Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.
|
|
- Corey Andrews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD ASH PROD. -HARNING- NO VALID REEIPTS REORDS DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAE NUHBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON- OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT U N I T S A S H V A R I. 06/5/85 H DISING FSET 00 08/5/85 H DISING TANDEH 00 /0/85 H DISING TANDE 00 /3/85 K ASH RENT ROPLAND 00 F 03/0/86 H DISING TANDEH 00 05/0/86 DISING TANDE 00 ^ \ Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs 4.
2 J0^\ GROSS INOE Description HAY GROSS Income Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986 SORGHU FOR HAY North entral Texas District (4) 986 Projected osts and Returns per SORGHU VARIABLE OST Description PREHARVEST FERT DRY FERT. RIG FERT ANHYDROUS RIG SEED FORAGE SORG Fuel & Lube - achinery R e p a i r s - a c h i n e r y L a b o r - a c h i n e r y PREHARVEST HARVEST USTO BALING USTO HAULING USTO BALING USTO HAULING HARVEST Interest Interest VARIABLE OST O Borrowed Positive ash Break-Even Price, Variable ost GROSS INOE minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description achinery Land FIXED ost Break-Even Price, ost $ of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Quantity 00 Quantity bale 00 0 lb. 0 acre 00 0 lb. 0 acre 50 0 lb Hour $ / 00 $ / bale bale bale bale Dol Dol per bale of HAY.80 per bale of HAY B-4(04) Your Estimate Information presented is prepored solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and developed by 4.3
3 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r a r c h 7, B-4K04) DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK P E R N O N - S H A R E E V E N HEAD ASH PROD. 06//86 HARVEST 07/5/86 HARVEST A A HAY HAY SORGHUH SORGHU DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE INPUT INPUT NAE NUBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD O F N O N - O R S H A R E U N I T S A S H V A R I. 06/5/85 PREHARVEST 08/5/85 PREHARVEST //85 PREHARVEST //85 PREHARVEST /5/85 PREHARVEST /3/85 PREHARVEST 0//86 PREHARVEST 0//86 PREHARVEST 03/5/86 PREHARVEST 03/5/86 PREHARVEST 06/0/86 HARVEST 06/0/86 HARVEST 07/5/86 HARVEST 07/5/86 HARVEST DISING DISING DRY FERT. RIG FERT DISING ASH RENT ANHYDROUS APPL. FERT DRILLING SEED FORAGE SORG USTO BALING USTO HAULING USTOH BALING USTO HAULING FSET TANDEH TANDE ROPLAND HAY HAY HAY HAY y ^ \ and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff members of tho Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.4
4 GROSS INOE Description DEFIIENY PT SORGHU GROSS Income Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, SORGHU PRODUTION AFTER WHEAT North entral Texas District (4) 986 Projected osts and Returns per SORGHU VARIABLE OST Description PREHARVEST FERT HERB, FALL LIQUID FERT. RIG FERT ANHYDROUS RIG SEED SORGHU HERB, PRE-EERGE INSET. SOIL Fuel & Lube - achinery R e p a i r s - a c h i n e r y L a b o r - a c h i n e r y PREHARVEST HARVEST USTO OBINING USTO HAULING HARVEST Interest Interest VARIABLE OST - O Borrowed - Positive ash GROSS INOE minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description achinery Land FIXED ost of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Quantity cwt cwt Quantity 500 lb acre acre 0 00 lb acre 0 70 lb acre acre Hour acre cwt Dol Dol $ / $ / B-4K04) Your Estimate 4.5
