arxiv:astro-ph/ v4 13 Jan 2005

Transcription

1 Brillouin sattering and the CMB arxiv:astro-ph/010533v4 13 Jan 005 A. Sandoval-Villalbazo a and R. Maartens b a Departmento de Físia y Matemátias, Universidad Iberoameriana Lomas de Santa Fe 0110 Méxio D.F., Méxio b Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 EG, UK alfredo.sandoval@uia.mx roy.maartens@port.a.uk January, 018 Abstrat Brillouin sattering of photons off the density flutuations in a fluid is potentially important for osmology. We derive the Brillouin spetral distortion of blakbody radiation, and disuss the possible impliations for the osmi mirowave bakground. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovih effet is slightly modified by Brillouin distortion, but only at very long wavelengths. 1 Introdution Dynamial light sattering theory [1] shows that photons interat with statistial flutuations in the fluid density and temperature. The origin of these flutuations an be traed bak to the fat that lassial partiles possess random trajetories that allow a desription in terms of a dynami struture fator. Early theoretial work by Brillouin [] predited a doublet in the frequeny distribution of monohromati light sattered by sound waves in a fluid. Experimental work [3] soon onfirmed the Brillouin doublet about the entral or Rayleigh line. Landau and Plazek [4] gave a theoretial explanation of the Brillouin spetrum, by means of a thermodynamial approah. Brillouin sattering has been mainly investigated in the ontext of laboratory physis. We are not aware of appliations to osmology, although Brillouin sattering has been onsidered in planetary atmospheres [5] and pulsar elipses [6]. In this paper, we derive the Brillouin spetral distortion of blakbody radiation interating with a hydrodynamial fluid. We disuss the possible appliations of this result to the osmi mirowave bakground (CMB) radiation. We also investigate the interation of the CMB with hot intra-luster gas. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovih (SZ) effet is slightly modified by Brillouin sattering, but only at very long wavelengths: the CMB is proteted from thermal Brillouin distortion by the low density and high temperature of the intra-luster gas, whih means that it does not behave like a hydrodynamial fluid. The Brillouin spetrum The standard system desribing flutuations of the thermodynamial variables in a hydrodynamial fluid of partiles of mass m an be written as [1]: t δn+n oδθ = 0, (1) t δθ+ s δn+α s n δt = 0, o () 1

2 t δt + ( 1 γ αn o ) δn = 0, (3) t where δn is the flutuation of the partile density relative to its average value n o, Θ = v is the fluid expansion rate, s is the sound speed, α = n 1 ( n/ T) p is the thermal expansion oeffiient, δt is the temperature flutuation, and γ = C p /C V is the heat apaity ratio. Following Landau and Plazek [4], a spatial Fourier transform is taken of Eqs. (1) (3) and then a Laplae transform is performed with respet to time: s n o 0 sk /(γn o ) s α sk /γ (1 γ)s/(αn o ) 0 s δñ(k,s) δ Θ(k,s) δ T (k,s) = The solution for the density flutuations in Fourier spae is [( δñ(k,t) = δñ(k,0) 1 1 ) + 1 ] γ γ os( skt) δñ(k,0) δ Θ(k,0) δ T (k,0)+(1 γ)δñ(k,0)/(αn o ). (4). (5) The Brillouin speifi intensity of the sattered light due to its interation with aousti modes of a fluid is given by whih leads to I ω δñ(k,0) δñ(k,t) e iωt dt, (6) ( I ν 1 1 ) δ(ν) + 1 γ γ δ(ν + s ν)+ 1 γ δ(ν s ν). (7) The Brillouin spetrum is a sum of Dira delta funtions. In the presene of dissipative effets, the delta peaks aquire finite height and width, but we are negleting non-equilibrium effets, whih would typially (but not always) produe only a small orretion to our equilibrium results. The first term in Eq. (7) represents the Rayleigh peak. The next two terms are the Brillouin doublet. This doublet reflets a shift in frequeny governed by the speed of sound of the fluid, diretly related to the Doppler effet, as shown by Eq. (5): ν = s ν. (8) The adiabati speed of sound for a monatomi gas is given by s = k BT m γ. (9) The integrated intensities under eah peak are simply related by the Landau-Plazek ratio. If we denote by I s the area under the singlet peak, and I d the area under one of the doublet peaks, then where I = I ω dω = I s +I d, (10) I s I d = γ 1. (11) Thus, for a monatomi gas with γ = 5 3, it follows that 1 4 of the total intensity of light sattered from a fixed frequeny ν will remain unshifted, while 3 4 of the intensity will be shifted in equal parts to the frequenies ν ± ν, given by Eq. (8). Also, if the density of the fluid inreases, γ 1 and the Rayleigh peak disappears, leaving all the sattered radiation divided by equal parts in the Brillouin doublet. In the hydrodynamial limit, density flutuations propagate as sound waves and ause the doublet. In this limit, sound waves of all wavenumbers are possible, so that all photon frequenies are affeted by Brillouin sattering. We will disuss later how this is hanged in the non-hydrodynamial regime. The undistorted blakbody spetrum is I = (k BT r ) 3 F(x), (1) (h)

