E05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report. Dustin McNulty UMass December 5, 2008

Similar documents
The P2 Experiment at MESA

The Lead Radius Experiment PREX. Dustin McNulty Idaho State University for the PREx Collaboration July 28, 2011

Status of the PREX Experiment R n through PVeS at JLab

The MOLLER experiment - testing the Standard Model at Jefferson Lab

P.M. King Ohio University for the MOLLER Collaboration

PREX Overview Extracting the Neutron Radius from 208 Pb

Parity Violating Electron Scattering at Jefferson Lab. Rakitha S. Beminiwattha Syracuse University

Strange Electromagnetic and Axial Nucleon Form Factors

The Qweak experiment: a precision measurement of the proton s weak charge

Measurement of Nucleon Strange Form Factors at High Q 2

The QWeak Experiment: A measurement of the proton weak charge and up-down quark weak couplings.

Parity-violating Electron Scattering and Strangeness in the Nucleon: Results from HAPPEX-II

PREX and CREX. R N from Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering. Neutron Skin.

C-REX : Parity-Violating Measurement of the Weak Charge of

A Precision Measurement of Elastic e+p Beam Normal Single Spin Asymmetry and Other Transverse Spin Measurements from Qweak

Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements

The G 0 Experiment: Backangle Running

Aspects of The Standard Model and Beyond

Acknowledgements: D. Armstrong, M. Dalton, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Pitt, B. Waidyawansa and all my theory colleagues

1 Introduction. THE Q W eak EXPERIMENT: A SEARCH FOR NEW PHYSICS AT THE TeV SCALE. W. Deconinck 1, for the Q W eak Collaboration

Helicity Correlated Beam Systematics in the Q weak. Experiment

Symmetry Tests in Nuclear Physics

DIS-Parity: Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Parity NonConserving Deep Inelastic Scattering

Qweak Transverse Asymmetry Measurements

Recent results and future direction of the parity-violating electron scattering program in Hall A at Jefferson Lab

Recent Results from Jefferson Lab

Optics Simulations. Dustin McNulty UMass July 10, 2009

Neutron stars at JLAB and the Pb Radius Experiment

Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering

PoS(Bormio 2013)024. P2 - The weak charge of the proton. D. Becker, K. Gerz. S. Baunack, K. Kumar, F. E. Maas

PREX / CREX Status. Jan 25, 2018 Bob Michaels, on behalf of the PREX collaboration. docdb

The SAMPLE Experiment and Weak Nucleon Structure

Project P2 - The weak charge of the proton

Two-photon physics. Marc Vanderhaeghen College of William & Mary / JLab. Hall-C Summer Workshop, JLab, August 19-20, 2004

The Q p weak Experiment: A Search for New TeV Scale Physics via a Measurement of the Proton s Weak Charge

Electroweak measurements at HERA

Two photon exchange: theoretical issues

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 15 Apr 2016

Neutron skin measurements and its constraints for neutron matter. C. J. Horowitz, Indiana University INT, Seattle, 2016

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Electroweak Tests of the Standard Model. Willem T.H. van Oers UCN Workshop at RCNP April 8 9, 2010

Electron Beam Polarimetry at Jefferson Lab Dave Gaskell Jefferson Lab (Hall C)

Nucleon Valence Quark Structure

Parity Violation Experiments

SPIN STRUCTURE OF THE NUCLEON AND POLARIZATION. Charles Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford CA 94309

Measurement Using Polarized e + /e Beams

Beam Polarimetry (for Future Experiments at JLab)

Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV

e e Collisions at ELIC

Two-boson exchange corrections in PVES

The Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Program

Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS

Status Report on the Precision Measurement of d n 2

First results of W ± boson production in high-energy polarized p+p collisions at RHIC at BNL

HERMES Status Report

Calculations of γz corrections

Strange Sea Contribution to the Nucleon Spin

The neutron skin in neutronrich nuclei at Jefferson Lab

Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV

Helicity: Experimental Status. Matthias Grosse Perdekamp, University of Illinois

Beam Instrumentation Challenges for Parity-Violation Experiments

Measurement of F L at HERA. S. Glazov, DESY, Ringberg 2008

Precision Tests of the Standard Model. Yury Kolomensky UC Berkeley Physics in Collision Boston, June 29, 2004

Building a Tracking Detector for the P2 Experiment

Neutral Current Cross Sections With Polarised Lepton Beam At ZEUS

Structure Functions at Very High Q 2 From HERA

MOLLER Experiment. Many slides courtesy of K. Kumar, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Dalton, etc.

