STABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable


 Terence Sullivan
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 ECE4510/5510: Feedback Control Systems. 5 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS 5.1: Boundedinput boundedoutput (BIBO) stability Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable The cone in the stable configuration can be perturbed by nudging it from any direction, and its position will not change much. The cone in the neutral configuration can be nudged in the axial direction without changing its position much, but if it is nudged in the radial direction, it will roll and its position will change a lot. (The stability of a neutral system depends on the input.) The cone in the unstable position can be nudged from any direction, and its position will change a lot. We want stability because we don t want a small input (e.g., possibly disturbance, or a small change in the reference input) to cause the output to grow without bound (seem to become uncontrolled ). In system analysis, there are many ways to mathematically define and evaluate whether a system is stable.
2 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 For LTI systems, all are basically the same, and equivalent to boundedinput boundedoutput or BIBO stability. If the system s input is bounded by some positive constant 1 u(t) < 1 t then BIBO stability guarantees that the output will also be bounded by some (possibly different) positive constant y(t) < t. In the time domain, So, y(t) < iff stability. y(t) y(t) 1 h(τ)u(t τ)dτ h(τ)u(t τ)dτ h(τ) u(t τ) dτ h(τ) dτ. h(τ) dτ <. ThisisonetestforBIBO u(t) C y(t) Stable? Note: (h(t) 1(t)). Integrating the absolute value of a function can be very tricky. Sometimes it s easier to integrate a simpler function that gives an upper bound instead. Consider h(t) exp( t) sin(πt)1(t). IsthissystemBIBOstable?
3 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 3 The blue line in the figure is h(t); and the green dotted line is h(t). To determine stability, we need to integrate to find the area under the green dotted line if this area is finite, then the system is stable. Finding the exact answer for this integral is hard. But,theintegral under the green dotted line is less than the integral under the red line. So, if the integral under the red line is finite, the system is stable. 0 e t dt e t 0 1. So, we have determined that the system is BIBO stable, and we didn t need to integrate a very challenging piecewise function. We can also evaluate BIBO stability in the Laplace domain: H(s) Y (s) R(s) m 1 (s z i) n 1 (s p m n. i) (assume poles unique) h(t) n k i e pit 1(t) i1 h(τ) dτ < iff R(p i )<0 i. (If poles are not distinct, h(t) will have terms for an mth order root. k (m 1)! t m 1 e p it h(t) h(t) exp( t)
4 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 4 Same condition.) h(τ) dτ < iff R(p i )<0; Laplacedomain condition for stability: All poles in the transfer function must be in the open left hand plane. (i.e., none on jω axis.) EXAMPLE: T (s).ist(s) stable? s + 3s + T (s) (s + 1)(s + ), Roots at s 1, s. Stable! EXAMPLE: T (s) 10s + 4.IsT(s) stable? s 3 + s 11s 1 10(s +.4) T (s) (s + 1)(s 3)(s + 4), Roots at s 1, s +3, s 4. Unstable! EXAMPLE: T (s) s.ist(s) stable? s + 1 s T (s) (s j)(s + j), Roots at s ±j. MARGINALLY stable. Use input sin(t). Y (s) s 1 s + 1 s + 1 s (s + 1) y(t) 1 t sin(t)... unbounded. MARGINALLY stable unstable (bounded impulse response, but unbounded output for some inputs.)
