Robust Control of Time-delay Systems
|
|
- Job Peters
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Robust Control of Time-delay Systems Qing-Chang Zhong Distinguished Lecturer, IEEE Power Electronics Society Max McGraw Endowed Chair Professor in Energy and Power Engineering Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology Web: qzhong2/
2 Outline Notations and some preliminaries Standard H control problem Delay-type Nehari problem Controller implementation
3 Notations Given a matrix A, A T and A denote its transpose and complex conjugate transpose respectively. A stands for (A 1 ) when the inverse A 1 exists. G(s) = D +C(sI A) 1 B. = G (s) = [G( s )] = [ A B C D [ ] A C B D F l and F u are the commonly-used lower/upper linear fractional transformation (LFT). ]
4 Preliminaries Two operators Chain-scattering representation Homographic transformation
5 Completion operator A completion operator π h is defined for h 0 as: π h {G} =. [ A B Ce Ah 0 ] e sh [ A B C D ].= Ĝ(s) e sh G(s). 4 Impulse response G e sh G π h (G) shift Time (sec) h=
6 Truncation operator A truncation operator τ h is defined for h 0 as: τ h {G}. = [ A B C D ] e sh [ A e Ah B C 0 ].= G(s) e sh G(s) 4 Impulse response G τ h (G) Time (sec) h=
7 Representations of systems C l (M) (a) the left CSR Input-output rep. C r (M) (b) the right CSR
8 Chain-scattering representation [ ] M11 M For M = 12, the right and left M 21 M 22 chain-scattering representations are defined as: C r (M) =. [ M12 M 11 M21 1 M 22 M 11 M21 1 M21 1 M 22 M21 1 C l (M) =. [ M12 1 M12 1 M 11 M 22 M12 1 M 12 M 22 M12 1 M 11 provided that M 21 and M 12, respectively, are invertible. If both M 21 and M 12 are invertible, then C r (M) C l (M) = I. ] ]
9 Homographic transformations (HMT) The right HMT: H r (M,Q) = (M 11 Q +M 12 )(M 21 Q +M 22 ) 1 The left HMT: H l (N,Q) = (N 11 QN 21 ) 1 (N 12 QN 22 ) M Q N Q H r (M,Q) H l (N,Q)
10 Properties of the HMT Lemma H r satisfies the following properties: (i) H r (C r (M),S) = F l (M,S); (ii) H r (I,S) = S; (iii) H r (M 1,H r (M 2,S) = H r (M 1 M 2,S); (iv) If H r (G,S) = R and G 1 exists, then S = H r (G 1,R). Lemma Let Λ be any unimodular matrix, then the H control problem H r (G, K 0 ) < γ is solvable iff H r (GΛ, K) < γ is solvable. Furthermore, K 0 = H r (Λ, K) or K = H r (Λ 1, K 0 ).
11 Outline Notations and some preliminaries Standard H control problem Delay-type Nehari problem Controller implementation
12 Standard H problem of single-delay systems Given a γ > 0, find a proper controller K such that the closed-loop system is internally stable and Fl (P, Ke sh ) < γ. z w y P u 1 e sh I u K
13 Key steps to solve the SP h The SP h is solved via solving two simpler problems: Key steps: The one-block problem (OP h ): in the form of SP h but with P( ) = [ ] 0 I. I 0 An extended Nehari problem (ENP h ): in the form of NP h but minimising the H -norm of G β11 +e sh Q β. Step 1: reduce SP h to SP 0 + OP h Step 2: reduce OP h to ENP h Step 3: solve ENP h Step 4: recover the controllers
14 Reducing SP h to SP 0 + OP h z u 1 e sh I u C r (P) K w y z u 1 z u 1 1 e sh I u C r (P) G α C r (G β ) K w y w 1 y Delay-free problem 1-block delay problem G α is the controller generator of SP 0. G β is defined such that C r(g β ). = G 1 α. Gα and Cr(G β) are all bistable.
