OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR HIRED LABOR LIVESTOCK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR A B A
|
|
- Homer Dennis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LABOR RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE COST OR VALUE TOTAL HAGE BEEFITS LABOR TYPE ($/HR) (A,B) OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR HIRED LABOR LIVESTOCK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR A A B " ^ Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intendod to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by C13.102
2 LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK FIRST AHE BEEF BULL BEEF COH BEEF HEIFER BUCK DOE DOE QUALIFYIG AHE RAISED RAISED GOAT GOAT YEARLIG REHAIIG LIFE (YR) CURRET HARKET VALUE ($) SALVAGE VALUE ISURACE RATE AUAL LEASE ($) CALC OPTIOS (R,L,P) DESCRIPTIO LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK FIRST AHE EKE EHE HORSE RAH QUALIFYIG AHE YEARLIG R E H A I I G L I F E ( Y R ) CURRET HARKET VALUE ($) S A L V A G E V A L U E ( X ) I S U R A C E R A T E ( X ) A U A L L E A S E ( $ ) C A L C O P T I O S ( R. L. P ) R R P P jp^ JP^ information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by C13.103
3 LAD RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE HARKET VALUE PROPERTY TAX APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (Y,) LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET- B E E T S C O R F O O D C O T T O I C O T T S S D C O T T S S I C R O P FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE HARKET VALUE PROPERTY TAX APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (Y,) LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET F O R A G E F P E A U T I G U A R D G U A R I H A Y I P A S T U R E DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE HARKET VALUE PROPERTY TAX APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (Y,) LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET P A S T U R E I P E C A S S E S A H E I S O R G H U M D S O R G H U H I S O Y B E A S DESCRIPTIO LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD LAD FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE HARKET VALUE PROPERTY TAX APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (Y,) LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET LAD - CASH RET SPEAUTD VEG HHEATD HHEATI PASTURE PASTURE 1/3 IHP DESCRIPTIO LAD LAD LAD LAD FIRST AHE PASTURE PASTURE QUALIFYIG AHE IHPROVED ATIVE HARKET VALUE PROPERTY TAX APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (Y,) PASTURE SH. GRAIS PAST. RAGE '^"\ Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and davaloped by C13.104
4 information presented Is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by C PEREIAL CROP RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE HARKET VALUE PROPERTY TAX REHAIIG LIFE SALVAGE VALUE APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (YR) (Y,) BERKUDA HAY BERKUDA PASTURE BERHUDA PASTURE IRRIG. DRYLAD IRRIG BUFFELGRASS KLEIGRASS PECA CULT. ESTABL. EARLY DESCRIPTIO PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP PEREIAL CROP FIRST AHE PECA PECA PECA PECA PECA QUALIFYIG AHE EARLYHAR ESTABL. ESTABL.I PREHARV. PREHARVI HARKET VALUE () PROPERTY TAX () REHAIIG LIFE (YR) SALVAGE VALUE APPRECIATIO RATE ITEREST RATE AUAL LEASE APP. CALCUATIOS (Y,)
5 BUILDIGS OR IMPROVEMETS RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR) REHAIIG LIFE ( YR) CURRET HARKET VALUE ($) S A LVA G E VA L U E ( X ) PROPERTY TAXES ($/YR) A U A L L E A S E ( $ ) O FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ($) O FARH OHER LABOR (HR) LEASE CALC. (AUAL) BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BAR FECE SHED HATER KORKIG PES >*\ ***\ Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by C13.106
6 Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and developed by C MAAGEMET RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO HAAGEHET F I R S T A H E H I S C A D H I O / H QUALIFYIG AHE X OF TOTAL GROSS X OF TOTAL VARIABLE C O S T P E R B U D G E T U I T ( $ ) 1 6 H A A G E H E T O P T I O ( 3, 4, 5 ) 5
7 IRRIGATIO EQUIPMET OCTOBER 24, 1992 "*s% DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE HORSEPOHER RATIG (HP) FUEL TYPE FUEL CO. (UIT/HR OR /HI) USEFULL LIFE (HR) REHAIIG LIFE (HR) EFFICIECY HIRED LABOR PER SET (HR) OHER LABOR PER SET (HR) UMBER OF SETS CURRET LIST PRICE ($) SALVAGE PERCET CURRET HARKET VALUE ($) LEASE PAYHET ($) O FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ($) O FARH OHER LABOR (HR) AUAL USE BASE (HR) R & H EG. ESTIHATE R & H C A L C. ( 8 1, 8 2 ) LEASE CALC. (HOUR,YEAR) FUEL USE ( DEF., CALC.) BOHLS BOHLS DIST. SYS. FURROH DIST. SYS. FURROH PEAUT DIST. SYS. PIVOT DIST. SYS. TRICKLE SYSTEH A A A HAILIE MAILIE A A A y^s. Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. C13.108
