Course of explosions in Propene/O 2 /N 2 and Methane/O 2 /N 2 mixtures in vessels of 20 l to 2500 l and load on the walls

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Course of explosions in Propene/O 2 /N 2 and Methane/O 2 /N 2 mixtures in vessels of 20 l to 2500 l and load on the walls"

Transcription

1 Course of explosions in Propene/O /N and Methane/O /N mixtures in vessels of l to 5 l and load on the walls Dr. Hans-Peter Schildberg BASF-AG GCT/S - L511 D-6756 Ludwigshafen hans-peter.schildberg@basf.com Tel: H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 1

2 Outline of talk Introduction Explosion characteristics Course of explosion in l sphere Pressure load P det on the wall of the vessel - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (no precompression) - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (with precompression) - quantification of P det for Propene/O /N in vessel at P initial = 5 bar abs, T initial = C Comparison: detonative regimes in l vessels 1, 5, 5 l vessels Predetonation distances of Propene/O in tubes Did ignition source directly trigger a spherical detonation? H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton

3 Information available in literature on explosive gas mixtures of type combustible/o /N Explosion characteristics (explosion limits, p ex, (dp/dt) ex ) combustible / air /N explosion limits p ex, (dp/dt) ex p initial 1 bar a p initial > 1 bar a + + explosion limits o -- combustible / air /O p ex, (dp/dt) ex Course of explosion (deflagrative, detonative, heat explosion) combustible / air /N combustible / air /O pipe (L/D > 1) vessel (L/D 1) pipe (L/D > 1) vessel (L/D 1) o - 1 p initial 1 bar a p initial > 1 bar a combustible [vol.-%] explosive range of combustible/air/o N [vol.-%] explosive range of combustible/air/n O [vol.-%] 5 4 combustible/air mixtures 3 1 => Much work needed to better understand combustible/air/o mixtures H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 3

4 Motivation for this work Trend in partial oxidation reactions: - replacing air or diluted air as oxidant by oxygen enriched air or by pure oxygen Advantages: - increase of yield in space and time - lower operating pressures Critical Issue when dealing with combustible/air/o -mixtures: Process Safety - vessel-like geometry - explosion characteristics - course of explosion (deflagration, detonation) Focus of this work - bubble column geometry (explosive gaseous bubbles dispersed in liquid) - mechanisms of flame propagation - course of explosion (deflagration, detonation) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 4

5 Gaseous mixtures investigated Propene / O / N, very detailed exp. investigations Methane / O / N Hydrogen / O Cyclohexane / NO only for one value of P initial and T initial Cyclohexane / N O Cyclohexane / NO H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 5

6 Introduction Explosion characteristics Course of explosion in l sphere Pressure load P det on the wall of the vessel - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (no precompression) - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (with precompression) - quantification of P det for Propene/O /N in vessel at P initial = 5 bar abs, T initial = C Comparison: detonative regimes in l vessels 1, 5, 5 l vessels Predetonation distances of Propene/O in tubes Did ignition source directly trigger a spherical detonation? H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 6

7 Experimental setup Test vessel: l sphere l sphere, P max =6 bar, T max =5 C Ignition source: exploding wire according to EN1839, Bomb method, section (arc discharge, ca. A over ca. 3 ms) Ignition energy: ca. J Mixture preparation: partial pressure method, ideal gas characteristics assumed H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 7

8 References for complete documentation of explosion characteristics H.P. Schildberg in deliverables no. 8 and no. 13 of EU-Research Project SAFEKINEX, Contract No. EVG1-CT--7; download possible from Explosion characteristics of Propene/O/N at 1, 5, 1 and 3 bar abs, 5 C and C, Hans-Peter Schildberg in Process Safety and Industrial Explosion Protection, editor: ESMG European Safety Management Group e. V., Hamm, Germany (5), ISBN (proceedings of the International ESMG Symposium 5 in Nürnberg, Germany, 3 pages ) Determination of the Explosion Behaviour of Methane and Propene in Air or Oxygen at Standard and Elevated Conditions, A.A. Pekalski, H.-P. Schildberg, P.S.D. Smallegange, S.M. Lemkowitz, J.F. Zevenbergen, M. Braithwaite, H.J. Pasman, 11th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries (4), Praha Congress Centre 31st May-3rd June 4; Thematic Section B, page (ISBN ) Determination of the Explosion Behaviour of Methane and Propene in Air or Oxygen at Standard and Elevated Conditions, A.A. Pekalski, H.-P. Schildberg, P.S.D. Smallegange, S.M. Lemkowitz, J.F. Zevenbergen, M. Braithwaite, H.J. Pasman, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Volume 83, issue B5, (5) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 8

9 Introduction Explosion characteristics Course of explosion in l sphere Pressure load P det on the wall of the vessel - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (no precompression) - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (with precompression) - quantification of P det for Propene/O /N in vessel at P initial = 5 bar abs, T initial = C Comparison: detonative regimes in l vessels 1, 5, 5 l vessels Predetonation distances of Propene/O in tubes Did ignition source directly trigger a spherical detonation? H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 9

10 Questions to be raised when considering explosions of combustible/air/o mixtures in vessel-like geometry What compositions will undergo a transition from Deflagration to Detonation (DDT) after ignition with a thermal ignition source? What is the largest conceivable pressure load on the vessel wall? How does the volume of the vessel affect the detonative range? How about the obscure effects reported mostly only in non-public communication? (Vessels believed to be explosion pressure proof did sometimes rupture, but when repeating the experiment at same initial pressure with even the worst case mixture (i.e. what one believed to be worst case), a mechanically identical vessel did withstand the load). Will combustible/air mixtures remain deflagrative for higher values of T initial and P initial? H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 1

11 Literature data on deflagrative and potentially detonative explosion regime of n-butane/o /N at 1 bar abs, C N [Vol.-%] n-butane [Vol.-%] 9 range of mixtures, where transition from deflagrative to detonative explosion is possible stoichiometric ratio n-butane : O = 1 : range of deflagrative explosion 6 O [Vol.-%] 5 binary mixture n-butane/air 4 Characteristic values of the explosive range [1]: Lower explosion limit in O : 1.4 vol.-% Upper explosion limit in O : 51 vol.-% Lower explosion limit in air: 1.4 vol.-% Upper explosion limit in air: 9.4 vol.-% Limiting oxygen concentration: 9.4 vol.-% Characteristic values of the potentially detonative range [,3]: Lower detonation limit in O :.5 vol.-% Upper detonation limit in O : 38 vol.-% Lower detonation limit in air: 1.98 vol.-% Upper detonation limit in air: 6.18 vol.-% [1] E. Brandes and W. Möller, Sicherheitstechnische Kenngrößen - Band 1: Brennbare Flüssigkeiten und Gase, Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven (3), ISBN: ; UEL in O is an estimate, basis is measured value of 56 Vol-% at C, ZET-report no N [] M. A. Nettleton, Fire Prev. Sci. and Tech. No 3, p.9 (198) [3] M. A. Nettleton in Gaseous Detonations, p. 76, Chapman and Hall Ltd, New York (1987) 3 1 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 11

12 What does potentially detonative regime mean? If a mixture lies outside the potentially detonative regime, an explosion will under all circumstances (e.g. type of ignition source, geometry) only be deflagrative If the mixture lies inside the potentially detonative regime and a detonative ignition source triggers an explosion, the flame front will propagate as detonation right from the beginning If the mixture lies inside the potentially detonative regime and a thermal * ignition source triggers an explosion, the flame front will initially propagate as deflagration and the transition to detonation (DDT) will not necessarily occur! There are further conditions that have to be fullfilled to enable the DDT (e. g. geometry of the containment must support flame acceleration). However, in practical applications it is mostly hard to assess to which degree these conditions are satisfied. There are absolutely no simulation tools (e.g. reactive CFD codes) available which could predict the DDT in vessels at least to some rudimentary extent. *: in process plants almost all ignition sources are thermal. The initial stage of the explosion they can trigger is always deflagrative H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 1

13 Literature data on deflagrative and potentially detonative explosion regime of Propen/O /N at 1 bar abs, C N [Vol.-%] Propene [Vol.-%] 9 8 range of mixtures, where transition from deflagrative to detonative explosion is possible stoichiometric ratio Propene : O = 1 : 4.5 Characteristic values of the explosive range [1,]: Lower explosion limit in O : vol.-% Upper explosion limit in O : 58 vol.-% Lower explosion limit in air: vol.-% Upper explosion limit in air: 11 vol.-% Limiting oxygen concentration: 11.5 vol.-% Characteristic values of the potentially detonative range [3]: Lower detonation limit in O :.5 vol.-% Upper detonation limit in O : 5 vol.-% Lower detonation limit in air: 3.55 vol.-% Upper detonation limit in air: 1.4 vol.-% [1] E. Brandes and W. Möller, Sicherheitstechnische Kenngrößen - Band 1: Brennbare Flüssigkeiten und Gase, Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven (3), ISBN: ; [] H.P. Schildberg in Process Safety and Industrial Explosion Protection, editor: ESMG European Safety Management Group e. V., Hamm, Germany (5), ISBN (proceedings of the International ESMG Symposium 5 in Nürnberg, Germany, 3 pages ) [3] M. A. Nettleton in Gaseous Detonations, p. 76, Chapman and Hall Ltd, New York (1987) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 13 7 range of deflagrative explosion 6 O [Vol.-%] 5 binary mixture Propene/air 4 3 1

14 Literature data on deflagrative and potentially detonative explosion regime of H /O /N at 1 bar abs, C N [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion H [Vol.-%] 9 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton range of mixtures, where transition from deflagrative to detonative explosion is possible stoichiometric ratio H :O = :1 O [Vol.-%] binary mixture H /air Characteristic values of the explosive range [1,]: Lower explosion limit in O : 4 vol.-% Upper explosion limit in O : 95. vol.-% Lower explosion limit in air: 4 vol.-% Upper explosion limit in air: 77 vol.-% Limiting oxygen concentration: 4.3 vol.-% Characteristic values of the potentially detonative range [3]: Lower detonation limit in O : 15 vol.-% Upper detonation limit in O : 9 vol.-% Lower detonation limit in air: 18.3 vol.-% Upper detonation limit in air: 58.9 vol.-% [1] E. Brandes and W. Möller, Sicherheitstechnische Kenngrößen - Band 1: Brennbare Flüssigkeiten und Gase, Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven (3), ISBN: [] V. Schröder in Process Safety and Industrial Explosion Protection, editor: ESMG European Safety Management Group e. V., Hamm, Germany (5), ISBN (proceedings of the International ESMG Symposium 5 in Nürnberg, Germany) [3] M. A. Nettleton in Gaseous Detonations, p. 76, Chapman and Hall Ltd, New York (1987) 1