5 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS : Routh Hurwitz stability (cases 0 and 1) Factoring highdegree polynomials to find roots is tedious and numerically not well conditioned. Want other stability tests, and also MARGINS of stability. (1) Routh test () Root locus (3) Nyquist test (4) Bode stability margins Can you tell this is an important topic? In 1868, Maxwell found conditions on the coefficients of a transfer function polynomial of nd and 3rd order to guarantee stability. It became the subject of the 1877 Adams Prize to determine conditions for stability for higherorder polynomials. Routh won this prize, and the method is still useful. Routh test case 0 Consider the denominator a(s). nd order: a(s) s + a 1 s + a 0 (s p 1 )(s p ) s (p 1 + p )s + p 1 p. 3rd order: a(s) s 3 + a s + a 1 s + a 0 (s p 1 )(s p )(s p 3 ) [ ][ ] s (p 1 + p )s + p 1 p s p3
6 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 6 s 3 (p 1 + p + p 3 )s + (p 1 p + p 1 p 3 + p p 3 )s p 1 p p 3. TREND: Stability none of the coefficients a i can be 0. Does this trend continue? a n 1 ( 1) sum of all roots. a n sum of products of roots taken two at a time. a n 3 ( 1) sum of products of roots taken three at a time.. a 0 ( 1) n product of all roots. Conclusions: 1. If any coefficient a i 0, notallrootsinlhp.. If any coefficient a i < 0, atleastonerootinrhp. TEST: If any coefficient a i 0, systemisunstable. EXAMPLE: a(s) s + 0s + 1. From conclusion (1), not all roots in LHP. Roots at s ±j. Marginally stable. EXAMPLE: a(s) s 3 + s 11s 1. From conclusion (), at least one root is in RHP. Roots at s 1, s 4, s +3. Unstable. EXAMPLE: a(s) s 3 + s + s + 8.
7 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 7 We don t know yet if this system is stable or not. 1 Roots at s, s ± j 15.Unstable,buthowdowefindout without factoring? Routh test case 1 Once we have determined that ai > 0 i, weneedtorunthefull Routh test ( case 0 doesn t really count). Very mechanical, not intuitive. Proof difficult. Start with characteristic polynomial (denominator of closedloop transfer function), a(s) s n + a n 1 s n 1 + +a 1 s + a 0. Form Routh array. First two rows are coefficients directly copied from a(s); Remaining rows are calculated as shown. s n a n a n a n 4 s n 1 a n 1 a n 3 a n 5 s n b 1 b s n 3 c 1 c. s 1 j 1 s 0 k 1 b 1 1 a n 1 b 1 a n 1 c 1 1 b 1 c 1 b 1 a n a n 1 a n a n 1 a n 1 a n a n 3 a n 4 a n 5 a n 3 b 1 b a n 1 a n 5 b 1 b 3 TEST: Number of unstable roots number of sign changes in left column.
8 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 8 EXAMPLE: a(s) s 3 + s + s + 8. s 3 1 s 1 8 s 1 6 s 0 8 b 1 1 Two sign changes (1 6, EXAMPLE: a(s) s + a 1 s + a 0. s 1 a 0 c (8 ) ( ) ) TworootsinRHP. s 1 a 1 s 0 a 0 b 1 1 a 1 Stable iff a1 > 0, a 0 > 0. 1 a 0 a (0 a 0 a 1 ) a 0 a 1 EXAMPLE: a(s) s 3 + a s + a 1 s + a 0. s 3 1 a 1 s a a 0 s 1 a 1 a 0 a s 0 a 0 b 1 1 a 1 a 1 a a 0 1 (a 0 a 1 a ) a c 1 1 b 1 a a 0 b 1 0 a 1 a 0 a 1 ( a 0 b 1 ) a 0. b 1 Stable iff a > 0, a 0 > 0, a 1 > a 0 a.
9 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS : Routh Hurwitz stability (cases and 3) Routh test case In the process of filling in the Routh array, we sometimes find an element in first column 0. This leads to a divide by zero computation in a subsequent step, which has an indeterminate result. Solution: Replace the zero in the left column with ±ɛ as ɛ 0. (Will get same result for +ɛ and ɛ.) EXAMPLE: a(s) s 5 + s 4 + s 3 + 4s + 11s b (4 4) 0 s s s new s 3 ɛ 6 s 1 ɛ 10 s 1 6 s 0 10 If ɛ>0, twosignchanges. If ɛ<0, twosignchanges. Two poles in RHP. b 1 c 1 1 ɛ c 1 ɛ d 1 ɛ 1 e ɛ 6 10 ɛ 0 ɛ ɛ 1 10 ɛ (10 ) (1 4ɛ) ɛ ɛ 1 (0 10ɛ) 10 ɛ ɛ 7 (10ɛ + 1 ɛ ) 6 1 (0 60) 10 6
10 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 10 Routh test case 3 Sometimes an entire row in Routh array 0. This means that polynomial factors such that one factor has conjugatemirrorroots, which can be configured as shown in the figure: I(s) I(s) I(s) R(s) R(s) R(s) In any case, system is unstable. ButhowmanyRHProots? Complete Routh array by making polynomial a1 (s) from last nonzero row in array. Poly has every second order of s only!! We do this in a reverse fashion from how we entered a(s) into the array in the first place. It turns out that a1 (s) is a factor of the original a(s). Itismissingsome orders of s, soisnotstable(by case0.) We want to see if it has roots in the RHP or only on the jωaxis. Replace zero row with coefficients from da 1 (s) ds and continue.
