arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 9 Jan 2016

Transcription

1 Local Weak Observability Conitions of Sensorless AC Drives Mohama Koteich, Stuent Member, IEEE, Abelmalek Maloum, Gilles Duc an Guillaume Sanou arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 9 Jan 2016 KEYWORDS Sensorless control, Synchronous motor, Inuction Motor, AC machine. ABSTRACT Alternating current (AC) electrical rive control without mechanical sensors is an active research topic. This paper stuies the observability of both inuction machine an synchronous machine sensorless rives. Observer-base sensorless techniques are known for their eteriorate performance in some operating conitions. An observability analysis of the machines helps unerstaning (an improving) the observer s behavior in the aforementione conitions. I. INTRODUCTION Eco-frienly technologies have attracte worlwie attention ue to several environmental issues. In this context, electric motors have become a serious competitor with combustion engines in many inustrial applications, especially in automotive inustry. The use of AC rives has been pioneere by the recent avances in power semiconuctor switching frequencies, an power converter topologies [1]. High performance control of AC Mohama Koteich is with Renault S.A.S. Technocentre, Guyancourt, France, an also with L2S - CentraleSupélec - CNRS - Paris-Su University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France ( mohama.koteich@renault.com). Abelmalek Maloum is with Renault S.A.S. Technocentre, Guyancourt, France ( abelmalek.maloum@renault.com). Gilles Duc an Guillaume Sanou are with L2S - CentraleSupélec - CNRS - Paris-Su University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France ( gilles.uc@centralesupelec.fr; guillaume.sanou@centralesupelec.fr).

2 rives can be achieve using vector control [2], which requires the measurement of the rotor position. For many reasons, mainly for cost reuction an reliability increase, mechanical sensorless techniques have attracte the attention of researchers as well as many large manufacturers [3]. These techniques consist of sensing the motor currents an voltages, an using them as inputs to an estimation algorithm (such as the state-observer algorithm) that estimates the rotor angular spee an/or position. One limitation of the use of sensorless techniques is the eteriorate performance in some operating conitions: namely the low-spee operation in the case of synchronous machines (SMs), an the low-frequency input voltage in the case of inuction machines (IMs) [4]. Usually, this problem is viewe as a stability problem, an sometimes is treate base on experimental results. However, the real problem lies in the so-calle observability conitions of the system. Over the past few years, a promising approach, base on the local weak observability concept [5], has been use in orer to better unerstan the eteriorate performance of sensorless AC rives. Several papers have been publishe on this topic: authors in [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] stuy the local observability of IMs in some operating conitions, namely for zero acceleration an low-frequency input voltages. Among SMs, only the permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) is stuie in the literature [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]. A unifie approach of AC rives observability analysis is propose in this paper. Sufficient conitions for both IM an SM s observability are stuie. Concerning the IM, a more general stuy, that covers a wier region of operating conitions, is one; the spee is not consiere to be constant, which requires the estimation of the resistant torque. Concerning the SMs, the woun-rotor synchronous machine (WRSM) is stuie, an consiere to be the general case of SMs; its moel an observability conitions are easily extene to the permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) an the synchronous reluctance machine (SyRM). The main purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better unerstaning of the eteriorate performance of sensorless techniques. The paper is ivie into five sections; after this introuction, the local weak observability concept is presente in section 2. Sections 3 an 4 are eicate to the observability stuy of IMs an SMs respectively. Conclusions are mae in section 5.