5 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON- SHARE EVEN HEAD ASH PROD. 0/5/86 HARVEST 08/5/86 HARVEST 09/5/86 HARVEST A DEFIIENY PHT SORGHU A SORGHU A DEFIIENY PT SORGHU N 33 Y 33 N DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE INPUT INPUT NAE NUBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD O F N O N - O R S H A R E UNITS ASH VARI. 06/5/85 PREHARVEST 08/5/85 PREHARVEST 09/5/85 PREHARVEST //85 PREHARVEST //85 PREHARVEST //85 PREHARVEST /5/85 PREHARVEST /5/85 PREHARVEST 0//86 PREHARVEST 0//86 PREHARVEST 0/5/86 PREHARVEST 03//86 PREHARVEST 03//86 PREHARVEST 03//86 PREHARVEST 03//86 PREHARVEST 03/5/86 PREHARVEST 04/05/86 PREHARVEST 08/0/86 HARVEST 08/0/86 HARVEST 08/0/86 H H EE E H E E E H H G G K DISING DISING DISING LIQUID FERT. RIG FERT HERB, FALL DISING SHAPING BEDS ANHYDROUS APPL. FERT SHAPING BEDS PLANTING SEED SORGHU HERB, PRE-EERGE INSET. SOIL ROLLING ULTIVATING USTO OBINING USTO HAULING ASH RENT FSET TANDEH TANDE SORGHU TANDE TREATED SORGHU SORGHU SORGHUH ROPLAND V V V V V V V V F 4.6
6 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch B-4K04) GROSS INOE Description WHEAT PRODUTION, ONTINUOUS North entral Texas District (4) 986 Projected osts and Returns per Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t Your Estimate DEFIIENY PT WHEAT WHEAT bu bu GROSS Income 5.05 VARIABLE OST Description Quantity $ / PREHARVEST FERT DRY FERT. RIG SEED WHEAT HERB, PRE-EERGE INSET. GREENBUG FERT LIQUID FERT. RIG INSET. GREENBUG Fuel & Lube - achinery R e p a i r s - a c h i n e r y L a b o r - a c h i n e r y 0.0 lb..0 acre 90,0 lb..0 acre,0 acre 5 0 lb.,0 acre,0 acre Hour. 0.00, PREHARVEST HARVEST USTO OBINING USTO HAULING acre bu HARVEST 7.60 I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d Dol VARIABLE OST 99.8 GROSS INOE minus VARIABLE OST 5.3 FIXED OST Description J^N achinery Land FIXED ost 43.4 of ALL ost 43.3 NET PROJETED RETURNS 8.8 Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs 4.7
7 Projections f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s Only B-4(04) Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. D A T E S T A G E TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD ASH PROD. 06/5/86 HARVEST A HHEAT Y 07/5/86 HARVEST A DEFIIENY PT KHEAT N D A T E S T A G E TYPE INPUT NAHE NUBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT UNITS ASH VARI. 06/5/85 PREHARVEST DISING FSET 00 08/5/85 PREHARVEST H DISING TANDEH 00 09/5/85 PREHARVEST DISING TANDE 00 //85 PREHARVEST DRY FERT. RIG 00 //85 PREHARVEST E FERT V 33 /5/85 PREHARVEST H DISING TANDE 00 /0/85 PREHARVEST DRILLING 00 /0/85 PREHARVEST E SEED HHEAT 9000 V /0/85 PREHARVEST E HERB, PRE-EHERGE KHEAT 00 V /5/85 PREHARVEST SPRAYING 00 /5/65 PREHARVEST E INSET. GREENBUG 00 V 33 03//86 PREHARVEST LIQUID FERT. RIG 00 03//86 PREHARVEST E FERT V 33 03/5/86 PREHARVEST E INSET. GREENBUG 00 V 33 06/0/86 HARVEST G USTO OBINING HHEAT 00 V 33 06/0/86 HARVEST G USTO HAULING HHEAT 4000 V 33 06/0/86 K ASH RENT ROPLAND 00 F and returns from any one particular farm or rancn operation. These projections were collected and developed by 4.8
8 GROSS INOE Description WEIGHT GAIN STOKERS WHEAT GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description PREHARVEST FERT FERT DRY FERT. RIG SEED WHEAT INSET. GREENBUG FERT LIQUID FERT. RIG INSET. GREENBUG Fuel & Lube - achinery R e p a i r s - a c h i n e r y L a b o r - a c h i n e r y PREHARVEST HARVEST USTO OBINING USTO HAULING HARVEST I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d VARIABLE OST GROSS INOE minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description achinery Land FIXED ost of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, WHEAT PRODUTION, ONTINUOUS WITH GRAZING North entral Texas District (4) 986 Projected osts and Returns per Quantity lb bu Quantity 00 lb lb acre lb acre lb acre 0 0 acre Hour acre bu Dol $ / $ / B-4(04) Your Estimate and returns from any one particular farm or rancn operation. These projections were collected and developed by 4.9
