arxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Dec 2006

Transcription

1 Brzilin Journl of Physics, vol 34, no. 4A, 6, The Csimir effect: some spects Crlos Frin ( Universidde Federl do Rio de Jneiro, Ilh do Fundão, Cix Postl 6858, Rio de Jneiro, RJ, 94-97, Brzil (Received rxiv:hep-th/63v Dec 6 We strt this pper with historicl survey of the Csimir effect, showing tht its origin is relted to experiments on colloidl chemistry. We present two methods of computing Csimir forces, nmely: the globl method introduced by Csimir, bsed on the ide of zero-point energy of the quntum electromgnetic field, nd locl one, which requires the computtion of the energy-momentum stress tensor of the corresponding field. As explicit exmples, we clculte the (stndrd Csimir forces between two prllel nd perfectly conducting pltes nd discuss the more involved problem of sclr field submitted to Robin boundry conditions t two prllel pltes. A few comments re mde bout recent experiments tht undoubtedly confirm the existence of this effect. Finlly, we briefly discuss few topics which re either elbortions of the Csimir effect or topics tht re relted in some wy to this effect s, for exmple, the influence of mgnetic field on the Csimir effect of chrged fields, mgnetic properties of confined vcuum nd rdition rection forces on non-reltivistic moving boundries. I. INTRODUCTION A. Some history The stndrd Csimir effect ws proposed theoreticlly by the dutch physicist nd humnist Hendrik Brugt Gerhrd Csimir (99- in 948 nd consists, bsiclly, in the ttrction of two prllel nd perfectly conducting pltes locted in vcuum. As we shll see, this effect hs its origin in colloidl chemistry nd is directly relted to the dispersive vn der Wls interction in the retrded regime. The correct explntion for the non-retrded dispersive vn der Wlls interction between two neutrl but polrizble toms ws possible only fter quntum mechnics ws properly estblished. Using perturbtive pproch, London showed in 93 for the first time tht the bove mentioned interction is given by V Lon (r (3/4( ω α /r 6, where α is the sttic polrizbility of the tom, ω is the dominnt trnsition frequency nd r is the distnce between the toms. In the 4 s, vrious experiments with the purpose of studying equilibrium in colloidl suspensions were mde by Verwey nd Overbeek 3. Bsiclly, two types of force used to be invoked to explin this equilibrium, nmely: repulsive electrosttic force between lyers of chrged prticles dsorbed by the colloidl prticles nd the ttrctive London-vn der Wls forces. However, the experiments performed by these uthors showed tht London s interction ws not correct for lrge distnces. Agreement between experimentl dt nd theory ws possible only if they ssumed tht the vn der Wls interction fell with the distnce between two toms more rpidly thn /r 6. They even conjectured tht the reson for such different behviour for lrge distnces ws due to the retrdtion effects of the electromgnetic interction (the informtion of ny chnge or fluctution occurred in one tom should spend finite time to rech the other one. Retrdtion effects must be tken into ccount whenever the time intervl spent by light signl to trvel from one tom to the other is of the order (or greter thn tomic chrcteristic times (r/c /ω Mn, where ω mn re tomic trnsition frequencies. Though this conjecture seemed to be very plusible, rigorous demonstrtion ws in order. Further, the precise expression of the vn der Wls interction for lrge distnces (retrded regime should be obtined. Motivted by the disgreement between experiments nd theory described bove, Csimir nd Polder 4 considered for the first time, in 948, the influence of retrdtion effects on the vn der Wls forces between two toms s well s on the force between n tom nd perfectly conducting wll. These uthors obtined their results fter lengthy clcultions in the context of perturbtive quntum electrodynmics (QED. Since Csimir nd Polder s pper, retrded forces between toms or molecules nd wlls of ny kind re usully clled Csimir-Polder forces. They showed tht in the retrded regime the vn der Wls interction potentil between two toms is given by V Ret (r = 3 cα A α B /(4πr 7. In contrst to London s result, it flls s /r 7. The chnge in the power lw of the dispersive vn der Wls force when we go from the non-retrded regime to the retrded one (F NR /r 7 F R /r 8 ws mesured in n experiment with sheets of mic by D. Tbor nd R.H.S. Winterton 5 only yers fter Csimir nd Polder s pper. A chnge ws observed round 5Å, which is the order of mgnitude of the wvelength of the dominnt trnsition (they worked in the rnge 5Å 3Å, with n ccurcy of ±4Å. They lso showed tht the retrded vn der Wls interction potentil between n tom nd perfectly conducting wll flls s /r 4, in contrst to the result obtined in the short distnce regime (non-retrded regime, which is proportionl to /r 3 (s cn be seen by the imge method. Csimir nd Polder were very impressed with the fct tht fter such lengthy nd involved QED clcultion, the finl results were extremely simple. This is very cler in converstion with Niels Bohr. In Csimir s own words In the summer or utumn 947 (but I m not bsolutely certin tht it ws not somewht erlier or lter I mentioned my results to Niels Bohr, during wlk. Tht is nice, he sid, Tht is something new. I told him tht I ws puzzled

2 et l. by the extremely simple form of the expressions for the interction t very lrge distnce nd he mumbled something bout zero-point energy. Tht ws ll, but it put me on new trck. Following Bohr s suggestion, Csimir re-derived the results obtined with Polder in much simpler wy, by computing the shift in the electromgnetic zero-point energy cused by the presence of the toms nd the wlls. He presented his result in the Colloque sur l théorie de l liison chimique, tht took plce t Pris in April of 948: I found tht clculting chnges of zero-point energy relly leds to the sme results s the clcultions of Polder nd myself... A short pper contining this beutiful result ws published in French journl only one yer lter 6. Csimir, then, decided to test his method, bsed on the vrition of zero-point energy of the electromgnetic field cused by the intercting bodies in other exmples. He knew tht the existence of zeropoint energy of n tomic system ( hot stuff during the yers tht followed its introduction by Plnck 7 could be inferred by compring energy levels of isotopes. But how to produce isotopes of the quntum vcuum? Agin, in Csimir s own words we hve the nswer 8: if there were two isotopes of empty spce you could relly esy confirm the existence of the zero-point energy. Unfortuntely, or perhps fortuntely, there is only one copy of empty spce nd if you cnnot chnge the tomic distnce then you might chnge the shpe nd tht ws the ide of the ttrcting pltes. A month fter the Colloque held t Pris, Csimir presented his seminl pper on the ttrction between two prllel conducting pltes which gve rise to the fmous effect tht since then bers his nme: On 9 My, 948, I presented my pper on the ttrction between two perfectly conducting pltes t meeting of the Royl Netherlnds Acdemy of Arts nd Sciences. It ws published in the course of the yer... As we shll see explicitly in the next section, Csimir obtined n ttrctive force between the pltes whose modulus per unit re is given by F( dyn L,3 (/µm 4 cm, ( where is the seprtion between the pltes, L the re of ech plte (presumbly very lrge, i.e., L. A direct consequence of dispersive vn der Wls forces between