Permutation Resolutions for Specht Modules of Hecke Algebras
|
|
- Preston Burns
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Permutation Resolutions for Specht Modules of Hecke Algebras Robert Boltje Department of Mathematics University of California Santa Cruz, CA U.S.A. Filix Maisch Department of Mathematics Oregon State University Corvallis, OR U.S.A. October 17, 2011 (revised March 25, 2012) Abstract In [BH], a chain complex was constructed in a combinatorial way which conjecturally is a resolution of the (dual of the) integral Specht module for the symmetric group in terms of permutation modules. In this paper we extend the definition of the chain complex to the integral Iwahori Hecke algebra and prove the same partial exactness results that were proven in the symmetric group case. Introduction In [BH], Hartmann and the first author constructed, for any composition λ of a positive integer r, a finite chain complex of modules for the group algebra RW of the symmetric group W on r letters over an arbitrary commutative ring R. The last module in this complex is the dual of the Specht module MR Subject Classification: 20C08. Keywords: Iwahori Hecke algebra, Specht module, permutation module, resolution 1
2 S λ and the other modules are permutation modules with point stabilizers given by Young subgroups of W. The construction of the chain complex was completely combinatorial and characteristic-free. It was conjectured that this chain complex is exact whenever λ is a partition. In other words the chain complex is conjectured to be a resolution of the (dual) of the Specht module by permutation modules. Partial exactness results were already established in [BH] and a full proof of the exactness was given recently by Yudin and Santana (see [SY]) by translating the construction via the Schur functor. Other permutation resolutions of Specht modules have been considered by Donkin in [Dn], Akin in [A], Zelevinskii in [Z], Akin and Buchsbaum in [AB1] and [AB2], Santana in [S], Woodcock in [W1] and [W2], Doty in [Dy] and Yudin in [Y]. See [BH, Section 6] for a more detailed comparison of these constructions with the construction in [BH]. The goal of this paper is to (a) lift the construction of the chain complex in [BH] for the group algebra RW to a chain complex for modules of the Iwahori Hecke algebra H R r,q for any integral domain R such that the specialization q = 1 reproduces the original chain complex; and (b) lift the partial exactness proofs from [BH] to the new construction. Both goals are achieved, with part (a) being relatively straightforward, but part (b) requiring much more subtle arguments. The paper is arranged as follows. In Section 1 we establish the necessary notation and recall results about the Hecke algebra H R r,q from [DJ]. In Section 2 we introduce a group of homomorphisms between permutation modules of H R r,q and show that such homomorphisms are closed under composition. This is used in Section 3 to construct the chain complex which generalizes the chain complex in [BH]. In Section 4 we prove that the chain complex in question is exact in degrees 1 and 0, for arbitrary partitions λ, and that it is exact everywhere, for all partitions of the form (λ 1, λ 2, λ 3 ) with λ 3 1, cf. Theorems 4.2, 4.4, 4.5. The very technical proof of a key lemma, Lemma 4.3, is postponed to Section 5. The authors are grateful to the referee for the careful reading and for pointing out a mistake in the proof of Proposition 2.2 in the first version of this paper. 2
3 1 Notation and Quoted Results Throughout this paper we denote by R an integral domain. Unadorned tensor products and homomorphism sets will be understood to be taken over R. Moreover, we fix a positive integer r and denote by W the symmetric group on the set {1,..., r}. Elements of W are composed like functions applied on the right in order to be consistent with [DJ]. Thus, W acts from the right on {1,..., r} and we write (i)w or iw for i {1,..., r} and w W. We set S := {(i, i + 1) i = 1..., r 1}, the standard choice of simple transpositions. The set of positive (resp. non-negative) integers will be denoted by N (resp. N 0 ). 1.1 The Hecke algebra H. For a unit q of R we denote by H = Hr,q R the Hecke algebra as introduced in [DJ]. It has an R-basis consisting of the elements T w, w W. The multiplication in H is uniquely determined by the following formulas for w W and s S: T ws, if l(ws) = l(w) + 1, i.e., if iw 1 < (i + 1)w 1, T w T s = qt ws + (q 1)T w, if l(ws) = l(w) 1, i.e., if iw 1 > (i + 1)w 1. The element T 1 is the identity element of H. By we denote the strong Bruhat order on W : for u, v W, one has u v if there exists a reduced expression u = s 1 s n of u and integers 1 i 1 < < i k n with v = s i1 s i2 s ik. While, for given v, w W, it is in general difficult to express T v T w in terms of the basis elements T x, x W, Lemma 2.1(ii) in [DJ] and a quick induction argument on l(w) imply that T v T w wu W RT vu (1) and that T v T w = T vw if l(vw) = l(v) + l(w). (2) 1.2 The H-modules M λ. We denote by Γ the set of compositions λ = (λ 1, λ 2,...) of r and by Λ the set of partitions of r. We define the dominance order on Γ by λ µ: e e λ i µ i for all e 1. i=1 i=1 3
4 This defines a partial order on Γ. Note that it differs from the dominance relation defined in [DJ] which is not a partial order and is defined by λ µ: µ λ, (3) where λ = (λ 1, λ 2,...) denotes the dual of λ, i.e., λ i := {k N λ k i}, for i N. Note that λ is always a partition. Let λ be a composition of r. One associates to λ the set partition P λ := {{1,..., λ 1 }, {λ 1 + 1,..., λ 1 + λ 2 },...} of {1,..., r} and the standard parabolic subgroup W λ consisting of all w W which fix P λ element-wise. Note that W λ is generated by the elements s = (i, i + 1) S with the property that i and i + 1 belong to the same element of P λ. More generally, a subgroup of W is called a parabolic subgroup if it arises as the stabilizer of an arbitrary set partition of {1,..., r}, i.e., if it is conjugate to a subgroup of the form W λ. Intersections of parabolic subgroups are again parabolic subgroups. The right H-submodule M λ of the regular module H is defined as M λ := x λ H with x λ := T w. w W λ For v W λ one has x λ T v = q l(v) x λ, (4) cf. [DJ, Lemma 3.2]. Every coset W λ w W λ \W has a unique element of smallest length. We denote the set of these distinguished coset representatives by D λ. For w W λ and d D λ one has l(wd) = l(w) + l(d) and T wd = T w T d. (5) The elements x λ T d, d D λ, form an R-basis of M λ, cf. [DJ, Lemma 3.2]. As usual one identifies compositions λ with Young diagrams and we say that λ is the shape of the corresponding Young diagram. A λ-tableau is a filling of the r boxes of the Young diagram of λ with the numbers 1, 2,..., r. We denote the set of λ-tableaux by T(λ) and usually denote elements of T(λ) by t. The λ-tableau which contains the entries 1, 2,..., r in ascending order is denoted by t λ. Thus, for λ = (1, 0, 2) one has t (1,0,2) =
