Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme
|
|
- Emerald Jones
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme Dragan Miličić Introduction This paper is inspired by two classical results in homological algebra o modules over an enveloping algebra lemmas o Casselman-Osborne and Wigner. They have a common theme: they are statements about derived unctors. While the statements or the unctors themselves are obvious, the statements or derived unctors are not and the published proos were completely dierent rom each other. In the irst section we give simple, pedestrian arguments or both results based on the same principle. They suggest a common generalization which is the topic o this paper. In the second section we discuss some straightorward properties o centers o abelian categories and their derived categories. In the third section, we consider a class o unctors and prove a simple result about their derived unctors which generalizes the irst two results. The original arguments were considerably more complicated and based on dierent ideas [1], [3] and [5]. 1 Classical approach 1.1 Wigner s lemma Let g be a complex Lie algebra, U (g) its enveloping algebra and Z (g) the center o U (g). Denote by M (U (g)) the category o U (g)-modules. Dragan Miličić Department o Mathematics, University o Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA, milicic@math.utah.edu 1
2 2 Dragan Miličić Let χ : Z (g) C be an algebra morphism o Z (g) into the ield o complex numbers. We say that a module V in M (g) has an ininitesimal character χ i z v = χ(z)v or any z Z (g) and any v V. Theorem 1.1 Let U and V be two objects in M (U (g)) with ininitesimal characters χ U and χ V. Then χ U χ V implies Ext p U (g) (U,V ) = 0 or all p Z +. Proo. Clearly, the center Z (g) o U (g) acts naturally on Hom U (g) (U,V ) or any two U (g)-modules U and V, by z(t ) = z T = T z or any z Z (g) and any T Hom U (g) (U,V ), i.e., we can view it as a biunctor rom the category o U (g)-modules into the category o Z (g)-modules. Hence, its derived unctors Ext U (g) are biunctors rom the category o U (g)-modules into the category o Z (g)-modules. Fix now a U (g)-module U with ininitesimal character χ U. Consider the unctor F = Hom U (g) (U, ) rom the category M (U (g)) into the category o Z (g)- modules. Since the ininitesimal character o U is χ U, any element o z Z (g) acts on F(V ) = Hom U (g) (U,V ) as multiplication by χ U (z) or any object V in M (U (g)). Fix now a U (g)-module V with ininitesimal character χ V. Let 0 V I 0 I 1... I n... be an injective resolution o V. Let z ker χ V. Then we have the commutative diagram 0 I 0 I 1... I n... z z z. 0 I 0 I 1... I n... We can interpret this as a morphism φ : I I o complexes. Clearly, since H 0 (I ) = V, we have H 0 (φ ) = 0. Thereore, φ is homotopic to 0. By applying the unctor F to this diagram we get 0 F(I 0 ) F(I 1 )... F(I n )... F(z) F(z) F(z), 0 F(I 0 ) F(I 1 )... F(I n )... i.e., a morphism F(φ ) : F(I ) F(I ) o complexes. Since φ is homotopic to 0, F(φ ) is also homotopic to 0. This implies that all H p (φ ) : H p (I ) H p (I ), p Z, are equal to 0. Since H p (I ) = R p F(V ) = Ext p (U,V ), we see that U (g) Ext p (U,V ) are annihilated by z. U (g)
3 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme 3 On the other hand, by the irst remark in the proo, z must act on Ext p U (g) (U,V ) as multiplication by χ U (z). Since χ U χ V, there exists z ker χ V such that χ U (z) 0. This implies that Ext p U (g) (U,V ) must be zero or all p Z Casselman-Osborne lemma Now we assume that g is a complex semisimple Lie algebra. Let h be a Cartan subalgebra o g, R the root system o (g,h) and R + a set o positive roots. Let n be the nilpotent Lie algebra spanned by root subspaces o positive roots. Let γ : Z (g) U (h) be the Harish-Chandra homomorphism, i.e., the algebra morphisms such that z γ(z) nu (g) [2, Ch. VIII, 6, no. 4]. Let V be a U (g)-module. Since h normalizes n, the quotient V /nv = C U (n) V has a natural structure o U (h)-module. Also, Z (g) acts naturally on V /nv, and this action is given by the composition o γ and the U (h)-action. We can consider F(V ) = V /nv as a right exact unctor F rom the category o U (g)-modules into the category o U (h)-modules. Let For g denote the orgetul unctor rom the category o U (g)-modules into the category o U (n)-modules. Let For h denote the orgetul unctor rom the category o U (h)-modules into the category o linear spaces. Then we have the ollowing commutative diagram F M (U (g)) M (U (h)) For g For h M (U (n)) H 0 (n, ) M (C). By the Poincaré-Birkho-Witt theorem, a ree U (g)-module is a ree U (n)- module, hence we can use ree let resolutions in M (U (g)) to calculate Lie algebra homology H p (n, ) o U (g)-modules, i.e., we get the commutative diagram L p F M (U (g)) M (U (h)) For g For h M (U (n)) H p (n, ) M (C), or any p Z +. Thereore, Lie algebra homology groups H p (n, ) o U (g)- modules have the structure o U (h)-modules. Theorem 1.2 Let V be an object in M (U (g)). Let z Z (g) be an element which annihilates V. Then γ(z) annihilates H p (n,v ), p Z +. Proo. Let z Z (g). Let