15 Experimental setup to determine the potentially detonative range of explosive gas mixtures Booster-mixture, Acetylene/O, stoichiometric with respect to formation of CO and H O. It transits to detonation after a few millimeters and acts upon the mixture to be tested with a stronger detonation front than the one that occurs in the mixture when it undergoes a detontive explosion mixture to be tested for potential detonability (i.e. ability to propagate a detonation which was once initiated either by an external source or by an initially deflagrative explosion in the mixture to be tested, which succeeded in running up to a detonation) ca. 15*pipe diameters location of thermal ignition source for booster mixture thin membrane or nothing (after injecting the mixture to be tested the booster mixture is injected close to the ignition source and propagates almost as plug flow into the pipe) Signals of pressure and/or flame sensors give evidence whether a stable detonation could be triggered in the mixture Note: Pipe must be long enough for to allow that the initial state of the overdriven detonation can pass over to a stable final state, which can be either a stable detonation or a deflagration in the mixture to be tested. H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 15

16 Different explosion regimes (deflagration, heat explosion, detonation) found for Propene/O /N in a l sphere at yellow range: possibly heat explosion Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] soot is formed here (43 vol.-% up to 69 vol.-%) 6 5 O [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion N [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion, 4 3 stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C3H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 HO stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 HO 1 propene/air-mixtures H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 16

17 Different explosion regimes (deflagration, heat explosion, detonation) of Propene/O /N in a l sphere at P initial = 1, 5 and 1 bar abs, 5 C 1 bar abs bar abs 9 8 yellow range: yellow range: 3 possibly heat 3 possibly heat 7 explosion explosion range of 6 deflagrative explosion, 6 1 bar abs, 5 C range of detonative explosion O [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C3H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 HO stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 HO N [Vol.-%] propene/air-mixtures Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] soot is formed here (43 vol.-% up to 69 vol.-%) 6 5 O [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion N [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion, 4 3 stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C3H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 HO stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 HO 1 propene/air-mixtures 1 bar abs bar abs 9 yellow range: possibly heat 8 explosion range of deflagrative explosion, 3 1 bar abs, 5 C (Heat explosion range and detonative range were not determined. It might be that the detonative range even extends down to the air line) range of detonative explosion (boundary at propene conc. > 1 vol.-% only estimated) O [Vol.-%] stoichiometric ratio Propene : O = 1 : 4.5 N [Vol.-%] propene/air-mixtures Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 17

18 Different explosion regimes (deflagration, heat explosion, detonation) of Propene/O /N in a l sphere at 1, 5 and 1 bar abs, C 1 bar abs bar abs 9 yellow range: 8 yellow range: possibly heat 3 possibly heat explosion 7 range of detonative explosion explosion O [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C3H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 HO stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 HO N [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion, 5 bar abs, C Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] 1 propene/air-mixtures Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] soot is formed here (41 vol.-% up to 75 vol.-%) O [Vol.-%] 6 range of detonative 5 N [Vol.-%] 4 3 stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C3H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 HO explosion stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 HO 9 range of deflagrative explosion, 5 bar abs, C 1 propene/air-mixtures 1 bar abs bar abs 9 yellow range: 8 possibly heat 3 explosion 7 (Heat explosion range and 4 6 detonative range were not 5 5 determined. It might be 6 that the detonative range 4 7 range of even extends down to the deflagrative explosion, 3 1 bar abs, C 8 air line) Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 18 O [Vol.-%] range of detonative N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C3H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 HO explosion stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 HO propene/air-mixtures

19 Different explosion regimes (deflagration, heat explosion, detonation) of Methane/O /N in a l sphere at 1 and and C 1 bar abs, 5 C yellow range: yellow range: 8 mixture reacts sometimes possibly heat 3 detonative and sometimes possibly heat 3 7 as heat explosion 7 range of detonative explosion explosion explosion Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] O [Vol.-%] stoichiometric CH O -> CO + HO stoichiometric CH4 + O -> CO + HO N [Vol.-%] soot formation starts at 55 vol.-% CH 4 O [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion, 1 bar abs, 5 C stoichiometric CH4 +.5O -> CO + H methane/air-mixtures yellow range: possibly heat explosion H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] O [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion 5 stoichiometric CH O -> CO + HO stoichiometric CH4 + O -> CO + HO N [Vol.-%] N [Vol.-%] soot formation starts at 55 vol.-% CH 4 stoichiometric CH O -> CO + HO stoichiometric CH4 + O -> CO + HO methane/air-mixtures soot formation starts at 55 vol.-% CH 4 range of deflagrative explosion, 5 bar abs, C range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric CH4 +.5O -> CO + H stoichiometric CH4 +.5O -> CO + H 5 bar abs, C methane/air-mixtures

20 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C (1) Propene =.5 vol.-% O = vol.-%, 5 File: PROP76-.5%.DAT Propene = 3 vol.-% O = 97 vol.-%, 1 3 Propene = 4 vol.-% O = 96 vol.-%, File: PROP8A;Propene=3, O=97 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT File: PROP14A-4%.DAT N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures top center bottom O [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton

21 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C () File: PROP7A;Propene=5, O=95 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT Propene = 5 vol.-% O = 95 vol.-%, File: PROP6A;Propene=6, O=94 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT Propene = 6 vol.-%, O = 94 vol.-%, Propene = 7 vol.-%, O = 93 vol.-%, File: PROP9A;Propene=7, O=93 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures top center bottom O [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 1

22 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C (3) File: PROP84A-8%.DAT Propene = 8 vol.-%, O = 9 vol.-%, N [Vol.-%] File: PROP143A-13%.DAT Propene = 13 vol.-%, O = 87 vol.-%, Propene = vol.-%, O = 81.8 vol.-%, 5 1 File:PROP13A-18.%.DAT stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures top center bottom O [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton

23 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C (4) Propene = 3 vol.-%, O = 77 vol.-%, Propene = 8 vol.-%, O = 7 vol.-%, File: PROP131A-3%.DAT File: Prope13a.dat, 8 vol.-% Propene = 33 vol.-% O = 67 vol.-%, File:PROP137A-33%.DAT N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures top center bottom O [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 3

24 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C (5) Propene = 35.5 vol.-% O = 64.5 vol.-%, File:PROP1A;Propene=35.5, O=64.5 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT Propene = 38 vol.-% O = 6 vol.-%, File: PROP136A-38%.DAT Propene = 39 vol.-%, O = 61 vol.-%, N [Vol.-%] File: Prope11A;Propene=39, O=61 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, 5C stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures O [Vol.-%] 5 top center bottom H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 4

25 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C (6) File: PROP1A;Propene=4, O=6 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT Propene = 4 vol.-%, O = 6 vol.-%, File: PROP13A;Propene=41, O=59 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT Propene = 41 vol.-%, O = 6 vol.-%, Propene = 4 vol.-%, O = 58 vol.-%, File: PROP14A;Propene=4, O=58 Vol.%; 5bar abs; 5C.DAT N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures O [Vol.-%] 5 top center bottom H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 5

26 Pressure-time traces of Propene/O at 5 bar, 5 C (7) Propene = 43 vol.-%, O = 57 vol.-%, Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 6 O [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion N [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion, top stoichiometric C3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H stoichiometric C 3 H6 + 3 O -> 3 CO + 3 H O stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O File: PROP139A-43%.DAT propene/air-mixtures

27 Pressure-time traces of stoich. Propene/O /N at 5 bar, 5 C (1) Propene = 5.5 vol.-% O = 4.75 vol.-%, N = File: PROP15A; Propen=5.5, O=5, N=69.5 Vol.%;5bar abs;5c.dat Propene = 6 vol.-% O = 7 vol.-%, N = 67 (first test) File: PROP8A-7%O(erster Test).DAT Propene = 6 vol.-% O = 7 vol.-%, N = 67 (second test) File: PROP9A-7%O(zweiter Test).DAT bottom center top N [Vol.-%] Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.- stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 8 range of detonativ explosion ran deflagrati 5 bar a stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + propene/air H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 7

28 Pressure-time traces of stoich. Propene/O /N at 5 bar, 5 C () Propene = 6.9 vol.-% O = 31 vol.-%, N = 6.1 File:PROP16A;Propen=6.9, O=31, N=6.1 Vol.%;5bar abs;5c.dat File: PROP7A-35%O.DAT Propene = 7.7 vol.-% O = 35 vol.-%, N = 57.3 (first test) Propene = 7.7 vol.-% O = 35 vol.-%, N = 57.3 (second test) File: PROP17A;Propen=7.8, O=35, N=57. Vol.%;5bar abs;5c.dat bottom center top N [Vol.-%] Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-% stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O range of detonative explosion range deflagrative 5 bar abs stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 propene/air-m H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 8

29 Pressure-time traces of stoich. Propene/O /N at 5 bar, 5 C (3) Propene = 8.8 vol.-% O = 4 vol.-%, N = 51. File: PROP18A;Propen=8.9, O=4, N=51.1 Vol.%;5bar abs;5c.dat Propene = 13.3 vol.-% O = 6 vol.-%, N = 6.7 File: PROP16A-6%O.DAT Propene = vol.-%, O = 81.8 vol.-%, 5 1 File:PROP13A-18.%.DAT H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 9 1 bottom center 9 top N [Vol.-%] Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-% stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O range of detonative explosion range deflagrative 5 bar abs stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 propene/air-m

30 Different explosion regimes (deflagration, heat explosion, detonation) of Methane/O /N in a l sphere at 1 and and C 1 bar abs, 5 C yellow range: yellow range: 8 mixture reacts sometimes possibly heat 3 detonative and sometimes possibly heat 3 7 as heat explosion 7 range of detonative explosion explosion explosion Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] O [Vol.-%] stoichiometric CH O -> CO + HO stoichiometric CH4 + O -> CO + HO N [Vol.-%] soot formation starts at 55 vol.-% CH 4 O [Vol.-%] range of deflagrative explosion, 1 bar abs, 5 C stoichiometric CH4 +.5O -> CO + H methane/air-mixtures yellow range: possibly heat explosion H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] O [Vol.-%] range of detonative explosion 5 stoichiometric CH O -> CO + HO stoichiometric CH4 + O -> CO + HO N [Vol.-%] N [Vol.-%] soot formation starts at 55 vol.-% CH 4 stoichiometric CH O -> CO + HO stoichiometric CH4 + O -> CO + HO methane/air-mixtures soot formation starts at 55 vol.-% CH 4 range of deflagrative explosion, 5 bar abs, C range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric CH4 +.5O -> CO + H stoichiometric CH4 +.5O -> CO + H 5 bar abs, C methane/air-mixtures

31 O [Vol.-%] Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, 5 C (1) Methane = 7 vol.-%, O = 93 vol.-%, yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane = 1 vol.-%, O = 9 vol.-%, Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 Methane = 1 vol.-%, O = 88 vol.-%, H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 31 top center bottom

32 Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, 5 C () Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 3 top center bottom O [Vol.-%] yellow range: possibly heat explosion Methane = 14 vol.-%, O = 86 vol.-%, stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] 15 1 Methane = 15 vol.-%, O = 85 vol.-%, nd test: Methane = 15 vol.-%, O = 85 vol.-%,

33 Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, 5 C (3) Methane CH [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 33 top center bottom O [Vol.-%] yellow range: possibly heat explosion Methane = 17.5 vol.-%, O = 8.5 vol.-%, stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane = vol.-%, O = 8 vol.-%, nd test: Methane = vol.-%, O = 8 vol.-%,