5 This provides a standard numbering of the boxes of the Young diagram of λ which we will use later. The group W acts from the right on T(λ) by simply applying an element w W to the entries of the tableau t T(λ). This action is free and transitive, and it yields a bijection W T(λ), w t λ w. A λ-tableau t is called row-standard if its entries are increasing in each row from left to right. The row-standard λ-tableaux form a subset T rs (λ) of T(λ). Two λ-tableaux t 1 and t 2 are called row-equivalent if they arise from each other by rearranging elements within each row. We denote the rowequivalence class of t by {t} and the set of row-equivalence classes by T(λ). One has canonical bijections D λ T rs (λ) T(λ) (6) given by d t λ d and t {t}. Thus, the canonical basis x λ T d, d D λ, could also be parametrized by T rs (λ) or T(λ). For d D λ we denote by ε d Hom(M λ, R) the R-module homomorphism with the property that ε d (x λ T e ) = δ d,e for all e D λ. In other words, the elements ε d, d D λ, form the dual basis of the R-basis x λ T d, d D λ. If t T rs (λ) corresponds to d D λ under the canonical bijection in (6) we will also write ε t instead of ε d. For λ Λ we have an obvious bijection T(λ) T(λ ), t t, where t is the reflection of t with respect to the diagonal axis. Note that (tw) = t w for all t T(λ) and w W. 1.3 The homomorphisms ϕ λ,µ d : M µ M λ. Let µ, λ Γ be compositions of r. The elements of D λ,µ := D λ D 1 µ form a set of representatives of the double cosets W λ \W/W µ, and each element d D λ,µ is the unique element of shortest length in its double coset W λ dw µ. By [DJ, Theorem 3.4], the set D λ,µ parametrizes an R-basis ϕ λ,µ d, d D λ,µ, of Hom H (M µ, M λ ) given by ϕ λ,µ d (x µ) = T w = x λ T de = x λ T d T e, (7) w W λ dw µ e D ν W µ e D ν W µ where ν Γ is determined by W ν = d 1 W λ d W µ. The last equality follows from (5). We want to mention that the cited theorem requires that R is a 5
6 principal ideal domain. But a careful examination of the canonical isomorphisms in [DJ, Theorems 2.5, 2.6, 2.7] involved in the proof of the theorem shows that this hypothesis is unnecessary. (More precisely, the R-modules Hom H (M Hν, N T d ) in [DJ, Theorem 2.8] are free of rank one in the case that M and N are trivial modules.) We will use a combinatorial description of the set D λ,µ in terms of the set T(λ, µ) of generalized tableaux T of shape λ and content µ. Such a generalized tableau T is a filling of the r boxes of the Young diagram of shape λ with µ 1 entries equal to 1, µ 2 entries equal to 2, etc. We denote by Tµ λ T(λ, µ) the generalized tableau which has its boxes filled in the natural order. If we number the boxes of the Young diagram of λ according to the entries of t λ T(λ), we may view T(λ, µ) as the set of functions T : {1,..., r} N with the property T 1 (i) = µ i for all i N. The group W acts transitively on T(λ, µ) from the left by (wt )(i) := T (iw), for T T(λ, µ), w W and i {1,..., r}. The stabilizer of Tµ λ is equal to W µ. This defines a bijection W/W µ T(λ, µ), ww µ wtµ λ. We call two generalized tableaux T 1, T 2 T(λ, µ) row-equivalent if they arise from each other by rearranging the entries within the rows, i.e., if T 2 = wt 1 for some w W λ. If we denote the row equivalence class of T T(λ, µ) by {T } and the set of such classes by T(λ, µ) then we obtain a bijection W λ \W/W µ T(λ, µ), W λ ww µ {wtµ λ }. A generalized tableau T T(λ, µ) is called row-semistandard if in each of its rows the entries are in their natural order from left to right. We denote the set of these tableaux by T rs (λ, µ). Each row-equivalence class contains a unique row-semistandard element. Thus, T rs (λ, µ) T(λ, µ), T {T }, is a bijection. Altogether, we now have canonical bijections D λ,µ W λ \W/W µ T(λ, µ) T rs (λ, µ) (8) and we may use each of these sets to parametrize the basis ϕ λ,µ d, d D λ,µ, of Hom H (M µ, M λ ). So, if T T rs (λ, µ) and d D λ,µ correspond under the above bijection, we also write ϕ λ,µ T instead of ϕ λ,µ d. We leave it to the reader to check that d D λ,µ corresponds to T T rs (λ, µ) if and only if ϕ λ,µ T homomorphism defined in [BH, Subsection 1.5]. = θ T : M µ M λ in the case q = 1, with θ T the 1.4 The Specht modules S λ. Let λ Λ be a partition of r. One defines elements y λ := w W λ ( q) l(w) T w and z λ := x λ T wλ y λ M λ 6
7 of H, where w λ W is defined by the property that (t λ w λ ) = t λ. The Specht module S λ is defined by S λ := z λ H. Since z λ M λ, S λ is an H-submodule of M λ. A λ-tableau t T(λ) is called a standard λ-tableau if t T rs (λ) and t T rs (λ ). We denote the set of standard λ-tableaux by T st (λ). More generally, for µ Γ, we say that a generalized tableau T T(λ, µ) is standard if T T rs (λ, µ) and if the entries of T are strictly increasing along each column from top to bottom. We denote the set of standard λ-tableaux of content µ by T st (λ, µ). We extend the definition of S λ, T st (λ), and T st (λ, µ) to arbitrary compositions λ Γ by setting S λ := 0, T st (λ) =, and T st (λ, µ) = if λ is not a partition. Recall that the weak Bruhat order on W is defined by u v if and only if there exists a reduced expression v = s 1 s n for v with s 1,..., s n S and k {0,..., n} such that u = s 1 s k. Given λ Λ, [DJ, Lemma 1.5] states that D st λ := {d W d w λ } T st (λ), d t λ d. (9) is a bijection. Thus, D st λ D λ. Note that for d W one has t λ d = (t λ w λ ) d = (t λ w λ d) and therefore, d w λ t λ d T st (λ ) t λ w λ d T st (λ) w λ d D st λ. (10) By [DJ, Theorem 5.6], for given λ Λ, the elements z λ T d with w λ d W form an R-basis of S λ. By the above, this set has cardinality T st (λ ) = T st (λ), since t T(λ) is standard if and only if t T(λ ) is standard. Moreover, [DJ, Lemma 5.1] states that if d w λ and if one expands the basis element z λ T d of S λ in terms of the standard basis of M λ, i.e., z λ T d = e D λ α d,e x λ T e, with α d,e R, then and α d,wλ d = q l(d) (11) α d,e 0 ( e = w λ d or l(e) > l(w λ d) ). (12) Thus, if we set D ns λ := D λ D st λ then the R-span of the elements x λ T e, e D ns λ, is a direct complement of S λ in M λ, and we state for later reference: For every λ Γ, the Specht module S λ is R-free of rank T st (λ) and S λ has an R-complement in M λ. 7 (13)
8 2 Ascending Generalized Tableaux and Homomorphisms In this section we introduce, for any compositions λ, µ Γ, an R-submodule Hom H(M µ, M λ ) of Hom H (M µ, M λ ). In Proposition 2.2 we show that for ϕ Hom H(M µ, M λ ) and ψ Hom H(M ν, M µ ) one has ϕ ψ Hom H(M ν, M λ ). 2.1 Let λ, µ Γ be compositions of r. We say that T T(λ, µ) is ascending if, for every i N, the i-th row of T contains only entries which are greater than or equal to i. As in [BH], we denote the set of ascending and rowsemistandard elements of T(λ, µ) by T (λ, µ). One has T (λ, µ) µ λ T λ µ T (λ, µ) (14) and T (λ, λ) = {Tλ λ }. We define D λ,µ as the image of T (λ, µ) under the canonical bijection in (8). Moreover, we define By (14) we have Hom H(M µ, M λ ) := d D λ,µ Rϕ λ,µ d Hom H (M µ, M λ ). (15) Hom H(M µ, M λ ) {0} µ λ. For i N, we define the intervals P i := {λ 1 + +λ i 1 +1,..., λ 1 + +λ i } and Q i := {µ µ i 1 + 1,..., µ µ i }. One has for any w W : wt λ µ is ascending P i w Q i Q i+1 for all i 1 (P i P i+1 )w Q i Q i+1 for all i 1. We define W λ,µ to be the set of elements w W satisfying the above equivalent properties. Clearly, W λ,µ is a union of double cosets in W λ \W/W µ. The following properties are also immediate from the definition: W λ,µ if and only if µ λ, W λ,λ = W λ, W λ,µ W µ,ν W λ,ν if ν µ λ, W λ 1W µ W λ,µ if µ λ, W λ,µ W µ,ν W λ,ν if ν µ λ. (16) 8
