and proper distance.
More informationFigure 19.19: HST photo called Hubble Deep Field.
19.3 Galaxies and the Universe Early civilizations thought that Earth was the center of the universe. In the sixteenth century, we became aware that Earth is a small planet orbiting a medium-sized star.
More informationUntitled 1/21/18, 11:31 AM Physics: What We Do and Don t Know Steven Weinberg NOVEMBER 7, 2013 ISSUE Speculations of this sort ran into an obvious dif
Untitled 1/21/18, 11:31 AM Physics: What We Do and Don t Know Steven Weinberg NOVEMBER 7, 2013 ISSUE Speculations of this sort ran into an obvious difficulty: photons have no mass, while any new particles
More informationTheory of General Relativity
Theory of General Relativity Expansion on the concept of Special relativity Special: Inertial perspectives are Equivalent (unaccelerated) General: All perspectives are equivalent Let s go back to Newton
More information22. Black Holes. Relativistic Length Contraction. Relativistic Time Dilation
22. Black Holes Einstein s Special Theory of Relativity Einstein s General Theory of Relativity Black holes exist in some binary star systems Supermassive black holes at of galaxy centers Two properties
More informationA100H Exploring the Universe: Quasars, Dark Matter, Dark Energy. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy
A100H Exploring the :, Dark Matter, Dark Energy Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy astron100h-mdw@courses.umass.edu April 19, 2016 Read: Chaps 20, 21 04/19/16 slide 1 BH in Final Exam: Friday 29 Apr at
More informationThe Hubble effect. Domingos Soares Departamento de Física Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
The Hubble effect Domingos Soares Departamento de Física Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 30123-970, Belo Horizonte, Brazil May 02, 2013 Abstract Hubble s law is the linear relation between the logarithms
More informationEarth Science Lesson Plan Quarter 4, Week 10, Day 1
Earth Science Lesson Plan Quarter 4, Week 10, Day 1 Outcomes for Today Standard Focus: PREPARE 1. Background knowledge necessary for today s reading. Before the term black hole was coined in 1967, these
More informationAy1 Lecture 17. The Expanding Universe Introduction to Cosmology
Ay1 Lecture 17 The Expanding Universe Introduction to Cosmology 17.1 The Expanding Universe General Relativity (1915) A fundamental change in viewing the physical space and time, and matter/energy Postulates
More informationHubble's Law. H o = 71 km/s / Mpc. The further a galaxy is away, the faster it s moving away from us. V = H 0 D. Modern Data.
Cosmology Cosmology is the study of the origin and evolution of the Universe, addressing the grandest issues: How "big" is the Universe? Does it have an "edge"? What is its large-scale structure? How did
More informationSummary: Mathematical Atomism (Unified Revolution: New Fundamental Physics) compared to Mainframe Physics. By Espen Gaarder Haug
Summary: Mathematical Atomism (Unified Revolution: New Fundamental Physics) compared to Mainframe Physics. By Espen Gaarder Haug Most of the book is about the first table, logic, derivations, and comparison
More informationOn the Validation of Physics Theories Several Examples
On the Validation of Physics Theories Several Examples by Roger Ellman Abstract A description of a physical behavior that successfully describes and predicts all of that behavior s actions is not necessarily
More informationo Terms to know o Big Bang Theory o Doppler Effect o Redshift o Universe
Standard 1: Students will understand the scientific evidence that supports theories that explain how the universe and the solar system developed. They will compare Earth to other objects in the solar system.
More informationLight Quantum Hypothesis
50 My God, He Plays Dice! Light Quantum Hypothesis Light Quantum Hypothesis 51 Light Quantum Hypothesis In his miracle year of 1905, Einstein wrote four extraordinary papers, one of which won him the 1921
More informationFormation of the Universe. What evidence supports current scientific theory?
