Foundations with D f equal to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAIN CHARACTERISTICS ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY

Similar documents
Chapter 4. Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. Omitted parts: Sections 4.7, 4.8, 4.13 Examples 4.8, 4.9, 4.

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Development of Bearing Capacity Theory. Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr. N. K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Topics. Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY NPTEL ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-I

Chapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

BEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS

CHAPTER 12 SHALLOW FOUNDATION I: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 12.1 INTRODUCTION

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V

Introduction to Soil Mechanics

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

New Approach for Evaluating the Bearing Capacity of Sandy Soil to Strip Shallow Foundation

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Module 6 (Lecture 23) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations

Bearing Capacity Of Shallow Foundation

PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Soil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required

Soil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanathan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 51 Earth Pressure Theories II

Geotechnical Parameters for Retaining Wall Design

Advanced Foundation Engineering

EARTH PRESSURES ON RETAINING STRUCTURES

Failure Modes and Bearing Capacity Estimation for Strip Foundations in C-ɸ Soils: A Numerical Study

Theory of Shear Strength

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

A Comparative Study on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Sand from N and /

Smith s Elements of Soil Mechanics

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Module 4 (Lecture 16) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT

FUNDAMENTALS SOIL MECHANICS. Isao Ishibashi Hemanta Hazarika. >C\ CRC Press J Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

Technical Supplement 14Q. Abutment Design for Small Bridges. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

9.13 Fixed Earth-Support Method for Penetration into Sandy Soil

UNIT V. The active earth pressure occurs when the wall moves away from the earth and reduces pressure.

INFLUENCE OF NONASSOCIATIVITY ON THE BEARING CAPACITY

2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room

SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH. Prepared by: Dr. Hetty Muhammad Azril Fauziah Kassim Norafida

Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Chapter 6 Bearing Capacity

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Module 4 Lecture 20 Pore water pressure and shear strength - 4 Topics

Sample Chapter HELICAL ANCHORS IN SAND 6.1 INTRODUCTION

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

SHEAR STRENGTH I YULVI ZAIKA

Compute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.

Chapter 12: Lateral Earth Pressure

Laboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis

Theory of Shear Strength

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

(Refer Slide Time: 01:15)

HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS. Mode of Failure Characteristics Typical Soils

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION

Analysis of Inclined Strip Anchors in Sand Based on the Block Set Mechanism

(Refer Slide Time: 02:18)

Seismic Bearing Capacity and Settlements of Foundations

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Triaxial Shear Test. o The most reliable method now available for determination of shear strength parameters.

Unsaturated Soils and Foundation Design: Theoretical Considerations for an Effective Stress Framework

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

Hyperbolic Soil Bearing Capacity

Chapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure

SOIL MECHANICS: palgrave. Principles and Practice. Graham Barnes. macmiiian THIRD EDITION

Module 9 : Foundation on rocks

Foundation Engineering

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES

Module 6 (Lecture 22) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RETAINING WALLS

CE 442 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SESSIONAL II

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

A study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips

Supplementary Problems for Chapter 7

ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED STRIP FOUNDATION ON SAND REINFORCED WITH GEOGRIDS

Failure mechanisms and corresponding shape factors of shallow foundations

EFFECT OF CONE ANGLE ON PENETRATION RESISTANCE

Session 3. Calculation Models. EQU, UPL and HYD. Design of Pile Foundations

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Verification Manual GT

OVERVIEW REVIEW OF FOUNDATIONS & SOILS ENG.

Chapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad

Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS

Numerical Analysis of the Effectiveness of Limited Width Gravel Backfills in Increasing Lateral Passive Resistance

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

SHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University

OP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT

Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

RAMWALL DESIGN METHODOLOGY

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

DETERMINATION OF UPPER BOUND LIMIT ANALYSIS OF THE COEFFICIENT OF LATERAL PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE IN THE CONDITION OF LINEAR MC CRITERIA

Transcription:

oundation Analysis

oundations with D f eual to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAI CHARACTERISTICS o Safe against overall shear failure o Cannot undergo excessive displacement, or settlement ULTIMATE EARIG CAPACITY o the load per unit area of the foundation at which shear failure in soil occurs

GEERAL SHEAR AILURE Long rectangular model footing of width at the surface of a dense sand The triangular wedge-shaped zone of soil marked I is pushed down and in turn presses the zones marked II and III sideways. The soil on the both sides of the foundation will bulge out and the slip surface will extend to the ground surface.