two toms or molecules is tht two neutrl but polrizble mcroscopic bodies my lso interct with ech other. However, due to the so clled non-dditivity of vn der Wls forces, the totl interction potentil between the two bodies is not simply given by pirwise integrtion, except for the cse where the bodies re mde of very rrefied medium. In principle, the Csimir method provides wy of obtining this kind of interction potentil in the retrded regime (lrge distnces without the necessity of deling explicitly with the non-dditivity problem. Retrded vn der Wls forces re usully clled Csimir forces. A simple exmple my be in order. Consider two semi-infinite slbs mde of polrizble mteril seprted by distnce, s shown in Figure. A ˆr AB f r AB FIG. : Forces between molecules of the left slb nd molecules of the right slb. Suppose the force exerted by molecule A of the left slb on molecule B of the right slb is given by f AB = C r γ r AB, AB where C nd γ re positive constnts, r AB the distnce between the molecules nd ˆr AB the unit vector pointing from A to B. Hence, by direct integrtion it is strightforwrd to show tht, for the cse of dilute medi, the force per unit re between the slbs is ttrctive nd with modulus given by F slbs Are = C, ( γ 4 where C is positive constnt. Observe tht for γ=8, which corresponds to the Csimir nd Polder force, we obtin force between the slbs per unit re which is proportionl to / 4. Hd we used the Csimir method bsed on zero-point energy to compute this force we would hve obtined precisely this kind of dependence. Of course, the numericl coefficients would be different, since here we mde pirwise integrtion, neglecting the non-dditivity problem. A detiled discussion on the identifiction of the Csimir energy with the sum of vn der Wls interction for dilute dielectric sphere cn be found in Milton s book 9 (see lso references therein. In 956, Lifshitz nd collbortors developed generl theory of vn der Wls forces. They derived powerful expression for the force t zero temperture s well s t finite temperture between two semi-infinite dispersive medi chrcterized by well defined dielectric constnts nd seprted by slb of ny other dispersive medium. They were ble to derive nd predict severl results, like the vrition of the thickness of thin superfluid helium films in remrkble greement with the experiments. The Csimir result for metllic pltes cn be reobtined from Lifshitz formul in the pproprite limit. The Csimir nd Polder force cn lso be inferred from this formul 9 if we consider one of the medi sufficiently dilute such tht the force between the slbs my f B

3 Brzilin Journl of Physics, vol 34, no. 4A, 6, be obtined by direct integrtion of single tom-wll interction. The first experimentl ttempt to verify the existence of the Csimir effect for two prllel metllic pltes ws mde by Sprny 3 only ten yers fter Csimir s theoreticl prediction. However, due to very poor ccurcy chieved in this experiment, only comptibility between experimentl dt nd theory ws estblished. One of the gret difficulties ws to mintin perfect prllelism between the pltes. Four decdes hve pssed, pproximtely, until new experiments were mde directly with metls. In 997, using torsion pendulum Lmoreux 4 inugurted the new er of experiments concerning the Csimir effect. Avoiding the prllelism problem, he mesured the Csimir force between plte nd sphericl lens within the proximity force pproximtion 5. This experiment my be considered lndmrk in the history of the Csimir effect, since it provided the first relible experimentl confirmtion of this effect. One yer lter, using n tomic force microscope, Mohideen nd Roy 6 mesured the Csimir force between plte nd sphere with better ccurcy nd estblished n greement between experimentl dt nd theoreticl predictions of less thn few percents (depending on the rnge of distnces considered. The two precise experiments mentioned bove hve been followed by mny others nd n incomplete list of the modern series of experiments bout the Csimir effect cn be found in 7-6. For detiled nlysis compring theory nd experiments see 7, 8 We finish this subsection emphsizing tht Csimir s originl predictions were mde for n extremely idelized sitution, nmely: two perfectly conducting (flt pltes t zero temperture. Since the experimentl ccurcy chieved nowdys is very high, ny ttempt to compre theory nd experimentl dt must tke into ccount more relistic boundry conditions. The most relevnt ones re those tht consider the finite conductivity of rel metls nd roughness of the surfces involved. These conditions become more importnt s the distnce between the two bodies becomes smller. Therml effects must lso be considered. However, in principle, these effects become dominnt compred with the vcuum contribution for lrge distnces, where the forces re lredy very smll. A gret number of ppers hve been written on these topics since the nlysis of most recent experiments require the considertion of rel boundry conditions. For finite conductivity effects see Ref. 3; the simultneous considertion of roughness nd finite conductivity in the proximity for pproximtion cn be found in Ref. 3 nd beyond PFA in Ref. 3 (see lso references cited in the bove ones. Concerning the present sttus of controversies bout the therml Csimir force see Ref. 9 B. The Csimir s pproch The novelty of Csimir s originl pper ws not the prediction of n ttrctive force between neutrl objects, once London hd lredy explined the existence of force between neutrl but polrizble toms, but the method employed by Csimir, which ws bsed on the zero-point energy ot the electromgnetic field. Proceeding with the cnonicl quntiztion of the electromgnetic field without sources in the Coulomb guge we write the hmiltonin opertor for the free rdition field s Ĥ = α= ω k â kαâkα+, (3 k where â kα nd â kα re the cretion nd nnihiltion opertors of photon with momentum k nd polriztion α. The energy of the field when it is in the vcuum stte, or simply the vcuum energy, is then given by E := Ĥ = k α= ω k, (4 which is lso referred to s zero-point energy of the electromgnetic field in free spce. Hence, we see tht even if we do not hve ny rel photon in given mode, this mode will still contribute to the energy of the field with ω kα nd totl vcuum energy is then divergent quntity given by n infinite sum over ll possible modes. The presence of two prllel nd perfectly conducting pltes imposes on the electromgnetic field the following boundry conditions: E ˆn pltes = B ˆn pltes =, which modify the possible frequencies of the field modes. The Csimir energy is, then, defined s the difference between the vcuum energy with nd without the mteril pltes. However, since in both situtions the vcuum energy is divergent quntity, we need to dopt regulriztion prescription to give physicl mening to such difference. Therefore, precise definition for the Csimir energy is given by ( ( E Cs := lim s ω k kα I ω k kα II (5, (6 where subscript I mens regulrized sum nd tht the frequencies re computed with the boundry conditions tken into ccount, subscript II mens regulrized sum but with no boundry conditions t ll nd s stnds for the regulrizing prmeter. This definition is well suited for plne geometries like tht nlyzed by Csimir in his originl work. In more complex situtions, like those involving sphericl shells, there re some subtleties tht re beyond the purposes of this introductory rticle (the self-energy of sphericl shell depends on its rdius while the self-energy of pir of pltes is independent of the distnce between them. Observe tht, in the previous definition, we eliminte the regulriztion prescription only fter the subtrction is mde. Of course, there re mny different regulriztion methods. A quite simple but very efficient one is chieved by introducing

