N.T.S. 092I/07W N, W. On behalf of. DOT Resources Ltd. SUITE TH AVENUE SW CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 0T8.

Transcription

1 TECHNICAL REPORT ON A MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR DOT RESOURCES LTD. S DOT PROPERTY MERRITT, BRITISH COLUMBIA NICOLA MINING DIVISION N.T.S. 092I/07W N, W On behalf of SUITE TH AVENUE SW CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 0T8 June 22 nd, 2009 Report prepared by: Ronald James Robinson P. Geol.

2 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS: This report was prepared by Ronald James Robinson of Aurora Geosciences Ltd. Jim Robinson P. Geol., is a principal of Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. He is a qualified person as defined by the Canadian Securities Administrator s National Instrument He has over 24 years experience conducting and supervising base and precious metal mineral exploration and mining projects and over nineteen years experience in producing and supervising the production of mineral resource estimates and mineral reserve documents on numerous deposits and deposit types in western Canada. He is a member in good standing with the NWT / Nunavut Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists (Member #1662). He is also a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada. The author visited the Dot Property on November 6 th,7 th and 8 th, I, Ronald James Robinson of 3506 McDonald Drive, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, hereby certify that: 1. I am presently employed by Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada as a consulting geologist. 2. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia (1985) and hold a B.Sc. degree in geology. I have been employed in my profession by various mining and consulting companies since my graduation. I have produced and supervised the production of mineral resource estimates and mineral reserve documents on numerous deposits and deposit types for the past nineteen years. 3. I am a qualified person for the purposes of National Instrument I am a member of the Northwest Territories Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists, and Geophysicists. 5. I visited the Dot Property on November 6 th, 7 th and 8 th, 2008, for the purposes of examining the surface access to the property, any workings, showings and significant outcrops, and to examine, study and sample the stored core. 6. I have had no involvement with nor in the Dot Property prior to the preparation of this report. 7. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.4 of National Instrument I have read Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, National Instrument and Form F1, and the Report has been prepared in compliance with this Instrument and that Form.

3 9. I am responsible for the preparation of the complete Report. 10. As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Report that is not reflected in the Report, the omission or addition of which would make the Report misleading. 11. This certificate applies to the NI compliant technical report titled TECHNICAL REPORT ON A MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR DOT RESOURCES LTD.'S DOT PROPERTY, MERRITT, BRITISH COLUMBIA dated June 22, 2009 Dated at Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, this 22 nd day of June, Signed R. J. Robinson, P. Geol.

4 Table of Contents SUMMARY Introduction and Terms of Reference TERMS OF REFERENCE RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION LOCATION CLAIM STATUS ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ACCESS PHYSIOGRAPHY INFRASTRUCTURE HISTORY EXPLORATION AND DRILLING** NORTHWEST ZONE SOUTHEAST ZONE COPPER ZONE LOWER VIMY ZONE GEOLOGICAL SETTING REGIONAL GEOLOGY PROPERTY GEOLOGY ALTERATION DEPOSIT TYPE PORPHYRY DEPOSIT GENETIC MODEL (after Seedorff et al., 2005) PORPHYRY DEPOSITS AND PORPHYRY-STYLE MINERALISATION IN THE GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH MINERALISATION AND STRUCTURE MINERALISATION STRUCTURE EXPLORATION DRILLING...41

5 11.0 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH SURFACE SAMPLING SUBSURFACE SAMPLING SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS AND SECURITY DATA VERIFICATION ADJACENT PROPERTIES MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES MODELING PROCEDURES BLOCK MODELLING OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGES...73 List of Figures FIGURE 1 DOT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP... 8 FIGURE 2 CLAIM LOCATION MAP: NORTHERN HALF... 9 FIGURE 3 CLAIM LOCATION MAP: SOUTHERN HALF...10 FIGURE 4 NORTHWEST ZONE DRILL HOLE COLLAR LOCATIONS...18 FIGURE 5 SOUTHEAST ZONE DRILL HOLE COLLAR LOCATIONS...22 FIGURE 6 GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY...27 FIGURE 7 GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH GRAVITY PROFILE...28 FIGURE 8 DOT PROPERTY GEOLOGY...29 FIGURE 9 POTASSIC ALTERATION...31 FIGURE 10 STRUCTURALLY RECONSTRUCTED GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH...35 FIGURE 11 CHALCOPYRITE AND NATIVE COPPER MINERALISATION...37 FIGURE 12 BORNITE MINERALISATION...39 FIGURE 13 STRUCTURAL CONTROL ON ALTERATION AND MINERALISATION...40 FIGURE 14 REGIONAL DEPOSITS AND MINERAL OCCURRENCES...49 FIGURE 15 ISOMETRIC VIEW OF THE FOUR MINERALISED ZONES ON THE DOT PROPERTY WITH DRILL HOLES AND TOPO OVERLAY...55 FIGURE 16 ISOMETRIC VIEW LOOKING NORTH SHOWING LOCATIONS OF ALL FOUR ZONES IN SPACE...56 FIGURE 17 3D MODEL -- LOOKING NORTH...57

6 FIGURE 18 ALL DRILLHOLES...58 FIGURE 19 TOP VIEW OF BLOCK MODEL SHOWING COPPER, SOUTHEAST AND EAST ZONES...61 FIGURE 20 CROSS SECTION THROUGH BLOCK MODEL AT 560N -- BLOCKS COLOURED ACCORDING TO COPPER EQUIVALENT VALUES...62 FIGURE 21 LONGITUDINAL SECTION VIEW OF SOUTHEAST ZONE BLOCK MODEL LOOKING WEST - NOTE EAST ZONE IN FOREGROUND...63 FIGURE 22 LONGITUDINAL SECTION THROUGH SOUTHEAST ZONE AT 250 EAST WITH COPPER EQUIVALENT VALUES POSTED (LOOKING WEST)...64 FIGURE 23 POINT CLOUD VIEW OF BLOCK MODEL WITH POINT COLOURS CORRESPONDING TO COPPER EQUIVALENT VALUES...65 List of Tables TABLE 1 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE SUMMARY TABLE... 3 TABLE 2 CLAIM STATUS...11 TABLE 3 MINERALISED INTERSECTIONS IN NORTHWEST ZONE DRILLHOLES...19 TABLE 4 MINERALISED INTERSECTIONS IN SOUTHEAST ZONE DRILLHOLES...23 TABLE 5 MINERALISED INTERSECTIONS IN COPPER ZONE DRILLHOLES...24 TABLE 6 ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF ECOTECH AND CANTECH LABS...44 TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH COPPER DEPOSITS (after McMillan, 1985)...47 TABLE 8 METALLURGICAL TESTING: ACID BOTTLE ROLL TEST...50 TABLE 9 SPECIFIC GRAVITY DETERMINATION CERTIFICATE...53 TABLE 10 SPECIFIC GRAVITY SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS...53 TABLE 11 LIST OF SUSPECT COLLAR LOCATIONS...59 TABLE 12 VARIOGRAM MODELLING PARAMETERS...60 TABLE 13 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE...67 TABLE 14 INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES ON THE DOT PROPERTY AT VARIOUS LOW-CUT GRADES...69 Appendices APPENDIX 1 DRILL HOLE CROSS SECTIONS

7 's Dot Property SUMMARY Exploration for porphyry-type copper mineralisation has occurred in the southern area of the Guichon Creek batholith for over 90 years. High-grade copper mineralization was mined shortly after the discovery of the Northwest and Lower Vimy showings by means of two short adits worked between 1920 and The discovery of historic Cu±Ag±Mo±Au showings located south of Gypsum Lake in the area of the Dot Property fuelled a resurgence in land acquisition and exploration in the area since the 1950 s. This exploration includes numerous Induced Polarization and Total field Magnetic geophysical surveys, geochemical soil surveys, and geologic investigation, trenching, and drilling programs over a number of assumed structural targets. The Dot Property covers three significant and undeveloped zones of Cu+Ag+Mo±Au mineralisation including the Northwest, Southeast, and Copper Zones, as well as the smaller, low grade zone, the Lower Vimy Zone, and a newly described, high-grade zone northeast of the Southeast Zone, called the East Zone. Exploration remained limited until the discovery of the Highland Valley Porphyry district in the central Guichon Creek Batholith. After that discovery, the entire batholith was the focus of much exploration; however it was not until the 1980 s that significant mineralisation was delineated on the Upper Vimy, or Northwest Zone. Lawrence Mining Corp. (1981) and Zappa Resources Ltd. (1992) delineated and significantly increased the possible mineral resource of the Northwest Zone through extensive reverse circulation and core drilling programs. In 1996, Alhambra Resources Ltd. discovered the Southeast Zone by drill testing an IP anomaly that extended along strike southeast of the Northwest Zone. The Copper Zone was discovered during stepout drilling conducted by Alhambra Resources Ltd. in A non-ni compliant inferred historical resource estimate of 9.8 million tonnes at 0.46% Cu was calculated after the 1997 drilling, incorporating all drill results obtained to that time. This historical estimate was not prepared by independent Qualified Persons, nor had any of the information contained therein been audited by an independent Qualified Person. The Historical Estimate does not conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ( CIM ) standards of reporting pursuant to requirements under National Instrument As a result, the author wishes to clarify that before the block modeling and resource estimation exercise described later in this report, there were no mineral resources and no mineral reserves on the Dot Property as such terms are defined under National Instrument The mineralised zones occur in strongly altered and steeply dipping northwest-trending fault zones that cut Highland Valley phase granodiorite and Border phase quartz diorite. Potassic alteration is pervasive and is recognized across the property. Argillic alteration is pervasive within the fault zones that host mineralisation. Phyllic and propylitic alteration is fracture and vein controlled. Copper sulphide and oxide mineralisation is disseminated and fracture and vein AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [1]

8 's Dot Property controlled in all zones. Elevated Cu+Ag+Mo+Au grades correlate with increased fracture density and silicification associated with zones of intense phyllic alteration. In 2006, Alhambra Resources Ltd. conducted a ground geophysical program on the property. This work consisted of 21.0 kilometres of IP, Total Magnetic Field, and VLF-EM surveys centred about the Northwest and Southeast Zones to correlate known mineralisation with modern survey results and delineate future targets. These surveys identified a number of additional targets and vectors for additional exploration, which were followed up by additional geophysical surveying, diamond drilling and a limited mapping and sampling program in 2007 / The geophysical surveys outlined two weak chargeability anomalies located northwest of the known zones of copper mineralisation. In addition, the VLF-EM survey located two zones that are interpreted to be either zones of disseminated sulphide mineralisation or structures which could contain copper mineralisation. The diamond drilling was completed to verify historical mineralised intersections reported prior to 2001, to test the strike and depth extent of the copper mineralisation in the Northwest, Copper and Southeast Zones and to test IP anomalies in the Vimy Zone. A total of 3,097.4 m of NQ size core drilling was completed in 14 diamond drill holes. In 2008, Aurora Geosciences Ltd. was contracted to review all work done to calculate historic mineral resource estimates, reinterpret the findings of those historic exploration programs, construct a new deposit model for the property, calculate a new mineral resource inventory or confirm historically reported resources, and report those resources in a format fully compliant with National Instrument standards. The results of that mineral resource inventory study comprise this report, and highlights are summarised below in Table 1. In order to expand the resource base and improve the confidence in the stated resources, the following recommendations should be considered. Continue the geophysical exploration program to delineate more anomalies and to better define those already known. A diamond drill program should be carefully designed and conducted in the Northwest Zone to confirm historical drill results in that area. This program should attempt to duplicate some of the higher grade intersections reported in the 1981 and 1992 drilling. Drill several holes between the Lower Vimy Zone and the newly discovered high-grade East Zone to see if they are contiguous. If time and funding allow, it would be reasonable to drill several holes on geophysical anomalies outside the known zones in an attempt to expand the resource base, in addition to continuing to carrying out additional geophysical surveying on less well-explored regions of the property. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [2]

9 's Dot Property ZONE MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE DOT RESOURCES LIMITED, DOT PROPERTY, MERRITT, BC MODELLED AND CALCULATED BY R. J. ROBINSON P.GEOL. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. MAY 13, 2009 COPPER EQUIVALENT GRADE RANGE (%) TONNAGE (TONNES) COPPER GRADE (PERCENT) SILVER GRADE (G/TONNE) GOLD GRADE (G/TONNE) MOLY GRADE (PERCENT) COPPER EQUIVALENT GRADE (PERCENT) COPPER ZONE 0.2 -> ,200 INFERRED > , > , > , > , > , > , > 0.6 2, Sub Total 519, SOUTHEAST ZONE 0.1 -> , INDICATED > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , Sub Total 5,352, SOUTHEAST ZONE 0.1 -> , INFERRED > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , Sub Total 2,322, EAST ZONE > 0.7 2, INFERRED 0.7 -> , > 0.8 1, > , > 0.9 1, > , > , Sub Total 32, TOTAL ALL ZONES INDICATED 5,352, TOTAL ALL ZONES INFERRED 2,873, TABLE 1 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE SUMMARY TABLE AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [3]

10 's Dot Property 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE This NI compliant report was prepared for to review all work done to calculate historic mineral resource estimates, reinterpret the findings of those historic exploration programs, construct a new deposit model for the property, calculate a new mineral resource inventory or confirm historically reported resources, and report those resources in a format fully compliant with National Instrument standards. The Dot Property is located 25 kilometres north of Merritt, B.C. in the Nicola Mining Division and consists of 49 contiguous mineral claims over prospective Cu±Ag±Mo±Au porphyry intrusive rocks of the Guichon Creek batholith. The Guichon Creek batholith is host to the Highland Valley Deposits which include many past producers and the Lornex and Valley Copper mines controlled by Highland Valley Copper. Though the Vimy showings were sporadically mined beginning in the 1920's, it wasn't until the discovery of the Highland Valley porphyry deposits in 1956 that the southern Guichon Creek batholith became a target of rigorous exploration. Historic work has included ground geophysical surveys, specifically IP and Magnetic surveys, geochemical surveys, geologic investigation, trenching and drilling. Much of this work was submitted for assessment and is available through the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines. Recent exploration includes the following programs. Total Magnetic Field, Induced Polarization, and Very Low Frequency Electromagnetic geophysical surveys were completed over the Northwest and Southeast Zones between October 17 th, 2006 and November 24 th, A surface geological mapping and outcrop sampling program, ground Time Domain Induced Polarization/resistivity ("IP"), Total Field Magnetometer and Very Low Frequency Electromagnetic ("VLF-EM") geophysical surveys and a diamond drilling program were conducted during the period October 14 th 2007 to February 15 th, A total of 9.35 kilometres of Induced Polarization surveying, 132 kilometres of magnetic surveying and 132 kilometres of VLF-EM surveying were completed, as well as a total of 3,097.4 m of NQ size core drilling in 14 diamond drill holes. 1.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE This report was prepared for (DOT) of Calgary, AB. This document is a technical evaluation of recent exploration results and historical data pertaining to the Dot Property. The Dot Property comprises 49 contiguous mining claims which cover 4803 acres of prospective copper porphyry intrusive rocks. This report reviews and summarizes all exploration work completed prior to March of 2008 as well as detailing the deposit modelling and mineral resource estimation project carried out between November, 2008 and March of AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [4]