8 Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intanded to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ona particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by C JP DESCRIPTIO MAILIE POHER PLAT POHER PLAT POHER PLAT POHER PLAT IPUMP FIRST AHE MAILIE ELECTRIC ATURAL GAS ATURAL GAS ATURAL GAS PUHP QUALIFYIG AHE PEAUT PECA PEAUT VEG HORSEPOHER RATIG (HP) FUEL TYPE G G G G FUEL CO. (UIT/HR OR /HI) USEFULL LIFE (HR) REHAIIG LIFE (HR) EFFICIECY HIRED LABOR PER SET (HR) A A A A A A OHER LABOR PER SET (HR) A A A A A A UMBER OF SETS A A A A A A CURRET LIST PRICE ($) SALVAGE PERCET CURRET HARKET VALUE ($) LEASE PAYHET ($) O FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ($) O FARH OHER LABOR (HR) AUAL USE BASE (HR) R & H EG. ESTIHATE R & H C A L C. ( 8 1, 8 2 ) LEASE CALC. (HOUR,YEAR) FUEL USE ( DEF..CALC.) DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE KORSEPOHER RATIG (HP) FUEL TYPE FUEL CO. (UIT/HR OR /HI) U S E F U L L L I F E ( H R ) REHAIIG LIFE ( HR) EFFICIECY HIRED LABOR PER SET (HR) OHER LABOR PER SET (HR) UHBER OF SETS CURRET LIST PRICE ($) SALVAGE PERCET CURRET HARKET VALUE ($) L E A S E PAY H E T ( $ ) O FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) OFF FARH PARTS & LABOR ($) O FARH OHER LABOR (HR) AUAL USE BASE (HR) R & H EG. ESTIHATE R & H C A L C. ( 8 1, 8 2 ) LEASE CALC. (HOUR,YEAR) FUEL USE ( DEF..CALC.) PUHP COL.,PIPE,SHAFT DISCHARGE HEAD GEAR DRIVE HATER SOURCE HATER SOURCE PUHP COLUM DISCHARGE RIGHT AGLE HELL HELL PEAUT A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A r
9 D E S C R I P T I O H AT E R S O U R C E H AT E R S O U R C E F I R S T A H E H E L L H E L L Q U A L I F Y I G A H E P E C A V E G KORSEPOHER RATIG (HP) FUEL TYPE FUEL CO. (UIT/HR OR /HI) U S E F U L L L I F E ( H R ) R E H A I I G L I F E ( H R ) EFFICIECY H I R E D L A B O R P E R S E T ( H R ) A A O H E R L A B O R P E R S E T ( H R ) A A U H B E R O F S E T S A A C U R R E T L I S T P R I C E < $ ) SALVAGE PERCET C U R R E T H A R K E T V A L U E ( $ ) L E A S E PAY H E T ( $ ) O F A R H H I R E D L A B O R ( H R ) 1 1 O F F F A R H P A R T S & L A B O R ( $ ) O F A R H O H E R L A B O R ( H R ) 2 2 A U A L U S E B A S E ( H R ) R & H E G. E S T I H A T E ( X ) R & H C A L C. LEASE CALC. (HOUR,YEAR) ( # 1, # 2 ) 2 2 FUEL USE ( DEF.,CALC.) Information presented Is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Thasa projections were collected and developed by C13.110
10 Information presented is praparad solely as a general guide and is not intandad to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by C MACHIERY COST REPORT OCTOBER 24, 1992 RESOURCE AHE UIT «VARIABLE EXPESES ==«= FIXED EXPESES m TOTAL FUEL ioper. & OPER. 1CUSTOH IREPAIR REPAIR HOURLY 1DEPREC. AUAL TAXES, EXPESES & 1MAAGE. IPUT 1OPER. isi HAIT. & HAIT. LEASE & LEASE LICESE LUBE LABOR 1OFF FARH LABOR ITEREST & ISUR. E DOBB S 100 HP S/HR HP $/HR HP $/HR HP S/HR HP $/HR HP $/HR PECA PICKER S/HR AHYDROUS APPL. $/HR BED SHAPER S/HR BEDDER 6 ROH $/HR CHISEL $/HR COHBIE PEAUT S/HR CULTIVATOR 4 ROH S/HR CULTIVATOR 6 ROH S/HR CULTIVATOR FIELD S/HR CULTIVATOR 4 ROH ROLLIG S/HR CULTIVATOR 6 ROH ROLLIG S/HR DIGGER PEAUT S/HR DISC TADEH S/HR DISC-OFFSET 12 FT S/HR DISC-OFFSET 8 FT S/HR DRILL S/HR FERTILIZER SPDR. S/HR HARR.OH SPIKE S/HR LAD PLAE S/HR HOLDBOARD PLOH S/HR PECA SHAKER S/HR PECA SHAKER HYDRAUL. S/HR PUTER 4 ROH S/HR PUTER 6 ROH S/HR PLATER PEAUT S/HR PUTER STAHAY S/HR PLATIG EQUIP. PECA S/HR RODHEEDER S/HR SHREDDER S/HR SPRAYER 12 FT S/HR SPRAYER 6 FT S/HR SPRAYER HI SPEED $/HR SPRAYER HYDRAUL. S/HR SPRAYER HYDRO. S/HR PECA CLEAER S/HR STOCK SPRAYER S/HR STOCK TRAILER S/HR TACK S/HR PICKUP TRUCK 3/4 TO S/HI HP AHYDROUS APPL. AHYDROUS APPL HP FERTILIZER SPDR APPLY FERTILIZER HP FERTILIZER SPDR APPLY.FERTILIZER HP BEDDER 6 ROH BEDDIG 6 ROH HP CHISEL HARROW SPIKE CHISEL/HARROH