9 The goal of this section is the proof of the following proposition. 2.2 Proposition Let λ, µ, ν Γ be compositions of r and let α Hom H(M ν, M µ ) and β Hom H(M µ, M λ ). Then β α Hom H(M ν, M λ ). Before we can prove the proposition, we need three lemmas. 2.3 Lemma Let λ, µ Γ be compositions of r and let w W λ,µ (in particular, µ λ). If w = sv with s S, v W and l(w) = l(v) + 1 then there exists ρ Γ such that µ ρ λ, s W λ,ρ and v W ρ,µ. Proof Write s = (i, i+1) with i {1,..., r 1} and note that iw > (i+1)w, since l(w) > l(sw). Let P 1, P 2,... and Q 1, Q 2,... be the subsets of {1,..., r} associated to λ and µ, respectively, as above. If there exists j N with {i, i + 1} P j then s W λ and ρ := λ satisfies the required conditions, since W λ = W λ,λ and v = sw W λ W λ,µ = W λ,µ. Hence, we may assume that there exist positive integers j < k such that i P j and i + 1 P k (we need to allow the possibility that P j+1 = = P k 1 = ). Set P l := P l for l / {j, k}, and set P j := P j {i} and P k := P k {i}. Moreover, let ρ Γ be the composition defined by P 1, P 2,.... Then clearly, ρ λ and s W λ,ρ. We still need to show that v W ρ,µ. This also implies µ ρ by (16). For l / {j+1,..., k} we have P l P l+1 = P l P l+1 and (P l P l+1 )v = (P l P l+1 )v = (P l P l+1 )sv = (P l P l+1 )w Q l Q l+1. For l {j + 1,..., k} we have i + 1 P l P l+1 = (P l P l+1 ) {i} and (P l P l+1 )v = ({i} P l P l+1 )v = ({i} P l P l+1 )sv = ({i} P l P l+1 )w {iw} Q l Q l+1, since w W λ,µ. It suffices to show that iw Q l Q l+1. But since w W λ,µ, we have (i + 1)w (P k P k+1 )w Q k Q k+1 Q l Q l+1, and iw > (i + 1)w now implies also iw Q l Q l+1. This completes the proof of the lemma. 2.4 Lemma Let λ, µ Γ and let w W λ,µ. If u W satisfies u w then also u W λ,µ. Proof We proceed by induction on l(w). Note that µ λ, since W λ,µ. If w = 1 we have u = 1 and u = w W λ,µ. Now assume that l(w) 1 and write w = sv with l(w) = l(v) + 1 and s S. By Lemma 2.3 there exists ρ Γ such that µ ρ λ, s W λ,ρ and v W ρ,µ. Since u w = sv and l(w) > l(v), we have u v or su v. If u v then l(u) l(v) < l(w) 9
10 and, by induction, v W ρ,µ implies u W ρ,µ. But W ρ,µ W λ,µ by (16). If su v then, again by induction, v W ρ,µ implies su W ρ,µ, and further, u = s(su) W λ,ρ W ρ,µ W λ,µ. Now the proof is complete. 2.5 Lemma Let λ, µ, ν Γ, v W λ,µ, and w W µ,ν. Then T v T w u W λ,ν RT u. Proof This follows immediately from Equation (1), Lemma 2.4 and W λ,µ W µ,ν W λ,ν. Proof of Proposition 2.2 By the definition in (15) we may assume that α = ϕ µ,ν d and β = ϕ λ,µ e for some d D µ,ν and e D λ,µ. By Equation (7) and since d W µ,ν and e W λ,µ, we have ϕ µ,ν d (x ν) x µ w W µ,ν RT w and (x µ ) v W λ,µ RT v. Together with Lemma 2.5 this implies ϕ λ,µ e (ϕ λ,µ e ϕ µ,ν d )(x ν) ϕ λ,µ e (x µ ) RT u = u W λ,ν w W µ,ν RT w f D λ,ν v W λ,µ w Wµ,ν u W λ fw ν RT u. RT v T w Since the elements ϕ λ,ν f, f D λ,ν, form an R-basis of Hom H (M ν, M λ ) we can write ϕ λ,µ e ϕ µ,ν d = f D λ,ν a f ϕ λ,ν f with a f R, for f D λ,ν. Thus, (ϕ λ,µ e ϕ µ,ν d )(x ν) = f D λ,ν a f ϕ λ,ν f (x ν ) = f D λ,ν a f u W λ fw ν T u. Comparing this with the above yields a f = 0 for all f D λ,ν D λ,ν, and the proof is complete. 3 The Chain Complex C λ Throughout this section we fix a composition λ Γ. We will use the R- modules Hom H(M µ, M λ ) from Section 2 and the result from Proposition 2.2 to construct a chain complex C λ of left H-modules. In the case q = 1, this chain complex coincides with the chain complex constructed in [BH] for the symmetric group algebra. 10
11 3.1 The definition of C λ. For every strictly ascending chain of length n in Γ we set γ = (λ (0) λ (n) ) (17) M γ := Hom H(M λ(0), M λ(1) ) Hom H(M λ(1), M λ(2) ) We view M γ as left H-module via Hom H(M λ(n 1), M λ(n) ) Hom(M λ(n), R). h(ϕ 1 ϕ n ε) := ϕ 1 ϕ n hε, for h H, ϕ i Hom H(M λ(i 1), M λ(i) ), i = 1,..., n, and ε Hom(M λ(n), R), where (hε)(m) := ε(mh) for m M λ(n). For every integer n 0, we write λ n for the set of chains γ as in (17) with λ (0) = λ. Further, we define the left H-module C λ n := γ λ n M γ. For n 1, γ λ n and i {1,..., n}, we denote by γ i λ n 1 the chain obtained from γ by omitting λ (i). We define an H-module homomorphism by d λ n,i : M γ M γi ϕ 1 ϕ n ε ϕ 1 ϕ i+1 ϕ i ϕ n ε, where ϕ i+1 is interpreted as ε if i = n. The direct sum of these homomorphisms yields an H-module homomorphism d λ n,i : C λ n C λ n 1 and we set n d λ n := ( 1) i 1 d λ n,i : Cn λ Cn 1 λ. i=1 Since the maps d λ n,i : Cn λ Cn 1 λ satisfy the usual simplicial relations, we obtain d λ n d λ n+1 = 0 for n 1. Thus, we have constructed a chain complex C λ : 0 C λ a(λ) d λ a(λ) Ca(λ) 1 λ d λ a(λ) 1 d λ 1 C λ
12 of finitely generated left H-modules and H-module homomorphisms. Here, a(λ) is defined as the length of the longest possible strictly ascending chain γ as in (17) with λ (0) = λ, in other words, a(λ) is the largest integer n with λ n. Note that the definition of d λ n implies immediately that d λ(0) n (ϕ 1 ϕ n ε) = (ϕ 2 ϕ 1 ) ϕ n ε ϕ 1 d λ(1) n 1(ϕ 2 ϕ n ε), (18) for n 2, γ as in (17), ϕ i Hom H(M λ(i 1), M λ(i) ), i = 1,..., n, and ε Hom(M λ(n), R). Finally, we extend the chain complex C λ by the H-module homomorphism d λ 0 : C0 λ = Hom(M λ, R) Hom(S λ, R) =: C 1 λ, ε ε S λ, and obtain a chain complex C λ : 0 C λ a(λ) d λ a(λ) Ca(λ) 1 λ d λ a(λ) 1 d λ 1 C λ 0 d λ 0 C λ 1 0 in the category of finitely generated left H-modules. In fact, in the next proposition we show that d λ 0 d λ 1 = 0. Note that C 1 λ = 0 if λ is not a partition. Also note that every H-module in the chain complex C λ is finitely generated and free as R-module so that after applying the functor Hom(, R) we obtain a chain complex starting with 0 S λ M λ and involving direct sums of modules of the form M µ with µ λ from there on. 3.2 Proposition With the notation from 3.1 one has d λ 0 d λ 1 = 0. Proof We may assume that λ is a partition, since otherwise C 1 λ = 0. Let λ µ be a chain of length 1 in Γ and let d D µ,λ. It suffices to show that (Sλ ) = 0. Since S λ = z λ H, it suffices to show that ϕ µ,λ (z λ) = 0. But, ϕ µ,λ d ϕ µ,λ d (z λ) = ϕ µ,λ d (x λt wλ y λ ) = ϕ µ,λ d (x λ)t wλ y λ x µ Hy λ and it suffices to show that x µ T w y λ = 0 for all w W. So assume that x µ T w y λ 0 for some w W. Then [DJ, Lemma 4.1] implies λ µ, with respect to relation defined in (3). But λ µ is equivalent to λ µ. Now λ = λ and λ µ implies µ λ. Since λ is a partition, we have 12 d
13 λ = λ and obtain µ µ λ, a contradiction to λ µ. This shows that x µ T w y λ = 0 for all w W and the proof is complete. 3.3 For λ Γ and an integer n 0 we denote by B λ n the set of symbols (λ (0) T1 λ (1) T2 Tn λ (n), t) (19) with γ = (λ (0) λ (n) ) λ n (so λ (0) = λ) and T i T (λ (i), λ (i 1) ) for i = 1,..., n, and with t T rs (λ (n) ). By the definition of C λ n, the elements of B λ n parametrize and R-basis of C λ n, by associating the symbol in (19) with the element ϕ λ(1),λ (0) T 1 ϕ λ(n),λ (n 1) T n ε t M γ C λ n. Note that B λ 0 = T rs (λ). For completeness we set B λ 1 := T st (λ) and associate to a standard tableau t T st (λ) the element ψ t Hom(S λ, R) with the property ψ t (z λ T d ) = 1 if d D st λ corresponds to t under the bijection (9) and ψ t (z λ T d ) = 0 otherwise. 4 Exactness Results The goal of this section is to state three exactness results, Theorems 4.2, 4.4 and 4.5, on the chain complex C λ. The lengthy and technical proof of a key lemma, Lemma 4.3, which is needed in the proof of the two latter theorems, will be postponed to the next section. The strategy of the proofs is the same as in [BH]. The proofs in this section are adaptations of the proofs in [BH]. We will present them for the reader s convenience in the Hecke algebra setting. However, the proof of Lemma 4.3 is more difficult if q Assume that λ Γ, that n 1 is an integer and that K λ n is an R-submodule of C λ n satisfying im(d λ n+1) + K λ n = C λ n (A λ n) and ker(d λ n) K λ n = {0}. (B λ n) 13