Formation of the Universe What evidence supports current scientific theory? Cosmology Cosmology is the study of the Nature, Structure, Origin, And fate of the universe. How did it all begin? Astronomers
More informationParticles in the Early Universe
Particles in the Early Universe David Morrissey Saturday Morning Physics, October 16, 2010 Using Little Stuff to Explain Big Stuff David Morrissey Saturday Morning Physics, October 16, 2010 Can we explain
More informationRealistic Decelerating Cosmology and the Return to Contraction
Realistic Decelerating Cosmology and the Return to Contraction N.S. Baaklini nsbqft@aol.com http://www.vixra.org/author/n s baaklini Abstract For cosmological theory without the bizarre vacuum-driven acceleration,
More informationAPPARENT TIME-DEPENDENCE OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT DEDUCED FROM THE OBSERVED HUBBLE VELOCITY- DISTANCE EQUATION. Feng Xu (
APPARENT TIME-DEPENDENCE OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT DEDUCED FROM THE OBSERVED HUBBLE VELOCITY- DISTANCE EQUATION Feng Xu (e-mail: xtwan@yahoo.com) Abstract An apparent time dependence of the Hubble constant
More informationGraviton and cosmology equations, before the Big Bang
Hossen Javadi Invited professor of the Faculty of Science at Azad Islamic University, Tehran campuses Tehran, Iran Javadi_hossein@hotmail.com Abstract: For long time seemed the Friedmann equation is able
More informationSteady-state cosmologies in context. The Big Bang: Fact or Fiction?
Steady-state cosmologies in context From Arrhenius to Einstein, from Hoyle to Linde The Big Bang: Fact or Fiction? Cormac O Raifeartaigh FRAS Waterford Institute of Technology Dublin Institute for Advanced
More informationWallace Hall Academy
Wallace Hall Academy CfE Higher Physics Unit 1 - Universe Notes Name 1 Newton and Gravity Newton s Thought Experiment Satellite s orbit as an Application of Projectiles Isaac Newton, as well as giving
More informationEra of Atoms 5/3/18. Our Schedule and Topics
5/3/18 ASTR 1040: Stars & Galaxies Cosmic Web Prof. Juri Toomre TAs: Peri Johnson, Ryan Horton Lecture 30 Thur 3 May 2018 zeus.colorado.edu/astr1040-toomre Our Schedule and Topics Final Exam on Wed May
More informationHawking s genius. L. Sriramkumar. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai
Hawking s genius L. Sriramkumar Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai Institute colloquium Indian Institute of Technology, Palakkad April 4, 2018 Plan of the talk Introduction
More informationASTR 200 : Lecture 27. Expansion and large scale structure
ASTR 200 : Lecture 27 Expansion and large scale structure 1 A preference for recession In 1912, american astronomer Vesto Slipher began painstakingly acquiring spectra of `spiral nebulae' and was the first
More informationCosmology holography the brain and the quantum vacuum. Antonio Alfonso-Faus. Departamento de Aerotécnia. Madrid Technical University (UPM), Spain
Cosmology holography the brain and the quantum vacuum Antonio Alfonso-Faus Departamento de Aerotécnia Madrid Technical University (UPM), Spain February, 2011. E-mail: aalfonsofaus@yahoo.es Abstract: Cosmology,
More informationUNIT 3 The Study of the. Universe. Chapter 7: The Night Sky. Chapter 8: Exploring Our Stellar Neighbourhood. Chapter 9:The Mysterious.
UNIT 3 The Study of the Universe Chapter 7: The Night Sky Chapter 8: Exploring Our Stellar Neighbourhood Chapter 9:The Mysterious Universe CHAPTER 9 The Mysterious Universe In this chapter, you will: identify
More informationChapter 29. The Hubble Expansion
Chapter 29 The Hubble Expansion The observational characteristics of the Universe coupled with theoretical interpretation to be discussed further in subsequent chapters, allow us to formulate a standard
More informationPhys333 - sample questions for final
Phys333 - sample questions for final USEFUL INFO: c=300,000 km/s ; AU = 1.5 x 10 11 m ; 1000 nm hc/ev ; ev/k 10 4 K; H-ionization energy is 13.6 ev Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that
More informationChapter 17 Cosmology
Chapter 17 Cosmology Over one thousand galaxies visible The Universe on the Largest Scales No evidence of structure on a scale larger than 200 Mpc On very large scales, the universe appears to be: Homogenous
More informationAn electron can be liberated from a surface due to particle collisions an electron and a photon.