11 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 11 EXAMPLE: a(s) s 4 + s 3 + 3s + s +. s s s 1 s 1 0 new s 1 s 0 No sign changes in Routh array. So, no RHP roots. Roots of a 1 (s) at s ±j. Marginally stable. b b c d a 1 (s) s + da 1 (s) s ds EXAMPLE: a(s) s (Hard). s s new s s 0 4 new s ɛ 4 s 1 16 ɛ s 0 4 Two sign changes. Therefore RHPpoles.Othertwo poles are mirrors in LHP. a 1 (s) s 4 + 4; b b c ɛ ɛ 4 d 1 ɛ 16 ɛ ɛ 0 4 da 1 (s) ds 16 ɛ 4 4s 3.
12 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS : Routh test as a design tool Consider the system: R(s) s + 1 s(s 1)(s + 6) Y (s) T (s) Y (s) R(s) 1 + s+1 s(s 1)(s+6) s+1 s(s 1)(s+6) (s + 1) s(s 1)(s + 6) + (s + 1) We might be interested in knowing for what values of the system is stable. Compute the denominator of the transfer function: Perform the Routh test s s 5 s s 0 a(s) s(s 1)(s + 6) + (s + 1) s 3 + 5s + ( 6)s +. b c 1 1 b 1 5 b ( 5( 6)) 5 (4 30)/5. 1 b 1 ( b 1 ) For stability of the closedloop system, > 0, and > 30/4. Step response for different values of.
13 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 13 Amplitude EXAMPLE: R(s) [ ] T I s Time (sec.) 1 (s + 1)(s + ) Y (s) T (s) Y (s) R(s) T I s+ T I s(s+1)(s+) 1 + T I s+ T I s(s+1)(s+) a(s) TI s 3 + 3T I s + T I ( + )s +. T I s + T I s(s + 1)(s + ) + T I s +. s 3 T I T I ( + ) s 3T I s 1 T I ( + ) 3 s 0 b 1 1 3T I T I T I ( + ) 3T I c 1 1 b 1 3T I b 1 0 T I( + ) 3 1 ( b 1 ) b 1
14 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 14 For stability of the closedloop system, > 0 and TI > 0 and T I > 3( + ). Alternately, < 0 and TI < 0 and T I < for < < 0, (or 3( + ) instead T I > for < but this is a contradiction since the 3( + ) quotient is positive and T I is negative by assumption). 1.5 Amplitude , T I 0.5 1, T I 0.5 1, T I Time (seconds)
15 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS : Advanced applications of the Routh test Note that the Routh test is not specifically a controls recipe. It is a geometric algorithm. It counts the number of roots of a polynomial that have R(s i ) 0. Modification #1 Suppose we want to ensure a settlingtime specification (or some form of robust stability), so we want R(s i ) σ for all poles. Routh test doesn t apply directly; but, perform a change of variables: Let p s + σ.then,s i < σ corresponds to p i < 0. So, we can perform a Routh test on a(p) instead of a(s). EXAMPLE: Let T (s).forwhatvaluesof are all poles to s + 4s + the left of s 1? Note, σ 1, andweletp s + 1 or s p 1. T (p) (p 1) + 4(p 1) + p p p 4 + p + p + 3. So, a(p) p + p + ( 3). FormtheRoutharray: p 1 ( 3) p 1 p 0 ( 3) If > 3, therealpartofallpolesof T (s) are less than Imaginary axis Root locus Real axis 3
16 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 16 Modification # When working with digital control systems, the complex frequency domain is represented by z insteadof s, and a system is stable if all poles of T (z) have magnitude strictly less than 1. The stability region is the unit circle in the zplane. The Routh test does not apply directly. But, we can perform the change of variables (where α>0) z 1 + αs or s 1 ( ) z 1, 1 αs α z + 1 which is known as the bilinear transformation. We can show that this transformation maps the inside of the unit circle in the zplane to the lefthalf splane. Let z re jθ.wehavestabilityifz < 1. So,wewanttoshowthatr < 1 produces R(s) <0. Substituting into the change of variables s 1 ( re jθ ) 1 1 ( re jθ 1 α re jθ + 1 α re jθ + 1 jr sin θ {}}{ 1 r 1 + re jθ re jθ α r re jθ + re jθ. Note that: } {{ } r cos θ )( re jθ ) + 1 re jθ + 1