11 CHISEL CHISELIG COHBIE COMBIIG CULTIVATOR 6 ROH SPRAYER CULT. & SPRAY CULTIVATOR CULTIVATIG CULTIVATOR CULTIVATIG CULTIVATOR CULTIVATIG RESOURCE AHE UIT VARIABLE EXPESES FIXED EXPESES TOTAL 150 HP 125 HP PEAUT PEAUT 150 HP ROLLIG 12 FT 100 HP 4 ROH 4 ROH 125 HP 6 ROH 6 ROH 100 HP FIELD FIELD FUEL 1OPER. & & 1MAAGE. LUBE 1LABOR OPER. CUSTOH RlEPAIR IPUT OPER. & HAIT. 01 FF FARH REPAIR & HAIT. LABOR o.ooo. HOURLY DEPREC. L E A S E & ITEREST AUAL ItUCES, L E A S E L I[CESE & ISUR EXPESES^ CULTIVATOR 4 ROH CULTIVATIG 4R0H 100 HP ROLLIG ROLLIG CULTIVATOR 6 ROH CULTIVATIG 6R0H 125 HP ROLLIG ROLLIG o.ooo DIGGER DIGGIG 125 HP PEAUT PEAUT DISC-OFFSET DISC OFFSET 125 HP 12 FT 12 FT ' DISC-OFFSET DISC OFFSET 40 HP 8 FT 8 FT DISC DISCIG 125 HP TADEH TADEH DRILL DRILLIG 75 HP PECA PICKER PICKIG PECAS PICKUP TRUCK PICKUP TRUCK 3/4 TO 3/4 TO S/HI S/HI LAD PLAE PLAIG 125 HP LAD B >^tv Information prasented is praparad solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Thasa projections were collected and developed by C13.112
12 RESOURCE AHE UIT «= VARIABLE EXPESES >» FIXED EXPESES TOTAL FUEL & LUBE OPER. & HAAGE. LABOR OPER. CUSTOH IPUT OPER. REPAIR 8. HAIT. ioff FARH REPAIR & HAIT. LABOR HOURLY LEASE DEPREC. AUAL TAXES, & L E A S E L I C E S E I T E R E S T & I S U R. EXPESES PLATER SPRAYER PLAT & SPRAY 125 HP 4 ROH 12 FT PLATER PLATIG 75 HP 4 ROH 4 ROH PLATER PLATIG 100 HP 6 ROH 6 ROH PLATER PLATIG 75 HP PEAUT PEAUT PLATIG EQUIP. PLATIG EQUIP. PLATIG 40 HP PECA HIRED PECAS PLATER PLATIG 100 HP STAHAY STAHAY 1.175* HOLDBOARD PLOH PLOHIG 150 HP HLDBOARD $/AC RODHEEDER RODHEEDIG 75 HP /#^ PECA SHAKER SHAKIG 40 HP PECAS BED SHAPER SHAPIG 125 HP SHREDDER SHREDDIG 75 HP SPRAYER SPRAYIG 75 HP 12 FT 12 FT SPRAYER SPRAYIG 40 HP 6 FT 6 FT SPRAYER SPRAYIG 75 HP $/AC HI SPEED HI SPEED SPRAYER SPRAYIG 75 HP HYDRAUL. HYDRAUL Information prasentad is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch oparation. These projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Servlco and approved for publication. C13.113
13 BUDGET PARAMETERS REPORT October 24, 1992 Parameter Value Unit ame of Measure = = sssss = s = = t=:s = = c ssssscssscss sssssss: DIESEL GAL. DIESEL BTU ELECTRICITY BTU KWH ELECTRICITY BTU 3410 BTU GASOLIE GASOLIE BTLI HIRED LABOR GAL BTU HOUR HIRED LABOR IRR HOUR IR % IRITB 11.OOOO % IRITE 7.OOOO % IROCB % IROCE % IRPCF 0 % LP GAS LP GAS BTU LUBE MULTI ATURAL GAS ATURAL GAS BTU OWER LABOR GAL BTU OE MCF BTU HOUR OWER LABOR IRR HOUR PTR 0 % Description Cost of Diesel Fuel Energy of Diesel Fuel Cost of Electricity E l e c t r i c i t y e n g e r y Cost of Gasoline Energy of Gasoline Hired Repair and Maintenance Labor Rate Hired Irrigation Operation Labor Insurance Rate, % of Market value Interest Rate, Intermediate Term Borrow. Interest Rate, Intermediate Term Equity Interest Rate, Operating Capital Borrow. Interest Rate, Operating Capital Equity Interest Rate, Positive Cash Flow Cost of LP Gas Energy of LP Gas Lube Multlplier Cost of atural Gas Energy of at. Gas per 100ft3 or Therm Owner Repair and Maintenance Labor Rate Owner Irrigation Operation Labor Personal Property Tax Rate Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costi and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. C13.114
14 r r
15 B-124KL13) TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTESIO SERVICE. THE TEXAS A&M UIVERSITY SYSTEM Z e r l e I. C a r p e n t e r, O i r e c t o r. C o l l e g e S t a t i o n, Te x a s f TEXAS LIVESTOCK ETERPRISE BUDGETS SOUTHWEST TEXAS DISTRICT Projected for 1992 r Data collected and submitted by Jose G. Pena E d u c a t i o n a l p r o g r a m s c o n d u c t e d b y t h e Te x a s A g r i c u l t u r a l E x t e n s i o n S e r v i c e s e r v e p e o p l e o f a l l a g e s r e g a r d l e s s o f s o c i o e c o n o m i c l e v e l, r a c e, c o l o r, s e x, r e l i g i o n o r n a t i o n a l o r i g i n. c o o p e r a t i v e E x t e n s i o n W o r k i n A g r i c u l t u r e a n d H o m e E c o n o m i c s, T h e Te x a s A a M U n i v e r s i t y S y s t e m a n d t h e U n i t e d s t a t e s D e p a r t m e n t o f A g r i c u l t u r e c o o p e r a t i n g. D i s t r i b u t e d i n f u r t h e r a n c e o f t h e A c t s o f C o n g r e s s o f M a y « «. a s a m e n d e d, and June 30. ISM e w
16 "I "T,~>
17 J*** Projections for Planning Purposes Only ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, COW-CALF PRODUCTIO, UIMPROVED BRUSH COUTRY Southwest Texas District (13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head P R O D U C T I O D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n C U L L B U L L S B E E F O. O I H d c w t C U L L C O W S B E E F O. I O H d c w t D E E R L E A S E a c r e H E I F E R C A L V E S H d c w t S T E E R C A L V E S H d c w t sssssssssss T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATIG IPUT or CUSTOM OPERATIO Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit Cost C O T T O S E E D C A K E l b M I S C E L L A E O U S C O W - C A