15 Reducing OP h to ENP h (I) Q α(s) = H r(c r(g β ),e sh K) = F l (G β,e sh K) = G β11 + G β12 Ke sh (I G β22 Ke sh ) 1 G β21 z 1 + G β12 u 1 e sh u I K(s) G β11 G β22 2 K h (s) w 1 G β21 y - Introducing a Smith predictor 2 (s) = π h {G β22 }. = Ĝ β22 + e sh G β22
16 Reducing OP h to ENP h (II) z 1 e sh u I 2 G β12 + Q β (s) G β11 Ĝ β22 K h (s) w 1 z 2 G β21 [. Q β = Hr( The OP h is now reduced to ENP h : Q α(s) = Gβ11 +e sh Q β < γ. G β12 0 Gβ21Ĝβ22(s) 1 G 1 β21 ],K h )
17 Solution to the SP h Solvability : H 0 dom(ric) and X = Ric(H 0 ) 0; J 0 dom(ric) and Y = Ric(J 0 ) 0; ρ(xy) < γ 2 ; γ > γ h, where γ h = max{γ : detσ 22 = 0}. u y Z - V 1 Q A+B2C1 B2 Σ12Σ 1 22 C 1 Σ 22 B1 V 1 = C1 I 0 γ 2 B1 Σ 21 C2Σ 22 0 I
18 Outline Notations and some preliminaries Standard H control problem Delay-type Nehari problem Controller implementation
19 The delay-type Nehari problem Given a minimal state-space realisation G β = [ ] A B C 0, which is not necessarily stable, and h 0, characterise the optimal value γ opt = inf{ Gβ (s)+e sh K(s) L : K(s) H } and for a given γ > γ opt, parametrise the suboptimal set of proper K H such that Gβ (s)+e sh K(s) L < γ.
20 The optimal value It is well known that this problem is solvable iff γ > γ opt. = Γe sh G β, (1) where Γ denotes the Hankel operator. The symbol e sh G β is non-causal and, possibly, unstable. The problem is how to characterise it.
21 Estimation of γ opt It is easy to see that γ opt G β (s) L because at least K can be chosen as 0. It can be seen from (1) that γ opt ΓGβ. Hence, ΓGβ γopt G β (s) L. (2) When γ G β (s) L, the matrix [ H = ] A γ 2 BB C C A has at least one pair of eigenvalues on the jω-axis.
22 Two AREs [ ] A B For a minimally-realised G β = having no C 0 jω-axis zero or pole, the following two AREs [ Lc I ] [ ] [ ] I [ ] Lo H c = 0, I Lo Ho = 0 L c I (3) always have unique stabilising solutions L c 0 and L o 0, respectively, where H c = [ ] A γ 2 BB 0 A, H o = [ ] A 0 C C A.
23 The formula for γ opt Theorem For [ a given minimally-realised ] transfer A B matrix G β = having neither jω-axis zero C 0 nor jω-axis pole, the optimal value γ opt of the delay-type Nehari problem is γ opt = max{γ : det ˆΣ 22 = 0}, where ˆΣ 22 = [ L c I ] Lo Σ[ I ], Σ = [ Σ11 Σ 12 Σ 21 Σ 22 ].= e Hh.
24 Parametrisation of K For a given γ > γ opt, all K(s) H solving the problem can be parametrised as [ ] I 0 K = H r ( W Z I 1, Q), where Q(s) H < γ is a free parameter and W 1 = [ Gβ I Z = π h {F u ( I 0 ],γ 2 G β )}, A+γ 2 BB L ˆΣ c 22 (Σ 12 +L oσ 11 )C ˆΣ 22 B C I 0 γ 2 B (Σ 21 Σ 11 L c) 0 I.
25 Representation in a block diagram The controller K consists of an infinite-dimensional block Z, which is a finite-impulse-response (FIR) block (i.e. a modified Smith predictor), a finite-dimensional block W 1 and a free parameter Q. z e sh u I K G β Z W 1 Q w y -
26 Example: G β (s) = 1 s a (a > 0) ˆΣ22 aγ ah aγ aγopt ah The contour ˆΣ The surface ˆΣ 22 with respect to ah and aγ 22 = 0 on the ah-aγ plane Since I L cl o = 1 4a 2 γ 2, there is Γ Gβ = 1 2a. As a result, the optimal value γ opt satisfies 0.5 aγ opt 1.
