2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY"

Shona Barton
5 years ago
Views:

1 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY

2018 Bucks County Board of Commissioners Robert

Operating Officer 2018 Bucks County Planning

3 2018 Bucks County Board of Commissioners Robert G. Loughery Chairman Charles H. Martin Vice Chairman Diane M. Ellis-Marseglia, LCSW Brian Hessenthaler Chief Operating Officer 2018 Bucks County Planning Commission Edward Kisselback, Jr., Chairman Robert M. Pellegrino, Vice Chairman R. Tyler Tomlinson, Secretary Craig E. Bryson Joan M. Cullen James J. Dowling Raymond W. Goodnoe David R. Nyman Carol A. Pierce Walter S. Wydro Evan J. Stone Executive Director, Planning Commission

4 The Almshouse Neshaminy Manor Center 1260 Almshouse Road Doylestown, Pennsylvania FAX

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS... 3 SECTION 3 ACT 247 REVIEW ACTIVITY... 5 SECTION 4 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY... 9 Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development... 9 Residential Proposals Nonresidential Proposals SECTION 5 MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY SECTION 6 PLANNING MODULE REVIEW ACTIVITY List of Tables Table 1 Review Activity by Type, 2017 and Table 2 Review Activity by Municipality, Table 3 Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development, Table 4 Housing Types Proposed, 2017 and Table 5 Proposed Residential Development, Table 6 Proposed Nonresidential Subdivisions, 2017 and Table 7 Reviews of Nonresidential Land Developments, 2017 and Table 8 Proposed Square Feet of Nonresidential Land Development, 2017 and Table 9 Proposed Nonresidential Development, Table 10 Municipal Proposals by Type, 2017 and Table 11 Municipal Proposals by Municipality, Table 12 Planning Module Reviews, List of Figures Figure 1 Review Activity, 2007 to Figure 2 Review Activity, Figure 3 Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development, Figure 4 Proposed Residential Development, 2007 to Figure 5 Share of Units by Type, Proposed Residential Activity, Figure 6 Proposals, 50 to 100 and 100 or More Units, Figure Proposed Residential Development in Bucks County Figure 8 Proposed Nonresidential Land Development, 2007 to Figure 9 Share of Square Footage by Type, Proposed Nonresidential Land Development, Figure 10 Proposed Nonresidential Development by Type, Figure Proposed Nonresidential Development in Bucks County Figure Major Residential Subdivision Proposals in Bucks County of Bucks Appendices Appendix A Residential Proposals 50 to 100 units Appendix B Proposed Nonresidential Land Developments Appendix C Bucks County Planning Commission Revenue, i

6 ii

7 SECTION 1 Introduction T his annual report is a summary of the subdivision, land development, and municipal proposals received by the Bucks County Planning Commission (BCPC) for review and comment as authorized by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247 as amended). It is not intended, nor should it be interpreted, as a summary of the amount of construction activity or the number of housing units built within the county or a particular municipality during Information on construction activity may be obtained by contacting municipal building inspectors or zoning officers or the U.S. Census. The number of reviews for 2017 reflects all the proposals submitted and reviewed during the year, including those that may have also been reviewed in a previous year at an earlier plan stage. Where a subdivision or land development was reviewed more than once in the current year due to different planning stages, it was counted more than once as a reviewed proposal. This allows for an accurate account of the number of reviews conducted by staff during the year. The information in this report provides an indication of what areas in the county might undergo development in the future. Comparisons are made with data from previous years to provide an indication of development trends in the county. A concerted effort was made to eliminate duplication of the number of residential units and the amount of nonresidential development proposed in the previous years. The number of lots and/or square footage of development were based on the most current plan submitted for review. PAGE 1