14 Then it is easy to see that the chain complex C λ is exact in degree n. In fact, the conditions (A λ n) and (Bn) λ together are equivalent to im(d λ n+1) = ker(d λ n) and ker(d λ n) K λ n = C λ n. We will produce, for certain choices of λ and n, submodules K λ n which satisfy (A λ n) and (B λ n), by taking the R-span of the basis elements of C λ n parametrized by a subset K λ n of the canonical R-basis B λ n, cf. Subsection 3.3. By abuse of notation we then will say that K λ n satisfies (A λ n) or (B λ n), if its R-span does. 4.2 Theorem The chain complex C λ is exact in degree 1 for every composition λ Γ. Proof Since S λ has an R-complement in M λ, cf. (13), the restriction map Hom(M λ, R) Hom(S λ, R) is surjective, and the proof is complete. The following lemma will be a key ingredient to the proof of Theorem 4.4, which in turn forms the base case for the inductive proof of Theorem 4.5. To state the lemma we need to introduce the following notation. For λ Γ, every tableau t T(λ) can be thought of as a sequence of numbers by appending the second row at the end of the first, and so on. On these sequences we have the lexicographic total order. We set t < t if and only if the first entry in the sequence of t which differs from the corresponding entry of t is greater than the one for t. Moreover, for t T rs (λ) we denote by C0,<t λ the R-span of the canonical basis elements ε t of Hom(M λ, R) with t > t T rs (λ). See the end of Subsection 1.2 for the definition of ε t, t T rs (λ). 4.3 Lemma Let λ Γ be a composition and let t T rs (λ). If t is not standard then ε t im(d λ 1) + C λ 0,<t. The proof of Lemma 4.3 will be given in the next section. 4.4 Theorem Let λ Γ be a composition and set K λ 0 := {(λ, t) B λ 0 t T st (λ)}. Then (A λ 0) and (B0 λ ) are satisfied. In particular, C λ every composition λ Γ. is exact in degree 0 for 14
15 Proof In order to show that (A λ 0) holds for K λ 0, we order the elements in T rs (λ) in ascending lexicographic order: t 1 < t 2 < < t n. For every i {1,..., n}, Lemma 4.3 implies that t i T st (λ) or ε ti im(d λ 1)+C0,<t λ i. An easy induction argument on i {1,..., n} now shows that ε ti im(d λ i )+K0 λ, and (A λ 0) holds. If λ is not a partition then (B0 λ ) holds trivially. Suppose that λ is a partition. In order to show that (B0 λ ) holds for K λ 0, we number the standard λ-tableaux t 1,..., t m in such a way that the following holds for i, j {1,..., m}: If t i = t λ w λ d i with unique w λ d i W, cf. (9) and (10), then l(w λ d i ) < l(w λ d j ) implies i > j. Next assume that there exists 0 ε K0 λ ker(d λ 0) and write ε = m i=1 a i ε ti with a i R. Let i be minimal with a i 0. Then, since 0 = d λ 0(ε) = ε S λ, we have m 0 = ε(z λ T di ) = a j ε tj (z λ T di ). j=i By (11) we obtain ε ti (z λ T di ) = q l(d i). Moreover, by (12) we obtain ε tj (z λ T di ) = 0 for j > i. This implies 0 = a i q l(d i), and since q is a unit, we have a i = 0, a contradiction. Thus, (B λ 0 ) holds and the proof is complete. We recall from [BH] that a composition µ Γ is called a quasi-partition if µ = µ. Here, µ is the unique smallest partition in Λ which dominates µ (cf. [BH, Lemma 4.2]) and µ Λ denotes the unique partition obtained by reordering the parts µ 1, µ 2,... of µ in weakly descending order. Recall also that a composition λ Γ is called tame if every composition µ Γ with λ µ is a quasi-partition. Tame compositions are classified in [BH, Proposition 4.6]. They include all partitions of the form (λ 1, λ 2, λ 3 ) with λ 3 {0, 1}. The technical definition of a tame composition is dictated by the inductive proof of the following theorem. The proof is a straightforward adaptation of the proof of Theorem 5.1 in [BH] and will not be repeated here. 4.5 Theorem Let λ Γ be a tame composition. For n = 1 set K λ 1 :=, for n = 0 set K λ 0 := T st (λ) and for n 1 set K λ n := { (λ = λ (0) T1 λ (1) T2 Tn λ (n), t) B λ n t T st (λ (n)}. Then (A λ n) and (B λ n) hold for all n 1. In particular, the chain complex C λ is exact. 15
16 5 Proof of Lemma 4.3 The exclusive goal of this section is to prove Lemma 4.3. The proof is a substantial refinement of the proof of [BH, Lemma 3.4]. Throughout we fix a composition λ Γ and a λ-tableau t T rs (λ) T st (λ). We first need to establish some notation that will be used throughout this section. 5.1 Since t T rs (λ) is not standard, there exist consecutive rows of t, say rows k and k + 1, which we write as and a 1 a 2 a m (m = λ k ) b 1 b 2 b n (n = λ k+1 ), such that there exist i {0,..., min{m, n 1}} satisfying a 1 < b 1, a 2 < b 2,, a i < b i, and (a i+1 > b i+1 or m = i). The case m = i can arise when λ k+1 > λ k. We also set Z := {a 1,..., a m, b 1,..., b n }. For every subset X Z with X n we set µ X := (λ 1,..., λ k 1, λ k + n X, X, λ k+2,...) Γ and denote by t X T rs (µ X ) the tableau which coincides with t in all rows except row k and row k+1, and which has the elements of X in row k+1 and those of ZX in row k. Moreover, we denote by d X D µx the element which satisfies t X = t µ X d X, and by ε X Hom(M µ X, R) the element ε tx = ε dx. We will also use the composition We then have ν X := (λ 1,..., λ k, n X, X, λ k+2,...) Γ. ν X λ µ X and W νx = W µx W λ. Finally, we define the adjacent, pairwise disjoint intervals of integers, A X := {λ λ k 1 + 1, λ λ k 1 + 2,..., λ λ k 1 + λ k }, B X := {λ λ k + 1,..., λ λ k + (n X )}, C X := {λ λ k + (n X + 1),..., λ λ k + n}, 16
17 (with n = λ k+1 ) and set D := {1,..., r} (A X B X C X ) Thus, (A X, B X, C X ) are the k-th, (k + 1)-th, (k + 2)-th respective subsets of the set partition associated with ν X, (A X, B X C X ) are the k-th and (k+1)-th respective subsets of the set partition associated with λ, and (A X B X, C X ) are the k-th and (k + 1)-th subsets associated with µ X. Recall from Subsection 1.3 that, for X as above, one has an element ϕ µ X,λ 1 Hom H(M λ, M µ X ). 5.2 Lemma Let X Z be a subset with X n. (a) For d D λ, the set W X,d := W µx (D νx W λ )dd 1 X has at most one element. (b) In Hom(M λ, R), one has the equation ε X ϕ µ X,λ 1 = q l(wx,d) ε d, d D λ W X,d where we write W X,d = {w X,d } when W X,d. Proof (a) Let d D λ and assume that one has elements w 1, w 2 W µx and e 1, e 2 D νx W λ with w i = e i dd 1 X for i = 1, 2. Then e 1 e 1 2 = w 1 w2 1 W µx W λ = W νx. Since e 1, e 2 D νx, we have e 1 = e 2 and w 1 = w 2. (b) Recall that the elements x λ T d, d D λ, form an R-basis of M λ. For d D λ we have ( ε X ϕ µ X,λ 1 (x λ T d ) ) ( ) = ε X ϕ µ X,λ 1 (x λ )T d = ε X (x µx T ed ) e D νx W λ by (7). For every e D νx W λ there exists a unique f d,e D µx with ed W µx f e,d and a unique element w e,d W µx with ed = w e,d f e,d. We continue the above computation: ( ε X ϕ µ X,λ 1 (x λ T d ) ) = ε X (x µx T we,d f e,d ) e D νx W λ = q l(w e,d) ε X (x µx T fe,d ) = e D νx W λ 17 e Dν X W λ f e,d =d X l(w q e,d ).