34 Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, 5 C (4) Methane CH [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 34 top center bottom O [Vol.-%] yellow range: possibly heat explosion Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 75 vol.-%, stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] nd test: Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 75 vol.-%, rd test: Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 75 vol.-%,

35 Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, 5 C (5) Methane = 4 vol.-%, O = 6 vol.-%, Methane = 35 vol.-%, O = 65 vol.-%, yellow range: possibly heat explosion N [Vol.-%] 4 stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O O [Vol.-%] top center bottom Methane = 45 vol.-%, O = 55 vol.-%, Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 35

36 Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, 5 C (6) Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 36 top bottom O [Vol.-%] yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 5 vol.-%, Methane = 55 vol.-%, O = 45 vol.-%,

37 Pressure-time traces of stoich. Methane/O /N at 5 bar, 5 C (1) 4 N [Vol.-%] 3 bottom top yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 37 Methane = 1 vol.-%, O = vol.-%, N = 7 vol.-%, Methane = 15 vol.-%, O = 3 vol.-%, N = 55 vol.-%,

38 Pressure-time traces of stoich. Methane/O /N at 5 bar, 5 C () yellow range: possibly heat explosion N [Vol.-%] bottom top stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O Methane = vol.-%, O = 4 vol.-%, N = 4 vol.-%, Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 5 vol.-%, N = 5 vol.-%, Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 38

39 O [Vol.-%] Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, C (1) 3 Methane = 1 vol.-%, O = 9 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 39 Methane = 1.5 vol.-%, O = 87.5 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C top center bottom Methane = 14 vol.-%, O = 86 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C

40 O [Vol.-%] Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, C () yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 4 top center bottom Methane = 15 vol.-%, O = 85 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C Methane = 17.5 vol.-%, O = 8.5 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C Methane = vol.-%, O = 8 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C

41 O [Vol.-%] Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, C (3) yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 41 top center bottom Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 75 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C Methane = 4 vol.-%, O = 6 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C Methane = 45 vol.-%, O = 55 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C

42 O [Vol.-%] Pressure-time traces of Methane/O at 5 bar, C (4) yellow range: possibly heat explosion stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O 4 N [Vol.-%] Methane CH [Vol.-%] 4 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 4 top center bottom Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 5 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C Methane = 55 vol.-%, O = 45 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C 3 1 Methane = 6 vol.-%, O = 38 vol.-%,, 5 bar abs, C 4 6 8

43 O [ Pressure-time traces of stoich. Methane/O /N at 5 bar, C (1) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 43 Methane = 15 vol.-%, O = 3 vol.-%,, N = 55 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, C yellow range: possibly heat explosion N [Vol.-%] bottom stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O Methane = vol.-%, O = 4 vol.-%,, N = 4 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, C center top Methane CH 4 [Vol.-%] 1 1 nd test: Methane = vol.-%, O = 4 vol.-%,, N = 4 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, C

44 Pressure-time traces of stoich. Methane/O /N at 5 bar, C () Methane = 5 vol.-%, O = 5 vol.-%,, Methane = 3 vol.-%, O = 6 vol.-%,, N = 5 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, C N = 1 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, C yellow range: possibly heat explosion center bottom top N [Vol.-%] 4 stoichiometric CH + O -> CO + H O O Note:This is not on the stoichiometric line!! Methane = 15 vol.-%, O = 55 vol.-%,, N = 3 vol.-%, 5 bar abs, C Methane CH [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 44

45 Summary of the differences in the pressure time diagrams between explosions in vessels that were triggered by a thermal ignition and ended up as deflagration, heat explosion or detonation presence of pressure pulse width of pressure pulse at half height [µs] height of pressure pulse divided by pressure in mixture just before its occurrence precompression ratio at the moment when pressure pulse occurs "oscillations" in reaction gases after occurrence of pressure pulse acoustic sound heard outside the vessel course of explosion deflagration heat explosion detonation no yes yes (not applicable) (not applicable) (not applicable) no oscillations anyway 1 - < 5 typically 4 to 7 (equals deflagration pressure ratio of the precompressed unreacted mixture) 5 1 (largest value equals p ex /p initial of the corresponding gas mixture) no oscillations typically 15 to 5 (due to too small sampling rate the true maximum was presumably mostly missed) 1 (largest value equals p ex /p initial of the corresponding gas mixture) massive oscillations (due to shock front bouncing backwards and forwards in reaction gases) nothing click prolonged whistle H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 45

46 Heat explosion tentative explanation of the course of events Before heat explosion: Reaction rate sufficiently slow to allow for pressure equilibrium over entire sphere Pressure as function of radial position in l sphere (p initial = 1 bar abs) just before heat explosion occurs in the precompressed, unreacted mixture (R = 17 cm) pressure/p initial hot reaction gases flame front precompressed unreacted mixture radial position r/r 1 At heat explosion: Immediate temperature rise and hence also pressure rise in the shell so far unreacted, but heated by adiabatic compression. The induction time must be of the order of.1 ms or even less, otherwise the flame front of the initial deflagration would have run through the thin shell of unreacted mixture before the heat explosion could develop. After heat explosion: reaction gases flow to the central part of the sphere and pressure equilibrium is attained H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 46

47 Temperatures obtainable by adiabatic compression p final /p initial T final [ C] resulting for different values of γ in case that T initial = 35 C = 38 K T final [ C] resulting for differrent values of γ in case that T initial = C = 473 K γ = 1,4 γ = 1,3 γ = 1, γ = 1,1 γ = 1,4 γ = 1,3 γ = 1, γ = 1,1 1,5 7,8 65, 56,5 46,6 58,1 46,4 33,1 17,8 1,5 88,4 7,7 55, 33,6 8, 57,9 3, ,6 13,9 96,9 67,3 374,4 336,5 95, 49, ,7 151,1 115,1 76,4 49,9 378,3 3,9 63,5 5 14,8 173,5 19,8 83,5 476,1 41,7 345,5 74,5 6 4,9 19,7 14, 89,5 516, 44, 364,6 83,7 7 64, 9,6 153, 94,6 551,7 468,1 381, 91,5 8 84,9 4,7 16,6 99,1 583,8 491,3 395,9 98,4 9 34, 38,4 171, 13,1 613,1 51,4 49, 34,6 1 31,7 51, 179,1 16,7 64, 531,7 41,3 31, ,5 73,5 193, 113,1 689,1 566,3 44,7 319, ,7 93,3 5, 118,5 73,4 596,7 461,3 38, 16 47,1 311, 15,9 13,3 771,5 63,9 477,8 335, ,4 37,1 5,6 17,6 87, 648,6 49,7 34,1 451,9 341,9 34,4 131,4 84, 671,3 56,3 348,1 Temperatures may well lie above the ignition temperatures the mixtures presumably have in the precompressed state! Formula for temperature increase due to adiabatic compression: ( γ 1) γ H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 47 T final = T initial p final p initial

48 Autoignition temperatures of Propene/O /N Propene [Vol.-%] O [Vol.- %] N [Vol.- %] Autoignition Temperature (AIT) [ C] AIT [ C] at P initial = 5 bar abs for Propene/O mixtures AIT [ C] at P initial = 5 bar abs for stoichiometric (with respect to CO and H O- formation) Propene/O mixtures, i.e. Propene:O = 1 : AIT [ C] at P initial = 1 bar abs for stoichiometric (with respect to CO and H O- formation) Propene/O mixtures, i.e. Propene:O = 1 : (CHEMSAFE, DIN-method in open Erlenmeyer flask) N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C 3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] 9 8 range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures O [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 48

49 Induction times of two mixture compositions lying in the yellow range of the explosion diagram at 5 bar abs Induction time, ms Temperature, K Calculation by A.A. Konnov, Department of Mechanical Engineering Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), based on the rate coefficients for all elementary reactions C3H6-O-N=-4-4 C3H6-O-N= Propene C 3 H 6 [Vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton N [Vol.-%] stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O range of detonative explosion stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H O Propene= 5 vol.-%, O = 95 Vol.-% 7 6 range of deflagrative explosion, stoichiometric C 3 H O -> 3 CO + 3 H propene/air-mixtures Propene= vol.-%, O = 4 vol.-%, N = 4 vol.-% O [Vol.-%]

50 Is heat explosion a realistic assumption for what happens in yellow range of the explosion triangle? - temperatures achieved by adiabatic compression lie well above the autoignition temperature, i. e. heat explosion is possible in principle - but: induction times calculated on the basis of the rate coefficients of the elementary reactions are still far too long (The induction time would have to be of the order of.1 ms or even less, otherwise the flame front of the initial deflagration would have run already through the thin shell of unreacted mixture before the heat explosion can develop). - including the influence of thermal radiation from the cental part of the sphere does not give a substancial reduction in induction times either (calculation of Hans Pasman) Not really clear what happens in the yellow range of the explosion triangle H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 5

51 Summary on explosion regimes of combustible/air/o mixtures ignited with a thermal ignition source in vessel-like geometry There are three explosion regimes: deflagration, heat explosion, detonation The detonative range in the l sphere is discernibly smaller than the potentially detonative range What really happens in the heat explosion regime is not yet really understood, maybe the pressure time curves are just due to failed DDT s The heat explosion regime becomes much smaller with increasing initial pressure Mixtures of type combustible/air seem to remain deflagrative even at elevated pressures and temperatures. However, the data collected so far do not allow to exclude that the detonative regime will expand down to the air line when going to extremely high initial pressures and large vessel volumes. H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 51

52 Introduction Explosion characteristics Course of explosion in l sphere Pressure load P det on the wall of the vessel - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (no precompression) - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (with precompression) - quantification of P det for Propene/O /N in vessel at P initial = 5 bar abs, T initial = C Comparison: detonative regimes in l vessels 1, 5, 5 l vessels Predetonation distances of Propene/O in tubes Did ignition source directly trigger a spherical detonation? H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 5

53 Schematic pressure-time trace of a detonative pressure pulse hot reaction products flamefront coupled with shockfront, v >> v soundl pressure sensor, flush with inner surface of wall unburned gas mixture Pressure/P initial Leading edge of detonation peak has almost infinite slope (rise time < 1µs) P initial von Neumann spike, about twice as high as P CJ width < 1 µs => much less than cycle time of any eigenfrequency of the containment => not noticed by the containment and not registered by the fastest available pressure sensors P CJ, about twice the deflagration pressure ratio of the gas mixture time width of Taylor expansion fan : ca. µs 5 µs in laboratory scale containments, longer in structures of larger dimensions (less than one quarter of the time interval over which the peak has already propagated) deflagration pressure ratio of gas mixture H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 53

54 Pressure-time diagrams recorded during a detonation in a long pipe at different locations (1/) Example: Propane/O, stoichiometric, P initial = 6 bar abs, T initial = C, pipe 5x, L = 5 m, side-on pressure P det 35*P initial (same value at all sensors) v = Δs/Δt =.945m/.375ms = 519 m/s location of ignition pipe: 5 x 15 mm P1 P P3 P4 197 mm 915 mm 3855 mm 5 mm H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 54