4 4 et l. high frequency cut off in the zero-point energy expression, s we shll see explicitly in the next section. This procedure cn be physiclly justified if we note tht the metllic pltes become trnsprent in the high frequency limit so tht the high frequency contributions re cnceled out from eqution (6. Though the clcultion of the Csimir pressure for the cse of two prllel pltes is very simple, its determintion my become very involved for other geometries, s is the cse, for instnce, of perfectly conducting sphericl shell. After couple of yers of hrd work nd nightmre in Bessel functions, Boyer 33 computed for the first time the Csimir pressure inside sphericl shell. Surprisingly, he found repulsive pressure, contrry to wht Csimir hd conjectured five yers before when he proposed very peculir model for the stbility of the electron 34. Since then, Boyer s result hs been confirmed nd improved numericlly by mny uthors, s for instnce, by Dvies in 97 35, by Blin nd Duplntier in nd lso Milton in , just to mention some old results. The Csimir effect is not peculirity of the electromgnetic field. It cn be shown tht ny reltivistic field under boundry conditions cused by mteril bodies or by compctifiction of spce dimensions hs its zero-point energy modified. Nowdys, we denominte by Csimir effect ny chnge in the vcuum energy of quntum field due to ny externl gent, from clssicl bckgrounds nd non-trivil topology to externl fields or neighboring bodies. Detiled reviews of the Csimir effect cn be found in 9, 38, 39, 4, 4. C. A locl pproch In this section we present n lterntive wy of computing the Csimir energy density or directly the Csimir pressure which mkes use of locl quntity, nmely, the energymomentum tensor. Recll tht in clssicl electromgnetism the totl force on distribution of chrges nd currents cn be computed integrting the Mxwell stress tensor through n pproprite closed surfce contining the distribution. For simplicity, let us illustrte the method in sclr field. The lgrngin density for free sclr field is given by L ( φ, µ φ = µφ µ φ m φ (7 The field eqution nd the corresponding Green function re given, respectively, by ( + m φ(x = ; (8 ( m G(x,x = δ(x x, (9 ( where, s usul, G(x,x =i T φ(xφ(x. Since the bove lgrngin density does not depend explicitly on x, Noether s Theorem leds nturlly to the following energy-momentum tensor ( µ T µν = T µν = L ( µ φ ν φ+g µν L, ( which, fter symmetriztion, cn be written in the form T µν = ( µ φ ν φ+ ν φ µ φ + g µν L. ( For our purposes, it is convenient to write the vcuum expecttion vlue (VEV of the energy-momentum tensor in terms of the bove Green function s T µν (x = i lim ( x µ ν+ ν µ g µν ( α x α +m G(x,x. ( In this context, the Csimir energy density is defined s ρ C (x= T (x BC T (x Free, (3 where the subscript BC mens tht the VEV must be computed ssuming tht the field stisfies the pproprite boundry condition. Anlogously, considering for instnce the cse of two prllel pltes perpendiculr to the OZ xis (the generliztion for other configurtions is strightforwrd the Csimir force per unit re on one plte is given by F C = T + zz T zz, (4 where superscripts+nd men tht we must evlute T zz on both sides of the plte. In other words, the desired Csimir pressure on the plte is given by the discontinuity of T zz t the plte. Using eqution (, T zz cn be computed by T zz = i ( lim x x z z z G(x,x. (5 Locl methods re richer thn globl ones, since they provide much more informtion bout the system. Depending on the problem we re interested in, they re indeed necessry, s for instnce in the study of rditive properties of n tom inside cvity. However, with the purpose of computing Csimir energies in simple situtions, one my choose, for convenience, globl methods. Previously, we presented only the globl method introduced by Csimir, bsed on the zero-point energy of the quntized field, but there re mny others, nmely, the generlized zet function method 4 nd Schwinger s method 43, 44, to mention just few. II. EXPLICIT COMPUTATION OF THE CASIMIR FORCE In this section, we show explicitly two wys of computing the Csimir force per unit re in simple situtions where plne surfces re involved. We strt with the globl pproch introduced by Csimir which is bsed on the zero-point energy. Then, we give second exmple where we use locl pproch, bsed on the energy-momentum tensor. We finish this section by sketching some results concerning the Csimir effect for mssive fields.

5 Brzilin Journl of Physics, vol 34, no. 4A, 6, A. The electromgnetic Csimir effect between two prllel pltes As our first exmple, let us consider the stndrd (QED Csimir effect where the quntized electromgnetic field is constrined by two perfectly prllel conducting pltes seprted by distnce. For convenience, let us suppose tht one plte is locted t z =, while the other is locted t z =. The quntum electromgnetic potentil between the metllic pltes in the Coulomb guge ( A = which stisfies the pproprite BC is given by 45 A(ρ,z,t = L (π { Z n= ( (κ,n(ˆκ ẑsin ( π / d κ ckl ( nπz + + ( (κ,n i nπ ( nπz k κsin ẑ κ ( nπz } k cos e i(κ ρ ωt + h.c., (6 where ω(κ,n = ck = c κ + n π / /, with n being non-negtive integer nd the prime in Σ mens tht for n= n extr / fctor must be included in the normliztion of the field modes. The non-regulrized Csimir energy then reds E nr c ( = c Z L d κ (π κ+ c Z L d κ (π n= Z + (κ + n π / dk z π κ + k z. Mking the vrible trnsformtion κ +(nπ/ =: λ nd introducing exponentil cutoffs we get regulrized expression (in 948 Csimir used generic cutoff function, E r (,ε= L Z e εκ κ dκ+ π e ελ λ dλ nπ n= Using tht = L π ε ε n= dn nπ e ελ λ dλ ( ε 3 + n= ε dn ε e εnπ/ nπ e εnπ/ ε e ελ dλ = ε ε e επ/ s well s the definition of Bernoulli s numbers, e t = n= B n t n n!,. (7, we obtin { } E( = L π ε 3 + B ( n επ n ε ε 6 n= n! πε 4 = L 6(B π π ε 4 +(+B ε 3 + B 4 π 3 ( B ( n π n (n (n 3ε n 4 +. n=5 n! Using the well known vlues B =, B = nd B 4= 3, nd tking ε +, we obtin E( L π = c As consequence, the force per unit re cting on the plte t z= is given by F( L = L E c ( = π c 4 4,3 (/µm 4 dyn cm, where in the lst step we substituted the numericl vlues of nd c in order to give n ide of the strength of the Csimir pressure. Observe tht the Csimir force between the (conducting pltes is lwys ttrctive. For pltes with cm of re seprted by µm the modulus of this ttrctive force is, 3dyn. For this sme seprtion, we hve P Cs 8 P tm, where P tm is the tmospheric pressure t se level. Hence, for the idelized sitution of two perfectly conducting pltes nd ssuming L = cm, the modulus of the Csimir force would be 7 N for typicl seprtions used in experiments. However, due to the finite conductivity of rel metls, the Csimir forces mesured in experiments re smller thn these vlues. B. The Csimir effect for sclr field with Robin BC In order to illustrte the locl method bsed on the energymomentum tensor, we shll discuss the Csimir effect of mssless sclr field submitted to Robin BC t two prllel pltes, which re defined s φ bound. = β φ n bound., (8 where, by ssumption, β is non-negtive prmeter. However, before computing the desired Csimir pressure, few comments bout Robin BC re in order. First, we note tht Robin BC interpolte continuously Dirichlet nd Neumnn ones. For β we reobtin Dirichlet BC while for β we reobtin Neumnn BC. Robin BC lredy pper in clssicl electromgnetism, clssicl mechnics, wve, het nd Schrödinger equtions 46 nd even in the study of interpolting prtition functions 47. A nice reliztion of these conditions in the context of clssicl mechnics

