William Gasarch-U of MD, Sam Zbarsky- Mont. Blair. HS. Applications of the Erdös-Rado Canonical Ramsey Theorem to
|
|
- Egbert Stanley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Applications of the Erdös-Rado Canonical Ramsey Theorem to Erdös-Type Problems William Gasarch-U of MD Sam Zbarsky- Mont. Blair. HS
2 EXAMPLES The following are known EXAMPLES of the kind of theorems we will be talking about. 1. If there are n points in R then there is a subset of size Ω(n 1/3 such that all distances between points are DIFFERENT. (KNOWN. If there are n points in R, no 3 collinear, then there is a subset of size Ω((log log n 1/186 such that all triangle areas are DIFFERENT. (OURS
3 An Erdös Problem Plus Plus Definition: 1. h,d (n is the largest integer so that the following happens: For all subsets of R d of size n there is a subset Y of size h,d (n such that all distances are DIFFERENT.. h a,d (n is the largest integer so that the following happens: For all subsets of R d of size n, no a on the same (a 1-hyperplane, there is a subset Y of size h a,d (n such that all a-volumes are DIFFERENT. 3. h a,d (α where ℵ 0 α ℵ 0 makes sense. 4. Erdös, others studied h,d (n. Little was known about h a,d (n.
4 BEST KNOWN RESULTS AND OURS BEST KNOWN RESULTS: 1. h,d (n = Ω(n 1/(3d. Torsten ( h, (n = Ω(n 1/3 / log n. Charalambides ( (AC h,d (α = α. Erdös ( (AC If α regular than h a,d (α = α. OUR RESULTS (FEB 013: 1. h,d (n Ω(n 1/(6d. (Uses Canonical Ramsey. h 3, (n Ω((log log n 1/186 (Uses Canonical Ramsey 3. h 3,3 (n Ω((log log n 1/396 (Uses Canonical Ramsey
5 OUR RECENT RESULTS OUR RECENT RESULTS: (With David Harris and Douglas Ulrich 1. h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d (Simple Proof!. h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d 3 (Simple Proof PLUS hard known result 1 3. h a,d (n Ω(n (a 1d (Uses Algebraic Geometry 4. (AC If α regular then h a,d (α = α (Simple Proof 5. (AD If α regular then h a,d (α = α
6 Standard Canonical Ramsey Definition Let COL : ( [n] ω. Let V [n]. V is homog if ( a < b, c < d[col(a, b = COL(c, d] V is min-homog if ( a < b, c < d[col(a, b = COL(c, d iff a = c] V is max-homog if ( a < b, c < d[col(a, b = COL(c, d iff b = d] V is rainbow if ( a < b, c < d[col(a, b = COL(c, d iff a = c and b = d] Theorem: (Lefmann-Rodl, 1995 ( k( n O(k log k, ( COL : ( [n] ω ( V, V = k, V is either homog, min-homog, max-homog, or rainbow.
7 Variant of Canonical Ramsey Definition: The set V is weak-homog if either ( a, b, c, d V [COL(a, b = COL(c, d] ( a < b, c < d V [a = c = COL(a, b = COL(c, d] ( a < b, c < d V [b = d = COL(a, b = COL(c, d] (Note: only one direction. Definition: WER(k 1, k is least n such that for all COL : ( [n] ω either have weak homog set of size k1 or rainbow set of size k. Theorem: WER(k 1, k k O(k 1.
8 Easy Geom Lemma Lemma: Let p 1,..., p n R d. Let COL be defined by COL(i, j = p i p j. Then COL has no weak homog set of size d + 3.
9 POINT 1: h,d (n Ω(n 1/(6d VIA CAN RAMSEY Theorem: For all d 1, h,d (n = Ω(n 1/(6d. Proof: Let P = {p 1,..., p n } R d. Let COL : ( [n] R be defined by COL(i, j = p i p j. k is largest integer s.t. n WER(d + 3, k. By VARIANT OF CANONICAL RAMSEY k = Ω(n 1/(6d. By the definition of WER 3 (d + 3, k there is either a weak homog set of size d + 3 or a rainbow set of size k. By GEOMETRIC LEMMA can t be weak homog case. Hence there must be a rainbow set of size k. THIS is the set we want!
10 POINT : h 3, (n Ω((log log n 1/186 VIA CAN RAMSEY Theorem: h 3, (n = Ω((log log n 1/186. Proof: Let P = {p 1,..., p n } R. Let COL : ( [n] 3 R be defined by COL(i, j, k = AREA(p i, p j, p k. k is largest integer s.t. n WER 3 (6, k. By VARIANT OF CANONCIAL RAMSEY n Ω((log log n 1/186. By the definition of WER 3 (6, k there is either a weak homog set of size 6 or a rainbow set of size k. By HARDER GEOMETRIC LEMMA can t be weak homog case. Hence there must be a rainbow set of size k. THIS is the set we want!