3 II. LOCAL WEAK OBSERVABILITY THEORY The local weak observability concept [5], base on the rank criterion, is introuce in this section. A. Problem statement Systems of the following form (enote Σ) are consiere: ẋ = f (x(t), u(t)) Σ : (1) y = h (x(t)) where x X R n is the state vector, u U R m is the control vector (input), y R p is the output vector, f an h are C functions. The observation problem can be then formulate as follows [14]: Given a system escribe by a representation (1), fin an accurate estimate ˆx(t) for x(t) from the knowlege of u(τ), y(τ) for 0 τ t. The system observability is require for observer esign. For nonlinear systems, global observability is not practical, since the observer often requires the system to be instantaneously observable in a certain neighborhoo of the state trajectories; the system shoul be locally weakly observable. B. Observability rank conition The system Σ is sai to satisfy the observability rank conition at x 0, if the observability matrix, enote by O y (x), is full rank at x 0. O y (x) is given by: [ L 0 f h(x) L fh(x) L 2 f O y (x) = x h(x)... Ln 1 f h(x) ] T x=x 0 (2) where L k fh(x) is the kth-orer Lie erivative of the function h with respect to the vector fiel f. C. Observability theorem A system Σ (1) satisfying the observability rank conition at x 0 is locally weakly observable at x 0. More generally, a system Σ (1) satisfying the observability rank conition for any x 0, is locally weakly observable [5]. Rank criterion gives only a sufficient conition for local weak observability.

4 III. OBSERVABILITY ANALYSIS OF INDUCTION MACHINES This section eals with the local observability conitions of inuction machines. First, the machine moel is presente, then its local weak observability is stuie. In this stuy, the spee is not consiere to be constant, therefore the resistant torque, which is assume to vary slowly, shoul be ae to the estimate state vector. A. Machine moel The IM can be moele as a three-phase stator an a three-phase rotor. The stator is supplie by a three-phase source, whereas the rotor winings are in short-circuit (see Figure 1). The IM state-space moel in the two-phase stator reference frame (α s β s ) can be written as follows: I s = 1 ( ) ] [V s r s I s + MLr I 2 ω e J 2 Ψ r (3a) σl s 1τr ( ) Ψ r 1 = I 2 ω e J 2 Ψ r + M I s (3b) τ r τ r where ω e T r = 3 p 2 M Is T J 2 Ψ r p 2 J L r J T r (3c) = 0 (3) r s = R s + R r M 2 L 2 r ; σ = 1 M 2 L s L r ; τ r = L r R r (4) R, L an M stan respectively for the resistance, inuctance an mutual inuctance. The inices s an r stan for stator an rotor parameters. p is the number of pole pairs, J is the inertia of the rotor with the associate loa, ω e is the electrical spee of the rotor an T r is the resistant torque. I s, Ψ r an V s stan for the stator currents, rotor fluxes an stator voltages in the stator reference frame (α s β s ) : I s = [ i sαs i sβs ] T ; Ψ r = The moel (3) can be fitte to the structure Σ (1) by taking: [ ] T [ ] T ψ rαs ψ rβs ; V s = v sαs v sβs (5) x = [ I T s Ψ T r ω e T r ] T ; u = V s ; y = I s (6)

5 I n is the n n ientity matrix, an J 2 is the π/2 rotation matrix : I 2 = 1 0 ; J 2 = 0 1 (7) b s β r β s β r β s q s v bs α r v as θ eαs a s s v cs θ s θ r α r θ e c s α s (a) Schematic representation (b) Vector iagram Fig. 1: Schematic representation (a) an vector iagram (b) of the inuction machine. (α s β s ), (α r β r ) an ( s q s ) are respectively the two-phase stator, rotor, an rotating magnetic fiel reference frames. B. Observability stuy The system (3) is a 6-th orer system. The local observability stuy requires the evaluation of erivatives up to the 5-th orer of the output. However, regaring the equations complexity, only the first an secon orer erivatives are evaluate for the IM in this paper. Higher orer erivatives of the output are too lengthy, an very ifficult to eal with. As the observability rank criterion provies sufficient conitions, information containe in the first an secon orer erivatives is rich enough to stuy the IM observability. It shoul be notice that, in practice, observer-base techniques o not usually nee information on higher than secon orer erivatives.

