arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 10 May 2017

Transcription

1 epl daft Pedicting the elativistic peiaston advance of a binay without cuving spacetime. axiv: v [physics.gen-ph] 0 May 07 Y. Fiedman, S. Livshitz and J. M. Steine Jeusalem College of Technology Jeusalem, Isael PACS Sf Relativity and gavitation PACS 95.0.Eg Obit detemination and impovement Abstact Relativistic Newtonian Dynamics, the simple model used peviously fo pedicting accuately the anomalous pecession of Mecuy, is now applied to pedict the peiaston advance of a binay. The classical teatment of a binay as a two-body poblem is modified to account fo the influence of the gavitational potential on spacetime. Without cuving spacetime, the model pedicts the identical equation fo the elativistic peiaston advance as the post-newtonian appoximation of geneal elativity fomalism theeby poviding futhe substantiation of this model. Intoduction. The pedictions of the anomalous pecession of Mecuy, the peiaston advance of the Hulse-Taylo binay and of the most elativistic double pulsa PSR J A/B ae consideed amongst the majo poofs of Eintein s theoy of Geneal Relativity (GR). In this pape we apply the simple elativistic model temed as Relativistic Newtonian Dynamics (RND) to pedict the peiaston advance of any binay and its oigin. This model incopoates the influence of the gavitational potential on spacetime in Newtonian gavity without the need of cuving the spacetime. The model was peviously exploed in [] and applied [] to pedict accuately the anomalous pecession of Mecuy. These two pedictions indicate that RND can povide an altenative to GR fo poblems involving gavitation. Since in a gavitational field diffeent objects positioned at the same point in spacetime follow the same tajectoy, the RND tajectoies can be viewed as geodesics in a cuved spacetime, as in GR (geometic theoy of gavitation). As it was shown in [] fo planetay motion the RND tajectoies ae the geodesics of the Schwazschild metic. In non gavitational fields, howeve, whee diffeent objects positioned at the same point in spacetime follow diffeent tajectoies, such geometic model no longe applies. The RND model, nevetheless, is also applicable to these non-gavitational fields. Fo gavitational fields it is known [3] that. the gavitational edshift (time dilation due to gavitational potential), can be deived solely fom enegy consevation and Planck s equation,. the existence of the gavitational edshift shows that a consistent theoy of gavity cannot be constucted within the famewok of SR. Fo non-gavitational fields. the enegy consevation and Planck s equation also pedict a time shift depending on the position in space,. such time dilation cannot be descibed within the famewok of SR. Indeed, SR defines time dilation due to velocity, but not due to position. We believe that, fo both the above fields, SR does not explain the position dependent time dilation, fo the eason that it does not conside the influence of the potential enegy on spacetime. This is is the elativistic basis of RND. Classical two-body poblem. Conside two objects S, S with masses m and m positioned in an inetial system with position vectos and espectively with a foce along the line joining them. Denote by = the displacement vecto between them and by ˆ the unit vecto in the diection. Let F = F ˆ be the foce acting on the fist object. By Newton s thid law the p-

2 Y. Fiedman, S. Livshitz and J. M. Steine foce acting on the second object is F. The acceleation of these objects by Newton s second law ae espectively = m F, = m F. () Note that the ecipocal of the mass, the constant of popotionality elating the foce to the acceleation it causes, expesses the agility of the object to be acceleated. Fom (), the elative acceleation of is ( = + ) F. () m m Since the acceleations of the two objects ae in opposite diections, the magnitude of thei elative acceleation is the sum of acceleation magnitudes of each object. Futhemoe, since the foces geneating these acceleations have the same magnitude, the agility of the object pai is the sum of thei espective agility, as seen fom (). This agility of the object pai is the agility of a single fictitious object P with educed mass ρ = m m m + m. (3) Thus, the evolution of the elative position in the two body poblem can obtained fom the dynamics of P unde the foce F. Fom equations (), m +m = 0 implying that the cente of mass defined by R = m + m m + m (4) moves