!onformali" Los# J.-W. Lee D. T. Son M. Stephanov D.B.K. arxiv: Phys.Rev.D80:125005,2009

Transcription

1 !onformali" Los# J.-W. Lee D. T. Son M. Stephanov D.B.K arxiv: Phys.Rev.D80:125005,2009

2 Motivation: QCD at LARGE N c and N f Colors Flavors

3 Motivation: QCD at LARGE N c and N f Colors Flavors Define x= N f /N c, treat as a continuous variable asymptotic freedom conformal trivial 0 ψψ =0 xc 11/2 x

4 Motivation: QCD at LARGE N c and N f Colors Flavors Define x= N f /N c, treat as a continuous variable asymptotic freedom conformal trivial 0 ψψ =0 xc 11/2 x gauge coupling:!! 0? Banks-Zaks fixed point Nucl.Phys.B196:189,1982

5 Motivation: QCD at LARGE N c and N f Colors Flavors Define x= N f /N c, treat as a continuous variable 0 asymptotic freedom ψψ =0 gauge coupling:!! 0 conformal xc 11/2? trivial Banks-Zaks fixed point What is the nature of this transition? How does the IR scale appear as conformality is lost? Nucl.Phys.B196:189,1982 x

6 Outline: I. A mechanism for vanishing conformal invariance II. The Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition III. A quantum mechanics model: the 1/r 2 potential IV. AdS/CFT V. Relativistic model: defect Yang-Mills VI. QCD with many flavors? A partner theory QCD* with a nontrivial UV fixed point?

7 A theory with an infrared conformal fixed point at g=g! has a zero in the beta function: β(g) =µ g µ = g t β(g) g g

8 A theory with an infrared conformal fixed point at g=g! has a zero in the beta function: β(g) =µ g µ = g t β(g) g g Suppose the theory has another parameter " such that the fixed point at g=g! vanishes for ">"!

9 A theory with an infrared conformal fixed point at g=g! has a zero in the beta function: β(g) =µ g µ = g t β(g) g g Suppose the theory has another parameter " such that the fixed point at g=g! vanishes for ">"! Example: supersymmetric QCD is conformal for 3/2 # Nf/Nc # 3

10 A theory with an infrared conformal fixed point at g=g! has a zero in the beta function: β(g) =µ g µ = g t β(g) g g Suppose the theory has another parameter " such that the fixed point at g=g! vanishes for ">"! Example: supersymmetric QCD is conformal for 3/2 # Nf/Nc # 3 " = Nf/Nc, "! = 3/2, 3

11 A theory with an infrared conformal fixed point at g=g! has a zero in the beta function: β(g) =µ g µ = g t β(g) g g Suppose the theory has another parameter " such that the fixed point at g=g! vanishes for ">"! Example: supersymmetric QCD is conformal for 3/2 # Nf/Nc # 3 " = Nf/Nc, "! = 3/2, 3 How is conformality lost?

12 Three ways to lose an infrared fixed point: #1: Fixed point runs to zero: β(g; κ) β(g; κ) $ κ <κ g κ >κ g

13 Three ways to lose an infrared fixed point: #1: Fixed point runs to zero: β(g; κ) β(g; κ) $ κ <κ g κ >κ g Example: Supersymmetric QCD at large N c and N f " Increasing flavors, leave conformal window. "=N f /N c, "!=3

14 Three ways to lose an infrared fixed point: #1: Fixed point runs to zero: β(g; κ) β(g; κ) $ κ <κ g κ >κ g Example: Supersymmetric QCD at large N c and N f " Increasing flavors, leave conformal window. "=N f /N c, "!=3 N f /N c < 3 weak coupling Banks-Zaks conformal fixed point ~ N f /N c > 3 trivial QED-like free electric theory ~

15 Three ways to lose an infrared fixed point: #1: Fixed point runs to zero: β(g; κ) β(g; κ) $ κ <κ g κ >κ g Example: Supersymmetric QCD at large N c and N f " Increasing flavors, leave conformal window. "=N f /N c, "!=3 N f /N c < 3 weak coupling Banks-Zaks conformal fixed point ~ N f /N c > 3 trivial QED-like free electric theory ~ F E g 2 r 2 ln (r Λ UV )