17 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 17 When r 1, s is purely imaginary (translating the unit circle into the jω axis) When r < 1, therealpartofs is less than zero (translating the inside of the unit disc into the lefthalf splane) When r > 1, therealpartofs is greater than zero (translating the outside of the unit disc into the righthalf splane). EXAMPLE: Let T (z) z + ( 0.5). We can see from inspection (for this simple example) that 0.5 < < 1.5 will result in a pole location that is between z 1 and z +1. But, let s perform the bilinear transformation and the Routh test. Choose α 1. T (s) T (z) z 1+s 1 s 1+s 1 s Form the (trivial) Routh array: + ( 0.5) (1 s) 1 + s + ( 0.5)(1 s) (1 s) (1.5 )s + ( + 0.5). s 1 (1.5 ) s 0 ( + 0.5) So, we have stability when < 1.5 and when > 0.5, asexpected.
18 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS : Internal stability BIBO stability requires that the output be bounded for every possible bounded input. However, a system may be inputoutput stable and still have unbounded internal signals. The issue is internal stability. Consider the following diagram: W (s) R(s) E(s) D(s) U(s) G(s) Y (s) We can find the following four transfer functions: Y (s) R(s) Y (s) W (s) D(s)G(s) 1 + D(s)G(s) G(s) 1 + D(s)G(s). U(s) R(s) D(s) 1 + D(s)G(s) U(s) W (s) D(s)G(s). For internal stability, all four of these transfer functions must be stable. EXAMPLE: Let G(s) 1 s 1 Then, Y (s) R(s) and D(s) s 1 s + 1. D(s)G(s) 1 + D(s)G(s) s 1 (s 1)(s+1) 1 + s 1 (s 1)(s+1)
19 ECE4510/ECE5510, STABILITY ANALYSIS 5 19 s 1 (s 1)(s + 1) + (s 1) 1 s s +. This system passes the test for BIBO stability. However, which is unstable. Y (s) W (s) G(s) 1 + D(s)G(s) 1 s s 1 (s 1)(s+1) s + 1 (s 1)(s + 1) + (s 1) s + 1 (s 1)(s + ), Therefore, this system is not internally stable. In this case, any (even very tiny) amount of disturbance will cause the output y(t) to grow without bound. The feedback will not help. This brings up the point that it is important to avoid bad cancellations of polezero pairs! We cannot stabilize a system by canceling an unstable pole with a compensator zero. We will see the same idea again from a different perspective when we look at rootlocus design.
ECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : RouthHurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationEE Control Systems LECTURE 9
Updated: Sunday, February, 999 EE  Control Systems LECTURE 9 Copyright FL Lewis 998 All rights reserved STABILITY OF LINEAR SYSTEMS We discuss the stability of input/output systems and of statespace
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Readings: Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems 4 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES 41: Bilinear transformation Three main aspects to controlsystem design: 1 Stability, 2 Steadystate response, 3 Transient response
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationOutline. Control systems. Lecture4 Stability. V. Sankaranarayanan. V. Sankaranarayanan Control system
Outline Control systems Lecture4 Stability V. Sankaranarayanan Outline Outline 1 Outline Outline 1 2 Concept of Stability Zero State Response: The zerostate response is due to the input only; all the
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Stability RouthHurwitz stability criterion Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationEE 380. Linear Control Systems. Lecture 10
EE 380 Linear Control Systems Lecture 10 Professor Jeffrey Schiano Department of Electrical Engineering Lecture 10. 1 Lecture 10 Topics Stability Definitions Methods for Determining Stability Lecture 10.