11 's Dot Property This report was prepared by Jim Robinson of Aurora Geosciences Ltd. Mr. Robinson is a principal of Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. He is a qualified person as defined by the Canadian Securities Administrator s National Instrument He has over 24 years experience conducting and supervising base and precious metal mineral exploration and mining projects and over nineteen years experience in producing and supervising the production of mineral resource estimates and mineral reserve documents on numerous deposits and deposit types in western Canada. He is a member in good standing with the NWT / Nunavut Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists (Member #1662). He is also a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada. The author visited the Dot Property on November 6 th,7 th and 8 th, RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS This report is based on reviews and summaries of the previous work with the caveat that a great deal of the older data were only available in paper map and chart format prior to their being digitised in The assay data is available for all 1981, 1992, 1996, and 1997 diamond drill holes and 1992 reverse circulation drill holes. Assays from percussion drilling completed in 1981 are only available in summary drill sections. Lithologic, alteration, and assay data collected in 1996 and 1997 and from the recent 2007 / 2008 drill program is used to validate the results of 1981 and No original data exists for the 1981 drilling aside from hand drawn drill sections and partial assay data, some of which exists only as summarized intervals. It should be noted that all previous reports were written by independent third parties with no direct interest in or benefits accruing from the property. The primary source of data used in this report is the technical report prepared for Alhambra Resources Ltd. By Gary Vivian and Dave White of Aurora Geosciences Ltd. (AURORA) (Vivian et.al., 2007). This was a NI compliant report prepared to collect, examine, verify and summarize all unpublished data that had been submitted for assessment purposes and government geological reports, and to report and discuss the results of a geophysical surveying program conducted in All documents examined in that report were prepared by persons holding a minimum of a post-secondary degree in geology or related fields and as such the reports were considered accurate. The primary disclaimer from the author preparing this report results from not having personally collected a great deal of original data. This author has however, had ongoing direct communication with other principals and employees of Aurora Geosciences who supervised or carried out the geological and geophysical exploration programs in 2006, 2007 and 2008, and who prepared the technical report in I was able to observe lithologies that outcrop on the property, view historic and recent drill collar locations, and observe and sample drill core and cuttings stored in Merritt, BC during my visit to the property on November 6 th,7 th and 8 th, AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [5]

12 's Dot Property The results of all drilling completed on the property before 2006 have been compiled and checked in a previous technical report (Vivian et. al. 2007). Historic drill logs and sections were examined and cross-checked with assay certificates. Assay procedures, certifications and accreditations were investigated and verified. Many of the historic drill collars have been verified in the field by GPS. Assay results are mostly complete for the 1992, 1996, 1997, and 2007 / 2008 drill programs. Assay results for diamond drill holes completed in 1981 are presented in Wells (1981); however, certified results of the percussion drilling completed in that program are not present. As it was not possible to confirm the results of that program, those results have been disregarded in this study. Results documented in previous reports have been confirmed from scanned images of original assay documents as stored in the BC minfile database. EcoTech Labs and Assayers Canada have ISO 2002 accreditation. Cantech Laboratories no longer exists. All three labs had or still have well- regarded national reputations, and have been used extensively by the mining industry. This writer has communicated extensively with the authors of the 2007 technical report (Vivian et. al. 2007), as well as the author of the assessment report documenting the most recent diamond drilling program (Stewart, 2008). Through these discussions, examination of the historical documents, examination of the historical core stored on the property and an examination of the surface workings on the property, this writer is convinced that the data used in this resource estimate analysis are true and valid for the purposes used. The principles and practices used to confirm and verify the results and data used in this report are documented in more detail in Section PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 3.1 LOCATION The Dot Property is located in south-central British Columbia, Canada and falls on NTS map sheet 092I/07W. It is centred about 50 20'00" N latitude and '00" W longitude or E, N (UTM NAD 83, zone 10N). The claim group lies in the Nicola Mining Division and covers copper-gold mineralisation approximately 20 kilometres southeast of the Highland Valley porphyry copper district (Figure 1). The Craigmont Mine site is located approximately 12 kilometres south-southwest of the property along the access road to the property. Further north along this road, the Aberdeen Mine site adjoins the southern limit of the property. The western limit of the property is a small group of eight claims identified as the Bob 1-8 claims (Figures 2, 3) and covers the northern extent of Broom Creek. The eastern limit of the claims extends east of Guichon Creek sub-parallel to highway 97C. The location of known mineralised zones and mine workings (Lower Vimy and Aberdeen Showing) with respect to outside property boundaries are shown in Figure 1. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [6]

13 's Dot Property 3.2 CLAIM STATUS The Dot Property consists of 49 contiguous mineral title units with a combined area of 1,944 hectares (Figures 2, 3). These claims have been staked and registered by the standards set forth in British Columbia by the Gold Commissioner Office and remain in good standing at least until March, The status and details of these claims are presented in Table 2. DOT currently holds 100% interest in the property. To the best of his knowledge, the author is not aware of any outstanding terms pertaining to royalties, back-in rights, payments or other encumbrances as outlined in any relevant legal documentation. To the extent known, this property is currently free of all environmental liabilities. Permits required from the British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum in order to initiate any next stages of exploration include: (i) Notice of Work Mineral and Coal Application, and (ii) Application for a License to Cut Timber. At the time of report preparation these permits have not been obtained for any work to be completed in ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY The property is located at an approximate elevation of 1075 metres on the southeast slope of Gypsum Mountain. Gypsum Mountain has a peak elevation of 1546 metres. The property extends to Guichon Creek at an elevation of approximately 930 metres near the eastern limit of the property. Property topography is moderate. Much of the central area of the property covers a terrace midway up the mountain where the elevation varies from 1000 metres at the south end of the claim block to 1375 at the northern end. An esker ridge traverses the northern half of the property; a small tributary to Broom Creek cuts the southwestern portion of the claims. 4.1 ACCESS The Dot Property is located 50 kilometres south of the city of Kamloops and 25 kilometres north of Merritt, BC. It is accessed by all weather roads from Merritt or Kamloops via the Craigmont Mine site and Aberdeen Mine Road. Highway 97C running between Merritt and Logan Lake falls within the eastern claim boundary for most of the length of the property. Mobility about the property is facilitated by unmaintained logging roads that remain in good condition. 4.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY The property is located east of the Cascade Mountains and south of the Highland Valley in the Thompson Plateau physiographic region of BC. Most of the property is covered by windfall of dense stands of Lodgepole Pine. Spruce and Fir grow in at lower elevations to the southeast and in localized areas of greater moisture. Broom and Guichon Creeks AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [7]

14 's Dot Property FIGURE 1 DOT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [8]

15 's Dot Property FIGURE 2 CLAIM LOCATION MAP: NORTHERN HALF AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [9]

16 's Dot Property FIGURE 3 CLAIM LOCATION MAP: SOUTHERN HALF AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [10]

17 's Dot Property Tenure Number Tenure Type Claim Name Owner Map Number Good to Date Status Mining Division Area (Ha) Tag Number Mineral DOT II (100%) 092I /aug/18 GOOD NICOLA Mineral DOT V (100%) 092I /aug/24 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT VI (100%) 092I /aug/24 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /nov/18 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 29A (100%) 092I /mar/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 30A (100%) 092I /mar/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 31A (100%) 092I /mar/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 32A (100%) 092I /mar/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 1-A (100%) 092I /mar/12 GOOD NICOLA Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/12 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/12 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/12 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/12 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/12 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT (100%) 092I /mar/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/28 GOOD NICOLA Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/27 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/28 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/28 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/28 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /apr/28 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /may/08 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /may/08 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 13A (100%) 092I /oct/05 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 14A (100%) 092I /oct/05 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 19A (100%) 092I /oct/05 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 20A (100%) 092I /oct/05 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /mar/03 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /mar/03 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DON (100%) 092I /mar/11 GOOD NICOLA Mineral SPOT (100%) 092I /mar/24 GOOD NICOLA Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral BOB (100%) 092I /apr/30 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral DOT 36A (100%) 092I /jul/11 GOOD NICOLA M Mineral (100%) 092I 2013/nov/17 GOOD Mineral (100%) 092I 2013/oct/09 GOOD Mineral (100%) 092I 2013/aug/16 GOOD Mineral (100%) 092I 2013/mar/11 GOOD Mineral (100%) 092I 2013/mar/03 GOOD Mineral DOT (100%) 092I 2013/may/13 GOOD Mineral (100%) 092I 2013/apr/30 GOOD TABLE 2 CLAIM STATUS AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [11]

18 's Dot Property cross the property from north to south sub-parallel to the western and eastern property boundaries respectively. The property is also traversed by numerous small seasonal and year round creeks. Two small lakes are located in the north-eastern quadrant of the property. Glacial overburden covers much of the property. Scattered outcrops of granodiorite are present to the north and west of the property at higher elevations. The climate is typical of the southern interior with an average annual precipitation of 30cm. Temperatures in the summer can reach 35 C and plunge to -40 C in the winter. Snow covers the property from mid November to May. 4.3 INFRASTRUCTURE Woven plastic bags of drill cuttings from the 1981 percussion drilling program as well as core drilled during the 1996, 1997 and 2007 / 2008 drill programs is stored in a secure, locked yard at Jackson's Welding in Merritt, BC. This core can be accessed with the permission of, and by arrangement with a representative of Jackson s Drilling. After 10 years of outdoor storage, the condition of the older core has been moderately compromised; however, much of the core is still competent and represents an excellent visual record of the results presented from the 1996 and 1997 and 2007 / 2008 exploration programs. The woven poly bags containing the percussion drill cuttings are badly weathered and the cuttings are of little scientific or technical use. 5.0 HISTORY Chalcocite was first recognized at the Aberdeen Mine site, located approximately 1500 metres to the south of the Southeast Zone, in Small shipments of copper grading 7% were shipped in 1916 and 1917 (Sanguinetti, 1972). Exploration and limited mining on Gypsum Mountain northwest of the Dot Property began in Two short adits were driven on small shear zones 450 metres west of Chataway Lake at Roscoe Creek. The Upper and Lower Vimy showings were sporadically mined between 1920 and 1927 (Sanguinetti, 1972). A shaft was sunk at the Upper Showing to a depth of 50 metres with a crosscut at the bottom that intersected a chalcopyrite-, bornite-, hematite-mineralised shear zone (Meyer, 1968). Mineralisation was described as sporadic and discontinuous. The Lower Vimy showing was the target of stripping, drilling, and two short adits. The adits were driven into small high-grade lenses of chalcopyrite, bornite, and copper carbonate in narrow shears (Meyer, 1968). In 1956 and 1957 Northwest Explorations Limited stripped and drilled the main showings and potential extensions with poor results. The discovery of the Bethlehem Property to the north in Hidden Valley sparked renewed interest in the area. In 1956 the Chataway Mining Syndicate staked a block of claims centred about the Roscoe showing. In 1962 Chataway Exploration Co. Ltd. conducted exploration that included AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [12]

19 's Dot Property prospecting, geophysical and geochemical surveys, stripping and diamond drilling. Significant copper-bearing mineralisation, referred to as Zone 04, was exposed by trenching south of Gypsum Lake, approximately three kilometres northwest of the Northwest Zone on the Dot Property. This showing was optioned by Bralorne Pioneer Mines Ltd. in Additional exploration which included stripping, diamond and percussion drilling, and a geophysical survey (Induced Polarization), delineated a low tonnage, high grade mineral occurrence deemed uneconomical at the time (Meyer, 1968). A total of 57 diamond drill holes totalling 3,999 metres and 20 percussion drill holes totalling 3,097 meters were completed on Zone 4 by the end of Work in 1968 by Chataway Exploration Co. Ltd. and Bralorne Pioneer Mines Ltd. included geological mapping, surveying, sampling, geochemical and geophysical (Induced Polarization) surveys, and limited trenching. No new mineralised occurrences were identified and it was determined that all existing showings were sub-economic. Asarco completed 148 percussion holes totalling 5,166 metres on a 610 metre grid (Wells, 1981). The exact location the Asarco drilling is unknown; however, it is assumed to related to the Zone 04 occurrence and therefore to the northwest of the Dot occurrences (Norman, 1992, held by Alhambra Resources Ltd.). Lawrence Mining completed an Induced Polarization and Magnetometer survey to the north and south of the existing occurrences and geophysical survey grids. Coincident magnetic lows and chargeable anomalies were drilled by percussion and diamond drilling methods. A total of 20 diamond drill holes (3,400.5 m) and 30 percussion drill holes (2,301.2 m) were completed between May and October of Core from this program was stored on the property (Wells, 1981). This drilling identified what is presently known by as the Northwest Zone. An additional three diamond drill holes were completed by Lawrence Mining in 1982 west of the Aberdeen Mine site. Zappa Resources Ltd. completed six reverse circulation drill holes totalling metres to further delineate the Northwest Zone to a strike length of 255 metres and to a depth of 100 metres. All six holes intersected copper-bearing mineralisation that graded from 0.33% to 0.91% Cu (Norman, 1992). A preliminary non-ni compliant historical estimate of 2.93 million tonnes grading 0.5% Cu was reported (Norman, 1992). This historical estimate was not prepared by independent Qualified Persons, nor has any of the information contained therein been audited by an independent Qualified Person. The historical estimates do not conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") standards of reporting pursuant to requirements under National Instrument Zappa Resources Ltd. also contracted Westcoast Biotech of Vancouver to conduct preliminary metallurgical testing; results of this work indicate copper sulphide/oxide mineralisation at the Dot Property is amenable to heap leaching (Norman, 1992). In 1996 and 1997 Alhambra Resources Ltd. discovered two new zones of copper mineralisation, the Southeast Zone and adjacent Copper Zone, both of which are along strike to the southeast of the Upper Vimy occurrence. These two zones were tested with 16 diamond drill holes totalling metres in 1996 and five diamond drill holes totalling 1290 metres in Based on copper mineralisation delineated by this drilling and historical drilling, Alhambra used the Inverse AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [13]

