Overview of Active Fault Research at Geological Survey of Japan

Similar documents
The Current Activities of the Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion Concerning Tonankai/Nankai Earthquakes

S. Toda, S. Okada, D. Ishimura, and Y. Niwa International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Japan

Regional Workshop on Essential Knowledge of Site Evaluation Report for Nuclear Power Plants.

Examination of aperiodicity parameters for the Brownian Passage Time model using intraplate paleoearthquake data in Japan

Detection Accuracy of Active Fault Based on Seismic Reflection Method Data

PROBABILISTIC SURFACE FAULT DISPLACEMENT HAZARD ANALYSIS (PFDHA) DATA FOR STRIKE SLIP FAULTS

Takashi Kumamoto, Masatoshi Fujita, Hideaki Goto, and Takashi Nakata

AN OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING

Evaluation of earthquake occurrence from active faults

Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment addressing the uncertainty of tsunami source

Forecasting Future Earthquakes from Tsunami Deposits and Simulation

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

Historical Maximum Seismic Intensity Maps in Japan from 1586 to 2004: Construction of Database and Application. Masatoshi MIYAZAWA* and Jim MORI

The Length to Which an Earthquake will go to Rupture. University of Nevada, Reno 89557

Lessons from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and the Asian tsunami

I. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!

A. Akinci 1, M. Murru 1, R. Console 2, G. Falcone 1, S. Pucci 1 1. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy 2

AIRCURRENTS THE TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE AND STRESS TRANSFER STRESS TRANSFER

Scenario Earthquake Shaking Maps in Japan

Southern California Earthquake Center Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) Thomas H. Jordan

A NEW PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MODEL FOR NEW ZEALAND

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

GEM Faulted Earth. A Global Active Fault and Fault Source Database

Seismic Activity and Crustal Deformation after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

6 Source Characterization

Elastic rebound theory

Title fective Earthquake Risk Managemen. Author(s) Nigauri, Yasuhide, Miyata, Takao.

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

Actual practices of seismic strong motion estimation at NPP sites

GEOL/GEOE 344: EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMIC HAZARDS (FALL 2001) FINAL EXAM NAME: TIME AVAILABLE: 120 MINUTES TOTAL POINTS: 110

Estimating fault slip rates, locking distribution, elastic/viscous properites of lithosphere/asthenosphere. Kaj M. Johnson Indiana University

SCEC Earthquake Gates Workshop Central Death Valley Focus Area

EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION

Interpretive Map Series 24

Earthquakes and Tsunamis

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

Challenges for Forecasting Size and Time for Future Great Earthquakes in Subduction Zone

San Andreas Movie Can It Happen?

Does the 2007 Noto Hanto earthquake reveal a weakness in the Japanese national seismic hazard map that could be remedied with geological data?

Module 7 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS (Lectures 33 to 36)

Response Analysis of a Buried Pipeline Considering the

Scientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures

Scenario Earthquake Shaking Maps in Japan

Working group. Study of the evolution of the seismic cycle of stress and strain to. Main areas of study. Research lines

SEISMIC-HAZARD ASSESSMENT: Conditional Probability

Case Study 2: 2014 Iquique Sequence

Active Fault Observation and Research on Earthquake Potential in Taiwan. Chao-Chung Lin Central Geological Survey, Taiwan

Characterizing Earthquake Rupture Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion

Lifelines mitigation in Hawke s Bay

PALEOSEISMOLOGY: SITES (17)

Overview of Seismic Source Characterization for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant

log 4 0.7m log m Seismic Analysis of Structures by TK Dutta, Civil Department, IIT Delhi, New Delhi. Module 1 Seismology Exercise Problems :

Magnitude 7.6 & 7.6 PERU

Learning goals - January 16, Describe the geometry of a fault (1) orientation of the plane (strike and dip) (2) slip vector

50 or 500? Current Issues in Estimating Fault Rupture Length. David P. Schwartz USGS Menlo Park

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis - Japanese intensity map and

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

UPDATED PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR TURKEY

Long-Term Paleoseismology in Cascadia: Probabilities, Clustering, and patterns of Energy Release

Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future

Some Problems Related to Empirical Predictions of Strong Motion

EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS FOR SUBDUCTION ZONE EVENTS CAUSING TSUNAMIS IN AND AROUND THE PHILIPPINES

RECENT COMPREHENSIVE TSUNAMI MODELING FOR COASTAL OREGON

Synthetic Seismicity Models of Multiple Interacting Faults

MAPPING FAULT RUPTURE HAZARD FOR STRIKE-SLIP EARTHQUAKES

The 1700/01/26 Cascadia subduction zone Earthquake and Tsunami

A Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for California

Earthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo

Borehole Strong Motion Observation along the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

Description of faults

Renewal models of seismic recurrence applied to paleoseismological. data. Abstract. I. Mosca 1, R. Console 2,3 and G. D Addezio 2

State of art of seismic design and seismic hazard analysis for oil and gas pipeline system

SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS FOR CITY GAS NETWORK IN SOUTHERN KANTO AREA

AVERAGE AND VARIATION OF FOCAL MECHANISM AROUND TOHOKU SUBDUCTION ZONE

Kinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements

Uncertainties in a probabilistic model for seismic hazard analysis in Japan

Examination of source-model construction methodology for strong ground-motion simulation of multi-segment rupture during 1891 Nobi earthquake

Stress triggering and earthquake probability estimates

) repeatedly occurred along fault segments of the Timpe system (Azzaro et al., 2012b).

Usually, only a couple of centuries of earthquake data is available, much shorter than the complete seismic cycle for most plate motions.

San Francisco Bay Area Earthquake Simulations: A step toward a Standard Physical Earthquake Model

Building up Seismsic Models for Ground Motion Prediction of Taiwan: Problems and Challenges

Geodesy (InSAR, GPS, Gravity) and Big Earthquakes

SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN AFTER THE 2011 TOHOKU-OKI MEGA-THRUST EARTHQUAKE (Mw9.0)

Earthquakes in Canada

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

Incorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington

Seismogenic structure of 1935 Hsinchu-Taichung (M GR =7.1) earthquake, Miaoli, western Taiwan 1935 (M GR =7.1)

RELATION BETWEEN RAYLEIGH WAVES AND UPLIFT OF THE SEABED DUE TO SEISMIC FAULTING

DCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?

Case Study 1: 2014 Chiang Rai Sequence

Overview of the Seismic Source Characterization for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

7 Ground Motion Models

Name Class Date. 1. What is the outermost layer of the Earth called?. a. core b. lithosphere c. asthenosphere d. mesosphere

Module 7 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS (Lectures 33 to 36)

Chapter 2 Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Seismotectonic Provinces Using Earthquake, Active Fault, and Crustal Structure Datasets

Paleoseismic investigations along a key active fault within the Gulf of Corinth, Greece

5. What is an earthquake 6. Indicate the approximate radius of the earth, inner core, and outer core.

Geometry of co-seismic surface ruptures and tectonic meaning of the 23 October 2011 Mw 7.1 Van earthquake (East Anatolian Region, Turkey)

Transcription:

Overview of Active Fault Research at Geological Survey of Japan Yasuo. AWATA and Toshikazu. YOSHIOKA Active Fault Research Center, Geological Survey of Japan, AIST UJNR, November 10, 2006, Tokushima 1

Main Subjects on Active Fault Research Paleoseismological investigation Segmentation and scaling relations Prediction of earthquake magnitude 2

Paleoseismological Investigation 3

Active Fault Research Project in Japan, 1st Stage 1995 to 2004 FY 4

Active Fault Research Project in Japan, 1st Stage by local governments by GSJ 1995 to 2004 FY 98 Active fault regions Investigated mainly by local govern. and GSJ Evaluated by ERC, HERP 5

Probabilistic Shaking Map for Coming 30 Years ( ERC, 2005 ) Active faults Subduction boundary Other sources 6

Active Fault Research Project in Japan, 2nd Stage by Local Govern. by GSJ s budget by GSJ (from 2003) contract with MEXT (2005 and 2006) Itoigawa-Shizuoka F From 2005 FY 18 faults re-investigated by GSJ, in 2005-2006 Kego F Tachikawa F Nagamachi-Rifu F 40 fault regions will be re-investigated Improved segmentation and scaling relations will be used? 7