LOCAL SHEAR AILURE Medium dense sand or clayey soil of medium compaction Movement of the foundation will be accompanied by sudden jerks The triangular wedge-shaped zone of soil marked I is pushed down but unlike in general shear failure, the slip surface end somewhere inside the soil.

PUCHIG SHEAR AILURE airly loose soil Soil will not extend to the ground surface

GEERAL SHEAR AILURE Applies to dense granular soil and to firmer saturated cohesive soils subject to undrained loading (the UU and CU shearing conditions apply) PUCHIG SHEAR AILURE Applies to compressible soils, such as sands having lowto-medium relative density, and for cohesive soils subject to slow loading (the CD shearing condition apply)

Vesic, 963 Laboratory plate loadbearing tests on circular and rectangular plates supported by a sand at various relative densities of compaction, D r. D r about 70% (general shear failure)

Vesic, 973 Relationship for the mode of bearing capacity failure of foundations resting on sands.

Vesic, 973 D r, relative density of sand D f, depth of foundation measured from the ground surface = L + L where,, width of foundation L, length of foundation

General range of S/ with the relative density of compaction of sand. General Shear ailure ultimate load may occur at settlements of 4 to 0% of. Local Shear or Punching Shear ailure ultimate load may occur at settlements of 5 to 5% of.

earing capacity failure in soil under a rough rigid continuous (strip) foundation. The triangular zone ACD immediately under the foundation. The radial shear zones AD and CDE, with the curves DE and D being arcs of a logarithmic spiral 3. Two triangular Rankine passive zones AH and CEG

Continuous or Strip oundation where, u = c C + + γ γ c is the cohesion is the unit weight of soil is the euivalent surcharge load eual to γd f C,, γ are bearing capacity factors that are nondimensional and are functions only of the soil friction angle ɸ.

where, K pγ is the passive pressure coefficient Modified for: Suare oundation u =.3c C + + 0.4γ γ Circular oundation u =.3c C + + 0.3γ γ

LOCAL SHEAR AILURE Strip oundation u = 3 c C + + γ γ Suare oundation u = 0.867c C + + 0.4γ γ Circular oundation u = 0.867c C + + 0.3γ γ ɸ = tan ( 3 tan ɸ )

all = u S et stress increase on soil = net ultimate bearing capacity S net(u) = u where, net(u) is the net ultimate bearing capacity = γd f So, all(net) = u S The factor of safety should be at least 3 in all cases.

. A suare foundation is m x m in plan. The soil supporting the foundation has a friction angle of ɸ = 5 and c = 0 k/m. The unit weight of soil, γ, is 6.5 k/m 3. Determine the allowable gross load on the foundation with a factor of safety (S) of 3. Assume that the depth of the foundation (D f ) is.5 m and that general shear failure occurs in the soil. Solution u =.3c C + + 0.4γ γ rom Table 3., for ɸ = 5, C = 5.3 =.7 γ = 8.34 Thus, u =.3 0 (5.3) + (.5x6.5)(.7) + 0.4(6.5)()(8.34) = 078.9 k/m

So, the allowable load per unit area of the foundation is all = u S = 078.9 3 Thus, the total allowable gross load is = 359.5 k/m Q = all ( ) = 359.5(x) = 438 k

The bearing capacity euation is modified when the water table is in the proximity of the foundation. earing Capacity Euation Modified earing Capacity Euation Case I Case II Case III

GEERAL SHEAR AILURE u u u c' c.3c'.3c' c c 0.4 0.3 (Continuous or Strip oundation) (Suare oundation) (Circular oundation)

If 0 D D f, = D γ + D (γ sat - γ w ) u c' c = γd f where, γ sat = sat. unit wt. of soil γ w = unit wt. of water γ in ½γ γ becomes γ where γ = γ sat - γ w

If 0 d, = γd f u c' c γ in the last term is _ ' d ( ') * The preceding modifications are based on the assumption that there is no seepage force in the soil.