16 #2: Fixed point runs off to infinity:

17 #2: Fixed point runs off to infinity: β(g; α) κ >κ β(g; α) κ κ $

18 $ #2: Fixed point runs off to infinity: β(g; α) κ >κ β(g; α) κ κ Possible example? SQCD again " "=N f /N c, "!=3/2 For "!"! get free magnetic phase [Seiberg]

19 $ #2: Fixed point runs off to infinity: β(g; α) κ >κ β(g; α) κ κ Possible example? SQCD again " "=N f /N c, "!=3/2 For "!"! get free magnetic phase [Seiberg] # electric theory dual to a QED-like magnetic theory: F E g2 ln (r Λ UV ) r 2 F M g 2 M r 2 ln (r Λ UV ) g M 1/g

20 #3: UV and IR fixed points annihilate: A toy model: β(g; κ) = (κ κ ) (g g ) 2 κ κ : κ = κ κ <κ g ± = g ± κ κ UV, IR fixed points fixed points merge conformality lost

21 #3: UV and IR fixed points annihilate: β(g; κ) κ >κ A toy model: g g + g β(g; κ) = (κ κ ) (g g ) 2 κ κ : κ = κ κ <κ g ± = g ± κ κ UV, IR fixed points fixed points merge conformality lost

22 #3: UV and IR fixed points annihilate: β(g; κ) κ >κ A toy model: g g + g β(g; κ) = (κ κ ) (g g ) 2 β(g; κ) κ = κ κ κ : g ± = g ± κ κ g g UV, IR fixed points κ = κ fixed points merge κ <κ conformality lost

23 #3: UV and IR fixed points annihilate: β(g; κ) κ >κ A toy model: g g + g β(g; κ) = (κ κ ) (g g ) 2 β(g; κ) κ = κ κ κ : g ± = g ± κ κ g g UV, IR fixed points κ = κ fixed points merge κ <κ conformality lost β(g; κ) κ <κ g

24 What happens close to the transition on the nonconformal side? β(g; κ) UV g IR κ κ

25 What happens close to the transition on the nonconformal side? β(g; κ) UV g IR κ κ i. Start: g = guv < g! in the UV ii. g grows, stalling near g! iii. g strong at scale %IR

26 What happens close to the transition on the nonconformal side? β(g; κ) UV g IR κ κ i. Start: g = guv < g! in the UV ii. g grows, stalling near g! iii. g strong at scale %IR = ln µ Λ IR Λ UV e R dg β(g) = Λ e π κ κ UV

27 What happens close to the transition on the nonconformal side? β(g; κ) UV g IR κ κ i. Start: g = guv < g! in the UV ii. g grows, stalling near g! iii. g strong at scale %IR = ln µ Λ IR Λ UV e R dg β(g) = Λ e π κ κ UV (Not like 2 nd order phase transition: ) Λ IR Λ UV κ κ

28 Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Scaling behavior of toy model is reminiscent of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition (an infinite order phase transition)

29 Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Scaling behavior of toy model is reminiscent of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition (an infinite order phase transition) BKT: a classical phase transition in the 2-d XY-model

30 Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Scaling behavior of toy model is reminiscent of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition (an infinite order phase transition) BKT: a classical phase transition in the 2-d XY-model Vortices in XY model box size R, vortex core size a:

31 Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Scaling behavior of toy model is reminiscent of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition (an infinite order phase transition) BKT: a classical phase transition in the 2-d XY-model Vortices in XY model box size R, vortex core size a: E = E 0 ln R/a, S = 2 ln R/a F = E TS =(E 0 2T ) ln R/a

32 Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Scaling behavior of toy model is reminiscent of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition (an infinite order phase transition) BKT: a classical phase transition in the 2-d XY-model Vortices in XY model box size R, vortex core size a: E = E 0 ln R/a, S = 2 ln R/a F = E TS =(E 0 2T ) ln R/a Vortices condense for T>T c = E 0 /2 ; can show correlation length forms: ξ ae b/ T T c

