arxiv:hep-th/ v11 4 Feb 2016

Transcription

1 A Fundamental Modification of Standad Cosmological Metic ChiYi Chen a a chenchiyi@hznu.edu.cn Hangzhou Nomal Univesity, Hangzhou , China axiv:hep-th/ v11 4 Feb 016 In this pape a novel physical pictue of space-time is intoduced by means of making a futhe distinction on the absolute backgound of space-time and the elative length o duation of base units of space-time. The existence of an absolute backgound fo space-time can not only be mostly compatible with the poven physical logic in Einstein s theoies of elativity, but also etains the most fundamental and natual philosophy fom ou intuitional expeience. In this pictue, usual dynamical laws fom Einstein s theoies of elativity can be undestood to just take effect on the length o duation of base units of space-time, athe than the backgound of space-time. Howeve, the existence of the backgound of space-time is necessay fo us to natually undestand the change of the length o duation of base units of space-time. Just based on the existence of the absolute backgound fo space, an explicit dynamical equation which satisfies a modeately geneal pinciple of elativity is logically deived unde the nonelativistic famewok of classical mechanics. The natue of the inetial foce is fistly evealed as the eal foces acting on the efeence object. Theefoe, Einstein s equivalence pinciple should be abandoned and only the numeical equality between the inetial mass and gavitational mass can be etained. Consequently, the candidate fo the standad clock should be changed and an adjusted physical pictue fo how to convet the gavitational foce into a geometic effect on space-time is theeby pesented. As fo cosmology, it should be emphasized that the obseve at the pesent time on the eath, instead of the comoving obseve, is the only tue obseve. The coodinate time t in the cosmological metic is just intoduced as the eading numbe of the obsevational clock, whose unning ate is duplicated fom the clock equipped by the obseve at the pesent time on the eath. With this new physical pictue of space-time, an exta facto b(t) must be intoduced into the cosmological metic to descibe the gavitational time dilation effect since the comoving local intinsic clock will un in a faste and faste ate with the expanding of the univese. In this way, we may obtain a positive value of ρ + 3p and avoid the intoduction of dak enegy in the cuent univese. PACS numbe(s): 04.0.Cv, k 1 INTRODUCTION Einstein s geometic theoy of gavity was used in studying the univese shotly afte the theoy was established in 1915, thus initiated the beginning of moden cosmology. In Einstein s geometic theoy of gavity, the cuvatue of the space-time is detemined by enegy-momentum distibutions[1 4]. The pedicted gavitational edshift effect is poved by a seies of gavity tests in the sola system[5 7]. This effect has adequately illustated that geometic desciption is moe accuate to descibe gavity than Newton s gavity law. In ecent decades, cosmology has gadually developed into a science [8, 9] including obsevations of supenova, cosmic micowave backgound, etc. Howeve, as soon as cuent standad cosmology was compaed with cosmological obsevation data, it was immediately confonted with some igoous challenges such as dak enegy[10, 11], dak matte[11]. All of these challenges have shaken the existing knowledge of physics. Especially dak enegy may dastically change the diection of scientific eseach. Futhe consideing that the dynamics of the univese can not be epeated in laboatoy, theefoe it is necessay fo us to make epeated inspection on the foundation of the standad cosmology. As well known to us, in the space-time physical pictue given by the standad geneal theoy of elativity, space-time can not exist on its own, o can not be isolated fom the matte. In othe wods, a space without any matte can not exist. In contast, thee is a tit-fo-tat classical opinion that the space in pinciple can be isolated fom the mass and exist on its own. Thee is an expession quoted fom Einstein to account fo the fundamental diffeence between the classical view of space-time and Einstein s elativistic view of space-time: in the classical view of space-time, the space-time itself, as a stage on which all physical phenomena occu, can still exist even if all the matte disappea fom the eality. Actually, whethe the space can exist isolated fom matte is a philosophical question. Even by now, all expeiments still fail to diectly give a definite answe on this issue. Theefoe, a new physical pictue of space-time to be inconsistent on this point with that of geneal theoy of elativity is not doomed to be hopeless. In fact, in this pape we just want to popose a compomise on this issue. That is to say, the concept of space-time should be futhe subdivided into two levels. One is the absolute backgound of space-time, and the anothe is the elative length o duation of base units of space-time. The latte can be egaded as a unit line segment which is cut fom the

2 absolute space-time backgound. Logically speaking, to any concete (with finite size) object, as long as it exists, thee must be a backgound of the existence. Othewise, the concepts of poduction and annihilation will make no sense, as do the concepts of tansfomation and evolution. Any poduction,evolution,tansfomation and annihilation of a concete object which must occu elative to a cetain backgound as the efeence. Theefoe, in physical concept, the backgound of an object is just the pemise of the existence of this object and the efeence basis only on which any change of the object can be obseved. The base unit of space-time can be egaded as a unit line segment which is cut fom the absolute backgound fo space-time. As an analogy, the backgound of space-time should be defined as the pemise of the existence of the base units of space-time and the efeence basis only on which any change of the length o duation of base units of space-time can be obseved. Moe specifically, a novel physical pictue of space-time with an absolute backgound is pesented as follows. Fistly, an absolute backgound of space-time exists in the univese. Hee absolute means that the backgound of space always exists homogeneously and infinitely, and the backgound of time passes