If d, u c' c *The water will have no effect on the ultimate bearing capacity.

SHAPE: The bearing capacity ens do not address the case of rectangular foundations (0 < /L < ). Wherein L >. DEPTH: The ens also do not take into account the shearing resistance along the failure surface in soil above the bottom of the foundation. LOAD ICLIATIO: The load on the foundation may be inclined.

u c' c cs cd ci s d i s d i where, c is the cohesion is the effective stress at the level of the bottom of the foundation γ is the unit weight of soil is the width of foundation (or diameter for circular foundation) cs, s, γs are shape factors cd, d, γd are depth factors ci, i, γi are load inclination factors c,, γ are bearing capacity factors

u c' α = 45 + ϕ / c cs cd ci s d i s d i = tan (45 + ϕ /) eπtan ϕ Reissner (94) c = ( ) cot ϕ Prandtl (9) γ = ( + ) tan ϕ Cauot and Kerisel (953), Vesic (973)

Shape actors Reference: Deeer (970) L L L s s c cs 0.4 ' tan

Depth actors Reference: Hansen (970) ') sin '( tan ' tan ' 0.4 d f d c d d cd d d f cd f D or D or D tan ') sin '( tan ' tan ' 0.4 tan d f d c d d cd d d f cd f radians D or radians D or D

Inclination actors Reference: Meyerhof (963); Hanna and Meyerhof (98) ci i i ' 90 inclination of the load on the foundation with respect to the vertical

. Solve Problem using the general bearing capacity euation. Suare foundation m x m ' c' 6.5k / m S 3 D 5 0k / m f. 5 m General shear failure Red: Allowable gross load 3

u c' c cs cd Solution: earing Capacity actors: ci s d i s d i c tan ( ( (45 ' / ) e )cot' ) tan' tan ' tan (45 5/ ) e (0.66 )cot 5 0.7 tan 5 (0.66 ) tan 5 0.87 0.66 *Table 3.3 can also be used. Load Inclination actors Since load is vertical, ci, i, γi =

Shape actors cs s s L L 0.4 L c tan' cs =+ (/)(0.66/0.7) =.54 s = + (/)tan5 =.466 γs =-0.4(/)= 0.6 Depth actors (D f / =.5/ = 0.75) D f or' cd d d tan'( sin ') d d.33 c tan' D f.33.57 0.7 tan 5 ( tan 5)( sin 5).5.33

u c' c cs cd ci s d i s d i u = 0 0.7.54.57 +.5x6.5 0.66.466.33 + 0.5 6.5 0.88 0.6 u =,373. k/m all = u S =,373. 3 = 457.7 k/m Q = 457.7 x =,830.8 k

3. A suare foundation ( x ) has to be constructed as shown below. Assume that γ = 6.5 k/m 3, γ sat = 8.55 k/m 3, = 34, D f =. m, and D = 0.6 m. The gross allowable load, Q all, with S = 3 is 667. k. Determine the size of the footing using the general bearing capacity euation.

Since there is no cohesion, ecomes En. En. u c' c cs u all all cd ci Q all u S s 3 d s d i ' 667. k / m s d s ' d s s d d i earing Capacity actors rom Table 3.3, for ϕ = 34 = 9.44 γ = 4.06

s s d d 0.4 tan'( sin') L tan' L 0.4 tan34.67 0.6 D f tan34( sin 34) 4.05 Case I = D γ + D (γ sat - γ w ) = (0.6)(6.5) + (0.6)(8.55-9.8)= 5.4 k/m

m error and y trial S u all all Q all Ens Combine x x S u all m k x d s d s S u all En.3, 35.89 65 5.38 667. & : 35.89 65 5.38 (4.06)(0.6)() 9.8) (8.55.05.67 9.44 5.4 3 / 5.4 9.8) 0.6(8.55 6.5 0.6 ) ' ( 3.