6 Symbolic math software is use te evaluate complex expressions. Moreover, the following change of variables is mae in orer to make the stuy easier: Ĩ s = σl s I s (8) Ψ r = M Ψ r L r (9) The system (3) becomes: Ĩs = V s + aĩs + γ(t) Ψ r (10a) with Ψ r ω e T r = γ(t) Ψ r (a b) Ĩs (10b) = c J ĨT s J 2 Ψr p J T r (10c) = 0 (10) a = r s ; b = R ( ) s ; c = 3p2 1 ; γ(t) = I 2 ω e J 2 σl s σl s 2σL s τ r The scale output is: ; γ = ω e J 2 (11) its first orer erivative is: y = Ĩs = ĩsα s ĩ sβs (12) Aing (10a) an (10b) gives: ẏ = Ĩs = V s + aĩs + γ(t) Ψ r (13) then: Ĩs + Ψ r = V s + bĩs (14) Ψ r = V s + bĩs Ĩs The secon orer erivative of the output can be then written as: 2 Ĩ s = Ṽs 2 + aĩs + γ(t) Ψ r (15) + γ Ψ r (16) = V s + aĩs + γ(t)v s + γ(t)bĩs γ(t) Ĩs + γ Ψ r (17) = V s + γ(t)v s + (ai 2 γ(t)) Ĩs + γ(t)bĩs + γ Ψ r (18)

7 The observability stuy is one using the scale output an its erivatives: y = Ĩs (19) ẏ = V s + aĩs + γ(t) Ψ r (20) ÿ = V s + av s + ( a 2 I 2 (a b)γ(t) ) ( ) γ Ĩ s + + aγ(t) γ(t)2 Ψ r (21) The IM observability matrix, evaluate for these erivatives, can be written as: Oy IM a 0 τ = r ω e ψrβs a ω e τ r ψ rαs e 11 e 12 f 11 f 12 (22) e 21 e 22 f 21 f 22 with: 11 = a 2 a b τ r c J ψ 2 rβ s ; 12 = (a b)ω e + c J ψ rαs ψrβs (23) 22 = a 2 a b τ r c J ψ 2 rα s ; 21 = (a b)ω e + c J ψ rαs ψrβs (24) e 11 = a 1 τ r τr 2 e 22 = a 1 τ r τr 2 + ω 2 e + c J ĩsβ s ψrβs ; e 12 = aω e 2 ω e τ r + ω e c J ĩsα s ψrβs (25) + ω 2 e + c J ĩsα s ψrαs ; e 21 = aω e + 2 ω e τ r ω e c J ĩsβ s ψrαs (26) ) f 11 = 2ω e ψrαs (a b)ĩ sβs + (a 2τr ψ rβs ; f 12 = p J ψ rβs (27) ) f 21 = 2ω e ψrβs + (a b)ĩ sαs (a + 2τr ψ rαs ; f 22 = p J ψ rαs (28) The matrix O IM y (22) is a 6 6 matrix, its eterminant is the following: IM = p J M 2 L 2 r [ 1 ω e ( ) ψ 2 τ r rαs + ψrβ 2 s (ω e ) ( ψrαs τr 2 ψ rβs ψ )] rβ s ψ rαs The expression (29) gives a sufficient local weak observability conition of the system (3); the value of IM has to be non-zero to ensure the local observability of sensorless IM rives. (29)

8 1) Results interpretation: The expression (29) evokes in the following two particular situations (to ensure the local weak observability of the system): ω e = 0: For constant rotor spee, the rotor fluxes shoul be neither constant (or slowly varying) nor linearly epenent, i.e. ψ rαs k.ψ rβs, for all constant k. ψ rαs = ψ rβs = 0: If the rotor fluxes are slowly varying (constant), which usually correspons to low-frequency input voltages, the spee has to vary (rapily). 2) Geometrical interpretation: The IM is locally weakly observable if the eterminant IM (29) is ifferent from zero, this means: τ r ω e 1 + τ 2 r ω 2 e ψ rαs Knowing that (Figure 1b): the conition (30) becomes: ψ rβs ψ rβs ψ rαs ψrα 2 s + ψrβ 2 s arctan(τ rω e ) ( ) arctan ψrβs ψ rαs (30) ( ) arctan ψrβs = ψ rαs θ s (31) ω s arctan(τ rω e ) (32) where ω s is the angular frequency of the rotating magnetic fiel. The relationship (32) tells that if the rotor spee ω e is slowly varying, the input voltage frequency shoul not be very low. Nevertheless, in a wie range of applications, the rotor spee is (almost) constant uring the most of machine operation time, the main conclusion to ensure the IM local weak observability is that the input voltage frequency shoul not be very low. IV. OBSERVABILITY ANALYSIS OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES An SM is a three-phase machine, having the same stator structure as the IM. Depening on the rotor structure, there exist three main SM sub-families (Figures 2, 3, an 4): wounrotor (WRSM), permanent-magnet (PMSM) an reluctance type SyRM synchronous machines. Both WRSM an PMSM can be either salient type (non cylinrical) rotor or non-salient type (cylinrical) rotor. Interior PMSM (IPMSM) is a salient machine, surface-mounte PMSM (SPMSM) is a non-salient machine. In this section, WRSM is stuie, an consiere to be the general case of SMs.