4 4 Dragan Miličić... P n... P 1 P 0 V 0 be a projective resolution o V in M (U (g)). Multiplication by z gives the ollowing commutative diagram:... P n... P 1 P 0 0 z z z... P n... P 1 P 0 0 We can interpret this diagram as a morphism ψ : P P o complexes o U (h)- modules. Applying the unctor F we get the diagram... F(P n )... F(P 1 ) F(P 0 ) 0 F(z) F(z) F(z)... F(P n )... F(P 1 ) F(P 0 ) 0 representing F(ψ ), where F(z) is the multiplication by γ(z). Now, assume that z Z (g) annihilates V. Then we have H 0 (ψ ) = 0. It ollows that ψ is homotopic to 0. This in turn implies that F(ψ ) is homotopic to 0. Hence, the multiplication by γ(z) on F(P ) is homotopic to zero. Thereore, the multiplication by γ(z) annihilates the cohomology groups o the complex F(P ), i.e., γ(z) H p (n,v ) = 0 or p Z +. 2 Centers o derived categories 2.1 Center o an additive category Let A be an additive category. This implies that or any object V in A, all its endomorphisms orm a ring End(V ) with identity id V. An endomorphism z o the identity unctor on A is an assignment to each object U in A o an endomorphism z U o U such that or any two objects U and V in A and any morphism ϕ : U V we have z V ϕ = ϕ z U. Lemma 2.1 Let z be an endomorphism o the identity unctor on A and V an object in A. Then z V is in the center o the ring End(V ). Proo. Let e : V V be an endomorphism o V. Then, z V e = e z V, i.e., z V commutes with e. This implies that z V is in the center o End(V ). All endomorphisms o the identity unctor on A orm a commutative ring with identity which is called the center Z(A ) o A. Let B be the ull additive subcategory o A. Then, by restriction, any element o the center o A determines an element o the center o B. Clearly, the induced map
5 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme 5 r : Z(A ) Z(B) is a ring homomorphism. I the inclusion unctor B A is an equivalence o categories, the morphism o centers is an isomorphism. Let U and V be two objects in A. Then the center Z(A ) acts naturally on Hom(U,V ) by z(ϕ) = z V ϕ = ϕ z U or z Z(A ). Thereore, Hom(U,V ) has a natural structure o a Z(A )-module. Clearly, in this way Hom(, ) becomes a biunctor rom A A into the category o Z(A )-modules. 1 Assume that C is a triangulated category and T its translation unctor. Let z be an element o the center o C. Let U and V be two objects in C and ϕ : U V a morphism. Then T 1 (ϕ) : T 1 (U) T 1 (V ) is a morphism and we have By applying T to this equality we get z T 1 (V ) T 1 (ϕ) = T 1 (ϕ) z T 1 (U). T (z T 1 (V ) ) ϕ = ϕ T (z T 1 (U) ). Since ϕ : U V is arbitrary, we conclude that the assignment U T (z T 1 (U) ) is an element o the center o A, which we denote by T (z). It ollows that T induces an automorphism o the center Z(C ) o C. The elements o the center Z(C ) ixed by this automorphisms orm a subring with identity which we call the t-center o C and denote by Z 0 (C ). Let W U h [1] g V be a distinguished triangle in C and z an element o the t-center Z 0 (C ) o C. Clearly, since z is in the center, we have the commutative diagram U V g W z U z V z W. U V g Moreover, since z is in the t-center o C, we have T (z U ) = z T (U) and the diagram W 1 A is the category opposite to A.
6 6 Dragan Miličić W h T (U) z W T (z U ) W h T (U) commutes. Thereore, U V g W h T (U) z U z V z W T (z U ) U V g W h T (U) is an endomorphism o the above distinguished triangle. It ollows that the elements o the t-center induce endomorphisms o distinguished triangles in C. Let X be another object o C. The above remark implies that the distinguished triangle determines long exact sequences and Hom(X,U) Hom(X,V ) Hom(X,W) Hom(X,T (U))... Hom(T (U),X) Hom(W,X) Hom(V,X) Hom(U,X)... o Z 0 (C )-modules. 2.2 Center o a derived category Let C (A ) (where is b, +, or nothing, respectively) be the category o (bounded, bounded rom below, bounded rom above or unbounded) complexes o objects o A. Then C (A ) is also an additive category. Let z be an element o the center o A. I... V 0 V 1... V n... is an object in C (A ), we get the commutative diagram... V 0 V 1... V n... z V 0 z V 1 z V n... V 0 V 1... V n... which we can interpret as an endomorphism z V o V.