20 's Dot Property Distance Squared method to estimate a non-ni compliant historic estimate of 9.8 million tonnes grading 0.46% Cu (Stewart, 1997). This Historical Estimate was not prepared by independent Qualified Persons, nor has any of the information contained therein been audited by an independent Qualified Person and therefore should not be relied upon. In the fall of 2007, spring 2008, carried out a program of surface mapping, sampling, geophysical surveying (IP, Mag and VLF-EM) and diamond drilling. A total of 9.35 kilometres of Induced Polarization surveying, 132 kilometres of magnetic surveying and 132 kilometres of VLF-EM surveying were completed. The diamond drilling was completed to verify historical mineralized intersection reported prior to 2001, to test the strike and depth extent of the copper mineralization in the Northwest, Copper and Southeast zones and to test IP anomalies in the Vimy zone. In 2007 / 2008 DOT Resources drilling in the Lower Vimy and found no significant mineralization except very narrow low grade copper. A total of 3,097.4 m of NQ size core was completed in 14 diamond drill holes. 5.1 EXPLORATION AND DRILLING** ** All resource estimates (inferred or other) presented in Sections 5.1 through 5.5 are considered Historical Estimates as defined by the NI The Historical Estimates were not prepared by independent Qualified Persons, nor has any of the information contained therein been audited by an independent Qualified Person. The Historical Estimates do not conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") standards of reporting pursuant to requirements under National Instrument The most important mineralised zones reported on in the historic literature are: the Northwest (Upper Vimy) Zone, Southeast Zone, and Copper Zone. The Lower Vimy Zone is significant in that is it a past producer; however little is known of early exploration related to this occurrence and it has not been the focus of more recent exploration except for two drill holes that intersected narrow zones of low-grade mineralisation in the 2007 / 2008 exploration program (Stewart, 2008). Documented exploration on the Dot Property has been sporadic since the 1920's. Previous work conducted on the Dot Property up to the discovery of the Northwest or Upper Vimy Zone was often part of exploration of semi-regional focus. Beginning in 1965, much exploration work including geophysical, geochemical, geological investigation, and later drilling began to target the Northwest, or Upper Vimy Zone. In 1965, Bralorne Pioneer Mines Ltd. conducted magnetometer (Minfile 00737), Induced Polarization (Minfile 00764), and geochemical surveys (Minfile 00749) over ground presently included in the Dot Property. The magnetometer survey recognized anomalous magnetic lows proximal to the Lower Vimy occurrence. These features were attributed to volcanic rocks, but no follow up work was recommended on these anomalies. The geochemical survey showed anomalous copper values that correlated with copper mineralisation at the Zone 4 showing and related IP anomalies, but nothing which supported mineralisation in the Northwest or Southeast zones. There were many AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [14]

21 's Dot Property missed sample locations within these zones which may have had an adverse effect on the geochemical interpretation. An IP survey conducted over the winter of 1965 for Bralorne Pioneer Mines Ltd. identified three anomalous zones coincident with the current Northwest and Southeast zones and extending southwest to the Aberdeen Mine. A magnetometer survey conducted in 1972 for Aselo Industries Ltd. identified magnetic lows associated with fault and shear zones coincident with intense alteration that hosts copper mineralisation at the Lower Vimy occurrence. Two other linear magnetic low trends identified to the east of the Vimy occurrence were interpreted to be caused by structural disruption and alteration (Minfile 04056, Minfile 04043). In 1979, Lawrence Mining Corp. conducted an IP survey near the Lower Vimy showing. The purpose of this survey was to delineate previously identified chargeable anomalies to greater depth. The survey showed a weakly anomalous chargeable zone striking northwest and extending to depth. This zone was open to the northwest extending to the Lower Vimy occurrence and to the southeast (Minfile 07494). In 1981, Lawrence Mining Corp. conducted a soil sampling survey and drilled two percussion drill holes to the southwest of the Aberdeen Mine site. The geochemical soil survey identified two anomalous trends to the southwest of the Aberdeen Mine and further work was recommended. The drill holes were collared to test coincident magnetic and IP anomalies. This drilling intersected copper values generally less than %; the anomalies were explained by elevated magnetite concentrations in the host granodiorite (Minfile 09187). There is reference to additional exploration documented in historic reports including: 30 drill holes (3,652m) proximal to the Northwest and Southeast zones and Lower Vimy occurrence by Kennco Exploration; 148 percussion holes (5,166m) by Asarco in 1970; 50 holes (3,658m) between completed by Chataway Exploration Co.; 24 holes (1,696m) completed by Bralorne Pioneer Mines Ltd. in the mid 1960's. Because of the lack of suitable references, and point-form descriptions provided in many of the historic reports, the author has been unable to confirm the exact location of this exploration. It is the author's interpretation that most of this exploration was focussed on, and adjacent to, the Zone 04 occurrence that is currently covered by the Chataway 1-A claim group located 2100 metres northwest of the Northwest Zone. Exploration conducted on the property in 2006 included ground Induced Polarization, VLF EM and Total Magnetic Field surveys. These surveys were centred on the Northwest and Southeast Zones. The exploration program of included ground Induced Polarization, VLF EM and Total Magnetic Field surveys, again centred in the area of the Northwest and Southeast Zones. The geophysical surveys outlined two weak chargeability anomalies located northwest of the known zones of copper mineralisation. In addition, the VLF-EM survey located two zones that are interpreted to be either zones of disseminated sulphide mineralisation or structures which could contain copper mineralisation. In addition to the geophysical surveying, fourteen AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [15]

22 's Dot Property diamond drill holes were completed comprising 3,097.4 m of NQ size core drilling. The diamond drilling was completed to verify historical mineralised intersections reported prior to 2001, to test the strike and depth extent of the copper mineralisation in the Northwest, Copper and Southeast Zones and to test IP anomalies in the Vimy Zone. The following summary for the three main work areas will provide the reader with a comprehensive overview in order to evaluate future work proposals. The majority of the text in this section relies heavily on analysis and interpretations of Meyer, W., Norman, G.E., Stewart, G., and Wells, R.A. compiled from exploration reports submitted between 1968 and Historical work is summarized from: Ground Magnetometer and Induced Polarization geophysical surveys, geochemical soil sampling, and geologic mapping is summarized from Meyer (1968); 50 diamond drill holes are summarized by Wells (1981); 6 reverse circulation drill holes and preliminary metallurgical testing and resource calculation is summarized by Norman (1992); 21 diamond drill holes and updated preliminary resource calculation is summarized in Stewart (1996, 1997); Ground Induced Polarization, Magnetometer, and VLF-EM surveys completed in 2006 are described by Vivian et al. (2006); and geological mapping, Ground Induced Polarization, Magnetometer, and VLF-EM surveys, and 14 diamond drill holes completed in 2007 / 2008 are described in Stewart (2008). All reports chronologically build on previous work and direct focus from a property scale to the Northwest and Southeast Zones and record general geophysical and geochemical exploration techniques to diamond drilling to delineate the most prospective targets. 5.2 NORTHWEST ZONE The Northwest Zone (historically identified as the Upper Vimy occurrence) defines a northwest trending and steeply to sub-vertical northeast dipping structural zone of altered granodiorite containing disseminated, fracture and vein controlled native copper, chalcocite, bornite, chalcopyrite, and malachite mineralisation (Figure 12). This zone has been traced by surface trenching and drilling to extend more than 270 metres along strike with a width of up to 55 meters (Norman, 1992). This zone has been tested to a depth of approximately 200 meters. This zone remains open along strike and down dip. Zappa Resources Ltd. calculated a geologic resource of 2.93 million tonnes at 0.5% Cu (1992) based on 34 drill holes. Alhambra Resources Ltd. completed two additional drill holes in the Northwest Zone in 1996 and using the Inverse Distance Squared method estimated a 1.29 million tonne copper resource at 0.56% Cu (1997). Metallurgical testing conducted in 1992 indicates that the oxide/sulphide mineralisation present in the Northwest Zone is amenable to heap leaching. This zone shows potassic, phyllic, argillic, and propylitic alteration typical of porphyrystyle systems. Potassic and argillic alteration may be pervasive or fracture controlled. Phyllic alteration occurs as localized silica flooding and quartz veins in association with coarse-grained sericite along vein contacts. The hanging wall of the Northwest Zone is AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [16]

23 's Dot Property generally defined by unaltered and unmineralised granodiorite while the footwall is defined by a lack of mineralisation but the persistence of potassic±argillic alteration. Many of the drill holes completed in the Northwest Zone were terminated in altered rock. Bornite and chalcopyrite are the most abundant copper-bearing hypogene sulphides. The presence of malachite, chalcocite, and native copper are interpreted as supergene mineralisation. Disseminated native copper shares a close spatial association with chalcocite and petrographic analysis supports localized secondary mobilization sourced from chalcocite (Norman, 1992). Native copper also occurs in fractures and quartz veins and may also be related to supergene enrichment or a secondary pulse of mineralisation. The presence of malachite, chalcocite, specular hematite mineralisation and strong hematite alteration supports the interaction of oxidized fluids with hypogene mineralisation. The highest copper grades are associated with silicification, both flooding and veining, where values may reach 6-10 percent copper as in hole 92RCD-03 (39.62m to 42.67m). Mineralisation is locally concentrated along a north-northeast trending structure that intersected the zone between holes and and and (Norman, 1992). The collar locations and surface traces of the drill holes of the Northwest Zone are shown in Figure 4, below. Highlights of mineralisation intersected in the Northwest Zone are summarized in Table 3, also below. * IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING DRILLHOLE INTERSECTION TABLES: Several of the reports from which the drill hole intersection tables contents were extracted purport the indicated widths to be true widths. This author has carefully examined the drill data in relation to the best available model of the mineralised zone and has concluded that many of the holes were drilled down dip and /or along the strike of the zone. The widths shown in tables 3, 4, and 5 should be considered core widths and not true widths. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [17]

24 FIGURE 4 NORTHWEST ZONE DRILL HOLE COLLAR LOCATIONS [18]

25 's Dot Property Hole Number Width (m)* Cu (%) RCD RCD RCD RCD RCD RCD C C n/a DOT-07-NW DOT-07-NW DOT-07-NW TABLE 3 MINERALISED INTERSECTIONS IN NORTHWEST ZONE DRILLHOLES AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [19]

26 's Dot Property 5.3 SOUTHEAST ZONE The Southeast Zone (Figure 5) was discovered in 1996 by drill testing a large IP anomaly to the southeast of the Northwest Zone and is interpreted as the southeastern extension of the Northwest Zone. This zone is defined exclusively by drilling and has been traced approximately 450 metres along strike, 100 metres in width, and to a depth of 175 metres. Sufficient drilling has not been completed to link this zone with the Northwest Zone, but it remains open along strike to the southeast and down dip. Copper- and lesser silver-, molybdenum-, and gold-bearing sulphide and oxide mineralisation occurs within a northwest trending fault zone in altered granodiorite that has been intruded by granitic aplite dykes. Bornite is the predominant copper sulphide with minor amounts of chalcopyrite. As in the Northwest Zone, native copper occurs as thin platy fracture fillings and in quartz veins. Gold and silver are tied up in copper sulphides. Stewart (1996) suggests that gold mineralisation increases along strike to the southeast. Gold assays are greater in the southeastern half of the zone; however anomalous gold values are sporadic and this hypothesis must be tested with additional drill holes. Gold mineralisation does strongly correlate with copper-bearing sulphide mineralisation that grades more than 0.5% Cu; however, Cu assays greater than 0.5% Cu do not strongly correlate with elevated gold grade, so gold concentration is being controlled by more than purely copper-sulphide concentration. Data presented in the historic drill logs is not complete enough to speculate on the cause of elevated gold mineralisation at the southern end of the Southeast Zone. Molybdenum-bearing mineralisation is fracture controlled and not related to copper mineralisation Stewart (1996). Hole and are the deepest holes on the property and together with intersect molybdenum mineralisation in steeply dipping veins at approximately 150 meters from the surface (Stewart, 1996). Weak to strong potassic alteration is the most prevalent alteration in this zone and is overprinted by various intensities of phyllic, argillic, and propylitic alteration. Potassic alteration is pervasive and may be more directly related to aplite dykes that have intruded the granodiorite; three of these dykes have been intersected in Aplite dykes may be important indicators of and related to the source of mineralisation on the Dot Property and related to regional scale episodic dyke emplacement is contemporaneous with the Bethlehem intrusive phase. The Bethlehem deposit, South Seas and Krain occurrences to the north are associated with a swarm of north-trending dykes and related breccias. These north-trending and younger northwest-trending dykes represent late-stage intrusions sourced from the Bethlehem intrusive phase and Bethsaida intrusive phase respectively and are related to the first major period of ore formation (McMillan, 1985). The stress regime which resulted in north to northwest trending peripheral dyke emplacement in the northern half of the batholith likely resulted AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [20]

27 's Dot Property in south to southwest trending peripheral dyke emplacement in the southern half of the batholith. Such dyke trends are well documented about the Dot Property. Phyllic alteration is recorded by pervasive silicification and quartz veins which commonly show coarse-grained sericitisation. Argillic alteration is fracture controlled and locally pervasive with the most intense alteration occurring at fractures, faults and strongly brecciated zones. Pervasive argillic alteration may completely alter feldspar and mafic minerals to clay resulting in a powdery white appearance. Chloritic alteration, related to phyllic, argillic and propylitic alteration coats facture planes, forms veinlets and alters mafic minerals. The Southeast Zone is offset from the Northwest Zone by a presumed dip-slip fault. This fault strikes approximately 030 and dips steeply to the southeast. Normal dextral dip-slip motion is inferred from the right lateral offset of mineralisation and a thinning of the overburden on the footwall block adjacent the fault (96-08). Drill holes that intersect the fault surface (96-13 and 96-05) show numerous brecciated zones and intense argillic alteration. Alhambra Resources Ltd. estimated a non-ni compliant 8.54 million tonne inferred copper resource for the Southeast Zone using the Inverse Distance Squared method (Stewart, 1997). Highlights of mineralisation intersected in the Southeast Zone are summarized in Table 4. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [21]

28 's Dot Property AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [22] FIGURE 5 SOUTHEAST ZONE DRILL HOLE COLLAR LOCATIONS