homogeneously and immotally. The backgound of space-time is independent of any matte s motion and distibution in the univese. Thee is no concept of base units fo the backgound of space-time since the backgound itself does not contain any specific object. On the contay, the base units of space-time can only be defined by local intinsic events which occu in eal objects. Fo instance, the backgound of space-time just like a blank sheet of pape. Oiginally, thee is no coodinates on it. It is nothing but the obsevation that equies the intoduction of coodinate base units. Usually, we define the coodinate base units by esoting to the local intinsic events which occu in specific objects, so the coodinate system is established. Secondly, the time dilation and length contaction effects which ae caused by a elative velocity between two efeence fames, can be egaded as a kind of obsevational effect. Howeve, the time dilation and length contaction effects which ae caused by gavity, should be undestood as a tansfomation ule of the base units of space-time. In pinciple, the space-time intevals of local intinsic events is able to change, but the backgound of space-time as the basis to eflect this change must be homogeneous foeve. As a esult, the absolute space-time backgound implies that the position of any paticle in the backgound of space is objective. In fact, this point is also the foundation of physical logic in Einstein s special theoy of elativity. In the deivation of special theoy of elativity, the position of any physical event is assumed to be objective and ielevant to the change of efeence fames[1], though the coodinates of this position will change with specific obseves. Just fo this eason, the coodinate tansfomation ules in special theoy of elativity, namely the time dilation and length contaction effect, should not be intepeted as the physical effects on the backgound of space-time. Theefoe, the existence of an absolute backgound of space-time can be compatible with the special theoy of elativity. Thidly, the base units of space-time ae diectly defined by unit intevals of local intinsic events which occu in specific objects. In this way, the magnitude of a base unit of space-time is descibed by the line segment which is cut fom the backgound of space-time by the two local intinsic events of defined unit inteval. Thee ae long and shot line segments. Thee ae thus lage and small base units of space-time. In contast, the eading numbe of obseves clocks and ules ae substantially detemined by the numbe of times of local intinsic events which occu. Theefoe, the eading numbe of clocks and ules itself does not diectly contain any infomation of base units. Only unde the same length of line segments cut fom the backgound of space-time, the diffeence of length o duation of thei coesponding space-time base units can be detemined by making a compaison of thei espective eading numbes of clocks and ules. Finally, in the backgound of time, the simultaneity always exists in fact accoding to a basic hypothesis that the backgound of time passes homogeneously. But an obsevable simultaneity should be defined manually. Fo instance, if an obseve want to make clea the simultaneity between diffeent space points by means of the obsevation of physical phenomena, he has to esot to the numbe of times of local intinsic events which occu on these space points. In othe wods, the obsevable simultaneity should be detemined by the coodinate time of space-time points. Theefoe, an obsevable simultaneity does not always available fo us in any cases. But fo two events which occu on the same space point, we must be able to distinguish the time ode of the occuence, so we always can etain the concept of simultaneity fo the same space point. Specifically speaking, on an accompanying spatial point whee the obseve stays, the simultaneity can always be defined fo all his obseved physical phenomena. Fo instance, in ancient people have no clock, even don t know a method to ecod the time. But it cetainly does not affect the occuence of many physical events at the same time. Theefoe, the simultaneity in the backgound of time always exist objectively. But the diectly obsevable simultaneity fo obseves must be defined by esoting to specific physical phenomena. In this pape, we would like to study the fomulism of space-time metic fo cosmological obsevation theoy. The pape is oganized as follows. In Sec., we pove that a modeately geneal pinciple of elativity can actually be ealized even unde the nonelativistic famewok of classical mechanics. Accoding to the physics indicated by this

3 new equation, Einstein s equivalence pinciple is given up. Besides, we also point out a question exists in the cosmology: who is the eal obseve fo cosmological obsevation, since the obseve at the pesent time on the eath is no longe equivalent to the comoving obseve afte Einstein s equivalence pinciple is abandoned. In Sec.3, we popose a modification on the cosmological Fiedman-Robetson-Walke metic based on the consideation of gavitational time dilation effect. Unde the new cosmological metic, new dynamical equations fo cosmology and some new physical effects ae also discussed. In Sec.4, we summaize the fundamental physical logic as a conclusion. 3 MOTIVATIONS AND REASONS.1 Genealization of the Relativity fo Paticle Dynamics and Existence of an Absolute Backgound fo Space-time In the famewok of Newtonian mechanics, the fundamental dynamics equation is Newton s second law. But as is well known, Newton s second law is only valid in inetial efeence fames. Povided that we apply the equation fom of Newton s second law in a non-inetial efeence fame, we need to intoduce a fictitious foce inetial foce additionally. The magnitude of the inetial foce is usually detemined by the elative acceleation between the noninetial efeence fame in question and a cetain inetial efeence fame[13, 14]. Theefoe, the Newtonian paticle dynamics is totally based on the concept of inetial efeence fame. Howeve, as well-known to us, we ae neve able to find a eal inetial efeence fame in pactice. This situation is suely not satisfactoy[4]. In pinciple, Newton s second law should be a causal law of paticle dynamics. Hee the foces acting on the paticle unde study should