Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Similar documents
Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

C. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

Habitat Assessment. Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

Chris Lenhart, John Nieber, Ann Lewandowski, Jason Ulrich TOOLS AND STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING CHANNEL EROSION IN MINNESOTA

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Session C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

PolyMet NorthMet Project

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER. Appendix C Biological Field Methods C1. Habitat Assessment DECEMBER 2013

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply: Advancing the Science of Watershed Analysis

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

Stream Classification

Dolores River Watershed Study

Great Lakes Tributary Modeling: Canaseraga Creek Watershed

The how, why, and lessons learned

Perspectives on river restoration science, geomorphic processes, and channel stability

Working with Natural Stream Systems

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

The Hydrologic Cycle STREAM SYSTEMS. Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. The Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Rivers T. Perron

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

Modeling Upland and Channel Sources of Sediment in the Le Sueur River Watershed, Minnesota

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

BZ471, Steam Biology & Ecology Exam 1

Erosion Rate is a Function of Erodibility and Excess Shear Stress = k ( o - c ) From Relation between Shear Stress and Erosion We Calculate c and

Application of Fluvial Geomorphologic Techniques At Abandoned Mine Sites 1. David A. Greenfield 2 Dennis M. Palladino 3

Assessment. Assessment

CASE STUDIES. Introduction

Step 6: Rapid Habitat Assessment (RHA)

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon Wash?

APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011

Business. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Clyde River Landslide

Elevation (ft) Slope ( ) County CONDITION CATEGORY. Parameter Natural Condition Slightly impacted Moderately Impacted Heavily Impacted

A PRIMER ON DAM REMOVALS IN MICHIGAN. Joe Rathbun Michigan Dept. Environmental Quality

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

Measuring Streambank Erosion Bank Profiles to more Robustly Estimate Recession Rates and Calibration of the AnnAGNPS-CEAP Model

SEDIMENT BENEFICIAL USE SUPPORT ASSESSMENT FOR OTTER CREEK

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Surface Water Short Study Guide

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Black Gore Creek Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

Final Exam. Running Water Erosion and Deposition. Willamette Discharge. Running Water

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Surface Water and Stream Development

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Kaskaskia Morphology Study Headwaters to Lake Shelbyville

Appendix K.2: Sediment Management Excerpt from South Orange County Hydromodification Management Plan

Fish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

Annotated Bibliography of River Avulsions Pat Dryer Geography 364 5/14/2007

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

Streams. Stream Water Flow

STABILIZATION OF THE H&CT RAILWAY STONE DAM WALTER E. SKIPWITH, PE, JOYCE CRUM, AIA AND JOHN BAUMGARTNER, PE. Introduction.

Geomorphic Assessment of City Center Athletic Club Development Impacts on Existing Stream Channel Stability, Lenexa, KS.

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

Black Gore Creek Total Maximum Daily Load Sediment Source Monitoring 2008 Vail Pass, Colorado. Prepared for: Eagle River Watershed Council

Transcription:

Stream Stability Assessment & BEHI Surveys Joe Rathbun MDEQ Water Resources Division rathbunj@michigan.gov 517--373 517 373--8868 Stability Stream can transport its water and sediment inputs without changing channel dimensions Width, depth, slope Complicating Issues Local Causes Easy to Identify Stream bank & bed mobility is natural Unnatural bank & bed mobility can have multiple causes Causes can be local or largerlarger-scaled Local causes can be fixed with local best management practices (BMPs) Large--scale causes can only be fixed Large with largelarge-scale BMPs 1

Large--Scale Causes Harder to Large Identify Most common cause of large--scale channel large degradation = Hydrologic alteration and increasing sediment loads due to landuse changes Causes of Hydrologic Alteration Impervious surface Soil compaction Vegetation change Dams Tile drainage Water withdrawal Sources of Increased Sediment Loads Upland erosion Agriculture, forestry, general development Stream bank erosion 10 to 90 % of total sediment load Results of Hydrologic Alteration Changes in: Peak flows Stream flashiness Channel dimensions Width Depth Sinuosity Slope Results of Increased Sediment Loads Loss of macroinvertebrate & fish habitat Buried riffles Loss of pools Channel filling (aggradation (aggradation)) = channel widening Dam failures 2

Indicators of Channel Condition Positive Qualitative Indicators: Herbaceous Vegetation Qualitative Observational Quantitative Observational = Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) Measurement Measurement--based = several options Positive Qualitative Indicators: Aquatic Moss Unvegetated MidMid-Channel Bar, or Braided Channel Positive Qualitative Indicators: Sensitive Fish or Mussels Leaning Trees on Both Sides 3