11 POINT 3: h 3,3 (n Ω((log log n 1/396 VIA CAN RAMSEY Theorem: h 3,3 (n = Ω((log log n 1/396. Proof: Let P = {p 1,..., p n } R 3. Let COL : ( [n] 3 R be defined by COL(i, j, k = AREA(p i, p j, p k. k is largest integer s.t. n WER 3 (13, k. By VARIANT OF CANONICAL RAMSEY n Ω((log log n 1/396. By the definition of WER 3 (13, k there is either a weak homog set of size 13 or a rainbow set of size k. By HARDER GEOMETRIC LEMMA can t be weak homog case. Hence there must be a rainbow set of size k. THIS is the set we want!
12 AUX RESULT: h,d 1 (n Ω(n 3d via MAXIMAL SETS ONWARD to NEW Results To prove h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d need result on spheres first. Definition h,d (n is the largest integer so that the following happens: For all subsets of S d of size n there is a subset Y of size (n such that all distances are DIFFERENT. h,d We prove Theorem For d 1, h,d Use induction on d. (n Ω(n 1 3d.
13 BASE CASE Base Case: d = 1. X S 1 (a circle. M is the maximal subset of X with all distances distinct. m = M. x X M. Either 1. ( u M( {u 1, u } ( M [ x u = u1 u ].. ( {u 1, u } ( M [ x u1 = x u ]. Map X M to M ( ( M M. Map is -to-1. ( ( X M M M M. M = Ω(n 1/3.
14 INDUCTION STEP X S d. M a a maximal subset of X. x X M. Either 1. ( u M( {u 1, u } ( M [ x u = u1 u ].. ( {u 1, u } ( M [ x u1 = x u ]. Map X M to M ( ( M M. Two cases based on param δ. Case 1: ( B co-domain[ map 1 (B n δ ]. Map is n δ -to-1. X M n δ M ( M ( M. Hence m Ω(n 1 δ 3. Case : ( B co-domain[ map 1 (B n δ ]. KEY: map 1 (B S d 1. By IH have set of size Ω(n δ/3(d 1. Take δ = d 1 d to obtain Ω(n 1/3d in both cases.
15 BETTER AUX RESULT: h,d 1 (n Ω(n 3d 3 Lemma (Charalambides 1. h,d (n Ω(n1/3.. h,d (n Ω(n 1/3. Theorem For d, h,d 1 (n Ω(n 3d 3. Only change is the BASE CASE. Start at d =. Use Charalambides result that h,d (n Ω(n1/3.
16 NEW RESULT: h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d 3 via MAXIMAL SETS Theorem For d, h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d 3. Induction on d. Base Case: Use Charalambides result that h,d (n Ω(n 1/3. Induction Step: Similar to that in lower bound for h,d (n.
17 NOTES ON THE PROOF I Contrast: h a,d (n Induction Step reduces S d to S d 1. h a,d (n Induction Step reduces R d to R d 1 OR S d 1. II KEY: In prove that h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d 3 we need that inverse image of map was S d 1 or R d 1. III Two views of result: h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d via self contained elementary techniques. h,d (n Ω(n 1 3d 3 via using hard known result.
18 h 3,d (n ATTEMPT Theorem Attempt: For all d, h 3,d (n LET S FIND OUT! Base Case: d =. X R, no 3 collinear. M is the maximal subset of X with all areas diff. m = M. x X M. Either ( {u 1, u } ( M ( {u3, u 4 } ( M AREA(x, u 1, u = AREA(x, u 3, u 4. ( {u 1, u } ( M ( {u3, u 4, u 5 } ( M 3 AREA(x, u 1, u = AREA(u 3, u 4, u 5. Map X M to ( M ( M ( M ( M 3. Need Nice Inverse Images. DO NOT HAVE THAT!
19 Definition of h a,d,r (n Definition: Let 1 a d + 1. Let r N. h a,d,r is the largest integer so that the following happens: For all varieties V of dimension d and degree r (in complex proj space, for all subsets of V of size n, no a points in the same (a 1-hyperplane, there is a subset Y of size h,d,r (n such that all a-volumes are DIFFERENT.
20 Theorem about h a,d (n Theorem Let 1 a d + 1. Let r N. h a,d,r (n Ω(n (The constant depends on a, d, r. Comments on the Proof 1. Proof uses Algebraic Geometry in Proj Space over C.. Cannot define Volume in Proj space! 3. Can define VOL(a, b, c VOL(d, e, f via difference of determinents (a homog poly being Proof uses Maximal subsets. Corollary Let 1 a d + 1. Let r N. h a,d (n Ω(n (The constant depends on a, d. 1 (a 1d. 1 (a 1d.