29 's Dot Property Hole Number Width (m)* Cu (%) 96C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C DOT-07-SE DOT-07-SE DOT-08-SE DOT-08-SE DOT-08-SE DOT-08-SE TABLE 4 MINERALISED INTERSECTIONS IN SOUTHEAST ZONE DRILLHOLES 5.4 COPPER ZONE The Copper Zone (Figure 13) is located approximately 100 metres west of the Southeast Zone. This zone is unique in that it contains predominantly native copper as disseminations and fracture coats. Seven diamond drill holes have been completed in this zone. The mineralisation is projected approximately 140 meters along strike and has an apparent width of 68 meters. The mineralised zone has been drilled to a depth of 130 meters and remains open at depth. The zone is terminated to the north by an hypothesized NE trending, steeply dipping fault, and weakens to the south as shown by several holes completed in the 2007 /2008 program. The character and continuity of the Copper Zone northwest of the fault intersected in hole has yet to be tested. Highlights of mineralisation intersected in the Copper Zone are summarized in Table 5. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [23]

30 's Dot Property Hole Number Width (m)* Cu (%) 97C C C DOT-08-CU-01 9 DOT-08-CU TABLE 5 MINERALISED INTERSECTIONS IN COPPER ZONE DRILLHOLES Due to the presence of native copper, determination of the actual copper grade is difficult due to the nugget effect of the native copper. A discrepancy in assay results presented from two geochemical labs using unique analytical techniques is summarized in section An increase of 1% Cu across 12 meters in hole supports the need for re-analysis of all samples previously submitted from holes 97-02, 97-04, This work may greatly increase the overall tonnage and grade currently delineated in the Copper Zone and demonstrates the importance of supergene and remobilized copper mineralisation peripheral to the Northwest and Southeast Zones in determining the resource potential of the Dot Property. 5.5 LOWER VIMY ZONE The Vimy Zone occurs about 200 meters east of the Northwest Zone and has been traced by previous exploration on the surface for approximately 100 meters. It is estimated to be about 25 meters wide. Based on historical information, the occurrence has been subjected to stripping, little drilling, and has had two short adits driven on small high grade lenses of chalcopyrite, bornite and copper carbonates in narrow shears (Meyer, 1968). Diamond drilling during the 2007 / 2008 program encountered only thin intervals of weak mineralisation. 6.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING The Dot Property is located in the Intermontane Belt. The Intermontane Belt is a linear allochthonous morphogeological belt that extends the length of central British Columbia from Washington to Yukon and is flanked by the Crystalline Belt and the Omineca Belt to the west and east, respectively. The belt is comprised of a number of terranes of volcanic, sedimentary, and granitic rocks. These include: 1) Devonian to early Jurassic sedimentary and (1a) volcanic rocks formed in island arcs and chert-rich accretionary complexes; 2) Middle Jurassic to early Cenozoic volcanic rocks formed mainly in continental arcs and (2b) marine and non-marine clastics eroded from the uplifting Omineca Belt; and 3) Devonian to Cenozoic granitic rocks AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [24]

31 's Dot Property deformed by compression and subduction to the west during the Mesozoic and extensiontranstension during the early Cenozoic (Monger, 2002). The geologic terranes of the Intermontane Belt are generally of sub-greenschist metamorphic facies. 6.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY The Quesnel Terrane is a volcanic arc terrane that is found along most of the length of the Canadian Cordillera. It is the westernmost of three regional domains that contain distinct facies and assemblages. This terrane is dominantly represented by Middle and Upper Triassic volcanic and sedimentary rocks assigned to the Takla Group in northern and central British Columbia and to the Cache Creek and Nicola groups in the south (Figure 6). These rocks are locally overlain by Lower Jurassic to Middle Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rocks and are intruded by several suites of Late Triassic through Early Jurassic plutons such as the Guichon Creek batholith (Schiarizza, 2003). Late Triassic-Early Jurassic intrusive rocks are a prominent and economically important component of the Quesnel Terrane. These include both calc-alkaline and alkaline plutonic suites, as well as Alaskan-type ultramafic-mafic intrusions. The Guichon batholith intrudes sedimentary and volcanic strata of the Mississippian to Triassic aged Cache Creek and Upper Triassic aged Nicola groups and is unconformably overlain by sedimentary and volcanic strata ranging in age from Lower Jurassic to Middle Tertiary including: Triassic Nicola Group volcanics, metasedimentary rocks of the Lower/Middle Jurassic Ladner and Jurassic/Cretaceous Relay Mountain groups, Lower/Middle Cretaceous Jackass Mountain Group sedimentary rocks and Middle/Upper Cretaceous Spences Bridge Group volcanic rocks. Along the eastern contact of the batholith the Nicola Group rocks are described as an eastern facing succession of calcalkaline, mainly plagioclase-phyric andesitic flows and breccias, with lenticular interlayers of limestone and bedded volcaniclastic rocks. Local exposures of dacite and rhyolite flows, welded tuff and breccia, and intercalated intermediate to felsic heterolithic volcaniclastic rocks represent felsic centers (Moore and Pettipas, 1990). Volcanic (dominantly intermediate, locally felsic and mafic), volcaniclastic (pyrolcastic and sediments), and sedimentary (chert-grain sandstone, conglomerate, minor shale) rocks of the Middle and Lake Cretaceous Spences Bridge Group are exposed at the southwestern contact of the batholith (Minfile Map 092ISW, 1993). Regional metamorphosed rocks include: Carboniferous to Jurassic Cache Creek Complex melanges, Permian to Lower Cretaceous Bridge River Complex and ultramafic rocks, and Upper Triassic Nicola Group metavolcanic rocks. Locally metamorphosed rocks adjacent to the batholith include hornblende plagioclase gneiss, schist, quartzite, and hornfels that occur in a metamorphic halo up to 500 meters in width (Norman, 1992). AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [25]

32 's Dot Property The 198 ±8 Ma Guichon Creek batholith is interpreted to be subvolcanic; initial Sr87/Sr86 ratios are primitive indicating an island arc setting during emplacement. Early equigranular phases are interpreted to be mesozonal in contrast to younger and mineralised porphyritic phases which are interpreted to be epizonal and therefore intruded higher into overlying volcano-sedimentary pile. Based on present geometry and a gravity profile published in 1972 (Ager, et al., Figure 7), magma is interpreted to have intruded along intersecting basement structures and expanded northward and southward along a dominant zone of weakness (McMillan et al., 1985). Reactivation of these same basement structures syn- to post-plutonism can control fault patterns in the batholith and the distribution of younger volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks adjacent to the batholith. These basement structures are also interpreted to have controlled the distribution of late mineralised porphyry dykes and localized ore deposition (McMillan et al., 1985). The batholith is host to many phases with distinct mineralogical and textural characteristics. From oldest to youngest, these phases include the Border, Highland Valley (incl. Guichon and Chataway varieties), Bethlehem (incl. Skeena variety), and Bethsaida phases. The older phases occur at the margins of the batholith; the younger phases are concentrated at the core. Contacts between the phases are generally gradational and rarely chilled indicating that consecutive phases intruded prior to complete solidification of the host phase. Crosscutting contacts are observed between all phases. Periodic dyke emplacement commenced after the intrusion of the Bethlehem phase. This phase of intrusion is associated with the first major period of ore formation in the batholith. These dykes have textural and chemical affinities to the Bethlehem phase, and because they crosscut Bethlehem and older phases are interpreted to be a latestage volatile-rich and incompatible phase of Bethlehem plutonism (McMillan et al., 1985). The Bethlehem ore deposits and South Seas and Krain occurrences are associated with these dykes and related magmatic-hydrothermal breccias. Central to the batholith and to the south a series of north- to northwest-trending dykes are interpreted to be younger than the initial ore-bearing phase of the north. These dykes are coeval with Bethsaida phase plutonism or representative of younger more evolved magmas. McMillan (1985) suggests that the largest ore deposits in the batholith are associated with this event. Quaternary sediments occur as thick drifts along the main rivers and some of the larger creeks. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [26]

33 's Dot Property FIGURE 6 GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [27]

34 's Dot Property FIGURE 7 GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH GRAVITY PROFILE 6.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY Lithologies of the Guichon Creek batholith range from diorite at the margin through quartz diorite, quartz monzodiorite, and granodiorite at the core. The Dot Property is located near the southeastern margin of the Guichon Creek batholith and predominantly overlies Guichon Variety medium grained hornblende monzodiorite to granodiorite of the Highland Valley phase. This phase is intruded by coarser grained granodiorite and younger porphyry intrusive rocks, possibly of Chataway, Skeena, or Bethsaida affinity (Figure 6). Isolated occurrences of Tertiary volcanic rocks, correlative with the Kamloops Group, unconformably overlie intrusive rocks at the northern end of the property. This unit is a dark green to dark brown vesicular basalt that shows distinctive rusting on weathered surfaces. Aplite dykes are observed in drill core from the Northwest and Southeast Zones. The dykes are fine grained, leucogranitic in composition, and little- to un-altered. This unit is described in outcrop north of the Dot Property as a series of small dykes and stringers of random orientation that intrude most lithologies. They are documented to have no spatial relationship to mineralisation though they can be weakly mineralised where observed to the north (Meyer, 1968). On the Dot Property these dykes are spatially associated with copper mineralisation. Granodiorite and quartz monzonite underlie the western and northwestern portion of the property. This phase is a generally fine to medium grained, locally porphyritic, AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [28]

35 's Dot Property FIGURE 8 DOT PROPERTY GEOLOGY AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [29]

36 's Dot Property hornblende-bearing granodiorite that shows gradational contacts with adjacent Chataway Varity granodiorite. It may be correlative with the Skeena or Bethlehem phases mapped further to the north (Meyer, 1968). This unit is distinguished from the more mafic Border phase by a lighter colour and coarser texture. The contact of the Border phase and the Guichon Varity granodiorite is mapped southeast and east of the Northwest and Southeast Zones. On a regional scale the Border phase is a dioritic unit interpreted to be a hybrid melt contaminated by Nicola Group volcanic rock upon emplacement. Hornblende and lesser pyroxene are the most abundant mafic minerals and may represent 35% modal abundance. These mafic minerals are strongly altered to chlorite and little replaced by magnetite. A limonitic colour is a common feature of the weathered surface. Where the Border phase underlies the Dot Property it is quartz dioritic in composition and strongly resembles the Border phase as described by McMillan (1985). The Border phase diorite hosts xenoliths of Nicola volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks; local mixing of these two units has resulted in amphibolite to monzonitic zones. Locally, subangular pyroxene-bearing mafic-rich granitoid xenoliths can be so abundant as to form a pseudo-breccia texture (McMillan, 1985). 6.3 ALTERATION Alteration identified at surface and in drill core on the Dot Property supports at least two, and possibly three, generations of ore-bearing fluid emplacement. The northwest striking mineralised zones show a positive correlation with a strong argillic,potassic, hematitic, and lesser phyllic and propylitic alteration halo which may extend up to 200 meters from the mineralised zone. Locally, argillic alteration may replace up to 90% of the host rock to clay minerals interpreted to be fine-grained sericite and kaolinite leaving only primary and secondary quartz. Phyllic alteration includes silicification and sericitization of the host rock. Where sericite is present it is coarse-grained and occurs along fracture surfaces. Hematite is concentrated along fracture planes and possibly overprinting potassic alteration. Specular hematite is noted to be abundant in historic drill logs; however, most of the hematite observed during re-examination of drill core conducted in February of 2007 exists as a weak to intense staining of fracture planes and mineral crystal faces. This oxidizing event has thoroughly eliminated any magnetic minerals from the mineralised zones. HEMATITE Hematite alteration is concentrated on fracture planes and pervasively stains. It overprints all vein and fracture hosted mineralogy and pervasive potassic alteration adjacent to these features. Specular hematite is present in high-grade copper zones. Hematite appears to be a late overprinting and may be more closely related to late oxidized fluids related to regional meteoric fluid circulation in Cretaceous and Tertiary AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [30]

37 's Dot Property times or younger faulting events than to fluids associated with copper mineralisation. POTASSIC Pervasive and vein controlled potassic alteration is weak to strong and is spatially related to all phases of mineralisation. Pervasive alteration overprints potassic feldspar and plagioclase with weak to strong peach to pink secondary potassic feldspar and appears to be a preliminary phase of alteration. Pervasively potassic-altered rock in mineralised intervals is often brecciated and highly fractured. Vein controlled potassic alteration is concentrated along fracture planes and permeates from the fracture surfaces into the host rocks forming a halo of alteration about the fracture plane (Figure 9). This alteration may anneal fractures or replace host granodiorite. In some cases vein and breccia matrix may be entirely secondary potassium feldspar. PHYLLIC FIGURE 9 POTASSIC ALTERATION Silicification is sporadic across mineralised intervals; however, where present it is associated with strong copper-bearing sulphide mineralisation. Quartz veins or quartz flooding of the granodiorite is concentrated in fracture zones. Quartz veins commonly host sulphide mineralisation and show brecciated textures. Sericitization is weak and sporadic; significant concentrations exist along fractures as a flaky coating on fracture planes and pervasive alteration of entire feldspar grains adjacent to fracture surfaces. It may or may not be spatially associated with silicification but is always associated with intense clay alteration that is interpreted to be an end member of pervasive argillic alteration. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [31]

38 's Dot Property ARGILLIC Argillic alteration is fracture controlled and most intense along fractures, fault surfaces, and in strongly brecciated zones, but is pervasive across mineralised intervals. Altered intervals can be completely replaced to clay minerals interpreted to be fine-grained sericite and kaolinite resulting in a powder white appearance. PROPYLITIC The presence of clay minerals, carbonate, chlorite, and epidote alteration in the mineralised zones show propylitic overprinting. This semi-regional overprint could be related to porphyry systems to the north as far away as the Highland Valley area. Chlorite alteration coats fracture planes, forms veinlets and replaces mafic minerals. The Northwest Zone shows weak to moderate pervasive chlorite alteration of feldspar and mafic minerals and this alteration becomes stronger near the narrowing ends of the zone (Norman, 1992). Epidote shares a similar distribution with chlorite but is most common in the more mafic phases of the granodiorite and is spatially associated with carbonate and clay minerals. Any spatial association of this propylitic alteration with structural controls of copper-bearing mineralisation on the Dot Property is likely coincidental. 7.0 DEPOSIT TYPE Mineralisation hosted in the Northwest, Southeast, Copper, and Lower Vimy Zones of the Dot Property can be classified under a Porphyry-style genetic model. 7.1 PORPHYRY DEPOSIT GENETIC MODEL (after Seedorff et al., 2005) Porphyry deposits arguably represent the most economically important class of nonferrous metallic mineral resources. These magmatic-hydrothermal deposits are characterized by sulphide and oxide ore minerals in veinlets and disseminations in large volumes of hydrothermally altered rock (up to 4 km 3 ). Porphyry deposits occur within magmatic belts worldwide and are spatially, temporally, and genetically related to hypabyssal dioritic to granitic intrusions that are porphyritic and that commonly have an aplitic groundmass. The preponderance are Phanerozoic and most typically Cenozoic in age which reflects the dominance of magmatism related to subduction tectonics and preservation in young rocks. Porphyry deposits are grouped into five classes based of the economically dominant metal in the deposits: Au, Cu, Mo, W and Sn. For each porphyry class the major metal concentration is enriched by a factor of 100 to 1,000 relative to unmineralised rocks of a similar composition. The mass of porphyry deposits ranges over four orders of AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [32]