27 Outline Notations and some preliminaries Standard H control problem Delay-type Nehari problem Controller implementation
28 Controller implementation All the above control laws associated with delay systems include a distributed delay like ˆ h v(t) = e Aζ Bu(t ζ)dζ, 0 or in the s-domain, Z(s) = (I e (si A)h ) (si A) 1. The implementation of Z is not trivial because A may be unstable. This problem had confused the delay community for several years and was proposed as an open problem in Automatica. It was reported that the quadrature implementation might cause instability however accurate the implementation is. My investigation shows that: The quadrature approximation error converges to 0 in the sense of H -norm. Approximation error N=1 N=5 N= Frequency (rad/sec)
29 Numerical integration v(t) = It is well known that ˆ h 0 e Aζ Bu(t ζ)dζ v(t) v w (t) = h N ΣN 1 i=0 eia h N Bu(t i h N ), but what will happen if transferred into the s-domain using the Laplace transform? Z w (s) = h N ΣN 1 i=0 e i h N (si A) B Not strictly proper = No guarantee of stability!
30 A trivial result y(τ) y(t) p(t) = 1 t h/n t τ 0 t 0 h/n t ˆ h N 0 y(t τ)dτ = ˆ t t h N y(τ)dτ = y(t) p(t),
31 Approximation of Z v(t) = ˆ h 0 N 1 = i=0 N 1 i=0 N 1 = i=0 N 1 = i=0 e Aζ Bu(t ζ)dζ ˆ (i+1) h N i h N e ia h N Bˆ (i+1) h N e Aζ Bu(t ζ)dζ i h N e ia h N Bˆ h N 0 u(t ζ)dζ u(t i h N τ i)dτ i e ia h N Bu(t i h N ) p(t) = v f(t)
32 Hidden sampling-hold effect N 1 v w (t) = i=0 N 1 v f (t) = i=0 e ia h N Bu(t i h N ) h N e ia h N Bu(t i h N ) p(t) This is equivalent to the sampling-hold effect.
33 Implementation in the z-domain v h N ZOH Σ N 1 u i=0 ei h N A Bz i S (a) Z f (s) = 1 e s h N s N 1 i=0 e i h N (si A) B v (e A h N I)A 1 ZOH Σ N 1 i=0 ei h N A Bz i S u (b) Z f 0 (s) = 1 e h N s s e N h A I h A 1 N 1 i=0 e i h N (si A) B N
34 Implementation in the s-domain Z fǫ (s) = 1 e h N (s+ǫ) h e N A I N 1 A 1 Σ 1 e h N ǫ i=0 s/ǫ+1 e i h N (si A) B. lim N + Z fǫ (s) Z(s) = 0, (ǫ 0) Approximation error N=1 N=5 N= Frequency (rad/sec)
35 Rational implementation The δ-operator is defined as δ = (q 1)/τ, where q is the shift operator and τ is the sampling period. We have δ = eτs 1 τ because q e τs when τ 0. Define Φ = 1 τ I and then = (e τ(si A) I)Φ, si A = lim τ 0, e (si A)τ = (Φ 1 +I) 1
36 Z(s) = (I e (si A)h ) (si A) 1 = (I e (si A)τN )(si A) 1 B = (I (Φ 1 +I) N )(si A) 1 B. Since si A, Z can be approximated as Z r (s) = (I (Φ 1 (si A)+I) N )(si A) 1 B = (I (Φ 1 (si A)+I) 1 ) Σ N 1 k=0 (Φ 1 (si A)+I) k (si A) 1 B = Φ 1 Σ N k=1 (Φ 1 (si A)+I) k B = Σ N k=1 Πk Φ 1 B, where Π = (si A+Φ) 1 Φ.
37 xn x N 1 Π x 2 Π x 1 Π u b 1 Φ B u v r 1 Π = ( si A + Φ) Φ Π = (si A+Φ) 1 Φ In order to guarantee zero static error, Φ = ( h N 0 e Aζ dζ) 1.
38 Fast-converging rational implementation Define ˆ h N Φ = ( 0 e Aζ dζ) 1 (e A h N +I) Γ = (e τ(si A) I)(e τ(si A) +I) 1 Φ, τ = h/n Then, si A = lim τ 0 Γ, si A s=0 = Γ s=0 = A, Γ si A=0 = 0.