21 h a,d (α Under AC Theorem: (AC ℵ 0 α ℵ 0, α regular, then h a,d (α = α. We do h 3, case. X R, no 3 collinear. M is a maximal subset of X. m = M. x X M. Either ( {u 1, u } ( M ( {u3, u 4 } ( M AREA(x, u 1, u = AREA(x, u 3, u 4 ( {u 1, u } ( M ( {u3, u 4, u 5 } ( M 3 AREA(x, u 1, u = AREA(u 3, u 4, u 5 Map X M to ( M ( M ( M ( M 3. Assume M < α.
22 h a,d (α = α Cases of Proof Case 1: ( B co-domain[ map 1 (B < α]. Contradicts α regularity. Case : ( B co-domain[ map 1 (B = α]. KEY: Using Determinant Def of AREA, any such B is alg variety. Let B 1 be one such B. Can show B 1 X. Repeat procedure on B 1. If get Case 1 DONE. If not get alg variety B B 1 X, If process does not stop then have X B 1 B B 3 Contradicts Hilbert Basis Theorem.
23 h a,d (α Under AD Theorem: (AD+DC If ℵ 0 α ℵ 0 1 a d + 1, h a,d (α = α. Proof omitted for space. and α is regular then for all
24 Open Questions 1. Get better lower bounds and ANY non-trivial upper bounds on h a,d (n.. What is h a,d (α for α singular? What axioms will be needed to prove results (e.g., AC, AD, DC? 3. (DC Assume α = ℵ 0 is regular. We have AC h a,d (α = α. We have AD h a,d (α = α. What if we have neither AC or AD?
Large Subsets of Points with all Pairs (Triples) Having Different Distances (Areas)
Large Subsets of Points with all Pairs (Triples) Having Different Distances (Areas) William Gasarch Univ. of MD at College Park Sam Zbarsky Montgomery Blair High School January 22, 2013 Abstract Let {p
More informationApplications of the Canonical Ramsey Theorem to Geometry
Applications of the Canonical Ramsey Theorem to Geometry arxiv:1302.5334v1 [math.co] 21 Feb 2013 William Gasarch Univ. of MD at College Park February 22, 2013 Abstract Sam Zbarsky Montgomery Blair High
More informationDistinct Volume Subsets: The Uncountable Case
Distinct Volume Subsets: The Uncountable Case Douglas Ulrich 1 William Gasarch 2 1 University of California, Irvine ds ulrich@hotmail.com 2 University of Maryland at College Park gasarch@cs.umd.edu July
More informationDistinct volume subsets
Distinct volume subsets David Conlon Jacob Fox William Gasarch David G. Harris Douglas Ulrich Samuel Zbarsky Abstract Suppose that a and d are positive integers with a 2. Let h a,d (n) be the largest integer
More informationEquations and Colorings: Rado s Theorem Exposition by William Gasarch
1 Introduction Equations Colorings: Rado s Theorem Exposition by William Gasarch Everything in this paper was proven by Rado [2] (but see also [1]) Do you think the following is TRUE or FALSE? For any
More informationHomework 3, Morally Due Tue Feb 20, 2018 COURSE WEBSITE: gasarch/858/s18.html (The symbol before gasarch is a tilde.
Homework 3, Morally Due Tue Feb 0, 018 COURSE WEBSITE: http://www.cs.umd.edu/ gasarch/858/s18.html (The symbol before gasarch is a tilde.) 1. (0 points) What is your name? Write it clearly. Staple your
More informationEquations and Infinite Colorings Exposition by Stephen Fenner and William Gasarch
1 Introduction Equations Infinite Colorings Exposition by Stephen Fenner William Gasarch Do you think the following is TRUE or FALSE? For any ℵ 0 -coloring of the reals, COL : R N there exist distinct
More informationThree Proofs of the Hypergraph Ramsey Theorem (An. Exposition)
Three Proofs of the Hypergraph Ramsey Theorem (An Exposition William Gasarch Univ. of MD at College Park Andy Parrish Univ. of CA at San Diego Sandow Sinai Poolesville High School Abstract Ramsey, Erdős-Rado,
More informationTheorem: Mileti s SECOND Proof. William Gasarch-U of MD. PROOF THREE of the Finite Canonical Ramsey Theorem: Mil
PROOF THREE of the Finite Canonical Ramsey Theorem: Mileti s SECOND Proof PROOF THREE: a-ary Case MODIFY PROOF TWO by GETTING RID of R a 1. Bill s Mantra It is often easier to proof something harder. Theorem:
More informationOff-diagonal hypergraph Ramsey numbers
Off-diagonal hypergraph Ramsey numbers Dhruv Mubayi Andrew Suk Abstract The Ramsey number r k (s, n) is the minimum such that every red-blue coloring of the k- subsets of {1,..., } contains a red set of
More informationThe Rainbow Turán Problem for Even Cycles
The Rainbow Turán Problem for Even Cycles Shagnik Das University of California, Los Angeles Aug 20, 2012 Joint work with Choongbum Lee and Benny Sudakov Plan 1 Historical Background Turán Problems Colouring
More informationThe universal triangle-free graph has finite big Ramsey degrees
The universal triangle-free graph has finite big Ramsey degrees Natasha Dobrinen University of Denver AMS-ASL Special Session on Set Theory, Logic and Ramsey Theory, JMM 2018 Dobrinen big Ramsey degrees