Paul Huffman! Investigating Hadronic Parity Violation Using the γd np Reaction at the Proposed HIGS2 facility at TUNL

Status report on parity violation in the (1232) resonance

PANIC August 28, Katharina Müller on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

G Ep /G Mp with an 11 GeV Electron Beam in Hall C

DVCS with CLAS. Elton S. Smith. Jefferson Lab. Conference on Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics New York, Elton S.

Nucleon Form Factors Measured with BLAST. John Calarco - University of New Hampshire

Parity-Violating Measurements of the Weak Charge of. Pb (PREX) & Ca (CREX) . and possible future measurements. R. Michaels, ICNT / MSU, Aug /26

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 29 Jun 2016

Hall C Users Meeting. January 22-23, 2010

Parity-Violating Asymmetry for 208 Pb

Measurement of Properties of Electroweak Bosons with the DØ Detector

MEASUREMENT OF PARITY-VIOLATING ELECTROWEAK ASYMMETRIES IN e p SCATTERING AT 0.1 < Q 2 < 0.4 (GeV/c) 2

Density Dependence of Parity Violation in Electron Quasi-elastic Scattering

Determining Strangeness Quark Spin in Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering at J-PARC

Text. References and Figures from: - Basdevant et al., Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics - Henley et al., Subatomic Physics

Update on Experiments using SoLID Spectrometer

Applications of Parity Violation

Polarimetry in Hall A

Two-Photon-Exchange Effects in Nucleon EM Form Factors

Electron Beam Polarimetry: Status and Prospects. DIS 2005, Madison, April 2005 E. Chudakov (JLab)

Kees de Jager Jefferson Lab SPIN 2004 Trieste October 11-16, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

LHCb results in proton-nucleus collisions at the LHC

SSA Measurements with Primary Beam at J-PARC

Electron Beam Polarimetry at JLab

Neutron skins of nuclei vs neutron star deformability

What Have We Learned from Electron Deep Inelastic Scattering?

H Parity Violating Deep Inelastic Scattering at CEBAF 6 GeV

The n- 3 He Experiment at SNS A Study of Hadronic Weak Interaction

Physics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment STAR 2009

Møller Polarimetry in Hall A and Beyond

PoS(DIS2018)216. W Measurement at PHENIX. Chong Kim

A Helium-3 polarimeter using electromagnetic interference. Nigel Buttimore

Studying Nuclear Structure

3 Dimensional String Theory

Transcription:

E05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report Dustin McNulty UMass mcnulty@jlab.org December 5, 2008

E05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report Outline Quick Review: Parity Violation and Strange FFs Worldwide Experimental Programs Motivation and Goals of HAPPEx-III Proposed Measurement Details Error Budget Preparations and Schedule Summary Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 1

Introduction to PVES Parity Violating Electron Scattering (PVES) allows access the the strange sea via an electroweak-interference dominated asymmetry measurement (A PV ) Very challenging measurement requiring: Precise matching of elec. beam charact. for Left vs. Right helicity states Precision non-invasive, continuous beam polarimetry Precision knowledge of Luminosity and spect. acceptances and bkgds HAPPEx group very experienced in these measurements and have robust experimental technique Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 2

Neutral Current Vector Form Factors Considering a light quark flavor decomposition... For electromagnetic scattering: G γ,p E/M = 2 3 Gu,p E/M - 1 3 Gd,p E/M - 1 3 Gs,p E/M For weak scattering: G Z,p E/M = (1-8 3 sin2 θ W )G u,p E/M - (1-4 3 sin2 θ W )G d,p E/M - (1-4 3 sin2 θ W )G s,p E/M Invoke charge symmetry to get the neutron FFs Remove G u E/M and Gd E/M dependence from GZ E/M the well measured G γ,p E/M and Gγ,n E/M G Z,p E/M = (1-4sin2 θ W )G γ,p E/M - Gγ,n E/M - Gs E/M and replace with Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 3

