Nagpur University Teachers Association. 5 th June, 2011 at Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya, Amravati

Transcription

1 YEAR : 36 ) 15th September 2011 ( No : 08 M I N U T E S of the General Body Meeting of NAGPUR UNIVERSITY TEACHERS'ASSOCIATION held at noon on SUNDAY, the 5 th June, 2011 at Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya, Amravati General Body of Nagpur University Teachers' Association met at noon on Sunday, the 5th June 2011 at Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya,Amravati. Prof. B.T.Deshmukh, President was in the chair. The membership numbers of the members present at the meeting are as follows :- 0044, 0048, 0058, 0072, , 0172, 0269,1122, 1161, 1382, 1715, 1811, 1948, 2038, 2120, 2138, 2156, 2369, 2370, 2414, 2439, 2524, 2528, 2586, 2603, 2809, 2853, 3134, 3297, 3299, 3300, 3306, 3321, 3344, 3351, 3368, 3391, 3423, 3432, 3449, 3451, 3457, 3464, 3483, 3492, 3495, 3497, 3498, 3506,3508, 3518, 3523, 3550,3560, 3571, 3619, 3626, 3631, 3642, 3659, 3750, 3770, 3772, 3787, 3797, 3805, 3806, 3815, 3838, 3851, 3852, 3853, 3890, 3894, 3925, 3926, 3975, 4019, 4036, 4081, 4084, 4097, 4134, 4189, 4192, 4334, 4346, 4362, 4411, 4426, 4436, 4490, 4492, 4498, 4499, 4502, 4584, 4599, 4630, 4633, 4637, 4638, 4640, 4641, 4649, 4706, 4713, 4714, 4782, 4846, 4873, 4885, 4888, 4979, 5028, 5047, 5158, 5161, 5191, 5202, 5214, 5215, 5221, 5265 Agenda of the General Body meeting was circulated on pages 33 to 35 of 2011 NUTA Bulletin. Additional Agenda was circulated on pages 33 to 57 of 2011 Ex-File. ITEM NO. 534 : CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES : CONFIRMED the minutes of the General Body meeting of Nagpur University Teachers' Association held at noon on Sunday, the 27th February, Notes :- 1) Copy of the minutes was Circulated on pages 21 to 29 of 2011 NUTA Bulletin. 2) Corrections, if any, were invited in the copy of the Minutes of the General Body Meeting of Nagpur University Teachers'Association held at noon on Sunday, the 27th February, vide No.CIM/30 Dated 15 March, 2011 published on page 23 of 2011) NUTA Bulletin. No correction was received. ITEM NO. 535 : APPROVAL TO THE ANNUAL REPORT : CONSIDERED AND APPROVED the Annual Report regarding the working of the Association for the calendar year ending on 31st December, Notes : (i) As per Article VI (b) (iii) of the Constitution of NUTA, the Annual Report of the working of the Association was prepared by the Executive Committee (vide item No.23 of 2011) and was placed for the approval of the General Body. (ii) The Copy of the Annual Report was circulated in 2011 NUTA Bulletin on pages 36 to 40. (iii) Dr. E.H.Kathale, Secretary presented the Annual Report on behalf of the Executive Committee. ITEM NO. 536 : APPROVAL TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET : APPROVED the Annual Budget of the Association for the Financial year commencing on 1st April, Notes : (i) Prof. S.A.Tiwari, Treasurer, NUTA, presented the Budget on behalf of the Executive Committee. (ii) The copy of the Budget was circulated on page No. 36 of 2011 NUTA Bulletin. ITEM NO. 537 : APPOINTMENT OF THE AUDITORS : CONSIDERED AND APPROVED the following resolution for the appointment of Auditors for the Financial year ending on 31st March, 2011 namely :- "C.R.Sagdeo & Co. Chartered Accountant "Prabha Niwas'' Nagpur be appointed as auditor for the Financial year ending on the 31st March 2011'' Notes : (i) As per Article VII of the Constitution of NUTA the "General Body shall appoint auditors annually in the Annual Meeting of the Association.'' Nagpur University Teachers Association MEETING NOTICE : 1 DATED : From : Prof. Dr. E. H. KATHALE Secretary, NUTA N-162, Reshim Bag, Nagpur To, All the members of the Nagpur University Teachers Association Dear members, I have the honour to inform you that General Body meeting of the Nagpur University Teachers Association will be held at noon, on the Day and the Date mentioned below. 2. If you propose to move any resolution for the consideration of the General Body, you are requested to send such resolution to me, with a copy to Prof. B.T.Deshmukh, President NUTA, No. 3, Subodh Colony, Near, Vidarbha Mahavidyalaya, Amravati within a period of 10 days from the date of the posting of this Bulletin. 3. It will not be possible to include in the agenda, resolutions received after the due date. So please make it convenient to send such resolutions, if any, within the stipulated time. The place of the meeting will be intimated to you alongwith the agenda. Thanking you. Yours faithfully Sd/- Dr.E. H. Kathale, Secretary, NUTA. Time, Day and Date of the Meeting : Noon on Sunday, the 27 th November, NUTA BULLETIN - 85

2 NUTA BULLETIN - 86 (ii) The Executive Committee resolved to recommend the above resolution, (Vide item No. 25 of 2011) which was placed before the General Body for its approval. (iii) Dr. S.A.Tiwari, Treasurer, on behalf of the Executive Committee, moved the resolution. ITEM NO. 538 : SUBMISSION OF STATEMENTS OF AUDITED ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING ON 31ST MARCH 2009 NOTED the submission of statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2009 to The Deputy Charity Commissioner Nagpur region, Nagpur by The Secretary NUTA, Dr. E.H. Kathale vide his letter No. 16/S/2010, Dated 15/06/2010. Notes : 1) Copy of the letter No.16/S/2010, Dated 15/06/ 2010 regarding Submission of Audited Accounts was circulated on page 34 of 2011 NUTA Bulletin. (2) Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2009 i.e. were approved by the Executive Committee in it's meeting held on 25th October 2009 vide item No. 24. Agenda on page 75, Minutes on page 85 and Enclosures on pages 73 & 76 of 2009 Ex-File. (3) Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2009 were approved by General Body in its meeting held on 13th December 2009 vide item No Agenda on page 161, Minutes on page 223, Enclosures on page 162 of 2009 NUTA Bulletin. (4) After the approvals mentioned at notes 2 & 3 above the Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2009 were submitted to the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Nagpur region, Nagpur by the Secretary as mentioned at note 1 above. ITEM NO. 539 : SUBMISSION OF STATEMENTS OF AUDITED ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING ON 31ST MARCH 2010 NOTED the submission of statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2010 to The Deputy Charity Commissioner Nagpur region, Nagpur by The Secretary NUTA, Dr. E.H. Kathale vide his letter No. 44/S/2011, Dated 15/03/2011 Notes : 1) Copy of the letter No.44/S/2011, Dated 15/03/ 2011 regarding Submission of Audited Accounts was circulated on page 34 of 2011 NUTA Bulletin. University Grants Commission Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg : New Delhi By Speed Post F.1-1/2002(PS) Exemp.Pt file IV : 16 August 2011 The Principal Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya Annexe, Mumbai Subject :- To Consider the representations received in