More information1 The Erdős Ko Rado Theorem
1 The Erdős Ko Rado Theorem A family of subsets of a set is intersecting if any two elements of the family have at least one element in common It is easy to find small intersecting families; the basic
More informationSquare-Difference-Free Sets of Size Ω(n )
Square-Difference-Free Sets of Size Ω(n 0.7334 ) Richard Beigel Temple University William Gasarch Univ. of MD at College Park Abstract A set A N is square-difference free (henceforth SDF) if there do not
More informationAn Exposition of a problem in Multiparty Communication Complexity and its Application to Lower Bounds on Branching Program By William Gasarch
An Exposition of a problem in Multiparty Communication Complexity and its Application to Lower Bounds on Branching Program By William Gasarch 1 Introduction Multiparty communication complexity was first
More informationMONOCHROMATIC VS. MULTICOLORED PATHS. Hanno Lefmann* Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Emory University. Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
MONOCHROMATIC VS. MULTICOLORED PATHS Hanno Lefmann* Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA and School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology
More information9 - The Combinatorial Nullstellensatz
9 - The Combinatorial Nullstellensatz Jacques Verstraëte jacques@ucsd.edu Hilbert s nullstellensatz says that if F is an algebraically closed field and f and g 1, g 2,..., g m are polynomials in F[x 1,
More informationMaking Change of n cents
A Complete High School Proof of Schur s Theorem on Making Change of n cents William Gasarch Univ. of MD at College Park Introduction Let a, a 2,..., a L be coin denominations. Assume you have an unlimited
More informationRamsey theory, trees, and ultrafilters
Ramsey theory, trees, and ultrafilters Natasha Dobrinen University of Denver Lyon, 2017 Dobrinen Ramsey, trees, ultrafilters University of Denver 1 / 50 We present two areas of research. Part I The first
More informationMonochromatic Solutions to Equations with Unit Fractions
Monochromatic Solutions to Equations with Unit Fractions Tom C. Brown and Voijtech Rödl Citation data T.C. Brown and V. Rödl, Monochromatic solutions to equations with unit fractions, Bull. Aus. Math.
More informationRamsey Theory. May 24, 2015
Ramsey Theory May 24, 2015 1 König s Lemma König s Lemma is a basic tool to move between finite and infinite combinatorics. To be concise, we use the notation [k] = {1, 2,..., k}, and [X] r will denote
More informationFINITE AFFINE PLANES. An incidence structure α = (P α, L α ) is said to be a finite affine plane if the following axioms are
FINITE AFFINE PLANES An incidence structure α = (P α, L α ) is said to be a finite affine plane if the following axioms are satisfied. A1 Every pair of distinct points are joined by exactly one line. A2
More informationUltrafilters and Set Theory. Andreas Blass University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI
Ultrafilters and Set Theory Andreas Blass University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ablass@umich.edu Ultrafilters and Set Theory Ultrafilters and Set Theory But not large cardinals (Itay Neeman) Ultrafilters
More informationCommuting nilpotent matrices and pairs of partitions
Commuting nilpotent matrices and pairs of partitions Roberta Basili Algebraic Combinatorics Meets Inverse Systems Montréal, January 19-21, 2007 We will explain some results on commuting n n matrices and
More informationRamsey theory of homogeneous structures
Ramsey theory of homogeneous structures Natasha Dobrinen University of Denver Notre Dame Logic Seminar September 4, 2018 Dobrinen big Ramsey degrees University of Denver 1 / 79 Ramsey s Theorem for Pairs
More informationChromatic number, clique subdivisions, and the conjectures of Hajós and Erdős-Fajtlowicz
Chromatic number, clique subdivisions, and the conjectures of Hajós and Erdős-Fajtlowicz Jacob Fox Choongbum Lee Benny Sudakov Abstract For a graph G, let χ(g) denote its chromatic number and σ(g) denote
More informationErdős-Ko-Rado theorems in polar spaces
Singapore, May 2016 The theorem of Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem, 1961: If S is an intersecting family of k-subsets of an n-set Ω, n 2k, then S ( n 1 k 1). For n 2k + 1 equality holds iff S consists of all k-subsets
More information* 8 Groups, with Appendix containing Rings and Fields.