L F h e a d S A L E S C O M M I S S I O h e a d S A L T & M I E R A L S l b V E T. M E D I C I E h e a d WATER FACILITY REPAIR head C U S T O M H A U L I G C O W - C A L F h e a d Fuel 2.93 Lube 0.03 R e p a i r To t a l O P E R AT I G I P U T a n d C U S T O M O P E R AT I O C o s t s ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land,-management, and profit C A P I TA L I V E S T M E T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f C o s t Invested Return - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O C B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l C A P I T A L I V E S T M E T C o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWERSHIP COST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) Cost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t L i v e s t o c k l t l - 2 T o t a l O W E R S H I P C o s t s B-124KL13) Your Estimate R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR COST Description Input Use Unit Average Cost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R C o s t s _ J Z :? f R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t ssssssssssssosssssssss==ssssssssss=ssssssssssss=ssssssssscsssssssessssssss===s LAD COST Description Input Use Unit Rate of Cost Return P A S T U R E A T I V E Annual Lease Acre T o t a l L A D C o s t s _ = _ Z 2 : f? R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t sssssssssss s sssssss ssssssssssssessssssssssssssssssscsssssssscsssssssssss -WARIG- o Management Cost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t?!! _ i? Z Total Projected Cost of Production Spring Calving, 78% calf crop, 3% death loss on cows, 13% replacement rate, 10,000 acre ranch, 450 animal units. J^', Information presented is prepared solely as general guide and Is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by L13.1
18 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, B-1241(L13) GROSS ICOME Description CULL BULLS CULL COWS DEER LEASE HEIFER CALVES STEER CALVES Total GROSS Income Cow-Calf Production, Unimproved Brush Country S o u t h w e s t Te x a s D i s t r i c t ( 1 3 ) P r o j e c t e d C o s t s a n d R e t u r n s p e r H e a d BEEF BEEF VARIABLE COST Description COTTOSEED CAKE CUSTOM HAULIG COW-CALF FECE Interest - OC Borrowed LIVESTOCK LABOR MISCELLAEOUS COW-CALF PICKUP TRUCK 3/4 TO SALES COMMISSIO SALT & MIERALS STOCK SPRAYER STOCK TRAILER TACK VET. MEDICIE WATER FACILITY REPAIR Total VARIABLE COST Quantity Unit $ / U n i t = :ssssssss ssss c = :SSSSSSSSS 0. 01Hd cwt Hd cwt acre Hd cwt ,39Hd cwt Total Total , Your Estimate GROSS ICOME minus VARIABLE COST FIXED COST Description SSSSSBSSSSCSSSBSSSSC=SSSSCSS=SSS: M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t Livestock Land Total FIXED Cost Total of ALL Cost ET PROJECTED RETURS Unit Acre Acre Total S p r i n g C a l v i n g, 7 8 % c a l f c r o p, 3 % d e a t h l o s s o n c o w s, 1 3 % r e p l a c e m e n t r a t e, 10,000 acre ranch, 450 animal units. ~*-as\ Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections ware collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. L13.2
19 Projections for Planning Purposes Only ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, B-124KL13) /#*V jrfjmlty PRODUCTIO Description C U L L B U L L S B E E F C U L L C O W S B E E F DEER LEASE HEIFER CALVES STEER CALVES Total GROSS Income COW-CALF PRODUCTIO, 1/3 IMPROVED PASTURE Southwest Texas District ( 13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head Q u a n t i t y U n i t O.OIHd cwt. O. I O H d c w t acre 0.27Hd cwt. 0.40Hd CWt. $ / Unit OPERATIG IPUT or CUSTOM OPERATIO Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit C O T T O S E E D C A K E l b M I S C E L L A E O U S C O W - C A L F h e a d P A S T U R E M A I T a c r e S A L E S C O M M I S S I O h e a d S A L T & M I E R A L S l b V E T. M E D I C I E h e a d WATER FACILITY REPAIR head C U S T O M H A U L I G C O W - C A L F h e a d Fuel Lube Repair Total OPERATIG IPUT and CUSTOM OPERATIO Costs Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit CAPITAL IVESTMET Description Interest Interest IT Equity OC Borrowed Quantity Invested Unit Dol. Dol. Rate of Return O. 110 Return Cost Cost T o t a l C A P I T A L I V E S T M E T C o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWERSHIP COST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) Machinery and Equipment Livestock Total OWERSHIP Costs Cost R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LABOR COST Description Input Use Unit Average Cost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R C o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LAD COST Description Input Use Unit Rate of Cost Return P A S T U R E 1 / 3 I M P. Annual Lease Acre T o t a l L A D C o s t s _ R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t Your Estimate -WARIG- o Management Cost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected Cost of Production Spring Calving, 80% calf crop, 3% death loss on cows, 13% replacement rate, 4,500 acre ranch, 250 animal units. Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ona particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and developed by Staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extanslon Service and approved for publication. L13.3
20 Projections for Planning Purposes Only ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, 1992, B-124KL13) GROSS ICOME Description CULL BULLS CULL COWS DEER LEASE HEIFER CALVES STEER CALVES Total GROSS Income Cow-Calf Production, 1/3 Improved Pasture Southwest Texas District ( 13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head BEEF BEEF VARIABLE COST Description COTTOSEED CAKE CUSTOM HAULIG COW-CALF FECE Interest - OC Borrowed LIVESTOCK LABOR MISCELLAEOUS COW-CALF PASTURE MAIT. PICKUP TRUCK 3/4 TO SALES COMMISSIO SALT & MIERALS STOCK SPRAYER STOCK TRAILER TACK VET. MEDICIE WATER FACILITY REPAIR Total VARIABLE COST Quantity Unit $ / U n i t ssssssssss ssss ss:sssssssss 0.,01Hd cwt , 10Hd cwt acre ,27Hd cwt Hd cwt Total ' Total OO Your Estimate GROSS ICOME minus VARIABLE COST FIXED COST Description Machinery and Equipment Livestock Land Total FIXED Cost Total of ALL Cost ET PROJECTED RETURS ESESSSI Unit BBSS Acre Acre Total sssssssssss Spring Calving, 80% calf crop, 3% death loss on cows, 13% replacement rate, 4,500 acre ranch, 250 animal units s * y y * \ Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. These projections wore collected and developed by L13.4
21 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 1 3 ) ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, J0"\. COW-CALF PRODUCTIO, IMPROVED PASTURE Southwest Texas District ( 13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head P R O D U C T I O D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t R e t u r n E s t i m a t e C U L L B U L L S B E E F O. O I H d c w t C U L L C O W S B E E F O. I O H d c w t " H E I F E R C A L V E S H d c w t ' S T E E R C A L V E S H d c w t T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e OPERATIG IPUT or CUSTOM OPERATIO Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit Cost C O T T O S E E D C A K E l b M I S C E L L A E O U S C O W - C A L F h e a d P A S T U R E M A I T a c r e S A L E S C O M M I S S I O h e a d S A L T & M I E R A L S l b V E T. M E D I C I E h e a d WATER FACILITY REPAIR head C U S T O M H A U L I G C O W - C A L F h e a d Fuel 7.33 Lube 0.07 R e p a i r T o t a l O P E R A T I G I P U T a n d C U S T O M O P E R A T I O C o s t s Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit SSSSESESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS C A P I T A L I V E S T M E T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f C o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O C B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l C A P I T A L I V E S T M E T C o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWERSHIP COST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) Cost M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t L i v e s t o c k T o t a l O W E R S H I P C o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS==SSSSSSSSSSSSSSCSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS LABOR COST Description Input Use Unit Average Cost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R C o s t s _ 5! J ". 1 9 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LAD COST Description Input Use Unit Rate of Cost Return P A S T U R E I M P R O V E D Annual Lease 1 Acre T o t a l L A D C o s t s? 9 l 9 9 SSSSSSSEEBSSSSSSSBBSSEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBSS SESSSSSSSSSCESBSSSBSSS SSSSSSS R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARIG- o Management Cost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t _ Total Projected Cost of Production Spring Calving, 85% calf crop, 3% death loss on cows, 13% replacement rate, 2,000 acre ranch, 200 animal units. y#^v Information presented is preparad solely as a general guide and Is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by L13.5