respect of lecturers appointed on regular basis in the State of Maharashtra from till Sir, I Would like to inform you on the subject cited above that for grant of exemption from NET for appointment as lecturers, especially in respect of Maharashtra State Universities was considered by the Commission at its meeting held on The Commission resolved as under :- ""The Commission deliberated on the issue regarding appointment of various teachers in the State of Maharashtra from September 19,1991 until April 3,2000 and resolved that all such appointments made on regular basis by various universities in the state of Maharashtra where the university has granted exemption to teachers from the requirement of NET in terms of the UGC Regulations, 1991 and subsequent Notification dated and where the representation has been forwarded to Commission seeking further approval in relation to such regular appointments made during the said period w.e.f. September 19,1991 till April 3, 2000 is approved. It further resolved that a communication in this regard be sent to the universities concerned and the state of Maharashtra'' Keeping in view of the aforesaid resolution of the Commission, you are requested to take further action accordingly. Yours faithfully B.K.Singh, Deputy secretary Copy to :- (1) The Registrar, University of Mumbai, M.R.Road, Fort, Mumbai (2) The Registrar, University of Pune, PO University, Pune (3) The Registrar, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, Gautami Nagar, PB No. 87 Vishnupura, Nanded (4) The Registrar, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University P.O. Aurangabad (5) The Registrar, Norht Maharashtra University PB No. 80, Umavinagar, Jalgaon (6) The Registrar, Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur (7) The Registrar,Solapur University, Solapur.(8) The Registrar, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Ravindranath Tagor Marg. Guru Nanak Bhawan, Nagpur. Maharashtra Pin code (9) The Registrar, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati (10) Dr. Tapati Mukhopadhyay, Park side 3, wing, Flat No. 1308, Kulupwadi Road, Borivali (East) Mumbai with reference to her letter dated (11) Dr. F.C.Raghuwansi, Principal, Vidya Bharti Mahavidyalaya, Camp Amravati. Pin code (M.S.) With reference to his representation addressed to Hon'ble Dr. Devising Shekhawat Saheb **AF : P 151 ** B.K.Singh, Deputy secretary

3 (2) Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2010 i.e. were approved by the Executive Committee in it's meeting held on 16th January 2011 vide item No. 18. Agenda on page 2, Minutes on page 10 and Enclosures on pages 2,3 & 4 of 2011 Ex-File. (3) Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2010 were approved by General Body in its meeting held on 27th February 2011 vide item No Agenda on page 01, Minutes on page 9, Enclosures on page 02 & 03 of 2011 NUTA Bulletin. (4) After the approvals mentioned at notes 2 & 3 above the Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March, 2010 were submitted to the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Nagpur region, Nagpur by the secretary as mentioned at note 1 above. (5) References of previous submissions for information :- (A) For Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March 2007, see item No. 35 of 2008 Executive Committee meeting. (Agenda on page 47 and Minutes on page 57 of 2008 Ex-File. Enclosure on page 36 of 2008 Ex-File.) Noted by the General Body meeting of NUTA, vide item No. 479 in its meeting held on 9th November (Agenda on page 126, Minutes on page 157, Enclosure on page 131 of 2008 NUTA Bulletin.) (B) For Statements of Audited Accounts of Nagpur University Teachers' Association for the year ending on 31st March 2008, see item No. 18 of 2008 Executive Committee meeting. (Agenda on page 43 and Minutes on page 53 of 2008 Ex-File. Enclosure on page 30,31,32 & 33 of 2008 Ex-File.) Noted by the General Body meeting of NUTA, vide item No. 477 in its NUTA BULLETIN - 87 meeting held on 9th November 2008.Agenda on page 125, Minutes on page 157, Enclosure on page 126 & 127 of 2008 NUTA Bulletin. π GÚ EÚ 540 : v x { Æ π n x b h EÚ S J S «S Ω (+) x 2010 v + Æ i M { n v Æ i n Æ P i x Z ± ± x b h EÚ i ± J S «S Ω S i n x 2011 S <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ 33 i 44 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. i S Æ i P h i + ± i EÚÆh i + ±. ( ) ±± EÚ Æ Ω ± ± Ø { 1,71,262 (Ø { BEÚ ± I BEÚ Ω k Æ Ω V Æ n x π]ı) Ø { S x v P ]ıx S O l ± S ={ M `ˆ P ]ıx S { i «EÚÆ h S x h «P h i + ±. ]ı{ : i { ± Æ i n x 2011 S <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ 33 i 44 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. π GÚ EÚ 541 : + Ï{ x Ú Ï «Æ i Æ J x ]ı EÚh ı. +. Æ n Ω +x { Œ l i + ± x { f ± `ˆÆ b h i + ± x Ω. :- ""Once the commutation option is exercised and duly signed by the pensioner and when it has not been returned to college either by J.D.Office or by A.G.Office, Nagpur for any deficiency or mistake, then the amount of commutation be paid, and it should not be rejected only on the ground that it does not contain the date.'' University Grants Commission Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg : New Delhi No.F-1-3/2011(PS)Exemp : 26 August To, Dr.Tapti Mukhopadhyay, General Secretary Maharashtra Federation of University and College Teachers Organization Kulup Wadi Road, Bori Vali (East), Mumbai Sub:- Your representation dated 17th August, 2011 pertaining to clarification in respect of date of placement of teachers falling within the purview of the decision of the commission dated 8th July,2011. Madam, Kindly refer to your representation dated 17th August,2011 on the subject mentioned above. The issue raised in your representation has been examined in the UGC and this is to inform you that the commission in its meeting held on 8th July, 2011 considered the representation received in respect of lecturers appointed in the State of Maharashtra from 19th September, 1991 till 3rd April, 2000 and resolved as under :- The commission deliberated on the issue regarding appointment of various teachers in the State of Maharashtra from September 19, 1991 until April 3,2000 and resolved that all such appointments made on regular basis by various universities in the State of Maharashtra where the universities has granted exemption to teachers from the requirement of NET in terms of UGC regulation, 1991 and subsequent Notification dated 24th December 1998 and where the representation has been forwarded to commission seeking further approval in relation to such regular appointments made during the said period w.e.f. September 19, 1991 till April 3, 2000 is approved. The above decision of the commission has already been communicated by UGC vide its letter No. F.1-1/2002(PS) Exemp. Pt. file IV dated 16th August, 2011 to the Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Higher & Technical Education Department, Mumbai. As may be seen from the above decision of the commission, the commission has taken the said decision in respect of all such appointments made on regular basis by various universities during the period from September 19, 1991 to April 3, Therefore the services of such teachers for all purposes should be counted from the date of their regular appointment. This is for information. Yours faithfully, ( B.K.Singh) Copy to :- (1) Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Higher & Technical Education Department, Mumbai. (2) Registrar of all universities in the State of Maharashtra. ( B.K.Singh) **AF : P 169 **