39 's Dot Property magnitude, with the mean size of a deposit ordered Cu > Mo - Au > Sn > W. Hydrothermal alteration is a guide to mineralisation because it produces a series of mineral assemblages both within the mineralised zones and extending into a larger volume (>10 km 3 ) of adjacent rock. The typically observed temporal evolution in porphyry ores is from early, high-temperature biotite±k-feldspar assemblages (potassic alteration) to muscovite±chlorite assemblages (sericitic alteration) to low-temperature, clay-bearing assemblages (advanced argillic and intermediate argillic alteration), which is consistent with progressively greater acidity and higher fluid-to-rock ratios of fluids, prior to their eventual neutralisation. Although advanced argillic alteration occurs relatively late in many deposits where it is superimposed on ore and potassic alteration, in the deposits where advanced argillic alteration (especially as quartz ± alunite) is preserved spatially above ore and commonly extending to the paleosurface, it can form early, broadly contemporaneous with potassic alteration. In contrast, assemblages of Na plagioclase-actinolite (sodic-calcic alteration) and albite-epidote-chlorite-carbonate (propylitic alteration) form from a fluid with low acidity and commonly lack ore minerals. Geologic, fluid inclusion, and isotopic tracer evidence indicate magmatic fluids dominate acidic alteration associated with ore, and non-magmatic fluids dominate sodic-calcic and propylitic alteration. Veins contain a large percentage of ore minerals in porphyry deposits and include high-temperature sugary-textured quartz veinlets associated with ore minerals and biotite-feldspar alteration and moderate-temperature pyritic veins with sericitic envelopes. The compositions of igneous rocks related to porphyry deposits cover virtually the entire range observed for present-day volcanic rocks. Mineralising porphyries are intermediate to silicic (>56 wt % SiO 2 ) and their aplitic textured groundmass represents crystallization as a result of abrupt depressurization of water-rich magma; however, small volumes of ultramafic to intermediate rocks, including lamprophyres, exhibit a close spatial and temporal relationship to porphyry ore formation in some deposits. The understanding of porphyry systems depends critically on determination of the relative ages of events and correlation of ages of events in different locations, which in part depends on exposure. Systems with the greatest degree and continuity of exposure generally have been tilted and dismembered by post-mineralisation deformation. Most porphyry intrusions associated with economic mineralisation are small-volume (<0.5 km3) dikes and plugs that were emplaced at depths of 1 to 6 km, though some were emplaced deeper. Deposits commonly occur in clusters above one or more cupolas on the roof of an underlying intermediate to silicic intrusion. Altered rocks extend upward toward the paleosurface, downward into the granitoid intrusion from which the porphyry magma and aqueous fluids were generated, and laterally for several kilometres on either side of a deposit. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [33]

40 's Dot Property 7.2 PORPHYRY DEPOSITS AND PORPHYRY-STYLE MINERALISATION IN THE GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH Previously recognized major porphyry Cu±Mo±Au±Ag deposits in the Guichon Creek batholith are clustered in the central part of the batholith; mineralisation is hosted in Bethlehem and Bethsaida phases and related dyke swarms and breccias. If displacement along regional faults is restored the deposits lie close to the surface projection of the batholith feeder zone. Porphyry deposits located at the core of the batholith are associated with dacite porphyry dykes and intrusive breccias (McMillan, 1985). Peripheral occurrences, most significantly the South Seas and Krain, are structurally controlled; mineralisation is hosted in intrusive breccias that cut Highland Valley and Bethlehem phases. In all cases, anomalous zones are commonly subtle. Overall sulphide content is low, and pyrite halos are poorly developed showing concentrations of less than 1%. The Highland Valley deposits to the north are generally classified as orthomagmatic in origin (McMillan, 1985). Most of the metal-bearing mineralisation is concentrated in hydrothermal solutions derived from more evolved younger phases of the batholith; metals are subsequently deposited in structural traps adjacent to subvolcanic source cupolas. McMillan (1985) suggests that depth and temperature of mineralisation can be inferred from a number of morphological features in the northern deposits including intensity of alteration. The deepest and hottest deposits are centered in the batholith, marginal to the youngest Bethsaida phase and the coolest deposits extend from the core to the margin of the batholith and are hosted in the older intrusive phases (Figure 8). This interpretation is supported in the southern half of the batholith. The TDM, Zone 04, Buck, and Aberdeen occurrences are all classified as porphyry-hydrothermal-epigenetic systems. The Zone 04 and Dot Property occurrences show many similarities with the Bethlehem deposit to the north. Within the Guichon Creek batholith, episodic dyke emplacement occurred after the intrusion of the Bethlehem phase. These dykes are predominantly oriented north/south and northwest/southeast. The first event is a series of dykes and related intrusive breccias of Bethlehem affinity that cut the Bethlehem and older phases and is associated with the South Seas and Krain deposits. This event represents the first major period of ore formation in the batholith. A younger event of Bethsaida phase affinity occurs as plugs and northwest/southeast-trending dykes. The largest copper deposits in the batholith were formed during or after this younger event (McMillan, 1985). Geologic mapping shows that porphyritic and fine-grained dykes are exposed north of the Dot Property and hole intersected native copper-bearing aplitic dykes beneath the Southeast Zone. Hydrothermal/porphyry copper mineralisation delineated on the Dot Property is herein classified as a structurally controlled end member of porphyry-style mineralisation. Mineralisation exposed at surface and in drill core is hosted in a number of subparallel AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [34]

41 's Dot Property steeply dipping fault and shear zones which consist of intensely silicified gouge, breccia and lesser carbonate intervals. Disseminated mineralisation exists in zones of structural deformation or peripheral to these zones and is dominated by native copper. Due to the lack of exposed rock, the extent of disseminated mineralisation is unknown. FIGURE 10 STRUCTURALLY RECONSTRUCTED GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [35]

42 's Dot Property 8.0 MINERALISATION AND STRUCTURE 8.1 MINERALISATION The Northwest and Southeast Zones are hosted in a northwest-trending structural zone of altered granodiorite. Disseminated, fracture controlled, and vein hosted copperbearing mineralisation includes native copper, chalcocite, bornite, chalcopyrite, and malachite. These features of mineralisation are common in porphyry systems. Highergrade copper mineralisation is associated with silicification where fracture density is high or where fractures show strong crosscutting relationships. The Copper Zone is host to predominantly native copper as disseminations and fracture coats and lesser disseminated chalcocite. Mineralisation in this zone appears to be related to supergene enrichment. Malachite is restricted to strongly oxidized intervals near the paleosurface; where mineralisation is intersected subjacent to tertiary overburden. It is strongly fracture controlled, commonly of massive habit along fracture surface coatings and rarely as subhedral habit where filling open fracture space. Native copper may be disseminated and spatially associated with chalcocite and platy in fracture fillings and quartz veins (Norman, 1992; Figure 11 Photo B). Copper associated with quartz veins may be remobilized or related to a younger phase of mineralisation. Disseminated copper occurs in oxidized granodiorite and aplite dykes intersected in the Southeast Zone. Massive chalcocite occurs as fracture fillings in oxidized intervals. Chalcopyrite is massive and occurs in veins, fracture fillings and coarse disseminations when associated with bornite and intense phyllic+argillic alteration (Figure 11 Photo A). Bornite is the most abundant copper-bearing mineral on the property. It occurs in veins of massive bornite or with smoky white quartz; in fracture fillings; and as coarse and fine disseminations when associated with strong phyllic+argillic alteration (Figure 12). Copper-bearing sulphide mineralisation is strongly associated with potassic±phyllic±argillic alteration. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [36]

43 's Dot Property FIGURE 11 CHALCOPYRITE AND NATIVE COPPER MINERALISATION AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [37]

44 's Dot Property 8.2 STRUCTURE At a regional scale, a framework of north and northwest striking structural zones host mineralisation. This trend is evident on the Dot Property as the Northwest (Upper Vimy) and Southeast zone, Lower Vimy Zone, the Copper Zone, and a number of copper occurrences are concentrated along structural breaks which trend north-northwest. These mineralised zones are interpreted to be locally offset by crosscutting northeast trending structural breaks, which on the Dot Property, show dextral offset. Many of the fault and shear zones that host mineralisation are interpreted to be older than mineralisation and therefore acted as conduits for mineralised fluids during at least two generations of reactivation as supported by crosscutting relationships in mineralised fractures. Reactivation of these faults can be caused by subsequent intrusive phases of the batholith. The mineralised northwest-trending structures dip steeply to the northeast in the both the Northwest and Southeast Zones. Geologic cross sections indicate that these features dip from 65 degrees to subvertical. The fault and shear zones show evidence for multiple generations of crosscutting fracture networks, displacement surfaces and brecciation (Figure 13). Many of these crosscutting features are mineralised. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [38]

45 's Dot Property FIGURE 12 BORNITE MINERALISATION AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [39]

46 's Dot Property FIGURE 13 STRUCTURAL CONTROL ON ALTERATION AND MINERALISATION AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [40]

47 's Dot Property 9.0 EXPLORATION As this report does not describe a current exploration program, all of the pertinent exploration programs and results have been reported in Section Five above on exploration history DRILLING As this report does not describe a current exploration program, all of the pertinent drilling programs and results have been reported in Section Five above on exploration history SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH 11.1 SURFACE SAMPLING Bulldozer trenching has exposed copper mineralisation in unaltered granodiorite at the northwestern end of the Northwest Zone. Zappa Resources sampled this location in SUBSURFACE SAMPLING Subsurface sampling as presented in the literature is predominantly the product of diamond drill core. There is mention of one adit on the Northwest showing and two adits on the Lower Vimy showing; however, there is no data pertaining to specific sampling practice or analysis. Each of the exploration programs completed in 1981, 1992, 1996 and 1997 were unique in terms of sample intervals, minerals assayed and analytical labs utilized. The author cannot verify the sampling techniques practiced by Lawrence Mining Corporation in 1981 as this core was not available during the November 2008 site visit. According to available literature sample intervals are generally one to two meters in length and a focused on mineralised intersections. Samples were constantly assayed for copper and silver. Gold and molybdenum analyses were performed on some intervals. Zappa Resources Ltd. completed six reverse circulation drill holes in The following sampling technique is summarized after Norman (1992). Samples were collected beneath a cyclone and split using a Jones Splitter into dry samples, collected in plastic bags, and wet samples, which were collected in perforated Hubco bags. A split sample of approximately 5 kilograms was shipped to Mineral Environments Laboratories (Assayers Canada) for assay purposes. Drill intersections recognized as copper-bearing intervals were assayed for total copper and non sulphide copper; a limited number of AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [41]

48 's Dot Property samples were assayed for native copper and intervals with no visible copper mineralisation were analyzed for copper by 31 element trace ICP. Sampling techniques practiced in the 1996, and 1997 exploration programs are not explicitly described in the literature. Inspection of the remaining core indicates that it was halved using a manual hammer splitter; one half submitted for analysis, the other returned in place to the core box. When comparing the quantity of mineralisation observed in the remaining core with the assay results for the same intervals it would appear that the core was sampled with little to no bias for mineralisation. Sample intervals in the 2007 / 2008 program were selected based on lithologies and intensity of alteration. The sample intervals generally were one and two metres and sample weights ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 kilograms respectively. The Cu, Ag, Au, and Mo assay results presented from these later exploration programs are deemed to be representative of mineralisation intersected during drilling. Sample intervals in 1996 were either one or three meters; the author is not aware of the specific criteria used to define a sample interval. Sample intervals in 1997 were exclusively three meters in length 12.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS AND SECURITY Samples collected during the 1981 exploration program, conducted by Lawrence Mining Corporation, were submitted to Kamloops Research and Assay Laboratory Ltd. Copies of the original assay certificates are included in the assessment report pertaining to that program (Wells, 1981). The author has no way of validating the authenticity of these results or the analytical process. Mineral Environment Laboratories (now Assayers Canada) analyzed core samples submitted by Zappa Resources Ltd. Copies of the original certificates of assay are included in the assessment report submitted to the Gold Commissioner Office in 1992 (Norman, 1992). A description of the analytical procedure as reported by Mineral Environments Laboratories is provided below. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE REPORT FOR ASSESSMENT WORK: PROCEDURE FOR 31 ELEMENT TRACE ICP Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Sb, Sr, Th, Ti, V, Zn, Ga, Sn,W, Cr and Geochemical Analysis Samples are processed by Min-En Laboratories, at 705 West 15th Street, North Vancouver, employing the following procedures. After drying the samples at 95 C, soil and stream sediment samples are screened by 80 mesh sieve to obtain the minus 80 mesh fraction for analysis. The rock samples are crushed by a jaw crusher and pulverized by ceramic plated pulverizer or ring mill pulverizer. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [42]

49 's Dot Property 0.5 gram of the sample is digested for 2 hours with an aqua regia mixture. After cooling samples are diluted to standard volume. The solutions are analyzed by computer operated Jarrell Ash ICAP or Jobin Yvon 70 Type II Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometers. Reports are formatted and printed using a laser printer. For geochemical Analysis samples are tested by Atomic Absorption (A.A.) techniques rather than the above ICP method. NON-SUL CU % - 3% sulphuric acid - Boil 30 minutes - Then AA finish COPPER OXIDE - 20% ammonium sulphate - AA finish NATIVE COPPER - 25% ammonium sulphate - Cold leaching for 3 hours - Then 20% ammonium acetate hot leaching - AA finish The results of the solution copper oxide = native copper SPECIAL CU LEACHING - Using 3% and 10% of H2SO4 - Leach for 3 hours - AA finish The following sampling technique is summarized after Stewart (1996). Samples collected in 1996 and 1997 were analyzed by EcoTech labs. Mineralisation intersected in 1997 consisted primarily of native copper. Ten of the samples collected in 1997 were submitted to two AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [43]