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationSome special cases
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 87 11.3.1 Some special cases Routh table is easy to form in most cases, but there could be some cases when we need to do some extra work. Case 1: The first
More informationECE 3620: Laplace Transforms: Chapter 3:
ECE 3620: Laplace Transforms: Chapter 3: 3.13.4 Prof. K. Chandra ECE, UMASS Lowell September 21, 2016 1 Analysis of LTI Systems in the Frequency Domain Thus far we have understood the relationship between
More informationCourse Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: SteadyState Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationControl Systems Engineering ( Chapter 6. Stability ) Prof. KwangChun Ho Tel: Fax:
Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 6. Stability ) Prof. KwangChun Ho kwangho@hansung.ac.kr Tel: 027604253 Fax:027604435 Introduction In this lesson, you will learn the following : How to determine
More informationCourse Outline. Closed Loop Stability. Stability. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Nyquist Stability. Dr. Dunant Halim
Amme 3 : System Dynamics & Control Nyquist Stability Dr. Dunant Halim Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 5 Mar Introduction 2 12 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 19 Mar System Response
More informationECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27
1/27 ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability Feedback System Consider the feedback system u + G ol (s) y Figure 1: A unity feedback system
More informationSTABILITY OF CLOSEDLOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS
CHBE320 LECTURE X STABILITY OF CLOSEDLOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 2018 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering 101 Road Map of the Lecture X Stability of closedloop control
More informationLecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions
MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Systems Lecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions Stability Concepts BIBO Stability and The RouthHurwitz Criterion Dorf, Sections 6.1, 6.2, 7.6 Cleveland State
More informationI Stable, marginally stable, & unstable linear systems. I Relationship between pole locations and stability. I RouthHurwitz criterion
EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems Lecture Chapter 6 Stability Lecture abstract Alexandre Bayen Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of California Berkeley Topics
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuoustime, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationLecture 4 Classical Control Overview II. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 4 Classical Control Overview II Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Stability Analysis through Transfer Function Dr. Radhakant
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationSoftware Engineering/Mechatronics 3DX4. Slides 6: Stability
Software Engineering/Mechatronics 3DX4 Slides 6: Stability Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on lecture notes by P. Taylor and M. Lawford, and Control
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several polezero cancellations between the controller and
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 22: The Nyquist Criterion Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Complex Analysis The Argument Principle The Contour
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
More informationA system that is both linear and timeinvariant is called linear timeinvariant (LTI).
The Cooper Union Department of Electrical Engineering ECE111 Signal Processing & Systems Analysis Lecture Notes: Time, Frequency & Transform Domains February 28, 2012 Signals & Systems Signals are mapped
More informationBASIC PROPERTIES OF FEEDBACK
ECE450/550: Feedback Control Systems. 4 BASIC PROPERTIES OF FEEDBACK 4.: Setting up an example to benchmark controllers There are two basic types/categories of control systems: OPEN LOOP: Disturbance r(t)
More informationIC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS
DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING YEAR/SEMESTER: II/IV IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION 1. What is the mathematical
More informationData Based Design of 3Term Controllers. Data Based Design of 3 Term Controllers p. 1/10
Data Based Design of 3Term Controllers Data Based Design of 3 Term Controllers p. 1/10 Data Based Design of 3 Term Controllers p. 2/10 History Classical Control  single controller (PID, lead/lag) is designed
More informationChemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University
