Two Generalizations of Lifting Modules
|
|
- Jean Johnston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 13, Two Generalizations of Lifting Modules Nil Orhan Ertaş Süleyman Demirel University, Department of Mathematics Çünür Isparta, Turkey Rachid Tribak Département de mathématiques Faculté des sciences de Tétouan B.P Tétouan, Morocco Abstract In this paper we introduce the notions of G 1 L-modules and G 2 L- modules which are two proper generalizations of lifting modules. Then we give some characterizations and properties of these modules. We also show that these two classes of modules are not closed under direct sums. Some special cases of direct sums of these modules are studied. Moreover, Harada rings are characterized by using G 1 L-modules. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 13C05; 16D50; 16D80 Key words: lifting modules, cosingular modules, small modules 1 Introduction Throughout this paper all rings have identity and all modules are unital right modules. Let R be a ring and M an R-module. A submodule S of M is called a small submodule (notation S M) if M S + T for any proper submodule T of M. In [5], Leonard defined a module M to be small if it is a small submodule of some R-module. He showed that a module M is small if and only if M is small in its injective hull. Let N be a submodule of M. The module M is called a lifting module if for every submodule A of M there exists a direct summand B of M such that B A and A/B M/B. In [10],
2 600 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak Talebi and Vanaja defined Z(M) = {U M M/U is small}. If Z(M) = 0 ( Z(M) = M), then M is called a cosingular (non-cosingular) module. Let X be a class of modules. Adopting the notation of [1], we denote by d*x the class of modules M such that each submodule N of M contains a direct summand K of M such that the factor module N/K belongs to X. Some general properties of the class d*x are given in [1]. Moreover, some properties of d*x have been studied in various special cases (see e.g. [1] and [8]). Our purpose is to study some properties of d*x for two special classes X of modules. In the first section we prove that if X is a class of modules closed under submodules, then the direct sum of two projective modules in d*x is also in d*x. In Section 3, we consider X 1 the class of small modules. For X 1, we associate the class d*x 1 with the property G 1 L. A module M is a G 1 L-module, if for every submodule N of M, there exists a direct summand K of M such that K is contained in N and the factor N/K is a small module. It is shown that the calss of G 1 L-modules is not closed under finite direct sums. In Theorem 3.9 we characterize Harada rings. In Section 4, for X 2 the class of cosingular modules, we associate the class d*x 2 with the property G 2 L. A module M is a G 2 L-module, if for every submodule N of M, there exists a direct summand K of M such that K is contained in N and the factor N/K is a cosingular module. We prove that every torsion-free Z-module is G 2 L. It is also proved that every R-module is G 2 L if and only if every R-module is a direct sum of an injective module and a cosingular module. In Theorem 4.11 we show that if R is a right hereditary ring, then every R-module is G 2 L if and only if Z(M) is injective for every R-module M. It is easily seen that the properties G 1 L and G 2 L are two generalizations of lifting modules and we have the following hierarchy: Lifting G 1 L G 2 L. 2 General Properties Like in [1], we define a class X of R-modules to be any collection of R-modules such that X contains a zero module and any module which is isomorphic to some module in X also belongs to X. A class X is called s-closed if every submodule of a module in X also belongs to X. Proposition 2.1 The following are equivalent for a module M: (i) M is in d*x. (ii) Every submodule A of M can be written as A = N S with N is a direct summand of M and S is in X.
3 Two generalizations of lifting modules 601 (iii) For every submodule A of M there exists a decomposition M = M 1 M 2 such that M 1 A and A M 2 is in X. Proof. Clear. Lemma 2.2 (see [1, Lemma 2.2 (iii)]) If X is any class of modules, then d*x is s-closed. Proposition 2.3 If X is any class of modules, then the following are equivalent: (i) Every R-module is in d*x. (ii) Every injective R-module is in d*x. Proof. By Lemma 2.2 and the fact that every module is contained in an injective module. Proposition 2.4 Let X be any class of modules. If M 1 is a module in d*x and M 2 is a semisimple module, then M = M 1 M 2 is in d*x. Proof. By [1, Proposition 2.3 (ii)]. Theorem 2.5 Let X be an s-closed class of modules such that X is closed under finite direct sums. Let M 1 and M 2 be two modules in d*x such that M i is M j -projective (i, j = 1, 2). Then M = M 1 M 2 belongs to d*x. Proof. Let A be a submodule of M. Consider the submodule M 1 (A + M 2 ) of M 1. Since M 1 is in d*x, there exists a decomposition M 1 = A 1 B 1 such that A 1 M 1 (A + M 2 ) and M 1 (A + M 2 ) B 1 = B 1 (A + M 2 ) belongs to X. Therefore M = M 1 M 2 = A 1 B 1 M 2 = A + (M 2 B 1 ). Since M 2 (A + B 1 ) M 2 and M 2 is in d*x, there exists a decomposition M 2 = A 2 B 2 such that A 2 M 2 (A+B 1 ) and B 2 (M 2 (A+B 1 )) = B 2 (A+B 1 ) belongs to X. Since A 2 A + B 1, we have M = A + B 1 M 2 = A + B 1 B 2. Since M = (A 1 A 2 ) (B 1 B 2 ) and A 1 A 2 is (B 1 B 2 )-projective, there exists A A such that M = A B 1 B 2 by [11, 41.14]. Since B 1 (A + B 2 ) and B 2 (A + B 1 ) are in X, [B 1 (A + B 2 )] [B 2 (A + B 1 )] is in X. But X is s-closed. Then A (B 1 B 2 ) is in X. Hence M is in d*x. Corollary 2.6 Let X be an s-closed class of modules such that X is closed under finite direct sums. Let M 1 and M 2 be two projective modules in d*x. Then M is in d*x.
4 602 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak Proof. By Theorem 2.5. A module M is called a duo module provided every submodule of M is fully invariant. Proposition 2.7 Let X be an s-closed class of modules such that X is closed under finite direct sums. Let M = M 1 M 2 be a duo module such that M 1 and M 2 are two modules in d*x. Then M belongs to d*x. Proof. Let A be a submodule of M. As A is fully invariant we have A = (A M 1 ) (A M 2 ). Since M 1 and M 2 are in d*x, there exist decompositions A M 1 = A 11 A 12 and A M 2 = A 21 A 22, where A 11 is a direct summand of M 1, A 21 is a direct summand of M 2 and A 12 and A 22 are in X. Then A 11 A 21 is a direct summand of M. Moreover, A 12 A 22 is a submodule of M belonging to X. Therefore M belongs to d*x. Proposition 2.8 Let X be an s-closed class of modules such that X is closed under factor modules. Let M be a module which belongs to d*x. (i) If N is a fully invariant submodule of M, then M/N belongs to d*x. (ii) If N be a submodule of M such that the sum of N with any nonzero direct summand of M is a direct summand of M, then M/N is in d*x. Proof. (i) Let A/N be a submodule of M/N. Since M belongs to d*x, there exists a decomposition M = K K such that K A and A/K belongs to X. By [7, Lemma 5.4], M/N = (K + N)/N (K + N)/N. But [A/N]/[(N + K)/N] = [A/K]/[(N + K)/K]. Then [A/N]/[(N + K)/N] belongs to X since X is closed under factor modules. Therefore M/N belongs to d*x. (ii) Let A be a submodule of M such that N A. If A X, then A/N X. Suppose that A X. Since M is in d*x, there exists a nonzero direct summand K of M such that K A and A/K is in X. By assumption, N + K is a direct summand of M. It is clear that (N + K)/N is also a direct summand of M/N. Since [A/K]/[(N + K)/K] = [A/N]/[(N + K)/N], [A/N]/[(N + K)/N] is also in X. It follows that M/N belongs to d*x. Theorem 2.9 Let X be an s-closed class of modules such that X is closed under factor modules. Let M = M 1 M 2 such that M 1 belongs to d*x and M 2 is M 1 -projective. Then M belongs to d*x if and only if for every submodule N of M such that N + M 1 M, there exists a direct summand K of M such that N/K belongs to X.