4 π GÚ EÚ 542 : x ]ı ]ı i P b ± ± v P ]ıx S tœ l i x n EÚÆ h t S ]ı{ h NUTA BULLETIN - 88 (+) x ]ı ]ı i P b ± ± v P ]ıx S tœ l i n «h Æ +v I S M «n «x x Æ P ]ıx S Ω S. b Ï. h Æ P x i Æ E Ú± ± 18 t S ]ı{ h S Æ i P h i + ±. ( ) n x EÚ 18, 2011 Æ V S Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P S S x.b Ï. h Æ P x ± Ω ± ± (2011 S <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ 56 Æ fii ) { j ± I i P i Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P S π]ı b S t { `ˆ +x n x + M S +v I n x EÚ 10 V x Æ V S S «Ω h Æ + Ω + n x i. ""x ]ı ]ı i P b ± ± v P ]ıx S tœ l i x n EÚÆ h t S ]ı{ h '' l S BE Úh 18 t S ]ı{ h ± I i P i "". =SS x ± S x h «Æ t { `ˆ +x n x + M S EÚ i Æ Ω i + i x Ω EÚ n Æ q Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x t { `ˆ +x n x + M S ± I i + h x t i S Æ Æ ""(1) In view of the para 24 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgement dated , the position taken by the UGC as mentioned in the UGC letter dated 25 th December 1998 that entire service of the teacher be counted for the purposes of placement be communicated to the Hon'ble High Court. Further (2) It be communicated to the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Nagpur that every teacher who was appointed (from 1991 to ) through duly constituted Selection Committees and having had the then requisite minimum qualification as were existing at that time, is covered by proviso 2 of clause 2 of UGC regulation of April 2000, to satisfy the mandate of the Hon'ble High Court Nagpur that similarly situated will have to be similarly treated.'' + EÚ Æ S x i Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x t { `ˆ +x n x + M ± EÚÆ.'' + x i Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P ± EÚÆ h S x h «P h i + ±. (EÚ) π Æ ± S S Êi +x EÚ n x M P i ±. S S Ê v ={ Œ l i Z ± ± EÚ Ω Ω i { h «t S i i +v I x M fiω ± { f ± h Ω i n ±. :- (1) x 1991 i x 1999 EÚ ± J b i x i Æ i i + ± ± M Æ x ]ı- ]ı I EÚ x x ]ı- ]ıs { j i EÚ t x i ± M S EÚÆ h i + ± ± x Ω i. i Ω «I EÚ BEÚ M «i i i i MAHARASHTRA FEDERATION OF UNIVERSITY & COLLEGE TEACHERS ORGANISATIONS (MFUCTO) Vidyapeeth Vidyarthi Bhavan, B Road, Churchgate, Mumbai To, The Chairman/Secretary, University Grant Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi Subject: Qualification of NET/SET for University and College Lecturers in Maharashtra Proper and legal implementation thereof Sri/Madam, Thank you very much for giving an appointment to MFUCTO President and General Secretary on 2nd August 2011 despite your very busy schedule during the monsoon session of the Parliament. The MFUCTO in its emergency Executive Committee meeting held on Sunday 7th August 2011 in Mumbai adopted a resolution after carefully considering the decision of the UGC on Item 2.09 in its meeting held on 8th July 2011:- "1.The Executive Committee has carefully considered the decision taken by the University Grants Commission (UGC) on the Item To consider the representations received in respect of Lecturers appointed in the State of Maharshtra from till That the decision has been confined only to the State of Maharshtra and that in it the issue considered was appointment of various teachers in the State of Maharashtra from September 19, 1991 until April 3, 2000 is matter of satisfaction. 3.Despite the fact that appointments made between till 3rd April 2000 ware reflecting a common situation, instead of giving the same consideration for similarly situated persons, the UGC took piecemeal decisions and fragmented the teachers belonging to the same category; now that in view of the aforesaid decision the fragments have been brought together and a common single decision has been taken in respect of all these teachers, this too is a matter of satisfaction. 4.It will be seen that during this period the UGC 12th/17th August 2011 insisted till the very end that NET/SLET is compulsory, and in this background it would not behove to be vague while communicating to the Government of Maharashtra this decision of approvals presumed to have been granted by the Vice Chancellors and the same having been endorsed by the UGC in each and every representation made to it. Ergo, the Executive Committee hereby demands that the University Grants Commission must unambiguously communicate to the Government of Maharshtra the answer to the question: From which date should the placement be done of each of these teachers falling under the purview of the aforesaid decision of the UGC?. This is because this is precisely what has been mandated by the directions of the Hon ble High Court; the clear and legally correct answer to that question is From the date of appointment. This is because this is precisely what has been mandated by the directions of the Hon ble Supreme Court." Prayer 5(a) The MFUCTO requests the UGC to communicate this decision including the decision taken in Para 4 above to the Government of Maharshtra expeditiously. 5(b) We also request to your honour that the decision taken by UGC be communicated to each teacher involved in the decision taken by UGC on 8th July Thanking you, Yours Faithfully, Prof. Shivajirao Patil President Dr.Tapati Mukhopadhyay, General Secretary Copies Enclosed : - (1) Explanatory note including all the relevant legal points (English Version (2) Original resolution adopted in EC meeting of MFUCTO (Marathi) (3) Original Explanatory note including all the relevant legal points (Marathi Version) ***** Notes :- (1) Explanatory note including all the relevant legal points (English Version) is not circulated, Since (2) Original resolution adopted in EC meeting of MFUCTO (Marathi) is circulated on page 73 of 2011 Nuta Bulletin (3) Original Explanatory note including all the relevant legal points (Marathi Version) is circulated on page 74 of 2011 Nuta Bulletin **AF : P 171 **