7 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme 7 Let ϕ : U V be a morphism in C (A ). Then z V p ϕ p = ϕ p z U p or any p Z, i.e., z V ϕ = ϕ z U. Thereore, the assignment V z V deines an element C (z) o the center o C (A ). Moreover, we have the ollowing trivial observation. Lemma 2.2 The map z C (z) deines a homomorphism o the center Z(A ) o A into the center Z(C (A )) o C (A ). Let K (A ) be the corresponding homotopic category o complexes. Let [z V ] be the homotopy class o endomorphism z V o V in C (A ). Then it deines an endomorphism o V in K (A ). Clearly, the assignment V [z V ] is an endomorphism K (z) o the identity unctor in K (A ). Moreover, the category K (A ) is triangulated and the translation unctor is given by T (U ) p = U p+1 or any p Z or any object U in K (A ). I a morphism ϕ : U V is the homotopy class o a morphism o complexes : U V, the morphism T (ϕ) : T (U ) T (V ) is the homotopy class o the morphism o complexes given by p+1 : T (U ) p T (V ) p or p Z. This immediately implies that T ([z U ]) = [z T (U )] or any element z o the center o A. It ollows that K (z) is in the t-center Z 0 (K (A )) o K (A ). Thereore, we have the ollowing observation. Lemma 2.3 The map z K (z) deines a homomorphism o the center Z(A ) o A into the t-center Z 0 (K (A )) o K (A ). Finally, assume that A is an abelian category and let D (A ) be the corresponding derived category o A, i.e., the localization o K (A ) with respect to all quasiisomorphisms. Clearly, or any z Z(A ), [z V ] determines an endomorphism [[z V ]] o V in D (A ). Let U and V be two complexes in D (A ) and ϕ : U V a morphism o U into V in D (A ). We can represent ϕ by a roo (see, or example [4]): s U V where s : U is a quasiisomorphism and : V is a morphism in K (A ). On the other hand, [[z U ]] and [[z V ]] are represented by roos id U U [z U ] U U and V id U [z V ] V V.
8 8 Dragan Miličić To calculate the composition [[z V ]] ϕ we consider the composition diagram s id W id V V [z V ] U V V which obviously commutes. This implies that the composition is represented by the roo s [z V ] U V. Analogously, to calculate ϕ [[z U ]] we consider the composition diagram id U U s [z U ] s [z W ] U U V which commutes since K (z) is in the center o K (A ). This implies that the composition is represented by the roo s [z W ] U V. Since [z ] = [z V ], these two roos are identical and [[z V ]] ϕ = ϕ [[z V ]]. Hence, the assignment V [[z V ]] deines an element o the t-center Z 0 (D (A )) o D (A ) which we denote by D (z). Moreover, we have the ollowing result. Lemma 2.4 The map z D (z) deines an injective morphism o the center Z(A ) o A into the t-center Z 0 (D (A )) o D (A ). For any z Z(A ), we have H p ([[z V ]]) = z H p (V ) or any V in D (A ) and any p Z. Proo. The second statement ollows immediately rom the construction.
9 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme 9 To prove injectivity, assume that D (z) = 0 or some z Z(A ). For an object V in A, denote by D(V ) the complex such that D(V ) 0 = V and D(V ) p = 0 or p 0. By our assumption, we have [[z D(V ) ]] = 0. This implies that z V = H 0 ([[z D(V ) ]]) = 0. Thereore, z V = 0 or any V in A, i.e., z = 0. Let z be an element o the t-center Z 0 (D (A )) o D (A ). Then H p+1 (z U ) = H p (T (z U )) = H p (z T (U )) or any object U in D (A ) and p Z. Thereore, H 0 (z U ) = 0 or all objects U in D (A ) is equivalent to H p (z U ) = 0 or all objects U in D (A ) and p Z. In particular, I 0 (D (A )) = {z Z 0 (D (A )) H p (z U ) = 0 or all U in D (A ) and p Z} = {z Z 0 (D (A )) H 0 (z U ) = 0 or all U in D (A )} is an ideal in Z 0 (D (A )). On the other hand, let D : A D (A ) be the unctor which attaches to each object V in A the complex D(V ), such that D(V ) 0 = V and D(V ) p = 0 or all p 0. This unctor is an isomorphism o A onto the ull additive subcategory o D (A ) consisting o all complexes U such that U p = 0 or all p 0 [4]. Thereore, we have a natural homomorphism r o Z(D (A )) into Z(A ) which attaches to an element z o the center o D (A ) the element o the center o A given by V H 0 (z D(V ) ) or any V in A. In particular, we have a natural homomorphism r : Z 0 (D (A )) Z(A ). From 2.4, we see that r(d (z)) V = H 0 (D (z) D(V ) ) = H 0 ([[z D(V ) ]]) = z V or any z in the center o A and any V in A. Thereore, we have the ollowing result. Proposition 2.5 The natural homomorphism r : Z 0 (D (A )) Z(A ) is a let inverse o the homomorphism D : Z(A ) Z 0 (D (A )). In particular, it is surjective. Its kernel is the ideal I 0 (D (A )). The situation is particularly nice or bounded derived categories. 2 Proposition 2.6 The natural homomorphism r : Z 0 (D b (A )) Z(A ) is an isomorphism. Proo. We have to prove that I 0 (D b (A )) = 0. Let z be an element o I 0 (D b (A )). Clearly, or any object V in A, we have z D(V ) = 0. Moreover, since z is in the t-center, z T p (D(V )) = 0 or any p Z. 2 I do not know any example where this result ails in unbounded case.
