AGN AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THEIR HOST GALAXIES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AGN AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THEIR HOST GALAXIES"

Transcription

1 AGN AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THEIR HOST GALAXIES by William McAlpine A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University In Partial fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Physics Committee: Dr. Shobita Satyapal, Dissertation Director Dr. Jessica L. Rosenberg, Committee Member Dr. Mario Gliozzi, Committee Member Dr. Rebecca Goldin, Committee Member Dr. Michael Summers, Director, School of Physics, Astronomy, and Computational Sciences Dr. Richard Diecchio, Interim Associate Dean for Student and Academic Affairs, College of Science Dr. Peggy Agouris, Interim Dean, College of Science Date: Fall Semester 2013 George Mason University Fairfax, VA

2 AGN and the Characteristics of their Host Galaxies A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University By William McAlpine Bachelor of Science George Mason University, 2009 Director: Dr. Shobita Satyapal, Professor School of Physics, Astronomy, and Computational Sciences Fall Semester 2013 George Mason University Fairfax, VA

3 Acknowledgments First I would like to thank my advisor, Shobita Satyapal, for her encouragement and support throughout my graduate studies. Her excitement for science is contagious and inspired me to complete this work. I would also like to thank the other members of my dissertation committee, Jessica Rosenberg, Mario Gliozzi, and Rebecca Goldin for their time and encouragement. ii

4 Table of Contents Page List of Tables v List of Figures vi Abstract vii 1 Introduction Black Holes in Bulgeless Galaxies Introduction Observations and Data Reduction Procedure Results X-Ray Spectral Analysis X-Ray Temporal Analysis UV - Optical Data Previous Observations of NGC 3367 and NGC Contamination by X-Ray Binaries Bolometric Luminosities Black Hole Mass Estimation Methods Summary Optically Hidden AGNs in non-u/lirg Interacting Galaxies Introduction The Sample The non-u/lirg pairs sample Comparison Samples: The SINGS and ULIRG Sample Sample Properties and Potential Selection Biases Observations and Data Reduction Incidence of AGNs in Galaxy Pairs Comparison with Isolated and ULIRG Samples Which Galaxies Host Infrared-Identified AGNs? What are the AGN Properties and how do they Depend on Merger Stage? How do Mid-IR Identified AGNs Compare to Optically Identified AGNs? 39 iii

5 3.7 Mid-IR Identified Dual AGN Summary and Conclusions WISE Study of AGN in Galaxy Pairs Introduction Sample Selection Results Selection of AGN by WISE Optical Selection of AGN by SDSS The Effect of AGN Luminosity on AGN Selection by WISE AGN Fraction in Galaxy Zoo Mergers Other Causes of Red WISE Colors Reliability of Photometry in Close Pairs Conclusion Bibliography iv

6 List of Tables Table Page 2.1 Observation Log Best Fit Model Results for PN Data Black Hole Mass Estimates Sample Properties Fluxes for Full Sample WISE AGN fraction by Galaxy Zoo merger vote fraction Comparison between average W1-W2 color and angular separation for the projected pairs sample v

7 List of Figures Figure Page 2.1 Images of NGC 4536 and NGC Best fit models and data-to-model ratios XMM-Newton EPIC light curves for NGC 3367 and NGC α OX plotted versus 2500 Å monochromatic luminosity DSS images of the non-u/lirg pairs The properties of the non-u/lirgs pair sample, the isolated SINGS sample, and the ULIRG sample IRS spectra showing the [NeV] 14.3 µm line Distribution of 3σ limiting [NeV] line sensitivities for our pairs sample Properties of galaxies with [NeV] detections Distribution of merger stages for galaxies with [NeV] detections Distribution of [NeV] luminosities [NeV] luminosity vs. pair separation Comparison of the properties of mid-ir identified AGN and optically classified Seyferts with [NeV] detections Composite SEDs with varying AGN contribution WISE colors of AGN as a function of redshift with increasing amounts of contamination from the host galaxy Fraction of galaxies that have a color of W1-W BPT diagram of the galaxy pair sample with the demarcation line of AGN and star-forming galaxies Fraction of galaxies that are classified as an optical AGN according to the classification scheme of Kewley et al. (2001) WISE color-color plot of hard X-ray selected BAT AGN [OIII] luminosities of optically selected AGN in the pairs sample vi

8 Abstract AGN AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THEIR HOST GALAXIES William McAlpine, PhD George Mason University, 2013 Dissertation Director: Dr. Shobita Satyapal The vast majority of optically identified active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the local universe reside in host galaxies with prominent bulges, supporting the hypothesis that black hole formation and growth is fundamentally connected to the buildup of galaxy bulges. However, recent mid-infrared spectroscopic studies with Spitzer of a sample of bulgeless galaxies reveal strong evidence for AGNs in these galaxies. We present follow-up X-ray observations recently obtained with XMM-Newton of two such sources, the late-type optically normal galaxies NGC 3367 and NGC Detailed spectral analysis reveals that for both galaxies, the 2-10 kev emission is consistent with low-luminosity AGNs. These observations therefore add to the growing evidence that the fraction of late-type galaxies hosting AGNs is significantly underestimated using optical observations alone. A comparison of the mid-infrared [NeV] luminosity and the X-ray luminosities suggests the presence of a highly absorbed X-ray source in both galaxies. Next, a mid-infrared spectroscopic study was conducted on a sample of 30 pairs of interacting galaxies with archival Spitzer high-resolution spectroscopic observations. Previous studies of galaxy interactions have focused primarily on luminous galaxies, or were conducted in the optical or the UV where emission from the AGN may be hidden. Based

9 on the detection of the [NeV] 14.3 µm emission line we find an AGN detection rate of 18%, including 4 optically unidentified AGN. Our study therefore reveals that optical studies miss AGNs even in non-u/lirg interactions. Furthermore, we find that these AGNs are found in both disturbed and undisturbed hosts with a wide range of pair separations and Hubble types. Combining our study with previously published studies of U/LIRGs, we find that the AGN detection rate is highest in ULIRGs. In addition, we find tentative evidence that the incidence of AGNs is bimodal, with merger stage, with the highest incidence found in the earliest and latest merger stages. Finally, we find evidence based on mid-infrared spectroscopy for three possible dual AGNs, suggesting that a significant population of dual AGNs is hidden in the optical. The study of a larger sample of interacting galaxies is important to understand the relation between the incidence of AGN and the interaction stage of merging galaxies. Using infrared observations from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) we find that galaxy pairs have a higher AGN fraction than isolated galaxies and the AGN fraction increases with decreasing pair separation. While WISE only detects AGNs that dominate the emission of their host galaxies, it is able to detect obscured AGN. WISE finds a similar trend with AGN fraction and pair separation as optical studies, however WISE selects a different population of AGN since only a third of the optically selected AGN are categorized as AGN by WISE.

10 Chapter 1: Introduction We now know that supermassive black holes lurk in the centers of most bulge-dominated galaxies in the local Universe and that their black hole masses and the stellar velocity dispersions, σ, of their host galaxy s bulge are strongly correlated (Gebhardt et al. 2000, Ferrarese & Merritt 2000). This discovery has launched numerous speculations that the formation and evolution of galaxies and supermassive black holes are fundamentally linked, and that perhaps the process that builds galaxy bulges is coupled to the growth of the central black hole. The nature of this connection and the detailed physics behind it is currently unknown and remains at the forefront of extragalactic astrophysics today. According to the current paradigm of hierarchical structure formation, major mergers are ubiquitous and are a crucial element in the assembly of present-day galaxy bulges (e.g., Kaufman et al. 1993). Furthermore, numerical simulations predict that gravitational encounters between galaxies induce gravitational torques on the gas that efficiently drives the gas to the nuclear regions of the host galaxies (e.g. Mihos & Hernquist 1996, Cox et al. 2008), where it can fuel both star formation and accretion onto the central black hole. It is therefore natural to assume that major merging between galaxies grows galaxy bulges and simultaneously triggers accretion onto the supermassive black hole. Indeed, prior to our work, the vast majority of actively growing black holes - i.e., active galactic nuclei (AGN) - in the local Universe were found in galaxies with prominent bulges, and only 1 galaxy without an evidence of a bulge in the local Universe was confirmed to host an AGN. On the other hand, extensive optical studies of interacting galaxies show little or no evidence of enhanced AGN activity (e.g. Bushouse et al. 1996, Ellison et al. 2008, Darg et al. 2009). However, these studies were based on optical spectroscopic observations, which can be severely limited in the study of bulgeless or interacting galaxies, where a putative AGN 1

11 is likely to be both energetically weak and deeply embedded in the center of a dusty and possibly tidally disturbed host. In such systems, the traditional optical emission lines used to identify AGN can be dominated by emission from star formation regions, in addition to being significantly attenuated by dust in the host galaxy. As a result, it is by no means clear what fraction of late-type or interacting galaxies host AGN, and whether the purported connection between merging and black hole growth holds. Therefore, some key fundamental questions on the connection between black holes and galaxy formation and evolution have yet to be answered, such as: Is the bulge a necessary ingredient for a black hole to grow? Do black holes ever form in purely bulgeless galaxies? If so, how does the black hole mass and accretion rate relate to the properties of the parent galaxy? Are they related in any way to the mass of the disk? Which forms first in a galaxy, the black hole or the bulge? Are interactions necessary for black hole formation and growth? 2

12 Chapter 2: Black Holes in Bulgeless Galaxies 2.1 Introduction The discovery that at the heart of virtually all early-type galaxies in the local Universe lies a massive nuclear black hole strongly suggests that black holes play a pivotal role in the formation and evolution of galaxies. The well-known correlation between the black hole mass, M BH, and the host galaxy stellar velocity dispersion σ (Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese & Merritt 2000) suggests an intimate connection between black hole growth and the build-up of galaxy bulges, a connection that is reinforced by the fact that the vast majority of optically-identified active galactic nuclei (AGN) are found in early type hosts (e.g., Heckman 1980; Ho et al. 1997, henceforth H97). However, a number of recent studies have now shown that determining if AGNs reside in low-bulge galaxies cannot be definitively answered with only optical observations (e.g., Satyapal et al. 2007, 2008, 2009; Ghosh et al. 2008; Desroches & Ho 2009). The problem arises because a putative AGN in a galaxy with a minimal bulge is likely to be energetically weak and deeply embedded in the center of a dusty late-type spiral. As a result, the optical emission lines can be dominated by the emission from star forming regions, severely limiting the diagnostic power of optical surveys in determining the incidence of AGNs in low-bulge systems. In a recent mid-infrared spectroscopic study with Spitzer of a sample of optically normal late-type galaxies, we found remarkably the presence of high-ionization [NeV] lines in a significant number of sources, providing strong evidence for AGNs in these galaxies, and suggesting that the AGN detection rate in late-type (Sbc or later) galaxies is possibly more than 4 times larger than what optical spectroscopic studies alone indicate (Satyapal et al. 2008). While the detection of a [NeV] line strongly suggests that these galaxies harbor an 3

13 AGN, [NeV] emission can originate in shock-heated gas produced by starburst-driven winds (Contini 1997). X-ray detection would provide corroborating evidence and strengthen the case for the presence of an AGN based on the luminosity and spectrum of the source. X-ray observations arguably represent one of the most effective means to confirm the existence of an AGN and to investigate the AGN properties since: 1) Unlike the IR emission line features that probe lower density gas at larger distances from the black hole, X-rays are produced (and reprocessed) in the inner hottest nuclear regions where accretion occurs. 2) The penetrating power of (hard) X-rays allows them to carry information from the inner core of the galaxy without being significantly affected by absorption, and to probe the presence of the putative torus (provided that N H < cm 2 ). 3) X-rays are far less affected by the host galaxy contamination than optical radiation. 4) The hard X-rays (2-10 kev) can more robustly constrain the bolometric luminosity of the AGN. Here we present a pilot study with XMM-Newton observations of NGC 3367 (D=43.6Mpc; Tully 1988) and NGC 4536 (D=17.7Mpc; Saha et al. 2006) which are two of the late-type galaxies in our Spitzer sample (Satyapal et al. 2008) showing robust evidence for a [NeV] line. The distance of NGC 4536 determined by use of Cepheids, is significantly higher than reported by Tully (1988), yielding larger luminosities in all bands which are more consistent with an AGN. Among the galaxies with [NeV] detections, these 2 galaxies have optical spectra in the extreme HII-region range, indicating that there is absolutely no hint of an AGN based on their optical spectra. Both galaxies are isolated very low bulge systems; deep HST imaging of NGC 4536 for example, shows no evidence for a classical bulge but instead reveals a surface brightness profile consistent with a pseudo-bulge that exhibits spiral structure (Fisher 2006a). The presence of AGNs in these systems is indeed highly surprising. 4

14 GALEX XMM kev 3 arcmin 3 arcmin GALEX XMM kev 1 arcmin 1 arcmin Figure 2.1: Images of NGC 4536 (top two) and NGC 3367 (bottom two) from GALEX in the near-ultraviolet (from Gil de Paz et al. 2007) and smoothed XMM in the kev energy range. Both panels show the smoothed XMM 2-10 kev image overlaid as contours with levels starting at 0.25 counts (smoothed), incremented in 0.25 steps. The smoothing of the XMM images used a Gaussian with kernel of radius = 4.8 (3 pixels). 5