33 Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Scaling behavior of toy model is reminiscent of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition (an infinite order phase transition) BKT: a classical phase transition in the 2-d XY-model Vortices in XY model box size R, vortex core size a: E = E 0 ln R/a, S = 2 ln R/a F = E TS =(E 0 2T ) ln R/a Vortices condense for T>T c = E 0 /2 ; can show correlation length forms: ξ ae b/ T T c

34 RG analysis of the BKT transition XY model = Coulomb gas (vortices = point-like charges with ln(r) Coulomb interaction):

35 RG analysis of the BKT transition XY model = Coulomb gas (vortices = point-like charges with ln(r) Coulomb interaction): Z = N N +,N fugacity zn+ zn N +!N! Sum over vortex positions/numbers N + i=1 N j=1 d 2 x i d 2 y j Dφ e R d 2 x T 2 ( φ)2 +i P i,j (φ(x i) φ(y j )) Coulomb field vortices anti-vortices

36 RG analysis of the BKT transition XY model = Coulomb gas (vortices = point-like charges with ln(r) Coulomb interaction): Z = N = N N +,N fugacity zn+ zn N +!N! Sum over vortex positions/numbers N + i=1 N j=1 d 2 x i d 2 y j Dφ e R d 2 x [ T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ] Dφ e R d 2 x T 2 ( φ)2 +i P i,j (φ(x i) φ(y j )) Coulomb field vortices anti-vortices temp. fugacity

37 RG analysis of the BKT transition XY model = Coulomb gas (vortices = point-like charges with ln(r) Coulomb interaction): Z = N = N N +,N fugacity zn+ zn N +!N! Sum over vortex positions/numbers N + i=1 N j=1 d 2 x i d 2 y j Dφ e R d 2 x [ T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ] Dφ e R d 2 x T 2 ( φ)2 +i P i,j (φ(x i) φ(y j )) Coulomb field vortices anti-vortices temp. fugacity The XY model is equivalent to the Sine-Gordon model

38 Classical XY model BKT transition = zero temperature quantum transition in Sine-Gordon model: L = T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ

39 Classical XY model BKT transition = zero temperature quantum transition in Sine-Gordon model: L = T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ New variables: u =1 1 8πT, v = 2z T Λ 2 Perturbative &-functions: β u = 2v 2, β v = 2uv

40 Classical XY model BKT transition = zero temperature quantum transition in Sine-Gordon model: L = T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ New variables: u =1 1 8πT, v = 2z T Λ 2 Perturbative &-functions: β u = 2v 2, β v = 2uv % = UV cutoff at vortex core Dimensionful quantities in units of XY model interaction strength

41 Classical XY model BKT transition = zero temperature quantum transition in Sine-Gordon model: L = T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ New variables: u =1 1 8πT, v = 2z T Λ 2 Perturbative &-functions: β u = 2v 2, β v = 2uv % = UV cutoff at vortex core Dimensionful quantities in units of XY model interaction strength v T<Tc bound vortices trivially conformal u

42 Classical XY model BKT transition = zero temperature quantum transition in Sine-Gordon model: L = T 2 ( φ)2 2z cos φ New variables: u =1 1 8πT, v = 2z T Λ 2 Perturbative &-functions: β u = 2v 2, β v = 2uv % = UV cutoff at vortex core Dimensionful quantities in units of XY model interaction strength v T<Tc bound vortices trivially conformal T>Tc Coulomb gas u screening length

43 u =1 1 8πT, v = 2z T Λ 2 "/' v ' β u = 2v 2, β v = 2uv Newer variables: u τ =(u + v), κ =(u 2 v 2 ) β τ = κ τ 2, β κ =0 Nonperturbative region κ >κ (T<T c ) κ = κ κ =0 κ <κ (T>T c )

44 Correlation length in BKT transition: ">0: Conformal (bound vortices) For small negative ", assume ' small & positive in UV T=Tc ' blows up in RG time t = dτ β(τ) = π 2 κ "<0 finite ( (unbound vortices)