6 6 et l. cn be obtined if we study vibrting string with its extremes ttched to elstic supports 48?. Robin BC cn lso be used in phenomenologicl model for penetrble surfces 49. In fct, in the context of the plsm model, it cn be shown tht for frequencies much smller thn the plsm frequency (ω ω P the prmeter β plys the role of the plsm wvelength?. In the context of QFT this kind of BC ppered more thn two decdes go 5, 5. Recently, they hve been discussed in vriety of contexts, s in the AdS/CFT correspondence 5, in the discussion of upper bounds for the rtio entropy/energy in confined systems 53, in the sttic Csimir effect 54, in the het kernel expnsion 55, 56, 57 nd in the one-loop renormliztion of the λφ 4 theory 58, 59. As we will see, Robin BC cn give rise to restoring forces in the sttic Csimir effect 54. Consider mssless sclr field submitted to Robin BC on two prllel pltes: φ z= = β φ z z= ; φ z= = β φ z z=, (9 where we ssume β (β. For convenience, we write Z G(x,x = d 3 k α (π 3 eık α(x x α g(z,z ;k,ω, ( with α=,,, g µν = dig(,+,+,+ nd the reduced Green function g(z,z ;k,ω stisfies ( z + λ g(z,z ;k,ω= δ(z z, ( where λ = ω k nd g(z,z ;k,ω is submitted to the following boundry conditions (for simplicity, we shll not write k,ω in the rgument of g: g(,z =β z g(,z ; g(,z = β z g(,z It is not difficult to see tht g(z,z cn be written s A(z (sinλz+β λcosλz, z<z g(z,z = B(z (sinλ(z β λcosλ(z, z>z For points inside the pltes, <z,z <, the finl expression for the reduced Green function is given by ( ( g RR (z,z γ eıλz < e ıλz < γ eıλ(z > e > ıλ(z = ıλ( γ e ıλ, γ e ıλ ( where γ i = +iβ iλ iβ i λ (i=,. Outside the pltes, with z,z >, we hve: ( g RR (z,z = eıλ(z < e ıλ(z < e ıλ(z <. (3 ıλ γ Defining t µν such tht Z d T µν k dω (x = (π π tµν (x, (4 we hve t 33 (z = ( i lim z z z z + λ g(z,z. (5 The Csimir force per unit re on the plte t x= is given by the discontinuity in t 33 : Z d F k dω = t 33 z= t 33 z=+. (π π After strightforwrd clcultion, it cn be shown tht F(β,β ;= 3π 4 ( +β ξ/ β ξ/ dξ ξ 3 ( +β ξ/ β ξ/. e ξ (6 Depending on the vlues of prmeters β nd β, restoring Csimir forces my rise, s shown in Figure by the dotted line nd the thin solid line. p 4 O (β =,β (β =, β = (β = β = or β = β FIG. : Csimir pressure, conveniently multiplied by 4, s function of for vrious vlues of prmeters β nd β. The prticulr cses of Dirichlet-Dirichlet, Neumnn- Neumnn nd Dirichlet-Neumnn BC cn be reobtined if we tke, respectively, β = β =, β = β nd β = ; β. For the first two cses, we obtin F DD (=F NN (= 3π 4 dξ ξ3 e ξ. (7 Using the integrl representtion R ξs dξ e ξ = ζ R(sΓ(s, where ζ R is the Riemnn zet function, we get hlf the electromgnetic result, nmely, F DD (=F NN (= π c 48 For the cse of mixed BC, we get 4. (8 F DN (=+ ξ 3 3π 4 dξ e ξ +, (9

7 Brzilin Journl of Physics, vol 34, no. 4A, 6, Using in the previous eqution the integrl representtion R ξs dξ e ξ + = ( s Γ(sζ R (s we get repulsive pressure (equl to hlf of Boyer s result 6 obtined for the electromgnetic field constrined by perfectly conducting plte prllel to n infinitely permeble one, F DN (= 7 8 π c (3 C. The Csimir effect for mssive prticles In this subsection, we sketch briefly some results concerning mssive fields, just to get some feeling bout wht kind of influence the mss of field my hve in the Csimir effect. Firstly, let us consider mssive sclr field submitted to Dirichlet BC in two prllel pltes, s before. In this cse, the llowed frequencies for the field modes re given by ω k = c κ + n π /, + m which led, fter we use the Csimir method explined previously, to the following result for the Csimir energy per unit re (see, for instnce, Ref. 38 L E c(,m= m 8π n= n K (mn, (3 where K ν is modified Bessel function, m is the mss of the field nd is the distnce between the pltes, s usul. The limit of smll mss, m, is esily obtined nd yields L E c(,m π m 96. (3 As expected, the zero mss limit coincides with our previous result (8 (fter the force per unit re is computed. Observing the sign of the first correction on the right hnd side of lst eqution we conclude tht for smll msses the Csimir effect is wekened. On the other hnd, in the limit of lrge mss, m, it cn be shown tht L E c(,m m 6π ( π m / e m (33 Note tht the Csimir effect disppers for m, since in this limit there re no quntum fluctutions for the field nymore. An exponentil decy with m is relted to the plne geometry. Other geometries my give rise to power lw decys when m. However, in some cses, the behviour of the Csimir force with m my be quite unexpected. The Csimir force my increse with m before it decreses monotoniclly to zero s m (this hppens, for instnce, when Robin BC re imposed on mssive sclr field t two prllel pltes 6. In the cse of mssive fermionic fields, n nlogous behviour is found. However, some cre must be tken when computing the Csimir energy density for fermions, regrding wht kind of BC cn be chosen for this field. The point is tht Dirc eqution is first order eqution, so tht if we wnt non-trivil solutions, we cn not impose tht the field stisfies Dirichlet BC t two prllel pltes, for instnce. The most pproprite BC for fermions is borrowed from the so clled MIT bg model for hdrons 6, which bsiclly sttes tht there is no flux of fermions through the boundry (the norml component of the fermionic current must vnish t the boundry. The Csimir energy per unit re for mssive fermionic field submitted to MIT BC t two prllel pltes ws first computed by Mmyev nd Trunov 63 (the mssless fermionic field ws first computed by Johnson in L E f c (,m= π 3 dξξ m ξ m log + ξ m ξ+m e ξ The smll nd lrge mss limits re given, respectively, by L E f 7π c (,m m 4 ; L E f c(,m 3(m/ 5 π 3/ 3 e m. (34 Since the first correction to the zero mss result hs n opposite sign, lso for fermionic field smll msses diminish the Csimir effect. In the lrge mss limit, m, we hve behviour nlogous to tht of the sclr field, nmely, n exponentil decy with m (gin this hppens due to the plne geometry. We finish this section with n importnt observtion: even prticle s light s the electron hs completely negligible Csimir effect. III. MISCELLANY In this section we shll briefly present couple of topics which re in some wy connected to the Csimir effect nd tht hve been considered by our reserch group in the lst yers. For obvious resons, we will not be ble to touch ll the topics we hve been interested in, so tht we hd to choose only few of them. We first discuss how the Csimir effect of chrged field cn be influenced by n externl mgnetic field. Then, we show how the constitutive equtions ssocited to the Dirc quntum vcuum cn be ffected by the presence of mteril pltes. Finlly, we consider the so clled dynmicl Csimir effect. A. Csimir effect under n externl mgnetic field The Csimir effect which is observed experimentlly is tht ssocited to the photon field, which is mssless field. As we mentioned previously, even the electron field lredy exhibits completely unmesurble effect. With the purpose (nd hope of enhncing the Csimir effect of electrons nd positrons we considered the influence of n externl electromgnetic field on their Csimir effect. Since in this cse.