9 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4(04) DATE STAGE PRODUTION 03/0/86 GRAZING 06/5/86 HARVEST TYPE PROD. sac A A HEIGHT GAIN HHEAT PRODUT NAHE STOKERS NUBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK P E R N O N - S H A R E E V E N HEAD ASH PROD DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE INPUT INPUT NAE NUBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD O F N O N - O R S H A R E U N I T S A S H V A R I. 06/5/85 PREHARVEST 07/5/85 PREHARVEST 08/5/85 PREHARVEST 08/5/85 PREHARVEST 08/5/85 PREHARVEST 09/0/85 PREHARVEST 09/0/85 PREHARVEST /5/85 PREHARVEST /5/85 PREHARVEST 03//86 PREHARVEST 03//86 PREHARVEST 03/5/86 PREHARVEST 06/0/86 HARVEST 06/0/86 HARVEST 06/0/86 H D I S I N G O F F S E T H D I S I N G T A N D E H H D R Y F E R T. R I G E F E R T E F E R T H D R I L L I N G E S E E D K H E A T H S P R A Y I N G E I N S E T. G R E E N B U G H L I Q U I D F E R T. R I G E F E R T E I N S E T. G R E E N B U G G U S T O H O B I N I N G K H E A T G U S T O H H A U L I N G H H E A T K A S H R E N T R O P L A N D Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and Is not intended to recognize or predict the costs 4.30
10 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r a r c h 7 986, B-4(04) V GROSS INOE Description DEFIIENY PT WHEAT WHEAT PRODUTION AFTER ROW ROP N o r t h e n t r a l Te x a s D i s t r i c t ( 4 ) P r o j e c t e d o s t s a n d R e t u r n s p e r A c r e WHEAT Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t 35.OOO 400 bu bu Your Estimate GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description PREHARVEST FERT DRY FERT. RIG SEED WHEAT HERB, PRE-EERGE INSET. GREENBUG FERT INSET. GREENBUG LIQUID FERT. RIG F u e l & L u b e - a c h i n e r y R e p a i r s - a c h i n e r y L a b o r - a c h i n e r y PREHARVEST HARVEST USTO OBINING USTO HAULING HARVEST I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d VARIABLE OST GROSS INOE minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description achinery Land FIXED ost of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Quantity 0 0 lb. 0 acre 90 0 lb. 0 acre 0 acre 5 0 lb. 0 acre 0 acre Hour 0 acre 40 0 bu. 5 3 Dol. $ /
11 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986, B-4(04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD ASH PROD. 06/5/86 HARVEST A HHEAT Y 07/5/86 HARVEST A DEFIIENY PT HHEAT N DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAE NUBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT UNITS ASH VARI. 08/0/85 PREHARVEST H SHREDDING STALK 00 08/5/85 PREHARVEST DISING TANDEH 00 09/0/85 PREHARVEST DISING FSET 00 //85 PREHARVEST DRY FERT. RIG 00 //85 PREHARVEST E FERT V 33 /5/85 PREHARVEST DISING TANDEH 00 /0/85 PREHARVEST DRILLING 00 /0/85 PREHARVEST E SEED HHEAT 9000 V /0/85 PREHARVEST E HERB, PRE-EERGE HHEAT 00 V /5/85 PREHARVEST H SPRAYING 00 /5/85 PREHARVEST E INSET. GREENBUG 00 V 33 03//86 PREHARVEST LIQUID FERT. RIG 00 03//86 PREHARVEST E FERT V 33 03//86 PREHARVEST E INSET. GREENBUG 00 V 06/0/86 HARVEST G USTO OBINING HHEAT 00 V 33 06/0/86 HARVEST G USTO HAULING HHEAT 4000 V 33 07/5/86 K ASH RENT ROPLAND 00 F 4.3
12 ROP PRODUTS REPORT arch 7, &\ rop Product Name Price Weight ash per of per Flow es. Row ORN 00 bu OTTON LINT.4500 lb OTTONSEED 7000 ton DEFIIENY PT ORN.0300 bu DEFIIENY PT OTTON.600 lb 00 3 DEFIIENY PT SORGHU.7500 cwt DEFIIENY PT WHEAT.8300 bu 56.OOOO 3 DIVERSION PT OTTON. 500 lb..oooo 3 DIVERSION PT WHEAT.7000 bu 56.OOOO 3 HAY ALFALFA 3.OOOO bale 67.OOOO 0 HAY BERUDA.OOOO bale 67.OOOO 0 HAY SORGHU.OOOO bale 67.OOOO 0 PASTURE AU 00 0 SORGHU cwt WEIGHT GAIN STOKERS.500 lb..oooo WHEAT.000 bu. 56.OOOO 0 staff members of tho Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.33