15 2.2 Observations and Data Reduction Procedure We observed our 2 targets with XMM-Newton in June, The nominal durations range between 27 and 34 ks (NGC MOS: 34ks, PN: 32ks; NGC MOS: 28ks, PN: 27ks). All of the EPIC cameras (Strüder et al. 2001; Turner et al. 2001) were operated in full-frame mode with the medium filter because of the presence of bright nearby sources in the field of view. As a precaution, for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 the MOS cameras were operated in small window mode to prevent photon pile-up. The recorded events were screened to remove known hot pixels and other data flagged as bad; only data with FLAG=0 were used. The data were processed using the latest CCD gain values. For the temporal and spectral analysis, events corresponding to pattern 0 12 (singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples) in the MOS cameras and 0 4 (singles and doubles only, since the pn pixels are larger) in the pn camera were accepted. Arf and rmf files were created with the XMM-Newton Science Analysis Software (SAS) 7.1. Investigation of the full field light curves revealed the presence of several background flares for NGC 3367 and NGC These time intervals were excluded, reducing the effective total exposures time to the values reported in Table 2.1. The nuclear X-ray sources in NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 are well-separated from other field X-ray sources in the X-ray images (Figure 2.1) and extraction radii used for source spectra and light curves are 30 in both cases. For reference, 10 correspond to 2.11 kpc for NGC 3367, and 0.89 kpc for NGC The derived X-ray positions for the central sources are 10 h 46 m 35 s + 13 d 44 m 59 s and 12 h 34 m 27 s + 02 d 11 m 16 s for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536, respectively. These positions are consistent with the positions of the optical nuclei taken from NED based on SDSS images (10 h 46 m 34. s d 45 m 03. s 09 and 12 h 34 m 27. s d 11 m 17. s 29 for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536, respectively). There are also off-nuclear X-ray sources seen in Figure 2.1 which are not investigated here. Background spectra and light curves were extracted from source-free circular regions on the same chip as the source, with extraction radii 2 times larger than those used for the source. There are no signs of pile-up 6

16 Table 2.1: Observation Log Source Date PN exposure PN rate [dd/mm/yyyy] [ks] [s 1 ] NGC /16/ ± NGC /17/ ± Table 2.2: Best Fit Model Results for PN Data Name Power Law Thermal Intrinsic kev 2-10 kev Photon Index Component kt N H Luminosity Luminosity (kev) cm ergs s ergs s 1 NGC ± ± NGC ± ± ± in the pn or MOS cameras according to the SAS task epatplot. The Reflection Grating Spectrometer (RGS) data have signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) that is too low for a meaningful analysis. The observation log with dates of the observations, EPIC net exposures, and the average count rates are reported in Table 2.1. The spectral analysis was performed using the XSPEC v software package (Arnaud 1996; Dorman & Arnaud 2001). The EPIC data have been re-binned in order to contain at least 20 counts per channel, depending on the brightness of the source. The errors on spectral parameters are at 90% confidence level for one interesting parameter ( χ 2 = 2.71). 2.3 Results X-Ray Spectral Analysis We fitted the EPIC spectral data in the kev range. To analyze the spectral data we first attempted to find the best-fit model for the pn data, which would then be applied 7

17 to the MOS1 and MOS2 data. For NGC 3367 we fitted the data with a simple power law with galactic absorption which did not provide an acceptable fit. Positive residuals at low energy suggest the addition of a thermal component which provided an acceptable fit with a χ 2 red = 1.34 for 88 degrees of freedom. Allowing the column density to vary or adding additional absorption components did not improve the fit. Therefore we determined that the best-fit model shown in Figure 2.2 was produced by a power law with an added thermal component. The model provided a kt value of 0.64 ± 0.03 kev for the thermal component and a photon index value of 2.15 ± Applying this model to the pn, MOS1, and MOS2 data resulted in a good fit with a χ 2 red = 1.25 for 140 degrees of freedom. A summary of the results is shown in Table 2.2. We then determined the contribution of the components to the overall flux by evaluating each component separately. Removing the power-law component and leaving the thermal component gave fluxes of and ergs cm 2 s 1 for the kev and the 2 10 kev ranges respectively. Restoring the power-law component and removing the thermal component gave fluxes of and ergs cm 2 s 1 for the kev and the 2 10 kev ranges respectively. From these values it can be determined that the power-law component dominates in the 2 10 kev energy range with 98% of the luminosity. For NGC 4536 we again fitted the data with a simple power law with galactic absorption which also did not result in an acceptable fit. As before, we then added a thermal component, which resulted in an acceptable fit with a χ 2 red = 1.37 for 70 degrees of freedom. Next we added an absorber at the position of the source, which further improved the fit to a χ 2 red = 1.23 for 69 degrees of freedom. The best-fit model included a thermal component with a kt value of 0.58 ± 0.03 kev, a photon index value of 2.30 ± 0.26, and an absorber with N H = (1.14 ± 0.4) cm 2. Applying this model to the pn, MOS1, and MOS2 data resulted in a reasonably good fit with a χ 2 red = 1.24 for 106 degrees of freedom. Lastly we determined the contribution of the different components to the overall flux. Removing the power-law component and leaving the thermal component gave fluxes of 8

18 "$! 34%*##56 "$! 34%*56#7 %&'()*+,)-*./!! *0-1!! 2 "$"!!"!# %&'()*+,)-*./!! *0-1!! 2 "$"!!"!# 9,):& # 8! 9,):& # 8! " "$7! 8 7 ;(-9<=*.>-?2 " "$6! 8 6 ;(-9<=*.>-?2 Figure 2.2: Best fit models and data-to-model ratios obtained by fitting the EPIC pn spectra in the kev energy range. Both models include a best-fit power law plus a thermal component and are absorbed by Galactic N H. NGC 4536 requires additional intrinsic absorption and ergs cm 2 s 1 for the kev and the 2 10 kev ranges respectively. Restoring the power-law component and removing the thermal component gave fluxes of and ergs cm 2 s 1 for the kev and the 2 10 kev ranges respectively. From these values we again determined that the power-law component dominates in the 2 10 kev range with 98% of the luminosity X-Ray Temporal Analysis Since in general the X-ray variability is one of the defining properties of AGNs, it is important to investigate the temporal properties of NGC 3367 and NGC We studied the short-term variability of both sources using EPIC pn data with time-bins of 1000 s. Figure 2.3 shows the EPIC time series in the kev band. A visual inspection of Figure 2.3 reveals that the average count rate of NGC 4536 is larger than the one of NGC 3367 by a factor of 10, and suggests that low-amplitude flux changes might be present in both light curves. However, a formal analysis based on a χ 2 test indicates that there is statistically significant variability only in NGC 4536 (P χ 2 9%), while no significant variability (P χ 2 83%) is detected in NGC

19 Figure 2.3: XMM-Newton EPIC light curves for NGC 3367 and NGC The time bin is 1000 s UV - Optical Data The OM allows us to simultaneously investigate the optical-uv properties of NGC 4536 and NGC In the case of these galaxies, the AGN is of low luminosity and furthermore obscured in the optical. It is thus likely that the optical-uv emission is dominated by star formation in the host galaxy in addition to being attenuated by dust. Nonetheless, we compare the UV-X-ray properties of NGC 4536 and NGC 3367 to optically identified more powerful AGNs to see if they are similar. In particular, we can compare the broadband spectral index α OX between our galaxies and optically identified AGNs. Using a sample of 333 optically selected Seyferts, Steffen et al. (2006) found that the broadband spectral index α OX are highly correlated with the UV monochromatic luminosity. For our sample, we apply the same approach by computing the spectral index, α OX = log(l /l 2500Å 2keV)/ log(ν /ν 2500Å 2keV) (Tananbaum et al. 1979), where l ν is the monochromatic luminosity in units of erg s 1 Hz 1. This is then plotted against the UV monochromatic luminosity. The 2500 Å flux is obtained by converting the flux measured in the UVM2 band (2310 Å) assuming a typical slope of 0.7 (f ν ν 0.7 ). Different extinction prescriptions were tested to account for the reddening in the UV band; the Small Magellanic Cloud extinction law was finally used for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 (see Gliozzi et al for details). E(B-V) 10

20 values of mag and mag were used for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 respectively. The observed magnitudes for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 are 14.3 and 15.2 respectively. The extinction corrected fluxes in the UVM2 band are 1935 µjy and 770 µjy for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 respectively. The fluxes at 2500 Å are 2046 µjy and 814 µjy for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 respectively. The values of α OX for our sample are shown superimposed to the best-fit linear regression found by Steffen et al. (2006) in Figure 2.4. As can be seen from the figure, NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 are clear outliers to the relation and are underluminous in the X-ray as compared to the sample of Seyferts. A possible explanation for this discrepancy may be that optical and UV emission is dominated by star formation. This is reinforced by the fact that these objects are optically classified as H II galaxies, suggestive of nuclear star formation. 2.4 Previous Observations of NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 NGC 3367 is an isolated face-on Sc barred galaxy (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1976) that is optically classified as an HII galaxy (H97). Although optically there is no hint of an AGN, radio observations reveal a bipolar synchrotron outflow from an unresolved compact nucleus with a diameter <65 pc (García-Barreto et al. 2002), and the possibility of two lobes straddling the nucleus and extending up to 12 kpc (García-Barreto et al. 1998). Assuming a spectral index in the range of, α = 0 0.7, we estimate a 5 GHz flux for the nucleus of 1.0 to 1.4 mjy based on the VLA 8.4 GHz measurement of 0.96 mjy at 0.3 resolution by García-Barreto et al. (2002). The higher spectral index assumed is that measured for the core at matched lower resolution (4.5 ) between 1.4 GHz (as published in García-Barreto et al. 1998) and 8.5 GHz, the latter being newly determined from our analysis of an archival VLA dataset (program AK550). However this spectral measurement may be dominated by diffuse emission surrounding the core as seen in the maps from García-Barreto et al. (1998). In a study of M81, another low luminosity AGN, α = has been observed (Markoff et al. 2008). The central stellar velocity dispersion is 61.2 ± 10.1 km s 1 (Ho et al. 2009). 11

21 Figure 2.4: α OX plotted versus 2500 Å monochromatic luminosity. The solid line corresponds to the best-fit relation derived by Steffen et al. (2006) and the dashed lines account for the uncertainties in the fit. 12

22 In the MIR Spitzer observation of NGC 3367 the [NeV] lines at 14.3 µm and 24.3 µm were detected (Satyapal et al. 2008). The detected fluxes of these lines were 1.2 ± 0.3 and 0.93 ± W cm 2 respectively. The aperture from which the [NeV] 14.3 µm line was detected corresponds to a projected size of kpc. Photoionization models of mid-infrared fine-structure line fluxes suggests that about 10 to 30 percent of the total bolometric luminosity of the galaxy may be attributed to the AGN. NGC 4536 is a barred late-type spiral SABbc (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1976) optically classified as an HII galaxy (H97). HST imaging shows no evidence of a classical bulge, but has a surface brightness profile consistent with a pseudo-bulge that appears to exhibit spiral structure (Fisher 2006b). To the best of our knowledge, the only hint of an AGN in the optical is the optical line ratios from Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph spectroscopy that suggest the presence of a weak AGN (Hughes et al. 2005). There is evidence of star formation in the central region with strong Brγ emission (Puxley et al. 1988) and 10.8 µm emission (Telesco et al. 1993). Also a continuum-subtracted image of Hα + [NII] emission (Pogge 1989) is suggestive of nuclear star formation. The radio emission has a diffuse morphology with three separate peaks (Vila et al. 1990; Laine et al. 2006) that may be an annular ring of star formation around the nucleus. The morphology is similar to what is seen at 10.8 µm (Telesco et al. 1993), as well as in the 1-0 S(1) molecular hydrogen line (Davies et al 1997). ROSAT High Resolution Imager data revealed two ultra luminous X-ray sources, one of which may be coincident with the optical nucleus (Liu & Bregman 2005). The second ULX is 150 away from the nucleus of the galaxy, well outside the 30 aperture radius of the XMM-Newton observation. The central region of NGC4536 is composed of an extended radio source at arcsecond resolution (Vila et al. 1990). From our reanalysis of the VLA 4.9 GHz map (1.3 beam; program AD176) published by Vila et al. (1990), we measure a point source upper limit of <1.7 mjy for the nucleus based on the observed peak surface brightness at the optical center. The central stellar velocity dispersion is 85 ± 1 km s 1 (Batcheldor et al. 2005). 13

23 The [NeV] 14.3 µm line was detected in this galaxy from an pc region, approximately 10 northeast of the optical nucleus (Satyapal et al. 2008). A flux of 0.32 ± W cm 2 was detected. [OIV] 26 µm and [NeIII] 15.5 µm lines were also detected, but were concentrated at a location nearer to the optical nucleus than the [NeV] emission. Photoionization models of mid-infrared fine-structure line fluxes suggests that about 10 to 30 % of the total bolometric luminosity of the galaxy may be attributed to the AGN. 2.5 Contamination by X-Ray Binaries The 2-10 kev band X-ray luminosity of 2.0 x ergs s 1 and 0.9 x ergs s 1 for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 respectively is consistent with low-luminosity AGNs (Ho et al. 2001). A compilation of low-luminosity AGN from Ho et al. (2001), finds X-ray luminosities ranging from ergs s 2 While the observed X-ray emission is most likely due to the presence of an AGN, there is a possibility of contamination due to X-ray binaries (XRBs). Gilfanov (2004) examined the connection between the X-ray luminosity of low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) and the stellar mass of 11 galaxies with no evidence of current star formation. An average ratio of L x /M = ergs s 1 M 1 was found for the kev luminosity. For NGC 3367 and NGC 4536, LMXBs would account for approximately only 5 percent of the observed X-ray luminosity according to this ratio. High mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) however may account for significantly higher portion of the observed luminosity since both galaxies show emission lines consistent with ongoing star formation. Colbert et al. (2004) used a sample of 32 spiral, elliptical, and irregular galaxies, with 1441 X-ray point sources detected by Chandra to study the relation between the X-ray emission (0.3-8 kev) from these point sources and the properties of the galaxy. They related the X-ray point source luminosity, assumed to be mostly from black hole HMXBs and ULXs, to K-band luminosity and the FIR-UV luminosity. Using the K-band 14