22 GROSS ICOME Description Projections for Planning Purposes Only ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, 1992 Cow-Calf Production, Improved Pasture Southwest Texas District ( 13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head C U L L B U L L S B E E F O. O I H d C U L L C O W S B E E F O. I O H d H E I F E R C A L V E S H d S T E E R C A L V E S H d Total GROSS Income VARIABLE COST Description COTTOSEED CAKE CUSTOM HAULIG COW-CALF FECE Interest - OC Borrowed LIVESTOCK LABOR MISCELLAEOUS COW-CALF PASTURE MAIT. PICKUP TRUCK 3/4 TO SALES COMMISSIO SALT & MIERALS STOCK SPRAYER STOCK TRAILER TACK VET. MEDICIE WATER FACILITY REPAIR Total VARIABLE COST GROSS ICOME minus VARIABLE COST FIXED COST Description Machinery and Equipment Livestock Land Total FIXED Cost Total of ALL Cost ET PROJECTED RETURS Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t cwt. cwt, cwt, cwt, Unit ESSE Acre Acre OOOO 95.OOOO Total Total Total Spring Calving, 85% calf crop, 3% death loss on cows, 13% replacement rate, 2,000 acre ranch, 200 animal units B-124KL13) Your Estimate. **%. ) Information prasented is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by L13.6
23 J^^ PRODUCTIO Description CULL EWES DEER LEASE LAMBS WOOL WOOL ICETIVE SHEEP Total GROSS Income OPERATIG IPUT or CUSTOM Description LAMB FEED MARKETIG SHEEP MISC. EXPESE SHEEP RAGE CUBES SHEARIG SHEEP VET. MEDICIE SHEEP Fuel Lube Repa1r P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 1 3 ) ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, SHEEP PRODUCTIO Southwest Texas District (13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head OPERATIO Residual returns to capitsnl, ownership labor, land, management,, a n d p r o fi t Quantity 0.85Hd Hd Input Use Total OPERATIG IPUT and CUSTOM OPERATIO Cost s Unit cwt. acre cwt. lb. lb. Unit lb. head $ lb. head $ $ $ / U n i t / U n i t Return Cost C A P I TA L I V E S T M E T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t R a t e o f C o s t Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y D o l I n t e r e s t - O C B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l C A P I T A L I V E S T M E T C o s t s Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWERSHIP COST Description (Depreciation, Taxes, and Insurance) Cost L i v e s t o c k r M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t T o t a l O W E R S H I P C o s t s R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a b o r, l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t SSSSESSBSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBSSSSSSSSESESSSSSSSSSSSESESESSSSSSSSSSESESSSSSSSSBSSSES LABOR COST Description Input Use Unit Average Cost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t H r O t h e r H r T o t a l L A B O R C o s t s _ 6 ;. 8 f R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o l a n d, m a n a g e m e n t, a n d p r o fi t LAD COST Description Input Use Unit Rate of Cost Return PA S T U R E R A G E Annual Lease 2 Acre T o t a l L A D C o s t s _ Z 9 : 9 9 R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r o fi t WARIG- o Management Cost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t S S S S S S S E S E S S S S S S S S S E B S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S E S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S E E Total Projected Cost of Production % lamb crop, 1 ram to 33 ewes, 3% death loss, 20% replacement rate. Your Estimate Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. L13.7
24 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B ( L 1 3 ) ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, Sheep Production Southwest Texas District (13) P r o j e c t e d C o s t s a n d R e t u r n s p e r H e a d / «3 B! k Y o u r ^ \ G R O S S I C O M E D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t T o t a l E s t i m a t e C U L L E W E S H d c w t D E E R L E A S E a c r e L A M B S H d C W t WOOL lb W O O L I C E T I V E S H E E P l b SSSSSSSBEEE T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e V A R I A B L E C O S T D e s c r i p t i o n T o t a l BAR 0.01 F E C E I n t e r e s t - O C B o r r o w e d L A M B F E E D L I V E S T O C K L A B O R MARKETIG SHEEP 2.91 M I S C. E X P E S E S H E E P P I C K U P T R U C K 3 / 4 T O R A G E C U B E S SHEARIG SHEEP SHED 0.00 S T O C K S P R A Y E R S T O C K T R A I L E R V E T. M E D I C I E S H E E P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WATER 0.07 W O R K I G P E S T o t a l V A R I A B L E C O S T G R O S S I C O M E m i n u s V A R I A B L E C O S T FIXED COST Description Unit Total M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t A c r e L i v e s t o c k ' ^ m ^ L a n d A c r e ~ ^ \ Total FIXED Cost Total of ALL Cost E T P R O J E C T E D R E T U R S % lamb crop, 1 ram to 33 ewes, 3% death loss, 20% replacement rate. /**\ Information presented Is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not intanded to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by L13.8