45 Correlation length in BKT transition: ">0: Conformal (bound vortices) For small negative ", assume ' small & positive in UV T=Tc ' blows up in RG time t = dτ β(τ) = π 2 κ "<0 finite ( (unbound vortices)...giving rise to an IR scale (like % QCD ) which sets the scale for the finite correlation length for!<0: ξ BKT 1 Λ e π 2 α

46 So far: BKT transition = loss of conformality via fixed point merger Mechanism of fixed point merger in general gives rise to BKT scaling : Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ

47 So far: BKT transition = loss of conformality via fixed point merger Mechanism of fixed point merger in general gives rise to BKT scaling : Λ IR Λ UV e π κ κ Next: other examples: QM with 1/r 2 potential AdS/CFT Defect Yang-Mills QCD with many flavors

48 Example: QM in d-dimensions with 1/r 2 potential [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 V r

49 Example: QM in d-dimensions with 1/r 2 potential [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 V r k=0 solutions: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + ν ± ( ) d 2 2 ± κ κ κ = ( d 2 2 ) 2

50 Example: QM in d-dimensions with 1/r 2 potential [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 V r k=0 solutions: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + ν ± ( ) d 2 2 ± κ κ κ = ( d 2 2 ) 2 valid for "! < " < ("! +1) " < "! : ) ± complex, no ground state " = "! : ) + = ) - " > ("! +1): r )- too singular to normalize

51 [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 k=0 solutions: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + ( d 2 ) ( d 2 ) 2 ν ± = 2 ± κ κ, κ = 2

52 [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 k=0 solutions: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + ( d 2 ) ( d 2 ) 2 ν ± = 2 ± κ κ, κ = 2 c + =0 or c - =0 are scale invariant solutions If c + "0, * + c + r )+ for large r () + > ) - ) to make sense of BC at r=0, introduce,-function:

53 [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 k=0 solutions: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + ( d 2 ) ( d 2 ) 2 ν ± = 2 ± κ κ, κ = 2 c + =0 or c - =0 are scale invariant solutions If c + "0, * + c + r )+ for large r () + > ) - ) to make sense of BC at r=0, introduce,-function: V (r) = κ r 2 gδ(d) (r)

54 [ 2 + V (r) k 2] ψ =0, V(r) = κ r 2 k=0 solutions: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + ( d 2 ) ( d 2 ) 2 ν ± = 2 ± κ κ, κ = 2 c + =0 or c - =0 are scale invariant solutions If c + "0, * + c + r )+ for large r () + > ) - ) to make sense of BC at r=0, introduce,-function: V (r) = κ r 2 gδ(d) (r) r )+ dominates at large r -- corresponds to IR fixed point of g r )- dominates at small r -- corresponds to UV fixed point of g

55 I. Non-perturbative RG treatment of 1/r 2 potential: regulate with square well: { r0 κ/r 2 r > r 0 V (r) = g/r0 2 g/r0 2 r > r 0 κ/r 2 UV regulator E=0 solution for r>r0: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν +

56 I. Non-perturbative RG treatment of 1/r 2 potential: regulate with square well: { r0 κ/r 2 r > r 0 V (r) = g/r0 2 g/r0 2 r > r 0 κ/r 2 UV regulator E=0 solution for r>r0: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + Solve for c+/c- (a physical dimensionful quantity) and require invariance: d(c+/c-)/dr0 = 0:

57 I. Non-perturbative RG treatment of 1/r 2 potential: regulate with square well: { r0 κ/r 2 r > r 0 V (r) = g/r0 2 g/r0 2 r > r 0 κ/r 2 UV regulator E=0 solution for r>r0: ψ = c r ν + c + r ν + Solve for c+/c- (a physical dimensionful quantity) and require invariance: d(c+/c-)/dr0 = 0: Find exact &-function for g. Eg, for d=3: β = 2 g ( κ + g cot g g cot 2 g ) "! = -!, g! Β g, Α cot g + g csc 2 g Α 0 "=0 Α 1 4 g "=-1/4 Α 1 2 "=-1/2 g

58 Aside: Even better to define a modified coupling constant ( gjd/2 ( ) g) γ = J d/2 1 ( g) Condition d(c+/c-)/dr0 yields exact &-function in d-dimensions: β γ = γ t =(κ κ ) (γ γ ) 2, γ = d 2 2 Toy model is exact!. is a periodic function of g,.=±/ equivalent Aside: Limit cycle behavior for "<"! : describes Efimov states