5 » `ˆ BEÚ S EÚ Æ S x h «t { `ˆ +x n x + M S x S { i Æ Ω h +{ I i + Ω. ""similarly situated will have to be similarly treated.'' +. =SS x ± S x h «S + Ω. t { `ˆ NUTA BULLETIN x n x + M S { i Æ { h «M «`ˆ BEÚ S EÚ Æ S x h «Ω `ˆ P ]ıx «l Æ x ix ± + Ω. ={ Æ HÚ (+) Æ S Æ i P h i + ± ± ]ı{{ h ( ) Æ P h i + ± ± x h «Ω MAHARASHTRA FEDERATION OF UNIVERSITY & COLLEGE TEACHERS ORGANISATIONS (MFUCTO) Vidyapeeth Vidyarthi Bhavan, B Road, Churchgate, Mumbai To, Shri. Kapil Sibal Hon'ble Minister for Human Resource Development, Government of India, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi. Subject:- Regarding the non communication of the date of effect of approval of exemption given by the university and approved by the UGC, in respect of the regular appointments of various teachers in the State of Maharashtra appointed during September 19,1991 till April 3, Hon ble Minister Sir, Let us take this opportunity to thank you for having given an audiance to the MFUCTO delegation along with Shri. Basudev Acharya, Hon ble M.P. on 2nd August 2010 and 10th June 2011 to discuss about the issue of lecturers appointed during 19 /09 /1991 till 03 / 04 /2000 in Maharashtra. The MFUCTO is well aware of the fact that it was due to your direction that the HRD Ministry issued a letter to the UGC on 3rd Nov clearly stating that These regulations are bound to be prospective only. Appointments can never be made with retrospective effect. Since by Commission s own admission the regulations are prospective in nature and not retrospective. 2. The University Grants Commission by their letter (No.F.1-1/2002(PS) Exemp.Pt file IV) dated 16th August 2011 communicated to the Government of Maharashtra and to the Universities in the State of Maharashtra regarding the subject of grant of exemption from NET for the appointment as a lecturer and approved the action of the University in granting exemption in respect of the regular appointments during the period 19 Sept till 3 April Every appointment made on regular basis during the said period is approved by the UGC. By virtue of this decision all appointments made on regular basis during this period have been brought under one and only one decision. All teachers similarly situated are similarly treated. 3. MFUCTO would like to bring to your kind notice that unfortunately University Grants Commission has not communicated to the Government of Maharashtra the date from which such approval to the exemption became effective even though it was mandatory on their part to follow the directions of Hon ble Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court in writ petition No of 2010 decided on 20th April 2011 reads :- We direct the respondent no. 5 University Grants Commission to communicate to the State Government the date when such exemption became effective as per notification dated 5/11/2008 in respect of petitioners, within a period of three weeks. By not following the above said directions of Hon ble High Court, UGC is failing in its duties which tantamount to disrespect to the Hon ble High Court. 4. Since all these appointments were made on regular Basis and now approved by the University Grant Commission would stand regularized," as per the mandate of the Supreme Court. Last sentence quoted from Para 24 of the judgement (delivered on , in University of Delhi, Appellant v/s Raj Singh and others, Respondents. A.M. AHMADI AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ. : AIR 1995 SUPREME COURT 336.) is as follows. :-... it not only would not forfeit its grant but the appointment made without obtaining the U.G.C s prior approval would stand regularized. 5. In view of the above mentioned Judgement of the Apex Court and the stand taken by UGC, once approval to the exemption from NET/SET is granted the appointments will have to be treated as regularized and entire service of the teacher will have to be counted for the purposes of placement for the following reasons :- (i) In view of the fact that the every teacher under this decision was appointed on a regular basis, and now UGC granted its approval to the said appointment, his services needs to be counted for all purposes from the date of appointment. (ii) Experience is the basis of placement. as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sharadendu Bhushan, Appellant v. Nagpur University, Nagpur & Ors, Respondents (AIR 1988, Supreme Court 335). (iii) Further, as per Para 24 of the Hon ble Supreme Court Judgement dated 08/09/1994, the stand taken by UGC after obtaining legal opinion, as mentioned in the UGC letter dated 20th Dec.1998 is that the entire service of the teacher be counted for the purposes of placement. (iv) Even as late as in 2010 the latest UGC Regulations Notified (In the Gazette of India) under No.F.3-1/2009 dated 30th June 2010 dealt with the question of counting of past service for placement benefits as under: COUNTING OF PAST SERVICES FOR DIRECT RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION UNDER CAS: 10.1 (f) The adhoc or temporary service of more than 1 year duration can be counted provided that (i) The period of service was of more than one year duration (ii) The incumbent was appointed on the recommendation of duly constituted selection committee and (iii) The incumbent was selected to the permanent post in continuation to the ad hoc or temporary service without any break. 6. Hundreds of college teachers from Maharashtra are assembled, to day at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, requesting the UGC for appropriate action. In the light of the above stated points, we now request you that :- The UGC be directed to communicate to the state of Maharashtra the date (Which could only be the date of appointment for the reasons mentioned in para 5 above) of the effect of the said approval of the UGC arising out of it's decision at item no of its 479th meeting held on 8th July 2011 as directed by the Hon ble High Court, as mentioned in para 3 above. Thanking you in anticipation. Prof. Shivajirao Patil Dr.Tapati Mukhopadhyay Dr. P.B. Raghuwanshi President Secretary Vice President MAHARASHTRA FEDERATION OF UNIVERSITY & COLLEGE TEACHERS ORGANISATIONS (MFUCTO) Copy forwarded to Hon'ble Chairman, University Grants Commission for further necessary action. **FS : P 91 **

6 EÚ S Ø i + Ω. EÚ i EÚ, +{ <«± Ω + V S E Úh ± Ω M i h Æ x Ω. (2) +v I x { f + Ω M i ± EÚ, =t EÚ x h «Ω <«±? S x ]ı { Ω i h M Ω h Æ x Ω. + V + { ± Æ V Œ l i + Ω i ± i Âb n h S i Æ EÚÆ S ± M i. E Ú Ω i M b x l h ={ M S `ˆÆ i x Ω. + V 1991 i 1999 EÚ ± J b i ± EÚ n Æ Æ i i E Ú± ± M Æ x ]ı- ]ı I EÚ S +x EÚ EÚ Æ t { `ˆ +x n x + M S x h «x i x h «x i Æ Z ± ± + Ω i. f x x Ω EÚ Æ { f ± h + Ω i. :- (1) t { `ˆ x { n S V Ω Æ i x EÚØ x n i x V Ω Æ i v x ]ı ]ıs { j i x n E Ú± x Ω i + I EÚ (2) t { `ˆ x { n S V Ω Æ i x EÚØ x n i x I EÚ S V Ω Æ i v NET/SLET/ Preference / or + x n E Ú± Ω i + I EÚ. (3) t { `ˆ x { n S V Ω Æ i x EÚØ x n i x I EÚ S V Ω Æ i v NET/SLET AND S Ø { i x n E Ú± + I EÚ (4) I EÚ x UGC EÚb x Exemption + ±, Placement Z ± Exemption withdraw E Ú± M ± + I EÚ (5) I EÚ x UGC EÚb x Exemption + ±, Placement Z ± x Ω Exemption withdraw E Ú± M ± + I EÚ (6) I EÚ x UGC EÚb x Exemption + ±, Placement Z ± Exemption withdraw E Ú± M ± x Ω + I EÚ (7) t { `ˆ +x n x + M x Exemption n ±, Placement Z ± Ω S ± EÚ x i x Æ i x n h V S i i x i { h Ø E Ú± + Ω + I EÚ. (8) t { `ˆ +x n x + M x Exemption n ±, Placement Z ± Ω S ± EÚ x i x Æ i x n h S i i f i x Ø x EÚÆ h S x h «P i ± + I EÚ. (9) t { `ˆ +x n x + M x Exemption n ±, Placement Z ± Ω S ± EÚ x i x Æ i x n h S i i EÚ h i S EÚ Æ <«E Ú± x Ω Ú+ I EÚ. (10) UGC x EÚ Ω EÚ Æ h i Exemption x EÚ Æ ± + I EÚ (11) <i Æ EÚ Æ S I EÚ (3) x 1991 i x 1999 EÚ ± J b i ± BEÚ S M «i ± I EÚ S M h +x EÚ EÚ Æ i Z ± + { h x Œ S i { h EÚ h i EÚ Æ i i S S Æ + ± EÚ M n { j S + v Æ Æ v