24 luminosity to determine the stellar mass and the FIR-UV luminosity to determine the star formation rate (SFR) they found a linear relationship between X-ray luminosity, stellar mass, and the SFR of a galaxy. Using this relation, we estimated the luminosity expected from X-ray sources other than an AGN. SFRs for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 were estimated using the extinction-corrected UV luminosities calculated earlier, and using the formula given in Kennicutt (1998). With SFRs of 0.65 and 0.16 M yr 1 for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 respectively, the relation gives an X-ray luminosity from point sources of approximately 10 percent of the observed luminosity from both NGC 4536 and NGC 3367, suggesting that AGN dominates the X-ray luminosity. The possible contamination by XRBs may also be estimated based on their expected density within the area observed by the 30 beam of the XMM-Newton. Pence et al. (2001) examined the distribution of X-ray point sources within NGC Using the surface density of X-ray point sources in NGC 5457, a rough estimate of the number of X-ray sources in NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 may be determined. They determine the surface density of X-ray sources as a function of the distance from the nucleus. Assuming a distance of 6.85 Mpc for NGC 5457 (Saha et al. 2006), the distance from the nucleus may be compared with our galaxies. The XMM-Newton extraction aperture for NGC 3367 corresponds to a radius of 6.3 kpc and is estimated to have a surface density of 0.29 sources per kpc 2. The XMM-Newton extraction aperture for NGC 4536 corresponds to a radius of 2.6 kpc and is estimated to have a surface density of 0.56 sources per kpc 2. These values give an expected number of sources of approximately 36 and 12 sources for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 respectively. Typical XRBs have luminosities of up to ergs s 1 (White et al. 1995). However, assuming all the X-ray sources in NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 emit at ergs s 1 (the highest luminosities reached by XRBs in NGC 5457, Pence et al. 2001) NGC 3367 would require at least 200 sources and NGC 4536 would require at least 90 sources in order to account for the observed X-ray emission in the 2-10 kev band if these sources were exclusively due to XRBs. While we assumed a similarity between NGC 5457 and our 15

25 sample that may not exist, the probability of these many sources emitting at an average luminosity of ergs s 1 within an area of a few kpc 2 is extremely unlikely. In addition to the lower X-ray luminosities, XRBs are expected to be characterized by different SEDs over the UV - optical - X-ray range compared to those from AGNs (Yuan & Cui 2005). By using the [NeV] emission as a proxy for UV emission, the ratio of the [NeV] luminosity to the X-ray luminosity can be used as a crude indicator of the SED of the ionizing source. The L [NeV] /L x ratio for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 is and respectively, consistent with optically identified AGN (Gliozzi et al. 2009). The L [NeV] /L x ratio will of course depend on a number of parameters including the ionization parameter and the fraction of the emission due to star formation. Moreover there is a large scatter in the correlation between [NeV] emission and UV emission. However, the similarity between this ratio in NGC 4536 and NGC 3367 suggests that XRBs alone cannot be responsible for both the X-ray and [NeV] line emission in NGC 3367 and NGC Lastly, the X-ray variability presented in section for NGC 4536 strongly suggests that the emission is from a single source. We have thus shown that the X-ray luminosities of NGC 4536 and NGC 3367 are unlikely to be due to XRBs. Furthermore, the detection of the [NeV] line together with the high X-ray luminosities, is highly suggestive of an AGN. 2.6 Bolometric Luminosities An estimation of the bolometric luminosity of the AGN may be found using the X-ray and [NeV] luminosities using their respective bolometric correction factors. If we assume that the X-rays are emitted exclusively by the AGN, the X-ray luminosity can be used to estimate the bolometric luminosity of the AGN. If we assume that the black holes at the center of these galaxies have relatively low masses given their low bulge masses, then the Eddington ratios of these galaxies are likely to be high (Greene & Ho 2007). Lusso et al. (2010) studied 545 X-ray selected type 1 AGNs from the XMM-COSMOS survey 16

26 Table 2.3: Black Hole Mass Estimates Galaxy logm Edd logm Edd logm BMC logm σ logm fund [NeV] X-ray NGC 3367 >5.19 > NGC 4536 >3.91 >3.58 < <6.67 with available black hole masses and bolometric luminosities estimated using their spectral energy distribution. Assuming that these AGNs emit at very high rates with Eddington ratios >0.2 we adopt a mean bolometric correction factor of 53 (Lusso et al. 2010). Using this bolometric correction factor, the estimated bolometric luminosities are logl bol (ergs s 1 ) = 42.0 and logl bol (ergs s 1 ) = 41.7 for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536, respectively. For these galaxies photoionization by a starburst is unlikely to give rise to significant [NeV] emission (Abel & Satyapal 2008). If we assume that the [NeV] only arises from the AGN, we can use the relation between bolometric luminosity and [NeV] luminosity established in a large sample of more powerful AGNs (Satyapal et al. 2007) to estimate the bolometric luminosity of the AGNs. The bolometric luminosities are estimated to be logl bol (ergs s 1 ) = 43.3 and logl bol (ergs s 1 ) = 42.0 for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536, respectively. These luminosities are a factor of 20 and 2 higher, respectively, than the bolometric luminosities estimated using the X-ray luminosities. This discrepancy may suggest that some of the [NeV] emission originates in shocks. However, given the large scatter in the correlations used to estimate the bolometric luminosities, any definitive conclusions cannot be made about the discrepancy. 2.7 Black Hole Mass Estimation Methods Eddington Mass Limits Using the [NeV] and X-ray estimated bolometric luminosities, we can obtain lower limits on the mass of the black hole assuming the Eddington limit. The black hole mass estimates are given in Table

27 Bulk Motion Comptonization (BMC) Model One possible method to determine the mass in BH systems relies on the fact that hard X-rays are produced by the Comptonization process in both stellar and supermassive black holes. Specifically, by fitting the X-ray spectra of Galactic black holes (GBHs) with the BMC model during their spectral transition, one can derive a universal scalable relationship between the photon index Γ and the normalization of the BMC model N BMC. If one assumes that the physics of a black hole system is the same no matter the scale and that the bulk of the X-ray emission is produced by Comptonization, this technique can be used to compare masses of black holes of differing scales. Using the known mass and properties of a Galactic black hole used as reference, the mass of the black hole in question can be extrapolated. A more detailed description of the application of this method to AGNs is given in Gliozzi et al. (2009, 2010). The mass estimates obtained using this technique vary depending on the uncertainty of the BMC spectral parameters and on the GBH used as a reference giving a range of values. This mass range for NGC3367 and the upper limit mass for NGC4536 is compatible with the lower mass limit derived using the Eddington limit as can be seen in Table 2.3. M-σ Relation The mass of the central black holes can be estimated using the M- σ relation, assuming that the relation extends to lower mass ranges. Using the velocity dispersion values of 61.2 ± 10.1 km s 1 (Ho et al. 2009) for NGC 3367 and 85 ± 1 km s 1 (Batcheldor et al. 2005) for NGC 4536 and the M-σ relation from Gültekin et al. (2009b), the masses are found to be consistent with the lower mass limits derived using the Eddington limit, but significantly higher than those derived using the BMC model. Fundamental Plane This method of estimating black hole mass uses an apparent correlation between X-ray luminosity, 5GHz radio luminosity, and black hole mass. Gültekin et al. (2009a) recently examined this correlation, using dynamically-determined black hole masses, archival data from Chandra, and 5GHz luminosities from the literature for 18 galaxies. Using the X-ray luminosity and the 5GHz core radio flux estimated earlier, mass estimates for our galaxies may be determined. The masses estimated with this method are consistent with masses implied by the M-σ relation as can be seen in Table 2.3. The 18

28 relation however comes with in intrinsic scatter 0.77 dex, larger than the scatter of the M-σ relation, but like the M-σ relation, the scatter increases as the mass decreases. The relation is developed using higher mass black hole on the order of 10 7 to 10 9 M and may not be appropriate for this sample if their central black holes truly have relatively small masses. Gültekin et al. (2009a) explains this scatter with the possibility that the relation may not apply to sources that accrete at high rates. They also explain that the scatter may be skewed by a few outliers. We note that the last two methods yield significantly larger values for the black hole than the ones obtained using the scaling technique based on the results from the BMC fit. However, Gliozzi et al. (2010) using very high-quality X-ray spectra of the narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxy PKS , showed that the value of M BH obtained with this technique is fully consistent with the other indirect methods. The low values of M BH derived for NGC 3367 and NGC 4536 using the scaling technique can be reconciled with those derived from the fundamental plane and from the M-σ relation if the measured X-ray luminosity is substantially underestimated (for example because of a significant intrinsic absorption). This scenario is consistent with the anomalous optical - X-ray spectral index discussed in section Summary We have analyzed the XMM-Newton observations of two late-type galaxies; NGC 3367 and NGC 4536, which are believed to harbor AGNs based on the previous detection of mid-infrared [NeV] line emission. Our main results are summarized as follows: 1. Detailed spectral analysis of the XMM-Newton data for these galaxies reveals that the X-ray luminosity is dominated by a power law with 2-10 kev luminosities of ergs s 1 for NGC 3367 and ergs s 1 for NGC 4536, respectively, consistent with low luminosity AGNs. 19

29 2. The possibility that significant X-ray emission may be emitted by X-ray binaries was explored. It was found that XRBs could be responsible for only a small fraction of the X-ray luminosity detected, and that the significant [NeV] emission cannot be explained by the presence of XRBs alone. 3. Low-amplitude flux changes may be present in both galaxies, and NGC 4536 shows statistically significant variability, providing further evidence of an AGN. 4. A comparison of the black hole mass estimated using the BMC model with other methods suggests the X-ray source may be absorbed in both galaxies. This hypothesis is supported by the steep spectral index α OX found in both sources. 5. Estimated black hole masses range of M for NGC 3367 and M for NGC We have demonstrated that MIR spectroscopy coupled with X-ray observations can more robustly determine the presence of an AGN and estimate the black hole mass. 20

30 Chapter 3: Optically Hidden AGNs in non-u/lirg Interacting Galaxies 3.1 Introduction Based on the current cold dark matter cosmological framework, it is now well-established that galaxy interactions are ubiquitous and that they play a pivotal role in the formation and evolution of galaxies. From both a theoretical and observational perspective, galaxy interactions are undoubtedly responsible for enhanced nuclear star formation (e.g., Mihos & Hernquist 1996; Larson & Tinsley 1978; Sanders & Mirabel 1996; Kennicutt et al. 1987; Woods, Geller, & Barton 2006; Woods & Geller 2007; Ellison et al. 2008; Smith & Struck 2010; Patton et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2012), and the formation of spheroids (e.g., Toomre 1977; Lake & Dressler 1986; Shier & Fischer 1998; Rothberg & Joseph 2006). A natural assumption from the tight correlation between central black hole mass and bulge velocity dispersion (e.g., Gebhardt et al. 2000) is that in addition to bulge growth, interactions trigger accretion onto a central supermassive black hole. However, despite over three decades of extensive research, it is still unclear whether or not there is observational evidence for a causal connection between mergers and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), and, if so, how this connection depends on merger and host galaxy parameters. A number of studies have found evidence for mergers in AGN hosts (e.g., Surace et al. 1998; Canalizo & Stockton 2001; Ramos Almeida et al. 2011). On the other hand, recent large surveys that include carefully constructed control samples find no evidence that AGN hosts are more tidally disturbed than quiescent galaxies (e.g., Cisternas et al. 2011). These studies depend critically on sample size and the choice of control sample. Furthermore, since tidal features can be faint and appear only in the gas instead of the stars (e.g. Kuo et al. 2008), the sensitivity 21

31 (e.g. Canalizo & Stockton 2001; Ramos Almeida et al. 2011) and the wavelength (e.g., Hancock et al. 2007; Boselli et al. 2005) of the observations are critical. To circumvent these challenges, there have been a large number of optical spectroscopic studies aimed at finding AGN signatures in confirmed samples of interacting pairs. However, these studies also yield contradictory results. Several studies have shown little evidence for an increased incidence of AGNs in interacting galaxy pairs compared with a control (e.g., Bushouse 1986; Darg et al. 2010) in direct contrast with a number of other studies (e.g., Keel et al. 1985; Dahari 1985; Ellison et al. 2011; Silverman et al. 2011). Since the centers of interacting galaxies may be more obscured than isolated galaxies, a potential shortcoming of previous optical studies is that they can miss buried AGN. Moreover, the onset of accretion activity in an interaction will likely be weak and accompanied by star formation. In such cases, the traditional optical spectroscopic line ratios will be dominated by star formation, hiding the AGN (see Abel & Satyapal 2008). In such cases, observations of mid-ir fine-structure lines are a powerful tool for finding optically unidentified AGNs. AGNs show prominent high-excitation fine structure lines that are not seen in normal and starburst galaxies (Genzel et al. 1998; Satyapal et al. 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009). A key prominent line is the [NeV] 14 µm line with an ionization potential of 97 ev. This line is not seen in starburst galaxies since even the most massive stars produce few photons of this energy (e.g., Sturm et al. 2002; Satyapal et al. 2004). The detection of this line in any galaxy therefore provides strong evidence for an AGN. In fact, mid-ir spectroscopic studies of external galaxies have revealed that the census of AGN activity in the local Universe is significantly underestimated by optical spectroscopic studies alone (e.g., Satyapal et al. 2007, 2008, 2009; Goulding & Alexander 2009), underscoring the importance of conducting mid-ir spectroscopic studies of interacting galaxies. While there have been a number of mid-ir spectroscopic studies of interacting galaxies, most previous studies have focused primarily on the most luminous interactions, which target typically advanced mergers between galaxies of comparable mass ( major mergers ). 22