8 8 et l. we hve chrged fields, we wondered if the virtul electronpositron pirs which re continuously creted nd destroyed from the Dirc vcuum would respond in such wy tht the corresponding Csimir energy would be gretly mplified. This problem ws considered for the first time in (see lso Ref. 66. The influence of n externl mgnetic field on the Csimir effect of chrged sclr field ws considered in Ref. 67 nd recently, the influence of mgnetic field on the fermionic Csimir effect ws considered with the more pproprite MIT BC 68. For simplicity, let us consider mssive fermion field under nti-periodic BC (in the OZ direction in the presence of constnt nd uniform mgnetic field in this sme direction. After lengthy but strightforwrd clcultion, it cn be shown tht the Csimir energy per unit re is given by 66 E(, B l = (m π 3 eb 4π n= ( n n= n K (mn ( ( n dσ e (n/ σ (m eb /σ L σ where we introduced the Lngevin function: L(ξ = cothξ /ξ. In the strong field limit, we hve E(, B l ebm π n= ( n K (mn. (35 n In this limit we cn still nlyze two distinct situtions, nmely, the smll mss limit (m nd the lrge mss limit (m. Considering distnces between the pltes typicl of Csimir experiments ( µm, we hve in the former cse ρ c (,B ρ c (, 4 B Tesl while in the ltter cse, ρ c (,B ρ c (, B Tesl ; m, (36 ; m. (37 In the bove equtions ρ c (,B nd ρ c (, re the Csimir energy density under the influence of the mgnetic field nd without it, respectively. Observe tht for the Csimir effect of electrons nd positrons, which must be treted s the lrge mss limit described previously, huge mgnetic fields re needed in order to enhnce the effect (fr beyond ccessible fields in the lbortory. In other words, we hve shown tht though the Csimir effect of chrged fermionic field cn indeed be ltered by n externl mgnetic field, the universl constnts conspired in such wy tht this influence turns out to be negligible nd without ny chnce of direct mesurement t the lbortory., B. Mgnetic permebility of the constrined Dirc vcuum In contrst to the clssicl vcuum, the quntum vcuum is fr from being n empty spce, inert nd insensible to ny externl influence. It behves like mcroscopic medium, in the sense tht it responds to externl gents, s for exmple electromgnetic fields or the presence of mteril pltes. As previously discussed, recll tht the (stndrd Csimir effect is nothing but the energy shift of the vcuum stte of the field cused by the presence of prllel pltes. There re mny other fscinting phenomen ssocited to the quntum vcuum, nmely, the prticle cretion produced by the ppliction of n electric field 69, the birefringence of the QED vcuum under n externl mgnetic field 7, 7 nd the Schrnhorst effect 7, 73, to mention just few. This lst effect predicts tht the velocity of light propgting perpendiculrly to two perfectly conducting prllel pltes which impose (by ssumption BC only on the rdition field is slightly ltered by the presence of the pltes. The expected reltive vrition in the velocity of light for typicl vlues of possible experiments is so tiny ( c/c 36 tht this effect hs not been confirmed yet. Depending on the nture of the mteril pltes the velocity of light propgting perpendiculr to the pltes is expected to diminish 74. The Schrnhorst effect inside cvity ws considered in 75. The negligible chnge in the velocity of light predicted by Schrnhorst my be connected with the fct tht the effect tht bers his nme is two-loop QED effect, since the clssicl field of trveling light wve intercts with the rdition field only through the fermionic loop. With the purpose of estimting chnge in the constitutive equtions of the quntum vcuum t the one-loop level, we were led to consider the fermionic field submitted to some BC. The mgnetic permebility µ of the constrined Dirc vcuum ws computed by the first time in Ref. 76, but with the nonrelistic nti-periodic BC. In this cse, the result found for the reltive chnge in the permebility, µ:= µ, ws lso negligible (n nlogous clcultion hs lso been mde in the context of sclr QED 77. However, when the more relistic MIT BC re imposed on the Dirc field t two prllel pltes things chnge drsticlly. In this cse, it cn be shown tht the mgnetic permebility of the constrined Dirc vcuum is given by 78 µ(m = π π e m + 6π e m H(m, where { ( } x x H(m = dx (x ln + e mx. 3/ x+ (38 For confining distnces of the order of,µm, we hve µ := µ 9. (39 The previous vlue is comprble to the mgnetic permebility of Hydrogen nd Nitrogen t room temperture nd tmospheric pressure. Hence, n experimentl verifiction of this

9 Brzilin Journl of Physics, vol 34, no. 4A, 6, result seems to be not unfesible (we will come bck to this point in the finl remrks. C. The Dynmicl Csimir effect As our lst topic, we shll briefly discuss the so clled dynmicl Csimir effect, which consists, s the nme suggests, of the considertion of quntum field in the presence of moving boundries. Bsiclly, the coupling between vcuum fluctutions nd moving boundry my give rise to dissiptive forces cting on the boundry s well s to prticle cretion phenomenon. In some sense, these phenomen were expected. Recll tht the sttic Csimir force is fluctuting quntity 79 nd hence, using generl rguments relted to the fluctution-dissiption theorem 8 dissiptive forces on moving boundries re expected. Further, using rguments of energy conservtion we re led to cretion of rel prticles (photons, if we re considering the electromgnetic field 8. For the bove resons, this topic is sometimes referred to s rdition rection force on moving boundries. After Schwinger s suggestion tht the phenomenon of sonoluminescence could be explined by the dynmicl Csimir effect 8 (nme coined by himself, lot of work hs been done on this subject. However, it ws shown few yers lter tht this ws not the cse (see 9 nd references therein for more detils. The dynmicl Csimir effect lredy shows up in the cse of one (moving mirror 83, 84, 85. However, oscillting cvities whose wlls perform vibrtions in prmetric resonnce with certin unperturbed field eigenfrequency my gretly enhnce the effect 86, 87, 88, 89. Recently, one dimensionl oscillting cvity with wlls of different nture ws considered 9. The dynmicl Csimir effect hs lso been nlyzed for vriety of three-dimensionl geometries, including prllel plne pltes 9, cylindricl wveguides 9, nd rectngulr 93, cylindricl 94 nd sphericl cvities 95. For review concerning clssicl nd quntum phenomen in cvities with