i I EÚ ± S EÚÆ ± M ± i i Œ l i ± i Âb n h `ˆ n i B V M EÚÆ h S EÚ r HÚ M i { i Æ S EÚÆ ± M ±. f x x + EÚ M n { j S n BEÚ Ú «i Æ EÚØ x HÚ & V ± M ±. V h EÚØ x i EÚ I EÚ S i i { f ± Ω i P ]ıx S ={ M `ˆ Ω V { h ={ ± v Æ Ω ±. :- (1) Full Name of the Teacher (2) Age (3) Address (4) Occupation (5) Name of the College (6) Letter of approval of the advertisement by the University (7) Copy of advertisement published in newspaper (8) Selection committee report (9) Order of the Appointment (10) Approval of the Teacher by University (11) Copy of U.G..C. Exemption letter (12) Copy of the cancellation of the exemption by UGC, if there is any. (13) Placement report (14) University certificate for placement (15) Copy of O/C Submitted to Joint Director (4) Æ Æ S S Êi + ± ± BEÚ t i +v I x { π]ı{ h J ± E Ú± EÚ, + ""x ]ı/ ]ı O i I EÚ S P >applex x ± x P π «`ˆ x v M ËÆ M EÚÆ h S EÚ h i Ω x h «P ]ıx x P i ± ± x Ω. Æ J x + x v P ]ıx EÚv Ω Œ EÚ Æ i x Ω. Œ EÚ Æ S i Ω i Æ J EÚi v x n u Æ S Œ EÚ Æ ± V i. Æ J x E Úh + x v M EÚÆ i + ± i Æ i EÚ P ]ıx S EÚ i { v x Ω.'' +v I x i i + Ω P π i E Ú± EÚ, "" EÚ `ˆ P ]ıx V { S + ± ± x v { Æ + x { h «M «`ˆ BEÚS x h «EÚÆ x P h i ± M EÚ h i Ω x v S + EÚi h Æ x Ω. { h «M «`ˆ BEÚS x h «Ω h i +{ + ± BEÚ BEÚ EÚ Æ i ± BEÚBEÚ I EÚ `ˆ x ± x P π «EÚÆ h S + ± i { Æ Œ l i i EÚÆ S ={ V x i P ]ıx S { i Æ + v EfiÚi { h x h «P x i x h «± ]ı x v + v EfiÚi { h V Ω Æ E Ú± V i ±.'' x ]ı : (i) x ]ı ]ı i P b ± ± v P ]ıx S tœ l i n «h Æ +v I S M «n «x x Æ P ]ıx S Ω S. b Ï. h Æ P x i Æ E Ú± ± 18 t S ]ı{ h <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ 45 i 52 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. i + i x 2011 S x ]ı ± ]ı x S { fiπ`ˆ 92 i 100 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± + Ω NUTA BULLETIN - 90 (ii) Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x P ]ıx S Ω S b Ï. h Æ P x n x EÚ 18, 2011 Æ V { `ˆ ± ± { j <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ 56 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. i + i x 2011 S x ]ı ± ]ı x S { fiπ`ˆ 92 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± + Ω. π GÚ EÚ 543 : Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x t { `ˆ +x n x + M n x EÚ 7, 2011 Æ V n ± ± { j Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x t { `ˆ +x n x + M n x EÚ 7, 2011 Æ V n ± ± { j S x Ân P h i + ±. x ]ı : Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x t { `ˆ +x n x + M n x EÚ 7, 2011 Æ V n ± ± { j <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ 53 i 56 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. i + i x 2011 S x ]ı ± ]ı x S { fiπ`ˆ 101 i 102 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± + Ω. π GÚ EÚ 544 : Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x P ]ıx S Ω S b Ï. h Æ P x { `ˆ ± ± { j Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x P ]ıx S Ω S b Ï. h Æ P x { `ˆ ± ± { j S x Ân P h i + ±. x ]ı : Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x P ]ıx S Ω S b Ï. h Æ P x n x EÚ 18, 2011 Æ V { `ˆ ± ± { j <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ 56 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. i + i x 2011 S x ]ı ± ]ı x S { fiπ`ˆ 92 Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± + Ω. π GÚ EÚ 545 : i l ± n «{ h { Æ π n ĭ { Æ i Z ± ± S Æ Ωį { h «`ˆÆ n x EÚ 26, 2011 Æ V i l Z ± ± n «{ h { Æ π n i { Æ i Z ± ± { f ± S Æ Ω i { h «`ˆÆ S Æ i P h i + ±. `ˆÆ i x HÚ Z ± ± i Ω i HÚ EÚÆ h i i + Ω. :- `ˆÆ GÚ EÚ 1 «i Æ V S Ω h, >apple Ω Ω Æ, + Æ.E Ú.{ ]ı ±, Æ Æ n J, {.E Ú.n J, M { Æ J b EÚÆ, π Æ x J b, n EÚ x n x, x x Ω E Ú] ı, ± I h Æ ]ıeúæ, { f Æ x l { ]ı ± i ieú ± x V π`ˆ x i x n x EÚ 28 {] ı Æ 1953 Æ V x M { Æ EÚÆ Æ EÚØ x fir Ω Æ π] ı S x EÚ { f S { Æ h E Ú±. Ω Æ π] ı i π]ı Ω h n «, Æ `ˆ b = «Æ i Ω Æ π] ı i x Ω M S i ± EÚ Ω <«± S CEÚ { EÚÆ Æ x P ± x n ± ± + Ω. E Ú EÚÆ Æ Æ Ω M π]ı l ± x Ω i Æ i ieú ± x M fiω j. M À n ±± { i S +v I i J ± ± n S = M fiω S HÚ S EÚi i { f BEÚ i x + { ± EËÚ Ú i b x, P ]ıx i EÚ± 371(2) π]ı EÚØ x, x M { Æ EÚÆ Æ ± P ]ıx i EÚ l x x n h i + S i ieú ± x V π`ˆ x i x ±. Ω Æ π] ı Æ V S x à i S i ieú ± x J j V π`ˆ x i. i Æ V S Ω h x v x b i n x EÚ 13 S «1960 Æ V E Ú± ± v Æ h i EÚ x n x i S { x SS Æ E Ú± ± + Ω. Ω Æ π] ı S i x Ω M S i ± EÚ ± P ]ıx i EÚ i Æ i n S CEÚ + v π`ˆ x + x r +x EÚ EÚ I j v n EÚ + i ± `ˆ h v fī + x V ± À S x S I j v + i ± x +GÚ GÚ Ø { v Æ h E Ú± ± + Ω. x 2001 x i Æ. Æ V { ± S x nê x Æ h i x v ={ ± v Z ± i Æ (i S { Æ Ω h i +x EÚ +b S h x «h EÚÆ h i + ± Ω ± I i P x ) r Œ l i v EÚ h i Ω n ± Z ± x Ω ; + Æ i Ω ± M S +x π V x 1982 v 417 Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Ω i. i 2009 v BEÚ Ω C]ıÆ x V Æ EÚ Z ± + i i Æ i EÚ Z ± + S Ω h ± M ± + i { h v EÚÆ h S x S +Ω ± h i + i V x 2009 v Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Z ± + Ω. x M { Æ Ω ± M S +x π V x 1982 v 110 Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Ω i i 2009 v BEÚ Ω C]ıÆ x V Æ EÚ Z ± + i i Æ i EÚ Z ± + S Ω h ± M ± + i { h v EÚÆ h S

7 2011- NUTA BULLETIN Ω ± h i + i V x 2009 v Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Z ± + Ω. n «S +x π V x 1982 v 527 Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Ω i i 2009 v BEÚ Ω C]ıÆ x V Æ EÚ Z ± + i i Æ i EÚ Z ± + S Ω h ± M ± + i. { h v EÚÆ h S +Ω ± h i + i V x 2009 v Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Z ± + Ω. Æ `ˆ b S +x π V x 1982 v 260 Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Ω i i 2009 v BEÚ Ω C]ıÆ x V Æ EÚ Z ± + i i Æ i EÚ Z ± + S Ω h ± M ± + i, { h v EÚÆ h S +Ω ± h i + i V x 2009 v 501 Ω V Æ Ω C]ıÆ S Z ± + Ω. n «S V f V ± i +x π Ω i i { ËEÚ BEÚ Ω V ± S +x π { π]ı i + ± ± x Ω Ω V f J Æ + Ω, i f S Ω Ω J Æ EÚ { ËEÚ BEÚ Ω V ± S +x π EÚ r Z ± x Ω, =± ]ı i n {{ ]ı ÀEÚ V V n {{ ]ı Z ± Ω Æ ± + EÚb Æ x { π]ı Ω i. Ω Æ π] ı Æ V + { ± h «Ω i π «V Æ EÚÆ i + i x + i Ω k x j i À S x +x π x O i + M i Ú Æ `ˆ h i f ± ± V ± À S x EÚ I j i ± +x π EÚ EÚÆ h `ˆ «{ i Ø x ix EÚÆ h S x v «Æ Ω { Æ π n HÚ EÚÆ i + Ω. `ˆÆ GÚ EÚ 2 2 (1) + Ãl EÚ +x π Ø x EÚ f h S v Æ h ]ı EÚ E ÚS EÚ `ˆÆ ± i i V `ˆÆ h S x h «P h + EÚ Z ± + Ω. + Ãl EÚ +x π S +l «i S Æ V Æ Æ Æ Ω C]ıÆ v x P ± ± Ë i EÚ +x π S + n V EÚ ±{ x EÚ EÚ i v Ø x EÚ f ± ± Ø { i ± +x π Ω. + Ãl EÚ +x π x EÚ f h S Ω { r i { h «{ h Z ]ı `ˆÆ ± ± + Ω. n b EÚÆ i S +Ω ± i ( { f { Ω ± +Ω ± Ω h ) Ω EÚ i Ω C]ıÆ 10 Ω V Æ Ø { v Æ ± + Ω, i Æ +x π x nê EÚ i S +Ω ± i ( { f n Æ +Ω ± Ω h ) i 50 Ω V Æ Ø { i Ω C]ıÆ "" Ω Æ π] ı V ± { k x x v EÚÆ h Ãπ EÚ +Ω ± '' ( { f i Æ +Ω ± Ω h ) v i EÚ i 80 Ω V Æ Ø { i Ω C]ıÆ v Æ ± ± + Ω. Ø { i ± EÚ i i S n Æ S Æ + v Æ ± ± + i i. i I i f i EÚ i i Æ CEÚ i i f i V i. i + Ãl EÚ +x π x EÚ f h S Ω { n b { h «{ h Ω { n `ˆÆ ±. =n Ω Æ h Ω h x t S Z ± { Ω ± +Ω ± x V ± À S x S n «S + Ãl EÚ +x π 527 EÚ ]ı Ø { Æ `ˆ b S EÚ ]ı Ø { x Œ S i E Ú± Ω i. i { I EÚi i Æ V i x v 2007 { i n x Ω M v J S «Z ± + ± i Æ BEÚ Ω C]ıÆ S r +x π n Æ Z ± ± x Ω. { Ω ±, n i +Ω ± S EÚ V { «EÚ + ± EÚx E Ú± Ω Œ l i ± I i i. 2 (2) n Æ π S Æ V Æ Æ Æ Ë i EÚ +x π +t i EÚÆ h S v Æ h Œ EÚ Æ h S + EÚi + i x «h Z ± + Ω. +x π x «± x S BE Ún Æ v Æ h v, BEÚ Ω h V + Ãl EÚ +x π (Ø { i ± ) n Æ EÚÆ h S v Æ h Œ EÚ Æ h n Æ Ω h V BEÚ π]ı π «S Æ Æ Æ EÚ f ± ± +x π, ({ f S { f S i EÚ π +t i x EÚÆ i ) n Æ EÚÆ h S v Æ h Œ EÚ Æ h Ω n x ` ˆ n π + V { i S v Æ h i Ω i + { Æ π n ± ]ıi. 2 (3) M EÚ h i Ω j h l { x x EÚÆ i n Æ Ω + v x S EÚ± 20 +x v EÚÆ h Æ J v j h EÚb n Æ π S V x S Æ Æ Æ ± +x π n J h S Ω V EÚ { ± ± + Ω i S ={ M n Æ π S Æ V Æ Æ Æ ± +x π +t i EÚÆ h S EÚ + { ± ± EÚ x P i <«±. i EÚ π EÚÆ h i + ± ± + Ãl EÚ i Æ i n i x i EÚ V ± S Ë i EÚ +x π EÚi Ω C]ıÆ x EÚ Z ± i π «i Æ V Æ Æ f ± i EÚi f ± Ω h V BE Úh EÚi EÚ Z ± ÀEÚ V i Z ± S n Æ π S S j v EÚÆ h S j h S v i x + { ± ± +t i EÚÆ i <«±. + Æ i x n Æ π S Ë i EÚ M i S f ± ± Æ V Æ Æ S + v Æ Æ n Æ π S i EÚ V ± S V ± À S x +x π S S j +t i EÚÆ h Ω Æ V x S v Æ h S +{ Æ Ω «M + + { Æ π n S M h + Ω. 2 (4) V ± À S x EÚ I j `ˆ n Æ π ={ ± v Ω h x v { ËEÚ M Æ +x π V ± `ˆ +x π V ± `ˆ EÚi x v ={ ± v EÚ x t i i v x i S Ú Æ S i i b x + ± V h EÚÆ + M h Ω { Æ π n EÚÆ i + Ω. `ˆÆ GÚ EÚ 3 n S. { i v x x n «S + i Ω k O i M ± i & i I ]ı n ±. E Ú ]ı n ±, + x Ω i Æ EÂÚp x S i x + v EfiÚi { h { j EÚ EÚ f x ""+ i Ω k Ω h M EÚ Æ h +x EÚ + ± i Æ À S x v S + Ω J EÚ Æ h + Ω.'' + Æ M S x n x E Ú±, E Ú Æ M S x n x EÚØ x. { i v x l ± x Ω i i Æ i x + i Ω k O i 6 V ± i ± À S x EÚ±{ { h «EÚÆ h `ˆ 2177 EÚ ]ı Ø { S x v ={ ± v EÚ x n ±. V EÚ±{ `ˆ x v ={ ± v EÚØ x n ± i EÚ±{ S n v n S GÚ EÚ Æ +{{ Æ v «EÚ±{ x n + Ω. Ω { h À S x `ˆ S { Æ ± V <«± + EÚÆ Æ x Ω Æ π] ı x EÂÚp x v Z ± + Ω. 2-3 π Ê i h { j n x EÚ ]ı v Ø { S x v À S x v S Ãv i M V x + i M «i Æ V S V ± { n M S + v EÚ x ± + Ω. + + i x V + v EÚ x x v + h i x EÚÆ Æ { j Æ h { j Æ E Ú± i S + v EÚ x Ω M π]ı Æ V EÚ x i fii S ± I i x + h x n i J V M b ± n Æ M x i v x À S x S 300 n. ±.P.. { h { ËEÚ 100 n.±.p.. { h E Úx ]ı EÚ±. Ω Æ Æ EÂÚp x S Ú h EÚ EÚÆ h Æ EfiÚi + Ω. EfiÚk ± V n Æ + ± ± + v EÚ S S ËEÚ EÚÆ h i i S Æ EÚ Æ <«EÚÆ h i + M h Ω { Æ π n EÚÆ i + Ω. Ω k +x π + ± ± { Ω ± 5 V ± v + Æ i i V ± S Ø i { x + Ω + V Ω i GÚ EÚ + Ω, + + i x n x Ω V ± i ± { h M Æ À S x S V x `ˆ h «x h «S { x à S Æ EÚØ x i x h «Æ q EÚÆ h i i + M h Ω { Æ π n EÚÆ i + Ω. { i v x { ÏE ÚV v + ± n x V ± S M =±± J E Ú± + ± i Æ v Æ h Ω h x + Ω M h EÚÆḣ i i + Ω EÚ, n «i ± Ω į V ± i V ± À S x S `ˆ h i +x π + ± n «i n h i + ± ± + Ëπh EÚ EÚ±{ S Æ `ˆ { Æ x M i i b x Æ q EÚÆ h i i i EÚÆ i x Ω Æ π] ı S i x Ω M i + EÚ Æ S + ËŒπh EÚ EÚ±{ S x ]ı{ EÚÆ, + S P ]ıx i EÚ + v EÚ Æ S Æ I h EÚÆ h i + M h Ω { Æ π n EÚÆ i + Ω. `ˆÆ GÚ EÚ 4 i EÚ V ± À S x EÚ±{ S x V x v π S S Æ EÚ x EÚ Ω l b { h Ω =t M `ˆ Æ J x ` ˆ ± ± + i S. i { h S { Æ Ω Æ V M Æ x «h EÚÆ h Æ =t M, i { Æ EÚ =t M, l x EÚ Æ V M Æ x Æ V M Æ n h Æ ± P =t M n π h Æ Ω i =t M x à i `ˆ { Æ ± V <«± + +{ I + i. n ní x Ω l b { h r x M h Æ V M Æ ={ ± v EÚÆ h, `ˆ h i À S x I i M h BEÚ S M i + x n π h x «h EÚÆ h V EÚ±{ EÚb h S l «x EÚ h Ω EÚ x EÚi x Ω + { Æ π n S i + Ω. x ]ı : n x EÚ 26, 2011 Æ V i l Z ± ± n «{ h { Æ π n i { Æ i Z ± ± ={ Æ HÚ S Æ Ω i { h «`ˆÆ <«BC Ú <«± S { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ Æ fii EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. π GÚ EÚ : 546 M h J : x ]ı S P ]ıx i ± J b 5 v + ± ± i Æ i n x Æ M h J S + Ø i ± +v «i `ˆ i Ω E Ú EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i, Ω EÚ «fik v x Ân h i i + Ω, + +v I x V Ω Æ E Ú±. π GÚ EÚ : 547 l q ± + Æ : EÚ «EÚ Æ b S i x +v I x Ω t ± S S «l x EÚ J S <i Æ v { EÚ, V ±Ω x ]ı S +v I, S n, x Ω EÚÆ h `ˆ P i ± ± { Æ q ± + h n ± ± Ω EÚ «q ± i S x :{ «EÚ + Æ x ±. ]ı «={ Œ l i n S + Æ x x { ± + +v I x V Ω Æ E Ú±. /.]ı.n J +v I ***** / BEÚx l EÚ`ˆ S

8 NUTA BULLETIN - 92 x ]ı ]ı i P b ± ± v P ]ıx S tœ l i x n EÚÆḣ t S ]ı{ h (1) n x EÚ 27 Ú Æ 2011 Æ V Z ± ± x ]ı S + S EÚ «fik v π GÚ EÚ 529 ( ) Æ { f ± EÚ «fik S x Ân + Ω. :- ""={ Æ HÚ i Æ ± S S Êi ]ı Ω M Ω i x +v I x + { ± π h i x ]ı ]ıs +]ı { Æ i Æ i i Z ± ± I EÚ S i i n EÚ i Æ Æ ± ix Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P S x ]ı S i Æ Æ Ω i + i x + { Æ i Æ i i Ω i + ± ± i EÚ I EÚ x HÚ & { Æ { b S V n Æ i +x EÚ I EÚ S n ± «I Ω i + ± q ± i µ ÀS i HÚ E Ú±. i x i Æ +v I x + { ± π h i (1) { n S V Ω Æ i x Æ +V «EÚÆ h S ]ıs i Æ J =± ] ıx M ± x i Æ { j i S +]ı v n ± EÚÆ i i x Ω. i. =SS x ± S ÊSS x ± S +x EÚ x h «S Ω i n ±. (2) x M { Æ t { `ˆ I j v i S (3) + Æ i t { `ˆ I j v + V i EÚ Œ l i + Ω S i { ± M x (4) HÚ & i EÚ n x { Æ { b S EÚ Æ <«S q i { ± Æ { h x n E Ú±. Ω V n Æ HÚ & l i I EÚ x S { Æ { b S + Ω. i i i EÚ h i Ω Ω M ÀEÚ x πeú V { h Ω i EÚ x S i EÚ x EÚ V P + +v I x x n E Ú±.'' (2) x ]ı ± ]ı x v ={ Æ HÚ EÚ «fik EÚ i Z ± x i Æ +x EÚ I EÚ x i S t S i { ± V h x P h `ˆ P ]ıx S +v I { n v EÚ { E«Ú E Ú±. M ± + S + ± ± Œ l i i x i Æ P b ± ± v P ]ıx ± I i P i x i S q x Ω Ω i fii EÚÆ h S x h «P h i + ±. +v I S M «n «x x Æ P ]ıx S Ω S.b Ï. h Æ P x i Æ EÚ ± ± t S { f ± ]ı{ h fii EÚÆ i + Ω i. :- (1) l x x Œ S i `ˆ x ]ı ]ı HÚ S EÚÆ h Æ + n V ± M P ± M ±. 1.1 x ]ı ]ı HÚ S EÚÆ h Æ Æ M ± x V x 1991 v EÚ f ±. i x i Æ 1998 v BEÚ x ]ı ÚE Ú x EÚ f x Æ π`ˆ h `ˆ x b h `ˆ x ]ı ]ı HÚ S + ±. (Para of UGC Notification dated 24th December 1998, - P 20 of NB 1999) + i Æ i n t { `ˆ +x n x + M x E Ú± Ω i { h ÊSS x ± S 1994 S x h «i x i M P ± M ±. V x «+ v S x Æ q EÚÆ ± M ± 4 B ± 2000 Æ V x x Æ M ± x EÚ f ± M ±. i Æ M ± x v ± { Ω ± S C { f ± h :- ""In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) & (g) of sub-section (1) of Section 26 read with Section 14 of University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (3 of 1956), and in supersession of the Regulations issued under University Grants Commission letter No.F.1-93/74 (CPP) Part (v) dated 13th June,1983 and No.F.1-11/87 (CPP-II) dated 19th September,1991 and Notification No.1-93/74(CP) dated 19th February, 1985, 26th November, 1985 and No.F.3-1/ 94 (PS) dated 24th December, 1998, the University Grants Commission hereby makes the following regulations,'' (P 66 of NB 2000) 1.2 V x «Æ M ± x Æ h Æ q EÚØ x x ]ı ]ı i t { `ˆ +x n x + M x + { ± EÚ 4 B ± 2000 S Æ M ± x n Æ { π]ı E Ú± ± + Ω. ""EÚ h i Ω HÚ ± (No person) x ]ı ]ıs { j i { Æ I =k h «E Ú± t { `ˆ i x Ω t ± i x I EÚ { n Æ x i h Æ x Ω '' + { π]ı{ h J b 2 v x n EÚ Æ i + i x S t { `ˆ +x n x + M x + { ± x ± n Æ { Æ i EÚ V b ± ± + Ω. { S x ± M ± ± HÚ S i i { Æ i EÚ v + `ˆ { h x n EÚÆ h i + ± ± + Ω EÚ :- "" Provided further that these regulations shall not be applicable to such cases where selections of the candidates having had the then requisite minimum qualification as were existing at that time through duly constituted Selection Committees for making appointments to the teaching posts have been made prior to the enforcement of these regulations.'' (P 66 of NB 2000) (2) ÊSS x ± S Ω i { h «x h «2. Civil Appeal No of 1994, decided on , in University of Delhi, Appellant v/s Raj Singh and others, Respondents. A.M. AHMADI AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ. : AIR 1995 SUPREME COURT 336 EÚÆ h i. ÊSS x ± x { f ± h x h «n ±. :- ""i) Regulations are valid : Regulations (1991), notified on 19th September, 1991, by the University Grants Commission are valid. ii) recommendatory : The provisions of clause 2 of the said Regulations are, therefore, recommendatory in character. iii) application prospective : The second proviso to clause 2 makes the application of the said Regulations prospective.'' (P 316 