arxiv: v1 [cs.lo] 11 Aug 2017

Transcription

1 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK axiv: v1 [c.lo] 11 Aug 2017 Abtact. Thi ae ooe a new algoithm deciding the ta height oblem. A hown by Kiten, the ta height oblem educe to a oblem concening automata with counte, called limitedne. The new contibution i a diffeent algoithm fo the limitedne oblem, which educe it to olving a Gale-Stewat game with an ω-egula winning condition. The ta height of a egula exeion i it neting deth of the Kleene ta. The ta height oblem i to comute the ta height of a egula language of finite wod, i.e. the mallet ta height of a egula exeion that define the language. Fo intance, the exeion (a b ) ha ta height two, but it language ha ta height one, becaue it i defined by the exeion (a + b) of ta height one, and it cannot be defined by a ta-fee exeion. Hee we conide egula exeion without comlementation, in which cae ta-fee egula exeion define only finite language. The ta height oblem i notoiou fo being one of the mot technically challenging oblem in automata theoy. The oblem wa fit tated by Eggan in 1963 and emained oen fo 25 yea until it wa olved by Hahiguchi in [Ha88]. Hahiguchi olution i vey difficult. Much wok wa devoted to imlifying the oof, eulting in imotant new idea like the toical emiing [Sim88a] o Simon Factoiation Foet Theoem [Sim88b]. Thi wok culminated in a imlified oof, with an elementay comlexity bound, which wa given by Kiten in [Ki05]. Kiten intoduce an automaton model, called a neted ditance deet automaton, and how that the ta height oblem can be educed to a deciion oblem fo thi automaton model, called the limitedne oblem. The eduction of the ta height oblem to the limitedne oblem i not difficult, and mot of the effot in [Ki05] goe into deciding the limitedne oblem. Late olution to the limitedne oblem can be found in the wok of Colcombet on cot function [Col09], o in the PhD thei of Touńczyk [To11]. All ae baed on vaiant of the limitedne oblem. The contibution of thi ae i a concetually imle algoithm deciding the limitedne oblem, and theefoe alo the ta height oblem. The algoithm i a athe imle eduction of the limitedne oblem to the Chuch Synthei Poblem, i.e. the oblem of finding the winne in a Gale-Stewat game with an ω-egula winning condition. Since the Chuch Synthei Poblem itelf i a had oblem, the contibution of thi ae hould mainly be een a etablihing a connection between the two uetion (limitedne, and the Chuch Synthei Poblem), a ooed to giving a imle and elf-contained olution to the ta height oblem. We how how the ta height oblem i educed to the limitedne oblem in Section 1, and in Section 2 we eent the new contibution, namely the algoithm fo limitedne. LOGICAL METHODS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE DOI: /LMCS-??? c Mikołaj Bojańczyk Ceative Common 1

2 2 MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK I would like to thank Nathanaël Fijalkow, Deni Kuebeg, Chitof Löding and the anonymou efeee fo thei helful comment. Thi ae i a jounal veion of a ae eented at LICS The main diffeence between the confeence veion and thi ae i the addition of ictue. 