* 8 Groups, with Appendix containing Rings and Fields Binary Operations Definition We say that is a binary operation on a set S if, and only if, a, b, a b S Implicit in this definition is the idea that
More informationDecidability of WS1S and S1S (An Exposition) Exposition by William Gasarch-U of MD
1 Introduction Decidability of WS1S and S1S (An Exposition) Exposition by William Gasarch-U of MD We are going to prove that a (small) fragment of mathematics is decidable. 1. A Formula allows variables
More information5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting
5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting Let N denote the positive integers, N 0 := N {0} be the non-negative integers and Z = N 0 ( N) the positive and negative integers including 0, Q the rational numbers,
More informationPart III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces
Part III 10 Topological Space Basics Topological Spaces Using the metric space results above as motivation we will axiomatize the notion of being an open set to more general settings. Definition 10.1.
More informationAlgebraic function fields
Algebraic function fields 1 Places Definition An algebraic function field F/K of one variable over K is an extension field F K such that F is a finite algebraic extension of K(x) for some element x F which
More informationPurely Combinatorial Proofs of Van Der Waerden-Type Theorems. William Gasarch and Andy Parrish
Purely Combinatorial Proofs of Van Der Waerden-Type Theorems William Gasarch and Andy Parrish March 5, 2009 2 Contents 1 Introduction 11 1.1 What is Van Der Waerden s Theorem?............. 11 1.2 The Polynomial
More informationPosets, homomorphisms, and homogeneity
Posets, homomorphisms, and homogeneity Peter J. Cameron p.j.cameron@qmul.ac.uk Dedicated to Jarik Nešetřil on his sixtieth birthday HAPPY BIRTHDAY JARIK! Summary Jarik Nešetřil has made deep contributions
More informationUniformly X Intersecting Families. Noga Alon and Eyal Lubetzky
Uniformly X Intersecting Families Noga Alon and Eyal Lubetzky April 2007 X Intersecting Families Let A, B denote two families of subsets of [n]. The pair (A,B) is called iff `-cross-intersecting A B =`
More informationThe axiom of choice and two-point sets in the plane
A.Miller AC and 2-point sets The axiom of choice and two-point sets in the plane Abstract Arnold W. Miller In this paper we prove that it consistent to have a two-point set in a model of ZF in which the
More informationVertex opposition in spherical buildings
Vertex opposition in spherical buildings Anna Kasikova and Hendrik Van Maldeghem Abstract We study to which extent all pairs of opposite vertices of self-opposite type determine a given building. We provide
More informationInduced subgraphs of prescribed size
Induced subgraphs of prescribed size Noga Alon Michael Krivelevich Benny Sudakov Abstract A subgraph of a graph G is called trivial if it is either a clique or an independent set. Let q(g denote the maximum
More informationThe following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof
Ch. 1.6 Introduction to Proofs The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof - Direct proof - Indirect proof (our book calls this by contraposition)
More informationR(p, k) = the near regular complete k-partite graph of order p. Let p = sk+r, where s and r are positive integers such that 0 r < k.
MATH3301 EXTREMAL GRAPH THEORY Definition: A near regular complete multipartite graph is a complete multipartite graph with orders of its partite sets differing by at most 1. R(p, k) = the near regular
More informationJournal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences & Cryptography Vol. 9 (2006), No. 1, pp
Some generalizations of Rédei s theorem T. Alderson Department of Mathematical Sciences University of New Brunswick Saint John, New Brunswick Canada EL 4L5 Abstract By the famous theorems of Rédei, a set
More informationLinear Algebra: Homework 3
Linear Algebra: Homework 3 Alvin Lin August 206 - December 206 Section.2 Exercise 48 Find all values of the scalar k for which the two vectors are orthogonal. [ ] [ ] 2 k + u v 3 k u v 0 2(k + ) + 3(k
More informationThe extent of the failure of Ramsey s theorem at successor cardinals
The extent of the failure of Ramsey s theorem at successor cardinals 2012 North American Annual Meeting of the ASL University of Wisconsin Madison 31-March-2012 Assaf Rinot University of Toronto Mississauga
More informationWell-Ordering Principle. Axiom: Every nonempty subset of Z + has a least element. That is, if S Z + and S, then S has a smallest element.
Well-Ordering Principle Axiom: Every nonempty subset of Z + has a least element. That is, if S Z + and S, then S has a smallest element. Well-Ordering Principle Example: Use well-ordering property to prove
More informationConflict-Free Colorings of Rectangles Ranges
Conflict-Free Colorings of Rectangles Ranges Khaled Elbassioni Nabil H. Mustafa Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany felbassio, nmustafag@mpi-sb.mpg.de Abstract. Given the range space
More informationCanonicity and representable relation algebras
Canonicity and representable relation algebras Ian Hodkinson Joint work with: Rob Goldblatt Robin Hirsch Yde Venema What am I going to do? In the 1960s, Monk proved that the variety RRA of representable
More informationList of Theorems. Mat 416, Introduction to Graph Theory. Theorem 1 The numbers R(p, q) exist and for p, q 2,
List of Theorems Mat 416, Introduction to Graph Theory 1. Ramsey s Theorem for graphs 8.3.11. Theorem 1 The numbers R(p, q) exist and for p, q 2, R(p, q) R(p 1, q) + R(p, q 1). If both summands on the
More informationLecture 3: Probability Measures - 2
Lecture 3: Probability Measures - 2 1. Continuation of measures 1.1 Problem of continuation of a probability measure 1.2 Outer measure 1.3 Lebesgue outer measure 1.4 Lebesgue continuation of an elementary
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 18 Dec 2018
A Construction for Difference Sets with Local Properties Sara Fish Ben Lund Adam Sheffer arxiv:181.07651v1 [math.co] 18 Dec 018 Abstract We construct finite sets of real numbers that have a small difference
More informationLinear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2015
Linear Algebra I Ronald van Luijk, 2015 With many parts from Linear Algebra I by Michael Stoll, 2007 Contents Dependencies among sections 3 Chapter 1. Euclidean space: lines and hyperplanes 5 1.1. Definition
More informationDefinition 2.3. We define addition and multiplication of matrices as follows.