55 Pressure-time diagrams recorded during a detonation in a long pipe at different locations (/) Experiment: Ethylene/air stoichiometric,14 bar abs, C, side-on pressure, pipe: φ i = 44.3 mm, φ o = 48.3 mm, L = 8 m, turbulence enhancer in front of ignition source to reduce run-up distance P 3 1 Δs = m Δt = 1.33 ms v det =Δs/Δt=1936 m/s P Δs = 1.5 m Δt =.796 ms v det =Δs/Δt=1883 m/s P location of ignition P 3 P P 1 m 1.5 m.5 m H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 55

56 Qualitative consideration: differences between the pressures produced in a long pipe by a deflagration and by a detonation (/) Example: Propane/air, stoichiometric, T initial = C, explosion pressure ratio: 9.5 (simplification: no heat loss to wall) Detonative Explosion (predetonation stage necglected) Location of ignition hot reaction products flamefront coupled with shockfront, v >> v soundl unburnt gas mixture P ex /P initial P = 9.5*P initial P det = *9.5*P initial extension: in space ca. 1 cm In time ca. 5 µs P = P initial distance from left pipe end P is different at different locations in the pipe: - behind shockfront: P = 9.5*P initial (9.5 is explosion pressure ratio of mixture) - at shockfront: P = *9.5*P initial (i.e. about twice as high as behind shockfront) - in front of shockfront: P = P initial (reason: reaction gases would like to expand into region ahead of shockfront, but speed of sound in hot reaction gases only about 1 m/s whereas shockfront propagates with about 17 m/s) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 56

57 Detonation pressures P det in long pipes (L >> L predet, no precompression) Stable Detonation, side-on pressure (i. e. in plane perpendicular to shockfront) detonation front pressure sensor, flushwithinner surface of wall P det = P initial * P CJ P CJ is the so-called Chapman-Jouguet-pressure ratio of the explosive gas mixture Stable Detonation, reflected pressure (i. e. in plane parallel to shockfront, e. g. blind flange) detonation front pressure sensor, flushwithinner surface of flangel P det = P initial * P CJ * F reflec Important: The pipe directly ahead of the blind flange experiences the reflected pressure as well. The length of this section corresponds to the axial extension of the taylor expansion fan. (In lab-scale equipment of up to 5 m length a section of about 3 pipe diameters from the blind flange back into the pipe is affected, in longer pipes this section increases). F reflec.5 H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 57

58 Detonation pressures P det in long pipes (L >> L predet, no precompression) (continued) Side-on pressure at location where Deflagration-to-Detonation transition (DDT) occurs P det = P initial * P CJ * F DDT 1.5 F DDT location of ignition flame front of initial first occurrence of ignition deflagration has accelerated by adiabatic compression to a very high speed in precompressed mixture; generation of shock front coupled with flame front, propagating leftwards Reflected pressure, if DDT occurs directly in front of blind flange (a very rare case!) flame front of initial deflagration has accelerated to a very high speed first occurrence of ignition by adiabatic compression in precompressed mixture; generation of shock front coupled with flame front, propagating leftwards P det = P initial * P CJ * F DDT * F reflec F reflec.5 Important: The pipe directly ahead of the blind flange experiences the reflected pressure as well. The length of this section corresponds to the axial extension of the taylor expansion fan. (In lab-scale equipment of up to 5 m length a section of about 3 pipe diameters from the blind flange back into the pipe is affected, in longer pipes this section increases). H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton F DDT

59 Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios P CJ calculated by STANJAN Example: Propene/O /N (Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio) pcj/pinitial P (Chapman-Jouguet CJ pressure divided by pinitial) Pcj/Pinitial at Pcj/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C measured defl. pr.-ratios Pex/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, 5 C measured defl. pr.-ratios Pex/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C Propene concentration in Propene/O -mixture [vol.-%] pex/pinitial (deflagration pressure ratio) Solid lines: Calculated Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios for p initial = 5 bar abs (by Prof. M. Braithwaite with software package STANJAN) Symbols: Measured deflagration pressure ratios (scale on right side of plots) The values are just about half of the Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios!! (Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio) pcj/pinitial P (Chapman-Jouguet CJ pressure divided by pinitial) calculated Pcj/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, 5 C measured defl. pr.-ratios Pex/Pinitial at Propene conc. in stoich. Propene/O /N -mixture [vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton pex/pinitial (deflagration pressure ratio)

60 Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios P CJ calculated by STANJAN Example: Methane/O /N (Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio) pcj/pinitial P (Chapman-Jouguet CJ pressure divided by Pinitial ) calculated Pcj/Pinitial at calculated Pcj/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C measured defl. Pr.-ratios Pex/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, 5 C measured defl. Pr.-ratios Pex/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C Methane concentration in Methane/O -mixture [vol.-%] 17,5 15 1,5 1 7,5 5,5 pex/pinitial (deflagration pressure ratio) (Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio) P PCJ Chapman-Jouguet CJ detonation pressure ratio bar abs, C Methane concentration in Methane/air-mixture [vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 6

61 Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios P CJ calculated by STANJAN Example: H /O /N 1 pcj/pinitial (Chapman-Jouguet pressure divided by pinitial) calculated detonation pr.-ratios PCJ/Pinitial at 1 bar abs, C calculated detonation pr.-ratios PCJ/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C calculated detonation pr.-ratios PCJ/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C measured pex/pinitial at 1 bara bs, C H concentration in H /O -mixture [vol.-%] 7,5 5,5 pex/pinitial deflagration pressure ratio) 1 pcj/pinitial (Chapman-Jouguet pressure divided by pinitial) calculated detonation pr.-ratios PCJ/Pinitial at 1 bar abs, C calculated detonation pr.-ratios PCJ/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C calculated detonation pr.-ratios PCJ/Pinitial at 5 bar abs, C measured pex/pinitial at 1 bar abs, C measured pex/pinitial at 5 bar abs, C measured pex/pinitial at 5 bar abs, C H concentration in H /Air-mixture [vol.-%] H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 61 7,5 5,5 pex/pinitial deflagration pressure ratio)

62 Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios P CJ calculated on basis of detonation velocity meaning of symbols: P CJ = p det /p initial = (γ *M +1)/(γ+1) (γ * M )/(γ+1) = (D * MW)/(R*T initial *(γ+1)) = ρ/p initial * D /(γ+1) M = D/c Mach number D propagation speed of detonation [m/s] c = (γ * p initial /ρ).5 speed of sound in the unreacted gas mixture [m/s] ρ density of unreacted gas mixture [kg/m 3 ] MW mean molar mass of unreacted gas mixture [kg/mol] R=8.314 universal gas constant [J/(mol*K)] γ c p /c v, for diatomic gases γ = 1.4 T initial, p initial initial temperature [K], initial pressure [Pa] of gas mixture side on pressure of stable detonation p det Remarks: For using STANJAN various thermodynamic parameters of the reaction components must be known. If these are not available, the detonation velocity is experimentally easily aminable with high precision by recording the side-on pressure of the propagating detonation at different axial locations in the pipe with piezoelectric pressure sensors. Since the absolute signal value, which is actually the quantity one is looking for, is often prone to errors, one has to use the bypass over the speed. H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 6

63 General remarks on Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios P CJ Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios can be calculated by e.g. STANJAN (freeware, STANJAN Chemical Equilibrium Solver v4.1, Stanford University 3) If thermodynamic quantities required by STANJAN are not available for all components of the considered explosive gas mixture, P CJ can be calculated on the basis of the experimentally determined detonation speed. Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratios are with good precision twice as high as the explosion pressure ratio found for deflagrative explosion: - stoichiometric combustible/air- mixtures at C: 16 P CJ - stoichiometric combustible/o -mixtures at C: 3 P CJ 5 Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio is inversely proportional to the absolute initial temperature. (Propagation speed of detonation is almost independent of T initial!) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 63

64 Example: bulging out of a pipe end due to reflected pressure Experiment: Acetylene, 8 bar abs, C, pipe.9 x 8., i.e. φ i = 4.5 mm, material: St35.8, R p. = 3 N/mm, P Rp. =184 bar, L = 8 m, detonative ignition source to reduce run-up distance; side-on pressure ca. 4 bar, reflected pressure ca. 8 bar Increase of tube diameter directly in front of blind flange to 117 % of original value no increase in diameter in the section that has only been exposed to the sideon pressure H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 64

65 Example: Rupture of pipe end due to reflected pressure Experiment: Ethylene/air stoichiometric, 17 bar abs, C, pipe 76.1 x.6, i.e. φ i = 7.9, material: , R p. = 1 N/mm, P Rp. =154 bar, L = 8 m; side-on pressure ca. 34 bar, reflected pressure ca. 765 bar increase in diameter to 15 % of original value in the section that has only been exposed to the sideon pressure end of tube, which was exposed to the reflected pressure, is fragmented H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 65

66 Example: bulging out of a pipe wall due to the extra pressure at the point where the DDT occurs Experiment: Acetylene, 4 bar abs, C, pipe 3.17 x.5, φ i =.17 mm, material: , R p. 5 N/mm, P Rp. 115 bar, kaltgezogen, L = 1 m Localized bulging of tube is attributed to the location of the deflagration to detonation transition H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 66

67 Introduction Explosion characteristics Course of explosion in l sphere Pressure load P det on the wall of the vessel - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (no precompression) - quantification of P det for four scenarios occuring in a pipe (with precompression) - quantification of P det for Propene/O /N in vessel at P initial = 5 bar abs, T initial = C Comparison: detonative regimes in l vessels 1, 5, 5 l vessels Predetonation distances of Propene/O in tubes H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 67

68 How does precompression ( pressure piling ) come into existence? During the initial deflagrative stage of the explosion each volume element that reacts through expands by a factor equal to the explosion pressure ratio at the expense of the volume available for the yet unreacted mixture. If this volume is large compared to the volume occupied by the reaction gases formed during initial deflagrative stage, the pressure in the yet unreacted mixture will almost stay the same as at the moment of ignition (P = P initial ). However, if this volume is small, the yet unreacted mixture will be precompressed. When the deflagration to detonation transition then occurs, the detonation will not propagate in a mixture at pressure P = P initial, but at P = F precomp * P initial F precomp may attain any value between 1 and the explosion pressure ratio of the gas mixture (up to 1 for combustible/air-mixtures, up to 4 for combustible/o - mixtures). The temperature rise that comes along with the fast and hence adiabatic compression will slightly alleviate the detonative pressure P det. This is accounted for by the Factor F temp (details see next slide) In the formulae given beforehand for P det, F precomp and F temp will appear as additional factors H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 68

69 Temperature factor F temp The temperature factor F temp accounts for the reduction of the Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio due to the rise in temperature of the unburned mixture brought about by the precompression during the initial deflagrative stage of the explosion. I: Temperature T final of unburned mixture attained by adiabatic compression: T final ( γ 1) γ ( γ 1) final = T = γ initial Tinitial F p precomp initial p with: γ = c p /c v (γ = 1.4 for ideal gases) T initial = temperature at moment of ignition II: Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio is inversely proportional to the temperature the gas mixture exhibits at the moment of detonation (here denoted by T final ). F temp results from the combined effect of I: and II: F temp = T T initial final = F 1 precomp ( γ 1) γ H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 69

