TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
|
|
- Dinah Reynolds
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch
2 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40" ROWS, TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATED CCSTS AND RETURNS PER CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT COTTONSEED TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS SO COTTON-UPLAND INSECT. COTTON MISC EXP COTTON HERBI. COTTON FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR RE PA IRS -TR AC TOR L A BO R - MACH I NERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL* PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS GIN.BAG* TIES FUEL 6 LUBE TRACTOR REPAIRS TRACTOR LABOR- MACHINERY SUBTOTAL* HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PROJECTED ESQJ II. YOUR YIELD UNIT S/UNIT VALUE ESTIMATE LB TON _ 2&*±2 $ $ It*PUT USE LB APPL SoOO a i e *3mm.*m*m*^m.^mmmmm»mmmMm^sm HOUR DOL x l ± $ 3.21 s C.60 BALE _,_,,,,,, 0o ^_»^_»^ -_- M»^-» HOUR 5.00 _ 2*12 S $ INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTSS $ $ 4. FIXEO COSTS DEPREC* INTEREST. TAXES & INSUR. TRACTOR LAND CNET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS *25 $ e7.2i $ 5. TOTAL PROJECTEO COSTS S 6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS $ * LAND <NET RENT) BASED ON 1/4 OF GROSS INCOME LESS 1/4 OF INSECT. GIN-BAG-TIES GOVT PAYMT NOT INCL. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIOE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FRCP* ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND OEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPRQVEO FOP PUBLICATION. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. The Texas A&M University System. Daniel C. Pfannstiel, Director. College Station, Texas
3 2. COTTON* DRYLAND* (SOLID 40* ROWS) TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS ESTIMATED CCSTS AND RETURNS PER I REGION FUEL,GIL* FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP* COSTS OPERATION NO. GATE OVER HOURS HCURS PER PER SHREOOER 2R 5*56 DEC TANDEM DISC 3*40 DEC tfoldboard 68 2*47 DEC DEC 0. o.aoo C.29 CH_SEL 2*44 J f\ N 0.70 CoO JAN OolO 0.0 FEB TANDEM DISC 3*40 MAR 2o00 Oo HERB SPR/ DISC 61 MAR PJCKUP TRUCK MAR LISTER-.OLNT6R 3*36 APR 1 ooo APR 0. OolOO MAY OolO 0.U25 0*0 C.29 LISTER«PLNT6R 3 q 36 JUNE looo o.ais *86 SAND FIGHTER 3«5fi JUNE o C.71 CULTIVATOR 6R 3*33 JUNE 1.CO ft CULTIVATOR 6R 2*33 JUNE 1.CO C o73 PJCKUP TRUCK IO JUNE OolO 0.0 0*29 PTCKUP TRUCK HO JULY OolO OolOO 0*29 SEPT 0. G.&OO C.29 COTTON STR/BSK 3*64 NOV 0o50 C NOV OolO C.125 OolOO COTTCN T. 38L *62 NOV x122-0*215-2x*& -1**2 ^ s TOTALS ^ \
4 3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R F O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T U P D A T I N G A F T E R 0 1 / 0 9 / 8 1. B«1241(C 5) C O T T O N * O R V L A N O o N A R R O W R C «i. T E X A S R C L L I N G P L A I N S I R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E CATEGORY G R O S S R E C E I P T S COTTON LINT COTTONSEED TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS PROJECTED PRQJEC.I52 YOUR VIELC UNIT S/UNIT VALUE ESTIMATE LB TCN 0., JL0<,00 _.-25**2 $ S VA R I A B L E C O S T S PREHARVEST COSTS SO COTTON-WPLAND INSECT. COTTON MISC EXPENSE HERBI. COTTON CUS. STRIP F U E L & L U B E T R A C T O R REPAI RS TRACTOR LABOR MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL* PREHARVEST HARVEST COST'S GIN.BAG* TIES F U E L & L U B E T R A C T O R REPAIRS TRACTOR L A B O R M A C H I N E R Y SUBTOTAL* HARVEST T O TA L VA R I A B L E C O S T S INPUT USE 1C.00 LB. 0.» o.io APPL 8.00 ceo mm L ±i. _ DCL. l i»00 I 6 *O *00 LB. 0, mtmmwm mwmm^mmmmmm 1.82 v, HCUR _ DOL _ 2x51 $ $ Co-0 BALE i B,, 0.20 HCUR *22 s s $ 9C.83 s 3. I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S rs s $ 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC.* INTEREST.TAXES TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTEO COSTS. I N S U R _ II.. Ill II 5^75 1 s S s NET PROJECTEO RETURNS r $ S A N D ( N E T R E N T ) B A S E D C N i / 4 O F G R O S S I N C O M E L E S S 1 / 4 O F I N S E C T. G I N - B A G - T I E S * I E L D B A S E D C N B R O A D C A S T P L A N T I N G I N 2 0 " R O W S. G O V T PAY M T N O T I N C L. I N F O R M AT I O N P R E S E N T E D I S P R E PA R E D S O L E LY A S A G E N E R A L G U I D E A. D I S N O T I N T E N D E O T O R E C O G N I Z E O R P R E O I C T T H E C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S F R O M A N Y O N E PA R T I C U L A R FA R M O R R A N C H O P E R AT I O N. T H E S E P R O J E C T I O N S W E R E C O L L E C T E D A N D D E V E L O P E D B Y S TA F F M E M B E R S O F T H E T E X A S A G R I C U LT U R A L E X T E N S I O N S E R V I C E A N O A P P R O V E D F C R P U B L I C AT I O N.
5 li. COTTON, DRYLAND* NARROW ROW* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E ^ % icn ca aaiac-cooaai OPERATION OlCD #0434QCQCQOOQCQOOQ) FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIWES LA8QR MACHINE LUB..REP* COSTS NO. DATE OVER HOURS HCURS PER PER cgcptstf-kaiuacag-ttt--m i laoaoioa.aaaa a.taaaala.oooa.ctaiaan. oeieia SHREDDER 2R TANDEM DISC MOLDBOARD 6B CHISEL TANDEM OISC afckup TRUCK PTCKUP TRUCK HER9 SPR/DISC =MCKUP TRUCK SAT.D FIGHTER =»5CKUP TRUCK 3 I CKUP TRUCK COTTCN TR 5BL 5.56 DEC *40 DEC *47 OEC OEC OolO 0.0 J/.NJ *44 JAN 0.70 C ,40 FEB 2.C FEB C.29 so MAR C.29 3*61 MAR Ooase APR C.29 MAY JUNE C.29 3*51 JUNE JULY C.29 SEPT 0. o.aoo 0.4- C.29 NOV *63 NOV a.oo.*_i_q_ -2*152-1*22-1*23 TOTALS
6 5- PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/09/81. GUAR* DRVLAND* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER B-124KC 5) CATEGORY 1. GROSS RECEIPTS GUAR TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS 2. VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS GUAR SEED MISC EXPENSE FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR REPA IRS TRACTOR LABOR MACH INERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL* PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CSTM HVST GUAR CSTM HAUL GUAR SUBTOTALo HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PROJECTED YIELD UNIT 7.00 CWT. IhPUT USE 8.00 LB. DOLo 2.80 HCUR 8.38 DOL CWT. BREAK-EVEN PRICE, VARIABLE CCSTS $ 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXFD COSTS DEPREC* INTEREST* TAXES & INSUR. TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS *23 '. $ S O. 1 1 $. 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS BREAK-EVEN PRICE, TOTAL CCSTS 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS A C R E $ $ / C W T. A C R E $ $ L A N O C H A R G E U S E S L A N D L O R D ' S S H A R E C F G P G S S 3 3 * L E S S 3 3 % O F H A U L ANO HARVEST. I N F O R M AT I O N P R E S E N T E D I S P R E PA R E D S O L E LY A S A G E N E R A L G U I D E A N D I S N O T I N T E N D E D T O R E C O G N I Z E O R P R E D I C T T. E C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S F R O M A N Y O N E PA R T I C U L A R FA R M O R R A N C H O P E R AT I C N. T H E S E P R O J E C T I O N S W E R E C O L L E C T E D A N D D E V E L O P E D B Y S TA F F M E M B E R S O F T H E T E X A S A G R I C U LT U R A L E X T E N S I O N S E R V I C E A N D A P P R O V E O F O P P U B L I C AT I O N.