1. Reduction to limitedne of cot automata Thi ection intoduce cot automata, and decibe a eduction of the ta height oblem to a oblem fo cot automata, called limitedne. The exact eduction ued in thi ae wa hown in [Ki05] and i included to make the ae elf-contained. The idea to ue counte and limitedne in the tudy of ta height date back to the oiginal oof of Hahiguchi. Cot automata and the limitedne oblem. We begin by intoducing the automaton model ued in the limitedne oblem. Thi i an automaton with counte, which in the liteatue aea unde the following name: neted ditance deet automaton in [Ki05]; hieachical B-automaton in [BC06] and [Col09]; and R-automaton in [AKY08]. (The lat model i lightly moe geneal, being euivalent to the non-hieachical veion of B-automata, but it limitedne oblem i no moe difficult.) Hee, we imly ue the name cot automaton. Define a cot automaton to be a nondeteminitic finite automaton, additionally euied with a finite et of counte which toe natual numbe. Fo each counte c, thee i a ditinguihed ubet of tanition that incement counte c, and a ditinguihed ubet of tanition that eet counte c. The counte ae totally odeed, ay they ae called 0,..., n, and evey tanition that eet o incement a counte c mut alo eet all counte 0,..., c 1. At the beginning of a un, all counte have value zeo. Define the value of a un to be the maximal value which could be een in ome counte duing the un. Moe fomally, thi i the mallet m uch that fo evey counte c, thee can be at mot m tanition in the un that incement counte c and which ae not eaated by a tanition which eet counte c. Examle 1. Hee i a ictue of a (deteminitic) cot automaton with one counte and inut alhabet {a, b}. In the ictue, initial and final tate ae eeented uing dangling aow, and the counte action ae eeented in ed lette. a incement b eet The automaton incement the counte wheneve it ee a, and eet it wheneve it ee b. Theefoe, fo evey inut wod, the value of the uniue un of thi automaton i the bigget numbe of conecutive a that ae not eaated by any b. Examle 2. Hee i a ictue of a (deteminitic) cot automaton with two counte called 0, 1 and inut alhabet {a, b}.

3 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES 3 a incement 0 b eet 0 incement 1 Theefoe, fo evey inut wod, the value of the uniue un of thi automaton i the maximum of the following value: bigget numbe of a that ae not eaated by any b; the numbe of b. In aticula, if the inut wod length n, then the value of the uniue un i at leat n. Examle 3. Hee i a ictue of a (nondeteminitic) cot automaton with one counte and inut alhabet {a, b}. Nondeteminim i ued in electing the initial tate, and the moment when the fit hoizontal tanition i ued. The only tanition that affect the counte i the elf-loo in the middle. a,b a incement a,b b b The value of a un fo thi automaton i the numbe of a the wa een afte fit enteing the middle tate, until ome b i eached. Fo an inut wod of the fom a n 1 ba n2 ba n k the acceting un have value n 1, n 2,..., n k eectively. A cot automaton i aid to be limited ove a language L if thee exit a bound m uch that fo evey wod in L thee exit a un of the cot automaton which i both acceting (i.e. begin in an initial tate and end in a final tate) and ha value at mot m. The limitedne oblem i to decide, given a cot automaton and a egula language L, whethe the automaton i limited ove L. Fom the eective of the limitedne oblem, it i natual to aociate (cf. [Col09]) to a cot automaton the function [A] defined by { if thee i no un acceting un of A ove w [A](w) = n if n i the minimal value of an acceting un of A ove w. In tem of the function [A], the limitedne oblem ak if [[A] i bounded ove the ubet of agument L (having at leat one value mean that a function i unbounded).