10 10 Dragan Miličić For any object U in D b (A ) we put l(u ) = Card{p Z H p (U ) 0}, and call l(u ) the cohomological length o U. Now we want to prove that z U = 0 or all U in D b (A ). The proo is by induction in the cohomological length l(u ). I l(u ) = 0, U = 0 and z U = 0. I l(u ) = 1, there exists p Z such that H q (U ) = 0 or all q p. In this case, U is isomorphic to the complex which is zero in all degrees q p and in degree p is equal to H p (U ), i.e., to T p (D(H p (U ))). Hence, by the above remark, z U = 0. Assume now that l(u ) > 1. Let τ p and τ p be the usual truncation unctors [4]. Then, or any p Z, we have the truncation distinguished triangle τ p+1 (U ) [1] τ p (U ) U and by choosing a right p Z, we have l(τ p (U )) < l(u ) and l(τ p+1 (U )) < l(u ). Thereore, by the induction assumption, there exists p Z such that z τ p (U ) = 0 and z τ p+1 (U ) = 0. As we remarked beore, this distinguished triangle leads to the long exact sequence Hom(U,τ p (U )) Hom(U,U ) Hom(U,τ p+1 (U ))... o Z 0 (D b (A ))-modules. By our construction, z annihilates the irst and third module. Thereore, it must annihilate Hom(U,U ) too. This implies that 0 = z(id U ) = id U z U = z U. 3 Centers and derived unctors 3.1 Homogeneous unctors Let A and B be two abelian categories. Let R be a commutative ring with identity and α : R Z(A ) and β : R Z(B) ring morphisms o rings with identity. By 2.4, α and β deine ring morphisms α = D α : R Z 0 (D (A )) and β = D β : R Z 0 (D (B)) Let F : A B be an additive unctor. We say that F is R-homogeneous i or any r R we have
11 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme 11 β(r) F(V ) = F(α(r) V ) or any object V in A. Assume now that F is let exact. Assume that there exists a subcategory R o A right adapted to F [4, ch. III, 6, no. 3] 3. Then F has the right derived unctor RF : D + (A ) D + (B). Theorem 3.1 The unctor RF : D + (A ) D + (B) is R-homogeneous. Proo. Let V be a complex in D + (A ). Since R is right adapted to F, there exists a bounded rom below complex R consisting o objects in R and a quasiisomorphism q : V R. Let z be an element o the center o A. Then we have the commutative diagram V q R [[z V ]] [[z R ]]. V R q By applying the unctor RF to it, we get the diagram RF([[z V ]]) RF(q) RF(V ) F(R ) [[F(z) F(R ) ]] RF(V ) RF(q) F(R ). I r R, α(r) is in the center o A and the above diagram implies that RF([[α(r) V ]]) RF(V ) RF(q) F(R ) [[β(r) F(R ) ]] RF(V ) RF(q) F(R ) is commutative. Moreover, β(r) is in the center o B, hence we also have [[β(r) RF(V )]] RF(q) RF(V ) F(R ) [[β(r) F(R ) ]] RF(V ) RF(q) F(R ). Hence, we conclude that RF([[α(r) V ]]) = [[β(r) RF(V )]], i.e., RF is R-homogeneous. 3 I would preer a proo o the next theorem which doesn t use the construction o the derived unctor, but its universal property. Unortunately, I do not know such argument.
12 12 Dragan Miličić Let V be an object in A. Then By taking cohomology, we get β(r) RF(D(V )) = RF(α(r) D(V ) ) or any r R. β(r) R p F(V ) = H p (β(r) RF(D(V )) ) = R p F(α(r) V ) or any r R and p Z +. Thereore, we have the ollowing consequence. Corollary 3.2 The unctors R p F : A B are R-homogeneous. We leave to the reader the ormulation and proos o the analogous results or a right exact unctor F and its let derived unctor LF : D (A ) D (B). 3.2 Special cases Now we are going to illustrate how 1.1 and 1.2 ollow rom the above discussion. First, we prove a well-known result about the center o the category o modules. This is not necessary or our applications, but puts the constructions in a proper perspective. Let A be a ring with identity and Z its center. Let M (A) be the category o A- modules. Any element z in Z determines an endomorphism z U o an A-module U. Clearly, the assignment U z U deines an element o the center Z(M (A)) o M (A). Thereore, we have a natural homomorphism i : Z Z(M (A)) o rings. Lemma 3.3 The morphism i : Z Z(M (A)) is an isomorphism. Proo. I we consider A as an A-module or the let multiplication, we see that i(z) A is the multiplication by z or any z Z. Thereore, i(z) A (1) = z and i : Z Z(M (A)) is injective. Let ζ be an element o the center o A. Then ζ A is an endomorphism o A considered as A-module or let multiplication. Let z = ζ A (1). Then ζ A (a) = aζ A (1) = az or any a A. Moreover, any b A deines an endomorphism ϕ b o A given by ϕ b (a) = ab or all a A. Since we must have ζ A ϕ b = ϕ b ζ A, it ollows that bz = (ζ A ϕ b )(1) = (ϕ b ζ A )(1) = zb. Since b A is arbitrary, z must be in the center Z o A. Let M be an arbitrary A-module and m M. Then m determines a module morphism ψ m : A M given by ψ m (a) = am or any a A. Thereore, ζ M (m) = (ζ M ψ m )(1) = (ψ m ζ A )(1) = zm = i(z) M m.