3 I Τ Ν Figure 1: CMB distortion for the ase of Brillouin sattering off hydrodynamial aousti modes, as given by Eq. (16). The fluid temperature is T = 10 4 K. The frequeny is given in Hz and I br /τ br is given in units of (kt r ) 3 /(h). where x = hν, F(x) = x3 k B T r e x 1, (13) and T r is the radiation temperature. The effet of Brillouin sattering on the intensity spetrum an be alulated from Eqs. (7) (11), for the ase γ 1, by means of the onvolution integral [7]: I br (ν) = [1 τ br ]I(ν)+ τ { ( [ br I( ν) δ ν ν 1+ ]) ( [ s +δ ν ν 1 ])} s d ν. (14) Here τ br is the fration of photons that are Brillouin sattered off the aousti modes of the fluid and I br = I + I br is the perturbed spetrum. For a fairly dense system, τ br 1. The Brillouin peaks are Dira delta funtions, preserving the intensity frations of the sattered radiation. If we now perform the substitution ( α = ν ν 1± s ), (15) we may expand the integrand in a Taylor series. Straightforward alulation leads to the following expression for CMB sattering off the aousti modes: I br = τ br ( s ) ν I ν. (16) This expression is plotted in Fig. 1 for s = m/s, whih roughly orresponds to a fluid temperature of 4000 K. The urve resembles the ordinary thermal SZ effet, with the rossover frequeny in this ase being ν a, = 6.61 GHz. 3 Corretions to the SZ effet? Consider now the ase of CMB photons rossing the intra-luster gas of a galaxy luster. The Brillouin distortion is apparently given by Eq. (16), whih may be ompared with the (non-relativisti, thermal) SZ distortion [8] I sz = yi ex F(x) [ x xoth x ] 4. (17) 3

4 I Ν Figure : The solid line represents the ordinary SZ effet in the given frequeny range. The dashed line orresponds to Brillouin sattering. The luster parameters are T = 10 7 K, and optial depth τ = The units are as in Fig. 1. However, the intra-luster gas is hot (T 10 8 K) and very dilute (n 10 3 m 3 ). This means that it is far from the hydrodynami (ollision-dominated) regime, and muh loser to the ollisionless regime. Therefore the hydrodynamial analysis above does not over the intra-luster gas. Pressure flutuations do not disappear, but they no longer propagate as sound waves at all frequenies. While there may be sound-like waves, there will be a maximum frequeny, above whih there is no propagation [9]. An interesting question is how the transition from propagating to non-propagating frequenies is determined, but answering this question requires a detailed kineti-theory analysis, whih will be takled elsewhere. For present purposes, we an assume that there is an instantaneous ut-off at about the plasma frequeny. For typial lusters, this gives an upper limit k k max k plasma 10 4 m 1. (18) This means that standard Brillouin sattering of the CMB by lusters is osmologially insignifiant, sine it affets only very low frequenies. Nevertheless it is interesting to ompute the distortion up to the ut-off frequeny, whih is given by Eq. (7), subjet to Eq. (18), in the ase γ = 5 3. The orresponding result now reads: I = 1 4γ ( s ) ν I ν. (19) The Brillouin distortion of the CMB by a typial luster over the allowable range of frequenies is shown in Fig.. The SZ distortion in this range is also shown, for omparison. Although the Brillouin ontribution is not negligible, it operates at frequenies whih are of little interest. 4 Disussion We derived the distortion of a blakbody spetrum that follows from the hydrodynamial Brillouin frequeny shift, given in Eq. (16) and illustrated in Fig. 1. The question then is what are the osmologial impliations of this result. We onsidered the Brillouin distortion indued by lusters, but sine the intraluster gas is not hydrodynamial, the standard analysis does not apply beyond a very low frequeny, so that Brillouin distortion is insignifiant. 4