Quantum Theory and the Atom the Bohr Atom The story so far... 1. Einstein argued that light is a photon (particle) and each photon has a discrete amount of energy associated with it governed by Planck's
More informationPHY 475/375. Lecture 5. (April 9, 2012)
PHY 475/375 Lecture 5 (April 9, 2012) Describing Curvature (contd.) So far, we have studied homogenous and isotropic surfaces in 2-dimensions. The results can be extended easily to three dimensions. As
More informationThe Big Bang Theory. Rachel Fludd and Matthijs Hoekstra
The Big Bang Theory Rachel Fludd and Matthijs Hoekstra Theories from Before the Big Bang came from a black hole from another universe? our universe is part of a multiverse? just random particles? The Big
More informationLecture Notes 1: Was There a Beginning of Time? (Part 1)
Lecture Notes 1: Was There a Beginning of Time? (Part 1) 1 Hubble s Law and the Big Bang People have long speculated about the origin of the Universe, but it wasn t until the 1920s that cosmology the study
More informationCosmology. Chapter 18. Cosmology. Observations of the Universe. Observations of the Universe. Motion of Galaxies. Cosmology
Cosmology Chapter 18 Cosmology Cosmology is the study of the structure and evolution of the Universe as a whole How big is the Universe? What shape is it? How old is it? How did it form? What will happen
More informationPreface. Out for no reason this universe came to be Out of a place to be, this universe filled itself Rumi vii
Preface Out for no reason this universe came to be Out of a place to be, this universe filled itself Rumi 1207 1273 Many cultures throughout the history including the Greeks, ancient Egyptians, Indians,
More informationDark Matter and Energy
Dark Matter and Energy The gravitational force attracting the matter, causing concentration of the matter in a small space and leaving much space with low matter concentration: dark matter and energy.
More informationObserving the Night Sky. Observing the Night Sky. Observing the Night Sky. Observing the Night Sky. Observing the Night Sky. Chapter 29 THE UNIVERSE
Hewitt/Lyons/Suchocki/Yeh Conceptual Integrated Science Constellations are groups of stars named over antiquity. A familiar constellation is Ursa Major, the Great Bear. Chapter 29 THE UNIVERSE The monthly
More informationCosmic Inflation and Energy Conservation of the Universe
Introduction and relevance Many cosmologists simply state that energy conservation is a local statement, based on Einstein s theories 1. The current universal model (Lambda-CDM) uses dark energy (Lambda)
More informationCosmology & Culture. Lecture 4 Wednesday April 22, 2009 The Composition of the Universe, & The Cosmic Spheres of Time.
Cosmology & Culture Lecture 4 Wednesday April 22, 2009 The Composition of the Universe, & The Cosmic Spheres of Time UCSC Physics 80C Why do scientists take seriously the Double Dark cosmology, which says
More informationLecture 37 Cosmology [not on exam] January 16b, 2014
1 Lecture 37 Cosmology [not on exam] January 16b, 2014 2 Structure of the Universe Does clustering of galaxies go on forever? Looked at very narrow regions of space to far distances. On large scales the
More informationLecture notes 20: Inflation
Lecture notes 20: Inflation The observed galaxies, quasars and supernovae, as well as observations of intergalactic absorption lines, tell us about the state of the universe during the period where z
More informationwhat scientist believe happened to form the universe, and it is called the Big Bang Theory.
Schjelderup 1 Ari Schjelderup David Schaffer PHYS-1040-009 10/30/11 The Big Bang Theory When I was a little girl I asked my mom how long god had been around. She told me he had been around forever. When
More information