4 4 MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK Examle 4. Define a b-block in a wod to be a maximal et of connected oition which all have label b. If A i the automaton in Examle 1, then [[A] ma a wod to the maximal ize of an b-block; fo Examle 3 the coeonding function etun the minimal ize of a b-block. the of conecutive a. If A i the automaton in Examle 2, then w [A](w) w. In aticula, the anwe to the limitedne oblem fo the automaton fom Examle 2 i limited if and only if the et of agument L i finite. The et of Section 1 i devoted to oving the eduction tated in the following theoem. Thi i the ame eduction that wa ued in Kiten oof fom [Ki05], a detailed oof can be found in Pooition 6.8 of [Ki06]. Theoem 1.1. The ta height oblem educe to the limitedne oblem. In the eduction we conide a nomal fom of egula exeion, which ae called ting exeion following [Coh70]. The main idea i that in a ting exeion, a concatenation of union i conveted into a union of concatenation. Sting exeion have two aamete, called (ta) height and degee, and ae defined by induction on height. A ting exeion of height 0 and degee at mot m i defined to be any egula exeion decibing a finite et of wod of length at mot m. Fo h 1, a ting exeion of height at mot h and degee at mot m i defined to be any finite union of exeion of the fom A taightfowad on h, ee Lemma 3.1 in [Coh70], how that evey egula exeion of ta height h i euivalent to a ting exeion of height h and ome degee. The main obevation in the eduction of the ta height oblem to the limitedne oblem i the following ooition, which ay that fo evey ta height h and evey egula language L, thee i a cot automaton which ma an inut wod to the mallet degee of a ting exeion that contain the inut wod, ha ta height at mot h, and i contained in L. Pooition 1.2. Fo evey egula language L A and h N one can comute a cot automaton A uch that [A] ma a wod w A to the numbe min{degee of e : e i a height h ting exeion e atifying w e L}. Note that the function [[A] alway etun a numbe w fo wod w L, becaue the wod w itelf i a ting exeion of height 0 and degee w. Poof. The ooition i oved by induction on h. The induction bae of h = 0 i taightfowad: the cot automaton ha one counte, ha an acceting un if and only if the wod belong to L, and the value of the counte in thi un i the length of the inut wod.

5 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES 5 Let u now do the induction te. Suoe that we have oved the ooition fo h 1, and we want to ove it fo h. Take L a in the tatement of the ooition. Since L i egula, it i ecognied by ome homomohim α : A M into a finite monoid. Fo a ubet N M define [N] m h A the union of all ting exeion that have degee at mot m, height at mot h, and which ae contained in α 1 (N). (Actually, thi union can be viewed a a ingle ting exeion, ince ting exeion of given height and degee ae cloed unde union.) In the lemma below, we ue the following notation: fo w 1,..., w i A and N 1,..., N i M, we wite w 1 N1 w i Ni M to be all oible element of the monoid M that can be obtained by taking a oduct α(w 1 )n 1 α(w i )n i whee each n j i in the ubmonoid of M geneated by N j. The following lemma follow immediately fom the definition of ting exeion and the et [N] m h. Lemma 1.3. Let h, m N, w A and N M. Then w [N] m h (*) thee exit a numbe i m and ubet uch that w admit a factoiation N 1,..., N i M w = w 1 v 1 w 2 v 2 w i v i uch that the following condition hold if and only if w 1 N 1 w i N i α(l) (1.1) w j m fo j {1,..., i} (1.2) v j ([N j ] m h 1 ) fo j {1,..., i}. (1.3) To comlete the oof of the ooition, we will how that fo evey N and h thee exit a cot automaton, which ma a wod w to the mallet value m N which atifie condition (*) in the above lemma. When eading an inut wod w, the automaton oceed a follow. It ue nondeteminim to gue a factoiation w = w 1 v 1 w 2 v 2 