Out with the Old, In with the New: Implementing the Results of the Iowa Rapid Floodplain Modeling Project

Similar documents
ASFPM - Rapid Floodplain Mapping

Base Level Engineering FEMA Region 6

Applying GIS to Hydraulic Analysis

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Dealing with Zone A Flood Zones. Topics of Discussion. What is a Zone A Floodplain?

Real-Time Flood Forecasting Modeling in Nashville, TN utilizing HEC-RTS

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA

Flood Insurance Study

HEC & GIS Modeling of the Brushy Creek HEC & GIS Watershed Modeling of the

GREENE COUNTY, PA. Revised Preliminary DFIRM Mapping FEMA. Kevin Donnelly, P.E., CFM GG3, Greenhorne & O Mara, Inc. April 10, 2013

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses Using ArcGIS

Hydrologic Engineering Applications of Geographic Information Systems

CONVERTING A NEXRAD MAP TO A FLOODPLAIN MAP. Oscar Robayo, Tim Whiteaker, and David Maidment*

FLOODPLAIN MAPPING OF RIVER KRISHNANA USING HEC-RAS MODEL AT TWO STREACHES NAMELY KUDACHI AND UGAR VILLAGES OF BELAGAVI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Zone A Modeling (What Makes A Equal Approximate, Adequate, or Awesome)

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

Vulnerability of Flood Hazard in Selected Ayeyarwady Delta Region, Myanmar

Flood Inundation Mapping

Extreme Phenomena in Dobrogea - Floods and Droughts

Using NFHL Data for Hazus Flood Hazard Analysis: An Exploratory Study

Community Discovery Data Questionnaire

Discovery Data Questionnaire

NAVAJO NATION PROFILE

REMOTE SENSING AND GEOSPATIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WATERSHED DELINEATION

Issue 44: Phase II & III H&H Issues Date: 07/03/2006 Page 1

CWMS Modeling for Real-Time Water Management

Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Yavapai County Flood Control District. Prescott Valley Mapping Activity Statement Activities (Zone A Floodplain Delineation and Base Map Updates)

USGS Flood Inundation Mapping of the Suncook River in Chichester, Epsom, Pembroke and Allenstown, New Hampshire

Nebraska. Large Area Mapping Initiative. The Nebraska. Introduction. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources

Flood Hazard Inundation Mapping. Presentation. Flood Hazard Mapping

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

A New National Flood Inundation Mapping Science Initiative

Flood Event Analysis to Estimate the Avoided Damages Due to Flood Improvement Projects & Voluntary Buyout Program

Muhammad Rezaul Haider (A ). Date of Submission: Course No.: CEE 6440, Fall 2016.

Floodplain Modeling and Mapping Using The Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Hec-RAS/Hec-GeoRAS Applications. Case of Edirne, Turkey.

Las Colonias Subdivision September 2010 Flood Study

Corps Involvement in FEMA s Map Modernization Program

Breaking the 5 Mile per Hour Barrier: Automated Mapping Using a Normal Depth Calculation

A Cloud-Based Flood Warning System For Forecasting Impacts to Transportation Infrastructure Systems

Technical Memorandum No

13 Watershed Delineation & Modeling

Leon Creek Watershed October 17-18, 1998 Rainfall Analysis Examination of USGS Gauge Helotes Creek at Helotes, Texas

Document Title. Estimating the Value of Partner Contributions to Flood Mapping Projects. Blue Book

A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner

New Mapping, Recent Events What do we know? June 9, 2011

Flood Hazard Zone Modeling for Regulation Development

New Service Provided by State Agency in Oregon: Base Flood Elevation Determinations

Storm Surge Analysis Update Meeting Cross City, Florida June 17, 2014

San Antonio River Authority. San Antonio River Authority Floodworks implementation in the San Antonio River Basin. Nefi Garza, PE, CFM

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT IN MID- EASTERN PART OF DHAKA, BANGLADESH

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

GIS Techniques for Floodplain Delineation. Dean Djokic

FLOOD RISK MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF THE M ZAB VALLEY, ALGERIA