25 JPK Projections for Planning Purposes Only ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, GOAT PRODUCTIO Southwest Texas District ( 13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head PRODUCTIO Description Quantity Unit $ / Unit ADULT MOHAIR lb C U L L D O E S H d lb D E E R L E A S E acre K I D G O A T S head 35.OOOO KID MOHAIR lb W O O L I C E T I V E G O A T S lb Total OPERATIG IPUT and CUSTOM OPERATIO Cost: CAPITAL IVESTMET Description Quantity Unit Rate of Cost Invested Return I n t e r e s t - I T E q u i t y Dol I n t e r e s t - O C B o r r o w e d Dol B-124KL13) S S S S E E E E S E E E Y O U r Return Estimate Total GROSS Income OPERATIG IPUT or CUSTOM OPERATIO Description Input Use Unit $ / Unit Cost M I S C. E X P E S E G O A T S 1 $ R A G E C U B E S lb SALT AD MIERAL 6 lb S H E A R I G G O A T S head V E T. M E D I C I E G O A T S head Fuel 4.40 Lube 0.04 Repair 1.31 Residual returns to capital, ownership labor, land, management, and profit Total CAPITAL IVESTMET Costs Residual returns to ownership, labor, land, management, and profit OWERSHIP COST Description (Depredation, Taxes, and Insurance) Cost Machinery and Equipment Livestock 5.29 Residual returns to labor, land, management, and p r o fi t LABOR COST Description Input Use Unit Average Cost Rate M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t Hr O t h e r Hr Residual returns to land, management, and profi t Unit Rate of Return Acre Total OWERSHIP Costs Total LABOR Costs LAD COST Description Input Use P A S T U R E R A G E Annual Lease 2 Cost Total LAD Costs Residual returns to management and profit WARIG- o Management Cost Specified R e s i d u a l r e t u r n s t o p r o fi t Total Projected Cost of Production % kid crop, 1 buck to 50 ewes, 5% death loss, 20% replacement rate. Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by L13.9
26 GROSS ICOME Description Projections for Planning Purposes Only ot to be Used without Updating after October 24, Goat Production Southwest Texas DistMet (13) 1992 Projected Costs and Returns per Head Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t ADULT MOHAIR lb. C U L L D O E S H d l b. D E E R L E A S E a c r e K I D G O A T S h e a d KID MOHAIR lb. W O O L I C E T I V E G O A T S l b. Total GROSS Income VARIABLE COST Description BAR FECE Interest - OC Borrowed LIVESTOCK LABOR MISC. EXPESE GOATS PICKUP TRUCK 3/4 TO RAGE CUBES SALT AD MIERAL SHEARIG GOATS SHED STOCK SPRAYER STOCK TRAILER VET. MEDICIE GOATS WATER WORKIG PES Total VARIABLE COST B r e a k - E v e n P r i c e, To t a l V a r i a b l e C o s t $ p e r l b. GROSS ICOME minus VARIABLE COST FIXED COST Description Machinery and Equipment Livestock Land Unit Acre Acre Total ssssssss: 31, 20 2, 76 34, 75 63, , Total of ADULT MOHAIR O. 00 O O Total sssssssss:ss Total FIXED Cost B r e a k - E v e n P r i c e, To t a l C o s t $ p e r l b. o f A D U LT M O H A I R Total of ALL Cost E T P R O J E C T E D R E T U R S % kid crop, 1 buck to 50 ewes, 5% death loss, 20% replacement rate. B-124KL13) Your Estimate Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by L13.10
C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationC OPERATING INPUT RESOURCES April 20, 1990
OPERATIG IPUT RESOURCES April 20, 1990 Operating :[nput Price Unit Cash per of Flow Unit Measure Row ================ ======== ======== ======= == = = 32-0-0.63 gal. 45 4-29-2 1.10 gal. 45 ALLOTMET LEASE.20
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationUnit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42
Auto or Truck Resources D e s c r i p t i o n A u t o o r o r TTr r u c k Pirst ame H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r
More informationPRODUCT NAHE NUMBER HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r A p r i l 0, 1 9 9 0. B-14K0) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTIO TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT
More informationN o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationPRODUCT NAHE DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER CASH FIXED LANDLORD
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993. B-124K02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD.