39 xn x N 1 Π x 2 Π x 1 Ξ B u v r 1 Π = ( si A + Φ) ( A si + Φ) 1 Ξ = 2( si A + Φ) Π = (Φ si +A)(sI A+Φ) 1, Ξ = 2(sI A+Φ) Implementation error δ operator discrete delay bilinear trans Frequency (rad/sec)
40 Summary Standard H control problem Delay-type Nehari problem Controller implementation
41
Rational Implementation of Distributed Delay Using Extended Bilinear Transformations
Rational Implementation of Distributed Delay Using Extended Bilinear Transformations Qing-Chang Zhong zhongqc@ieee.org, http://come.to/zhongqc School of Electronics University of Glamorgan United Kingdom
More informationA Case Study for the Delay-type Nehari Problem
Proceedings of the 44th EEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 MoA A Case Study for the Delay-type Nehari Problem Qing-Chang Zhong
More informationA unified Smith predictor based on the spectral decomposition of the plant
A unified Smith predictor based on the spectral decomposition of the plant Qing-Chang Zhong and George Weiss Dept. of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Imperial College London Exhibition Rd., London
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #4 Monday, January 13, 2003 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Impulse and Step Responses of Continuous-Time
More informationProblem Set 5 Solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 5 Solutions The problem set deals with Hankel
More informationEFFECTS OF TIME DELAY ON FEEDBACK STABILISATION OVER SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO CONSTRAINED CHANNELS
EFFECTS OF TIME DELAY ON FEEDBACK STABILISATION OVER SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO CONSTRAINED CHANNELS Julio H. Braslavsky, Rick H. Middleton, Jim S. Freudenberg, Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control,
More informationJ-SPECTRAL FACTORIZATION
J-SPECTRAL FACTORIZATION of Regular Para-Hermitian Transfer Matrices Qing-Chang Zhong zhongqc@ieee.org School of Electronics University of Glamorgan United Kingdom Outline Notations and definitions Regular
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 8: Youla parametrization, LMIs, Model Reduction and Summary [Ch. 11-12] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 8: Youla, LMIs, Model Reduction
More informationHankel Optimal Model Reduction 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 2004: MODEL REDUCTION Hankel Optimal Model Reduction 1 This lecture covers both the theory and
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationLecture 9 Infinite Impulse Response Filters
Lecture 9 Infinite Impulse Response Filters Outline 9 Infinite Impulse Response Filters 9 First-Order Low-Pass Filter 93 IIR Filter Design 5 93 CT Butterworth filter design 5 93 Bilinear transform 7 9
More informationFrequency domainsolutionto delay-type Nehari problem
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Automatica 39 (2003) 499 508 www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Brief paper Frequency domainsolutionto delay-type Nehari problem Qing-Chang Zhong Department of
More informationControl Systems. Frequency domain analysis. L. Lanari
Control Systems m i l e r p r a in r e v y n is o Frequency domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 5: Transfer Functions. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 5: Transfer Functions Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 20, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 5: Control Systems I 20/10/2017
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several pole-zero cancellations between the controller and
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable
ECE4510/5510: Feedback Control Systems. 5 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS 5.1: Bounded-input bounded-output (BIBO) stability Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 12: I/O Stability Readings: DDV, Chapters 15, 16 Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 14, 2011 E. Frazzoli
More informationIntroduction & Laplace Transforms Lectures 1 & 2
Introduction & Lectures 1 & 2, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 Control System Definition of a Control System Group of components that collectively
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture : Different Types of Control Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Limits of Proportional Feedback Performance
More informationEffects of Time Delay on Feedback Stabilisation over Signal-to-Noise Ratio Constrained Channels
Effects of Time Delay on Feedback Stabilisation over Signal-to-Noise Ratio Constrained Channels Julio H. Braslavsky Rick H. Middleton Jim S. Freudenberg Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control The
More informationCDS Solutions to Final Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to Final Exam Instructor: Danielle C Tarraf Fall 27 Problem (a) We will compute the H 2 norm of G using state-space methods (see Section 26 in DFT) We begin by finding a minimal state-space
More information10 Transfer Matrix Models
MIT EECS 6.241 (FALL 26) LECTURE NOTES BY A. MEGRETSKI 1 Transfer Matrix Models So far, transfer matrices were introduced for finite order state space LTI models, in which case they serve as an important
More informationControl Systems. Laplace domain analysis
Control Systems Laplace domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic equations define an Input/Output
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Q-Parameterization 1 This lecture introduces the so-called
More informationOptimal Discretization of Analog Filters via Sampled-Data H Control Theory
Optimal Discretization of Analog Filters via Sampled-Data H Control Theory Masaaki Nagahara 1 and Yutaka Yamamoto 1 Abstract In this article, we propose optimal discretization of analog filters or controllers