59 II. Perturbative RG treatment of "/r 2 potential: "!! -(d-2) 2 /4 so work in d=2+0

60 II. Perturbative RG treatment of "/r 2 potential: "!! -(d-2) 2 /4 so work in d=2+0 S = dt d d x (iψ t ψ ψ 2 2m dt d d x d d y ψ (t, x)ψ (t, y) propagator: i ω p 2 /2m + gπ ) 4 ψ ψ ψψ,-function κ ψ(t, y)ψ(t, x) x y 2 contact vertex: iπgµ ɛ meson exchange : 2πiκ ɛ 1 q ɛ

61 II. Perturbative RG treatment of "/r 2 potential: "!! -(d-2) 2 /4 so work in d=2+0 S = dt d d x (iψ t ψ ψ 2 2m dt d d x d d y ψ (t, x)ψ (t, y) propagator: contact vertex: i ω p 2 /2m meson exchange : iπgµ ɛ 2πiκ ɛ 1 q ɛ + gπ ) 4 ψ ψ ψψ Find g runs:,-function κ ψ(t, y)ψ(t, x) x y 2 β(g; κ) =µ g µ = + ( κ + ɛ2 4 ) (g ɛ) 2

62 II. Perturbative RG treatment of "/r 2 potential: "!! -(d-2) 2 /4 so work in d=2+0 S = dt d d x (iψ t ψ ψ 2 2m dt d d x d d y ψ (t, x)ψ (t, y) propagator: contact vertex: i ω p 2 /2m meson exchange : iπgµ ɛ 2πiκ ɛ 1 q ɛ + gπ ) 4 ψ ψ ψψ Find g runs:,-function κ ψ(t, y)ψ(t, x) x y 2 β(g; κ) =µ g µ = + ( κ + ɛ2 4 ) (g ɛ) 2 Same as toy model! "! = -0 2 /4, g! =0 Exact, 0=1: "! = -1/4, g! =1.36

63 II. Perturbative RG treatment of "/r 2 potential: "!! -(d-2) 2 /4 so work in d=2+0 S = dt d d x (iψ t ψ ψ 2 2m dt d d x d d y ψ (t, x)ψ (t, y) propagator: contact vertex: i ω p 2 /2m meson exchange : iπgµ ɛ 2πiκ ɛ 1 q ɛ + gπ ) 4 ψ ψ ψψ Find g runs:,-function κ ψ(t, y)ψ(t, x) x y 2 β(g; κ) =µ g µ = ( Λ 2 IR + ( κ + ɛ2 4 ) (g ɛ) 2 ">"! : conformal "="! : critical B e 2π/ κ κ m m "<"! : g blows up in IR BKT scaling Same as toy model! "! = -0 2 /4, g! =0 Exact, 0=1: "! = -1/4, g! =1.36 ) ( Λ 2 UV ) bound state energy

64 Conformal phases: measure correlations, not &-functions! Look at operator scaling dimensions:

65 Conformal phases: measure correlations, not &-functions! Look at operator scaling dimensions: From Nishida & Son, 2007: Replace V(r1-r2) $ V(r1-r2) + " 1 2 r1 2 +r2 2 Compute 2-particle ground state energy E0 Operator dimension of ** is 2** =E0/1

66 Conformal phases: measure correlations, not &-functions! Look at operator scaling dimensions: From Nishida & Son, 2007: Replace V(r1-r2) $ V(r1-r2) + " 1 2 r1 2 +r2 2 Compute 2-particle ground state energy E0 Operator dimension of ** is 2** =E0/1 2-particle wavefunction at r 1 -r 2 =0

67 Conformal phases: measure correlations, not &-functions! Look at operator scaling dimensions: From Nishida & Son, 2007: Replace V(r1-r2) $ V(r1-r2) + " 1 2 r1 2 +r2 2 Compute 2-particle ground state energy E0 Operator dimension of ** is 2** =E0/1 2-particle wavefunction at r 1 -r 2 =0 As the two conformal theories merge when "% "!, operator dimensions in the two CFTs merge