Exposed Infrastructure Failed BMPs Headcuts (= Nickpoints) Exposed Tree Roots on Both Sides Slumping Stream Banks Downstream of a Dam 4

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators Stable Unstable the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy Bank Erosion Hazard Index BEHI developed by Dr. Dave Rosgen Seven metrics: Plant root depth Root density Bank angle Surface protection Bank composition Bank stratification (Bank Ht./Bankfull Ht.) BEHI Applicability Also not alluvial Alluvial channels only those that form themselves through sediment transport Alluvial Not alluvial Root Depth = depth relative to bank height, in % ~ 100 % 30 % Root Density = % of bank surface covered by roots ~ 100 % ~ 40 % Values: < 5; 5-14; 15-29; 30-49; 50-89; 90-100 Scores: 10 8.5 7 5 3 1.5 Values: < 5; 5-14; 15-29; 30-49; 50-89; 90-100 Scores: 10 8.5 7 5 3 1.5 5

Surface Protection = % of bank covered by rocks, logs, etc. Bank Angle ~ 10 80 to 90 Top of bank ~ 30% Values < 10; 10-14; 15-29; 30-49; 50-89; 90-100 Values: 0-20; 21-60; 61-80; 81-90; 91-119; > 119 Scores: 1.5 Bank angle hardest to get right? 3 5 7 8.5 10 Adjustment Factors: Bank materials Bedrock, boulders, & cobble = decreased erosion risk Gravel & sand = increased erosion risk Bedrock = always Very Low Boulders = always Low Cobble = subtract 10 points Gravel or mostly gravel = add 5 points Sand or mostly sand = add 10 points Silt or clay = no adjustment Adjustment Factors: Bank stratification Sand layers within a bank of other materials = increased erosion risk No layers = no adjustment Single layer of erodible material = add 5 points Multiple layers of erodible materials = add 10 points Rural Stream Plant root depth 100 % Root density 90 % Bank angle 30º Surface protection = 90 % Materials = silt/loam BEHI = 9.5 = Low 6

Unstable Ag Stream Plant root depth < 5 % Urban Stream Root density < 5 % Plant root depth 40 % Bank angle 90º Root density 10 % Bank angle 85º Surface protection < 10 % Surface protection 10 % Materials = silt/loam Materials = sand = +10 (Upper Iowa River, MN) BEHI = 39 = Very High BEHI = 37 = Extreme Stable Ag Drain Unstable Ag Drain Plant root depth 100 % Plant root depth 10 % Root density 100 % Root density 15 % Bank angle 60º Bank angle 80º Surface protection 100 % Surface protection 5 % Materials = silt/loam Materials = sand = +10 BEHI = 7.5 = Low BEHI = 40.5 = Extreme Stabilized Bank Plant root depth 10 % Root density 20 % Bank angle 80º Surface protection 30 % Materials = silt/loam BEHI = 27 = High Urban stream, in park Plant root depth 90 % Root density 60 % Bank angle 90º Surface protection 0 % Materials = silt/loam BEHI = 21.5 = High 7

BEHI Application Local Problem = Local BMP BEHI Application Widespread Problem = Large-scale BMPs Low Low Project site Moderate Project site Moderate Extreme Extreme BEHI Pros Quantitative, & a continuum Minimal training required Low level of effort; 1 day = multiple stations Cons Inter-person variation No estimate of erosion rate or sediment loadings On-going Study to Calibrate BEHI BEHI + bank pin or toe pin measurements Quantify bank erosion rates and calculate sediment loadings for different BEHI categories Army Corps, DEQ, DNR Throughout Great Lakes states Calibrating BEHI Toe Pins Calibrating BEHI Toe Pins Eleventh St. 3.5 3 2.5 7/20/2010 7/13/2011 Feet 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 1 2 3 4 Feet BEHI = 10 = Low 1.Square feet of soil lost x bank length = cubic feet of soil lost 2.Cubic feet x soil density = mass of soil lost 8

Another option: cross-channel channel transects Elevation (ft) 96 2010 95 2011 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Station (ft) Richards-Baker Stream Flashiness Index Flashy stream = frequent, rapid, short-term term changes in streamflow Due to impervious surfaces, tile drainage, etc. Stream Flashiness Index Calculate using USGS gage station data Discharge (m 3 /sec) High Flashiness Index Time Low Flashiness Index Index 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 04135700 SOUTH BRANCH AU SABLE RIVER NEAR LUZERNE, MI Stable flashiness Index 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 04136500 AU SABLE RIVER AT MIO, MI Decreasing flashiness 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Water Year 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Water Year 9

Flashiness Index Results 308 sites Index 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 04135500 AU SABLE RIVER AT GRAYLING, MI Complex flashiness 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 Water Year Thanks! Questions? 10