w i v i, a in the tatement of the claim, and it alo ue nondeteminim to gue the ubet N 1,..., N i. The ubet N j i only toed in the memoy of the automaton while oceing the block v j. Condition (1.1) i veified uing the finite contol of the automaton: when the automaton i oceing the block w j v j, it finite memoy toe N j a well a w 1 N 1 w j N j M. The emaining condition ae veified uing counte. The mot imotant counte i ued to the length i of the factoiation, i.e. it i incemented wheneve a block of the fom w j v j i oceed. A le imotant counte i ued to bound the length of the wod w 1,..., w i, a euied by condition (1.2), i.e. it i incemented wheneve eading a ingle lette of w i, and eet afte finihing w i. Finally, fo condition (1.3), when oceing w j we ue the inductively obtained cot automaton A Nj, which wok fo the malle height h 1. Thi

6 6 MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK inductively obtained cot automaton i un in a loo, coeonding to the Kleene ta in condition (1.3), and afte each iteation of thi loo all of it counte ae eet. Theoem 1.1, which educe the ta height oblem to the limitedne oblem, i a taightfowad coollay of the above ooition. Suoe that we want to decide if a egula language L ha ta height h. Aly Pooition 1.2 to L and h, yielding a cot automaton. We claim that L ha ta height h if and only if the cot automaton i limited ove L. If the cot automaton i limited ove L, ay evey wod in L admit a un with value at mot m, then by the ooition, we know that evey wod w L belong to ome ting exeion e which ha height at mot h and degee at mot m. Thee ae finitely many ting exeion of given height and degee, and theefoe one can take the union of all of thee ting exeion, yielding a egula exeion (in fact, a ting exeion) of ta height at mot h which define L. If L ha ta height h, then it i defined by a egula exeion of ta height h, and theefoe alo by a ting exeion of the ame height (and ome degee), and the cot automaton i limited by the degee. Thi comlete the eduction of the ta height oblem to the limitedne oblem. 2. The limitedne oblem i decidable The eduction in the eviou ection wa ued aleady in the oof of Kiten, and i included hee only to make thi ae elf-contained. Thi ection contain the oiginal contibution of the ae, namely an altenative decidability agument fo the limitedne oblem. We how that the limitedne oblem educe to olving Gale-Stewat game with ω-egula winning condition, a oblem which wa hown decidable by Büchi and Landwebe [BL69]. Alo in thi ection, mot of the mateial i not new: aat fom uing the the Büchi-Landwebe theoem a a taget of the eduction, the eduction itelf i mainly baed on a techniue fom [CL08]. Gale-Stewat Game. A Gale-Stewat game i a game of efect infomation and infinite duation layed by two laye, call them A and B. Each laye ha thei own finite alhabet, call thee alhabet A and B. The game i layed in ound; in each ound laye A ick a lette fom alhabet A and laye B eond with a lette fom alabet B. Afte ω ound have been layed, the game eult in an ω-wod of the fom a 1 b 1 a 2 b 2 with a 1, a 2,... A and b 1, b 2,... B. The objective of laye B i to enue that the eulting euence belong to a given et of ω-wod, called the winning condition fo laye B, while the objective of laye A i to avoid thi. A ecial cae of Gale-Stewat game that i imotant in comute cience i when the winning condition i ω-egula, i.e. it i ecognied by a nondeteminitic Büchi automaton, o any othe euivalent model. Let u biefly ecall nondeteminitic Büchi automata, following [Tho96, Definition 5.1]. The yntax of uch an automaton i exactly the ame a fo a nondeteminitic automaton on finite wod. An ω-wod ove the inut alhabet i aid to be acceted by the automaton if thee i a un (i.e. a labelling of wod oition with tanition which i conitent with the tanition elation in the uual ene) which begin in ome initial tate and ue ome acceting tate infinitely often. Language ecognied by nondeteminitic Büchi automata ae called ω-egula; thi i a obut cla of language