14 Chapter 2 Matrices In this chapter, we review matrix algebra from Linear Algebra I, consider row and column operations on matrices, and define the rank of a matrix. Along the way prove that the row
More informationComplementary Ramsey numbers, graph factorizations and Ramsey graphs
Complementary Ramsey numbers, graph factorizations and Ramsey graphs Akihiro Munemasa Tohoku University joint work with Masashi Shinohara May 30, 2017, Tohoku University 1st Tohoku-Bandung Bilateral Workshop:
More informationOn the intersection of infinite matroids
On the intersection of infinite matroids Elad Aigner-Horev Johannes Carmesin Jan-Oliver Fröhlich University of Hamburg 9 July 2012 Abstract We show that the infinite matroid intersection conjecture of
More informationFinite-Dimensional Cones 1
John Nachbar Washington University March 28, 2018 1 Basic Definitions. Finite-Dimensional Cones 1 Definition 1. A set A R N is a cone iff it is not empty and for any a A and any γ 0, γa A. Definition 2.
More informationMekler s construction and generalized stability
Mekler s construction and generalized stability Artem Chernikov UCLA Automorphism Groups, Differential Galois Theory and Model Theory Barcelona, June 26, 2017 Joint work with Nadja Hempel (UCLA). Mekler
More informationRational curves on general type hypersurfaces
Rational curves on general type hypersurfaces Eric Riedl and David Yang May 5, 01 Abstract We develop a technique that allows us to prove results about subvarieties of general type hypersurfaces. As an
More informationCSE 206A: Lattice Algorithms and Applications Spring Basis Reduction. Instructor: Daniele Micciancio
CSE 206A: Lattice Algorithms and Applications Spring 2014 Basis Reduction Instructor: Daniele Micciancio UCSD CSE No efficient algorithm is known to find the shortest vector in a lattice (in arbitrary
More informationMTH 309 Supplemental Lecture Notes Based on Robert Messer, Linear Algebra Gateway to Mathematics
MTH 309 Supplemental Lecture Notes Based on Robert Messer, Linear Algebra Gateway to Mathematics Ulrich Meierfrankenfeld Department of Mathematics Michigan State University East Lansing MI 48824 meier@math.msu.edu
More informationQuantum measure theory, quantum cardinals, and noncommutative Hardy spaces. David Blecher. December 2016
Quantum measure theory, quantum cardinals, and noncommutative Hardy spaces David Blecher University of Houston December 2016 Abstract The larger first part of the talk (joint work with Nik Weaver) is concerned
More informationThe Banach-Tarski paradox
The Banach-Tarski paradox 1 Non-measurable sets In these notes I want to present a proof of the Banach-Tarski paradox, a consequence of the axiom of choice that shows us that a naive understanding of the
More informationTheorems of Erdős-Ko-Rado type in polar spaces
Theorems of Erdős-Ko-Rado type in polar spaces Valentina Pepe, Leo Storme, Frédéric Vanhove Department of Mathematics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 28-S22, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Abstract We consider Erdős-Ko-Rado
More informationIntroduction to Model Theory
Introduction to Model Theory Jouko Väänänen 1,2 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki 2 Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam Beijing, June
More informationConstructions in Ramsey theory
Constructions in Ramsey theory Dhruv Mubayi Andrew Suk Abstract We provide several constructions for problems in Ramsey theory. First, we prove a superexponential lower bound for the classical 4-uniform
More informationPosets, homomorphisms and homogeneity
Posets, homomorphisms and homogeneity Peter J. Cameron and D. Lockett School of Mathematical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS, U.K. Abstract Jarik Nešetřil suggested
More information1 Systems of equations
Highlights from linear algebra David Milovich, Math 2 TA for sections -6 November, 28 Systems of equations A leading entry in a matrix is the first (leftmost) nonzero entry of a row. For example, the leading
More informationLattice Theory Lecture 4. Non-distributive lattices
Lattice Theory Lecture 4 Non-distributive lattices John Harding New Mexico State University www.math.nmsu.edu/ JohnHarding.html jharding@nmsu.edu Toulouse, July 2017 Introduction Here we mostly consider