More informationBalanced Truncation 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 2004: MODEL REDUCTION Balanced Truncation This lecture introduces balanced truncation for LTI
More informationL 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 WeB1.1 L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationLecture 7 - IIR Filters
Lecture 7 - IIR Filters James Barnes (James.Barnes@colostate.edu) Spring 204 Colorado State University Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE423 / 2 Outline. IIR Filter Representations Difference
More informationProblem set 5 solutions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION Problem set 5 solutions Problem 5. For each of the stetements below, state
More informationA Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants
00 ECTI TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY VOL., NO.2 NOVEMBER 2005 A Design Method for Smith Predictors for Minimum-Phase Time-Delay Plants Kou Yamada Nobuaki Matsushima, Non-members
More informationGATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS
www.gatehelp.com GATE EE Topic wise Questions YEAR 010 ONE MARK Question. 1 For the system /( s + 1), the approximate time taken for a step response to reach 98% of the final value is (A) 1 s (B) s (C)
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time
More informationLMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control
LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 14: LMIs for Robust Control in the LF Framework ypes of Uncertainty In this Lecture, we will cover Unstructured,
More informationMultivariable Control. Lecture 03. Description of Linear Time Invariant Systems. John T. Wen. September 7, 2006
Multivariable Control Lecture 3 Description of Linear Time Invariant Systems John T. Wen September 7, 26 Outline Mathematical description of LTI Systems Ref: 3.1-3.4 of text September 7, 26Copyrighted
More informationSTABILITY. Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential equations. and used the Laplace transform to help find step and impulse
SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS: PAPER 3C1 HANDOUT 4. Dr David Corrigan 1. Electronic and Electrical Engineering Dept. corrigad@tcd.ie www.sigmedia.tv STABILITY Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Norms for Signals and Systems
. AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System Norms for Signals and. Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Norms for Signals ...
More informationLTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete) - Basics
LTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete) - Basics 1. A system with an input x(t) and output y(t) is described by the relation: y(t) = t. x(t). This system is (a) linear and time-invariant (b) linear and time-varying
More informationNorm invariant discretization for sampled-data fault detection
Automatica 41 (25 1633 1637 www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Technical communique Norm invariant discretization for sampled-data fault detection Iman Izadi, Tongwen Chen, Qing Zhao Department of Electrical
More informationStabilization of Networked Control Systems with Clock Offset
Stabilization of Networked Control Systems with Clock Offset Masashi Wakaiki, Kunihisa Okano, and João P Hespanha Abstract We consider the stabilization of networked control systems with time-invariant
More information2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8 I * * Massachusetts
More informationRobust Multivariable Control
Lecture 2 Anders Helmersson anders.helmersson@liu.se ISY/Reglerteknik Linköpings universitet Today s topics Today s topics Norms Today s topics Norms Representation of dynamic systems Today s topics Norms
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationControl Systems. System response. L. Lanari
Control Systems m i l e r p r a in r e v y n is o System response L. Lanari Outline What we are going to see: how to compute in the s-domain the forced response (zero-state response) using the transfer
More informationLinear Quadratic Gausssian Control Design with Loop Transfer Recovery
Linear Quadratic Gausssian Control Design with Loop Transfer Recovery Leonid Freidovich Department of Mathematics Michigan State University MI 48824, USA e-mail:leonid@math.msu.edu http://www.math.msu.edu/
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 2 Stability Definitions We define stability first with respect to changes in the initial conditions Analysis of Discrete-Time
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real
More informationDenis ARZELIER arzelier
COURSE ON LMI OPTIMIZATION WITH APPLICATIONS IN CONTROL PART II.2 LMIs IN SYSTEMS CONTROL STATE-SPACE METHODS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS and SYNTHESIS Denis ARZELIER www.laas.fr/ arzelier arzelier@laas.fr 15
More informationModule 06 Stability of Dynamical Systems
Module 06 Stability of Dynamical Systems Ahmad F. Taha EE 5143: Linear Systems and Control Email: ahmad.taha@utsa.edu Webpage: http://engineering.utsa.edu/ataha October 10, 2017 Ahmad F. Taha Module 06
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : 0. LS_D_ECIN_Control Systems_30078 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucnow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 0-4546 CLASS TEST 08-9 ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
More informationModern Control Systems
Modern Control Systems Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 18: Linear Causal Time-Invariant Operators Operators L 2 and ˆL 2 space Because L 2 (, ) and ˆL 2 are isomorphic, so are
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017-3-14 4.1 Input-output controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationELEG 305: Digital Signal Processing
ELEG 305: Digital Signal Processing Lecture : Design of Digital IIR Filters (Part I) Kenneth E. Barner Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Delaware Fall 008 K. E. Barner (Univ.