9 b q β q β Ψ O v b v f v a θ α a L i q c v c θ O θ M f i f L δ i α (a) Schematic representation (b) Vector iagram showing the (ashe) observability vector Fig. 2: Schematic representation (a) an vector iagram (b) of the woun-rotor synchronous machine. (αβ) an (q) are respectively the stator an rotor reference frames. A. Woun-rotor synchronous machine moel The state-space moel of the WRSM is written in the two-phase (αβ) stationary reference frame (see Figure 2a), in a way to be fitte to the structure (1): I ω θ where the state, input an output vectors are respectively: [ T x = I T ω θ] ; u = V = = L 1 R eq I + L 1 V (33a) = p J T m p J T r (33b) = ω (33c) [ v α v β v f ] T ; y = I = [ i α i β i f ] T (34) I an V are the current an voltage vectors. Inices α an β stan for stator signals, inex f stans for rotor (fiel) ones. ω stans for the electrical rotor angular spee an θ for the electrical angular position of the rotor. L is the (position-epenent) matrix of inuctances, an R is the

10 matrix of resistances: L 0 + L 2 cos 2θ L 2 sin 2θ M f cos θ L = L 2 sin 2θ L 0 L 2 cos 2θ M f sin θ ; R eq = R + L R s 0 0 θ ω ; R = 0 R s 0 M f cos θ M f sin θ L f 0 0 R f J is the moment of inertia of the rotor with its associate loa, p is the number of pole pairs, T r is the resistant torque an T m is the motor torque: T m = 3 2 pm fi f (i β cos θ i α sin θ) 3 2 pl [ 2 (i 2 α i 2 β) sin 2θ 2i α i β cos 2θ ] (35) β β v β v β θ θ v α α v α α (a) IPMSM (b) SPMSM Fig. 3: Schematic representation of the IPMSM (a) an the SPMSM (b) B. Other SMs moels The other SMs can be seen as special cases of the salient-type WRSM; the IPMSM (Figure 3a) moel can be erive by consiering the rotor magnetic flux to be constant: an by substituting M f i f by the permanent magnet flux ψ r : i f = 0 (36) i f = ψ r M f (37)

11 β β v β v β θ θ v α α v f v α α (a) SyRM (b) Non-salient WRSM Fig. 4: Schematic representation of the SyRM (a) an the non-salient WRSM (b) The SyRM (Figure 4a) moel can be erive from the IPMSM moel by consiering the rotor magnetic flux ψ r to be zero: ψ r 0 (38) The equations of the non-salient WRSM (Figure 4b) an SPMSM (Figure 3b) are the same as the salient WRSM an IPMSM respectively, except that the stator self-inuctances are constant an inepenent of the rotor position, that is: L 2 = 0 = L = L q = L 0 (39) C. Observability stuy The system (33) is a 5-th orer system. Its observability stuy requires the evaluation of the output erivatives up to the 4-th orer. In this stuy, only the first orer erivatives are calculate, higher orer ones are very ifficult to calculate an to eal with. This gives the following partial observability matrix: I Oy SM = 3 O 3 1 O 3 1 L 1 R eq L 1 L I L 1 I (40) L 1 L ωi