7 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES 7 which in aticula i cloed unde Boolean oeation. A oblem known a the Chuch ynthei oblem i to decide, given a Gale-Stewat game with an ω-egula winning condition, which of the laye, if any, ha a winning tategy. Thi oblem wa olved by Büchi and Landwebe, who oved the following theoem. Theoem 2.1. [BL69] Conide a Gale-Stewat game with an ω-egula winning condition. The game i detemined, i.e. one of the laye ha a winning tategy. One can decide which laye ha a winning tategy. The laye with a winning tategy ha a finite memoy winning tategy (ee oof of Lemma 2.4 fo a definition). Thi i a non-tivial theoem and it oof i not included hee. A moden oof, ee [Tho96, Theoem 6.16], conit of two eult: memoyle deteminacy of aity game, and conveion of nondeteminitic Büchi automata into deteminitic aity automata. Uing the Büchi-Landwebe theoem, we how below that the limitedne oblem i decidable, becaue it educe to detemining the winne in a Gale-Stewat game with an ω-egula winning condition. Theoem 2.2. The limitedne oblem educe to olving Gale-Stewat game with ω- egula winning condition. Fix a cot automaton A and a egula language L, both ove the ame inut alhabet. Let u begin by fixing ome notation. We view a un of the cot automaton, not neceaily acceting, a a euence of tanition uch that the ouce tate of the fit tanition i the initial tate, and which i conitent in the uual ene: fo evey tanition in the un, it taget tate i the ame a the ouce tate of the following tanition. We will alo talk about infinite un. In the oof, we will be often be uing et of tanition. It i convenient to viualie a et of tanition a a biatite gah accoding to the following ictue: tate of the automaton a eet 0, incement 1 a a eet 0, eet1 tate of the automaton a incement 1 a tanition, labelled by inut lette and counte action Note that in the above ictue, all tanition in the et ue the ame inut lette; thi will alway be the cae below. If δ 1,..., δ n i a euence of et of tanition in the cot

8 8 MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK automaton, then a un in δ 1 δ n i defined to be any un whee the i-th tanition i fom the et δ i ; likewie fo infinite euence of et of tanition. Hee i a ictue: { { { { a eet 0, incement 1 b c incement 1 a eet 0, incement 1 a a eet 0, eet1 b eet 0, incement 1 c c eet 0, eet1 a eet 0, eet1 a incement 1 b a incement 1 a un in Fo a numbe m N { }, conide the following Gale-Stewat game, call it the limitedne game with bound m. The alhabet fo laye A i the inut alhabet of the cot automaton. The alhabet fo laye B i {δ : δ i a et of tanition that ead lette a}. a inut alhabet The idea i that laye A contuct an infinite wod, and laye B contuct a eeentation of a et of un that i ufficient to accet efixe of thi wod with counte value that ae mall with eect to m. Thi idea i fomalied by the winning condition, defined a follow. When m i a finite numbe, then the winning condition fo laye B i the et of euence a 1 δ 1 a 2 δ 2 uch that a 1, a 2,... ae lette and δ 1, δ 2,... ae et of tanition, and the following condition hold fo evey i: (1) evey tanition in the et δ i i ove lette a i ; and (2) evey un in δ 1 δ i ha value at mot m; and (3) if a 1 a i L then ome un in δ 1 δ i i acceting. In aticula, the winning condition imlie that if a 1 a i belong to L, then it admit an acceting un of the cot automaton which ha value at mot m. Fo m =, item 2) i elaced by 2 ) fo evey infinite un in δ 1 δ 2 and evey counte c, if the un incement c infinitely often, then it eet c infinitely often. The following lemma i alo tue fo finite value of m, but we only ue the cae of m = in the eduction. Lemma 2.3. Fo m = the winning condition i ω-egula.