More informationA system that is both linear and time-invariant is called linear time-invariant (LTI).
The Cooper Union Department of Electrical Engineering ECE111 Signal Processing & Systems Analysis Lecture Notes: Time, Frequency & Transform Domains February 28, 2012 Signals & Systems Signals are mapped
More informationDiscrete and continuous dynamic systems
Discrete and continuous dynamic systems Bounded input bounded output (BIBO) and asymptotic stability Continuous and discrete time linear time-invariant systems Katalin Hangos University of Pannonia Faculty
More informationClosed-Loop Structure of Discrete Time H Controller
Closed-Loop Structure of Discrete Time H Controller Waree Kongprawechnon 1,Shun Ushida 2, Hidenori Kimura 2 Abstract This paper is concerned with the investigation of the closed-loop structure of a discrete
More informationFeedback Stabilization over Signal-to-Noise Ratio Constrained Channels
Feedback Stabilization over Signal-to-Noise Ratio Constrained Channels Julio H. Braslavsky, Rick H. Middleton and Jim S. Freudenberg Abstract There has recently been significant interest in feedback stabilization
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationIntro. Computer Control Systems: F8
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Properties of state-space descriptions and feedback Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 22 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F7: Quiz! 2
More informationNetwork Reconstruction from Intrinsic Noise: Non-Minimum-Phase Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress he International Federation of Automatic Control Network Reconstruction from Intrinsic Noise: Non-Minimum-Phase Systems David Hayden, Ye Yuan Jorge Goncalves Department
More informationZeros and zero dynamics
CHAPTER 4 Zeros and zero dynamics 41 Zero dynamics for SISO systems Consider a linear system defined by a strictly proper scalar transfer function that does not have any common zero and pole: g(s) =α p(s)
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 3, Part 2: Introduction to Affine Parametrisation School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 3, Part 2: Affine Parametrisation p. 1/29 Outline
More informationCH.6 Laplace Transform
CH.6 Laplace Transform Where does the Laplace transform come from? How to solve this mistery that where the Laplace transform come from? The starting point is thinking about power series. The power series
More informationA Simple Derivation of Right Interactor for Tall Transfer Function Matrices and its Application to Inner-Outer Factorization Continuous-Time Case
A Simple Derivation of Right Interactor for Tall Transfer Function Matrices and its Application to Inner-Outer Factorization Continuous-Time Case ATARU KASE Osaka Institute of Technology Department of
More informationECE301 Fall, 2006 Exam 1 Soluation October 7, Name: Score: / Consider the system described by the differential equation
ECE301 Fall, 2006 Exam 1 Soluation October 7, 2006 1 Name: Score: /100 You must show all of your work for full credit. Calculators may NOT be used. 1. Consider the system described by the differential
More informationChapter 7: The z-transform
Chapter 7: The -Transform ECE352 1 The -Transform - definition Continuous-time systems: e st H(s) y(t) = e st H(s) e st is an eigenfunction of the LTI system h(t), and H(s) is the corresponding eigenvalue.