Strange Form Factor Extraction Measured A PV is proportional to the neutral current FFs The relative contributions of the FFs to A PV depends on experiment kinematics For a proton: A PV = G FQ 2 4πα A E +A M +A A 2 σ p few ppm where A E = εg p E GZ E most sensitive at forward angles A M = τg p M GZ M contributes everywhere A A = (1 4sin 2 θ W )ε G p M G Z A most sensitive at backward angles τ = Q 2 /4M 2 ε = [1+2(1+τ)tan 2 (θ/2)] 1 ε = [τ(1+τ)(1 ε 2 )] 1/2 For spinless isoscalar target(such as 4 He or 12 C), A PV only sensitive to G s E (HAPPEx-4 He measurement) For backward angle scattering with Deuterium target, A PV dominated by the axial FF (G0 backangle measurement) Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 4

Worldwide Experimental Programs Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 5

Motivation and Goals of HAPPEx-III A definitive probe of nucleon Strangeness at high Q 2 ( 0.6 GeV 2 ) significant non-zero world data average for Q 2 > 0.5 GeV 2 HAPPEx capabilities high stats, low syst. errors, and nearly bkgd-free Precision meas. interpretable without assumptions regarding Q 2 evol. Extract G s E +ηgs M from experimental A PV: (δa PV /A PV ) 4 % total Anticipated precision: δ(g s E +0.48Gs M ) 0.011 total Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 6

HAPPEx-III Proposed Measurement Configuration: 20 cm cryogenic Hydrogen Target 100µA I beam 80% polarization Kinematics: E= 3.4 GeV, θ 13.7 (both arms), E = 3.1 GeV Q 2 0.6 GeV 2 Rate: 1.1 MHz per arm (3700 ppm width per arm, 2600 ppm per pair at 30Hz) A PV (assuming no strange vector FF): A PV 22.1 ± 0.62 ppm (2.9%) Anticipated results: δa PV = 0.55 ppm(stat) ± 0.33 ppm(syst) δ(g s E +0.48Gs M )= 0.0070(stat)±0.0042(syst)±0.0079(FF) Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 7

Experimental Error Budget δa PV /<A PV > δ(g s E +0.48Gs M ) Polarization 1.0% 0.0028 IR=hard Q 2 Measurement 0.8% 0.0022 Backgrounds 0.3% 0.0009 Linearity 0.6% 0.0017 Finite Acceptance 0.3% 0.0009 False Asymmetries 0.3% 0.0009 easy Total Systematic 1.5% 0.0042 Statistics 2.5% 0.0070 Total Experimental 2.9% 0.0082 small improvement over H-II significant improvement over H-II Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 8

Estimated Precision δa PV /<A PV > δ(g s E +0.48Gs M ) Total Systematic 1.5% 0.0042 Statistics 2.5% 0.0070 Total Experimental 2.9% 0.0082 Axial FF 1.5% 0.0042 EM FF 2.4% 0.0067 Total FF 2.8% 0.0079 TOTAL 4.0% 0.011 Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 9

Simple fits (to 1 st order in Q 2 ): Only includes data for Q 2 < 0.3 GeV 2 G s E = ρ sτ G s M = µ s Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 10

Preparations Detectors - Examine HAPPEx-I detectors, refurbish or rebuild (W&M) Polarimetry - Review e- analysis, will use IR system Linearity - LED studies of phototubes/bases and Jan 2008 beam studies Q 2 - verify cross sections and plan angle mesurement Finite Acceptance - simulations (HAMC) backgrounds - simulation and target design (HAMC) Rapid Flip - > 200 Hz flip rates are considered for QWeak, PREx. HAPPEx-III may benefit as well. Schedule Start Installation: 6/1/2009 Beam Restoration: mid August 2009 Commission and run until: 10/26/2009 Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 11

Summary. HAPPEx-III motivated to probe the sizeable strange quark effects at higher Q 2 which are not ruled out by current world dataset Precision data at middle Q 2 can finish the question of large contributions to the static properties, in a way that backangle measurements cannot independently do. Experiment Scheduled to run late summer through mid Fall 2009. CSB effects in proton could be as large as stat. error of high-precision HAPPEx data (at low Q 2 ) are are not well constrained at higher Q 2. The current uncertanties in the EM FFs (including 2-photon exchange effects) limit precision to a few percent at higher Q 2. Dustin McNulty, Dec 5, 2008, Hall A Collaboration Meeting 12