13 TRATORS, IPLEENTS AND EQUIPENT HARH 7, 986 DESRIPTION FIRST NAE QUALIFYING NAHE KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR I) FUEL TYPE REAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR I) SPEED (HPH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT ARKET VALUE LEASE PAYENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR F FAR PARTS & LABOR ON FAR OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR I) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR ffl YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H AL. (#,#) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) TRATOR 50 TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR aaottooacnaobhob t TRATOR IHPLEENT TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR ANHYDROUS RIG 0 HP 5 HP 50 HP 40 HP 75 HP DI DI DI DI DI (%) (HR) DESRIPTION IPLEENT IPLEENT IPLEENT IPLEHENT IHPLEENT IPLEENT FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR I) FUEL TYPE REAINING LIFE (HR OR I) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /I) ANNUAL USE (HR OR I) SPEED (HPH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY <%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT ARKET VALUE LEASE PAYENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR <$) (%) (S) (HR) ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & AL. (#,#) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) HISEL 6 FT DRY FERT. RIG GRAIN DRILL HARROH LIQUID FERT. RIG D FSET DIS 3 FT and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by 4.34
14 DESRIPTION IHPLEENT IPLEENT IPLEENT IPLEENT IHPLEENT IPLEENT FIRST NAE QUALIFYING NAHE ORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (PH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT ARKET VALUE LEASE PAYENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR (%> (HR) ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT Ul DEPREIATION FATOR # YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) F U E L U S E ( D E F.. A L. ) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) PLANTER ROLLER ROLLING ULT. SADDLE TANK SHREDDER SPRAY RIG 6 ROH 6 ROH 4 ROH DESRIPTION IPLEENT IPLEHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPENT EQUIPENT EQUIPENT r FIRST QUALIFYING NAE NAE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR I) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /I) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (PH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A L V A G E V A L U E ( % ) URRENT ARKET VALUE L E A S E P A Y E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR ON FAR OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) F U E L U S E ( D E F., A L. ) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) TANDE DIS 0 FT HAGON BULK HILK OOLER ANURE D OOLER STORAGE EL DIGGER/HAGON SILAGE FEED HILL and returns from any one particular farm or rancn operation. These projections were collected and developed by 4.35
15 DESRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR I) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR I) SPEED (PH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR (%) (HR) ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & AL. (#,#) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) EQUIPHENT FEED SYSTE EQUIPENT FEEDER EHANI EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT FEEDERS HOG HAY RAKS ANURE SYSTE ILKING EQUIP DESRIPTION FIRST NAE QUALIFYING NAE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR I) SPEED (HPH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR F FAR PARTS & LABOR ON FAR OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR I) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & AL. (#,#) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) EQUIPENT EQUIPENT EQUIPENT ILKING STALLS INERAL FEEDER 4085 (%) (HR) SPRAYER STOK EQUIPHENT SSBOStStSSE TRAILER STOK EQUIPENT HATER SYSTEH EQUIPHENT annaapbg HATERERS HOG