32 Indeed, virtually all large coordinated studies carried out with ISO (e.g., Genzel et al. 1998), and Spitzer (e.g., Veilleux et al. 2009; Armus et al. 2007, 2009; Farrah et al. 2007; Petric et al. 2011) have targeted ultraluminous (L> L ) or luminous (L> L ) infrared galaxies (U/LIRGs), which are invariably advanced mergers of equal mass progenitors. This is a serious deficiency since only a narrow phase in the merger sequence is observationally studied. Theory predicts that as a merger progresses, gravitational instabilities cause large radial gas inflows toward the nuclear regions. These numerical simulations show that multiple gas inflow epochs along the merger sequence occur, resulting in at least two distinct episodes of enhanced star formation and possibly accretion activity, with the first peak taking place shortly after the first close encounter, when the two galaxies are widely separated (e.g., Mihos & Hernquist 1996; Cox et al. 2006). Therefore, no observational study of the incidence and properties of AGNs in interacting galaxies is complete without the inclusion of a wider range of merger stages. To address this deficiency, we present a Spitzer mid-infrared spectroscopic investigation of a strategically-selected sample of non-u/lirg interacting galaxy pairs, which generally target earlier interaction phases. This is the first systematic mid-infrared spectroscopic investigation of a significant sample of non-u/lirg interactions. The principal goals of this work are to determine the incidence and intrinsic luminosity of optically hidden AGNs and to explore the dependence on pair separation/merger stage and host galaxy properties. Together with previously published studies aimed at normal isolated galaxies and U/LIRGs, our proposed database will enable a more comprehensive study of merger evolution from the first close pass through to final coalescence. This chaper is structured as follows. In Section 3.2, we summarize the properties of the Spitzer sample presented here in addition to previously published comparison samples. In Section 3.3, we summarize the observational details and data analysis procedure, followed by a discussion of the incidence of AGNs in section 3.4. In Section 3.5, we explore the dependence of AGN incidence on host galaxy and merger properties, followed by an investigation of the dependence of AGN properties on pair separation, and merger stage in section 23

33 3.6. In section 3.7, we discuss the possible dual AGN found in our sample. A summary of our major conclusions is given in Section The Sample The non-u/lirg pairs sample Here we present a comprehensive mid-ir spectroscopic survey using Spitzer IRS of 30 pairs of interacting galaxies. Our goal was to assemble a sample of interactions that are less luminous than the U/LIRG interacting galaxies, since this population of interacting galaxies have not been systematically investigated in any previous infrared spectroscopic studies. Our pairs sample is an archival sample and is thereby restricted by the number of interacting galaxies that have been observed by the high-resolution IRS modules onboard Spitzer. The sample was assembled by conducting an exhaustive search of the Spitzer archive using several large compilations of interacting galaxies including the Arp Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, which selects galaxies with strong morphological indicators of interactions, the optical spectroscopic sample from Keel et al. (1985), which includes an extensive list of physically associated pairs with no morphological indicators of interactions, and the Galaxy Zoo merger list, which contains over 3000 morphologically identified mergers drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Darg et al. 2010). We required that both nuclei in each pair was observed by both high-resolution IRS modules. In addition, we applied the following criteria to the sample: 1) we eliminated all galaxies with more than one companion within 100 kpc, since our intent is to study the effects of interactions and not local galaxy density, 2) we included only galaxies with two distinct nuclei, eliminating all single nuclei, irregular, and starburst galaxies in the Arp atlas, and 3) we eliminated any U/LIRG (all sources with L FIR > L ) interacting galaxies, since these galaxies are part of large programs and the results published.. The resulting sample contains 30 galaxy pairs and includes both mergers with clear morphological signatures of interactions as well as physically associated pairs with no evidence of tidal distortion or structural peculiarity. 90% of the pairs in this 24

34 sample are part of the optical spectroscopic sample from Keel et al. (1985). We note that the galaxies in our final pairs sample were observed as part of a random collection of guaranteed and open-time programs with differing scientific goals; the sample should therefore not be viewed as complete in any sense. In Figure 3.1, we display DSS images of the galaxy pairs from our pairs sample. As can be seen from the figure, the morphologies of the pairs in our pairs sample are varied, with some systems showing distorted morphologies and prominent tidal features, and others with large pair separations with no obvious signs of interactions. In Table 3.1, we summarize the basic properties of our pairs sample. The properties of the host galaxies in our pairs sample were assembled by conducting an extensive literature search. Distances were complied using NED, adopting the most recent estimated distance. Through visual inspection of the assembled DSS images, galaxies with tidal features were identified and are listed in Table 3.1. Based on the DSS images, all galaxies in our sample were characterized by an merger stage according to the classification scheme based on numerical simulations (Mihos & Hernquist 1996) first proposed by Surace et al. (1998) and used by Veilleux et al. (2002) to classify ULIRGs. We emphasize that the identification of tidal features as well as the adopted classification scheme is dependent on the wavelength and sensitivity of the observations. Indeed, a recent HI study conducted by Kuo et al. (2008) of local Seyferts showed remarkably the presence of tidal features in the HI gas in the vast majority of optically undisturbed hosts. The adopted identifications should therefore be viewed with some caution. Stellar masses were estimated using K-band 20 mag arcsec 2 isophotal elliptical aperture magnitudes from 2MASS by assuming a mass-to-light ratio of 1.32 M /L, taken from Cole et al. (2001) for the Salpeter IMF. Hubble type, nuclear classifications based on optical emission line ratios, and IR luminosities where available were also compiled for our sample and are displayed in Table

35 3.2.2 Comparison Samples: The SINGS and ULIRG Sample Any study of interacting galaxies requires a carefully constructed control sample, and a thorough investigation of possible statistical biases arising from observational selection. Since this study is an archival study, no deliberately designed accompanying control sample exists. Moreover, the number of galaxies selected for a control sample is limited by the number of galaxies observed by the high-resolution module onboard Spitzer. The largest sample of nearby galaxies observed by the high-resolution IRS modules is the SINGS sample of nearby galaxies (Kennicutt et al. 2003; Dale et al. 2005). We constructed a comparison sample selected from the SINGS sample, which contains 35 galaxies that can be considered isolated following the criteria adopted by Smith et al. (2007). Galaxies were eliminated if they had companions whose velocities differ by <1000 km s 1, that have an optical luminosity >1/10 the target galaxy, and are separated from the target galaxy by <10 times the optical diameter of either galaxy. Each of the galaxies in this sample has published highresolution IRS spectra of the nucleus (Dale et al. 2009), which can be readily compared to our data. In addition to our constructed isolated nearby sample, we also compared the mid-ir spectral properties of our pairs sample with those of ULIRGs from Veilleux et al. (2009). The sample of ULIRGs compiled by Veilleux et al. (2009) are a subsample of the 1 Jy sample, chosen to be representative of the full sample in terms of redshift and luminosity. We also compared our results to those from a sample of LIRGs that are part of the GOALS sample (Great Observatory All-sky LIRG Survey, Armus et al. 2009). Since mid-ir spectroscopic data is reported for only those galaxies with [NeV] detections (Petric et al. 2011), we included in our comparative analysis only those galaxies that have [NeV] detections that have a pair visible in the DSS images. Optical classifications of these galaxies were compiled from NED. We note that since the mid-ir spectroscopic results for the full GOALS sample are not yet published, our comparative analysis with the interacting LIRGs is limited. 26

36 IC750 IC749 NGC4394 NGC4382 NGC2633 NGC2634 NGC2970 NGC2968 NGC3166 NGC ' x 12' NGC4567 NGC5481 NGC ' x 12' NGC3800 NGC3799 NGC5394 NGC5195 NGC5194 NGC5395 NGC ' x 12' NGC7753 NGC7752 NGC3227 NGC3226 NGC2300 NGC2276 NGC5614 NGC5615 NGC5545 NGC5544 NGC3448 UGC6016 NGC7682 NGC7679 NGC4038 NGC3396 NGC3395 NGC5427 NGC935 12' x 12' NGC4438 NGC4435 Binary NGC275 NGC274 12' x 12' NGC474 NGC470 Binary NGC ' x 12' NGC7715 NGC7714 IC196 IC195 NGC5426 IC1801 NGC3788 NGC3786 IC564 12' x 12' NGC1253A NGC1253 Binary NGC1242 NGC1241 IC563 Figure 3.1: DSS images of the non-u/lirg pairs with IRS SH and LH slits overlaid. Images are 6 by 6 unless otherwise noted. As can be seen from the images, our pairs sample includes widely separated pairs with no signs of tidal distortion as well as pairs with clear morphological signatures of interactions. 27

37 Pairs ULIRGs Isolated Number Number Number Distance (Mpc) log(m/m8) N/A log(l IR /L8) Number Number Number E S0 Sa Sb Sc Sd-Sm I Hubble Type 0 I II IIIa IIIb IVa IVb V Merger Stage Pair Separation (kpc) Number N/A H L S Optical Type Figure 3.2: Sample Properties: The properties of our pairs sample, the isolated SINGS sample, and the ULIRG sample. We note that Hubble types and stellar masses for the ULIRGs are not readily available in the literature and are therefore not listed. As can be seen, our pairs sample in general consists of infrared-faint galaxies with significantly wider separations and earlier merger stages that does the ULIRG sample. 28

38 Table 3.1: Sample Properties Name D Type Tidal Merger PS log M log L IR Optical (Mpc) Features Stage (kpc) (M ) (L ) Activity IC Sab n I H IC SABcd n I H NGC SBb n I H NGC E1 n I NGC I0 n I NGC E1 n I NGC SAB0/a n I L NGC SAdm n I <9.1 - NGC SBb n I L NGC SA0 n I <8.3 - NGC SAbc y II H NGC SAbc y II H NGC SAc n I H NGC cd n I <8.4 - NGC SBb y I H NGC SABb y I H NGC SAb y IIIa H NGC SAb y IIIa S2 NGC SAbc y IIIa S2 NGC I0 y IIIa L NGC I0 y IIIa H NGC SABbc y IIIa L NGC E2 y II L NGC SABa y II S NGC SABc n I H NGC SA0 n I <9.6 - NGC SB0 n I H NGC SA0/a n I L NGC SAB0 y II NGC SBcd y II H NGC SAab n II L NGC n II H NGC SB0/a y II L NGC SAbc y II L NGC I0 n I H UGC Im n I <9.1 - NGC SBab n I S2 NGC SB0 n I S2 NGC SA0 n I <8.8 L NGC SAb n I H Continued on next page 29

39 Table 3.1 Continued from previous page Name D Type Tidal Merger PS log M log L IR Optical (Mpc) Features Stage (kpc) (M ) (L ) Activity NGC SBm y II H NGC SAm y II H NGC IBm y II H NGC SABcd y II H NGC SAc y IIIa H NGC SAc y IIIa S IC SBb y II H NGC Scd y II L NGC1253A 21 SBm n I NGC SABcd n I H NGC Im y IIIa <9.5 H NGC SBb y IIIa H IC SBb n I L IC SAB0 n I H NGC SABa y I S NGC SABab y I IC SAcd n I H IC SBab n I NGC SBb n I S2 NGC SBc n I H Col(1): Common Source Names; Col(2): Distances were complied using NED when available, adopting the most recent estimated distance for each pair, otherwise are derived from redshift assuming H 0 =73 km s 1 Mpc 1 ; Col(3): Hubble types were taken from de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991); Col(4): Tidal features are identified through inspection of DSS images; Col(5): Merger stages as defined in Veilleux et al. (2002) are identified through inspection of DSS images; Col(6): Projected pair separations are calculated from angular separations between galaxies in each pair; Col(7): Stellar masses were estimated using K- band K-20 magnitudes from 2MASS by assuming a mass-to-luminosity ratio of 1.32; Col(8): IR luminosities were calculated from IRAS fluxes according to the prescription from Sanders & Mirabel (1996). Values in parentheses represent the total luminosity for the pair since the individual galaxies are not resolved; Col(9): Optical activity classifications are compiled from the literature. 30

40 3.2.3 Sample Properties and Potential Selection Biases The properties of our pairs sample, the isolated galaxy comparison sample, and ULIRG comparison sample are shown in Figure 3.2. As can be seen, our pairs sample contains more distant galaxies than does the isolated sample. Since the physical scale of the IRS aperture will vary with distance, care must be taken in comparisons between these two samples. Our pairs sample and the isolated sample span the same range of Hubble types and stellar masses, however a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test gives a 50% probability that the stellar masses of the isolated SINGS sample and our pairs sample are drawn from the same distribution. We emphasize that there are important selection effects that need to be explored in any comparative study carried out on these samples. As can be seen from Figure 3.2, our pairs sample in general consists of infrared-faint galaxies with significantly larger separations and earlier merger stages than does the ULIRG sample. 3.3 Observations and Data Reduction All observations were executed in staring mode using both the short-wavelength (SH, , λ = µm ) and long-wavelength (LH, , λ = µm ) high-resolution modules of the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS; Houck et al. 2004) with a spectral resolution of R 600. Data for the galaxies in our pairs sample were obtained from various observing programs (PIDs, 20140, 159, 30323, 3674, 96, 21, 14, and 3374) from 2003 December and 2009 September. Exposure times varied considerably, ranging from 30 to 840 seconds. Background sky observations located 2 from the source were conducted following each observation in order to enable background subtraction. On-source observations were centered on the galaxy nuclei. DSS images of all galaxies were carefully inspected in ensure that the nucleus of the galaxy falls within the slit. The slit size for the median distance of 30 Mpc corresponds to a projected extraction aperture of kpc and kpc for the SH and LH modules, respectively. Prior to download the data were preprocessed by the IRS pipeline (version S18.7.0) at 31

41 the Spitzer Science Center (SSC). The preprocessing steps include ramp fitting, dark-sky subtraction, droop correction, linearity correction, flat-fielding, and flux calibration 1. The resulting Spitzer spectra were then further processed using the SMART analysis package (Higdon et al. 2004) and the corresponding version of the calibration files (ver 1.7.1), to obtain final line fluxes. Using SMART, the spectra were then individually inspected for remaining bad pixels which were subsequently removed. The fine-structure line fluxes presented here were obtained with Gaussian fits to spectral lines and linear fits to the baseline continuum. Table 3.2: Fluxes for Full Sample Name [NeV] 14.32µm [NeV] 24.32µm IC ± ±0.66 IC749 <1.06 <0.43 NGC2633 <3.56 <2.84 NGC2634 <1.15 <0.40 NGC2968 <1.39 <0.39 NGC2970 <0.96 <0.36 NGC3166 <1.22 <0.53 NGC3165 <3.85 <0.36 NGC4394 <2.41 <0.47 NGC4382 <8.35 <0.30 NGC4567 <0.99 <1.25 NGC4568 <1.66 <1.97 NGC5480 <0.86 <3.21 NGC5481 <1.85 <0.30 NGC3799 <0.89 <0.89 NGC3800 <0.87 <0.89 NGC5394 <1.61 <0.83 NGC5395 <2.29 <0.35 NGC ± ±0.07 NGC5195 <0.97 <0.26 NGC7752 <0.16 <0.46 NGC7753 <1.73 <0.22 NGC3226 <1.03 <1.32 NGC ± ±2.38 NGC ±0.51 <0.35 Continued on next page 1 See IRS Instrument Handbook, 32