8 PAGE 2

9 SECTION 2 Definitions Housing Type Attached A building having: (i) only one dwelling structure from ground to roof, (ii) three or more dwelling units in each structure, (iii) independent outside access to each dwelling, and (iv) two or more walls in common with adjoining dwellings, with the exception of end units. Detached A single-family dwelling on an individual lot with yard space on all four sides. Manufactured Home A dwelling fabricated in an off-site manufacturing facility for installation or assembly at the building site, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance with the Federal Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. It is not constructed or equipped with a permanent hitch or other device allowing it to be moved other than for the purpose of moving to a permanent site, and it does not have any wheels or axles permanently attached to its body or frame. A mobile home is not a manufactured home. Mobile Home A transportable single-family dwelling which arrives at a site complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations and is constructed so that it may be used without a permanent foundation. Multifamily A building containing more than two dwelling units and not elsewhere classified (high-rise, mid-rise, and garden apartments). Semidetached A building containing two dwelling units (twin, duplex). Land Development The improvement of one lot or two or more contiguous lots, tracts, or parcels of land for any purpose involving: a. A group of two or more residential or nonresidential buildings, whether proposed initially or cumulatively, or a single nonresidential building on a lot or lots regardless of the number of occupants or tenure; or b. The division or allocation of land or space, whether initially or cumulatively, between or among two or more existing or prospective occupants by means of, or for the purpose of streets, common areas, leaseholds, condominiums, building groups, or other features. PAGE 3

10 Major Subdivision A proposal of three or more lots or units reviewed by the staff of the Bucks County Planning Commission. Minor Subdivision A proposal of fewer than three lots or units reviewed by the staff of the Bucks County Planning Commission. Municipal Proposal Sketch Plan Subdivision An application involving a zoning map change, ordinance amendment, new ordinance, comprehensive plan, the creation or extension of an agricultural security area, vacation of a public street or right-of-way, acquisition or sale of public ground, a new school or an addition to a school, etc., that is prescribed by the Municipalities Planning Code to be reviewed by the Bucks County Planning Commission. An informal plan of future development that is reviewed by the staff of the Bucks County Planning Commission. The division or redivision of a lot, tract, or parcel of land by any means into two or more lots, tracts, or parcels or other divisions of land including changes in existing lot lines for the purposes of transfer of ownership or building or lot development. PAGE 4

11 Number of Reviews 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY SECTION 3 Act 247 Review Activity In 2017, the Bucks County Planning Commission and staff reviewed a total of 310 proposals submitted for subdivisions, land developments, and municipal actions. The graph below details the total number of reviews prepared each year since FIGURE 1. Review Activity, 2007 to Year The totals for the types of reviews conducted in 2017 and 2016 are summarized in Table 1, while Figure 2 shows the percentage of types of reviews for Table 2 on page 7 provides a breakdown by municipality. PAGE 5

12 TABLE 1. Review Activity by Type, 2017 and Number of Number of REVIEW TYPE Reviews Reviews Difference Change Major % Minor % Sketch % Municipal % TOTAL % FIGURE 2. Review Activity, 2017 Municipal 35% Major 43% Sketch 8% Minor 15% PAGE 6

13 TABLE 2. Review Activity, 2017 Municipality Major Minor Sketch Municipal Total Bedminster Township Bensalem Township Bridgeton Township Bristol Borough Bristol Township Buckingham Township Chalfont Borough Doylestown Borough Doylestown Township Dublin Borough Durham Township East Rockhill Township Falls Township Haycock Township Hilltown Township Hulmeville Borough Ivyland Borough Langhorne Borough Langhorne Manor Borough Lower Makefield Township Lower Southampton Township Middletown Township Milford Township Morrisville Borough New Britain Borough New Britain Township New Hope Borough Newtown Borough Newtown Township Nockamixon Township Northampton Township Penndel Borough Perkasie Borough Plumstead Township Quakertown Borough Richland Township Richlandtown Borough Riegelsville Borough Sellersville Borough Silverdale Borough Solebury Township Springfield Township Telford Borough Tinicum Township Trumbauersville Borough Tullytown Borough Upper Makefield Township Upper Southampton Township Warminster Township Warrington Township Warwick Township West Rockhill Township Wrightstown Township Yardley Borough Quakertown Area Planning Commission Newtown Area Joint Planning Commission Totals PAGE 7

14 PAGE 8

SECTION 4 Subdivision and Land Development Activity In accordance with Sections 502 and 704 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247 as amended), all

Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development Subdivision and land development activity has a significant impact on the amount of land developed in the future.

Table 3 on page 10 provides a municipal breakdown of the amount of land that may be affected by the proposals submitted for review in 2017.

contains an existing residence). Rural residences usually contain significant open space and vacant area and allow for additional subdivision and development.