68 Conformal phases: measure correlations, not &-functions! Look at operator scaling dimensions: From Nishida & Son, 2007: Replace V(r1-r2) $ V(r1-r2) + " 1 2 r1 2 +r2 2 Compute 2-particle ground state energy E0 Operator dimension of ** is 2** =E0/1 2-particle wavefunction at r 1 -r 2 =0 As the two conformal theories merge when "% "!, operator dimensions in the two CFTs merge For 1/r 2 potential -- find for the two conformal theories: ( ) d +2 + = UV fixed point ± κ κ 2 - = IR fixed point [**]: ± =(d + ν ± )= Note: ( ) = (d+2): scaling dimension of nonrelativistic spacetime.

69 Analog in AdS/CFT:

70 Analog in AdS/CFT: AdS: ds 2 = 1 z 2 (dz 2 + d i=1 dx 2 i )

71 Analog in AdS/CFT: AdS: ds 2 = 1 z 2 (dz 2 + d i=1 dx 2 i ) Massive scalar in the bulk two solutions to eq. of motion, corresponding to two different CFT s: ϕ = c + z + + c z ± = d 2 m ± 2 + ( ) d 2 2 d 2 ± m 2 m 2 2± = operator dim

72 Analog in AdS/CFT: AdS: ds 2 = 1 z 2 (dz 2 + d i=1 dx 2 i ) Massive scalar in the bulk two solutions to eq. of motion, corresponding to two different CFT s: ϕ = c + z + + c z ± = d 2 m ± 2 + ( ) d 2 2 d 2 ± m 2 m 2 AdS 2± = operator dim QM ( )=d= spacetime dim of CFT (2 + **+2 - **)=(d+2)= conformal wt. of nonrelativistic d-space+time

73 Analog in AdS/CFT: AdS: ds 2 = 1 z 2 (dz 2 + d i=1 dx 2 i ) Massive scalar in the bulk two solutions to eq. of motion, corresponding to two different CFT s: ϕ = c + z + + c z ± = d 2 m ± 2 + ( ) d 2 2 d 2 ± m 2 m 2 AdS 2± = operator dim QM ( )=d= spacetime dim of CFT when m 2 = m! 2 = -d 2 /4, 2 ± =d/2 (2 + **+2 - **)=(d+2)= conformal wt. of nonrelativistic d-space+time " = "! = -(d-2) 2 /4 2 ± =(d+2)/2

74 Analog in AdS/CFT: AdS: ds 2 = 1 z 2 (dz 2 + d i=1 dx 2 i ) Massive scalar in the bulk two solutions to eq. of motion, corresponding to two different CFT s: ϕ = c + z + + c z ± = d 2 m ± 2 + ( ) d 2 2 d 2 ± m 2 m 2 AdS 2± = operator dim QM ( )=d= spacetime dim of CFT when m 2 = m! 2 = -d 2 /4, 2 ± =d/2 Instability (no AdS or CFT) for m 2 < m! 2 (B-F bound) (2 + **+2 - **)=(d+2)= conformal wt. of nonrelativistic d-space+time " = "! = -(d-2) 2 /4 2 ± =(d+2)/2 Conformality lost for " < "!

75 AdS/CFT cont d: As with QM example, 2 different solutions 2 different CFTs

76 AdS/CFT cont d: As with QM example, 2 different solutions 2 different CFTs ϕ = ϕ 0 z + : Z grav. ϕ z 0 ϕ 0 z + = Z CFT [ϕ 0 ]

77 AdS/CFT cont d: As with QM example, 2 different solutions 2 different CFTs ϕ = ϕ 0 z + : Z grav. ϕ z 0 ϕ 0 z + = Z CFT [ϕ 0 ] S = S CFT + d d x φ 0 O

78 AdS/CFT cont d: As with QM example, 2 different solutions 2 different CFTs ϕ = ϕ 0 z + : Z grav. ϕ z 0 ϕ 0 z + = Z CFT [ϕ 0 ] S = S CFT + d d x φ 0 O ϕ = Jz : Z grav. ϕ Jz z 0 = Z CFT [J] = Dϕ Z CFT [ϕ]e i R d d xjϕ