Chemical Process Dynamics and Control Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University 1 Chapter 4 System Stability 2 Chapter Objectives End of this
More informationSTABILITY. Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential equations. and used the Laplace transform to help find step and impulse
SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS: PAPER 3C1 HANDOUT 4. Dr David Corrigan 1. Electronic and Electrical Engineering Dept. corrigad@tcd.ie www.sigmedia.tv STABILITY Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #4 16.31 Feedback Control Stability in the Frequency Domain Nyquist Stability Theorem Examples Appendix (details) This is the basis of future robustness tests. Fall 2007 16.31 4 2 Frequency Stability
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Basic Feedback Analysis & Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Routh s Stability
More informationMAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions
MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions Question 1. SIGNALS: Design of a noisecancelling headphone system. 1a. Based on the lowpass filter given, design a highpass filter,
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationModule 4. Related web links and videos. 1. FT and ZT
Module 4 Laplace transforms, ROC, rational systems, Z transform, properties of LT and ZT, rational functions, system properties from ROC, inverse transforms Related web links and videos Sl no Web link
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency ResponseDesign Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationProcess Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)
Firstorder systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January  April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A firstorder
More information7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM
ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 5: Transfer Functions. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 5: Transfer Functions Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 20, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 5: Control Systems I 20/10/2017
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationIntroduction & Laplace Transforms Lectures 1 & 2
Introduction & Lectures 1 & 2, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 Control System Definition of a Control System Group of components that collectively
More informationLTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete)  Basics
LTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete)  Basics 1. A system with an input x(t) and output y(t) is described by the relation: y(t) = t. x(t). This system is (a) linear and timeinvariant (b) linear and timevarying
More informationModule 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOTLOCUS. Solutions
Cambridge University Engineering Dept. Third Year Module 3F: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER ROOTLOCUS Solutions. (a) For the system L(s) = (s + a)(s + b) (a, b both real) show that the rootlocus
More informationECE 486 Control Systems
ECE 486 Control Systems Spring 208 Midterm #2 Information Issued: April 5, 208 Updated: April 8, 208 ˆ This document is an info sheet about the second exam of ECE 486, Spring 208. ˆ Please read the following
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationStability of Feedback Control Systems: Absolute and Relative
Stability of Feedback Control Systems: Absolute and Relative Dr. Kevin Craig Greenheck Chair in Engineering Design & Professor of Mechanical Engineering Marquette University Stability: Absolute and Relative
More informationIntro to Frequency Domain Design
Intro to Frequency Domain Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using the
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationCompensation 8. f4 that separate these regions of stability and instability. The characteristic S 0 L U T I 0 N S
S 0 L U T I 0 N S Compensation 8 Note: All references to Figures and Equations whose numbers are not preceded by an "S"refer to the textbook. As suggested in Lecture 8, to perform a Nyquist analysis, we
More informationChapter 7. Digital Control Systems
Chapter 7 Digital Control Systems 1 1 Introduction In this chapter, we introduce analysis and design of stability, steadystate error, and transient response for computercontrolled systems. Transfer functions,
More informationEE Experiment 11 The Laplace Transform and Control System Characteristics
EE216:11 1 EE 216  Experiment 11 The Laplace Transform and Control System Characteristics Objectives: To illustrate computer usage in determining inverse Laplace transforms. Also to determine useful signal
More informationCourse Background. Loosely speaking, control is the process of getting something to do what you want it to do (or not do, as the case may be).