70 Temperatures obtainable by adiabatic compression T initial = 5 C = 98 K T initial = C = 473 K P final /P initial T final [ C] for different values of γ = c p /c v γ = 1,4 γ = 1,3 γ = 1, γ = 1,1 P final /P initial T final [ C] for different values of γ = c p /c v γ = 1,4 γ = 1,3 γ = 1, γ = 1,1 1, 4,9 37,8 34, 3, 1, 5,3,3 14,6 7,9 1,5 61,6 54, 45,8 36, 1,5 58,1 46,4 33,1 17,8 9,3 76,7 61,5 44,4 33,6 8, 57,9 3, ,8 137,3 1,5 65, 4 49,9 378,3 3,9 63,5 6 4, 177,6 18,7 77, , 44, 364,6 83,7 8 66,8 8,5 148,4 87, 8 583,8 491,3 395,9 98,4 1 3,3 34, 164,4 94,4 1 64, 531,7 41,3 31, ,1 55,8 177,9 1, ,1 566,3 44,7 319, ,4 74,9 189,6 15, ,4 596,7 461,3 38, , 9,1, 11, ,5 63,9 477,8 335, ,6 37,6 9,4 114, , 648,6 49,7 34,1 48,4 31,9 18, 118,3 84, 671,3 56,3 348, ,5 353,4 36,6 16, ,5 71, 535,8 36, ,5 38,3 5,3 133, 3 977, 763,9 56,8 371, , 43,9 66, 138, , 81,4 58,5 38,5 4 58, 45,1 78,1 143, , 835,1 61,7 388, , 444,3 89, 148, ,5 865,6 619,1 395, , 46, 99, 15, ,4 893,6 634,9 4, Formula for temperature increase due to adiabatic compression: T final = T initial p final p initial ( γ 1) γ H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 7

71 Example 1: precompression in a pipe P 3 P 1 hot reaction products P flame front of initial deflagration first occurrence detonation front precompressed unburned gas mixture If the pipe is only slightly longer than the predetonation distance, the unburned gas which is remaining at the moment when the DDT occurs may have been precompressed by a factor F precomp by the initial deflagrative stage of the combustion. F precomp may attain any value between 1 and the explosion pressure ratio of the gas mixture (up to 1 for combustible/air-mixtures, up to 4 for combustible/o - mixtures). The temperature rise that comes along with the fast and hence adiabatic compression will slightly alleviate the detonative pressure P det. This is accounted for by the Factor F temp H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 71

72 Example : precompression in the vessel-pipe configuration vessel pipe, slightly longer than L predet Location of ignition hot, gaseous reaction products Precompressed, unburned gas mixture deflagrative flamefront If in the vessel the DDT does not happen because of the unfavourable L/D-ratio and if the volume of the pipe is small compared to the volume of the vessel, the precompression factor may come close to the highest possible value, i. e. the explosion pressure ratio. The highest possible value is usually not attained, because the available time is too short to pressurize the pipe up to the same pressure as in the vessel. This configuration occurs frequently in practical applications, because vessels often have nozzles onto which short pipe segments with a block valve are welded. H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 7

73 Example 3: precompression in empty vessels (i.e. without packing inside) vessel (here spherical, L/D = 1) Location of ignition hot reaction products Precompressed, unburned mixture First occurrence of detonation front Flamefront of initial deflagration If there is a transition from deflagration to detonation in the vessel, precompression will almost always occur, because the diameter is usually not much larger than the predetonation distance. The precompression factor may attain the highest possible value, i. e. the explosion pressure ratio. Reference: GCT report N, I H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 73

74 Detonation pressures P det in pipes with precompression (1/) Side-on pressure (i. e. in plane perpendicular to shockfront) detonation front pressure sensor, flushwithinner surface of wall P det = P initial * P CJ * F precomp * F temp Reflected pressure (i. e. in plane parallel to shockfront, e. g. blind flange) detonation front pressure sensor, flushwithinner surface of flangel P det = P initial * P CJ * F reflec * F precomp * F temp Important: about 3 pipe diameters from the blind flange back into the pipe this higher pressure also acts on the wall of the pipe! H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 74

75 Detonation pressures P det in pipes with precompression (/) Side-on pressure at location where Deflagration-to-Detonation transition (DDT) occurs P det = P initial * P CJ * F DDT * F precomp * F temp location of ignition flame front of initial first occurrence of ignition deflagration has accelerated by adiabatic compression to a very high speed in precompressed mixture; generation of shock front coupled with flame front, propagating leftwards Reflected pressure, if DDT occurs directly in front of blind flange (a very rare case!) P det = P initial * P CJ * F DDT * F reflec * F precomp * F temp flame front of initial deflagration has accelerated to a very high speed first occurrence of ignition by adiabatic compression in precompressed mixture; generation of shock front coupled with flame front, propagating leftwards Important: about 3 pipe diameters from the blind flange back into the pipe this higher pressure also acts on the wall of the pipe! H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 75

76 Detonation pressure P det acting on the wall of a vessel (almost always with precompression) P det = Initial pressure in vessel at moment of ignition (P initial ) x Chapman-Jouguet pressure ratio of the mixture at the temperature the mixture exhibits at the moment of ignition (P CJ ) x Precompression factor (F Precomp ) x Temperature factor (F Temp ) x Factor accounting for reflection of stable detonation at wall (F reflec ) x Factor accounting for extra pressure if DDT happens directly before wall (F DDT ), otherwise factor is 1 P det = P initial * P CJ * F precomp * F temp * F reflec * (F DDT or 1, depending on where DDT happened) H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 76

77 Example: Rupture of the wall of a pipe installed in the vessel-pipe configuration due to precompression detonation in this section, outer diameter is 1 % to 11 % of original value closed Valve (to vacuum pump) 1x pipe (1.4541) rupture pressure in hydraulic test: 348 bar rupture at location of DDT in precompressed mixture l sphere only deflagration in this section, outer diameter is not increased Rest of the bend has been burned off by outflowing hot reaction gases P initial = 5 bar abs, T initial = 5 C 99.5 vol.-% N O.5 vol.-% Tetradecane Ignition in center of sphere H.-P. Schildberg, 41st UKELG meeting, 13 May 8, Shell Technology Centre Thornton 77

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS 41 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 48, 16 Guest Editors: Eddy de Rademaeker, Peter Schmelzer Copyright 16, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-968-39-6; ISSN 83-916 The Italian Association

More information

Dr. Hans-Peter Schildberg BASF SE GCT/S - L511 D Ludwigshafen Tel: +49 (0)

Dr. Hans-Peter Schildberg BASF SE GCT/S - L511 D Ludwigshafen   Tel: +49 (0) The need to calculate detonation pressure profiles and use them as a source term in FE calculations to quantify the response of the containment subjected to detonations Dr. Hans-Peter Schildberg BASF SE

More information

SAFEKINEX: Detailed report, related to overall project duration

SAFEKINEX: Detailed report, related to overall project duration Project SAFEKINEX, contract No. EVG1-CT-22-72 1 SAFEKINEX: Detailed report, related to overall project duration Background (description of the problems to be solved) Partial oxidation processes, carried

More information

EXPLOSION PRESSURES OF CONFINED DEFLAGRATIONS PROPAGATING IN STOICHIOMETRIC GASEOUS MIXTURES OF LOWER ALKANES WITH AIR

EXPLOSION PRESSURES OF CONFINED DEFLAGRATIONS PROPAGATING IN STOICHIOMETRIC GASEOUS MIXTURES OF LOWER ALKANES WITH AIR Department of Physical Chemistry 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, District 3, Bucharest phone: +40-21-3143508; fax: +40-21-3159249 ISSN: 1844-0401 ARS DOCENDI PUBLISHING HOUSE Sos. Panduri 90, District 5 Bucharest

More information

Cellular structure of detonation wave in hydrogen-methane-air mixtures

Cellular structure of detonation wave in hydrogen-methane-air mixtures Open Access Journal Journal of Power Technologies 91 (3) (2011) 130 135 journal homepage:papers.itc.pw.edu.pl Cellular structure of detonation wave in hydrogen-methane-air mixtures Rafał Porowski, Andrzej

More information

Detonation initiation by hypervelocity projectiles

Detonation initiation by hypervelocity projectiles Detonation initiation 1 Detonation initiation by hypervelocity projectiles J. Bélanger, M.Kaneshige,J.E.Shepherd California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125 USA Abstract: We report experimental

More information

Propagation of hydrogen-air detonation in tube with obstacles

Propagation of hydrogen-air detonation in tube with obstacles Open Access Journal Journal of Power Technologies 91 (3) (2011) 122 129 journal homepage:papers.itc.pw.edu.pl Propagation of hydrogen-air detonation in tube with obstacles Wojciech Rudy, Rafał Porowski,

More information

Carbon Science and Technology

Carbon Science and Technology ASI RESEARCH ARTICLE Carbon Science and Technology Received:10/03/2016, Accepted:15/04/2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Presentation Start. Zero Carbon Energy Solutions 4/06/06 10/3/2013:; 1

Presentation Start. Zero Carbon Energy Solutions 4/06/06 10/3/2013:; 1 Presentation Start 10/3/2013:; 1 4/06/06 What is an Explosion? Keller, J.O. President and CEO,, ISO TC 197, Technical Program Director for the Built Environment and Safety; Gresho, M. President, FP2FIRE,

More information

Laminar Premixed Flames: Flame Structure

Laminar Premixed Flames: Flame Structure Laminar Premixed Flames: Flame Structure Combustion Summer School 2018 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinz Pitsch Course Overview Part I: Fundamentals and Laminar Flames Introduction Fundamentals and mass balances of

More information

CPPC: Development of a Simple Computer Code for H 2 and CO Combustion in Severe Accidents

CPPC: Development of a Simple Computer Code for H 2 and CO Combustion in Severe Accidents CPPC: Development of a Simple Computer Code for H 2 and CO Combustion in Severe Accidents Fernando Robledo (CSN) Juan M. Martín-Valdepeñas (CSN) Miguel A. Jiménez (CSN) Francisco Martín-Fuertes (UPM) CSNI

More information

SAFEKINEX BL

SAFEKINEX BL SAFEKINEX project Delft University of Technology Julianalaan 136 2628 BL Delft The Netherlands Tel: +31 15 278 43 92 Fax: +31 15 278 44 52 E-mail: Pekalski@tnw.tudelft.nl http://www.dct.tudelft.nl/part/explosion/

More information

TRANSITION TO DETONATION IN NON-UNIFORM H2-AIR: CHEMICAL KINETICS OF SHOCK-INDUCED STRONG IGNITION

TRANSITION TO DETONATION IN NON-UNIFORM H2-AIR: CHEMICAL KINETICS OF SHOCK-INDUCED STRONG IGNITION TRANSITION TO DETONATION IN NON-UNIFORM H2-AIR: CHEMICAL KINETICS OF SHOCK-INDUCED STRONG IGNITION L.R. BOECK*, J. HASSLBERGER AND T. SATTELMAYER INSTITUTE OF THERMODYNAMICS, TU MUNICH *BOECK@TD.MW.TUM.DE