16 OPERATING INPUT RESOURES arch 7, 986 Operating 3Input Price ash per of Flow easure Row BERUDA SOD bu. 43 BOAR FEED 9.80 cwt. 47 BREEDING DAIRY 4.50 head 48 DEFOLIANT.75 qt. 45 FEEDER PIGS 0 cwt. 46 FERT lb. 44 FERT lb. 44 FERT lb. 44 FERT lb. 44 FERT lb. 44 FINISHING RATION 9.60 cwt. 47 GRAIN IX 9. 4 cwt. 47 GRAIN SUPPL. 9 cwt. 47 HAY 3.75 cwt. 47 HAY STOKER.5 bale 47 HERB, FALL SORGHU 3.0 acre 45 HERB, PRE-EERGE ALFALFA 8 acre 45 HERB, PRE-EERGE BERUDA 5 acre 45 HERB. PRE-EERGE OTTON 8 acre 45 HERB, PRE-EERGE SORGHU 6 acre 45 HERB, PRE-EERGE WHEAT 5.5 acre 45 HERB, YELLOW OTTON 6 lb. 45 INOULANT.75 acre 43 INSET. GREENBUG 4 acre 45 INSET. PLANTBUG.50 acre 45 INSET. SOIL 3 acre 45 INSET. THRIPS acre 45 INSET. WEEVIL 5.50 acre 45 ARKETING HOGS 3.50 head 55 GT. REORDS 8 head 55 ILK REPLAER.55 lb. 47 ISELLANEOUS DAIRY 5 head 55 ISELLANEOUS FARTIN 37 head 55 ISELLANEOUS GOATS head 55 ISELLANEOUS HOGS.75 head 55 ISELLANEOUS PIGS head 55 ISELLANEOUS SHEEP head 55 ISELLANEOUS STOKER 4 head 55 PASTURE DAIRY 0 acre 47 PASTURE NATIVE 5 acre 47 PIG STARTER.93 cwt. 47 PREDATOR ONTROL.35 head 55 PROTEIN SUPPL cwt. 47 SALES OISSION DAIRY 6.05 head 55 SALES OISSION GOATS head 55 SALES OISSION PIG.75 head 55 SALES OISSION SHEEP.60 head 55 SALES OISSION STOKER.5 cwt. 55 SALT 5.30 cwt. 47 SALT & INERALS 7.93 cwt. 47 SALT & INERALS STOKER 7.93 cwt. 47 SEED ALFALFA.50 lb
17 Operating Input Price ash per of Flow easure Row SEED EREAL RYE. 3 lb. 43 SEED LOVER. lb. 43 SEED ORN.38 lb. 43 SEED OTTON.60 lb. 43 SEED FORAGE SORG.6 lb. 43 SEED RYEGRASS.5 lb. 43 SEED SORGHU TREATED.80 lb. 43 SEED WHEAT.0 lb. 43 SALL GRAINS PASTURE acre 47 SORGHU SILAGE 5 ton 47 SOW FEED GESTAT cwt. 47 SOW FEED LATAT cwt. 47 STOKER STEERS 73 cwt. 46 SUPPLEENT 9 cwt. 47 SUPPLIES DAIRY head 55 UTILITIES 40 head 50 VET. EDIINE DAIRY 30 head 48 VET. EDIINE GOATS.80 head 48 VET. EDIINE HOGS.50 head 48 VET. EDIINE PIGS.80 head 48 VET. EDIINE SHEEP.0 head 48 VET. EDIINE SOWS 6.50 head 48 VET. EDIINE STOKER head 48 /-s^\ Information presented is prepared solely as a gonoral guide and Is not intended to recognize or predict the costs 4.38
18 AUTO OR TRUK RESOURES ARH 7, 986 DESRIPTION AUTO OR TRUK FIRST NAE QUALIFYING NAHE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) USEFUL LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL TYPE REAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR HI) SPEED (PH) HIDTH (FT) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (ARES PER HOUR) POHER UNIT ULTIPLIER LABOR ULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT ARKET VALUE LEASE PAYENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FAR HIRED LABOR F FAR PARTS & LABOR ON FAR OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR OR HI) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR ffl YEARS OHNED REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR ff APAITY FUEL USE R & H AL. LEASE AL. (DEF.,AL. (DEF..AL. (#,#) (HOUR,YEAR) PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON GA (%) (HR) staff mombers of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.39
19 USTO OPERATION RESOURES arch 7, 986 AERIAL APPL. ANHYDROUS RIG USTO BALING USTO OBINING USTO OBINING USTO OBINING USTO HAULING USTO HAULING USTO HAULING USTO HAULING USTO SPRIGGING USTO STRIPPING DRY FERT. RIG GINNING HAULING LIQUID FERT. RIG SHEARING SOD SEEDING atlon Price ash per of Flow easure Row USTO 3 acre 4 RENTAL acre 4 HAY.65 bale 4 ORN acre 4 SORGHU acre 4 WHEAT acre 4 ORN. 4 bu. 4 HAY.35 bale 4 SORGHU.5 cwt. 4 WHEAT. 4 bu. 4 BERUDA 35 acre 4 OTTON cwt 4 RENTAL acre 4 OTTON 3.5 cwt. 4 ILK.7 cwt. 4 RENTAL acre 4.50 head 4 USTO 5 acre 4 /^s%. and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collectod and developed by 4.40
20 IRRIGATION EQUIPENT ARH 7, 986 DESRIPTION FIRST NAE QUALIFYING NAE KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) FUEL TYPE FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) U S E F U L L L I F E ( H R ) REHAINING LIFE ( HR) EFFIIENY (%) HIRED LABOR PER SET (HR) OHNER LABOR PER SET (HR) NUHBER SETS URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE PERENT (%) URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ON FAR HIRED LABOR (HR) F FAR PARTS & LABOR ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR) R & H ENG. ESTIATE (%) R & H AL. (#,#) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) FUEL