be the cause and the esulting acceleation should be the effect. Usually, the taditional theoetical fomula of Newton s second law is witten down as F p = m p a p O. (1) In theoy, the left hand side of this equation (F p ) must denote the total foce fom the whole univese acting on the paticle p. Othewise, when the equation is applied into concete cases, we will not be able to make it clea what foces should be included in the counting, and what foces should not be counted. The left hand side (F p ) only depends on p. Yet the ight hand side a p O is the acceleation of the paticle p with espect to the efeence fame O, equivalently measued elative to the efeence object of O. Theefoe in fact, the effect (namely the esult) a p O depends not only on the paticle p, but also on the efeence object of O which coesponds to the oigin point of the efeence fame. In this sense, the causality of Newton s second law is not symmetic and consistent in the fom. This is the vey point to account fo why Newton s second law is theoetically valid only in inetial efeence fames, but none of them can be found in pactice. Since fo Newton s second law, neithe the theoy no the causality is satisfactoy, we conside whethe it is possible to econstuct the physical logic fo paticle dynamics. In this pocess, the only one most fundamental pinciple which can be esoted to is the pinciple of causal consistency. It is the one of most fundamental equiements fo physics laws that the causal elationship should be symmetic and consistent. We still suppose that a valid paticle dynamics is cetainly to be a theoy with causal pinciple. We egad foces as the cause, and egad acceleations as the effect(esult). How to solve the poblem of causal inconsistency fo paticle dynamics? The key point is how to descibe the coesponding effect accoding to the causal consistency pinciple, if the total foce fom the whole univese acting on the paticle is the cause unde the consideation. The total foce acting on a single paticle should be objective, namely it will not change with the vaiation of obseves. Theefoe, the coesponding effect should also be objective, and not elevant to any efeence fame. In this way, a completely objective acceleation can only be expessed as the acceleation with espect to the absolute spatial backgound of the whole univese, F p = m p d p. () Hee the objective position of the paticle p in the absolute backgound of space is paticulaly denoted by p. The conjectue that an absolute backgound exists fo the space of the univese is fistly oiginated fom ou intuitional expeiences. Theefoe, the absolute backgound of space (may also be called cosmic spatial backgound) can be intuitively undestood. Fo example, we have known that the dimensions of cosmic spatial backgound should be of thee. As the name implies, the spatial backgound is just what still exists in a space egion afte all objects inside it wee moved away. And the cosmic spatial backgound is just what still exists in the whole univese afte all concete objects in the univese wee moved away. Hee absolute means that the backgound of space always

4 exists homogeneously and infinitely, and is independent of the motion and distibution of any matte which exists in the univese. Thee is no concept of base units fo the backgound of space-time since the backgound itself does not contain specific objects. On the contay, only the base units of space-time is defined by local intinsic events which occu in eal objects. In pinciple, the base units of space will change with the spatial intevals of these local intinsic events. Fo this eason, we must make a physical distinguish between the absolute backgound and the elative length o duation of base units of space. We believe that the motion of all objects in the univese must be pefomed ove this common absolute theedimensional space backgound, because only on this basis the existence of an objective dynamical law is possible. Fom the logical point of view, we also suppose that evey natual pinciple descibing pue elative law must have an absolute basis. Hee the absoluteness is only poposed fo the backgound of space-time, instead of base units o geneal space-time. Because only in this way the absolute backgound of space-time can be mostly compatible with the solidest pat of moden physics. The vey point in Newton s absolute view of space-time, which has been denied by the pinciple of invaiant light speed, is only that the measuement of space-time inteval is absolute. In contast, Einstein s special and geneal theoies of elativity can be natually intepeted as the change ules of space-time base units [1, 1]. All of them ae ielevant to the backgound of space-time. Moeove, in the logical deduction of Einstein s special theoy of elativity, it is easy to find that evey event is substantially assumed to have an objective position[1]. This is just the eflection of the existence of absolute backgound. Only based on the existence of an absolute backgound of space, it is possible fo us to assume that any paticle at any time has its objective position in the univese. We also conjectue that both the numbe of types of inteactions in the univese and thei calculation ules ae objective. In pinciple, all kinds of inteactions can be ecognized and undestood by people, and thei calculation ules can be ultimately obtained. The eason is that all these inteactions must be able to intepet the motions of all objects in the univese, simultaneously and self-consistently. Although evey paticle has its objective position in the absolute backgound of space, thee is still a poblem that the objective position in cosmic spatial backgound can not be diectly measued. What we can eally measue is the diffeence between any two objective positions, which substantially constucts a mathematical vecto, p O = p O. (3) Afte that, we ae able to constuct a paticle dynamical equation which is eally available to any obseves. In fact, evey efeence fame must be established on a eal efeence object. Othewise, thee would be no efeence value in measuing any object s motion in the natual wold. Theefoe, a physical efeence fame must be the eal efeence fame. As fo the elationship between the efeence object and the efeence fame, the efeence fame can be natually established by identifying the efeence object as its oigin point if we assign a efeence object fist in pactical cases. Othewise, in pinciple any eal object which is fixed in the efeence fame can be identified as its efeence object if the efeence fame is assigned fist. All objects in the univese, including objects unde study (p) and efeence objects (O), should be of equal status in the most fundamental law of dynamics. Similaly, the dynamics of any eal efeence object should also satisfy F O = m O d O. (4) Hee the efeence object O natually coesponds to the oigin point of a efeence fame, so we can establish a efeence fame which is iotational with espect to the absolute backgound of space. The intoduction of efeence fames is just to make elative measuements on kinematical quantities. As a causal coespondence, the foces should also be elatively counted in natue. 