unifomly in a staight line. We define a new inetial fame by K by tanslating the oigin of the oiginal fame to O = R. Thus, the elative position of each object in K is given by = R = m m, = R =. (5) m + m m + m The gavitational foce between two objects in a binay with masses m, m, espectively, is given by F = Gmm ˆ, whee G is the gavitational constant. Equation () becomes ρ = GMρ ˆ, M = m + m, (6) which is the equation of motion of a fictitious planet P of mass ρ in the cental gavitational foce field of a massive fictitious Sun S with mass M at the oigin O of K and elative position. Using that the potential enegy of the gavitational field is U = GMρ, the enegy consevation equation is ρ GMρ = E (7) dt expessing that the total enegy E (the sum of the kinetic and potential enegies) of P is conseved on its obit. Note that fom (3) and (5), the kinetic enegy of P ρ = m dt ( ) d + m dt ( ) d dt is the sum of the kinetic enegies of the pulsa and its companion in K and the potential enegy of P U() = GMρ = Gm m defines popely the foce F. Dividing equation (7) by ρc, whee c is the speed of light we obtain the dimensionless enegy consevation equation ( ) d c s = E, (9) dt whee (8) s = GM c (0) is the Schwazschild adius of S which is also the Schwazschild adius of the binay (the minimal distance between the objects fo which) the elative velocity to sepaate them is less than c). The dimensionless kinetic enegy is d ( ) c dt = β, whee β is the known beta-facto and the absolute value of the dimensionless potential enegy is u = GM c Finally, we denote by E = E ρc enegy of the obit. Using (5) = s. () the dimensionless total ρ ṙ = m + m, () showing that in K the angula momentum of P and that of the binay with espect to O ae the same. Fom (6) follows that the angula momentum pe unit mass J of P is conseved on the obit implying that is in the plane pependicula to J and fom (5) the tajectoies of the two objects ae in this plane. We intoduce pola coodinates, ϕ in this plane with oigin O, whee ϕ is the dimensionless pola angle, measued in adians. Consevation of angula momentum pe unit mass J, allows us to expess the angula velocity as dϕ dt = J (3) and to decompose the squae of the velocity of the planet as the sum of the squaes of its othogonal adial and tansvese components = dt + J dt. (4) p-

3 Pedicting binay peiaston advance Substituting this into (9) we obtain the classical dimensionless enegy consevation equation c + J dt c s = E. (5) Using the definition () of u, and denoting its deivative with espect to ϕ by u, it can be shown that Hence, fom (5), the obits of the two objects ae nonpecessing ellipses, see Figue. The apaston sepaation of the binay (the maximum distance between the the two objects) is the same as the apogee (maximal distance of P fom O). Similaly, the peiaston sepaation (the minimum distance between the two objects) is the same as the peigee (minimal distance of P fom O). d dt = J s u. (6) P' S 5 Hence, equation (5) becomes J sc ( (u ) + u ) = u + E. (7) Multiplying this equation by µ, whee µ is a unit-fee obit paamete µ = sc J (8) we obtain (u ) = u + µu + µe. (9) Diffeentiating this equation with espect to ϕ and dividing by u we obtain a linea diffeential equation with constant coefficients Its solution is u + u = µ. (0) u(ϕ) = µ( + ε cos(ϕ ϕ 0 )), () whee ε - the eccenticity of the obit, and ϕ 0 - the pola angle of the peihelion. This implies that (ϕ) = s /µ + ε cos(ϕ ϕ 0 ) () and the obit is a non-pecessing ellipse. Since the minima of (ϕ), coesponding to the peihelion, occu when ϕ = ϕ 0 +πn, n = 0,,, the position of the peihelion will not change with the evolution of the planet P. The obit constant µ, as we shall see late, plays a majo ole fo pecession of the obit. It has both a physical and geometic meaning. Fom equation () µ = π π 0 u(ϕ)dϕ, (3) the absolute value of the angula aveage dimensionless potential enegy of P on the obit. Moeove, fom () µ = s L, whee L is the semi-latus ectum of the obit of P. Fom (), the u values on the obit achieve its maximum and minimum values u p and a u a at the peihelion and aphelion, espectively. Thus, fom () µ = u p + u a. (4) A' A Figue : The obits of the the two objects S, S (in ed and geen) and the tajectoy of the fictitious planet P (in black dashed). The apaston sepaation A, A of the binay equals to apogee A of P. Point O is the cente on mass R fo the binay and position of S. Potential enegy as the souce of pecession. The classical Newtonian