42 Table 3.2 Continued from previous page Name [NeV] 14.32µm [NeV] 24.32µm NGC2300 <0.68 <0.29 NGC ±0.18 <2.08 NGC4438 <1.76 <2.90 NGC0274 <0.65 <1.57 NGC0275 <1.20 <0.45 NGC5614 <39.64 <1.20 NGC5615 <34.61 <0.30 NGC5544 <5.26 <1.42 NGC5545 <4.61 <0.33 NGC3448 <1.21 <1.21 UGC <1.00 <3.45 NGC ±0.40 <1.75 NGC ± ±2.23 NGC474 <4.34 <0.36 NGC470 <6.03 <0.86 UGC08335E <1.08 <7.08 UGC08335W <0.82 <1.16 NGC5257 <0.82 <2.09 NGC5258 <1.35 <1.45 NGC4038 <4.83 <1.11 NGC4039 <2.07 <1.50 NGC3396 <2.17 <0.97 NGC3395 <2.32 <0.46 NGC5426 <1.12 <1.87 NGC ± ±0.70 IC1801 <1.00 <0.95 NGC935 <1.12 <0.35 NGC1253A 4.13± ±0.25 NGC1253 <2.31 <1.69 NGC7715 <27.98 <3.13 NGC7714 <1.97 <3.56 IC196 <0.60 <1.69 IC195 <1.68 <1.50 NGC6286 <6.56 <2.58 NGC ±0.31 <0.49 NGC ± ±1.28 NGC3788 <1.45 <3.41 UGC09618N 3.30± ±1.67 UGC09618S <0.35 <1.40 IC564 <0.36 <1.00 IC563 <0.33 <0.73 Continued on next page 33

43 Table 3.2 Continued from previous page Name [NeV] 14.32µm [NeV] 24.32µm NGC ±0.66 <1.02 NGC1242 <0.57 <0.52 Col(1): Common Source Names; Col(2) & (3): Fluxes are in units of W cm 2. 3 σ upper limits are reported for non-detections. 3.4 Incidence of AGNs in Galaxy Pairs In our pairs sample, we detected the 14 µm [NeV] line in 18% (11/60) of the galaxies, as seen in Figure 3.3, only 7 of these galaxies are optically classified as Seyferts. The detection of AGN not identified in optical surveys demonstrates that optical studies miss AGNs even in non-u/lirg galaxy interactions. We note that the observations of these galaxies have limited and variable signal-to-noise ratios that allows for the possibility that the [NeV] detection rate in our pairs sample would likely be higher if the sensitivity of the observations were higher and more uniform. The distribution of the [NeV] detections as a function of the 3 σ [NeV] 14 µm line sensitivity is presented in Figure 3.4. At sensitivities better than 39 ergs s 1, the fraction of galaxies with [NeV] detections increases as seen in Figure 3.4, suggesting that if deeper exposures were obtained in all the IRS observations, the [NeV] detection rate would be higher than 20% Comparison with Isolated and ULIRG Samples Of the 32 galaxies in the isolated SINGS comparison subsample, only 1 of the galaxies displays a [NeV] 14 µm detection compared to 11 of 60 for our pairs sample. This galaxy (NGC 3621) is optically classified as a Seyfert (Barth et al. 2009). No new AGNs were discovered using infrared spectroscopy in the isolated SINGs sample. Since the observations 34

44 Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) IC750 [NeV] Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC5194 [NeV] Flux Density (10-18 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC3227 [NeV] Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm) 14.8 Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC [NeV] Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC4435 [NeV] Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC7682 [NeV] Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm) 15.0 Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC7679 [NeV] 2.4 Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC5427 [NeV] Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC1253A [NeV] Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm) Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) NGC3786 [NeV] Wavelength (µm) 14.8 Flux Density (10-19 W cm -2 µm -1 ) 2.4 [NeV] NGC Wavelength (µm) Figure 3.3: IRS spectra showing the [NeV] 14.3 µm listed in Table 3.2 line for the galaxies with detections 35

45 60 50 Observations Detections Number [NeV] Line Sensitivity (log (ergs s -1 )) 42 Figure 3.4: Distribution of 3σ limiting [NeV] line sensitivities for our pairs sample. Galaxies are included in each bin if they have sensitivities equal to or better than the given sensitivity range. Detections are indicated with darkened histograms in the SINGS sample have comparable or better sensitivities than the observations in our pairs sample, this result strongly suggests that optically hidden AGNs are more prevalent in interacting pairs compared with isolated galaxies. Confirmation of this result requires a careful statistical analysis using a larger interacting sample together with a carefully constructed control sample, an endeavor that can only be accomplished when future infrared spectroscopic missions become available. Of the 68 galaxies in the ULIRG sample, 28% (19/68) show [NeV] detections, significantly higher than in our pairs sample. The limiting mid-ir sensitivities of the ULIRG observations are typically an order of magnitude worse than those in our non-u/lirg sample, suggesting that the [NeV] detection rate in ULIRGs would be even greater if more sensitive observations were available confirming recently pulbished results derived by different methods by Petric et al. (2011). It is therefore clear from our study that the incidence of AGNs in ULIRGs is significantly higher than in non-u/lirg galaxy pairs 3.5 Which Galaxies Host Infrared-Identified AGNs? Using our pairs sample, we explore the dependence of AGN incidence on various host galaxy and merger properties in our sample in Figure 3.5. Mid-IR identified AGNs occur in 36

46 both disturbed and undisturbed hosts with a wide range of Hubble types and galaxy pair separations. Several previous studies suggest that the incidence of AGNs increases in the final stages of a merger just prior to coalescence (e.g Veilleux et al. 2009; Yuan et al. 2010). Since our sample targets wide pair separations and likely early merger stages, we combined our pairs sample with the previously published ULIRG (Veilleux et al. 2009) sample to explore the dependence of AGN incidence with merger stage. In Figure 3.6 we show the fraction of mid-ir identified AGN as a function of merger stage, where merger stage is based on optical morphology as defined and discussed in section 3.2. As can be seen, the fraction appears to decrease from stage I to stages II, and III (24±8% to 6±6%, and 18±8% respectively), and then increases to 39±13% in stage IV. This trend is limited by the small number statistics but hints at the possibility that the distribution is bimodal, with the fraction of galaxies hosting AGN highest at the earliest and latest merger stages, confirming recently published results by Petric et al. (2011) and Yuan et al. (2010). In the next section, we summarize the published literature on the optically normal galaxies in our sample discovered through our mid-infrared spectroscopy to host AGNs. 3.6 What are the AGN Properties and how do they Depend on Merger Stage? Several studies have found that the AGN luminosity is correlated with merger stage or pair separation (e.g. Liu et al. 2012; Koss 2012), where the dominance of the AGN increases at more advanced stages, consistent with predictions from numerical simulations (e.g. Di Matteo et al. 2005; Hopkins et al. 2006). The [NeV] luminosity is tightly correlated with the bolometric luminosity of the AGN and can therefore be used as indicator of the AGN luminosity (see Satyapal et al. 2007; Secrest et al. 2012). In Figure 3.7, we combine the [NeV] luminosities of our pairs sample with those from the previously published interacting galaxies in the ULIRG (Veilleux et al. 2009) and LIRG (Petric et al. 2011) samples. We 37

47 AGN Fraction tidal features no tidal features AGN Fraction Pair Separation (kpc) Mass Ratio AGN Fraction AGN Fraction N/A H L S Optical Type 0.0 E S0 Sa Sb Sc Sd-Sm I Hubble Type AGN Fraction log(m/me) Figure 3.5: Properties of galaxies with [NeV] detections: The AGN fraction represents the fraction of galaxies with [NeV] detections in each bin. 38

48 AGN Fraction I II III IV V Merger Stage Figure 3.6: Distribution of merger stages for galaxies with [NeV] detections. The AGN fraction represents the fraction of galaxies with [NeV] in each bin. The first and fourth stages have the highest fraction of AGN. find a clear deficit of the highest AGN luminosities in galaxies in the earliest merger stages. We note that since mid-ir sensitivities for the ULIRGs are lower, we cannot say whether or not there is a lack of low luminosity AGNs at the latest merger stages. There is also a similar correlation between [NeV] luminosities and pair separation as seen in Figure 3.8, with increasing luminosities with decreasing pair separation How do Mid-IR Identified AGNs Compare to Optically Identified AGNs? We studied the difference between the mid-ir-identified AGN (those with [NeV] detections but are not optically classified as Seyferts) and optically classified Seyferts with [NeV] detections. Again, we expanded our sample to include the sample of interacting LIRGs and ULIRGs with [NeV] detections. In Figures 3.8 (a) and (b), we plot the distributions of pair separations and merger stages for mid-ir identified AGNs and optically classified AGNs. As can be seen in Figures 3.8 (a) and (b), both mid-ir identified AGNs and optically classified Seyferts have similar distributions of pair separations and merger stages. A K-S test shows no significant difference between the pair separation or merger stage distributions of the mid-ir-identified AGNs and optically classified Seyferts. 39

49 Number Stage I-II Stage III Stage IV-V log( L [NeV] /Le ) 8 9 Figure 3.7: Distribution of [NeV] luminosities grouped by merger stage for the combined sample of the non-u/lirg pairs, the interacting LIRGs, and the ULIRGs 9 log( L [NeV] (L8) ) Pair Separation (kpc) 80 Figure 3.8: [NeV] luminosity vs. pair separation for the combined sample of the non- U/LIRG pairs, the interacting LIRGs, and the ULIRGs. 40

50 Number (a) Mid-IR identified AGN Optically Identified AGN Number (b) Pair Separation (kpc) 80 0 I II III IV V Merger Stage 15 (c) 15 (d) Number 10 5 Number log( L [NeV] /Le ) log([nev]/[neii]) Figure 3.9: Comparison of the properties of mid-ir identified AGN and optically classified Seyferts with [NeV] detections. 41

51 In Figures 3.8 (c) and (d), we plot the distributions of the [NeV] luminosity and the [NeV] 14 µm / [NeII] 12 µm flux ratio for mid-ir identified AGNs and optically-classified Seyferts. The [NeV] luminosity can be used as a proxy for the AGN bolometric luminosity (e.g., Satyapal et al. 2007) and the [NeV] 14 µm / [NeII] 12 µm flux ratio is an indicator of the strength of the AGN relative to star formation within the Spitzer aperture (e.g., Genzel et al. 1998; Sturm et al. 2002; Dale et al. 2006; Dale et al. 2009; Satyapal et al. 2009). As can be seen from Figures 3.8 (c) and (d), the distributions of [NeV] luminosity and the [NeV]/[NeII] flux ratio are significantly different. According to K-S tests, the likelihood that the two samples are drawn from the same distribution is 3% and <0.1% respectively for the [NeV] luminosity and the [NeV]/[NeII] flux ratio distributions. The optically-classified Seyferts are typically more luminous and have larger [NeV]/[NeII] flux ratios than the mid- IR identified AGNs, suggesting that mid-ir spectroscopy identifies lower luminosity AGNs in hosts that have significant nuclear star formation. 3.7 Mid-IR Identified Dual AGN Despite decades of searching, and strong theoretical reasons that they should exist, observationally confirmed cases of close dual AGNs are extremely rare. Indeed, only 0.1% of quasars are found in pairs with projected separations of tens to hundreds of kpc (e.g. Hennawi et al. 2010), and only a handful of confirmed close dual AGNs in the local Universe (D<100 Mpc) are currently known (e.g. NGC 6240: Komossa et al. 2003, Mrk 463: Bianchi et al. 2008, Arp 299: Ballo et al. 2004, 3C 75: Owen et al. 1985). Recently more dual AGNs were discovered in follow-up studies of double-peaked [OIII] emitters selected from SDSS (Liu et al. 2010), but the fraction of interacting pairs with two AGNs is still low. There are several possible reasons to explain the scarcity of dual AGNs : 1) SMBHs are rarely active at the same time for the vast majority of merger parameters, 2) the fueling stage for the SMBHs occurs at separations that cannot be resolved by current facilities, or 3) dual SMBHs are optically invisible for a large fraction of the time when they are active. Given the scarcity 42

52 of observations, and the lack of extensive investigations that are carried out at wavelengths less sensitive to extinction, it is impossible to determine the true frequency of dual AGNs and to answer several key questions such as: What makes some mergers fuel dual SMBHs and other not? How does the onset, duration, and accretion rate of dual AGNs depend on the merger parameters and the properties of the host galaxy such as the bulge mass, star formation rate, and gas fraction? We investigated the incidence of dual AGNs identified by mid-ir spectroscopy in our pairs sample. Of the galaxies that displayed infrared spectral signatures suggestive of AGNs, we remarkably found 3 dual AGN candidates (labeled in Figure 3.1), Arp 120 (NGC4435/NGC4438), Arp 279 (NGC1253/NGC1253A), Arp 216 (NGC7679/NGC7682), where both galaxies in the pair show distinct mid-ir signatures of AGNs. One galaxy pair, Arp 216, shows a [NeV] detection in both galaxies. Two other galaxy pairs likely contain dual AGN based upon the detection of [NeV] in one galaxy and an enhanced f[oiv]/f[neii] line flux ratio or a low f[siii]/f[siii] line flux ratio (see Dale et al. 2009) in the other. As can be seen from Table 3.1, except for Arp216, only one of the galaxies in each pair is optically classified as a Seyfert. None of the others shows evidence for AGNs in the optical. Most galaxies are disk galaxies; interestingly there are a few extremely late-type galaxies that typically do not harbor optically identified AGNs. The projected pair separation for these dual AGN candidates ranges from kpc, significantly larger than the projected separations of the few known nearby dual AGNs NGC 6240, Mrk 463, Arp 299, as well as the SDSS sources from Liu et al. (2010). This may suggest that our pairs sample captures an earlier stage of AGN pairing that is overlooked in studies that target U/LIRGs, which are invariably more advanced mergers. Our observations suggest that a significant fraction of dual AGNs are optically unidentified and will be discovered through future infrared spectroscopic studies. 43