7 6. GUAR. DRYLAND* TEXAS ROLLING FLAINS I REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER / ^ % K OPERATION OH C3 C_9 V_ IQ _3 QOQ.<9 _-,*-" * C3 CS34&4 MOLDBOARD 6B CHISEL PICKUP PICKUP TANOEM TRUCK TRUCK OISC LISTER~PLNT6R SANO FIGHTER ROLLING CULT LI5TER«PLNT6R ROLLING CULT CULTIVATOR 6R I CKUP TRUCK FUEL.OIL. FIXEO ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. CCSTS N O o D A T E O V E R H O U R S H C U R S P E R A C R E PER > _ 3 - a n < 0 4 S c i G. a o i e _ K B Q a o o t a ( a t n c a «s a c i a >. 2*47 DEC O0O DEC 0. OolOO 2*44 JAN JAN OolO OolOO C.29 FEB OolO 0.0 C.29 2o.0 MAR O.SO C.68 3*36 MAR loco MAR APR OolO OolOO Co 29 3*51 MAY 2o *30 MAY l.co MAY OolO 0.0 3o36 JUNE *30 JUNE JUNE 0. O.iOO 2*33 JULY 1.CO C JULY AUG C.29 SEPT C.29 OCT o.io.g_.l_. -flalflft.2***.2x23 <****x TOTALS ^-«%
8 7. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TC BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/09/81. B«124KC 5) WHEAT. ORYLAND* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS WHEAT WHEAT PASTURE TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS SEED WHEAT FERT _N) APPL8D FERT (P) APPL D INSECTICIDE CROP INS. :WHEAT MISC EXPENSE FUEL 6 LUBE TRACTOR REPAIRS TRACTOR LABOR MACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL* PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS CSTM HVST WHEAT CSTM HAUL WHEAT SUBTOTAL HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTSS $ $ 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST* TAXES & INSUR TRACTOR LAND (NET -HARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS PROJECTED YIELD UNIT S/UNIT VALUE eu I DAYS 0.13$..25* S INPUT USE BU. LB. LB. APPL DQL DQL o HCUR a $ BU *23 s $ s $ *70 «21* $ S S 2 3 o 9 8 $ YOUR ESTIMATE LAND (NET RENT) BASED ON 33% CF GROSS INCOME LESS 33% OF FERT. INSECT* HARVEST AND HAUL. GOVT PAYMENT NOT INCLUDED. FORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO IS INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS ANO RETURNS FROM ANY UNE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOB PUBLICATION.
9 8. WHEAT* DRYLAND* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AMD RETURNS PER OPERATION ITEM NO. DATE TIMES LABOR OVER HOURS FUEL*OIL* FIXEO MACHINE LUB.. REP. COSTS HOURS PER PEP c a c a c a o. a c a e. c d o o a s c a c a t s.» «o..... * (.«CHISEL CHISEL CHISEL GRAIN DRILL PICKUP PICKUP PICKUP PICKUP PICKUP TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK 6*44 6*44 6,44 6*58 JUNE JUNE JULY JULY AUG AUG SEPT SEPt OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY 0. l.co Co-25.<!_- 0.0 OolOO OolOO OolOO x o49 -_* C.29 C.29 C.29.2x23 TOTALS ^ \
10 9- PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TC BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0 1/09/81 B-124UC 5) ALFALFA ESTABLISHMENTS DRYLAND* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER CATEGORY GROSS RECEIPTS TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS ALFALFA SEED FERT (N) APPL8D FERT (P) APPL D FUEL & LUBE TRACTOR REP A IRS -TR ACTOR L ABOR - NI ACHINERY OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL* PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PROJECTEO YIELD UNIT NPUT USE LB LB LBo 1-04 HCUR DOL. PRQdgCJgO YOUR S / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E $ 0. 0 $ 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC.INTEREST.TAXES & INSUR TRACTOR LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS $ 15* $ $ $ $ $ INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
11 . ALFALFA ESTABLISHMENT* ORYLANO. TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION ESTIMATED COSTS ANO RETURNS PER OPERATION ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.oRTEPo COSTS NO* DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER CHISEL CHISEL GRAIN DRILL 2o44 JULY JULY *44 AUG *. AUG 0* OolOO 2*53 SERT C SEPT 0. OolOO C.29 1Q oct fii-isa -_U 2.2x23 TOTALS ^ ^