5 Two generalizations of lifting modules 603 Proof. ( ) Clear. ( ) Let N be a submodule of M such that N + M 1 = M. Since M 2 is M 1 - projective, there exists a submodule N N such that M = N M 1. Since M/N = M1, M/N belongs to d*x. Then there exists a direct summand K/N of M/N such that (N/N )/(K/N ) = N/K belongs to X. Clearly, K is also a direct summand of M. Then M belongs to d*x. 3 G 1 L-Modules A module M is called a G 1 L-module (or G 1 L for short), if for every submodule N of M there exists a direct summand K of M such that K N and N/K is a small R-module. It is clear that lifting modules and small modules are G 1 L. Since the class of small modules is closed under submodules, factor modules and finite direct sums, it follows that all the results of Section 2 are true for G 1 L-modules. Examples 3.1 (1) Let R be a commutative domain. Harada proved ([4, Theorem 2]) that the module R R is small. Therefore R R is a G 1 L-module. In particular, Z Z is a G 1 L-module. On the other hand, it is clear that Z Z is not lifting. (2) Let R be a Dedekind domain. Since every injective R-module is radical, every finitely generated R-module is small. Thus every finitely generated R- module is G 1 L. (3) Let M denote the Z-module Z/2Z Z/8Z. Then M is a G 1 L-module by (2). On the other hand, M is not lifting by [2, Example 22.5]. (4) It is easily seen from Proposition 2.4 that any module which is a direct sum of a semisimple module and a G 1 L-module is G 1 L. Then for every prime numbers p and q, the Z-module M = Z(p ) Z/qZ is a G 1 L-module. Note that M is neither lifting nor small. The following example shows that the condition M i is M j -projective (i, j = 1, 2) is not necessary in Theorem 2.5. Example 3.2 Let R be a commutative noetherian local ring with maximal ideal m and let I be an ideal of R such that I m and the ring R/I is a local ring with exactly one additional prime ideal, p/i, and such that the integral closure of R/p is also local. Consider the R-module M = R/m (R/I) p with (R/I) p is the total quotient ring of R/I (e.g. if R is a discrete valuation ring and p = I = 0, then (R/I) p = Q(R) the quotient field of R). It is clear by [6, Proposition 5.10] that (R/I) p is a hollow module. So it is a G 1 L-module. By
6 604 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak Proposition 2.4, M is a G 1 L-module. On the other hand, by [6, Proposition 5.10 and Lemma 5.11], R/m and (R/I) p are not relatively projective. Proposition 3.3 An indecomposable module M is G 1 L if and only if every proper submodule of M is a small module. Proof. Clear. A submodule L M is called coclosed in M, if for any proper submodule K L, there is a submodule N of M such that L + N = M but K + N M. A module M is called weakly injective if for every extension X of M, M is coclosed in X. It is known that every factor module of M is weakly injective if and only if M is non-cosingular (see [12]). Proposition 3.4 The following are equivalent for a weakly injective module M: (i) M is a G 1 L-module. (ii) M is lifting. Proof. By Proposition 2.1 and [2, 3.7(3) and 22.3]. Corollary 3.5 Let M be a module. If M is non-cosingular or injective, then M is G 1 L if and only if M is lifting. Proof. By Proposition 3.4. Corollary 3.6 An indecomposable injective module M is G 1 L if and only if M is hollow. Proof. Clear. Corollary 3.7 Let M be an injective Z-module. Then M is G 1 L if and only if M = i I [Z(p i )] (ni) where p i (i I) are primes and n i (i I) are natural numbers. Moreover, every submodule of M is G 1 L. Proof. By [6, Propositions A.7 and A.8], Proposition 3.4 and Lemma 2.2. In general, direct sums of G 1 L-modules is not G 1 L as seen by the following examples.
7 Two generalizations of lifting modules 605 Examples 3.8 (1) Let R be an incomplete rank one discrete valuation ring, with quotient field K. By [6, Lemma A.7], the module M = K 2 is not lifting. Since M is injective, M is not a G 1 L-module by Corollary 3.5. However, K is a G 1 L-module since K is a hollow module. (2) Let p be a prime number and let E = Z(p ) be the injective hull of the Z-module Z/pZ. By [2, 25.2], M = E (N) is not lifting. Therefore M is not G 1 L by Corollary 3.5. Theorem 3.9 The following are equivalent for a ring R: (i) Every R-module is a G 1 L-module. (ii) Every injective R-module is a G 1 L-module. (ii) R is a right Harada ring. Proof. (i) (ii) By Proposition 2.3. (ii) (iii) Let M be an R-module. Since E(M) is a G 1 L-module, M = N K such that N is a direct summand of E(M) and K is a small R-module by Proposition 2.1. We conclude from [2, 28.10] that R is a right Harada ring. (iii) (i) It is a consequence of [2, 28.10] and Proposition G 2 L-Modules Let M be a module. In [10], Talebi and Vanaja defined Z(M) = {U M M/U is small}. If Z(M) = 0 ( Z(M) = M), then M is called cosingular (non-cosingular). It is easy to check that every small module is cosingular. In this section, as a proper generalization of G 1 L-modules, we introduce the notion of G 2 L-modules. The module M is called a G 2 L-module (or G 2 L for short), provided for every submodule A of M there exists a direct summand K of M such that K A and A/K is cosingular. It is clear that G 1 L-modules and cosingular modules are G 2 L. In the following example we will give a counterexample to separate the properties G 1 L and G 2 L. Examples 4.1 (1) Let R be a Dedekind domain. Since every injective R- module is radical, every finitely generated R-module is small. Hence every finitely generated R-module is cosingular. Thus every direct sum of finitely generated R-modules is cosingular by [10, Corollary 2.2]. Therefore every direct sum of finitely generated R-modules is G 2 L. (2) Let R be a discrete valuation ring with maximal ideal m and quotient field K. Consider the R-module M = R (N). By (1), R R is a small module and hence Z(M) = 0 by [10, Proposition 2.1 (4)]. So M is a G 2 L-module.
