Human Impacts to Rivers

Similar documents
ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Kaskaskia Morphology Study Headwaters to Lake Shelbyville

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

Appendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

Annotated Bibliography of River Avulsions Pat Dryer Geography 364 5/14/2007

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Appendix E: Cowardin Classification Coding System

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Name: Mid-Year Review #2 SAR

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Consequences of river regulation works: altered fluvial processes + increasing flood hazard

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Monitoring Headwater Streams for Landscape Response to

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

4. Reconstructing the Historical Riverine Landscape of the Puget Lowland

Ms. A. Mormando's Class *

Columbia Estuary Province

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

GLG362/GLG598 Geomorphology K. Whipple October, 2009 I. Characteristics of Alluvial Channels

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Geomorphology Of The Chilliwack River Watershed Landform Mapping At North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington By National Park Service

Geomorphology Studies

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure. Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

Business. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition, and Landscape Development

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

APPROACH TO THE SPANISH WATER ORGANISATION IMPROVING FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING, LAWS AND AUTHORITIES COORDINATION

Unconventional Wisdom and the Effects of Dams on Downstream Coarse Sediment Supply. Byron Amerson, Jay Stallman, John Wooster, and Derek Booth

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Lab 13: Fluvial Processes and Landforms

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

A floodplain is the flat land immediately surrounding a stream channel and innundated at 5mes of high flow.

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

Geomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge.

Rivers. Regents Earth Science Weathering & Erosion

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Stream Classification

Section 5. Low-Gradient Streams. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF RETENTION PONDS

Landscape Development

Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply: Advancing the Science of Watershed Analysis

Surface Processes Focus on Mass Wasting (Chapter 10)

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Attachment D. Technical Memorandum, Susitna River Large Woody Debris Reconnaissance (March 2013)

Floods Lecture #21 20

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

PolyMet NorthMet Project

River Meandering and Braiding. Pierre Y. Julien. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Review of Riparian Function Riparian Management Riparian Monitoring

Assessment. Assessment

Long Valley Meadow Restoration Project

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

New Approaches to Restoring NH s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal

Evolution of the Po Delta, Italy

Carex nudata, a native sedge, as facilitator of restoration goals following passive restoration

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

What is a watershed or landscape perspective?

General discussion and conclusions

FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE ENTIAT RIVER, WA, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR STREAM RESTORATION

Page 1. Name:

We are interconnected, we are resilient As air temperatures warm forests change, fires increase glaciers retreat, snowpack diminishes sediment

DRAFT DISCUSSION OF SKOKOMISH RIVER VALLEY FLOOD AND A VULSION HAZARDS

Transcription:

Human Impacts to Rivers Sediment Water Wood Confinement Valley slope Channel morphology Bank material Flow obstructions Riparian vegetation

Human Impacts on Rivers dams channelization loss of woody debris/riparian forests

More than 80,000 dams affect > 90% of the nation's 5.8 million km of rivers. QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Dams trap a higher proportion of runoff in drier regions

U.S. Dam construction leveled of in 1980s at almost a billion acre-feet

Timing of Dam construction varied regionally, but was fastest between 1940 and 1980.

QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Hoover Dam

Timber crib dam in Michigan QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Reservoirs often trap 40% to >80% of the sediment carried by large rivers, reducing the sediment delivered to coastal environments despite increased soil erosion in upland environments. QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean, James P. M. Syvitski, Charles J. Vörösmarty, Albert J. Kettner, Pamela Green, Science, v. 308, p. 376-380.

Human s increased annual sediment delivery to rivers by 2.3 billion tons, from about 6.5 billion tons to almost 9 billion tons QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Human s decreased annual sediment delivery to oceans by 1.4 billion tons, from about 6.5 billion tons to about 5 billion tons QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Less sediment reaches the coast in Asia and parts of the Americas due to dam construction QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Humans have simultaneously increased the sediment transport by global rivers through soil erosion (by 2.3 ± 0.6 billion metric tons per year), yet reduced the flux of sediment reaching the world's coasts (by 1.4 ± 0.3 billion metric tons per year) because of retention within reservoirs.

Splash dams

Human Impacts on Rivers dams channelization loss of woody debris/riparian forests

Los Angeles River at Vernon QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Los Angeles River at Canoga Ave.