More information

USE OF DETAILED KINETIC MECHANISMS FOR THE PREDICTION OF AUTOIGNITIONS

USE OF DETAILED KINETIC MECHANISMS FOR THE PREDICTION OF AUTOIGNITIONS USE OF DETAILED KINETIC MECHANISMS FOR THE PREDICTION OF AUTOIGNITIONS F. Buda 1, P.A. Glaude 1, F. Battin-Leclerc 1*, R. Porter 2, K.J. Hughes 2 and J.F. Griffiths 2 1 DCPR-CNRS, 1, rue Grandville, BP

More information

This article was published in an Elsevier journal. The attached copy is furnished to the author for non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the author s institution, sharing

More information

Direct experimental impulse measurements for detonations and deflagrations

Direct experimental impulse measurements for detonations and deflagrations Direct experimental impulse measurements for detonations and deflagrations M. Cooper, S. Jackson, J. Austin, E. Wintenberger, and J.E. Shepherd Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute

More information

Application of a Laser Induced Fluorescence Model to the Numerical Simulation of Detonation Waves in Hydrogen-Oxygen-Diluent Mixtures

Application of a Laser Induced Fluorescence Model to the Numerical Simulation of Detonation Waves in Hydrogen-Oxygen-Diluent Mixtures Supplemental material for paper published in the International J of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 30, 6044-6060, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.182 Application of a Laser Induced Fluorescence

More information

AME 513. " Lecture 8 Premixed flames I: Propagation rates

AME 513.  Lecture 8 Premixed flames I: Propagation rates AME 53 Principles of Combustion " Lecture 8 Premixed flames I: Propagation rates Outline" Rankine-Hugoniot relations Hugoniot curves Rayleigh lines Families of solutions Detonations Chapman-Jouget Others

More information

Workshop Paris, November 2006

Workshop Paris, November 2006 SAFe and Efficient hydrocarbon oxidation processes by KINetics and Explosion expertise and development of computational process engineering tools Project No. EVG1-CT-2002-00072 Workshop Paris, November

More information

Experimental study on the explosion characteristics of methane-hydrogen/air mixtures

Experimental study on the explosion characteristics of methane-hydrogen/air mixtures 26 th ICDERS July 3 th August 4 th, 217 Boston, MA, USA Experimental study on the explosion characteristics of methane-hydrogen/air mixtures Xiaobo Shen, Guangli Xiu * East China University of Science

More information

DETONATION WAVE PROPAGATION IN SEMI-CONFINED LAYERS OF HYDROGEN-AIR AND HYDROGEN-OXYGEN MIXTURES

DETONATION WAVE PROPAGATION IN SEMI-CONFINED LAYERS OF HYDROGEN-AIR AND HYDROGEN-OXYGEN MIXTURES DETONATION WAVE PROPAGATION IN SEMI-CONFINED LAYERS OF HYDROGEN-AIR AND HYDROGEN-OXYGEN MIXTURES Grune, J. 1 *, Sempert, K. 1, Friedrich, A. 1, Kuznetsov, M. 2, Jordan, T. 2 1 Pro-Science GmbH, Parkstr.9,

More information

Lecture 7 Detonation Waves

Lecture 7 Detonation Waves Lecture 7 etonation Waves p strong detonation weak detonation weak deflagration strong deflagration / 0 v =/ University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign eflagrations produce heat Thermal di usivity th

More information

DETAILED PROJECT PLAN

DETAILED PROJECT PLAN Proposal No. EVG1-2001-00098 SAFEKINEX 1 PROGRAMME ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Call identifier: EESD-ESD-3 (JO 2000/C 324/09) Project No. EVG1-2001-00098 - SAFEKINEX DETAILED PROJECT

More information

Combustion Theory and Applications in CFD

Combustion Theory and Applications in CFD Combustion Theory and Applications in CFD Princeton Combustion Summer School 2018 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinz Pitsch Copyright 201 8 by Heinz Pitsch. This material is not to be sold, reproduced or distributed

More information

Simulation of dust explosions in spray dryers

Simulation of dust explosions in spray dryers Simulation of dust explosions in spray dryers Dr.-Ing. K. van Wingerden, Dipl. Ing. T. Skjold, Dipl. Ing. O. R. Hansen, GexCon AS, Bergen (N) and Dipl. Ing. R. Siwek, FireEx Consultant GmbH, Giebenach

More information

Explosion venting data: A single maximum overpressure

Explosion venting data: A single maximum overpressure Energy Research Institute 53 rd UKELG meeting, 23rd April 2015 Explosion venting data: A single maximum overpressure is not sufficient Phylaktou H.N., Fakandu B.M., Andrews G.E. and Tomlin G. Energy Research

More information

MITIGATION OF VAPOUR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS BY CHEMICAL INHIBITION

MITIGATION OF VAPOUR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS BY CHEMICAL INHIBITION MITIGATION OF VAPOUR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS BY CHEMICAL INHIBITION Dirk Roosendans a, Pol Hoorelbeke b, Kees van Wingerden c a PhD Fellow, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium b Total,

More information

Unit 1 Fire Engineering Science

Unit 1 Fire Engineering Science IFE Level 4 Certificate in Fire Safety and Fire Science Unit 1 Fire Engineering Science Examiner Report March 2017 Introduction The examination paper appeared to present challenges for candidates and results

More information

DETONATION HAZARD CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THE CRITICAL ORIFICE PLATE DIAMETER FOR DETONATION PROPAGATION

DETONATION HAZARD CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THE CRITICAL ORIFICE PLATE DIAMETER FOR DETONATION PROPAGATION DETONATION HAZARD CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THE CRITICAL ORIFICE PLATE DIAMETER FOR DETONATION PROPAGATION by Mitchell Cross A thesis submitted to the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering In

More information

FLAME ACCELERATION AND TRANSITION FROM DEFLAGRATION TO DETONATION IN HYDROGEN EXPLOSIONS

FLAME ACCELERATION AND TRANSITION FROM DEFLAGRATION TO DETONATION IN HYDROGEN EXPLOSIONS FLAME ACCELERATION AND TRANSITION FROM DEFLAGRATION TO DETONATION IN HYDROGEN EXPLOSIONS A. Heidari and J.X. Wen* Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies, Faculty of Engineering, Kingston University Friars

More information

Detonation Diffraction

Detonation Diffraction Detonation Diffraction E. Schultz, J. Shepherd Detonation Physics Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91125 MURI Mid-Year Pulse Detonation Engine Review Meeting February 10-11, 2000 Super-critical Detonation Diffraction

More information

Jennifer Wen 1 & Changjian Wang 2,3. Warwick Fire, School of Engineering, University of Warwick

Jennifer Wen 1 & Changjian Wang 2,3. Warwick Fire, School of Engineering, University of Warwick A new single-step reaction mechanism for propane explosions covering the entire spectrum of flame acceleration, transition to detonation and detonation Jennifer Wen 1 & Changian Wang 2,3 1 Warwick Fire,

More information

Available online at ScienceDirect. Nuclear power plant explosions at Fukushima-Daiichi. Takashi Tsuruda*

Available online at   ScienceDirect. Nuclear power plant explosions at Fukushima-Daiichi. Takashi Tsuruda* Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 62 ( 2013 ) 71 77 The 9 th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology Nuclear power plant explosions at Fukushima-Daiichi

More information

Fundamentals of Rotating Detonation. Toshi Fujiwara (Nagoya University)

Fundamentals of Rotating Detonation. Toshi Fujiwara (Nagoya University) Fundamentals of Rotating Detonation Toshi Fujiwara (Nagoya University) New experimental results Cylindical channel D=140/150mm Hydrogen air; p o =1.0bar Professor Piotr Wolanski P [bar] 10 9 8 7 6 5 4

More information

Direct Simulation of Ultrafast Detonations in Mixtures

Direct Simulation of Ultrafast Detonations in Mixtures Direct Simulation of Ultrafast Detonations in Mixtures Patrick D. O Connor *, Lyle N. Long * and James B. Anderson * Department of Aerospace Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,

More information

High-pressure shock-tube study of the ignition of fuel-rich CH 4 /air and CH 4 /additive/air mixtures over a wide temperature range

High-pressure shock-tube study of the ignition of fuel-rich CH 4 /air and CH 4 /additive/air mixtures over a wide temperature range High-pressure shock-tube study of the ignition of fuel-rich CH 4 /air and CH 4 /additive/air mixtures over a wide temperature range J. Herzler, M. Fikri, O. Welz, C. Schulz Institute for Combustion and

More information

Laser-Induced Explosion and Detonation in Gas-Particle and Gas-Droplet Mixtures

Laser-Induced Explosion and Detonation in Gas-Particle and Gas-Droplet Mixtures Laser-Induced Explosion and Detonation in Gas-Particle and Gas-Droplet Mixtures Dr Konstantin Volkov Centre for Fire and Explosion Studies Kingston University Friars Avenue, Roehampton Vale, SW15 3DW London

More information

Detonations and explosions

Detonations and explosions 7. Detonations and explosions 7.. Introduction From an operative point of view, we can define an explosion as a release of energy into the atmosphere in a small enough volume and in a short enough time

More information

Detonation Characteristics Of Dimethyl Ether, Methanol and Ethanol Air Mixtures

Detonation Characteristics Of Dimethyl Ether, Methanol and Ethanol Air Mixtures 24 th ICDERS July 28 - August 2, 213 Taipei, Taiwan Detonation Characteristics Of Dimethyl Ether, Methanol and Ethanol Air Mixtures Peter Diakow and Gaby Ciccarelli Queen's University Kingston, Ontario,

More information

WP5 Combustion. Paris, October 16-18, Pre-normative REsearch for Safe use of Liquid HYdrogen

WP5 Combustion. Paris, October 16-18, Pre-normative REsearch for Safe use of Liquid HYdrogen WP5 Combustion Paris, October 16-18, 2018 Pre-normative REsearch for Safe use of Liquid HYdrogen 1 Work package 5: Combustion Work package number 5 Start Date or Starting Event Month 10 Work package title

More information

Ignition. Jerry Seitzman. Temperature (K) School of Aerospace Engineering Review. stable/steady self-sustained propagation of premixed flames

Ignition. Jerry Seitzman. Temperature (K) School of Aerospace Engineering Review. stable/steady self-sustained propagation of premixed flames Mole Fraction Temperature (K) Ignition Jerry Seitzman 0. 500 0.5 000 0. 0.05 0 CH4 HO HCO x 000 Temperature Methane Flame 0 0. 0. 0. Distance (cm) 500 000 500 0 Ignition - Review So far, examined stable/steady

More information

APPLICATION OF DETONATION TO PROPULSION. S. M. Frolov, V. Ya. Basevich, and V. S. Aksenov

APPLICATION OF DETONATION TO PROPULSION. S. M. Frolov, V. Ya. Basevich, and V. S. Aksenov APPLICATION OF DETONATION TO PROPULSION COMBUSTION CHAMBER WITH INTERMITTENT GENERATION AND AMPLIFICATION OF PROPAGATING REACTIVE SHOCKS S. M. Frolov, V. Ya. Basevich, and V. S. Aksenov N. N. Semenov Institute

More information

CFD Analysis of Vented Lean Hydrogen Deflagrations in an ISO Container

CFD Analysis of Vented Lean Hydrogen Deflagrations in an ISO Container 35 th UKELG Meeting, Spadeadam, 10-12 Oct. 2017 CFD Analysis of Vented Lean Hydrogen Deflagrations in an ISO Container Vendra C. Madhav Rao & Jennifer X. Wen Warwick FIRE, School of Engineering University