4 Finally, we obtain m O F p m p F O = m p m O d ( p O ) = m p m O d p O. (5) F p m p F O m O = a p O. (6) In this equation, the definition of the foce and the acceleation ae just the same as that in the taditional theoetical fomula of Newton s second law (1). F p and F O ae the total foces fom the whole univese espectively acting on the paticle p and the efeence object O. m p and m O denote the mass of the paticle p and the efeence object O espectively. Since the efeence object is definitely fixed in the efeence fame, the acceleation (a p O ) of the

5 paticle p is measued elative to the efeence object, equivalently with espect to the oigin point of the efeence fame. Keep in mind, any physical efeence fame must be elated to a cetain eal efeence object. Theefoe, the equation (6) is just the dynamical equation of the paticle p with espect to an abitay efeence fame O. In the equation (6), the object unde study and the efeence object ae now placed on an equal status. So the special status fo the efeence object in the univese is emoved. It eflects that all objects in the univese have the equal status in dynamics. That is obvious as well, since what object should be selected as the paticle unde study, and what paticle should be selected as the efeence object ae essentially assigned by people. In fact, thee is no essential division of them. Moe impotantly, the natue of the inetial foce is nothing but the eal foce acting on the efeence object, and which is supposed to appea in the new dynamical equation (6) accoding to the pinciple of causal consistency. To demonstate the diffeence between the equation (6) and the theoetical fomula of Newton s second law (1), we may ewite (6) to be, F p m p m O F O = m p a p O. (7) Hee the left hand side of this equation can be called as a elative counting of foces. Obviously, the equation (7) has a net tem ( mp m O F O ) moe than Newton s second law, while the othe tems ae identical. The equation (6) o (7) is just the new dynamical equation which is poposed to eplace the cuent theoetical fomula of Newton s second law unde the famewok of classical mechanics, since the new dynamical law (6) o (7) pesents a moe natual and concise physical pictue based on eintepeting all empiical laws fom classical mechanics expeiments. In the application of (6) o (7), it is easy to find that the inetial efeence fame is no longe equied and the inetial foce is no longe intoduced by hand. A modeately geneal pinciple of elativity is essentially a pactical equiement. On one hand, we ae neve able to know about the actual state of motion of ou teestial efeence fame whee ou obseves exist. On the othe hand, we ae always able to detemine the otation of any efeence fame with espect to cosmic spatial backgound by esoting to the galaxies fa enough away since the cosmic spatial backgound is objective and motionless. In pinciple, the exact otation of any pactical efeence fame with espect to the absolute backgound of space can be mathematically solved because the efeence fame given in pactice must intepet the dynamics fo all objects in the univese, simultaneously and self-consistently. Theefoe, what the pactical obsevation eally equies is that dynamical laws must keep fom invaiant to any efeence fame which is iotational with espect to the absolute backgound of space. Futhemoe, in paticle dynamics, the otation phenomena can always be attibuted to the elative motion between diffeent paticles. But fo single paticle, thee is no concept of otation. In othe wods, once any efeence object is egaded as a paticle, no poblem of otation exists fo efeence paticle. Just as the poblem of vaiable mass system unde the famewok of Newtonian mechanics, the vaiable mass phenomena should be attibuted to the elative motion between diffeent paticles in the system of paticles, so the fundamental paticle dynamical equation is still F p = m p a p O. But fo F p = d(p p O), it actually can be genealized fom the fome equation when a system of paticles is consideed. In this sense, the poblem of efeence fames otation is essentially a mathematical poblem. Ultimately, the poblem of the otation of efeence fames can be sepaated fom the poblem of dynamical elativity. It can be exactly poved that the new classical dynamical equation (6) must be valid unde the famewok of classical mechanics. Unde the famewok of classical mechanics, any object s dynamical poblem in any efeence fame can be substantially egaded as a two-body poblem. Fistly, we assume thee eally exists an inetial efeence fame which is denoted by Ω. Accoding to the theoetical fomula of Newton s second law, an abitay object p satisfies, F p = m p a p Ω. (8) Hee, the foces F p is defined to include all the foces acting on the paticle p fom the whole univese. Similaly, to an abitay efeence object O, which must also obey the same natual law, Pefoming a simple algebaic manipulation, we obtain F O = m O a O Ω. (9) F p m p m O F O = m p a p Ω m p m O (m O a O Ω ) = m p [a p Ω a O Ω ] = m p a p O. (10) Theefoe, unde the famewok of Newtonian mechanics, the new dynamical equation (7) is ecoveed. 5

