from the Double Torus hypothesis-papers [2] with the Verlinde-energy E, I

Transcription

1 instein s nergy Is Conneted To A New Dark nergy In A Rotational Double Torus Universe While Aelerated Spae-expansion in Big Bang Cosmology Is An Optial Illusion. Author: Dan Visser, Almere, the Netherlands. Date: November 6 0. Abstrat. instein s energy is onneted to a new dark energy fore, refined-time, the fundamental onstants of Plank and Newton and prove the universe is a rotational Double Torus Universe. Also is proven that an aelerated spae-expansion in a stand-alone Big Bang osmology is an optial illusion. This paper presents a new energy-equation onneting instein s relativistienergy to a new dark matter-fore in a new dark energy fore. This new equation is the result of ombining a rather new energy-formula of. Verlin (UvA-NL) with my new dark energy foreformula of my Double Torus hypothesis. The Double Torus hypothesis is a new mol for the universe and against Big Bang-osmology. A seond new equation proves ined the aelerated spae-time expansion is an optial illusion. The new dark energy fore uses refined time, whih is smaller than the Plank-time. Suh auses a yli refined time-proess from a sub-quantum sale realulating dark matter towards the quantum sale, but in a rotational Double Torus Universe. This has onsequenes for the philosophy of past and future. Introdution: New quations for energy. I ombined a rather new energy-formula of. Verlin () (UvA-NL), 4 h J my new dark energy fore-formula of the Double Torus hypothesis., with In my view the Verlin-energy shows the Plank-onstant is driven by an angle-veloity making the relativisti energy looks like a torus-spiral. But after I ombined my new dark energy fore-formula from the Double Torus hypothesis-papers [] with the Verlin-energy, I find a new result: J 4 h rad m dm Instead of waiting to refer to the formulations I already mention what the impliation of this result is theoretially.

2 m The insight from this equation is, that the instein s relativisti energy is pennt on a higher orr of dark energy fore, whih is a fore in a Double Torus Universe. This fore stands in ratio to the Plank-onstant h, the Newton-onstant and dark matter m dm. This means: relativisti energy is produed in a proess of refined time, beause the refined time is embedd in the new dark energy fore, wherein also dark matter is embedd as m dm. The refined time is applied on dark matter. Note: is per 4. So, mathematially seen this is a genus- surfae-energy. But it goes further. I found an energy I named the DAN-energy (see also the image- at the end of this paper). The DAN-energy is as follows : kg.. Js rad. s m It is related to the angle-veloity from the Verlin-energy, however, the dimensions express a remarkable result. It is a sphere-mass-nsity kg m that spins (+ or -), but simultaneously the sphere unrgoes an a time-aeleration in a rotational torus s. Then within this proess two half-spheres rad onverge into two points (at eah si of the sphere-mass-nsity). This auses a transformation into a twin-light-one (see again the image- at the end of this paper). These points enable to observe the past and the future. This is different than the openlight-one in standard physis. My DAN-energy sribes a yli time-proess in a Double Torus Universe. This predits that the aelerated spae-time-expansion we observe after the Big Bang is an optial illusion. My DAN s equations are based on a new dark energy fore that uses time smaller than the Planktime. With that I prove the past and future are possible to proess from levels eper than the quantum-world. Thus from a sub-quantum-level and towards the quantum-world by the realulation of dark matter through the refined time. In this way past and future must be possible to look at. Suh a yli-time world is onsired in history as solution of the instein ield quations ( investigated by Lanzos (97), van Stokum (94), ӧl (949), llis and Hawking (97). But now I have several arguments extra of whih follows that the Big Bang an no longer be maintained as the Mol of the Universe. So what my DAN-energy tells osmology and physis is: It is not an eduational solution of the instein ield quations (whih is not likely to be real). It is more likely it is a real solution of urved spae-time, whih allows spae-time to be a Double Torus Universe. It is Double, beause an inner dark matter torus rotates and is enlosed by a dark energy time-torus that fills in the refined time smaller than the Plank-time towards the dark matter. With that the Universe is realulated from a sub-quantum-sale towards the quantum-sale. rom there on reality gets its shape in a lassial way. rom now on the Big Bang an no longer be maintained as the mol