More information

Modified Porosity Distributed Resistance Combined to Flamelet Combustion Model for Numerical Explosion Modelling

Modified Porosity Distributed Resistance Combined to Flamelet Combustion Model for Numerical Explosion Modelling Modified Porosity Distributed Resistance Combined to Flamelet Combustion Model for Numerical Explosion Modelling Dr. Sávio Vianna School of Chemical Engineering University of Campinas - UNICAMP University

More information

Influence of a Dispersed Ignition in the Explosion of Two-Phase Mixtures

Influence of a Dispersed Ignition in the Explosion of Two-Phase Mixtures 25 th ICDERS August 2 7, 2015 Leeds, UK in the Explosion of Two-Phase Mixtures J.M. Pascaud Université d Orléans Laboratoire Prisme 63, avenue de Lattre de Tassigny 18020 BOURGES Cedex, France 1 Introduction

More information

CHAPTER 5 TNT EQUIVALENCE OF FIREWORKS

CHAPTER 5 TNT EQUIVALENCE OF FIREWORKS 109 CHAPTER 5 TNT EQUIVALENCE OF FIREWORKS 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 Explosives and Fireworks Explosives are reactive substances that can release high amount of energy when initiated (Meyer 1987). Explosive

More information

Theory and calibration of JWL and JWLB thermodynamic equations of state

Theory and calibration of JWL and JWLB thermodynamic equations of state Structures Under Shock and Impact XI 147 Theory and calibration of JWL and JWLB thermodynamic equations of state E. L. Baker 1, D. Murphy 1, L. I. Stiel 2 & E. Wrobel 1 1 US Army Armament Research Development

More information

DYNAMIC LOAD ANALYSIS OF EXPLOSION IN INHOMOGENEOUS HYDROGEN-AIR

DYNAMIC LOAD ANALYSIS OF EXPLOSION IN INHOMOGENEOUS HYDROGEN-AIR DYNAMIC LOAD ANALYSIS OF EXPLOSION IN INHOMOGENEOUS HYDROGEN-AIR Bjerketvedt, D. 1, Vaagsaether, K. 1, and Rai, K. 1 1 Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University College

More information

INFLUENCE OF INITIAL PRESSURE ON HYDROGEN/AIR FLAME ACCELERATION DURING SEVERE ACCIDENT IN NPP

INFLUENCE OF INITIAL PRESSURE ON HYDROGEN/AIR FLAME ACCELERATION DURING SEVERE ACCIDENT IN NPP INFLUENCE OF INITIAL PRESSURE ON HYDROGEN/AIR FLAME ACCELERATION DURING SEVERE ACCIDENT IN NPP Scarpa, R. 1, Studer, E. 2, Kudriakov, S. 3, Cariteau, B. 4 and Chaumeix, N. 5 1 DEN-STMF, CEA, Université

More information

Asymptotic Structure of Rich Methane-Air Flames

Asymptotic Structure of Rich Methane-Air Flames Asymptotic Structure of Rich Methane-Air Flames K. SESHADRI* Center for Energy and Combustion Research, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla,

More information

Detonations in Hydrocarbon Fuel Blends

Detonations in Hydrocarbon Fuel Blends Detonations in Hydrocarbon Fuel Blends J.M. Austin and J.E. Shepherd Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Explosion Dynamics Laboratory Report

More information

UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST FACULTY OF CHEMISTRY DOCTORAL SCHOOL IN CHEMISTRY. PhD THESIS SUMMARY

UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST FACULTY OF CHEMISTRY DOCTORAL SCHOOL IN CHEMISTRY. PhD THESIS SUMMARY UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST FACULTY OF CHEMISTRY DOCTORAL SCHOOL IN CHEMISTRY PhD THESIS SUMMARY CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETERS OF FUEL AIR EXPLOSIONS INITIATIONS PhD Student: Maria Prodan PhD Supervisor: Prof.

More information

Ignition delay-time study of fuel-rich CH 4 /air and CH 4 /additive/air mixtures over a wide temperature range at high pressure

Ignition delay-time study of fuel-rich CH 4 /air and CH 4 /additive/air mixtures over a wide temperature range at high pressure 25 th ICDERS August 2 7, 2015 Leeds, UK Ignition delay-time study of fuel-rich CH 4 /air and CH 4 /additive/air mixtures over a wide temperature range at high pressure Jürgen Herzler, Mustapha Fikri, Oliver

More information

Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction from Reflecting Detonations

Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction from Reflecting Detonations Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction from Reflecting Detonations J. Damazo 1, J. Ziegler 1, J. Karnesky 2, and J. E. Shepherd 1 1 Introduction The present work is concerned with the differences in how

More information

Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios of Ethanol and Toluene Experimental Studies

Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios of Ethanol and Toluene Experimental Studies 111 This article is available in PDF-format, in colour, at: www.wydawnictwa.ipo.waw.pl/materialy-wysokoenergetyczne.html Materiały Wysokoenergetyczne / High-Energetic Materials, 2016, 8, 111 117 ISSN 2083-0165

More information

Combustion Behind Shock Waves

Combustion Behind Shock Waves Paper 3F-29 Fall 23 Western States Section/Combustion Institute 1 Abstract Combustion Behind Shock Waves Sandeep Singh, Daniel Lieberman, and Joseph E. Shepherd 1 Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California

More information

EVALUATION OF HYDROGEN, PROPANE AND METHANE-AIR DETONATIONS INSTABILITY AND DETONABILITY

EVALUATION OF HYDROGEN, PROPANE AND METHANE-AIR DETONATIONS INSTABILITY AND DETONABILITY EVALUATION OF HYDROGEN, PROPANE AND METHANE-AIR DETONATIONS INSTABILITY AND DETONABILITY Borzou, B. 1 and Radulescu, M.I. 2 1 Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Ottawa, 161 Louis Pasteur,

More information

What Are Type Ia Supernovae?

What Are Type Ia Supernovae? What Are Type Ia Supernovae? Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik Based on collaborations with: W. Hillebrandt (MPA Garching) S.E. Woosley (UC Santa Cruz) M. Reinecke (MPA Garching) B. Leibundgut (ESO Garching)

More information

Phenomena in the Vicinity of Detonation Fonnation in a Gas

Phenomena in the Vicinity of Detonation Fonnation in a Gas 296 G. A. ZATSEV theory of relativity. But, it is necessary to keep in mind that for elementary particles the concrete character of the connection between the mass and the properties of space does not

More information

TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF FLUID MECHANICS 97

TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF FLUID MECHANICS 97 TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF FLUID MECHANICS 97 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/tpfm.2016.014 DESIGN OF COMBUSTION CHAMBER FOR FLAME FRONT VISUALISATION AND FIRST NUMERICAL SIMULATION J. Kouba, J. Novotný, J. Nožička

More information

Detonation Cell Width Measurements for H 2 N 2 O N 2 O 2 CH 4 NH 3 Mixtures

Detonation Cell Width Measurements for H 2 N 2 O N 2 O 2 CH 4 NH 3 Mixtures Detonation Cell Width Measurements for H 2 N 2 O N 2 O 2 CH 4 NH 3 Mixtures U. Pfahl, E. Schultz and J. E. Shepherd Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 925

More information

Experimental Study of 2D-Instabilities of Hydrogen Flames in Flat Layers

Experimental Study of 2D-Instabilities of Hydrogen Flames in Flat Layers 25 th ICDERS August 2 7, 2015 Leeds, UK Experimental Study of 2D-Instabilities of Hydrogen Flames in Flat Layers M. Kuznetsov 1 *, J. Grune 2, S. Tengah 1, J. Yanez 1 1 Intitute for Energy and Nuclear

More information

Severe, unconfined petrol vapour explosions

Severe, unconfined petrol vapour explosions Severe, unconfined petrol vapour explosions Graham Atkinson Health and Safety Laboratory Fire and Process Safety Unit Buncefield - Lessons for whom? Plant managers Safety managers Risk assessors Explosion

More information

Simulation of soot formation and analysis of the "Advanced soot model" parameters in an internal combustion engine

Simulation of soot formation and analysis of the Advanced soot model parameters in an internal combustion engine Simulation of soot formation and analysis of the "Advanced soot model" parameters in an internal combustion engine Marko Ban, dipl. ing.* Power Engineering Department Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

More information

Advanced Turbulence Models for Emission Modeling in Gas Combustion

Advanced Turbulence Models for Emission Modeling in Gas Combustion 1 Advanced Turbulence Models for Emission Modeling in Gas Combustion Ville Tossavainen, Satu Palonen & Antti Oksanen Tampere University of Technology Funding: Tekes, Metso Power Oy, Andritz Oy, Vattenfall

More information

Astrophysical Combustion: From a Laboratory Flame to a Thermonuclear Supernova

Astrophysical Combustion: From a Laboratory Flame to a Thermonuclear Supernova 25 th ICDERS August 2 7, 2015 Leeds, UK : From a Laboratory Flame to a Thermonuclear Supernova Alexei Y. Poludnenko Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C., USA 1 Introduction Exothermic processes associated

More information

Application of Steady and Unsteady Detonation Waves to Propulsion

Application of Steady and Unsteady Detonation Waves to Propulsion Application of Steady and Unsteady Detonation Waves to Propulsion Thesis by Eric Wintenberger In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology

More information

Faculty of Engineering. Contents. Introduction

Faculty of Engineering. Contents. Introduction Faculty of Engineering Contents Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames vs. Hydrogen Explosion: A Short Survey on Experimental, Theoretical and Analytical Studies Dr.-Ing. Siva P R Muppala Lecturer Prof. Jennifer

More information

APPENDIX A: LAMINAR AND TURBULENT FLAME PROPAGATION IN HYDROGEN AIR STEAM MIXTURES*

APPENDIX A: LAMINAR AND TURBULENT FLAME PROPAGATION IN HYDROGEN AIR STEAM MIXTURES* APPENDIX A: LAMINAR AND TURBULENT FLAME PROPAGATION IN HYDROGEN AIR STEAM MIXTURES* A.1 Laminar Burning Velocities of Hydrogen-Air and Hydrogen-Air-Steam Mixtures A.1.1 Background Methods of measuring

More information

Detonation of Gas Particle Flow

Detonation of Gas Particle Flow 2 Detonation of Gas Particle Flow F. Zhang 2.1 Introduction Fine organic or metallic particles suspended in an oxidizing or combustible gas form a reactive particle gas mixture. Explosion pressures in

More information

Explosion Properties of Highly Concentrated Ozone Gas. 1 Iwatani International Corporation, Katsube, Moriyama, Shiga , Japan

Explosion Properties of Highly Concentrated Ozone Gas. 1 Iwatani International Corporation, Katsube, Moriyama, Shiga , Japan Explosion Properties of Highly Concentrated Ozone Gas Kunihiko Koike 1*, Masaharu Nifuku 2, Koichi Izumi 1, Sadaki Nakamura 1, Shuzo Fujiwara 2 and Sadashige Horiguchi 2 1 Iwatani International Corporation,