More informationC4.46 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L A B O R L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E (
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More information2X.X X X X 6.X 13124
Projections fa Planning Purposes Only d to be Used without Updating after Mvch 1,19X. 8-1241(112) COW-CALF PRODUCTIO, IMPROVED PASTURE South Texas Distrid (12) 1996 Projected Costs and Returns Per Head
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationNORTHEAST TEXAS DISTRICT 5. . JL_JCamp^ l. Hopkins n 8 I = I o
ORTHEAST TEXAS DISTRICT 5 Hopkins n 8 I = I o. JL_JCamp^ l B-141(L05) W The Texas A&M University System Texas Livestock Enterprise Budgets East Texas District Projected for 1994 Henderson Smith Cher- Anderson
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationTexas Panhandle & South Plains Districts
k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationEM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More information2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst
2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for
More informationEMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique
EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED Investment Proposal Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique 20 July 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name: EMVEST LIMOPO Lda (MATUBA), District Chokwe, Province of Gaza.
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationINCOME BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS 32,373 Net Operating Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 70, ,619 32,373 Net Total Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 71, ,306
Goodwill Industries, Inc. Comparative Income Statement Feb16 Year to Date Variance/ Variance Variance Variance/ Last Year from Budget Actual INCOME Actual from Budget Last Year (5,847) (6,678) 1,471,935
More informationG200 & CL605 Analysis
G200 & CL605 Analysis Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Gulfstream G200 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 8 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 3051.75 / 3511.89 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 447.53
More informationThe Talking Farm Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016
Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016 Table of Contents: Treasurer's Report 1 Page: Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Position 2 Statements of Activities
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationAnnual & Hourly Cost Detail
Aircraft Analysis Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Embraer Phenom 100 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 1 / 6 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 896.00 / 1031.10 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 390.00 /
More informationChris Doerr Phone: Aircraft Cost Calculator, LLC 1341 W. Mequon Road, Suite 205, Mequon, WI Powered by ACC:
Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Embraer Legacy 650 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 13 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 3569.48 / 4107.68 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 435.83 / 501.54 Average Pre-Owned
More informationI-94 COMMERCIAL LAND ±30.44 ACRES TH ST Eau Galle, WI 54747
PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS + + Located off I-94 and Hwy 63 Interchange 2,900 VPD + + Baldwin-Woodville Area School District + + Zoning: Commercial, Rural Residential + + 40 miles to St. Paul + + 25 miles to Menomonie,
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationInvestors presentation Oddo BHF Forum - January 2019
Investors presentation Oddo BHF Forum - January 2019 YMAGIS IN A NUTSHELL European leader for digital technologies and services for the cinema industry 26 countries 180m present in 26 countries across
More informationAgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016
AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016 AGDEX 821-62 December, 2017 ECONOMICS OF BEEKEEPING IN ALBERTA 2016 Emmanuel Anum Laate Economics Section Economics and Competitiveness Branch Alberta
More informationSolutions to Accompany
Solutions to Accompany Chapter 2 Engineering Economics Engineering economy problems require the calculation of various interest factors listed in Table 2.2. An alternative is to create an EES function
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationIntroduction... vii ACC Economics and Statistics Department Staff... vii 1. CHEMISTRY AND THE ECONOMY...1
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... vii ACC Economics and Statistics Department Staff... vii 1. CHEMISTRY AND THE ECONOMY...1 Chemistry in Our Lives...2 Economic Contributions of the Business of Chemistry...4
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information10:42 AM Sample Winery with Vineyard. 01/02/16 Profit & Loss Accrual Basis January through December 2016
10:42 AM Sample Winery with Vineyard Ordinary Income/Expense Income 410000 TRADE SALES 0.00 420000 RETAIL SALES 0.00 450000 EVENT 0.00 480100 BULK WINE SALES 0.00 490000 Bad Debt Expense 0.00 Total Income
More information