5 The ordinary Brillouin spetrum arises from light sattering off pressure flutuations at onstant entropy. When the fluid is ollision-dominated, these flutuations propagate as sound waves and generate a Brillouin doublet for eah wavenumber. As density dereases (and the Knudsen number approahes 1), the onept of sound propagation eventually beomes meaningless. For lusters, there is a ut-off maximum wavenumber for propagating modes, of roughly the plasma frequeny, i.e m 1. Thus the CMB is proteted from Brillouin distortion over all frequenies exept the very low tail. The SZ effet is therefore in pratie unaffeted by ordinary Brillouin sattering. Nevertheless, there may still be some Brillouin-type affets on the CMB from lusters. Pressure flutuations still exist beyond the hydrodynami regime and, although no doublet is present in the sattered spetrum, eah entral (Rayleigh) line will be broadened by an quantity proportional to the width parameter [10] s(ν) = πν ( kb T m ) 1/. (0) This means that some sattering of photons will our due to pressure flutuations even in the ollisionless limit. The distortion indued by this broadening is of the form given by the onvolution integral (ompare [11]) I + I 0 I(ν ) s(ν ) exp [ ν ] ν s(ν dν. (1) ) This non-standard ollisionless Brillouin distortion ould lead to effets at signifiant frequenies, and this is urrently under investigation. A Boltzmann equation approah to the study of time orrelation funtions shows that sound-wave peaks are present for wavelengths omparable to the mean free path[1]. Furthermore, beause of the high densities of hot photons in the intra-luster gas, there may be propagating modes at higher frequenies; relativistiplasmasathightemperatures(t > 10 8 K)mayinsomesensebetreatedasollision-dominated systems [13]. Other arguments that suggest olletive behaviour of low density plasmas far beyond the plasma frequeny have been developed in[14]: the plasma-dynamial regime desribes motions of spatially smooth, weakly damped disturbanes whih may osillate at high frequenies. In view of these points, we believe that dynamial light sattering of CMB photons in lusters should not be simply dismissed, and further investigation is warranted. Furthermore, there remains the potentially more important question of whether ordinary Brillouin sattering has an effet during reombination. Aknowledgements: We thank Naoki Itoh for pointing out the limits in whih Brillouin sattering operates. We also thank Leopoldo Garía-Colín, Brue Bassett, Qinghuan Luo and Thanu Padmanabhan for valuable omments. ASV was supported during this work by CONACyT grant F, and thanks the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at Portsmouth for hosting him while this work was done. RM thanks the ESI Mathematial Cosmology Programme, Vienna, where part of this work was ompleted. The work of RM is supported by PPARC. Referenes [1] T.J. Greytak and G.B. Benedek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 179 (1966); R.M. Mountain, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 05 (1966); B.J. Berne and R. Peora, Dynami Light Sattering (Wiley, N.Y., 1976); J.P. Boon and S. Yip, Moleular Hydrodynamis (Dover, N.Y., 1991). [] L. Brillouin, Ann. Phys. 17, 88 (19). [3] E. Gross, Nature 15, 01 (1930); ibid., 19, 7 (193). 5

6 [4] L. Landau and G. Plazek, Phys. Zeit. Sow. 5, 17 (1934). Also inluded in, The Colleted Papers of L.D. Landau, ed. D. ter Haar (Pergamon Press, London, 196). [5] G.W. Kattawar, A.T. Young, and T.J. Humphreys, Astrophys. J. 43, 1049 (1981). [6] Q. Luo and A.C. Chian, Mon. Not. R. Astron. So. 89, 5 (1997). [7] A. Sandoval-Villalbazo and L.S. Garia-Colin, J. Phys. A36, 4641 (003). [8] Y.B. Zel dovih and R.A. Sunyaev, Astrophys. Spae Si. 4, 301 (1969); R.A. Sunyaev and Y.B. Zel dovih, Comments Astrophys. Spae Phys. 4, 173 (197). [9] This was pointed out to us by N. Itoh. [10] J.H. Grinstead and P.F. Barker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1 (000). [11] R. di Stefano, L.H. Ford, H. Yu, and D.J. Fixsen, astro-ph/ [1] S. Yip and M. Nelkin, Phys. Rev. A 135, 141 (1964). [13] S.R. de Groot, W.A. van Leeuwen, and Ch. G. van Weert, Relativisti Kineti Theory(North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980). [14] R. Balesu, L. Brenig, and I. Paiva-Veretennioff, Physia 74, 447 (1974). 6