15 SECTION 4 Subdivision and Land Development Activity In accordance with Sections 502 and 704 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247 as amended), all applications for subdivisions, land developments, and planned residential developments reviewed by municipalities must be submitted to the county planning agency for review and comment. The following describes the proposed residential and nonresidential subdivision and land development activity reviewed by the Bucks County Planning Commission in Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development Subdivision and land development activity has a significant impact on the amount of land developed in the future. Figure 3 below shows the percentage of land potentially impacted by proposed development in Table 3 on page 10 provides a municipal breakdown of the amount of land that may be affected by the proposals submitted for review in This figure and table includes only land that is currently being farmed, is vacant, or is considered rural residential (a parcel which is five acres or larger and contains an existing residence). Rural residences usually contain significant open space and vacant area and allow for additional subdivision and development. As Table 3 indicates, 1,005 acres of farm, vacant, and rural residential land could be impacted by the residential and nonresidential development proposed in If the 2017 proposals were developed, over 166 acres (16 percent) would be preserved as open space, park and recreation land, or conservation easements. FIGURE 3. Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development, 2017 (1,005 acres) Farmland 14% Rural Residential 50% Vacant 36% PAGE 9

16 TABLE 3. Land Potentially Impacted by Proposed Development, 2017* Proposed Residential Development Proposed Nonresidential Development Total Proposed Development Municipality Farmland Vacant Rural Residential Total Acreage Farmland Vacant Rural Residential Total Acreage Farmland Vacant Rural Residential Total Acreage Bedminster Township Bensalem Township Bridgeton Township Bristol Borough Bristol Township Buckingham Township Chalfont Borough Doylestown Borough Doylestown Township Dublin Borough Durham Township East Rockhill Township Falls Township Haycock Township Hilltown Township Hulmeville Borough Ivyland Borough Langhorne Borough Langhorne Manor Borough Lower Makefield Township Lower Southampton Township Middletown Township Milford Township Morrisville Borough New Britain Borough New Britain Township New Hope Borough Newtown Borough Newtown Township Nockamixon Township Northampton Township Penndel Borough Perkasie Borough Plumstead Township Quakertown Borough Richland Township Richlandtown Borough Riegelsville Borough Sellersville Borough Silverdale Borough Solebury Township Springfield Township Telford Borough Tinicum Township Trumbauersville Borough Tullytown Borough Upper Makefield Township Upper Southampton Township Warminster Township Warrington Township Warwick Township West Rockhill Township Wrightstown Township Yardley Borough Totals ,005 *Table 3 represents the potential amount of farm, vacant, and rural residential (parcels over five acres with an existing residence) land that may be developed/ consumed if proposed development in 2017 would be constructed. The acreage does not include land with existing development, except for rural residential properties. PAGE 10

17 Number of Units 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY Residential Proposals The development proposals reviewed by the planning commission in 2017 contained a total of 441 residential units, a decline of 21 percent from Figure 4 illustrates the total number of residential development units proposed each year since A summary of 2017 and 2016 data for residential development is shown in Table 4. Figure 5 shows the breakdown of the number of units by type for FIGURE 4. Proposed Residential Development, 2007 to ,000 1,796 1, Years TABLE 4. Housing Types Proposed, 2017 and Number of Number of HOUSING TYPE Units Units Difference Change Single-family % Semidetached % Attached % Multifamily % Mobile/Manufactured Home TOTAL % PAGE 11

For the first time in 13 years the total number of single-family detached dwellings outpaced the combined number of multifamily, attached, and semi-detached units.

Table 5 on page 14 and Figure 7 on page 15 provide a breakdown of residential development proposals by municipality. FIGURE 5.

time (2012) since 1960 that no proposals contained more than 100 units. Figure 6 shows proposals of 50 to 100 units and 100 or more units from 1994 to 2017.

This was only the second time (2012) since 1960 that no proposals contained more than 100 units. Appendix A provides information regarding residential proposals of 50 to 100 units.

18 For the first time in 13 years the total number of single-family detached dwellings outpaced the combined number of multifamily, attached, and semi-detached units. Single-family units represented 63 percent of all units proposed in Table 5 on page 14 and Figure 7 on page 15 provide a breakdown of residential development proposals by municipality. FIGURE 5. Share of Units by Type, Proposed Residential Activity, 2017 Mobile/ Manufactured Home 0% Attached 18% Multifamily 20% For the first time in 13 years the total number of single-family detached dwellings outpaced the combined number of multifamily, attached, and semi-detached units. Single-family Detached 63% Semi-Detached 0% This was only the second time (2012) since 1960 that no proposals contained more than 100 units. Figure 6 shows proposals of 50 to 100 units and 100 or more units from 1994 to Large proposals remain low as compared to previous years. In 2017, only two development proposals contained between 50 and 100 units and no proposals had more than 100 units proposed. This was only the second time (2012) since 1960 that no proposals contained more than 100 units. Appendix A provides information regarding residential proposals of 50 to 100 units. There was only one age-qualified development (84 units), marking the third year in a row with this type of development proposed, after a 5-year hiatus. The annual average of proposed age-qualified units for the eight years prior to 2010 was over 600 units. PAGE 12