of NB 2001) MAHARASHTRA FEDERATION OF UNIVERSITY & COLLEGE TEACHER S ORGANISATION Registered under the Trade Union Act No By II-8162 of 1985 Affiliated to the All India Federation of University and College Teacher s Organizations (AIFUCTO) Vidyapeeth Vidyarthi Bhavan, B Road, Churchgate, Mumbai PRESIDENT GENERAL SECRETARY Prof. Shivajirao Patil Dr. Tapati Mukhopadhyay SHIVAI 39 Rewu Nagar, Dheku Road, Park Side 3, Wing, Flat No Kulupwadi Amalner , District Jalgaon Road, Borivali (East) Mumbai ( ) Date: 18th May 2011 ( , ) Prof Praveen Raghuwanshi Dear Friend, This is to inform you that, in response to our memorandum submitted to UGC on 7 th may 2011 (for counting of services for the purpose of placement benefit in respect of teachers appointed in Maharashtra from to ) UGC chairman has given an appointment to the MFUCTO delegation on 10 th June 2011 at 11am at UGC head office Delhi (Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg New Delhi). As you are a part of the delegation you are requested to be in Delhi office before 11am on Friday10 th June You make all your arrangement for your travel and stay at Delhi with the help of your local organization. Thanking you Tapati Mukhopadhyay ]ı{ : + S { j P ]ıx S +v I..]ı.n J x {i Z ± + Ω. **AF : P 201 **

9 2011- NUTA BULLETIN - 93 ÊSS x ± x t { `ˆ +x n x + M S x ]ı ]ı i S 1991 S Æ M ± x S i { ± Æ ± π h EÚÆ h Æ V x b n x EÚ Æ V n ± i x Æ Ω Æ M ± x Ú Æ S Ø { S (The provisions of clause 2 of the said Regulations are, therefore, recommendatory in character.) + Ω. i Ci S EÚÆ S ÀEÚ x Ω i S x h «t { `ˆ x Æ V x x P S + Ω. i x h «P h i + ± i { Æ x ÀEÚ h Ω i x M «i E Ú± x i Æ S EÚ i (The second proviso to clause 2 makes the application of the said Regulations prospective.) ± M { b ±, { «± I x x Ω. Ω Æ M ± x = n Æ `ˆ (Relates to all applicants i.e. candidates) ± M + Ω i, + i x h «v { π]ı EÚÆ h i + ± ± + Ω. ÊSS x ± S i x h «{ f 4 B ±, 2000 S Æ M ± x + M ± x M «i EÚÆ ± M ±. i x Æ ""EÚ h i Ω HÚ ± (No person) x ]ı ]ıs { j i { Æ I =k h «E Ú± t { `ˆ i x Ω t ± i x I EÚ { n Æ x i h Æ x Ω '' + { π]ı{ h x n EÚ Æ i + i x S t { `ˆ +x n x + M ± + { ± x ± BEÚ { Æ i EÚ V b ± M ±. { S x ± M ± ± HÚ S i i { Æ i EÚ v + `ˆ { h x n EÚÆ h i + ± ± + Ω EÚ :- "" Provided further that these regulations shall not be applicable to such cases where selections of the candidates having had the then requisite minimum qualification as were existing at that time through duly constituted Selection Committees for making appointments to the teaching posts have been made prior to the enforcement of these regulations.'' l S i Æ i +Œ i i i + ± ± x b i S «Úi V S x b Z ± ± + Ω i +Œ i i i + ± ± EÚ x { j i V v Æ h EÚÆ i i i x x ]ı ]ıs { j i S x ± M + h Æ x Ω, + x 2000 S Æ M ± x v { π]ı{ h x n + Ω. (3) BEÚn x ]ı ]ı { x "BCZ x ' n ± EÚ i x h EÚ x i Z ± (Regularised) + V ± M ±. 3. ÊSS x ± S ={ Æ HÚ x h «i ± { Æ SU Ùn 24 { f ± h + Ω.:- 24. As analyzed above, therefore the Delhi University may appoint as a lecturer in itself and its affiliated colleges one who has cleared the test prescribed by the said Regulations or it may seek prior approval for the relaxation of this requirement in a M h EÚ j ËEÚŒ±{ EÚ π ± +x n x n i x n ± V h Æ n { h «M h EÚ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY; NAGPUR BENCH; NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No.64/2011 In Writ Petition No.3510/2010 Petitioners :- (1) Smt. Narasamma Hirayya Educational Trust, Amravati, Through its Secretary, Shri Suresh Wamanrao Chimanpure, Ambika Nagar, Amravati. (2) Arts, Commerce and Science College, Kirannagar, Amravati, Through its Principal, Dr. Shrikant Deshpande. -:Versus:- Respondent :- Shri Mahesh Pathak, Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32. A F F I D A V I T I, Shri Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 50 years, presently working as Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32, do hereby take oath and state as under :- 1. I state that the present petition has been filed by the petitioner trust alleging dis-obedience of the order passed by this Hon ble Court on and praying to the Hon ble Court to issue directions to the respondent to purge the contempt and comply with the directions issued by this Hon ble Court and take a policy decision in respect of grant of permission to start Computer Science / Engineering courses and the petitioner alleges that by not taking a policy decision the respondents have flouted the orders passed by this Hon ble Court. 2. I most respectfully state before this Hon ble Court that I was impleaded as party respondent on and direction was issued by this Hon ble Court to inform about time frame within which the State Government would take a decision in respect of grant-in-aid facility being made available to the Computer Science. I have perused the various orders passed by the Hon ble Court as well as the copy of contempt petition. I am filing the present affidavit on the basis of official record of the department. I most respectfully state that the issue as regards whether the grant in aid should be made available to the subject in Computer Science, Electronic and Physical Education was placed for discussion in the meeting of Cabinet held on The Cabinet, arrived at the following decision in the meeting held on (i) The State Government prior to and from 1989 to and from 1991 to 2001 had granted permission to conduct and impart education in Computer Science, Electronic and Physical Education on permanent no grant in aid basis. The said decision of the State Government is modified and approval is granted to bring 135 colleges imparting education in Computer Science, 8 colleges imparting education in Electronic subject and 19 colleges imparting education in Physical Education to be brought on 100% grant in aid w.e.f. 1st April (ii) For this purpose 586 posts would be admissible for grant. (iii) Expenditure to be incurred to the tune of Rs Crores as additional expenditure should be approved of. 3. In view of aforesaid position I state before this Hon ble Court that the grievance made by the petitioner in the contempt petition is now redressed and a policy is taken by the State Government for making grant in aid available to the colleges imparting education in Computer Science. Hence, this affidavit. Nagpur. Date: Deponent Drafted by (Mrs. B.H.Dangre) Addl. Government Pleader, V E R I F I C A T I O N Verified and signed at Mumbai on this 29th day of August, 2011, that I have carefully gone through the contents of above paras 1 to 3. I find them to have been correctly drafted by my counsel in accordance with my instructions, written as well as oral. I state that the contents thereof from paras 1 to 3 are based on official record and believed to be true by me. Deponent. Solemnly affirmed before me by Sanjay Kumar is identified before me by V.G.Chandekar ***** whom I personally know This 29th day of August, 2011 at Mumbai ***** (R.D.Sankhe) Joint Secretary (Law) Government of Maharashtra (Empowered under Oaths Act) ***** I know the deponent. V.G.Chandekar Desk Officer, H. & T.E.D.