53 3.8 Summary and Conclusions We have conducted a high-resolution mid-infrared spectroscopic study using Spitzer of an archival sample of 30 non-u/lirg interacting galaxies, which generally target early merger stages. This is the first systematic mid-infrared spectroscopic investigation of a significant sample of non-u/lirg interactions. Our main results can be summarized as follows: 1. Optical spectroscopic studies of interacting galaxies miss AGNs even in non-u/lirg interactions. Of the 11 AGN identified in the mid-infrared based on the detection of the [NeV] 14 µm emission line, 4 were not detected optically. 2. Our mid-ir spectroscopy reveals that AGNs in our pairs sample are found in both disturbed and undisturbed hosts, at a wide range of pair separations and Hubble types. 3. Combining our study with previously published studies of U/LIRGs, we find tentative evidence that the incidence of AGNs is bimodal with merger stage, with the highest incidence found in the earliest and latest merger stages. Based on the [NeV] 14 µm luminosity, a reliable proxy for the AGN bolometric luminosity, we also find that there is a deficit of luminous AGNs in the earliest merger stages. 4. We find evidence based on mid-infrared spectroscopy for three possible dual AGNs in our pairs sample, suggesting that a significant population of dual AGNs are hidden in the optical. 44

54 Chapter 4: WISE Study of AGN in Galaxy Pairs 4.1 Introduction Mergers of galaxies are common throughout the universe. The merging of galaxies and the interactions that precede these mergers create gravitational instabilities within the galaxies, often allowing vast quantities of dust and gas to be funneled into center of the galaxy. This excess of gas near the centers of these interacting galaxies often leads to an enhancement of star formation (e.g., Ellison et al. 2008). An example of this is seen in the high infrared luminosity ULIRGs, where extremely high star formation rates are observed in these recent mergers (e.g., Sanders & Mirabel 1996). In addition to enhancing star formation, some of this material may accrete onto a central black hole. A strong correlation between the properties of the bulge of the galaxy and the mass of the super-massive black hole at its center (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000; Gebhardt et al. 2000) may be an effect of galaxy mergers. Merging galaxies and the inflow of material may allow for the simultaneous growth of both the bulge and the black hole, thereby forming this tight correlation. If this material reaches the center of the galaxy due to galaxy interactions, then active galactic nuclei (AGN) will be much more frequent in interacting galaxies and recent mergers. Many studies have shown strong evidence of an increased fraction of AGN in merging galaxies (e.g., Dahari 1985; Ellison et al. 2011; Keel et al. 1985). Others have found that most AGN are in host galaxies that show no signs of recent interactions with other galaxies (e.g., Cisternas et al. 2011). The precise fraction of AGN that are triggered by interactions or the importance of the merger to the triggering of an AGN is still under debate. One limitation of many previous studies that are conducted in the optical or UV wavelengths is that obscuration may hide the AGN. Since galaxies in interactions have an excess of gas and dust around their 45

55 centers, the emission from the AGN may be obscured in the optical or UV. Here we will look for signs of AGN activity in the infrared, where the AGN emission may be observed. By comparing the AGN fraction observed in the infrared between pairs of galaxies and isolated galaxies, the fraction of AGN triggered or enhanced by interactions between galaxies can be estimated. The mid-infrared can be used to identify AGN due to the infrared emission from dust in the vicinity of the AGN. The dust surrounding the AGN, thought to occur in a toroidal shape around the accreting supermassive black hole, reaches very high temperatures and emits strongly in the infrared. This infrared emission is then able to exit the galaxy without excessive absorption. The dust in the torus around the AGN and excessive amounts of dust and gas disturbed in some galaxy interactions, make the identification of AGN at other wavelengths difficult. To study the incidence of AGN in galaxy pairs we will use data from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), an all-sky survey conducted in the infrared. The WISE all-sky survey allows for the ability to look at large samples of galaxies with a high depth of coverage, to separate AGN from non-agn. From January 7, 2010 to August 6, 2010, WISE surveyed the entire sky in 4 bands; 3.4µm, 4.6µm, 12µm, and 22µm (referred to as W1, W2, W3, and W4 respectively). The resolution is 6.1, 6.4, 6.5 and 12 with estimated sensitivities of 0.08, 0.11, 1 and 6 mjy for these 4 bands respectively (Wright et al. 2010). The reason the W1 and W2 WISE bands are efficient at separating star forming galaxies and AGN is clearly seen in Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1 displays the SED of a star-forming galaxy, M82, with varying contributions of a template AGN SED. The SED of M82, representing star forming galaxies, has a dip in the region of the WISE bands, whereas the SED of the AGN shows an increase in emission over the same region. The two main components of the star forming SED in the infrared is the stellar bump peaking at 1.6µm and thermal dust emission heated to temperatures of 25-50K by star formation that is responsible for longer wavelength emission. The WISE bands observe between these 2 regions which results in a W1-W2 color near 0. As in the star forming galaxy, there is thermal dust emission present in 46

56 the AGN SED, however dust heated by the AGN reaches much higher temperatures resulting in significant emission into the WISE bands and filling the dip in the star forming galaxy SED. Dust nearest the AGN in the torus may reach the dust sublimation temperature of K. Dust heated to various temperatures depending on the distance to the AGN s center result in a superposition of blackbodies producing a power law continuum beginning near 1µm. This power law continuum results in a red W1-W2 color. The bottom panel of Figure 4.1 includes an AGN template with an extinction of A ν =2, demonstrating that the shape of the SED at the location of the WISE bands is largely unaffected by extinction and that WISE will be able to detect these obscured AGN. At shorter wavelengths towards the optical and UV, extinction strongly affects the shape of the SED of the AGN, making the nearly indistinguishable from the shape of a star-forming galaxy SED. Problems with detecting the presence of an AGN with this method include contamination of the infrared continuum emission by the emission of the galaxy, which may prevent the detection of the AGN. Since a galaxy with an AGN will have a composite SED composed of the SED of the AGN and the SED of the host galaxy, a weak AGN will be missed by WISE. The variation in the shapes of the SEDs due to different AGN contributions can be seen in Figure 4.1. The effect of this on the W1-W2 color is illustrated in Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2 from Figure 1 of Stern et al. (2012), is based on combinations of spectral template models of pure AGN and an elliptical galaxy from Assef et al. (2013). The W1-W2 color of the galaxy gets progressively bluer as the AGN contribution falls from 100% to 50%, and will eventually drop below 0.5 for weaker AGN. Therefore WISE will only select AGN that dominate the emission of the galaxy. In addition to contamination by host galaxy emission, redshift also has an effect on the WISE color since the WISE bands will sample different regions of the galaxy s spectrum. This is demonstrated in Figure 4.2 where the WISE color is shown to vary depending on redshift. However, for our sample the redshift is limited to 0.2, so there will be little to no effect on the WISE colors of the galaxies in our sample. 47

57 Figure 4.1: Composite SEDs constructed from M82(red) and QSO1(purple) templates of Polletta et al. (2008) with AGN contribution increasing from 0% in red to 100% in purple. For the lower panel an extinction of A ν = 2 is applied to the QSO template using the Draine (2003) extinction law. The approximate location of WISE band W1(3.4µm) and W2(4.6µm) are marked on the figure. This figure is adapted from Figure 1 of Donley et al. (2012). 48

A Monster at any other Epoch:

A Monster at any other Epoch: A Monster at any other Epoch: Are Intermediate Redshift ULIRGs the Progenitors of QSO Host Galaxies? Barry Rothberg Large Binocular Telescope Observatory/George Mason University Co-Is: J. Fischer (NRL),

More information

Molecular Gas and the Host Galaxies of Infrared-Excess Quasi-Stellar Objects

Molecular Gas and the Host Galaxies of Infrared-Excess Quasi-Stellar Objects Molecular Gas and the Host Galaxies of Infrared-Excess Quasi-Stellar Objects A. S. Evans (Stony Brook) J. A. Surace & D. T. Frayer (Caltech) D. B. Sanders (Hawaii) Luminous Infrared Galaxies Properties

More information

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics with: Tim Heckman (JHU) GALEX Science Team (PI: Chris Martin), Lee Armus,

More information

High Redshift Universe

High Redshift Universe High Redshift Universe Finding high z galaxies Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) Photometric redshifts Deep fields Starburst galaxies Extremely red objects (EROs) Sub-mm galaxies Lyman α systems Finding high

More information

Multi-wavelength Surveys for AGN & AGN Variability. Vicki Sarajedini University of Florida

Multi-wavelength Surveys for AGN & AGN Variability. Vicki Sarajedini University of Florida Multi-wavelength Surveys for AGN & AGN Variability Vicki Sarajedini University of Florida What are Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)? Galaxies with a source of non-stellar emission arising in the nucleus (excessive

More information

Astro2010 Science White Paper: Tracing the Mass Buildup of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies

Astro2010 Science White Paper: Tracing the Mass Buildup of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies Astro2010 Science White Paper: Tracing the Mass Buildup of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies Anton M. Koekemoer (STScI) Dan Batcheldor (RIT) Marc Postman (STScI) Rachel Somerville (STScI)

More information

Challenges in Finding AGNs in the Low Luminosity Regime. Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Amrit Singh (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC)

Challenges in Finding AGNs in the Low Luminosity Regime. Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Amrit Singh (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC) Challenges in Finding AGNs in the Low Luminosity Regime Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Amrit Singh (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC) Motivation and Overview Why are low luminosity AGNs important?

More information

LeMMINGs the emerlin radio legacy survey of nearby galaxies Ranieri D. Baldi

LeMMINGs the emerlin radio legacy survey of nearby galaxies Ranieri D. Baldi LeMMINGs the emerlin radio legacy survey of nearby galaxies Ranieri D. Baldi in collaboration with I. McHardy, D. Williams, R. Beswick and many others The radio-loud / radio-quiet dichotomy Among the many

More information

Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei

Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei A black hole is a region of spacetime from which gravity prevents anything, including light, from escaping. The theory of general relativity predicts that a sufficiently

More information

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS Spring Quarter 4, University of Washington, Željko Ivezić Lecture : SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio Large Surveys at Many Wavelengths SDSS: UV-IR five-band

More information

A Supermassive Black Hole in the Dwarf Starburst Galaxy Henize Amy Reines Einstein Fellow National Radio Astronomy Observatory

A Supermassive Black Hole in the Dwarf Starburst Galaxy Henize Amy Reines Einstein Fellow National Radio Astronomy Observatory A Supermassive Black Hole in the Dwarf Starburst Galaxy Henize 2-10 Amy Reines Einstein Fellow National Radio Astronomy Observatory Supermassive black holes and galaxy evolution Supermassive black holes

More information

Active Galactic Alexander David M Nuclei

Active Galactic Alexander David M Nuclei d.m.alexander@durham.ac.uk Durham University David M Alexander Active Galactic Nuclei The Power Source QuickTime and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture. Black hole is one billionth

More information

Introduction to AGN. General Characteristics History Components of AGN The AGN Zoo

Introduction to AGN. General Characteristics History Components of AGN The AGN Zoo Introduction to AGN General Characteristics History Components of AGN The AGN Zoo 1 AGN What are they? Active galactic nucleus compact object in the gravitational center of a galaxy that shows evidence

More information

Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, 27 Ottobre 2011

Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, 27 Ottobre 2011 Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, 27 Ottobre 2011 BASIC PARADIGM: Copious energy output from AGN (10 9-10 13 L Θ ) from accretion of material onto a Supermassive Black Hole SMBH ( 10 6-10 9 M Θ ). AGN

More information

Active Galaxies & Emission Line Diagnostics

Active Galaxies & Emission Line Diagnostics Active Galaxies & Emission Line Diagnostics Review of Properties Discussed: 1) Powered by accretion unto a supermassive nuclear black hole 2) They are the possible precursors to luminous massive galaxies

More information

Debate on the toroidal structures around hidden- vs non hidden-blr of AGNs

Debate on the toroidal structures around hidden- vs non hidden-blr of AGNs IoA Journal Club Debate on the toroidal structures around hidden- vs non hidden-blr of AGNs 2016/07/08 Reported by T. Izumi Unification scheme of AGNs All AGNs are fundamentally the same (Antonucci 1993)

More information

Star Formation Indicators

Star Formation Indicators Star Formation Indicators Calzetti 2007 astro-ph/0707.0467 Brinchmann et al. 2004 MNRAS 351, 1151 SFR indicators in general! SFR indicators are defined from the X ray to the radio! All probe the MASSIVE

More information

The Phenomenon of Active Galactic Nuclei: an Introduction

The Phenomenon of Active Galactic Nuclei: an Introduction The Phenomenon of Active Galactic Nuclei: an Introduction Outline Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN): > Why are they special? > The power source > Sources of Continuum Emission > Emission & absorption lines

More information

BUILDING GALAXIES. Question 1: When and where did the stars form?