3 of the Universe and mention several arguments in the end of this paper that plead against the Big Bang. Short History. In 004 I formulated my new dark energy fore-formula after a solitaire period of puzzling. Several papers therefore an be bak-viewed in the vixra-arhive going bak to 009. It took a long time before I sueed to apply my formula in a more extend type of formulations. Then I found the Verlin-energy for whih he reeived the Spinoza-prize in the Netherlands. I am an inpennt osmologist not affiliated to any institution. I used ommon sense for physis and osmology applying simple math. In former papers and this paper I show my formulations leading to the onnetion of instein relativisti energy and dark matter as a part of a refined time-proess. I hope physiists and osmologists, as well as the press will pay attention to this paer. I regularly notied that the urrent osmology-lan is hooked to the Big Bang. A lot of people earn a nie piee of bread by that. However, I are for the searh of the right pereption of the universe. All my papers point at a Double Torus Universe. ormulations of equations towards my DAN-energy. My new dark energy fore is as follows: Oe m kgm N s () or the speifi exerises following this an be rewritten as follows: Lplank Oe () m m Aording a long-existent equation of: O e L plank () ollows: L plank (4) This hanges the dark energy fore as follows: O e m m ()

4 With h (6) hanges the dark energy fore again as follows: O e m m h (7) 4 So the expression (7) an be written as: 4 hm dim (8) or whih the dimensions will be found as follows: h rad Js m Dim 4. m Dim kg m s kg kgm s kg J kg spin. s (9) (0) A part of this dimension an be further expressed as follows: kg s m s s m s s m s m s Nm s () Of whih follows: Nm s Nmms Jms () These dimensional exerises termine the dimension of m as follows: m kg spin. s Jms spin, named (A) () m Jms spin J m, named (B) (4) Now the dimension of the dark energy fore an be expressed aording to (A): 4. h rad Js m Jms spin () rom this follows the dimension dim:

5 4 hm rad J m. spin (6) whih is the same as: 4 spin hm J m rad (7) This dimension is the image of a spinning surfae-energy-sphere per radial. So it is part of a rotation, whih then reates a torus! That implies a transformation of the surfae-energy-sphere into a twin-light-one with past- and future-points rotating all along around insi the torus. This is beause a sphere doesn t hold its spherial form while moving. However, rotating lightones in a yli period are one of the strange solutions of instein s ield quations mentioned by Lanzos in 97, van Stokum in 94 and ӧl in 949. But llis and Hawking analyzed that in 97. They mathematially pointed-out that the light-ones beame twin-light-ones with a past- and future point instead of an open past and future. These past- and future light-onepoints enable to observe one past and future. Suh a universe will not have time-evolution, but instead CTC s (Closed Time Curves). However, nobody at that time saw a rotational universe in 97. Then the disovery of an aelerated spae-expansion in 998 grad suh a rotational universe to an eduated-exerise of the instein s ield quations. However, nowadays there is reason enough doubting the Big Bang strongly. This is beause we observed a CMB-dipole, an α- dipole, a dark flow, a dark energy not fitting the Big Bang framework, a negative urvature of spae and a sale-possibility below the Plank-sale by observing RB s. I will explain the arguments at the end of this paper. Comparison with the Verlin-energy. The Verlin-energy is as follows: h J (8) 4 The ratio of the Verlin-energy and the new dark energy fore will be as follows aording to (B): 4 h rad. s hm m J m 4 (9) Whih is the same as: 4 h rad. s hm m J m 4 (0)

6 This ratio is the ratio of the Verlin-energy and the DAN dark energy fore formula in the Double Torus hypothesis. The ratio expresses the angle-veloity per rotational surfae-energysphere. That means we al with a rotational torus-surfae! Now this ratio an be rewritten aording to (7) as follows: J mspin.. rad s rad m J m () rom this follows: spin J m s () J m This energy is based on the refined time smaller than the Plank-time, beause it is expressed in the new dark energy fore. It affets the dark matter and ould have as a onsequene a twinlight-one moving in a yli way insi the Double Torus. I have to prove that, beause it is expliitly expressed in the equations by separate parts for the Newton-quantum-gravity-fore and the dark matter-fore. This will be proved by exerises further in this paper. But the substitution of the dark energy fore shows a hek that the Verlin-energy follows anyhow: 4 hm 4 h J () m Connetion of the instein-energy with dark matter, the Plank-onstant, the Newtononstant and refined time in the new dark energy fore; all part of the framework of the Double Torus hypothesis. rom this point on I an show how the instein s relativisti energy matter and more. m onnets to dark Starting with equation (): J (4) m The Verlin-energy 4 h J will be get, if:

7 h () m 4 As sribed in former of my papers [] and legitimized by astronomial observations a split-up of visible mass and dark matter mass is exeuted, as follows: h m m dm 4 (6) This the same as: h m dm 4 (7) This is the same as: 4 hm dm (8) This leads to: 4 h J rad m dm This equation proves the instein s relativisti energy is pennt on a higher orr dark energy-fore in ratio to the Plank-onstant, the Newton-onstant and dark matter. This means: relativisti energy is produed in a proess of refined time, whih is enlosed by the new dark energy fore, and whih is applied on dark matter. Please note: is per4. So, mathematially seen, this is a genus- surfae-energy. (9) Now I also hek, if the instein-onnetion with the dark matter-fore in is orret. In a ertain way this should liver a well-known parameter of standard physis by substitution of the tails of my dark energy fore equation. The hek of the instein-onnetion with the dark matter-fore by substitution of my dark energy fore equation in tail. My dark energy fore formula is in tail as follows:

8 g q N sq dm, for Newton-quantum-gravity-fore and sub-quantum-dark matter fore. Here the partial-equation sq is the new dark matter-fore that onnets instein s dm relativisti energy to a sub-quantum domain of refined time. Whih is equivalent to: m. k m. k, see my paper dm (4) (0) Substitution in equation (9: m. k m dm. k 4 hm dm () ives the following result: mk. 4 h () or O k e at quantum gravity (see also my paper (4) ) () ollows: O m. e 4 h (4) or m () ollows: O m. e m 4 h (6) This is the same as: h Lplank O e, whih is OKAY! This proves my dark energy fore-formula must be right!

9 Now the evine for the twin-light-one with past-and future points an be rived, whih enables to observe the past and future in a yli rotational Double Torus Universe. I show the evine from the equations. I start with the amount of new dark energy that followed from the mathematial-equation sribed by Chris orbes with whom I lost ontat beginning 0 and with whom I sribed the Double Torus in the first three papers of 009. I had to go on my own he said! 4 6 Y m 4 (7) This an be rewritten as: h Y m 4 (8) And beause I have found in equation (7): h 4 m m 4 h (9) And then follows from equation (8) and (9): Y (40) Whih is the same as: Y (4) rom my equations in a former paper () follow: Y mh Oe (4) rom this follows: mh Oe (4) Aording to the earlier found equation (4):

10 . m (44) Whih is the same as: m (4) follows: mh (46) Oe m Whih is the same as: h (47) Oe Whih is the same (after substitution of O e ) as: h h O h e (48) rom this follows: h dim, with h (49) it is the same as: dim (0) Now I find the dimensiondim as follows: rad. Js rad J. rad rad J. rad rad kg dim.. Js. rad. s. rad () m s m m m m N. kg. kg s kg kg. s

11 The DAN-energy. kg.. Js rad. s. rad () m I all this the DAN-energy (after my name Dan Visser, Almere, the Netherlands). It is related to the angle-veloity in the Verlin-energy. However, the dimensions express a remarkable result. kg It is a sphere-mass-nsity m that spins Js (+ or -). But at the same this sphere moves forward rotational in time s. rad. This auses two half-spheres rad whih onverge into two points at eah si. This is the transformation into a twin-light-one (see image- )moving forward rotational in time. The points at eah si are the past and the future. This is different than the open-light-one in standard physis. But it is already predited by Lanzos (97), van Stokum (94) and ӧl (949) and analyzed by llis and Hawking (97). So what my DAN-energy tells osmology and physis is: It is not an eduational solution of the instein ield quations, but a real solution of urved spae-time. It is a Double Torus Universe, of whih the inner dark matter torus rotates and of whih the enlosing dark energy time-torus fills in the time smaller than the Plank-time towards dark matter. With that the Universe is realulated from a sub-quantum-sale towards the quantum-sale. rom there on, reality gets its shape in a lassial way. rom now on the Big Bang an no longer be maintained as the mol of the Universe. There are several arguments that ined plead against the Big Bang. I sribe them at the end of this paper. But above all, I also have proved that an aeleration of time follows from this equation. This suggests spae-time-expansion. Thus spae-time-expansion in the Big Bang-osmology is an optial illusion!! Image-: The DAN-energy.