More information

SIMULATION OF DETONATION AFTER AN ACCIDENTAL HYDROGEN RELEASE IN ENCLOSED ENVIRONMENTS

SIMULATION OF DETONATION AFTER AN ACCIDENTAL HYDROGEN RELEASE IN ENCLOSED ENVIRONMENTS SIMULATION OF DETONATION AFTER AN ACCIDENTAL HYDROGEN RELEASE IN ENCLOSED ENVIRONMENTS L. Bédard Tremblay, 1 L. Fang, 1 L. Bauwens,1 P.H.E. Finstad,2 Z. Cheng3 and A. V. Tchouvelev3 1 Department of Mechanical

More information

DET3D - A CFD TOOL FOR SIMULATING HYDROGEN COMBUSTION IN NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY

DET3D - A CFD TOOL FOR SIMULATING HYDROGEN COMBUSTION IN NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY DET3D - A CFD TOOL FOR SIMULATING HYDROGEN COMBUSTION IN NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY Reinhard Redlinger Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, IKET Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen Germany

More information

Hot Spot Ignition in White Dwarfs One-zone Ignition Times

Hot Spot Ignition in White Dwarfs One-zone Ignition Times Hot Spot Ignition in White Dwarfs One-zone Ignition Times L. Jonathan Dursi CITA, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H8, Canada Frank X. Timmes Theoretical Astrophysics Group, Los Alamos National

More information

Formation and Evolution of Distorted Tulip Flames

Formation and Evolution of Distorted Tulip Flames 25 th ICDERS August 2 7, 2015 Leeds, UK Formation and Evolution of Distorted Tulip Flames Huahua Xiao 1, 2, Ryan W. Houim 1, Elaine S. Oran 1, and Jinhua Sun 2 1 University of Maryland College Park, Maryland,

More information

GHS: Physical Hazards

GHS: Physical Hazards A liquid having a flash point of not more than 93 C (199.4 F). 3 4 Extremely Liquid and Vapor Highly Liquid and Vapor Liquid and Vapor Combustible Liquid Liquids Flash point < 23 C (73.4 F) and initial

More information

Chapter 5 Test. Directions: Write the correct letter on the blank before each question.

Chapter 5 Test. Directions: Write the correct letter on the blank before each question. Chapter 5 Test Name: Date: Directions: Write the correct letter on the blank before each question. Objective 1: Explain the science of fire as it relates to energy, forms of ignition, and modes of combustion.

More information

Combustion. Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

Combustion. Indian Institute of Science Bangalore Combustion Indian Institute of Science Bangalore Combustion Applies to a large variety of natural and artificial processes Source of energy for most of the applications today Involves exothermic chemical

More information

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN COMBUSTION. Jan-patrice SIMONEAU, FRAMATOME - FRANCE

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN COMBUSTION. Jan-patrice SIMONEAU, FRAMATOME - FRANCE FR0200503 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN COMBUSTION Jan-patrice SIMONEAU, FRAMATOME - FRANCE Novatome - 10, rue Juliette Recamier- F 69456 LYON cedexo6 - France Ph : +33 4 72 74 73 75 - Facs : +33 4

More information

The modelling of premixed laminar combustion in a closed vessel

The modelling of premixed laminar combustion in a closed vessel INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING Combust. Theory Modelling 8 (2004) 721 743 COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING PII: S1364-7830(04)69216-3 The modelling of premixed laminar combustion in a closed vessel Khizer

More information

Flame Acceleration and Transition to Detonation in Benzene-Air Mixtures

Flame Acceleration and Transition to Detonation in Benzene-Air Mixtures Flame Acceleration and Transition to Detonation in Benzene-Air Mixtures R. Knystautas, J.H.S. Lee Dept. of Mechanical Engineering McGill University, Montreal, Canada J. E. Shepherd Graduate Aeronautical

More information

Mixing and Combustion of Rich Fireballs

Mixing and Combustion of Rich Fireballs Mixing and Combustion of Rich Fireballs F. Pintgen and J. E. Shepherd Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125 U.S.A. GALCIT Report FM23-4 October 14, 23

More information

An analytical model for the impulse of a single-cycle pulse detonation tube

An analytical model for the impulse of a single-cycle pulse detonation tube Preprint, see final version in Journal of Propulsion and Power, 19(1):22-38, 23. http://dx.doi.org/1.2514/2.699. See also the erratum (JPP 2(4) 765-767, 24) and responses to comments by Heiser and Pratt

More information

Hydrocarbon - Air - Nitrous Oxide Detonations

Hydrocarbon - Air - Nitrous Oxide Detonations Hydrocarbon - Air - Nitrous Oxide Detonations M. Kaneshige Mechanical Engineering R. Akbar, J.E. Shepherd Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories California Institute of Technology April 14-15, 1997 Western

More information

Ignition Delay Time of Small Hydrocarbons-Nitrous Oxide(-Oxygen) Mixtures

Ignition Delay Time of Small Hydrocarbons-Nitrous Oxide(-Oxygen) Mixtures 24 th ICDERS July 28 - August 2, 2013 Taipei, Taiwan Ignition Delay Time of Small Hydrocarbons-Nitrous Oxide(-Oxygen) Mixtures Rémy Mével and Joseph Shepherd Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California

More information

VENTED HYDROGEN-AIR DEFLAGRATION IN A SMALL ENCLOSED VOLUME

VENTED HYDROGEN-AIR DEFLAGRATION IN A SMALL ENCLOSED VOLUME VENTED HYDROGEN-AIR DEFLAGRATION IN A SMALL ENCLOSED VOLUME Rocourt, X. 1, Awamat, S. 1, Sochet, I. 1, Jallais, S. 2 1 Laboratoire PRISME, ENSI de Bourges, Univ. Orleans, UPRES EA 4229, 88 bd Lahitolle,

More information

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 7 Dec 2015

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 7 Dec 2015 Chapman-Jouguet deflagrations and their transition to detonation Mohamed Saif a, Wentian Wang a, Andrzej Pekalski b, Marc Levin c, Matei I. Radulescu a a Department of Mechanical Engineering, University

More information

CFD study of gas mixing efficiency and comparisons with experimental data

CFD study of gas mixing efficiency and comparisons with experimental data 17 th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering ESCAPE17 V. Plesu and P.S. Agachi (Editors) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1 CFD study of gas mixing efficiency and comparisons with

More information

Combustion of Kerosene-Air Mixtures in a Closed Vessel

Combustion of Kerosene-Air Mixtures in a Closed Vessel Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 010 Paris Combustion of Kerosene-Air Mixtures in a Closed Vessel C. Strozzi *, J-M Pascaud, P. Gillard Institut PRISME, Université d Orléans. *Corresponding

More information

Modelling of transient stretched laminar flame speed of hydrogen-air mixtures using combustion kinetics

Modelling of transient stretched laminar flame speed of hydrogen-air mixtures using combustion kinetics Loughborough University Institutional Repository Modelling of transient stretched laminar flame speed of hydrogen-air mixtures using combustion kinetics This item was submitted to Loughborough University's

More information

DETAILED MODELLING OF SHORT-CONTACT-TIME REACTORS

DETAILED MODELLING OF SHORT-CONTACT-TIME REACTORS DETAILED MODELLING OF SHORT-CONTACT-TIME REACTORS Olaf Deutschmann 1, Lanny D. Schmidt 2, Jürgen Warnatz 1 1 Interdiziplinäres Zentrum für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Universität Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer

More information

Irreversible Phenomena

Irreversible Phenomena Irreversible Phenomena Kunio Terao Irreversible Phenomena Ignitions, Combustion and Detonation Waves With 363 Figures and 23 Tables Kunio Terao Tsuruga-oka 1-8-3 238-0056 Yokosuka Japan Library of Congress

More information

Shock Wave Propagation due to Methane-Air Mixture Explosion and Effect on a Concrete Enclosure

Shock Wave Propagation due to Methane-Air Mixture Explosion and Effect on a Concrete Enclosure Shock Wave Propagation due to Methane-Air Mixture Explosion and Effect on a Concrete Enclosure Sharad Tripathi, T.C.Arun Murthy, Alain Hodin, K.Suresh, Anup Ghosh International Contents 1. Introduction

More information

Rouen LBV 2012 ACCURACY OF TWO METHODS TO MEASURE LAMINAR FLAME SPEEDS: (1) STEADY BUNSEN BURNER FLAMES AND (2) SPHERICAL FLAMES IN BOMBS.

Rouen LBV 2012 ACCURACY OF TWO METHODS TO MEASURE LAMINAR FLAME SPEEDS: (1) STEADY BUNSEN BURNER FLAMES AND (2) SPHERICAL FLAMES IN BOMBS. Rouen LBV 2012 ACCURACY OF TWO METHODS TO MEASURE LAMINAR FLAME SPEEDS: (1) STEADY BUNSEN BURNER FLAMES AND (2) SPHERICAL FLAMES IN BOMBS. A. Bonhomme, T. Boushaki*, L. Selle, B. Ferret and T. Poinsot

More information

RECOMMENDATION FOR MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MESH SIZE FOR PLANT COMBUSTION ANALYSES WITH CFD CODES. M. A. Movahed. AREVA GmbH Offenbach, Germany

RECOMMENDATION FOR MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MESH SIZE FOR PLANT COMBUSTION ANALYSES WITH CFD CODES. M. A. Movahed. AREVA GmbH Offenbach, Germany OECD/NEA & IAEA Worshop Hosted by United States NRC Washington D.C., USA 14 16 September 2010 RECOMMENDATION FOR MAIMUM ALLOWABLE MESH SIZE FOR PLANT COMBUSTION ANALYSES WITH CFD CODES M. A. Movahed AREVA

More information

LINEAR ELASTIC RESPONSE OF TUBES TO INTERNAL DETONATION LOADING

LINEAR ELASTIC RESPONSE OF TUBES TO INTERNAL DETONATION LOADING Journal of Sound and Vibration (4):67-6,. Preprint, see journal for final version. http://dx.doi.org/.6/jsvi..49 LINEAR ELASTIC RESPONSE OF TUBES TO INTERNAL DETONATION LOADING W.M. Beltman University

More information

The Effect of Initial Pressure on Explosions of Hydrogen- Enriched Methane/Air Mixtures

The Effect of Initial Pressure on Explosions of Hydrogen- Enriched Methane/Air Mixtures The Effect of Initial Pressure on Explosions of Hydrogen- Enriched Methane/Air Mixtures Cammarota F. 1, Di Benedetto A. 1, Di Sarli V. 1, Salzano E. 1, Russo G. 2 1 Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione,

More information

Chemical inhibiting of hydrogen-air detonations Sergey M. Frolov

Chemical inhibiting of hydrogen-air detonations Sergey M. Frolov Chemical inhibiting of hydrogen-air detonations Sergey M. Frolov Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics Moscow, Russia Outline Introduction Theoretical studies Classical 1D approach (ZND-model) Detailed

More information

Reactions and Reactors

Reactions and Reactors Reactions and Reactors ChE 400 - Reactive Process Engineering If we want to run a chemical process in order to convert some reactants (the reactor feed) to some product (the reactor effluent), we have

More information