8 606 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak Let r be any nonzero element of m and let N = Mr = (rr) (N). Suppose that M is a G 1 L-module. Then N = A B with A is a direct summand of M and B is a small module. Since R is a principal ideal ring, A is a direct sum of cyclic submodules of N. But every cyclic submodule of N is small in M. Then A = 0. Therefore N = B is a small R-module, a contradiction (see [5, Theorem 5]). Consequently, M is not a G 1 L-module. (3) If p is any prime number, then the Z-module M = Z(p ) is not cosingular ( Z(M) = M). On the other hand, M is a G 2 L-module since it is a hollow module. (4) For every module M, the factor module M/ Z(M) is a G 2 L-module since it is cosingular by [10, Proposition 2.1]. Lemma 4.2 (see [10, Corollary 2.2]) Let M be an R-module. The class of all cosingular modules is closed under submodules and direct sums. It follows immediately from the last lemma that all the results from 2.1 to 2.7 of Section 2 are true for G 2 L-modules. Lemma 4.3 Every non-cosingular submodule of a G 2 L-module M is a direct summand of M. Proof. Let N be a non-cosingular submodule of M. By Proposition 2.1, there exists a decomposition N = N 1 N 2, where N 1 is a direct summand of M and N 2 is cosingular. Since N is non-cosingular, we see that N 2 = 0 by [10, Proposition 2.1 (4)]. Hence N is a direct summand of M. Proposition 4.4 Let M be a G 2 L-module. Then Z 2 (M) = Z( Z(M)) is noncosingular and it is a direct summand of M. Proof. Since Z(M) is a submodule of M and M is a G 2 L-module, there exists a decomposition M = K K such that K Z(M) and Z(M)/K is cosingular. This gives Z 2 (M) + K = K by [10, Proposition 2.1 (1)]. Thus Z 2 (M) K. But Z 2 (M) = Z 2 (K) Z 2 (K ). Then Z 2 (M) = Z 2 (K). Since Z(M)/ Z 2 (M) is cosingular ([10, Proposition 2.1 (7)]), K/ Z 2 (M) is cosingular. Thus Z(K/ Z 2 (K)) = 0. It follows that Z(K) + Z 2 (K) = Z 2 (K). Therefore Z(K) = Z 2 (K) = Z 2 (M). Hence Z 2 (M) is non-cosingular. By Lemma 4.3, Z 2 (M) is a direct summand of M. Proposition 4.5 Let M be a non-cosingular amply supplemented module. Then M is G 2 L if and only if M is lifting.
9 Two generalizations of lifting modules 607 Proof. Assume that M is G 2 L. Let K be a coclosed submodule of M. By [10, Lemma 2.3 (3)], K is non-cosingular. Therefore K is a direct summand of M by Lemma 4.3. It follows from [2, 22.3] that M is lifting. The converse is clear. Proposition 4.6 Let M be an indecomposable module. Then M is G 2 L if and only if every proper submodule of M is cosingular. Proof. ( ) Let A be a proper submodule of M. By assumption, there exists a direct summand K of M such that K A and A/K is cosingular. Since M is indecomposable, we get K = 0. Hence A is cosingular. ( ) Follows from Proposition 2.1. Proposition 4.7 Let M be a non-cosingular G 2 L-module. Then every submodule of M is a direct sum of a non-cosingular module and a cosingular module. Proof. Let A be a submodule of M. By Proposition 2.1, A = A 1 A 2, where A 1 is direct summand of M and A 2 is cosingular. Clearly, A 1 is non-cosingular. This completes the proof. Lemma 4.8 Let M be an injective module. Then M is a G 2 L-module if and only if every submodule of M is a direct sum of an injective module and a cosingular module. Proof. ( ) By Proposition 2.1 and the fact that every direct summand of an injective module is again injective. ( ) Let L be a submodule of M. By assumption, L = L 1 L 2 such that L 1 is injective and L 2 is cosingular. Clearly, L/L 1 is cosingular and L 1 is a direct summand of M. So M is a G 2 L-module. It is easily seen from Theorem 3.9 that over Harada rings, every module is G 2 L. Theorem 4.9 The following are equivalent for a ring R: (i) Every R-module is G 2 L. (ii) Every injective R-module is G 2 L. (iii) Every R-module is a direct sum of an injective module and a cosingular module.
10 608 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak Proof. (i) (ii) By Proposition 2.3. (ii) (iii) Let M be a module and let E(M) be the injective hull of M. By assumption, E(M) is a G 2 L-module. By Lemma 4.8, M is a direct sum of an injective module and a cosingular module. (iii) (ii) By Lemma 4.8. An internal direct sum i I X i of submodules of a module M is called a local summand of M if, given any finite subset F of the index set I, the direct sum i F X i is a direct summand of M. Lemma 4.10 If every R-module is G 2 L, then every non-cosingular module is injective and it is a direct sum of indecomposabale modules. Proof. Let M be a non-cosingular module. Let X = i I X i be a local summand of M. Since all X i (i I) are non-cosingular, we have X i = Z(X i ) Z(X). Therefore X Z(X). Thus X is non-cosingular. By Theorem 4.9, X = A B where A is injective and B is cosingular. But B is non-cosingular by [10, Proposition 2.4]. Then B = 0 and X is injective. It follows that X is a direct summand of M. By [6, Theorem 2.17], M is a direct sum of indecomposable modules. Proposition 4.11 If R is a right hereditary ring, then the following conditions are equivalent: (i) Every R-module is G 2 L. (ii) R is right noetherian and for every R-module M, M is cosingular if and only if M has no nonzero injective submodules. (iii) For every R-module M, Z(M) is injective. (iv) Every non-cosingular R-module is injective and for every R-module M, Z(M) is a direct summand of M. If these conditions hold, then for every R-module M, Z(M) = {E M E is injective}. Proof. (i) (ii) Since R is right hereditary, the injective modules are exactly the non-cosingular modules by [10, Proposition 2.7] and Lemma Therefore every injective module is a direct sum of indecomposable modules by Lemma Thus R is noetherian by [9, Theorem 4.4]. The last statement follows from Theorem 4.9. (ii) (iii) Let M be an R-module. By [9, Exercise 4.1 p. 118], M = E F where E is an injective module which contains every injective submodule of M. So F is cosingular by assumption. On the other hand, E is non-cosingular by [10, Proposition 2.7]. Thus Z(M) = E is injective.