19 Number of Proposals 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY FIGURE 6. Proposals, 50 to 100 and 100 or More Units, or more 50 to Year PAGE 13

20 TABLE 5. Proposed Residential Development, 2017 Municipality Single-family Detached Semi- Detached Attached Multifamily Mobile Homes Total Bedminster Township Bensalem Township Bridgeton Township Bristol Borough Bristol Township Buckingham Township Chalfont Borough Doylestown Borough Doylestown Township Dublin Borough Durham Township East Rockhill Township Falls Township Haycock Township Hilltown Township Hulmeville Borough Ivyland Borough Langhorne Borough Langhorne Manor Borough Lower Makefield Township Lower Southampton Township Middletown Township Milford Township Morrisville Borough New Britain Borough New Britain Township New Hope Borough Newtown Borough Newtown Township Nockamixon Township Northampton Township Penndel Borough Perkasie Borough Plumstead Township Quakertown Borough Richland Township Richlandtown Borough Riegelsville Borough Sellersville Borough Silverdale Borough Solebury Township Springfield Township Telford Borough Tinicum Township Trumbauersville Borough Tullytown Borough Upper Makefield Township Upper Southampton Township Warminster Township Warrington Township Warwick Township West Rockhill Township Wrightstown Township Yardley Borough Totals PAGE 14

21 PAGE 15

22 Nonresidential Proposals Information on nonresidential activity is arranged according to the following categories: the number of lots/units proposed through subdivision, number of land development proposals, and the amount of square footage proposed in land developments (both new and reuse). A total of 30 nonresidential lots (i.e., lots without a proposed building) were proposed in , a decrease of 19 percent from the 2016 total. TABLE 6. Proposed Nonresidential Subdivisions, 2017 and TYPE OF USE Number of Lots Number of Lots Difference Change Commercial % Industrial % Institutional % Office TOTAL % Table 7 includes each land development proposal submitted for review in 2017 and Where a proposal contained mixed uses, each use was counted in the appropriate category. TABLE 7. Reviews of Nonresidential Land Developments, 2017 and Number of Number of TYPE OF USE Reviews Reviews Difference Change Commercial % Industrial % Institutional % Office % TOTAL % In 2017, proposals totaling almost 2.6 million square feet were reviewed (Figure 8). This is an increase of 18 percent from the amount reviewed in A summary of proposed nonresidential square footage by type is provided in Figure 9 and Table 8. 1 These lots do not include units associated with institutional use proposals such as continuing care facilities. PAGE 16

Square Feet 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY FIGURE 8.

3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 3,938,896 3,086,827

1,297,192 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Years FIGURE 9.

Institutional 19% In 2017, proposals totaling almost 2.

23 Square Feet 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY FIGURE 8. Proposed Nonresidential Land Development, 2007 to ,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000, , ,938,896 3,086,827 2,769,036 2,206,594 2,598,352 2,715,597 1,308,344 1,114,109 1,213,312 1,183,806 1,297, Years FIGURE 9. Share of Square Footage by Type, Proposed Nonresidential Land Development, 2017 Institutional 19% In 2017, proposals totaling almost 2.6 million square feet were reviewed (Figure 8). This is an increase of 18 percent from the amount reviewed in Office 1% Commercial 36% Industrial 45% PAGE 17

24 Square Footage 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF REVIEW ACTIVITY TABLE 8. Proposed Square Feet of Nonresidential Land Development, 2017 and 2016 TYPE OF USE Difference Change Commercial 936, , ,203 12% Industrial 1,157,158 1,110, ,030 15% Institutional 490, , , % Office 13,900 58,748-44,848-76% TOTAL 2,598,352 2,206, ,758 18% FIGURE 10. Proposed Nonresidential Development by Type, ,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000, , , , ,000 0 Commercial Industrial Office Institutional Year PAGE 18