A SIMPLE GIS METHOD FOR OBTAINING FLOODED AREAS

Leveraging LiDAR for Statewide NHD Hydrography Projects. Susan Phelps, CFM, GISP

State of Washington RiskMAP Business Plan

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

Section 4: Model Development and Application

MAPPING THE FLASH FLOOD PRONE AREA IN THE TAITA WATERSHED (ROMANIA) USING TOPOGRAPHIC INDEXES AND HYDRAULIC MODEL

Juneau Jokulhlaup Inundation Report

Automated Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling of a Hydroelectric System UC1131 July 2012

Introduction. Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water

IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Determination of flood risks in the yeniçiftlik stream basin by using remote sensing and GIS techniques

Results of the Sava River Model

Using Morphometric models and Open Source Software to locate Flood prone areas A guide to pilot Implementation

Dam Break Analysis Using HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS A Case Study of Ajwa Reservoir

Floodplain Mapping & Flood Warning Applications in North Carolina

Determining the Location of the Simav Fault

Floodplain and Flood Probability Mapping Using Geodatabases

Appendix C. Questionnaire Summary of Responses Geographic Information Systems

ResSIMLite vs. ResSIM Model Comparison

Standard methods for the Iowa statewide floodplain mapping program

Frequently Asked Questions about River Corridors

The Ecosystem Functions Model: A Tool for Restoration Planning

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Colorado Ice Jams and CRREL s Ice Jam Database CRREL Ice Engineering Group

FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING OF DHAKA-NARAYANGANJ-DEMRA (DND) PROJECT USING GEO-INFORMATICS TOOLS

Geolocation and Analysis of FEMA FIS Discharge Data

3D Elevation Program, Lidar in Missouri. West Central Regional Advanced LiDAR Workshop Ray Fox

Progress Report. Flood Hazard Mapping in Thailand

Preliminary Data Release for the Humboldt Bay Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment: Humboldt Bay Sea Level Rise Inundation Mapping

Risk Identification using Hazus

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

Location: Jacksonville, FL December 11, 2012

Watershed Delineation

Floodplain modeling. Ovidius University of Constanta (P4) Romania & Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Greece

DOWNLOAD OR READ : GIS BASED FLOOD LOSS ESTIMATION MODELING IN JAPAN PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Flood Modeling using Gis and LiDAR of Padada River in Southeastern Philippines

A Temporal Hydrologic Database for Rapidly Changing Landscapes

Watershed Modeling With DEMs

THE HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE USTUROI VALLEY - USING TWO MODELING PROGRAMS - WetSpa and HecRas

Using ArcGIS 10 to Estimate the U.S. Population Affected by Drought

Transcription:

Out with the Old, In with the New: Implementing the Results of the Iowa Rapid Floodplain Modeling Project Traci Tylski, E.I., CFM Hydraulics Engineer USACE - Omaha District Traci.M.Tylski@USACE.army.mil 04 May 2017 US Army Corps of Engineers

Mitigation = Risk Informed Decisions

A Need for New/Updated Mapping The Omaha District/IFC developed automated scripts that: Sets up the HEC-RAS (Hydraulic Model) data Manages the data (such as the flow and geometry data) QA/QC tool So 100% manual review is not needed Iowa Floodplain Mapping Project USACE Section 22 for 8 HUC8 Watersheds 55 HUC8 Watersheds total Goal is to develop data applicable for a Zone A approximate study to be incorporated into the NFIP Through the application of statewide LiDAR data and GIS automation tools, HEC- RAS models are used to develop this data. Automated methods have been developed to assist hydraulic modelers in verifying that engineering products meet specific requirements.