79 AdS/CFT cont d: As with QM example, 2 different solutions 2 different CFTs ϕ = ϕ 0 z + : Z grav. ϕ z 0 ϕ 0 z + = Z CFT [ϕ 0 ] S = S CFT + d d x φ 0 O ϕ = Jz : Z grav. ϕ Jz z 0 = Z CFT [J] = Dϕ Z CFT [ϕ]e i R d d xjϕ UV fine-tuning: m adds OO operator. Eg: O=**, OO =****

80 AdS/CFT cont d: As with QM example, 2 different solutions 2 different CFTs ϕ = ϕ 0 z + : Z grav. ϕ z 0 ϕ 0 z + = Z CFT [ϕ 0 ] S = S CFT + d d x φ 0 O ϕ = Jz : Z grav. ϕ Jz z 0 = Z CFT [J] = Dϕ Z CFT [ϕ]e i R d d xjϕ UV fine-tuning: m adds OO operator. Eg: O=**, OO =**** analog of,(r) in QM example tuned to unstable UV fixed pt.

81 A relativistic example: defect Yang-Mills theory d spatial dimensions

82 A relativistic example: defect Yang-Mills theory d spatial dimensions Charged relativistic fermions on a d-dimensional defect + 4D conformal gauge theory (eg, N=4 SYM) S = d d+1 xi ψγ µ D µ ψ 1 4g 2 d 4 xf a µνf a,µν

83 A relativistic example: defect Yang-Mills theory d spatial dimensions Charged relativistic fermions on a d-dimensional defect + 4D conformal gauge theory (eg, N=4 SYM) S = d d+1 xi ψγ µ D µ ψ 1 4g 2 d 4 xf a µνf a,µν g doesn t run

84 g doesn t run by construction Expect a phase transition as a function of g: ψψ = { 0 g < g g > g Λ d IR

85 g doesn t run by construction Expect a phase transition as a function of g: ψψ = { 0 g < g g > g Λ d IR Add a contact interaction to the theory (as in QM & AdS/CFT examples!) and study its running: S = d d+1 x ( c 2 ( ψγ µ T a ψ) 2)

86 g doesn t run by construction Expect a phase transition as a function of g: ψψ = { 0 g < g g > g Λ d IR Add a contact interaction to the theory (as in QM & AdS/CFT examples!) and study its running: S = d d+1 x ( c 2 ( ψγ µ T a ψ) 2) Phase transition is in perturbative regime for d=1+0 (spatial dimensions of defect ): compute &-function

87 &(c): 1/0 pole for d=(1+0)

88 &(c): β(c) = g2 2π ɛc N c = 1 2π 2π c2 ( π 2 ɛ 2 ) g 2 N c N c 2π ( c ɛπ N c 1/0 pole for d=(1+0) ) 2

89 &(c): β(c) = g2 2π ɛc N c = 1 2π 2π c2 ( π 2 ɛ 2 ) g 2 N c N c 2π ( c ɛπ N c 1/0 pole for d=(1+0) ) 2 Find BKT transition at g 2 = g 2! = (0#) 2 /N c % IR ~ % UV exp[-#/$(g 2 -g!2 )] Schwinger-Dyson gap eq (rainbow approx) gives qualitatively same results

90 Back to QCD at LARGE N c and N f : asymptotic freedom conformal trivial 0 ψψ =0 xc 11/2 x gauge coupling:!! 0? Banks-Zaks fixed point Transition at x=x c?

91 Back to QCD at LARGE N c and N f : asymptotic freedom conformal trivial 0 ψψ =0 xc 11/2 x gauge coupling:!! 0? Banks-Zaks fixed point Transition at x=x c? Schwinger-Dyson (rainbow approximation):

92 Back to QCD at LARGE N c and N f : asymptotic freedom conformal trivial 0 ψψ =0 xc 11/2 x gauge coupling:!! 0? Banks-Zaks fixed point Transition at x=x c? Schwinger-Dyson (rainbow approximation): Found: BKT scaling for <**>...not rigorous, but qualitatively correct?