6 In the new dynamical equation (6), the definition of the foce and the acceleation ae just the same as that in the taditional theoetical fomula of Newton s second law (1). Howeve, the dynamical elativity is obviously extended fom the Galileo pinciple of elativity to a modeately geneal pinciple of elativity[15]. This achievement must has been beyond Newtonian classical mechanics and we also have actually found a counteexample of Einstein s equivalence pinciple. 6. Einstein s equivalence pinciple is given up Since all lage-scale galaxies ae in a comoving expansion with the univese, all comoving coodinate points descibing these comoving galaxies can be egaded to be in fee falling states. Howeve in Einstein s geneal theoy of elativity, the popety of the clock in a fee falling state is just assumed by Einstein s equivalence pinciple[1,, 16]. Theefoe, whethe the gavitational foce and the inetial foce ae fully equivalent is woth eexamining. Fistly, it has been demonstated by an explicit equation (6) that a modeately geneal pinciple of elativity can be ealized in a vey concise pictue, which is obviously diffeent with Einstein s view[17] on the pinciple of dynamical elativity. Moeove, the new dynamical equation (6) also indicates that, the natue of the inetial foce is the eal foce acting on the efeence object. Hence the so-called inetial foce can actually be all kinds of inteactions such as the gavitational inteaction, electomagnetic inteaction and so on. But the concept of inetial foce still exists in Einstein s special theoy of elativity, and even in his geneal theoy of elativity Einstein s equivalence pinciple still claims that the inetial foce is physically equivalent to the gavitational foce. Moe impotantly, so fa as we know, thee is only gavitational foce has the time dilation effect. Theefoe, Einstein s equivalence pinciple is neithe indispensable no desiable fo the ealization of a fully geneal pinciple of elativity. Secondly, the clock which is elatively est in the gavitational field and the clock which is fee falling unde changing gavity, they diffe only in a non-gavitational foce and the esulting acceleation. If thee is eally no gavitational time dilation effect fo the fee falling clock unde changing gavity, it must imply that a non-gavitational foce and the esulting acceleation ae also able to bing about a time contaction effect fo clocks. Howeve, by now thee is no such a sign which has been obseved and veified in all past expeiments. In pinciple, whethe the edshift effect can be aoused by the acceleation can be tested in a gound-based laboatoy, and thee has been some high enegy expeiments show that the pope longevity of negative muon is not elated to its acceleation[18, 19]. In ou discussion we give up Einstein s equivalence pinciple and only accept the weak equivalence pinciple, namely the gavitational mass equals to the inetial mass. Consequently, the unning ate fo a clock fee falling unde gavity should no longe be assumed to be a constant. Moeove, accoding to the gavitational time dilation effect veified in the sola gavity test[5 7], all local clocks will change thei unning ates depending on thei local intensity of gavitational field. In the light of this physics, hee the standad clock is no longe the usual fee falling clocks in a qualified geometic theoy of gavity. What is the qualified candidate fo the standad clock, which is defined to make the compaison on the unning ate of diffeent local clocks? In this pape we suppose that any clock in the gavitational field, egadless of whethe it is fee falling o not, its unning ate will change with the local intensity of gavitational fields. Fo above easons, we popose that the clock equipped by the obseve himself is the only qualified candidate fo the standad clock. Fo the advantage in undestanding, it is necessay to establish a igid and homogeneous coodinate system fo the efeence fame on the spatial egion unde study, the coodinate base units of space-time inside it is defined accoding to the obseve s own clock and ule. Howeve the gavitational effect on the local intinsic base units of space-time has been veified in many gavity tests, hence such an obseve s coodinate system fo the efeence fame can only be mathematical. The space-time inteval measued by this set of coodinate system is mathematically equivalent to be measued by the obseve s own clock and ule..3 a modified physical pictue fo gavity being geometized We only etain the weak equivalence pinciple which is aleady enough to account fo why the gavity can be descibed by a geometic theoy. Fo example, we may illustate this easoning by using the tajectoy of satellites aound the eath. To simplify the question, we assume the tajectoy is a cicle. Accoding to Newtonian mechanics, we have GMm = m v, so we obtain v = GM. The unique paamete () fo the tajectoy does not depend on the mass of the satellite. That is to say, the dynamical law fo satellites in gavitational field has no diect coelation with the magnitude of gavitational foces acting on these satellites. Theefoe, the dynamical law of satellites can be equivalently descibed by a kinematical law. This is a concete example to account fo that the physical effect of gavity can be descibed by the cuve of the geomety of space-time.

7 Accoding to gavitational time dilation effect, the unning ate of local clocks is elated to the intensity of local gavitational field. But on the logic, the validity of Einstein s gavitational field equation does not depend on Einstein s equivalence pinciple[16]. Theefoe, only based on the weak equivalence pinciple, we can still adopt the same lagangian as Einstein s geneal theoy of elativity in the following discussion, I = c4 16πG d 4 x gr+ d 4 x gl matte. (11) Accodingly, the gavitational field equation emains unchanged. Accoding to the pinciple of causal consistency, a ational appoach how to convet gavity into the geomety of space-time should be caied out as follows. Fist, a suitable efeence fame such as sun-centeed efeence fame must be selected, which will bing about both the elative measuement of distance and the elative counting of gavitational foces. Second, a igid and homogeneous coodinate system should be established. The efeence object is usually assigned as the oigin point of coodinate system. At the same time, the base units of space and time in this coodinate system ae defined by the clock and the ule equipped by the obseve himself and duplicated into the whole coodinate system. Finally, the cuved geomety of space-time is theeby detemined by making a compaison between the local intinsic clock (o ule) located on evey position in the gavitational field and the mathematical clock duplicated fom the obseve himself, meanwhile this obseve-based coodinate system must be povided as the backgound. In mathematics, the geomety of the cuved space-time should be quantitatively woked out by solving the gavitational field equation. 