11 Two generalizations of lifting modules 609 (iii) (iv) Clear. (iv) (i) Let M be an R-module. We have M = Z(M) N for some submodule N of M. By [10, Proposition 2.1 (3)], N is cosingular. Therefore Z(M) = Z 2 (M). Thus Z(M) is non-cosingular. By hypothesis, Z(M) is injective. The result follows from Theorem 4.9. The last statement follows from (iii) and [10, Proposition 2.1 (1) and Proposition 2.7]. A module M over a Dedekind domain is called reduced if it has no nonzero divisible submodules. Lemma 4.12 Let M be a module over a Dedekind domain R. Then M is non-cosingular if and only if M is injective. Proof. Assume that M is non-cosingular. It is well known that M = E F such that E is injective and F is a reduced module. By [12, Satz 2.6], F is semisimple projective. Since every cyclic Z-module is small, Z(F ) = 0. But Z(F ) = F. Then F = 0 and M = E is injective. Conversely, it is clear that every injective R-module is non-cosingular by [10, Proposition 2.7]. Proposition 4.13 Let R be a Dedekind domain. The following are equivalent: (i) Every R-module is G 2 L. (ii) Every injective R-module is G 2 L. (iii) R is a field. Proof. (i) (iii) Let M be an R-module. By [13, Bemerkung 1.7 and Satz 2.10], there exists an R-module N such that M N and M = Z 2 (N). Since N is G 2 L, Proposition 4.4 shows that M is non-cosingular. Thus M is injective by Lemma Therefore every R-module is injective. It follows that R is semisimple. Thus R is a field. (iii) (ii) Clear. (ii) (i) See Theorem 4.9. Remarks 4.14 (1) The Z-module Z is a G 2 L-module but it follows easily from Proposition 4.13 that the ring Z has a module which is not G 2 L. (2) From Propositions 4.11, 4.13 and Lemma 4.12, it may be concluded that there exists a reduced Z-module which is not cosingular. Corollary 4.15 There is an injective Z-module M which is not G 2 L.
12 610 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak Proof. By Proposition Example 4.16 Let M be a Z-module which is not G 2 L (see Corollary 4.15). Let I be an index set such that M is a homomorphic image of Z (I). Since Z (I) is cosingular, Z (I) is G 2 L. This proves that in general the class of G 2 L-modules need not be closed under homomorphic images. Proposition 4.17 Let M = i I M i with M i = Q, the additive group of rational numbers, for all i I. Then every reduced submodule of M is cosingular. Proof. Let N be a reduced submodule of M. Assume that Z(N) 0. Let 0 x Z(N). Since Z(N) = s Z,s 0 sn by [13, Lemma 1.1 and Bemerkung 1.7], we have x sn for every nonzero element s Z. Consider the map ϕ : Q N defined by ϕ(r/s) = ry, where r Z, 0 s Z and y is an element of N such that x = sy. Note that ϕ is well defined since N is torsion-free. It is a simple matter to check that ϕ is a monomorphism. Thus Q = ϕ(q). So ϕ(q) is injective, a contradiction. Therefore Z(N) = 0. Corollary 4.18 Let M = i I M i with M i = Q, the additive group of rational numbers, for all i I. Then M is G 2 L but not G 1 L. Proof. It is well known that every Z-module is a direct sum of an injective module and a reduced module. The result follows from Lemma 4.8, Proposition 4.17, Corollary 3.5 and [2, 20.12]. Corollary 4.19 Every torsion-free Z-module is G 2 L. Proof. Let M be a torsion-free Z-module. Then E(M), the injective hull of M, is torsion-free. Thus E(M) = Q (I) for some index set I. By Corollary 4.18, E(M) is a G 2 L-module. Therefore M is G 2 L by Lemma 2.2. Remark 4.20 By Corollary 4.15, there exists an injective Z-module M such that M is not G 2 L. It is well known that M is a direct sum of modules each isomorphic to Q, the additive group of rational numbers, or to Z(p ) (for various primes p). Note that Q and Z(p ) are G 2 L (see Corollary 4.18). This proves that in general the class of G 2 L-modules need not be closed under direct sums.
13 Two generalizations of lifting modules 611 Let Mod-R denote the category of all right R-modules. For any R-module M, let σ[m] denote the full subcategory of Mod-R whose objects are isomorphic to a submodule of an M-generated module (see [11]). Recall (see [11, 23.1]) that a module M is called cosemisimple if each factor module of M has zero (Jacobson) radical and, for any ring R, the right R- module R R is cosemisimple precisely when every simple right R-module is injective, i.e., R is a right V -ring. Lemma 4.21 Let M be a cosemisimple module and let N be a module in σ[m]. If N is a G 2 L-module, then N is semisimple. Proof. Since M is cosemisimple, every module in σ[m] is non-cosingular by [10, Proposition 2.5]. It follows from Lemma 4.3 that every submodule of N is a direct summand of N. So N is semisimple. Corollary 4.22 Suppose that R is a right V -ring. Then every G 2 L-module over R is semisimple. Proof. By Lemma A ring R is a right max ring if every right module M 0 has at least one maximal submodule. Proposition 4.23 Let R be a ring such that every G 2 L-module is semisimple. Then R is a right max ring. Proof. Since every small module is a G 2 L-module, every small module is semisimple. It follows that for every module M, Rad(M) is semisimple. Let N be an R-module such that Rad(N) = N. Then N is semisimple, and hence Rad(N) = 0. Thus N = 0. Therefore for every nonzero module M, we have Rad(M) M. Consequently, R is a right max ring. A subset I of a ring R is called right T-nilpotent in case for every sequence a 1, a 2,... in I there is a natural number n such that a n... a 1 = 0. Corollary 4.24 Let R be a commutative ring such that every G 2 L-module is semisimple. Then R/J is a von Neumann regular ring and J = Rad(R) is T -nilpotent. Proof. By Proposition 4.23 and [3, First Max Theorem p. 203].