25 TABLE 9. Proposed Nonresidential Development, 2017 Commercial Commercial Industrial Industrial Office Office Institutional Institutional Municipality Square Feet Lots Square Feet Lots Square Feet Lots Square Feet Lots/Units Bedminster Township 0 0 9, Bensalem Township 8, , ,502 0 Bridgeton Township Bristol Borough ,831 0 Bristol Township 44, , ,400 0 Buckingham Township 8, , Chalfont Borough Doylestown Borough 17, , Doylestown Township 95, ,600 0 Dublin Borough Durham Township East Rockhill Township 26, Falls Township 59, , Haycock Township Hilltown Township ,460 2 Hulmeville Borough Ivyland Borough Langhorne Borough Langhorne Manor Borough Lower Makefield Township 13, ,552 0 Lower Southampton Township 10, Middletown Township 19, ,312 0 Milford Township 52, , ,000 0 Morrisville Borough , New Britain Borough New Britain Township 126, New Hope Borough 18, Newtown Borough Newtown Township 180, ,243 0 Nockamixon Township 15, , Northampton Township 5, Penndel Borough Perkasie Borough 2, Plumstead Township 34, Quakertown Borough Richland Township 7, , ,090 0 Richlandtown Borough Riegelsville Borough Sellersville Borough , Silverdale Borough Solebury Township Springfield Township 0 0 1, , Telford Borough Tinicum Township Trumbauersville Borough Tullytown Borough 12, Upper Makefield Township Upper Southampton Township 5, Warminster Township 1, , , ,825 0 Warrington Township 82, ,813 0 Warwick Township 48, , West Rockhill Township 19, Wrightstown Township 20, Yardley Borough TOTALS 936, ,157, , ,628 3 PAGE 19

26 PAGE 20

27 SECTION 5 Municipal Activity In accordance with the provisions of Sections 301.3, 304, 305, 408, 504, 505, 609, and of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, municipalities must submit proposals concerning requests for zoning map changes, zoning ordinance amendments, subdivision and land development ordinance amendments, comprehensive plans, curative amendments, official maps, and other proposals (school district reviews, street vacations, acquisitions of public ground, sewage facilities plan update, etc.) to the county planning commission for review and comment. Table 10 provides a summary of municipal proposals reviewed by type and Table 11 provides municipal totals. TABLE 10. Municipal Proposals by Type, 2017 and Number of Number of TYPE OF PROPOSAL Proposals Proposals Difference Change Zoning Map Change % Ordinance Amendment % Curative Amendment New Ordinances Comprehensive Plan Official Map Other * % TOTAL % * Other proposals include Agriculture Security Area extensions, school district reviews, water and sewer plan updates, street vacations, and acquisition of public lands. PAGE 21

28 TABLE 11. Municipal Proposals by Municipality, 2017 Municipality PAGE 22 Zoning Map Change Ordinance Amendment Curative Amendment New Ordinance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Official Map Other ASA, CR, SD, WS, Septa Bedminster Township Bensalem Township Bridgeton Township Bristol Borough Bristol Township Buckingham Township Chalfont Borough Doylestown Borough Doylestown Township Dublin Borough Durham Township East Rockhill Township Falls Township Haycock Township Hilltown Township Hulmeville Borough Ivyland Borough Langhorne Borough Langhorne Manor Borough Lower Makefield Township Lower Southampton Township Middletown Township Milford Township Morrisville Borough New Britain Borough New Britain Township New Hope Borough Newtown Borough Newtown Township Nockamixon Township Northampton Township Penndel Borough Perkasie Borough Plumstead Township Quakertown Borough Richland Township Richlandtown Borough Riegelsville Borough Sellersville Borough Silverdale Borough Solebury Township Springfield Township Telford Borough Tinicum Township Trumbauersville Borough Tullytown Borough Upper Makefield Township Upper Southampton Township Warminster Township Warrington Township Warwick Township West Rockhill Township Wrightstown Township Yardley Borough Quakertown Area Plng. Comm Newtown Area Jt. Plng. Comm Totals Total

29 SECTION 6 Planning Module Review Activity The Pennsylvania Sewage Facilities Act (Act 537 of 1970) requires county planning agencies to review sewage facilities planning modules for land development. The review of the modules is coordinated with the review of the corresponding subdivision or land development. TABLE 12. Planning Module Reviews, 2017 Bedminster Township 2 Bensalem Township 5 Bristol Township 2 East Rockhill Township 1 Hilltown Township 1 Lower Makefield Township 1 Lower Southampton Township 4 Middletown Township 1 New Britain Township 1 New Hope Borough 1 Newtown Borough 1 Newtown Township 4 Northampton Township 3 Springfield Township 1 Upper Makefield Township 1 Warminster Township 2 Warrington Township 1 Wrightstown Township 1 TOTAL 33 PAGE 23