7.4 eintepetation of gavitational time dilation effect in sola gavity tests Since a quantitative success has been achieved in the sola gavity test by Einstein s gavitational field equation[1, 3], now we eintepet the gavitational edshift effect[5 7] in the sola system to examine above poposed physical pictue of space-time. Fist of all, all successes in sola gavity test can be attibuted to the coectness of Schwazschild metic. Second, we etain Einstein s gavitation field equation as a valid fomula to descibe the geometic theoy of gavity and etain the mathematical fom of Schwazschild metic, since the solving pocess fo Schwazschild metic is not diectly elated to the validity of Einstein s equivalence pinciple. Thid, it must be pointed out that the actual way we deive the Schwazschild metic by using Einstein s gavitational field equation is in line with ou poposed modeately geneal pinciple of elativity. Moe specifically, in the deivation of Schwazschild metic, the counting of the gavity is esticted to the gavity exeted by objects inside of the sola system. Coincidently, the efeence oigin is fixed at the cente of the sola system. Theefoe, what the sola gavity test has essentially satisfied is the causal consistency pinciple and the modeately geneal pinciple of elativity, instead of Einstein s geneal pinciple of elativity. Finally, the full expession of Schwazschild metic is witten down, ds = (1 GM ) +(1 GM ) 1 d + dθ + sin θdφ. (1) In above equation, the coodinate base units of space-time ae defined accoding to the clock and ule equipped by the obseve. In othe wods, the clock and ule of the obseve ae duplicated onto the evey space-time points in the whole sola system. Afte that, the time dilation effect is eflected by the diffeence of the magnitude between the eading numbe((1 GM ) 1 ) of local intinsic clocks and the eading numbe() of the obseve s clock, within the same line segment() cut fom the backgoundof time. Obviously, at the suface of the sun, we have (1 GM ) 1 < 1. Theefoe, unde the same duation of line segments in the backgound of time (), the eading numbe of the local intinsic clock at the suface of the sun, will be smalle than that of the local intinsic clock at infinity. In othe wods, the clock located at the suface of the sun uns slowe than that at infinity. The coodinate time t in the fom (1) is actually measued by a mathematical clock initially intoduced by the obseve befoe the gavity is geometized. Hee the mathematical clock is defined to un at a igid and homogeneous ate. Theefoe, the coodinate time t can be egaded to be equivalently measued by a mathematical backgound clock. Fo two events which occu on the same spatial coodinate point, thei diffeence on the time intevals measued by the local intinsic clock and the mathematical backgound clock espectively, embodies the cuve of space-time. In this spiit, the gavitational edshift effect of light signals emitted fom the suface of the sun can be calculated by incopoating the concete situation of popagations. Since the gavitational field aound the sun is in a vacuum spheical symmety, the metic of space-time is stationay. In othe wods, g µν is ielevant to the time. Now we assume thee ae two spatial coodinate points. One is p 1 ( 1 ). Anothe is p ( ). We intoduce a light signal that

8 popagates fom p 1 to p to investigate the gavitational edshift effect in the sola system. One wavefont is emitted at the moment of coodinate time t 1 and aives at p at the moment of coodinate time t. Thus the time inteval measued by the obseve s clock (o mathematical backgound clock) is δt = t t 1. Similaly, fo the popagation of the next wavefont whose phase diffeence is π, also fom p 1 to p, the time inteval measued by the obseve s clock is δt = t t 1. Consideing that the space-time aound the sun is stationay, we have which futhe indicates δt = δt, (13) t t = t 1 t 1 1. (14) Above equation means that the light signal will keep the cycle time and fequency invaiant, which is measued by the obseve s clock (o mathematical backgound clock) in its popagation to any positions in the gavitational field. As a fundamental assumption, the gavity causes the cuve of spacetime but in an infinitesimal neighbohood the spacetime should be asymptotically flat. Theefoe, as fa as the infinitesimal inteval of spacetime is concened, we ae always able to wite down the local intinsic time inteval dτ fo evey infinitesimal intevals between abitay two events: (t 1, 1 ) and (t, ), ds = (1 GM ) +(1 GM ) 1 d + dθ + sin θdφ = dτ ()++(1 GM ) 1 d + dθ + sin θdφ. (15) Fo above two wavefonts of the light signals emitted fom p 1 at the moments of t 1 and t espectively, it is obvious to have dτ 1 = (1 GM 1 ) 1 1. (16) Hee τ 1 is measued by the local intinsic clock fixed at the spatial coodinate point p 1, and t 1 is measued by the obseve s clock (o mathematical backgound clock). Similaly, we have Theefoe, The fequency measued by the local intinsic clock satisfies dτ = (1 GM ) 1. (17) GM dτ 1 (1 = 1 ) 1 1. (18) dτ (1 GM ) 1 ν = dτ GM 1 (1 = 1 ) 1 1. (19) ν 1 dτ (1 GM ) 1 We investigate a pactical case: p 1 is a est with espect to the suface of the sun and p is at est on the eath. Since above dτ 1 and dτ ae both coesponding to one cycle time(namely π), in consideation of = 1, we also have ν = dτ GM 1 (1 = 1 ) 1 ν 1 dτ (1 GM ) 1 < 1. (0) Hee the fequency of the light signal ν is measued by the local intinsic clock at p. Combining with a fundamental hypothesis that the local fequency of light signal emitted at the suface of the sun is equal to that emitted on the eath measued by the local clock on the eath, then we can daw a conclusion that the fequency of the light signal emitted fom the sun is deceased when it is obseved on the eath, compaed with the light signal emitted by the same type of atom on the eath. Ultimately, we demonstate that the gavitational edshift effect in the sola gavity test can also be self-consistently intepeted by the adjusted physical pictue of space-time. 8