ECE4520/5520: Multivariable Control Systems I. 1 1 Course Background 1.1: From time to frequency domain Loosely speaking, control is the process of getting something to do what you want it to do (or not
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101  Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationFATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Senkottai Village, Madurai Sivagangai Main Road, Madurai  625 020. An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Institution DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
More informationDiscrete and continuous dynamic systems
Discrete and continuous dynamic systems Bounded input bounded output (BIBO) and asymptotic stability Continuous and discrete time linear timeinvariant systems Katalin Hangos University of Pannonia Faculty
More informationThe stability of linear timeinvariant feedback systems
The stability of linear timeinvariant feedbac systems A. Theory The system is atrictly stable if The degree of the numerator of H(s) (H(z)) the degree of the denominator of H(s) (H(z)) and/or The poles
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition adings: Guzzella, Chapter 9.4 6 Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Emilio Frazzoli Institute
More informationRobust Control 3 The Closed Loop
Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time
More informationSignals and Systems. Spring Room 324, Geology Palace, ,
Signals and Systems Spring 2013 Room 324, Geology Palace, 13756569051, zhukaiguang@jlu.edu.cn Chapter 10 The ZTransform 1) ZTransform 2) Properties of the ROC of the ztransform 3) Inverse ztransform
More informationTime Response of Systems
Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) splane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Steadystate error Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling Analysis Design Laplace
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 5/8/25 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationReview of Linear TimeInvariant Network Analysis
D1 APPENDIX D Review of Linear TimeInvariant Network Analysis Consider a network with input x(t) and output y(t) as shown in Figure D1. If an input x 1 (t) produces an output y 1 (t), and an input x
More informationLecture 9 Timedomain properties of convolution systems
EE 12 spring 2122 Handout #18 Lecture 9 Timedomain properties of convolution systems impulse response step response fading memory DC gain peak gain stability 9 1 Impulse response if u = δ we have y(t)
More informationGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DATE: 09Dec13 COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels) NAME: STUDENT #: LAST, FIRST Write your name on the front page
More informationChapter 6  Solved Problems
Chapter 6  Solved Problems Solved Problem 6.. Contributed by  James Welsh, University of Newcastle, Australia. Find suitable values for the PID parameters using the ZN tuning strategy for the nominal
More informationCh 14: Feedback Control systems
Ch 4: Feedback Control systems Part IV A is concerned with sinle loop control The followin topics are covered in chapter 4: The concept of feedback control Block diaram development Classical feedback controllers
More informationEE 3054: Signals, Systems, and Transforms Summer It is observed of some continuoustime LTI system that the input signal.
EE 34: Signals, Systems, and Transforms Summer 7 Test No notes, closed book. Show your work. Simplify your answers. 3. It is observed of some continuoustime LTI system that the input signal = 3 u(t) produces
More informationIntroduction to Root Locus. What is root locus?
Introduction to Root Locus What is root locus? A graphical representation of the closed loop poles as a system parameter (Gain K) is varied Method of analysis and design for stability and transient response
More informationAndrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain)
1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, 2018 Linear systems (frequency domain) 2 Motivations Consider an LTI system Thanks to the Lagrange s formula we can compute the motion of
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More information(Continued on next page)
(Continued on next page) 18.2 Roots of Stability Nyquist Criterion 87 e(s) 1 S(s) = =, r(s) 1 + P (s)c(s) where P (s) represents the plant transfer function, and C(s) the compensator. The closedloop characteristic
More informationDiscrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture
Discrete Systems Mark Cannon Hilary Term 22  Lecture 4 Step response and pole locations 4  Review Definition of transform: U() = Z{u k } = u k k k= Discrete transfer function: Y () U() = G() = Z{g k},
More informationTime Domain Analysis of Linear Systems Ch2. University of Central Oklahoma Dr. Mohamed Bingabr
Time Domain Analysis of Linear Systems Ch2 University of Central Oklahoma Dr. Mohamed Bingabr Outline Zeroinput Response Impulse Response h(t) Convolution ZeroState Response System Stability System Response
More informationRemember that : Definition :
Stability This lecture we will concentrate on How to determine the stability of a system represented as a transfer function How to determine the stability of a system represented in statespace How to
More informationCHAPTER # 9 ROOT LOCUS ANALYSES
F K א CHAPTER # 9 ROOT LOCUS ANALYSES 1. Introduction The basic characteristic of the transient response of a closedloop system is closely related to the location of the closedloop poles. If the system
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More information20. The pole diagram and the Laplace transform
95 0. The pole diagram and the Laplace transform When working with the Laplace transform, it is best to think of the variable s in F (s) as ranging over the complex numbers. In the first section below
More informationCHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING
When I complete this chapter, I want to be able to do the following. Determine the stability of a process without control Determine the stability of a closedloop feedback control system Use these approaches
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2ndorder system. Step response for 2ndorder system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of ndorder systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More informationEEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.
More informationRoot Locus Methods. The root locus procedure
Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain
More informationLecture 1: Feedback Control Loop
Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure
More informationECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8
Learning Objectives ECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8 Dr. Oishi oishi@unm.edu November 2, 203 State the phase and gain properties of a root locus Sketch a root locus, by
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 OpenLoop Process The study of dynamics was limited to openloop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
More information