Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

Similar documents
(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Geomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River

Spring Run Spawning Habitat Assessment Sediment Mobility

Sediment Transport Analysis for Stream Restoration Design: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

BZ471, Steam Biology & Ecology Exam 1

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Big Wood River. General Information

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

RAILWAYS AND FISH: HOW TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE FISH HABITAT VALUES AT STREAM CROSSINGS THROUGH PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

Squaw Creek. General Information

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

Gravel Augmentation Experiments

Physical modeling to guide river restoration projects: An Overview

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Can fluvial-hydraulic models accurately predict bed load transport in gravel bed streams?

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Perspectives on river restoration science, geomorphic processes, and channel stability

Restoration Manuals. FINAL REPORT Physical Modeling Experiments to Guide River Restoration Projects: Prepared for

UPPER TUOLUMNE RIVER ECOSYSTEM PROJECT Preliminary Sediment Source and Sediment Transport Capacity Evaluation: O Shaughnessy Dam to Poopenaut Valley

Study on Flushing Mechanism of Dam Reservoir Sedimentation and Recovery of Riffle-Pool in Downstream Reach by a Flushing Bypass Tunnel

Reach 1A Spawning Area Bed Mobility

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Geomorphology 5. Stream Sediment Stream Sediment

Stream Classification

River Nith restoration, cbec UK Ltd, October 2013 APPENDIX A

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Restoring Entrenched Rivers: lessons learned from the

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Restoring the Napa River:

Evaluation of Geomorphic Effects of Removal of Marmot and Little Sandy Dams and Potential Impacts on Anadromous Salmonids

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure. Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

~ W 89 CONTENTS J-1 J-1 J-6 J-7 J-9 J-10 J-10 J-10

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

The Effects of Geomorphology and Watershed Land Use on Spawning Habitat

Unconventional Wisdom and the Effects of Dams on Downstream Coarse Sediment Supply. Byron Amerson, Jay Stallman, John Wooster, and Derek Booth

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Calculation of Stream Discharge Required to Move Bed Material

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Session C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design

Gravel Extraction Annual Monitoring Report

Lectures Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology. Gauley River Images. Ancients' (= Biblical) Model of Water (Hydrologic) Cycle

Mississippi River West Bay Diversion Geomorphic Assessment and 1-D Modeling Plan

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Experimental evidence for the effect of hydrographs on sediment pulse dynamics in gravel-bedded rivers

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

3 Theoretical Basis for SAM.sed Calculations

Channel responses to the removal of Gold Ray and Savage Rapids Dam. Prepared by Desirée Tullos and Cara Water

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

60 PERCENT DESIGN REPORT HABITAT RESTORATION OF THE CHELAN RIVER REACH 4 AND TAILRACE

Seagrass Transplantation & Environmental & Marine Consulting Services, Inc. Drew Campbell, Vice President & Lead Scientst.

Technical Memorandum

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Geomorphology. considerations

Sediment and Water Quality in HEC-RAS. Mark Jensen

RESTORATION DESIGN FOR REROUTED WATERCOURSES

River floodplain regime and stratigraphy. Drs. Nanette C. Kingma.

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Influence of dam removal and past sediment mining on river morphology and biology: example of the Vienne River (France)

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

Dolores River Watershed Study

Environmental Value. Low Moderate High

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF FLUVIAL SEDIMENT DELIVERY, NEKA RIVER, IRAN. S.E. Kermani H. Golmaee M.Z. Ahmadi

Ecosystem response during the removal of the Elwha River Dams

What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon Wash?