BUILDING GALAXIES. Question 1: When and where did the stars form? BUILDING GALAXIES The unprecedented accuracy of recent observations of the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background leaves little doubt that the universe formed in a hot big bang, later cooling

More information

X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies

X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies, Marat Gilfanov & Rashid Sunyaev (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics) Ultra-Luminous X-ray sources and Middle Weight Black Holes Monday May 24th, 2010 - ESAC

More information

Low Luminosity AGNs: The Power of JWST. Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Dillon Berger (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC)

Low Luminosity AGNs: The Power of JWST. Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Dillon Berger (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC) Low Luminosity AGNs: The Power of JWST Shobita Satyapal Nick Abel(UC), Nathan Secrest (NRL), Dillon Berger (GMU), Sara Ellison(UVIC) Low Luminosity AGNs: The Power of JWST Why are LLAGN important? Why

More information

Soft X-ray Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei. Mat Page

Soft X-ray Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei. Mat Page Soft X-ray Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei Mat Page MSSL-UCL Observations of soft X-ray line emission allow us to investigate highly ionized plasmas in galaxies and AGN. I ll start with the most

More information

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 May 2004

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 May 2004 XMM-NEWTON OBSERVATIONS OF THREE HIGH REDSHIFT RADIO GALAXIES arxiv:astro-ph/0405116 v1 6 May 2004 Abstract E. Belsole, D.M. Worrall, M. J. Hardcastle Department of Physics - University of Bristol Tyndall

More information

Astr 2320 Thurs. April 27, 2017 Today s Topics. Chapter 21: Active Galaxies and Quasars

Astr 2320 Thurs. April 27, 2017 Today s Topics. Chapter 21: Active Galaxies and Quasars Astr 2320 Thurs. April 27, 2017 Today s Topics Chapter 21: Active Galaxies and Quasars Emission Mechanisms Synchrotron Radiation Starburst Galaxies Active Galactic Nuclei Seyfert Galaxies BL Lac Galaxies

More information

Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)

Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) Astronomy Summer School in Mongolia National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar July 21-26, 2008 Kaz Sekiguchi Hubble Classification M94-Sa M81-Sb M101-Sc M87-E0

More information

IRS Spectroscopy of z~2 Galaxies

IRS Spectroscopy of z~2 Galaxies IRS Spectroscopy of z~2 Galaxies Houck et al., ApJ, 2005 Weedman et al., ApJ, 2005 Lutz et al., ApJ, 2005 Astronomy 671 Jason Marshall Opening the IR Wavelength Regime for Discovery One of the primary

More information

Active Galactic Nuclei

Active Galactic Nuclei Active Galactic Nuclei Optical spectra, distance, line width Varieties of AGN and unified scheme Variability and lifetime Black hole mass and growth Geometry: disk, BLR, NLR Reverberation mapping Jets

More information

Energy Sources of the Far IR Emission of M33

Energy Sources of the Far IR Emission of M33 Energy Sources of the Far IR Emission of M33 Hinz, Reike et al., ApJ 154: S259 265 (2004). Presented by James Ledoux 24 µm 70 µm 160 µm Slide 1 M33 Properties Distance 840kpc = 2.7 Mlyr (1'' ~ 4 pc) Also

More information

Galaxies with Active Nuclei. Active Galactic Nuclei Seyfert Galaxies Radio Galaxies Quasars Supermassive Black Holes

Galaxies with Active Nuclei. Active Galactic Nuclei Seyfert Galaxies Radio Galaxies Quasars Supermassive Black Holes Galaxies with Active Nuclei Active Galactic Nuclei Seyfert Galaxies Radio Galaxies Quasars Supermassive Black Holes Active Galactic Nuclei About 20 25% of galaxies do not fit well into Hubble categories

More information

Broadband X-ray emission from radio-quiet Active Galactic Nuclei

Broadband X-ray emission from radio-quiet Active Galactic Nuclei 29 th ASI Meeting ASI Conference Series, 2011, Vol. 3, pp 19 23 Edited by Pushpa Khare & C. H. Ishwara-Chandra Broadband X-ray emission from radio-quiet Active Galactic Nuclei G. C. Dewangan Inter-University

More information

Hubble Space Telescope ultraviolet spectroscopy of blazars: emission lines properties and black hole masses. E. Pian, R. Falomo, A.

Hubble Space Telescope ultraviolet spectroscopy of blazars: emission lines properties and black hole masses. E. Pian, R. Falomo, A. Hubble Space Telescope ultraviolet spectroscopy of blazars: emission lines properties and black hole masses E. Pian, R. Falomo, A. Treves 1 Outline Extra Background Introduction Sample Selection Data Analysis

More information

Luminous radio-loud AGN: triggering and (positive?) feedback

Luminous radio-loud AGN: triggering and (positive?) feedback Luminous radio-loud AGN: triggering and (positive?) feedback Clive Tadhunter University of Sheffield ASA, ESA, NRAO Collaborators: C. Ramos Almeida, D. Dicken," R. Morganti,T. Oosterloo, " R. Oonk, M.

More information

Ultra Luminous Infared Galaxies. Yanling Wu Feb 22 nd,2005

Ultra Luminous Infared Galaxies. Yanling Wu Feb 22 nd,2005 Ultra Luminous Infared Galaxies Yanling Wu Feb 22 nd,2005 The Biggest and the brightest Biggest and the best & best and the brightest Definition: LIRG: L8-1000umL

More information

Krista Lynne Smith M. Koss R.M. Mushotzky

Krista Lynne Smith M. Koss R.M. Mushotzky Krista Lynne Smith M. Koss R.M. Mushotzky Texas Symposium December 12, 2013 X-ray Bright, Optically Normal Galaxy Luminous compact hard X-ray source No optical emission lines to indicate nuclear activity.

More information

ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI: FROM THE CENTRAL BLACK HOLE TO THE GALACTIC ENVIRONMENT

ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI: FROM THE CENTRAL BLACK HOLE TO THE GALACTIC ENVIRONMENT Julian H. Krolik ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI: FROM THE CENTRAL BLACK HOLE TO THE GALACTIC ENVIRONMENT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Princeton, New Jersey Preface Guide for Readers xv xix 1. What Are Active Galactic

More information

Galaxies 626. Lecture 10 The history of star formation from far infrared and radio observations

Galaxies 626. Lecture 10 The history of star formation from far infrared and radio observations Galaxies 626 Lecture 10 The history of star formation from far infrared and radio observations Cosmic Star Formation History Various probes of the global SF rate: ρ* (z) M yr 1 comoving Mpc 3 UV continuum

More information

Analysis of Off-Nuclear X-Ray Sources in Galaxy NGC Sarah M. Harrison

Analysis of Off-Nuclear X-Ray Sources in Galaxy NGC Sarah M. Harrison SLAC-TN-6-19 August 26 Analysis of Off-Nuclear X-Ray Sources in Galaxy NGC 4945 Sarah M. Harrison Office of Science, Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship (SULI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology

More information

v Characteristics v Possible Interpretations L X = erg s -1

v Characteristics v Possible Interpretations L X = erg s -1 Ultra Luminous X-ray sources v Characteristics L X = 39-41 erg s -1 >> M black hole(bh) L Edd = 39 erg s -1. Usually seen in star forming regions. On arms of spiral galaxies (right). In starburst or irregular

More information

TEMA 6. Continuum Emission

TEMA 6. Continuum Emission TEMA 6. Continuum Emission AGN Dr. Juan Pablo Torres-Papaqui Departamento de Astronomía Universidad de Guanajuato DA-UG (México) papaqui@astro.ugto.mx División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Campus Guanajuato,

More information

The Rela(on Between Bars and AGN locally and at high redshi8

The Rela(on Between Bars and AGN locally and at high redshi8 The Rela(on Between Bars and AGN locally and at high redshi8 Mauricio Cisternas Ins(tuto de Astrofisica de Canarias The Triggering Mechanisms for AGN, Leiden, July 24, 2013 What is triggering most AGN?

More information

GALAXIES. I. Morphologies and classification 2. Successes of Hubble scheme 3. Problems with Hubble scheme 4. Galaxies in other wavelengths

GALAXIES. I. Morphologies and classification 2. Successes of Hubble scheme 3. Problems with Hubble scheme 4. Galaxies in other wavelengths GALAXIES I. Morphologies and classification 2. Successes of Hubble scheme 3. Problems with Hubble scheme 4. Galaxies in other wavelengths 5. Properties of spirals and Irregulars. Hubble tuning-fork diagram.

More information

Galaxies 626. Lecture 9 Metals (2) and the history of star formation from optical/uv observations

Galaxies 626. Lecture 9 Metals (2) and the history of star formation from optical/uv observations Galaxies 626 Lecture 9 Metals (2) and the history of star formation from optical/uv observations Measuring metals at high redshift Metals at 6 How can we measure the ultra high z star formation? One robust

More information

Chapter 19 Galaxies. Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Each dot is a galaxy of stars. More distant, further into the past. halo

Chapter 19 Galaxies. Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Each dot is a galaxy of stars. More distant, further into the past. halo Chapter 19 Galaxies Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Each dot is a galaxy of stars. More distant, further into the past halo disk bulge Barred Spiral Galaxy: Has a bar of stars across the bulge Spiral Galaxy 1

More information

Demographics of radio galaxies nearby and at z~0.55. Are radio galaxies signposts to black-hole mergers?

Demographics of radio galaxies nearby and at z~0.55. Are radio galaxies signposts to black-hole mergers? Elaine M. Sadler Black holes in massive galaxies Demographics of radio galaxies nearby and at z~0.55 Are radio galaxies signposts to black-hole mergers? Work done with Russell Cannon, Scott Croom, Helen

More information

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 24. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 24. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outlines Chapter 24 Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Chapter 24 Galaxies Units of Chapter 24 24.1 Hubble s Galaxy Classification 24.2 The Distribution of Galaxies in Space 24.3 Hubble

More information

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys Items of the PhD thesis József Varga Astronomy MSc Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Science PhD School of Physics, Programme of Particle

More information

Active Galactic Nuclei OIII

Active Galactic Nuclei OIII Active Galactic Nuclei In 1908, Edward Fath (1880-1959) observed NGC 1068 with his spectroscope, which displayed odd (and very strong) emission lines. In 1926 Hubble recorded emission lines of this and

More information

Formation of z~6 Quasars from Hierarchical Galaxy Mergers

Formation of z~6 Quasars from Hierarchical Galaxy Mergers Formation of z~6 Quasars from Hierarchical Galaxy Mergers Yuexing Li et al Presentation by: William Gray Definitions and Jargon QUASAR stands for QUASI-stellAR radio source Extremely bright and active

More information

AST Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy. Lecture 20. Black Holes Part II

AST Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy. Lecture 20. Black Holes Part II AST4320 - Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Lecture 20 Black Holes Part II 1 AST4320 - Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Outline: Black Holes Part II Gas accretion disks around black holes, and

More information

MASSIVE BLACK HOLES AMY REINES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES HUBBLE FELLOW NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATROY

MASSIVE BLACK HOLES AMY REINES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES HUBBLE FELLOW NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATROY MASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES AMY REINES HUBBLE FELLOW NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATROY Motivation: The origin of massive black holes (BHs) Massive BHs are fundamental components of

More information

Martin Ward (Durham University, UK) allenges in Modern Astrophysics Sofia, Bulgaria Oct. 2009

Martin Ward (Durham University, UK) allenges in Modern Astrophysics Sofia, Bulgaria Oct. 2009 Martin Ward (Durham University, UK) allenges in Modern Astrophysics Sofia, Bulgaria Oct. 2009 What Makes a Galaxy ACTIVE? What is a Normal Galaxy? What is an Normal Galaxy? A literary analogy, adapted

More information

The AGN / host galaxy connection in nearby galaxies.

The AGN / host galaxy connection in nearby galaxies. The AGN / host galaxy connection in nearby galaxies. A new view of the origin of the radio-quiet / radio-loud dichotomy? Alessandro Capetti & Barbara Balmaverde (Observatory of Torino Italy) The radio-quiet

More information

TEMA 3. Host Galaxies & Environment

TEMA 3. Host Galaxies & Environment TEMA 3. Host Galaxies & Environment AGN Dr. Juan Pablo Torres-Papaqui Departamento de Astronomía Universidad de Guanajuato DA-UG (México) papaqui@astro.ugto.mx División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas,

More information

Revealing new optically-emitting extragalactic Supernova Remnants

Revealing new optically-emitting extragalactic Supernova Remnants 10 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Ioannina, September 2011 Revealing new optically-emitting extragalactic Supernova Remnants Ioanna Leonidaki (NOA) Collaborators: P. Boumis (NOA), A. Zezas (UOC, CfA)

More information

Extended Molecular Gas Distribution in Mrk 273 and Merger-Luminosity Evolution

Extended Molecular Gas Distribution in Mrk 273 and Merger-Luminosity Evolution University of Massachusetts Amherst From the SelectedWorks of Min S. Yun October 1, 1995 Extended Molecular Gas Distribution in Mrk 273 and Merger-Luminosity Evolution Min S. Yun, University of Massachusetts

More information

X-raying galactic feedback in nearby disk galaxies. Q. Daniel Wang University of Massachusetts

X-raying galactic feedback in nearby disk galaxies. Q. Daniel Wang University of Massachusetts X-raying galactic feedback in nearby disk galaxies Q. Daniel Wang University of Massachusetts Chandra survey of diffuse X-ray emission from 53 edge-on galaxies i > 60 o, D < 30 Mpc (Li, J.-T. & Wang, Q.D.

More information

Some HI is in reasonably well defined clouds. Motions inside the cloud, and motion of the cloud will broaden and shift the observed lines!