9 9.5 who is the tue obseve fo cosmology Unlike what we ae studying in cosmology is the whole evolution histoy of the univese, the tue cosmological obseve is only the obseve at the pesent time on the eath, athe than a comoving obseve. The ealization of a moe ealistic pinciple of elativity in section.1 has shown that the counting of foces must be in an one-to-one coespondence with the selection of the efeence fame. Theefoe, any abitay choice of the efeence fame would not affect the validity of dynamical equations, but evey tem in the dynamical equation is closely elated to what efeence object chosen. Theefoe, fo the sake of coectly applying Einstein s gavitational field equation into cosmology, it is vey impotant to make clea the dynamical state of the obseve of cosmology. Fistly, all obsevations fo cosmology and all deteminations on the edshift values ae pocessed by the obseve at the pesent time, instead of a comoving obseve which evolves with the expanding of the univese. Theefoe, in cosmology thee is a eally impotant featue should be emphasized that all obsevations ae actually implemented at the pesent time. Not only the obseve is at the pesent time, But also the detemination of edshift values is implemented at the pesent time. Secondly, consideing that the intensity of gavitational field in the univese is changing fom stong to weak continuously, the intinsic clock located on a comoving galaxy should un faste and faste with the expanding of the univese, compaed with the same kind of intinsic clock equipped by the obseve at the pesent time on the eath. Theefoe, in constucting a igid and homogeneous efeence coodinate system fo cosmology, the coodinate clock (ule) should be in stict accodance with the clock (ule) equipped by the obseve at the pesent time on the eath. 3 NEW COSMOLOGICAL METRIC AND DYNAMICAL EQUATIONS Thee ae two points of physical consideation should be fully incopoated in the constuction of cosmological metic. Fistly, it has been demonstated by an explicit equation that a modeately geneal pinciple of elativity can be ealized in a vey concise pictue, so Einstein s equivalence pinciple is no longe indispensable fo the geometic theoy of gavity. We only etain the numeical equality between the inetial mass and gavitational mass since it has a solid foundation fom expeiments. But the assumption that all fee falling clocks unde gavity un in a unifom ate is given up. We suggest that the unning ate of any local intinsic clock located in a gavitational field depends on the intensity of gavitational field. Even fo the local intinsic clock in a locally fee falling state, its unning ate should also be subject to the intensity of gavitational field. That will not be in conflict with ou expeience. Because we can imagine that if the unning ates of all clocks inside a local egion slow down at a same ate, the dynamical law inside this egion must emain unchanged. In this spiit, the candidate fo the standad clock should also be changed. Accoding to the gavitational time dilation effect and the causal consistency pinciple, the unning ate of the clock equipped by the obseve himself must be set as the base unit of efeence in cosmological metic. In mathematics, the clock equipped by the obseve himself can be imaginatively duplicated onto all space-time points. Theefoe, the coodinate clock which is mathematically duplicated fom the obseve is just the qualified standad clock. Then the geometical effect esulted by the gavitational field is descibed by the diffeence between above mathematically defined coodinate clock and local intinsic clocks. Secondly, we know the matte density in the univese has changed a lot fom the beginning of the unvese, so the intensity of gavitational field has also changed appeciably. Thee exists an evolution of the unning ate fo evey local intinsic clock fixed on the comoving galaxies of the univese. Theefoe, with espect to the long evolution histoy of the univese studied in cosmology, the constuction of cosmological metic must exactly distinguish the clock equipped by the obseve at the pesent time on the eath fom the comoving local intinsic clock. 3.1 the coodinate system of efeence fame fo cosmological metic As fo spatial coodinates of cosmological metic, thee is a Hubble s pinciple which pedicts a pedominate spatial coodinate system named as spatial comoving coodinate system[8, 9]. Although the comoving galaxies ae selected as the spatial coodinate points in cosmological metic, but the cosmological obseve is still the obseve at the pesent time on the eath. In pinciple the obseve can duplicate his intinsic ule as the standad base unit to evey spatial point and build up a igid and homogeneous spatial coodinato system. We give the ule equipped by the obseve at the pesent time on the eath the name of the cosmological obsevation ule. The spatial inteval of comoving

10 coodinate points is theeby measued by this cosmological obsevation ule, dl = a d (t)[ 1 k + dθ + sin θdφ ]. (1) In othe wods, the distance between cosmological comoving coodinate points is substantially measued by the pesent obseve s ule on the eath. Hee k is the cuvatue of thee-dimensional space, which can be etained in a geneal cosmological metic if the absolute backgound of space is synchonously extended into highe dimensions. As fo the coodinate time, we must also define it fom the obseve point of view. We all know that the study of the cosmology is mainly based on the obsevation of light signals emitted fom the ealie univese. That is to say, the edshift of light signals is a paticulaly impotant quantity to study the evolution of the univese. The edshift is detemined by compaing a eceived light signal with the same type of light signals on the eath at the pesent time. Theefoe, the coodinate time should be defined by esoting to the clock of the obseve at the pesent time on the eath. We take the pesent obseve s clock ate as the standad one, duplicate this clock ate onto evey time-point and build up a igid and homogeneous coodinate time system. We give this time system the name of the cosmological obsevation clock. We use t to denote the eading numbe of the cosmological obsevation clock. On the one hand, we know the