9 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES 9 Poof. The cla of ω-egula language i cloed unde inteection and comlement, and theefoe it uffice to give eaate nondeteminitic Büchi automata fo item 1), 2 ) and the comlement of item 3). Fo item 1) and 3) one only need a deteminitic automaton with an accetance condition, ometime called the tivial accetance condition, whee a un i acceting unle a long a it neve viit ome deignated ink tate. (Thi can be eaily conveted into a Büchi automaton, by making all tate acceting excet fo the ink tate.) Fo item 1), only one additinal tate excet the ink tate i needed; fo item 3) it uffice to comute the et of tate of the cot automaton that ae acceible via un in δ 1 δ i. It emain to deal with the comlement of 2 ). The comlement of item 2 ) i ecognied by a nondeteminitic Büchi automaton whoe numbe of tate i olynomial in the numbe of counte; the Büchi automaton nondeteminitically guee a un of the cot automaton which incement a counte infinitely often without eetting it. In aticula, thank to the Büchi-Landwebe Theoem, one can decide the winne in the limitedne game with bound. Theefoe, Theoem 2.2 will follow fom Pooition 2.4 below, which educe the limitedne oblem to finding the winne in the limitedne game with bound. Pooition 2.4. The following ae euivalent: (a) The cot automaton A i limited ove language L; (b) Playe B ha a winning tategy in the limitedne game with ome finite bound m <. (c) Playe B ha a winning tategy in the limitedne game with bound. A cloe analyi how that condition (c) can be decided in exonential time, becaue the game ha a winning condition whoe comlement i ecognied by a olynomial ize Büchi automaton, and theefoe (uing deteminiation) the game coeond to an exonential ize aity game with a olynomial numbe of ank [Tho96]. Theefoe, ou eduction give an exonential time olution to the limitedne oblem, which i infeio to Kiten otimal olynomial ace olution [Ki05]. The et of thi ae i devoted to howing Pooition 2.4. We ove euivalence of (b) and (c), and euivalence of (a) and (b). Euivalence of (b) and (c). The imlication (b) (c) i immediate. Let u do (c) (b). Since the limitedne game with bound i a Gale-Stewat game with an ω-egula winning condition, the Büchi-Landwebe theoem imlie that if laye B ha a winning tategy, then laye B ha a finite memoy winning tategy. Let u ecall the definition of a finite memoy winning tategy fo laye B. Thi i a deteminitic finite automaton B whoe inut alhabet i the alhabet of laye A (in ou alication: the inut alhabet of the cot automaton) togethe with a function f fom tate of B to the alhabet of laye B (in ou alication: et of tanition of the cot automaton which hae a common inut lette) uch that when laye A chooe lette a 1,..., a n in the fit n ound, then the lette choen by laye B in the n-th ound i obtained by alying f to the tate of B afte eading the wod a 1 a n. To ove condition (b) in Pooition 2.4, conide the tategy defined by a deteminitic automaton B which i winning in the limitedne game with bound. We will how that when laye B ue thi ame tategy, the eulting un have value at mot m, whee

10 10 MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK m i the numbe of tate in the cot automaton time the numbe of tate in the deteminitic automaton B defining the tategy. Towad a contadiction, uoe that laye A chooe lette a 1, a 2,..., laye B ue the finite memoy tategy given by B to eond with et of tanition δ 1, δ 2,..., and the winning condition fo bound m i violated. Thi mean that fo ome n m, ome finite un ρ in δ 1 δ n ha value at leat m. By the igeon hole incile, thee mut exit i, j with i < j uch that: in the un of B on a 1 a n the ame tate i ued in oition i and j; in the un ρ the ame tate i ued in oition i and j; and one of the counte i incemented but not eet between oition i and j. Hee i a ictue: oition i on thi at, ome counte c i incemented by ρ, but not eet oition j { a un ρ that violate the condition fo m et of tanition layed by laye B t a b a b b a tate of the tategy automaton lette layed by laye A Theefoe, if laye A chooe the infinite wod a 1 a i (a i+1 a j ) ω, then the eone of laye B will contain a un whee one of the counte i incemented infinitely often but eet finitely often, a contadiction. Euivalence of (a) and (b). The imlication (b) (a) i immediate. To ove (a) (b), we ue idea fom [CL08]. Aume that the automaton i limited ove L, i.e. thee i ome m N uch that evey wod in L admit an acceting un with value at mot m. Fo a natual numbe m m, define a coing function with bound m to be a function which ma evey finite un to a numbe in N { }, called it coe, uch that un with value m have finite coe and un with value > m have infinite coe. No containt ae imoed on un with value between m and m. A coing function i called monotone if coe(ρ) coe(ρ ) coe(ρσ) coe(ρ σ) hold fo evey un ρ, ρ that end in the ame tate, and evey un σ that begin in thi tate. To ove condition (b), Lemma 2.5 how that the exitence of a monotone coing function i a ufficient condition fo laye B winning the limitedne game with a finite bound; Lemma 2.6 how that thi ufficient condition can be met. Lemma 2.5. If thee exit a monotone coing function with bound m, then laye B ha a winning tategy in the limitedne game with bound m.