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Estimated Sediment Volume: Bridge Street Dam Impoundment, Royal River, Yarmouth, Maine

BZ471, Steam Biology & Ecology Exam

DRAFT LOW FLOW CONVEYANCE CHANNEL BORAMEP TOTAL LOAD ANALYSIS 2001 MIDDLE RIO GRANDE, NEW MEXICO MAY 2005

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MEASUREMENTS OF SAND THICKNESSES IN GRAND CANYON,

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Upper Manistee River Instream Fish Habitat Assessment

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY C A L I F O R N I A S T A T E L A N D S C O M M I S S I O N

Transcription:

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc. scott@mcbaintrush.com

Components Some geomorphic and ecological considerations Conceptual approach at understanding augmentation needs, locations, and rates Augmentation grain size considerations Augmentation methods

Thalweg Elevation Typical geomorphic responses Year of dam construction Present-day Distance Below dam

Potential ecological responsessalmonid spawning habitat, benthic macroinvertebrate habitat

Thalweg Elevation Potential ecological responsesabandoned side channels Side channel entrances Year of dam construction Present-day Distance Below dam

Potential Objective: Re-establish and maintain coarse sediment balance Dam induced changes in coarse sediment supply Degrade Aggrade Dam induced changes in coarse sediment transport capacity

Conceptualizing the evolution in sediment budget and routing

Coarse Sediment Transport Capacity (tons/day) Tools to estimate coarse sediment transport rates Bedload transport measurements 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 Existing Condition Post-transfusion Sediment transport relationships Gravel Refresher 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 Water Discharge (ft3/s)

Potential shortterm and longterm strategy Short-term transfusion to rapidly increase storage Long-term augmentation to maintain increased storage

How could we implement shortterm and longterm strategy? Depends on: Impact of dam on sediment supply and storage Geomorphic and ecological restoration objectives Cost Timeline Others

Short-term transfusion sites-planning level locations and volume estimates

Sum up the introduction areas Approx river mile location Approx length (ft) Approx width (ft) Estimated depth of sediment to be placed (ft) Approx. surface area to be constructed / enhanced (ft2) Estimated volume of coarse sediment to be added (yd3) 111.48 2,030 100 3.0 201,600 22,400 111.05 1,520 40 7.0 56,100 14,540 110.73 110 40 3.0 4,400 490 Then consider: Access, logistics, and land ownership Risk Cost Ecological benefits Conceptual models Regulatory requirements Prioritization and sequencing TOTAL: CONSTRUCTION LEVEL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS 37,430 cy yds

Grain size considerations Spawning Gravel versus Coarse Sediment Fines versus screening out fines Current and future transport rates (and augmentation needs)

Coarse Sediment vs Spawning Gravel 8 mm (0.3 in) 25 mm (1 in) Spawning Gravel Coarse Sediment Augmentation 101 mm (4 in) Mobilization Threshold at 11,000 152 mm cfs (6 in) 8 Size in (mm) 32 256 Medium Gravel Cobble Boulder Coarse Bed Material Load

Fines versus screening out fines Instream placement in California usually requires fines to be screened out, and placed material to be double washed (turbidity, mercury, sand) However, fines are a natural component of substrate, and reasonable amounts of sand can be beneficial to incubating salmonid eggs

Coarse Sediment Transport Capacity (tons/day) Potential changes in grain size and coarse sediment transport rates 100,000 10,000 1,000 Increased transport rates via decreased grain size 100 10 1 Existing Condition Post-transfusion 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 Water Discharge (ft3/s)

Augmentation Introduction: Potential source areas Restore two sites for the price of one

Augmentation source areas: materials testing to estimate net yield from source area Percent Finer 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 37% sample weight removed by processing for coarse sediment between 9.5 mm and 127 mm 10% 0% Total distribution (D84=73 mm, D50=19 mm) Distribution with particles <9.5 mm removed (D84=96 mm, D50=36 mm) Distribution with particles <9.5 mm and > 127 mm removed (D84=72 mm, D50=31 mm) 1 10 100 Particle Size (mm)

Potential Coarse Sediment Augmentation Methods

Method #1: Instream placement method- Riffle and/or pool tail augmentation

Method #2: Instream placement method- Bar creation

Method #3: Fluvial placement method

Method #4: Selffeeding method (high flow recruitment pile)

Method #5: Restore more natural poolriffle sequence and redistribute slope

Modeling tools Additional information? scott@mcbaintrush.com Other Coarse Sediment Management Plans and brochures Implementation designs CALFED white paper Kristin Bunte review Monitoring plans