solution fo a binay does not account fo the peiaston advance. In fact, the obseved Hulse-Taylo pulsa s peiaston advance in one day is appoximately as the one obseved peviously fo Mecuy in 00 yeas. Nowadays, thee ae ten neuton sta binaies fo which the advance of peiaston has been measued. Among all those, the double pulsa PSR J A/B is the most elativistic with a peiaston advance of degees/yea. We will show that the peiaston advance is a esult of the influence of the gavitational potential (8) on the spacetime. Rathe then poposing an a pioi postulate fo such influence, we will be guided by the Einstein s Equivalence Pinciple and Clock Hypothesis. Einstein s Equivalence Pinciple states [4] the complete physical equivalence of a gavitational field and a coesponding acceleated system. To be able to use this pinciple effectively, we use the notion of escape velocity and escape tajectoy. Fo any displacement of a binay the escape velocity v e () is the minimal elative velocity needed to sepaate the binay. Fom symmety consideation v e () is in the diection of. Define the escape tajectoy as an imaginay (de)acceleated tajectoy of a test object stating at point P 0 positioned at with escape velocity v e (), and pogessing feely in a deceasing potential field U() to the ultimate point P with zeo potential. Note that on this tajectoy we have equality of the kinetic and potential enegies. Using the Equivalence Pinciple the effect of gavitation on spacetime is modeled by the (de)acceleating system attached to escaping test object. Denote by K 0, K -5 O S A p-3

4 Y. Fiedman, S. Livshitz and J. M. Steine the comoving spacetime efeence fames at P 0 and P, espectively. Note that K is an inetial (lab) fame esting in K, hence with the same spacetime. Using an extension of Einstein s Clock Hypothesis, (extending the time to spacetime tansfomation) intoduced in [5, 6], we can inteconnect the spacetime tansfomations between the two acceleated fames at P 0 and P by use of the Loentz tansfomation fom K 0 to K. Fo a cental foce potential, the fame K 0 moves with escape velocity v e in the adial diection with espect to K. We choose the fist spacial coodinate in the adial diection, and denote by βe = ve/c = u, whee u is defined by (). Then, the spacetime tansfomation (Loentz tansfomation) fom K 0 to K is whee ct = γ(ct + β e x ), x = x, x = γ(β e t + x ), x 3 = x 3, (5) γ = v e /c = (6) u is the known gavitational time dilation facto. Fom the tansfomation fomulas (5) we get t = γ t, x = γ x, x = x, x 3 = x 3 (7) implying that the 3D velocity tansfomations between these systems is (v, v, v 3 ) = (v, γ v, γ v 3). (8) Thus the influence of acceleation o potential enegy at x 0 on any velocity is expessed by multiplication of the component of this velocity tansvese to U(P 0 ) by γ, whee the time dilation facto γ is defined by (6). Relativistic Newtonian Dynamics application to binaies. Relativistic Newtonian Dynamics (RND) is a modification of the Newtonian dynamics by tansfoming it fom absolute space and time to spacetime influenced by enegy. Fo a cental foce, the diection influenced by the potential enegy is the adial diection implying that the adial velocities ae not affected by this influence, while the tansvese ones should be multiplied by γ = u(). This implies, that in ou lab fame K the decomposition of the squae of the velocity of the paticle as the sum of the squaes of its othogonal adial and tansvese components, given by (4), should be modified to ( ) d = + J ( u()). (9) dt dt Ou model also eveals the souce of the pecession of the planetay obit. As mentioned above, in NG, the adial and the tansvese peiods ae identical, esulting in a non-pecessing obit. In SR, both the adial and tansvese components of the velocity ae alteed, esulting in unequal peiods with elatively small diffeence between them and hence a small pecession. In ou model, only the adial component of the velocity is influenced, while the tansvese (angula) component is not. This, in tun, accentuates the diffeence between these peiods, esulting in the obseved pecession, as follows. Thus, consideing the influence of the potential enegy, the dimensionless enegy consevation equation (5) becomes c + J dt c ( u()) u() = E. (30) This equation togethe with equation (3) fom a fist ode system of diffeential equations with espect to (t), ϕ(t). They ae the RND equations of motion unde a cental foce. Fo an invese-squae law foce, using known methods (see fo example [7], [8] and []) we can obtain the tajectoy of the motion by solving equation (30) fo the function u(ϕ). If we denote u = du dϕ, then substituting (6) in the above equation gives J c s (u ) + J u c s ( u) u = E. (3) Multiplying this equation by µ, whee µ is defined by (8), we obtain (u ) = u 3 u + µu + µe. (3) This equation is identical to (9) in NG, except that it has a vey small (since u ) additional tem u 3 on the ight-hand side. This esult is the same esult as that of GR. Figue : The pecessing obit of the fictitious planet P in ed. The classical obit in geen. We seek a solution of this equation in the fom genealizing (), u(ϕ) = µ( + ε cos α(ϕ)) (33) fo some function α(ϕ). As befoe, two oots of the cubic on the ight-hand side of (3), ae the u values u p and u a of the the peihelion and aphelion, espectively. Moeove, p-4

5 Pedicting binay peiaston advance since the coefficients of this cubic ae constant fo a given obit, these values will not change fom one evolution to the next. We denote the thid oot of this cubic by u e. Thus, equation (3) can be factoized as (u ) = (u u p )(u u a )(u e u). (34) Fom equation (33), (u ) = (α ) µ ε sin α(φ), u p = µ + µε and u a = µ µε. Moeove, since the sum of the oots of this cubic is, u e = (u p + u a ) = µ. (35) Substituting these into (34), yields afte simplification α = dα dϕ = ( 3µ µε cos α(ϕ))/. This allows us to obtain the dependence of ϕ on α as ϕ(α) = ϕ 0 + α 0 ( 3µ µε cos α) / d α. (36) As we have shown in [] and [], this yields the pecession 3πµ ad ev of P. As mentioned above, this is also the elativistic peiaston advance pe evolution of the binay, the object we ae looking fo. Hence, the commonly used non-kepleian paamete ω-the peiaston advance pe unit of time o time ate of change (pecession) of the longitude of the peiaston, is ω = 3π µ P b, (37) whee P b is the obital peiod of the binay pe same unit of time. We expess this fomula fo in tems of the Kepleian paametes of the obits of the two objects of the binay. Fom () and (4) u p = GM p c, u a = GM a c µ = GM c ( p + a ), whee p, a denote the peiaston and apaston sepaations, espectively. As evident fom (5,) the eccenticity of P is the same as that of the eccenticity of each object. Hence, we can expess p and a in tems of a, a ae the semimajo axes of objects and espectively, as p = ( ε)(a + a ), a = ( + ε)(a + a ), implying that p + a = a ( ε ), (38) whee a = a + a is the semimajo axis of P. Fom Keple s fomula fo P, ( ) a 3 /3 P b = π GM, a = Pb (GM)/3 π Substituting all these into (37) and ω = 3π GM c P b (GM) /3 ω = 3 (GM)/3 c ( ε ) ( ) /3 Pb ( ε ). π ( ) 5/3 Pb, (39) π which is the post-kepleian equation fo the elativistic advance of the peiaston ω, given fo example in [9], [0], [] and []. This fomula can be used to povide the total mass M of the system, which combined with the theoy independent mass atio, yields the individual masses of the system. Summay and Discussion. We have deived the peiaston advance fomula (39) of any binay by the use of ou Relativistic Newtonian Dynamics (RND) which incopoates the influence of the potential enegy on flat spacetime. This fomula is the same as the one obtained using the fist ode Post-Newtonian (PN) appoximation (PN) of GR. The PN appoximation is effectively an expansion of Einstein s theoy in powes of a small paamete ṙ /c GM/(c ). The peiaston advance of a binay using the PN appoximation was obtained in [3] by employing a second PN educed Hamilton function Ĥ in isotopic coodinates in the cente of mass system. The 3PN appoximation fo this advance was deived in [4]. The diffeence between the RND and the PN appoach is best seen by compaing ou RND educed Hamilton function H n in flat space in the cente of mass system, with the coesponding Ĥ. As evident fom (30) and (), H n (, ṙ, M) = ṙ GM GM c (ṙ (ṙ n) ), (40) whee n is a unit vecto in the adial diection. Unlike Ĥ, ou H n is deived fom the pinciples of ou model and is not an appoximation. The elativistic contibution in H n embodied in the last tem of (40) esembles simila PN tems of Ĥ, howeve Ĥ involves two exta PN tems with complicated coefficients. The diffeence in the complexity between Ĥ and H n esults patly by the use of isotopic coodinates instead of flat spacetime, and patly by the paametization of the tajectoy by pope time instead of time. Since the paametization of the tajectoy does not affect the fomula fo the peiaston advance, one may use any paametization which may simplify the solution. As it was shown in [5], fo moe elativistic binaies such as a neuton sta with a 0 sola mass black hole companion, the PN appoximation and the leading ode spin-obit coupling tem could have significant contibutions to the peiaston advance of such binaies. Actual obsevations of such binaies, once available, will povide the eal test fo the accuacy of RND. p-5