11 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES 11 Poof. (Thi oof coeond to Lemma 9 in [CL08].) Given a coing function, define a finite un to be otimal if it coe i finite and minimal among the coe of un that ead the ame wod and end in the ame tate. Conide the following tategy fo laye B: if laye A ha layed a wod w, then laye B eond with the et of tanition t uch that ome otimal un ove w ue t a the lat tanition. (Thi tategy deend on the choice of coing function.) We how that thi tategy i winning in the limitedne game with bound m. Suoe that in a finite efix of a lay whee laye B ue thi tategy, laye A ha choen lette a 1,..., a i and laye B ha elied with et of tanition δ 1,..., δ i. Claim 1. The et δ 1 δ i i eual to the et otimal un ove a 1 a i. Poof. If a un ρ i otimal, then by monotonicity evey efix of ρ i otimal, and theefoe evey tanition ued by ρ i the lat tanition of ome otimal un, thu oving membehi ρ δ 1 δ i. The convee incluion i oved by induction on i. Suoe that δ 1 δ i contain a un of the fom ρt, whee ρ ha length i 1 and t i the lat tanition ued by the un. By induction aumtion, ρ i otimal. By definition of δ i thee i ome otimal un of the fom ρ t. By otimality, ρ ha malle o eual coe than ρ. By monotonicity ρt ha malle o eual coe than the otimal un ρ t, and theefoe i itelf otimal. Uing the claim, we veify that the above decibed tategy of laye B i winning in the limitedne game with bound m. Item 1) in the winning condition i clealy atified. Since otimal un have finite coe, and un with finite coe have value at mot m, item 2) i atified fo bound m. Since evey wod a 1 a i L admit an acceting un with value at mot m, and un of value m have finite coe, then a 1 a i admit an acceting otimal un, and theefoe item 3) i atified. To comlete the oof of Pooition 2.4, we how that thee alway exit a monotone coing function. Lemma 2.6. Thee exit a monotone coing function with ome finite bound. Poof. (Thi oof coeond to Lemma 8 in [CL08].) When thee i a ingle counte, a good coing function i one which ma un of value exceeding m to, and ma othe un to the numbe of incement afte the lat eet; in thi ecial cae m = m. In aticula, the mateial given o fa i ufficient to decide limitedne of ditance automata, which ae the ecial cae of cot automata with one counte and no eet. A moe fancy coing function i needed when thee ae two o moe counte. Suoe that the counte ae numbeed 0,..., n. A coing function need to etun one numbe (oibly ), which omehow ummaie all counte value at the ame time. One natual idea would be to define the coe of a un to be if it value exceed m, and othewie to be n a i (m + 1) i i=0 auming that a i i the numbe of incement on counte i afte it lat eet. In othe wod, a counte valuation (a tule in {0,..., m} n ) would be inteeted a a numbe in bae m + 1. Thi coing function i unfotunately not monotone. Indeed, uoe that thee ae two counte, and conide two un: ρ doe one incement on counte 1 (coe m + 1); ρ doe m incement on counte 0 (coe m).