13 Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme 13 Hence ζ = i(z), and i is surjective. Now we return to the notation rom the irst section. By 3.3, the center o the category M (U (g)) is isomorphic to Z (g). First we discuss 1.1. The unctor F = Hom U (g) (U, ) is a unctor rom the category U (g) into the category o Z (g)-modules. I we deine α as the natural morphism o Z (g) into the center o M (U (g)) and β as multiplication by χ U (z), F is clearly Z (g)-homogeneous. This implies that the unctors R p F are Z (g)- homogeneous. Hence, or any V in M (U (g)) we have R p F(z V ) = χ U (z) or all p Z +. In, particular, i z ker χ V we have 0 = R p F(0) = R p F(z V ) = χ U (z). This clearly contradicts χ U χ V i Ext p (U,V ) 0 or some p Z. U (g) No we discuss 1.2. The unctor F = H 0 (n, ) is a unctor rom the category U (g) into the category o Z (g)-modules. I we deine α as the natural morphism o Z (g) into the center o M (U (g)) and β as the composition o the Harish-Chandra homomorphism with the natural morphism o U (h) into the center o M (U (h)), F is clearly Z (g)-homogeneous. This implies that the unctors L p F are Z (g)- homogeneous. Hence or any V in M (U (g)), we have L p F(z V ) = γ(z) Lp F(V ) or all p Z +. In, particular, i z annihilates V, γ(z) annihilates L p F(V ) = H p (n,v ) or all p Z. Reerences 1. A. Borel and N. Wallach, Continuous cohomology, discrete subgroups, and representations o reductive groups, second ed., Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 67, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, Nicolas Bourbaki, Groupes et algèbres de Lie, Hermann, William Casselman and M. Scott Osborne, The n-cohomology o representations with an ininitesimal character, Compositio Math. 31 (1975), no. 2, Sergei I. Geland and Yuri I. Manin, Methods o homological algebra, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Anthony W. Knapp and David A. Vogan, Jr., Cohomological induction and unitary representations, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 45, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995.
ON DEGENERATION OF THE SPECTRAL SEQUENCE FOR THE COMPOSITION OF ZUCKERMAN FUNCTORS
ON DEGENERATION OF THE SPECTRAL SEQUENCE FOR THE COMPOSITION OF ZUCKERMAN FUNCTORS Dragan Miličić and Pavle Pandžić Department of Mathematics, University of Utah Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts
More informationDescent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014
Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014 We treat two eatures o the étale site: descent o morphisms and descent o quasi-coherent sheaves. All will also be true on the larger pp and
More informationA NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space.
A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space. DIETER HAPPEL AND DAN ZACHARIA Abstract. Let P n be the projective n space over the complex numbers. In this note we show that an indecomposable
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationNOTES ON BASIC HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 0 L M N 0
NOTES ON BASIC HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA ANDREW BAKER 1. Chain complexes and their homology Let R be a ring and Mod R the category of right R-modules; a very similar discussion can be had for the category of
More informationHSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS
HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS MICHAEL BARR Abstract. Given a triple T on a complete category C and a actorization system E /M on the category o algebras, we show there is a 1-1 correspondence
More informationMath 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)
Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does
More informationA Primer on Homological Algebra
A Primer on Homological Algebra Henry Y Chan July 12, 213 1 Modules For people who have taken the algebra sequence, you can pretty much skip the first section Before telling you what a module is, you probably
More informationSTABLE MODULE THEORY WITH KERNELS
Math. J. Okayama Univ. 43(21), 31 41 STABLE MODULE THEORY WITH KERNELS Kiriko KATO 1. Introduction Auslander and Bridger introduced the notion of projective stabilization mod R of a category of finite
More informationMath 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications
Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle
More information1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.
MacLane: Categories or Working Mathematician 1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transormations 1.1 Axioms or Categories 1.2 Categories Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an
More informationLie Algebra Cohomology
Lie Algebra Cohomology Carsten Liese 1 Chain Complexes Definition 1.1. A chain complex (C, d) of R-modules is a family {C n } n Z of R-modules, together with R-modul maps d n : C n C n 1 such that d d
More informationThe Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!
The Cliord algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach detailed version 1 Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 3 June 2016. Not prooread! 1. Introduction: the Cliord algebra The theory o the Cliord
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationLECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY
LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY In this lecture we want to cover some basic concepts from homological algebra. These prove to be very helpful in our discussion of singular homology. The following
More informationMATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 23
MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA 23 6.4. Homotopy uniqueness of projective resolutions. Here I proved that the projective resolution of any R-module (or any object of an abelian category
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS Your Name: Conventions: all rings and algebras are assumed to be unital. Part I. True or false? If true provide a brief explanation, if false provide a counterexample
More informationTCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions)
TCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions) David Loeffler, d.a.loeffler@warwick.ac.uk 30th November 2016 This is the third of 4 problem sheets. Solutions should be submitted to me (via any appropriate
More informationIn the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.
Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by
More informationKazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups
Kazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups Binyong Sun (Joint with Jing-Song Huang) Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science Chinese Academy of Sciences IMS, NUS March 28, 2016 Contents
More informationEXT, TOR AND THE UCT
EXT, TOR AND THE UCT CHRIS KOTTKE Contents 1. Left/right exact functors 1 2. Projective resolutions 2 3. Two useful lemmas 3 4. Ext 6 5. Ext as a covariant derived functor 8 6. Universal Coefficient Theorem
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationRepresentation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi
Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions
More informationTHE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY
THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, DAVID A. JORGENSEN & STEFFEN OPPERMANN Dedicated to Ranar-Ola Buchweitz on the occasion o his sixtieth birthday Abstract. We consider the homotopy cateory
More informationFormal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings
Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely
More informationHungry, Hungry Homology
September 27, 2017 Motiving Problem: Algebra Problem (Preliminary Version) Given two groups A, C, does there exist a group E so that A E and E /A = C? If such an group exists, we call E an extension of
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.
INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7. 7. Killing form. Nilpotent Lie algebras 7.1. Killing form. 7.1.1. Let L be a Lie algebra over a field k and let ρ : L gl(v ) be a finite dimensional L-module. Define
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.
More informationLie algebra cohomology
Lie algebra cohomology November 16, 2018 1 History Citing [1]: In mathematics, Lie algebra cohomology is a cohomology theory for Lie algebras. It was first introduced in 1929 by Élie Cartan to study the
More informationand this makes M into an R-module by (1.2). 2
1. Modules Definition 1.1. Let R be a commutative ring. A module over R is set M together with a binary operation, denoted +, which makes M into an abelian group, with 0 as the identity element, together
More informationSEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the
More informationOn the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem
On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationA TALE OF TWO FUNCTORS. Marc Culler. 1. Hom and Tensor
A TALE OF TWO FUNCTORS Marc Culler 1. Hom and Tensor It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of covariance, it was the age of contravariance, it was the epoch of homology, it
More informationTHE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C)
THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1. summary Given a reductive Lie algebra g and choice of Cartan subalgebra h, the Harish- Chandra map gives an isomorphism between the center z of
More informationGeneralized Alexander duality and applications. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 38(2) P.469-P.485
Title Generalized Alexander duality and applications Author(s) Romer, Tim Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 38(2) P.469-P.485 Issue Date 2001-06 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/10.18910/4757
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationTHE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE
THE SNIL LEMM ENRICO M. VITLE STRCT. The classical snake lemma produces a six terms exact sequence starting rom a commutative square with one o the edge being a regular epimorphism. We establish a new
More informationMath 248B. Base change morphisms
Math 248B. Base change morphisms 1. Motivation A basic operation with shea cohomology is pullback. For a continuous map o topological spaces : X X and an abelian shea F on X with (topological) pullback
More informationCategories and Natural Transformations
Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical
More informationDe Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)
II. De Rham Cohomology There is an obvious similarity between the condition d o q 1 d q = 0 for the differentials in a singular chain complex and the condition d[q] o d[q 1] = 0 which is satisfied by the
More informationSECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS
SECTION 5: EILENBERG ZILBER EQUIVALENCES AND THE KÜNNETH THEOREMS In this section we will prove the Künneth theorem which in principle allows us to calculate the (co)homology of product spaces as soon
More informationLECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES DMYTRO MATVIEIEVSKYI Abstract. These are notes for a talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Graduate Student Seminar on category O and Soergel bimodules,
More information7.3 Singular Homology Groups
184 CHAPTER 7. HOMOLOGY THEORY 7.3 Singular Homology Groups 7.3.1 Cycles, Boundaries and Homology Groups We can define the singular p-chains with coefficients in a field K. Furthermore, we can define the
More informationDERIVED CATEGORIES OF STACKS. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Conventions, notation, and abuse of language The lisse-étale and the flat-fppf sites
DERIVED CATEGORIES OF STACKS Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Conventions, notation, and abuse of language 1 3. The lisse-étale and the flat-fppf sites 1 4. Derived categories of quasi-coherent modules 5
More informationBLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More informationReducibility of generic unipotent standard modules
Journal of Lie Theory Volume?? (??)???? c?? Heldermann Verlag 1 Version of March 10, 011 Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules Dan Barbasch and Dan Ciubotaru Abstract. Using Lusztig s geometric
More informationarxiv: v4 [math.rt] 14 Jun 2016
TWO HOMOLOGICAL PROOFS OF THE NOETHERIANITY OF FI G LIPING LI arxiv:163.4552v4 [math.rt] 14 Jun 216 Abstract. We give two homological proofs of the Noetherianity of the category F I, a fundamental result
More informationMATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA
MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to
More informationKOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS II. STANDARDLY STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS
KOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS II. STANDARDLY STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK Abstract. We give a complete picture of the interaction between the Koszul and Ringel dualities for graded
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationNOTES ON CHAIN COMPLEXES
NOTES ON CHAIN COMPLEXES ANDEW BAKE These notes are intended as a very basic introduction to (co)chain complexes and their algebra, the intention being to point the beginner at some of the main ideas which
More informationCategory Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond
Category Theory Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, 2010 Typset by Cathal Ormond Contents 1 Types, Composition and Identities 3 1.1 Programs..................................... 3 1.2 Functional Laws.................................