30 PAGE 24

31 APPENDIX A Residential Proposals 50 to 100 Units Municipality: Newtown Township BCPC File No.: A Plan Type: Tentative PRD Plan of Subdivision for Arcadia Green TMP No , , , , and Applicant: Owner: Location: Proposal: Arcadia at Newtown Holdings, LP Wynmere Hunt Associates, LP, Karr Associates, LP, and Newtown Reform Church (TMP # ) Western side of the Newtown Bypass, northwest of its intersection with Buck Road (S.R. 532). Access to the site is via the existing service road cul-de-sac that parallels the Bypass and intersects Buck Road. In addition, a one-way road (egress-only) is proposed through an adjacent house lot (TMP # ) to a cul-de-sac (High Street) in the existing Newtown Crossing development. Subdivide a acre tract into 85 dwelling units (26 single-family detached dwellings and 59 townhouse units) and acres of open space as a Planned Residential Development (PRD). Proposed density is 3.1 dwelling units per acre. Public water and sewerage facilities are intended. Municipality: Richland Township BCPC File No.: Plan Type: Preliminary Plan of Land Development Phoebe Richland Health Care Center Independent Living Complex TMP No Applicant: Owner: Location: Phoebe Richland Health Care Center c/o Lisa Fichera Same North of Depot Lane, and west of South Main Street, on the border with Richlandtown Borough. Proposal: Construct 84 units of independent living senior housing within three buildings on a acre lot. The plan provides 128 parking spaces around the three buildings. The development will be connected to the existing senior living facility on the parcel immediately to the east of the site in Richlandtown. The site is served by public water and public sewer. PAGE 25

32 PAGE 26

33 APPENDIX B Proposed Nonresidential Land Developments Commercial BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Bensalem Township Shop Rite 3,257 Bensalem Township 9813-J Chick-fil-A 4,870 Bristol Township McDonald s Restaurant Remodel 4,190 Bristol Township Wawa Food Market & Refueling Station 10,881 Bristol Township New Falls Dental 7,437 Bristol Township 4613-A Cedar Properties, Inc. 22,200 Buckingham Township Hirsch Property 6,000 Buckingham Township Leaver-Cable Funeral Home 2,205 Doylestown Borough 8727-A Oishi Restaurant & Retail Center 15,204 Doylestown Township Metro Storage Facility 95,256 East Rockhill Township 4900-C Foreman 26,100 Falls Township Lake Caroline Lower Bucks YMCA 55,000 Falls Township Medexpress 4,717 Lower Makefield Township D L. Bucks Pediatrics/Octagon Center, Ph. III 13,909 Lower Southampton Township 9867-C Citadel Federal Credit Union 10,503 Middletown Township D Lincoln Plaza 10,900 Middletown Township Burns Auto Group 8,190 Milford Township B Quaker Pointe Drive Hotel 42,903 Milford Township 1004-C Windy Springs Farm 10,000 New Britain Township A Wawa 10,167 New Britain Township 6169-P New Britain Corporate Center Lot 4N 8,891 New Britain Township 4832-A Metro Storage Facility 107,008 New Hope Borough Odette s Relocation 1,132 PAGE 27

34 Commercial (continued) BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet New Hope Borough 4323-C Logan Inn 7,210 New Hope Borough Buckingham Retail Partners 10,167 Newtown Township 6857-A Premier A-2 Self Storage 110,400 Newtown Township Fred Beans Ford Newtown 9,618 Newtown Township 5616-D Village at Newtown 60,076 Nockamixon Township A Harrow Station 15,620 Northampton Township nd Street Pike 5,226 Perkasie Borough Nacarella 2,250 Plumstead Township Doylestown II RT 313 TVC ARC, LP 4,736 Plumstead Township A Tague Lumber 29,856 Richland Township 7833-C Trainer s Corner Retail 7,500 Tullytown Borough Wawa Food Market & Fueling Station 10,016 Tullytown Borough 6164-G Arby s Restaurant 2,567 Upper Southampton Township Street Road 5,290 Warminster Township 8590-A Family Dining, Inc. 1,108 Warminster Township Steak n Shake 416 Warminster Township A 380 West Street Road 200 Warrington Township D Valley Square Town Square (Phase II) 1,800 Warrington Township A NTB & Autozone 13,781 Warrington Township 5806-B 532 Easton Road (Wawa) 10,865 Warrington Township West Street Road 56,382 Warwick Township A Warwick Village Commons, Phase II 37,943 Warwick Township 4500-A 800 Almshouse Road 10,424 West Rockhill Township Nyce 2,184 Industrial BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Bedminster Township T.S. Hess Holdings, LLC 9,964 Bensalem Township 5167-A Gougler 20,800 Bensalem Township Morelli 4,335 Bristol Township 8182-M Bristol Commerce Center, Lot 3 80,992 PAGE 28