California Missouri QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Connecticut Illinois QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Port of Seattle circa 1870 Lower Duwamish River and estuary

Lower Duwamish River today

Human Impacts on Rivers dams sediment input channelization loss of woody debris/riparian forests

Extent of global forests Forests have covered about one-third of the Earth s land surface during the Holocene. But the extent of forest cover has changed substantially... Oregon Amazon Cameroon

Few of the worlds forests retain frontier conditions

Log jams were significant obstacles to navigation and land development in the western U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers aggressively desnagged American Rivers Thousands of snags were removed from Puget Sound rivers between 1880 and the mid-20th Century Snags/Year 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Rivers & Harbors Skagit River All Rivers 0 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960

LWD can control the formation of pools and bars, and thereby channel reach morphology

Greater wood loading leads to more pools For channels we ve surveyed in Alaska and Washington, a plane-bed morphology occurs only at low LWD loading pool spacing (channel widths/pool) 20 15 10 5 0 0.0 plane-bed pool-riffle SE Alaska NW Washington 0.5 1.0 LWD frequency (pieces/m) 1.5

Log jams trap copious amounts of sediment and aggrade entire reaches of channel. A 100 m

How big does a log have to be in order to influence a river?

The key member logs that anchor log jams tend to have a diameter half the channel depth and a length half the channel width.

NISQ Other Jams SNOH STILL Pieces/Kilometer

Valley jam Position in Channel Network Queets River, Washington Log steps Meander jam Bankfull bench

Effects of Wood in Rivers 1000 Valley Bottom Years 100 10 1 In-Channel Pools Cover Bank Complexity Reach Channel Switching Islands Sloughs Water, Sediment & Wood Routing 1 100 10,000 Spatial scale (meters)

Environmental History of Puget Sound Rivers Two dominant types of river valleys: Pleistocene (glacial) and Holocene (fluvial) Pleistocene (glacial) valleys were incised by meltwater beneath the Puget Lobe glacier

Holocene (fluvial) valleys were incised by rivers into the Puget Lowland after deglaciation

Lidar DEM Pleistocene (glacial ) valley: Snoqualmie River 16 14 12 * * 2606001 ~1870 Landscape 10 8 6 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Horizontal distance (m) * = Snoqualmie river channel 16 * * 2606021 14 12 10 8 0 400 800 1,200 1,600 Horizontal distance (m) Channel pattern: Meandering Habitats: Oxbows and large depressional wetlands Cross valley profile: Convex

Holocene (fluvial) valley: Nisqually River 18 16 14 * * 8 1999 aerial & 2000 field 12 10 8 0 400 800 Horizontal distance (m) * = main channel 23 21 11 19 * * 17 15 13 0 400 800 Horizontal distance (m) Channel pattern: Anastomosing Habitats: Multiple channels & floodplain sloughs Cross valley profile: Corrugated from channels & islands

Examples of cross-valley topography Pleistocene valleys Holocene valleys 12 Green River in Tukwila * * xs 89 Cedar River near Elliott 36 27 10 34 8 32 6 30 * * 4 28 2 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Horizontal Distance (m) 26 0 500 Horizontal distance (m) = regraded areas (e.g. Southcenter Mall) River perched above floodplain River at low point of floodplain

Comparative river dynamics Avulsion type: Meander cutoff Channel switching Floodplain occupation rate: Slow Rapid Migration & avulsion zone: Narrow Wide

Metric Prediction Pleistocene Holocene MORPHOLOGY 1. Channel gradient Low High 2. Stable forested islands Few Many (surrogate for branching pattern) 3. Sinuosity Meandering Strait 4. Cross-valley topography Convex Corrugated HABITATS 5. Wetland area High Low 6. Oxbow ponds Many Few 7. Total length of floodplain sloughs Variable High DYNAMICS 8. Dominant avulsion type Meander cutoff Channel switching 9. Channel migration zone Narrow Wide Slow rate Rapid rate

Nooksack River

Nooksack River Glacial valley Fluvial valley

Change to wetland area in four North Sound estuaries/deltas mid 1800s mid 1900s Wetland area (hectares) 20,000 10,000 P RT 1870s 2000 ESS EEM 0 NKS SKG STL SNH NKS SKG STL SNH EEM=estuarine emergent; ESS=estuarine scrub-shrub; RT=riverine-tidal; P=palustrine

Hazard prediction and zoning Pleistocene valleys Rivers migrate slowly within ~10% of the valley, but floodwaters fill the valley with regularity White (now Green) River near Kent, 1906 Holocene valleys Rivers avulse & migrate with high frequency within ~60-70% of the valley Skykomish River, 1917 In other words: in a Pleistocene valley the river channel won t visit but the water will--frequently a Holocene valley river channel will knock on your door before long

Restoring rivers, habitats, and species Without a planning framework