6 Y. Fiedman, S. Livshitz and J. M. Steine It is known [3] that the gavitational edshift, can be deived fom enegy consevation (and using Planck s equation) and that an agument of A. Schild yields an impotant conclusion: the existence the gavitational edshift shows that a consistent theoy of gavity cannot be constucted within the famewok of special elativity. This is because special elativity does not conside the influence of potential enegy on spacetime. RND pedicts accuately both the anomalous pecession pecession of Mecuy [] as well as the peiaston advance of any binay. This indicates that RND povides an altenative to Geneal Relativity (GR) fo poblems involving gavitation. Note that in both poblems, we consideed, thee exits a pefeed efeence fame: fo a cental foce this is the fame attached to the cente of the foce, while fo a binay this is the fame attached to the cente of mass of the binay. Thus, in ode to simplify the solution, we can wok in these fames and use space and time sepaately, without using the 4D fomulation. Only fo deiving the influence of the gavitational potential on spacetime we have to use the 4D fomulation. Since in gavity diffeent objects positioned at the same spacetime follow the same tajectoy, the RND dynamics, which consides the change of the spacetime at any point in space, can be expessed as cuving of spacetime, as in GR (geometic theoy of gavitation). As it was shown in [] fo planetay motion the RND tajectoy is the same as the geodesic unde a Schwazschild metic. Fo non gavitational potentials fo which diffeent objects positioned at the same spacetime follow diffeent tajectoies, the geometic model does not expess the influence of these potentials on spacetime. As stated in Living Review [6], if one wee to use Einstein s GR fo nongavitational fields, it is cuently assumed that the nongavitational laws of physics ae witten in the language of Special Relativity (SR). Howeve, enegy consevation and Planck s equation pedict a time dilation depending on the position in space also fo non-gavitational potentials. Thus, thee should be also an influence of the non gavitational potentials on spacetime. This is achieved by the RND model. We expect that this theoy will be able to descibe popely dynamics fo the micoscopic egion (which diffe significantly fom the classical one) because of extemely high acceleation and non gavitational foces playing the main ole thee. The obseved pecession and non-lineaity of the dynamics equation of a binay pedicts [] chaotic motion of an electon in a hydogen-like atom. model fo the Hulse-Taylo pulsa s peiaston advance. Refeences [] Y. Fiedman, Eu. Phys. Lett., 6 (06) 900 [] Y. Fiedman and J. M. Steine, Eu. Phys. Lett. (EPL), 3 (06) 3900 [3] C. W. Misne, K. S. Thone and J. A. Wheele, Gavitation (Feeman and co.) 973 [4] A. Einstein, Jahbuch de Radioaktivitaet und Elektonik, 4 (907) 4 [5] B. Mashhoon, Phys. Lett. A, 43 (990) 76 [6] B. Mashhoon, Phys. Lett. A, 45 (990) 47 [7] S. Kopeikin, M. Efoimsky and G. Kaplan, Relativistic Celestial Mechanics of the Sola System (Wiley-VCH, Belin) 0. [8] Ø. Gøn and H. Sigbjøn, Einstein s Geneal Theoy of Relativity: With Moden Applications in Cosmology (Spinge) 007. [9] M. Kame, I.H. Stais,R.N. Mancheste, M.A. McLaughlin, A.G. Lyne, R.D. Fedman, M. Bugay,D.R. Loime,A. Possenti, N. D Amico,J.M. Sakissian, G.B. Hobbs,J.E. Reynolds,P.C.C. Feie, F. Camilo, Science, 34 (006) 97 [0] D. R. Loime, Living Rev. Relativity, (008) 8 [] J. M. Weisbeg, D. J. Nice, J. H. Taylo, Astophys.J., 7 (00) 030 [] T. Damou, N. Deuelle, Ann. Inst. Heni Poincaé, 43 (985) 07 [3] T. Damou, G. Schäfe, Nuovo Cimento B, 0 (988) 7 [4] C. Königsdöffe, A. Gopakuma, Phys.Rev D, 7 (005) [5] M. Bagchi, Mon. Not. Aston. Soc., 48 (03) 0 [6] C. M. Will, Living Rev. Relativity, 7 (04) 4 We wish to thank the efeee fo his valuable suggestions that helped to impove the pape consideably. Many thanks to D. Richad Mancheste of the Austalia Telescope Facility fo poviding infomation about the double pulsa. Finally, we wish to acknowledge D. Rosemay Madling of Monash Univesity fo suggesting to test ou p-6