35 Industrial (continued) BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Bristol Township 8182-N Bristol Industrial Park, Lots 7B & 7C 81,600 Bristol Township H D Surgical 15,030 Bristol Township 4328-A 6401 Airport Road 4,000 Buckingham Township PA Biotechnology Center 35,815 Doylestown Borough 5341-D 3 Atkinson Drive 1,040 Falls Township G Mazza Iron and Steel 5,280 Falls Township Kelly Pipe Warehouse 75,000 Falls Township A Accu-Fire Fabrication 48,150 Falls Township 6253-LL2 Medical Marijuana Grower/Processor 123,685 Falls Township 6253-QQ Harsco Storage Tent 10,280 Falls Township 4465-G DriveTime Inspection Center 109,884 Milford Township 6494-O 2100 AM Drive 79,000 Morrisville Borough Agostino Foods 62,150 Nockamixon Township A Easton Road LPG Partners, LLC 30,000 Richland Township A Park ,200 Sellersville Borough 7415-D Bucks Technical Associates 69,500 Springfield Township Timber Land Associates 1,303 Warminster Township Pressure Technology, Inc. 6,734 Warminster Township A Victory Gardens 1,500 Warwick Township PDC Machines 20,916 Institutional BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Bensalem Township 6663-J 3330 Tillman Drive 1,502 Bristol Borough Wilson Avenue 61,831 Bristol Township 8583-A Levittown Fire Company #2 2,400 Doylestown Township 8122-E Doylestown Hospital 77,600 Hilltown Township Swaminarayan Community Center 4,460 Lower Makefield Township Artis Senior Living Facility 33,552 Middletown Township 6636-G St. Mary Medical Center - MRI Addition 2,312 PAGE 29

36 Institutional (continued) BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Milford Township I St. Luke's Hospital, Bucks County Campus 132,000 Newtown Township Pickering Manor Home Expansion 70,243 Richland Township D Bible Baptist Church of Bucks County 18,090 Warminster Township A Delaware Valley Residential Care 9,825 Warrington Township 9831-C Gloria Dei Community 76,813 Office BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Springfield Township Ranson Fuel, LLC 2,400 Warminster Township MARA II 11,500 Mixed-Use Developments BCPC Proposed Municipality File No. Name Square Feet Doylestown Borough Barnes 2,230 Commercial 2 Multifamily Units Wrightstown Township Laurel Nobilis Arabian Riding Academy 20,484 Commercial 1 Single-Family Dwelling West Rockhill Township 7486-A Fedegari Technologies, Inc. 17,397 Commercial 1 Single-Family Dwelling PAGE 30

37 APPENDIX C Bucks County Planning Commission Revenue 2017 Application Fee Revenue Application Type Number of Applications Lots/Units Square Feet Revenue Residential subdivisions, land developments and conversions 2 lots or units $5, lots or units $5, lots or units $4, lots or units $3, lots or units $4, lots or units Subtotal $23, Nonresidential land developments 0 5,000 sq. ft ,803 $9, ,001+ sq. ft. 59-2,592,218 $128, Subtotal 81-2,646,021 $137, Nonresidential subdivisions 2 lots or units $3, lots or units $ lots or units $1, Subtotal $5, Curative Amendments Private Petitions for Zoning Change $8, Total ,646,021 $174, Community Contract Revenue Number of Contracts Revenue 12 $91, PAGE 31

38 PAGE 32

ZONING. 195 Attachment 1

ZONING. 195 Attachment 1 ZONING 195 Attachment 1 Use Regulation Schedule Town of Chelmsford [Amended 10-16-2000 ATM by Art. 20; 5-3-2001 ATM by Art. 17; 10-15-2001 ATM by Art. 22; 4-29-2002 ATM by Art. 22; 10-24-2002 ATM by Art.