moving boundries see Dodonov 96 nd for vriety of topics on non-sttionry Csimir effect including perspectives of its experimentl verifiction see the specil issue 97. In this section, we shll discuss the force exerted by the quntum fluctutions of mssless sclr field on one moving boundry s well s the prticle cretion phenomenon in unusul exmple in + dimensions, where the field stisfies Robin BC t the moving boundry 98, 99. We shll follow throughout this pper the perturbtive method introduced by Ford nd Vilenkin 84. This method ws lso pplied successfully to the cse of the electromgnetic field under the influence of one moving (perfectly conducting plte 85 s well s n oscillting cvity formed by two prllel (perfectly conducting pltes 9. Let us then consider mssless sclr field φ in + in the presence of one moving boundry which imposes on the field Robin BC t one moving boundry when observed from co-moving inertil frme. By ssumption, the movement of the boundry is prescribed, non-reltivistic nd of smll mplitude (δq(t is the position of the plte t generic instnt t. Lst ssumptions my be stted mthemticlly by δ q(t << c nd δq(t << c/ω, where ω corresponds to the (min mechnicl frequency. Therefore, we must solve the following eqution: φ(x,t=, with the field stisfying Robin BC t the moving boundry given by x + δ q(t φ(x,t t x=δq(t = β φ(x,t x=δq(t. (4 where β is non-negtive prmeter nd the previous condition ws lredy written in the lbortory frme. We re neglecting terms of the order O(δ q /c. The prticulr cses of Dirichlet nd Neumnn BC re reobtined by mking β = nd β, respectively. The dissiptive forces for these prticulr cses were studied t zero temperture s well s t finite temperture nd lso with the field in coherent stte in (dissiptive forces on perfectly conducting moving plte cused by the vcuum fluctutions of the electromgnetic field t zero nd non-zero temperture were studied in. The perturbtive pproch introduced by Ford nd Vilenkin 84 consists in writing φ(x,t=φ (x,t+δφ(x,t, (4 where φ (x,t is the field submitted to Robin BC t sttic boundry fixed t the origin nd δφ(x,t is the first order contribution due to the movement of the boundry. The totl force on the moving boundry my be computed with the id of the corresponding energy-momentum tensor, nmely, δf(t= T ( t,δq + (t T ( t,δq (t, (4 where superscripts + nd men tht we must compute the energy-momentum tensor on both sides of the moving boundry. It is convenient to work with time Fourier trnsforms. The susceptibility χ(ω is defined in the Fourier spce by δf(ω =: χ(ω δq(ω (43 where δf(ω nd δq(ω re the Fourier trnsformtions of δf(t nd δq(t, respectively. It is illuminting to compute the totl work done by the vcuum fluctutions on the moving boundry. It is strightforwrd to show tht Z + δf(tδ q(tdt = π dωωi mχ(ω δq(ω. (44 Note tht only the imginry prt of χ(ω ppers in the previous eqution. It is responsible for the dissiptive effects nd hence it is closely relted with the totl energy converted into rel prticles. On the other hnd, the rel prt of χ(ω, when it exists, does not contribute to the totl work nd hence it is not relted to prticle cretion, but to dispersive effects. For the prticulr cses of Dirichlet or Neumnn BC it cn be shown tht the susceptibility is purely imginry nd given by χ D (ω=χ N (ω=i ω3 6πc, (45

10 et l. which implies δf(t= d 3 6πc δq(t. (46 dt3 Since I mχ(ω >, for these cses the vcuum fluctutions re lwys dissipting energy from the moving boundry. However, for Robin BC n interesting thing hppens. It cn be shown tht χ(ω cquires lso rel prt, which gives rise to dispersive force cting on the moving boundry. The explicit expressions of R eχ(ω nd I mχ(ω cn be found in 98, but the generl behviour of them s functions of ω is shown in Figure 3. For convenience, we normlize these quntities dividing them by the vlue I mχ D (ω, where the subscript D mens tht I mχ(ω must be computed with Dirichlet BC. β= nd β, respectively. The results coincide nd re given by (we re mking c = dn (D dn(n (ω= dω dω (ω=(δq T ω(ω ωθ(ω ω. (5 A simple inspection in (49 shows tht, due to the presence of the Heviside step function, only the field modes with eigenfrequencies smller thn the mechnicl frequency re excited. Further, the number of prticles creted per unit frequency when Robin BC re used is lwys smller thn the number of prticles creted per unit frequency when Dirichlet (or Neumnn BC re employed.,,5 Im Im D, Re Im D -, FIG. 3: Imginry nd rel prts of χ(ω with Robin BC ppropritely normlized by the vlue of I mχ(ω for the Dirichlet BC. Now, let us discuss briefly the prticle cretion phenomenon under Robin BC. Here, we shll consider semiinfinite slb extending from to δq(t following s before prescribed non-reltivistic motion which imposes on the field Robin BC t δq(t. It cn be shown tht the corresponding spectrl distribution is given by 99 dn 4ω (ω= dω +β ω dω π δq(ω ω +β ω ω β ωω (47 As n explicit exmple, let us consider the prticulr motion δq(t=δq e t /T cos(ω t, (48 where, by ssumption, ω T (this is mde in order to single out the effect of given Fourier component of the motion. For this cse, we obtin the following spectrl distribution dn dω (ω= (δq T ω(ω ω β ω(ω ω (+β ω (+β (ω ω Θ(ω ω. (49 The spectrl distributions for the prticulr cses of Dirichlet or Neumnn BC cn be esily reobtined by mking simply FIG. 4: Spectrl distributions of creted prticles for: Dirichlet nd Neumnn BC (dshed line nd for some interpolting vlues of the prmeter β (dotted nd solid lines. Figure 4 shows the spectrl distribution for different vlues of the prmeter β, including β= (dshed line, which corresponds to Dirichlet or Neumnn BC. Note tht for interpolting vlues of β prticle cretion is lwys smller thn for β = (dotted line. Depending on the vlue of β, prticle cretion cn be lrgely suppressed (solid line. IV. FINAL REMARKS In the lst decdes there hs been substntil increse in the study of the Csimir effect nd relted topics. It is remrkble tht this fscinting effect, considered nowdys s fundmentl one in QFT, ws born in connection with colloidl chemistry, n essentilly experimentl science. As we mentioned previously, the novelty of Csimir s seminl work (see lso 6 ws the technique employed by him to compute forces between neutrl bodies s is emphsized by Itzykson nd Zuber 3: By considering vrious types of bodies influencing the vcuum configurtion we my give n interesting interprettion of the forces cting on them.