14 612 N. O. Ertaş and R. Tribak References [1] I. AL-Khazzi and P.F. Smith, Classes of modules with many direct summands, J. Aust. Math. Soc. (Series A), 59, (1995), [2] J. Clark, C. Lomp, N. Vanaja and R. Wisbauer, Lifting Modules, Frontiers in Mathematics, Birkhäuser, [3] Carl Faith, Rings whose modules have maximal submodules, Publ. Mat., 39, (1995), [4] Manabu Harada, On small submodules in the total quotient ring of a commutative ring, Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina, 28, (1977), [5] W.W. Leonard, Small modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 17, (1980), [6] S. H. Mohamed and B. J. Müller, Continuous and Discrete Modules, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series, 147, Cambridge, [7] N. Orhan, D. K. Tütüncü and R. Tribak, On hollow-lifting modules, Taiwanese J. Math., 11 (2), (2007), [8] A. Ç. Özcan, Modules with small cyclic submodules in their injective hulls, Comm. Algebra, 30 (4), (2002), [9] D. W. Sharpe and P. Vamos, Injective Modules, Lecture in Pure Mathematics, University of Sheffield, [10] Y. Talebi and N. Vanaja, The torsion theory cogenerated by M-small modules, Comm. Algebra, 30 (3), (2002), [11] R. Wisbauer, Foundations of Module and Ring Theory, Gordon and Breach, Philadelphia, [12] H. Zöschinger, Schwach-injektive moduln, Period. Math. Hungar., 52 (2), (2006), [13] H. Zöschinger, Kosinguläre und kleine moduln, Comm. Algebra 33, (2005), Received: January, 2009
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 2, and Lifting Modules. Nil Orhan Ertaş
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 2, 59-68 ( )-Generalized Projective Modules and Lifting Modules Nil Orhan Ertaş Department of Mathematics, University of Süleyman Demirel 32260 Çünür, Isparta,
More informationA generalization of modules with the property (P )
Mathematica Moravica Vol. 21, No. 1 (2017), 87 94 A generalization of modules with the property (P ) Burcu N ışanci Türkmen Abstract. I.A- Khazzi and P.F. Smith called a module M have the property (P )
More informationON GENERALIZATIONS OF INJECTIVE MODULES. Burcu Nişancı Türkmen
PUBLICATIONS DE L INSTITUT MATHÉMATIQUE Nouvelle série, tome 99(113) (2016), 249 255 DOI: 10.2298/PIM141215014T ON GENEALIZATIONS OF INJECTIVE MODULES Burcu Nişancı Türkmen Abstract. As a proper generalization
More informationWeakly distributive modules. Applications to supplement submodules
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 120, No. 5, November 2010, pp. 525 534. Indian Academy of Sciences Weakly distributive modules. Applications to supplement submodules ENGİN BÜYÜKAŞiK and YiLMAZ
More informationRINGS WHOSE MODULES ARE -COFINITELY SUPPLEMENTED
ANALELE ŞTIINŢIFICE ALE NIVERSITĂŢII AL.I. CZA DIN IAŞI (S.N.) MATEMATICĂ, Tomul LXII, 2016, f.1 RINGS WHOSE MODLES ARE -COFINITELY SPPLEMENTED BY ERGÜL TÜRKMEN Abstract. It is known that a commutative
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ra] 30 Jul 2017
GENERALIZATION OF RAD-D 11 -MODULE arxiv:1707.09682v1 [math.ra] 30 Jul 2017 MAJID MOHAMMED ABED, ABD GHAFUR AHMAD AND A. O. ABDULKAREEM Abstract. This paper gives generalization of a notion of supplemented
More informationON (D 12 )-MODULES DERYA KESKIN TÜTÜNCÜ AND RACHID TRIBAK
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 43, Number 4, 2013 ON (D 12 )-MODULES DERYA KESKIN TÜTÜNCÜ AND RACHID TRIBAK ABSTRACT. It is known that a direct summand of a (D 12 )- module need not be a
More informationInternational Journal of Algebra, Vol. 4, 2010, no. 2, Atomic Modules. V. A. Hiremath 1
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 4, 2010, no. 2, 61-69 Atomic Modules V. A. Hiremath 1 Department of Mathematics, Karnatak University Dharwad-580003, India va hiremath@rediffmail.com Poonam M. Shanbhag
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ra] 4 Feb 2008
ON A RECENT GENERALIZATION OF SEMIPERFECT RINGS ENGIN BÜYÜKAŞIK AND CHRISTIAN LOMP arxiv:0802.0477v1 [math.ra] 4 Feb 2008 Abstract. It follows from a recent paper by Ding and Wang that any ring which is
More informationCOMPRESSIBLE MODULES. Abhay K. Singh Department of Applied Mathematics, Indian School of Mines Dhanbad India. Abstract
COMPRESSIBLE MODULES Abhay K. Singh Department of Applied Mathematics, Indian School of Mines Dhanbad-826004 India Abstract The main purpose of this paper is to study under what condition compressible
More informationProjective and Injective Modules
Projective and Injective Modules Push-outs and Pull-backs. Proposition. Let P be an R-module. The following conditions are equivalent: (1) P is projective. (2) Hom R (P, ) is an exact functor. (3) Every
More informationSemi co Hopfian and Semi Hopfian Modules
Semi co Hopfian and Semi Hopfian Modules Pınar AYDOĞDU and A. Çiğdem ÖZCAN Hacettepe University Department of Mathematics 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey paydogdu@hacettepe.edu.tr, ozcan@hacettepe.edu.tr
More informationOn Commutative FDF-Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 2011, no. 53, 2637-2644 On Commutative FDF-Rings Mamadou Barry and Papa Cheikhou Diop Département de Mathématiques et Informatique Faculté des Sciences et Techniques
More informationCorrect classes of modules
Algebra and Discrete Mathematics Number?. (????). pp. 1 13 c Journal Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE Correct classes of modules Robert Wisbauer Abstract. For a ring R, call a class C
More informationFULLY IDEMPOTENT AND COIDEMPOTENT MODULES. Communicated by Siamak Yassemi. 1. Introduction
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 38 No. 4 (2012), pp 987-1005. FULLY IDEMPOTENT AND COIDEMPOTENT MODULES H. ANSARI-TOROGHY AND F. FARSHADIFAR Communicated by Siamak Yassemi Abstract. In
More informationON w-local MODULES AND Rad-SUPPLEMENTED MODULES
J. Korean Math. Soc. 51 (2014), No. 5, pp. 971 985 http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/jkms.2014.51.5.971 ON w-local MODULES AND Rad-SUPPLEMENTED MODULES Engin Büyükaşik and Rachid Tribak Abstract. All modules considered
More informationPrimal, completely irreducible, and primary meet decompositions in modules
Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie Tome 54(102) No. 4, 2011, 297 311 Primal, completely irreducible, and primary meet decompositions in modules by Toma Albu and Patrick F. Smith Abstract This paper was
More informationDepartment of Mathematics Quchan University of Advanced Technology Quchan Iran s:
italian journal of pure and applied mathematics n. 36 2016 (65 72) 65 ON GENERALIZED WEAK I-LIFTING MODULES Tayyebeh Amouzegar Department of Mathematics Quchan University of Advanced Technology Quchan
More informationCharacterisation of Duo-Rings in Which Every Weakly Cohopfian Module is Finitely Cogenerated
Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-1768 Volume 13, Number 4 (2017), pp. 1217-1222 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com Characterisation of Duo-Rings in Which
More informationON MAXIMAL RADICALS AND PRIME M-IDEALS
ON MAXIMAL RADICALS AND PRIME M-IDEALS John A. Beachy Department of Mathematical Sciences Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL 60115 ABSTRACT: It is shown that if M is a projective generator in the
More informationPiecewise Noetherian Rings
Northern Illinois University UNAM 25 May, 2017 Acknowledgments Results for commutative rings are from two joint papers with William D. Weakley,, Comm. Algebra (1984) and A note on prime ideals which test
More informationRIGHT-LEFT SYMMETRY OF RIGHT NONSINGULAR RIGHT MAX-MIN CS PRIME RINGS
Communications in Algebra, 34: 3883 3889, 2006 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0092-7872 print/1532-4125 online DOI: 10.1080/00927870600862714 RIGHT-LEFT SYMMETRY OF RIGHT NONSINGULAR RIGHT
More informationALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL
ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL 1. Suppose that G is a finite group. (a) Prove that if G is nilpotent, and H is any proper subgroup, then H is a proper subgroup of its normalizer. (b) Use (a)
More informationCOMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY. John A. Beachy and William D.
COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), 471 478 (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY John A. Beachy and William D. Weakley Department of Mathematical Sciences Northern Illinois University DeKalb,
More informationDecompositions of Modules and Comodules
Decompositions of Modules and Comodules Robert Wisbauer University of Düsseldorf, Germany Abstract It is well-known that any semiperfect A ring has a decomposition as a direct sum (product) of indecomposable
More informationProceedings of the Twelfth Hudson Symposium, Lecture Notes in Math. No. 951, Springer-Verlag (1982), 4l 46.
Proceedings of the Twelfth Hudson Symposium, Lecture Notes in Math. No. 951, Springer-Verlag (1982), 4l 46. MAXIMAL TORSION RADICALS OVER RINGS WITH FINITE REDUCED RANK John A. Beachy Northern Illinois
More informationABSORBING MULTIPLICATION MODULES OVER PULLBACK RINGS. S. Ebrahimi Atani and M. Sedghi Shanbeh Bazari
International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 21 (2017) 76-90 ABSORBING MULTIPLICATION MODULES OVER PULLBACK RINGS S. Ebrahimi Atani and M. Sedghi Shanbeh Bazari Received: 4 March 2016; Revised: 3
More informationOn Generalizations of Pseudo-Injectivity
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 12, 555-562 On Generalizations of Pseudo-Injectivity S. Baupradist 1, T. Sitthiwirattham 2,3 and S. Asawasamrit 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty
More informationDOUGLAS J. DAILEY AND THOMAS MARLEY
A CHANGE OF RINGS RESULT FOR MATLIS REFLEXIVITY DOUGLAS J. DAILEY AND THOMAS MARLEY Abstract. Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring and E the minimal injective cogenerator of the category of R-modules.
More informationLecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).
Lecture 2 1. Noetherian and Artinian rings and modules Let A be a commutative ring with identity, A M a module, and φ : M N an A-linear map. Then ker φ = {m M : φ(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im φ is
More informationGeneralization of Generalized Supplemented Module
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 29, 1431-1441 Generalization of Generalized Supplemented Module Majid Mohammed Abed and Abd Ghafur Ahmad School of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Science
More informationc-pure Projective and c-pure Injective R-Modules
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 57, 2835-2842 c-pure Projective and c-pure Injective R-Modules V. A. Hiremath Department of Mathematics Mangalore University Mangalore-580003, India va hiremath@rediffmail.com
More informationINJECTIVE MODULES: PREPARATORY MATERIAL FOR THE SNOWBIRD SUMMER SCHOOL ON COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA
INJECTIVE MODULES: PREPARATORY MATERIAL FOR THE SNOWBIRD SUMMER SCHOOL ON COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA These notes are intended to give the reader an idea what injective modules are, where they show up, and, to
More informationOn Harada Rings and Serial Artinian Rings
Vietnam Journal of Mathematics 36:2(2008) 229 238 Vietnam Journal of MATHEMATICS VAST 2008 On Harada Rings and Serial Artinian Rings Thanakarn Soonthornkrachang 1, Phan Dan 2, Nguyen Van Sanh 3, and Kar
More informationCOFINITENESS AND COASSOCIATED PRIMES OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES
MATH. SCAND. 105 (2009), 161 170 COFINITENESS AND COASSOCIATED PRIMES OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES MOHARRAM AGHAPOURNAHR and LEIF MELKERSSON Abstract Let R be a noetherian ring, an ideal of R such that
More information4.4 Noetherian Rings
4.4 Noetherian Rings Recall that a ring A is Noetherian if it satisfies the following three equivalent conditions: (1) Every nonempty set of ideals of A has a maximal element (the maximal condition); (2)
More informationSTATE OF THE ART OF THE OPEN PROBLEMS IN: MODULE THEORY. ENDOMORPHISM RINGS AND DIRECT SUM DECOMPOSITIONS IN SOME CLASSES OF MODULES
STATE OF THE ART OF THE OPEN PROBLEMS IN: MODULE THEORY. ENDOMORPHISM RINGS AND DIRECT SUM DECOMPOSITIONS IN SOME CLASSES OF MODULES ALBERTO FACCHINI In Chapter 11 of my book Module Theory. Endomorphism
More informationPaul E. Bland and Patrick F. Smith (Received April 2002)
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 32 (2003), 105 115 INJECTIVE AND PROJECTIVE MODULES RELATIVE TO A TORSION THEORY Paul E. Bland and Patrick F. Smith (Received April 2002) Abstract. Injective and
More informationEXTENSIONS OF SIMPLE MODULES AND THE CONVERSE OF SCHUR S LEMMA arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 13 May 2009
EXTENSIONS OF SIMPLE MODULES AND THE CONVERSE OF SCHUR S LEMMA arxiv:0903.2490v2 [math.ra] 13 May 2009 GREG MARKS AND MARKUS SCHMIDMEIER Abstract. The converse of Schur s lemma (or CSL) condition on a
More informationINJECTIVE COGENERATOR RINGS AND A THEOREM OF TACHIKAWA1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 60, October 1976 INJECTIVE COGENERATOR RINGS AND A THEOREM OF TACHIKAWA1 CARL FAITH For Seth Camillo, and the happy parents. Abstract. Tachikawa
More informationArtinian local cohomology modules
Artinian local cohomology modules Keivan Borna Lorestani, Parviz Sahandi and Siamak Yassemi Department of Mathematics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and
More informationA Survey of some generalized extending conditions
Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 3(Spec 1) (2014), 518 530 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2014 A Survey of some generalized extending conditions G.F. Birkenmeier, A. Tercan and R. Yaşar Dedicated
More informationDecompositions Of Modules And Matrices
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of Mathematics Mathematics, Department of 1973 Decompositions Of Modules And Matrices Thomas
More informationUniversal Localization of Piecewise Noetherian Rings
Universal Localization of Piecewise Noetherian Rings Northern Illinois University UCCS November 29, 2017 Acknowledgments For commutative rings, results on piecewise Noetherian rings are from two joint
More informationAlgebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010
Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Problem 6. (1) Let I and J be ideals of a commutative ring R with I + J = R. Prove that IJ = I J. (2) Let I, J, and K be ideals of a principal ideal domain.
More informationLe Van An, Nguyen Thi Hai Anh and Ngo Sy Tung. Abstract. In this paper, we give some results on (1 C 2 ) modules and 1 continuous modules.
Math. J. Okayama Univ. 59 (2017), 141 147 ON THE (1 C 2 ) CONDITION Le Van An, Nguyen Thi Hai Anh and Ngo Sy Tung Abstract. In this paper, we give some results on (1 C 2 ) modules and 1 continuous modules.