Paleoseismicty of an Active Fault, Which Triggered during the 2004 Mid-Niigata Earthq. Triggered surface rupture, with a slip of 0.2 m Characteristic two faulting events each with a slip > 1.5 m 8

Prediction of Most-Likely Earthquake-Segment by ERC 5-km-thresould (Matsuda, 1990) Scaling relation between total rupture length and slip 145 :Most likely earthquake segments 12 :further segmented based on paloseismicity alone 9

Fault Segmentation and New Scaling Relations 10

Behavioral Segment & Earthquake Segment Time Estimate the extent of behavior segment? Probabilistic prediction of earthquake segment? 11

Segmentation of 15 Surface Ruptures in Japan Paleoseismicity, Rupture process, Geometry Segment length <= 35 km Jog and Gap >= 2 km 12

Scaling Relation : for Behavioral Segments 15 10 strike-slip Dmax = 2.0 x 10e-4 L y = 0.1965x R 2 = 0.905 13 segments / in 6 ruptures 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 Behavioral Segment Length (km) Japan (strike-slip) 13

Scaling Relation : for Behavioral Segments 15 strike-slip reverse normal y = 0.2047x y = 0.2028x 10 y = 0.169x 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 Behavioral Segment Length (km) World (all types) 14

Scaling Relation : for Behavioral Segments 15 10 strike-slip Dmax = 2.0 x 10e-4 L y = 0.1965x R 2 = 0.905 15 10 strike-slip reverse normal y = 0.2047x y = 0.2028x y = 0.169x 5 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 0 0 20 40 60 80 Behavioral Segment Length (km) Behavioral Segment Length (km) Japan (strike-slip) World (all types) 15

Criteria for Behavioral Segment Geometry :Jog & Gap >= 2 km :Bend >=20 deg. Paleoseismicity :Timing of faulting event :Recurrence interval 16

Behavioral Segments - Fault Length 431 behavioral segments ( Length >= 10 km ) ( Slip rate >= 0.1 mm/y ) km 17

Behavioral Segments - Fault Length 431 behavioral segments ( Length >= 10 km ) ( Slip rate >= 0.1 mm/y ) 145 prob. earthq. segments. (by ERC, 2005) 290 behavioral segments 18

Behavioral Segments - Fault Length Mostly <= 40 km 19

Fault Length v.s. Slip per Event Dave. = 1.2 x 10e-4 L = ~ 0.6 Dmax 20

Prediction of Future Earthquake Segments 21

Prediction of Most Likely Earthquake Segments Application of 5-km-thresould ( Matsuda, 1990 ) 431 b-segments 256 earthquake-segments 22

Scaling Relation : Between B- & E-Segments Predicted 23

Scaling Relation : Between B- & E-Segments Predicted 24

Scaling Relation : Between B- & E-Segments Predicted 25

Scaling Relation : for Historical Ruptures Total Length v.s. Maximum Slip 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Total Length of Surface Rupture (km) Data from Wells & Coppersmith(1994) and others after 1994 26

Summary We have been contributing to the Paleoseismological investigation. We are working on fault segmentation and new scaling relations We have to attack to the problems on the probabilistic prediction of future earthquakes ( geology, mechanics of earthquake & faulting ) 27

Active Fault Database at AFRC Website ( http://www.aist.go.jp/riodb/activefault/ ) 500 segments with fault strand map Parameters of faulting Site information on long-term slip rate and paleoseismicity Tokushima 28

Active Fault Database at AFRC Website ( http://www.aist.go.jp/riodb/activefault/ ) Chichio Segment Strike N 80 E Segmentation of MTL Dip 45 N Length 52 km Sense of Faulting Right-lateral Upthrown Side North-side Slip Rate 4 m/ky Slip per Event 6.9 m Recurrence Interval 1.7 ky Age of Last Faulting AD 1500 to 1868 AD 1596 (documented) Elapsed-time Rate 0.18 Rupture Probability ca. 0 % by BPT in Next 30 years ca. 2 % by Poisson Tokushima 29

Thank You for Your Attention 30 2005 Kashmir Earthquake, PAK