11 Brzilin Journl of Physics, vol 34, no. 4A, 6, However, the ttrctive or repulsive chrcter of the Csimir force cn not be nticipted. It depends on the specific boundry conditions, the number of spce-time dimensions, the nture of the field (bosonic or fermionic, etc. The mystery of the Csimir effect hs intrigued even proeminent physicists such s Julin Schwinger, s cn be seen in his own sttement 37:... one of the lest intuitive consequences of quntum electrodynmics. There is no doubt nowdys bout the existence of the (sttic Csimir effect, thnks to the vst list of ccurte experiments tht hve been mde during the lst ten yers. It is worth emphsizing tht rigorous comprison between theory nd experimentl dt cn be chieved only if the effects of temperture nd more relistic BC re considered. In principle, the former re importnt in comprison with the vcuum contribution for lrge distnces, while the ltter cn not be neglected for short distnces. Typicl rnges investigted in Csimir experiments re form.µm to.µm nd, to hve n ide of typicl plsm wvelengths (the plsm wvelength is closely relted to the penetrtion depth, recll tht for Au we hve λ P 36nm. The Csimir effect hs become n extremely ctive re of reserch from both theoreticl nd experimentl points of view nd its importnce lies fr beyond the context of QED. This is due to its interdisciplinry chrcter, which mkes this effect find pplictions in quntum field theory (bg model, for instnce, cvity QED, tomic nd moleculr physics, mthemticl methods in QFT (development of new regulriztion nd renormliztion schemes, fixing new constrints in hypotheticl forces, nnotechnology (nnomchines operted by Csimir forces, condensed mtter physics, grvittion nd cosmology, models with compctified extr-dimensions, etc. In this work, we considered quntum fields intercting only with clssicl boundries. Besides, these interctions were described by highly idelized BC. Aprt from this kind of interction, there ws no other interction present. However, the fields in nture re intercting fields, like those in QED, etc. Hence, we could sk wht re the first corrections to the Csimir effect when we consider intercting fields. In principle, they re extremely smll. In fct, for the cse of QED, the first rditive correction to the Csimir energy density (considering tht the conducting pltes impose BC only on the rdition field ws firstly computed by Bordg et l 4 nd is αλ c given by E ( C (,α=e( C ( 3 9, where λ c is the Compton wvelength of the electron nd E ( C ( is the zeroth order contribution to the Csimir energy density. As we see, t lest for QED, rditive corrections to the Csimir effect re experimentlly irrelevnt. However, they might be relevnt in the bg model, where for qurks λ c nd lso the qurk propgtors must be considered submitted to the bg BC 9. Besides, the study of rditive corrections to the Csimir effect provide good lbortory for testing the vlidity of idelized BC in higher order of perturbtion theory. Concerning the dynmicl Csimir effect, the big chllenge is to conceive n experiment which will be ble to detect rel photons creted by moving boundries or by n equivlent physicl system tht simultes rpid motion of boundry. An ingenious proposl of n experiment hs been mde recently by the Pdov s group 5. There re, of course, mny other interesting spects of the dynmicl Csimir effect tht hs been studied, s quntum decoherence 6, mss correction of the moving mirrors 7, etc. (see lso the reviews 8. As finl comment, we would like to mention tht surprising results hve been obtined when deformed quntum field theory is considered in connection with the Csimir effect. It seems tht the simultneous ssumptions of deformtion nd boundry conditions led to new mechnism of cretion of rel prticles even in sttic sitution 9. Of course, the Csimir energy density is lso modified by the deformtion. Quntum field theories with different spce-time symmetries, other thn those governed by the usul Poincré lgebr (s for exmple the κ-deformed Poincré lgebr my give rise to modified dispersion reltion, desirble feture in some tenttive models for solving recent strophysicl prdoxes. Acknowledgments: I m indebted to B. Mintz, P.A. Mi Neto nd R. Rodrigues for creful reding of the mnuscript nd mny helpful suggestions. I would like lso to thnk to ll members of the Csimir group of UFRJ for enlightening discussions tht we hve mintined over ll these yers. Finlly, I thnk to CNPq for prtil finncil support. H.B.G. Csimir Proc. K. Ned. Akd. Wet. 5, 793 (948. F. London Z. Physik 63, 45 (93. 3 E.J.W. Vervey, J.T.G. Overbeek nd K. vn Nes, J. Phys. nd Colloid Chem. 5, 63 ( H.B.G. Csimir nd D. Polder, Phys. Rev. 73, 36 ( D. Tbor nd R.H.S. Winterton, Nture 9, (968; Proc. Roy. soc. Lond. A3, 435 ( H.B.G. Csimir J. Chim. Phys. 46, 47 ( M. Plnck, Verh. d. Deutsch. Phys. Ges. ( 3 (9. 8 H.B.G. Csimir, Some remrks on the history of the so clled Csimir effect, in the Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Quntum Field Theory under the Influence of Externl Conditions, pg 3, Ed. M. Bordg, World Scientific ( K.A. Milton, Physicl Mnifesttion of zero point energy - The Csimir effect, World Scientific (. Lifshitz E M 956 Sov. Phys. JETP 73 E.M. Lifshtz e L.P. Pitevskii, Lndu nd Lifshtz Course of Theoreticl Physics: Sttisticl Physics Prt, Butterworth- Heinemnn (98. E.S. Sbisky nd C.H. Anderson, Phys. Rev. A 7, 79 (973. Dzyloshinskii I E Lifshitz nd L.P. Pitevskii, Advn. Phys., 65 (96. 3 M.J. Sprny, Physic 4, 75 ( S.K. Lmoreux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (997.