12 12 MIKO LAJ BOJAŃCZYK Conide a tanition t that incement counte 0. Aending t to thee un evee the ode on coe, becaue ρt ha coe m + 2, while ρ t ha coe. Monotonicity i ecoveed uing the following modification. When an incement to counte i caue it value to each m + 1, then intead of etting the whole coe to, the value of counte i i caied ove to counte i + 1, which may tigge futhe caie. The coe become only when the mot imotant counte n eache m + 1. Fomally, the coe of a un ρ i defined a follow by induction on length. The coe of an emty un i 0. Suoe that the coe of ρ i aleady defined and t i a ingle tanition. If the coe of ρ i, then alo the coe of ρt i. Othewie, let n a i (m + 1) i i=0 be the bae m + 1 eeentation of the coe of ρ. If the tanition t doe not do any counte oeation, then the coe of ρt i the ame a the coe of ρ. If the tanition t eet ome counte k {0,..., n}, then the coe of ρt i obtained by eetting digit on oition 0,..., k, i.e. the coe of ρt i n a i (m + 1) i i=k+1 Finally, if the tanition t incement ome counte k {0,..., n}, then the coe of ρt i obtained by eetting digit on oition 0,..., k 1 and incementing the digit on oition k, i.e. the coe of ρt i n (a k + 1) (m + 1) k + a i (m + 1) i i=k+1 If, a a eult of the incement, the coe eache the maximal numbe, call it m, which can be toed in bae m + 1 eeentation uing digit a 0,..., a n, then the coe of ρt i defined to be. We how below that the function thu defined i a monotone coing function with the bound being m defined above. Monotonicity. We need to how coe(ρ) coe(ρ ) coe(ρt) coe(ρ t). The mot inteeting cae i when the tanition t incement ome counte k. In thi cae, the coe i obtained by fit eetting digit 0,..., k 1, which i monotone, and then adding (m + 1) k, which i alo monotone. Run with value at mot m have finite coe. By induction on the length of the un, one how that if a un ha value at mot m, then fo evey i {0,..., n}, the i-th digit in the bae m + 1 eeentation of it coe i eual to the numbe of incement on counte i afte it lat eet. Run with finite coe have value at mot m. Towad a contadiction, uoe that a un with finite coe ha value tictly bigge than m. Thi mean that fo ome counte i, the un doe moe than m incement without any eet of counte i. Duing thee incement, the coe will cay ove o that the value of counte n exceed m, and theefoe the coe will become infinite.

13 STAR HEIGHT VIA GAMES 13 Thi comlete the oof of euivalence of (a) and (b) in Pooition 2.4, and theefoe alo the oof of Theoem 1.1. Refeence [AKY08] Paoh Aziz Abdulla, Pavel Kcal and Wang Yi. R-Automata. In CONCUR, age 67 81, [BL69] J. Richad Büchi and Lawence H. Landwebe. Solving Seuential Condition by Finite-State Stategie. Tanaction of the Ameican Mathematical Society, Volume 138, age , [BC06] Miko laj Bojańczyk and Thoma Colcombet. Bound in ω-egulaity. In LICS, age , [Coh70] Rina S. Cohen. Sta height of cetain familie of egula event. Jounal of Comute and Sytem [CL08] Science, Volume 4, Iue 3, age , Thoma Colcombet and Chitof Löding. The neting deth of dijunctive µ-calculu fo tee language and the limitedne oblem. In CSL, age , [Col09] Thoma Colcombet. The theoy of tabiliation monoid and egula cot function. In ICALP (2), age , [Ha88] Koabuo Hahiguchi. Algoithm fo detemining elative ta height and ta height. Inf. Comut., 78(2): , [Ki05] Daniel Kiten. Ditance deet automata and the ta height oblem. Infomatiue Théoiue et Alication, 39(3): , [Ki06] Daniel Kiten. Ditance Deet Automata and Sta Height Subtitution. Habilitation thei, Univeität Leizig. [Sim88a] Ime Simon. Recognizable et with multilicitie in the toical emiing. In Mathematical Foundation of Comute Science, age , [Sim88b] Ime Simon. Poetie of factoization foet. Fomal Poetie of Finite Automata and Alication, age 65 72, [Tho96] Wolfgang Thoma. Language, automata and logic. Technical Reot 9607, Intitut fü Infomatik und Paktiche Mathematik, Chitian-Albecht-Univeität zu Kiel, [To11] Szymon Touńczyk. Language of ofinite wod and the limitedne oblem. PhD Thei, Univeity of Waaw, 2011.