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS
VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where
More informationClassification of effective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4
Classiication o eective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4 Shintarô Kuroki Department o Applied Mathematics, Faculty o Science, Okayama Uniervsity o Science, 1-1 Ridai-cho Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005,
More informationNew York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group
New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 1 (1995) 196 205. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group D. J. Benson Abstract. In this paper, we prove the conjectures made in
More informationVALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN
VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not
More informationRepresentations of semisimple Lie algebras
Chapter 14 Representations of semisimple Lie algebras In this chapter we study a special type of representations of semisimple Lie algberas: the so called highest weight representations. In particular
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9 1. Jordan-Hölder theorem and indecomposable modules Let M be a module satisfying ascending and descending chain conditions (ACC and DCC). In other words every increasing sequence
More informationA Leibniz Algebra Structure on the Second Tensor Power
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 12 (2002) 583 596 c 2002 Heldermann Verlag A Leibniz Algebra Structure on the Second Tensor Power R. Kurdiani and T. Pirashvili Communicated by K.-H. Neeb Abstract. For any
More informationTRIANGULATED CATEGORIES, SUMMER SEMESTER 2012
TRIANGULATED CATEGORIES, SUMMER SEMESTER 2012 P. SOSNA Contents 1. Triangulated categories and functors 2 2. A first example: The homotopy category 8 3. Localization and the derived category 12 4. Derived
More informationHomotopy, Quasi-Isomorphism, and Coinvariants
LECTURE 10 Homotopy, Quasi-Isomorphism, an Coinvariants Please note that proos o many o the claims in this lecture are let to Problem Set 5. Recall that a sequence o abelian groups with ierential is a
More informationCohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra
Cohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra John H. Palmieri Department of Mathematics University of Washington WCATSS, 27 August 2011 Cohomology operations cohomology operations = NatTransf(H n ( ;
More informationLECTURE IV: PERFECT PRISMS AND PERFECTOID RINGS
LECTURE IV: PERFECT PRISMS AND PERFECTOID RINGS In this lecture, we study the commutative algebra properties of perfect prisms. These turn out to be equivalent to perfectoid rings, and most of the lecture
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More information3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection
3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection is called the objects of C and is denoted Obj(C). Given
More informationPacific Journal of Mathematics
Pacific Journal of Mathematics PICARD VESSIOT EXTENSIONS WITH SPECIFIED GALOIS GROUP TED CHINBURG, LOURDES JUAN AND ANDY R. MAGID Volume 243 No. 2 December 2009 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 243,
More informationKOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS I. QUASI-HEREDITARY ALGEBRAS
KOSZUL DUALITY FOR STRATIFIED ALGEBRAS I. QUASI-HEREDITARY ALGEBRAS VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK Abstract. We give a complete picture of the interaction between Koszul and Ringel dualities for quasi-hereditary
More information132 C. L. Schochet with exact rows in some abelian category. 2 asserts that there is a morphism :Ker( )! Cok( ) The Snake Lemma (cf. [Mac, page5]) whi
New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 5 (1999) 131{137. The Topological Snake Lemma and Corona Algebras C. L. Schochet Abstract. We establish versions of the Snake Lemma from homological algebra
More informationON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT
ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT HUNG YEAN LOKE AND GORDAN SAVIN Abstract. Let g = k s be a Cartan decomposition of a simple complex Lie algebra corresponding to
More informationDETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS
DETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS EDWARD T. CLINE, BRIAN J. PARSHALL AND LEONARD L. SCOTT Let G be a connected, semisimple algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field k of
More informationMinimal Cell Structures for G-CW Complexes
Minimal Cell Structures for G-CW Complexes UROP+ Final Paper, Summer 2016 Yutao Liu Mentor: Siddharth Venkatesh Project suggested by: Haynes Miller August 31, 2016 Abstract: In this paper, we consider
More informationCritical Groups of Graphs with Dihedral Symmetry
Critical Groups of Graphs with Dihedral Symmetry Will Dana, David Jekel August 13, 2017 1 Introduction We will consider the critical group of a graph Γ with an action by the dihedral group D n. After defining
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004
arxiv:math/0410162v1 [math.at] 6 Oct 2004 EQUIVARIANT UNIVERSAL COEFFICIENT AND KÜNNETH SPECTRAL SEQUENCES L. GAUNCE LEWIS, JR. AND MICHAEL A. MANDELL Abstract. We construct hyper-homology spectral sequences
More informationLecture 4 Super Lie groups
Lecture 4 Super Lie groups In this lecture we want to take a closer look to supermanifolds with a group structure: Lie supergroups or super Lie groups. As in the ordinary setting, a super Lie group is
More informationTwisted Harish-Chandra sheaves and Whittaker modules: The nondegenerate case
Twisted Harish-Chandra sheaves and Whittaker modules: The nondegenerate case Dragan Miličić and Wolfgang Soergel Introduction Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra, U (g) its enveloping algebra and
More informationOn the modular curve X 0 (23)