10 specific case; or it may appoint as lecturer one who does not meet this requirement without having first obtained the UGC's approval, in which event it would if it failed to show cause for it's failure to abide by the said Regulations to the satisfaction of the UGC, forfeit its grant from the U.G.C. If however it did show cause to the satisfaction of the U.G.C., it not only would not forfeit its grant but the appointment made without obtaining the U.G.C s prior approval would stand regularized. (P 316 of NB 2001) (4) v { EÚ { n `ˆ { j i `ˆÆ h S v v 4. Ω Æ π] ı v { EÚ Ω P x t { `ˆ +x n x + M ± n x EÚ 30 S «2003 Æ V { `ˆ ± ± x n x i ± { Æ SU Ùn 2 { f ± h + Ω. :- ""2. LAWFUL INSTRUMENT FOR PRESCRIBING QUALIFICATIONS: 2.1 The Non-Agricultural Universities in Maharashtra, viz, University of Mumbai, SNDT Women's University, University of Pune, Nagpur University, Amravati University, Shivaji University, North Maharashtra University, Dr. Babasaheb Marathwada University and NUTA BULLETIN - 94 Ramanand Tirth University are governed by the provisions of the Maharashtra Universities Act, Section 51(8) of the said Act provides that Recruitment and Qualifications of the teachers of the Universities and the affiliated colleges is to be regulated by Statutes to be made by the Universities. In case Statutes do not exist or where Statutes exist but they need to be amended, and if in the opinion of the Universities it is likely to take time before new Statutes could be brought into existence or existing Statutes could be amended, Section 14(8) of the Act provides the Vice Chancellors with powers to issue directions. 2.2 Section 8(3) of the said Act empowers the State Government to issue Standard Code for the purpose of securing and maintaining uniform standards by Notification in the official Gazette. 2.3 It may be pointed out that the UGC is fully aware of such provisions in the Universities Act in different States in the country and therefore in all the Regulations/ Notifications that the UGC has been issuing from time to time, the UGC has been emphasizing that it would be necessary for the Universities to make Statutes to implement the UGC Notifications/Regulations.'' (P 596 of NB 2001) t { `ˆ x ]ıs x b h EÚ S J S «S Ω (1) t { `ˆ x ]ıs i EÚ x b h EÚ S +v I S x i fii J ± = n Æ S { Ïx ± V = E Ú± V i i x b h EÚ S Æ l «Ω h Æ EÚ J S «Ω = n Æ S i i. +±{ Æ CEÚ i EÚ = n Æ EÚb x EÚ V E Ú± V i. x ]ı S EÚ «EÚ Æ b S BJ n n Æ n Ω h x V J S «S EÚ ] ıeú Æ { h Ω ` ˆ i. Ω J S «EÚ ]ıeú Æ x EÚÆ EÚ h i Ω { Æ Œ l i i V { I J S «V i Ω >apple x + v x + i. Æ n S x ]ı Ω ` ˆ i i. Ω +v I x n Æ Z ± EÚ i = n Æ Æ + h /ÀEÚ EÚ «EÚ Æ b Æ ` ˆ ± V i i. ±± EÚ Æ EÚ i S x h «r i l S Ω i. (2) x 1995 v Z ± ± i M b M + Æ i t { `ˆ, + Æ i x ]S x b h EÚ `ˆ I EÚ { n v Æ i n Æ P i x BEÚ 55 = n Æ S { Ïx ± = EÚÆ h S x h «P h i + ± Ω i. x b h EÚ S J S «M h `ˆ I EÚ { n v Æ = n Æ EÚb x i EÚ. 1,000/- P h S `ˆÆ± Ω i. i h BE Úh 55 = n Æ S i EÚ. 1,000/- h BE Úh. 55,000/- V Z ± Ω i. i i x x b h EÚ S BE Úh J S «Ø { 38, V V i <i EÚ Æ ±± EÚ Æ Ω ± Ω i. Æ n x n Æ E Ú± ± Ω x ]ı S EÚ «EÚ Æ b x n x EÚ 15 B ± 1995 Æ V Z ± ± Ë`ˆEÚ i π GÚ EÚ 42 +x S Æ i P i ± ±± EÚ x v P ]ıx EÚb { i «EÚÆ h S x h «P i ±. (EÚ «fik i { ± x 1995 S <«-BC Ú <«± { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ 26,27 60 { Ω ) (3) x 2000 v Z ± ± i M b M + Æ i t { `ˆ, + Æ i x ]S x b h EÚ `ˆ I EÚ { n v Æ i n Æ P i x BEÚ 51 = n Æ S { Ïx ± = EÚÆ h S x h «P h i + ± Ω i. x b h EÚ S J S «M h `ˆ I EÚ { n v Æ = n Æ EÚb x i EÚ. 1,000/- P h S `ˆÆ± Ω i. i h BE Úh 51 = n Æ S i EÚ. 1,000/- h BE Úh. 51,000/- + v EÚ i n Æ x Ân h EÚÆ h `ˆ +M n Æ Ω M n ± ± 1400 Ø { + BE Úh Ø { V Z ± Ω i. i i x x b h EÚ S BE Úh J S « V V i <i EÚ Æ ±± EÚ Æ Ω ± Ω i. Æ n x n Æ E Ú± ± Ω x ]ı S EÚ «EÚ Æ b x n x EÚ 11 S «2001 Æ V Z ± ± Ë`ˆEÚ i π GÚ EÚ 36 +x S Æ i P i ± ±± EÚ x v P ]ıx EÚb { i «EÚÆ h S x h «P i ±. (EÚ «fik x 2001 S <«-BC Ú <«± { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ Æ { Ω ) (4) x 2005 v Z ± ± i M b M + Æ i t { `ˆ, + Æ i x ]S x b h EÚ `ˆ I EÚ { n v Æ i n Æ P i x BEÚ 54 = n Æ S { Ïx ± = EÚÆ h S x h «P h i + ± Ω i. i x b h EÚ S J S «M h `ˆ = n Æ EÚb x i EÚ. 1,000/- P h S `ˆÆ± Ω i. i h 54 = n Æ S i EÚ. 1,000/- h BE Úh. 54,000/- V Z ± Ω i. i i x x b h EÚ S BE Úh J S «31, Ø { V V i. 22, <i EÚ Æ ±± EÚ Æ Ω ± Ω i. Æ n x n Æ E Ú± ± Ω x ]ı S EÚ «EÚ Æ b x n x EÚ 17 {]Âı Æ 2006 Æ V Z ± ± Ë`ˆEÚ i π GÚ EÚ 59 +x S Æ i P i ± ±± EÚ x v P ]ıx EÚb { i «EÚÆ h S x h «P i ±. (EÚ «fik x 2006 S <«-BC Ú <«± { fiπ`ˆ GÚ EÚ Æ { Ω ) (5) "" x ]ı v I EÚ S { n v Æ S x Æ ""x ]ı ''x n ± ± S x S { ± x EÚÆ h S x r + ± ± I EÚ { n v Æ = n Æ S { Ïx ± '' x 2010 S i M b M + Æ i t { `ˆ x ]ı x b h EÚ `ˆ = EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. J { fiπ`ˆ Æ "" ]ıs «O ÏS B]ı { Ïx ± S V Ω Æ x '' + l + ± ± 26 { fiπ`ˆ S BEÚ ± Ω x { Œ i EÚ S Æ l «UÙ { x i n Æ x ]ıh i + ± Ω i. { Œ i E ÚS J { fiπ`ˆ Æ P ]ıx S +v I ""..]ı.n J S I EÚ { n v Æ i n Æ x x i '' r EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. x b h EÚ `ˆ I EÚ i n Æ P i x 23 { n v Æ i n Æ P i x 13 + BE Úh 36 = n Æ x { Ïx ± Æ = EÚÆ h i + ± Ω i. i EÚ = n Æ x Ø { S Æ Ω V Æ x b h EÚ S <«EÚ J S «`ˆ Æ n EÚb V E Ú± Ω i. i ± +x EÚ = n Æ x Z EÚb J S «S Ω i S Æ h E Ú± Ø x { f ± h S x EÚÆ h i i + Ω i. :- (1) Æ n x J S «S Ω { f ± 15 n v +v I EÚb n Æ EÚÆ + i x x i EÚÆ h i i + Ω. (2) i x i Æ «= n Æ S Ë`ˆEÚ ± x = «Æ i x v S EÚ EÚÆ S? BEÚ Ω h V ±± EÚ Æ S + ± i Æ i EÚ = n Æ ± { Æ i n h ÀEÚ n Æ Ω h V +±{ + ± i Æ P ]ıx S { i «EÚÆ h i S x h «i Ë`ˆEÚ i S P i ± V <«± v I, "x ]ı '