Study Area

Coordinated Needs Management System (CNMS) A FEMA initiative to update the way FEMA organizes, stores, and analyzes flood hazard mapping information for communities. Studied Stream Lines Unmapped Stream Lines

Coordinated Needs Management System (CNMS) Unmapped Stream Lines Studied Stream Lines

Large Data Set Entire Watershed/HUC 13,000 of these 100,000+ stream miles 55 of these

Python Scripts #1 Create Directories Script: Breaks up a large area (i.e.: watershed) into individual stream folders #2 Hydraulic Preprocessing Script: (1) Creates HEC-GeoRAS Geodatabase (2) Creates Hydraulics Folder (3) Clips Mannings' N Land Use Shapefile (4) Exports Flow Points (5) Created Station Points (6) Extracts DEM (7) Creates Hillshade (8) Clips Contour Shapefile (9) Adding Stream to River_Tarr_Creek (10) Adding Stream to Flowpaths_Tarr_Creek (11) Exports Banklines (12) Adding Cross Sections to XSCutlines_Tarr_Creek (12a) Ran Hydraulic Flow Change Points Script (13) Loading Data (13a) Updating HydroID (14) Creating float file

Individual Stream

Heisler Creek Example Video

USACE Omaha District QA/QC automated tool checks: Completeness Review: Is the project title correct? Is there only one plan, geometry and flow file? Are the plan, geometry, flow titles correct? Geometry Review: Model units Are the reach lengths correct? Is the cross section stationing in line with the reach lengths? Are the cross sections long enough to include the flooded areas? Are the overbank Manning's values correct? Are the channel Manning's values correct? Flow Review: Does the model contain each profile Are the discharges for each profile correct? Do the flows increase in the downstream direction? Is the slope acceptable for boundary conditions-normal depth? Results Review: QA/QC No real criteria for Zone A mapping Do any of the profiles cross or contain dips?

Hydraulics Completion USACE Omaha District Completed Modeling for 8 HUC8 Watersheds 2,000 individual streams Calibrations and Re-Delineations on detailed study (FEMA Mapped Zone AE) areas

Project Stages Hydrology and Hydraulics Done Re-Delineations Incorporated (if any) New Studies Incorporated (if any) FPM Manual Cleanup/Review Stage One: Initial Mapping Complete Phone Kick-off Meeting with officials/stakeholders DFHP Meeting with officials/stakeholders Distribute Products (Shapefiles, Depth Grids, Models, CSLF) to stakeholders Deliver data on www.iowafloodmaps.org website Elicit Feedback from officials/stakeholders Stage Two: Draft FPM Products Delivered (Public Official Ready) Incorporate new development since LiDAR Incorporate new information from community Review to assess impact of new information Follow up with officials regarding results Incorporate changes into FPM/Hydraulic Submittals if warranted Incorporate changes into other products (Depth Grids, CSLF) Stage Three: Incorporate Changes to FPM Products (Public Ready After Complete) Base Map preparation (roads, panels, general structures, sub-basins) IFC GIS Staff Preliminary Map Preparation before preliminary submittal to FEMA DNR Subcontractor Incorporate last minute changes Post Preliminary Map Production DNR Sub Meetings (Engineering Review/CCO) DNR/FEMA/Sub Letter of Final Determination DNR/FEMA/Sub COMPLETE!!! Stage Four: DFIRM

Rock Valley, Iowa

Non-Regulatory Floodplain Boundaries

Non-Regulatory Floodplain Boundaries

Depth Grids A Deeper Look at Inundation

Scour Targeting Maps

Continued Mapping Efforts: Post Project Some communities currently mapped in detailed study areas (Zone AE) are not being updated through this study Re-delineation models created Current Zone A models and terrain available to update the existing mapped Zone AE Detailed Study areas Need structure survey data Sources available to upgrade current Zone A mapping to Zone AE mapping for communities in need of a detailed study flood zone

What Did We Accomplish? Successfully updated the existing flood risks within the state of Iowa People have the resources to be aware of their risks More residents located in the 100-year floodplain boundary Newly mapped residents inside the boundary will have to purchase flood insurance per NFIP requirements Is this a good thing? How can we help these communities after providing them this information?

How Can We Help? Iowa Silver Jackets USACE Planning Studies Section 14 Section 22 Section 205 Section 206 Section 1135

Questions? Traci Tylski US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Flood Risk and Floodplain Management 402-995-2325 Traci.M.Tylski@USACE.army.mil Special Thanks: Michelle Schultz USACE Programmer and GIS Specialist Tony Krause USACE Flood Risk and Floodplain Management Section Iowa Flood Center Technical Partner Iowa Department of Natural Resources Project Sponsor