More informationA Note on Dedekind Modules
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 5, 2011, no. 10, 491-498 A Note on Dedekind Modules Hanni Garminia, Pudji Astuti and Irawati Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Institut Teknologi Bandung,
More informationBulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017-060X (Print) ISSN: 1735-8515 (Online) Special Issue of the Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society in Honor of Professor Heydar Radjavi s 80th Birthday Vol 41 (2015), No 7, pp 155 173 Title:
More informationJournal of Algebra 338 (2011) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Journal of Algebra.
Journal of Algebra 338 (2011) 207 219 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Algebra www.elsevier.com/locate/jalgebra An alternative perspective on injectivity of modules Pınar Aydoğdu a,b,
More informationA NOTE ON ALMOST INJECTIVE MODULES
Math. J. Okayama Univ. ZZ (20XX), xxx yyy A NOTE ON ALMOST INJECTIVE MODULES Adel Alahmadi and Surender K. Jain Abstract. We give some new properties of almost injective modules and their endomorphism
More informationSUMS OF UNITS IN SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS
SUMS OF UNITS IN SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS ANJANA KHURANA, DINESH KHURANA, AND PACE P. NIELSEN Abstract. We prove that if no field of order less than n + 2 is a homomorphic image of a right self-injective ring
More informationCOURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA
COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER 2017-8: MODERN ALGEBRA JAROD ALPER Week 1, Sept 27, 29: Introduction to Groups Lecture 1: Introduction to groups. Defined a group and discussed basic properties
More informationInternational Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 2012, no. 56, Epiform Modules. Inaam M. A. Hadi
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 2012, no. 56, 2749-2758 Epiform Modules Inaam M. A. Hadi Department of Mathematics College of Education Ibn-Al-Haitham University of Baghdad Baghdad, Iraq innam1976@yahoo.com
More informationA Generalization of VNL-Rings and P P -Rings
Journal of Mathematical Research with Applications Mar, 2017, Vol 37, No 2, pp 199 208 DOI:103770/jissn:2095-2651201702008 Http://jmredluteducn A Generalization of VNL-Rings and P P -Rings Yueming XIANG
More informationPIF-Property in Pullbacks
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 33, 1625-1629 PIF-Property in Pullbacks Chahrazade Bakkari Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez Box 2202, University S. M.
More informationADDITIVE GROUPS OF SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS
SOOCHOW JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 33, No. 4, pp. 641-645, October 2007 ADDITIVE GROUPS OF SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS BY SHALOM FEIGELSTOCK Abstract. The additive groups of left self-injective rings, and
More informationOn Dual Versions of Krull s Intersection Theorem
International Mathematical Forum, 2, 2007, no. 54, 2655-2659 On Dual Versions of Krull s Intersection Theorem H. Ansari-Toroghy and F. Farshadifar Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science, Guilan University
More informationEssential Extensions of a Direct Sum of Simple Modules
Contemporary Mathematics Essential Extensions of a Direct Sum of Simple Modules K.I.Beidar, S. K. Jain, and Ashish K.Srivastava Dedicated to Don Passman on his 65 th Birthday Abstract. It is known that
More informationON DIRECT SUMS OF BAER MODULES
ON DIRECT SUMS OF BAER MODULES S. TARIQ RIZVI AND COSMIN S. ROMAN Abstract. The notion of Baer modules was defined recently. Since a direct sum of Baer modules is not a Baer module in general, an open
More informationn-x -COHERENT RINGS Driss Bennis
International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 7 (2010) 128-139 n-x -COHERENT RINGS Driss Bennis Received: 24 September 2009; Revised: 31 December 2009 Communicated by A. Çiğdem Özcan Abstract. This
More informationA dissertation presented to. the faculty of. the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University. In partial fulfillment
The Subprojectivity and Pure-Subinjectivity Domains of a Module A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationON REGULARITY OF RINGS 1
ON REGULARITY OF RINGS 1 Jianlong Chen Department of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001, P. R. China and Department of Applied Mathematics, Southeast University Nanjing 210096, P.
More informationHong Kee Kim, Nam Kyun Kim, and Yang Lee
J. Korean Math. Soc. 42 (2005), No. 3, pp. 457 470 WEAKLY DUO RINGS WITH NIL JACOBSON RADICAL Hong Kee Kim, Nam Kyun Kim, and Yang Lee Abstract. Yu showed that every right (left) primitive factor ring
More informationREMARKS ON REFLEXIVE MODULES, COVERS, AND ENVELOPES
REMARKS ON REFLEXIVE MODULES, COVERS, AND ENVELOPES RICHARD BELSHOFF Abstract. We present results on reflexive modules over Gorenstein rings which generalize results of Serre and Samuel on reflexive modules
More informationNeat Homomorphisms over Dedekind Domains
Salahattin ÖZDEMİR (Joint work with Engin Mermut) Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir-Turkey NCRA, V 12-15 June 2017, Lens outline 1 Neat submodules 2 Neat homomorphisms 3 The class of neat epimorphisms 4 Z-Neat
More informationRad-supplementing modules
Rad-supplementing modules Salahattin Özdemir arxiv:1210.2893v1 [math.ra] 10 Oct 2012 May 3, 2014 Abstract LetRbearingandM bealeftr-module. IfM israd-supplementing, then every direct summand of M is Rad-supplementing,
More informationALGEBRA HW 4. M 0 is an exact sequence of R-modules, then M is Noetherian if and only if M and M are.
ALGEBRA HW 4 CLAY SHONKWILER (a): Show that if 0 M f M g M 0 is an exact sequence of R-modules, then M is Noetherian if and only if M and M are. Proof. ( ) Suppose M is Noetherian. Then M injects into
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012 Work all of the problems. Justify the statements in your solutions by reference to specific results, as appropriate. Partial credit is awarded for partial solutions.