USE ( DEF.,AL.) BOHLS DIST. SYS. HAINLINE POHER PLANT OL.,PIPE,SHAFT DI!SHARGE HEAD BOHLS ENTER PIVOT AINLINE NATURAL GAS OLUN DISHARGE 55 NG DESRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) FUEL TYPE FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) U S E F U L L L I F E ( H R ) REHAINING LIFE ( HR) EFFIIENY (%) HIRED LABOR PER SET (HR) OHNER LABOR PER SET (HR) NUBER SETS URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE PERENT (%) URRENT ARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR ON FARH OHNER LABOR (HR) ANNUAL USE BASE (HR) R & H ENG. ESTIATE (%) R & H A L. ( f fl, f f ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) FUEL USE ( DEF.,AL.) GEAR DRIVE RIGHT ANGLE HATER SOURE HELL Information presented Is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and developed by staff members of tho Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.4
21 FARING OPERATIONS arch 7, 986 Reso. Type Resource Name Resource Description ash Flow Row A G J A J A J A J A J A J A G J TRATOR ANHYDROUS RIG ANHYDROUS RIG OPERATOR LABOR HISELING TRATOR HISEL OPERATOR LABOR ULTIVATING TRATOR ROLLING ULT. OPERATOR LABOR DISING TRATOR FSET DIS OPERATOR LABOR DISING TRATOR TANDE DIS OPERATOR LABOR DRILLING TRATOR GRAIN DRILL SADDLE TANK OPERATOR LABOR DRY FERT. RIG TRATOR DRY FERT. RIG DRY FERT. RIG OPERATOR LABOR A HARROWING TRATOR HARROW OPERATOR LABOR A d A G J HAULING TRATOR WAGON LABOR LIQUID FERT. RIG TRATOR LIQUID FERT. RIG LIQUID FERT. RIG OPERATOR LABOR FJ PIKUP TRUK PIKUP TRUK OPERATOR LABOR A J PLANTING TRATOR SADDLE TANK PLANTER OPERATOR LABOR ROLLING A TRATOR ROLLER J OPERATOR LABOR 50 HP RENTAL 50 HP 6 FT. 0 HP 6 ROW FSET 50 HP 3 FT. TANDE 50 HP 0 FT. 0 HP 0 HP RENTAL 0 HP ANURE 40 HP ANURE 0 HP RENTAL 3/4 TON 3/4 TON 0 HP 6 ROW 0 HP ustom Operation ustom Operation ustom Operation Auto or Truck Information presented is prepared solely as a goneral guide and Is not intended to recognize or predict the costs 4.4
22 jjp\ Reso. Type SHAPING BEDS A TRATOR ROLLING ULT. J OPERATOR LABOR SHREDDING A TRATOR SHREDDER J OPERATOR LABOR SPRAYING A TRATOR SPRAY RIG J OPERATOR LABOR Resource Name Resource Description 0 HP 6 R O W I m p l e m e n t S TA L K F a r m i n g O p e r a t i o n 0 HP 4 R O W I m p l e m e n t 0 HP ash Flow Row staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension service and approved for publication. 4.43
23 BUDGET PARAETERS REPORT arch 7, 986 Parameter Name DIESEL DIESEL BTU ELETRIITY ELETRIITY BTU GASOLINE GASOLINE BTU HIRED LABOR HIRED LABOR IRR INR IRITB IRITE IROB IROE IRPF ITI LP GAS LP GAS BTU LUBE ULTI NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS BTU OWNER LABOR OWNER LABOR IRR PTR Value of easure GAL BTU KWH 3400 BTU.500 GAL BTU HOUR HOUR 00 % 400 % 400 % 400 % 400 % % 400 % 00 GAL BTU 0 NONE 300 F BTU HOUR HOUR 000 % Description ost of Diesel Fuel Energy of Diesel Fuel ost of Electricity E l e c t r i c i t y e n e r g y ost of Gasoline Energy of Gasoline Hired Repair and aintenance Labor Rate Hired Irrigation Insurance Rate, % of arket value Interest Rate, Intermediate Term Borrow. Interest Rate, Intermediate Term Equity Interest Rate, Operating apital Borrow. Interest Rate, Operating apital Equity Interest Rate, Positive ash Flow Interest Rate, Investment apital ost of LP Gas Energy of LP Gas Lube ultiplier ost of Natural Gas Energy of Nat. Gas per 0ft3 or Therm Owner Repair and aintenance Labor Rate Owner Irrigation Personal Property Tax Rate Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs 4.44
N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
More informationPRODUCT NAHE DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER CASH FIXED LANDLORD
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993. B-124K02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD.