18 But, if e D νx W λ satisfies f e,d = d X then w e,d = edd 1 X W X,d = {w X,d } and e is the only element in D νx W λ with f e,d = d X. Conversely, if W X,d and we write w X,d = edd 1 X with e D νx W λ then e satisfies f e,d = d X. Thus, we have ε X ( ϕ µ X,λ 1 (x λ T d ) ) = 0 if W X,d =, q X,d) if W X,d. Now the statement in (b) is immediate and the proof is complete. 5.3 Lemma Let X Z be a subset with X n. (a) The function {X Y Z Y = n} D λ, Y d Y, is injective with image {d D λ W X,d }. (b) In Hom(M λ, R), one has ε X ϕ µ X,λ 1 = q l(w X,Y ) ε Y, X Y Z Y =n where w X,Y := w X,dY. (c) For X Y Z with Y = n one has l(w X,Y ) = {z Z Y y < z}. y Y X Proof (a) For X Y Z with Y = n we have d Y D λ, since µ Y = λ. Moreover, the map Y d Y is clearly injective. Our next goal is to show that W X,dY. Note that X Y = (B X C X )d Y implies (X)d 1 Y B X C X. We define an element e W by e AX D is the identity, e CX : C X (X)d 1 Y is monotonous, e BX : B X (B X C X ) (X)d 1 is monotonous. Y (20) Then, e D νx, since e is monotonous on A X B X, on C X and on D. Moreover, e W λ, since (B X C X )e = B X C X and e is the identity on A X D. We set w := ed Y d 1 X. (21) 18
19 We claim that In fact, for x D we have (x)ed Y d 1 X coincide on D. Also, w CX w CX D is the identity map. (22) is the composition = (x)d Y d 1 X = x, since d X and d Y C e X (X)d 1 Y d Y X d 1 X C X. This composition is monotonous, since each of the three factors is monotonous (because e D νx, d Y D λ, d X D µx and (C X )e B X C X ). Thus, w CX is the identity map and Claim (22) is proven. Since w is the identity on D C X, we obtain (A X B X )w = A X B X. This implies w W µx and w W X,dY. Conversely, let d D λ with W X,d. Then there exists w W µx and e D νx W λ with w = edd 1 X. Since w W µx, we have (C X )w = C X, and since e W λ, we have (C X )e (B X C X )e = B X C X. Therefore, Y := (B X C X )d (C X )ed = (C X )wd X = (C X )d X = X and Y = B X C X = n. We claim that d = d Y. For j / {k, k + 1} and D j := {λ λ j 1 + 1,..., λ λ j 1 + λ j } we have (D j )d = (D j )ed = (D j )wd X = (D j )d X = (D j )d Y, since e W λ and w W µx. Moreover, d and d Y are monotonous on D j, since d, d Y D λ. Therefore, d and d Y coincide on D j. Further, (B X C X )d Y = Y = (B X C X )d and d and d Y are monotonous on B X C X. Therefore, d and d Y coincide on B X C X. The above implies that (A X )d = (A X )d Y and since d and d Y are monotonous on A X, they also coincide on A X. Thus, d = d Y. (b) Using Lemma 5.2(b) and part (a), we have ε X ϕ µ X,λ 1 = d D λ W X,d q l(w X,d) ε d = X Y Z Y =n q l(w X,d Y ) ε dy and (b) is proven. (c) By (22), w X,Y is the identity on D C X, and we can view w X,Y as a permutation of A X B X. We claim that w := w X,Y is the permutation of A X B X with maps B X monotonously onto the positions of Y X in the 19
20 k-th row of t X. In fact, we need to show that (B X )wd X = Y X and that w is monotonous on B X. But by (20) we have (B X )wd X = (B X )ed Y = ( ) (B X C X ) (X)d 1 Y dy = Y X, where e is defined as in Part (a). Moreover, since (B X )w A X B X and since d X is monotonous on A X B X, w is monotonous on B X if and only if wd X = ed Y is. Again, since (B X )e B X C X and d Y is monotonous on B X C X, ed Y is monotonous on B X if and only if e is. But, e D µx is monotonous on A X B X and so also on B X. This shows the claim. Since l(w) is equal to the number of inversions of w, where w is viewed as a permutation of A X B X, our claim immediately implies the desired equation if we can also show that w is monotonous on A X. But, w is monotonous on A X if and only if wd X = ed Y is, by the argument above. Further, e is the identity on A X, cf. (20), so that with d Y also ed Y is monotonous on A X, and the proof of the lemma is complete. where and Next we consider the element c 1 := ( 1) X q f(x)(,λ µ X ϕ 1 ε X) C λ 1, X {a 1,...,a i } X := X {b i+2,, b n } f(x) := j {1,...,i} a j X (m + 1 j). 5.4 Lemma With the above notation, one has for some integer l. d λ 1(c 1 ) q l ε t + C 0,<t, Proof By Lemma 5.3(b) we have d λ 1(c 1 ) = ( 1) X q f(x)( ε X ϕ = = X {a 1,...,a i } X {a 1,...,a i } {b i+2,...,bn} Y Z Y =n ( 1) X q f(x) ( X Y Z Y =n X {a 1,...,a i } Y 20,λ µ X 1 ) q l(w X,Y ) ε Y ( 1) X q f(x)+l(w X,Y )) ε Y.