12 xplanation image-: The DAN-energy sribes a yli time-proess in a Double Torus Universe. This predits the aelerated spae-time-expansion we observe after the Big Bang should have started, is an optial illusion. My DAN-equations are based on a new dark energy fore that uses time smaller than the Plank-time. With that I prove the past and future are possible to proess from levels eper than the quantum-world. This means from a sub-quantum-world towards the quantum-world a realulation of dark matter takes plae through refined time. In this way past and future must be possible to look at. Suh a ylitime-urved world (t) is a serious solution of the instein ield quations (investigated by Lanzos (97), van Stokum (94), ӧl (949), llis and Hawking (97). But suh a t was an interpretation within the Big Bang-osmology and not within the Double Torus Universe. Now I proved a t belongs in the Double Torus Universe. Moreover, several arguments nowadays indiate that the Big Bang an no longer be maintained as the Mol of the Universe. I give the arguments here. ight arguments for the non-existent Big Bang.. The Plank-satellite ouldn t eliminate the anomaly of the CMB-dipole from former less aurate observations with WMAP. The CMB is the Cosmi Mirowave Bakground, whih is supposed to have taken are for the superfast expansion of the universe after the Big Bang. The dipole means that a lot less low frequenies than high frequenies are part of the variations in temperature in the CMB. This learly indiates an observable warmer and olr expansion in the most far distant spae of the universe. Apparently a flow of spae is approahing and flowing away. This is an indiation of a rotational universe. The Big Bang is an optial illusion. The Big Bang is no stand-alone mol. The Big Bang has to be part of a different dynamis of time in the rotational Double Torus Universe.. Additionally astronomial observations have measured an alpha-dipole at galaxylusters. An alpha-dipole means a smaller- and larger value for the fine-struture onstant, whih is a measure for the strength of the eletromagneti fore (so also light) in two opposite diretions in the universe. This is an additional indiation that matter an flow towards and flow-away from the observer. This indiates a orrelation with the CMB-dipole.. Moreover, a dark matter-flow is also teted astronomially. Suh a dark flow appears to affet galaxy-lusters. It an be a onfirmation of a flow-away of matter, beause dark matter flows around in the Double Torus-shaped universe. It goes hand-in-hand with the CMB-dipole en alpha-dipole. 4. Besis, eneral Relativity predits gravity-waves. These are not (yet) termined in earth-laboratories. Still gravity-waves are observed by at least 0 onentri irles with eah irle presenting equal temperatures. This so alled Conformal Cyli Cosmology [6] nies the existene of osmi inflation. It posits ollisions of blak holes in a former universe. This should have initiated the gravity-waves as onentri irles. The time-evolution from that former universe is being ontinued. The investigators laim to have a -sigma ertainty, whih is equivalent to a disovery. This indiates in general that the universe did not start with a stand-alone Big Bang super-mass-nsity. Moreover, it has been alulated mathematially that a hane on osmi inflation is on This would be too small to be true in addition to the other arguments.. The sphere-shape of the universe in advane of omi inflation is intensively investigated. But aording to mathematially predition suh a universe would look a

13 foot-ball, whih is given shape by slies of spae with five borrs. Twelve of these slies are supposed to be there. These should mirror all possible light-images in the CMB. This leads to the expetation of a pattern of a speifi distribution of temperatures, whih is repeating itself. However, suh a pattern has never been found. This pleads again the Big Bang osmology. 6. Sine reently observations have termined that the amount of dark energy in the urrent dark-energy-theory is not orret. The urrent dark energy is supposed to be responsible for the aelerated spae-expansion sine 998. But now it is an indiation that the instein osmologial onstant again has to be drawn bak. My DAN-energy formula learly shows the aelerated spae-expansion is an optial illusion. 7. ven there is an astronomial observation of negative urvature. This points to the observation of distant spae to be urved as the insi borr of the torus-shape. 8. Last but not least: The Integral-satellite has gathered evine for smaller lengths than the Plank-sale. These measurements are related to the observation of amma-ray- Bursts (RB s); a RB is the esape of strong radiation aused by an enormous ollision of blak holes. Referene. [] ntropie-zwaartekraht JHP04 (0) 09 by. Verlin (UVA-NL). [] : Overview of the papers of Dan Visser, Almere, the Netherlands. [] Verson-: Author Dan Visser, titled: "Deeper Properties rived from the -st rivative of the Dark nergy ormula ore". [4] : Author Dan Visser, titled: Riemann Hypothesis Solved Through Physis-Math In New Cosmologial Mol: The Double Torus Hypothesis. [] : Version-: Double Torus Cosmology Reveals Cosmi Mirowave Bakground To Measure Dark nergy. [6] Arxiv (November 6 00): Conentri irles in WMAP data may provi evine of violent pre-big-bang ativity by V.. urzadyan of the Yerevan Physis Institute and Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 006, Armenia en R. Penrose of the Mathematial Institute, 4-9 St iles, Oxford OX LB, U.K.