More informationOn Antichains in Product Posets
On Antichains in Product Posets Sergei L. Bezrukov Department of Math and Computer Science University of Wisconsin - Superior Superior, WI 54880, USA sb@mcs.uwsuper.edu Ian T. Roberts School of Engineering
More informationMATH 22A: LINEAR ALGEBRA Chapter 1
MATH 22A: LINEAR ALGEBRA Chapter 1 Steffen Borgwardt, UC Davis original version of these slides: Jesús De Loera, UC Davis January 10, 2015 Vectors and Matrices (1.1-1.3). CHAPTER 1 Vectors and Linear Combinations
More informationReview Notes for Linear Algebra True or False Last Updated: February 22, 2010
Review Notes for Linear Algebra True or False Last Updated: February 22, 2010 Chapter 4 [ Vector Spaces 4.1 If {v 1,v 2,,v n } and {w 1,w 2,,w n } are linearly independent, then {v 1 +w 1,v 2 +w 2,,v n
More informationApplied Logic. Lecture 1 - Propositional logic. Marcin Szczuka. Institute of Informatics, The University of Warsaw
Applied Logic Lecture 1 - Propositional logic Marcin Szczuka Institute of Informatics, The University of Warsaw Monographic lecture, Spring semester 2017/2018 Marcin Szczuka (MIMUW) Applied Logic 2018
More information10.4 The Kruskal Katona theorem
104 The Krusal Katona theorem 141 Example 1013 (Maximum weight traveling salesman problem We are given a complete directed graph with non-negative weights on edges, and we must find a maximum weight Hamiltonian
More informationTopology of Nonarchimedean Analytic Spaces
Topology of Nonarchimedean Analytic Spaces AMS Current Events Bulletin Sam Payne January 11, 2013 Complex algebraic geometry Let X C n be an algebraic set, the common solutions of a system of polynomial
More informationTrees. A tree is a graph which is. (a) Connected and. (b) has no cycles (acyclic).
Trees A tree is a graph which is (a) Connected and (b) has no cycles (acyclic). 1 Lemma 1 Let the components of G be C 1, C 2,..., C r, Suppose e = (u, v) / E, u C i, v C j. (a) i = j ω(g + e) = ω(g).
More informationRainbow Hamilton cycles in uniform hypergraphs
Rainbow Hamilton cycles in uniform hypergraphs Andrzej Dude Department of Mathematics Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, MI andrzej.dude@wmich.edu Alan Frieze Department of Mathematical Sciences Carnegie
More informationBoolean Semilattices
Boolean Semilattices Clifford Bergman Iowa State University June 2015 Motivating Construction Let G = G, be a groupoid (i.e., 1 binary operation) Form the complex algebra G + = Sb(G),,,,,, G X Y = { x
More informationSet Theory and Models of Arithmetic ALI ENAYAT. First European Set Theory Meeting
Set Theory and Models of Arithmetic ALI ENAYAT First European Set Theory Meeting Bedlewo, July 12, 2007 PA is finite set theory! There is an arithmetical formula E(x, y) that expresses the x-th digit of
More informationm + q = p + n p + s = r + q m + q + p + s = p + n + r + q. (m + s) + (p + q) = (r + n) + (p + q) m + s = r + n.
9 The Basic idea 1 = { 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3,..., n, n + 1,...} 5 = { 0, 5, 1, 6, 2, 7,..., n, n + 5,...} Definition 9.1. Let be the binary relation on ω ω defined by m, n p, q iff m + q = p + n. Theorem 9.2.
More informationRectangle Free Coloring of Grids
Rectangle Free Coloring of Grids Stephen Fenner- U of SC William Gasarch- U of MD Charles Glover- U of MD Semmy Purewal- Col. of Charleston Credit Where Credit is Due This Work Grew Out of a Project In
More informationProofs of Mathema-cal Statements. A proof is a valid argument that establishes the truth of a statement.
Section 1.7 Proofs of Mathema-cal Statements A proof is a valid argument that establishes the truth of a statement. Terminology A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions
More informationSection 7.5: Cardinality
Section 7: Cardinality In this section, we shall consider extend some of the ideas we have developed to infinite sets One interesting consequence of this discussion is that we shall see there are as many
More informationUNIONS OF LINES IN F n
UNIONS OF LINES IN F n RICHARD OBERLIN Abstract. We show that if a collection of lines in a vector space over a finite field has dimension at least 2(d 1)+β, then its union has dimension at least d + β.