12 11. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/09/81. ALFALFA. ORYLANO* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGICN ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER B«=1241(C 5) CATEGORY PROJECTED S8Qa.I_.IIfi YOUR Y I E L D U N I T S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E 1. GROSS RECEIPTS A L F A L F A H A V T O N ? S? [ C 0 T O T A L P R O J E C T E D R E T U R N S $ * Z Z Z Z Z _ - 2. V A R I A B L E C O S T S I N P U T U S E PREHARVEST CCSTS FERT _P8 APPL D 2C.00 LB F U E L & L U B E T R A C T O R A C R E 0. 0 ~ Z Z E Q U I P M E N T A C R E R E P A I R S T R A C T O R A C R E C O ~ " Z Z Z E Q U I P M E N T A C R E l o l 3 Z Z Z LABOR MACHINERY C75 HOUR S O P E R A T I N G C A P I T A L D O L ^ 4 f t ~ Z Z Z S U B T O T A L. P R E H A R V E S T A C R E S S ~ HARVEST COSTS C U S T H R V A L F A L F A B A L E _ \ * 2 S U B T O T A L * H A R V E S T A C R E S S ~ T O T A L V A R I A B L E C O S T S A C R E $ $ BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS S 26.92/TON 3. I N C O M E A B O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S A C R E $ S 4. FIXEO COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST.TAXES & INSUR. T R A C T O R A C R E 0. 0 E Q U I P M E N T A C R E I " ~ PRORATED ESTABLISHMENT DOL ~ L A N O N E T S H A R E - R E N T ) A C R E 3 1 * 3 2 Z Z Z T O T A L F I X E O C O S T S A C R E $ ~ $ Z Z 1 5. T O T A L P R O J E C T E D C O S T S A C R E S $ B R E A K - E V E N P R I C E * T O TA L C O S T S / T O N 6. N E T P R O J E C T E O R E T U R N S A C R E S $ LAND CHARGE USES LANDLORD'S SHARE OF GROSS 3325 LESS 33% OF FERTILIZER AND HARVEST. ESTABLISHMENT COSTS PRORATED OVER SIX YEARS. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO IS rnot INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY %IE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE OLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPRCVED FOP PUELICATIONo
13 12. ALFALFA. DRYLAND. TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGICN ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER /<^l OPERATION ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.«REPci C C S T NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER AC E_Kt9 -B O CD '*my_» - D OaiC3 > a_ QO-«_TCa40QC3C.C_C D«OC_>_-G 0D4V«a,«_1. CB «.«>-_«APR 0. OolOO MAY JUNE OolOO JULY 0. OelOO C.29 AUG 0. 0ol25 OolOO C.29 SEPT OolO..2*125-2*122-2*23 TOTALS /*S\ ^ \
14 _ f _ ' t _ i -. _ - & _ -» - ^ : - r _ e ^ ^ 13. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/09/81. ALFALFA ESTABLISHMENT* IRRIGATED* TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER B-124HC 5) I REGION CATEGORY GROSS TOTAL RECEIPTS PROJECTED RETURNS» VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST COSTS ALFALFA SEED FERT «N) APPLBD FERT (P) APPL D (RRIGATION SATER FUEL 6 LUBE TRACTOR EOUIPMENT IRRIGATION RE PA IRS TRACTOR IRRIGATION LABOR MACHINERY IRRIGATION OPERATING CAPITAL SUBTOTAL* PREHARVEST HARVEST COSTS SUBTOTAL. HARVEST TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS PROJECTED YIELD INPUT USE 2CoC o C40 12o92 4. FIXED COSTS DEPREC. INTEREST.TAXES 6 INSUR. TRACTOR IRRIGATION LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) TOTAL FIXED COSTS 5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS UNIT LB. LB. LB. ACIN HOUR HCUR OOL. _S9 J_ I!_o your S / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E $ _.0 $ C _ 1*21 S S s 0.0* $. s $ -63o72 $ 4.70 S *22 3o.se S $ s "»94.28 $ S INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARE- SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANtl t. «^_ PA T??f %ZC06mZe * PRE0,CT T«COSTS ANO RETURNS fsss Inv.. - F * R " R " A N C H O P «" I O N. T H E S E P R O J E C T I O N S - E R E EXTENSION -XT-NS.ON SERVICE _R E ANO _P APPROVED ST*FF M6MBERS FOP PUBLICATION. F THE TEX*S A-R-C-L. URAL
PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationUNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
More informationTEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More information30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationUNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT
42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT
More informationPROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.