12 where O n m is an n m zero matrix. L an L enote, respectively, the first an secon partial erivatives of L with respect to θ. It is sufficient to have five linearly inepenent lines of matrix (40) to insure the local observability of the system. The first five lines, which come from the first erivatives of i α an i β, are stuie. This choice is motivate by the fact that these currents are available for measurement in all synchronous machines, the rotor current (that gives the sixth line of matrix (40)) oes not exist for PMSM an SyRM. Another reason comes from the physics of the machine: i f is a DC signal, whereas both i α an i β are AC signals, so it is more convenient for physical interpretation to take them together. Symbolic math software is use to calculate the eterminant. Currents an fluxes are expresse in the rotor (q) reference frame (using the Park transformation) in orer to make the interpretation easier. The eterminant is written, in terms of stator currents an fluxes, uner the following general form: SM = L [( ) 1 (ψ L q i ) 2 + L δ i 2 q ω + ψ L D L q L i q + ψ ( q i i ψ q + i )] q ψ with L D = L M 2 f L f (41) ; L = L δ M 2 f L f ; L = L 0 + L 2 ; ; L q = L 0 L 2 ; ; L δ = L L q (42) The observability conitions for the ifferent SMs can be euce from (41), by replacing the fluxes by their expressions in the rotor (q) reference frame as the following: a) WRSM: ψ = L i + M f i f ; ψ q = L q i q 1 [ W RSM = (Lδ i + M f i f ) 2 ] + L L δ i 2 q ω L D L q + L [( ) i L δ L D L q + M i f f i q (L δ i + M f i f ) i ] q The eterminant of the non-salient rotor WRSM (L δ = 0) can be then euce: N W RSM = M f 2 [ i 2 L D L fω M ( )] f i f i q q L f i i q f b) PMSM: ψ = L i + ψ r ; ψ q = L q i q ; L D = L ; L = L δ [ 1 [ IP MSM = (Lδ i + ψ r ) 2 ] + L 2 L L δi 2 L δ i q ω + L δ q L L q i q (L δ i + ψ r ) i ] q SP MSM = ψ2 r ω L 2 0 (43) (44) (45) (46)

13 c) SyRM: ψ = L i ; ψ q = L q i q ; L D = L ; L = L δ [ ] SyRM = L2 δ (i ) 2 + i 2 i q ω + L L q i i q q i 1) Results interpretation: The expression of W RSM (43) shows that WRSM can be observable at stanstill if the currents i, i q an i f are not constant at the same time. Non-salient WRSM (44), IPMSM (45) an SyRM (47) can be also observable at stanstill. However, the observability of SPMSM at stanstill cannot be guarantee. 2) Geometrical interpretation: The observability conition W RSM 0 implies: ( ) i (L δ i + M f i f ) L q i L δ + M i f f L i q ω (L δ i + M f i f ) 2 + L L δ i 2 q The above equation can be written as: then ω (L δi + M f i f ) 2 + L 2 i2 q (L δ i + M f i f ) 2 + L L δ i 2 q ω (L δi + M f i f ) 2 + L 2 i2 q (L δ i + M f i f ) 2 + L L δ i 2 q The following approximation can be aopte 1 : (L δ i + M f i f ) L i q ( L δ i + M f (L δ i + M f i f ) 2 + L 2 i2 q ( arctan L i q L δ i + M f i f ) ) i f L i q (L δ i + M f i f ) 2 + L 2 i2 q (L δ i + M f i f ) 2 1 (50) + L L δ i 2 q Thus, the WRSM observability conition can be formulate as: ω ( ) arctan L i q (51) L δ i + M f i f It can be seen that the above equation escribes a vector, which will be calle the observability vector an enote Ψ O (Figure 2b), that has the following components in the q reference frame: The conition (51) becomes: (47) (48) (49) Ψ O = L δ i + M f i f (52) Ψ Oq = L i q (53) ω θ O (54) 1 This approximation oes not affect the observability conitions at stanstill where ω = 0 an currents are non-zero. In aition, this assumption is an equality for the PMSM ans the SyRM.