matte density in the univese has changed a lot fom the beginning of the unvese, so the intensity of gavitational field has also changed appeciably. On the othe hand, based on above discussion, a local intinsic clock in the ealie univese, egadless of whethe it is fee falling o not, is supposed to un in a diffeent ate with espect to the clock unde null gavity. To be distinguished fom the cosmological obsevation clock, the eading numbe of the local intinsic clock which is fixed on the comoving galaxy in the ealie univese is denoted by τ. So the time dilation effect is expessed by dτ = b(t). () It must be noticed that we usually set b(t 0 ) = 1, which means that the coodinate time t is equivalently measued by the local intinsic clock of the pesent obseve on the eath. In othe wods, the inteval of coodinate time is also a special kind of local intinsic time intevals but all of them ae measued by the clock of the obseve at the pesent time. Hee the non-constant facto b(t) can not be tivially absobed, since the obsevational time only coesponds to the coodinate time t, instead of the comoving local intinsic time τ. Accoding to above definitions of the time and spatial coodinates, a geneal cosmological metic can be witten as, ds = b (t) +a d (t)[ 1 k + dθ + sin θdφ ]. (3) In fact, above fom is also the most geneal expession fo cosmological metic unde the condition of the cosmological pinciple. We popose the metic (3) to eplace the well known Fiedman-Robetson-Walke (F RW) metic [1, 8, 9] in pocessing obsevation data. The eason is what we eiteated in this pape that cosmological obsevations ae always implemented by the obseve at the pesent time on the eath, instead of any othe obseves including the comoving obseve in the ealie univese the dynamical equation of cosmology Accoding to the new cosmological metic (3), The non-zeo components of Ricci tenso can be easily deived: R 00 = 3ä a +3ȧḃ ab, (4) R ij = 1 b (ȧ a + ä a ȧḃ ab )g ij + k a g ij. (5) A consistent enegy-momentum tenso is given by the following fomula due to the cosmological pinciple[17], T µν = ρu µ U ν +p(η µν +U µ U ν ). (6) Substituting the equations(4-5) into Einstein s gavitational field equation, the fundamental equations of cosmology ae deived out: ȧ a b + k a = 8πG 3 ρ (7) 1 b (ä a ȧḃ ab ) = 4πG (ρ+3p). 3 (8)

11 whee k is the cuvatue of space. In essence, k is not a dynamical vaiable but a cetain value maybe decided by the pimay conditions. The cosmic enegy density ρ(t) and pessue p(t) can be teated in pinciple as the functions of two geometical vaiables a(t) and b(t). Since the expansion of the univese soon becomes slow enough, in a tentative investigation we might suppose b(t) = 1 k a(t) in analogous to the countepat b() = 1 GM c in Schwazschild metic. Hee k is also an undetemined constant physical pedicts unde the new cosmological metic Without explicitly solving equations (7-8), we ae still able to undestand the kinematic effects of the expansion [9] fom the metic (3). We have a edshift value fom geometical analysis (analogous to the analysis in [9]), 1+z = a(t 0) a(t 1 ). (9) This is just the same esult in the standad cosmology. Howeve, above edshift effect should be only attibuted to the kinematical effect, which can be futhe attibuted to the Dopple effect fom the expansion, athe than a gavitational edshift effect. Of couse, a complete obsevational edshift effect in cosmology should futhe incopoate the gavitational time dilation effect, which should be included into the calculation just when the light signals being emitted and eceived. Analogous to the gavitational time dilation effect in the sola gavity test, we have Then the total effect of edshift is obtained, 1+z = b(t 0) b(t 1 ). (30) 1+z = (1+z )(1+z ) = b(t 0) a(t 0 ) b(t 1 ) a(t 1 ). (31) Since b(t 0 )/b(t 1 ) is geate than 1 and decease with the incease of the time t 1 when the univese is expanding, the fitted value of phenomenological coodinate acceleation (d a/ ) may be changed accoding to the cuent obsevation data[9, 10]. Futhemoe, we discuss the mathematical expession fo the acceleation of the univese. As we know, acceleation is not a Loentz-invaiant quantity unde the tansfomation of inetial efeence fames. Of couse, it will also change explicitly in diffeent coodinate efeence fames. Once the cosmological metic (3) is adopted, since t is the only diectly measuable time fo the obseve at the pesent time on the eath, the definition of the phenomenological acceleation should be evised to be d a, instead of d a dτ. Moe accuately, d a dτ should be called as the local intinsic acceleation. The elationship between these two definitions of acceleation is given by d a dτ = 1 d a(t) b (t) 1 da(t) db(t) b 3 (t) = a b (ä a ȧḃ ). (3) ab In consideing that all compaisons of the fequency of light signals ae implemented at the pesent time, then all the edshifts ae intinsically measued by the clock of the pesent obseve on the eath. That is to say, all edshifts ae essentially evaluated by the coodinate time t, which has been defined to un at the same ate with the clock of the pesent obseve on the eath. Hence the value of the phenomenological acceleation of expanding, which can be diectly calculated fom cuent obsevational data, coesponds to d a. It has been shown by the equation (3) that the sign of this fomula ( d a ) may be diffeent with that of d a dτ. To illustate this point, we may investigate the evolution popety of b(t) in analogy to the gavitational time dilation effect in Schwazschild metic. Thee the time dilation facto 1 GM c incease with the distance. So we expect that the facto b(t) may incease with the decease of the gavitational field intensity. With the expanding of the univese, the gavitational field intensity deceases, then b(t) will incease with time. It indicates db(t) > 0. Besides, we have da(t) > 0 fo an expanding univese. Hence it is possible to have a negative d a dτ accoding to the equation (3) even d a > 0 holds. It futhe means a possibility that ρ+3p > 0 accoding to the equation (8). Theefoe, we must keep in mind that thee ae two diffeent concepts of the acceleation when we ae talking about the acceleated expansion of the univese. The acceleation diectly indicated fom the pactical obsevation data is d a, athe than d a dτ.