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline Input-Output
More informationECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 2 Laplace Transform I 1/52
1/52 ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS Lecture 2 Laplace Transform I Linear Time Invariant Systems A general LTI system may be described by the linear constant coefficient differential equation: a n d n
More informationController Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems
Controller Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems L. Paunonen We present three dynamic error feedbac controllers for robust output regulation of regular linear systems. These controllers
More informationLecture 6. Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 6 Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 6 p. 1/73 6.1 General
More information2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Massachusetts
More informationLecture 7: Laplace Transform and Its Applications Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto
Dr-Ing Sudchai Boonto Department of Control System and Instrumentation Engineering King Mongkut s Unniversity of Technology Thonburi Thailand Outline Motivation The Laplace Transform The Laplace Transform
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real Poles
More informationOptimal Hankel norm approximation for infinite-dimensional systems
Optimal Hankel norm approximation for infinite-dimensional systems A.J. Sasane and R.F. Curtain Department of Mathematics, University of Groningen, P.O.Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands. {A.J.Sasane,R.F.Curtain}@math.rug.nl
More informationRobust Control ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE. Alireza Karimi Laboratoire d Automatique
Robust Control ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE Alireza Karimi Laboratoire d Automatique Course Program 1. Introduction 2. Norms for Signals and Systems 3. Basic Concepts (stability and performance)
More informationEE 380. Linear Control Systems. Lecture 10
EE 380 Linear Control Systems Lecture 10 Professor Jeffrey Schiano Department of Electrical Engineering Lecture 10. 1 Lecture 10 Topics Stability Definitions Methods for Determining Stability Lecture 10.
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7-(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More information3 Gramians and Balanced Realizations
3 Gramians and Balanced Realizations In this lecture, we use an optimization approach to find suitable realizations for truncation and singular perturbation of G. It turns out that the recommended realizations
More informationCompensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus
1 Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus Prof. Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning
More informationLecture 8 - IIR Filters (II)
Lecture 8 - IIR Filters (II) James Barnes (James.Barnes@colostate.edu) Spring 2009 Colorado State University Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE423 1 / 27 Lecture 8 Outline Introduction Digital
More informationEE595S : Class Lecture Notes Parameter Identification and Maximum Torque Per Amp Control Algorithm
EE595S : Class Lecture Notes Parameter Identification and Maximum Torque Per Amp Control Algorithm Outline GA based AQDM Characterization Procedure MTPA Control strategy AMTPA Control Strategy 2 Alternate
More informationStability preserving post-processing methods applied in the Loewner framework
Ion Victor Gosea and Athanasios C. Antoulas (Jacobs University Bremen and Rice University May 11, 2016 Houston 1 / 20 Stability preserving post-processing methods applied in the Loewner framework Ion Victor
More informationModel reduction for linear systems by balancing
Model reduction for linear systems by balancing Bart Besselink Jan C. Willems Center for Systems and Control Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science University of Groningen, Groningen,
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): -7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 22: The Nyquist Criterion Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Complex Analysis The Argument Principle The Contour
More informationCylinder with Conical Cap
Cylinder with Conical Cap MUS420/EE367A Supplement to Lecture 11 Stability Proof for a Cylindrical Bore with Conical Cap Julius O. Smith III (jos@ccrma.stanford.edu) Center for Computer Research in Music
More informationGATE 2017 ECE Session 3 Answer Key
1. Three pair cubical dice are thrown simultaneously. What is the probability that all three dice have same number is... Ans. ( 1 36 ). The one of the eigen value is real, rest are imaginary the real value
More informationTHE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS FOR MIMO TD PLANTS WITH THE SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information Control ICIC International c 218 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 14, Number 2, April 218 pp. 387 43 THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL ROBUST STABILIZING MULTI-PERIOD
More informationIterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I
Iterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK etar@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ Contents Basics Representations
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability
More informationLecture 8 Finite Impulse Response Filters
Lecture 8 Finite Impulse Response Filters Outline 8. Finite Impulse Response Filters.......................... 8. oving Average Filter............................... 8.. Phase response...............................
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationCHBE320 LECTURE V LAPLACE TRANSFORM AND TRANSFER FUNCTION. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CHBE320 LECTURE V LAPLACE TRANSFORM AND TRANSFER FUNCTION Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 2018 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering 5-1 Road Map of the Lecture V Laplace Transform and Transfer
More informationSome of the different forms of a signal, obtained by transformations, are shown in the figure. jwt e z. jwt z e
Transform methods Some of the different forms of a signal, obtained by transformations, are shown in the figure. X(s) X(t) L - L F - F jw s s jw X(jw) X*(t) F - F X*(jw) jwt e z jwt z e X(nT) Z - Z X(z)
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More information