12 et l. S.K. Lmoreux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 5475(E ( J. Blocki, J. Rndrup, W.J. Switecki nd C.F. Tsng, Ann. of Phys ( U. Mohideen e A. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 4549 ( G.L. Klimchisky, A. Roy, U. Mohideen nd V.M. Mostepnenko Phys. Rev. A 6, 3487 ( A. Roy e U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 438 ( A. Roy, C.-Y. Lin e U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. D 6, (R 999 U. Mohideen e A. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 334 (999.. B.W. Hrris, F. Chen e U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. A 6, 59 (. F. Chen, U. Mohideen, G.L. Klimchitsky nd V.M. Mostepnenko, Phys. Rev. A 69, 7 (. 3 T. Ederth, Phys. Rev. A 6, 64 (. 4 G. Bressi, G. Crugno, R. Onofrio e G. Ruoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 484 (. 5 F. Chen, U. Mohideen, G.L. Klimchitsky nd V.M. Mostepnenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 8 (. F. Chen, U. Mohideen, G.L. Klimchitsky nd V.M. Mostepnenko, Phys. Rev. A 66, 33 (. 6 R.S. Decc, E. Fischbch, G.L. Klimchitsky, D.E. Kruse, D. Lopes e V. M. Mostepnenko Phys. Rev. D 68, 63 (3. 7 R.S. Decc, D. Lopez, E. Fischbch, G.L. Klimchitsky, D.E. Kruse nd V.M. Mostepnenko, Annls Phys. (NY 38, 37 (5. 8 G.L.Klimchitsky, F.Chen, R.S.Decc, E.Fischbch, D.E. Kruse, D.Lopez, U.Mohideen nd V.M.Mostepnenko, J. Phys. A 39, 6485 (6. 9 V.M.Mostepnenko, V.B.Bezerr, R.S.Decc, B.Geyer, E.Fischbch, G.L.Klimchitsky, D.E.Kruse, D.Lopez nd C.Romero, J.Phys. A 39, 6589 (6. 3 A. Lmbrecht nd S. Reynud, Eur. Phys. J. D 8, 39 (. 3 G.L. Klimchitsky, A. Roy, U. Mohideen nd V.M. Mostepnenko, Phys. Rev. A 6, 3487 ( P.A. Mi Neto, A. Lmbrecht nd S. Reynud, Phys. Rev. A 7, 5 (5. 33 T.H. Boyer, Phys. Rev. 74, 764 ( H.B.G. Csimir, Physic 9, 846 ( B. Dvies, J. Mth. Phys. 3, 34 (97 36 R. Blin nd B. Duplntier, Ann. Phys. (N.Y., 65 ( K.A. Milton, L.L. DeRd,, Jr., nd J. Schwinger, Ann. Phys. (N.Y. 5, ( G. Plunien, B. Muller B nd W. Greiner Phys. Rep. 34, 89 ( P.W. Milonni, The Quntum Vcuum: An Introduction to Quntum Electrodynmics, Acdemic, New York, ( V.M. Mostepnenko nd N.N. Trunov, The Csimir Effect nd its Applictions, Clrendon Press, Oxford ( M. Bordg, U. Mohideen, e V. M. Mostepnenko, Phys. Rep. 353, (. 4 E. Elizlde, S. D. Odintsov, A. Romeo, A. A. Bitsenko, nd S. Zerbini, Zet Regulriztion Techniques with Applictions, (World Scientific, Singpore, J. Schwinger, Lett. Mth. Phys. 4, 59 ( M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin, A. J. Seguí-Sntonj, Lett. Mth. Phys. 3, 69 (994; M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin, A. J. Seguí-Sntonj, Lett. Mth. Phys. 3, 39 (994; L.C. Albuquerque, C. Frin, S.J. Rbello e A.N. Vidy, Lett. Mth. Phys. 34, 373 ( G. Brton, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. ( J.D. Bondurnt nd S.A. Fulling, J. Phys. A: Mth. Gen. 38, 55 (5. 47 M. Asorey, F.S. d Ros nd L.B. Crvlho, presented in the XXV ENFPC, Cxmbú, Brsil (4. 48 G. Chen nd J. Zhou, Vibrtion nd Dmping in Distributed Systems, ol. (Boc Rton, FL:CRC, pg V.M. Mostepnenko nd N.N. Trunov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45, 88 ( D. Deutsch nd P. Cndels, Phys. Rev. D, 363 ( G. Kennedy, R. Critchley nd J.S. Dowker, Ann. Phys. (NY 5, 346 (98. 5 P. Minces nd V.O. Rivelles, Nucl. Phys. B 57, 65 ( 53 S.N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D 63, 44 (. 54 A. Romeo nd A.A. Shrin, J. Phys. A35, 97 (. 55 M. Bordg, H. Flomir, E.M. Sntngelo nd D.V. Vssilevich, Phys. Rev. D 65, 643 (. 56 S.A. Fulling, J. Phys. A 36, 6857 (3. 57 J.S. Dowker mth.sp/4944 v4 (5. 58 L.C. de Albuquerque nd R.M. Cvlcnti J. Phys. A 37, 739 (4. 59 L.C. de Albuquerque, hep-th/579 v (5. 6 T.H. Boyer, Phys. Rev A 9, 78 ( T.M. Britto, C. Frin nd F.P. Reis, in preprtion. 6 A. Chodos, R.L. Jffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn nd V.F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D 9, 347 ( S.G. Mmyev nd N.N. Trunov, Sov. Phys. J. 3, 55 ( K. Johnson, Act Pol. B 6, 865 ( M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin nd A.C. Tort, Proceedings of the IV Workshop on Quntum Field Theory under the Influence of Externl Conditions, Ed. M. Bordg, Leipzig, Germny, M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin nd A.C. Tort, Brz. J. Phys. 3, 84 (. 67 M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin, M.R. Negrão nd A. Tort, J. Phys. A 3, 4457 ( E. Elizlde, F.C. Sntos nd A.C. Tort, J. Phys. A 35, 743 (. 69 J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 8, 664 (95. 7 Z. Bilynicki-Birul nd I. Bilynicki-Birul, Phys. Rev. D, 34 (97. 7 S.L. Adler, Ann. Phys. (NY 67, 599 (97. 7 K. Schrnhorst, Phys. Lett. B 36, 354 ( G. Brton, PHys. Lett. B 37, 559 ( M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin, F.C. Sntos nd A.C. Tort, Phys. Lett. B ( R.B. Rodrigues nd N.F. Sviter, Physic A 34, 59 (4. 76 M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin, A.C. Tort nd J. Rfelski, Phys. Lett. B434, 388 ( M.V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Frin, M.R. Negrão nd A.C. Tort, Phys. Lett. B483, 44 (. 78 L. Bernrdino, R. Cvlcnti, M.V. Cougo-Pinto nd C. Frin, to pper in the J. Phys. A. 79 G. Brton, J. Phys. A4, 5533 (99; C. Eberlein, J. Phys. A 5, 35 (99. 8 V.B. Brginsky nd F.Y. Khlili, Phys. Lett. A6, 97 (99; M.T. Jekel nd S. Reynud, Qunt. Opt. 4,39 (99. 8 Moore G T 97 Mth. Phys J. Schwinger, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 9, 958 ( S.A. Fulling nd P.C.W. Dvies, Proc. R. Soc. London A 348, 393 ( L.H. Ford nd A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D5, 569 ( P.A. Mi Neto, J. Phys. A 7, 67 (994; P. A. Mi Neto nd L.A.S. Mchdo, Phys. Rev. A 54, 34 (996.