Some HI is in reasonably well defined clouds. Motions inside the cloud, and motion of the cloud will broaden and shift the observed lines! Some HI is in reasonably well defined clouds. Motions inside the cloud, and motion of the cloud will broaden and shift the observed lines Idealized 21cm spectra Example observed 21cm spectra HI densities

More information

The Classification of Galaxies

The Classification of Galaxies Admin. 11/9/17 1. Class website http://www.astro.ufl.edu/~jt/teaching/ast1002/ 2. Optional Discussion sections: Tue. ~11.30am (period 5), Bryant 3; Thur. ~12.30pm (end of period 5 and period 6), start

More information

The Correlation Between Supermassive Black Hole Mass and the Structure of Ellipticals and Bulges

The Correlation Between Supermassive Black Hole Mass and the Structure of Ellipticals and Bulges 1 The Correlation Between Supermassive Black Hole Mass and the Structure of Ellipticals and Bulges Peter Erwin 1, Alister W. Graham 2, Nicola Caon 1 (1) Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna,

More information

Lecture Two: Galaxy Morphology:

Lecture Two: Galaxy Morphology: Lecture Two: Galaxy Morphology: Looking more deeply at the Hubble Sequence Galaxy Morphology How do you quantify the properties of galaxies? and how do you put them in groups which allow you to study physically

More information

A Unified Model for AGN. Ryan Yamada Astro 671 March 27, 2006

A Unified Model for AGN. Ryan Yamada Astro 671 March 27, 2006 A Unified Model for AGN Ryan Yamada Astro 671 March 27, 2006 Overview Introduction to AGN Evidence for unified model Structure Radiative transfer models for dusty torus Active Galactic Nuclei Emission-line

More information

Halo Gas Velocities Using Multi-slit Spectroscopy

Halo Gas Velocities Using Multi-slit Spectroscopy Halo Gas Velocities Using Multi-slit Spectroscopy Cat Wu Thesis Proposal, Fall 2009 Astronomy Department New Mexico State University Outline Diffuse ionized gas; galaxy halos Origin of halo galactic fountain

More information

Radio emission from galaxies in the Bootes Voids

Radio emission from galaxies in the Bootes Voids Radio emission from galaxies in the Bootes Voids Mousumi Das, Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore Large Scale Structure and galaxy flows, Quy Nhon, July 3-9, 2016 Collaborators K.S. Dwarkanath

More information

Probing the Origin of Supermassive Black Hole Seeds with Nearby Dwarf Galaxies. Amy Reines Einstein Fellow NRAO Charlottesville

Probing the Origin of Supermassive Black Hole Seeds with Nearby Dwarf Galaxies. Amy Reines Einstein Fellow NRAO Charlottesville Probing the Origin of Supermassive Black Hole Seeds with Nearby Dwarf Galaxies Amy Reines Einstein Fellow NRAO Charlottesville Motivation: The origin of supermassive BH seeds Motivation: The origin of

More information

A zoo of transient sources. (c)2017 van Putten 1

A zoo of transient sources. (c)2017 van Putten 1 A zoo of transient sources (c)2017 van Putten 1 First transient @ first light UDFj-39546284, z~10.3 Bouwens, R.J., et al., Nature, 469, 504 Cuchiara, A. et al., 2011, ApJ, 736, 7 z=9.4: GRB 090429B, z~9.4

More information

Active Galactic Nuclei SEDs as a function of type and luminosity

Active Galactic Nuclei SEDs as a function of type and luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei SEDs as a function of type and luminosity Mari Polletta (IASF-INAF Milan) Collaborators: L. Chiappetti (IASF-INAF), L. Maraschi, M. Giorgetti, G. Trinchieri (Brera-INAF), B. Wilkes

More information

The parsec scale of. ac-ve galac-c nuclei. Mar Mezcua. International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Astrophysics

The parsec scale of. ac-ve galac-c nuclei. Mar Mezcua. International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Astrophysics The parsec scale of ESO ac-ve galac-c nuclei International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Astrophysics COST Ac(on MP0905 - Black Holes in a Violent Universe In collaboration with A. Prieto,

More information

9. Evolution with redshift - z > 1.5. Selection in the rest-frame UV

9. Evolution with redshift - z > 1.5. Selection in the rest-frame UV 11-5-10see http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/ franx/college/galaxies10 10-c09-1 11-5-10see http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/ franx/college/galaxies10 10-c09-2 9. Evolution with redshift - z > 1.5 Selection in

More information

Lecture 9. Quasars, Active Galaxies and AGN

Lecture 9. Quasars, Active Galaxies and AGN Lecture 9 Quasars, Active Galaxies and AGN Quasars look like stars but have huge redshifts. object with a spectrum much like a dim star highly red-shifted enormous recessional velocity huge distance (Hubble

More information

The Peculiar Case of Was 49b: An Over-Massive AGN in a Minor Merger?

The Peculiar Case of Was 49b: An Over-Massive AGN in a Minor Merger? The Peculiar Case of Was 49b: An Over-Massive AGN in a Minor Merger? Nathan Secrest NRC Postdoctoral Fellow, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Henrique Schmitt (NRL), Laura Blecha (UMD), Barry Rothberg (LBT),

More information

Galaxies. Need a (physically) meaningful way of describing the relevant properties of a galaxy.

Galaxies. Need a (physically) meaningful way of describing the relevant properties of a galaxy. Galaxies Aim to understand the characteristics of galaxies, how they have evolved in time, and how they depend on environment (location in space), size, mass, etc. Need a (physically) meaningful way of

More information

Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies

Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies Michael Pierce (University of Wyoming) A Science Use Case for GMT and TMT Origin of Elliptical Galaxies! Elliptical Galaxies Form Through Mergers!

More information

Lecture 19: Galaxies. Astronomy 111

Lecture 19: Galaxies. Astronomy 111 Lecture 19: Galaxies Astronomy 111 Galaxies What is a galaxy? Large assembly of stars, gas and dust, held together by gravity Sizes: Largest: ~1 Trillion stars (or more) Smallest: ~10 Million stars Milky

More information

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved Outline Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved Individual stars can be analyzed Applicable for Milky Way star clusters and the most nearby galaxies Integrated spectroscopy / photometry only The most

More information

The bolometric output of AGN in the XMM-COSMOS survey

The bolometric output of AGN in the XMM-COSMOS survey The bolometric output of AGN in the XMM-COSMOS survey Elisabeta Lusso Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Bologna-INAF/OABO A. Comastri, C. Vignali, G. Zamorani, M. Brusa, E. Treister, R. Gilli, M.

More information

Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics: ASTR 3830 Astrophysics 2 - Galactic and Extragalactic Phil Armitage office: JILA tower A909 email: pja@jilau1.colorado.edu Spitzer Space telescope image of M81 Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

More information

Dust properties of galaxies at redshift z 5-6

Dust properties of galaxies at redshift z 5-6 Dust properties of galaxies at redshift z 5-6 Ivana Barisic 1, Supervisor: Dr. Peter L. Capak 2, and Co-supervisor: Dr. Andreas Faisst 2 1 Physics Department, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia 2 Infrared

More information

Active galactic nuclei (AGN)

Active galactic nuclei (AGN) Active galactic nuclei (AGN) General characteristics and types Supermassive blackholes (SMBHs) Accretion disks around SMBHs X-ray emission processes Jets and their interaction with ambient medium Radio

More information

Measuring Black Hole Masses in Nearby Galaxies with Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics

Measuring Black Hole Masses in Nearby Galaxies with Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Measuring Black Hole Masses in Nearby Galaxies with Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Claire Max Anne Medling Mark Ammons UC Santa Cruz Ric Davies Hauke Engel MPE-Garching Image of NGC 6240: Bush et al.

More information

Quasars ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Quintuple Gravitational Lens Quasar

Quasars ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Quintuple Gravitational Lens Quasar Quasars ASTR 2120 Sarazin Quintuple Gravitational Lens Quasar Quasars Quasar = Quasi-stellar (radio) source Optical: faint, blue, star-like objects Radio: point radio sources, faint blue star-like optical

More information

Payne-Scott workshop on Hyper Compact HII regions Sydney, September 8, 2010

Payne-Scott workshop on Hyper Compact HII regions Sydney, September 8, 2010 Payne-Scott workshop on Hyper Compact HII regions Sydney, September 8, 2010 Aim Review the characteristics of regions of ionized gas within young massive star forming regions. Will focus the discussion

More information

The BAT AGN Survey - Progress Report J. Tueller, C. Markwardt, L. Winter and R. Mushotzky Goddard Space Flight Center

The BAT AGN Survey - Progress Report J. Tueller, C. Markwardt, L. Winter and R. Mushotzky Goddard Space Flight Center The BAT AGN Survey - Progress Report J. Tueller, C. Markwardt, L. Winter and R. Mushotzky Goddard Space Flight Center The Swift BAT (Burst and Transient Telescope) has been observing the whole sky in the

More information

The Contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei to the Excess Cosmic Radio Background at 1.4 GHz

The Contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei to the Excess Cosmic Radio Background at 1.4 GHz The Contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei to the Excess Cosmic Radio Background at 1.4 GHz David R. Ballantyne Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, School of Physics, Georgia Tech The Cosmic Backgrounds

More information

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona) Feeding the Beast Chris Impey (University of Arizona) Note: the box is growing due to cosmic expansion but this is factored out. Heirarchical Structure Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) Nuclear activity in

More information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION doi:10.1038/nature11096 Spectroscopic redshifts of CDF-N X-ray sources We have taken a recent compilation 13 as our main source of spectroscopic redshifts. These redshifts are given to two decimal places,

More information

Simultaneous X-ray and Radio Observations of Seyferts, and Disk-Jet Connections

Simultaneous X-ray and Radio Observations of Seyferts, and Disk-Jet Connections Simultaneous X-ray and Radio Observations of Seyferts, and Disk-Jet Connections Ashley Lianne King, University of Michigan Advisor: Jon M. Miller Collaborators: John Raymond, Michael Rupen, Kayhan Gültekin,

More information

Black Holes in Hibernation

Black Holes in Hibernation Black Holes in Hibernation Black Holes in Hibernation Only about 1 in 100 galaxies contains an active nucleus. This however does not mean that most galaxies do no have SMBHs since activity also requires

More information

A TALE OF TWO MONSTERS: EMBEDDED AGN IN NGC6418 AND IRAS

A TALE OF TWO MONSTERS: EMBEDDED AGN IN NGC6418 AND IRAS A TALE OF TWO MONSTERS: EMBEDDED AGN IN NGC6418 AND IRAS16399 0937 Photometry Aperture 2.2 2.0 1.8 Optical 3.6 µm E 4.5 µm N Normalized flux 1.6 1.4 0 100 200 300 Figure 3.1: NGC6418 false color image

More information

Survey of Astrophysics A110

Survey of Astrophysics A110 Goals: Galaxies To determine the types and distributions of galaxies? How do we measure the mass of galaxies and what comprises this mass? How do we measure distances to galaxies and what does this tell

More information

Studying Merger Driven BH Growth with Observations of Dual AGN

Studying Merger Driven BH Growth with Observations of Dual AGN Studying Merger Driven BH Growth with Observations of Dual AGN Mike Koss University of Hawaii Richard Mushotzky and Sylvain Veilleux (U Maryland), Dave Sanders and Vivan U (Hawaii), Ezequiel Treister (U

More information

Coronal geometry at low mass- accretion rates from XMM and NuSTAR spectra. Felix Fürst Caltech for the NuSTAR AGN physics and binaries teams

Coronal geometry at low mass- accretion rates from XMM and NuSTAR spectra. Felix Fürst Caltech for the NuSTAR AGN physics and binaries teams Coronal geometry at low mass- accretion rates from XMM and NuSTAR spectra Felix Fürst for the NuSTAR AGN physics and binaries teams Accreting black holes Supermassive black hole: Cen A Central engine of

More information

Stellar populations of quasar host galaxies

Stellar populations of quasar host galaxies Knud Jahnke AIP Galaxies division Hauskolloquium 10.01.2003 Introduction/motivation Multicolour imaging On-nucleus spectroscopy What does this teach us? Outlook Overview Introduction Introduction HE 1043

More information

AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models

AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Physics of Galactic Nuclei, Ringberg Castle, June 18, 2009 Outline Brief introduction

More information

MIT Invitational, Jan Astronomy C. 2. You may separate the pages, but do not forget to put your team number at the top of all answer pages.

MIT Invitational, Jan Astronomy C. 2. You may separate the pages, but do not forget to put your team number at the top of all answer pages. MIT Invitational, Jan 2019 Astronomy C Competitors: School name: Team number: INSTRUCTIONS 1. Please turn in all materials at the end of the event. 2. You may separate the pages, but do not forget to put

More information

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/84153

More information

Quasars and AGN. What are quasars and how do they differ from galaxies? What powers AGN s. Jets and outflows from QSOs and AGNs

Quasars and AGN. What are quasars and how do they differ from galaxies? What powers AGN s. Jets and outflows from QSOs and AGNs Goals: Quasars and AGN What are quasars and how do they differ from galaxies? What powers AGN s. Jets and outflows from QSOs and AGNs Discovery of Quasars Radio Observations of the Sky Reber (an amateur

More information

Chapter 15 2/19/2014. Lecture Outline Hubble s Galaxy Classification. Normal and Active Galaxies Hubble s Galaxy Classification

Chapter 15 2/19/2014. Lecture Outline Hubble s Galaxy Classification. Normal and Active Galaxies Hubble s Galaxy Classification Lecture Outline Chapter 15 Normal and Active Galaxies Spiral galaxies are classified according to the size of their central bulge. Chapter 15 Normal and Active Galaxies Type Sa has the largest central

More information

X-ray variability of AGN

X-ray variability of AGN X-ray variability of AGN Magnus Axelsson October 20, 2006 Abstract X-ray variability has proven to be an effective diagnostic both for Galactic black-hole binaries and active galactic nuclei (AGN). This

More information

The cosmic distance scale

The cosmic distance scale The cosmic distance scale Distance information is often crucial to understand the physics of astrophysical objects. This requires knowing the basic properties of such an object, like its size, its environment,

More information

SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN BULGELESS AND DWARF GALAXIES: A MULTI-WAVELENGTH INVESTIGATION

SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN BULGELESS AND DWARF GALAXIES: A MULTI-WAVELENGTH INVESTIGATION SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN BULGELESS AND DWARF GALAXIES: A MULTI-WAVELENGTH INVESTIGATION by Nathan J. Secrest A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University In Partial fulfillment

More information