21 For every Y Z with {b i+2,..., b n } Y and Y = n we study the contribution of the corresponding summand at the end of the last equation. We distinguish three cases. If Y = {b 1,..., b n } then ε Y = ε t and the only possible set X in the inner sum of the last equation is the empty set. Therefore, the summand corresponding to Y is equal to q l ε t with l = f( ) + ). l(w,y If Y {a 1,..., a i } = and Y {b 1,..., b n } we claim that t Y < t. Note that in this case we have m 1. Let j {1,..., i+1} be minimal with b j / Y (note that a 1 < b j ) and let p {j 1,..., i} be maximal with a p < b j (note that a j 1 < b j 1 < b j ). Then the k-th row of t Y begins with a 1, a 2,..., a p, b j and b j < a p+1. Note that p < m, since if p = m then a 1,..., a m Z Y and therefore Y {b 1,..., b n }, a contradiction. Now our claim is proven and the contribution of the summand corresponding to Y is an element in C0,<t. λ We are left with the case that Y {a 1,..., a i }. If t Y < t we are done. So assume that t Y > t. Our goal is to show that ( 1) X q f(x)+l(w X,Y ) = 0. X {a 1,...,a i } Y First let j {1,..., i} be minimal with a j Y. We claim that {z Z Y z < a j } = {a 1,..., a j 1 }. (23) Clearly, the right-hand side is contained in the left-hand side. Now let z Z Y with z < a j and assume that z is not contained in the right-hand side. Then z = b p for some p {1,..., i + 1}, since b i+2,..., b n Y. Let r {1,..., i + 1} be minimal with b r Z Y and b r < a j, and let s {1,..., j 1} be maximal with a s < b r (note that j > 1, since b r < a j and that a 1 < b r ). Then the k-th row of t Y starts with a 1, a 2,..., a s, b r and one has b r < a s+1. This implies t Y < t, a contradiction. Therefore, the claim (23) is proven. For our given set Y, the subsets X of {a 1,..., a i } Y = {a j,..., a i } Y fall into two classes, the ones that contain a j and the ones that don t. So let X 1 be a subset of {a 1,..., a i } Y with a j X 1 and let X 2 := X 1 {a j }. Since X 1 X 2 defines a bijection between these two classes, it suffices to show that or, equivalently, that ( 1) X 1 q f(x 1)+l(w X 1,Y ) + ( 1) X 2 q f(x 2)+l(w X 2,Y ) = 0, l(w X1,Y ) + m + 1 j = l(w X2,Y ). (24) 21
22 But by Lemma 5.3(c) and Equation (23), and since Y X 2 = Y X 1 {a j } and Z Y = m, we have l(w X2,Y ) l(w X1,Y ) = y Y X2 {z Z Y y < z} y Y X1 {z Z Y y < z} = {z Z Y a j < z} = m {z Z Y z < a j } = m (j 1). This shows Equation (24) and the proof of the lemma is complete. Now Lemma 4.3 is an immediate consequence of Lemma 5.4. References [A] [AB1] [AB2] [BH] [DJ] [Dn] K. Akin: On complexes relating the Jacobi-Trudi identity with the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolution. J. Algebra 117 (1988), K. Akin, D. A. Buchsbaum: Characteristic-free representation theory of the general linear group. Adv. in Math. 58 (1985), K. Akin, D. A. Buchsbaum: Characteristic-free representation theory of the general linear group II. Homological considerations. Adv. in Math. 72 (1988), R. Boltje, R. Hartmann: Permutation resolutions for Specht modules. J. Algebraic Combin. 34 (2011), R. Dipper, G. James: Representations of Hecke algebras of general linear groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. 52 (1986), S. Donkin: Finite resolutions of modules for reductive algebraic groups. J. Algebra 101 (1986), [Dy] S. R. Doty: Resolutions of B modules. Indag. Mathem. 5(3) (1994), [S] A. P. Santana: The Schur algebra S(B + ) and projective resolutions of Weyl modules. J. Algebra 161 (1993),
23 [SY] A. P. Santana, I. Yudin: Characteristic-free resolutions of Weyl and Specht modules. Adv. in Math (2012), [W1] D. J. Woodcock: Borel Schur algebras. Comm. Algebra 22 (1994), no. 5, [W2] [Y] [Z] D. J. Woodcock: A vanishing theorem for Schur modules. J. Algebra 165 (1994), I. Yudin: On projective resolutions of simple modules over the Borel subalgebra S + (n, r) of the Schur algebra S(n, r) for n = 3. J. Algebra 319 (2008), A. V. Zelevinskii: Resolvants, dual pairs, and character formulas. Funct. Analysis and its Appl. 21 (1987),
Permutation resolutions for Specht modules
J Algebr Comb 2011) 34: 141 162 DOI 10.1007/s10801-010-0265-1 Permutation resolutions for Specht modules Robert Boltje Robert Hartmann Received: 23 July 2010 / Accepted: 7 November 2010 / Published online:
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationYOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP
YOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP YUFEI ZHAO ABSTRACT We explore an intimate connection between Young tableaux and representations of the symmetric group We describe the construction
More informationThe Littlewood-Richardson Rule
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP The Littlewood-Richardson Rule Aman Barot B.Sc.(Hons.) Mathematics and Computer Science, III Year April 20, 2014 Abstract We motivate and prove the Littlewood-Richardson
More informationFormal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings
Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP (FOLLOWING [Ful97])
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP (FOLLOWING [Ful97]) MICHAEL WALTER. Diagrams and Tableaux Diagrams and Tableaux. A (Young) diagram λ is a partition of a natural number n 0, which we often
More informationOn the Fully Commutative Elements of Coxeter Groups
Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 5 (1996), 353-385 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. On the Fully Commutative Elements of Coxeter Groups JOHN R. STEMBRIDGB* Department
More informationMultiplicity Free Expansions of Schur P-Functions
Annals of Combinatorics 11 (2007) 69-77 0218-0006/07/010069-9 DOI 10.1007/s00026-007-0306-1 c Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2007 Annals of Combinatorics Multiplicity Free Expansions of Schur P-Functions Kristin
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationLecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).
Lecture 2 1. Noetherian and Artinian rings and modules Let A be a commutative ring with identity, A M a module, and φ : M N an A-linear map. Then ker φ = {m M : φ(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im φ is
More informationIrreducible Representations of symmetric group S n
Irreducible Representations of symmetric group S n Yin Su 045 Good references: ulton Young tableaux with applications to representation theory and geometry ulton Harris Representation thoery a first course
More informationBLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More informationMath 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition
Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ Φ, and let B be the unique
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationRepresentations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett/ 1. Generic algebras
(February 19, 2005) Representations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Generic algebras Strict Iwahori-Hecke algebras Representations with Iwahori-fixed
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationTHE BRAUER HOMOMORPHISM AND THE MINIMAL BASIS FOR CENTRES OF IWAHORI-HECKE ALGEBRAS OF TYPE A. Andrew Francis
THE BRAUER HOMOMORPHISM AND THE MINIMAL BASIS FOR CENTRES OF IWAHORI-HECKE ALGEBRAS OF TYPE A Andrew Francis University of Western Sydney - Hawkesbury, Locked Bag No. 1, Richmond NSW 2753, Australia a.francis@uws.edu.au
More informationLECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O
LECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this and the next lecture we will describe an entirely different application of Hecke algebras, now to the category O. In the
More informationMultiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions
Annals of Combinatorics 5 (2001) 113-121 0218-0006/01/020113-9$1.50+0.20/0 c Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2001 Annals of Combinatorics Multiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions John R. Stembridge Department
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 2 Dec 2008
An algorithmic Littlewood-Richardson rule arxiv:08.0435v [math.co] Dec 008 Ricky Ini Liu Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts riliu@math.mit.edu June, 03 Abstract We introduce
More informationIsomorphisms between pattern classes
Journal of Combinatorics olume 0, Number 0, 1 8, 0000 Isomorphisms between pattern classes M. H. Albert, M. D. Atkinson and Anders Claesson Isomorphisms φ : A B between pattern classes are considered.
More informationMath 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems
Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems 12.1.2. Let M be a module over the integral domain R. (a) Assume that M has rank n and that x 1,..., x n is any maximal set of linearly independent elements
More informationOn Tensor Products of Polynomial Representations
Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 5 (4), 2008 pp. 584 592 On Tensor Products of Polynomial Representations Kevin Purbhoo and Stephanie van Willigenburg Abstract. We determine the necessary and sufficient combinatorial
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More informationTHE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17
THE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17 Abstract. In this paper the 2-modular decomposition matrices of the symmetric groups S 15, S 16, and S 17 are determined
More informationCitation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 43(2)
TitleIrreducible representations of the Author(s) Kosuda, Masashi Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 43(2) Issue 2006-06 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/094/0396 DOI Rights Osaka
More informationMath 250A, Fall 2004 Problems due October 5, 2004 The problems this week were from Lang s Algebra, Chapter I.