c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More information49. PEANUTS. SPANISH ORYLANO T E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E
49. PEANUTS. SPANISH ORYLANO T E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E ^ \ FUEL,OIL. FIXEO ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB..REP. CCSTS OPERATION
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationUNIT CWT TON LBS. ACRE APPL APPL APPL ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR HOUR DOL. CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. ACRE HOUR CWT*
36 WATERMELONS. NORTHEAST TEXAS REGION EST IMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE CF COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WATERMELONS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS
More information'f^ CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY
63 CITRUS ESTABLISHMENT, 2ND YEAR, IRRIGATED, TEXAS RIO GRANDE ESTIMATEC COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE VALLEY UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O P COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECFIPTS FROM PRODUCTION 0.0
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationTEXAS UPPER GULF COAST
r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationCORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationTexas Panhandle & South Plains Districts
k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell
More informationPROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION^ THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More information/*^^_>r ORANGES. PURCHASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT
42 ORANGES. PURCASED MATURE GROVE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER IG LEVEL MANAGEMENT / ^^v- OPERAMON IT-. NO. DATE FUEL.OIL. FIXED TIMES LABOR MACINE LUB..REP. COSTS
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationEconomics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationRICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationSOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 SOYBEANS 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-02 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
More information. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO
_- LISTING OF THE NAME SET AMI PRICE VECTOR REGION NUMBERS DATES 101480 151 PASTURE 152 SM. gr. PASTURE 133 PAST E«TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL 157 COASTAL RYEGRASS 158
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationJ J ) " '- ACRE L SO DAYS
L I S T I N G O F. - \ A M E S E T A N D P R I C - V E C T O R REGION number: DATE: 131480 151 PASTURE MAINT. 152 SM. GR. PASTURE 153 PASTURE. TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL
More informationrw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V
r - hlrr M H ^ _ ^ t t _ ^ ^ 1 _ V H T. h1 t\v?vc rw^vr! i ^ _.! L ' _ \.V L... r TEXAS EL PASO FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas El Paso Re gion are based on estimates of yields, production input
More informationCOTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2008 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2007-01 December 2007 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationCOTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 COTTON 2010 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2009-02 December 2009 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationThe Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More informationImpact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
More informationRICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-04 October 2017 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More information2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationRICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2017 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2016-04 October 2016 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationCorn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets
Corn, Grain Sorghum, and Wheat 2017 Planning Budgets Contents Acknowledgments... 2 2017 Budget Committees... 2 2017 Planning Budgets... 3 Budgets for Agricultural Enterprises... 3 Methods and Procedures...
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More informationGAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7
FYE 09/30/92 JULY 92 0.00 254,550.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 254,550.00 AUG 10,616,710.31 5,299.95 845,656.83 84,565.68 61,084.86 23,480.82 339,734.73 135,893.89 67,946.95
More informationPEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 PEANUTS 2019 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2018-07 October 2018 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
More informationEM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
More information72. <~*x TOTALS lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i
lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i 72. C U C U M B E R S ( P I C K L E S ) I R R I G A T E D T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I G N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A
More information12/07/2016 Jeremy E. Machanic Receipt collections Rent/Lease Income - July ,987.16
Sundial Real Estate 263 W 3rd Place Mesa, AZ 85201 Period: 01 Dec 2016-31 Dec 2016 Owner Statement Henry Barcena 2451 Redwing Ln Oxnard, CA 93036 Properties Vaughn Gilbert, AZ Date Payee / Payer Type Reference
More informationN o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More informationEM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
More information» FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
P E A N U T S. S PA N I S H. D R Y L A N D, L O W E R S O U T H C E N T R A L T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION» FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR
More informationCONTENT. I. Project at a Glance. A Small write up about the Project & Promoters Back Ground. Project Implementation Schedule. Financial Statements
CONTENT I. Project at a Glance II. III. IV. A Small write up about the Project & Promoters Back Ground Project Implementation Schedule Financial Statements FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1 Details of Project 2 Projected
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationEMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique
EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED Investment Proposal Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique 20 July 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name: EMVEST LIMOPO Lda (MATUBA), District Chokwe, Province of Gaza.
More informationEconomic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms
& RESEARCH Economic Impacts of the Safety Net Provisions in the 2012 Senate and House Farm Bills on AFPC s Representative Crop Farms Working Paper 12-2 July 2012 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.
Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD
More information