50 's Dot Property independent laboratories because of an apparent discrepancy in the visual copper content of mineralised intervals and the corresponding assay grades that were returned from the geochemical analysis. The first core samples collected were submitted to EcoTech Labs of Kamloops for analysis by standard metallic processes. The same core interval was then submitted to CanTech Labs of Calgary for analysis by a different method. The methods were not classified in the report, but are described. The EcoTech Labs procedure is described as: " crushing the sample and then splitting this sample several times until the sample weighs approximately 250 grams. This 250 gram sample is pulverized to 150 mesh and then screened to remove the coarse fraction (-150 mesh). The entire coarse fraction is weighed and then digested in an acid solution and analyzed for the copper content. The +150 mesh sample is weighed and mixed to homogenize the sample consistency. Approximately 1 gram of this sample is digested in acid solution and analyzed for copper content. The weights and grades of the individual samples are averaged to equate the percentage of copper for that sample." The procedure for analysis completed at CanTech Laboratories Inc of Calgary is described as " pulverizing the entire sample and then screening for metallic copper. The -150 mesh fraction was entirely digested in acid and analyzed for copper and two grams of the +150 mesh sample was digested and analyzed for copper and averaged as to weight and grade. The digestion time for the copper in these assays was twelve hours." Analytical techniques, detection limits, standards data used by EcoTech Labs for geochemical analysis in 1996 and 1997 is not included in the relevant reports nor is there any literature currently available from EcoTech Labs of Kamloops. This information is also not available for analysis completed by CanTech Laboratories Inc. in In both cases only the analysis certificates were included in the report. A comparison of the results from the two methods as presented by Stewart (1997) as listed below. SAMPLE NUMBER EcoTech Labs values (% Cu) CanTech Labs values (% Cu) TABLE 6 ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF ECOTECH AND CANTECH LABS AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [44]

51 's Dot Property Samples with predominantly copper-bearing sulphide mineralisation show similar assay results as in samples and Samples from core with high visual estimates of native copper (interval to inclusive) show 200 to 500 percent increase in copper grade (Stewart, 1997). EcoTech Labs and Assayers Canada are presently ISO certified companies. The sample preparation and analysis procedures carried out by EcoTech Lab on samples submitted during the 2007 / 2008 program are described as follows (Stewart, 2008). Sample preparation and analysis of the samples collected from the surface and diamond drilling program was completed by EcoTech Laboratories ( EcoTech ) located in Kamloops, British Columbia. Samples are prepared using a 2 stage crushing on a jaw crusher to 70% passing 10 mesh screen. A 250 gram sub-sample of the crushed material is pulverized on a ring mill to 95% passing minus 150 mesh screen. The sub sample is rolled and homogenized. After initially analyzing the samples on the ICP/MS all samples with greater than 1,000 ppm copper are re analyzed using the Aqua Regia Assay method. On the same set of samples, the 10 highest copper values are re-split and re-analyzed in triplicates using the Total Copper Assay method. In sample intervals where native copper was observed, metallic copper sample preparation and analysis were performed. For metallic copper analysis, rock samples are pulverized to 95% passing -140 mesh. The sample is weighed, rolled, homogenized and screened at 140 mesh. The -140 mesh fraction is homogenized and 2 samples are digested for a copper assay. The +140 mesh material is assayed entirely. The sample is digested with an Aqua Regia digestion and then analyzed by atomic absorption to grams/t detection limit. The values are calculated back to the original sample weight providing a net copper value as well as values and a single +140 mesh value. Gold analyses are completed on a 30 gram sample and a repeat sample is completed for every 10 samples. The samples are fused along with proper fluxing materials and the resulting bead is digested in Aqua Regia and analyzed by atomic absorption. Over-range values are reanalyzed using gold assay methods. (Detection limit 1-5 ppb AA) Eco Tech Laboratory Ltd. is registered for ISO by QMI Quality registrars (CDN ) for the provision of assay and geochemical analytical services. Eco Tech also Participates in The Canadian Certified Reference Materials Project (CCRMP) testing program annually and is independent of, and the Dot Property. The Quality Assurance, Quality Control program conducted by Aurora Geosciences for the 2007 / 2008 program consisted of inserting a series of blanks, duplicates and Reference Standards into the sample batches submitted to EcoTech for preparation and analysis. Reference Standards used are CDN-CGS-16 and CDN-CM-1 AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [45]

52 's Dot Property The process for non-destructive determination of sample density utilised by EcoTech to determine the density of the core samples collected for this Mineral Resource Estimate are summarised below. The weight of a dried core sample is determined in grams. The sample is immersed in molten wax and allowed to set. The wax-covered core sample is reweighed and the weight is recorded in grams. A counter balance is weighted and then the wax-covered core sample (which is attached to the counter-balance via a specific gravity apparatus) is completely immersed in a container holding RO water. The weight of the wax covered core sample is recorded in grams. The specific gravity is then calculated using the recorded measurements. Each batch of non-destructive specific gravity samples is repeated every 10th sample and a granite rock in-house standard is run with every job as a reference material DATA VERIFICATION The author was not involved in any of the design, management or implementation of any of the previous programs. The author has not undertaken any independent verification of the quantitative data that has been extracted from these reports, especially with respect to the various historical mineral resource estimates; therefore the author has not had an opportunity to verify any of the data accept to say all information was documented by suitable and qualified personnel. Additionally, all geochemical analyses were conducted by accredited laboratories utilising procedures, processes and equipment that was state of the art for the time. Diamond drill core was examined on-site to confirm the qualitative character of mineralisation and to verify logging accuracy. Drill logs were checked against drill sections and interpretations, and against assay certificates provided by the assayer. Assay certificates were checked against resource modeling databases to determine whether or not transcription errors or systematic inconsistencies were present. Block model design parameters and assumptions were all checked, reviewed, and verified. The work on the property has been carried out by reputable companies and there is no apparent reason to question the veracity of the reported results or information. The core from the later (1990's) drill programs is in moderate condition and stored in Merritt. Should there be a need to verify documented results the author recommends re-sampling some of the stored core and twinning two of the previously-drilled holes at random to properly verify the previous assay results. Successfully twinning the holes would also serve to verify historic drill intersections and reported mineralisation ADJACENT PROPERTIES The Nicola Mining Division area contains 191 recorded mineral occurrences. The most significant of these occur in the Highland Valley porphyry copper district located in the northcentral portion of the Guichon Creek batholith approximately 18 km northwest of the Dot AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [46]

53 's Dot Property Property. Two major past producing mines include Bethlehem (Minfile 092ISE001) and Highmont (Minfile 92ISE013). The Lornex (Minfile 092ISW045), JA (Minfile 092ISE149), and Valley Copper (Minfile 092ISW012) deposits are also located in the Highland Valley district (Figure 14). Figure 14 shows only a small number of the more significant deposits in the area surrounding the Dot Property. Resource estimates and locations with the Dot Property and Zone 04 for comparison are summarized in Table 7. Production from the Lornex Mine (092ISW045) and Highland Valley Mine (Valley Copper Minfile 092ISW012) were combined in 1987 and share a measured and indicated resource of 761 million tonnes of 8% Cu and 72% Mo. The O.K. (092ISW010), a past producer, contains approximately one million tonnes of ore grading 2.33 per cent copper and 11.6 grams per tonne silver in six zones. The Victor (092ISW005 - past producer) has possible reserves of tonnes grading 1.5 per cent copper. In 1985, the Highmont West (092ISW036) contained measured reserves of 21 million tonnes at 0.25 per cent copper and 7 per cent molybdenum. These deposits occur within the core (Bethsaida phase) of the Guichon Creek batholith. Numerous hydrothermal vein and shear-hosted showings and prospects have been discovered within the batholith and explored using mainly geophysical techniques. The Swakum Mountain area is noted for polymetallic skarn-type mineralisation, lead-zinc-silver bearing quartz veins and replacements, and polymetallic-precious metal quartz veins in Nicola Group rocks. Limited past production has been recorded at the Lucky Mike (092ISE027), Old Alameada (092ISE094) and Thelma (092ISE101). In the Stump Lake area Nicola Group rocks host numerous polymetallic-precious metal quartz veins (Enterprise (092ISE028), Joshua (092ISE109)) which have also received limited past production. Deposit Name Location Reserves* Grade Latitude Longitude (million tonnes) %Cu %Mo Relative Age Bethlehem Copper ' ' n/a Post Bethlehem, Pre Bethsaida Krain 50 35' ' Post Bethlehem Highmont 50 26' ' Late Stage Bethsaida J.A ,5' ' Late Stage Bethsaida Lornex ' Late Stage Bethsaida South Seas 50 32' ' n/a Bethlehem, Post Bethlehem Valley Copper ' n/a Late Stage Bethsaida Zone ' ' ** 1.26 n/a Undetermined Dot Property*** ' 9.8** 0.46 n/a Undetermined *includes mined ore and reserves **historic resource Non compliant ***includes Northwest and Southeast Zones only TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF GUICHON CREEK BATHOLITH COPPER DEPOSITS (after McMillan, 1985) A number of prospects occur adjacent the Dot Property. The Craigmont Mine (producer, Minfile 092ISE035) is located approximately 8 kilometres southwest of the Dot Property. The mine lies adjacent to the southern margin of the Guichon Creek batholith. Host rocks to massive, disseminated, and vein hosted magnetite, copper sulphides, and hematite mineralisation are calcareous sedimentary rocks of the Nicola Group comprised of limestones, limy tuffs, AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [47]

54 's Dot Property greywackes and argillites. The Craigmont Mine has proven reserves in excess of 1 million tonnes of magnetite. As of 2006, 33 million tonnes of ore had been mined. The Zone 04 (minfile 092ISE063) is covered by the Chataway 1-A claim group and lies adjacent the Dot Property to the northwest. This occurrence exists along strike of the Northwest and Southeast zones. The showing is underlain by Guichon and Chataway phases of the Guichon Creek batholith. Several lamprophyre and dacite porphyry dykes trend north-northwest and parallel regional faults and tensional features which host mineralisation. Copper mineralisation is hosted in a northwest striking and steeply west-dipping shear zone that is associated with strong porphyry-style alteration. A historic resource estimate of 293,000 tonnes grading 1.26% copper has been reported for the showing. The Buck showing (Minfile 092ISE065) is located 1.4 kilometres to the northeast and is currently unstaked. Structurally controlled disseminated copper sulphide mineralisation is described as hydrothermal and epigenetic. The Buck showing is located near the eastern border of the Lower Jurassic Guichon Creek batholith. The area between Guichon Creek and Cougar Creek south of Mamit Lake is underlain by mainly intermediate to mafic volcanic rocks of the Upper Triassic Nicola Group. These rocks are in contact with granodiorites to the north (Gump Lake phase) and to the west (Highland Valley phase). Approximately 1200 meters west of theshowing, the Nicola Group rocks are overlain by Eocene Kamloops Group volcanic flows. Early development of the showing included driving an adit and extensive cat trenching. The country rock in the area is dark, medium-grained gabbro (Guichon) cut by a few vertical, easttrending shear zones. The shears are 5 to 15 centimetres wide, up to 60 meters in length and carry chalcopyrite, pyrite and malachite mineralisation (Minfile 092ISE065). The TDM showing (Minfile 092ISE153) is located approximately four kilometres north of the Dot Property. This showing is located on the eastern flank of the Guichon Creek batholith. Disseminated native copper mineralisation occurs in Guichon phase granodiorite. Two major structural breaks that trend northeast and northwest occur on the property. The author has not verified the character of mineralisation on these properties; therefore, he cannot confirm that mineralisation at the aforementioned deposits is indicative of mineralisation described on the Dot Property. The data has been primarily summarized from the Government of British Columbia Minfile database and references therein. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [48]

55 's Dot Property FIGURE 14 REGIONAL DEPOSITS AND MINERAL OCCURRENCES AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [49]

56 's Dot Property 15.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING No recent mineralogical or metallurgical studies have been carried out on the Dot Property. In 1992 Zappa Resources Ltd. commissioned Westcoast Biotech to assess the chemical and biological leaching characteristics of the Northwest Zone oxide-sulphide-native copper bearing rock from the Dot Property. Westcoast Biotech concluded the Northwest Zone ore would be highly amenable to dump/heap leach process. The Metallurgical testing is summarized below by Norman (1992). The Dot Copper deposit contains both primary and secondary copper mineralization. Metallurgical testing was initiated to test for the viability of copper extraction by leaching techniques. Initial acid bottle roll test completed by MinEn Labs on samples from drill hole 92RCD-03 indicated that approximately 12% of the copper is nonsulphide copper (Table 8). ACID BOTTLE ROLL TEST Northwest Zone By Min En Labs for Zappa Resources Ltd Drill Hole Sample No. *Cu% **Cu% Nonsulph Cu% Total Cu% Native Cu % %Oxide Leached % Leached Total 92RCD RCD RCD Average * 10 gram sample, 100ml of 3% H2SO4-Leached for 3 hours ** 10 gram sample, 100 ml of 10% H2SO4-Leached for 3 hours TABLE 8 METALLURGICAL TESTING: ACID BOTTLE ROLL TEST Further metallurgical testing of Dot mineralization was initiated to determine if biological leaching would be a viable method of low cost copper extraction. In 1992, Gibraltar Mines located 60 kilometres north of Williams Lake tested biochemical leaching on a stock pile of lowgrade sulphide/oxide copper mineralization. At Gibraltar, 5,000 tons per year of high-purity copper cathode was produced from rock containing grading 0.15% copper. The process consists of heap leaching with sulphuric acid coupled with a solvent extraction plant and use of electro-winning to yield saleable copper cathodes grading 99.99% copper. The leaching process relies on bacteria (thiobacilus ferro-oxidans) that break down the sulphides within the rock. These bacteria occur naturally in sulphide mine waters and flourish under conditions of low acidity and moderate temperatures. The organisms eat away at the iron sulphides in the rock to liberate the copper by oxidation. A. Bruynesteyn of Westcoast Biotech was commissioned to assess the chemical and biological leaching characteristics of the Dot oxide-sulphide-native copper bearing rock from the Dot Property. Testing by Westcoast Biotech was completed on a composite sample obtained from mixing -200 mesh pulp material (25 mg.) from 25 samples taken throughout the Dot Copper Property. The average head grade of the sample was 0.48% total copper. The amount of AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [50]