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationTexas Panhandle & South Plains Districts
k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 20, NUMBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 0, 1990. B-14K05) DATE STAGE PRODUTION 05/05/90 FIRST UTTING 06//90 SEOND UTTING 07/15/90 THIRD UTTING 09/0/90 FOURTH
More informationC4.46 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 20, 1990 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L A B O R L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E (
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationPRODUCT NAHE NUMBER HEIGHT NUMBER UNITS
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r A p r i l 0, 1 9 9 0. B-14K0) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTIO TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationPrice Unit Weight Cash per of per Flow
ROP PRODUTS REPORT pril 5, 1986 rop Product Name ORN OTTON LINT OTTONSEED DEFIIENY PMT. ORN DEFIIENY PMT. OTTON DEFIIENY PMT. SORGHUM FLX GRZING HY HY OSTL HY SORGHUM KLEINGRSS SEED PENUTS PIK DIVERSION
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationOTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR HIRED LABOR LIVESTOCK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR A B A
LABOR RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTIO FIRST AHE QUALIFYIG AHE COST OR VALUE TOTAL HAGE BEEFITS LABOR TYPE ($/HR) (A,B) OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR HIRED LABOR LIVESTOCK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationEAST TEXAS DISTRICT 9
TEXAS DISTRIT 9 Texas Agricultural Extension Service The Texas A&M University System B-141(09) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Southeast Texas District Projected for 1994 Dr. Arthur R. Gerlow, District 9
More informationUnit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42
Auto or Truck Resources D e s c r i p t i o n A u t o o r o r TTr r u c k Pirst ame H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationTEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More informationEM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More informationCorn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets
Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More information2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst
2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationC OPERATING INPUT RESOURCES April 20, 1990
OPERATIG IPUT RESOURCES April 20, 1990 Operating :[nput Price Unit Cash per of Flow Unit Measure Row ================ ======== ======== ======= == = = 32-0-0.63 gal. 45 4-29-2 1.10 gal. 45 ALLOTMET LEASE.20
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationDelaware County Census Data
Number of s Owners Percent of s Operated by Owner Percent of Tenancy Number of Renters Number of Managers No Return 94 90 96 4 4 0 0 42 35 83 17 6 1 1 62 56 90 10 6 0 4 19 11 58 42 4 4 0 137 114 83 17
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More informationCOTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationTexas Coastal Bend District
Texas Agricultural xtension Service The Texas A&M University System B-11(11) Texas rop nterprise Budgets Texas oastal Bend District Projected for 1995 Dr. Lawrence L. Falconer, District 11 xtension conomist-management
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationUNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT
42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT
More informationPROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.
c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc
More informationAgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016
AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016 AGDEX 821-62 December, 2017 ECONOMICS OF BEEKEEPING IN ALBERTA 2016 Emmanuel Anum Laate Economics Section Economics and Competitiveness Branch Alberta
More information