Math 250A, Fall 2004 Problems due October 5, 2004 The problems this week were from Lang s Algebra, Chapter I. 24. We basically know already that groups of order p 2 are abelian. Indeed, p-groups have non-trivial
More informationFAMILIES OF IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF S 2 S 3
FAMILIES OF IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF S S 3 JAY TAYLOR We would like to consider the representation theory of the Weyl group of type B 3, which is isomorphic to the wreath product S S 3 = (S S S )
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)
REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1 outline For a given finite group G, we have that the number of irreducible representations of G is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of G Although
More informationRings and groups. Ya. Sysak
Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R -module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...
More informationTHE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter
THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter Abstract. In previous work, the second author introduced a topology, for spaces of irreducible representations,
More informationGroups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order
Journal of Algebra 219, 625 657 (1999) Article ID jabr.1998.7909, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Simon R. Blackburn*
More informationASYMPTOTIC CASE. MEINOLF GECK and LACRIMIOARA IANCU. To George Lusztig on his 60th birthday
M. Geck and L. Iancu Nagoya Math. J. Vol. 182 (2006), 199 240 LUSZTIG S a-function IN TYPE B n IN THE ASYMPTOTIC CASE MEINOLF GECK and LACRIMIOARA IANCU To George Lusztig on his 60th birthday Abstract.
More informationA Formula for the Specialization of Skew Schur Functions
A Formula for the Specialization of Skew Schur Functions The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher
More informationTHE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES
Horiguchi, T. Osaka J. Math. 52 (2015), 1051 1062 THE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES TATSUYA HORIGUCHI (Received January 6, 2014, revised July 14, 2014) Abstract The main
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationSome notes on Coxeter groups
Some notes on Coxeter groups Brooks Roberts November 28, 2017 CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 Sources 2 2 Reflections 3 3 The orthogonal group 7 4 Finite subgroups in two dimensions 9 5 Finite subgroups in three
More informationKAZHDAN LUSZTIG CELLS IN INFINITE COXETER GROUPS. 1. Introduction
KAZHDAN LUSZTIG CELLS IN INFINITE COXETER GROUPS MIKHAIL V. BELOLIPETSKY AND PAUL E. GUNNELLS 1. Introduction Groups defined by presentations of the form s 1,..., s n s 2 i = 1, (s i s j ) m i,j = 1 (i,
More informationHomological Methods in Commutative Algebra
Homological Methods in Commutative Algebra Olivier Haution Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Sommersemester 2017 1 Contents Chapter 1. Associated primes 3 1. Support of a module 3 2. Associated primes
More informationON KRONECKER PRODUCTS OF CHARACTERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS WITH FEW COMPONENTS
ON KRONECKER PRODUCTS OF CHARACTERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS WITH FEW COMPONENTS C. BESSENRODT AND S. VAN WILLIGENBURG Abstract. Confirming a conjecture made by Bessenrodt and Kleshchev in 1999, we classify
More informationNoetherian property of infinite EI categories
Noetherian property of infinite EI categories Wee Liang Gan and Liping Li Abstract. It is known that finitely generated FI-modules over a field of characteristic 0 are Noetherian. We generalize this result
More informationA CHARACTERISTIC-FREE EXAMPLE OF A LASCOUX RESOLUTION, AND LETTER-PLACE METHODS FOR INTERTWINING NUMBERS
A CHARACTERISTIC-FREE EXAMPLE OF A LASCOUX RESOLUTION, AND LETTER-PLACE METHODS FOR INTERTWINING NUMBERS DAVID A. BUCHSBAUM Alain Lascoux: un homme de caractère libre dont les travaux se basent en caractéristique
More informationPERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE
PERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE A. POLISHCHUK The goal of this note is to prove that the category of perverse sheaves constructible with respect to a triangulation is Koszul (i.e. equivalent to
More informationModular branching rules and the Mullineux map for Hecke algebras of type A
Modular branching rules and the Mullineux map for Hecke algebras of type A 1 Introduction Jonathan Brundan Department of Mathematics University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1222 USA E-mail: brundan@darkwing.uoregon.edu
More informationEssays on the structure of reductive groups. Root systems. X (A) = Hom(A, G m ) t t t t i,
9:51 p.m. November 11, 2006 Essays on the structure of reductive groups Root systems Bill Casselman University of British Columbia cass@math.ubc.ca Suppose G to be a reductive group defined over an algebraically
More informationEQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TEN: MORE ON FLAG VARIETIES
EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TEN: MORE ON FLAG VARIETIES WILLIAM FULTON NOTES BY DAVE ANDERSON 1 A. Molev has just given a simple, efficient, and positive formula for the structure
More informationThe symmetric group action on rank-selected posets of injective words
The symmetric group action on rank-selected posets of injective words Christos A. Athanasiadis Department of Mathematics University of Athens Athens 15784, Hellas (Greece) caath@math.uoa.gr October 28,
More informationBruhat order, rationally smooth Schubert varieties, and hyperplane arrangements
FPSAC 2010, San Francisco, USA DMTCS proc. AN, 2010, 833 840 Bruhat order, rationally smooth Schubert varieties, and hyperplane arrangements Suho Oh 1 and Hwanchul Yoo Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.co] 30 Jan 2004
arxiv:math/0401430v1 [math.co] 30 Jan 2004 The eading Coefficient of Certain Kazhdan-usztig Polynomials of the Permutation Group S n Nanhua Xi Abstract. In thispaper we show that the leading coefficient
More informationInfinite-Dimensional Triangularization
Infinite-Dimensional Triangularization Zachary Mesyan March 11, 2018 Abstract The goal of this paper is to generalize the theory of triangularizing matrices to linear transformations of an arbitrary vector
More informationAlgebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010
Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Problem 6. (1) Let I and J be ideals of a commutative ring R with I + J = R. Prove that IJ = I J. (2) Let I, J, and K be ideals of a principal ideal domain.
More informationLECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we continue to study the category O 0 and explain some ideas towards the proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. We start by introducing
More information11. Finitely-generated modules
11. Finitely-generated modules 11.1 Free modules 11.2 Finitely-generated modules over domains 11.3 PIDs are UFDs 11.4 Structure theorem, again 11.5 Recovering the earlier structure theorem 11.6 Submodules
More informationCombinatorial Structures
Combinatorial Structures Contents 1 Permutations 1 Partitions.1 Ferrers diagrams....................................... Skew diagrams........................................ Dominance order......................................
More informationMath 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces. In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces.
Math 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces. First, recall the dot product on R n : if x, y R n, say x = (x 1,...,
More informationNon-separable AF-algebras
Non-separable AF-algebras Takeshi Katsura Department of Mathematics, Hokkaido University, Kita 1, Nishi 8, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 6-81, JAPAN katsura@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp Summary. We give two pathological
More informationJournal Algebra Discrete Math.
Algebra and Discrete Mathematics Number 2. (2005). pp. 20 35 c Journal Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE On posets of width two with positive Tits form Vitalij M. Bondarenko, Marina V.
More informationBackground on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System
Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System Paul Tokorcheck Department of Mathematics University of California, Santa Cruz 10 October 2011 Abstract In 1955, Claude Chevalley described
More informationNOTES ON LINEAR ALGEBRA OVER INTEGRAL DOMAINS. Contents. 1. Introduction 1 2. Rank and basis 1 3. The set of linear maps 4. 1.