On the modular curve X 0 (23) René Schoof Abstract. The Jacobian J 0(23) of the modular curve X 0(23) is a semi-stable abelian variety over Q with good reduction outside 23. It is simple. We prove that
More informationWIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES
WIDE SUBCATEGORIES OF d-cluster TILTING SUBCATEGORIES MARTIN HERSCHEND, PETER JØRGENSEN, AND LAERTIS VASO Abstract. A subcategory of an abelian category is wide if it is closed under sums, summands, kernels,
More informationCLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6
CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6 BERTRAND GUILLOU 1. Mon, Feb. 21 Note that since we have C() = X A C (A) and the inclusion A C (A) at time 0 is a coibration, it ollows that the pushout map i
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationAzumaya Algebras. Dennis Presotto. November 4, Introduction: Central Simple Algebras
Azumaya Algebras Dennis Presotto November 4, 2015 1 Introduction: Central Simple Algebras Azumaya algebras are introduced as generalized or global versions of central simple algebras. So the first part
More informationActa Acad. Paed. Agriensis, Sectio Mathematicae 28 (2001) THE LIE AUGMENTATION TERMINALS OF GROUPS. Bertalan Király (Eger, Hungary)
Acta Acad. Paed. Agriensis, Sectio Mathematicae 28 (2001) 93 97 THE LIE AUGMENTATION TERMINALS OF GROUPS Bertalan Király (Eger, Hungary) Abstract. In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions
More informationTangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007
Tangent Categories David M Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble September 5, 2007 Abstract For any n-category C we consider the sub-n-category T C C 2 o squares in C with pinned let boundary This resolves
More informationPERIODS OF PRINCIPAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES OF ALGEBRAIC TORI
PERIODS OF PRINCIPAL HOMOGENEOUS SPACES OF ALGEBRAIC TORI A. S. MERKURJEV Abstract. A generic torsor of an algebraic torus S over a field F is the generic fiber of a S-torsor P T, where P is a quasi-trivial
More informationz Y X } X X } X = {z X + z
THE CENTER OF THE CATEGORY OF (g, ) MODULES GORAN MUIĆ AND GORDAN SAVIN 1. Introduction Let A be an Abelian category. We write Obj(A) for the collection of all objects of A. If X, Y are the objects of
More informationON sfp-injective AND sfp-flat MODULES
Gulf Journal of Mathematics Vol 5, Issue 3 (2017) 79-90 ON sfp-injective AND sfp-flat MODULES C. SELVARAJ 1 AND P. PRABAKARAN 2 Abstract. Let R be a ring. A left R-module M is said to be sfp-injective
More informationDirect Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013
Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry
More informationJournal of Pure and Applied Algebra
Journal o Pure and Applied Algebra () 9 9 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal o Pure and Applied Algebra journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jpaa When the heart o a aithul torsion pair
More information9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence
9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence 9.1. The functor Lie. The fundamental theorems of Lie concern the correspondence G Lie(G). The work of Lie was essentially local and led to the following fundamental
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationMath 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen
Math 530 Lecture Notes Xi Chen 632 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail address: xichen@math.ualberta.ca 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary
More informationGENERALIZED MORPHIC RINGS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS. Haiyan Zhu and Nanqing Ding Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Communications in Algebra, 35: 2820 2837, 2007 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0092-7872 print/1532-4125 online DOI: 10.1080/00927870701354017 GENERALIZED MORPHIC RINGS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
More informationThus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.
1.51. The distinguished invertible object. Let C be a finite tensor category with classes of simple objects labeled by a set I. Since duals to projective objects are projective, we can define a map D :
More informationON RIGIDITY OF ALGEBRAIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS
ON RIGIDITY OF ALGEBRAIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS ALEX CLARK AND ROBBERT FOKKINK Abstract. We study topological rigidity of algebraic dynamical systems. In the first part of this paper we give an algebraic condition
More informationCharacters and triangle generation of the simple Mathieu group M 11
SEMESTER PROJECT Characters and triangle generation of the simple Mathieu group M 11 Under the supervision of Prof. Donna Testerman Dr. Claude Marion Student: Mikaël Cavallin September 11, 2010 Contents
More informationBranching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.
Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.
More informationSupplementary Notes October 13, On the definition of induced representations
On the definition of induced representations 18.758 Supplementary Notes October 13, 2011 1. Introduction. Darij Grinberg asked in class Wednesday about why the definition of induced representation took
More informationNoetherian property of infinite EI categories
Noetherian property of infinite EI categories Wee Liang Gan and Liping Li Abstract. It is known that finitely generated FI-modules over a field of characteristic 0 are Noetherian. We generalize this result
More informationφ(a + b) = φ(a) + φ(b) φ(a b) = φ(a) φ(b),
16. Ring Homomorphisms and Ideals efinition 16.1. Let φ: R S be a function between two rings. We say that φ is a ring homomorphism if for every a and b R, and in addition φ(1) = 1. φ(a + b) = φ(a) + φ(b)
More information