More informationTIGHT CLOSURE IN NON EQUIDIMENSIONAL RINGS ANURAG K. SINGH
TIGHT CLOSURE IN NON EQUIDIMENSIONAL RINGS ANURAG K. SINGH 1. Introduction Throughout our discussion, all rings are commutative, Noetherian and have an identity element. The notion of the tight closure
More informationZARISKI-LIKE TOPOLOGY ON THE CLASSICAL PRIME SPECTRUM OF A MODULE
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 35 No. 1 (2009), pp 253-269. ZARISKI-LIKE TOPOLOGY ON THE CLASSICAL PRIME SPECTRUM OF A MODULE M. BEHBOODI AND M. J. NOORI Abstract. Let R be a commutative
More informationGENERALIZED MORPHIC RINGS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS. Haiyan Zhu and Nanqing Ding Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Communications in Algebra, 35: 2820 2837, 2007 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0092-7872 print/1532-4125 online DOI: 10.1080/00927870701354017 GENERALIZED MORPHIC RINGS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationTHE LARGE CONDITION FOR RINGS WITH KRULL DIMENSION
proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 72, Number 1, October 1978 THE LARGE CONDITION FOR RINGS WITH KRULL DIMENSION ANN K. BOYLE1 Abstract. A module M with Krull dimension is said to
More informationProper classes related with complements and supplements
Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 4 (Spec. 1) (2015), 471 489 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2015 Proper classes related with complements and supplements RAFAİL ALİZADE and ENGİN MERMUT Communicated
More informationOn the torsion graph and von Neumann regular rings
Filomat 26:2 (2012), 253 259 DOI 10.2298/FIL1202253M Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat On the torsion graph and von
More informationOn Commutative SCI-Rings and. Commutative SCS-Rings
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 4, 2010, no. 12, 585-590 On Commutative SCI-Rings and Commutative SCS-Rings Abdoulaye MBAYE, Mamadou SANGHARÉ and Sidy Demba TOURÉ Département de Mathématiques et
More informationOn Pseudo-P-Injectivity
Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics (2011) 35: 21 27 Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics c SEAMS. 2011 On Pseudo-P-Injectivity Samruam Baupradist Department of Mathematics, Mahidol University,
More informationSTRONGLY JÓNSSON AND STRONGLY HS MODULES
STRONGLY JÓNSSON AND STRONGLY HS MODULES GREG OMAN Abstract. Let R be a commutative ring with identity and let M be an infinite unitary R-module. Then M is a Jónsson module provided every proper R-submodule
More informationON MAXIMAL TORSION RADICALS, II
Can. J. Math., Vol. XXVII, No. 1,1975, pp. 115-120 ON MAXIMAL TORSION RADICALS, II JOHN A. BEACHY Let R be an associative ring with identity, and let ^Jé denote the category of unital left i^-modules.
More information11 Annihilators. Suppose that R, S, and T are rings, that R P S, S Q T, and R U T are bimodules, and finally, that
11 Annihilators. In this Section we take a brief look at the important notion of annihilators. Although we shall use these in only very limited contexts, we will give a fairly general initial treatment,
More informationChan Huh, Sung Hee Jang, Chol On Kim, and Yang Lee
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 39 (2002), No. 3, pp. 411 422 RINGS WHOSE MAXIMAL ONE-SIDED IDEALS ARE TWO-SIDED Chan Huh, Sung Hee Jang, Chol On Kim, and Yang Lee Abstract. In this note we are concerned with
More informationSUBCATEGORIES OF EXTENSION MODULES BY SERRE SUBCATEGORIES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 140, Number 7, July 2012, Pages 2293 2305 S 0002-9939(2011)11108-0 Article electronically published on November 23, 2011 SUBCATEGORIES OF EXTENSION
More informationQuasi-primary submodules satisfying the primeful property II
Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 44 (4) (2015), 801 811 Quasi-primary submodules satisfying the primeful property II Hosein Fazaeli Moghimi and Mahdi Samiei Abstract In this paper
More informatione-ads MODULES AND RINGS
e-ads MODULES AND RINGS M. TAMER KOSAN, T. CONG QUYNH, AND JAN ZEMLICKA Abstract. This paper introduces the notion of an essentially ADS (e-ads) module, i.e. such a module M that for every decomposition
More informationPRIMALITY, IRREDUCIBILITY, AND COMPLETE IRREDUCIBILITY IN MODULES OVER COMMUTATIVE RINGS
PRIMALITY, IRREDUCIBILITY, AND COMPLETE IRREDUCIBILITY IN MODULES OVER COMMUTATIVE RINGS TOMA ALBU and PATRICK F. SMITH The aim of this paper is to extend from ideals to modules over commutative rings
More informationFLAT AND FP-INJEOTVITY
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 41, Number 2, December 1973 FLAT AND FP-INJEOTVITY SAROJ JAIN1 Abstract. One of the main results of this paper is the characterization of left FP-injective
More informationGraduate Preliminary Examination
Graduate Preliminary Examination Algebra II 18.2.2005: 3 hours Problem 1. Prove or give a counter-example to the following statement: If M/L and L/K are algebraic extensions of fields, then M/K is algebraic.
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF MULTIPLICATION MODULES
J. Indones. Math. Soc. Vol. 23, No. 2 (2017), pp. 47 53. SOME PROPERTIES OF MULTIPLICATION MODULES H. A. Tavallaee 1 and R. Mahtabi 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Tehran-North Branch, Islamic Azad University,
More informationOn the vanishing of Tor of the absolute integral closure
On the vanishing of Tor of the absolute integral closure Hans Schoutens Department of Mathematics NYC College of Technology City University of New York NY, NY 11201 (USA) Abstract Let R be an excellent
More informationSOME APPLICATIONS OF ZORN S LEMMA IN ALGEBRA
SOME APPLICATIONS OF ZORN S LEMMA IN ALGEBRA D. D. ANDERSON 1, DAVID E. DOBBS 2, AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH 3 Abstract. We indicate some new applications of Zorn s Lemma to a number of algebraic areas. Specifically,
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationREGULAR AND SEMISIMPLE MODULES
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 65, No. 2, 1976 REGULAR AND SEMISIMPLE MODULES T. J. GHEATHAM AND J. R. SMITH A module is regular if all its submodules are (Cohn) pure. The family of all regular modules
More informationInjective Modules and Matlis Duality
Appendix A Injective Modules and Matlis Duality Notes on 24 Hours of Local Cohomology William D. Taylor We take R to be a commutative ring, and will discuss the theory of injective R-modules. The following
More informationRIGHT SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS IN WHICH EVERY ELEMENT IS A SUM OF TWO UNITS
Journal of Algebra and Its Applications Vol. 6, No. 2 (2007) 281 286 c World Scientific Publishing Company RIGHT SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS IN WHICH EVERY ELEMENT IS A SUM OF TWO UNITS DINESH KHURANA and ASHISH
More informationCommutative Algebra. Contents. B Totaro. Michaelmas Basics Rings & homomorphisms Modules Prime & maximal ideals...
Commutative Algebra B Totaro Michaelmas 2011 Contents 1 Basics 4 1.1 Rings & homomorphisms.............................. 4 1.2 Modules........................................ 6 1.3 Prime & maximal ideals...............................
More informationRadical Endomorphisms of Decomposable Modules
Radical Endomorphisms of Decomposable Modules Julius M. Zelmanowitz University of California, Oakland, CA 94607 USA Abstract An element of the Jacobson radical of the endomorphism ring of a decomposable
More informationCommunications in Algebra Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
This article was downloaded by: [Greg Oman] On: 17 June 2012, At: 23:15 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
More informationMATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53
MATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53 10. Completion The real numbers are the completion of the rational numbers with respect to the usual absolute value norm. This means that any Cauchy sequence
More informationTHE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter
THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter Abstract. In previous work, the second author introduced a topology, for spaces of irreducible representations,
More informationSmall-Essential Submodules and Morita Duality
Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics (2011) 35: 1051 1062 Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics c SEAMS. 2011 Small-Essential Submodules and Morita Duality D.X. Zhou and X.R. Zhang Department of Mathematics,
More information