More information2.2 Some Consequences of the Completeness Axiom
60 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTANT PROPERTIES OF R 2.2 Some Consequences of the Completeness Axiom In this section, we use the fact that R is complete to establish some important results. First, we will prove that
More informationVariants of the Erdős-Szekeres and Erdős-Hajnal Ramsey problems
Variants of the Erdős-Szekeres and Erdős-Hajnal Ramsey problems Dhruv Mubayi December 19, 2016 Abstract Given integers l, n, the lth power of the path P n is the ordered graph Pn l with vertex set v 1
More informationA Do It Yourself Guide to Linear Algebra
A Do It Yourself Guide to Linear Algebra Lecture Notes based on REUs, 2001-2010 Instructor: László Babai Notes compiled by Howard Liu 6-30-2010 1 Vector Spaces 1.1 Basics Definition 1.1.1. A vector space
More informationHomogeneous Structures and Ramsey Classes
Homogeneous Structures and Ramsey Classes Julia Böttcher April 27, 2005 In this project report we discuss the relation between Ramsey classes and homogeneous structures and give various examples for both
More informationn n P} is a bounded subset Proof. Let A be a nonempty subset of Z, bounded above. Define the set
1 Mathematical Induction We assume that the set Z of integers are well defined, and we are familiar with the addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. In particular, we assume the following
More informationA NEW CLASS OF RAMSEY-CLASSIFICATION THEOREMS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN THE TUKEY THEORY OF ULTRAFILTERS, PART 1
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9947(XX)0000-0 A NEW CLASS OF RAMSEY-CLASSIFICATION THEOREMS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN THE TUKEY THEORY OF ULTRAFILTERS,
More informationWe know that S is a weak* compact convex subset of N and here are some sample questions where the answers are much less clear. 1.
Extending a normal state from a MASA of a von Neumann algebra by Charles Akemann David Sherman and I are just finishing a closely related paper titled Conditional Expectations onto Maximal Abelian Subalgebras
More information8 Perverse Sheaves. 8.1 Theory of perverse sheaves
8 Perverse Sheaves In this chapter we will give a self-contained account of the theory of perverse sheaves and intersection cohomology groups assuming the basic notions concerning constructible sheaves
More informationCONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP
CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP TOSHIHIRO SHODA Abstract. In this paper, we study a compact minimal surface in a 4-dimensional flat
More informationIndependence numbers of locally sparse graphs and a Ramsey type problem
Independence numbers of locally sparse graphs and a Ramsey type problem Noga Alon Abstract Let G = (V, E) be a graph on n vertices with average degree t 1 in which for every vertex v V the induced subgraph
More informationCarmen s Core Concepts (Math 135)
Carmen s Core Concepts (Math 135) Carmen Bruni University of Waterloo Week 4 1 Principle of Mathematical Induction 2 Example 3 Base Case 4 Inductive Hypothesis 5 Inductive Step When Induction Isn t Enough
More informationVAUGHT S THEOREM: THE FINITE SPECTRUM OF COMPLETE THEORIES IN ℵ 0. Contents
VAUGHT S THEOREM: THE FINITE SPECTRUM OF COMPLETE THEORIES IN ℵ 0 BENJAMIN LEDEAUX Abstract. This expository paper introduces model theory with a focus on countable models of complete theories. Vaught
More information20 Ordinals. Definition A set α is an ordinal iff: (i) α is transitive; and. (ii) α is linearly ordered by. Example 20.2.
20 Definition 20.1. A set α is an ordinal iff: (i) α is transitive; and (ii) α is linearly ordered by. Example 20.2. (a) Each natural number n is an ordinal. (b) ω is an ordinal. (a) ω {ω} is an ordinal.
More informationAMS regional meeting Bloomington, IN April 1, 2017
Joint work with: W. Boney, S. Friedman, C. Laskowski, M. Koerwien, S. Shelah, I. Souldatos University of Illinois at Chicago AMS regional meeting Bloomington, IN April 1, 2017 Cantor s Middle Attic Uncountable
More informationReid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.
Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed. Answer: Note that the first generator factors as (y
More informationFORCING WITH SEQUENCES OF MODELS OF TWO TYPES
FORCING WITH SEQUENCES OF MODELS OF TWO TYPES ITAY NEEMAN Abstract. We present an approach to forcing with finite sequences of models that uses models of two types. This approach builds on earlier work
More informationMorley s Proof. Winnipeg June 3, 2007
Modern Model Theory Begins Theorem (Morley 1965) If a countable first order theory is categorical in one uncountable cardinal it is categorical in all uncountable cardinals. Outline 1 2 3 SELF-CONSCIOUS
More informationFilters in Analysis and Topology
Filters in Analysis and Topology David MacIver July 1, 2004 Abstract The study of filters is a very natural way to talk about convergence in an arbitrary topological space, and carries over nicely into
More informationKevin James. MTHSC 3110 Section 4.3 Linear Independence in Vector Sp
MTHSC 3 Section 4.3 Linear Independence in Vector Spaces; Bases Definition Let V be a vector space and let { v. v 2,..., v p } V. If the only solution to the equation x v + x 2 v 2 + + x p v p = is the
More information