57 's Dot Property copper leached with initial acid leaching tests was 7% or 39% which compares well with 38% average as shown in Table 11 for total nonsulphide copper within the deposit. Initial testing of the Dot copper material indicates that acid consumption of the ore in a dump/heap leach will be in the order of 17 kg/t. The 18.7 milligrams of copper leached from the 10.0 gram sample is probably readily acid soluble copper such as copper oxide but also may be partly chalcocite and native copper. The sulphide copper minerals include chalcocite-bornite and minor chalcopyrite. Thin section work by Vancouver Petrographics on samples taken from 92RCD-03 shows that sample ( metres) assaying 10.78% total copper contains at least 3-5% chalcocite (4.5% Cu) and 0.3% bornite/chalcopyrite whereas sample ( metres) assaying 1.73% total copper and 5% nonsulphide copper contains 5-7% bornite. 0.3% chalcocite and 0.1% chalcopyrite. Thewiderange of percentages indicates the variable content of the different sulphides, chalcocite and bornite, in the more sulphide rich portion of the deposit. Bruynesteyn states that chalcocite leaches rapidly (70-80% extraction in a 120 day period), but chalcopyrite leaches slowly. Bruynesteyn suggests bornite would leach relatively easily. Westcoast Biotech concludes the Dot ore will be highly amenable to dump/heap leach process with reservations about acid consumption. In that regard, Bruynesteyn recommended an inexpensive column test be carried out to determine acid consumption of 5cm. material. If acid consumption is favourable after 1-2 months, further testing of the column with bacteria leaching would commence. Column testing would require procurement of a representative sample of the deposit through further drilling. Continued metallurgical testing to ensure leachability of the mineralization tested in Northwest Zone is recommended. It was also recommended that preliminary work be conducted on the Southeast Zone. In order to procure a proper sample for column testing several large diameter holes may be necessary if sufficient quantity of core cannot be obtained from previous drilling. Because of the variability of oxide/sulphide ratios through the deposit, more than one column testing is warranted. Additional polished thin section work is required within the sulphide-rich zones to quantify percentages of leachable copper minerals MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES The author visited the Dot Property on November 6 th,7 th and 8 th, During the course of the property visit, he also had occasion to visit the facilities of Eco Tech Labs In Kamloops, BC. The author interviewed the lab manager to ascertain what standards of Quality assurance and quality control the lab currently employs, and what standards and procedures were followed in the past. This was important as Eco Tech has been the laboratory responsible for the analysis of core samples from the Dot Property for many phases of its exploration history. The author was able to determine that the lab currently follows acceptable modern QA/QC, sample handling and security protocols, and is of the opinion that it has done so in the past AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [51]

58 's Dot Property maintaining acceptable procedures as expectations and regulatory guidelines evolved through time. During the course of the property visit, the author was able to inspect the core storage facility in Merritt, the core and RC cuttings stored there, as well as the property itself. During his visit to the site, the author enjoyed the guidance and technical expertise of Mr. David White, a consultant and professional geologist employed by Aurora Geosciences Ltd., and a co-author of the most recent technical report on the property (Vivian, et al. 2007). A great deal of time was spent examining the stored core. The core was cross-checked with descriptions from historical reports, and with assay results to determine whether the descriptions and analytical results seemed plausible. The core in storage closely matched the descriptions in the reports and there is no reason to believe that the results reported in previous phases of exploration do not reflect what is seen in the core. A suite of core samples was collected and carefully described. These samples were selected to represent all phases and degrees of alteration and lithologies as well as all mineralised zones from the property to be modelled. These samples were described, bagged, tagged, labelled and hand delivered to Eco Tech Labs in Kamloops for nondestructive density analysis. The wax immersion non-destructive specific gravity method of density determination was selected due to the presence of varying amounts of clay alteration products and soluble solids in the core. The results of the specific gravity testing are shown below in Table 9. The descriptions of the selected core samples are also included below in Table 10. The author had hoped to correlate the various densities reported for the different core samples with some visible, physical property of the core described in the drill logs. To this end, the author evaluated the correlations of alteration type and pervasiveness, degree of mineralisation, and depth and physical source location of the core sample on the property. Unfortunately there does not appear to be any correlation between measured density of the core and any physical property of the rock described in the historic drill holes. On close examination of drill logs from different episodes of exploration for drill holes located in close proximity in space on the property there was found to be poor correlation or continuity between holes. The descriptions of the alteration, fracturing, competence and even colour of the rock vary wildly between adjacent holes. This is due either to the different perceptions and experience of the different workers on the property over time, or to the presence of structural controls on alteration and mineralisation not yet determined. For these reasons, a rough weighted average was calculated for specific gravity based on estimates of type and degree of alteration and amount of mineralisation across the property. The specific gravity of the mineralised, altered granodiorite modelled on the Dot Property was calculated to be 2.53 g/cm 3. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [52]

59 's Dot Property CERTIFICATE OF ASSAY AK SG QC DATA: ET #. Tag # g/cm 3 Repeat: Standard: 1 8R R SG R R R R R R R R R R ECO TECH LABORATORY LTD. 12 8R Jutta Jealouse 13 8R B.C. Certified Assayer TABLE 9 SPECIFIC GRAVITY DETERMINATION CERTIFICATE 16.1 MODELING PROCEDURES The resource modelling was performed utilising Gemcom s Surpac geology and mine modelling, design and analysis software. All of the deposit modelling, analysis, calculating and reporting was done using version of the software on a Dell Latitude D830 laptop computer. SAMPLE HOLE ROCK ALTN. DEPTH NUMBER NUMBER TYPE TYPE DESCRIPTION DENSITY 8R SE GDR AR PERVASIVE SI-ARG. STRONGLY ALTERED R SE GDR AR PERVASIVE SI-ARG. STRONGLY ALTERED R SE GDR AR LESS SILICEOUS, MORE CLAYEY, DUSTY, LESS IRON R SE GDR AR LESS SILICEOUS, MORE CLAYEY, DUSTY, LESS IRON R SE GDR UA CG, MINOR CP, MINOR SPHENE. WEAK K-ALTD F-SPAR R SE GDR UA MG, DK GRN-GRY. 1% SPHENE R SE Aplite UA FG, PINK. XTALS TO 1MM R NW GDR K INTENSE K-ALT.1% SPHENE, MINOR BO, MINOR HEM R NW GDR K AS ABOVE BUT WITH MORE HEMATITE R NW GDR AR INTENSE ARG ALT.1-2% BO.10% CHLORITE. CRUMBLED, CLAYEY DUST R NW GDR AR ASA ABOVE, BUT LESS STRONG ALTD R CU GDR AR MG GRN-GRY. 0-1% CU R CU GDR KA AS ABOVE BUT MORE K-AR ALTD 2.47 Average 2.53 TABLE 10 SPECIFIC GRAVITY SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [53]

60 's Dot Property The drill hole data were checked for internal consistency, typographic and transcription errors, sample or lithology overlaps, and data past the end of the hole. The data were then imported into the Surpac database. During the importing process, the software performs rigorous checks on the data to help ensure that only valid values are imported. Before modelling commenced, the data were translated into local grid coordinates. The point 0,0 in local coordinates corresponds to NAD 83 UTM coordinates E, N. The data were then rotated 35 clockwise around point 0,0 to make the strike of the mineralisation local grid north, and to facilitate the modelling process. All drill collar data was checked to ensure that there was consistency between the holes as well as agreement with digital terrain model data. It was determined early on that due to the poor correlation between drill holes and the lack of agreement between the drill collar survey information and the known geography in the Northwest Zone, it would not be possible to calculate a meaningful or defensible mineral resource for the that zone. Several more holes must be drilled in this area before adequate confidence exists to calculate a resource model. There should to be at least two new holes drilled in the vicinity of some of the higher-grade intersections from the 1981 program, especially those with no assay certificates or individual sample results available. In addition, it will be necessary to re-drill several of the 1992 holes to determine where, in fact those holes were drilled. In some cases, the collar locations plot more than 50 metres beneath the ground surface. See Table 11 below. It is not known whether this is due to a problem with the recorded elevations of the collars, or to a larger lateral offset. Drill holes in the Northwest zone appear to have poor survey control, and there were no logs from the reverse circulation holes to corroborate the reported assay values. It was necessary to discard almost all holes drilled in the Northwest Zone. The assay values for acceptable drill holes were composited down the drill holes and composite values greater than percent copper were used as the lower limit for the definition of mineralization. The minimum width for an intersection to be included was 3m. Cross sections were constructed perpendicular to the strike of the mineralised zones. Limits of mineralisation were digitised from the drill holes and composite intervals. The segments on each section were then connected between sections to build a 3D model of the mineralised zones. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [54]

61 's Dot Property FIGURE 15 ISOMETRIC VIEW OF THE FOUR MINERALISED ZONES ON THE DOT PROPERTY WITH DRILL HOLES AND TOPO OVERLAY AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [55]

62 's Dot Property AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [56] FIGURE 16 ISOMETRIC VIEW LOOKING NORTH SHOWING LOCATIONS OF ALL FOUR ZONES IN SPACE

63 's Dot Property AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [57] FIGURE 17 3D MODEL -- LOOKING NORTH

64 assay\ag assay\cu DOT RESOURCES LTD. Scale: 1: Date: AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. ALL DRILLHOLES ON DOT PROPERTY DOT PROPERTY, MERRITT, BC ISOMETRIC VIEW LOOKING NORTH May-09 SURPAC - Gemcom Software all_drillholes

65 's Dot Property HOLE NUMBER SUPPOSED COLLAR ELEVATION SURFACE ELEVATION AT COLLAR COORDINATES DIFFERENCE (METRES) TABLE 11 LIST OF SUSPECT COLLAR LOCATIONS An intersection table was created in the database and intersections of the drill holes with the various bounding 3D models were recorded. These intersections were then employed in a recursive modelling procedure. The composites were used to modify and define the 3D models, and the models were then used to define the limits of the compositing. Composites were created at two metre intervals with 75% set as the minimum sample amount required to define a composite. Composites were determined using the fixed length method. Non-assayed intervals in the drill holes were treated as zero value assays and were diluted appropriately. The 3D model was displayed with the drill holes and composites and checked to ensure that all selected intersections fell within the model, and that there were not excessively large blocks of low-grade material included. Separate 3-D models were constructed for the Southeast, Copper, Northeast and East Zones. The four models were carefully edited to ensure that they corresponded closely as possible to the information contained in the drill holes. The Northwest and Southeast Zones appear to strike at approximately 225 and dip steeply to the northeast at about 85. The bedrock-overburden contact was digitised for all the drill holes and a surface for the top of bedrock was constructed. This surface was also used to constrain the block model. The 3D models are shown in several different views in Figures 15, 16 and 17 above. Figures 15 and 16 show the relationship in space and the interpreted geometry of all four zones on the property. Figure 17 shows a zoomed in view of the Southeast, Copper and East Zones, which were the subjects of the resource estimation process. Figure 18 above shows the drill holes traces for all the holes drilled on the property from 1981 to The view in Figure 18 is inclined, looking down and towards the north. The hole traces are plotted with assay values for copper and silver shown along side the drill traces. On each hole trace, the copper values are plotted on the right side of the trace, and the silver values to the left. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [59]

66 's Dot Property 16.2 BLOCK MODELLING A block model was built to encompass the three mineralised zones to be included in the Mineral Resource Study. It extended 1300m north/south, 700m east/west, and 500m from top to bottom. The block size selected was 10m by 10m by 10m, as this is approximately one quarter of the nominal drill spacing. The model was then constrained by only including the blocks which fell within the previously-made 3D models, so as to only contain material from the mineralised zones. A statistical analysis was carried out on the assay values for each individual element in each separate zone. Frequency distribution graphs were plotted in order to determine the distribution characteristics of the assay values. For those data sets which displayed normal distributions, variogram modelling was carried out in order to determine whether or not anisotropy exists in the distribution of mineralisation. The deposit was found to display anisotropy, and the appropriate search ellipsoids and search parameters to be used in populating the block model were calculated. The results of the variogram modelling are shown in Table 12 below. These variogram results and search ellipsoids were applied when populating the block model. The model was populated using various estimation methods and parameters in an effort to create a model which most closely matched the observed distribution of the various metals in the drill holes. After each estimation pass, the block model was closely compared to the 3D model, the assay composites and the drill hole assay data. ELLIPSOID MAJOR:SEMI- MAJOR: ZONE ELEMENT NUGGET STRUCTURE SILL RANGE PLUNGE BEARING DIP MAJOR RATIO MINOR RATIO COPPER Cu Ag Au SOUTHEAST Cu Cu Ag Au TABLE 12 VARIOGRAM MODELLING PARAMETERS The results from applying Ordinary Kriging as an estimation method closely matched those resulting from the application of inverse distance squared estimation of grade distribution. It was not possible to employ variogram modelling on the molybdenum assays due to the statistically non-normal distribution of the assay values. It was also not possible to successfully statistically model the East Zone due to the small number of AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [60]

67 's Dot Property FIGURE 19 TOP VIEW OF BLOCK MODEL SHOWING COPPER, SOUTHEAST AND EAST ZONES AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [61]

68 's Dot Property AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [62] FIGURE 20 CROSS SECTION THROUGH BLOCK MODEL AT 560N -- BLOCKS COLOURED ACCORDING TO COPPER EQUIVALENT VALUES

69 's Dot Property AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [63] FIGURE 21 LONGITUDINAL SECTION VIEW OF SOUTHEAST ZONE BLOCK MODEL LOOKING WEST - NOTE EAST ZONE IN FOREGROUND

70 N 300N 400N 500N 800El 800El 900El 900El 1000El 1000El DOT RESOURCES LTD. Scale: 1: Date: AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. BLOCK MODEL SECTION 250E - LOOKING WEST DOT PROPERTY, MERRITT, BC COPPER EQUIVALENT VALUES May-09 SURPAC - Gemcom Software sect250_str_05

71 Dot Resources Ltd. Dot Resources Ltd.'s Dot Property AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [65] FIGURE 23 POINT CLOUD VIEW OF BLOCK MODEL WITH POINT COLOURS CORRESPONDING TO COPPER EQUIVALENT VALUES