14 where θ O is the phase of the vector Ψ O in the q reference frame. Finally, the following SMs local weak observability conition can be state: the observability of an SM is guarantee if the rotational velocity of the observability vector with respect to the rotor is ifferent from the electrical velocity of the rotor with respect to the stator. Therefore, at stanstill, the observability vector shoul rotate an not be fixe. V. CONCLUSIONS The local weak observability of motion-sensorless three-phase electrical rives has been stuie through this paper. The stuy shows that the observability might not be guarantee in some operating conitions: such as low-frequency rotor fluxes for the inuction machines, an stanstill operation for the synchronous machines. The main conclusion, concerning the local weak observability of inuction machines, is that input voltage frequency shoul not be low to ensure the machine observability. The concept of observability vector generalizes the observability conitions for synchronous machines: this vector shoul rotate whith respect to the rotor with a spee ifferent from the electrical spee of the rotor with respect to the stator, to ensure the observability. Having the expressions (29), (43), (44), (45) an (47), it seems to be interesting to combine high-frequency signal injection techniques with observer-base sensorless techniques. In other wors, high-frequency voltages can be injecte in the stator (or the rotor in the case of WRSM) winings, in orer to guarantee the machine observability in the critical operating conitions, which improves the observer s behaviour. Concerning the SPMSM, the only way to insure its observability is to move the rotor (equation (46)), to make the spee ifferent from zero. REFERENCES [1] Bose, Bimal K. Power electronics an motor rives: avances an trens. Acaemic press, [2] Leonhar, W., Control of Electrical Drives, 3r e. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, [3] Vas, P. Sensorless Vector an Direct Torque Control. Monographs in electrical an electronic engineering, Oxfor University Press, [4] Holtz, J., Sensorless control of inuction motor rives, Proceeings of the IEEE, vol.90, no.8, pp.1359,1394, Aug 2002 [5] Hermann, R.; Krener, Arthur J., Nonlinear controllability an observability, Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol.22, no.5, pp.728,740, Oct 1977.

15 [6] De Wit, C.C.; Youssef, A.; Barbot, J.-P.; Martin, P.; Malrait, F., Observability conitions of inuction motors at low frequencies, Decision an Control, Proceeings of the 39th IEEE Conference on, vol.3, no., pp.2044,2049 vol.3, [7] Ghanes, M.; De Leon, J.; Glumineau, A., Observability Stuy an Observer-Base Interconnecte Form for Sensorless Inuction Motor, Decision an Control, th IEEE Conference on, vol., no., pp.1240,1245, Dec [8] Marino, Riccaro, Patrizio Tomei, an Cristiano M. Verrelli. Inuction motor control esign. Springer Science & Business Meia, [9] Vaclavek, P.; Blaha, P.; Herman, I., AC Drive Observability Analysis, Inustrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol.60, no.8, pp.3047,3059, Aug [10] Glumineau, Alain, an Jesús e León Morales. Sensorless AC Electric Motor Control: Robust Avance Design Techniques an Applications, Avances in Inustrial Control, Springer International Publishing Switzerlan, [11] Guchuan Zhu; Kaouri, A.; Dessaint, L.-A.; Akhrif, O., A nonlinear state observer for the sensorless control of a permanent-magnet AC machine, Inustrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol.48, no.6, pp.1098,1108, Dec [12] Ezzat, M.; e Leon, J.; Gonzalez, N.; Glumineau, A., Observer-controller scheme using high orer sliing moe techniques for sensorless spee control of permanent magnet synchronous motor, Decision an Control (CDC), th IEEE Conference on, vol., no., pp.4012,4017, Dec [13] Zaltni, D.; Ghanes, M.; Barbot, Jean Pierre; Abelkrim, M.N., Synchronous motor observability stuy an an improve zero-spee position estimation esign, Decision an Control (CDC), th IEEE Conference on, vol., no., pp.5074,5079, Dec [14] Besancon, G., Nonlinear observers an applications, Lecture Notes in Control an Information Science 363, Springer Verlag, 2007.