93 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger.

94 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD 2** = 4? 1 x! 2 - QCD* xbz =11/2 x

95 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD Free fermions 2** = 4? 1 x! 2 - QCD* xbz =11/2 x

96 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD Free fermions 2** = 4? 1 x! QCD* 2 - Free boson xbz =11/2 x

97 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD Free fermions 2** = 4? 1 x! QCD* 2 - Free boson xbz =11/2 x

98 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD Free fermions 2** = 4? 1 x! QCD* 2 - Free boson xbz =11/2 x Near Banks-Zaks (IR) fixed point:

99 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD Free fermions 2** = 4? 1 x! 2 - QCD* xbz =11/2 Free boson x Near Banks-Zaks (IR) fixed point: QCD: + 2** = 3 - # g 2 Nc (almost free quarks)

100 Conjecture: loss of conformality for QCD at x c is of BKT type, due to fixed point merger QCD Free fermions 2** = 4? 1 x! 2 - QCD* xbz =11/2 Free boson x Near Banks-Zaks (IR) fixed point: QCD: + 2** = 3 - # g 2 Nc Partner theory QCD*: - + 2** = d-2** = 1+ # g 2 Nc (almost free quarks) (almost free scalar?)

101 ! WANTED Conformal theory defined at nontrivial UV fixed point to merge with QCD at x=xc LAST SEEN WITH WEAKLY COUPLED SCALAR

102 ! WANTED Conformal theory defined at nontrivial UV fixed point to merge with QCD at x=xc Haven t found a Lorentz invariant perturbative example with: (i) weakly coupled scalar; (ii) full SU(Nf)xSU(Nf) chiral symmetry (iii) Matching anomalies LAST SEEN WITH WEAKLY COUPLED SCALAR

103 ! WANTED Conformal theory defined at nontrivial UV fixed point to merge with QCD at x=xc LAST SEEN WITH WEAKLY COUPLED SCALAR Haven t found a Lorentz invariant perturbative example with: (i) weakly coupled scalar; (ii) full SU(Nf)xSU(Nf) chiral symmetry (iii) Matching anomalies Look for nonperturbative QCD* on the lattice? One place to start: strong/weak transition for QCD with Nf in conformal window? (A. Hasenfratz) conformal phase strong coupling phase 0 g g + g QCD* possibly at g+*?

104 Conclusions:

105 Conclusions: I. Fixed point annihilation appears to be a generic mechanism for the loss of conformality

106 Conclusions: I. Fixed point annihilation appears to be a generic mechanism for the loss of conformality II. Leads to similar scaling as in the BKT transition: % IR ~ % UV e[-#/$(-"-"! )]

107 Conclusions: I. Fixed point annihilation appears to be a generic mechanism for the loss of conformality II. Leads to similar scaling as in the BKT transition: % IR ~ % UV e[-#/$(-"-"! )] III. Both relativistic & non-relativistic examples

108 Conclusions: I. Fixed point annihilation appears to be a generic mechanism for the loss of conformality II. Leads to similar scaling as in the BKT transition: % IR ~ % UV e[-#/$(-"-"! )] III. Both relativistic & non-relativistic examples IV. Analog in AdS/CFT; implications for AdS below the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound?

109 Conclusions: I. Fixed point annihilation appears to be a generic mechanism for the loss of conformality II. Leads to similar scaling as in the BKT transition: % IR ~ % UV e[-#/$(-"-"! )] III. Both relativistic & non-relativistic examples IV. Analog in AdS/CFT; implications for AdS below the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound? V. Implications for QCD with many flavors? Is there a pair of conformal QCD theories? What is QCD*?

110 Conclusions: I. Fixed point annihilation appears to be a generic mechanism for the loss of conformality II. Leads to similar scaling as in the BKT transition: % IR ~ % UV e[-#/$(-"-"! )] III. Both relativistic & non-relativistic examples IV. Analog in AdS/CFT; implications for AdS below the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound? V. Implications for QCD with many flavors? Is there a pair of conformal QCD theories? What is QCD*? VI. Finding QCD* should be on field theory / lattice QCD to-do list.

111