72 's Dot Property intersections and samples taken. The non-normal distribution of assay values for molybdenum is due to the low concentration of metal in most parts of the deposit and the relatively small number of analyses carried out for this element. In many cases, the assay results for molybdenum are at or very near to the detection limit, resulting in a distribution curve skewed toward the positive, with no left side at all. Since the results for estimating the copper, silver and gold values by the two different methods agreed so well, it was felt that nothing was lost by performing inverse distance squared estimation for molybdenum, and Ordinary Kriging for copper, gold, and silver estimations. The East Zone which has only been pierced by two drill holes so far was not amenable to estimation by Ordinary Kriging. The block model in this zone was populated by the use of the inverse distance squared method. The same search ellipsoid was employed in the East Zone as it appears to have the same strike as the Southeast Zone. Figures 19 to 23 above show different views of the block model and are included to illustrate the geometry of the three zones included in the model, the distribution of the mineralisation within the zones and the various tools and displays available for interpretation and analysis of the block model. The equation used to calculate the copper equivalent is as follows: Cu EQ(%) = (Cu(%)* *$Cu) + (Ag(ppm)*215*$Ag) + (Au(ppm)*2158*$Au) +( Mo(%)* *$Mo) ( *$Cu) Where $Cu = $1.50/lb, $Ag = $14/oz, $Au = $975/oz and $Mo = $13.50/lb($9.00/lb Mo 2 O 3 ) Note: The resulting Cu. EQ. value assumes 100% recovery of all metals. As directed by DOT management, the author has used the commodity prices indicated above to calculate a preliminary copper equivalency (Cu EQ.) value. Commodity prices are constantly fluctuating and will be corrected by the Company from time to time. Note: the copper equivalency determined is, essentially, a semi-quantitative number in that it is not based on metallurgical studies and does not address metal recovery and a host of other production considerations. Table 13 below details the mineral resources estimated for each of the three zones, classified according to accepted CIM standards. The table lists tonnages and grades for copper, silver, gold, molybdenum and copper equivalent as described above for various low-cut values. The tonnages have been rounded to the nearest hundred tonnes according to best practice purposes, and some very minor discrepancies in addition and calculations may appear to arise from this. These discrepancies will result in no more than a difference of 50 tonnes from the values as originally calculated. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [66]

73 's Dot Property ZONE MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE DOT RESOURCES LIMITED, DOT PROPERTY, MERRITT, BC MODELLED AND CALCULATED BY R. J. ROBINSON P.GEOL. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. MAY 13, 2009 COPPER EQUIVALENT GRADE RANGE (%) TONNAGE (TONNES) COPPER GRADE (PERCENT) SILVER GRADE (G/TONNE) GOLD GRADE (G/TONNE) MOLY GRADE (PERCENT) COPPER EQUIVALENT GRADE (PERCENT) COPPER ZONE 0.2 -> ,200 INFERRED > , > , > , > , > , > , > 0.6 2, Sub Total 519, SOUTHEAST ZONE 0.1 -> , INDICATED > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , Sub Total 5,352, SOUTHEAST ZONE 0.1 -> , INFERRED > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , Sub Total 2,322, EAST ZONE > 0.7 2, INFERRED 0.7 -> , > 0.8 1, > , > 0.9 1, > , > , Sub Total 32, TOTAL ALL ZONES INDICATED 5,352, TOTAL ALL ZONES INFERRED 2,873, TABLE 13 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [67]

74 's Dot Property 17.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION The results from the 2007 / 08 drilling in the NW Zone were so contradictory to the previous results, and the previous results were so internally inconsistent that it was necessary to discard all the results from the NW Zone drilling until such time as there are better data with which to work. Collar locations given in previous exploration programs plot up to 60 metres below the surveyed surface elevation for eight of the historical holes. Combining this with the lack of QA/QC information for drilling completed prior to 1992 and the unacceptably poor correlations between results from different programs, I was forced to disregard all drill results in the NW Zone from before the 2007 / 2008 program. Those results on their own are not enough to enable this author to draw adequate conclusions as to the location, quality and quantity of mineralisation in this zone needed to justify a mineral resource in this zone INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS and companies before it have completed a significant amount of work on the Dot Property mineral occurrences in Southern British Columbia. Previous work has identified three significant and undeveloped zones of Cu+Ag+Mo±Au mineralisation including the Northwest, Southeast, and Copper Zones, as well as the smaller, low grade zone, the Lower Vimy Zone and a newly described, high-grade zone northeast of the Southeast Zone, called the East Zone. DOT Resources contracted Aurora Geosciences Ltd to review the exploration completed on the property to date, correlate historic drilling to more recent, NI compliant drill results, and produce a Mineral Resource Estimate for the property. Early in the resource estimate exercise it was determined that the historic drill results in the Northwest Zone were too internally inconsistent, and showed poor correlation to recent drilling. It was necessary to discount the historic drilling for the Northwest Zone, and it was not possible to include resources from that zone in the property estimate. Results from recent drilling correlated well with historic data in the other zones, and it was possible to include these data in the current mineral resource estimate. In examining the geometry of the mineralised zones, and interpreting the relationships between drill hole intercepts, it was determined that the best interpretation for the geometry of the Southeast Zone was that it strikes 325 o and dips at 85 o to the northeast. The Southeast Zone is open to the south, and still requires more drilling to delimit the extent of the mineralisation. One drill hole (96-16) ended in good mineralization, and should be followed up on. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [68]

75 's Dot Property The higher grade zone in north portion of the Southeast Zone comes very close to surface. Mineralization probably sub-crops under the overburden in the middle of the north end of the zone. Consideration should be given to trenching in this area to expose bedrock and allow sampling and mapping of the zone at surface. This would aid in improving the understanding of the deposit in several ways. Firstly it would allow a look at the mineralisation of the Southeast Zone in situ, and allow for larger samples to be taken for metallurgical testing. Additionally, there is thought to be a large fault cutting off the north end of the Southeast Zone in this area, and exposing the bedrock in this area might help shed some light on the nature and offset of the fault. A separate and distinct mineralized zone was identified in 2007 / 2008 drill program this new zone has been labelled the East zone. There are only two holes drilled into this zone. It appears to be a high-grade, narrow zone, striking 325 and with an unknown dip. This zone is open in all directions as it lies in an area of the property which has not been drilled as extensively as have the neighbouring zones. More exploration must be carried out to properly delineate this zone. The Copper Zone is still open at depth and above. There is need for several holes in this area to determine the limits of the mineralization. Indicated Resources Across all Zones on the Property copper cut-off copper silver tonnes (%) (%) (g/t) gold (g/t) molybdenum (%) copper equivalent (%) 0.1 5,352, ,468, ,539, ,443, Inferred Resources Across all Zones on the Property copper cut-off copper silver tonnes (%) (%) (g/t) gold (g/t) molybdenum (%) copper equivalent (%) 0.1 2,873, ,386, ,863, ,105, TABLE 14 INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES ON THE DOT PROPERTY AT VARIOUS LOW-CUT GRADES A 3D model of the mineralisation was constructed for the Southeast, Copper and East Zones on the Dot Property. From this model, a 3D block model was constructed and populated with grades and densities for the three zones. The grades were determined by Ordinary Kriging of 2m composites of drill hole assay results for the Southeast and Copper Zones, and inverse AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [69]

76 's Dot Property distance squared estimation of drill assay composites for the East Zone. shown in detail in Table 13, above, and are summarised in Table 14, above. These results are More density samples will have to be taken in the future from all different areas of the property with particular attention paid to the alteration and mineralization type and intensity in each sample. It is important to be able to determine accurate specific gravities for all the rock types and alteration types encountered on the property RECOMMENDATIONS The higher grade zone in north portion of the Southeast Zone comes very close to surface. Mineralization probably sub-crops under the overburden in the middle of the north end of the zone. Consideration should be given to trenching in this area to expose bedrock and allow sampling and mapping of the zone at surface. This would aid in improving the understanding of the deposit in several ways. Firstly it would allow a look at the mineralisation of the Southeast Zone in situ, and allow for larger samples to be taken for metallurgical testing. Additionally, there is thought to be a large fault cutting off the north end of the Southeast Zone in this area, and exposing the bedrock in this area might help shed some light on the nature and offset of the fault. A diamond drill program should be carefully designed and carried out in the Northwest Zone to confirm historical drill results in that area. This program should attempt to duplicate some of the higher grade intersections reported in the 1981 and 1992 drilling, and try to confirm the locations of the 1992 drill holes. There is still a large portion of the property that has not been tested by the Induced Polarity method of geophysical surveying. It appears that only IP has been able to accurately differentiate between barren country rock and zones containing weakly disseminated sulphide minerals, and potentially, copper, silver, gold and molybdenum mineralisation. Other less costly methods of geophysical surveying have not been able to consistently detect these disseminated mineralised zones. Therefore, in order to most efficiently detect more mineralisation in other, less-explored regions of the property, as well as at greater depth careful consideration should be given to carrying out further IP surveying over the rest of the property. Additionally, there is still good potential to find mineralized zones more deeply emplaced than those found to date. These may also be detected by the IP method, utilising survey parameters selected for deeper penetration into the crust. A separate and distinct mineralized zone was identified in the 2007 / 2008 drill program, and this new zone has been labelled the East Zone. There are only two holes drilled in this zone. It appears to be a high-grade, narrow zone, striking 225 and with an unknown dip. This zone is AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [70]

77 's Dot Property open in all directions as it lies in an area of the property which has not been drilled as extensively as have the neighbouring zones. The Copper Zone is still open at depth and above. There is need for several holes in this area to determine the limits of the mineralization. The Southeast Zone is open to the south, and at depth, and still requires more drilling to delimit the extent of the mineralisation. One hole in the Southeast Zone (Hole 96-16) ended in good mineralisation, and this needs to be followed up on as well. More density samples will have to be taken in the future from all different areas of the property with particular attention paid to the alteration and mineralization type and extent in each sample. It is important to be able to determine accurate specific gravities for all the rock types and alteration types encountered on the property REFERENCES Hallof, P. and Mullan, A., 1972, Report on the Induced Polarization and Resistivity Survey on the Southeast Portion Chataway option claim group, Nicola Mining Division, British Columbia for Aselo Industries Ltd., 37 pages, (Minfile 04043) McMillan, W.J., et al, 1985, Geology and Ore Deposits of the Highland Valey Camp, Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Field Guide and Reference Manual Series, 121 pages. Meyer, W., 1968, Report on the Geological Survey of the Chataway Exploration Ltd. Property, Chateway Lake, B.C., Nicola and Kamloops Mining Divisions, 92 pages (Minfile 01790). Monger, J. and Price, R., 2002, The Canadian Cordillera: Geology and Tectonic Evolution, CSEGRecorder,p Moore, J.M. and Pettipas, A.R., 1990, Nicola Lake Region Geology and Mineral Deposits, Open File , 30 pages. Mullan, A., 1979, Report on the Induced Polarization and Resistivity Survey, Vimy Claims #100 and 200, Nicola Mining Division, B.C. for Lawrence Mining Corporation Ltd., 24 pages, (Minfile 07494). Norman, G.E., 1992, Report on the 1992 Exploration Program on the Dot Property, prepared for Zappa Resources Ltd. Sanguinetti, M.H., 1972, Geophysical Report on the Chataway-Bethlehem Option, Highland Valley Area, for Aselo Industries Ltd. 39 pages, (Minfile 04056) Seedorff et al., 2005, Porphyry Deposits: Characteristics and Origin of Hypogene Featrures in Economic Geology One Hundredth Anniversary Volume , p AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [71]

78 's Dot Property Schiarizza, P.,2003, Geology and Mineral Occurrences of the Quesnel Terrane, Kliyul Creeek to Johnson Lake (094D08,09) Stewart, E. B., 2005, A Summary of Historical Exploration and Proposed Exploration Program, Dot Copper Property, Highlland Valley Porphyry Copper District, British Columbia, 8 pages. Stewart, E. B. (2008), A Report On The Geological Mapping, Diamond Drilling And Geophysical Surveys On The Dot Property, British Columbia, 50 pages. Stewart, G., 1996, Report on the 1996 Exploration Program on the Dot Property, Nicola Mining Division, NTS 092I/07W, 298 pages Stewart, G. 1997, Report on the 1997 Exploration Program on the Dot Property, Nicola Mining Divison, NTS 092I/07W, 99 pages. Vivian, G., White, D., 2007, Technical Report On 2006 Ground Geophysics And Preveous Exploration, Including Diamond Drilling, Dot Property, British Columbia, Nicola Mining Division, N.T.S. 092i/07w, N, W, 92 pages. Weeks, J.P., 1965, Geophysical Report on the South West, South East Mid East and North Groups of Claims, Gypsum Lake, Nicola Mining Division for Bralorne Pioneer Miners Ltd., 17 pages (Minfile 00737) Weeks, J.P., 1965, Geochemical Report on the South West, South East Mid East and North Groups of Claims, Gypsum Lake, Nicola Mining Division for Bralorne Pioneer Miners Ltd., 11 pages (Minfile 00749) Weeks, J.P., 1965, Geophysical Report on the South West, South East Mid East and North Groups of Claims, Gypsum Lake, Nicola Mining Division for Bralorne Pioneer Miners Ltd., 31 pages (Minfile 00764) Wells, R.A., 1981, Assessment Report for the Vimy Property Mineral Claims in the Nicola Mining Division, Percussion and Diamond Drilling reports, Minfile No. 9699, 264 pages. Wells, R.A., 1981, Assessment Report for the Tye #1, 2, 3 Mineral Claims in the Nicola Mining Division, Percussion Drilling and Geochemical Survey Report for Lawrence Mining Corporation, 20 pages, Minfile AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [72]

79 's Dot Property 21.0 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGES I, Ronald James Robinson of 3506 McDonald Drive, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, hereby certify that: I am presently employed by Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada as a consulting geologist. 1. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia (1985) and hold a B.Sc. degree in geology. I have been employed in my profession by various mining and consulting companies since my graduation. I have produced and supervised the production of mineral resource estimates and mineral reserve documents on numerous deposits and deposit types for the past nineteen years. 2. I am a qualified person for the purposes of National Instrument I am a member of the Northwest Territories Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists, and Geophysicists. 4. I visited the Dot Property on November 6 th,7 th and 8 th, 2008, for the purposes of examining the surface access to the property, any workings, showings and significant outcrops, and to examine, study and sample the stored core. 5. I have had no involvement with nor in the Dot Property prior to the preparation of this report. 6. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.4 of National Instrument I have read Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, National Instrument and Form F1, and the Report has been prepared in compliance with this Instrument and that Form. 8. I am responsible for the preparation of the complete Report. 9. As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [73]

80 's Dot Property subject matter of the Report that is not reflected in the Report, the omission or addition of which would make the Report misleading. 10.This certificate applies to the NI compliant technical report titled TECHNICAL REPORT ON A MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR DOT RESOURCES LTD.'S DOT PROPERTY, MERRITT, BRITISH COLUMBIA dated June 22, 2009 Dated at Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, this 22 nd day of June, R. J. Robinson, P. Geol. AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD. [74]