NOTES ON LINEAR ALGEBRA OVER INTEGRAL DOMAINS Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Rank and basis 1 3. The set of linear maps 4 1. Introduction These notes establish some basic results about linear algebra over
More informationA CATEGORIFICATION OF INTEGRAL SPECHT MODULES. 1. Introduction
A CATEGORIFICATION OF INTEGRAL SPECHT MODULES MIKHAIL KHOVANOV, VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK, AND CATHARINA STROPPEL Abstract. We suggest a simple definition for categorification of modules over rings and illustrate
More informationSome homological properties of the category O
Some homological properties of the category O Volodymyr Mazorchuk Abstract In the first part of this paper the projective dimension of the structural modules in the BGG category O is studied. This dimension
More informationSupplement to Multiresolution analysis on the symmetric group
Supplement to Multiresolution analysis on the symmetric group Risi Kondor and Walter Dempsey Department of Statistics and Department of Computer Science The University of Chicago risiwdempsey@uchicago.edu
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationDefinitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations
Page 1 Definitions Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:23 AM Notations " " means "equals, by definition" the set of all real numbers the set of integers Denote a function from a set to a set by Denote the image of
More informationQuotients of Poincaré Polynomials Evaluated at 1
Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 13 (2001), 29 40 c 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Quotients of Poincaré Polynomials Evaluated at 1 OLIVER D. ENG Epic Systems Corporation,
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationON AUSLANDER-REITEN SEQUENCES FOR BOREL-SCHUR ALGEBRAS KARIN ERDMANN, ANA PAULA SANTANA AND IVAN YUDIN
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 13 20 ON AUSLANDER-REITEN SEQUENCES FOR BOREL-SCHUR ALGEBRAS KARIN ERDMANN, ANA PAULA SANTANA AND IVAN YUDIN Abstract:
More informationLecture 6 : Kronecker Product of Schur Functions Part I
CS38600-1 Complexity Theory A Spring 2003 Lecture 6 : Kronecker Product of Schur Functions Part I Lecturer & Scribe: Murali Krishnan Ganapathy Abstract The irreducible representations of S n, i.e. the
More informationCombinatorics for algebraic geometers
Combinatorics for algebraic geometers Calculations in enumerative geometry Maria Monks March 17, 214 Motivation Enumerative geometry In the late 18 s, Hermann Schubert investigated problems in what is
More informationKostka multiplicity one for multipartitions
Kostka multiplicity one for multipartitions James Janopaul-Naylor and C. Ryan Vinroot Abstract If [λ(j)] is a multipartition of the positive integer n (a sequence of partitions with total size n), and
More informationINFINITE RINGS WITH PLANAR ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS
INFINITE RINGS WITH PLANAR ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS YONGWEI YAO Abstract. For any commutative ring R that is not a domain, there is a zerodivisor graph, denoted Γ(R), in which the vertices are the nonzero zero-divisors
More informationCharacter values and decomposition matrices of symmetric groups
Character values and decomposition matrices of symmetric groups Mark Wildon Abstract The relationships between the values taken by ordinary characters of symmetric groups are exploited to prove two theorems
More informationDIFFERENTIAL POSETS SIMON RUBINSTEIN-SALZEDO
DIFFERENTIAL POSETS SIMON RUBINSTEIN-SALZEDO Abstract. In this paper, we give a sampling of the theory of differential posets, including various topics that excited me. Most of the material is taken from
More informationON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS LISA CARBONE Abstract. We outline the classification of K rank 1 groups over non archimedean local fields K up to strict isogeny,
More informationEXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS
EXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS FRANK IMSTEDT AND PETER SYMONDS Abstract. We prove a recursive formula for the exterior and symmetric powers of modules for a cyclic 2-group.
More informationAdv. Math. 206 (2006)
This is the author s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Advances in Mathematics Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural
More informationSign elements in symmetric groups
Dept. of Mathematical Sciences University of Copenhagen, Denmark Nagoya, September 4, 2008 Introduction Work in progress Question by G. Navarro about characters in symmetric groups, related to a paper
More informationLOWER BOUNDARY HYPERPLANES OF THE CANONICAL LEFT CELLS IN THE AFFINE WEYL GROUP W a (Ãn 1) Jian-yi Shi
LOWER BOUNDARY HYPERPLANES OF THE CANONICAL LEFT CELLS IN THE AFFINE WEYL GROUP W a (Ãn 1) Jian-yi Shi Department of Mathematics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China and Center for Combinatorics,
More informationAN ALGEBRAIC APPROACH TO GENERALIZED MEASURES OF INFORMATION
AN ALGEBRAIC APPROACH TO GENERALIZED MEASURES OF INFORMATION Daniel Halpern-Leistner 6/20/08 Abstract. I propose an algebraic framework in which to study measures of information. One immediate consequence
More informationCritical Groups of Graphs with Dihedral Symmetry
Critical Groups of Graphs with Dihedral Symmetry Will Dana, David Jekel August 13, 2017 1 Introduction We will consider the critical group of a graph Γ with an action by the dihedral group D n. After defining
More informationMATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE
MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group. 1.1. Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9 1. Jordan-Hölder theorem and indecomposable modules Let M be a module satisfying ascending and descending chain conditions (ACC and DCC). In other words every increasing sequence
More informationHOMOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MODULES OVER DING-CHEN RINGS
J. Korean Math. Soc. 49 (2012), No. 1, pp. 31 47 http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/jkms.2012.49.1.031 HOMOLOGICAL POPETIES OF MODULES OVE DING-CHEN INGS Gang Yang Abstract. The so-called Ding-Chen ring is an n-fc
More informationFoundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes
Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes These notes form a brief summary of what has been covered during the lectures. All the definitions must be memorized and understood. Statements
More informationCOHEN-MACAULAY RINGS SELECTED EXERCISES. 1. Problem 1.1.9
COHEN-MACAULAY RINGS SELECTED EXERCISES KELLER VANDEBOGERT 1. Problem 1.1.9 Proceed by induction, and suppose x R is a U and N-regular element for the base case. Suppose now that xm = 0 for some m M. We
More informationTHE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP. Contents
THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP JE-OK CHOI Abstract. Young tableau is a combinatorial object which provides a convenient way to describe the group representations of the symmetric group, S n.
More informationParameterizing orbits in flag varieties
Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties W. Ethan Duckworth April 2008 Abstract In this document we parameterize the orbits of certain groups acting on partial flag varieties with finitely many orbits.
More informationA Recursion and a Combinatorial Formula for Jack Polynomials
A Recursion and a Combinatorial Formula for Jack Polynomials Friedrich Knop & Siddhartha Sahi* Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ 08903, USA 1. Introduction The Jack polynomials
More informationTHE KNUTH RELATIONS HUAN VO
THE KNUTH RELATIONS HUAN VO Abstract We define three equivalence relations on the set of words using different means It turns out that they are the same relation Motivation Recall the algorithm of row
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More informationClassification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO
UTMS 2011 8 April 22, 2011 Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs by Toshiyuki Kobayashi and Yoshiki Oshima T UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF
More information6 Permutations Very little of this section comes from PJE.
6 Permutations Very little of this section comes from PJE Definition A permutation (p147 of a set A is a bijection ρ : A A Notation If A = {a b c } and ρ is a permutation on A we can express the action
More informationjoint with Alberto Mínguez
joint with Alberto Mínguez We consider (complex, smooth, finite length) representations of GL n (F ) where F is a non-archimedean local field. We write Irr = n 0 Irr GL n (F ) (equivalence classes of irreducible
More informationFOULKES MODULES AND DECOMPOSITION NUMBERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP
FOULKES MODULES AND DECOMPOSITION NUMBERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP EUGENIO GIANNELLI AND MARK WILDON Abstract. The decomposition matrix of a finite group in prime characteristic p records the multiplicities
More informationIndependent generating sets and geometries for symmetric groups
Independent generating sets and geometries for symmetric groups Peter J. Cameron School of Mathematical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS UK Philippe Cara Department
More informationGeneralized Alexander duality and applications. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 38(2) P.469-P.485
Title Generalized Alexander duality and applications Author(s) Romer, Tim Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 38(2) P.469-P.485 Issue Date 2001-06 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/10.18910/4757
More informationSchur Functors (a project for class)
Schur Functors (a project for class) R. Vandermolen 1 Introduction In this presentation we will be discussing the Schur functor. For a complex vector space V, the Schur functor gives many irreducible representations
More informationINJECTIVE MODULES: PREPARATORY MATERIAL FOR THE SNOWBIRD SUMMER SCHOOL ON COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA
INJECTIVE MODULES: PREPARATORY MATERIAL FOR THE SNOWBIRD SUMMER SCHOOL ON COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA These notes are intended to give the reader an idea what injective modules are, where they show up, and, to
More information